2012 Rock County Carver Roehl Park Master Plan by MSA Professional Services

CARVER-ROEHL PARK PLAN ROCK COUNTY, WISCONSIN

ADOPTED JUNE 28, 2012 PREPARED BY: MSA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, INC.

This page intenĆ&#x;onally leĹ&#x152; blank

Carver-Roehl Park Plan

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Rock County, Wisconsin

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

CHAPTER 1

1.1 Background 1.2 Planning Process 1.3 Public Input Summary 1.4 Vision Statement

ROCK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE KurƟs L. Yankee - Chair BeƩy Jo Bussie - Vice Chair Eva Arnold - Member David Diestler - Member (former) Brent Fox - Member Dave Brown - Member

ROCK COUNTY PARKS ADVISORY MEMBERS

CHAPTER 2

Lori A. Williams - Parks Director Joleen SƟnson - Community Coordinator

Existing Conditions ........................................................ 10 2.1 Park Amenities 2.2 Natural Features 2.3 Demographics & Land Use

CHAPTER 3

Recommendations ............................................................ 22 3.1 Park Facilities 3.2 Trail System 3.3 Signage 3.4 Land Management 3.5 Other

Tom Presny - Member Floyd Finney - Member Mike Guisleman - Member

ROCK COUNTY - PARKS DIVISION STAFF

Introduction......................................................................... 6

CHAPTER 4

Action Plan ........................................................................ 32 4.1 Action Plan Summary

FRIENDS OF CARVER-ROEHL PARK Special thanks to the residents of Rock County and other individuals who devoted their Ɵme and energy to develop this plan for the future of Carver-Roehl Park.

PREPARED BY:

APPENDIX A

Survey Results

APPENDIX B

Trail Redesign Guidelines

APPENDIX C

SNA Memorandum of Understanding & Management Plan

CARVER-ROEHL PARK MASTER PLAN

ACTION PF.1 PF.2

SHORTTERM

MIDTERM

LONGTERM

2012-2014

2015-2019

2020+

ESTIMATED COST

Build a new vault toilet building near the other park facilities.

$20,000 - $30,000

Pave an area for 5-8 parking spaces adjacent to the restrooms, including two handicap spaces.

$5,000 - $10,000

PF.3

Build an ADA-compliant path in the looped driveway section, connecting the proposed bathroom facilities, existing pavilion, playground, and the proposed water hand pump.

$3,000 - $5,000

PF.4

Add a ADA-compliant water hand pump within the looped driveway adjacent to proposed trail crossing.

$3,000 - $5,000

PF.5

Remove the existing bathrooms (after completion of the new facilities) and replace the area with either a paved or gravel parking area.

$2,000 - $10,000

Add a gazebo in Picnic Area "D".

$3,000 - $8,000

PF.6 PF.7 PF.8 PF.9

Provide a bike rack near the existing pavilion.

$100 - $1,000

Provide picnic tables, grills, and garbage containers, as necessary, at all designated picinc areas.

$1,000 - $3,000

Repaint existing benches and add five more benches.

$1,000 - $3,000

TS.1

Update existing bridges and build a new bridge, or stepping stones, connecting proposed/existing trails on both sides of Spring Brook. Close trail sections that have erosion and accessibility issues, and establish new trail segments to complete the trail system. Create several interlocking trail loops that can be followed using a map and park signage.

TS.2

Establish a new trail west of Spring Brook from the park entrance to existing trails east of Spring Brook.

$5,000 - $15,000

TS.3

Establish a trail that is accessible to all users, especially disabled individuals confined to a wheelchair.

$25,000 - $65,000

TS.4

Add grass pavers from the driveway to the upper picnic area.

S/r.1

Add wayfinding signage on I-43 and WIS 140.

S/r.2

Add a park sign to the intersection of E. Creek Rd and S. Carver Rock Rd directing users to parking.

S/r.3

Consider upgrading the park entrance sign as the initial step to upgrading the entire County-wide park entryway signage system.

$2,500 - $5,000

S/t.1

Replace the trail signage system with reassurance and junction parkers illustrated in the Park Trail and Signage Management Plan Map (13).

$1,500 - $3,000

S/t.2

Provide a kiosk at the park entrance and near the existing pavilion, providing general information about the park.

S/t.3

After a kiosk is placed at the park entrance, move the SNA educational sign to the turnaround.

S/t.4

Add an educational sign at the historic grave site.

$500 - $1,500

S/t.5

Add an educational sign at the turnaround discussing the historic value of the limestone outcropping.

$500 - $1,500

LM.1

Land management activities (Spring Burn Season, Growing/Harvest Season, Fall Burn Season, Winter Work Season).

PF.10

O-1 O-2 O-3

Construct a tree/plant identification course.

O-4

Consider future property acquisitions.

$1,000 - $5,000 $25,000 - $85,000

$2,000 - $5,000 $50 - $150 per year County Staff Time & Materials

$500 - $1,000 County Staff Time

-- annually --

Varies $100 - $1,000

Add painted crosswalks where any trail crosses a road.

$100 - $500

Add gravel and/or pedestrian caution signs along S. Carver Rock Road.

$500 - $2,000

-- ongoing --

Unknown

Carver-Roehl Park Plan

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Rock County, Wisconsin Carver-Roehl Park is located fourteen miles southeast of the City of Janesville, in Rock County, WI. Purchased in the 1950s, this 52-acre site is Rock County’s second oldest park. A small tributary (Spring Brook) runs through the park and has helped shape the carved limestone outcroppings found throughout the park. In the southern part of the park are the graves of two of the county’s oldest settlers, members of the William C. Chase family. The graves date from 1843 and 1845. In November of 2010, 26 acres of the park were designated as a Wisconsin State Natural Area by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources and Rock County. The impetus for a master plan originated when the Rock County Parks Department was working on their Parks, Outdoor Recreation and Open Space Plan (POROS) in 2009. During this process it became apparent that there were issues with the facilities and trails within Carver-Roehl Park, and to mitigate them a more detailed master plan was needed. The purpose of a master plan is to provide a framework by which the County can manage future maintenance and improvement projects consistent with the vision developed through a collaborative process. In 2011, the County contracted with MSA Professional Services and Trail Design Specialists to assist with the development of a master plan for Carver-Roehl Park. This plan was developed concurrent with a similar project to develop a master plan for Magnolia Bluff County Park. The planning process included a web-based survey and a number of public informational meetings to discuss desired park improvements with area stakeholders. The planning process included: •

An analysis of existing conditions within the park (e.g. trails, facilities, etc.)

•

Gathering public input and analyzing park improvement needs

•

Creation of a vision for the use of the park

•

Developing preliminary and final recommendations for improvements to existing trails and facilities, including potential land acquisition

•

Establishing a time line and cost estimate for park improvement projects

The table on the previous page provides a summary of the recommendations described in Chapter 3. Major park improvement recommendations include building a new restroom facility, redesigning segments of existing trails to mitigate erosion issues, developing new trails (including an accessible trail) in unused portions of the park, improvements to park/trail signage, removal of invasive plant species, and increasing opportunities for environmental education. Implementation time frames illustrated in the table are categorized into short-, medium-, and long-term horizons based on such factors as: •

Ease of implementation and whether the project requires any design or construction services

•

Relative need or desire for the project

•

Opportunities for coordination with other park improvements

•

Probable cost

The desired vision for this park cannot be created overnight. However, by incrementally implementing the recommendations within this plan the park can become the outstanding scenic and recreation destination desired by the County and its residents.

CARVER-ROEHL PARK MASTER PLAN

Rock County Parks Division

Carver Roehl Park

Rock County, WI

Sweet-Allyn Park

Scale 1 Mile

51.804 Acres Entrance: 4907 S Carvers Rock Rd Clinton Township T.1N - R.13E Rock County, WI Map Revised 2009-11-24 Rock County Parks

CHAPTER ONE

IntroducƟon

CHAPTER ONE

7 - Background / 7 - Planning Process / 8 - Public Input Summary / 9 - Vision Statement The impetus for a master plan originated when the County was working on their Parks, Outdoor Recreation and Open Space Plan (POROS) in 2009. During this process it became apparent that there were issues with the facilities and trails within Carver-Roehl Park, and to mitigate them a master plan was needed. The purpose of a master plan is to provide a framework by which the County can manage future maintenance and improvement projects consistent with the vision developed through a collaborative process. This plan is not to supercede the POROS Plan, but supplements its objectives and recommendations.

1.1 BACKGROUND Carver-Roehl County Park is located fourteen miles southeast of the City of Janesville, five miles northeast of Clinton, and five miles south of State Highway 11/14. More specifically, it is located at the junction of Creek Road and Carvers Rock Road with access provided along Carvers Rock Road. Purchased in the 1950s, this 52-acre site is Rock County’s second oldest park and contains one of Rock County’s most outstanding geological feature--limestone outcroppings. A small tributary (Spring Brook) runs through the park and has helped shape the carved limestone outcroppings. In the southern part of the park are the graves of two of the county’s oldest settlers, members of the William C. Chase family. The graves date from 1843 and 1845. Friends of Carver-Roehl Park is a volunteer group who help patrol the park to keep it safe and help preserve and maintain the natural beauty of the park. Additionally, they raise funds to make updates to the park, such as the park’s pavilion, playground equipment, swing set, and trash cans. In November of 2010, 26 acres of the park were designated as a Wisconsin State Natural Area by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources and Rock County. As part of the designation a land management plan was developed to outline specific restoration work to be completed. Refer to Chapter 3 for specific management objectives.

A State Natural Area (SNA) protects outstanding examples of Wisconsin native landscape, significant geological formations and archaeological sites. Wisconsin’s has more than 600 SNAs, encompassing over 330,000 acres. SNAs are important for research and education, the preservation of genetic and biological diversity, and providing benchmarks for determining the impact of use on managed lands. They also provide some of the last refuges for rare plants and animals. More than 90% of the plants and 75% of the animals on Wisconsin’s list of endangered and threatened species are protected in State Natural Areas.

