Lake Delton, WI Housing Study 2020
Acknowledgments
Lake Delton Housing Study - Steering Committee
Marije Ajvazi Tom Diehl Joe Eck Tom Holtz Bob Nagel Todd Nelson Bill Ryan Dave Schultz Romy Snyder
Prepared by: This document was prepared by MSA Professional Services, Inc. with assistance from Village Staff. Project No.: 00083235
Space reserved for resolution.
Page intentionally left blank.
“
All who live, work, and play in Lake Delton should have access to affordable and adequate housing in an area of their choosing. Users of the Village who are able to become residents of the community are a source of strength and growth toward our shared future.
“
Purpose This Housing Study presents an in-depth look at the Village of Lake Delton’s housing conditions, market, and needs. Though national discourse portrays housing affordability as a universal crisis, we know that every community is unique, having distinct needs dependent upon local economic and social conditions. This study examines these conditions in Lake Delton, and proposes how housing needs can best be met - especially for those that work in the Village but reside elsewhere.
Content O1 09 19
INTRODUCTION » Study Process » Affordable Housing » Housing Affordability » Workforce Housing » Who Needs Housing? ABOUT Lake Delton » Community Basics » Population » Households » Age » Income » Projections RENTAL MARKET » Affordability » Tenure » Rental Housing Stress » Consumption » Unit Types » Affordability Trends » Cost » Vacancy » Size » Age
39
59 67 75
OWNERSHIP MARKET » Affordability » Tenure » Owner Housing Stress » Consumption » Spatial Affordability » Affordability Trends » Entry-Level Affordability » Availability » Mortgage Status » Unit Types » Size OTHER POPULATIONS » Homelessness » Aging Populations » Disability LOCAL IMPACTS » Assessment » Improvement Value Ratio » Available Lots/Lot Value » Zoning » Development Fees CHALLENGES & RECOMMENDATIONS » Market for Housing » Housing for Employees » Options for Residents » Aging Populations » Sense of Place » Number of Units
Page intentionally left blank.
Introduction The Study & Measures of Need
2020 Housing Study
1
Print Date: 12/9/2019
Re
Adams Camp Douglas
Lake Delton Regional Context New Lisbon
Hustler
MONROE COUNTY M A R Q U E TT E COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
Mauston
JUN EAU COUNTY
GREEN LAKE COUNTY
Elroy Lyndon Station Union Center
VERNON COUNTY
Wisconsin Dells
Wonewoc
Lake Delton La Valle
Portage
Ironton Cazenovia
West Baraboo
Rock Springs
Lime Ridge Printed By: aconverse, File: \\msa-ps.co m\fs\Project\00\00083\00083235\GIS\00083235_RegionalM ap.mxd
Pardeeville
Reedsburg
North Freedom
Wyocena
COLUMBIA COUNTY
Baraboo
Loganville
Doylestown
SA U K C O U N T Y
RICHLAND COUNTY
Rio
Poynette Merrimac
Arlington Lodi
Plain
Prairie Du Sac
Mun
Sauk City
DANE COUNTY
This study was commissioned by the Village of Lake Delton in October 2019. The Village has identified housing as a critical issue that needs to be addressed in order to improve Lake Delton, provide opportunity for employees and residents, and continue to grow the economy. Village leaders have clearly identified these needs based on feedback from various stakeholders. The purpose of this study is to help the Village better understand its housing market and to craft targeted strategies to improve housing options.
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
nevertheless important to a holistic understanding of the market. This report attempts to document conditions and trends in the overall market, including insight on one central question: why do individuals, families, and households choose to live outside the Village?
There are two main components to all municipal housing markets. The first component of the market is all of the housing located in Lake Delton - and the second is all of the housing located outside of Lake Delton that is occupied by people who work or otherwise do business in the Village. The housing physically located in Lake Delton is the easiest to measure and analyze, and is also the market portion that the Village has the most control over. Housing outside of the Village is more difficult to quantify and qualify, but it is 2
Village of Lake Delton
Study Process
This study uses a variety of methods and data to better understand the housing market. Objective, measurable data were collected from the Village, the Multiple Listing Service (real estate listings and sales), the State of Wisconsin, the U.S. Census Bureau, and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. The Village is at times compared to its regional peer communities, as well as among a wider context (county, state, nation) in a variety of ways, and also compared to itself in the form of time-series data that reveal trends. This study also incorporated a series of interviews with people familiar with the housing market, and a community survey of area residents, employees, and property managers.
Project Oversight
The study was initiated by the Lake Delton Village Board. A steering committee was created that represented a wide variety of stakeholders in the community, including community members with expertise in the local economy and housing markets. This steering committee met a total of three times throughout the project to provide direction to the planning team.
Interviews
The planning team met with and interviewed a variety of residents with knowledge and insight into the local housing market, including those who know it best: users of the market themselves. These interviews included realtors, lenders, builders, landlords, employers, and employees. Feedback collected through interviews often naturally gravitated toward similar topics and knowledge, indicating a strong shared understanding of how the local housing market inherently functions. This feedback is described in the Public Engagement section of this report.
2020 Housing Study
Community Survey
An extended online community survey was conducted from December 2019 - February 2020. In total, the survey received 203 responses from individuals that either live, work, or recreate in the Village. The survey was promoted through an extensive community network, as well as through the Wisconsin Dells School District. Full responses to the survey are provided in Appendix A, and relevant findings are discussed in the public engagement section of this report, including crosstabulations between residents and commuters.
3
What is Affordable Housing? Affordable Housing is housing that serves
the residents currently living in a community commonly residents with no income up through residents making 80% of the area median income. In Lake Delton, the area median income (as defined by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development for Sauk County) is $70,500 for a family of 4. This means that the 80% income limit is $56,400 for a family of 4.
Funding for newly constructed affordable
housing comes through subsidy that offsets costs of construction and/or operation. This allows rents to be set at an amount that is manageable for low-income households, while also ensuring they have residual income to afford childcare, transportation, healthcare, grocery, and all other amenities necessary for personal and family health and stability. Other forms of affordable housing include:
Income Limits calculated by HUD allow
» Naturally Occurring Affordable Housing » Housing Operated by Non-Profits » Vouchers, Tax Credits, Other Federal Programs
general ranges for which housing market service levels are measured. Current (FY 2019) income limits are:
Household Income Categories Median Family Income
Sauk County
4
$70,500 (100% AMI)
Persons in Household 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Extremely Low Income (30% AMI)
$14,850
$16,950
$21,330
$25,750
$30,170
$34,590
$39,010
$43,430
Very Low Income (50% AMI)
$24,700
$28,200
$31,750
$35,250
$38,100
$40,900
$43,750
$46,550
Low Income (80% AMI)
$39,500
$45,150
$50,800
$56,400
$60,950
$65,450
$69,950
$74,450
Village of Lake Delton
Monthly Costs
30%
TransportaƟon
30% Savings/ Savings Other $1,489
$884
Housing
$1,164
2 Adults 1 Child Annual Income = $45,000
Medical $585
Food Childcare
$585
$600
Housing Affordability describes
the relationship between housing cost and household income. Affordability os measured at the household level, inSavings terms of the percentage Housing $1,489 percentage of gross income that goes toward $1,763 housing costs. The widely accepted standard for “affordable” is 30% of total household costs going to housing. For renters, housing costs include contract rent, utilities, and renters insurance. Homeowner costs include principal, interest, taxes, TransportaƟon $884 This measure is relative, insurance, and utilities. Food $585 meaning that higher income households have larger shares of homes thatMedical wouldChildcare be affordable, $600 $554 while lower income households generally have less affordable options within the housing market.
Housing $1,763
2 Adults 1 Child Annual Income = $70,500
TransportaƟon $884
Food $585
Medical $554
Childcare $600
Affordability Limits describe the housing
prices considered to be affordable within a particular region, tied to the median household income in the region. Lake Delton is part of the Sauk County region, where the median income is $70,500 for a family of 4. A household earning exactly 100% of the median income could afford: » $1,762.50 in monthly rental costs » $236,800 home purchase A household earning 50% of the area median income (which equates to one full time job at $17/ hour) could afford: » $881.25 in monthly rental costs » $118,450 home purchase
What is Housing Affordability? 2020 Housing Study
5
What is Workforce Housing? Workforce Housing is housing that is
Housing Variety is a necessary component
affordable to the workforce in a community. Because incomes within the workforce vary, a range of housing options is needed to fit the needs of the community. Workforce housing also means ensuring supply of affordable housing for employee households that earn minimum wage - and ensuring appropriately priced housing for moderate to high income earners in both the rental and ownership markets.
of housing stock, as households have a variety of preferences that impact where and how they can live. Important types of variety necessary to serve area employees include structure types, sizes, locations, and price points.
Workforce Affordability is different
among essential members of the workforce. Management employees, service workers, municipal workers (police, fire, etc.) all have housing need, while all generally desire costappropriate housing that allows enough residual income to support other necessary expenses.
Income categories are calculated by HUD, and used to determine appropriate monthly housing costs across different regions. For the Lake Delton region (Sauk County), affordability limits are:
Housing Affordability Limits Monthly Housing Cost Limit
Sauk County
6
$1,763 (100% AMI)
Persons in Household 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Extremely Low Income (30% AMI)
$371
$424
$533
$644
$754
$865
$975
$1,086
Very Low Income (50% AMI)
$618
$705
$794
$881
$953
$1,023
$1,094
$1,164
Low Income (80% AMI)
$988
$1,129
$1,270
$1,410
$1,524
$1,636
$1,749
$1,861
Village of Lake Delton
There are two categories of households
Severe Cost Burden (SCB) refers to households paying more than 50% of income toward housing.
whose needs are not being met by the current supply of housing in the village: » »
Looking solely at the needs of residents currently living in the Village, there is need for:
those that live here but are spending more than 30% of income to do so
» 325 units of rental housing • monthly cost varying from $645 to $1,400
those that could live here but do not 250
» 115 units of ownership housing • sales cost varying from $98,000 to $200,000 200 30 30 150
100
130
110
15
30
25
25
20
25
50
0
< 30% AMI
31% - 50% AMI SCB Owners
20 0 81% - 100% AMI
51% - 80% AMI CB Owners
SCB Renters
> 100% AMI
CB Renters
Who Needs Housing? 2020 Housing Study
7
Employee Housing was identified by the project steering committee as well as in interviews as a
primary need for the community. Per the U.S. Census, 3,458 workers live outside Lake Delton and commute into the Village for work, while only 224 persons both live and work in Lake Delton.
Inflow/Outflow of Primary Jobs
Municipalities listed in the table on right represent nearly 2,400 employees whose primary job is in the Village. This is 69.3% of all employees commuting into Lake Delton daily for work.
Top Employee Places of Residence Municipality
Number of Employees
Baraboo
475
Reedsburg
362
Delton (Town)
343
Wisconsin Dells
286
Portage
210
Baraboo (Town)
133
Lyndon (Town)
130
Dellona (Town)
126
Dell Prairie
119
Mauston
109
West Baraboo
103
Who Needs Housing? 8
Village of Lake Delton
About Lake Delton
2020 Housing Study
9
Print Date: 12/9/2019
Community Basics
Re
Adams Camp Douglas
New Lisbon
Hustler
MONROE COUNTY M A R Q U E TT E COUNTY
ADAMS COUNTY
Mauston
JUN EAU COUNTY
GREEN LAKE COUNTY
Elroy Lyndon Station Union Center
VERNON COUNTY
Wisconsin Dells
Wonewoc
Lake Delton La Valle
Portage
Ironton
Pardeeville
Reedsburg
Cazenovia
West Baraboo
Rock Springs
Lime Ridge
North Freedom
Wyocena
COLUMBIA COUNTY
Baraboo
Printed By: aconverse, File: \\msa-ps.co m\fs\Project\00\00083\00083235\GIS\00083235_RegionalM ap.mxd
Loganville
Doylestown
SA U K C O U N T Y
RICHLAND COUNTY
Rio
Poynette Merrimac
Arlington Lodi
Plain
Prairie Du Sac
Mun
Sauk City
DANE COUNTY Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Lake Delton is a community in Sauk County,
WI. Located along the Wisconsin River adjacent to Columbia County. The larger Lake Delton region also contains areas of Juneau and Adams County. The Village is a 1 hour drive from Madison, 2-2.5 hours from both Green Bay and Milwaukee, and 3 hours from both Chicago and Minneapolis. The largest of all adjoining municipalities, Lake Delton is known for both its natural and manmade landscapes, and as one of the major tourist destinations in the State of Wisconsin. Over 4.5 million tourists pass through the Village annually. 10
The larger Lake Delton region employs over 16,000 workers solely in support of the tourism industry, which brings approximately $1.2 billion dollars into the region annually, with an additional $400 million in indirect tourism impacts. Village businesses employ nearly 9,000 individuals at over 400 individual businesses during peak season. 32% of employees are in the service sector, 19% in “blue collar” positions, and 50% in “white collar” positions. There is little to no unemployment for residents actively seeking work, which displays both the strengths and challenges of the local economy. Village of Lake Delton
Population
Population within the region and the Village
itself has displayed relative consistency throughout the past decade. Lake Delton saw a net increase of 166 residents from 2009 to 2018 per American Community Survey estimates. This represents a total percentage growth of 5.9%, the lowest growth percentage among peer communities. The closest community in growth percentage is the Wisconsin Dells, which grew at approximately the same rate (6.0%) as Lake Delton in the same timeframe.
Population Growth Rates
As discussed in later sections, this population growth percentage is not altogether unexpected. Falling rates in the number of persons per household, coupled with housing markets that have not seen large amounts of increase in housing stock predict slow and steady population growth that does not directly correlate with the number of new units constructed. What is of note is that of all peer communities, Lake Delton experienced the lowest rate of growth.
Municipality
2009 - 2018 Population Growth
Annual Percent Change
Lake Delton
166
0.64%
Baraboo
1,107
1.07%
Reedsburg
930
1.15%
Wisconsin Dells
256
1.09%
Portage
584
0.65%
PopulaĆ&#x;on Trends
Population Trends
14,000
12,000
10,000
8,000
6,000
4,000
2,000
0
2020 Housing Study
Lake Delton
Baraboo
Reedsburg
Wisconsin Dells
Portage
11
Housheolds 6,000
Household Trends 5,000
4,000
3,000
2,000
1,000
0
Lake Delton
Baraboo
Reedsburg
Wisconsin Dells
Portage
Household growth within the Village, Household Growth Rates Municipality
2010 - 2018 Household Growth
Annual Percent Change
Lake Delton
-18
-0.16%
Baraboo
276
0.66%
Reedsburg
-18
-0.06%
Wisconsin Dells
86
0.90%
Portage
332
1.02%
although showing slight decline, has remained relatively steady since 2009. This relative consistency in households, combined with a larger population increase, displays against the national trend of lowered average household sizes, impacting demand for existing housing stock. Often this manifests in demand for familysized housing units, both rental and ownership, and appears to be driven by slightly larger family sizes since 2010. Within the region, consistent with population trends, Lake Delton has seen the lowest amount of annual percent change. This may represent many things, including children living at home longer and natural increases in family size. Population growth has come in spite of inmigration that would increase total household numbers. Although the Wisconsin Dells has a similar rate of population increase, they have displayed an increase in overall households likely due to availability of smaller unit housing in the community that aids in new household formation.
Households 12
Village of Lake Delton
Age Cohorts Age Cohort Population Change
Age Trends can help predict current and
future needs of the community. As populations continue to age, or add members to their households, needs change as well. Since 2010, the Village has seen the largest increase in population amongst children 0-9 years of age, nearly doubling during the timeframe. There has been a corresponding increase in persons aged 20-34, a typical age for the formation of family households that would correspond to an increase in youth. The only other age range displaying an increase are those of a retirement age, from 65-79 years old. These households likely aged into this category over the decade, which is consistent with general trends of aging in the County, State, and Nation as baby-boomers reach retirement. The largest share of households are those aged 20-34 and 50-64, consistent with general trends in generation sizes over time.
