Progressive Crop Consultant - November/December 2019 by JCS Marketing, Inc.

November/December 2019 Biocontrol of Aflatoxin Contamination in Nut Crops is Working! Southern Blight in Processing Tomatoes: Diagnosis, Management and Monitoring Entomopathogenic Fungi Antagonizing Macrophomina phaseolina in Strawberry Maximizing the Efficiency of Airblast Spraying

PUBLICATION

Volume 4 : Issue 6 November / December 2019

www.progressivecrop.com

COMPOST

100% Fully Composted Dairy Manure The Leaders in Dairy Compost Manufacturing

ble a l i a v A g in d n e l B m Custo e - Sulfur

on t s e m i L Gypsum

EH W , L L A C YOU

AUL

Servicing the Valley since 1925

559-686-5707

What can Cain do for you?

2 Progressive Crop Consultant / December 2019 Ask us about ourNovember Dust Control and Fertilizer Products.

PUBLISHER: Jason Scott Email: jason@jcsmarketinginc.com EDITOR: Kathy Coatney ASSOCIATE EDITOR: Cecilia Parsons Email: article@jcsmarketinginc.com PRODUCTION: design@jcsmarketinginc.com Phone: 559.352.4456 Fax: 559.472.3113 Web: www.progressivecrop.com

IN THIS ISSUE

4 14 20

Biocontrol of Aflatoxin Contamination in Nut Crops is Working!

Southern Blight in Processing Tomatoes: Diagnosis, Management and Monitoring

Entomopathogenic Fungi Antagonizing Macrophomina Phaseolina in Strawberries

CONTRIBUTING WRITERS & INDUSTRY SUPPORT Suchitra S. Dara

Global Agricultural Solutions, Bakersfield, CA

Sumanth S. R. Dara

Crystal Nay

Surendra K. Dara

Steve Shoemaker

Mark Doster

Ryan Puckett

Victor Gabri

Cassandra Swett

Plant Pathologist, UC Davis Retired

26 32 38 42

Ramon Jaime

Professor and Plant Pathologist, UC Davis

Maximizing the Efficiency of Airblast Spraying

Contributing Writer Grower

Professor and Plant Pathologist, UC Davis

Visiting Agronomist, University of San Juan, Argentina

Weed Management in Vineyards

Professor and Plant Pathologist, UC Davis

Global Agricultural Solutions, Bakersfield, CA UCCE, San Luis Obispo, CA

V I N E YA R D R E V I E W

Themis Michailides

Ph.D. Cooperative Extension Specialist, Vegetable and Field Crop Pathology, Department of Plant Pathology

Amber Vinchesi-Vahl

Stefan T. Jaroski

USDA-ARS Retired

Ph.D. Area Vegetable Crops Advisor, Colusa, Sutter and Yuba Counties, UCCE

John Lake

Lynn R. Wunderlich

Professor and Plant Pathologist, UC Davis

UCCE Farm AdvisorCentral Sierra Region

UC COOPERATIVE EXTENSION ADVISORY BOARD

Mechanized Vineyard—Is It the Wave of the Future?

Kevin Day

Emily J. Symmes

County Director and

UCCE IPM Advisor,

UCCE Pomology Farm

Sacramento Valley

Advisor, Tulare/Kings County

Kris Tollerup Steven T. Koike,

UCCE Integrated Pest

Director, TriCal Diagnostics

Management Advisor, Parlier, CA

Angled Shoot Projection (SASP) Trellis Design

The articles, research, industry updates, company profiles, and advertisements in this publication are the professional opinions of writers and advertisers. Progressive Crop Consultant does not assume any responsibility for the opinions given in the publication.

November / December 2019

www.progressivecrop.com

Biocontrol of Afla toxin Contamination in Nut Crops is Working !

By THEMIS MICHAILIDES | Professor and Plant Pathologist, UC Davis MARK DOSTER | Plant Pathologist, UC Davis (retired) RAMON JAIME | Professor and Plant Pathologist, UC Davis RYAN PUCKETT | Professor and Plant Pathologist, UC Davis JOHN LAKE | Professor and Plant Pathologist, UC Davis VICTOR GABRI | Visiting Agronomist, University of San Juan, Argentina

Figure 1 The biological agent, Aspergillus flavus strain AF36, producing large sclerotia (black, spherical structures in the plate). All photos courtesy of Themis Michailides.

t was in 1991, when I received a call by the President of the former California Pistachio Commission, Karen Reinecke, asking if there was a way to get involved as a technical member of the newly then established Aflatoxin Elimination Workgroup. The goal of this Workgroup was to evaluate proposals submitted by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and University researchers to the USDA Special Fund to participate toward research to eliminate the problem of aflatoxin contamination by the year 2000. We are now in the second half of 2019 and we still have aflatoxin contamination problems in both pistachio and almond, particularly in years when navel orangeworm damage is high in these crops. Our first proposal was submitted in 1992 to the USDA/Aflatoxin Elimination Technical Committee. It was funded and research started after hiring postdoc associate Dr. Mark Doster, a University of California (UC) Davis graduate with postdoc research at the University of Cornell. Mark an 4

Progressive Crop Consultant

expert in fungal pathology and practical plant pathology was immersed quickly in this research. We were also supported then by the California pistachio industry which supplemented funding to intensify the research to reduce aflatoxins and find solutions for the growers. At the same time other researchers from UC Davis focused on aflatoxin research to reduce it in almond and walnut. Later on, we expanded our aflatoxin management research and included almonds and figs. Aflatoxins are toxic compounds produced mainly by certain molds called Aspergillus flavus and A. parasiticus when these molds grow on various susceptible crops. These molds produce toxins which are considered very harmful when they are consumed with food products. These toxins produced are called aflatoxins which are considered as the most potent naturally-produced carcinogenic compounds causing liver cancer and in acute situations deaths. Strains of Aspergillus flavus that do not produce toxin are called atoxigenic, and they act as biological control agents.

November / December 2019

When they are applied on the orchard floor displace the toxin-producing mold strains, and reduce the potential for aflatoxin contamination in various crops. There are four major aflatoxin types: the B1 and B2 produced by both the above mentioned fungi and G1 and G2 produced only by A. parasiticus. B1 is the most toxic among the four aflatoxin types. Because of this high toxicity these compounds are regulated strictly by various governments, and in fact, the B1 is regulated separately. For instance, in the USA the tolerance for B1 is 10 ppb (parts per billion) and for all the aflatoxins (total) is 15 ppb. The European Union (EU) has even stricter tolerances, i.e., 8 ppb for B1 and 10 ppb for total aflatoxins. One can judge the seriousness of aflatoxin contamination not only from the very strict tolerances but also from the losses and additional costs associated with the re-sorting and losses associated with the dumping the contaminated product. It should be noted that when shipments exceed

Continued on Page 6

Multi-Target Navel Orangeworm Monitoring Systems for conventional and organic tree nuts

FOUR STAR – 2020 LINE UP! WE ARE READY TO SUPPORT YOUR NOW MONITIORING NEEDS! MONITORING SYSTEMS

Male Attractant System: PHEROCON ® NOW L2 Lure

Female Attractant System: PHEROCON ® IV NOW

PHEROCON VI Delta Trap

NOW L2 High Pheromone Lure

NEW! Multi-Gender Attractant System: PHEROCON ® NOW PPO -HR L2 ™ Lure

PHEROCON IV NOW Egg Trap

NOW L2 Low Pheromone Lure

• Male NOW Attractant High/LowRelease Pheromone Lures

NEW! Predator Detection System: PHEROCON ® PREDATOR ™ Trap

• Female NOW – Oviposition – Attractant, Concentrated, Stabilized lures

• Detect mite predators, such as the Six-spotted thrips and Stethorus beetles • Based on the Great Lakes IPM trap • Used in recent university trials • May be used as a treatment threshold indicator • Contains easy hanger Note: Apply miticides based on UC-IPM Guidelines

PHEROCON 1C Trap

• Multi-Gender NOW Attractant, High-Release PPO-HR L2™ Microporous Gel™ Peelable Lure More information below

® NEW!NEW! Multi-Gender Attractant System: PHEROCON NOW PPO -HR L2™ Lure Multi-Gender Attractant System: PHEROCON® PPO™ Lure

• Multi-Gender Quick-Change™ with expanded hang tight spacer • Multi-Gender NOW Attractant, High-Release PPO-HR L2™ • Ready-to-Use, peelable backing Microporous Gel™ Peelable Lure • Duplicates Standard USDA vial release rate • 12 weeks field longevity • Easy to use; ready-to-use barrier pack

Controls the release of more volatile molecules while allowing release of less volatile molecules. • Volatile molecules Precision - multicomponent release •

• Less volatile molecules

Higher capture rates • Earlier detection •

• Greater longevity *Patent pending

Contact your local supplier and order now!

Visit our website: www.trece.com or call: 1- 866-785-1313.

INCORPORATED INSECT PHEROMONE & KAIROMONE SYSTEMS

Your Edge – And Ours – Is Knowledge. www.progressivecrop.com 5

39.9%

38.6%

36.7%

30 20

20.4%

10 0 2008

2009

2010

2011

(Doster et al. (2014), Plant Disease 98:948-956)

85.4%

80 58.1%

54.6%

40 20 0

2008

23.6%

2009

2010

2011

2009-2011

(3 years average)

Reduction of aflatoxin contamination (left, main crop; right, reshakes) during the years of experimental use permit (2008 to 2011) after application of AF36 strain in commercial orchards.

Continued from Page 4

in the samples we analyzed.

the threshold, the consignments are rejected and must ...either be reconditioned (re-sorted) or destroyed. Below is a historical summary how this technology developed to help our California nut crop industries and the fig industry. In the first eight years we focused on cultural practices that affect the predisposition of the pistachio crop to aflatoxin contamination and to also find out whether contaminated nuts show special characteristics that can be used to sort out these nuts at the processing plant. Below is a list of the findings from those studies led by Drs. Doster and Michailides: a. We confirmed that early split nuts (ES) contained large amounts of aflatoxins and we named these nuts the “Achilles Heel” for aflatoxin contamination. b. ES by themselves explained 84 percent of the aflatoxin contamination in the samples we analyzed. c. When the ES were combined with the navel orangeworm (NOW) damaged nuts explained 99 percent of the aflatoxin contamination Progressive Crop Consultant

2008 - 2011

(4 years average)

Figure 2

100

NO SAMPLES

P value = 0.0033

44.9%

Reduction of contaminated samples (%)

from cotton fields, and the Cotton Research Council of Arizona that d. We reduced the incidence of ES supported financially this research were by providing the trees with sufficient able to get AF36 registered for use in water during early season (May) cotton and corn in 2008. Meanwhile when it is the critical time for the starting in 2002, we discovered the full size development of nut shell same strain was the most commonly (water stress of trees during May encountered strain among the other leads to higher incidence of ES). atoxigenic strains in pistachio, almond, and fig orchards in California, and e. We compared the incidence of ES immediately included this strain in on Kerman under the influence of our aflatoxin biocontrol studies. With four rootstocks: UCB1 and Pioneer multiyear support of USDA funding Gold I resulted in significantly lower and funding by the pistachio and ES incidence than Pistacia atlantica fig industries in California, we were and Pioneer Gold II rootstocks. able to show that this strain is among the most common atoxigenic strains In my first Aflatoxin Elimination occurring in California nut crop and Committee (AEC) Meeting in 1991, in fig orchards, and indeed it can be found Peoria, Illinois, I learned for the first at much higher incidence in compartime that some strains of Aspergillus ison with all other atoxigenic strains. flavus do not produce aflatoxins and For instance, during these studies 15 some USDA researchers reported that different groups of atoxigenic strains a very large portion of the A. flavus were determined, and each one was at population consisted of strains that a rate of less than one percent, while do not produce any aflatoxin, called the AF36 atoxigenic strain (Figure 1, atoxigenic strains. They started using see page 4) was found in an average these atoxigenics as candidates for of five to eight percent depending on biological control of aflatoxigenic fungi. the field and the type of the crop, and It was also discovered that the proporin some instances up to 12 percent of tion of strains that produced aflatoxin populations of the atoxigenic strains. included strains that produced variable amounts of aflatoxins. USDA research- Initially, the studies were confined in ers started first working with atoxigenic small experiments in replicated mistrains to be used as biocontrol agents cro-plots where we showed that when to reduce aflatoxins in the various the AF36 was applied once preseason, it crops. One of this strains was initially Continued on Page 8 selected in Arizona from samples taken

November / December 2019

Next year Starts Now Apply KTS®

Orchards consume large amounts of potassium as the crop matures. Almonds remove 91.2 pounds of K2O per 1,000 kernel pounds every season. KTS® is the clear,chloride-free liquid fertilizer with the highest potassium and sulfur content available. KTS® provides 3.0 lbs of K2O and 2.1 lbs of sulfur per gallon available for boosting crop resistance to environmental stress. Applying KTS® is easy as it is 100% soluble and compatible with many fertilizers. Crop Vitality Specialists can provide assistance regarding application, blending, field studies and technical data.

