April/May 2021 How Much Nitrogen Can You Expect from Organic Fertilizers and Compost? Understanding the Economics of Organic Seed Production How to Help Endangered Pollinators Biosolarization and Cover Crop Impact on Weeds and Soilborne Pathogens
An All New Daily Radio Show
Available now on the MyAgLife App, Download Today
Volume 4: Issue: 2 (Photo courtesy Stephanie McKnight/Xerces Society.)
Organic Almonds Made Easy
With the Super High Density Hedged System
Super High Density Almond Advantages TOTAL MECHANIZATION
From the moment of planting
HARVEST OFF THE TREE
1 pass using over-the-row harvester!
HIGH YIELD FOR GROWERS EARLY ENTRY INTO PRODUCTION
Harvest Direct From the Tree at Hull Split!
This reduces the amount of time hulls are open and will potentially eliminate aflatoxins and crop damage due to pest and diseases.
Eliminate the Need for Weed Control! By harvesting off the ground, weed management becomes less important making it easier to grow Organic Almonds
(Almost full production in Year 3)
LESS LABOR LESS WATER NEEDED TO GROW ALMONDS
MEETS
Current 800 acre SHD Almond orchard being planted in Kern County!
(Picture taken January 2021)
The SHD Hedged System is grown on a size-controlling rootstock called Rootpac™ 20.
For More Information
Melissa Steidlmayer Grower Relations Manager | Agromillora Nursery
2
(530) 812-3398 www.agromillora.com Organic Farmer April/May 2021 msteidlmayer@agromillora.com
Scan to Watch Our Video
PUBLISHER: Jason Scott Email: jason@jcsmarketinginc.com EDITOR: Marni Katz ASSOCIATE EDITOR: Cecilia Parsons Email: article@jcsmarketinginc.com PRODUCTION: design@jcsmarketinginc.com Phone: 559.352.4456 Fax: 559.472.3113 Web: www.organicfarmingmag.com
IN THIS ISSUE
4 10
How Much Nitrogen Can You Expect from Organic Fertilizers and Compost? Understanding the Economics of Organic Seed Production
CONTRIBUTING WRITERS & INDUSTRY SUPPORT
14
Danita Cahill
Contributing Writer
Taylor Chalstrom Assistant Editor
Daniel Geisseler
14
UCCE Nutrient Management Specialist
Biosolarization and Cover Crop Impact on Weeds and Soilborne Pathogens
Sabrina Halvorson Contributing Writer
20
USDA Passes Final Rules on Hemp Growing
Timothy Jacobs
Risk Management Specialist, USDA
Neal Kinsey
24
Research into Alfalfa Crop Rotation for Organic Tomatoes
26
Food Safety Laws and Standard Operating Procedures for Urban Farmers
30
Kinsey Ag Services, Contributing Writer
26
36
USDA National Organic Program Changing Approach to Organic Oversight in India
38
Micronutrients: Effective Measurement and Use of Manganese
Kevin Day County Director/UCCE Pomology Farm Advisor, Tulare/Kings Counties Elizabeth Fichtner UCCE Farm Advisor, Tulare County Katherine Jarvis-Shean UCCE Area Orchard Systems Advisor, Sacramento, Solano and Yolo Counties
30 April/May 2021
UC Davis PhD Candidate
Margaret Lloyd
UCCE Small Farms Advisor
Joji Muramoto
UCCE Organic Production Specialist
Kiki Hubbard
Organic Seed Alliance
Richard Smith
UCCE Vegetable Production Specialist
Ashraf M. Tubeileh Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo
UC COOPERATIVE EXTENSION ADVISORY BOARD Surendra Dara UCCE Entomology and Biologicals Advisor, San Luis Obispo and Santa Barbara Counties
How to Help Endangered Pollinators While Also Helping Your Farm
Patricia Lazicki
Steven Koike Tri-Cal Diagnostics Jhalendra Rijal UCCE Integrated Pest Management Advisor, Stanislaus County Kris Tollerup UCCE Integrated Pest Management Advisor, Parlier Mohammad Yaghmour UCCE Area Orchard Systems Advisor, Kern County
The articles, research, industry updates, company profiles, and advertisements in this publication are the professional opinions of writers and advertisers. Organic Farmer does not assume any responsibility for the opinions given in the publication.
www.organicfarmermag.com
3
How Much N Can You Expect from
ORGANIC FERTILIZERS AND COMPOST? By MARGARET LLOYD | UCCE Small Farms Advisor DANIEL GEISSELER | UCCE Nutrient Management Specialist PATRICIA LAZICKI | UC Davis PhD Candidate JOJI MURAMOTO | UCCE Organic Production Specialist and RICHARD SMITH | UCCE Vegetable Production Specialist
Soil microbes facilitate N availability in organic systems through organic matter decomposition. Microbes use carbon (C) as their primary energy source. However, to grow, microbes also require N. When compost and fertilizers are added to moist soil, microbes are “fed” and microbial activity is stimulated. With this activity, there is rapid turnover of microbes as well as organic matter decomposition, which become the two main sources of available N for plants. However, as the ratio of C:N in the amendments approaches 20:1, additional N is required to facilitate microbial breakdown. This additional N is taken 4
Organic Farmer
April/May 2021
Figure 1. An example of N uptake and N supply in an organic tomato field. Field studies occurred in the Sacramento Valley in a silt loam soil with approx. 1% organic matter content, growing fresh market tomato cv Brandywine. Cover crop was an oat legume mix with 3% N that averaged approximately 3 T/A biomass that was incorporated one month before planting. Granular fertilizer was applied at 700 lb./acre. Irrigation water total estimated 3.6 acre-feet with a concentration of 1 ppm NO3-N (Geisseler et al., unpublished). 250 Cumulative N release/ uptake (lbs/acre)
N
itrogen (N) is an essential plant nutrient, providing the building blocks for plant growth and development. The N sources on an organic farm are numerous, including crop residue, compost, fertilizers, soil organic matter and irrigation water (Figure 1). Nitrogen management in organic systems is challenging because complex organic forms of N originating from organic materials need to be mineralized by microbes to become plant-available mineral forms of N: ammonium (NH4+) and nitrate (NO3-). Learning how to predict and monitor N release from soil amendments are important skills useful for selecting amendments and determining application rates and timing to achieve optimum plant health and yield.
Irrigation water Granular fertilizer (4% N) Poultry manure compost Cover crop Soil (0-24 in) Plant uptake
200 150 100 50
Apr
May
Jun
from the pool of plant-available forms of N in the soil. Because this reduces the amount of N available to plants, it is sometimes referred to as “tying up N” or N immobilization. Because most amendments available to organic farmers are bound in complex molecules containing both C and N, only a portion of the N becomes available to plants in the short term. This begs the question, how much N can you expect from organic fertilizers and compost?
Jul
What to Expect
Aug
Sep
Composts, manures and organic fertilizers are all applied to supplement soil N. The N availability from these materials differs widely, from 90% to tying up N. To better understand this, we mixed common soil amendments with organically-managed field soil and incubated them for 84 days in warm and moist soil (73 degrees F and 60% water holding capacity.) Figure 2 (see page 5) shows how quickly N became available from each material. A negative value indicates
Figure 3. Relationship between potentially available N and amendment carbon to nitrogen ratio2.
Figure 2. Predicted N release curves from different amendment types when incorporated into warm, moist soil2.
100
Blood & feather meal
80 Liquids
60
Granular fertilizer, 4% N
50
N risks being immobilized
30 10 0 0
5:1
10:1
15:1
20:1
Carbon to nitrogen ratio
40
Composted poultry manure
20 Composted yard trimmings 0
70
0
20
40
60
80
%N not a good predictor for mineralization from liquids
Available N @ 12 weeks (% amendment N)
Available N (% amendment N)
Available N @ 12 weeks (% amendment N)
Guano
Liquids Blood & feather meal Granular fertilizers and guano Manure composts Yard trimmings composts
90
Days after incorporation
0
5 10 Nitrogen concentration (%)
15
N immobilization. Actual N release rates in the field will depend on soil moisture and temperature but will follow a similar pattern. Our research along with dozens of other studies has found that the C:N ratio and % N of an amendment are good predictors of N availability. The lower the C:N ratio in the material, the more quickly N will be released. As the C:N ratio exceeds 15:1, available N moves closer to 0 due to temporarily tying up N. Such materials should not be applied too close to planting. Especially for compost, it is important to find out the total N and C:N ratio from the supplier to understand whether this material will be contributing N or tying up N in the soil. When C:N ratio is unavailable, the total N concentration is closely related to availability. Generally, as total N increases, availability of N increases (See Figure 3). Among the amendments tested, guano had a very high N content (% N) and a very low C:N ratio which resulted in high N availability (80% to 90% of the total N) and rapid availability—more than 50% of
Builds Humus & Healthy Soil Pacific Gro feeds soil microbes and helps establish a healthy fungal balance. This produces soil that’s resilient and efficient at providing nutrients. And it increases humus and soil organic matter. Used as a foliar fertilizer — Pacific Gro’s salmon oil performs as a sticker oil, and the amino acids chelate nutrients to facilitate absorption.
Provides calcium, salmon oil, amino acids and crab and shrimp shell metabolites in a liquid foliar and soil fertilizer. O Helps microbes feed and defend the crop O Builds healthy fungal populations O Delivers plant-available calcium Produced by Creative AG Products Inc. www.pacificgro.com 503-867-4849
Continued on Page 6 April/May 2021
www.organicfarmermag.com
5
Continued from Page 5
Table 1. Potential N availability from different types of organic amendments under warm, moist conditions. Negative numbers mean the compost tied up soil N2. All % N numbers for solid amendments are on a dry weight basis. Note: Liquid % N is reported on a fresh weight basis and isn’t a good indicator of the release rate. *(See Figure 3, page 5)
the N was available immediately with an additional 30% to 40% becoming available over 40 days (Figure 2, see page 5). On the other hand, composted yard trimmings had low total N content, less than 2%, and a high C:N ratio between 13 to 20, which resulted in slight N immobilization to 4% N release.