Annual Percent Change
Age Cohort
2010
2018
0 - 9 Years
203
412
9.25%
10 - 19 Years
195
134
-4.58%
20 - 34 Years
646
853
3.54%
35 - 49 Years
560
474
-2.06%
50 - 64 Years
599
576
-0.49%
65 - 79 Years
349
370
0.73%
80 and Over
195
161
-2.37%
Age Growth
Age Trends 900
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
2010
2020 Housing Study
2011 0 - 9 Years
2012 10 - 19 Years
2013 20 - 34 Years
2014 35 - 49 Years
2015 50 - 64 Years
2016 65 - 79 Years
2017 80 and Over
2018
13
Population Projections Population Projection Methods Projections based on CAGR refer to the compound annual growth rate from years 2010-2018. Peer communities are Wisconsin Dells, Baraboo, Reedsburg, and Portage. Projected growth is based on the average growth rate of all four communities.
Lake Delton Population Projections
2020
DOA Projection
3,375
3,695
3,985
4,185
4,320
2010-2018 CAGR
3,022
3,120
3,221
3,326
3,434
2010-2018 Peer Community CAGR
3,043
3,197
3,358
3,528
3,706
Projecting Lake Delton’s population
growth into the future is somewhat uncertain. For a community of the size of the Village, one large multi-unit building or a new subdivision development could significantly change the percentage growth in any one year. The community survey administered through this process indicated that 32.8% of Lake Delton
2025
2030
2035
2040
employees are very interested or somewhat interested in finding a place to live that is closer to their place of employment. Applying this to known 3,458 full-time employees that work in Lake Delton and live elsewhere, this could represent 1,134 employees interested in moving to the Village. Adding that population to the Village would bring Village population back in line with the highest projection by 2040 if units were availble to grow the population.
PopulaƟon ProjecƟons 5,000
Population Projections 4,500
4,000
3,500
3,000
2,500
2,000
1,500
1,000
500
0
14
Lake Delton Actual
DOA ProjecƟon
2010-2018 CAGR ProjecƟon
Regional Peer Community Average Growth Rate
Village of Lake Delton
Household ProjecƟons 2,500
Household Projections 2,000
1,500
1,000
500
0
Lake Delton Actual
DOA ProjecƟon
2010-2018 CAGR ProjecƟon
Projecting Lake Delton’s future households
is tied to both future population projections as well as anticipated persons per household as demographics change and age. Across the nation, reductions in household sizes are expected to continue through at least 2040. This is indicative of populations continuing to age, dependents leaving their family households
Regional Peer Community Average Growth Rate
(creating their own), and longer formation periods for young-family households than existed in prior decades (young adults waiting longer to start families). Projection methods for the Village show drastic differences in future number of potential households - from a possible reduction using 2010-2018 household growth rate, to an increase of nearly 500 households by 2040 when planning utilizing Department of Administration projections.
Household Projection Methods Lake Delton Household Projections
2020
DOA Projection
1,515
1,673
1,817
1,922
1,997
2010-2018 CAGR
1,435
1,424
1,413
1,401
1,390
2010-2018 Peer Community CAGR
1,458
1,505
1,553
1,602
1,653
2025
2030
2035
2040
Projections based on CAGR refer to the compound annual growth rate from years 2010-2018. Peer communities are Wisconsin Dells, Baraboo, Reedsburg, and Portage. Projected growth is based on the average growth rate of all four communities.
Household Projections 2020 Housing Study
15
Age ProjecĆ&#x;ons
Age Cohort Projection 16,000
14,000
12,000
10,000
8,000
6,000
4,000
2,000
0
0 - 9 Years
10 - 19 Years
20 - 34 Years
As Populations Age, their housing needs
begin to change. While a family of four might be best suited to a three- or four-bedroom home, once children move out of the home they have they effect of overconsuming in the market using more than they need. Continuing to age, householders may prefer to size-down, making upkeep and care more accommodating to their preferred lifestyle. Similarly, younger households (both single-person and two-person) have needs for smaller units prior to family creation, often seeking smaller homes and apartments before needing larger homes once they begin to have children. Looking at projected population growth rates to 2040, the fastest growing populations are those age 65 and over. There is a distinct need for housing tailored to this age group, whether age-specific housing or policies that assist aging in place in their own homes. The remaining age groups show moderate projected increase, and may be served more generally by the housing market.
35 - 49 Years
50 - 64 Years
65 - 79 Years
80 and Over
Age Cohort Rates Age Cohort
2018
Projected Percent Projected Increase 2040
0 - 9 Years
412
3.4%
426
10 - 19 Years
134
10.5%
148
20 - 34 Years
853
5.0%
896
35 - 49 Years
474
8.6%
515
50 - 64 Years
576
6.8%
615
65 - 79 Years
370
23.5%
457
80 and Over
161
119.5%
353
Age Cohort Projections 16
Village of Lake Delton
Income Trends Village Percent Above/Below DiďŹ&#x20AC;erence County Income Distribution
Income and Earnings are central to
housing affordability. The more income that a household earns, more housing falls within their affordability threshold (<30% income toward housing). While incomes are mobile (households can move place to place), housing units are stationary. In practice, this means that households will often commute, choosing to live wherever they find the acceptable balance among convenience, quality, and affordability.
-0.9%
$200,000 or More
-4.4%
$150,000 to $199,999
$100,000 to $149,999
-10.7% 2.9%
$75,000 to $99,999
Among regional peer communities, Lake Delton has the lowest median and mean incomes - meaning that households who live in the Village earn less on average than those who live in other communities. In variance from the County, larger percentages of Lake Deltonâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s population fall into lowerincome categories, and less of Lake Deltonâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s population falls into high-income categories compared to income distribution for the County.
$50,000 to $74,999
-0.1%
$35,000 to $49,999
-0.1% 0.7%
$25,000 to $34,999
1.5%
$15,000 to $24,999
0%
$10,000 to $14,999
11.1%
Less than $10,000
-15.0%
-10.0%
-5.0%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
Chart Title $90,000
Income (2018) $80,000
$70,000
$60,000
$50,000
$40,000
$30,000
$20,000
$10,000
$-
Median Household Income
2020 Housing Study
Lake Delton
Baraboo
Mean Household Income Reedsburg
Wisconsin Dells
Portage
Sauk County (Total)
17
Employment Indicators
27%
12%
Graduated High School
32%
No High School Diploma
Some College or Associateâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Degree
0.0%
24%
Unemployment Rate
Bachelorâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Degree or Higher
Variance Village Percent Above/Below County Educational Attainment
Income is dependent on many other factors,
0.6%
Bachelor's or Higher
including resident educational attainment and the overall health of the economy. -0.7%
Some College or Associate's
-3.5%
Graduated High School
3.0%
Less than High School Diploma
-4.0%
-3.0%
-2.0%
-1.0%
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
Among Village residents, educational attainment runs roughly proportional to that of the County. For residents 25 and over, the Village has a larger share of residents than Sauk County that have not graduated High School (3% less than County share). Even with lower educational attainment, unemployment for the Village remains virtually nonexistent. For those in the labor force and seeking employment, there are enough opportunities for all residents to secure employment, whether in the Village or other communities.
4.0%
Employment Indicators 18
Village of Lake Delton
Rental Market Demand & Supply
2020 Housing Study
19
Rental Market
Residential Rental Properties
H ß 23 Trout Rd
E Hiawatha
Dr
Sauk County, WI
s in Rive r
n
Lake Sho re Dr
Clara Ave
12 2 /
Lake Delton Housing Study
lto
n
Birchwood Rd
W
is
co
Berry Rd
La Wisconsin Dells Pkwy
P ß Munroe Ave
r
Rd
Other Municipality
A ß
Residential Property Single Family Residential Condo
ll s De
Duplex
S wy Pk
Hillman Rd
/ 2
Multi-Family Residential
12
Mobile Home
Wisc
onsin Dells Pk wy S
Dell Creek
in on s sc Wi
urritt Ave SB
Xanadu Rd
+ * ,
23
de D
Lake Delton
23
an Dr
ke
Canyo
A lc
La
Hillsi
n Rd
Bu nker
ss
94
De
Park Dr
+ * ,
a Bl
ke
Mixed Use
90
T ß
Ishnala R
d
Gasser Rd
Kalahari Dr
ke
+ * ,
Busse Ln
Bunker Dr
94
Mi rro
r
La
Data Sources: Municipal Boundary: Sauk County (2019) Roads: Sauk County (2019) Residential Type: Inferred from tax assessment codes, residential address points, zoning classification and aerial review.
12 / 2 Fern Dell Rd
Hastings Rd
Fern Dell Rd
Moon Rd
ß BD
Lake Delton’s rental market consists of a
variety of housing types. Single-unit homes, rented condo units, and multi-family residential units are the most prevalent type of rental unit per Village assessor data. Because assessment data for the Village does not include number of multifamily units or tenure type (ownership/rental), assumptions were made to estimate the spatial distribution of rental units in the Village. In the above map, any unit owned by a LLC was classified as an assumed rental property. This is not a perfect, accurate measure 20
0
0.2
0.4 Miles
of the number of units (for example, condo units at Great Wolf Lodge are displayed as rental units under this measure). The map above also displays any properties under the ownership of a person who owns 3 or more residential properties - generally smaller landlords who may operate with or without a property management company. This data includes some vacation rentals (e.g. Wydham), but also landlords who own up to 25 single-family properties. Due to limited assessment data, it is difficult to distinguish between vacation rentals and year-round rentals. in the Village. Village of Lake Delton
Income of Residents is central to housing affordability. For ownership opportunities, this largely
refers to the â&#x20AC;&#x153;purchasing powerâ&#x20AC;? of a given household based on known income. Because the housing market extends outside of Lake Delton, and few employees of Village businesses live in the municipality, incomes shown below illustrate the median for Sauk County. Using the County as a general income measure more closely ties to the ability of employees to purchase housing in the Village, and are consistent with Wisconsin Housing & Economic Development Authority (WHEDA) and U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development (HUD) guidelines.
Persons in Household
Median Family Income
Sauk County
$70,500 (100% AMI)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Extremely Low Income (30% AMI)
$14,850
$16,950
$21,330
$25,750
$30,170
$34,590
Very Low Income (50% AMI)
$24,700
$28,200
$31,750
$35,250
$38,100
$40,900
Low Income (80% AMI)
$39,500
$45,150
$50,800
$56,400
$60,950
$65,450
Purchase Limits based on the incomes above illustrate the general amount a household could
afford in the housing market without becoming housing cost burdened. These vary based on percentages of the Area Median Income (AMI) as well as family size. The median income household for the County could afford a $236,880 home purchase from a annual income of $70,500.
Persons in Household
Rent Limit
Sauk County
$1,763 (100% AMI)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Extremely Low Income (30% AMI)
$371
$424
$533
$644
$754
$865
Very Low Income (50% AMI)
$618
$705
$794
$881
$993
$1,023
Low Income (80% AMI)
$988
$1,129
$1,270
$1,410
$1,524
$1,636
Affordability Limits in the Rental Market 2020 Housing Study
21
[Following the Great Recession], household growth has finally returned to a more normal pace. Housing production, however, has not. The shortfall in new homes is keeping the pressure on house prices and rents, eroding affordabilityâ&#x20AC;&#x201D;particularly for modest-income households in high-cost markets. While demographic trends should support a vibrant housing market over the coming decade, realizing this potential depends heavily on whether the market can provide a broader and more affordable range of housing options for tomorrowâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s households. - Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University; State of the Nationâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Housing 2019
22
Village of Lake Delton
Tenure in the Housing Market
Tenure in the housing market refers to the
structure of occupancy - ownership or rental. Within the Village for year-round primary occupancy, more households rent their primary place of residence than own. This is consistent with general income trends (Lake Deltonâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s median and lower-income households are a higher percentage of the population than in peer communities). Lower-income households nationwide are more likely to be renter households, and this is true in the Village as well. Of note however is that higher-income households (>100% AMI) make up a sizable portion of the renter population. This income range generally has higher rates of homeownership than shown. This indicates both a lack of supply of ownership opportunities in the Village, as well as demand for high-amenity market rate rental units to ease market pressure.
Households, Income & Tenure Income
Renters
Owners
Total
0% - 30% AMI
185
45
230
31% - 50% AMI
165
90
255
51% - 80% AMI
135
125
260
81% - 100% AMI
50
55
105
>100% AMI
265
365
630
Total
795
675
1475
Income / Household Distribution 700
Tenure by Income 600
500
Households
400
300
200
100
0
0% - 30% AMI
2020 Housing Study
31% - 50% AMI
51% - 80% AMI Owner
Renter
81% - 100% AMI
> 100% AMI
23
200
Tenure in the Housing Market 100
0
0% - 30% AMI
31% - 50% AMI
51% - 80% AMI Owner
of the commuter shed and larger Lake Delton housing market, display different trends in rates of homeownership. Income is generally higher for residents of these communities - as such it would be expected that they have higher rates of ownership than rental. However, the rates of ownership are significantly higher for each than in Lake Delton.
45.8%
Lake Delton is the only community under comparison that is majority renter households. Baraboo, Portage, Reedsburg, and the Wisconsin Dells all are majority owner-occupied resident households. This reflects not only income differences between communities, but how the built environment has adjusted to market demand. More ownership options are available in these communities - meaning that households who want to purchase homes and enter homeownership have more options for purchase in each of these communities.
54.2%
Owner Households
Regional Tenure Comparisons
ner Households
Renter Households
Owner Households
Renter Households
53.0%
53.0%
55.9%
Owner Households
Renter Households
Owner Households
Wisconsin Dells Owner Households Owner Households Renter Households
Renter Households Reedsburg
Owner Households Renter Households
Owner Households
47.0%
47.0%
55.9%
Sauk County
53.0%
53.0%
55.9%
55.9%
31.3%
Renter Households
68.7%
Renter Households
68.7%
40.8% 49.9%
49.9%
40.8% 59.2%
.8%
49.9%
useholds
Owner Households
Renter Households
Owner Households
60.1%
60.1%
59.2%
59.2%
60.1%
60.1%
59.2% 49.9%
24
Renter Households
47.0%
47.0%
44.1%
44.1%
31.3%
Portage
44.1%
Renter
Tenure - Lake Chart Title delton
Regional Peer Communities, while part
Baraboo
81% - 100% AMI
Owner Households
Owner Households Renter Households
Renter Households
Renter Households
Owner Households
Renter Households
Owner Households
Owner Households
Owner Households Renter Households
Renter Households
Renter Households
Owner Households
Renter Households
Village of Lake Delton
Renter Households
>
Cost Burden >30% to <=50%
Cost Burden >50%
Housing Stress - Tenure
Renter Households Renter Households
st Burden <=30%
Owner Households Owner Households
Owner Households
CostBurden Burden <=30% Burden >30% to <=50% Cost Burden >30%<=30% to <=50% Cost Cost Burden >50% Cost Burden >30% to <=50% Cost Cost Burden >50%
Cost Burden >
Housing Stress is measured by cost Owner Households Rental Housing Stress
Municipality
% of Renter Households with Cost Burden
# of Cost Burdened Renter Households
Lake Delton
40.9%
325
Baraboo
44.3%
989
Reedsburg
49.0%
730
Wisconsin Dells
24.0%
113
Portage
50.9%
945
Sauk County
40.7%
burden, which reflects the amount of income a household pays for total housing costs. Generally, municipalities with larger stock of rental housing and increased vacancies would show lowered housing costs for consumers and decreasing rates of cost burden (except for extremely fast-growing communities). This is true in Lake Delton, as overall rates of rental housing cost burden are low compared to regional peer communities. This also represents, however, the large share of high-income households renting within the Lake Delton housing market. Higher-income households â&#x20AC;&#x153;renting downâ&#x20AC;? within the market (spending less than 30% income toward rent) skew these figures by spending significantly a significantly smaller percentage of income on market rents than lower-income households.