Start a Conversation today with Your Crop Vitality Specialist Call (800) 525-2803, email info@cropvitality.com or visit CropVitality.com ©2019 Tessenderlo Kerley, Inc. All rights reserved. KTS® is/a registered Tessenderlo Kerley, Inc. November Decembertrademark 2019 ofwww.progressivecrop.com

Continued from Page 6 persisted well until the next application in the following year and displaced the toxigenic A. flavus strains at a rate of 90 to 95 percent displacement. These results, the fact that this strain was native to California orchards, and it was the most common atoxigenic strain and the toxicological data developed by the USDA in Arizona were sufficient to submit to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to request an experimental use permit (EUP) to test the strain commercially on a larger acreage without the need to follow crop destruct requirements as needed with application of experimental compounds. The EUP was approved in 2008 and 3,000 acres of pistachios were treated with the commercial product of Aspergillus flavus AF36 strain produced in the Cotton Council of Arizona facility in Phoenix, Arizona. Also, 3,000 acres of pistachio close to the AF36-treated orchards were used as untreated controls. All this acreage for the EUP was provided by the former Paramount Farming Company (now Wonderful Orchards Company). At harvest the treated and the untreated fields were sampled separately and the samples, specifically called “library samples”, were analyzed for aflatoxins. For four years we showed a significant reduction of aflatoxins (Figure 2A, see Page 6). The average of this reduction for the four years of the EUP was close to 40 percent. When library samples of reshakes were analyzed for aflatoxins, this reduction in one year reached to 85 percent (Figure 2B, see page 6). These commercial efficacy data were sufficient to obtain registration of AF36 for use in pistachio in the states of California, Arizona, Texas, and New Mexico. After the registration of AF36 on pistachio, the Almond Board of California and the California Fig Institute (the latter has funded research during the early stages of our aflatoxin research) became interested in completing any additional research so that the AF36’s registration is expanded to include almonds and figs. It took five years of additional research (funded by the Production Research 8

Progressive Crop Consultant

and Food Safety and Quality Committees of the Almond Board of California) to provide the USEPA and the California Department of Pesticide Regulations the additional data for the registration of AF36 for use on almond and figs. Meanwhile because the manufacturer of the commercial product changed the initial wheat carrier of the AF36 strain to sorghum (Figure 3) the product was registered as AF36 Prevail® in January 2017 and included all, pistachio, almond, and fig. Although the pistachio industry adapted the use of AF36 widely and from 75,000 acres treated in 2012 reached to up to 200,000 acres in 2018, the almond industry was a little hesitant in widely adopting this new technology, despite the fact that there was good efficacy in reducing aflatoxin contamination in pistachio orchards. We expect to see better efficacy when all pistachio, almond and fig orchards are treated on an areawide basis because the spores of the biocontrol can spread from field to field easily with even slight windy conditions and dust. Description of the Biocontrol Product Initially the AF36 product used sterilized wheat as the carrier. Sterilized wheat seed was inoculated and incubated under certain favorable conditions for the strain to invade and grow in the entire wheat seed. More recently and after additional studies in Arizona it was determined that sorghum, which has a lower cost was as good carrier as the wheat (even better under conditions in cotton and corn fields) and the manufacturer replaced the wheat with sorghum and at the same time changed the method of inoculation. The sorghum seed now is coated with a mix of a polymer and spores of AF36 instead of waiting for the seed to be colonized by the atoxigenic mold. This was done in order to satisfy the increased demand for tons and tons of inoculum since the rate is 10 lbs per acre. Studies

November / December 2019

Figure 3 The sorghum career of the AF36 Prevail® commercial product.

in California under orchard conditions indicated that the sporulation on the sorghum seed is delayed, although by the end of a week both sorghum and wheat showed similar sporulation rates. The time of production of spores and the rate of sporulation are very critical for the successful use of this biocontrol agent. It is a numbers game: we want to overload the soil with atoxigenic spores and displace the spores of the toxigenic molds. That is the way this biological control approach works in the field (see challenges at the end of this article relevant to sporulation). Proper Way for Ground Application: For detailed information please read the label of the product: Michailides emphasized that as far as we know up to now there are four critical application factors that need to be taken into account for AF36 Prevail to be successful in the orchard: a) the timing of application; b) the rate (amount) per acre; c) the proper placement on the orchard floor; and d) the proper irrigation before and after the application.

Continued on Page 10

Each $1 in FAS-taxpayer support for

SAVE THE DATES

California walnuts export promotion

ly, the California Walnut Commission (CWC) conducts

generated over $15 in tax revenue

d marketing programs in eight countries throughout

creation.

and Asia, including an EU regional industrial program,

Spending on export promotion in

ing California walnuts distinctive quality, taste, versatility

2017 created 2,682 jobs.

ritional benefits. Industry growers, handlers, and the

ave made great strides by working together and will

e building demand in an ever-expanding

66%

•Trade

Shows/Free Events

CE Credits Offered Seminars & Workshops •Networking •Free Industry Lunches •Free Coffee & Donuts •Cash Prizes

• 66% of the California walnut crop was exported •year. in the 2017/18 crop

January 10, 2020 Co-hosted by: Yuba-Sutter Fairgrounds walnuts.org 442 Franklin Ave, Yuba City, CA 95991

California Agricultural Statistics Review 2016/2017 by CDFA Economic Evaluation of the California Walnut Commission’s Export Promotion Programs: An Analysis of the Direct and Indirect Impacts January 2018, , Cornell University

In conjunction with the UCCE Butte/Glenn/Tehama Counties Almond & Walnut Day

January 21, 2020 Glenn County Fairgrounds, 221 E Yolo St, 95963 Orland, CA

@jcsmarketing

JCS Marketing Inc.

@jcs_marketing November / December 2019

www.progressivecrop.com

Continued from Page 8

Figure 4 Another biocontrol product (Afla-Guard®) not registered yet, using barley as the carrier.

Timing for pistachio, almond, and fig: Apply Aspergillus flavus AF36 to the surface of the soil under the plant canopy with a granular applicator and do not cover the AF36—colonized grain with soil. For pistachios apply the product from late May through July, for almonds from late May to early July, and for figs from early May to early June. Specifically in almonds, application should be timed around hull split. If you know when to expect hull split, you should time application about one to two weeks before. You want to have the max sporulation of the biocontrol during the hull split stage of the nuts. The rate (amount): The proper application rate is 10 pounds per acre. A single application should be made each year.

Beat the Heat & Care for Your Crops with:

Anti-Stress 550 ®

Frost & Freeze

Additional Environmental Stress Conditions that the product is useful for:

• High Temperatures & Extreme Heat • Drought Conditions • Transplanting • Drying Winds

What is Anti-Stress 550®?

A foliar spray that creates a semi-permeable membrane over the plant surface.

When to apply Anti-Stress 550®?

Optimal application period is one to two weeks prior to the threat of high heat.

When is Anti-Stress 550® most effective?

The coating of Anti-Stress becomes effective when the product has dried on the plant. The drying time of Anti-Stress is the same as water in the same weather conditions.

*One application of Anti-Stress 550® will remain effective 30 to 45 days, dependent on the rate of plant growth, application rate of product and weather conditions. 559.495.0234 • 800.678.7377 polymerag.com • customerservice@polymerag.com Order from your PCA or local Ag Retailer / Crop Protection Supplier

Progressive Crop Consultant

November / December 2019

Proper placement: AF36 Prevail should be applied within the berm area of the orchard, not at row middles, so that it will be reached by the irrigation system and minimize delivery to areas that do not get wet. Proper irrigation: Irrigation is required directly after application. Irrigation within three days after application of Aspergillus flavus AF36 will improve efficacy. The AF36 product will not sporulate without moisture and can fail if there is too much moisture. Aim for soil moisture levels around 13-18

percent. Proper placement within the berm, close to the irrigation system, will ensure it is successfully activated. “Conditioning” of the orchard floor before application: This is a practice that some growers have figured out on their own. Pre-irrigating and then about two days later apply the AF36 inoculum and then apply irrigation as in (d) above. Although Michailides and his crew do not have any data to support this practice, they strongly believe the practice of pre-irrigation will speed up the sporulation of the product since the rehydration can start as soon as the product comes in contact with the pre-wetted soil. A 45 Percent Reduction of Aflatoxins is a Reality Now Dr. Themis Michailides, plant pathologist at the UC Davis/ Kearney Agricultural Research and Extension Center and former member of the National Aflatoxin Elimination Technical Committee, and Dr. Mark Doster have devoted decades to studying aflatoxins and their work has been instrumental in development and registration of AF36 in pistachio, almond, and fig. Until now, Michailides notes, tree nut and fig growers had no direct way to combat aflatoxin. Instead contamination has been managed primarily through preventing navel orangeworm damage. While as noted below, effective orangeworm management is still very critical and essential in reducing crop damage, AF36 offers an additional tool that has a direct impact on reducing harmful toxigenic Aspergillus mold strains and the aflatoxin they produce. Recent Challenges with the Use of Aspergillus flavus AF36 AF36 Prevail can result in more than 80 percent reduction of aflatoxin contaminated cotton and corn, but here in California, only once we reached an 85 percent reduction (Figure 3, see page 8) and this was only in the second harvest (reshakes) pistachios, which have higher risk for NOW infestation

and aflatoxin contamination than the pistachios of the main (first) harvest. Results of analyses of a large number of library samples obtained from treated and untreated fields of Wonderful Orchards Company, resulted in a significant reduction of up to 45 percent in aflatoxin contamination. Michailides’ lab crew is trying to explain why the efficacy of AF36 in reducing aflatoxin cannot match the one reached in cotton fields in Arizona and corn fields in Texas. The following challenges may explain partially these disadvantages of the AF36 product in California: a) inadequate soil moisture and temperatures; b) incorrect timing of application; c) delayed harvest, and d) inefficient control of NOW, both contributing to increased aflatoxin contamination; e) arthropod pests of carrier seed; and f) other predators (rodents, birds, etc.). Recent research projects are focused

on addressing all these challenges. One new development is that a new product (Afla-Guard®, manufactured by Syngenta Company) that is registered to reduce aflatoxin contamination in peanuts and corn was introduced in California for experimentation and gathering data to support registration for use in pistachio, almond and fig. If successful, this will be the second product registered in the USA which represents a different from the AF36 atoxigenic strain of Aspergillus flavus and the carrier is barley (Figure 4, see page 10). Studies done by Drs. Jaime and Michailides (Kearney Agriculture Research and Extension Center) in 2017 and 2018 showed that this product sporulated faster, better, and under lower temperatures and lower soil moisture content than the Aspergillus flavus AF36 strain. Registration of this product in California is anticipated in 2020, so that growers may then have a second tool to choose to combat

B 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

Feeding sites/almond

Figure 5 Correlation of the sites of feeding damage of almonds by NOW larvae and amounts of aflatoxins (Palumbo et al. 2014, Plant Disease 98:1194-1199).

