April 20, 2017

Page 1

The

Minnesota State University Mankato

www.msureporter.com

THURSDAY, APRIL 20, 2017

Candidates pitch their case at MSSA debates Students pose questions to presidential and VP hopefuls.

LUKE LARSON Staff Writer Student s gathered Wednesday in the Heritage Lounge in the CSU for debates between the presidential and vice-presidential candidates for this year’s MSSA election scheduled for April 25. What follows are highlights from the nearly two-hourlong event. PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE Question from the gallery: “Former presidential candidate Aaron Eberhart wrote a letter to the editor in which he accused the Elections Commission of corruption. What were your roles on the Elections Commission?” Abdul-Aziz (Mavericks Empowering Mavericks): “I played no role in the Elections Commission at all. I’m just a presidential candidate.” Fred de Ruiter (Support

Our Students): “I did play a role. I attended two meetings in which we went over the election rules and made some changes—those were presented to senate. I resigned from it because I felt biased against a particular candidate and I felt it was in the best interest, along with other people who provided me feedback, to resign. As you know, you don’t want bias in that. Ironically, the Thursday after I resigned the article came out with the allegations that there was corruption. So I resigned before any corruption was unsurfaced in that regard.” Question from the gallery: “How will you promote diversity in your role as president?” Fred de Ruiter: “I’m a supporter of Affirmative Action, that nobody gets overlooked, and that’s one of the key foundations of diversity, is that we all have our own differences but that should not make anybody more or less qualified for a certain thing. So really it’s about communication. When I was a senator my very first year here, there

was talk about cutting the multicultural funds during the SAC presentation during the 81st Senate. I am a cis white male. It did not necessarily pertain to me, so what I did was I went out and there were people in our gallery who worked with CLASA and Latino Wellness and I asked them, what did they think about this? Why would they be against it? I made my decision, I made my vote based on what they wanted not necessarily because it didn’t pertain to me, it’s because it’s what they wanted.” Abdul-Aziz: “I think in my role as MSSA president is to understand in life, no one’s the same, you’re not going to meet somebody who’s exactly the same as you. They make look the same as you, but they don’t have the same experiences as you. You’re all going to have different experiences, you’re all going to go through different things, and I think it really comes down to the part where I stated […] about communicating and sponsoring events with other cultural RSOs on campus,

and we can promote those… But essentially, having more of those events on campus, sponsoring more of those event, and really, really working on outsourcing it to students that this is something they can come to.” Question from the gallery: “I see that on the home page of the MSSA website, there was a mention about $22.6 million in student activity fees for 18 programs. I know the Student Allocations Committee spent a lot of time with hearing student senate spend hours deliberating that. So what happens, whoever wins, there’s still five weeks of the Minnesota House and Minnesota Senate—there’s a bill out there to destroy that concept of students getting involved with student activity fees. So what do you think about that House bill, and are you even going to be around this summer to help fight it?” Abdul-Aziz: “Basically, what I understand about this bill is that it makes student fees optional. So Students United… they had delegates April—basically a while back they had a conference where

there were more than one motion written about how we should take it… before the motion, prior to the conference, Students United didn’t take a stance on a bill that effectively threatened to defund them. But through these motions, basically they now passed and they are now taking a stance that this motion of course… it is making student fees optional, that they can opt out of them. It is making Students United, the student government obsolete. What I think about the bill, to me I just don’t understand, because essentially we use student fees to essentially power the resources on campus for these students to use. So, if the student did feel the need to opt out of them we wouldn’t have the adequate resources or funding to keep up with the necessary things we use, such as the CSU, the bussing system, the weight room. To me, it was just confusing…”

DEBATE page 8

Students to vote on three constitutional amendments

LUKE LARSON Staff Writer While the race for MSSA president, vice president, and senators have commanded much of the attention this election season, this Tuesday’s ballot will also feature three constitutional amendments proposed by the Constitution Commission.

TODAY’S FEATURED STORIES

According to commission member David Cowan, in order for a constitutional amendment to pass, there must be a 10 percent student body voter turnout and it must be approved by more than half of all votes. Article XI Section 2 states that amendments “shall be subject to ratification during elections by a simple majority of a number equivalent to at least ten (10) percent of the non-extended campus students and to approval, modification, or disapproval by the University President.” The text of this year’s

proposed amendments has not yet been finalized, but Constitution Commission chair Daniel Gries explains the content of each amendment. One of the amendments would change the voting procedure so that presidential and vice presidential candidates of the same party run as a combined ticket. Under the current constitution, students vote for the positions of MSSA president and vice president separately. This means that students could conceivably elect a president and vice president from opposing

parties. Gries notes that this has in fact occurred in the past and that the Constitution Committee is seeking to avoid such a potentially dysfunctional situation in the future. Another amendment deals with the constitutional amendment ratification process itself. The current constitution requires more than half of all votes cast to be in favor of a proposed amendment in order for that amendment to be ratified. Because of this, abstentions count as votes against the amendment. The new

What brings you true happiness?

Fate of the Furious takes a turn for the worse

Maverick baseball outscores NSU 18-2

Page 4

Page 9

Page 13

amendment would not factor in abstentions. Ratification of amendments would simply require more “yes” votes than “no” votes. The new amendment would not affect the 10 percent threshold requirement. Another amendment proposes several fairly insignificant “housekeeping” changes to the text of the constitution. Gries notes that one such change is to replace each mention of “MnSCU” with “Minnesota State,” the system’s new name.

Have a story idea or a comment? EMAIL

News Editor Nicole Schmidt nicole.schmidt-3@mnsu.edu


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.