Progressive Crop Consultant - November/December 2020

November / December 2020 Fusarium Wilt of Tomato Race 3

Autonomous Control of Strawberry Diseases, Insects and Mites Nutrient Management and Crop Disease Prevention

Insect Vectors of Grapevine Red Blotch Virus in California Vineyards

PUBLICATION

Volume 5: Issue 6

They may be unseen, but they shouldn’t go unnoticed.

Nematodes are the invisible threat to almond orchards.

Protect your crops from nematode damage with Velum® One. Protection from wide-spectrum nematode damage.

58% average increase in canopy diameter in newly planted trees.2

Can increase yield 8.3% with an average of $475/bearing acre.1

Convenient in-season application via chemigation.

For more information, visit www.VelumOne.com.

1

Profit increase based on 2017 almond price/lb. and average yield/bearing acres with 8.3% increase in yield versus untreated over three-year trial, per trial data of five locations with a single application of Velum One at 6.5 or 6.85 fl. oz./A.

2

Velum One applied at 6.5 oz./A, spring 2017, via drip irrigation. Trees planted in January 2017. Increase in green canopy pixels based on an average of two rows of untreated trees compared to an average of two rows of Velum One-treated trees.

ALWAYS READ AND FOLLOW PESTICIDE LABEL DIRECTIONS. Not all products are approved and registered in all states and may be subject to use restrictions. The distribution, sale, or use of an unregistered pesticide is a violation of federal and/or state law and is strictly prohibited. Check with your local product dealer or representative or U.S. EPA and your state pesticide regulatory agency for the product registration status in your state. Bayer, Bayer Cross, and Velum ® are registered trademarks of Bayer Group. For additional product information, call toll-free 1-866-99-BAYER (1-866-992-2937) or visit our website at www.BayerCropScience.us.

Bayer CropScience LP, 800 North Lindbergh Boulevard, St. Louis, MO 63167. ©2020 Bayer Group. All rights reserved.

PUBLISHER: Jason Scott Email: jason@jcsmarketinginc.com EDITOR: Marni Katz ASSOCIATE EDITOR: Cecilia Parsons Email: article@jcsmarketinginc.com PRODUCTION: design@jcsmarketinginc.com Phone: 559.352.4456 Fax: 559.472.3113 Web: www.progressivecrop.com

IN THIS ISSUE

4

Fusarium Wilt of Tomato Race 3

10

Ultraviolet-C Light and Robotics for Autonomous Control of Strawberry Diseases, Insects and Mites

16 20 24 28 32

Nutrient Management and Crop Disease Prevention

CONTRIBUTING WRITERS & INDUSTRY SUPPORT Andre Biscaro Fumiomi Takeda, Ph.D. UCCE Irrigation and Water Resources Advisor, Ventura County

4

Bacterial Leaf Spot in Lettuce

40

Foliar Feeding of Plant Nutrition

Surendra K. Dara

Tracy Leskey, Ph.D.,

Editorial Assistant Intern Entomology and Biologicals Advisor, UCCE

Pathologist, USDA-ARS,

Entomology Research Leader/Director, USDAARS and Adam Stager, JW Lemons Founder and CEO, TRIC CCA, CPAg, Western Region Robotics CCA

Germán SandoyaMiranda

Eryn Wingate

CCA, Tri-Tech Ag Products, Contributing Writer

Houston Wilson

Asst. UCCE Specialist, Dept. of Entomology, UC Riverside

Assistant Professor, Horticultural Sciences, University of Florida

UC COOPERATIVE EXTENSION ADVISORY BOARD Surendra Dara

32

UCCE Entomology and Biologicals Advisor, San Luis Obispo and Santa Barbara Counties

Kevin Day

Steven Koike Tri-Cal Diagnostics

Jhalendra Rijal UCCE Integrated Pest Management Advisor, Stanislaus County

UCCE Pomology Farm Advisor, Tulare and Kings Counties Kris Tollerup UCCE Integrated Pest Management Advisor, Fresno, CA Elizabeth Fichtner UCCE Farm Advisor, Mohammad Yaghmour Tulare County UCCE Area Orchard Systems Advisor, Kern County Katherine Jarvis-Shean UCCE Orchard Systems Advisor, Sacramento, Solano and Yolo Counties

Impact of Some Biostimulants in Improving Strawberry Yields

36

Wojciech Janisiewicz, Ph.D., Research Plant

Vegetable Crop Pathology, Department of Plant Pathology, UC Davis

Assessing the Accuracy and Precision of Commercial Ag Laboratories Western Region CCA Awards Presented at 2020 Crop Consultant Conference

Taylor Chalstrom

Kelley Paugh and Cassandra Swett

Update on Potential Insect Vectors of Grapevine Red Blotch Virus in California Vineyards

Research Horticulturist/ Lead Scientist, USDA-ARS,

40

The articles, research, industry updates, company profiles, and advertisements in this publication are the professional opinions of writers and advertisers. Progressive Crop Consultant does not assume any responsibility for the opinions given in the publication.

November / December 2020

www.progressivecrop.com

3

Fusarium Wilt of Tomato Race 3

New Management Options and Research into this Damaging Soil-Borne Wilt Disease

By KELLEY PAUGH AND CASSANDRA SWETT | Vegetable Crop Pathology, Department of Plant Pathology, UC Davis

F

usarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici (Fol) race 3 causes Fusarium wilt, a disease currently affecting most tomato-producing counties in California. Fol is divided into groups called races based on the ability to overcome plant resistances. Fol race 3 is the most recent race, which broke resistance to race 2. Fol race 3 was long restricted to the Sutter Basin, but began spreading in the early 2000s and is now present in every county with large-scale tomato production, making this one of the greatest economic threats to the industry.

Growers are seeking solutions for this damaging soil-borne disease. In this article, an issue overview as well as the latest information on Fusarium wilt race 3 spread, control and prevention is provided. The focus is on current research that is shining a light on new prospects for management of Fusarium wilt in tomato.

Key Characteristics

Bright yellow foliage on one or several shoots on an otherwise normal plant are the earliest symptoms, starting as early as 45 days after planting but typically occurring at about 60 days.

The one-sided yellowing of a branch or whole plant can help distinguish this disease from other wilt pathogens (e.g. Verticillium) and other causes of chlorotic conditions (e.g. nutrient disorders) (Figure 1A). From time of initial symptoms to harvest, disease symptoms progress from shoot yellowing to branch death which leads to partial or entire canopy collapse (Figure 1B). Fruit in this exposed canopy develop sunburn and may rot. Another

important diagnostic feature of Fusarium wilt of tomato is the presence of chocolate-brown vascular discoloration in the plant stem (Figure 1C).

Vascular discoloration is also a symptom of Verticillium wilt, which can lead to misdiagnosis. At advanced stages of Fusarium wilt, the general canopy collapse is similar to other tomato diseases such as southern blight, bacterial canker and Fusarium crown rots. Because of the potential for misdiagnosis of Fusarium wilt, even by experienced scouters, it is prudent to submit plant samples to a diagnostics laboratory prior to making management decisions.

Survival and Spread

Fusarium wilt race 3 occurs across the Central Valley from the Sacramento Valley region (Colusa, Sutter, Solano, Yolo and Sacramento) to the central San Joaquin Valley (San Joaquin, Stanislaus, Merced, Fresno and Kings) and, most recently, to the southern end of the San Joaquin Valley (Kern) (Figure 2). The pathogen is thought to move locally from field to field by hitching a ride in the soil and plant debris that cling to farm equipment. Hence, the increased movement of farm equipment across processing tomato regions may have facilitated spread of this disease.

Once present in the field, Fol can persist in dead tissue in the soil.

Ongoing studies suggest that this pathogen can persist for at least two years in infested tomato tissue after incorporation. In addition, although Fol can only cause disease in toma-

Continued on Page 6 4

Progressive Crop Consultant

November / December 2020

Figure 1. Symptoms of Fusarium wilt in tomato plants, shown here as a shoot with bright yellow and dying foliage (also known as “yellow flagging”) on an otherwise healthy plant (A), collapse of the vine (B) and chocolate-brown discoloration inside a stem (C) (photos by K. Paugh.)

Figure 2. California counties with documented cases of Fusarium wilt race 3, as highlighted in red.

Continued from Page 4

Fusarium wilt incidence, %

Efficacy of drip-applied fumigant against Fusarium wilt of tomato 100 80 60 40 20 0

Untreated

K-Pam, 30 gal/acre

Figure 3. Results for a 2019 small plot trial at the UC Davis Plant Pathology research farm on the efficacy of the drip-applied fumigant, K-Pam HL, against Fusarium wilt of tomato.

toes, it can infect many different non-tomato crops, including melons, pepper and sunflower, without causing any symptoms and survive in non-tomato crop residue in soil. Thus, Fol can feasibly be introduced into a field that has never had tomato, propagate on these silently-infected crops and cause severe losses in the first year the field is planted to tomato. Of note, there are also many Fusarium wilt diseases of rotation crops (e.g. Fusarium wilt of melon, watermelon and lettuce,) but these Fusarium wilts are all caused by completely different pathogens. Therefore, if you have Fusarium wilt of melon in your field, this does not mean you will get Fusarium wilt in your tomatoes.

Management

Overview of IPM for Fusarium wilt The most effective tool for Fusarium wilt management is preventing pathogen introduction. If introduced into a field, the disease can usually be successfully managed with resistant cultivars (F3 cultivars), although there are some caveats in F3 efficacy. If F3 cultivars are not available for management, pathogen-tolerant cultivars and early-season chemical management options are also available. Crop rotation can help reduce pathogen pressure and reduce risk that an F3 resistance-breaking race will emerge (race 4).