Continued on Page 12

You don’t report to the front lines. You live on them. Too much rain. Too much sun. Weeds. Disease. Insects. Farming is a battle — and the only way to win is to go all in. That applies to us just as much as it applies to you. Our place is at your side, with you in the fight. Our way of helping is through value-driven crop protection. And the expertise to help you get the most out of it. Learn more at AtticusLLC.com.

ATTICUSLLC.COM

November / December 2019

www.progressivecrop.com

Continued from Page 11

by timely harvest, in-season insecticide sprays, and winter mummy shake.

aflatoxin contamination in 2020. NOW Management is Still Necessary Aflatoxin contamination becomes a major problem in years when damage by navel orangeworm is higher than the standard low level. Relatively studies by Drs. Michailides and Palumbo (ARS (Agricultural Research Service), USDA, Albany, CA) showed that NOW moths are heavily contaminated with spores of aflatoxigenic fungi as soon as they emerge from mummies in early spring. Also as the damage on nuts increases so is the incidence and the amounts of aflatoxins (Figure 5, see page 11). Therefore, it is essential to keep up with navel orangeworm pest management practices. Growers should use all the available tools for reducing damage by NOW to supplement the mummy sanitation, which should be the first step towards aflatoxin reduction. Reduction of NOW damage can also be achieved

Where to Find the Product, Learn More, and Application Services To learn more about AF36 and its application, watch two short videos produced by California Pistachio Research Board. Although they were filmed in a pistachio orchard, the information is useful and accurate for almond and fig growers. Western Milling is the distributor for AF36 in California. Growers can contact Jeff Chedester, seed business manager, at (559) 302-2593; and Agri Systems, Inc., c/o Brendan Brooks, at 559-665-2100 for product information and application. Distributors for the second product will be provided as soon as it is registered in California. Acknowledgments The author thanks all his collaborators

Cal Expo, Sacramento

Progressive Crop Consultant

November / December 2019

for the dedicated research, the California Pistachio Industry (California Pistachio Research Board), the Almond Board of California, and the California Fig Institute for their continuous financial support of these studies. We also thank the USDA for the initial seed grants provided by the Aflatoxin Elimination Technical Committee, and California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) (Grant SCB16054). Special thanks go to Wonderful Orchards for their continuous support of this research by allowing use of their orchards for various experiments; also we thank Keenan, Sutton, and Nichols Farms for their support as well. In addition, we appreciate very much the support by Syngenta in 2018 and 2019. Comments about this article? We want to hear from you. Feel free to email us at article@jcsmarketinginc.com

ADVERTORIAL

/// Rising Impact of Almond Bloom Diseases Game Plan for a Winning Season Bloom diseases are opponents that are constantly evolving. They are more prevalent than ever in California, where increasingly erratic weather is a consistent threat, creating prime conditions for diseases to thrive and have a significant effect on almond yield potential. As a result, growers need a strategic game plan to make the best countermove against bloom diseases while also managing resistance. Scala,® Luna Experience® and Luna Sensation® from Bayer are the recommended fungicide treatments to counteract these challenges. Growers can’t out-spray bloom diseases, but they can outsmart them through a combination of knowledge, application timing and by using products that demonstrate consistently high performance, overcome weather challenges and manage resistance. “We always like to recommend that our fungicides are used in a preventive manner prior to there being disease issues. So proper timing is very important,” says Matthew Wilson, field sales representative for Bayer. Scala fungicide is notable for its control of Brown rot blossom blight at pink bud as an early-season spray option. It also offers both preventive and curative activity, rapid penetration and an ease of mobility into the bud and blossom. It is crop safe, mixes well with IPM programs and other products, and is effective across a wide range of temperatures and weather conditions, with minimal adverse effects on beneficial insect species.

“We’re kicking off with Scala,” notes grower Scott Long, general manager for Superior Fruit Ranch in Ceres, California. “We’ll come back with Luna® and that gives us full coverage, plus it really helps us cover all aspects and concerns in the early spring period.” Luna Experience and Luna Sensation are strong choices for maximizing yields by providing longlasting, broad-spectrum disease protection when applied at bloom. Luna penetrates green tissue and moves systemically into closed buds, protecting against Brown rot blossom blight, Jacket rot, Shot hole, Anthracnose, Scab, Rust and Alternaria. It also offers two built-in modes of action for each product, providing the flexibility to alternate FRAC groups for more effective fungicide resistance management. “I use Luna products predominantly in the bloom time for a myriad of diseases,” says PCA David Vermeulen of Vernalis, California. “I like the ease of handling, and it mixes well with a number of other products. It also covers a broad spectrum of different fungal diseases I’m going after.”

Diseases to Watch /// Brown Rot Blossom Blight – Thrives in humid temperatures with or without rain. /// Anthracnose – Originates in warm, rainy weather. /// Jacket Rot – Rare, but, under cool and wet conditions at bloom, can cause devastating loss. /// Scab – Favors wet weather and spreads to new sites by wind or rain. /// Shot Hole – Requires prolonged periods of moisture, and water moves spores to new sites.

PCA Ryan Garcia of Salida Ag Chem in Modesto, California, uses Scala. “I’ll use it in the early stages of bloom for Brown rot blossom blight. I think it’s a great material.”

/// Alternaria – Develops with high humidity where dew forms and air is stagnant. /// Rust – Favors humid conditions, worsens in rainy weather and spreads easily by wind.

Application Timing PINK BUD

BLOOM

February

GROWTH March

SHELL-HARDENING

April

May

June

HARVEST July

August

September

Brown Rot Blossom Blight, Jacket Rot Brown Rot Blossom Blight, Jacket Rot, Anthracnose, Shot Hole, Scab Rust, Alternaria Hull Rot

Prepare for a winning season and learn more about bloom disease management. Contact your Bayer representative or visit LunaScalaGamePlan.com. © 2019 Bayer Group. Always read and follow label instructions. Bayer, the Bayer Cross, Luna, Luna Experience, Luna Sensation, and Scala are registered trademarks of the Bayer Group. Not all products are registered for use in all states. For additional product information, call toll-free 1-866-99-BAYER (1-866-992-2937) or visit our website November / December 2019 www.progressivecrop.com at www.CropScience.Bayer.us. Bayer CropScience LP, 800 North Lindbergh Boulevard, St. Louis, MO 63167. CR0919MULTIPB003S00R0

SOUTHERN BLIGHT IN PROCESSING TOMATOES:

DIAGNOSIS, MANAGEMENT AND MONITORING

By AMBER VINCHESI-VAHL | Ph.D. Area Vegetable Crops Advisor Colusa, Sutter and Yuba Counties, UCCE

And CASSANDRA SWETT | Ph.D., Cooperative Extension Specialist, Vegetable and Field Crop Pathology Department of Plant Pathology

with other crown rotting diseases, outhern blight, caused by like Fusarium crown rot. Severely the fungus Sclerotium rolfsii, affected plants can have vascular is a destructive crown rot discoloration, which may be confused disease that rapidly kills to- with Fusarium wilt. Accurate diagmato plants. The fungus is fa- nosis is critical to effective control. vored by high temperatures (over 86°F), high soil moisture, dense canopies, and You can distinguish southern blight frequent irrigation. Southern blight in the field based on the following survives in soil as hardened structures diagnostic traits, one or more of which called sclerotia for at least five years. may be present. Diagnosis requires Each infected plant can produce tens of looking at the soil around the crown of thousands of sclerotia and then become the plant, in addition to the plant itself. more widely distributed in a field with each successive field operation. Al▶ Small tan to reddish brown sclerotia though this disease may initially only form at the base of the plant and/or affect a few plants in the field, southern in the soil around the plant. blight can be serious enough to cause significant yield loss within a season ▶ White fungal mycelium (thread-like or two. With a host range of over 500 strands) growing INTO the soil. No plants, this fungus can easily persist from year to year in infected crop debris.

other fungus will grow extensively in the soil (Figure 1). ▶ White fan like mycelium (threadlike) growing on the crown/affected tissues. ▶ Plants go from healthy to dead in less than a week—much faster than most crown rots (Figure 2). ▶ Circular disease patches. From a distance, they look like bands of dead plants. If none of these characteristics are present, the best way to diagnose the disease is to put infected tissue in a plastic bag on a moist paper towel

Continued on Page 16

Southern Blight Identification Southern blight misdiagnosis is likely if it occurs in an area where it has not historically been an issue, like the Sacramento Valley. It can be easily confused 14

Figure 1: Fungal mycelium growing into the soil. All photos courtesy of C. Swett.

Progressive Crop Consultant

November / December 2019

Figure 2: Rapid plant collapse and death caused by southern blight.

fungicide

THERE CAN ONLY BE ONE CHAMPION HELMSTAR PLUS SC is a true champion for disease control in almonds and grapes. Delivering the industry’s most powerful systemic active ingredients, HELMSTAR PLUS SC provides maximum protection to elevate crops to their highest potential. As a single, simple solution for disease control, HELMSTAR PLUS SC offers the protection you expect with the economic value you demand.

helmstarplus.com

November / December 2019

www.progressivecrop.com

Figure 3: Distinct fan-like growth of southern blight.