Cost Burden <=30% 3,240
Cost Burden >30% to <=50%
Cost Burden >50
Cost burden is much more prevalent in Lake Delton for renter than owner households, indicative of generally higher owner income, tight lending standards, and other market forces.
Rental Housing Stress 2020 Housing Study
25
Rental Stress by Income
where high income households rent units that are more appropriately priced to lower-income households, decreasing affordable options to households in lower income brackets.
Rental Stress in the Village exists almost
entirely within low-income Village households. There are practically no renter households over 80% AMI that experience cost burden. Due to the structure of the rental market in the Village, there are gaps in unit availability at appropriate price points to serve specific incomes in the market.
Rental Unit Mismatch
Overall, there is a lack of approximately 25 units that would serve extremely low income Income households (rental cost $644 per month or less). Range There is also a significant housing gap at the top of the rental housing market, with an undersupply 0% - 30% AMI of market-rate units for households earning over 80% AMI (rental housing cost $1,410 per month or 31% - 50% AMI more). While choice in the market is important, Chart Title and many higher income households value 51% - 80% AMI affordability (spending less than 30%), this does not display true unit for unit demand for high cost > 81% AMI housing. It does however create market tension,
Rental Renter Units Households Available
Over-/ UnderSupply
185
135
-50
165
205
40
135
365
230
315
90
-225
Chart Title 180
Cost Burden (income) 130
160
110
140
120
130 110
100
80
60
40
3020 0
< 30% AMI
26
30 30 < 30% AMI
25
30 31% - 50% AMI
31% - 50% AMI
25 51% - 80% AMI
81% - 100% AMI
51% - 80% AMI
Cost burden > 30% Cost burden > 30%
Cost burden > 50%> Cost burden
81% - 100% AMI
50%
> 100% AMI
> 100% AMI
Village of Lake Delton
69%
%
%
Delton
Levels of Cost Burden
Chart Title
100%
90% 30% 80%
42%
48% 70%
51%
70%
69%
74%
60%
52%
50%
49%
40%
31%
70% 30%
58%
52%
49%
20%
0%
31%
26%
10%
Baraboo Lake Delton
Baraboo
Reedsburg
Reedsburg
Cost Income Burden (30%-50% Income Toward Cost Burden (30%-50% Toward Rent)Rent)
Wisconsin Dells
Wisconsin Dells
Portage
Portage
Sa
Sauk County
Severe Cost Burden (>50% Income Toward Rent)
Severe Cost Burden (>50% Income Toward Rent)
Rates of Renter Cost Burden may
Cost Burdened Renter Households
Municipality
# with Cost Burden (30%-50%)
# with Severe Burden (>50%)
% Severely Cost Burdened
Lake Delton
85
240
73.8%
Baraboo
684
295
30.1%
Reedsburg
375
340
47.6%
Wisconsin Dells
34
75
68.8%
Portage
445
460
50.8%
Sauk County
1,855
1,320
41.8%
be low in Lake Delton overall, but those renters who are cost burdened are much more likely to be severely cost burdened (spending more than 50% income toward rental costs). Of those experiencing cost Burden in the Village, 74% are severely cost burdened. This rate is much higher than in regional peer communities, only Wisconsin Dells has a similar rate of severe cost burden. While rates of cost burden are low overall, higher income households â&#x20AC;&#x153;renting downâ&#x20AC;? squeezes the housing market, increasing competition for units in the moderate- and middle- market segments. This also indicates a lack of appropriatelypriced units for the lowest income households already living in the community, and indicates opportunity to better serve low-income households through income-restricted and subsidized units that ensure affordability levels not currently provided within the market.
Rental Housing Stress 2020 Housing Study
27
Rental Unit Consumption
Higher-income households (making over 100% AMI) rent nearly 40% of rental housing units that would be affordable to households earning 51% - 80% AMI, 15% of housing units that would be affordable to households earning 31% - 50% AMI, and nearly 20% of housing units that would be affordable to the lowest-income residents (30% AMI or less). While this means access to affordable housing options is readily available for these households, it also means that lower-income households (which are less competitive in the rental market) must spend more to secure housing, and often housing that is significantly above their affordability limit.
Which households are over- or
underconsuming housing is tracked annually by both the US Census Bureau and the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). While we know based on general over- and undersupply that higher-income households have to be renting down within the market in order to secure housing, we can also match which income-range units they are actually occupying. In Lake Delton, low-income households (80% AMI or under) are not renting any higher-end market rate units. This could be due to income requirements enforced by property management to secure higher priced rental units, barriers due to increasingly high security deposits, or many other reasons. This also results in generally low-levels of cost burden for the Village overall, disguising the true level of need that exists for many households in the community.
Chart Title
For example, nearly 15% of rental units priced to be affordable to a household making between 51% and 80% AMI are rented by the lowest-income households in the Village, as well as over 35% of rental units priced to be affordable to a household between 31% and 50% AMI.
130 Chart Title
Rental Unit Consumption110 (by income)
130
Units
110
30
30 30
0%
28
25
30
0%
10%
10%
20%
25
20%
30%
30%
40%
30% AMI 31% - 50% AMI - 80% AMI - 30% AMI 31% -51% 50% AMI Household Income 0% - 0%
40%
50%
60%
50%
70%
81% - 100% AMI AMI>100% AMI 51% - 80% 81% -
60%
80%
100% AMI
90%
70%
100%
>100% AMIof Lake Village
80%
Delton
Rental Unit Household Occupancy Households by Income Rental Units
0% - 30%
31% - 50%
51% - 80%
81% - 100%
Affordable at 30%
65
25
20
0
25
Affordable 31% - 50%
75
80
20
0
30
Affordable 51% - 80%
45
60
95
25
135
0
0
0
20
70
Affordable at >80%
While Unit Choice is important to the
freedom and desirability of the local housing market, more options at appropriate price points can help guide consumers into more appropriately priced units that ease burden at all levels. Households that would potentially move to Lake Deltonâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s as identified in the Community Survey a need for both affordability and availability of units - as well as a need for increased types of housing options in the community. Renter households in the community survey identified housing affordability as their main concern in the Village - with nearly 45% of respondents indicating this as a negative impact on choosing housing in the community. This was followed closely by housing availability and housing type options - all with a much larger negative than positive or neutral indicated impact.
>100%
These have been longstanding concerns of residents in the Village. Greater than 60% of both salaried and hourly employees, as well as nearly 70% of employers indicated in survey responses that adequate housing has become more difficult to find, or has always been difficult to find in the community. This represents a large group of invested residents and potential residents who are seeking more choices in the housing market, across all price points, for both ownership and rental units. The survey indicates a varied mix of rental housing unit types, with between 25% and 35% of respondents living each in single-unit detached, 2-4 unit, of 5-19 unit buildings. However, there is less choice within the community and more options are needed. Rental housing should be priced appropriately for the workforce of the community, largely hourly employees - of whom 64% are renter households compared to 22% of salaried employee households.
Rental Unit Consumption 2020 Housing Study
29
Rental Unit Types Residential Rental Properties
H ß 23 Trout Rd
E Hiawatha
Dr
Sauk County, WI
s in Rive r
n
Lake Sho re Dr
Clara Ave
12 / 2
Lake Delton Housing Study
lto
n
Birchwood Rd
W
is
co
Berry Rd
La Wisconsin Dells Pkwy
ke
ß
Lake Delton Other Municipality
A ß
Residential Property
23
Condo
A lc
ll s De
Duplex
S wy Pk
Hillman Rd
12 / 2
Multi-Family Residential Mobile Home
Wisc
onsin Dells Pk wy S
Dell Creek
in on s sc Wi
urritt Ave SB
an Dr
Single Family Residential
Xanadu Rd
+ * ,
23
r
Canyo
P
Munroe Ave
de D
n Rd
Rd
La
Hillsi
Bu nker
ss
94
De
Park Dr
+ * ,
a Bl
ke
Mixed Use
90
T ß
Ishnala R
d
Gasser Rd
Kalahari Dr
ke
+ * ,
Busse Ln
Bunker Dr
94
Mi rro
r
La
Data Sources: Municipal Boundary: Sauk County (2019) Roads: Sauk County (2019) Residential Type: Inferred from tax assessment codes, residential address points, zoning classification and aerial review.
12 / 2 Fern Dell Rd
Hastings Rd
Fern Dell Rd
Moon Rd
BD ß
Unit types are important to provide choice
in the housing market that meets preferences of residents and potential residents of the Village. Of note, there are no rental units per the U.S. Census that are single-unit attached (townhouse) units, nor units in 50+ unit buildings. 67% of the rental units in the Village are either single-unit detached homes or in 5-19 unit buildings. Although these comprise the majority of rental units in the Village, they house different household types. Single-unit detached homes tend to have higher rents (and therefore are less affordable to lower-income households), while 5-19 unit building provide more affordable options. 30
0
0.2
0.4 Miles
Rental Units - Type Unit Type
Number of Units
% of Total Rental Units
Rental as % of Unit Type
1-unit detached 232
30.9%
39.5%
2-4 unit
105
14.0%
100%
5-19 unit
272
36.2%
88.3%
20-49 unit
108
14.4%
76.1%
Mobile home
34
4.5%
11.4%
Village of Lake Delton
Affordability Trends $1,200
$1,000
General Measures and trends
in affordability are a contrast of current incomes and current costs. One measure $1,200 130 median renter $800or not the is whether household can afford the median rental unit, which is a measure of choice. If yes,110 $1,000 50% or more of all rental units would be $600 available to that household. If no, choice is 130 $800 restricted and market supply and demand are unbalanced. Displayed as a rolling average$400 to smooth data, the median rental $600 unit became unaffordable to the median renter household from 2016-2017. $400
Rental Cost & Income $1,200
$1,000
130
$800
110
110
$600
$400
$200 of unit
Ranges rental costs in the Village show that most units rent between $750$200 $799 per month (including utilities), and there are scarce units priced less than $500 $30 per month. $800 in 30 or more than $1,250 $30 rental costs per month is the affordability limit for a household earning $32,000 annually, and is the high end of the most common rental amount.
$200
$-
30 30
25
25
30
Lake Delton Lake Delton Median GrossMedian RentGross Rent
25
Lake AďŹ&#x20AC;ordable Delton Median to Gross Renter Rent Household Rent AďŹ&#x20AC;ordable to Median Renter RentRent AďŹ&#x20AC;ordable toMedian Median Renter Household
Gross Rent 180
Current Unit Rents 160 140
130 120
110
Units
100 80 60 40 20
30
30
25
0
2020 Housing Study
Gross Rent
31
Chart Title $1,200
Rental Unit Cost $1,000
130 $800
110 $600
$400
$200
30 $0
30
25
1-Bedroom
2-Bedroom US Census
3-Bedroom
Study Survey
Renter Households in the Village currently
pay about $700-$800 per month for a 1-bedroom unit (average), and between $850-$950 per month for 2-bedroom units (average). Within the market, however, there is significant variation in unit costs expected with variance in age of construction, location, and amenities. The property management survey administered through this process identified managers of 1- and 2-bedroom units, and costs for those units ranged from $700 per month up to $1,130 per month. This range represents rates which would generally be affordable to households earning between $28,000 and $45,000 annually. These incomes reprent 27% of Lake Deltonâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s renter households, with 40% earning below this amount (likely to be cost burdened) and 33% earning above this amount (likely to pay less than 30% income toward housing).
Monthly Rental Estimates Income
Census
Survey Low
Survey High
1 Bedroom
$761
$700
$900
2 Bedroom
$856
$820
$1,130
3+ Bedroom
$764
-
-
All Bedrooms
$762
-
-
Rental Housing Cost 32
Village of Lake Delton
Vacancies in the rental market are important
to continued access and affordability. Healthy vacancy rates are considered to be between 5% and 7% of all units. This falls within an assumed vacancy for development, allows turnover and growth in population, keeps market rental increases to appropriate amounts, and provides a general balance between landlord and tenant. The U.S. Census Bureau does not provide accurate numbers for rental vacancy in the Village. Instead, certain property managers volunteered to self-report numbers of units and vacancies for the Village and larger region. Respondents represented nearly 50% of all the rental units in the Village, although skewed toward larger property management companies operating smaller units. There were no reported vacancies in this sample, indicating extremely lo vacancy rates for the Village, likely under 5%.
Rental Unit Vacancy Income
Units
Vacant
Total
1-bedroom
145
0
145
2-bedroom
225
0
225
3-bedroom
-
-
-
Total
370
0
370
Smaller landlords and property management companies operating larger single-family homes do not appear to have much higher vacancy. Although no data is available, only 5 rental units available for immediate move-in were observed in March 2020 on rental listing aggregator websites, and all were in multi-unit buildings. Sauk County
12%
Sauk County Vacancy Rate 10%
130
8%
Healthy Range 6%
Increasing Supply and increasing
4%
30
2%
The same property managers were asked to supply the total number of units and vacancies offered in the Lake Delton region, whether or not those units were within municipal boundaries. In total for numbers supplied for units within the larger region, there were 15 total vacancies out of 1,556 units. This represents a vacancy rate of 0.96% for managed units in the larger area. At the more accurate county level, the U.S. Census has shown a steadily decreasing vacancy rate since 2010 - one below a healthy range.
30
25
0%
vacancy of rental units in the community would be healthy for the housing market. Doing so would allow potential residents and employees the opportunity to move into the community, allow healthy turnover of units within the market providing more choices of housing for current residents, and allow residents to self-select into housing of both an appropriate size and type.
Vacancy Rate 2020 Housing Study
33
Rental Housing Size
Chart Title 0.8% 7.0%
Household Size is important to the housing
market, as larger households require units with more bedrooms so as not to be overcrowded (more then 1 person per room). While renter households 130 Lake Delton generally have smaller household sizes, growth trends have shown increasing household sizes generally over recent years. This is consistent with data from the Community Survey, in which 42% of respondents indicated having children in the home. For the rental market, especially for hourly 130 employees, maintaining access to 3+ bedroom units will be important in the coming years to encourage employees to become residents.
Chart Title Employees - # of Children 0.8% 19.4%
19.4%
110
Overall in the Village, 25% of all rental units have 3- or more bedrooms. However, with increasing household size and many families having children, this submarket will remain an important relative component of new development in the Village. Per most recently available Census30 data, there are more renter households with 3+ person families (141) than owner households (110). Currently there30are enough units for resident households, but expanding supply can work to attract new resident families of all incomes.
