Tuesday, February 28, 2012 twitter.com/@msureporter
facebook.com /msureporter
www.themsureporter.com
Minnesota State University, Mankato
WEDNESDAY
H 34 • L 22
THURSDAY
H 37 • L 28
MSU Parking Plans Fee increases, no new lots CHELSEA MILLER
staff writer
The lack of parking around a college campus is a struggle that most students will encounter at some point in their college careers, and at Minnesota State University, Mankato, the desire for more parking spots has been around for years. Students are given the opportunity to voice their opinions on this matter at the annual public hearing on parking and transportation policies, capital improvements and budget. On March 14 at 1 p.m. everyone is welcome to attend this hearing which will take place in the Ostrander auditorium in the Centennial Student Union. The topic highlighted at this year’s meeting is not about plans for more parking spots, but the proposed permit price increases that will help fund the reconstruction of existing lots. A hearing, in this case, is a preliminary examina-
tion of the actions needed to be taken for next year’s parking budget. Actions have already been proposed and discussed at the meeting of the Parking Advisory Committee which took place February 2, at 1 p.m., but next months public hearing will give the public a chance to review what has been decided before they actually commit. Four days after the meeting of the PAC, an online copy of the proposal was posted on MSU’s website. This proposal documents the increases which are expected to be seen for the gold, purple, orange, light green, dark green, motorcycle and handicap parking permits. The increases range from $8 to $102, with the average being $41. This could be seen as incentive to utilize other forms of transportation, such as walking or riding your bike. Anytime a
student chooses to walk or even ride the bus, they are helping to decrease the impact cars have on our ecosystem. Unfortunately, the fee increases do not stop at parking permits. Made available through a separate link on the university’s website, you will find the same proposal but with data on increased bus fare. This extended version, first available at the February 1 Minnesota State Student Association meeting, notes changes in the fee for route 1 and route 8, as well as the semester U-pass. For example, it currently costs 50 cents to ride route
Parking Changes / page 5
Lecture: A sense of home
Graduate student discusses Minnesota’s role in the Civil and Dakota Wars ELISE KONERZA
news editor
As the 150-year anniversary of the Dakota Conf lict approaches, history students and faculty members of Minnesota State University, Mankato gathered in Erick Hughes discussion of “The Ideas of Home in Minnesota during the Civil and U.S. Dakota War.” Erick Hughes is a History and Anthropology graduate student at MSU. Hughes discussed Mankato’s place in the U.S. Dakota War and why the Dakota War and the Civil War was talked about separately but occurred at the same time. The Civil War helped cause the Dakota War in the rashness of resources to
inside: Voices.............................................4 Sports.............................................7 A&E.................................................9 Classifieds...................................11
be spread about the people. Yet, the Dakota people developed their home here in Minnesota before the American home was conceptualized. The idea of a “manifest destiny” helped advance the movement of the American home as Fort Snelling, Mendota went under attack. A manifest destiny was the overriding theme in both wars. As the advancement took place in Minnesota, questions were raised about what to do with the indigenous people. Americans wanted the land, so the expansion of slavery developed in Minnesota. The Treaty of Fort Laramie with the Sioux in 1851 was created for safety
purposes of settlers as they passed through Dakota Territory. The Dakota were given a reservation by the river. Another critical part to the advancement was the trader’s papers, or the Treaty of the Traverse de Sioux. The United States wanted the treaty to gain control of agricultural lands for more settlers. The Dakota were hesitant to sign so much land so, in agreement the United States would pay $1,665,000 in cash and annuities to the Dakota. The trickery of the United States slowly showed as debt set in among the Dakota people and the cash and annuities only amounted to a few pennies per acre,
leaving the Dakota people struggling for survival. The treaty wasn’t ratified until 1854. The American people were drawn to Minnesotan land by mental desires, the land of opportunity, settlements, communities, friendships and families. They soon started to consider the land as their own. The eruption of the Civil War gave more national attention to Minnesota and incorporated Minnesota into the national identity. White settlers fought in Minnesota regiments under Minnesota, and wanted to spread the word of their existence because they were “so far north.” One Irishman even went
so far as to ask what regiment a soldier was from. In response the soldier said, Minnesota. The Irishman said, but where… what state? Minnesota was far off the map. Minnesota was then consolidated as a white American home. The Dakota people desired to fight for the union army but were rejected. “Forbids the use of savages,” said Thomas S. Williamson in response to the Dakota’s request. If the Dakota were allowed to enlist in the union army, questions were raised as to what would happen next. The United States thought it would reinforce
History Lecture / page 6
MSU HOCKEY GOALIE AUSTIN LEE IS A SMART DUDE -READ MORE ON PAGE 9