Continued from Page 14 and leave at room temperature for one to two weeks. The southern blight fungus will produce distinct fan like growth within about 5-7 days (Figure 3). After about 5-14 days, it will make round white balls that turn into amber colored sclerotia (Figure 4). Both the fan growth and the sclerotia are unique to this fungus. Southern Blight Management » Soil Moisture Maintaining a dry surface may help reduce losses if the fungus is detected in your field. The one advantage of drip irrigation is that the soil surface can more easily be kept dry, which inhibits infection by Sclerotium rolfsii. Avoid alternating wet and dry periods—wet followed by dry episodes can be particularly conducive to disease development. » Crop Rotation If you have detected southern blight in your field, one of the best things you can do the following year is to plant a narrow canopy crop that you can effectively manage with fungicides to prevent sclerotia from increasing. Rotations with non-host crops are limited because of the wide host range of the pathogen. Poor-host crops such 16

Progressive Crop Consultant

Figure 4: Sclerotia developing and turning from white to amber-colored spheres.

as corn and small grains (wheat, millet, oats) can help to reduce sclerotia levels in the field. Most if not all of these crops can become infected by the fungus, but either they are not good hosts and/or the environmental conditions during the growing season are not favorable for pathogen growth. For instance, wheat can be a host, but it’s typically too cold for fungal growth during the time that wheat is grown. On the other hand, rotation with highly susceptible crops such as legumes (beans, peas and hairy vetch) can greatly increase soil infestation levels. Mustard cover crops can suppress southern blight, and may be useful for organic producers, where fumigation is not an option. » Soil Treatment Deep plowing will bury the sclerotia and prevent it from attacking plants at the soil line. Sclerotia deeper than six inches are usually parasitized by other microbes and killed over time. Of course, plowing is not an option for fields where buried drip irrigation systems are already installed. Sclerotia near the surface of the soil can be killed when exposed to high temperatures (105-120°F) for two to four weeks during the summer months. Solarization alone is not generally considered a viable management

November / December 2019

strategy, but when soils were solarized before the addition of biological control or a fungicide, disease was reduced by 70-100 percent compared to the same biological or chemical treatment without solarization. Make sure to prepare the soil for planting before solarizing, since cultivation and the incorporation of amendments can bring buried sclerotia back to the upper soil layers. » Monitoring Southern Blight Prevalence in Colusa County Southern blight is not usually considered to be a widespread problem in California—major impacts are generally limited to Kern County. However, in 2017, late spring rains in the Sacramento Valley led to later planting dates, followed by record high temperatures, even consecutive nights where the temperature remained above 70°F. The combination of late planting dates and record high temperatures in 2017 created unusually favorable conditions for the pathogen in northern California. In 2018, we conducted a project funded by the California Tomato Research Institute to monitor southern blight prevalence in Colusa County, which had five fields with positive southern blight diagnoses in 2017. The objective of this research was to quantify southern blight spread and impact in annual

Continued on Page 18

agrinos.com

Organic Products

That Boost Your Bottom Line

Available Through Your Local Retailer November / December 2019

www.progressivecrop.com

Continued from Page 16

sunflower and corn. Sunflower fields were checked rotations in the twice monthly for region. Sarah southern blight Light-Area symptoms once Agronomy temperatures were Advisor was over 90°F for seven involved in consecutive days this project because sunflower in addition to is a known host of the authors. southern blight. Tomato fields near We sampled or adjacent to the soil from eight monitored fields fields, five of were also checked which were for southern confirmed to blight symptoms have southern twice a month. blight in 2016 Soil was collected Figure 5: Southern blight sclerotia germination in soil samples. Note white thread-like mycelial or 2017, the from the same growth. other three spots in the fields 2017, and one was planted with canary thought to have southern blight based in August/September 2018 to deterbean in 2017. We sampled the soil in on grower and pest control adviser mine if there were any changes to May 2018 to get baseline data on early experience and observations. Six of southern blight sclerotia levels in the season southern blight sclerotia levels. the fields were in tomato in 2017, one field. Cassandra Swett’s lab analyzed The rotational crops in 2018 included was in tomato in 2016 and wheat in the soil samples using the methanol

Progressive Crop Consultant

November / December 2019

method (Rodriguez-Kabana et al 1980). Methanol kills most microbes, but not southern blight. Trays of soil were sealed in plastic bags so the moisture could stimulate germination of the southern blight sclerotia. The germination of sclerotia was evaluated at 3 and 7 days (Figure 5, see page 18). Sclerotia were recovered from three fields in May 2018, possibly five fields but identification was unclear for two of the fields. The confidence level for identifying southern blight was whether the germinated growth in the trays produced sclerotia. Germination was observed in the two samples where identification was unclear, but no sclerotia were produced from these colonies. The end-of-season samples from August and September 2018 contained much higher volumes of soil than the May samples, and we recovered sclerotia from seven of the eight fields. For total number of sclerotia, five fields had increased sclerotia levels, two fields decreased, and one field had the

same number of sclerotia in both the May and September samples. Southern blight increased in all three of the sunflower fields, which was expected since sunflower is a host crop. Corn fields were spread between increases, decreases, and no changes. It is worth noting though, that the only fields with decreased levels were corn fields. Also, fields where no sclerotia were recovered may contain southern blight that was not captured among our samples. Sunflower is not recommended as a rotational crop because it is a southern blight host. Corn is likely a better choice for rotation. We were able to recover southern blight sclerotia in fields throughout Colusa County and demonstrate southern blight increases over the growing season with certain rotational crops. Unlike 2017, southern blight was not a large issue for tomato growers in 2018. Because southern blight requires specific conditions for development

to occur, it remains a disease that is a problem in the Sacramento Valley only when environmental conditions are ideal for development, especially for certain fields. Currently in 2019, due to late spring rains and high temperatures, we have identified southern blight in the Sacramento Valley from a few tomato and vineseed fields. We would like to thank our grower and pest control adviser cooperators on this project. We would also like to thank the California Tomato Research Institute for funding this project. References Rodriguez-Kabana, R., Beute, M. K., & Backman, P. A. 1980. A method for estimating numbers of viable sclerotia of Sclerotium rolfsii in soil. Phytopathology, 70(9), 917-919. Comments about this article? We want to hear from you. Feel free to email us at article@jcsmarketinginc.com

Nature’s way back to Soil Health

A Bio-Formulated Agricultural Soil Improver SOIL PRO is a proprietary blend of naturally occurring bacteria which will help restore your soil to optimal conditions. • • • • • •

Naturally out-competes soil pathogens Controls Gaul and Canker Healthier plants Reduces water usage Cost effective Stimulates plants natural immunity

Manufactured by Micro-TES, Inc

Rick Reynolds 510-334-4711 liventia.net/en/agriculture liventia-print-ad-soil-pro-WCN-7.25X5-8-2019.indd 1

November / December 2019

www.progressivecrop.com 19 8/8/19 11:15 AM

harcoal rot, caused by Macrophomina phaseolina, is one of the important fungal diseases of strawberry in California. Macrophomina phaseolina is a soilborne fungus and has a wide host range, including alfalfa, cabbage, corn, pepper, and potato, some of which are cultivated in the strawberry production areas in California. The fungus infects the vascular system of the plant roots, obstructing the nutrient and water supply and ultimately resulting in stunted growth, wilting, and death of the plant. The fungus survives in the soil and infected plant debris as microsclerotia (resting structures made of hyphal bodies) and can persist for up to three years. Microsclerotia germinate and penetrate the root system to initiate infection. Plants are more vulnerable to fungal infection when they are experiencing environmental (extreme weather or drought conditions) and physiological (heavy fruit bearing) stress.

Soil fumigation is the primary management option for addressing charcoal rot in strawberry. Additionally, crop rotation with broccoli can reduce the risk of charcoal rot due to glucosinolates and isothiocyanates in broccoli crop residue that have fungicidal properties. Beneficial microorganisms such as Bacillus spp. and Trichoderma spp. are also considered, especially in organic strawberries, to antagonize M. phaseolina and other soilborne pathogens and provide some protection. 20

Progressive Crop Consultant

November / December 2019

Entomopathogenic Fungi Antagonizing Macrophomina phaseolina in Strawberries By SUCHITRA S. DARA | Global Agricultural Solutions, Bakersfield, CA

And SUMANTH S. R. DARA | Global Agricultural Solutions, Bakersfield, CA And SURENDRA K. DARA | UCCE, San Luis Obispo, CA And STEFAN T. JAROSKI | USDA-ARS Retired The role of beneficial microbes in disease management or improving crop growth and health is gaining popularity in the recent years with the commercial availability of biofungicide, biostimulant, and soil amendment products. In a couple of recent strawberry field studies in Santa Maria, some of the beneficial microbial products improved fruit yield or crop health. These treatments can be administered by inoculating the transplants prior to planting, immediately after planting or periodically applying to the plants and or the soil. Adding beneficial microbes can help improve the soil microbiome especially after chemical or bio-fumigation and anaerobic soil disinfestation.

efficacy of two California isolates of Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae s.l. and their application strategies against M. phaseolina. Methodology

(cultivar Albion) from a strawberry field were transplanted into 1.6-gallon pots with Miracle-Gro All Purpose Garden Soil (0.09-0.05-0.07 N-P-K) and maintained in an outdoor environment. They were regularly watered, and their

About six-week old strawberry plants

Continued on Page 22

Similar to the benefits of traditionally used bacteria (e.g., Bacillus spp. and Pseudomonas spp.) and fungi (e.g., Glomus spp. and Trichoderma spp.), studies with entomopathogenic fungi (EPF) such as Beauveria bassiana, Isaria fumosorosea, and Metarhizium spp. also demonstrated their role in improving water and nutrient absorption or antagonizing plant pathogens. The advantage of EPF is that they are already used for arthropod pest management in multiple crops, including strawberry; now, there are the additional benefits of promoting crop growth and antagonizing plant pathogens. In light of some promising recent studies exploring these roles, a study was conducted using potted strawberry plants to evaluate the November / December 2019

www.progressivecrop.com

Plant health star�ng from 1 week a�er M. phaseolina inocula�on 1 wk

5.0

0.002

4 wk

0.030

5 wk

6 wk

0.130 ab

4.0

3 wk

0.182 a

a bc

4.5

0.038 a

7 wk

0.018 bc

a c

ab abc

abc

3.0

b bc

3.5

Plant health ra�ng

2 wk

P = 0.117

c 2.5

2.0

1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0

Untreated control

M. phaseolina

Bb 1wk before Mp

Continued from Page 21 health was monitored for about five months prior to the commencement of the study. Conidial suspensions of the California isolates of B. bassiana and M. anisopliae s.l. were applied one week before, one week after, or at the time of applying microsclerotia of M. phaseolina to the potting mix. The following treatments were evaluated in the study: 1. Untreated control 2. Soil inoculated with M. phaseolina 3. Soil inoculated with B. bassiana one week prior to M. phaseolina inoculation 4. Soil inoculated with M.

Ma 1wk before Mp

Bb with Mp

anisopliae s.l. one week prior to M. phaseolina inoculation 5. Soil inoculated with B. bassiana at the time of M. phaseolina inoculation 6. Soil inoculated with M. anisopliae s.l. at the time of M. phaseolina inoculation 7. Soil inoculated with B. bassiana one week after M. phaseolina inoculation 8. Soil inoculated with M. anisopliae s.l. one week after M. phaseolina inoculation EPF were applied as 1X1010 viable conidia in 100 ml of 0.01 percent DyneAmic (surfactant) solution distributed around the base of the plant. To apply M. phaseolina, 5 grams of infested cornmeal-sand inoculum containing 2,500 CFU/gram was added to 4-5 cm deep holes around the base of the plant. Each treatment had six pots each planted with a single strawberry plant representing a replication. Treatments were randomly arranged within each replication. The study was repeated a few days after the initiation of the first experiment. Plant health was monitored starting from the first week after the M. phaseolina inoculation and continued for seven weeks. Plant health was rated on a scale of 0 to 5 where

Progressive Crop Consultant

November / December 2019

Ma with Mp

Bb 1wk a�er Mp

Ma 1wk a�er Mp

0=dead and 5=very healthy and the rest of the ratings in between depending on the extent of wilting. Data from both experiments were combined and analyzed by ANOVA using Statistix software and significant means were separated using LSD test. The influence of EPF treatments applied at different times as well as the combined effect of different applications within each fungus were compared for seven weeks. Ratings for some plants that were scorched from hot summer temperatures and died abruptly were removed from the analyses. Results Untreated control plants maintained good health throughout the observation period varying between the rating of 4.3 and 4.9. In general, plant health declined considerably from the 5th week after M. phaseolina inoculation. Plant health appeared to be slightly better in plants treated with EPF, but there was no statistically significant difference in any except one instance. Plants treated with M. anisopliae s.l. one week prior to the application of M. phaseolina had a rating of 3.0 compared to 1.6 rating of plants inoculated with M. phaseolina alone. When data from different treatments

Continued on Page 24

WE WILL PUMP YoU UP with our mycorrhizal products

POWER UP YOUR PLANTS

Ask us about our other soil care products. • BACTERIAL Inoculants • Soil Products • Biological Food Products • Micro Nutrients • Foliar Nutrients Contact Us Today at 1-800-279-9567 callnrg.com November / December 2019

www.progressivecrop.com

Plant health ra�ng from 1 week a�er M. phaseolina inocula�on combined for each beneﬁcial fungus Untreated control 5.0

4.5

M. phaseolina

B. bassiana

M. anisopliae s.l.

a a

4.0

b ab

3.5 Plant health ra�ng

3.0

b b b

2.5

2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0

1 wk

P = 0.084

2 wk

3 wk

0.082

0.049

4 wk

0.058

5 wk

0.069

6 wk

0.039

7 wk

0.010

*Bars with no or same le�er within each week are not signiﬁcantly diﬀerent (LSD test)

Continued from Page 22

arthropod pests, they could count on additional benefits against diseases or improving general plant health.

for each EPF were compared, both B. bassiana and M. anisopliae s.l. appeared to reduce the wilting, but the plant health rating was not significantly different from the M. phaseolina treatment without EPF.

