Raw appeal WEEKEND | 21 APRIL 29, 2016 VOLUME 24, NO. 14
www.MountainViewOnline.com
650.964.6300
MOVIES | 24
School board ditches shared campus plans STEVENSON AND THEUERKAUF TO REMAIN TWO SEPARATE SCHOOLS By Kevin Forestieri
C
MICHELLE LE
WHERE ELEPHANTS ROAM Michael Maung and Christina Yin stand near two unusual sculptures that inhabit the Mountain View couple’s driveway. The eye-catching figures, which spark much curiosity among passersby, represent only a fraction of the extensive elephant statue and figurine collection they’ve accumulated over the years. Read the story on Page 7.
Much-criticized mediation program wins council approval ORDINANCE GOES INTO EFFECT IN LATE MAY By Mark Noack
I
n a 4-3 vote, the Mountain View City Council gave the final nod to an ordinance creating a mandatory-mediation program for the city’s rental housing despite many misgivings from its own supporters. While critics blasted the new ordinance as ineffective, the approving majority stressed that it was more important to establish a program — even an imperfect one — so it could begin helping renters. The approval on Tuesday, April 26, was the second reading of the city’s Rental-Housing Dispute Resolution Program, the city’s answer to longstanding tenants’ demands for some form of relief from soaring rents. The ordinance, set to take effect on May 26, will mandate a mediation process, if requested, for renters and
INSIDE
landlords for any rent increases beyond a 7.2 percent threshold. That process would include three separate stages of discussions, each meant to broker a compromise between the parties. While landlords would be obligated to attend, they would not be required to reach any resolution, leading some to question whether the process was doomed to fail. “There no teeth in this,” said Councilman Lenny Siegel, a vocal opponent. “I don’t know why any tenant facing a rent increase of 5 percent, or even 20 percent would seek mediation knowing there’s no way the landlord can be forced to protect them from displacement.” In March, city staff had presented plans for a three-stage mediation process that would culminate, if mediation was unsuccessful, in binding arbi-
tration with a third party. But facing a fierce backlash from landlords and their advocates, the council lost confidence in the program, which some began describing as tantamount to rent control. A council majority coalesced around the idea of making the arbitration step non-binding, leaving it up to landlords to decide whether to notch down their rent increases. Final approval of the ordinance was on the agenda last month, but with the absence of Councilman Mike Kasperzak, the council delayed the vote to avoid a stalemate. On Tuesday, Siegel pulled the rental program ordinance approval from the consent agenda so that the council could have a full discussion of it, and some council members laid out See RENT ORDINANCE, page 6
VIEWPOINT 17 | GOINGS ON 28 | MARKETPLACE 31 | REAL ESTATE 33
onstruction plans that would have created facilities shared by Theuerkauf and Stevenson Elementary fell through last week, after the Mountain View Whisman School District’s board of trustees yielded to public demand calling for separate campuses. But the decision came with some serious reservations. In recent months, district officials have called shared facilities a must-have to cut costs and stay within the constraints of the $198 million Measure G school bond. Despite the 4-1 vote at the April 21 board meeting to move forward with separate school plans, a majority of the board signaled concerns that the district may not have the money to support ambitious building plans favored by parents and school staff. In March, architects worked with school staff, parents and community members from both schools to hatch a plan for a new school site. Stevenson and
Theuerkauf are now right next door to the district office and board room, Google’s preschool, community tennis courts and a piece of city-owned property that juts out along San Pierre Way and San Luis Avenue. The original plan was to have Theuerkauf and Stevenson share a multipurpose room and a library to keep construction costs within the $26 million budget — an idea that has remained unpopular since it was first proposed last year. Parents from both schools have maintained that Theuerkauf and Stevenson are different schools with very different needs, and many of the shared-campus configurations would require students at Stevenson to do a cross-campus trek for lunch and assemblies. There are key differences between the schools. Stevenson is home to the district’s PACT choice program, which has a strong parent-participation component and attracts students from all over the district. Theuerkauf is a See SHARED CAMPUS, page 16
Mountain View teacher negotiations stalled UNION REPS SAY DISTRICT OFFICIALS ARE UNWILLING TO FACE TEACHER RETENTION PROBLEMS By Kevin Forestieri
R
epresentatives from the Mountain View Educators Association (MVEA) are calling contract negotiations “dead in the water” this week, following several fruitless meetings with Mountain View Whisman School District officials. MVEA president Jonathan Pharazyn told the Voice on
Wednesday that no more negotiations have been scheduled following an April 25 meeting, and that it’s likely they will have to suspend negotiations until after the summer break. “We’re so far apart in terms of compensation and a lot of other questions around health care benefits and evaluations that See NEGOTIATIONS, page 13