Rental Units by Bedroom Size
7.0%
110
58.1%
14.7% 58.1%
14.7%
30
25 30
25
No Children
1 Child
No Children
1 Child
2 Children 2 Children
3 Children 3 Children
4 Children 4 Children
Number of Rental Units
250
200
130 110 150
100
50
34
0
30
30
EďŹ&#x192;ciency
1-Bedroom
25
2-Bedroom
3-Bedroom
Village 4-Bedroom of Lake Delton
Rental Unit Age
Multi-Family Dwellings by age of home
ßH
n co
s in R iv e r
is
D
r
Sauk County, WI n
Lake Shore
Dr
B er ry
ha
t
94
W
12 / 2
+ , *
d
Lake Delton Housing Study
23 a E Hia w
el
to
Birchwood Rd
ke
Canyon
s as
Rd
La
ke
Bl
D
Dr ide Hills
La Park Dr
R
Clara Ave
Wisconsin Dells P kw y
Trout Rd
Bunker Rd
Lake Delton
ßA
ßP Munroe Ave
23 Alc
1926 - 1950
n sc o Wi
1951 - 1975
sin s Del P kw
1976 - 2000
Hillman Rd
yS
2001 - 2019
W
isconsin Dells Pkwy S
De l l C reek
1850 - 1900
12 / 2
an Dr
urritt Ave SB
Xanadu Rd
+ , *
23
Other Municipality Duplexes/Multi/Mobile Homes/Mixed Use
Age of Home Unknown
90
ßT
La
Kalahari Dr
ke
+ , *
Bunker Dr
94
Busse Ln
Mir
r or
Ishnala R d
Gasser Rd
Data Sources: Municipal Boundary: Sauk County (2019) Roads: Sauk County (2019) Age of Homes: Associated Appraisal
12 / 2 Fern Dell Rd Hastings Rd
Fern Dell Rd
Moon Rd
BD ß
Lake Delton’s rental market consists of a
variety of housing types. For multifamily units (the most common rental type), there are varying ages of construction. The majority of multifamily units in the Village were constructed between 1980 - 2000. There are smaller structures built between 1926 1950, and larger structures constructed after 2000. Older units are commonly more affordable to tenants, providing affordable housing opportunity, while newer units are often rented at higher price points.
2020 Housing Study
0
0.2
0.4 Miles
Older units in the Village that are rental units have limited risk of contaminants such as leadbased paint, though other health concerns come with age and compounded disrepair. However, many renters in the Village are satisfied with the overall quality of rental housing - over 45% of survey respondents indicated a positive view of the quality of rental units, compared to 32% who indicated a negative view of rental unit quality. Housing quality due to age or other factors was the least listed concern for renters, well behind affordability and availability of units. 35
1-Bedroom Rental (New Construction) Typical 1-Bedroom Construction & Land Cost = $125,000 Equity to Cost Ratio
20%
Loan to Cost Ratio
Required Equity
$25,000
Mortgage Loan
Annual Pre-tax Distribution Rate 10%
Mortgage Interest Rate
Cash Payments for Equity
Debt Service
$2,500
Net Operating Income
$8,750
Operating Expenses
$2,500
Real Estate Taxes
$2,000
Replacement Reserve
$300
Effective Gross Revenue
$13,350
Vacancy (5% required assumption)
$675
Gross Potential Income
$14,225
Breakeven Annual Rent
$14,225
Breakeven Monthly Rent
$1,185
There is a Need for new construction in
the Village that serves low- and high-income earners alike. High-income earning households can afford rents associated with higher cost of new-construction, and developers can market increased costs through increased amenities. However, lower-income households largely cannot afford new construction, even assuming limited to no profit from development.
80% $100,000 5% $6,250
Construction cost and the requisite rents to cover debt service, reserves, and operating expenses even under a conservative example necessitate rents that are unaffordable for low-income households. To ensure expanded opportunities for all members of the workforce in Lake Delton, including hourly employees, subsidy is needed to offset construction costs to make more units affordable.
Example - Construction Cost 36
Village of Lake Delton
Example - Affordability Persons in Household
Monthly Housing Cost Limit
Sauk County
$1,763 (100% AMI)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Extremely Low Income (30% AMI)
$371
$424
$533
$644
$754
$865
$975
$1,086
Very Low Income (50% AMI)
$618
$705
$794
$881
$953
$1,023
$1,094
$1,164
Low Income (80% AMI)
$988
$1,129
$1,270
$1,410
$1,524
$1,636
$1,749
$1,861
Households marked by red in the Housing Affordability Limit table above would not be able to afford the 1-bedroom new construction rental unit in the example.
2020 Housing Study
37
Page intentionally left blank.
38
Village of Lake Delton
Ownership Market Demand & Supply
2020 Housing Study
39
Ownership Market
Residential Properties
H ß
23
n
co
W
Birchwood Rd
M unroe Ave
23
Lake Delton yon Can
Other Municipality
Rd
Bunker Rd
P ß
De
Park Dr
Wisconsin Dells Pkwy
a
Owner Occupied Property
A ß
Rental Property
/ 2
S Burritt Ave
L
Bl
ke
Dr
lto
n
ide Hil ls
La
e ak
Sauk County, WI
s in Rive r
is
Clara Ave
94
ss
R
Berr y
+ * ,
E
d
12 / 2
Lake Delton Housing Study
Hi a watha D r
Lake Shore Dr
Trout Rd
12
sc Wi si n on l ls De
Xanadu Rd
w Pk
Hillman Rd
yS
Alcan Dr
onsin Dells Pk wy S
Wisc
k
D ell Cr e e
+ * ,
23
90
ßT
Ishnala
Rd
Gasser Rd
ke
Dr
+ * ,
Bunker Dr
94
Busse Ln
Mi rro
r
La
Kal a hari
Data Sources: Municipal Boundary: Sauk County (2019) Roads: Sauk County (2019) Residential Type: Inferred from tax assessment codes, residential address points, zoning classification and aerial review.
12 / 2 Fern Dell Rd
Hastings Rd
Fern Dell Rd
Moon Rd
BD ß
The Majority of Residential Parcels
in the Village are owner-occupied, even though the primary tenure type is rental. This is due to the large number of multi-unit residential rental buildings that house the majority of the population. Central Lake Delton shows a mix of rental and owner-occupied housing, although areas surrounding the Lake as well as platted subdivisions are largely owner-occupied.
40
0
0.2
While some of the owner-occupied units on the map are vacation or secondary homes, data presented in this chapter is largely focused on year-round residents of the Village. This is structured to better display opportunity available to current and prospective primary residents, and outline barriers, obstacles, and opportunities in the local ownership market as separate from the tourist or second-home market.
Village of Lake Delton
0.4 Miles
Income of Residents is central to housing affordability. For ownership opportunities, this largely
refers to the â&#x20AC;&#x153;purchasing powerâ&#x20AC;? of a given household based on known income. Because the housing market extends outside of Lake Delton, and few employees of Village businesses live in the municipality, incomes shown below illustrate the median for Sauk County. Using the County as a general income measure more closely ties to the ability of employees to purchase housing in the Village, and are consistent with Wisconsin Housing & Economic Development Authority (WHEDA) and U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development (HUD) guidelines.
Persons in Household
Median Family Income
Sauk County
$70,500 (100% AMI)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Extremely Low Income (30% AMI)
$14,850
$16,950
$21,330
$25,750
$30,170
$34,590
Very Low Income (50% AMI)
$24,700
$28,200
$31,750
$35,250
$38,100
$40,900
Low Income (80% AMI)
$39,500
$45,150
$50,800
$56,400
$60,950
$65,450
Purchase Limits based on the incomes above illustrate the general amount a household could
afford in the housing market without becoming housing cost burdened. These vary based on percentages of the Area Median Income (AMI) as well as family size. The median income household for the County could afford a $236,880 home purchase from annual income of $70,500.
Persons in Household
Purchase Limit
Sauk County
$236,880 (100% AMI)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Extremely Low Income (30% AMI)
$49,846
$56,952
$76,788
$86,520
$101,371
$116,222
Very Low Income (50% AMI)
$82,992
$94,752
$106,680
$118,440
$128,016
$137,424
Low Income (80% AMI)
$132,720
$151,704
$170,688
$189,504
$204,792
$219,912
Affordability Limits in the Ownership Market 2020 Housing Study
41
200
Tenure in the Housing Market 100
0
0% - 30% AMI
31% - 50% AMI
51% - 80% AMI Owner
Tenure Impacts Ownership Markets as
The lack of ownership housing stock available to current and prospective residents is significantly less (as a percentage) than in regional peer communities. More units in the ownership market often means a more active market: more listings, more turnover, and more sales. The average homeowner stays in a home for 7 years after purchase, but often longer in tighter markets with less inventory, as there are less options for them to â&#x20AC;&#x153;upgradeâ&#x20AC;? their housing or move to a more preferable unit in the market. Tight markets also increase competition, and sales prices rise due to comptetion between purchasers - creating additional layers of unaffordability.
45.8% 54.2%
Owner Households
Regional Tenure Comparisons
ner Households
Renter Households
Owner Households
Renter Households
53.0%
53.0%
55.9%
Owner Households
Renter Households
Owner Households
Wisconsin Dells Owner Households Owner Households Renter Households
Renter Households Reedsburg
Owner Households Renter Households
Owner Households
47.0%
47.0%
55.9%
Sauk County
53.0%
53.0%
55.9%
55.9%
31.3%
Renter Households
68.7%
Renter Households
68.7%
40.8% 49.9%
49.9%
40.8% 59.2%
.8%
49.9%
useholds
Owner Households
Renter Households
Owner Households
60.1%
60.1%
59.2%
59.2%
60.1%
60.1%
59.2% 49.9%
42
Renter Households
47.0%
47.0%
44.1%
44.1%
31.3%
Portage
44.1%
Renter
Tenure - Lake Chart Title delton
well as rental markets. This is largely apparent in limits on the total amount of ownership housing stock in the inventory. It is uncommon for single-unit rental properties to reach the open market, and most new homeowners do not purchase 2+ unit buildings for their primary residence.
Baraboo
81% - 100% AMI
Owner Households
Owner Households Renter Households
Renter Households
Renter Households
Owner Households
Renter Households
Owner Households
Owner Households
Owner Households Renter Households
Renter Households
Renter Households
Owner Households
Renter Households
Village of Lake Delton
Renter Households
>
Income / Household Distribution
Tenure by Income 700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
0% - 30% AMI
31% - 50% AMI
51% - 80% AMI Owner
81% - 100% AMI
> 100% AMI
Renter
The Majority of owner-occupied homes Chart Title Households, Income & Tenure in the Village are occupied by households that are above the median income for the County. This is not an uncommon occurance, as increased income opens up increased ownership opportunities and eases costs associated with homeownership (downpayment, taxes, etc.). While significant percentages of low-income residents (< 80% AMI) are renters, 35% are still homeowners. Often these populations are aging homeowners who have entered retirement and seen significant loss in income,54.2% which brings new challenges. Although these owners may own their home free and clear, they often struggle with property tax payments, upkeep, and other factors of homeownership that require continual maintnance funds or physical requirements that agining populations stuggle to meet.
Owner Households
Income
Renters
Owners
0% - 30% AMI
185
45
230
31% - 50% AMI
165
90
255
51% - 80% AMI
135
125
260
81% - 100% AMI
50
55
105
>100% AMI
265
365
630
Total
795
675
1475
45.8%
Total
Renter Households
Tenure by Income 2020 Housing Study
43
Cost Burden >30% to <=50%
Cost Burden >50%
Housing Stress - Tenure
Renter Households Renter Households
st Burden <=30%
Owner Households Owner Households
Owner Households
CostBurden Burden <=30% Burden >30% to <=50% Cost Burden >30%<=30% to <=50% Cost Cost Burden >50% Cost Burden >30% to <=50% Cost Cost Burden >50%
Cost Burden >
Housing Stress is measured by cost Owner Households Ownership Housing Stress
Municipality
% of Owner Households with Cost Burden
# of Cost Burdened Owner Households
Lake Delton
20.0%
135
Baraboo
23.3%
665
Reedsburg
20.5%
460
Wisconsin Dells
26.0%
168
Portage
13.8%
Sauk County
22.1%
burden, which reflects the amount of income a household pays for total housing costs. While the rental housing market in the Village is marked by high levels of cost burden (> 30% income toward rental costs), the ownership housing market has significantly reduced levels of burden in comparison. Further - for those households in the ownership market who do experience cost burden, they are much less likely to experience severe cost burden (> 50% income toward housing costs). While housing is a necessity, so all households must participate in the market in some aspect, owner households have the financial resources available to choose to purchase their housing.
An effect of that choice is that in order to qualify, potential owner households must meet Cost Burden <=30% Coststandards Burden >30% <=50%of the Cost Burden >50 underwriting - antoaspect market 3,825 that drastically reduces the cost risk associated with owning, as borrowers are more likely to have higher incomes, increased access to credit, etc.. 295
Owner Housing Stress 44
Village of Lake Delton
Owner Stress by Income Owner Stress in the Village exists almost
entirely within low-income Village households (85%). Important to consider is that for households above this amount - 100% AMI or greater, cost burden is less impactful than for low-income households. Even accounting for increased housing costs, costs associated with fixed-cost goods (childcare, healthcare, food, etc.) allow more flexibility within a monthly budget to allow some levels of cost burden while maintaining financial stability. For lowerincome households, there is less room for increased costs or unexpected expenditure.
Ownership Unit Mismatch Ownership Owner Units Income Range Households Available
Chart Title
In ownership unit mismatch, homes that would be affordable to even low-income households are occupied by higher-income households, further decreasing observed rates of cost burden. This indicates a need for increased ownership opportunities, as homes that would otherwise be affordable 20 to lower-income households are not available to them in a competitive market.
Over-/ UnderSupply
0% - 50% AMI
135
320
185
51% - 80% AMI
125
180
55
81% - 100% AMI
55
60
5
> 100% AMI
365
120
-245
Chart Title 60
Cost Burden (income) 50
20 40
30
25
25
30
20
25
30 10
0
20
15
31% - 50% AMI
< 30% AMI
2020 Housing Study
31% - 50% AMI
51% - 80% AMI 51% - 80% AMI
Cost Burden > 30%
Cost Burden > 30%
81% - 100% AMI
Cost Burden > 50%
Cost Burden > 50%
81% - 100% AMI
> 100% AMI
45
33%
32%
34% 46%
Levels of Cost Burden
Chart Title
20
100%
39%
47%
90% 33%
80%
32%
34% 46%
39%
47%
20
70%
25 60% 67%
50%
25
40%
54%
67%
30%
15
61%
53% 68%
25
66%
30
54%
61%
20
53%
25
30
20%
20
15
10%
Lake Delton
68%
66%
0%
Lake Delton
Baraboo
Baraboo
Reedsburg Reedsburg
Burden (30% - 50% Income Housing Toward Housing Cost) Cost Burden (30%Cost - 50% Income Toward Cost)
Wisconsin Wisconsin Dells
Dells
Portage
Portage Sauk County
Severe CostCost Burden (> 50% Income Toward Housing Cost) Severe Burden (> 50% Income Toward
Sauk County
Housing Cost)
Cost Burdened Owner Households
Municipality
# with Cost Burden (30%-50%)
# with Severe Burden (>50%)
% Severely Cost Burdened
Lake Delton
90
45
33%
Baraboo
345
290
46%
Reedsburg
255
130
34%
Wisconsin Dells
89
79
47%
Portage
200
95
32%
Sauk County
2,235
1,440
39%
Rates of Owner Cost Burden that assess severe burden as a percentage of total burden are lower in Lake Delton than in all peer communities except for Portage. This has to do with many factors - including homeowners being higher-income as a percentage, lower housing costs, and the large percentage of homes in Lake Delton that are owned free and clear (without a mortgage). Combined, these factors display relative stability within the ownership market. Those that own their homes find them relatively affordable.
Owner Housing Stress 46
Village of Lake Delton
Owner Unit Consumption Overall, the market is dominated by households earning over 80% AMI. These households are consuming units in the housing market that are very affordable to them - their relative incomes significantly lower housing cost burden, and income shares spent on housing costs are extremely low. While this is beneficial to these households, it does strain the market and ultimately increase sales prices in all housing ranges, from entry-level homes upward.
Which households are over- or
underconsuming housing is tracked annually by both the US Census Bureau and the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Per HUD data, within the Village the largest share of ownership homes in the market (320 units) should be affordable to households earning about 50% AMI ($35,250 for a family of 4). Of these housing units, about 35% are owned by households that fall into that income category. The remainder are owned by higher-income households, with nearly 45% being owned by households earning above the area median income.