Acknowledgements: We thank Dr. Kelly Ivors (previously at Cal Poly San Luis Obispo) for the pathogen inoculum.

This is the first report of the impact of EPF on M. phaseolina with some promise. The current study evaluated a single application of EPF. Additional studies under more uniform environmental conditions and with more treatment options would be useful to improve our understanding of EPF antagonizing M. phaseolina. When growers use EPF for controlling

Dara, S. K. and D. Peck. 2017. Evaluating beneficial microbe-based products for their impact on strawberry plant growth, health, and fruit yield. UC ANR eJournal Strawberries and Vegetables. https://ucanr.edu/blogs/blogcore/ postdetail.cfm?postnum=25122 Dara, S. K. and D. Peck. 2018. Evaluation of additive, soil amendment, and biostimulant products in Santa Maria strawberry. CAPCA Adviser, 21(5): 44-50. Dara, S. K., S.S.R. Dara, and S. S. Dara. 2017. Impact of entomopathogenic fungi on the growth, development, and health of cabbage growing under water stress. Amer. J. Plant Sci. 8: 12241233. http://file.scirp.org/pdf/ AJPS_2017051714172937.pdf Dara, S. K., S. S. Dara, S.S.R. Dara, and T. Anderson. 2016. First report of three entomopathogenic

Progressive Crop Consultant

November / December 2019

fungi offering protection against the plant pathogen, Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. vasinfectum. UC ANR eJournal Strawberries and Vegetables. https://ucanr.edu/blogs/blogcore/ postdetail.cfm?postnum=22199 Koike, S. T., G. T. Browne, and T. R. Gordon. 2013. UC IPM pest management guidelines: Strawberry diseases. UC ANR Publication 3468. http://ipm. ucanr.edu/PMG/r734101511.html Partridge, D. 2003. Macrophomina phaseolina. PP728 Pathogen Profiles, Department of Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University. https://projects.ncsu.edu/cals/ course/pp728/Macrophomina/ macrophominia_phaseolinia.HTM Vasebi, Y., N. Safaie, and A. Alizadeh. 2013. Biological control of soybean charcoal root rot disease using bacterial and fungal antagonists in vitro and greenhouse condition. J. Crop Prot. 2(2): 139-150.

Comments about this article? We want to hear from you. Feel free to email us at article@jcsmarketinginc.com

November/December 2019

V I N E YA R D R E V I E W FEATURED ARTICLES: Angled Shoot Projection (SASP) Trellis Design Weed Management in Vineyards Maximizing Effectiveness of Spraying Mechanized and Autonomous Vineyard Operations

November /December 2019

www.progressivecrop.com

VINEYARD REVIEW

WEED MANAGEMENT IN VINEYARDS By CRYSTAL NAY | Contributing Writer

rom wine grapes to table grapes and raisins, there are several ways to prevent and manage weeds in the vineyard. Ideally, weeds are managed while they’re still small, since the crop is closer to the ground, and taller weeds can provide easy access for pests, disease, and other complications.

While industry best practices and research hasn’t changed significantly very recently, there has been one change that farm advisors now recommend to growers: spray volumes. “The old recommendations were thirty gallons an acre,” says Kurt Hembree, weed management farm advisor for the University of California Cooperative Extension, “but it really needs to be about forty to fifty gallons an acre.” 26

Progressive Crop Consultant

Farm advisors are seeing better results for the contact herbicides at this higher volume, with better coverage and less weed regrowth, and overall a cleaner vineyard floor than at the lower volumes. Everything else, including timing and materials, remain the same. The main component of struggling with weed control is the fact that even though herbicide labels are very specific about application timing, many growers get into the field later than they should. Sometimes pruning can take growers into the middle of winter, and by then there are rainstorms that can prevent them from getting out into the field, especially in vineyards with heavier soils. Before growers catch themselves at odds in the winter, there are things that can be done earlier to

November / December 2019

ensure a well-implemented program. “Late summer and early fall is a great time to make sure all your equipment is working properly,” says Hembree. “Check your spray nozzles and all your machinery.” Whichever weed management program a grower chooses, Hembree insists on sticking to it, and adhering as closely as possible to the timings. “As soon as everything is pruned and the canes come out of the field, be ready to go. Timing is the biggest issue. Like in the case of raisins, you only have a few months before the canopies touch the ground.” Another major key for ensuring spray effectiveness is cleaning up trashy berms and keeping them clean. If there is debris at the base

Continued on Page 28

VINEYARD REVIEW ADVERTORIAL

Lock Out Weeds Protect the orchard floor from nutrient-robbing weeds. Killing weeds after they take over the orchard floor is akin to installing a security system after thieves emptied the house.

“Most growers,” he says, “prefer a tree line application, though some broadcast Alion across their acreage.”

To protect yield from nutrient-robbing weeds, lock them out of the orchard floor. Slam the gate on weeds with a tankmix of a long-lasting, foundational herbicide paired with a contact treatment that provides a second mode of action.

Wilson’s goal is to simplify weed control for growers and help them harvest high yields.

Benefits include: • Increased yield potential • Reduced insect and disease pressure • More efficient water and nutrient uptake • Improved harvestability in tree nuts

“It’s important to maintain control of weeds in an orchard throughout the growing season,” Wilson says. “If weeds go untreated through the growing season, they can potentially rob the orchard of valuable nutrients and water, which can put unnecessary stress on the crop. At harvest time, weeds can compromise the harvest process.” Ryan Garcia, of Hughson, California, a PCA/CCA with Salida Ag Chem, sees the weed population diminishing in the orchards he helps manage.

“Herbicides are important in almond orchards,” says Pest Control Advisor/ “Alion does a really good job, “I continue to use Alion in a pre-emergent Certified Crop Advisor (PCA/CCA) has long residual weed control rotation because it’s a good product and David Vermeulen, Modesto, California. and it takes care of a lot of it works really well. We can see Alion “Weeds compete for nutrients. They broad-spectrum weeds…” reducing the weed population overall as compete for water. Those are probably soon as we start using it,” Garcia states. your bigger two issues in the almond “I think it’s one of the top – if not the top – pre-emergent product orchard, especially early on, so by keeping them down you have out in the market right now. Alion does a really good job, has long more water and more nutrients getting to the plant to get a better residual weed control and it takes care of a lot of broad-spectrum crop. Weeds also harbor insects – take morning glory, when you weeds that are giving us issues here in the Central Valley.” control it, you have a little less mite pressure in the orchard.”

“Alion works well and it works perfectly for switching chemistries around,” Vermeulen states.

Alion Provides Long-Lasting Weed and Grass Control The effective, long-lasting weed control extends across a broad spectrum of broadleaf weeds and grasses. With low use rates in an easy-to-use liquid SC formulation, Alion also offers excellent crop safety. Bayer Sales Representative Matthew Wilson, PCA, recommends Alion for pre-emergent weed control in mature almonds, walnuts and grapes during dormancy from November through January.

Outstanding Weed Control Compared to Other Premium Herbicides Percent of weed control at 121 days after application replicated at two locations in California tree nuts. Percent of Weed Control (121 Days after Application)

Vermeulen uses Alion® two ways, depending on crop needs: a single application in a tankmix with a second mode of action in the fall or Alion alone in a split application with treatments in November and February. As a Group 29 herbicide, Alion offers a unique mode of action, which Vermeulen particularly appreciates for the resistance management opportunity.

100 80

97.5

100

92.5

85 72.5

60 40 20 0

Roundup® + Rely ® Overall

Alion® at 3.5 oz./A + Roundup + Rely Jungle rice

Mission® at 2.15 oz./A + Roundup + Rely Fluvellin

Source: Brad Hanson, UC Davis, 2017.

Learn more at AlionEndsWeeds.com

© 2019 Bayer Group. Always read and follow label instructions. Bayer, the Bayer Cross, Alion, and Roundup are registered trademarks of the Bayer Group. Not all products are registered for use in all states. Rely is a registered trademark of BASF Corporation. Mission is a registered trademark of Ishihara Sangyo Kaisha, Ltd. For additional product information, call toll-free 1-866-99-BAYER (1-866-992-2937) or visit our website at www.CropScience.Bayer.us. Bayer CropScience LP, 800 North Lindbergh Boulevard, St. Louis, MO 63167. CR0918ALIONNB016S00R0

November / December 2019

www.progressivecrop.com

BICIDE EC

FORORGANICPRODUCTION

VINEYARD REVIEW

Continued from Page 26

of your vines, there’s no telling whether or not the spray chemicals are making it into the soil and reaching the weeds, or if they’re getting stuck and then washing away.

According to Hembree, if the field is clean and the proper spray timings are followed, the rest of any weed management program will fall into place. This is especially true for organic

vineyards, as trying to rein in weeds from an organic standpoint is very challenging. This becomes trickier because available options are much more limited, but organic growers who dedicate the right equipment, manpower, and timing can do just as well. Doing nothing—in both organic and conventional—is a recipe for disaster, and can wreak havoc on the crop, the harvest crew, and the bottom line. Using raisin grapes again as an example, tall horseweeds or prickly lettuce

HERBICIDE EC

72 hours post-application

Your Partner for an Effective Weed Control Program

SUPPRESS® Herbicide EC is a broad spectrum contact herbicide for post-emergent, non-selective weed control.

◊ Provides fast and effective burndown ◊ Excellent tool in IPM programs

◊ Helps break chemical resistance ◊ Zero pre-harvest interval (PHI) ◊ Safe for pollinators and beneficials ◊ Non-volatile, emulsifiable concentrate ◊ Approved for certified organic crop production

Progressive Crop Consultant

(800) 876-2767 www.westbridge.com November / December 2019

can overrun a vineyard, which can also bring white flies and leaf hoppers. Combine this with an angry crew that has to fight with weeds to hunt for clusters, a too-lax weed management system will have weeds seeds nestled in the folds of raisins and will, therefore, result in a contaminated crop.

“I’ve seen weeds seeds end up in the trays, and I’ve seen loads get rejected from overseas because of them,” says Hembree. Growers who are vigilant about their weed management program will benefit greatly because of it. Both pre-plant and post-plant options are available to control weeds in vineyards. Pre-Plant Options

FORORGANICPRODUCTI Preparing the soil prior to planting a new vineyard is a great time to initiate a solid weed management regiment. For one, controlling weeds at this stage is critical because of the competition for resources that can happen if weeds are present during the planting of vines. An irrigation program that supports weed seed germination, which is then followed by tillage to uproot these new seedlings, can help greatly reduce the presence of weeds. There’s also the option of burying seeds even further beneath the ground, preventing them from sprouting at all. However, a drawback of this is that the soil shouldn’t be tilled for about four years, otherwise the seeds might be brought back to the surface and germinate.