1.2 PLANNING PROCESS This plan was developed over approximately twelve months, beginning in April 2011. The process included several meetings with planners from MSA Professional Services and trail designer from Trail Design Specialists. Initially the consultants walked the park property with County staff to assess the condition of park trails and facilities. This included using global positioning systems to accurately inventory the location of all trails, park signs, and other park amenities. Data from this initial inventory and assessment are discussed and illustrated in Chapter 2. To gauge public opinion, a Public Information Meeting (PIM) and a County-wide web-based survey were administered in June 2011. From these public input activities MSA was able to get a clear understanding of park users’ use and satisfaction of existing facilities and desired park improvements for the future. Based on these public input sessions, and MSA’s analysis of the existing conditions of the site, preliminary recommendations were developed. County staff reviewed and suggested changes prior to MSA facilitating another PIM in November 2011. Draft copies of the plan were reviewed by Parks Staff, the Public Works Committee, and members of

CARVER-ROEHL PARK MASTER PLAN

CHAPTER ONE

•Inventory/Analyze Existing Issues •Gather Public Feedback on Existing Park Issues and Desired Improvements

Preliminary Park Recommendations •Develop Preliminary Recommendations (e.g. trails, signage, facilities, etc.) •Gather Public Feedback

1.3 PUBLIC INPUT SUMMARY As indicated in Section 1.2, there were several instances were the public was able to provide comments and insight that has improved this plan.

Community Survey There were 40 responses from the County-wide web-based survey, which included separate questions for Carver-Roehl and Magnolia Bluff parks. Only two of the respondents indicated they were generally dissatisfied with the park. The park features that rated fair to poor were trail signage, grills, parking, and restrooms. The priorities for improvements were

ROCK COUNTY, WISCONSIN - PARKS DIVISION

•Public Hearing •County Adoption

Master Plan Development

Existing Conditions Analysis

the public prior to presentation and adoption by the County Board. In addition, the planning process ran concurrently with the development of a separate park master plan for Magnolia Bluff County Park.

•Develop Park Master Plan Document

natural resource restoration, restrooms, drinking fountains, parking, picnic areas, and bike racks. See Appendix A for the complete results of the survey.

Public Informational Meetings On June 20, 2011, MSA facilitated a public informational meeting (PIM) to review the project goals, expectations and time line, and present an overview of the conditions of the existing facilities and trails. During this meeting, MSA solicited feedback from attendees regarding their vision for the park, including its long-term use, potential activities, and desired facilities. Below are some of the responses received at this meeting and from subsequent discussions with the Friends of Carver-Roehl Park. •

Interest in locating and possibly using old trails at the park – possible historic interpretive aspect.

INTRODUCTION • •

Parking is an issue. Consider using concrete grassy pavers in some of the existing developed areas as a low cost/low impact solution. General sentiments run against allowing off road bicycling on trails. Concerns ran towards safety and perceived conflicts. Note: there were no cyclists present at PIM.

•

Some of the steep trail grades and abrupt edges were a concern.

•

Views and natural scenic beauty along trails is a priority.

•

Interest in using land west of Spring Brook (northern corner of park) for more trails. Apparently there used to be stone steps through the brook to this part of the park.

•

Interest in opening the gate along S. Carvers Rock Road, just north of where Spring Brook crosses the road. There is a stump in the middle of this “parking area” that needs to be removed.

•

Increased interest in using the park for weddings (through 2011 there were 12 reservations, 2 were for a wedding). Install a gazebo for these events.

•

Add a drinking fountain near or by the power box.

•

Use an information board to cover power box.

•

Construct a bridge over the small ravine at the southern tip of the park island (driving circle).

1.4 VISION STATEMENT Based on the input gathered throughout the planning process the project team presents the following vision statement for the park: Carver-Roehl County Park is a scenic haven with its southern drymesic forest and magnificent limestone cliffs. Invasive species management is a continual priority and management prescriptions are implemented in partnership between Rock County Parks Staff, the WDNR, and local volunteers. Spring Brook, and the parks variety of wildlife and vegetation, provide excellent opportunities for environmental education. The parks historical grave site is protected and interpretive signs tell visitors the history of this site and the park. Development of additional park infrastructure should have minimal impact to the natural environment and primarily be limited to trail development, improved signage, environmental education, restroom and parking improvements. Primary recreation uses will continue to be hiking, cross-country skiing/ snowshoeing, wildlife viewing, and picnicking.

On November 28, 2011, a second PIM was held to review preliminary recommendations regarding trail and facility improvements. The attendees ranked the priority of each recommendation and provided their overall level of satisfaction and comments for further improvements. Information gathered from this meeting, and from subsequent discussions with the Friends of Carver-Roehl Park, Parks staff, Parks Committee, and the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resource’s Accessibility Coordinator was used to refine the preliminary recommendations and to develop the implementation schedule. Refer to Chapters 3 and 4.

CARVER-ROEHL PARK MASTER PLAN

CHAPTER TWO

ExisƟng CondiƟons

CHAPTER TWO

11 - Park AmeniƟes / 14 - Natural Features / 19 - Demographics & Land Use Map 1: Park Trails & Facilities

2.1 PARK AMENITIES Park Facilities Within the past three years two significant improvements have been made at the park. Extensive driveway and culvert enhancements were completed where Spring Brook crosses the park entrance. Prior to the improvements, significant rain events would cause water to spill over the road closing the park to visitors and eroding the roadway. In addition, in 2011 the park added an accessible playground to the existing swing set facilities near the pavilion. Other park facilities are listed in the table below with their locations shown on Map 1. Facility Type

Quantity

Condition

Comments

Pavilion w/ electricity

Excellent

---

Hand-Pump (fountain) Open Air Shelter w/ built-in benches

Fair

---

Good

Stain wearing thin

Benches

Fair

Graffiti (covered up and uncovered); paint wearing thin, especially on seat sections

Restroom Building

Poor

Discoloration at base of concrete block; rusted door; shingle replacement needed ---

Picnic Tables

15-18

Good

Grill

Good

---

Swingset

Good

---

Playground Appartus

Excellent

---

Trail Bridges

Fair

Stain wearing thin

Trail Signage

---

see Map 2

Entry Signage

Fair

stain wearing/worn off in areas

Gates

Fair

---

Trash Receptacle

Fair

---

Trails

---

Good

Erosion issues

Historic Grave Site

---

Early settler grave site

Driveway

---

Good

Parking Areas

---

Fair

Minor cracks in main loop; new paved entry and turning circle Gravel levels are low along driveway loop

CARVER-ROEHL PARK MASTER PLAN

CHAPTER TWO Upon visual inspection, most of park facilities are in fair to excellent condition. The pavilion, play equipment, and associated sidewalk areas are in excellent condition with no improvements identified. The core infrastructure is also in excellent condition. As previously mentioned, the main driveway and culvert were reconstructed in 2009 and in 2011 the turning circle on S. Carvers Rock Road was upgraded from gravel to asphalt. The additional shelters and benches are also in good condition with only minor maintenance needs anticipated. The facilities in most need of improvement or replacement are the water pump and the restroom facilities. At 30 years old the restroom facility has probably exceed its life cycle. The building is in need of a new roof, and because of its age, it lacks some of the newer technology used in vault toilets to mitigate odors. While the facility is still functional it definitely is not a welcoming facility for park users and does not meet current ADA standards. The water pump is functional and the water is tested annually to ensure compliance with water quality standards. However, its location has resulted in erosion of the adjacent hill side from both water runoff and from park users who walk directly up the hill from the trail network by Spring Brook.

12 ROCK COUNTY, WISCONSIN - PARKS DIVISION

Map 2: Trails Sign & Post Conditions

EXISTING CONDITIONS Trails System

Wayfinding & Signage

Type, Lengths, & Widths The park has approximately 1.5 miles of natural surface trails. The trails range from two feet to ten feet in width, with the majority of them being between four and six feet in width. All trails offer hiking and prohibit offroad bicycle or equestrian use. In the winter, the trails may be used for ungroomed cross-country skiing and snowshoeing.

The two primary means of accessing the park are from US 14 to the north and from I-43 to the south, via WIS 140. US 14 connects the cities of Janesville and Delavan and is approximately 3.5 miles north of the park, via S. Carvers Rock Road. There are park wayfinding signs on both approaches to S. Carvers Rock Road along USH 14. I-43 connects the City of Beloit to the greater Milwaukee metropolitan area. There is a full interchange at WIS 140 just north of the Village of Clinton. The park is approximately four miles from this interchange, via WIS 140 and Creek Road. However, there is no wayfinding signage at the interchange or at the intersection of WIS 140 and Creek Road.

Locations & Access Points The majority of the trails follow Spring Brook along the western portion of the site with one segment running along the eastern/northern border of the parcel through a heavy forested area (the section designated State Natural Area). There are several pedestrian access points, including at the driveway entrance and at the corner of Creek Road and S. Carver-Roehl Road (as shown in the above image). There are a couple of issues with the existing trail layout. Too Many Out and Back Spurs. In the southern portion of the park there are two trails which dead end on Creek Road. In general dead end trails should be avoided in favor of a closed loop as this offers a more appealing experience for park users (i.e. most hikers are unlikely to use these trails unless as a point of entry/exit). Poor Trail Alignment. Another trail location issue is the area around the main gate. As one survey respondent summarized it...”The loop doesn’t exactly match up when crossing the park entrance road - instead, there is the confusing option of continuing south on the west or east side of Spring Brook.” Under Utilized Park Areas. During the planning process several individuals commented that the northwestern portion of the park (west of Spring Brook) was under utilized since there is no trail network in this area. Conditions Overall the trails are in good condition; however, there are sections that have erosion issues due to steep grade changes and weathering (see Map 3 on page 13).

There are 23 signs within the park, including 13 trail signs, 2 park entrance signs, 3 neighborhood watch signs, 2 grave site signs, a park’s rules sign, a picnic sign, and a trash sign. As shown on Map 2 (on the previous page), the sign faces are in excellent to good condition, while the sign posts are in good to fair condition. There are a couple of issues with the existing trail signage beyond just their physical condition. Poor Location. The park has two kiosks which include a map of the trail system; however, both are located too far away from where users park and access the trails. Missing Signage. Some of the trail entry points lack an identification sign, as do some of the trail junction locations. In addition, there is a trail spur just north of the turning circle on S. Carvers Rock Road which is not identified. Adding to the confusion is whether the trail network is supposed to follow the roadway down past the turning circle to the corner entrance at Creek Road. There is one sign where Spring Brook crosses the road indicating to continue south along the eastern edge of the road yet this area is not indicated as a trail on the park map. Confusing Identification. There are two signs which identify trails by specific name. Along the northeast portion of the driveway loop there is a sign indicating the location of

CARVER-ROEHL PARK MASTER PLAN

CHAPTER TWO the start of the “Summer Trail” and south of the main entrance gate there is another sign indicating the start of the “Winter Trail”. However, there are no other signs which indicate where either trail ends and neither of these names appear on the park maps located at the two park kiosks. Missed Opportunities. In the summer of 2011, the Parks Department constructed an educational sign south of the main gate providing information about the park’s SNA designation. However, there are other opportunities to provide additional educational signage regarding the historic grave site and the natural features of the park.