Material
Low C:N ratio materials like guano, feather meal and fish emulsion released much of their N in the first week, and almost all their N within three weeks. This quality makes them good sidedress materials. They can also be used to remediate known N deficiency. Poultry manure composts and granular fertilizers contributed some available N as soon as they were applied, but released their N more slowly. When incorporated into moist soil under warm conditions, they will release more quickly, though still over weeks, not days (See Table 1). High C:N materials like plant-based yard trimmings and composts released little to no N. They provide C which supports microbial communities and, over time, improves soil physical structure, but provides little N in the short term. Longterm soil fertility may be improved. Plant-based liquid fertilizers ranged from 48% to 92% N availability whereas manure-based liquid fertilizers (typically fish) ranged from 83% to 99% N availability after four weeks1,2. Organic liquid fertilizers are suspensions and often include particulate matter with which 8% to 21% of total N content is associated. Without proper filtration, these materials increase the risk of clogging drip emitters. If they are injected before the filter, a significant amount of the N can be removed from the suspension. Regular backflushing may be required to maintain system flow. New technology in liquid organic fertilizer is now providing materials in which N is thoroughly dissolved and does not have the issues just discussed. Coupled with the high cost per unit N, liquid fertilizers are often viewed as an easy way to supplement in-season fertility, but too expensive to 6
Organic Farmer
Typical %N
Typical C:N ratio
N available after 12 weeks
Municipal yard trimmings compost
0.5-2
13-20
-3% - 4%
Years
Poultry manure composts
2-5
6-8
30 - 35%
Weeks-months
Granular fertilizers (except guano)
2-7
5-7
38 - 60%
Days-weeks
Blood & feather meal
13-15
3-4
65 - 70%
Days
Liquid fertilizers
2-4*
4-6
50 - 100%
Days
Guano
12-13
3-4
80 - 90%
Days
provide the bulk of the crop’s N demand. In all cases, amendment N release is slower in cool weather or dry conditions as microbial activity is decreased. Crops planted in cold temperatures may benefit from starter fertilizers that contain some available N initially − those with a higher amount at day 0 and a steep initial curve (Figure 2, see page 5). For example, manure-based composts have roughly 15% of their total N available at application, whereas granular fertilizers started with an average of about 22%, or guano at more than 50%. If only a portion of the total N becomes available, what happens to the rest? The unmineralized organic N becomes part of the soil organic matter pool of N, and will be available in the future as the material is subject to mineralization processes.
How Much N and When?
Crop N demand and yield are very closely linked. The crop N demand includes N requirements to produce the plant material, harvested crop and cull produce. Expected yield is a good starting point for estimating how much N the crop needs. Specific crop N demand guidelines can be found at geisseler.ucdavis.edu/Guidelines/Home.html. The timing of crop demand depends on the crop. Figure 4 (see page 8) shows the N demand curve for broccoli tomato
April/May 2021
Releases in:
and strawberry. The steep areas on the curve indicate high N demand and represent times when N should be in high and sufficient supply. The fresh market tomato curve shows that from full bloom to early harvest, tomatoes utilize 73% of the crop’s total N demand. During this period, N uptake rates averaged 3 to 5 pounds N/A/day. Little N was used prior to flowering or once harvest was on-going, in this case of indeterminate tomatoes. Crops with similar growth and fruiting habits form similarly shaped N demand curves, though additional crops can be found at geisseler.ucdavis.edu/ Guidelines/N_Uptake.html. To ensure that sufficient N is available for the period of high N demand, taking a soil test a couple of weeks prior to that period is recommended. Samples taken at this time will reflect current availability from any number of organic sources (fertilizers, compost, cover crop residue, soil organic matter and others). Convert soil test data to lb./A to determine whether the supply will meet the demand. Details on how to take a soil sample can be found at geisseler.ucdavis.edu/Guidelines/Soil_Sampling_Nitrate.pdf.
Conclusion
Supplying a crop with sufficient N is essential for optimum health and production. In organic production, this is very challenging and requires the ability to synthesize hard numbers, educated
Continued on Page 8
Continued from Page 6 400
guesses, and keen observations.
• Monitor N with soil sampling to refine your estimations and confirm sufficient N for your crop. Organic N management is challenging, so we hope this article will help you navigate this important decision with more confidence and success.
Additional Resources
N dynamics in field-grown organic heirloom tomatoes: ucanr.edu/sites/SFA/files/343252.pdf Practical Training on N Planning and Management in Organic Production: ccsmallfarms.ucanr.edu/ Events_and_trainings/Nitrogen_Planning_and_ Management_in_Organic_Production_of_Annual_Crops_915/ References
1 Hartz, T..K., Smith, R., Gaskell, M., 2010. Nitrogen availability from liquid organic fertilizers, HortTechnology 20(1), 169-172. 2Lazicki, P., Geisseler, D., Lloyd, M., 2020. Nitrogen mineralization from organic amendments is variable but predictable. Journal of Environmental Quality 49, 483-495. Available at: https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ jeq2.20030 3Hartz, T.K., Cahn, M.D., Smith, R.F., 2017. Efficient nitrogen fertility and irrigation management of cool-season vegetables in coastal California. Available at: https://vric.ucdavis.edu/ pdf/fertilization/fertilization_EfficientNitrogenManagementforCoolSeasonvegetable2017.pdf
Comments about this article? We want to hear from you. Feel free to email us at article@jcsmarketinginc. com
8
Organic Farmer
April/May 2021
100
0
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Days after Planting 100 Tomato, fresh market Green fruit
60 40
Harvest period
0
30
150 100
Full bloom
20 0
200
50
60 90 Days after Planting
120
150
Crop N uptake (lb N/acre)
• Learn the N uptake demand for your crop (Figure 4).
Broccoli seeded in winter only starts to rapidly take up N when the weather warms. N uptake is high right through to harvest.
0
100 160
80 Harvest period
60
120
40
80
20
40
0
0
60
120 180 240 Days after Planting
300
0 360
Crop N uptake (lb N/acre)
• Familiarize yourself with the N release pattern from amendments (Figure 2, see page 5).
200
Crop N uptake (% of total)
• Identify the C:N ratio or total % N of your amendment to estimate N availability for your amendment (Table 1, see page 6, Figure 3, see page 5).
Broccoli seeded in summer starts growing and taking up N quickly. Uptake starts to slow wjen the weather cools.
300
Crop N uptake (% of total)
• Establish an N goal for your crop.
Crop N uptake (lb N/acre)
Here are some tips:
Broccoli
Figure 4. Example of crop N uptake curves of fresh market ‘Brandywine’ tomato and broccoli. Broccoli data is from a conventional field in the Salinas Valley. Yields were 28,000 and 22,000 lb./acre for summer- and winter-seeded broccoli, respectively3. Tomato data is from a fresh-market organic heirloom trial in Yolo County. Total yield was 62,000 lb./acre (unpublished data).
CONVERTING SOIL TEST DATA TO LB/A Soil test results are often reported as either NO3-N or NO3 and in ppm or mg/kg. NO3-N is reporting just N whereas NO3 is reporting the whole molecule and needs to be adjusted (See conversion too).
1 mg/kg = 1ppm If soil test is NO3, convert to NO3-N:
ppm / 4.42 = NO3
ppm NO3-N
Converting ppm or mg/kg to lb./acre can be calculated by multiplying this number by a factor of three to four per 12’’ depth of soil, depending on the soil bulk density. If you do not know your soil bulk density, 3.6 is a good starting place. See the conversion tools for details.
If soil test is in ppm, convert:
3.6 = lb. N/A ppm x NO3-N soil bulk density NO3-N
JCS-Organic Grower_1Q2021_April Print Ad_Final.pdf
1
3/15/21
5:49 PM
This IPM Solution Doesn’t Take Days Off... Does Yours?
Insecticide | Fungicide | Biostimulant | Surfactant C
M
Y
PureCrop1 is revolutionizing the agriculture industry with a new approach to crop protection, utilizing clean technology through colloidal chemistry.
With innovative chemistry and unprecedented power, PureCrop1 eliminates pests, molds, mildews, boosts plant health, and more effectively delivers nutrients than water alone.
CM
Use pre-bloom to harvest day Extend crop shelf-life Rainfast two hours post-spray Bio-selective to certain bacteria Improved root calcium-binding Organic approved
MY
CY
CMY
K
Increase nutrient intake Increase Brix levels Reduce salt build-up Zero phytotoxicity Zero REI Zero PHI
N
EFIC
IA
L
R
Y
L F
BE
Changing The Way We Grow. Dig deeper into PureCrop1 with studies, testimonials, and more on our website.
www.PureCrop1.com (707) 621-8939 info@purecrop1.com
April/May 2021
www.organicfarmermag.com
9
IEND
Understanding the Economics of Organic Seed Production By KIKI HUBBARD | Organic Seed Alliance
Organic seed production can be an economic opportunity for organic growers (photo by Broken Banjo Photography.)
O
rganic seed production is a developing industry and viable economic opportunity for organic growers. To help growers manage the uncertainties and risks inherent to seed production, and to help growers earn more profit, Organic Seed Alliance (OSA) recently published an online toolkit to assist organic seed growers and seed enterprises. The toolkit serves as the first of its kind to focus on organic seed production specifically, offering support in the form of budgeting spreadsheets, inventory management, and foundation and stock seed planning. Seed production can be deeply rewarding work. However, turning a passion for seeds into a viable livelihood is a challenge that even experienced seed growers struggle to overcome. That’s why this entire toolkit was developed in partnership with agricultural economists at Highland Economics— experienced professionals who understand the importance of a farm budget and production plan.
Tracking Expenses and Budgets
The first tool in the Seed Economics Toolkit is a spreadsheet that helps growers track the costs associated with producing seed crops. Enterprise budgets provide a snapshot of costs associated with a crop for a single year and do not make predictions or forecasts for future years. However, they can be used to provide guidance for growers who are considering investments in new equipment and scaling up.