Effective management of Fusarium wilt requires accurate diagnosis. As noted above, there are many diseases that look like Fusarium wilt, and at present there is no way to differentiate these diseases in the field. Before developing a Fusarium wilt management plan, it is critical to submit samples for analysis by a diagnostic lab. Ideally, growers could have their soils tested for Fusarium wilt prior to planting. Although there are no commercial soil testing services available, there are preliminary soil testing tools under development at UC Davis (contact C. Swett for more information.)

Figure 4. Preliminary results for the effect of rotation crops on development of Fusarium wilt (FW) in tomato. Plots at the UC Davis Plant Pathology research farm were previously planted to a summer or winter rotation crop (or tomato) or left in chemical or unmanaged fallow (=weeds) in summer 2019 (A) or winter 2019-2020 (B), respectively.

6

Progressive Crop Consultant

November / December 2020

Management with genetic resistance Fol race 3 resistant cultivars, called F3 cultivars, typically develop no disease and are an excellent management tool. The tomato industry has worked hard to overcome challenges in F3 cultivar quality, yield and seed availability. In addition, certain F2 cultivars are “tolerant” of Fusarium wilt race 3 in that their yield does not appear to be significantly impacted in infested fields. Fusarium wilt tolerance is not a listed trait

for existing commercial cultivars, but this information is available through seed dealers.

In some cases, F3 cultivars develop Fusarium wilt due to Fol race 3. This is typically attributed to either the presence of off-types (when incidence is below 2%) or environmental stresses (when incidence is higher.) Abiotic and biotic stresses appear to play a role in influencing stability of resistance, and recent studies have demonstrated that salt stress can compromise F3 resistance, leading to Fusarium wilt development in up to 30% of F3 plants in a field. While the role of various stresses in mediating F3 resistance is not well-characterized, research in this area is ongoing. Management of these stresses can help maintain the efficacy of host resistance against Fol race 3.

Chemical control pre- and post-planting Fusarium wilt race 3 is notoriously difficult to control once established in soil.

Although host resistance is the gold standard for management, F3 cultivars are not always available. Chemical management may function as a shortterm alternative. Recent studies have shown promising results for pre-plant fumigation with K-Pam HL (AMVAC Corporation) at 30 gal/A or higher (maximum rate of 60 gal/A) for optimal efficacy (Figure 3, see page 6).

Crop rotation Crop rotation is a common recommendation for management of host-specific pathogens like Fusarium wilt because non-host crops suppress pathogen propagation and survival. However, the efficacy of this method relies on the inability of the pathogen to infect rotation crops. It has been discovered that Fol race 3 can infect many crops without causing symptoms, which may reduce the effectiveness of crop rotation. Several rotation crops were found to be poor hosts and were suppressive to pathogen build up in soils; these include cotton, bean crops (i.e. garbanzo, fava, lima and green bean), grass crops, including wheat and potentially corn

and rice (poor hosts, not field tested), and onion (Figure 4, see page 6). These appear to be good crops to grow right after tomato and the year before planting to tomato. Pathogen-enhancing crops should be avoided when possible; these include pepper, melons, pumpkins, and sunflower.

wilt management is preventing pathogen introduction. On farms where Fusarium wilt is not present, this is best achieved by only using equipment that remains within the farm. However, as this is not an option for most producers, a second option is to use a sanitation regime for shared equipment.

No free rides for pathogens The most effective tool for Fusarium

®

Continued on Page 8

The Grower’s Advantage © Since 1982

Effective Plant Nutrients and Biopesticides to Improve Crop Quality & Yield

ORGANIC

ORGANIC

®

Botector Biofungicide

Herbicide EC

Plant Nutrients & Adjuvants

Contains Auxiliary Soil & Plant Substances

®

®

®

G ARGOIL

®

INSECT, MITE & DISEASE CONTROL

Blossom Protect ™ Bactericide

For more information, call (800) 876-2767 or visit www.westbridge.com

November / December 2020

www.progressivecrop.com

7

Where to Go Next

There are no documented cases of Fol race 4 in California. However, given the history of this pathogen, it is almost inevitable that a new race (race 4) will emerge that overcomes race 3 resistance. As a result, race 4 monitoring continues to be a top priority across the state.

F3 resistance can be compromised by stress, and Fol race 3 has been documented causing disease in multiple F3 tomato fields every year. Knowing which types of plant stress affect host resistance would help growers prioritize management strategies. Long-term studies of Fol race 3 survival in soil are important for knowing optimal durations for rotating out of tomato.

Figure 5. Fusarium wilt commonly travels from field to field on farming equipment, particularly harvesters (A), which retain large amounts of plant debris (B) (photos by C. Swett.)

Continued from Page 7 There is limited information on which equipment is the most important to target for sanitation, but Fusarium has been found at high levels on harvesters which retain large amounts of plant debris (Figure 5). An assessment of critical control points on harvesters indicates that areas which only have contact with fruit have lower levels of microbes, whereas the chipper and other areas which come into contact with whole plant material have higher levels.

Robust analysis of effective sanitation methods is lacking, but preliminary data indicates some efficacy of current practices such as physical removal of contaminants using scrapers, combined

8

Progressive Crop Consultant

with chemical and steam treatment.

Further management options under study Compost amendments are commonly used for soil fertility management, and recent studies at UC Davis suggest that composts may also suppress Fusarium wilt in soil. Pathogen-infested tomato residue decomposes more rapidly in soil with long-term inputs of poultry manure compost. Preliminary studies also indicate that cover crops such as hairy vetch may be suppressive to Fusarium wilt, as has been seen for Fusarium wilt of watermelon, but results are inconsistent.

November / December 2020

There are several common rotation crops whose risk status is still unknown, including safflower, alfalfa, potato and hemp. Furthermore, there is clearly a need for soil testing tools for Fol race 3. The UC Davis Vegetable Pathology program is working to develop more rapid molecular tools for both soil detection and diagnosis in plants. Industry innovations in effective sanitation, such as full room steam or fumigation sanitation stations, could provide a breakthrough in slowing spread of Fusarium wilt as well as other soil-borne pathogens.

While the aforementioned management approaches have primarily focused on Fusarium wilt alone, in reality, Fusarium wilt also occurs as part of disease complexes. Developing strategies that minimize damage wrought by these soil-borne complexes is a critical next step in achieving healthy tomato production in California.

For more information, contact Cassandra Swett at clswett@ucdavis.edu.

Comments about this article? We want to hear from you. Feel free to email us at article@jcsmarketinginc.com

THE BEST WAY TO MANAGE PATHOGENS BEFORE THEY BECOME AN ISSUE.

TriClor is chloropicrin based and can be used as a standalone or as a complement to Telone® depending on your orchard redevelopment needs. When targeting soil borne disease and nematodes, TriClor and Telone® can be applied in a single pass. This reduces application costs, promotes early root development, and improves soil health. For more information about TriClor and Telone or to schedule an application contact TriCal, Inc.

669-327-5076

www.TriCal.com Authorized distributor for Telone® *TriClor and Telone are federally Restricted Use Pesticides.

Ultraviolet-C Light and Robotics for Autonomous Control of Strawberry Diseases, Insects and Mites New Technology is a Viable Non-Chemical Option for Disease and Pest Control

By FUMIOMI TAKEDA, PH.D. | Research Horticulturist/Lead Scientist, USDA-ARS, WOJCIECH JANISIEWICZ, PH.D. | Research Plant Pathologist, USDA-ARS, TRACY LESKEY, PH.D. | Entomology Research Leader/Director, USDA-ARS and ADAM STAGER, PH.D. | Founder and CEO, TRIC Robotics

A second-generation autonomous UV-C application platform being evaluated at the Appalachian Fruit Research Station in Kearneysville, W.Va. This research plot was established to study the natural infestation of strawberry plants by pestiferous insects and mites in pesticide- and UV-C treated plots as well as in control plots (no UV-C and pesticides.) The robot has been programmed to capture images for phenotyping of strawberry plants.

The person in the foreground is controlling the UAV flying over the plot (photos courtesy F. Takeda.)

T

his article summarizes the recent work of a multi-disciplinary research team on strawberry disease and arthropod pest management using a robotic Ultraviolet-C (UV-C) irradiation machine. The team’s desire to develop novel approaches for more sustainable strawberry culture (e.g. non-chemical and safer use of ultraviolet light) was based on the following factors: Reliance on fungicides for management of diseases (e.g. development of resistance to more synthetic pesticides, phytotoxicity, environmental issues, application residues, etc.,) make chemical management of Botrytis gray mold of strawberry often challenging and costly, especially when the harvesting period exceeds six months; Pestiferous insects and mites are developing resistance to synthetic pesticides, increasing demands by consumers for pesticide-free berries; Need for automation to reduce labor input in the field; Need for systematic approaches for disease and pest management that are less intrusive to workers in the field, harvesting and myriads of seasonal cultural operations.

Sustainable Approach Through UV-C

The idea of using UV light to control fungal diseases of strawberry fruit 10

Progressive Crop Consultant

came from a discussion between Drs. Janisiewicz and Takeda in 2010 about problems with use of fungicides and needs for alternative control methods.