2.2 NATURAL FEATURES Viewsheds There are three major viewing locations (overlooks) within CarverRoehl Park all centered around the limestone cliffs and Spring Brook. As shown in Map 3 (on the next page), these viewing areas are all located within the southern portion of the park near a winding section of Spring Brook. The image to the right illustrates one of the unique views this park offers.

14 ROCK COUNTY, WISCONSIN - PARKS DIVISION

Slope The majority of the slopes are between 6-12%; however, there is a significant portion surrounding Spring Brook that is in the 12-20% range. Generally, slopes 12% or greater are often classified as steep. Due to poor trail alignment several sections have significant erosion issues in the steeper portions of the park. Map 3 (on the next page), identifies the location of some of the more severe erosion concern areas. The area leading to the water pump has been previously discussed. The other areas include the grass hill east of the driveway loop, a segment of trail west of Spring Brook, a small segment of trail east of Spring Brook, and another trail segment in the southern portion of the park which cuts directly up a steep hill. The segment just south of the driveway is also a safety concern as the trail is directly adjacent to the brook, elevated by 10+ feet. This areas are illustrated in the pictures below. Modifying these sections or building new trails around these issues will help control future soil erosion and reduce annual maintenance costs.

Hydrology & Drainage Carver-Roehl Park is located in the Lower Rock River Basin and, more specifically, the Turtle Creek Watershed. As shown in Map 4 (on the next page), the park primarily drains to Spring Brook, which is a four-mile long spring and seepage creek that flows southerly at a medium gradient

EXISTING CONDITIONS Map 3: Slope Analysis & Viewsheds

Map 4: Hydrology & Drainage

CARVER-ROEHL PARK MASTER PLAN

CHAPTER TWO through the park to its confluence with Turtle Creek. On average the brook is 6 inches to 2 feet deep and 10 to 20 feet wide. Based on the Turtle Creek Watershed Plan 2011 (WDNR), high fecal Streptococcus bacteria counts have been detected in the stream, probably due to the obvious stream bank pasturing upstream in the flat terrain of the creek’s headwaters adjacent to dairy farm operations. A habitat evaluation in 1996 at the Carver-Roehl Park characterized the stream as having “good” habitat quality at that site. To meet the Clean Water Act, Wisconsin has designated Spring Brook as an Exceptional Resource Waterway (ERW). ERWs are surface waters which provide outstanding recreational opportunities, support valuable fisheries and wildlife habitat, have good water quality, and are not significantly impacted by human activities. Due to this designation, the State requires additional protection of water quality from the effects of pollution.

Soil Inventory Carver-Roehl Park is within the Outwash Plains physiographic region characterized by flat plains. Locally this area is referred to as “Rock Prairie”. The area was transformed by a glacier outwash that left behind silt, sand, and gravel. The soils within this region consists primarily of well-drained, deep prairie soils (silt loam-to-loam) over glacial till or stratified sand and gravel. See Map 5 for specific soil types within Carver-Roehl Park. The following provides an account of the original vegetation/woodland group for each soil series from the Rock County Soil Survey (1974): •

Millington Silt Loam (Mf): Prairie grasses and scattered wetland hardwoods, such as elm, soft maple, and willow (notes: moderate-high natural fertility, excessive water and medium-high available water capacity are management issues)

•

Pecatonica Silt Loam (PeB2): Black, white, and red oaks mixed with hickory, including some black cherry, aspen, and sugar maple (notes: moderate-high natural fertility, high-very high available water capacity are management issues)

16 ROCK COUNTY, WISCONSIN - PARKS DIVISION

Map 5: Soil Inventory

EXISTING CONDITIONS •

Sogn Loam (SoD): Oak hickory forest with black oak on north and east facing slopes and bur oak on south and west facing slopes (notes: lowmoderate natural fertility, slopes, stoniness and low-very low available water capacity are management issues)

•

Whalen Loam (WlB2 & WlC2): Oak hickory forest (notes: moderate natural fertility, steep slopes and medium available water capacity are management issues)

•

Kane (KaA): Prairie grasses and scattered wetland hardwoods such as elm, soft maple and willow (notes: moderate-high natural fertility, medium-high availability water capacity are management issues)

Map 6: Soil Suitability for Trail Facilities

Based on Rock County Soil Survey (and illustrated in Map 6), the majority of the park is suitable for trail development, as the soils are only somewhat limited around Spring Brook and very limiting near the pedestrian access at the intersection of Creek and S. Carver Rock roads. As shown in Map 7, soil suitability for structures (i.e. “dwellings” without basements) are a little more limiting than for recreational trails, especially in areas near Spring Brook. Note that limitations for trails and structures can be overcome or minimized by special planning, design, or installation, although often at an increased cost. In addition, while an entire soil series may be classified as “very limited,” there may be specific locations that are less limiting due to the generality of the soil ratings.

Threatened and Endangered Species The Wisconsin Natural Heritage Working List (WDNR) contains species known or suspected to be rare in the state and natural communities native to Wisconsin. It includes aquatic and terrestrial species legally designated as “Endangered” or “Threatened”, as well as species in the advisory “Special Concern”. To protect the identified species, only known occurrences within the town and range is provided by WDNR (i.e. no specific locations). The table on the next page lists the known occurrences in the Carver-Roehl Park area (T.2.N R.14.E) reported as of 11-04-2011.

CARVER-ROEHL PARK MASTER PLAN

CHAPTER TWO Map 7: Soil Suitability for Structures

Scientific Name

Plant

Adoxa moschaltellina

Must-root

Plant

Agrimonia parviflora

Swamp Agrimony

Mussel

Alasmidonta marginata

Plant

Asclepias lanuginosa

Plant

Aster furcatus

Forked Aster

THR

Plant

Besseya bullii

Kitten Tails

THR

Plant

Calylophus serrulaus

Plant

Cirsium hillii

Hill's Thistle

Community

Dry prairie

Dry Prairie

Plant

Echinacea pallida

Pale Purple Coneflower

THR

Gravel Chub

END

Fish

Erimystsax x-punctatus

Community

Floodplain forest

Community

Moist cliff

Common Name

State Status

Group

THR SC

Elktoe

SC/P

Woolly Milkweed

THR

Yellow Evening Primrose

SC THR

Floodplain Forest

Moist Cliff

Ozark Minnow

THR

Fish

Notropis nubilus

Community

Shrub-carr

Snake

Sistrurus catenatus catenatus

Community

Southern dry-mesic forest

Southern Dry-mesic Forest

Community

Southern sedge meadow

Southern Sedge Meadow

Shrub-carr

Eastern Massasuaga

END

More information on this program is available at: http://dnr.wi.gov/org/land/er/nhi/

Existing Land Cover The ground layer is diverse and very representative of this native habitat type in southern Wisconsin. In early spring the park is full of many different types of wildflowers (e.g. patches of bloodroot, wild leek, wild geranium, yellow and blue violets, Solomonâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s seal, wild ginger, etc.), especially in the southern sections. Near the driveway loop (in the northern section of the park) the flora resembles what is typically found in a savanna, including hepatica, Robinâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s plantain, wood betony, smooth rock cress, shooting star, woodland phlox and rattlesnake-root. Around the limestone cliffs one can find many moist cliff species, such as bulblet fern, purple cliff, brake and liverworts. (Source: Rock County Planning, Economic, and Community Development Agency and WI DNR)

18 ROCK COUNTY, WISCONSIN - PARKS DIVISION

EXISTING CONDITIONS Carver-Roehl Park has a dry-mesic forest, which includes such hardwoods as Sugar Maple, Red Oak and Basswood. As shown in Map 8, there is also a Red Pine section in the southeast corner of the park, which may be thinned or removed as part of the State Natural Area management plan. One of the reasons for their removal is southern Wisconsin flora is not adapted to pines and has limited to no ground cover surrounding them. Without ground cover soil erosion can be an even larger issue.

Map 8: Existing Land Cover

Another issue has been the increase in buckthorn and garlic mustard in the park (both are invasive species). Rock County Parks has received several WDNR County Conservation Aid Grants in recent years to assist with the garlic mustard control. These grants have enabled the County to hire a private ecological restoration firm to apply herbicide on garlic mustard in this park. Over the last decade, volunteers have battled controlling this plant south of the entrance road (west of the stream) and north of the park entrance (west of the stream).

2.3 DEMOGRAPHICS & LAND USE Carver-Roehl Park is located between the Villages of Clinton and Darien. Although the park is located in a rural area it is within an easy drive from several large urban areas. The table below provides a demographic report for the region using a drive-time analysis from the entrance to the park. The approximate area within each of the drive-times is illustrated in the map on the next page. 15-Minute Drive Time Summary Population

30-Minute Drive Time

45-Minute Drive Time

2011

2016

2011

2016

2011

2016

4,457

4,413

193,394

196,543

580,079

590,583

Median Age

40.1

41.0

37.8

38.3

37.9

38.3

Households

1,647

1,642

74,893

76,420

225,072

229,768

Source: ESRI

CARVER-ROEHL PARK MASTER PLAN

CHAPTER TWO Drivetime Analysis from Carver-Roehl Park

Bicycle Routes and Trails

Existing and Proposed Land Use

The Bicycle Routes and Trails illustrated here were established as part of the Transportation element of the Rock County Comprehensive Plan. The routes were selected in order to connect centers of activity (e.g. parks) with communities in a direct and safe manner. Carver-Roehl Park is served by an existing designated on-road bicycle route along Creek Road to the park entrance. The plan identifies providing a future designated on-road bicycle route from the park entrance north to US 14, and another on-road bicycle route south to the Pelishek Nature Trail. The Pelishek Nature Trail is 6 miles long and connects the communities of Clinton and Allen Grove.

In general, the park is surrounded by agricultural land with a few rural residential properties nearby. There are also wooded sections onsite and within the surrounding area, especially along Turtle Creek. No major roadways are adjacent to the park; however, there is an active rail line just north of the park (Wisconsin & Southern Railroad). The parcel east of the park is identified as a Natural Resource Area; however, this parcel is in private ownership and used for agricultural purposes. Based on the Rock County Comprehensive Plan 2035, the preferred land uses adjacent to the park will remain agriculture with some rural residential areas around Turtle Creek; however, floodplains will limit some of this potential development.