Stock and Foundation Seed Production
Common questions around foundation, stock and production seed include: How much foundation seed do I need to ensure I have enough stock seed? How much stock seed should I produce every third year for my production seed? This second spreadsheet helps guide decisions around how much and how often to produce foundation, stock, and production seed based on your operation, desired inventory, longevity of the seed and estimated yield.
Tracking Labor
Tracking on-farm labor can be confusing and overwhelming, but it is also extremely important for growers trying to get a handle on their operation costs. A third piece of this toolkit is designed as a guide for tracking your operation each day, including a form designed for routine activities over the course of many days (such as watering in a greenhouse or screening a large seed lot) for tracking labor in seed production.
Getting Seed Contracts
Success in seed production contracts requires careful management of the grower-buyer relationship and an understanding of the terms of the contract. Learning from others’ experience can save many headaches and ensure a successful grower-buyer relationship. Over the years, experienced seed growers and buyers have shared their experiences and advice in workshops and webinars at the Organic Seed Growers Conference and other online networking events. Several of these webinars also offer contact information
Continued on Page 12 10
Organic Farmer
April/May 2021
®
IMAGINATION
INNOVATION
SCIENCE IN ACTION
Continued from Page 10 and guidance on how to reach out to seed companies when seeking contracts (all of these webinars are provided as part of the Seed Economics Toolkit at the link at the end of the article.) Growing seed on contract for a seed company takes some of the sales-related risks out of seed production, but finding the opportunity to grow on contract can also be a hurdle as it is not always clear how to connect with a seed company to acquire contracts. Seed companies and growers alike report that they most often make new relationships by networking at conferences, such as the Organic Seed Growers Conference, and other regional events. Many seed growers also cold call companies to see if they’re looking to contract with new growers. As an organization that strives to create networking opportunities for seed growers, OSA developed an online registry called the Organic Seed Producers Directory to connect seed growers with seed companies. It includes a user profile that shares each grower’s location, scale and crop expertise. In this way, the directory can be searched by seed companies seeking new growers and for producers to connect with one another as well. If you are an organic seed grower who would like to join this directory, create a profile today to start connecting with seed companies and other growers at: seedalliance.org/directory/.
‘
The best time to contact seed companies to inquire about contract opportunities is between September and January when companies are preparing for the following year’s production.
Seed Company Advice
Prices for wholesale production vary widely by crop, variety and scale as well as terms of the contract. The roles and expectations of the producer also influence the pricing in a production contract and understanding the expectations of the seed company is very important as it significantly influences the risks and costs of production. While prices vary widely from company to company and depend on a multitude of factors, it is also helpful to have some ballpark idea of average wholesale prices to help in negotiating contracts and using the enterprise budgeting tool to project profit potential. OSA surveyed nine seed companies to solicit feedback on best practices for engaging in contract seed production and to inquire about average contract prices for specific crops to help growers develop production plans (these prices are listed in the online toolkit at the link at the end of the article.) Contract prices often varied widely between companies and within a given crop by each company. Commonly mentioned determinants of prices included production scale; variety type (high or low yielding, ease of production); roles of producer, such as need for rogueing or finished quality seed cleaning; seed quality, such as germination rate and disease testing; and whether the crop is an open-pollinated or hybrid variety. Below is a summary of best practices shared by seed companies: The best time to contact seed companies to inquire about contract opportunities is between September and January when companies are preparing for the following year’s production.
12
Organic Farmer
April/May 2021
Communication is critical to maintaining a good contract relationship. Most companies request an update on the crop status two to three times throughout the growing season. Photos of the crop and updates on any off types are very helpful.
’
Timely delivery of clean seed is important as it helps the company prepare for the following year’s sales. If you are new to contract production, start small and try crops that you are familiar with growing. Try a test plot the first year if it is a new crop you are unfamiliar with so you can determine if you can grow it in your location. Also, plan for how you will harvest and handle the finished seed crop. Keep good records on your costs of production, including your time, so that you are able to engage in informed negotiations on price. Share your production information with the company and ask them to share what they know about the crop. Seed companies want to learn from your experience and also help you succeed. It takes an open exchange of information to ensure everyone’s success. If you need help, ask! To access the Seed Economics Toolkit, visit seedalliance.org/publications/ seed-economics-toolkit/. Comments about this article? We want to hear from you. Feel free to email us at article@jcsmarketinginc.com
Strawberries in May (peak production period for San Luis Obispo) of non-solarized (left) and solarized plots (right) (all photos courtesy A.M. Tubeileh.)
Biosolarization and Cover Crop Impact on Weeds and Soilborne Pathogens By TIMOTHY JACOBS | Risk Management Specialist, USDA and ASHRAF M. TUBEILEH | Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo
S
oils contain a lot of good things, but they are also reservoirs for weeds, pathogens and nematodes, which, if left uncontrolled, can devastate crop yields. If soilborne pests rise to economically damaging levels, it becomes necessary for growers to use soil disinfestation techniques to kill soilborne organisms.
Most conventional growers use fumigants for soil disinfestation. Fumigation is unavailable to organic growers leaving organic growers few options for controlling soilborne pests. However, over the past couple of decades, there has been substantial research into organic soil disinfestation techniques due to increasing regulations for conventional fumigants. Researchers at California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo recently conducted research on soil solarization and biosolarization, two organic soil disinfestation techniques, on organic strawberry production at the Cal Poly Organic Farm in San Luis Obispo, Calif. Strawberry beds undergoing solarization during August.
Soil Solarization
Solarization involves placing clear, thin (25 to 50μm), low-density polyethylene tarps over irrigated soil to increase soil temperatures to lethal levels for pathogens, pests and weeds. In general, temperatures generated during soil solarization range from 104 to 158 degrees F. The tarp is left on the soil for four to eight weeks, depending on the soil tem14
Organic Farmer
April/May 2021
peratures generated during solarization. The efficacy of solarization is primarily based on ambient air/soil temperatures and intensity of solar radiation. In most cases, solarization should raise the ambient soil temperature between 10 and 20 degrees C (18 to 36 degrees F) in the top six inches of the soil.
Germination (% )
100 90
species annual sowthistle bristly oxtongue common lambsquarters common purslane little mallow pigweed
80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
0
40
120 160 200 240 280 320 Hours Figure 1. Logistic regression models showing how germination rate of different weed species is affected by the duration of exposure to 122 degrees F under laboratory conditions simulating solarization. 80
Solarization is most effective when used during the summer when solar radiation is high in sunny, warm climates. Costs of solarization vary depending on plastic prices, but in general, the plastic costs in between $150 to $300 per acre. The best plastics are clear/transparent, one to three millimeters thick and UV-inhibited to prevent breakdown in sunlight. Biosolarization, which combines the use of organic soil amendments and soil solarization, has been proven to enhance the results of solarization in numerous field experiments. Organic amendments commonly used are plant residues, animal manure, compost and other high-nitrogen organic materials such as blood meal. Biosolarization is a relatively new area of research and can reduce the time needed for solarization as well as increase solarization’s effectiveness in areas with marginal conditions for solarization. For example, in San Luis Obispo, we are about five miles from the coast, experience frequent, foggy mornings and rarely have temperatures above 90 degrees F. We included biosolarization of cover crop residues in our experiment to see if it would increase the efficacy of solarization in our climate. The rest of this article will focus on the results from our research. For more information on solarization and biosolarization, including application techniques, please see our previous Organic Farmer article from April/May 2019 or UC extension’s webpage on solarization ipm.ucanr.edu/PMG/ PESTNOTES/pn74145.html.
Solarization Research
pigweed. Additionally, hard seeded (thick seed coats) seed were relatively unaffected by heat treatments taking long duration to kill. Time and percent mortality of weed seeds were used to create thermal death models for weed seeds at each temperature (Figure 1). Additionally, models were
Continued on Page 16
®
Natural Fish Fertilizers for
Organic Crop Production
PASTURE
As part of our research, we conducted lab experiments under simulated solarization conditions assessing the time needed to kill weed seeds at five different temperatures (104, 113, 122, 131 and 140 degrees F). Seeds tested included little mallow, redstem filaree, bristly oxtongue, annual sow thistle, common purslane, common lambsquarters and redroot pigweed. Efficacy of solarization temperatures differed between different species. In general, cool-season annuals annual sow thistle and bristly oxtongue were more susceptible to heat treatments than warm-season annuals such as redroot
VEGETABLES ROW CROPS
PRODUCE
DRAMM Corporation Manitowoc,WI USA
.FishFertilizer.com
www
April/May 2021
www.organicfarmermag.com
15
We also conducted field experiments on solarization of sudangrass residues in organic strawberry production. The objectives of our field experiment were: •
Time needed to achieve 90% mortality
Little mallow
Bristly oxtongue
Common purslane
Common lambsquarters
Redroot pigweed
Annual sowthistle
Species
Figure 2. Time needed to reduce germination rates by 90% for six different species at five different temperatures (40°C=104°F, 45°C=113°F, 50°C =122°F, 55°C=131°F, 60°C=140°F ) according to logistic regression models.
fdf
• To determine if soil solarization can reduce weed and pathogen pressures and improve plant health and strawberry yields in San Luis Obispo County, • To determine if the effect of sudangrass cover crop residues will increase the effects of soil solarization, and • To compare the effects of sudangrass residue mulching vs. incorporation on weed populations, pathogen populations and strawberry health and yields. The experiment was designed so that we had three cover crop treatments: A control, one where sudangrass was left as a surface mulch after mowing, and the other where sudangrass was incorporated into the soil after mowing. Within each cover crop treatment, we solarized half and left the other half non-solarized. ‘Piper’ sudangrass was planted in mid-
16
700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0
45° C 50° C 55° C 40° C 40° C 45° C 50° C 55° C 50° C 55° C 60° C 40° C 45° C 50° C 55° C 60° C 45° C 50° C 55° C 60° C 40° C 45° C 50° C 55° C
used to estimate the amount of time needed to kill 90% of seeds for all species tested (Figure 2). Redstem filaree germination rates were unaffected by heat treatments. Additionally, common purslane was unaffected by heat treatments below 113 degrees F or lower and redroot pigweed was unaffected by temperatures of 104 degrees F or below. Results indicated daily temperatures above 122 degrees F are needed for four to eight weeks to achieve adequate weed management via solarization.