Consistent with insights from the Community Survey and data gathered from community conversations, owners and prospective owners feel that the largest negative aspect to the These homes are extremely affordable to higherhousing market in Lake Delton is housing income households, and provide desirable Chart Title availability, which is followed by affordability. As affordable ownership options for high income the market is restricted, these two concerns are earners. However, it does provide increased inherently connected, and families who choose competition that precludes lower-income earners to live in Lake Delton may purchase housing well from entering the owner housing market. below a price they would be able to afford in the market otherwise in order to live in the Village, while still overpaying for that housing due to limited supply.
130
Chart Title
Ownership Unit Consumption (by income) 110
Units
20
25
30
25
30
30
20
25
15
0%
10%
0%
2020 Housing Study
10%
20%
20%
0% - 30% AMI 0% - 30% AMI
30%
30%
40%
40%
50%
50%
60%
60% 70%
80%
31% - 50% 51% 80% AMI - 100% >AMI 31% - 50% AMIAMI 51% AMI - 80%- AMI 81% AMI - 81% 100% AMI 100% AMI >100% AMI
70%
90%
80%
100%
47
90
Ownership Unit Household Occupancy 0% - 30%
31% - 50%
51% - 80%
81% - 100%
Units With a Mortgage
Affordable at 50%
0
0
0
0
40
Affordable at 51% - 80%
0
0
25
20
55
Affordable at 81% - 100%
0
0
0
0
0
Affordable at > 100%
0
20
0
0
85
Units Without a Mortgage
Households by Income Ownership Units
Affordable at 50%
45
70
50
15
100
Affordable at 51% - 80%
0
0
20
0
60
Affordable at 81% - 100%
0
0
30
20
15
Affordable at > 100%
0
0
0
0
15
Disparity in ownership opportunity is apparent
with looking at the distribution of homes, by value, that have a lien on the property. The table above shows the household incomes of occupants of ownership housing both with and without a mortgage, which due to lending standards can generally be thought of as “purchased in the past 15-30 years” for homes with a mortgage and “purchased more than 15-30 years ago” for homes without a mortgage. For units with a mortgage (representing more recent home purchases), 82% were purchased by households earning more than 100% AMI ($70,500
>100%
for a family of 4). However, homeowners > 100% AMI own only 43% of homes without a mortgage. While some of this discrepancy is due to retirement and reduced income for owners who have paid off their homes, the sheer number of homes without a mortgage indicates this is not the sole cause. What this likely represents is a larger shift in unit availability and purchase trends that is moving towards homeowner opportunities in the Village becoming almost exclusively for higher-income households, while tightening lending standards and unit availability has priced out lower-income households that could otherwise afford unit purchase.
Owner Unit Consumption 48
Village of Lake Delton
Spatial Affordability Approximate Market Value of Single Family Residential Properties
H ß
23
Lake Shore
co
W
Lake Delton Housing Study
lto
n
Birchwood Rd
Dr
Berr y
is
w
a th a
d
s in Rive r
n
E Hi a
La
a
P ß
on R Cany
23
Sauk County, WI
Dr
d
Lake Delton
ßA
Other Municipality
si n on
Less than $118,400
l ls De w Pk
Hillman Rd
yS
$118,400 - $189,504
Wisc
onsin Dells Pk wy S
Dell Creek
Approximate Market Value
sc Wi
urritt Ave SB
Xanadu Rd
+ , *
23
Hillsi de
12 2 / Dr
M unroe Ave
ke
De
Bunker Rd
94
Park Dr
Wisconsin Dells Pkwy
ss
+ , *
ke
Bl
La
Alcan
R
12 / 2
Clara Ave
Dr
Trout Rd
$189,505 - $239,700
90
$239,700 - $267,900
ßT
Rd
Gasser Rd
Ishnala
Greater than $269,700 Kalahari Dr
No Assessed Value
+ , *
Bunker Dr
94
Busse Ln
Mi rro
r
L
e ak
Data Sources: Municipal Boundary: Sauk County (2019) Roads: Sauk County (2019) Residential Type: Inferred from tax assessment codes, residential address points, zoning classification and aerial review.
12 / 2 Fern Dell Rd
Hastings Rd
Fern Dell Rd
Moon Rd
BD ß
0
0.2
0.4 Miles
Approximating Market Value of homes
is accomplished by adding 15% to the assessed value of the property. While this is not a perfect approximation, it estimates price fluctuations driven by demand in a competitive market. This spatial availability of homes by market cost shows where opportunity for affordability exists in the Village’s housing market for residents at different income levels. Even though the opportunity exists for lowerincome households to purchase housing that would be affordable to them, they are often limited by lower downpayments, different loan types, and less overall ability to compete with higher-income households when offering on the same home. 2020 Housing Study
Ownership units Unit Affordability
Low Cost
High Cost
Affordable up to 50% AMI
-
$118,400
Affordable at 51% - 80% AMI
118,401
$189,504
Affordable at 81% - 100% AMI $189,505
$239,700
Affordable above 100% AMI
-
$239,701
49
Affordability Trends General Measures and trends
Year Owner MovedChart Into Title Unit
in homeowner affordability have to do with market conditions in real estate markets and prospective buyer incomes. Looking at the Lake Delton region, home values historically peaked in 2007 before the Great Recession, and saw a corresponding loss in value - though not to the extent of many other areas of the Nation. Both condo and single family units have regained lost value associated with the recession, in 2017 for single-family units and 2019 for condo units. Within the Village, real estate transactions for year-round residents increased in 2010 as tracked by the year the homeowner moved into the unit. Lake Delton has many long-tenured homeowners who have not been active members of the housing market for many years, and whose mortgages have fully amortized since their initial purchase.
1989 or Earlier
49
1990 to 1999
184
20
2000 to 2009
162
25 2010 to 2014
197
25
30
2015 to 2016
83
15
2017 or Later
14
0
50
100
150
200
250
SF and Condo Affordability Single-Unit & Condo Market Value $250,000
$200,000
$150,000
$100,000
$50,000
$0
50
Single-Unit Detached $300,000
Condominium
12 per. Mov. Avg. (Single-Unit Detached)
Village of 12 per. Mov. Avg. (Condominium)
Lake Delton
$300,000
Single-Unit & Condo Affordability $250,000
$200,000
$150,000
$100,000
$50,000
$0
Single-Unit Detached
Condominium
Low-Income AďŹ&#x20AC;ordability Limit
Median AďŹ&#x20AC;ordability Limit
While Unit Price is an important factor in
housing affordability, so too is household income. Sauk County and Lake Delton experienced rising incomes for residents coming out of the recession - and for a time these income rose at a rate ahed of the real estate market. When single-family and condo units reached the bottom of their market dip in 2014, both were affordable to different sectors of the community. In 2014, the median single-unit home was within the affordability limit of not only the median household, but also within the limit of a household at 80% of the area median income (AMI). Concurrently, households at 50% AMI had seen an increase in incomes so that the median condo unit was nearly an affordable method of homeownership.
Very Low-Income AďŹ&#x20AC;ordability Limit
Since the bottom of the market in 2014 however, house value growth has drastically outpaced income growth for the same period. While the median single-unit home is still affordable to the median household, it has surpassed the affordability limit of an 80% AMI household as of 2017. 50% AMI household income growth closely tracked median condo pricing, yet never came quite within the affordability limit - and the gap has continued to widen. Of note, the appreciation in market value, especially of single-unit homes rose drastically over 2019. Over this timeframe, the market value of the median single family home rose nearly $25,000 in a single year. This rise represents half of the difference between affordability limits for the median family household and a household at 80% of the area median.
Affordability Trends 2020 Housing Study
51
Affordability Trends Median List Price $300,000 Increasing Sales Prices of houses
in the Village directly impact monthly owner cost and affordability. With a large $250,000 amount of homes owned free and clear, there are many homes in the Village whose housing payments consist solely of taxes and insurance. For new borrowers however, $200,000 appreciation on existing housing as well as costs of new construction place ownership costs into higher brackets (over $1,000 per $150,000 month).
Chart Title Monthly Owner Cost > $1,500
80
$1,250 - $1,499
132
20
$1,000 - $1,249
41
$800 - $999
50
25
The median list price of homes in the Lake Delton$100,000 region has incresed steadily since the earliest numbers we have tracked since 2005. Using a 12-month rolling average, house prices peaked in the summer of 2018 for the 15 $50,000 larger housing market area, decreasing over the season of 2018. The median home in the area is still affordable to the median Sauk County household, although sales prices are $0 increasing faster than income and closing the gap.
$600 - $799
69
$400 - $599
25
30
143
$200 - $399
149
< $200
25
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
$300,000
All Units - Median Affordability $250,000
$200,000
$150,000
$100,000
$50,000
0
52
Median List Price
AďŹ&#x20AC;ordable to the Median Households
12 per. Mov. Avg. (Median List Price) Village
of Lake Delton
Bottom-Tier Home Value
Starter Home Value $140,000
$120,000
$100,000
$80,000
$60,000
$40,000
$20,000
2005-01 2005-05 2005-09 2006-01 2006-05 2006-09 2007-01 2007-05 2007-09 2008-01 2008-05 2008-09 2009-01 2009-05 2009-09 2010-01 2010-05 2010-09 2011-01 2011-05 2011-09 2012-01 2012-05 2012-09 2013-01 2013-05 2013-09 2014-01 2014-05 2014-09 2015-01 2015-05 2015-09 2016-01 2016-05 2016-09 2017-01 2017-05 2017-09 2018-01 2018-05 2018-09 2019-01 2019-05 2019-09
$0
Median "Bo�om-Tier" Value
Affordable to a Household at 50% AMI
12 per. Mov. Avg. (Median "Bo�om-Tier" Value)
Monthly Sales Listings 200
Lower-Income Households commonly 180
occupy what is referred to as the “starter home” market. This160 is tracked as the “Bottom Tier Home Value” and is the median of the lowest 1/3 (33%) of 140 all home values. These homes followed the same general trend both going into and coming out of 120 the recession - although appreciation follows more closely to condo units in that growth rate in value 100 was more reserved. These houses did display the same value spike in 2019, increasing at a much 80 faster rate than in previous periods. 60
These houses appear to be affordable to residents with incomes40 at or below 50% AMI. However, the houses are not being bought by lower-income households. 20 While 41% of homes in this category without a mortgage are owned by households at or below 50%0 AMI, 100% of homes in the category with a mortgage are owned by households earning over 100% AMI. This indicates a strong need for ownership opportunities at all levels of the cosst spectrum, from low-income opportunities to higher-end new construction.
Occupant Incomes of Houses Affordable to 30% AMI Households Household Income
With Without Mortgage Mortgage
0% - 50% AMI
0
115
51% - 80% AMI
0
50
81% - 100% AMI
0
15
> 100% AMI
40
100
Entry-Level Affordability 2020 Housing Study
53
House Availability As of September 6, 2019 (the date MLS data was pulled), there were 23 residential (single-unit) homes on the active market. These homes had an average asking price of $347,926, a median asking price of $262,000, and were on the market for an average of 289 days. The average days on market is unusually large, and may be skewed by vacation properties.
Single-Unit Home Sales tracked by the
Multiple listing Service hold similar trends to metrics tracking home value. It is important to note in this data that due to the extremely small sample of homes listed in specific years, data can be skewed based on a small representative sample. For instance, the median single family home in 2011 sold for nearly $40,000 more than the median homes in 2010 and 2012. Years with larger amounts of home sales show a better representation of the market.
5-Year Average Home Sales:
31.4 / year
Home sales for single-unit properties have increased coming out of the recession, and values have risen with increased sales activity. Likely the opposite holds more correct - that with increasing values and market demand, more owner households are choosing to place their homes on the market. Increased activity is a good sign that opportunities to live in the Village are presenting themselves to potential buyers.
5-Year Median Sales Price:
$185,750
Chart Title 45
40
$250,000
Chart Title
Single Family Home Sales 45
$250,000
$200,000
40
35
20 $200,000
35
30
20 $150,000
30
25 $150,000 25
25
20
25
20
$100,000 $100,000
15 15
25
30
25
30
10
15
10
5
20
20 $50,000 $50,000
15
5
0 2005
54
0
2006 2005
2007 2006
2008 2007
2009 2008
2009 2010
2010 2011 2011
Home Sales Home Sales
20122012
Median Median SalesSales PricePrice
2013 2013
2014 2014
2015 2015
2016 2016
2 per.Mov. Mov.Avg. Avg. (Median (Median Sales 2 per. SalesPrice) Price)
20172017
2018 2018
0 2019* 2019*
0
Village of Lake Delton * partial year data
Chart Title 100 Condo / Zero Lot Line Sales
$250,000
90
80
$200,000
20
70
$150,000
60
50
25 $100,000
40
30 $50,00020
15
10
0
25
30
20
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Home Sales
2011
2012
2013
Median Sales Price
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019*
$-
2 per. Mov. Avg. (Median Sales Price)
* partial year data
Condo Unit Sales have been a significantly
higher portion of the sales market year-to-year within the Village than single-unit homes, although condo and zero lot line units did display a more pronounced dip during the great recession. Dependent upon the year, condo and zero lot line (attached unit) listings have also displayed higher median sales prices. While condo sales dropped more dramatically, they displayed relatively more consistent year to year sales prices than homes in the single unit market.
5-Year Average Condo Sales:
59.4 / year
Similar to single-unit homes in the sales market, though more pronounced, condo sales are impacted heavily by the vacation and second home market in data reported by the Multiple Listing Service. As of September 6, 2019 the average asking price of condo units was $236,709 with a median asking price of $190,900,with an average days on market of 168.
5-Year Median Sales Price:
$158,200
House Availability 2020 Housing Study
55
Mortgage Status
15%
27% 20 %
Age of Householders is one of the
aspects that impacts mortgage status. While the average householder nationally remains in their home for 7 years, many members of the community purchase homes to age into them, providing 25 consistent shelter for long periods of time. As shown earlier, the Village of Lake Delton has an unusually high number of owner households without a mortgage on their property. This is partially due to 71% of all owner-occupied homes being owned by residents over the age of 55. Many of these households will 15 choose to age-in-place, while some will require other housing options in the community as they continue to age. The Village should take into consideration plans to best serve these community members over the next 20-30 years as more residents continue to age into this range.
49%
Mortgage Status
15% 27% 20
14%
25
30 25
Chart Title
44%
30
25
15
44%
35 or Under
35 to 54
35 or Under
34%
14%
Ownership market - Age
34%
37%
20
35 to 54
55 to 74 55 to 74
75 or Over
75 or Over
34%
37%
Chart Title
100%
90% 34%
80% 49%
25
34%
34%
37%
37%
20
70%
60%
66%
50%
25
51%
15
66%
30%
63%
25
30
40%
66%
66%
63%
51%
66%
63%
20
66%
63%
25
30
20
20%
15 10%
Lake Delton
56
0%
Baraboo
Lake Delton
Baraboo
Reedsburg
Reedsburg
With a Mortgage With a Mortgage
Wisconsin Dells
Wisconsin Dells
Without a Mortgage Without a Mortgage
Portage
Portage
Sauk County
Sauk County
Village of Lake Delton
Ownership Unit Types Residential Owner Occupied Properties
H ß 23 Trout Rd
Clara Ave
Lake Shore Dr
co is r
Sauk County, WI
Birchwood Rd
lto
n
Berr y
aD
W
ath
d
s in Rive r
n
E Hi a w
R
Lake Delton Housing Study
12 / 2
La
ke
P ß M unroe Ave
23
De
Hillsi de
Dr
n Rd
Residential Property
yo Can
Bunker Rd
94
a
Single Family Residential
A ß
Condo Duplex
12 / 2
Multi-Family Residential
sc Wi
S Burritt Ave
+ * ,
Bl
ke
Park Dr
ss
Wisconsin Dells Pkwy
La
si n on
Mobile Home
l ls De
Xanadu Rd Dr
w Pk
Mixed Use
Hillman Rd
yS
Alcan
Lake Delton
onsin Dells Pk wy S
Wisc
k
D ell Cr e e
+ * ,
23
Other Municipality
90
T ß
Ishnala
Rd
Gasser Rd
ke
Dr
+ * ,
Bunker Dr
94
Busse Ln
Mi rro
r
La
Kal a hari
Data Sources: Municipal Boundary: Sauk County (2019) Roads: Sauk County (2019) Residential Type: Inferred from tax assessment codes, residential address points, zoning classification and aerial review.