UV light includes electromagnetic radiation with wavelengths between 100 and 400 nanometers (nm), which is shorter than that of visible light but longer than X-rays. UV radiation is present in sunlight, but almost all the UV light produced by the sun is filtered out by the ozone in the upper atmosphere. UV light can also be produced by specialized lights such as mercury-vapor lamps and tanning lamps, LEDs and specific wavelength excimer lamps. UV radiation is subdivided into three general classes based on their wavelengths (i.e. UV-A ranges from 315 to 400 nm, UV-B ranges from 280 to 315 nm, and UV-C ranges from 100 to 280 nm.)

Research with UV-A and UV-B has shown that insect behavior could be altered by modulating UV irradiation levels. Research on UV-B showed that a nightly ~3-hour exposure time was necessary to achieve adequate control of diseases such as powdery mildew on grapes and strawberry. UV-C irradiation is used to kill microorganisms in November / December 2020

different situations including sterilization of air in hospitals, water treatments, sterilizing laboratory benches and treatment of meat and poultry products. The FDA has determined that UV light can be used to surface sterilize food products, and considers UV light to be safe when precautions are taken by the user.

The use of UV light in crop production, however, has been limited because the doses required to kill plant pathogens usually can cause damage such as leaf burn and defoliation. The goal of the team’s research program has been to develop UV-C treatment methods that have high efficacy for disease and pest control without damaging plants and are cost effective.

What is known is that UV-C irradiation kills microorganisms and arthropod pests by damaging their DNA. What other agricultural researchers had not considered in their treatment protocol was the fact that microorganisms and mites have a special mechanism for repairing the damaged DNA. This occurs when light is present, e.g. the repair process is “light activated”. Thus, there is a simple question: What happens if

Our research approach has focused on new ways of using UV-C light to

daylight) caused by UV-C irradiation and prevented the disease to develop on fruit and leaves. This method of UV-C irradiation at night resulted in lowering the effective doses needed to kill the microbes that cause strawberry gray mold, powdery mildew and anthracnose. The reduced doses required to kill

Ampersand

Spock

®

Continued on Page 12

Luigi

In the May/June 2018 issue of Progressive Crop Consultant, the team reported on the use of germicidal UV-C irradiation for the control of major fungal diseases of strawberries (e.g. gray mold, anthracnose and powdery mildew.)

Currently, the team has prototype autonomous platforms applying UV-C light to in-soil strawberry plants at night. As the research on diseases progressed, the project expanded to include management of insects and mites and development of an autonomous vehicle to apply UV-C treatments.

The team is aware that research on using UV-B and UV-C irradiation to control diseases and arthropod pests on various crops had been conducted for more than two decades in various laboratories around the world, including several in the U.S., the Netherlands, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, China, Japan, Norway and the United Kingdom. Their research consistently reported plant damage described as burns, leaf curls and defoliation after irradiating the plants with doses required to control diseases and arthropod pests. Recently, some of these laboratories have transitioned to using UV-C lamps in their research.

Robin

Robotic Application Methods for Pest and Disease

kill strawberry pathogens and arthropod pests (insects and mites) without damaging the strawberry plant. Initial studies clearly demonstrated that a dark period of 2 to 4 hours (depending on which pathogen was being controlled) immediately after a UV-C irradiation of one minute or less prevented microbes from repairing DNA damage (e.g. repair mechanism requires

Pippen

the microbes are irradiated with UV-C at night and they are kept in the dark for certain periods of time? The reasoning for this approach was a) That the dark period following UV-C irradiation will prevent the activation of this DNA repair mechanism that needs sunlight to become active and b) Without the ability to repair the damage to DNA, the organism would not be able to replicate and further infect plant, eventually causing the microbes to die. The night application of UV-C light for control of pathogens and pests allowed the team to use much lower doses of UV-C light that was still effective and, more importantly, was below the threshold that causes damaging effects on the strawberry plant.

EVEN THE GREATS

NEED HELP BEING GREAT.

51%

Improved conventional herbicide performance*

79%

85%

Increased organic herbicide performance*

Increased insecticide performance*

Ampersand adjuvant works differently than other surfactants to maximize the potential of your herbicide or insecticide’s chemistry, even at low use rates, to levels never seen before. ®

Ampersand

®

a d j u v a n t

Learn more about our technology at *compared to active alone

www.attuneag.com

November / December 2020

www.progressivecrop.com

11

two agar plugs with actively growing fungus-causing anthracnose (Colletotrichum). Over a period of 7 to 10 days, the team observed the infection (black and yellow lesion) develop on the leaves.

The effect of treating strawberry plants with UV-C light on subsequent infection by anthracnose fungus (Colletotrichum gloeosporioides 162). Two agar plugs with fungal mycelia were placed on each leaflet. The top row has three detached leaflets from UV-treated plants. Note that very narrow band around each plug with fungal inoculum has turned yellow after nine days. The bottom row shows leaflets taken from control plants (not exposed to UV-C irradiation.)

‘THE ROBOTIC UV-C APPLICATION SYSTEM IS BEING DEVELOPED FOR LARGE-SCALE STRAWBERRY GROWERS AND NURSERIES IN CALIFORNIA AND ELSEWHERE. COOPERATING GROWERS IN CALIFORNIA HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED TO CONDUCT LARGE PILOT STUDIES THAT WILL BEGIN IN EARLY 2021.’

Continued from Page 11 plant pathogens caused no apparent damage to strawberry plants. Further analyses revealed there was no damage to chlorophyll, no reduction in photosynthetic activity, no loss in pollen viability (ability of pollen tube to grow through the style) and development of fruit, and no reduction in fruit phenolic content as determined by metabolomic analysis.

Another aspect of the team’s research program is to study other direct effects of UV-C light on plants. Since research was being conducted on diseases, the

12

Progressive Crop Consultant

team asked, “Can UV-C light make the strawberry plant more resistant to fungal infection?”

It is known that when a plant is perturbed by abnormal environmental or biotic factors such as insect feeding, it responds by producing more phenolic and other chemical compounds such as jasmonic acid to make itself resist infection by a pathogen or an attack from insects and mites. For this test, the team harvested leaves from strawberry plants that had been treated with brief (15 to 60 second) nightly applications of UV-C irradiation for about a month and then inoculated each leaflet with

November / December 2020

On the leaves taken from UV-C irradiated plants, the dark area was confined to the agar plug, while on the leaflets taken from untreated plants, the lesion radiated out from the plugs and caused large areas of the leaflet to turn black and yellow. The team’s research has shown that multiple levels of biological effects occur on disease-causing pathogens as well as make plants exposed to night-time UV-C light treatments more resistant to fungal infection.

The team also showed that night-time UV-C treatments were effective against insects and mites. A detailed study with plants artificially infested with ~100 two-spotted spider mites (TSSM) revealed that nightly 60-second UV-C irradiation of plants for six weeks had reduced mite populations to below a commercial treatment threshold of five mites per mid-canopy leaflet, while mite population on untreated strawberry plants exploded to over 300 mites per leaf. Tomato plants artificially infested with greenhouse whitefly (GWF) were irradiated for just 16 seconds nightly. The results showed a decline in adult, nymph and egg populations on UV-C treated plants within two weeks.

The team also conducted studies on spotted wing drosophila (SWD). In that study, store-bought strawberries were artificially infested with adult female SWD and then were subjected to a pulsed UV-C light treatment. Over time, 12 SWD on average emerged from each untreated control fruits compared to only 1 SWD among 40 UV-C treated fruits. A better way to use UV-C irradiation is to prevent fungal pathogens from infecting susceptible plants, pestiferous insects and mites from infesting the crops, and prevent egg laying in the fruit. The team has

Continued on Page 14

ADVERTORIAL

/// Rising Impact of Almond Bloom Diseases Game Plan for a Winning Season Bloom diseases are opponents that are constantly evolving. They are more prevalent than ever in California, where increasingly erratic weather is a consistent threat, creating prime conditions for diseases to thrive and have a significant effect on almond yield potential. As a result, growers need a strategic game plan to make the best countermove against bloom diseases while also managing resistance.

Scala,® Luna Experience® and Luna Sensation® from Bayer are the recommended fungicide treatments to counteract these challenges. Growers can’t out-spray bloom diseases, but they can outsmart them through a combination of knowledge, application timing and by using products that demonstrate consistently high performance, overcome weather challenges and manage resistance.

“We always like to recommend that our fungicides are used in a preventive manner prior to there being disease issues. So proper timing is very important,” says Matthew Wilson, field sales representative for Bayer.

Scala fungicide is notable for its control of Brown rot blossom blight at pink bud as an early-season spray option. It also offers both preventive and curative activity, rapid penetration and an ease of mobility into the bud and blossom. It is crop safe, mixes well with IPM programs and other products, and is effective across a wide range of temperatures and weather conditions, with minimal adverse effects on beneficial insect species.

“We’re kicking off with Scala,” notes grower Scott Long, general manager for Superior Fruit Ranch in Ceres, California. “We’ll come back with Luna® and that gives us full coverage, plus it really helps us cover all aspects and concerns in the early spring period.”

Luna Experience and Luna Sensation are strong choices for maximizing yields by providing longlasting, broad-spectrum disease protection when applied at bloom. Luna penetrates green tissue and moves systemically into closed buds, protecting against Brown rot blossom blight, Jacket rot, Shot hole, Anthracnose, Scab, Rust and Alternaria. It also offers two built-in modes of action for each product, providing the flexibility to alternate FRAC groups for more effective fungicide resistance management.