There is also the option of laying UV-inhibiting, clear plastic between rows that are six feet wide and damp. The longer the days, the better, and this should be started no later than late August in most California regions to ensure that this process can be completed within four to six weeks, before the seasonal change. Post-Plant Options Most vineyards aren’t starting anew when it comes to weed

Continued on Page 30

VINEYARD REVIEW

November 20th, 2019 7:00 AM to 1:00 PM

Tulare Fairgrounds

215 Martin Luther King Jr Ave, Tulare, CA 93274

• Free Event Growers, Applicators, PCAs, CCAs, and Processors Welcome! • CE Credits Offered • Seminars & Workshops • Networking Opportunities • Free Industry Lunch • Free Coffee & Donuts • Cash Prizes WCNGG.COM/SVNCC

Pre-Register at

@jcsmarketing

JCS Marketing Inc.

@jcs_marketing November / December 2019

www.progressivecrop.com

VINEYARD REVIEW

Continued from Page 28

"When a burst of heat is applied at 130°F, the plant’s cell wall ruptures. This is most effective on non-grass plants that have fewer than two true leaves."

management, so staving off weeds can either be a proactive endeavor, or a reactive one that can leave growers—and harvest crews—battling weeds. Cultivation With this method, weeds can either be uprooted or buried, with uprooting working better for larger weeds, and burial working better for smaller ones. Keeping the depth of grape roots in mind, cultivation ideally destroys weed roots to remove current plants without turning over the soil enough to allow for germination of new seeds. Established perennial weeds will need more attention in order to remove them, and growers may need a special mechanism to protect vine roots.

Whichever method a grower chooses, it’s helpful to keep a weed survey of the field. These records can assist in method selection, can track changes in the field, and can help with diligently sticking to a weed management program, which is imperative for vineyard success.

Flaming When a burst of heat is applied at 130°F, the plant’s cell wall ruptures. This is most effective on non-grass plants that have fewer than two true leaves. Burning isn’t necessary, and a weed that loses its shine or retains a fingerprint when pressed has been adequately flamed. Propane-fueled flamers are the most commonly used models for weeds in the vine row, and it’s extremely important to avoid this method in windy conditions or around dry vegetation. Herbicides Contact herbicides are effective, and since the results are dependent upon the chemicals touching the plant, they can also damage grape leaves and vines. New flushes of weeds will require additional application, as contact herbicides don’t generally have a residual effect. Following all provided directions—from application method and timing, to protective equipment and storage—is extremely important when using any specific herbicides. Mulch What is weed control without the mention of mulch? While mulch can be made from a variety of materials, such as wood chips, straw and even newspaper, the ultimate goal is to completely block any light from reaching seeds, thus preventing germination. Organic mulches break down faster, so the layer will have to be thicker. Winter cover crops can be cut and then moved to be used as mulch. Though cover crops can outcompete weeds, they can also compete with the vine. Mulches in general may provide cover for some unwanted visitors as well, such as rodents that can damage vine trunks and roots.

Progressive Crop Consultant

November / December 2019

Comments about this article? We want to hear from you. Feel free to email us at article@jcsmarketinginc.com

Bring the heat on hard-to-kill weeds and insects with TM

d-LIMONENE ADJUVANT

100% Active Ingredient!

Spreader-Activator with Citrus Extract

R-Agent DL® dramatically boosts performance.

Use R-Agent DL with and without oil on agricultural, turf, ornamental, and non-cropland sites. Distributed by

Chemurgic Agricultural Chemicals, Inc. P.O. Box 2106 • Turlock, CA 95381

www.chemurgic.net

For more information: email: tom@chemurgic.net Tom Kelm: 559 696-6558

• Adjuvants • Nutrients • Organics • Formulation Services

VINEYARD REVIEW

Thank You to our 2019 Sponsors

DINNER SPONSOR & MIXER CO-SPONSOR

BREAKFAST SPONSOR

AGENDA SPONSOR

INDOOR SPONSOR

TOTE BAG SPONSOR & MIXER CO-SPONSOR

REGISTRATION SPONSOR

BREAK SPONSOR

MEDIA SPONSOR

INDOOR SPONSOR

COFFEE SPONSOR & TRAEGER GRILL SPONSOR

INDOOR SPONSOR

CE CREDIT SPONSOR

CO-HOSTED BY: POWERED BY: PUBLICATION

November / December 2019

www.progressivecrop.com

VINEYARD REVIEW

MAXIMIZING THE EFFICIENCY OF AIRBLAST SPRAYING By LYNN R. WUNDERLICH | University of California Cooperative Extension Farm

All photos courtesy of L.R. Wunderlich, UC Regents

gricultural operations are becoming more efficient-have you noticed? Efficiency is defined as using the least amount of input to achieve the highest amount of output. And any business person, engineer or farmer knows that efficiency saves money. Still, there is one critical piece of equipment on every farm that sometimes is forgotten when we talk efficiency: the airblast sprayer.

When I think of maximizing the efficiency of an airblast application, I think of coverage. Spray coverage is the opposite of drift, and good spray coverage on the target, while minimizing off-site pesticide movement, is the goal when we take the sprayer out. 32

Progressive Crop Consultant

Here, some tips for improving the efficiency of your airblast sprayer.

1. Take care of your equipment,

understand how it works. Don’t ignore the basics. Keep a clean machine. Cleaning improves the life of the sprayer, reduces the chance of cross-contamination of pesticides and crop injury, and improves spray quality. Although this is a “duh”, I often encounter sprayer problems that are due to neglect of the basics:

▶ The pump pre- and post-filters should be cleaned at the end or start of every spray day. ▶ Likewise, the nozzle strainers. Cleaning the filters doesn’t take much time but can make a huge

November / December 2019

difference in the application. ▶ Replace the nozzles annually at least. Enough said. ▶ The fan grill should be clear of leaves and debris so it can intake air. ▶ Be sure that the agitation-either mechanical or hydraulic-is working properly-this ensures a uniform pesticide suspension. ▶ Make sure your pressure gauge is easy to read, uses a scale that makes sense for your typical spray pressure (no need to go to 1000 psi), and check the pressure gauge against another gauge for accuracy.

Continued on Page 34

VINEYARD REVIEW

They may be unseen, but they shouldn’t go unnoticed.

Nematodes are the invisible threat to almond orchards. Protect your crops from nematode damage with Velum® One. Protection from wide-spectrum nematode damage.

58% average increase in canopy diameter in newly planted trees.2

Can increase yield 8.3% with an average of $475/bearing acre.1

Convenient in-season application via chemigation.

For more information, visit www.VelumOne.com. 1

Profit increase based on 2017 almond price/lb. and average yield/bearing acres with 8.3% increase in yield versus untreated over three-year trial, per trial data of five locations with a single application of Velum One at 6.5 or 6.85 fl. oz./A.

Velum One applied at 6.5 oz./A, spring 2017, via drip irrigation. Trees planted in January 2017. Increase in green canopy pixels based on an average of two rows of untreated trees compared to an average of two rows of Velum One-treated trees.

© 2019 Bayer Group. Always read and follow label instructions. Bayer, the Bayer Cross, and Velum are registered trademarks of the Bayer Group. Not all products are registered for use in all states. For additional product information, call toll-free 1-866-99-BAYER (1-866-992-2937) or visit our website at www.CropScience.Bayer.us. Bayer CropScience LP, 800 North Lindbergh Boulevard, St. Louis, MO 63167. CR0119VELONEB034S00R0

November / December 2019

www.progressivecrop.com

VINEYARD REVIEW

This pump pre-filter was so full of sulfur and oil that it couldn’t be easily removed. It came lose after an overnight soak with a tank cleaner. No wonder the pressure had low-impeded flow! Photo courtesy of F. Niederholzer

Continued from Page 32

2. Check your calibration variables to make sure they are accurate. Calibration is an essential part of sprayer efficiency. I prefer to use the basic calibration formula, which works with any sprayer and is easy to remember.

To measure the entire sprayer flow rate, follow these steps: ▶ Park the sprayer on a level surface. Fill the tank with clean water up to a verifiable spot at the top of the tank—usually you can see a line at the strainer or even make a mark with a Sharpie. ▶ Working with the driver, bring the PTO or engine up to operating RPMs (540) and open all the nozzles while timing with a stopwatch how long they are open.

Spray volume

(GPA, gallons per acre) =

Flow Rate

(GPM, gallons per minute)

Land Rate

(APM, acres per minute)

No matter what formula you choose to use to calibrate, the variables you need to measure are the same: nozzle output, tractor ground speed, and spray swath width. Nozzle output (flow rate) is a function of the pressure and the type of nozzle. You can check this in the nozzle manufacturer’s catalog-most are available online. But you should also confirm by measuring the flow rate because the output can change when nozzles wear, or when the pressure differs from that listed in the catalog. I’ve found that even new nozzles can have flow rates that differ significantly from what is expected.

You’ll want to keep them open for a minute or two. Check to confirm the pressure while they are open (you’ll need to wear PPE, personal protective equipment, because you’ll get wet!). Be sure to stop your stopwatch when the nozzles are shut off and use that time for your calculation. ▶ Refill the sprayer up to your line and record how much water it takes to refill. Be sure to use a bucket that has been calibrated itself to make accurate measurements. Then divide the number of gallons it took to refill by the time to get the gallons per minute.

This method gives you output of the entire sprayer, all nozzles. If you want to measure individual nozzle flow rates, you will need to either make or purchase a nozzle adapter, to fit over the nozzle with a hose attached to capture the flow. We’ve made an adapter from dishwasher plumbing supplies, brass hose bibs and hose clamps. AAMS Salvarani manufacturing in Belgium is a source to purchase nozzle adapters. Once you have the actual sprayer flow rate, confirm your tractor ground speed. Don’t rely on the tractor speedometer, these are notoriously erroneous as they are typically set with the tires at the place of manufacturing. When tire sizes are changed, as they often are once the tractor reaches the sale point, the number of rotations and corresponding speedometer mph will be affected. To check the tractor speed, measure out at least 100 feet in the terrain you’ll be working in, note the tractor gear and setting, and time the travel. This is typically in seconds, so you’ll need to convert to distance travelled over time in minutes to get feet per minute. Land rate is defined as the swath width in feet multiplied by the ground speed in feet per minute. Swath width in orchards and vineyards is the row spacing, in feet. From the square feet, or area sprayed, you can then do the conversions to acres sprayed per minute.

Continued on Page 36 34

Progressive Crop Consultant

November / December 2019

“WHEN QUANTIX IS DONE FLYING I can look at the Quick-Look images immediately and get some answers right away. It’s going to make us more efficient and make

BETTER MANAGEMENT

DECISIONS.” —NICK GATZMAN, Tavaille & Phippen, CA

Learn more

Quantix-AVDSS.com MAXIMIZE EVERY ACRE

November / December 2019

www.progressivecrop.com

VINEYARD REVIEW

Continued from Page 34

3. Recheck your calibration variables

by looking at spray coverage. Use water sensitive spray cards or add a visible marker like kaolin clay to the tank, to check the spray coverage once you’ve calibrated. Water sensitive spray cards used to be hard to find, but a quick check online gave me three results—Gemplers, Sprayer Depot and Amazon—for places to purchase.

No fancy tools needed! A simple bucket can be used to measure the sprayer output after spraying out for a measured amount of time, as demonstrated here by U.C. Cooperative Extension Farm Advisor Franz Niederholzer.