20 ROCK COUNTY, WISCONSIN - PARKS DIVISION

EXISTING CONDITIONS Map 9: County Comprehensive Plan - Existing Land Use

Map 10: County Comprehensive Plan - Future Land Use

CARVER-ROEHL PARK MASTER PLAN

CHAPTER THREE

RecommendaƟons

CHAPTER THREE

24 - Park FaciliƟes / 26 - Trail System / 27 - Signage / 28 - Land Management / 30 - Other In developing the recommendations for Carver-Roehl Park, the 2009-2014 Rock County Parks, Outdoor Recreation and Open Space (POROS) Plan was reviewed. The POROS Plan was created as a vision for the entire park system with some specific recommendations for each park. The map displayed on the right illustrate the major suggested improvements for Carver-Roehl Park. Since the POROS Plan was adopted, the driveway entrance was SHELTER/GAZEBO upgraded, a playground was PARKING ADD built (however it was located PLAYGROUND within the looped driveway), and the turnaround has been paved. Due to feedback from County staff, Friends of Carver-Roehl and the general UPGRADE public, some of the suggested ENTRANCE SMALL PARK SUPPORT BUILDING improvements were not carried FOR DAYCAMP/GROUPS ADD PARKING forward in this plan. These LOT recommendations include a ADD(3) PICNIC SHELTERS support building for day camp/ IMPROVE EXISTING groups, additional picnic TRAILS (SURFACING, EROSION, IMPROVE ETC.) shelters and an additional TURN-AROUND AREA BACK parking lot with a new park CLEAR DRIVE TO PARKING THIS AREA AREA entrance. The remainder of ADDITIONAL ENTRANCE the recommendations have been included in this plan.

Map 11: Master Plan

The Carver-Roehl Park Master Plan (shown in Map 11) provides a vision for the park in the form of public improvements to be completed over the next ten to twenty years. This Master Plan is intended to enhance existing assets and identify opportunities for improvements. The subsequent sections of this chapter will outline the specific action steps to meet this vision. Chapter 4 will discuss implementation strategies and estimated costs.

CARVER-ROEHL PARK MASTER PLAN

CHAPTER THREE 3.1 PARK FACILITIES (PF) RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Build a new vault toilet building near the other park facilities (along the looped driveway). The current building has outlived its life cycle, as it needs major repairs and lacks newer technology to mitigate odors associated with vault toilets. The proposed location for this facility (near Picnic Area A) will greatly improve user access as compared to other park facilities. New parking to include handicap spaces will be directly adjacent to this facility (see Action PF.3). 2. Pave an area for 5-8 parking spaces adjacent to the restrooms, including two handicap spaces. In conversations with park users, parking is not an issue outside of the two major events held at the park and they did not want any major disturbance to the green space within the looped driveway. As proposed, the limited number of spots will not affect the existing tree canopy or overall atmosphere within the park. It will, however, provide ADA-compliant parking with easy access to all of Carver-Roehlâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s park facilities. 3. Build a ADA-compliant path in the looped driveway section, connecting the proposed bathroom facility (see Action PF.1), existing pavilion, playground, and the proposed water hand pump (see Action PF.4). This path could either be a concrete sidewalk or a hard surfaced crushed limestone trail. The key is to provide a firm and stable surface at least 5â&#x20AC;&#x2122; wide connecting the main park facilities. 4. Add an ADA-compliant water hand pump within the looped driveway adjacent to proposed trail crossing. The current hand pump is still in good condition; however, it is significantly further away from the other park facilities and is not ADA-compliant. This distance is not great, but can be overlooked by users due to its location. The

24 ROCK COUNTY, WISCONSIN - PARKS DIVISION

Map 12: Park Facilities Management Plan

RECOMMENDATIONS existing hand-pump well may remain as long as it continues to function properly and meets drinking water standards. Replacing the pump at its current location is a viable option; however, moving it within the driveway loop will make it more accessible to all users and will eliminate the existing erosion issues documented in Chapter 2. The new location will allow water to runoff into an existing drainage area. 5. Remove the existing bathrooms (after completion of the new facilities) and replace the area with either a paved or gravel parking area. The existing bathroom facility would need a new roof and will cost the County more time and money to manage two bathroom facilities. Therefore, removing this facility upon completion of the new facility will be in the County’s best interest. It suggested that this area provide additional parking, as it will be located near the proposed water pump (see Action PF.4) and existing trail entrances. 6. Add a gazebo in Picnic Area “D”. There has been support for a gazebo within this park from the Friends Group. The proposed location (in the upper picnic area) will minimize its effect on the natural landscape and tree canopy near the looped driveway. The cost of purchasing/ building this facility could be offset by future rental fees related to reserving the gazebo. 7. Provide a bike rack near the existing pavilion. The County’s Comprehensive and POROS plans support a bicycle network that connects its parks as one system. Carvers Rock Road and Creek Road are both proposed as County bike routes (see page

20). To promote this effort, the County should provide a location for bicyclist to properly lock up their bicycles. If this is not provided, bicyclist will be forced to lock up around trees and sign posts, potentially damaging these features. 8. Provide picnic tables, grills, and garbage containers, as necessary, at all designated picnic areas. The Park Facilities Management Plan (see Map 12) provides suggested items to be located within each designated picnic area. 9. Repaint existing benches and add five more benches (as suggested in Map 12). Some of the existing benches have wearing or worn off paint, and at least one bench has uncovered and poorly covered graffiti. Repainting the benches will improve the park experience at minimal cost to the County. The proposed benches (as suggested on Map 12) will provide additional seating in areas with high usage, or will introduce a new location to rest. 10. Update existing bridges and build a new “bridge” connecting proposed/existing trails on both sides of Spring Brook. As suggested in the County’s POROS Plan, the existing bridges should be upgraded, or at minimum, repainted over time. Map 13 (next page) proposes creating a new trail on the northwest side of Spring Brook. To connect this trail to the existing trail system a new bridge will be required. One potential option favored during the public informational meetings was to create a natural stepping stone bridge (similar to the picture shown here). This portion of the brook is only a few inches deep most of the year and this option would provide another unique aspect/experience for park users.

CARVER-ROEHL PARK MASTER PLAN

CHAPTER THREE 3.2 TRAIL SYSTEM (TS) RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Close trail sections that have erosion and accessibility issues, and establish new trail segments to complete the trail system. As discussed in Chapter 2, there are several locations where grade changes and constant foot/ski traffic has created erosion issues. Additionally, these sections often are inaccessible to all trail users. The proposed changes shown in Map 12 will mitigate these issues, creating a low-impact and sustainable trail system. Refer to Appendix B for additional information on trail redesign guidelines. •

As part of the trail reconstruction, create several interlocking trail loops that can be followed using a map and park signage. Instead of establishing a single trail route, this plan suggests creating several trail loops. This allows the user to create their own experience and/or exercise route. It is recommended that each loop be given a color or name (e.g. animal or tree species).

2. Establish a new trail west of Spring Brook from the park entrance to existing trails east of Spring Brook. During the public process it was noted that this section of the park was inaccessible to its users, and that they would like a trail be built within this area. As proposed this trail will require a crossing (see Action PF.10). 3. Establish a trail that is accessible to all users, especially disabled individuals confined to a wheelchair. The Park Master Plan (Map 11) identifies a trail loop that could be converted from a natural surface to a hard mineral surface to provide an accessible trail within the park. This loop was chosen because it connects the park’s main facilities and because the existing natural grade has the least amount of undulations compared to the other trail segments. A firm and stable surface (e.g. crushed limestone) at least 5’ wide is recommended. In addition, a hard surfaced trail should be provided from the edge of the driveway to the existing water hand pump if this facility is upgraded with an ADA hand pump.

26 ROCK COUNTY, WISCONSIN - PARKS DIVISION

Map 13: Park Trail and Signage Management Plan

RECOMMENDATIONS 4. Add grass pavers from the driveway to the upper picnic area. Some erosion of the hill from the driveway loop to the upper (eastern) picnic area has occurred and is likely to continue to worsen as improvements (e.g. gazebo) are made to the area. To mitigate this issue grass pavers can be installed under the native grass. The pavers provide stabilization yet are permeable to allow water infiltration.

3.3 SIGNAGE (S) RECOMMENDATIONS Road Signage (S/r) Recommendations 1. Add wayfinding signage on I-43 and WIS 140. Wayfinding signage provides several benefits to the park at minimal cost, such as advertising (and introducing) the park to new/old users and making it easier for users to find the park. Currently, the park is well SIS Example signed from US 14 (north of the park), but it lacks signage from I-43 (south of the park). It was clear in the survey that many did not know about the location of this County park and signing this major thoroughfare, carrying 14,000 vehicles a day, would help bridge this gap. Specific Informational Signs (SIS) should be placed on I-43 before the WIS 140 interchange (in both directions) with directional signage on both exit ramps. Tourist Oriented Directional Signs (TODS) should be placed on WIS 140 near the Creek Road intersection (in both directions). Initially directional signage on the exit ramps and at Creek/WIS 140 would be sufficient; however, if financially feasible, the interstate exit sign would greatly improve the park’s visibility. For more information, go to the WisDOT website on their Directional and Informational Signs webpage. 2. Add a park sign at the intersection of E. Creek Rd and S. Carvers Rock Rd directing users to parking. The northeast

corner of this intersection marks the southern-most point of the park and is the gateway to the park from residents/ visitors to the south. Additionally, this location provides pedestrian access into the park’s trail system. The sign can resemble existing park signage; however, it should include an additional board directing users to the vehicle park entrance and parking (as shown in the image above). 3. Consider upgrading the park entrance sign as the initial step to upgrading the entire County-wide park entryway signage system. Replace the existing park entrance sign with a more permanent structure using high-quality building materials. The sign should incorporate the park’s signature limestone outcroppings. An example is Entryway Sign Example shown on the right.

Trail Signage (S/t) Recommendations 1. Replace the trail signage system with reassurance and junction markers, which is illustrated in the Park Trail and Signage Management Plan (Map 13). Junction markers should be placed at any trail intersection, directing users to the correct trail and/or park facility. Reassurance markers should be placed at all trail access points and in the middle of any significantly long trail segments. To allow park users who are color-blind navigate within the park, the trail identifier sign face could include the letter (or animal/tree species) within the center of it.

Junction Marker

Reassurance Marker

CARVER-ROEHL PARK MASTER PLAN

CHAPTER THREE 2. Provide a kiosk at the park entrance and near the existing pavilion, providing general information about the park. A kiosk can provide information regarding park (e.g. rules, history, amenities, etc.), provide a map to guide users within the park, and provide brochures/pamphlets with pertinent information (e.g. birding, State Natural Areas, tree identification course, etc.). The kiosks should be located adjacent to an accessible path/trail (see Action TS.3); however, the kiosk at the park entrance should be placed closer to the road than the existing trail to help identify and align the trail connection across the driveway. 3. After a kiosk is placed at the park entrance (see Action S/t.2), move the SNA educational sign (with map) to the turnaround (adjacent to the limestone outcroppings). A kiosk at the entrance (see S/t.2) will have some of this same information, so the sign will provide better value to park users stopping at the outcropping turnaround off S. Carvers Rock Road.