“I use Luna products predominantly in the bloom time for a myriad of diseases,” says PCA David Vermeulen of Vernalis, California. “I like the ease of handling, and it mixes well with a number of other products. It also covers a broad spectrum of different fungal diseases I’m going after.”

Diseases to Watch /// Brown Rot Blossom Blight – Thrives in humid temperatures with or without rain. /// Anthracnose – Originates in warm, rainy weather. /// Jacket Rot – Rare, but, under cool and wet conditions at bloom, can cause devastating loss. /// Scab – Favors wet weather and spreads to new sites by wind or rain. /// Shot Hole – Requires prolonged periods of moisture, and water moves spores to new sites.

PCA Ryan Garcia of Salida Ag Chem in Modesto, California, uses Scala. “I’ll use it in the early stages of bloom for Brown rot blossom blight. I think it’s a great material.”

/// Alternaria – Develops with high humidity where dew forms and air is stagnant. /// Rust – Favors humid conditions, worsens in rainy weather and spreads easily by wind.

Application Timing PINK BUD

BLOOM

February

GROWTH March

SHELL-HARDENING

April

May

June

HARVEST July

August

September

Brown Rot Blossom Blight, Jacket Rot Brown Rot Blossom Blight, Jacket Rot, Anthracnose, Shot Hole, Scab Rust, Alternaria Hull Rot

Prepare for a winning season and learn more about bloom disease management.

Contact your Bayer representative or visit LunaScalaGamePlan.com.

ALWAYS READ AND FOLLOW PESTICIDE LABEL DIRECTIONS. Not all products are approved and registered in all states and may be subject to use restrictions. The distribution, sale, or use of an unregistered pesticide is a violation of federal and/or state law and is strictly prohibited. Check with your local product dealer or representative or U.S. EPA and your state pesticide regulatory agency for the product registration status in your state.

Bayer, Bayer Cross, Luna,® Luna Experience,® Luna Sensation,® and Scala® are registered trademarks of Bayer Group. For additional product information, call toll-free 1-866-99-BAYER (1-866-992-2937) or visit our website at www.BayerCropScience.us. Bayer CropScience LP, 800 North Lindbergh Boulevard, St. Louis, MO 63167. ©2020 Bayer Group. All rights reserved.

Continued from Page 12

pest populations below the economic Further field-based validation is needed threshold levels. to confirm the efficacy of the system on a broader scale to compare with The positive results obtained from conventional management practices night-time application and relatively (e.g. pesticide application). Prototype low doses of UV-C irradiation for conautonomous mobile UV-C irradiatrolling fungal pathogens and arthrotion units that could traverse multiple pod pests to date indicate the potential strawberry rows have been developed of UV-C treatments to reduce disease and evaluated under field conditions. incidence and alter insect behavior To date, the team has used strawberry impacting their herbivory and egg layplants and their fruit as a model system, ing. The team will continue to explore Things to Consider but this UV-C technology may be wide- the efficacy of the UV-C irradiation Substantial costs can be incurred ly applicable to other specialty crops. system for management of pestiferous through application of synthetic mites and insects on other specialty Future Directions pesticides, scouting or monitoring, crop plants. To make UV-C technoloCurrently, the team is evaluating ways especially if the annual crop is being gy commercially useful for open-field for reducing the duration and frequenharvested over six months. UV-C strawberry growing systems and nurscy of exposure, comparison of dayirradiation provides the opportunity eries, a prototype robot for applying time and night-time applications and to reduce chemical and labor inputs UV-C was developed and field-tested in addressing the need for deeper penfor management of T. urticae, gray 2019 and 2020. USDA is now collaboetration of UV-C light into the plant mold, anthracnose, powdery mildew rating with TRIC Robotics (tricrobotics. canopy. Mites prefer to colonize and and pestiferous insects in the produccom), which has highly skilled robot lay eggs on the undersides of leaves tion of specialty crops. In the team’s engineers, manufacturing capacity, and research, the engineering aspects of the and in the lower portions of canopies. provides on-the-go solutions for autonTherefore, UV-C penetration is critirobot technology and optimizing the omous UV-C application for specialty cal. The team’s study has shown that UV-C system to make the technology crops. The robotic platform is agriculeconomically competitive with conven- UV-C ir radiation reaching the lowest tural equipment built to control pests portions of the strawberry plants was tional chemical control approaches are and diseases. As such, UV-C applicareduced by ∼45% compared to that being refined. tion equipment will be certified by EPA received by the upper as a pesticide device. The videos of their surface of leaves robot applying UV-C treatments in the at the upper canofield during night time and day time py. This reduction can be accessed on YouTube by searchin intensity may ing the key words “TRIC Autonomous have played a role UV-C Treatment.” in supporting the survivorship of mites Now, it is not so much a question of recorded in the lower whether UV-C light treatments can be canopy. Japanese applied effectively to field-grown speresearchers have recialty crops, but how soon application ported that reflective equipment and UV-C technology will mulches enhance UV be available to large and small growers. light penetration to The team is currently conducting R&D the undersides of the work to develop a commercially viable leaves. Also, arthroUV-C delivery system that is affordable, pod management user friendly, generally compatible with UV-C light with current production practices, as should be examined effective in controlling diseases and in conjunction with pests as currently used pesticides and our technology to reduces the overall costs of disease and A close-up of an autonomous vehicle which has a UV-C light array increase management pest control practices. mounted on its frame operating in a commercial strawberry field. efficacy and bring For the purpose of photography, the robot was operated shortly after sunset. plans to refine the UV-C light regimen, quality and application technology to make the UV-C technology more practical for commercial berry producers. Currently, the team is exploring ways to use UV-C irradiation more effectively and to further reduce the time required to treat each plant so that the robot can travel over a larger area each day.

14

Progressive Crop Consultant

November / December 2020

It is important to develop a platform that is useful and affordable to smallacre strawberry growers. The Northeast has over 200 certified organic farms with five acres or less of strawberries. To fund this aspect of the UV-C research project, the team received a grant in 2020 from the USDA Northeast Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education (SARE) program to improve control of diseases and arthropod pests of strawberry. Also, the robotic UV-C application system is being developed for large-scale strawberry growers and nurseries in California and elsewhere. Cooperating growers in California have been identified to conduct large pilot studies that will begin in early 2021.

Summary

The management of disease-causing fungal pathogens and arthropod pests is a complex task for specialty crop producers, particularly given the occurrence of latent infection by Botrytis cinerea and the highly perishable nature of fruits and berries, and the need for a complete control of SWD in berry fields. This requires comprehensive knowledge of disease etiology, host-plant biology and the physical environment determining the severity of infection and pest infestation.

Failure to manage Botrytis cinerea at bloom will have an impact on subsequent stages of fruit development, especially when the fruit reaches harvest maturity. Future research will certainly focus on multi-pronged strategies instead of searching for a single “silver bullet” answer to produce effective, long-term solutions for specialty crop growers. These solutions will surely include genetic improvements, the integration of night-time UV-C applications for a range of cropping systems along with use of “clean” nursery plants, good sanitation practices, new chemicals, and knowing how environmental conditions affect the biology of pathogens and pests to reduce disease

pressures and pest infestation.

Additional information on UV-C light technology can be requested from F. Takeda (fumi.takeda@usda.gov).

Further discussion on the UV-C technology can be found in the additional resources section.

Additional Resources

Janisiewicz, W. J., Takeda, F., Glenn, D. M., Camp, M. J., and Jurick, W. M. II. 2016. Dark period following UV-C treatment enhances killing of Botrytis cinerea conidia and controls gray mold of strawberries. Phytopathology 106: 386-394. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-09-15-0240-R Janisiewicz, W. J., Takeda, F., Jurick II, W. M., Nichols, B. and Glenn, S.M. 2016. Use of low-dose UV-C irradiation to control powdery mildew caused by Podosphaera aphanis on strawberry plants. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 38:430-439. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/1 0.1080/07060661.2016.1263807

Takeda, F., Janisiewicz, W.J., Smith, B.J., Nichols, B. 2019. A new approach for strawberry disease control. Eur. J. Horticult. Sci. 84:3-13. https://www. pubhort.org/ejhs/84/1/1/index.htm Short, B., W. Janisiewicz, F. Takeda, and L. Leskey. 20/18. UV-C irradiation as a management tool for Tetranychus urticae on strawberries. Pest Management Science 74(11):2419-2423. https:// doi.org/10.1002/ps.5045 Sun, J., W. J. Janisiewicz, F. Takeda, B. Evans, W.M. Jurick, M. Zhang, L. Yue, and P. Chen. 2020. Effect of nighttime UV-C irradiation of strawberry plants on phenolic content of fruit: Targeted and non-targeted metabolomic analysis. J. Berry Res. 10(3):365-380. https:// www.doi.org/10.3233/JBR-190482

Comments about this article? We want to hear from you. Feel free to email us at article@jcsmarketinginc.com

Is your irrigation strategy really working?

Top growers don’t guess— they know.

MEASURE ORCHARD HEALTH, IDENTIFY TRENDS, AND TRACK YOUR PROGRESS

Learn more at

ceresimaging.net/progressivecrop

November / December 2020

www.progressivecrop.com

15

Nutrient Management and Crop Disease Prevention Proper Supply of Essential Elements Increases Plant Strength

By ERYN WINGATE | CCA, Tri-Tech Ag Products, Contributing Writer

F

armers and agronomists have long observed that well-fed crops tend to suffer fewer pest and disease symptoms compared with nutrient-deficient plants. However, few of us turn to nutrient management to actively prevent disease. Just as a healthy diet rich in vitamins and minerals is the first measure in disease prevention in human health, proper fertilization should be your crop’s baseline of defense against pathogens. Balanced nutrient applications and good-quality soil produce vigorous crops capable of warding off disease.

nutritive additions that can upregulate plant defenses. Macro and micronutrient applications can support disease-free growth by building strong structural support and developing a biochemical environment unfavorable to pathogenic growth.