Time (hours)
Continued from Page 15
Organic Farmer
April/May 2021
May using a seed drill. In mid-July, sudangrass was chopped and shredded with a tractor-drawn flail mower and incorporated into the soil in our incorporated treatment. After incorporation, beds were created in all plots except mulched plots. In mulched treatments, sudangrass residue was left on the soil surface and no beds were created. On July 26, solarization plastic was hand-applied onto solarized plots. After applying plastic, fields were irrigated for 72 hours using one line of drip tape till fields reached field capacity. Tarps were left on for five weeks and removed on August 31, 2018. Strawberries were planted in October after doing weed population assessments in our various treatments.
Results
Maximum soil temperatures in solarized plots were 118 degrees F at a soil depth of two inches and 42 degrees C at a soil depth of 6 inches. On average, temperatures in cover crop mulched plots were 4 to 6 degrees F lower than other solarized plots. Temperatures in all solarized plots were 18 to 30 degrees
F higher than non-solarized plots. In initial weed biomass assessments taken six weeks after tarp removal, non-solarized incorporated plots reduced weed biomass by 24.4% compared to the control. Non-solarized mulched plots reduced weed biomass by 95.6% compared to the control. All solarized plots resulted in similar reduction in weed biomass compared to the control with an average reduction of 97.1% ± 0.6%. Efficacy of solarization treatments decreased with time. In final weed biomass assessments taken 15 weeks after tarp removal, the only solarization treatment providing a significant reduction in weed biomass compared to the control was incorporated plots with solarization resulting in 67% lower biomass than the control. Mulched plots without solarization also provided significant control, reducing weed biomass to 84.1% of the control. However, in non-solarized mulched treatments, the sudangrass re-grew after mowing and did not die until the winter.
Continued on Page 18
April/May 2021
www.organicfarmermag.com
17
Non-solarized (left) and solarized (right) beds of strawberries during June.
Sudangrass Effect
Yields per 30 Yields per 30 Solarization effect plants (g) plants (g)
Mulched
8820 a
Solarized
11,595 a
Incorporated
7501 a
Non-Solarized
3,609 b
None
6480 a
Table 1. The yield in grams per 30 plants from solarized treatments (n=12) and sudangrass treatments (n=8) from March through June.
Continued from Page 16 This led to poor strawberry establishment, although the strawberries later recovered. Solarization reduced verticillium wilt populations by 80.7% compared to non-solarized plots. Solarized plots had much lower disease incidence throughout the growing season. Non-solarized plots started to experience disease symptoms in April and were not producing fruit by May. Solarized plots experienced almost no disease pressure till late May/June when temperatures warmed. Solarized plants experienced disease pressure from Charcoal Rot, Macrophomina phaesolina, a warm-season pathogen which we theorize was not reduced to the same degree as verticillium wilt populations were. Total 18
Organic Farmer
plant mortality was significantly higher in non-solarized plots with 35.5% mortality compared to 16.0 % mortality in solarized plots. Additionally, solarized plots had much higher yield than non-solarized plots. The different cover crop treatments did not have a clear effect on reducing verticillium wilt population, disease severity or increasing yields.
Key Takeaways
Solarization provided effective weed management for 3.5 months after tarp removal, reduced verticillium wilt populations, reduced disease severity and increased yield compared to non-solarized plots.
the effect of solarization. Cover crop treatments did not have a significant effect on verticillium populations or yields. Mulched treatments did reduce weed population and had lower disease severity than other treatments. Solarization effectively killed mowed sudangrass, preventing it from regrowing. Solarization of mowed cover crops provides a potential mechanism for killing cover crops for organic growers wishing to perform no-till production. However, more research is needed into this topic. The effectiveness of solarization depends not only on the temperatures you can achieve, but on the disease and weed species present in a field as well. Particularly in areas with cooler climates or frequent foggy/cloudy days during the summer, knowing the temperature thresholds required to kill the pests in your field can be important in determining whether solarization is a viable solution. This is another area where more research can be done. First, develop models to help growers estimate the temperatures they can achieve during solarization. Secondly, models can be used to determine the susceptibility of different pest species to solarization. Comments about this article? We want to hear from you. Feel free to email us at article@jcsmarketinginc.com
Biosolarization and Cover Crop Impact on Weeds and Soilborne Pathogens April/May 2021
Cover crop treatments did not enhance
®
The Grower’s Advantage Since 1982
©
Effective Plant Nutrients and Biopesticides to Improve Crop Quality & Yield
ORGANIC
®
ORGANIC
Herbicide EC
Contains Auxiliary Soil & Plant Substances
Plant Nutrients & Adjuvants
Botector
G ARGOIL
Biofungicide
®
®
®
®
INSECT, MITE & DISEASE CONTROL
Blossom Protect™ Bactericide
For more information, call (800) 876-2767 or visit www.westbridge.com
USDA Passes Final Rules on Hemp Growing
Agency Makes Changes Based on Grower Input and Experiences By DANITA CAHILL | Contributing Writer Open-pollinated field of hemp plants in Nicolaus, Calif. (all photos courtesy J. Eve.)
J
ust when you thought you knew all the rules and laws that regulated legal hemp growing in the U.S. at the federal level, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) went and made changes to those rules. They didn’t do it to cause headaches, but rather because they listened to what the public had to say and what growers learned during the 2020 growing season. The regulations that first came out after the 2018 Farm Bill passed into law was
Hemp flowers.
an interim final rule. The interim regulations were published on October 31, 2019 and laid out guidelines for hemp growers to legally register, test their plants to stay within the THC limitations and generally stay out of trouble with the law. On January 15, 2021, the USDA published a final rule. Those updated hemp regulations took effect on March 22, 2021. Below is a general overview of the final federal regulations. Since the law may vary from state to state and within tribal land, be sure to check the regulations within your own state or jurisdiction.
Violation for Too Much THC
Justin Eve believes rules for hemp are being rushed.
20
Organic Farmer
April/May 2021
As was law before, plants that test too high in tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), a cannabinoid, must be destroyed. The final rule raises the amount from 0.5% to 1%. If plants test at or below the 1% threshold, there is no “negligent violation.” A grower can only receive one such
violation in any given growing season. Scientists estimate there are more than 100 different cannabinoids in hemp. More studies are currently underway. Of those cannabinoids, two are the most well-known. The first is THC. It’s the hallucinogenic, or recreational component in cannabis (marijuana). THC is also found in hemp, but generally in much smaller amounts. The second most recognized is Cannabidiol (CBD), the popular medical cannabinoid in hemp. CBD is also found in cannabis. Plants over the 1% THC threshold can be destroyed in more ways than before. No longer will a grower be required to use only law enforcement or a Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) reverse distributor, which is a person or company that reclaims outdated or otherwise unusable drugs and destroys them. Reverse distributors are registered with the DEA. According to reports submitted by states and tribes in 2020, growers planted 6,166 acres under the 2018 Farm Bill hemp plans and about 730 acres of those had to be destroyed for noncompliance.
Plant Testing
Since there aren’t enough labs regis-
Strengthen cell walls and lessen the impact of abiotic stress.
A 2019 midwestern hemp crop.
tered with the DEA for the amount of hemp production expected in 2021, the DEA is allowing non-DEA registered labs to test hemp. This is an extension only until January 1, 2022. In the meantime, the DEA is trying to quickly process lab applications to get more testing labs registered. The timing of plant sample collection has been extended. The interim regulations gave only a 15-day window from testing to harvest. That time frame has been raised to 30 days. Growers asked for a change in the sampling method. They requested that larger samples be taken from each plant sampled, or that the whole plant be sampled. They also asked that samples be taken from fewer plants. The final regulations let individual states and tribes set their own policies using a performance-based approach to sampling. These policies must be written into a plan and sent to the USDA for approval. The plan may consider the state’s seed certification programs, the history of grower compliance and other factors as determined by tribe or state.
Tribal Regulations
The rules were a little fuzzy about tribal jurisdiction in the interim regulations. Those initial rules didn’t specifically
discuss if a tribe with an approved USDA plan had primary rule of law over hemp production across its entire territory, or only over land in which it had inherent jurisdiction. Since tribes rule themselves as quasi-sovereign nations, the USDA decided in the final regulations that a tribe may exercise jurisdiction, and therefore regulatory authority, over hemp production in all of its territory no matter the extent of the tribe’s inherent regulatory authority (generally, tribes can’t exercise criminal or civil jurisdiction over non-tribe members.)
A Hemp Researcher’s Perspective
So how do hemp researchers and growers feel about the hemp final regulations? And how do these regulations affect them? “Working with hemp as a researcher poses unique challenges because of the regulatory factor,” said Sarah Light, UCCE agronomy advisor in Sutter, Yuba and Colusa Counties. “It’s just the nature of working with the crop.” Light sees the final rule as a positive rather than a negative. “Now that we have the final ruling, we can move ahead. Now we know,” she said. “We’re
Call to learn more:
208-678-2610
Continued on Page 22 April/May 2021
www.organicfarmermag.com
21
An indoor canopy of hemp plants.
tatoes on 20 acres north of Sacramento, Cal. His background is in bioenergy, plant sciences and soil chemistry. He sees a high level of importance in getting viable hemp genetics that hemp farmers can grow, harvest and make some money on while staying within the legal boundaries of the regulations. Hemp growers like Eve are banding together to form the Hemp Farmers Guild. The guild is working with the DEA and the USDA to help them understand the growing challenges of hemp from a farmer’s perspective. So, are the federal agencies listening to hemp growers? “They are,” Eve said, but added a caveat about the USDA, “They’re not really farmers. They’re not granting us a buffer to make some mistakes as we go along.” Justin Eve stands next to one of his hemp plants
Continued from Page 21 excited to keep doing research for our growers. We’ll just continue to be in compliance.”