Put the spray cards in the canopy where you are targeting your spray. You can use mailing tags, with a card stapled to each side, to easily hang them in the canopy. Hang several also in areas where you don’t want to see spray. Remember to flag the branches where the paper is hung for easy retrieval. Then, run your sprayer down the row and retrieve the cards after. Interpreting what you see on the paper can be a bit tricky—you want to look for about 85 dots per square centimeter (see https://sprayers101.com/confirm-coverage-with-water-sensitive-paper/ for a visual

A FRESH APPROACH TO SPRAYING VINEYARDS We have distinct fan options for every crop.

Call us for your FREE demonstration

EXPERTLY DESIGNED WITH PASSION AND INNOVATION

The Manez Lozano TWISTER is SIMPLY BRILLIANT! Generates air turbulence. Limited moving parts saves tractor wear. Energy efficcient reduces fuel consumption. Reliable, more than 50 years of experience.

TWISTER FR PARRON Trailed sprayer for vine growing perfect for table grapes (Inverter Options Available)

TWISTER FR ESPALDERA Trailed sprayer designed for vines.

Twister Sprayers USA LLC is located at 1320 Dupont Ct. Manteca CA 95336 with direct sales, parts and 24/7 service Ask for Gerald (209) 277-9554 ts@twistersprayers.com www.twistersprayers.com 36

Progressive Crop Consultant

November / December 2019

VINEYARD REVIEW

Don’t get too caught up in how many dots though; the most important thing is that you want some dots but not a totally blue card, which would indicate too much spray...

Water sensitive spray cards are yellow and turn blue when sprayer water drops hit. They can be attached to mailing tags for easy hanging in the canopy. of what this looks like). Don’t get too caught up in how many dots though; the most important thing is that you want some dots but not a totally blue card, which would indicate too much spray; nor a totally yellow card, which would indicate not enough spray. The cards can give you clues on adjustments to make to refine your calibration: nozzle position, nozzle flow rate, fan speed, and ground speed may need to be modified for the best efficiency! Plan to spend at least a morning on optimizing your sprayer efficiency, it will pay off in the end.

Comments about this article? We want to hear from you. Feel free to email us at article@jcsmarketinginc.com

Grape Bud

ANALYSIS

The More You Know the More You Grow Since 1983 Bio Ag Services has been aiding grower decisions on grape projections, yield, and pruning. Our technicians dissect the buds on grape canes and spurs, giving you the information you can expect in next year’s crop.

Our Program Percentage of Fruitful Buds Yield Projections

Cost Savings Increase Pruning and Thinning Efficiency Yield Stability

www.bioagservicescorp.com

For more information on how to sample and send canes and spurs to our office contact us at: Robert Weaver: 559-977-2563 Scott Lecrone: 559-470-7328 November / December 2019

www.progressivecrop.com

VINEYARD REVIEW

MECHANIZED VINEYARD IS IT THE WAVE OF THE FUTURE? By CECILIA PARSONS | Associate Editor

echanization progress in a traditionally labor intensive crop is yielding improved production and quality.

Wine grape growers in California’s San Joaquin Valley and other wine grape growing regions are finding benefits in University of California Cooperative Extension (UCCE) research into mechanized dormant pruning and shoot removal. While the traditional winegrape training system can work for mechanical harvest, mechanical dormant pruning and shoot removal operations have not been as successful. The aim in further mechanization is to lower labor costs while still ensuring crop yields and quality. Mechanical Pruning University of California (UC) researchers Kaan Kurtural, a specialist at the UC Davis Department of Viticulture and Enology and George Zhuang, UCCE viticulture advisor in Fresno County found that introducing mechanized pruning and other vine management operations could be done in existing vineyards. Vines could be re-trained during the transition from hand pruning and they would still retain production and fruit quality. This choice is significant for wine grape growers in the San Joaquin Valley, who produce more than half of the wine grapes in California, because in recent years they have faced increased labor costs, worker shortages and tighter profit margins. A report from UC Davis noted mechanical pruning in wine grape vineyards reduced

Vineyard photos courtesy of Kaan Kurtural. 38

Progressive Crop Consultant

November / December 2019

VINEYARD REVIEW

Indianmeal Moth Control!

Mating disruptant for stored product moths!!

LESS IS MORE!

Most Cost-Effective Moth Control Available!

CIDETRAK ® IMM Dispenser

LESS MATING FEWER LARVAE LESS INSECTICIDE REDUCED INFESTATION

Reduction of IMM at Retail Store 600

96%

500

REDUCTION

400 300 200 100

MATING DISRUPTANT FOR INDIANMEAL MOTH AND RELATED SPECIES

INCORPORATED INSECT PHEROMONE & KAIROMONE SYSTEMS

Your Edge – And Ours – Is Knowledge.

No. of IMM

700

2014

JUN

FEB

DEC

APR

2013

OCT

JUN

AUG

FEB

DEC

APR

2012

OCT

2011

JUN

0 AUG

CIDETRAK® IMM is proven to be the most cost effective tool you can use for prevention and control of IMM and related moths. CIDETRAK IMM has consistently reduced or eliminated season long IMM abundance, and related insecticide applications in very large scale scientific trials. And users report outstanding results from extensive commercial use in food processing, commodity storage and retail facilities.

APR

A report on converting vineyards to mechanical pruning, authored by Kurtural, Andrew E. Beebe, Johann Martinez-Luscher, Zhuang, Karl T. Lund, Glenn McGourty and Larry J. Bettiga and published in HortTechnology, concluded that conversion of traditional systems to the bilateral cordon-trained mechanically box pruned single high wire sprawling system (SHMP) sustained greater yield with more clusters per vine and smaller berries without affecting the canopy microclimate.

FEB

In the trial, the vines were converted to a bilateral cordon-trained spur pruned California sprawl training system or to a bilateral cordon-trained, mechanically box pruned single high wire sprawling system. The UCCE report noted that the second system was the most successful for mechanical pruning.

APR

In the San Joaquin Valley, the traditional trellis system consists of vines head trained to a 38-inch tall trunk above the vineyard floor and two eight-node canes laid on a catch wire in opposite directions. There are also two eight-node canes attached to a 66-inch catch wire. This system can work for mechanical harvesting, but not dormant pruning and shoot removal and limits options for other canopy management operations.

Continued on Page 41

DEC

Trellis Systems

From 2013 to 2015, labor costs per acre with the SHMP system totaled $463.05 while the hand labor during that time totaled $1,348 per acre.

JUN

The report noted that following completion of the research trial, the remainder of the vineyard was converted to the single high-wire sprawling system used in the trial block. UC researchers also reported other wine grape growers in the area are beginning to transition vineyards to the new system.

system is recommended for growers in the hot Central Valley winegrape growing areas to increase sustainability of production while not sacrificing adequate berry composition.

OCT

One of the research sites was an eight-acre portion of a 53-acre block of 20-year-old Merlot vines in Madera County. The field study took place over three growing seasons.

This was due to a higher number of nodes retained after dormant pruning. Compared to the traditional and the bilateral cordon-trained spur pruned California sprawl training system, the SHMP canopies filled their allotted space earlier. The report authors said that earlier canopy growth coupled with sufficient reproductive compensating responses allowed for increased yields while reaching maturity without a decline in anthocyanin content. This

AUG

labor costs by 90 percent, increased grape yields and had no impact on the berry’s anthocyanin content.

CT IMM Applied - Fall 2011, Spring 2013, Fall 2013 36 Dispensers per application

Contact your local supplier and order now! Visit our website: www.trece.com or call: 1- 866-785-1313.

November / December 2019

www.progressivecrop.com

VINEYARD REVIEW

DON’T FALL FOR THEIR BULL. Buck the rest. Get Acadian®. Talk is cheap. Other products claim to be as eﬀective as Acadian® but lack the research or in-ﬁeld trials to prove it. Ask for the ingredients. Ask for the research. Better yet – Ask for Acadian®… 100% Ascophyllum nodosom. Get growing.

Acadian Plant Health™ is a division of Acadian Seaplants Limited, Acadian® is a registered trademark of Acadian Seaplants Limited.

Progressive Crop Consultant

Do Not Print (for office use only)

Potency matters. Get growing.

acadian-usa.com

November / December 2019 McDaniels Marketing • Client: Acadian• “2019 Acadian Bloom Ads” Print Ad • Ad Size: Half Page horz., 7.25” x 5”• 4/c, 300 dpi • Progressive Crop Consultant • Pub Deadline: asap

VINEYARD REVIEW

physiology. Buds will break earlier in the growing season, Zhuang said and the vines would begin to push new growth much faster. The early growth will mean early water demands will need to be met. Demand for nutrients will be accelerated by the early growth, larger canopies and yields. Labor Nick Davis, ranch manager for The Wine Group, a company that farms 13,000 acres of wine grapes between Kern County and Lodi, said reducing the impacts of increased labor costs prompted the decision to move toward mechanized pruning in their vineyards. Any new vineyard developed by the company, in the Central Valley, will be set up for mechanization, Davis said, and the goal is to become 100 percent mechanized in the future.

Continued from Page 39 Vineyard Mechanization Conversion Kurtural also led research on vineyard mechanization conversion in a 40acre vineyard in Napa County. The research began as a labor-saving trial, but Kurtural reported that when they began looking at the physiological aspects of how plants grow, there were benefits to fruit quality as well. Taller canopies due to increased trunk height protect the developing winegrapes from sun damage. The taller canopies and the increased yields from mechanically pruned vines also mean that water and nutrient requirements in the vineyard can be different from those in hand-pruned vineyards. Zhuang confirmed that interest in mechanical pruning and vineyard transition is growing, not only in the San Joaquin Valley, but on the Central Coast where sufficient labor for cultural practices is becoming difficult to find.

The premium wine grape growing areas in northern California have strong traditions with hand spur pruning, but tighter labor markets may lead growers there to consider mechanization. The vine re-training could also be feasible for raisin grape vineyards, Zhuang said, but not for table grapes due to different production needs. Changes in Nutrient and Irrigation Management

“We know this system works, but we will be working on managing the hedge-pruned box and not allow it to creep out,” Davis said. Transitioning existing vineyards requires removal of cross arms and foliage wires and t-posts, but if the berry quality and the production are the same or better than vines that are hand pruned, transitioning will continue, Davis said. Comments about this article? We want to hear from you. Feel free to email us at article@jcsmarketinginc.com

Where mechanized pruning is done, Zhuang said, there would need to be changes in nutrient management and irrigation. Water and fertilizer requirements for mechanically pruned vines are different than those of hand pruned vines. “Canopies will grow faster and bigger on those vines,” he said. Mechanized pruning operations will leave many more buds, as many as double the number left after spur pruning, and that will change the plant November / December 2019

www.progressivecrop.com

VINEYARD REVIEW

ANGLED SHOOT PROJECTION TRELLIS DESIGN ( SASP)

By STEVE SHOEMAKER | Grower

e have a small vineyard consisting of mostly French and a few Spanish varietals planted on deep sand, sandy loam, and river rock clay soils. The deep sand soil creates vines that are balanced in growth and grapes that produce wines with a mineral touch. In contrast, the sandy loam soil creates vines that are overgrown with grapes that are excellent as long as the vine growth is controlled in order to keep the vines balanced. The vines were planted in the river rock clay area a few years ago.