Nitrogen

tissue. Stem rust in wheat, club root in cruciferous vegetables and powdery mildew on many crops feed on succulent, living tissue. High N applications increase vegetative growth, increasing the proportion of young susceptible tissue. High N also increases the concentration of amino acids in cells and on leaf surfaces, attracting and feeding pathogenic organisms. Nitrogen-rich plants decrease their production of phenolics and lignin, weakening both structural and chemical defenses against infection. Overfed plants weaken their defenses.

In most cropping systems, nitrogen (N) is the most limiting nutrient to plant growth. Adequate N at key growth stages must be supplied throughout the season to help the crop meet its growth and yield potential. N management can also impact disease susceptibility. The type of nitrogen applied, the amount Plants require a balanced supply of 18 While obligate parasites such as downy and the timing of the application all essential elements throughout their and powdery mildew proliferate at lifecycle to sustain growth, repair tissue, affect the soil chemistry and plant high N levels, facultative parasites are physiology in ways that can either favor sometimes suppressed by higher N prevent and resist disease. Deficiencies in macro and micronutrients often lead or suppress infection. N management content in the crop. Facultative paradecisions should be based not only on to impaired cell wall structure and sites such as Fusarium, Alternaria and the crop’s N requirement, but also on accumulation of metabolic products Xanthomonas feed on dead or damaged the field’s history of disease. The type that attract pathogens. Weakened and plant tissue. Management practices that of pathogens the plants will likely face leaky cells walls give pathogenic fungi can keep plants vigorous and prevent may determine how to fertilize the crop. senescence, or cell death, will reduce and bacteria easy entry points into the plant and plenty of food to fuel their damage from facultative pathogens. If Obligate and facultative parasites are proliferation.

Fusarium is a known problem in the affected by the crop’s N status differfield, preventing N deficiency should ently. Obligate parasites, which require Disease prevention requires underbe the first preventative action against standing the environmental conditions a living host for survival, benefit from infection. a high concentration of N in the plant that favor the pathogen as well as the Continued on Page 18

16

Progressive Crop Consultant

November / December 2020

Go boldly into every battle.

Including the one for your crops.

They say farming is tougher than ever — like you didn’t already know that. You also know that allies still matter in the fight to protect crops. Allies like Atticus. We make branded-generic herbicides, fungicides and insecticides you can count on, and back them up with the expertise necessary for victory. Fierce times call for fierce partners. Find yours at AtticusLLC.com.

ATTICUSLLC.COM

©2020 Atticus. Important: Always read and follow label instructions.

Continued from Page 16 Starving the crop of N will surely weaken the plant, making it more vulnerable to attack. However, more N is not always protective, even against facultative pathogens. Some facultative bacterial and fungal foliar diseases proliferate under high N applications because they preferentially feed on young, succulent tissue. N fertilization increases vegetative growth, attracting pathogens with tender new leaves and stems.

Evaluating the crop’s nitrogen status by taking frequent leaf samples and conducting the soil nitrate quick test can help farmers and advisers determine how much N to apply to stay in the proverbial goldilocks zone.

Potassium, Calcium and Magnesium

Potassium (K) fertilizer is another critical defense against crop disease.

K applications reduce both facultative and obligate parasite infections through two main mechanisms. First, K can thicken and strengthen cell walls, helping to keep pathogens out. Second, K deficiency impairs protein, starch and cellulose synthesis, leading cells to accumulate amino acids and sugars.

Weak cell walls leak these metabolites, attracting and feeding parasitic organisms.

K applications can decrease both disease incidence and severity. Researchers have shown that K fertilization reduces damage from bacterial leaf blight in wheat, rice and cotton. Others have demonstrated reduction in leaf spot, sheath blight and stem rot in a variety of crops (Dordas, 2008).

Calcium (Ca) deficiency promotes pathogen growth in similar ways as K deficiency. Ca is a critical component of cell wall structure and membrane integrity. When Ca levels are low, the plant is vulnerable to fungal infection via the xylem. Once inside the plant, pathogenic fungi damage vascular tissue and the crop wilts.

18

Progressive Crop Consultant

Ca deficiency can cause severe physiological disorders such as bitter pit in apples and blossom end rot in tomatoes and peppers. Former UC plant pathologist and current director of TriCal Diagnostics Dr. Steven Koike warns against black heart in celery.

Black heart, a Ca deficiency disorder, causes young growth in the heart of the plant to brown and blacken. Koike explains that as the celery grows, the necrotic tissue is pushed up and exposed to air where it can easily come into contact with pathogenic fungal spores. Sclerotinia spores aggressively attack damaged tissue leading to severe infection. Ca deficiency in other crops creates similar damaged entry points for pathogens.

Ca fertilizer applications can prevent infection in the field and can continue supporting the yield postharvest.

Amending the soil with Ca and increasing pH can suppress clubroot disease in cruciferous vegetables such as broccoli and cabbage. Ca applications can also suppress Pythium, Rhizoctonia and Botrytis. Foliar Ca sprays shortly before or after harvest increase shelf life and help fruit resist rotting (Gupta et al., 2017).

Magnesium (Mg) deficiency is less common and perhaps less obvious than Ca or K deficiency, but Mg is no less important. Magnesium is at the center of chlorophyll and facilitates photosynthesis. When Mg is low, photosynthesis is reduced, causing a cascade of negative consequences. Among other issues, Mg deficiency causes a buildup of sugars and amino acids in leaves, attracting and feeding pathogens. Mg, K and Ca are all positively charged cations and compete for uptake via the roots. Mg deficiency often occurs in high-potassium soils and can be worsened by K fertilization. Pre-plant soil testing can help determine whether Ca, K and Mg fertilization are advisable.

Phosphorous

After N, phosphorus (P) is the sec-

November / December 2020

Celery black heart, a calcium deficiency disorder, causes young growth in the heart of the plant to brown and blacken (photo by S. Koike.)

ond-most widely used mineral nutrient.

The effects of P applications on disease suppression are less clear than the other nutrients. P fertilization is most helpful in fighting root rot when applied to seedlings. Plenty of P helps young plants quickly develop strong root systems and escape infection during their most vulnerable early stages of development (Dordas, 2008). P foliar applications can also provide local protection and systemic resistance against powdery mildew in some crops. However, other studies have shown increased disease after P fertilization (Dordas, 2008). Providing adequate P for growth is critical, but applying additional P does not necessarily confer any protection against disease.

Micronutrients

Micronutrients including boron, copper, manganese and zinc affect disease incidence in many ways. Micronutrients are critical to plant metabolism, cellular structure and stress responses. Manganese fertilization can suppress disease by supporting production of lignin and suberin, which provide chemical defense against fungal infection. Low zinc can cause accumulation and leakage of amino acids and sugars as seen with macronutrient deficiencies. Boron is critical to cell structure and lignin formation. Micronutrient applications can also prevent disease by activating the

plant’s defense mechanisms against a broad range of pathogens. Deficiencies in any of the micronutrients increases the crop’s vulnerability to infection.

Optimizing Nutrient Management

Complex interactions between the pathogen, the host and the surrounding environment determine disease incidence and severity. We can use nutrient management to strengthen the host and manipulate the soil in ways that suppress pathogens. Whenever possible, determine which diseases your crop will likely face. Review field history and send soil and infected plant tissue to a pathologist like Dr. Steven Koike at TriCal Diagnostics. Conduct preplant soil tests to determine pH and baseline nutrient levels. For example, if you anticipate Fusariam pressure, adjust pH to neutral or slightly alkaline using lime.

Plan foliar micronutrient applications to compensate for decreased manganese and iron availability at elevated pH. Other diseases and soil conditions will require different techniques.

Sharma, P., Purohit, J. (2017). Role of Nutrients in Controlling the Plant Diseases in Sustainable Agriculture. In: Meena V., Mishra P., Bisht J., Pattanayak A. (eds) Agriculturally Important Microbes for Sustainable Agriculture. Springer, Singapore. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-981-10-5343-6_8.

Huber, D.M. & Haneklaus, S. (2007).

Managing nutrition to control plant disease. Haneklaus / Landbauforschung Völkenrode. 4.

Comments about this article? We want to hear from you. Feel free to email us at article@jcsmarketinginc.com

Increasing beneficial microbial activity and increasing soil organic matter can build a suppressive soil environment and simultaneously increase nutrient availability. In addition to nutrient fertilizer applications, consider amending the soil with composts and biostimulant products such as seaweed extracts, humic acids and beneficial microbial inoculants.

Many strategies can increase nutrient availability and help crops defend themselves against disease. The CCA and PCA should develop a plan that will meet the unique conditions on a each ranch.