12 / 2 Fern Dell Rd Hastings Rd
Fern Dell Rd
Moon Rd
BD ß
Ownership Unit Type Distribution
across the Village shows that the majority of owner households live in single unit detached homes, followed by mobile homes. Together, these two unit types make up 90% of all ownership unit types. These factors also contribute to the relatively small number of homes without a mortgage. Financing for mobile home units are not subject to the same requirements as more permanent housing types, and do not qualify as a traditional “mortgage” financing. However, the way data is reported by the Census considers any mobile home with an installment loan balance remaining to be “with a mortgage”, even if the land the unit is on is leased. 2020 Housing Study
0
0.2
0.4 Miles
Ownership Units - Type Unit Type
Number of Units
% of Total Owner Occupied
Owner as % of Unit Type
1-unit detached 356
51.3%
60.5%
2-4 unit
0
0%
5-19 unit
36
5.2%
11.7%
20-49 unit
34
4.9%
23.9%
Mobile home
263
38.2%
88.6%
0%
57
Ownership Housing Size
Chart Title 0.8%
7.0%
The Most Common bedroom size for owner-
Chart Title
Employees - # of Children
occupied housing in the Village is in 3-bedroom units, followed by 2-bedroom units and 4+ 130bedroom units. Ownership housing often has a larger size (more bedrooms) than rental units, and is a component of the preference for families in commonly seeking out ownership housing units rather than rental. 42% of emplyees in the Community Survey indicated130they have at least 1 child in the home, and attracting employees to meet Village growth should consider a mix of unit sizes for both households with and without children to increase affordable options at all levels.
19.4%
0.8%
7.0%
110
19.4%
110
58.1%
14.7%
Mobile homes likely make up the majority of ownership housing units that are listed as efficiency, 1-bedroom, and 2-bedroom units. While larger units are an important part of new construction unit mix, smaller non-mobile home ownership 30opportunities that are 1- to 2-bedroom units are an important entry point into the housing market for many families, 30 especially those without children and households that are currently at lower incomes.
58.1%
14.7%
30
25 30
25
No Children
1 Child
No Children
1 Child
2 Children 2 Children
3 Children 3 Children
4 Children 4 Children
Number of Ownership Units
Rental Units by Bedroom Size 350
300
20 250
200
25 150
30
100
25
20
15 50
58
0
EďŹ&#x192;ciency
1-Bedroom
2-Bedroom
3-Bedroom
Village of Lake Delton 4-Bedroom
Other Populations Demand & Supply
2020 Housing Study
59
Chart Title 120
Homeless Students 98
100
84
84
82
96
78
80 71
68
59
60 48
48
40
28 20
0
Series1
3 per. Mov. Avg. (Series1)
Youth Homelessness is tracked at a Nighttime Residence - 2019
family level by school districts in Wisconsin. Different than traditional measures of homelessness which look at individuals both unsheltered and in transitional or emergency shelter, youth homelessness is a measure of housing instability. The definition of homelessness as tracked by educational institutions includes students who lack a fixed, permanent nighttime residence. While these students are often not in the shelter system, they have an unknown place of residence on a nightly basis - often staying in hotels on a temporary or permanent basis, or â&#x20AC;&#x153;doubling upâ&#x20AC;? with other families temporarily.
2019
100 90
88
80 70 60 50
2019
40 30 20 9
10 0
Doubled Up
Hotel/motel
The Wisconsin Dells School District collects this information annually and reports to the State Department of Public Instruction. Homeless students in the District was at a 12-year low in 2014, but quickly rose to peak in 2017. This is a good indicator of tight housing markets - as housing instability, especially inability to find/ afford rental units often forces individuals to find shorter-term options for their families. This is often temporary until more secure housing is located.
Homelessness 60
Village of Lake Delton
16 16
Homelessness 14
13
14 13 12 12
Homeless Unit Programs - After Hours
10 10
8
6
Often, homeless individuals and families without shelter are identified by local law enforcement officials.
Traditional Measures and counts of the
homeless population are accomplished through the annual Point in Time count, administered in Wisconsin on one night in both January and 8 July. This count sends out volunteers from local Continuum of Care (CoC) organizations to count all homeless individuals in known locations, both sheltered and unsheltered. The most recently available data from the January 2018 PIT indicates that 6 in the Central CoC, 25 total individuals were identified as experiencing homelessness. This includes 13 persons in 4 families, 8 individuals, and 4 youth aged 18-24.
8 In Lake Delton, persons experiencing homelessness identified by enforcement are issued a motel8 voucher or a bus ticket, dependent upon the situation. Their information is then passed on to the Central Wisconsin Community Action Council 6 (CWCAC) so they may be placed into coordinated entry systems and possible 6 resources can be identified.
The Wisconsin Dells Police Department also allows homeless individuals to sleep on a bench in their lobby.
4
4 4
4
8
3 3
2
Point-In-Time Count 16
2
1
15 14
14
1
0 12
13
Households
0
People Families
Households
10
Families
8
People
People
Individuals
People Chronically Homeless
8
Individuals 2018
8
Chronically Homeless 6
6
4
6
4
2018 4
2017
4
3
2 1
0
Households
2020 Housing Study
People
People
Families
Sheltered Individuals
Chronically Homeless
People
Sheltered 18-24 Youth
2018
2017
61
2017
Sh
Aging Populations The Community Basics section of this plan detailed expected population increases for senior populations in the Village. In addition, growth in population aged 35 and older often sees an accompanying increase in senior populations as persons aged 35-54 often have parents who will locate closer to their children for care as they age into more intensive services and care.
Senior Households are anticipated to
have the largest percentage growth through 2040. Many are current homeowners, and some will require different accommodations, specialized housing, or programming to assist aging-in-place. Senior housing generally refers to the combination of services and housing that allow seniors to continue to live comfortably. This ranges from continuing to live in their own home with virtually no services, townhomes and apartments that offer the ability to â&#x20AC;&#x153;downsizeâ&#x20AC;? living quarters, specialized housing units with limited services, and different types of assisted living facilities.
As varying levels of services are included with different types of housing for aging populations, typical affordability standards do not apply. Often senior households will pay up to 50% of their income for market rate senior housing, up to 90% of their income for specialized and assisted living, often funded in part through the sale of a home they owned. Many households age 62+ in the Village are still homeowners, who have not yet sold homes to fund other housing or services. Over the next 15 years, 370 residents will age into the 80+ age category, and may look to sell their housing for other living options.
Generally, independent-living senior facilities attract residents age 65 and older, while more specialized facilities (assisted living, etc.) attract residents who are age 80 and over and need assistance with daily living activities.
180
62+200Household Income and Tenure 180
180
160
140
70
120
70 55
100
80
70
60
15
70
25
25
40 25 20
< 30% AMI
0
62
55
55
15
25
15
< 30% AMI
0 31% - 50% AMI
31% - 50% AMI
51% - 80% AMI 51% - 80% AMI
Owner Owner
Renter Renter
0 81% - 100% AMI
81% - 100% AMI
> 100% AMI
Village of Lake Delton
> 100% A
Chart Title
119
180
119
55+ Detailed Categories
164 160
140
119
120
1
119
100
52 80
60
61 52
29 23
40
23
40
17
29 23
23
17
20
55 to 59
0
55 to 59
60 to 64
65 to 74
60 to 64
65 to 74
75 to 84
75 to 84
85 and Over
85 and Over
Owner Owner Renter Renter
Many Aging Households will be able
to use funds from home sales for other housing options. While home value increases make it more difficult for lower-income households to enter the housing market, it also means that senior homeowners have access to extra cash through the rapid appreciation of homes, and will have more funds available to ensure care as they continue to age. Assuming that a senior household owns their home free and clear, and their home sells for the 2019 median estimated value of $218,610, they would be able to generate an additional $4,110 in annual income from a 2% interest producing account ($342.50 per month) to supplement housing costs. Lake Delton’s current mill rate signifies an additional $4,110 annually they would have already been paying for housing cost, which brings their monthly total housing allowance to $685 without increasing share of income spent on housing.
Importantly, many of the households who might otherwise have sold their home during the past decade may have delayed plans for other housing options due to decreased housing values associated with the recession. With increases in home values, many of these households may be more interested in sale of their home over the coming years. Using growth projections for Village residents (not including the larger market area) and rates of those needing care, there would be an expected demand by 2040 for at least: » » » » »
45 units in Active Living senior housing 26 units in subsidized senior housing 35 units in “congregate housing” 35 units in Assisted Living facilities 41 units in Memory Care
These figures are based on percentage of population, by age, requiring assistance with specific daily activities. They do not include the number of units that currently exist in the Village, and do not include need from outside the market area.
Aging Populations 2020 Housing Study
63
25%
Disability - Age 21% 20%
15%
10%
5% 4%
3% 2%
0%
0% 17 and Under
18 to 34
Persons with a disability do not
inherently require access to specific housing types or accommodations, dependent upon the type and severity of the disability. More commonly, persons with a disability receive services and accommodations related to the disability as they continue to age and require more specialized forms of housing. This is due to the percentage of population, by age, that experience a disability being disproportionately higher in aging and senior households. When housing units are constructed, they are not traditionally built using methods that easily accommodate aging populations and often require renovation such as wider doorways, lower countertops, and zero entry showers/baths. However, many municipalities have requirements that mandate a percent of new construction be built using universal design standards. These standards often not only provide access to persons with and without disability, but are cheaper to construct on a per unit basis.
35 to 64
65 to 74
75 and Over
Age Projections Age Cohort
2018
Projected Percent Projected Increase 2040
0 - 9 Years
412
3.4%
426
10 - 19 Years
134
10.5%
148
20 - 34 Years
853
5.0%
896
35 - 49 Years
474
8.6%
515
50 - 64 Years
576
6.8%
615
65 - 79 Years
370
23.5%
457
80 and Over
161
119.5%
353
Disability 64
Village of Lake Delton
Accessibility
New Market Rate and Workforce
units in the Village, both ownership and rental, will likely see an increased demand for universal design features. Current Village trends show that households that contain a member with a disability are in all income ranges, but especially in income ranges that would find market rate housing affordable. While lower-income households often have disabilities go unreported or undiagnosed, there are residents at all ages in households of all incomes that require access to appropriate housing design to meet their needs. There is no reliable data on local levels for units currently accessible, estimates nationally place accessible single family homes at just 1% of the total housing stock.
Even at advanced ages, many residents choose to continue to remain in their own housing. However for those that move, over 50% choose to actively seek out residential units with accessibility features such as no-step entries, level style door handles, accessible shelving and electrical, and single floor living. As the population of the Village continues to age, and parents of residents move to be closer to their primary caretaker, ensuring continued supply of units with accessibility features should be a priority.
Disability - Income 120
110
100
100
Households
80
65 60
45
45
45
40
30
30
20
20
0
40
40
15
15
15
0
0 < 30% AMI
2020 Housing Study
31% - 50% AMI Hearing or Vision
Ambulatory
51% - 80% AMI CogniĆ&#x;ve
Self-Care or Independent Living
> 80% AMI
65
Page intentionally left blank.
66
Village of Lake Delton
Local Impacts on Housing
2020 Housing Study
67
Assessment H ß
Residential Properties: Assessed Property Values
1 /2 2 23
W
P ß M unroe Ave
y on Can
Rd
Lake Delton Other Municipality
23
Current Assessed Value
A ß
Less than $100,000 $100,001 - $250,000
1 /2 2 Dr
is c
n
$250,001 - $500,000
W
Alca
S B u rrit
s on
$500,001 - $750,000
in lls De
t Ave
Xan adu Rd
De
Rd
a
ke
Bu nker
Wiscons in Dells Pkwy
ss
Birchwood Rd
lto
n
r eD
Bl
Sauk County, WI
ls id Hil
e
La
Park Dr
k La
Lake Delton Housing Study
s in Rive r
is
co
n
h Hiawat a
94 + * , Clara Ave
Berry Rd
Dr
E
Lak e Shore
Dr
Trout Rd
$750,001 - $1,000,000
Pk
Hillman Rd
S wy
$1,000,001 or Greater No Assessed Value
k
D ell Cr e e
90 + * ,
T ß
Gasser Rd
Ish na
la Rd
23
ke
94 + * ,
Busse Ln
Mi rro
r
La
ari K alah Dr
Bunker Dr
Data Sources: Municipal Boundary: Sauk County (2019) Roads: Sauk County (2019) Residential Type: Inferred from tax assessment codes, residential address points, zoning classification and aerial review.
Hastings Rd
1 /2 2 Fern Dell Rd
Fern Dell Rd
Moon Rd
BD ß
The Assessed Value of land in the Village
helps to portray local impact and accessibility of the housing market. Different zoning districts have unique building requirements and locations, and as such the residential units in them have different associated values. R-3 (Mobile Home) districts show large land value because the land is leased to homeowners, and are considered one parcel for tax purposes. The Village, in promoting development, should continue to consider refinement to the Future Land Use Map of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as flexibility within the zoning code that eases constuction and accessibility. 68
0
0.2
0.4 Miles
Residential Assessment by District Zoning District
Avg. Assessed Value
Estimated Avg. Fair Market
# of Available Lots
R-1
$235,132
$251,416
15
R-2
$167,812
$176,851
103
R-3*
$757,540
$810,000
-
C-1
$254,361
$267,892
-
PUD
$165,139
$175,742
210
Village of Lake Delton
Since construction and development is based heavily on financial incentive, parcels with low Improvement:Land value ratios are more prone to redevelopment, and will often see increased pressure for teardown/rebuilds even in the singlefamily market.
Parcel Assessment is made up of two
values - land value and improvement value. While both land and improvements (buildings) generally appreciate over time, development and use trends can drastically shift associated land values over the course of decades. In practice, this means that very desirable areas have large increases in land value, while other areas grow at rates more consistent with overall inflation.
In the Village, newer construction generally shows higher Improvement:Land Value ratios. This is partially due to lower land costs (location) as well as increased construction cost and buyer preference (size/bedrooms/etc.). Areas of the Village that are most likely to see teardown/ rebuilds are along the Lake, where older, smaller homes have not gained nearly as much value over time as the land they are built on.
This shifting land value impacts the housing market due to the overall useable life of residential buildings. Single-unit homes have a useable life of 100 years or more, while small- to mid-size multiunits buildings can have a usable life between 50 and 75 years if properly maintained.
Residential Properties: Land Improvement Ratio
De lls
Pk
wy
H ß
W isc on s in
Trout Rd
W
ss
Birchwood Rd
lto
n
r eD
a
ke
De
y on Can
Rd
Lake Delton Other Municipality
Land Improvement Ratio
Bu nker
Rd
Bl
Sauk County, WI
ls id Hil
e ak
La
Park Dr
L
Lake Delton Housing Study
s in Rive r
is
co
n
h Hiawat a
94 + * , Clara Ave
Berry Rd
Dr
E
Lak e Shore
Dr
1 /2 2
P ß M unroe Ave
23
2.0 - 4.0
1 /2 2
n
4.0 - 6.0
is
Dr
6.0 - 10.0
ns co in
t Ave
Xan adu Rd
2.0 or Less
W
S B u rrit
Alca
A ß
ll De
10.0 - 15.0
s
Hillman Rd
Pk S wy
15.0 or Greater No Assessed Improvements
k
D ell Cr e e
90 + * ,
T ß
Gasser Rd Ish na la Rd
23
ke
94 + * ,
Busse Ln
Mi rro
r
La
ari K alah Dr
Bunker Dr
Data Sources: Municipal Boundary: Sauk County (2019) Roads: Sauk County (2019) Residential Type: Inferred from tax assessment codes, residential address points, zoning classification and aerial review.