A Hemp Grower’s Perspective
Justin Eve, owner of 7 Generations Producers, is a USDA-certified organic grower. He has a different take on the regulations. “They’re classifying it and approaching it like some sort of drug,” he said. “It’s a little upsetting to me. This is an agricultural crop. We already have those regulations in place. We don’t need to recreate the wheel.” Eve is frustrated with how the USDA and the DEA focus on THC levels within hemp. “It’s such a miniscule aspect to what this crop can be,” he said. “America made its way with hemp.” (The early drafts of the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights were written on hemp paper). In addition to hemp, Eve also grows moringa and sweet po22
Organic Farmer
April/May 2021
The way the regulations are written makes Eve believe there’s not a lot of wiggle room. “It’s limiting a farmer to harvesting within 30 days. It’s unconstitutional. We just want to grow a good crop and not get arrested for what we thought was legal. “The limitation on THC is low. The way they’re testing is skewed,” Eve said. If the plants test too high in THC, they must be destroyed; there’s no other path. Eve mentioned a hemp grower in the Merced area that had to destroy a 200acre, $2 million crop. “It can bankrupt farmers.” Big companies are hesitant to get involved with the business, according to Eve. But for the industry to flourish, it will take large companies investing in expensive processing facilities. “The major companies are afraid of backlash from the USDA, the FDA and the DEA,” Eve said. As for the timing of the final rule, Eve thinks it was rushed. “We should have two more years to figure out a final rule,” he said. He believes that state departments and local ag departments don’t fully understand the USDA regulations. “The head doesn’t know what the tail is doing. “I think the USDA is heading in the right direction, but up to this point, it’s been too hard,” Eve said. Comments about this article? We want to hear from you. Feel free to email us at article@jcsmarketinginc.com
#KLR_1 aka “Cherry Limeade Hemp”
Equatorial Champion High CBD
Cultivated in Jamaica, Haiti, Colombia, Hawaii, Mexico, Thailand, and all of North America
Minor Cannabinoid CBG
High Heat/High Humidity Survivability
Disease/Insect Resistant
Boutique Smokeable Flower Global Provider since 2017
Buy seeds at www.klrfarms.com
High Yield for Biomass/Extraction Certified Organic OTCO
Check us out at
Pictured: KLR#1 flower on October 18, Albany, Or.
@KLR_Farms
Research into Alfalfa Crop Rotation for
Organic Tomatoes By SABRINA HALVORSON | Contributing Writer
T
anecdotal or observational evidence that growers reported seeing on the ground Alfalfa grows on test plots at the UC Davis Russell Ranch Sustainable in their crop rotaAgriculture Facility. Researchers tested the use of alfalfa in crop rotation,” said Tautges, tions versus corn when growing organic tomatoes (photo now a researcher courtesy N. Tautges.) with Michael Fields Agricultural Institute in East Troy, Wisc. “A at the end of each rotation crop with lot of growers would say that they have the objective of seeing how the differbetter soil health and the soil was more ences persisted in time throughout the workable following alfalfa compared to rotation. They planted tomatoes after following other annual crops. They’re both crops and measured the same seeing yield boosts. They’re seeing indicators in the tomatoes to see how decreases in disease and pathogen pres- they compared to the findings from the sure in the following vegetable crop.” previous crop.
he practice of rotating alfalfa with tomatoes was once more popular than it is today, but recent research suggests it offers soil health benefits in organic tomato crops.
Researchers Nicole Tautges, Emily Woodward and Dan Putnam tested a three-year rotation of tomatoes, corn and alfalfa at the UC Davis Russell Ranch Sustainable Agriculture Facility. According to their research, alfalfa benefited tomato yields when in rotation, with fruit yields between 10% to 26% greater following three-year alfalfa as compared to following corn in a twoyear tomato-corn rotation. “This research was motivated by a lot of
"
“There was a real visual difference in the vine health among the systems, and I think that contributed to the stronger yields also."
Tautges said there has been limited research into forages and what exactly the biological and chemical mechanisms were that were driving those comments from growers.
In addition to monitoring the various indicators in the soil, they kept track of yields from the tomato crops and found an increase in tomatoes that followed alfalfa.
“It’s all qualitative at this point. So, I wanted to take a stab at doing that research,” she said.
“We saw about a 3- to 5-ton-per-acre increase in tomato fruit yields. At times, we did see even up to 10 tons per acre,” she said. She said while there were some individual cases of higher yields, the increase was generally around 10% minimum.
− Nicole Tautges, UC Davis
24
Organic Farmer
April/May 2021
Tautges explained they measured a suite of soil health indicators – biological, chemical and physical – in the soil at the end of the alfalfa crop compared to the corn as their annual control. They compared the indicators
She said they also noticed some other results visually. The plants were greener,
bushier and bigger. “There was a real visual difference in the vine health among the systems, and I think that contributed to the stronger yields also.” Their research findings broke down findings in terms of soil health. The research showed alfalfa enhanced soil microbial biomarkers and the nitrogen uptake of the soil microbial pool after three years compared to the corn. The alfalfa also showed higher levels of mycorrhizal fungi in the soil. The mycorrhizal fungi biomarkers were 45% higher in alfalfa soil than in corn soil. There were differences in nutrients as well. The research states total dissolved nitrogen in the soil solution was more than two times greater following corn than following alfalfa. That dissolved nitrogen represents a pool of potentially leachable nitrogen, the research explains. It also states greater potentially leachable nitrate in the fall lead to greater measured nitrate leaching
losses over the winter. According to the research, nitrate leached with winter precipitation was lower following alfalfa compared to conventional corn. When it comes to nitrogen, Tautges said things get more complicated. “There should be nitrogen going into the microbial community and there should be nitrogen going into the soil by all of the organic matter decomposition that we’re getting from the alfalfa,” she explained. Another result from the alfalfa rotation is a change in soil structure. The researched showed alfalfa greatly improved soil aggregation, which Tautges said is an important indicator of soil structure. “We had hypothesized that alfalfa having a deeper, bigger root system would be punching more holes in the soil and aerating the soil more. Fungi that were being maintained better in the alfalfa
system would be leading to better soil aggregation through the compounds fungi secrete,” she explained. While those factors were leading to improved soil aggregation, one factor of growing alfalfa was having a counter effect. “The haying activities also were increasing bulk density because you’re driving equipment across the field a lot without using any tillage to break it up again.” The research did find a couple of issues with the alfalfa rotation. Findings indicated the alfalfa tended to deplete soil cations, which left low levels of potassium and calcium fertility for the following tomato crop. However, overall, researchers determined alfalfa benefits biological and physical soil health parameters and tightens nitrogen cycling. Comments about this article? We want to hear from you. Feel free to email us at article@jcsmarketinginc.com
2021
DAY HOSTED BY
COMING SUMMER 2021
Register Today at: WCNGG.com/Almond-Day-2021 April/May 2021
www.organicfarmermag.com
25
Food Safety Laws and Standard Operating Procedures for Urban Farmers By TAYLOR CHALSTROM | Assistant Editor
Youth farmers at WOW urban farm in Oakland. Urban farming continues to rise in popularity as a way for urban communities to tackle food insecurity and promote food sovereignty (all photos by R. Surls.)
26
Organic Farmer
April/May 2021
A
s urban farming continues to rise in popularity as a way for urban communities to tackle food insecurity and promote food sovereignty, new laws and standard operation procedures are being put into place to ensure food safety of those products. The California Urban Agriculture Food Safety Guide, produced in December 2020 by UC Berkeley, UCCE and Sustainable Economies Law Center, provides a thorough overview of what those urban farmers or gardeners may be subject to. “For new urban farmers, it outlines relatively new laws that offer new opportunities for urban farmers and gardeners to grow and distribute foods for sale including the Cottage Food Act and the Community Food Producer Act,” said Jennifer Sowerwine, UCCE metropolitan agriculture and food safety specialist at UC Berkeley and lead author of the guide. “We tried to take complex regulations and put them into a format that will be more accessible for very small-scale growers,” added Rachel Surls, UCCE sustainable food systems advisor and co-author. The 72-page guide also explains whether or not urban farmers may be subject to the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA), and clarifies that all food grown and sold or donated in urban environments should be following the CDFA’s Small Farm Food Safety Guidelines, according to Sowerwine. “Generally, any farm or organization in California that grows or distributes produce offered for public consumption is subject to these guidelines,” she said. “Therefore, urban farmers, community gardens and backyard gardeners should all read and implement these guidelines before offering food for public consumption, whether by sale or by donation.”
Radishes for sale at an urban farm in Ontario, Calif. The 72-page guide clarifies that all food grown and sold or donated in urban environments should be following the CDFA’s Small Farm Food Safety Guidelines.
Handwashing station at an urban farm in San Diego. CDFA’s Small Farm Food Safety Guidelines dictate that proper hygiene should be followed in every step of the growing process.
Surls noted that products produced and distributed by urban farmers have long existed in a “legal gray area” and that new laws like the ones outlined in the guide are clearing things up. Continued on Page 28
DON’T FORGET THE SEASOL...
Solutions for the Earth
Increases Nutrient Uptake Efficiency Increases Yield for a Bountiful Crop Decreases Saline Stress Improves Environment for Soil Microbial Activity Conventional and Organic Products Available
Clearing Things Up
The laws and standard operation procedures in the guide were previously difficult to find and navigate. Sowerwine said that this guide provides a “one-stop-shop” for laws that may affect the urban farm as well as best practices for safe growing, distribution and storage of not only fresh produce, but also eggs, chicken and small livestock. It also provides guidelines and resources for safe compost production, application and management.