3.4 LAND MANAGEMENT (LM) RECOMMENDATIONS The Park’s varied natural area remnants, are restorable to their historic plant communities with proper and timely management. The removal of invasive species and restoration of native habitat is a long-term project that can take years to complete. As described in the SNA Memorandum of Understanding between Rock County and the WDNR (Refer to Appendix C), the long-term objective is to manage the site as moist cliff and southern dry-mesic forest communities in a manner to restore the ecological function of those natural communities. Natural processes, removal of invasive species and prescribed understory manipulation will determine the structure of the forest. General land management activities include: •

Conducting prescribed burns. This will help to control invasive plant material. Make sure to remove large volumes of woody material before treatment and to install enhancement seed mixes after treatment.

•

Using herbicide to control reed canary grass within the riparian corridors and wet prairie areas. Make sure to install enhancement seed mixes in areas after treatment.

•

Continuing to use cut and stump treatment on common buckthorn and multiflora rose in woodland areas.

•

Red Pine removal. The red pines planted in the southeast corner of the site may be cut gradually to eventually convert the stand to a deciduous forest. During the planning process some stakeholders spoke in favor of keeping these trees for the scenic variety they offer even if they are not native. In light of this, it is recommended that any gradual thinning begin in areas furthest from the adjacent trail. In addition, it should be noted that the other land management recommendations are considered a higher priority.

•

Removing hazard trees. Trees determined to be safety hazards for park trail users should be felled and removed from the trails. Any proceeds from salvaged trees should be used for other land management activities at the park.

4. Add an educational sign at the historic grave site. The grave site has historic value and is an asset to the park. The educational sign could explain the history of the area and the significance of the persons buried there. 5. Add an additional educational sign at the turnaround (adjacent to the limestone outcroppings). This location offers great views of limestone outcroppings and has significant historic value to the park. The January 19-25, 2011 issue of The Rock River Times, provides an example of what could be described on this sign.

28 ROCK COUNTY, WISCONSIN - PARKS DIVISION

RECOMMENDATIONS The following land management recommendations will provide a guide for current and future volunteers, researchers, visitors, County and State staff and administrators. The recommendations follow a seasonal calendar to mimic natural (pre-settlement) process, maximize effectiveness, and minimize negative impacts. 1. Spring Burn Season (March - early April). The Spring Burn Season is an initial Growing Season weed, bramble, and brush population control tool, intended to clear weed straw, kill weed seed, and provide fire cleared areas in which to spread native species seed. The Spring Burn Season can be started as soon as approved burn areas, and or brush piles can be safely burned without damaging desired plants and trees. Note, many woodland, and native plant species can be up and blooming ahead of the burning schedule. Some species will tolerate spring burning while others must be avoided when burning to allow the species to reach flowering and seed production. For example, growing spring ephemerals such as Blood Root should be avoided and burned around (3-5’ minimum radius). After the initial burn, some additional site specific torching and site clean-up may be necessary. With the completion of Spring Burn Season (early April) burn units preparation for the upcoming Growing Season can begin with spreading seed mixes. 2. Growing (and Harvest) Season (March through November). The Growing Season is a long season that overlaps into the Spring and Fall burn seasons, and focuses on several plants populations over several months. The growing season for this management calendar technically begins with the first weed plants of concern to show after the winter thaw, invasive Garlic Mustard rosettes and seedlings. By early April spring ephemerals have begun to emerge and are susceptible to severe setback from later burning. Land management during the Growing Season should focus on controlling invasive herbaceous weed populations, while at the same time providing for the harvesting and spreading of native species seed to replace the invasive populations. Although there are year-to-year differences, and there is always a timing and species overlap, the priority schedule

for weed population control should be: •

Garlic Mustard (March-June)

•

Eurasian Grasses (May-July)

•

Japanese Hedge Parsley (June-July, roadside mowing second year plants after they have developed white flowers but before seeds are fully mature)

•

Buckthorn (July-October)

Native seed/plants should be spread immediately after harvesting in the appropriate habitat. Native seed harvesting should be conservative in not removing too much seed from any one natural area or species. An accepted level is 30% of any species’ seed available, although this may decrease for rare species and increases to as much as 50% for common species. “Sloppy” seed collecting that leaves an ample amount of seed spread behind in the collection area is encouraged to enrich the original site’s seed bank. Seed harvesting should attempt to harvest 100% of the weed seed present, although in separate containers from those used for native species seed collection. 3. Fall Burn Season (August - November). Late summer into fall was the historic season for prairie fires in the Midwest. The Fall Burn Season today is planned and controlled, and is conducted in a very similar fashion to the Spring Burn Season. Both burning seasons are intended to return the necessary role of seasonal fires as tools for natural area management and enrichment. The Fall Burn Season is a final Growing Season weed, bramble, and brush population control tool, intended to clear weed straw, kill weed seed, and provide fire cleared areas in which to spread harvested native species seed. The Fall Burn Season can be started as soon as piled weeds can be safely burned without damaging desired plants and trees.

CARVER-ROEHL PARK MASTER PLAN

CHAPTER THREE Winter Work Season (December - February). The Winter Season is the dormant season. Drier, frosty, and frozen conditions allow for brush clearing, tree felling and hauling, and cut stump herbicide applications. Introduced invasive species are of higher priority for cutting and herbicide application, than native species that can be controlled through prescribed burning. Collected woody biomass should be arranged in burn piles in areas with little botanical value (i.e. away from desired trees and if possible in already burned or storm damaged areas with dead fall). The Winter Work Season also provides an opportunity to hold an annual meeting to discuss land management activities. An annual meeting should be held between the County Parks Department, WDNR, and local volunteers to discuss land management activities for the upcoming year and the roles of each party. In addition, any trail construction work planned for the year within an SNA area will need pre-approval from the WDNR.

3.5 OTHER (O) RECOMMENDATIONS See Chapter 4 for preferred completion time frame and funding strategies for each action item. 1. Construct a tree/plant identification course. To enhance the environmental education opportunities at the park a tree/plant identification course can be constructed along the trail network. Information about the course, including information on how to identify flora and fauna, can be made available at the parkâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s two kiosks. The design of the course and information on identification worksheets should caution against trampling sensitive plant communities.

30 ROCK COUNTY, WISCONSIN - PARKS DIVISION

2. Add painted crosswalks where any trail crosses a road. To guide and enhance safety for trail users crosswalks should be painted anywhere a trail crosses the driveway. Enlarged animal tracks could be painted as an alternative. 3. Add gravel and/or pedestrian caution signs along S. Carvers Rock Road. A portion of the Red Loop (Map 13) follows the eastern edge of S. Carvers Rock County to connect to the turnaround and the southern park entrance. Users traveling on the route are required to walk along the edge of the road. To increase safety the shoulder could be slightly widened, gravel added and pedestrian caution signs installed to warn north bound vehicles about the potential for pedestrians. 4. Consider future property acquisitions. County-wide acquisition of additional scenic areas was the preferred amenity from the county survey in the 2009 POROS plan. Expansion of the park was not identified as a particular need/desire during this planning process. However, this should not preclude the County from considering future expansion opportunities, either through land donations or real estate purchases. In considering future park expansion opportunities, the logical areas are (in no particular order): A. The land north of the park along Spring Brook, for an extension of the Blue and Purple Trails. B. The parcel between Creek Road and Turtle Creek immediately south of the park, for an extension of the Red and Green Trails. C. The agricultural parcel east of the park as an extension of the Green, Blue, and Purple trails as part of a prairie restoration project.

RECOMMENDATIONS D. The woodlands west of S. Carvers Rock Road as an extension of the Red Trail. If additional park expansion opportunities arise the County should add a site plan illustrating improvements (i.e. trails, signage, etc.) as an appendix to this plan. If additional development is considered adjacent to the park, the Parkâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Department should advocate the use of conservation subdivision principals to minimize private development, fragmentation, and clearing of the higher valued woodland areas surrounding the park. Potential Park Expansion Areas

CARVER-ROEHL PARK MASTER PLAN

CHAPTER FOUR

AcƟon Plan

CHAPTER 4

33 - AcƟon Plan Summary This plan is a guide to help the County, Parks Department Staff, and local volunteers implement the desired vision for Carver-Roehl Park. The desired vision for this park cannot be created overnight. However, by incrementally implementing the recommendations within this plan the park can become the outstanding scenic and recreation destination desired. Implementation will take coordination between the County, WDNR, and local volunteers.

4.1 ACTION PLAN SUMMARY Table 4.1 (on the next page) provides a summary of the recommendations described in Chapter 3, including a preferred time frame for completion. Implementation time lines are categorized into short-, medium-, and long-term horizons based on factors such as: •

Ease of implementation and whether the project requires any design or construction services.

Costs identified are preliminary estimates made prior to design considerations, or engineering studies, and typically assume using County staff for installation (except for major improvements such as restrooms, parking lots, and trails). Costs are expressed within a range to acknowledge that additional factors beyond the scope of this planning process will determine final cost. For example, the selection of particular materials, vendors, and the timing of projects will all have an influence on the final cost. Some recommendations such as the parking lot improvements will require additional engineering design services prior to implementation. In addition, particular recommendations may be modified or only partially implemented depending on available funding. For example, the County may wish to implement certain trail improvement projects over a period of time. The estimates are a starting point which can be used to aid in grant applications or future department budgets.

•

Relative need or desire for the project.

Funding to complete proposed projects will come from the following sources:

•

Opportunities for coordination with other park improvements.

•

General Department Budget

•

Probable cost – projects with higher costs are likely to take longer to implement.

•

ATC Funds

•

Program/Park Fees

•

Donations

•

Fundraising

•

State and Federal Grants

•

Sales from trees removed as part of land management activities at the park

The time frames are not mandates on the County for the completion of particular improvements during specific years. In addition, implementation of specific projects could be affected by the availability of grant funding or volunteer assistance. For example, construction of the gazebo is not identified as a high priority since there is an existing shelter at the park; however, if the County were to receive donations in the form of materials and/or labor it is possible that this improvement could be completed ahead of the identified schedule.

CARVER-ROEHL PARK MASTER PLAN

CHAPTER FOUR Figure 4.1: Action Plan

ACTION PF.1 PF.2

SHORTTERM

MIDTERM

LONGTERM

2012-2014

2015-2019

2020+

Build a new vault toilet building near the other park facilities.

ESTIMATED COST $20,000 - $30,000

Pave an area for 5-8 parking spaces adjacent to the restrooms, including two handicap spaces.

$5,000 - $10,000

PF.3

Build an ADA-compliant path in the looped driveway section, connecting the proposed bathroom facilities, existing pavilion, playground, and the proposed water hand pump.