The area where the vineyard is planted is a micro-climate within Region 4 (warm growing area) with fall wine grape ripening season in the 90’s during the day and 40’s at night, excellent for slow and balanced ripening. Since I take care of all vineyard and cellar requirements, I am always looking for designs and procedures that decrease time, work, and number of steps for completion. Everything is consciously engineered and tested for simplicity, repeatable results, and ease of care. VSP When the vines were first planted in 2007, I naturally assumed that Vertical Shoot Projection (VSP) was “the” way to trellis the vines because of its popularity and my ignorance of trellising designs. Because the rows are oriented east-west for esthetic reasons, special considerations were required for sun protection on the south side of the vines. I discovered that it was very difficult to get grapes of full physiological maturity balanced with the right brix to make premium wines, so I began looking at the trellis design wondering if there was a better way to achieve my goal of premium grapes without the extensive leaf and cane thinning and hedging. As I looked more intently at the VSP design, I decided there was a better way to trellis the grapes for this area; one that enabled easier vine maintenance without multiplying issues, like the ever-prominent powdery mildew. With the VSP trellis, I had to grow the southside of the

Continued on Page 44 42

Progressive Crop Consultant

Figure 1: Syrah on SASP Trellis. All photos courtesy of Steve Shoemaker.

November / December 2019

VINEYARD REVIEW

PUT YOUR GRAPES TO BED WITH THE RIGHT NUTRITION.

HIGH PHOS™

Apply High Phos as Part of Your Post Harvest Fertilizer Program. A balanced formulation of essential nutrients containing organic and amino acids to stabilize the nutrients and facilitate their chelation, uptake, translocation and use.

For more information visit wrtag.com, or contact Joseph Witzke at (209) 720-8040

November / December 2019

www.progressivecrop.com

VINEYARD REVIEW Spur Pruned

Figure 2: Syrah on SASP Trellis. All photos courtesy of Steve Shoemaker.

Continued from Page 42 vine canes longer to protect the fruit from premature raisining because of the intense sunlight; but that created a perfect environment for powdery mildew because of the “umbrella-like” structure that resulted. Essentially, when the vines were watered by the drip irrigation, the moisture turned to humidity that rose up and hung in the fruiting area encouraging mildew growth while the multiple layers of canes and leaves prevented the mildew sprays from reaching the fruit. I then pushed the vine canes up to get some airflow in the fruiting zone; but there was still a serious humidity problem in the fruiting area. After a few seasons, I decided to find a different trellising design that would eliminate the problems that VSP created. I analyzed the issues with VSP and made a list to be addressed by a different design. The VSP trellis design relies on the canes projecting vertically, but in warm growing environments with intense sunlight, there is a need for shading of the fruit to prevent premature raisining; but the number of canes required for protection also served as an effective protection from the 44

Progressive Crop Consultant

mildew spray reaching the fruiting zone, while also preventing the sun from penetrating the multiple layers of leaves to created color in the grapes. This technique of allowing the canes to flop over on the vine is known in this area as “California Sprawl” and it shades the fruit with many layers of leaves, thus preventing adequate air movement to help prevent powdery mildew. Additionally, having canes over four feet long, the green matter of the vines was exceeding the green matter-to-fruit ratio for growing premium quality grapes. The ratios for growing premium quality fruit are generally known to be 15 leaves per bunch and six to eight bunches per vine; but that is for vines grown in a cooler environment, which does not provide adequate protection in Region 4. Consequently, I have been working on creating the appropriate ratios for growing wine grapes in Region 4; but the long canes required to protect the fruit was creating a higher level of pyrazines in my fruit and thus flavors of bell-pepper in my Cabernet wines. Essentially, by protecting the fruit from too much sun with the VSP trellis design, there were additional issues of not enough sun to achieve physiological maturity in the grapes, preventing mildew sprays from reaching the grapes for their protection, and off flavors in the Cabernet wines.

November / December 2019

Since VSP trellised vines are spur pruned, it was always a fight between what I wanted the vines to do in terms of growth and what the vine actually did. The issue is that the number of buds left on the spur is inversely related to the number of canes that the spur will produce in the spring, especially on mature vines. I pruned to two-buds and would end up with four to six canes from each spur, requiring extensive spring cane and leaf thinning. I then pruned to fourbuds which resulted in three to four canes from each spur; and although better, it was still a real issue to get the fruiting zone cleaned up since it was only me doing all the leaf and cane thinning. Interestingly, I take care of a neighboring vineyard that is trellised on the VSP design; and each year, even though it receives leaf and cane thinning, it loses about 15-20 percent of the fruit from powdery mildew. In my analysis, I noticed the VSP trellis design puts all the fruit in the same area just above the horizontal cordon where all the canes are protruding from and the dead leaves from senescence land and stay, thus covering the fruit. For some vineyards that have adequate and well trained help, these problems might not be an issue; but for a vineyard that has little to no help, I was cleaning all the time. I noted in that having all the fruit in one area, it created problems of cane and fruit entanglement making it harder to harvest the fruit, a higher incidence of bunch-rot, and the dead leaves laying on top of the fruit in the crux of the canes formed at the cordon assisted with additional formation of mildew. I have also found that the fruit from VSP vines had more bird damage because of the readily available canes for perching and eating the grapes. Nutrition Concerning the nutrition of the grapes, there is a general theory that states the closer the fruit is to the soil, the better

Continued on Page 46

Helping Farmers Grow

VINEYARD REVIEW

Naturally Since 1974

www.newerafarmservice.com

Organic Products & Services • Compost • Custom Blends • VitazymeTM • Gypsum • Limestone • Root Stimulants • Liquid Fish Fertilizers • Mycorrhizae Fungi • Leaf Test

• AcadiamTM Seaweed Extract • Liquid Compost • Liquid R/S • Foliar Nutrients • Liquid Potassium • Humic Acid • Yucca Saponin Extract • Soil Test

Certified Crop Advisors on Staff

Contact Us Today! Doug Graham Certified Crop Advisor License #329563 Tel 559-686-3833 doug@newerafarmservice.com 2904 East Oakdale Ave. Tulare, CA 93274

November / December 2019

www.progressivecrop.com

VINEYARD REVIEW

Continued from Page 44 the nutrient supply to the fruit, thus making better fruit for wine. The VSP design puts the fruit a reasonable distance up the trunk away from the nutrient source, which has the potential for decreasing the fruit quality. I have found that the physiological maturity and brix in the fruit harvested from the VSP trellis design is not as balanced as it could be, for some reason. For example, the fruit I harvested from the vines on my neighbor’s property is on a sandy red clay mix soil and grown on the VSP trellis design. Although the soil has a huge effect on the maturity and quality of the fruit, this vintage’s fruit is very unbalanced with high pH and low Titratable/Total Acid (TA). I also noticed very little sunlight reached the fruit down in the crotch of the cane/cordon, thus creating an issue of physiological maturity, which might have contributed to the acid imbalance. In summary, the VSP design, at least in our area, produces lower quality and unbalanced fruit, contributes to increased powdery mildew, prevents mildew sprays from reaching the fruit, allows for more bird damage, requires more time and effort to maintain, and requires the soil nutrients to travel farther to the fruit. New Trellis Design The goal of a new trellis design became one that allows more light and air into the vine while still protecting the grapes from sunburn and being easy to care for on a small scale. I started looking into other trellising systems that might satisfy the requirements by studying publications, like Dr. Smart’s “Sunshine into Wine” and others, to find the right design. The research spanned the world of grape trellising including designs of France, Italy, Australia, and the U.S. As the analysis proceeded, I 46

Progressive Crop Consultant

discovered there really wasn’t a design that satisfied the identified requirements while still being easy to maintain. Consequently, I decided to create my own design that would answer my requirements and be easily maintained. The design is essentially a “V” shape with cordons angled up sharply and is named “Shoemaker’s Angled Shoot Projection” (SASP). SASP The SASP trellis design has resulted in less maintenance while providing higher quality fruit, significantly less powdery mildew, less bird damage, and easier harvests. Specifically, the SASP trellis design provides two to four leaves between the sun and fruit, thus providing the correct amount of sunlight on the grapes to achieve the 20 percent flecking recommended by Dr. Smart while preventing sunburn and premature raisining. This trellis design allows mildew sprays to easily reach into the vine to the fruit without the need for much leaf movement or an expensive fan-style spray rig, resulting in cleaner fruit at harvest. Even though it is still necessary to spray for powdery mildew, the SASP trellis design has decreased the number of sprays by more than half. The SASP trellis design allows the person harvesting to easily see the fruit for a faster harvest without expensive preparatory leaf cane and leaf thinning. (See Figure 2, page 44.) In Figure 2 (see page 44), the bird netting can be seen rolled along the drip line; but there are years that I don’t get all the nets up to protect from the birds. The SASP trellis design produces fruit along the angled cordon canes hanging free and making it almost impossible for birds get to the fruit. As an added benefit, the SASP trellis design has allowed for ‘interplanting’ of additional vines because the angled shoots extend upward and thus require less horizontal space along the support

November / December 2019

wires. Originally, the vineyard was planted with vines 5 feet apart, now because of the SASP design, I have been able to interplant vines at 2.5 feet apart which has doubled the number of vines while each one is mining the soil for its own nutrients resulting in high quality fruit on each vine. Interestingly, the vines planted in the fertile sandy loam soil were largely overgrown creating even more of a powdery mildew problem; but now, at the closer spacing, the vines are competing with each other and the amount of green matter growth has decreased resulting in more balanced vines between the leaves and fruit weight. In Conclusion The SASP trellis system was created to answer identified issues in our vineyard by mixing design parameters to satisfy the requirements in one trellis design structure. SASP has resulted in more balanced vines with higher quality fruit and easier and less expensive maintenance. Anyone is considering the SASP trellis design, the individual vineyard’s terroir, requirements, and issues should be considered prior to making the decision to use this design. For over 12 years now, Steve Shoemaker has been making wine and tending his vineyard; where he finds much needed solace after having been a CounterTerrorism (CT) expert and spending 7 years in war-zones. He has an undergraduate degree in Biology and is a few years away from a doctorate in CT; but is currently in his last two courses of the UC Davis Post Graduate Winemakers Certificate Program. He can be reached at: 3oaksvineyardclovis@gmail.com. Comments about this article? We want to hear from you. Feel free to email us at article@jcsmarketinginc.com

VINEYARD REVIEW

Navel Orangeworm Control!

Mating disruption product for conventional and organic California tree nuts!!

THANK YOU FOR YOUR BUSINESS! STAY TUNED FOR NEW INFORMATION AND DATA!

Navel Orangeworm, Amyelois transitella

• Up to 80% or more potential reduction in damage vs. current insecticide program • Season-long control through post-harvest • Easy application with ready-to-use carrier pack • No moving parts, no batteries, no gummy deposits • Removal not required ®

INCORPORATED INSECT PHEROMONE & KAIROMONE SYSTEMS

Your Edge – And Ours – Is Knowledge.

MATING DISRUPTION PRODUCT FOR NAVEL ORANGEWORM IN ALMONDS, PISTACHIOS & WALNUTS

Contact your local supplier and order now!

Visit our website: www.trece.com or call: 1- 866-785-1313.

November / December 2019

www.progressivecrop.com

FORTIFIED THAT’S HOW ALMONDS FEEL WITH MOVENTO.®

Movento® insecticide is the only foliar application with downward movement within the tree to protect roots by suppressing nematodes. With Movento, trees will show improved vigor and produce high yields year after year. For more information, contact your retailer or Bayer representative or visit www.Movento.us. © 2019 Bayer Group. Always read and follow label instructions. Bayer, the Bayer Cross, and Movento are registered trademarks of the Bayer Group. Not all products are registered for use in all states. For additional product information, call toll-free 1-866-99-BAYER (1-866-992-2937) or visit our website at www.CropScience.Bayer.us. Bayer CropScience LP, 800 North Lindbergh Boulevard, St. Louis, MO 63167. CR0319MOVENTB045S00R0

Progressive Crop Consultant

November / December 2019