View the Full Study at
earthsol.ag/crops
WATER
April/May 2021
SEASOL www.earthsol.ag www.organicfarmermag.com
27
Vertical urban farm in Los Angeles. Some urban farms, depending on the operation, are fully or partially exempt from certain laws under the Food Safety Modernization Act.
On-Farm Assessment
Continued from Page 27
“Food safety is very important in the At the end of the guide, Sowerwine “[Urban farm produce] was not necesurban farming sphere, particularly in prepared an on-farm food safety sarily considered an “approved source” relation to urban soils,” Sowerwine assessment for California urban farms. for sale to retail food establishments,” said. “It is important before starting According to Sowerwine, the checklist she said. “Two laws cleared that up. to farm to assess your urban soils for offers a comprehensive assessment of Now urban growers are considered any risk of contamination by learning potential on-farm food safety risks, “approved source” through a category about the prior site use, and if there is adapted from USDA guidelines and called “community food producers” elevated risk, then getting a soil test.” in compliance with the CDFA Food established by California state laws AB The guide outlines testing, remediation Safety Guidelines, yet “tailored to 1990 and AB 234.” and best management practices for smaller-scale operations,” she said. urban soils. Sowerwine said that the COVID-19 “It covers the five main areas of potenpandemic has contributed to an inAnother issue is disease prevention. tial risk of contamination and how to crease in household food production The guide makes it clear that followassess them, including risk from water, as evidenced by the rapid decline in ing standard operating procedures is animals, soils, surfaces and health and seed supplies, and rising demand in necessary to ensure that every biosecu- hygiene factors, and best practices to raising chickens in backyards. This has rity measure is met to reduce any and minimize risk as well sample record given more incentive for people to not all incidence, whether that be between keeping forms to document best praconly become urban growers but to also animals or zoonotic. tices,” she said. be aware of any laws or acts that may pertain to them. “Even one case of E. coli or SalmonelSowerwine noted that even for smallla is too many,” Surls said. “Everyone er-scale operations, it can be helpful “Many are sharing foods with their who produces food for distribution to walk through the assessment and neighbors, donating it to food pantries, wants it to be healthy for whomever is determine where there may be conaggregating produce into CSA-type going to eat it. Growers can face legal tamination issues and how to address boxes, and some are taking advantage liability if someone gets sick from eatthem. of the Community Food Producer Act ing what they grew, and of course we to sell their products,” Sowerwine said. want to prevent that from happening.” “And for farms that may have community or student engagement, what Importance of Food Safety Surls said that urban farmers are genkind of signage and training may be The entire guide is structured around erally focused on community health beneficial,” she added. the necessity for food safety in an urand food access, so the incentive for ban environment. Urban farmers need following proper guidelines to keep A publication of the full guide is availto adhere to any and all food safety food production constant is there. able for free download at anrcatalog. laws that may apply to their operation, “Everyone wants to be healthy, and ucanr.edu/pdf/8660.pdf. namely those relating to soil health following the best practices outlined Comments about this article? We want and disease prevention in order to will help minimize the risk of on-farm to hear from you. Feel free to email us at grow and sell products. or in-garden contamination.” article@jcsmarketinginc.com
28
Organic Farmer
April/May 2021
Blu� ����t �o� B�tt�r O��an�� P��du����n BE����T� O� P����GE���:
Sti����ti�� �� so�� ��c�o��g��i�m� Lo�s�, �i��n� ��il ��� f��e� w���� Red����on �� ��r�i��z�� �eq���e� Ac�i��t�� �he ����m�o��t�o� �� p���t �e��d�e an� ��c�u����s e���h���m� In��e�s�� �at�� �t��a�� c��a��t� �� so�� Ben�fi��a� t� ��� so�� �y��� an� ��m���it���� Op�i��z�� �ut����on �� �h� ��an�, ��d g�o�s ��ro���r ��o� s��te�
M��OR���Z�E PE���G��I� AC����TE
BE����T� O� M���R���ZA�:
Pla��s ��� �es� ��t�� Pla��s ��� �es� ��r���iz�� Sti����te� ���t ��ow�� Im��ov�� ��si���n�� �o f����l �o�� d��e���s Im��ov�� �r�u��t ����ra��� Red���� t�a�s���n� �h��� Im��ov�� �a�l� �ro��h Im��ov�� ��il ��r����re So�l ����on ����es���t�o� ��d ���t�i��t�o�
P�O��: 559-564-1236
BE����T� O� �C���AT�
Fre� ���in� ��m��o��s ��� p�e��t��� ne����de� Ac�i�� f���al ���g�� �n� �un��� b�o���s Nit����n fi�i�g ����ni��s Hum�� ��r�a���n
w��.My�o��A�dC�o�.c��
Cal� ����y �o� � 20% Dis����t o� Y��� �ex� O�de�
HOW TO HELP ENDANGERED POLLINATORS WHILE ALSO HELPING YOUR FARM By DANITA CAHILL | Contributing Writer No milkweed means no monarch caterpillar food, according to McKibbin (photo courtesy Kitty Bolte, Xerces Society.)
A
s a result of human activity, the world has lost about half of its insect populations in the last 75 years. Those insect declines are due largely to habitat loss and degradation, pesticides and climate change, said Jessa Kay-Cruz of the Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation. Some of those insects can be important pollinators for crop production, such as the monarch butterfly. “Monarchs across the U.S. are imperiled, though the Western population is worse off than the Eastern population,” said Sarah McKibbin, Restoration Project Manager of Solano Resource Conservation District (RCD). “Monarchs are completely dependent on milkweed plants,” said McKibbin, who was a speaker for a recent online workshop sponsored by Solano. The butterflies lay their eggs on milkweed plants. When the eggs hatch, the caterpillars eat only milkweed. “The toxins in milkweed helps protect them from predators,” she said.
Adult monarch on narrow-leaf milkweed, A. fascicuaris . In 2020, the Western Monarch Thanksgiving Count tallied only 1,914 monarchs (photo courtesy Stephanie McKnight/Xerces Society.)
The milkweed flowers provide a nectar source, not only for adult monarchs, but for other pollinators too, such as native bees. “Milkweed is a relatively prolific nectar supplier,” McKibbin said The monarch caterpillars go through
30
Organic Farmer
April/May 2021
Monarch caterpillar on woolypod milkweed, A. eriocarpa .There are multiple native milkweed species available for planting (photo courtesy Brianna Borders/Xerces Society.)
five instar stages (between molts) before forming a chrysalis and attaching it to a milkweed stem. The monarch lifecycle repeats four to five times each spring through fall. The last batch of butterflies that emerge are the ones that migrate from parts of the U.S. and Canada. “Western monarchs overwinter along
the California coast in Monterey pines and eucalyptus trees,” McKibbin said. “Eastern monarch populations overwinter in Mexico in Oyamel fir trees.”
number had dropped to approximately 29,000, and in 2020, the Western Monarch Thanksgiving Count tallied only 1,914 monarchs.
Monarch Numbers
“Western monarchs have declined by over 99%,” McKibbin said. “The East-
In the 1980s, there were an estimated 4.5 million monarchs that overwintered along the Pacific Coast. In 2019, the
April/May 2021
Continued on Page 32
www.organicfarmermag.com
31
Incorporating native milkweed species into cover crops can create a habitat for monarchs while reducing the need for broad-spectrum insecticides.
“Don’t plant milkweed within five miles of the coast because it can interrupt the monarch’s life cycle.
Continued from Page 31
− Sarah McKibbin, Solano RCD
ern monarchs have ‘only’ declined by 80% in the past 20 years.” So why are the Western monarchs in such rapid decline? The reasons are many, according to Solano RCD:
of milkweed.
• Loss of overwintering habitat.
•
• Development along the Pacific coastline. • Decline and aging of pine and eucalyptus groves without regeneration. • Breeding habitat loss and degradation. • Urban sprawl.
• Tropical milkweed, which is not native and can harbor a parasite harmful to monarchs.
“Good” vs. “Bad” Milkweed
• Agricultural practices with extensive tilling and pesticide use. • Pesticides used for mosquito control. • Pesticides used by homeowners and the nursery trade. • Widespread pesticide contamination 32
Organic Farmer
Climate change – causing changes in temperature and rainfall patterns which affects monarch migration and milkweed distribution.
April/May 2021
So, what is the difference between milkweed that is harmful to monarchs and milkweed that is beneficial? Tropical or exotic milkweed, Asclpias curassavica, is harmful. It grows north to Mexico but isn’t native to the U.S. or Canada. It’s an attractive plant and easily grown, so it is most often the species offered for sale in nurseries. Tropical milkweed blooms and grows year-round in mild climates – except in the case of rare
”
freeze events. Because of its year-round availability, tropical milkweed convinces the monarch to continue breeding throughout the winter. Nature didn’t intend for monarchs to breed year-round, and there are several risks involved when they do, according to Monarch Joint Venture (MJV), University of Minnesota. Risks include a higher OE infection rate and frigid temperatures during those rare freezing events. There is also a chance of food shortages when caterpillars eat tropical milkweed to the ground during the winter and there is no native milkweed available because of winter dieback. When gardeners and growers in the
coastal southern U.S. and California plant non-native tropical milkweed, there is another potential risk to the monarch. Milkweed harbors a debilitating parasite, a protozoan called Ophy-
ocystis elektroscirrha (OE). Patches of tropical milkweed growing year-round can foster greater transmission of OE, according to MJV, although another study shows that tropical milkweed can lower OE replication. This is because of elevated levels of cardenolide toxins (a type of heart-arresting steroid) in the plant. But less OE replication still may not be in the monarch’s favor. Instead of dying quickly, butterflies that are moderately infected could potentially spread more disease over a longer life span. Adult monarchs infected with OE can harbor thousands, even millions, of
microscopic spores on their bodies. Infected butterflies scatter the dormant spores onto eggs or milkweed leaves. These in turn are ingested by monarch caterpillars. The spores replicate inside the larvae and pupae. Heavily infested monarchs may not emerge completely from their chrysalis. They either become stuck or are too weak to fully open their wings. Monarchs with milder infections of OE can’t fly as well and don’t live as long as healthy butterflies.
ulation of OE. If you have any tropical milkweed, MJV suggests cutting it back in the fall and winter months and gradually replacing it with native milkweed species. The natives include narrow-leaf milkweed, Asclpias fascicuaris; showy milkweed, A. speciosa; California milkweed, A. Californica; heartleaf milkweed, A. cordifolia; and woolypod milkweed, A. eriocarpa. Other milkweed notes: “Don’t plant milkweed within five miles of the coast because it can interrupt the monarch’s life cycle,” McKibbin said.
