The Fight for Clarity

WITH THE ADVANCEMENT of technology, we have created more sources of information. Fake news can now be easily disseminated to the general public by the people. This serves as a catalyst for disinformation which results in unethical journalism.

According to the Statista Research Department, global social media usage peaked at 4.26 billion users in 2021. If more people are free to express their thoughts and more information is available to the public, then, these two factors, which can be the primary sources of disinformation, will also be improved. As a result, the lighT between opinions and the truth will become blurry.

Information can spread effortlessly. People would not know right away if the news that they received is factual or false. In the worst case scenario, fallacious news will be distributed all across the area, causing conflict to the public.

In checking if the news is fake or not, I personally analyze my prejudices. My own judgment could be influenced by my own personal beliefs. I also explore the said news’ background, its author, supporting sources, and the date.

As a Bicol Regional Science High School student, and a student writer myself, I believe that it is a must to protect the integrity of journalism and the school paper, considering it reflects not only my values but also the institution’s.

Something small often leads to bigger problems when it isn’t handled immediately or if it’s not given any solution right away. People should understand the value of fact-checking, since it is a simple yet effective approach to avoid disinformation, especially for Brisayanos. The key to prevailing in this never-ending fight is to understand what is correct and by doing more research on a particular conflict.

For instance, a fake public advisory spread throughout the campus during school hours. This may be a minor case, but its impact is immense as it affects the credibility of information dissemination of the school.

Disinformation will not benefit anyone in the long run. Except for the people who create fake news for their own advantage, so that they can protect their own reputation and to twist their rival’s actions or words. It is unfair, as it destroys the ethics and integrity of journalism. Trust is hard to earn, but easy to lose. If iniquity prevails, we can still continue to write. But it will not be considered journalism. Because journalism is just, right, and truthful. Journalism is something that the public should and would believe in. ■

Letters

Dear Editor,

I am writing to express my concern about a disturbing issue that has been happening in our school. I witnessed several students who used racist language, including the ”n-word”, as a joke and an insult to their classmates or schoolmates. I genuinely think that this behavior is greatly offensive and disrespectful. It is not enough to simply brush this issue under the rug and hope it goes away. The school must take action to address this problem and ensure that all students feel safe and respected. It is only crucial to implement strict measures to hold students accountable for their actions.

Sincerely, Firdaus-C

B. Ibrahim 12-Heisenberg

From The Desk

AS MY FELLOW Brisayanos and I observed the approaching jeepney, we signaled our intention to board the vehicle as this was a customary routine for a commuter like us. Jeepneys, a ubiquitous mode of transportation in the Philippines, are not only a practical conveyance for us—commuters, but also an emblem of our rich culture and heritage.

The rationale behind the new move of the Land Transportation Franchising and Regulatory Board (LTFRB) to force jeepney drivers to shift to the more environment-friendly, modern jeepney has been met with opposition from jeepney drivers and operators.

nal jeepney fare payments.

By ANISHA SHEN TAGUM

Many of them argue that the modernization program is too expensive and that they will not be able to afford the new vehicle. Of course, considering the cost per unit is P2.4 million with only a P200,000 subsidy and operators being required to purchase them is a great burden to our chauffeurs.

As a regular commuter, this will only have a domino effect that will result in escalated transportation fares since it comes equipped with advanced features such as air conditioning and cutting-edge payment systems like the E-trike that is now being used in some parts of the Philippines including the province of Albay. While it is undoubtedly more comfortable and efficient, the phase-out will also likely eliminate the distinct Bayanihan culture commonly observed during traditio-

Ultimately, jeepneys have been a part of our transportation system for decades, and the symbol of our national identity. The government’s modernization program overlooks the distinct requirements of our communities, which frequently necessitate dynamic and versatile transportation alternatives. The program’s one-size-fits-all approach is not appropriate for our country.

The government’s intentions to reduce pollution and congestion are noble, however, the consequences of their actions will only burden both the drivers and the commuters. We must also recognize the important cultural significance of jeepneys and work to preserve this important part of our heritage. Instead of removing jeepneys altogether, the government must find ways to modernize them while ensuring they remain affordable and accessible to all Filipinos. ■