References

Dordas, C. (2008). Role of nutrients in controlling plant diseases in sustainable agriculture. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, Springer Verlag/EDP Sciences/INRA, 2008, 28 (1), pp.33-46. ffhal-00886444f Gupta, N., Debnath, S., Sharma, S.,

November / December 2020

www.progressivecrop.com

19

Update on Potential Insect Vectors of Grapevine Red Blotch Virus in California Vineyards

By HOUSTON WILSON | Asst. UCCE Specialist, Dept. of Entomology, UC Riverside, MONICA L. COOPER | UCCE Viticulture Advisor , Napa County, RHONDA J. SMITH | UCCE Farm Advisor Emeritus, Sonoma County, ALEXIS BILLINGS | Postdoctoral Scholar, Dept. of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, UC Berkeley, KELSEY MCCALLA | Postdoctoral Scholar, Dept. of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, UC Berkeley and KENT M. DAANE | UCCE Specialist, Dept. of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, UC Berkeley

O

ver the past 10 years, wine grape growers, researchers and UCCE have been working together to control the spread of grapevine red blotch virus (GRBV), which is the causal agent of grapevine red blotch disease (GRBD), a red leaf disease that negatively impacts wine grape yield and quality.

A

B

C

D

Symptoms, Impacts and Spread

Symptoms of GRBD typically first appear around mid-season, although timing can vary across cultivars and between years. In red varieties, red blotches form outward from the leaf margin or within the leaf blade, and primary/secondary leaf veins will often turn red (Figure 1a). In white varieties, the blotches manifest as pale green or yellow patches with no reddening of the veins (Figure 1b).

Symptoms typically first originate on basal leaves then over time progress to additional leaves further up the shoot.

In the early season, these foliar symptoms are distinct from grapevine leafroll disease (GLD), but by late fall, leaf blade coloration of vines with GRBD may be similar to vines with GLD. The unique symptoms of GRBD were first noticed in Napa County in 2008, and in 2011 testing confirmed the existence of GRBV, a previously uncharacterized Geminiviridae. Subsequent vineyard surveys across the U.S. revealed that GRBV is widespread 20

Progressive Crop Consultant

Figure 1. Grapevine red blotch disease symptoms in red varieties include (a, b) red blotches extending out from the leaf margin or within the leaf blade and primary/secondary leaf veins will often turn red; (c, d) in white varieties, the blotches manifest as pale green or yellow patches with no reddening of the veins (photos courtesy UCCE.)

nationally, and the virus has also been reported from vineyards in Canada, Mexico, Argentina, India and South Korea. The wide geographic range suggests that GRBV was likely initially spread through the propagation of infected plant material. That said, November / December 2020

secondary spread has been recorded in some regions, indicating there may be unique insect vectors and/or non-crop reservoirs of GRBV.

Continued on Page 22

The CLEAN experience superior fruit and higher yields Table Grapes -‘Vintage Red’ - 2018 Earlimart, California

500

494.4

2018 Boxes/Acre

480

Don’t Compromise on your Organic Nutrients

460

440

423 420

Grower Soil Program Organic Foliar Program Sawtooth Ag Research, Woodlake, California

Consumers demand a superior taste and eating experience from their organic table grapes – a crisp, firm bite with texture, flavor and sweetness. They also want long shelf life. Grocery stores want less shrinkage. Growers need high marketable yields of superior quality fruit to maximize per acre returns.

Agro-K’s CLEAN line of nutritional products and application program is designed to deliver – superior eating quality consumers demand, less instore shrink grocers demand and maximum marketable yields growers require.

The second part of the consumer taste experience is flavor which is driven by brix, aromatics and flavonoids. To achieve high yields and full flavor requires the vine have large, fully functional leaves and maximum chlorophyll. The key nutrients: magnesium, manganese, iron, copper and zinc are needed as the leaves are forming and expanding to ensure sufficient leaf surface area and maximize chlorophyll function to drive optimal flavor, texture and shelf life. Allowing you to put the best finish on a quality bunch.

The first part of a superior eating experience is the bite. It needs to be firm and crisp on the outside with good structural integrity on the inside.

Maximizing calcium uptake into fruit cell walls during fruit cell division is critical to maximizing grape skin cell-wall thickness, internal flesh firmness and shelf life (minimizing shrink). Managing the N/Ca ratio is critical to growing firm fruit that stores well. CLEAN Cal is designed for rapid and complete uptake to help growers deliver that “first bite” experience in fruit that also stores better on the grocery store shelf and longer at home.

Agro-K’s CLEAN line of certified products gives organic growers the ability to meet “peak nutrient demand” in a form that goes in to tissues quickly and completely, resulting in superior fruit quality and yield. Plant physiology drives nutrient timing and understanding this timing gives growers the ability to address peak demand timings and maximize fruit quality and profitability. Use the right nutrients, at the right time, in the right form for the highest yields and best quality.

Talk to Agro-K or your authorized distributor today about how CLEAN can help you achieve higher yields of superior fruit.

Product available at

AGRO-K CORPORATION 8030 Main Street, NE • Minneapolis, MN 55432 • 800-328-2418 • www.agro-k.com

Science-Driven Nutrition ™

A

B

Figure 2. Three-cornered alfalfa hopper adult (left) and nymph (right) (left photo courtesy UCCE, right photo courtesy Charles Lewallan.)

Continued from Page 20

Plant Hosts and Insect Vectors of GRBV

Data so far indicate that GRBV appears limited to the genus Vitis, which can include non-cultivated wild-type grape vines that typically grow in riparian habitats. Multiple insect surveys have shown that certain species or genera

"

‘Insects that test positive for GRBV do not necessarily have the ability to transmit the virus. Rather, these surveys help researchers identify candidate insect species for further testing.’

22

Progressive Crop Consultant

tend to frequently test positive, although none of which are considered significant pests of grape vines. To clarify, insects that test positive for GRBV do not necessarily have the ability to transmit the virus. Rather, these surveys help researchers identify candidate insect species for further testing. At present, transmission experiments with common vineyard pests such as leafhoppers, mealybugs and sharpshooters have not shown any transmission.

The only insect to date that has been reported by two different labs to successfully transmit GRBV is the three-cornered alfalfa hopper (Membracidae: Spissistilus festinus) (TCAH) (Figure 2a), which was able to move the virus between potted vines in a greenhouse setting. As its name implies, TCAH is primarily a pest of leguminous crops such as alfalfa, peanuts and soybean.

While adults can oviposit into grape vines, the immature TCAH cannot completely develop on this host. In contrast, TCAH thrive on many types of legumes, which are critical for their development. Although TCAH can be found in California vineyards, its pest status is negligible and densities in vineyards typically tend to be very low. TCAH are pierce-suck feeders that, when present on vines, can girdle lateral shoots and leaf petioles, which leaves a distinct dark ring and leaves distal to the girdle turn red (Figure 3, see page 23).

November / December 2020

TCAH activity in vineyards (and in the vine canopy specifically) appears to be closely tied to the presence and quality of legumes in vineyard ground covers.

TCAH overwinter as adults in protected areas in and around vineyards, and in the early spring begin to deposit eggs onto ground covers (likely legumes.)

Nymphs (Figure 2b) pass through five juvenile stages as they develop. Ideal temperature range for nymph development is 65 to 95 degrees F; however, they can develop at temperatures as low as 55 degrees F. The appearance of first-generation adults roughly coincides with the seasonal dry-down and/or mowing/cultivation of vineyard ground covers. As ground covers are diminished in the late spring and early summer, TCAH adults may opportunistically feed in the vine canopy, which could potentially lead to transmission of GRBV between vines.

That said, a recent study found that TCAH appear to have a very strong preference for ground covers, and significant activity in the vine canopy was only observed once >90% of ground covers were eliminated or dead. In the North Coast, TCAH likely complete 1 to 2 generations per year depending on climate and availability of food resources, whereas in warmer areas such as SoCal TCAH can complete 3 to 4 generations per year.

Adults have been observed in vineyards until as late as leaf fall, after which they seek shelter in protected areas.

Figure 3. Feeding by three-cornered alfalfa hopper (left) results in characteristic girdling of lateral shoot, accompanied by reddened leaves distal to the girdle; (right) characteristic girdling damage to a rachis, resulting in uneven ripening. White arrows indicate girdling mark (photos courtesy UCCE.)

Given TCAH generally have a low aftesting positive, what makes S. granefinity for grape vines, that other insects ticus unique from other candidate vechave tested positive in surveys, and the tors is its strong affinity for grape vines. occasional rapid rates and extensive Very little is known about this insect, spread of disease, it is worth exploring and it is not considered a significant other candidate vectors. Furthermore, vineyard pest, but the sparse records field transmission by TCAH remains that exist all report it from grape vines unclear, as does transmission efficiency in the western U.S. Furthermore, recent (that is, how quickly TCAH can acquire vineyard surveys have documented and transmit the virus,) both of which relatively high populations of S. graneare critical pieces of information to bet- ticus that are almost exclusively found ter understand disease ecology. As such, in the vine canopy. As such, studies there are no existing recommendations are currently underway to evaluate S. to use insecticides to control TCAH in graneticus ability to transmit GRBV in vineyards. Rather, a management strat- both a greenhouse and field setting as egy that concentrates on the removal of well as characterize its host plants and vines and reduction of persistent legureproductive biology. minous ground covers (such as burclover and Spanish clover) may be more Previous greenhouse research also indieffective. While the specific economics cated that the Virginia creeper leafhopof individual vineyards will vary, the per (Cicadellidae: Erythroneura ziczac) general suggestion is that individual might also be a vector of GRBV. Howvines be replaced when overall infecever, this insect is not always found in tion is <20% of the block, whereas with vineyards where GRBD spreads and >20% of vines infected it may make other researchers have been unable more sense to replace a larger section or to verify GRBV transmission by this the entire block. leafhopper species or the related western grape leafhopper (Erythroneura Testing Additional Vectors elegantula) or variegated leafhopper One insect that is currently being (Erythroneura variabilis). There are othinvestigated as a potential vector is the er leafhopper species of interest such as leafhopper Scaphytopius graneticus (Ci- the mountain leafhopper (Colladonus cadellidae), which has frequently tested montanus) that have tested positive for positive for GRBV – but again, this carrying GRBV in the field but have not does not mean it can necessarily trans- yet been proven to be a vector. mit the virus. Aside from frequently

November / December 2020

Conclusion

There are currently no thresholds or management recommendations for TCAH in vineyards. The existing information does not support the use of insecticides for population control.