North America’s native milkweeds show dieback in the winter, which stops the winter breeding and resets the pop-
Continued on Page 34
LET MILLER’S ORGANICS BOOST YOUR PRODUCE PERFORMANCE CITOLEAF Non-ionic adjuvant designed to improve the contact, wetting and adhesion of agrochemicals onto the plant surface
Proprietary blend of organic acids that sequester and release soil nutrients while leaching sodium away from the root rhizosphere
BioVive
TM
®
Natural sea plant extract fertilizer which is fortified with proprietary yeast extract to strengthen crop plant resistance or recovery
Unique balanced profile blend of vegetable derived amino acids designed to improve root development and crop protection
BENEFITS OF MILLER’S ORGANIC COMPLIANT SYSTEM
ENHANCES INITIAL PRODUCT DEPOSITION AND COVERAGE
IMPROVES EFFICACY OF CROP PROTECTION PROGRAMS
BRINGING QUALITY AMERICAN FORMULATED PRODUCTS TO THE FARMING COMMUNITY FOR OVER 80 YEARS MILLERCHEMICAL.COM
MILLERCHEMICAL
INFO@MILLERCHEMICAL.COM
@MILLERCHEMICAL
800.233.2040
MILLERCHEMICALFERTILIZER
Always read and follow label directions. Not all products are registered in all states. Check registration in your state before using. THERE ARE NO IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Refer to the Miller Chemical & Fertilizer, LLC Standard Conditions of Sale for the only express warranties applicable to Miller Chemical & Fertilizer, LLC products. Products incorporating Miller Chemical & Fertilizer, LLC products are not warranted by Miller Chemical & Fertilizer, LLC. Nu-Film®, CITOLEAF®, BioVive™ and C.F.O.™ are used, applied for, or registered as trademarks of Miller Chemical & Fertilizer, LLC.
April/May 2021
www.organicfarmermag.com
33
Continued from Page 33 The toxin in milkweed concerns ranchers, but it takes a long ingestion period before it harms cattle. “There are no recent reported deaths of cattle to USDA from milkweed,” McKibbin said.
Helping Adult Monarchs and Other Pollinators
Besides native milkweed, there are other plantings that farmers can grow to attract monarchs as well as native bees and other pollinators. Plant a variety of nectar sources and plan your flowering selections so they produce year-round bloom. McKibbin suggests practicing the 10-10-10-10-1 rule: • Plant a 10’ X 10’ area (minimum).
Monarch chrysalis on narrow-leaf milkweed, A. fascicuaris. Planting milkweed within five miles of the coast can interrupt the monarch’s life cycle, according to McKibbin (photo courtesy Stephanie McKnight/Xerces Society.)
• Include at least 10 native milkweed plants of the same species. • Plant a total of at least 10 different plant species. • Plant each species in a block at least one square meter in size. •
Other ways to help pollinators is to shop mindfully − buy organic produce and organic nursery stock.
“Avoid products that contain GMO ingredients, especially corn, wheat, and soy. These are the most common ‘Roundup-ready’ GMO crops that allow farmers to spray entire fields with roundup to kill all plants except their crop, including wild milkweed. Milkweed that would have grown wild in fields and farm edges are collateral damage, so GMO crops are a large contributor to habitat loss in agricultural settings – no milkweed means no monarch caterpillar food,” McKibbin said. Protect monarch overwintering sites. Volunteer for citizen science projects. Get involved with the Thanksgiving and New Year’s monarch counts. Donate to nonprofits that are helping to protect monarchs and other pollinators. Avoid pesticides, especially systemic insecticides such as neonicotinoids. “They are the worst,” McKibbin said. “They can affect plants, water and soils for months to years.”
Tomato field hedgerow (photo courtesy of Kitty Bolte/Xerces Society.)
34
Organic Farmer
April/May 2021
For more information on helping monarchs and other beneficial insects visit the following websites: Solano Resource Conservation District: https://www.solano.org, Xerces Society: https//xerces.org, Monarch Joint Venture: https// monarchjointventure.org. Comments about this article? We want to hear from you. Feel free to email us at article@jcsmarketinginc.com
WE WILL PUMP YoU UP with our mycorrhizal products
POWER UP YOUR PLANTS
Ask us about our other soil care products. • BACTERIAL Inoculants • Soil Products • Biological Food Products • Micro Nutrients • Foliar Nutrients Contact Us Today at 1-800-279-9567 callnrg.com
USDA National Organic Program Changing Approach to Organic Oversight in India By TAYLOR CHALSTROM | Assistant Editor
U
SDA is increasing its oversight in the Indian organic market to better monitor organic products coming into the United States.
allowed to apply for direct certification to NOP by USDA-accredited certifiers. The exact timeline of the transition period, according to USDA, is as follows:
certification to any organic business verified to fully comply with USDA organic regulations throughout the transition period.
On Jan. 11, 2021, USDA notified India’s Agricultural and Processed Food Products Exports Development Authority (APEDA) that they are ending U.S.-India Organic Recognition. The decision comes as USDA deemed India’s organic control system unable to adequately protect the integrity of the USDA organic seal.
• Jan. 11, 2021: APEDA notified of an end to U.S.-India Organic Recognition.
India organic suppliers cannot continue business with U.S. buyers after July 12, 2021 if they do not apply for the NOP certification. The Organic Integrity Database will need to be used by buyers to verify existing certification or a pending application with a USDA-accredited certifier. The database can be accessed at organic.ams.usda.gov/Integrity/.
The previous agreement between USDA and APEDA allowed APEDA-accredited certifiers to provide USDA organic certification in India, according to the USDA website (ams.usda.gov/services/ organic-certification/international-trade/India). USDA is altering the agreement so that all India organic products/ingredients across the entire supply chain are to be certified as USDA organic with a USDA National Organic Program (NOP) certificate in order to come to the U.S. starting July 12, 2022. USDA will allow a one-and-a-half-year transition period for India organic suppliers and U.S. buyers in order to help minimize market disruption as a result of the new requirements. During this period, organic operations previously certified by APEDA-accredited certifiers will be 36
Organic Farmer
April/May 2021
• March 2021: Certifiers are to report any certification applicants who are currently certified by APEDA in India in the Organic Integrity Database (public data). This will help U.S. buyers verify that a farm or business in India has applied for NOP certification. • July 12, 2021: Any India organic business wanting to export to the U.S. must have applied for USDA/ NOP certification. • July 12, 2022: To export to the U.S., all India organic products/ingredients across the supply chain must be certified USDA organic with a USDA/NOP certificate. Organic businesses in the U.S. buying from an India organic supplier certified by an APEDA-accredited certifier must communicate with those suppliers about the need to apply for NOP certification to a USDA-accredited certifier by July 12, 2021. USDA states that USDA-accredited certifiers may issue USDA/NOP
Organic suppliers in India that are certified by an APEDA-accredited certifier will need to identify USDA-accredited certifiers previously approved under the U.S.-India recognition agreement. To accomplish this, visit apeda.gov.in/ apedawebsite/organic/NPOP_certification_bodies.pdf and refer to the “Validity of Current Accreditation” and “Scope of Accreditation” columns. Suppliers that do not apply for certification by July 12, 2021 will be barred from exporting USDA organic products to the U.S. India suppliers currently accredited by APEDA for USDA certification may apply to the USDA National Organic Program (NOP) for direct accreditation at any time. Comments about this article? We want to hear from you. Feel free to email us at article@jcsmarketinginc.com
The professionals’ top choice coast to coast for all root and foliar applications.
MICRONUTRIENTS: Effective Measurement and Use of Manganese
Part Two: Interpreting Lab Results for Manganese By NEAL KINSEY | Kinsey Ag Services, Contributing Writer
T
his article is the second in a two part series on the micronutrient manganese. See the February/ March issue of Organic Farmer magazine for additional information on manganese.
A close reading of the information provided in Part 1 of this article series and elsewhere should make it evident that testing for manganese levels can be measured and reported with great variance from lab to lab. Consequently, the required numbers can be very different on other tests than those that are being discussed here. The guidelines used below for manganese needs and recommendations 38
Organic Farmer
April/May 2021
are based on tests for evaluating soils analyzed by using the originally established needs for the Albrecht system. Some may object and question why one would report numbers that are not of universal application. When numbers vary so greatly, nothing is meaningful unless it can be based on a foundation that is solid enough to report what field testing shows to be actually needed.
Manganese Deficiencies
What should growers look for to help identify when manganese is deficient (less than 40 ppm on the true Albrecht system tests) and limiting for the crop being grown on such soils? Numbers reported by other soil laboratories are not comparable according to those who
have tried to do so. This is just to caution that pushing up the numbers on other soil tests to match what is shown as the measured need for crop examples used here may result in the overuse of manganese. But when this specific test is performed, 40 ppm is the minimum recommended. Soybeans will begin to show mild symptoms of manganese deficiency in mature leaves later in the season at 37 to 38 ppm. Levels of 30 ppm or so begin to show results of shorter stalks of corn, though less yield and stalk size should be expected to result long before that. This makes manganese deficiency especially important for attaining the highest tonnages of corn silage.