$3,000 - $5,000

PF.4

Add a ADA-compliant water hand pump within the looped driveway adjacent to proposed trail crossing.

$3,000 - $5,000

PF.5

Remove the existing bathrooms (after completion of the new facilities) and replace the area with either a paved or gravel parking area.

PF.6 PF.7 PF.8 PF.9

$2,000 - $10,000

Add a gazebo in Picnic Area "D".

$3,000 - $8,000

Provide a bike rack near the existing pavilion.

$100 - $1,000

Provide picnic tables, grills, and garbage containers, as necessary, at all designated picinc areas.

$1,000 - $3,000

Repaint existing benches and add five more benches.

$1,000 - $3,000

TS.1

TS.2

Establish a new trail west of Spring Brook from the park entrance to existing trails east of Spring Brook.

TS.3

Establish a trail that is accessible to all users, especially disabled individuals confined to a wheelchair.

TS.4

Add grass pavers from the driveway to the upper picnic area.

S/r.1

Add wayfinding signage on I-43 and WIS 140.

S/r.2

Add a park sign to the intersection of E. Creek Rd and S. Carver Rock Rd directing users to parking.

S/r.3

Consider upgrading the park entrance sign as the initial step to upgrading the entire County-wide park entryway signage system.

$2,500 - $5,000

S/t.1

Replace the trail signage system with reassurance and junction parkers illustrated in the Park Trail and Signage Management Plan Map (13).

$1,500 - $3,000

S/t.2

Provide a kiosk at the park entrance and near the existing pavilion, providing general information about the park.

S/t.3

After a kiosk is placed at the park entrance, move the SNA educational sign to the turnaround.

S/t.4

Add an educational sign at the historic grave site.

$500 - $1,500

S/t.5

Add an educational sign at the turnaround discussing the historic value of the limestone outcropping.

$500 - $1,500

LM.1

Land management activities (Spring Burn Season, Growing/Harvest Season, Fall Burn Season, Winter Work Season).

PF.10

O-1 O-2 O-3

Construct a tree/plant identification course.

O-4

Consider future property acquisitions.

$1,000 - $5,000 $25,000 - $85,000 $5,000 - $15,000 $25,000 - $65,000 $2,000 - $5,000 $50 - $150 per year County Staff Time & Materials

$500 - $1,000 County Staff Time

-- annually --

Add painted crosswalks where any trail crosses a road.

$100 - $500

Add gravel and/or pedestrian caution signs along S. Carver Rock Road.

34 ROCK COUNTY, WISCONSIN - PARKS DIVISION

Varies $100 - $1,000

$500 - $2,000

-- ongoing --

Unknown

ACTION PLAN Trail Construction Assumption •

New trail construction cost estimates assume a four foot wide natural surface trail with a cost per linear foot of $3.5 - $8.

•

Rehabilitation of closed trails assumes a cost per linear foot of $2 $15 and includes check dams for erosion control, and scarification/ cover up.

•

Accessible trail construction cost estimates assume a six foot wide hard mineral surface trail with a cost per linear foot of $8 - $20 and includes all materials.

•

Grass paver installation cost estimates assume a six foot wide trail with a cost per linear foot of $18 - $50 and includes all materials.

CARVER-ROEHL PARK MASTER PLAN

Appendix A: Survey Results 1. Over the past 12 months on average how often have you or members of your household visited Carver-Roehl Park? Response

Response

Percent

Count

13 or more times per year

7.5%

7-12 times per year

5.0%

2-6 times per year

22.5%

Once per year

20.0%

45.0%

answered question

skipped question

Have not visited the park in the past 12 months

1 of 24

2. If you seldom use or do not visit Carver-Roehl Park, what are your reasons? Please check up to TWO choices. Response

Response

Percent

Count

Not interested/No time

21.7%

Too far away from home

26.1%

Do not have transportation

0.0%

Don't know where the park is

21.7%

Too crowded

0.0%

Feel unsafe

8.7%

Don't know what's available

30.4%

I use other County parks

43.5%

8.7%

Lack of recreational facilities that interest me

Other (please specify)

2 of 24

answered question

skipped question

3. With regards to Carver-Roehl Park only, what is the primary reason for your visit? Please check up to THREE choices. Response

Response

Percent

Count

Walking/Hiking

92.9%

Jogging

7.1%

Cross-country skiing

14.3%

Bird/nature watching

57.1%

Picnics

28.6%

Special Events

7.1%

Volunteering - Park Maintenance

14.3%

Geocaching

7.1%

Nature Photography

14.3%

Other (please specify)

answered question

skipped question

3 of 24

4. Over the past 12 months on average how often have you or members of your household visited Magnolia Bluff Park? Response

Response

Percent

Count

13 or more times per year

15.4%

7-12 times per year

10.3%

2-6 times per year

30.8%

Once per year

12.8%

30.8%

answered question

skipped question

Have not visited the park in the past 12 months

4 of 24

5. If you seldom use or do not visit Magnolia Bluff Park, what are your reasons? Please check up to TWO choices. Response

Response

Percent

Count

Not interested/No time

13.3%

Too far away from home

40.0%

Do not have transportation

6.7%

Don't know where the park is

33.3%

Too crowded

0.0%

Feel unsafe

6.7%

Don't know what's available

26.7%

I use other County parks

33.3%

6.7%

Other (please specify)

answered question

skipped question

Lack of recreational facilities that interest me

5 of 24

6. With regards to Magnolia Bluff Park only, what is the primary reason for your visit? Please check up to THREE choices. Response

Response

Percent

Count

Horseback Riding

27.3%

Walking/Hiking

77.3%

Jogging

4.5%

Cross-country skiing

18.2%

Bird/nature watching

27.3%

Picnics

18.2%

Special Events

4.5%

Volunteering - Park Maintenance

18.2%

Geocaching

4.5%

Nature Photography

18.2%

Other (please specify)

6 of 24

answered question

skipped question

7. How would you rate your overall satisfaction with the park facilities in Carver-Roehl? Response

Response

Percent

Count

Very Dissatisfied

0.0%

Dissatisfied

6.7%

Satisfied

30.0%

Very Satisfied

13.3%

No Opinion

50.0%

Comment

7 of 24

answered question

skipped question

8. How would you rate the following characteristics of Carver-Roehl Park? Please use the comment box to describe any concerns with the following characteristics. No Poor

Fair

Good

Excellent

Opinion/Don't Use

Response Count

General Park Cleanliness

0.0% (0)

10.3% (3)

31.0% (9)

20.7% (6)

37.9% (11)

Cleanliness of Restrooms

3.6% (1)

17.9% (5)

14.3% (4)

7.1% (2)

57.1% (16)

Trail Conditions

0.0% (0)

10.3% (3)

41.4% (12)

6.9% (2)

41.4% (12)

Trail Signage/Maps

0.0% (0)

27.6% (8)

3.4% (1)

41.4% (12)

Shelters

0.0% (0)

10.7% (3)

28.6% (8)

14.3% (4)

46.4% (13)

Benches/Picnic Tables

3.4% (1)

6.9% (2)

31.0% (9)

17.2% (5)

41.4% (12)

Grills

7.1% (2)

17.9% (5)

10.7% (3)

3.6% (1)

60.7% (17)

Playground Equipment

3.6% (1)

7.1% (2)

10.7% (3)

3.6% (1)

75.0% (21)

Parking

6.9% (2)

17.2% (5)

34.5% (10)

6.9% (2)

34.5% (10)

Drinking Water

11.1% (3)

7.4% (2)

14.8% (4)

7.4% (2)

59.3% (16)

Comment

8 of 24

answered question

skipped question

9. How would you rate your overall satisfaction with the park facilities in Magnolia Bluff? Response

Response

Percent

Count

Very Dissatisfied

0.0%

Dissatisfied

3.6%

Satisfied

50.0%

Very Satisfied

25.0%

No Opinion

21.4%

Comment

9 of 24

answered question

skipped question

10. How would you rate the following characteristics of Magnolia Bluff Park? Please use the comment box to describe any concerns with the following characteristics. No Poor

Fair

Good

Excellent

Opinion/Don't Use

Response Count

General Park Cleanliness

0.0% (0)

6.7% (2)

43.3% (13)

33.3% (10)

16.7% (5)

Cleanliness of Restrooms

7.1% (2)

25.0% (7)

17.9% (5)

3.6% (1)

46.4% (13)

Trail Conditions

0.0% (0)

16.7% (5)

56.7% (17)

6.7% (2)

20.0% (6)

Trail Signage/Maps

0.0% (0)

32.1% (9)

39.3% (11)

7.1% (2)

21.4% (6)

Horse Tie Down Poles

7.4% (2)

3.7% (1)

14.8% (4)

3.7% (1)

70.4% (19)

Shelters

10.7% (3)

21.4% (6)

3.6% (1)

53.6% (15)

Benches/Picnic Tables

0.0% (0)

20.0% (6)

36.7% (11)

3.3% (1)

40.0% (12)

Grills

7.1% (2)

14.3% (4)

21.4% (6)

3.6% (1)

53.6% (15)

Campfire Rings

3.6% (1)

7.1% (2)

17.9% (5)

3.6% (1)

67.9% (19)

Parking

3.3% (1)

10.0% (3)

56.7% (17)

13.3% (4)

16.7% (5)

Drinking Water

7.7% (2)

15.4% (4)

11.5% (3)

7.7% (2)

57.7% (15)

Comment

10 of 24

answered question

skipped question

11. How safe do you feel when visiting Carver-Roehl Park? Please use the comment box to describe any safety concerns. Response

Response

Percent

Count

Very Safe

26.7%

Somewhat Safe

20.0%

Somewhat Unsafe

10.0%

Very Unsafe

0.0%

No Opinion

43.3%

Comment

answered question

skipped question

12. Do you have any accessibility concerns at Carver-Roehl Park? Please use the comment box to describe any specific concerns. Response

Response

Percent

Count

Yes

0.0%

72.4%

Not Sure

27.6%

Comment

11 of 24

answered question

skipped question

13. How safe do you feel when visiting Magnolia Bluff Park? Please use the comment box to describe any safety concerns. Response

Response

Percent

Count

Very Safe

45.2%

Somewhat Safe

19.4%

Somewhat Unsafe

9.7%

Very Unsafe

6.5%

No Opinion

19.4%

Comment

answered question

skipped question

14. Do you have any accessibility concerns at Magnolia Bluff Park? Please use the comment box to describe any specific concerns. Response

Response

Percent

Count

Yes

9.7%

71.0%

Not Sure

19.4%

Comment

12 of 24

answered question

skipped question

15. In the future, what type of improvements would you like to see added to (or more of) Carver-Roehl Park? Not a

Low

Medium

High

Response

Priority

Opinion

Count

Picnic Areas

14.8% (4)