Hastings Rd
1 /2 2 Fern Dell Rd
Fern Dell Rd
Moon Rd
BD ß
0
0.2
0.4 Miles
Improvement Value Ratio 2020 Housing Study
69
Available Lots Available Residential Lots
H ß
B er ry
n
94
co
+ , *
D
r
s in R iv e r
is
d
Lake Delton Housing Study
E Hiaw atha Dr
23
12 / 2
W
Lake Sho r e
n
Sauk County, WI l
to
De
as
s
Birchwood Rd
ke
e Dr lsid Hil
La
Canyon
Rd
Lake Delton
Bunker Rd
La
ke
Bl
Park Dr
R
Clara Ave
Wisconsin Dells P kw y
Trout Rd
ßA
ßP Munroe Ave
R-1: Single Family Residential (15)
sin s Del P kw
s isconsin Dell Pkwy S
W
+ , * 90
ßT
r or
Ishnala R d
Gasser Rd
Kalahari Dr
ke
+ , *
Bunker Dr
94
Busse Ln
Mir
La
Data Sources: Municipal Boundary: Sauk County (2019) Roads: Sauk County (2019) Zoning: Lake Delton (2019) Available Residential Lots: Residential Status based on assessment codes
12 / 2 Fern Dell Rd
Hastings Rd
Fern Dell Rd
Moon Rd
BD ß
Aside from Redevelopment, there are
parcels in the Village that remain vacant and awaiting construction/development of some type. The map above shows residential parcels which have an assessed improvement value of $0 and are zoned for residential development. Available parcels are located in several zoning districts, though the number available in each varies. For instance, only 15 lots are currently available for development in the R-1 (SingleFamily) district, while 103 lots are available in the R-2 (Single-Family and Multi-Family) district of the Village.
70
R-2: Multi Family Residential (103)
Hillman Rd
yS
De l l C reek
PUD: Planned Unit Development (210)
n sc o Wi
urritt Ave SB
Xanadu Rd
PDD: Planned Development District (6)
12 / 2
n Dr Alc a
23
Other Municipality Available Residential Lots
23
0
0.2
0.4 Miles
There are no R-1 lots available in the northern half of the Village. These building sites are located in two distinct clusters, one centrally located off Wisconsin Dells Parkway near Alcan Drive, and the other near Meadowview Drive. Available lots in the R-2 district are more dispersed throughout the Village, with a large cluster near Interstate 90/94 near Lake Blass. PDD and PUD sites that have not yet been constructed have been approved by the Plan Commission as part of larger development projects (Springbrook and Hickory Hill).
Village of Lake Delton
Using approximated employee demand through the survey of 1,134 (32% interested in moving closer to work and a 30% capture rate), it would be expected that 340 units would be needed to serve demand. Eighty-three percent of respondents would prefer single-family housing, which leaves parcel demand at:
Available Lot Land Value is largely
dependent upon the underlying zoning district - which is reflective of both the size and the development potential of the parcel. Parcels that have land values under $100,000 are largely zoned for lower-density residential use. This includes some parcels in PUD districts, as well as most R-1 and R-2 districts throughout the Village.
» » »
Higher-intensity potential uses (generally PUD and C-1) produce higher land values associated with each individual parcel. This is due to several aspects of development, but primarily the land has more assessed value due to the potential use of the property, while at the same time causing development to necessarily have increased residential density in order to generate the revenue needed to support the higher land cost.
282 lower-cost parcels for single-unit housing 20 parcels for 2-3 unit housing 20 parcels/units of attached unit buildings
This represents a current gap of 164 available parcels zoned R-1 and R-2 for single-family homes, 20 parcels zoned for 2-4 unit homes, and 20 parcels zoned for attached townhouse/rowhouse units.
Assessed Value of Available Residential Lots
Pkw
y
H ß
Clara Ave
12 2 /
+ * ,
W
is
co
n
s in Rive r
La k e Sho re Dr
Sauk County, WI lto
n
Birchwood Rd
Lake Delton Housing Study
Dr
23
94
d
E Hiaw atha
ke
De
Hillsi de
Dr
ss
rk Dr Pa
La
ke
a
Cany
Lake Delton
d on R
Other Municipality
Bunker Rd
La
Bl
P ß
Less than $100,000 $100,001 - $250,000
e ll yS kw sP
$250,001 - $500,000
r Alca nD
ve S Burri t t A
12 / 2
$500,001 - $750,000 Hillman Rd
Dell Creek
Xanadu Rd
s nsin Dell Pkw y S
Wisco
+ * ,
23
Assessed Value
A ß
Wiscons in D
Munroe Ave
90
T ß
Ishnala
Rd
Gasser Rd
ke
+ * ,
Bunker Dr
94
Busse Ln
r
La
Kalahari Dr
Mi rro
Data Sources: Municipal Boundary: Sauk County (2019) Roads: Sauk County (2019) Zoning: Lake Delton (2019) Available Residential Lots: Residential Status based on assessment codes
12 2 / Fern Dell Rd
Fern Dell Rd
Hastings Rd
Be r ry R
Wi sconsi
n De ll s
Trout Rd
Moon Rd
BD ß
0
0.2
0.4 Miles
Value of Available Lots 2020 Housing Study
71
It is the general intent of the residential districts to provide a quiet, pleasant and safe living area protected from traffic hazards and the intrusion of incompatible uses. - Village of Lake Delton Zoning Code
Lake Delton’s Zoning Ordinance is
written to have 3 strictly residential districts in the Village (R-1, R-2, R-3), as well as districts that allow residential as a conditional use (C-1, C-2, WC). In addition, residential units are allowed by rezoning under guidelines of the Planned Unit Development District, which allows oversight and approvals on a case-by-case basis as development is proposed.
R-1 R-2
Zoning District
R-3 C-1 C-2 WC
The residential districts themselves allow Planned Unit Developments as a conditional use, provided site layout and guidelines otherwise consistent with the districts. Overall, there are 3 districts (R-1, R-2, WC) that allow for single-family development by right, while 2 districts (R-2, WC) allow two-unit development by right. Multi-unit developments are allowed a conditional use in all residential and commercial districts.
Minimum Minimum Lot Residential Lot Size Width
SingleFamily
TwoFamily
3-4 Unit
5+ Unit
6,000 sq. ft.
P P
P
C
C
6,000 sq. ft.
60’ Mobile Home C
C
C
C
43,560 sq. ft.
75’
C
C
43,560 sq. ft.
200’
C
C
10,000 sq. ft.
100’
C
C
60’
6,000 sq. ft. SF 60’ SF 10,000 sq. ft. Duplex 100’ Duplex
P
P
Accessory Dwelling
P = Permitted Use; C = Conditional Use
Zoning 72
Village of Lake Delton
June 7, 2018
Zoning
Grott o
St
Lake Delton Dam Hydraulic Shadow Overlay Detail
a
Poc
Fe rry
St
Dam R
sCir
a hont
d
D ako
Tr a
an di
AGRICULTURAL
lP kw y
r dC Gr a n
BUSINESS PARK DISTRICT
In
di
ri
an
Li
n
Tr ai
D
Scott
INDUSTRIALCONSERVANCY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT GOVT-INSTITUTIONAL
ri
Lin
D
r
Miller Dr
Sh
er
a Rd
Zap Dr
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL MOBILE HOME RESIDENTIAL
d ow
Hydraulic Shadow Overlay Districts
view Dr
Ishnal
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
Great Wolf Dr
State Road 23
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
Me a
Gasser Rd
INDUSTRIAL
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
MOBILE HOME RESIDENTIAL Lake Hydraulic Shadow District
Dells Manor Dam Hydraulic Shadow District Hydraulic Shadow Overlay Districts
d
90
Co
un
Lake Delton Dam Hydraulic Shadow District
ty
Lake Hydraulic Shadow District
R
Village Limits
d
oa T
Bunker Dr
Dells Manor Dam Hydraulic Shadow District
R
Timothy Ln
the zoning code helps to ease planning and construction by having clear, concise rules and regulations so that residents and developers understand expectations for the site. Good zoning creates guidelines for this development while Moon Rd maintaining flexibility balanced with community health and aesthetically pleasing design. Overall, the many districts in the Village offer a range of development opportunities for a wide variety of housing types. One unit type that is not listed as a permitted or conditional use in the
0
R
500
1,000
Village Limits
2,000
Feet
Date Saved 6/8/2018 10:57 AM Path M:\WI\City\LDELTON\Zoning_CorpLimits2018.aprx
T
rl rT
Residential Development by right within
Scale 1:24,000 Shadow District Lake Delton Dam Hydraulic
ty
d
Dr
un
oa
de un
e
en
Bunker Dr Moon Rd
Co Timothy Ln
gr
Th
er
Ev
Ye l low
D eer Run Rd
US Highway 12
Ct
Vie w Pine
Rd
Gillem Rd
es gr
ro
Trl
Delt on
GOVT-INSTITUTIONAL LIGHT COMMERCIAL
WATER FRONT COMMERCIAL
sin Dells Pkwy S Wiscon
Erhardt
r Bay Campground
Fern Dell Rd
Legend Lake Delton Zoning CONSERVANCY
Hillman Rd
e 90
2020 Housing Study
dA
Kalahari Dr
n rou
view Dr
Cliff
In
Rd Bunker
n gton Rd
Sarri
s eP as
Rdg
Tim b er
P
Busse Ln
90
Roa
Sh
Interstat
Blu ewate
BUSINESS PARK DISTRICT
COMMERCIAL
s
Faw n
ils End Tra
Dr
sive Dr
Interstate
Kalahari Dr
LIGHT COMMERCIAL
Te r
wood Campg
w Rd
St
Ringling Rd a
St
ta R ge Rd id
Wis co
N Judson St
i n Dr
ala
an D r
Deerp ath
lvd Whitetai l B
hDr White B i rc
Me a
Point-In-Time
Dr
FLOOD STORAGE WATER FRONT COMMERCIAL
anyo n Dr
N Gasser Rd
Pickerel Slough Rd
nty
O a k Rid g
A lc
rie
Cou
Dr
Old Buck Ct
S Burritt Ave
Hines
W Delavan St
Ma
Kossuth St
ide
E Adams St
Mathew St
Xanadu Rd
Hills
Rd
E Durkee St
N Delavan St
N Burritt Ave
dC Gr a n
s
Munroe Ave
Hillman Rd
COMMERCIAL
Ln
n yL
N Birney St
Dr
F i eld
t Fores
anyo n Dr
ne Dr
wl
er
n Dr
nd Sa stone Dr
e Dr
yon
Can
B
D ako
Sunset Blvd
Rd
Park Dr
l l P th Hil Fla
Sug
o
Ca
ad
Sh
AGRICULTURAL
FLOOD STORAGE
Ln
News om Ln
Interstate
Fe rry
kw y
ll s P De
nsin
e
Rd
ar
Nixon Rd
Clara Ave
Rd Bunker
North
r
r Dr
Pik
t
1st St
ge
Ed
Lake Delton Zoning
Grotto
Skyline Ln
State St
Main St
ok Ln
Do Berr gw y Ln oo
Oakbrook Dr
dL n
Meado w
bro
2nd St
tC
Red Oa k Dr
ers
Riv
Rd
Arbo
E Lake Ave
W Hiawatha Dr
Commerce St
d
dA
Bay
gle
Suga
Roa
sCir
th
Lake Delton Dam Hydraulic Shadow Overlay Detail
Legend
a hont
Dam R
nty
er Ln
u Tro
W Lake Ave Winnebago Ln Kingsbird Ave Dekorra Ln Redbird Ave
Scott Ln
Fern Dell Rd
n
Cou
wa
Dr
Gravy Ln
d ow
t ry L
Dr
Blass Lake Dr
Gl e n V
to
un
a
Winnebago St
Spring Broo kDr
iew
Pilgrim Dr Ridgewood St
Ea
aple Cir
rM
County Road P
Village of Lake Delton Zoning Map June 7, 2018
Co
a
Ci
Cir
mb ffsid ria
Dr
Poc
Birchwood Rd
Hills
i EH
Su n
woods
se t
Cli
Ln
Bonanza Dr 1st St
r Lake Shore D
Berry Rd
wl
o
yon
B
ide
Trout Rd
Rd
Sug
ar
d
l R ll P ath Hi Fl
Moon Rd
R
Zoning Code is Accessory Dwelling Units (e.g. granny flat, mother-in-law suite).
Scale 1:24,000
0
500
1,000
2,000
Municipalities are commonly beginning to write in these unit types into their Zoning Code, whether internal, external, or attached. These units are commonly used as options for senior households to age in place, allowing the household to “downsize” to a more accessible unit while generating rental income of the main unit in retirement. These units also provide options for caretakers and family members to live in close proximity. Gillem Rd
ta R ge Rd id
Rd
il P kw y
ge
Ed
Ringling Rd
ers
Riv
Feet
Date Saved 6/8/2018 10:57 Path M:\WI\City\LDELTON\Zoning_CorpLimits2018.a
73
Development Fees One of the Costs directly passed on to
consumers in both ownership and rental markets are fees associated with development. These fees are assessed by the Village in order to ensure quality of development, as well as to mitigate potential negative impacts associated with increased residential density. Lake Deltonâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s fee schedule was last updated in 2002, and should be periodoically reassessed to ensure fees charged meet the required intent without dissuading development due to prohibitive cost.
Fee
74
Example: The fee schedule in the table below is a sample of total and per-unit development fees for a hypothetical subdivision of thirty 2,550 sq. ft. singlefamily homes and eight 1,500 sq. ft. duplexes (16 units). This 46-unit development under current fee structure would add a cost of nearly $1,900 per dwelling unit, without accounting for the cost of sewer main extenion.
Type
Amount
Unit
QTY
Total
Land Disturbance
$50
footprint
38
$1,900
New Residential Permit
$0.15
sq. ft.
99,000
$14,850
Mechanical - HVAC
$40
dwelling unit
46
$1,840
Electrical
$65
dwelling unit
46
$2,990
Plumbing
$150
dwelling unit
46
$6,900
Sewer Connection
$500
dwelling unit
46
$23,000
Water Fixture Charge - Minimum
$313
dwelling unit
46
$14,398
Sewer Drainage - Minimum
$250
dwelling unit
46
$11,500
Footing and Foundation
$100
footprint
38
$3,800
Soil Erosion Plan
$50
footprint
38
$1,900
Stormwater Plan
$25
footprint
38
$950
Driveway Permit
$50
dwelling unit
46
$2,300
Zoning Commission Meeting
$350
meeting
1
$350
Planning Commission Meeting
$350
meeting
1
$350
Total per Development
$87,028
Total per Dwelling Unit
$1,891.91 Village of Lake Delton
Housing Challenges & Recommendations
2020 Housing Study
75
There is a market for more housing.
76
Village of Lake Delton
Steps to increase housing supply include: Growth projections for the Village of Lake Delton indicate that current household growth rates are lagging behind expectations - and lagging behind peer communities. More employees would like to live in the Village. More area residents would like to call Lake Delton home. These recommendations call for increasing units - creating more opportunities for rental housing and ownership housing that can serve all members of the community.