Once other obvious deficiencies have been eliminated, wheat yields tend to respond well as manganese builds to the higher levels in any soil. For example, soils with similar fertility that have 40 ppm manganese will not produce the yield that those same soils provide at 80 ppm manganese. In fact, when manganese is truly the most limiting factor for high-yielding wheat soils, the yields will continue to increase on those soils until 200 to 250 ppm available manganese is reached when this specific type of testing is performed. Caution is extremely necessary here as almost any textbook will report that 200 ppm manganese is toxic to growing plants. Obviously, the tests being used are not the same as the one advocated here for determining manganese availability. Tree crops, especially nut trees, respond very well to manganese with best results on soils where manganese is above 120 ppm. Walnuts are espe-
cially sensitive to manganese deficiency. Consequently, though normally not specifically recognized as the problem, soils that test below 40 ppm using this particular type of testing for manganese are generally classified as being unfit for walnut production. The guidelines given here for manganese are specific to this type of testing, and using them is not advised for any other laboratory’s manganese test. But these numbers are being provided here to show there is a basic foundation to explain what can be expected when manganese is properly measured and applied for crop production. Anything less than 40 ppm on the test we use means the full benefits from adequate manganese will not be realized for whatever crop. Although on soils with more than 5% organic matter, resulting deficiencies may not be as evident, and optimum results will still
April/May 2021
not be attained until any manganese deficiency is corrected. In addition, keep in mind that a true manganese deficiency of below 40 ppm may be the case, and manganese still may not give the expected response when applied and even brought up to above the deficiency level. That is why so many “research” plots concerning manganese use fail to provide any benefits. If any of the primary or secondary elements are seriously deficient, correcting them will take precedence over the manganese level. For example, a serious problem with newly planted almond trees is breakage during high winds. Some growers have corrected that problem by adding sufficient amounts of manganese. Many others try it without the same satisfactory results. That is because there are three elements involved here that
Continued on Page 40
www.organicfarmermag.com
39
Continued from Page 39 provide for increased wood strength of which manganese is usually found to be correctly ranked as the second or third most important. Adequate potassium is always of primary importance for wood strength. Manganese is second if it is below 40 ppm. Sufficient copper, which will be considered next in this series, is the other needed element and is necessary to help provide strength and resilience to the limbs. Without an adequate uptake of manganese, weaker wood will always be the result. But soils can have good to excellent manganese levels and still the trees or other crops that grow there can be deficient in manganese. This becomes a serious problem when soils are too high in potassium (generally on lighter soils where too much compost has been applied) or too high in sodium (a problem for many soils, especially in
the Western U.S.) In fact, in any combination where potassium and sodium added together exceeds 10% of total soil saturation, manganese uptake begins to be blocked. The higher that percentage goes above 10%, the worse this problem becomes for the growth of any crop. Note that the soil test may show to have plenty of manganese, but remember that, in this case, manganese is still there and in the correctly available form. That is because potassium and sodium do not tie up the manganese. Between the two when their levels of soil saturation is too high (10% on the Albrecht test), then, the uptake of sufficient manganese is blocked out. There is so much available potassium or sodium there that sufficient manganese just cannot get into the plants.
Having Sufficient Manganese
Why be concerned about having suffi-
FREE online ag resources
publications, podcasts, videos, and more
How can ATTRA help you?
Trusted technical assistance for your ag challenges Call toll-free 800-346-9140 or 800-411-3222 (español)
40
Organic Farmer
April/May 2021
cient manganese in the soil? What are the benefits to farmers and growers when manganese-deficient soil is adequately corrected? First, sufficient manganese (above 40 ppm) is necessary for quicker seed germination. Accordingly, enough manganese will cause the plants to grow off faster. Manganese is needed to determine the number of seed to be produced and to hold the blooms and seed or fruit in place. So, adequate manganese is needed from start to finish in terms of crop production. What levels are needed? 40 ppm is the minimum. 80 ppm is considered as good. 125 ppm is considered the low side of excellent and 200 to 250 the high side, depending on crop sensitivity. In any case, it is best to build the level up in increments, even if the cost to do so is not considered as being a problem. The guidelines for application rates on manganese is a maximum of 200 pounds of 28% manganese sulfate per acre even when severe deficiencies will not be corrected by that amount. There is yet another problem that growers may have in trying to determine when there is sufficient manganese for the crop. This has to do with using a leaf analysis to determine if plants have sufficient or insufficient manganese. One good example is when the Albrecht analysis shows manganese as even slightly deficient, common scab can be a problem for potatoes. Yet, in too many cases, the leaf analysis shows the level of manganese to be adequate, even when the soil test still shows manganese as deficient in the soil. Which should be believed? The fact that this problem is never solved until adequate manganese is present in those soils should help show which is correct! Keep in mind that many potato growers use a metallic manganese based foliar to treat for disease. This can
‘Manganese is need-
ed to determine the number of seed to be produced and to hold the blooms and seed or fruit in place. So, adequate manganese is needed from start to finish in terms of crop production.
FIGHT WITH ’ BIOLOGICAL BITE
greatly skew the levels shown from the leaf test. But this is not the entire story. Potatoes have been used as an example here due to their extreme sensitivity to manganese deficiency. And at times, even those who have not used a foliar manganese can have leaf tests that show manganese as “too high” when, in actuality, the soils are still too deficient to correctly supply plant needs. We find this consistently tends to be the case with leaf testing for most micronutrients, not just manganese, as compared to the levels shown to be required on the soil test to properly solve each deficiency. Such deviations can also be a serious problem when considering needs for other manganese-sensitive crops such as wheat, grapes and all types of trees, but especially English walnuts and black walnuts. There is still another precaution that should be considered when using a leaf analysis for evaluating available levels of manganese for crop production. Even leaving dust on the leaves can cause manganese levels to appear to be too high in the plant. A good way to detect this is when iron and aluminum
Continued on Page 42
Broad Spectrum Peroxyacetic Acid (PAA) Sanitizer Controls SWD, Botrytis, Powdery Mildew
Better yield & harvest quality for conventional & organic strawberries Stimulates plant immunity & prevents disease such as Powdery Mildew & Phytophthora
Broad spectrum protection against sucking and chewing insects such as Lygus, Mites, Armyworms & Spotted Wing Drosophila (SWD) Easy on pollinators and beneficial insects
Learn more at MarroneBio.com/Strawberries
April/May 2021
©2021 Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc
www.organicfarmermag.com
41
Continued from Page 41 are also shown to be extremely high on the same analysis. When that happens, test again with clean plant tissue to be sure. Another factor that is essential for manganese uptake is that a sufficient supply of calcium must be present in the soil. This is not determined by the fact that the soil has an adequate to high pH. There is only one way to tell when soils have at least the minimum level of available calcium to take up sufficient manganese for the crop: the soil needs calcium levels to be built up to and then maintained at between 60% to 70% base saturation before plants can most efficiently utilize available manganese from the soil. (CAUTION: Some labs may test as much as 4% lower while others show as much as 12% higher soil calcium saturation than the numbers determined by the Albrecht system testing procedures.) Perhaps an additional word of caution should be given here, for even soils that may initially have an adequate amount of manganese can develop a deficiency problem if an excessive amount of unneeded lime is applied. An excess can cause manganese to go from adequate to deficient over the next one to three cropping seasons. This can happen when any material containing a sufficient amount of calcium is applied on soils that barely have enough manganese (with even worse results when the soil is already deficient in manganese), because when calcium is applied, as it becomes available over the next one to three years, it will begin to tie up plant-available manganese in that soil. If the soil has enough manganese to stand the amount of calcium applied, manganese will not become a problem there as a result of applying needed lime. This is one reason why in some areas potato growers can apply calcium limestone and have no problem with common scab, but in other areas no
42
Organic Farmer
April/May 2021
one will dare apply it. And due to soils needing calcium for adequate uptake of all the other nutrients (including N-P-K) if the problem is not solved, crop production will not only suffer but may even decline in terms of yield and certainly in terms of food quality. Yet the issue of adequate manganese in the soil can be overcome by applying a sufficient amount of the correct type of manganese. That needed amount should be based on a detailed soil analysis which can accurately determine the desired level in the soil. The test should be such that it can accurately determine how much manganese is required to overcome any tie-up from added calcium as well. Whether already deficient, or for a potential decrease in manganese due to liming or other sources of calcium (such as poultry manure), only the use of true manganese sulfate should be considered for adding to the soil to sufficiently build up the manganese level to solve that need.
MyAgLife Da
From the tests we use, the need for manganese will be reflected and solved based on the use of one pound of actual manganese for every pound shown to be lacking. If that does not happen in the next twelve months after an initial application, someone is likely providing the wrong advice or recommending the wrong product. Some soils do not even build well using manganese sulfate. In a very few cases it has been necessary to apply the needed amount for two or three years in a row to reach the desired minimum level. Because of its physiological make-up, a crop which can also help to measurably increase manganese availability in the soil is rice. Just keep in mind that the primary elements, N-P-K, truly are primary in terms of getting enough nutrients there to grow the crop. But when any one of these three are over-applied, providing more than the soil can tolerate, those
Compacted low-calcium soils reduce manganese availability for walnuts (photo by N. Kinsey.)
same elements can cause a whole new set of problems, not just for the crops mentioned in this article but for all types of crops and growing plants. For example, as discussed already in regard to manganese, potassium or sodium alone, or any combination of the two, totaling more than 10% will begin to block the uptake of manganese. Normally, available soil boron will begin to be tied up when potassium remains above 7.5% saturation in any soil during the growing season. Excessive phosphate reduces zinc availability and uptake in crops. And excessive nitrogen ties up available copper, which is the next micronutrient that will be considered in this series about the need for trace elements. Comments about this article? We want to hear from you. Feel free to email us at article@jcsmarketinginc.com
aily News Report
Subscribe at MyAgLife.com or Download the MyAgLife App to Play in Your Vehicle
Sustainable...Compatible... Plant Available... Guaranteed chain of custody Non-GMO ingredients Full line of organic & sustainable fertilizers
The Key to A Successful Finish is How You Start...
Call (480) 361-1300 or visit www.ferticellusa.com 44
Organic Farmer
April/May 2021
Complete programs, proven in the field...
@ferticell