Strategies that remove infected vines and reduce persistent leguminous ground covers may be more effective.

This insect is generally in low abundance and prefers to reside on leguminous ground covers. While some opportunistic feeding in the vine canopy can occur, it remains unclear whether this is sufficient to spread GRBV under field conditions. Additional studies are currently underway to verify TCAH field transmission of GRBV. In the meantime, monitoring TCAH populations on ground covers (using a sweep net) and in the vine canopy (using yellow sticky cards) can be combined with disease mapping to build a picture of annual changes in pest densities and disease incidence within the vineyard and drive management decisions.

Comments about this article? We want to hear from you. Feel free to email us at article@jcsmarketinginc.com

www.progressivecrop.com

23

Assessing the Accuracy and Precision of Commercial Ag Laboratories

By ANDRE BISCARO | UCCE Irrigation and Water Resources Advisor, Ventura, Los Angeles and San Bernardino Counties

S

oil chemical analysis is the cornerstone of an effective nutrient management program. Without a reliable soil test, significant miscalculations in fertilizer recommendations can occur, leading to drastic effects on profitability and the environment as a result of under and overfertilization and soil amendment recommendations.

Despite the large number of analytical commercial laboratories serving California agriculture, deciding which laboratory to send a sample to can be a daunting task. Unfortunately, there are no public data reporting the accuracy of the analysis performed by agricultural laboratories, and there isn’t a “true” certification program in the U.S. Although a lab may participate in a proficiency program such as the Agricultural Laboratory Proficiency (ALP) program or the North American Proficiency Testing (NAPT), these programs are not mandatory, nor do they certify lab quality. Therefore, laboratories are chosen based on “word of mouth” and prices, which can vary significantly.

Because of the absence of data, growers, farm managers, consultants, environmentalists and even researchers are left without a reliable means by which to select a testing laboratory. A study was conducted in 2019 to assess the performance of soil testing laboratories.

Methods and materials used for the laboratory accuracy assessment (photo courtesy A. Biscaro.)

Accuracy and Precision Assessment

Four reference soil samples from the ALP program were submitted to eight commercial Ag laboratories in the Western U.S. (seven in California and one in Idaho) for typical fertility analyses. In most cases, fertility “package analyses” offered by the laboratories were chosen in order to optimize project funds. The same four reference soil samples were resubmitted two more times totaling three rounds, approximately three months apart each round, in order to assess the precision of each laboratory.

Standard reference soil samples were selected from the ALP program archives, each previously analyzed by a minimum

of 30 credible laboratories, in triplicate for each soil sample (totaling 90+ analyses per reference soil.) The median and median absolute deviation (MAD) of these 90+ analyses per reference soil were used to assess the accuracy and precision of the eight laboratories assessed in this study (method based on ALP consensus statistics.) While the accuracy assessment is focused on contrasting each analysis with the ALP medians, the precision assessment is focused on the variability of the analyses across the three rounds (same reference soils analyzed at different times.) Sample IDs were modified and submitted to each laboratory so they wouldn’t be aware of

Continued on Page 26 24

Progressive Crop Consultant

November / December 2020

cop KLEEN

TM

Algicide/ Bactericide*/ Fungicide for Use on Raw, Citrus and Growing Agricultural Commodities

LOWER RATES of metallic copper with equal or BETTER EFFICACY Copper penetrates into plant tissue efficiently, leaving less on surfaces. *Non-public health bacteria

Preliminary data after four applications; 120 days after the first application Significant control of Walnut blight by all rates of Cop-Kleen Numerical rate response among the three rates of Cop-Kleen All three rates of Cop-Kleen provided the same level of control as standard (Champion + Manzate) with only 14.4%, 16.7%, and 20% metallic copper, respectively

FEATURES: Excellent bio-availability Low copper concentration Optimal dispersion and mixability Compatible with most fungicides

ESLAgri.com

BENEFITS: Improved biological efficacy due to systemic activity of Cop-Kleen with proven penetration of copper into the plant tissue, as well as other parts of the plant as evidenced in research studies Environmentally friendly Resistance management tool

800.257.9283

Continued from Page 24 the objectives of the study. Names of laboratories are not disclosed to follow university policy; laboratories are referred as #1 to #8 for discussion purposes.

Each reference soil was analyzed for NO3, P, extractable K, Na, Ca and Mg, SO4-S, electrical conductivity (ECe), Cl, Ca, Mg, Na and B, pH and five micronutrients. Some labs provided additional analyses in their fertility package, such as soil organic matter, estimated and measured CEC and others, however, these were not used in this study since they were not performed by all laboratories. Nineteen analyses performed on four reference soils by eight laboratories three times equals a total of 1,824 analyses, or 228 per laboratory. While that is a rich dataset, trying to create a performance rank for the laboratories across all analysis types is quite challenging since there are multiple types of soil analyses, extraction methods and units.

For that reason, performance standards used by the ALP program were applied to this project in order to assess the accuracy and precision of the analysis performed by the laboratories. Eight analyses were chosen for this assessment: Olsen P, extractable K, Ca and Mg, ECe, pH, sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) and DTPA Zn. For the purpose of accuracy assessment, each of these analyses were attributed a pass or failure score, totaling 96 scores per laboratory (8 analysis types, 4 reference soils and 3 rounds).

The precision assessment was based on the relative standard deviation of each analysis across the 3 rounds.

Although all labs presented certain inaccuracy and imprecision, some stood out.

Laboratories #2 and #8 were consistently inaccurate and imprecise, while laboratories #1 and #7 were the most accurate and precise. Laboratory #8 in particular presented the poorest performance for both accuracy and precision. Laboratories #3, #4, #5 and #6 presented varying accuracy and precision. These patterns of accuracy and precision are illustrated in the three graphs below.

Laboratory Results

Figure 1 illustrates the results for saturated paste pH for soil C. Listed is the pH median and the Median Absolute Deviation (MAD), with results for each lab and each round. Labs #1 and #7 were the most accurate over all rounds. Labs #2 and #8 had high bias, and lab #2 was imprecise (inconsistent). Due to funding limitations, only two rounds of samples were submitted to lab #7.

Results for exchangeable potassium analysis by ammonium acetate for soil C (Figure 2) illustrates a common occurrence of accuracy levels observed across most reference soils used in this study.

Generally, labs #1 and #7 consistently reported results near the median.

Results for Zn extractable by DTPA for soil A (Figure 3, see page 27) show a

general trend of all eight labs reporting higher Zn values relative to the median for this standard reference soil of 0.9 ppm. Labs #1, #4, #5 and #7 generally reported equivalent Zn concentrations for each round. Labs #2, #3, #6 and #8 were inconsistent across the three rounds.

Lab #6 in particular reported values that varied by 300% across the three rounds.

Need for Consistency

Besides the accuracy and precision parameters assessed in this study, it seems like consistency is an overall challenge for the lab industry: consistency of methods used for certain analyses, of how methods and units reported, and of the interpretation of the results (e.g. graphs illustrating sufficiency and deficiency ranges). Although it is the responsibility of the client to verify the methods used and request the most pertinent information for their application, many growers and farm managers are not familiar with the intricacies of soil analyses and nutrient management.

Hence, providing an electrical conductivity analysis in 1:1 or 1:2 extraction instead of the standard saturated paste extract (ECe) can lead to misleading conclusions and inappropriate management decisions since the literature for most salinity thresholds for crop yields were defined with the saturated paste extract method. Another observation in regard to the analysis type is about the phosphorus extraction method used for soils with different pH, where some labs used the Olsen extraction method for

250

8

K (ppm)

200 7

150 6

100 50

5

0 1

4 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Laboratory round 1

round 2

round 3

Median

+ 2.92*MAD

- 2.92*MAD

Figure 1. Soil pH analysis by the saturated paste method performed by eight commercial laboratories for soil C.

26

Progressive Crop Consultant

2

3

8

4 5 Laboratory

6

7

round 1

round 2

round 3

Median

+ 2.92*MAD

- 2.92*MAD

8

Figure 2. Exchangeable potassium analysis by ammonium acetate extract performed by eight commercial laboratories for soil C (SRS-1604).

November / December 2020

soils with pH below 6.0, and others utilized the Bray P1 method.

Soil testing lab users in California and in the Western U.S. could benefit tremendously from a certification program designed to certify the accuracy and precision of all labs on a regular basis. Please feel free to contact the lead author directly for more detailed information about this study at (805) 645-1465.

The author wishes to acknowledges the following contributors to this article: Robert Miller, ALP Program Director, former Extension Soil Specialist UC Davis; Dirk Holstege, Director, UC Davis Analytical Laboratory (retired); UCCE Advisor Steve Orlof, Siskiyou County (in memorian); Tim Hartz, UCCE Vegetable Crops Specialist, UC-ANR (retired); Ben Faber, UCCE Advisor, Ventura County; Anthony Luna, UCCE Advisor, Ventura County; and Eryn Wingate, Agronomist, Tri-Tech Ag Products.