18.5% (5)

11.1% (3)

18.5% (5)

37.0% (10)

Shelters/Gazebos

14.8% (4)

18.5% (5)

25.9% (7)

0.0% (0)

40.7% (11)

Grills

11.1% (3)

22.2% (6)

18.5% (5)

7.4% (2)

40.7% (11)

Campfire Rings

11.1% (3)

33.3% (9)

7.4% (2)

3.7% (1)

44.4% (12)

0.0% (0)

7.1% (2)

10.7% (3)

46.4% (13)

35.7% (10)

Mountain Bike Trails

25.0% (7)

14.3% (4)

7.1% (2)

14.3% (4)

39.3% (11)

Tent Camping Sites

34.6% (9)

15.4% (4)

7.7% (2)

3.8% (1)

38.5% (10)

Dog Exercise Area

22.2% (6)

18.5% (5)

14.8% (4)

7.4% (2)

37.0% (10)

Playground Equipment

18.5% (5)

14.8% (4)

22.2% (6)

0.0% (0)

44.4% (12)

General Recreational Field

36.0% (9)

20.0% (5)

4.0% (1)

36.0% (9)

Disc Golf Course

32.1% (9)

17.9% (5)

3.6% (1)

14.3% (4)

32.1% (9)

Restrooms

0.0% (0)

14.8% (4)

29.6% (8)

22.2% (6)

33.3% (9)

Parking Area

0.0% (0)

26.9% (7)

7.7% (2)

38.5% (10)

Bike Racks

14.3% (4)

25.0% (7)

17.9% (5)

10.7% (3)

32.1% (9)

7.1% (2)

14.3% (4)

17.9% (5)

28.6% (8)

32.1% (9)

14.8% (4)

22.2% (6)

3.7% (1)

37.0% (10)

Natural Resource Restoration

Drinking Fountains Increased Programs/Special Events

Other (please specify)

13 of 24

answered question

skipped question

16. In the future, what type of improvements would you like to see added to (or more of) Magnolia Bluff Park? Not a

Low

Medium

High

Response

Priority

Opinion

Count

18.5% (5)

25.9% (7)

7.4% (2)

22.2% (6)

3.7% (1)

29.6% (8)

18.5% (5)

22.2% (6)

25.9% (7)

Grills

11.1% (3)

44.4% (12)

14.8% (4)

3.7% (1)

25.9% (7)

Campfire Rings

33.3% (9)

11.1% (3)

0.0% (0)

22.2% (6)

0.0% (0)

10.7% (3)

3.6% (1)

57.1% (16)

28.6% (8)

Mountain Bike Trails

42.9% (12)

7.1% (2)

10.7% (3)

17.9% (5)

21.4% (6)

Rock Climbing Area

38.5% (10)

7.7% (2)

11.5% (3)

23.1% (6)

19.2% (5)

Equestrain Trails

32.1% (9)

10.7% (3)

17.9% (5)

21.4% (6)

Horse Tie Downs

35.7% (10)

17.9% (5)

7.1% (2)

21.4% (6)

Tent Camping Sites

33.3% (9)

22.2% (6)

14.8% (4)

7.4% (2)

22.2% (6)

Dog Exercise Area

40.7% (11)

14.8% (4)

7.4% (2)

22.2% (6)

Playground Equipment

37.0% (10)

18.5% (5)

0.0% (0)

25.9% (7)

General Recreational Field

37.0% (10)

14.8% (4)

3.7% (1)

29.6% (8)

Disc Golf Course

55.6% (15)

7.4% (2)

3.7% (1)

14.8% (4)

18.5% (5)

0.0% (0)

22.2% (6)

33.3% (9)

22.2% (6)

Parking Area

22.2% (6)

11.1% (3)

37.0% (10)

7.4% (2)

22.2% (6)

Bike Racks

33.3% (9)

18.5% (5)

11.1% (3)

18.5% (5)

Drinking Fountains

11.1% (3)

25.9% (7)

22.2% (6)

18.5% (5)

22.2% (6)

On-site Electricity

37.0% (10)

11.1% (3)

22.2% (6)

7.4% (2)

22.2% (6)

Increased Programs/Special Events

25.9% (7)

14.8% (4)

22.2% (6)

7.4% (2)

29.6% (8)

Picnic Areas Shelters/Gazebos

Natural Resource Restoration

Restrooms

Other (please specify)

answered question

14 of 24

skipped question

17. If you could make ONE key improvement to Carver-Roehl Park what would it be? Response Count 15 answered question

skipped question

18. Please share your other suggestions for improving Carver-Roehl Park. Response Count 8 answered question

skipped question

19. If you could make ONE key improvement to Magnolia Bluff Park what would it be? Response Count 16

15 of 24

answered question

skipped question

20. Please share your other suggestions for improving Magnolia Bluff Park. Response Count 11 answered question

skipped question

Response

Percent

Count

21. What is your age?

Under 18

0.0%

18-24

3.2%

25-34

22.6%

35-54

41.9%

55+

32.3%

answered question

skipped question

16 of 24

22. What is the total number of persons living in your household? Response

Response

Percent

Count

9.7%

64.5%

12.9%

5 or more

0.0%

answered question

skipped question

23. How many children (18 years old or younger) live in your residence? Response

Response

Percent

Count

87.1%

1-2

12.9%

3-4

0.0%

answered question

skipped question

17 of 24

24. Indicate the location of your primary residence using the zip code map below. Response

Response

Percent

Count

53114

0.0%

53190

3.2%

53505

0.0%

53511

6.5%

53520

6.5%

53521

0.0%

53525

3.2%

53534

3.2%

53536

3.2%

53538

0.0%

53545

29.0%

53546

19.4%

53548

9.7%

53563

0.0%

53576

3.2%

53585

0.0%

53589

3.2%

Other

9.7%

answered question

skipped question

Page 3, Q2. If you seldom use or do not visit Carver-Roehl Park, what are your reasons? Please check up to TWO choices.

Horses not allowed

Jun 19, 2011 5:13 AM 18 of 24

Page 3, Q2. If you seldom use or do not visit Carver-Roehl Park, what are your reasons? Please check up to TWO choices.

Page 7, Q6. With regards to Magnolia Bluff Park only, what is the primary reason for your visit? Please check up to THREE choices.

I am a member of the work group that is maintaining the trails too.

Jun 22, 2011 9:58 AM

Page 8, Q7. How would you rate your overall satisfaction with the park facilities in Carver-Roehl?

beautiful park without all the commercialism/plastic playground equipment. Nice to have a natural park

Jul 7, 2011 10:23 AM

would like to see mountain biking trails

Jul 4, 2011 11:04 AM

Page 8, Q8. How would you rate the following characteristics of Carver-Roehl Park? Please use the comment box to describe any concerns with the following characteristics.

There seems to be single men parked in various parts of the park which makes me uncomfortable. They are not hiking or picnicing, just sitting in cars or standing along the road.

Jun 29, 2011 8:16 PM

The hiking/cross-country skiing trails here are great - I love the challenging hill. However, the layout of the trails should be changed - the loop doesn't exactly match up when crossing the park entrance road - instead, there is the confusing option of continuing south on the west or east side of Spring Brook. At the very least, one of these trails should match up to the trail on the north side of the entrance road. Also, I think it might be possible to squeeze some extra trail into the loop, especially on the south side of the park, instead of having "out-andback" spurs.

Jun 22, 2011 1:44 PM

Page 9, Q9. How would you rate your overall satisfaction with the park facilities in Magnolia Bluff?

Toilets(heard new ones planned) Park Shelter (would like one near equine parking area)Picnic Tables(more)Grill & campfire ring(none in equine picnic area)

Jun 19, 2011 5:23 AM

I guess parks that are unpoliced and lightly used are targets for undesirable activity, so that can be a reason not to use the park

Jun 17, 2011 1:16 PM

After bathrooms installed, satisfied; after pavilion installed, very satisfied.

Jun 15, 2011 4:15 PM

Page 9, Q10. How would you rate the following characteristics of Magnolia Bluff Park? Please use the comment box to describe any concerns with the following characteristics.

19 of 24 Would be interested in knowing more about the park.

Jun 29, 2011 8:17 PM

Page 9, Q10. How would you rate the following characteristics of Magnolia Bluff Park? Please use the comment box to describe any concerns with the following characteristics.

signage is confusing and in disrepair. can users - hiker, horse people use all the trails or selected trails? i primairly use the horse trails and snowshoe in the winter. i would like to see all the trail systems expanded. i would also like to see the park expanded to the east or the south; or in lieu of that perhaps easments negotiated for trail corridors on adjoing property similar to Dane County.

Jun 27, 2011 12:53 PM

Park would be a nice destination aong the Ice Age Trail

Jun 23, 2011 1:21 PM

This park has some great views for hiking, but the trails could be laid out better. Considering the size, why not have a couple of different loops, with varying lengths? A trail layout similar to the John Muir trails in the Kettle Moraine would work well here. Also, another problem is the trails don't seem very "intuitive," with lots of shortcuts and dead-ends leading to roads.

Jun 22, 2011 1:57 PM

The ride is short but beautiful and home is in Magnolia Township; so, we have not far to come to enjoy the beauty of the park.

Jun 22, 2011 10:00 AM

I've worked many years to help improve MB. I realize it takes time and money for major improvements. I greatly appreciate the new equine parking area! I'm happy to hear of the new toilets. Hopefully, a park shelter will be built soon. Thank you Lori, Joleen, Jim and the rest of the Parks staff!

Jun 19, 2011 5:23 AM

Parking for horse trailers can be less than desirable at times and very hard to turn around in the upper parking area.

Jun 17, 2011 9:20 AM

Page 10, Q11. How safe do you feel when visiting Carver-Roehl Park? Please use the comment box to describe any safety concerns.

Homosexual activity has been a problem here.

Jul 14, 2011 12:25 AM

There were lone men sitting in cars or standing by the road, not obviously hiking or picnicing, that made me uncomfortable to get out of my car.

Jun 29, 2011 8:19 PM

My only safety concern when visiting Carver-Roehl is driving out to the park during the winter - the roads can be fairly hard to navigate when covered in snow and ice.

Jun 22, 2011 1:58 PM

It is much better than in previous years, however, we still have the problem of men sitting in parked cars.

Jun 16, 2011 11:52 AM

Have been confronted by strange characters there.

Jun 15, 2011 12:10 PM

Page 10, Q12. Do you have any accessibility concerns at Carver-Roehl Park? Please use the comment box to describe any specific concerns.

Have never been to this park-know nothing of its facilities.

Jun 22, 2011 10:01 AM

Page 11, Q13. How safe do you feel when visiting Magnolia Bluff Park? Please use the comment box to describe any safety concerns.