Extend Tax Increment Districts to Fund Housing Development
Adopt an Accessory Dwelling Unit (adu) Ordinance
Wisconsin Tax increment Finance (TIF) law currently allows municipalities to adopt a 1-year extension on an expiring Tax Increment District (TID) by municipal resolution. All of the revenue generated by the TID over the period of extension can be used for affordable housing - defined as “housing that costs a household no more than 30% of that household’s gross income”, and can be used anywhere in the Village. As detailed in this report, income - and affordability - are relative to individual households. This means that 75% of the revenue collected in the expiration year of the TID can be used for a wide variety of housing types and price-points, as long as households entering that housing (in aggregate) are not expected to experience cost burden.
Part of increasing density to foster more walkable and closely knit neighborhoods, Accessory Dwelling Units can commonly be found above garages, as small side-yard homes, and as 2nd stories or basements that are converted into their own unit with a separate entrance. While financing can be difficult, ADUs allow homeowners to create an additional dwelling unit on their own property for family members, caretakers, and friends who are in need of housing. They are also commonly used by aging households to “downsize” their own housing, while maintaining ownership of the property as either an income-generating rental, or housing for family members serving as caretakers later in age.
Revisit the Zoning Code, Add Unit Definitions, and Allow Multi-Family by Right The Village’s current zoning code allows for many housing types across districts - but most are classified as a conditional use. To make it easier to build housing, the Village could consider separating different unit-mixes of residential buildings in code, and provide standards that could be met administratively in some districts for permitted use. Many villages, cities, and states across the Country are looking to not only expand housing supply, but diversify types of housing in the market while doing so. Younger generations show a preference for dense, walkable neighborhoods - 17% of survey respondents indicated a preference to live in 2-19 unit buildings including multi-unit buildings and townhomes, even as ownership options. Including these types in ordinance encourages developers to build these products. 2020 Housing Study
Use Tax Increment Financing to Provide Financial Support to Developers that Need It Tax increment Financing is an important tool and more than ever one being used to provide direct financial assistance to developers of both rental and owner-occupied housing. Communities across the State need housing - but it doesn’t cost less to build the further you are from Madison or Milwaukee. Lake Delton is fortunate that it has a wide employment base, which displays demand for housing to development partners. And when development occurs in Lake Delton instead of other communities in the commuter shed, it provides not only tax revenue, but amenities to residents of the Village. TIF can be used to bridge financing gaps that make development infeasible, and support for building local housing units works to support long-term economic development. TIF funds should support housing consistent with goals identified in this study such as senior housing, housing affordable to the median employee income, etc.. 77
Many employees would live closer to work if there were opportunity. 78
Village of Lake Delton
Steps to build more employee housing include: If 25% of the employee households living outside of Lake Delton were to move into the Village, Lake Delton would already be at it’s projected number of 2040 households. While 80% of employee households would prefer to own housing, there is a current market of high-income renter households, indicating support and demand for both tenure types. Of primary concern are the obstacles noted in the community survey - the negative perception and experiences with housing affordability, availability, and type options - which were the only categories having more negative response rates than positive.
Develop a Downpayment Assistance Program (DPAP) for Employees who Buy in Lake Delton Community Survey results indicate that even for those who have incomes to afford homeownership, downpayment is still an issue. Of renter households, 54% indicated this as the primary barrier to attaining homeownership, followed by “too much existing debt” (which can help to be offset through additional downpayment) and “lack of type of unit I want”. Local employers could work together to develop a DPAP to assist employees with home purchase including appreciation forgiveness if residency in the Village is maintained. Often downpayment assistance programs function by “buying down the loan” and placing a secondary lien on the property. This lien repays the holder of the loan upon transfer of title, along with a share of appreciation which recapitalizes the fund. This program can also be coupled with programs such as the Downpayment Plus program through the Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago, which provides matching funds on downpayment assistance, maximizing employer-fund leveraging.
Start a Land-Banking Fund that supports Desired Development Types One of the main tools to guide the private market aside from zoning and land use regulations is municipal control of property. The Village should identify areas where multi-unit properties are desired, and proactively purchase parcels that can be assembled or sold to developers who will build the housing type the Village prefers.
2020 Housing Study
Survey Employees Annually to Track Changing Preferences and Needs Part of meeting the housing requirements of employees is understanding their changing needs and preferences. Employees should be asked directly - on an annual basis - where and how they live, what they want in housing, and key demographic information that can help instruct land-banking, TIF, and other programs that provide targeted support to needed development types. This can be accomplished through a “quickpoll” (5-10 question) survey distributed by major area employers in a coordinated distribution. These questions should be consistent, and trends maintained every year to track changes that would benefit community leadership and development partners in proactively meeting the needs of employees.
Support Market-Rate Rental Housing Aside from TIF gap-financing for market rate residential development, public officials can and should support most new housing types in almost all areas. Recognizing a need for housing is key to conversations that can attract developers and retain employees.
Actively Seek “Cottage Court” Style Development as a PUD Cottage Court style development is an affordable ownership option and desirable model of rental. The Board should explore areas of the Village where implementation could be possible, assemble land if necessary, and promote to developers. 79
Residents need increased options.
80
Village of Lake Delton
Steps to increase affordability include: For residents who already live in the Village, there are several key issues. Residents who previously would have been able to afford homeownership are now finding themselves being outpriced in an appreciating and competitive market. Rental housing costs are affordable to most - but some resident households are spending more than 50% of their gross income on housing costs. And there are hardly any vacancies in the housing market - meaning that households are likely staying in their units longer, even if they would prefer to live somewhere else.
Provide Support to Mobile Home Parks that Serve the Community Mobile home parks provide housing stability for at a lower price point than other ownership options for residents, and house a significant portion of the population (38% of all owner households). These parks are a key part of the community, and a key community affordable housing asset.
Partner with Developers and Utilize Village Funding to Leverage State and Federal tax Credits Tax Credits provide equity funding to developers through an application process with the Wisconsin Housing and Economic Development Authority (WHEDA). There are multiple forms of Tax Credits and Tax Credit Developments. Often, even with the influx of equity the sale of credits provides, developers still have financing gaps that make projects infeasible. Through TIF, affordable housing TIF extension, or municipal contribution, create fund availability for municipal support of Tax Credit developments. Project partners should be identified early on in the process, as financial leveraging and feasibility are important aspects of credit awards.
Work With Partner Municipalities to Provide ‘Housing First’ Units in Assisted Developments While homelessness is not prevalent in Lake Delton, there are households facing housing instability that result in individuals and families experiencing homelessness. If the Village is providing funding for Tax Credit development, proactively work with the developer and Central Wisconsin Community 2020 Housing Study
Action Council to set aside 1-2 units to be reserved for households experiencing or at-risk of homelessness.
Waive Fees on Housing Rehab for Low-Income Owners The Village has the ability to waive fees associated with permits for housing rehabilitation projects. If a households qualifies as low income (< 80% AMI), fees can be waived. These households should additionally be referred to the Sauk County CDBG Loan program, which provides 0% interest loans to low-income owners and landlords that provide housing to low income tenants.
Actively Promote Downpayment and Repair Assistance from SHR The Southern Housing Region (SHR) provides downpayment assistance programs to incomeeligible households. The Village should actively promote this assistance to lenders, realtors, and others involved in the housing market that can connect residents with this resource.
Recruit Developers who Will Build more Market-Rate Housing Building more market rate units will attract some households into newer units, which opens up older (and generally more affordable) units for other households. Considering vacancies for rental units are practically nonexistent in the Village, and owners seeking “starter homes” find a lack of market supply, all residential unit development will ease pressure on the market. New construction can provide spillover effects for residents of all incomes, both resident renters and households looking for ownership options. 81
Aging residents will need increased ageappropriate housing.
82
Village of Lake Delton
Steps to help residents age in place include: 300 housing units are owned by senior residents over the age of 55 - and many of them would like to continue to age in their own homes. At the same time, residents over 35 are projected to increase, and their parents may wish to move closer to children and grandchildren as they continue to age. There is a need for senior housing options nationally, and there is a need for senior housing options in Lake Delton. One development is already planned, but more options will be needed over the next 20 years.
Extend Tax Increment Districts to Fund Renovations for Seniors
Implement a Property Tax Assistance Program for Low Income Seniors
Wisconsin Tax increment Finance (TIF) law currently allows municipalities to adopt a 1-year extension on an expiring Tax Increment District (TID) by municipal resolution. 25% of the final year increment generated by the district must be used to improve the municipality’s housing stock. This 25% should be pooled into revolving loan fund that can be used to support resident homeowners over age 55 and under 80% AMI remodel their homes with necessary accessibility features that allow them to age in place. The structure of the fund should record the loan as a lien against the property payable upon transfer of the title, with little to no interest necessary to recapitalize the fund. This will allow senior residents to make necessary modifications to their homes, while continuing to age in place for as long as they would like.
One of the largest annual costs for aging populations is property taxes. As the Village is one of the entities charging the tax, they have the ability to defer the owner needing to pay the tax. The tax does, however, still need to be paid. The Village could set up a revolving loan fund to pay eligible resident’s property taxes, repaid through a lien on the property that re-capitalizes the revolving loan fund upon transfer of the title.
Continue to Support Age-Restricted and Specialized Care Development Types The Village Board is currently supporting an agerestricted housing development in the Village center that will serve a much-needed niche in the community. However, with anticipated growth in the current senior resident population of the Village, more units will need to be added over the next 20 years so that support structures are in place when they are needed. The Village should continue to monitor demand, and asess success of the current development in 3-5 years to determine additional need.
2020 Housing Study
Unlike traditional reverse-mortgages, these municipal programs for qualifying (low-income) seniors are usually designed to have minimal fees and low interest rates. Interest rates are typically set at the Village’s cost of borrowing (borrowing money for the fund) in addition to a set percent of that municipal borrowing cost. The collecting agency for the property’s tax bill would be paid through the Village reverse-mortgage fund, and reimbursed at a later date.
Encourage Universal Design Standards in New Development Units that meet universal design requirements are cheaper or equivalent cost to standard units. Investing in and supporting this practice now will increase options for households aging-incommunity or looking to relocate to Lake Delton, increasing access to housing and quality of life.
Previously Mentioned:
• Sauk County CDBG 0% Loan for Rehabilitation • ADU Ordinance
83
Foster a sense of place for residents.
84
Village of Lake Delton
Steps to foster a sense of place include: With the importance of the tourist economy, there are aspects of Lake Delton that can sometimes feel like “a place for tourists” instead of “a place for residents”. The Village should actively look for ways to increase sense of place - the feeling that there are distinct, residential neighborhoods inhabited primarily by year-round residents who know and love the Village, which is why they call it home. These neighborhoods can include resident serving commercial pockets and gathering spaces that make the Village an even more desirable place for families to live.
Consider the User When Reviewing Development Proposals
Community Conversations & the Comprehensive Plan
As a community whose economy is centered on tourism, many developments are targeted to further capture that economic base. When considering proposals and improvements, look for opportunities that have shared value for tourists and residents alike, increasing the amenities available to and promoted for local households. For residential developments, if targeted to residents, ensure they fit into the community in ways that actively work to promote pockets of resident engagement, activity, and community. The Village can work to ensure the same highquality experiences for residents that tourists have, while also promoting a unique residential place.
The Village of Lake Delton’s Comprehensive Plan was last updated in 2003. Since then, the Village has overcome major challenges and undergone large changes. As the policy document that guides decisions on future growth and connections in the community, this plan should be updated to reflect most recent conditions and evolving needs - not just in housing, but in economic development, community resources, and other key topics.
Encourage Village-Community Subdivisions There is a need for housing in the Village, but also a need for increased community connection. In planning for future subdivisions and other resdidential developments, promote aspects that connect the community and promote amenities complementary to housing for year-round residents. In practice, a Village-Community subdivision would foster neighborhood-based engagement, creating a unique sense of “home”. Amenities could include neighborhood-serving commercial pockets and ranges of different housing types by cost, structure, size, and tenure. This could include small multi-unit buildings, attached unit townhomes, single-unit detached family housing, accessory dwelling units, cottage courts, and options for ownership or rental of all types. 2020 Housing Study
Importantly, the Comprehensive Planning process works best when fostering and facilitating largescale community and resident conversations about shared experiences and a shared future. The Village should utilize this process to connect residents, and ensure that needs are being met on every level to attract and retain households to the community.
Provide Connections between Future Development and Amenities As part of any future housing development, the Village should consider how residents can access multi-use paths, trails, parks, and other community amenities. New housing should be connected to existing and future trail and path systems that allow nearby (or in-neighborhood) access to parks, open spaces, playgrounds, and centers of community activity.
85
How Many Units?
How many units?
86
Village of Lake Delton
Lake Delton has a demand for more residential housing. Based on estimated employee demand and current undersupply for residents, by 2040 the Village could look to add: Rental Housing Stock » 75-95 units priced $530 - $710 » 135-150 units priced $1,100 - $1,500 Ownership Housing Stock: » 115-135 units priced $135,000 - $165,000 » 250-300 units priced $225,000 and More
Employee demand assumes a 30% capture rate for 83% of employees who work, but do not live in the Village, adjusted for self-reported income of employees and accounting for units already in the market. Range estimates of the number of units under-supplied in the current market were then added to the employee total for a final estimate range. Unit costs are based on current (FY 2019) Housing Affordability charts in prior chapters. Subsequent year costs should be considered utilizing inflation or comparable income statistics. 2020 Housing Study
87
Data Sources
88
Village of Lake Delton
Page 4: HUD FY 2019 Income Limits
Page 34: US Census Bureau American Community Survey
Page 5: MIT Living Wage Calculator
Page 41: HUD FY 2019 Income Limits
Page 6: HUD FY 2019 Income Limits
Page 42: US Census Bureau American Community Survey
Page 7: Census Bureau - On the Map & Journey to Work
Page 43: HUD Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy
Applications
Page 8: HUD Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy Page 11: US Census Bureau American Community Survey Page 12: US Census Bureau American Community Survey Page 13: US Census Bureau American Community Survey Page 14: US Census Bureau American Community Survey; WI
Page 44: HUD Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy Page 45: HUD Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy Page 46: HUD Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy Page 47: HUD Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy Page 48: HUD Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy
Department of Administration
Page 49: HUD FY 2019 Income Limits
Page 15: US Census Bureau American Community Survey; WI
Page 50: US Census Bureau American Community Survey; Zillow
Department of Administration
Data & Research
Page 16: US Census Bureau American Community Survey; WI
Page 51: HUD FY 2019 Income Limits; Zillow Data & Research
Department of Administration
Page 52: US Census Bureau American Community Survey; Zillow
Page 17: US Census Bureau American Community Survey
Data & Research
Page 18: US Census Bureau American Community Survey
Page 53: HUD FY 2019 Income Limits; Zillow Data & Research;
Page 20: HUD FY 2019 Income Limits Page 21: HUD Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy Page 23: HUD Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy Page 24: HUD Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy
HUD Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy
Page 54: Multiple Listing Service Page 55: Multiple Listing Service Page 56: US Census Bureau American Community Survey; HUD Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy
Page 25: US Census Bureau American Community Survey
Page 57: US Census Bureau American Community Survey
Page 26: HUD Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy
Page 58: US Census Bureau American Community Survey
Page 27: HUD Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy
Page 60: WI Department of Public Instruction ESSA
Page 28: HUD Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy
Page 61: 2018 WI Central CoC PIT WISBOSCOC
Page 29: HUD Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy
Page 62: HUD Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy
Page 30: US Census Bureau American Community Survey
Page 63: US Census Bureau American Community Survey
Page 31: US Census Bureau American Community Survey
Page 64: US Census Bureau American Community Survey
Page 32: US Census Bureau American Community Survey
Page 65: HUD Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy
Page 33: US Census Bureau American Community Survey
Âť
2020 Housing Study
All ACS data sources vintage 2018, HUD 2016
89