20 of 24

We were there a couple years ago when a motor cycle group was arriving for a

Jun 22, 2011 10:05 AM

Page 11, Q13. How safe do you feel when visiting Magnolia Bluff Park? Please use the comment box to describe any safety concerns.

picnic. Fortunately, our horses were used to motor cycles and the drivers did slow down when passing our trucks and trailers where we were returning from a morning ride. 2

the remote location and past issues with undesirable characters frequenting the park make me a little uneasy.

Jun 15, 2011 12:13 PM

Page 11, Q14. Do you have any accessibility concerns at Magnolia Bluff Park? Please use the comment box to describe any specific concerns.

i like the rugged nature of the park and the fact you have to work to enjoy it.

Jun 27, 2011 12:54 PM

There are some trail areas that still need work. Wish riders would not leave the trails. Currently there are some large trees to remove after a recent storm. Our group removed 17 that we could handle last week. Please do not open this park to bikers-mountain type bikes as I believe that spells trouble with the way the trails will be torn up and the noise and scary presence that they have for the equines.

Jun 22, 2011 10:05 AM

Mainly parking for horse back riding. Overall the group that maintains the horse trails does an awesome job. It's a very nice park for a short ride offering all types of terrain. Kudos to the volunteer works crews that keep this park open to horses!

Jun 17, 2011 9:22 AM

Is the plateau (lookout) accessable to the disabled (wheelchairs)?

Jun 15, 2011 12:13 PM

Page 12, Q15. In the future, what type of improvements would you like to see added to (or more of) Carver-Roehl Park?

no fire in the parks, please!

Jul 7, 2011 10:25 AM

Would love to see some mountain bike trails in County Parks.

Jun 28, 2011 4:24 PM

I have no opinion to offer as I do not know anything about this park.

Jun 22, 2011 10:05 AM

Page 13, Q16. In the future, what type of improvements would you like to see added to (or more of) Magnolia Bluff Park?

no fires in the park, please! camping and playground equipment destroy the natural beauty of the parks

Jul 7, 2011 10:27 AM

Would love to see some mountain bike trails in County Parks.

Jun 28, 2011 4:25 PM

Connection to nearby communities

Jun 23, 2011 1:23 PM

21 of 24

Page 13, Q16. In the future, what type of improvements would you like to see added to (or more of) Magnolia Bluff Park?

I love the current peaceful atmosphere & lack of crowds. Magnolia Town people have used for a general picnic but it is hard to get people organized when families have so many other events all summer. Saddly, more people means more trash & noise.

Jun 22, 2011 10:09 AM

Do NOT want to have bikes on these trails! Doubt the geography would support "rock climbing". It's been difficult to keep folks on the trails without inviting "climbers"! Educational building/shelter would be great. Please buy more land to expand this park!

Jun 19, 2011 5:50 AM

Page 14, Q17. If you could make ONE key improvement to Carver-Roehl Park what would it be?

Mosquito abatement in season.

Jul 14, 2011 12:32 AM

Restrooms

Jul 7, 2011 10:27 AM

disc golf and mountian biking trails

Jul 4, 2011 11:06 AM

Mountain bike trails!

Jul 4, 2011 9:59 AM

Better picnic area.

Jun 29, 2011 8:21 PM

Replace the bathrooms

Jun 28, 2011 4:57 PM

Natural resource restoration/protection.

Jun 28, 2011 4:26 PM

Better parking

Jun 23, 2011 5:13 PM

Better trail layout, namely, one where the loop is actually continous.

Jun 22, 2011 2:02 PM

No opinion as I do not even know where this one is.

Jun 22, 2011 10:10 AM

Emphasis on nature and open space. no more construction

Jun 20, 2011 11:19 AM

I'm not familiar with this park. Possibly birdhouses, benches along trails for folks to rest and enjoy the view

Jun 19, 2011 5:50 AM

Parking Area

Jun 16, 2011 2:33 PM

Create more parking without changing the natural look of the park.

Jun 16, 2011 11:59 AM

Keep the oddball sexual predators out.

Jun 15, 2011 12:19 PM

Page 14, Q18. Please share your other suggestions for improving Carver-Roehl Park.

Make it more picnic-friendly with plenty of picnic tables, grills, and water fountains.

22 of 24

Jul 14, 2011 12:32 AM

Page 14, Q18. Please share your other suggestions for improving Carver-Roehl Park.

Mountain bike trails!

Jul 4, 2011 9:59 AM

A disc golf course at this park would be great!

Jun 28, 2011 4:57 PM

Would love to see some mountain bike trails in County Parks.

Jun 28, 2011 4:26 PM

Please do not add more playground equipment. This is a county park not a city park.

Jun 23, 2011 5:13 PM

improve trails and bridges

Jun 16, 2011 2:33 PM

Leave the red pines as they are, they have been there a long time. As they die, they will eliminate themselves naturally.

Jun 16, 2011 11:59 AM

Flora and Fauna restoration and conservation

Jun 15, 2011 12:19 PM

Page 15, Q19. If you could make ONE key improvement to Magnolia Bluff Park what would it be?

The road leading to the park needs to be paved.

Jul 7, 2011 10:28 AM

disc golf and mountian bikeing trails

Jul 4, 2011 11:07 AM

Replace the bathrooms

Jun 28, 2011 4:57 PM

Natural resource restoration/protection.

Jun 28, 2011 4:26 PM

more length in horse trails and don't mix with bikes ... and as i said earlier keep it rugged

Jun 27, 2011 1:01 PM

ELECTRICITY

Jun 23, 2011 5:14 PM

Removal of Invasive species

Jun 23, 2011 1:23 PM

Better trail layout. Currently, trails just do not make sense.

Jun 22, 2011 2:03 PM

Continue to improve and develop equestrian trails.

Jun 22, 2011 10:12 AM

Update the restrooms and drinking water.

Jun 20, 2011 11:20 AM

Park Shelter/Educational Center: dual purpose for social activities (weddings, family gatherings, meetings, fundraisers) and school programs. Best location on grassy clearing west of equine parking area and east of upper level toilets

Jun 19, 2011 5:50 AM

Add security camera at entrance

Jun 17, 2011 1:18 PM

Improve parking for horseback riders

Jun 17, 2011 9:23 AM

Improve restrooms

Jun 16, 2011 2:34 PM

Trail maintenance - deberming. Bathroom are scheduled for installation. Pavilion in upper area.

Jun 15, 2011 4:24 PM

23 of 24

Page 15, Q19. If you could make ONE key improvement to Magnolia Bluff Park what would it be?

Paved walk out to the lookout area.

Jun 15, 2011 12:21 PM

Page 15, Q20. Please share your other suggestions for improving Magnolia Bluff Park.

A shelter near the bluff overlook

Jun 28, 2011 4:57 PM

Would love to see some mountain bike trails in County Parks.

Jun 28, 2011 4:26 PM

signage, restrooms primaily on othe upper level, more trail length

Jun 27, 2011 1:01 PM

Better parking and CLEARLY LABELED HORSE TRAILS SPEARATE FROM HIKING TRAILS

Jun 23, 2011 5:14 PM

Connect to nearby communities

Jun 23, 2011 1:23 PM

Improved signage for specific use and trail directions. We leave our dogs home and I do not want to see any loose dogs in the park...need a sign for that too.

Jun 22, 2011 10:12 AM

A lookout tower at the top to utilize the view in all directions. It is the highest point in the county.

Jun 20, 2011 11:20 AM

Purchase adjacent wooded bluff/land to expand the park. Promote "birdwatching": post info at trailhead about types of birds there, install benches along lower perimeter trail adjacent to farm field as the song birds love the choke cherry trees, bluebird houses along the grassy picnic area in upper level

Jun 19, 2011 5:50 AM

Security cameras in parking areas

Jun 16, 2011 2:34 PM

Maybe having educational signs that identify trees, flowers, plants, etc.

Jun 15, 2011 4:24 PM

Flora and Fauna restoration and conservation

Jun 15, 2011 12:21 PM

24 of 24

Carver-Roehl Woods Goal: To restore and maintain moist cliff communities and southern dry-mesic forest, and provide an ecological reference area. Management Objectives: Manage the site as moist cliff and southern dry-mesic forest communities in a manner to restore the ecological functions of those natural communities. Natural processes, removal of invasive species and conversion of the pine plantation over time will determine the structure of the moist cliff and forest. Provide opportunities for research, education and interpretation on the highest quality native prairies, savanna, woodland and forest. Management Systems: The native dominant forest tree species (primarily oaks, maple, basswood and hickory) are mostly managed passively. However, some thinning of the canopy, understory manipulation and shrub control to provide safe use of the trail system may be needed on occasion. The red pines planted in the southeast corner of the site may be cut gradually to eventually convert the stand to a deciduous forest. The mostly passive canopy management and invasive species control activities will determine the ecological characteristics of the site. Salvage of trees after a major wind event can occur if the volume of woody material inhibits fire prescriptions. Management Prescriptions: The forest restoration is a long-term project that may take years to complete. â&#x20AC;˘ â&#x20AC;˘ â&#x20AC;˘

Periodically monitor for and eradicate exotic species. Garlic mustard, Japanese hedge parsley and common buckthorn are the primary targets for eradication. Provide opportunities for public use, education, and interpretation of the natural values of the site. Maintain park infrastructure (trails) to county parks standards. Trees determined to be safety hazards for park trail users can be felled and removed from the trails.

Implementation: Both the County and Department have limited funds to accomplish the site objectives. These funds are determined via respective, county and state budget processes. This plan should be more effective by bringing together both parties and in addition, the Friends of Carver-Roehl Park, to better manage the resource. To accomplish efficiencies, an annual meeting of all parties should assemble to discuss the next years work plans. In general, Rock County Parks would be responsible for trail and other infrastructure management. The Department would provide consultation on invasive species control methods, and interpretation of the natural features. Friends of Carver-

Roehl Park would accomplish on the ground native community management activities. Annual meetings would determine the seasonal roles of each party in management of the invasive species, brush removal, and other items that may arise.

Carver-Roehl Woods State Natural Area

E Larsen Rd

Rock County T2N-R14E, Sec. 27 26 acres

Â¨ Rock Rd

State Natural Area

S Carvers

d eek R

E Cr

Rock County Parks

0.1

0.2

0.3 Miles

1:10,000

34 2010

Carver-Roehl Woods State Natural Area

E Larsen Rd

Rock County T2N-R14E, Sec. 27 26 acres

Â¨ Rock Rd

State Natural Area

S Carvers

d eek R

E Cr

Rock County Parks

0.1

0.2

0.3 Miles

1:10,000

34 2010