Comments about this article? We want to hear from you. Feel free to email us at article@jcsmarketinginc.com

3.5

Zn (ppm)

3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 1

2

3

4 5 Laboratory

6

7

round 1

round 2

round 3

Median

+ 2.92*MAD

- 2.92*MAD

8

Figure 3 . Zinc analysis by the DTPA method performed by eight commercial laboratories for soil A (SRS-1809).

November / December 2020

www.progressivecrop.com

27

Western Region CCA Awards Presented at 2020 Crop Consultant Conference

New Awards Include Honors for CCA of the Year, Scholarships and Mentorships

By TAYLOR CHALSTROM | Editorial Assistant Intern

Darren “JW”Lemons was the first recipient of the Western Region CCA of the Year award (all photos courtesy WRCCA.)

Dr. Charlotte Decock, Cal Poly, SLO, left, and Dr. Candice Stafford-Banks, Woodland CC, were the recipients of the Allan Romander Mentor awards.

Anthony Venegas, Bryant Doyle and Erik Rodriquez (from left) were the recipients of the Allan Romander Scholarship awards.

T

he Western Region Certified Crop Advisers Association (WRCCA) awarded its first-ever CCA of the Year Award to Darren “JW” Lemons at this year’s 2020 Crop Consultant Conference. The two-day event, hosted on

28

Progressive Crop Consultant

Sept. 17 and 18 in a collaborative effort between JCS Marketing Inc. and Western Region CCA, featured a number of practical live virtual seminars for crop consultants in the Western U.S. WRCCA also announced recipients of its first

November / December 2020

ever mentor and scholarship awards.

The scholarship and mentor awards are named after the late Allan Romander, one of the first registered CCAs in

Continued on Page 30

MY

SPONSORED BY

LIFE

A NEW PODCAST About Your Life in Ag

What is My Ag Life?

My Ag Life is a brand new podcast powered by JCS Marketing, Inc. The publisher of the industry-leading ag publications, West Coast Nut, Progressive Crop Consultant, and Organic Farmer. Our podcast brings you exclusive interviews with industry professionals, readings of special articles from our publications, and more!

LISTEN NOW Available On All Major Podcast Platforms And more.

Interviews

Articles

with Industry Professionals

from our publications available in audio format

Visit our website for more information and to subscribe for updates, notifications for new episodes and more!

Visit:

myaglife.com Questions? Call us today at (559) 352-4456 or visit us online at www.wcngg.com | JCS Marketing • PO Box 27772, Fresno, CA 93729

Continued from Page 28 California. It was through his efforts that the CCA credential has grown in popularity over the years. The number of CCAs doubled under Romander’s tenure when he was running WRCCA’s marketing program.

CCA of the Year

The WRCCA subcommittee has a rubric for the CCA of the Year award that contains specific criteria. The award is given to someone who is a CCA in the western region and who has “contributed substantially to the exchange of ideas and agronomic knowledge within the agriculture industry,” said Jerome Pier, WRCCA Board Chair, who present the CCA of the Year Award.

structor and speaker on plant nutrition and has published dozens of articles on crop nutrition.

Scholarship and Mentor Awards

The scholarship and mentor awards recognize promising undergraduate college students who have expressed an interest in becoming a Certified Crop Adviser as well as faculty who support them in their education. Three $1,000 scholarships were awarded to undergraduate students across the local boards in the Central Valley, desert and coastal regions, Pier said.

“The point of the scholarships is to help grow membership and to get more recognition for our program and the scholarships themselves at the college level,” Pier said. “The recipients of the Scholarships were chosen based on “We’re looking at someone who has things like previous awards/scholarmade significant contributions in terms ships, academics, leadership and proof community service, leadership and fessional involvement as well as overall ethics, essentially all things important commitment to becoming a CCA.” to being a CCA. This is someone that has been recognized by the community Karl Wyant, vice president of ag science as a leader in the industry,” he said. at Heliae Ag, presented the scholarships and mentor awards at this year’s Darren “JW” Lemons was the first-ever conference on behalf of the WRCCA recipient of the Western Region CCA Board. of the Year award. Raised in Washington State on a family farm, JW is “The mentor awards recognize the menthe National Agronomist, Product torship provided towards students from Development Manager and Marketing professors who teach agronomy-related Coordinator for SQM North America. coursework,” Wyant said. “Professors He became a CCA in 2000 after already that receive the $500 honorarium are receiving his PCA license and joined recognized for developing and improvthe WRCCA Board in 2015, serving as ing CCA-related content in the classBoard Chairman in 2018. room. In the selection process for this award, we asked applicants to design According to WRCCA, Lemons has and describe how they would use the been instrumental in leading the WRC- honorarium to further improve their CA program in a direction of growth own CCA-related content.” as well as promoting the program to colleges while offering reduced student Allan Romander Mentor Recipients testing fees. A main focus of his tenure Dr. Charlotte Decock, assistant prohas been to bring young people into the fessor at Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo in CCA program. He mentored two Green the Natural Resources Management Scholarship recipients and traveled to and Environmental Studies DepartWashington D.C. twice to petition Con- ment, and Dr. Candice Stafford-Banks, gress for graduate research funding.

Agriculture Department Faculty at JW also serves as a freelance writer, in- Woodland Community College, were

30

Progressive Crop Consultant

November / December 2020

the recipients of the Mentor awards.

Decock plans to use the honorarium money to expand and adapt course materials for Soil Health and Plant Nutrition and Advanced Fertility courses, emphasizing use of the latest data and accessibility in order to provide participation opportunities for all students.

Stafford-Banks plans to develop a hybrid weed science class using a novel teaching modality that will enable her to reach all students all over California.

The class will include online lectures and the choice between an in-person or online lab component.

The recipients of this year’s awards play a vital role in the development of CCAs in the western region and will continue to educate growers and prospective CCAs in the future.

Allan Romander Scholarship Recipients Anthony Venegas from Salinas, Calif., Bryant Doyle from Portola, Calif. and Erik Rodriquez from Fresno, Calif. and Blackfoot, Idaho were the recipients of the Scholarship awards. All had excellent track records of academics, leadership and community service as well internship experience.

In the future, Venegas plans to take both the CCA and PCA certification exams as well as pursue an agricultural career on the Central Coast with a plant science graduate degree.

Doyle plans to take both the CCA and PCA certification exams and join the produce industry on the Central Coast.

Rodriquez plans to take both the CCA and PCA certification exams and travel the globe helping farmers from various countries and regions, especially in desert areas.

Comments about this article? We want to hear from you. Feel free to email us at article@jcsmarketinginc.com

“The recipients of the Scholarships were chosen based on things like previous awards/scholarships, academics, leadership and professional involvement as well as overall commitment to becoming a CCA.” -Jerome Pier, WRCCA

Helping Farmers Grow NATURALLY Since 1974

FEATURING:

Office: 559-686-3833 Fax: 559-686-1453 2904 E. Oakdale Ave. | Tulare, CA 93274 newerafarmservice.com

November / December 2020

www.progressivecrop.com

31

Impact of Some Biostimulants in Improving Strawberry Yields

By SURENDRA K. DARA | Entomology and Biologicals Advisor, UCCE

M

icrobial and botanical biostimulants have been used for promoting plant growth and to help plants withstand various pests, diseases or environmental stressors. While macro and micronutrients are necessary for plant growth and optimal yields, biostimulants play multiple roles by increasing the bioavailability of nutrients, improving nutrient and water absorption, and protecting plants from pestiferous organisms, either through direct antagonism or by triggering plants’ defense mechanisms (Berg, 2009). In addition to improving health and yields, biostimulants are also known to increase nutritional quality (Parađiković et al., 2011; Fierentino et al., 2018).

Multiple field studies in California demonstrated the potential of biostimulants and soil amendments in improving yields in tomato (Dara, 2019a; Dara and Lewis, 2019) and strawberry (Dara and Peck, 2018; Dara, 2019b). As the knowledge of biostimulants and their potential for sustainable agriculture is expanding, there has been a steady introduction of biostimulant products in the market warranting additional studies. A study was conducted to evaluate the potential of different biostimulant materials on strawberry growth, health and fruit yields.

Methodology

This study was conducted in an experimental strawberry field at the Shafter Research Station during 2019-2020.

Cultivar San Andreas was planted on October 29, 2019. No preplant fertilizer 32

Progressive Crop Consultant

The study included six treatments applied to 300-ft-long beds with single drip tape in the center and two rows of strawberry plants (all photos by S. Dara.)

application was made in this non-fumigated field, which had both Fusarium oxysporum and Macrophomina phaseolina infections in the previous year’s strawberry planting.

Each treatment was applied to a 300-footlong bed with single drip tape in the center and two rows of strawberry plant on either side. Sprinkler irrigation was provided immediately after planting along with drip irrigation, which was provided one or more times weekly as needed for the rest of the experimental period.

Each bed was divided into six 30-footlong plots representing replications with 18-foot buffers in between. This study included both biostimulant and nutrient supplements, but this article presents data from the biostimulant treatments only. Treatments were applied either as fertigation through the drip system using a Dosatron, or sprayed over the plants with a handheld garden sprayer.

Treatments

The following treatments were evaluated in this study: Grower Standard (GS): Between November 6, 2019 and May 9, 2020, 1.88 qt of 20-10-0 (a combination of 32-0-0 urea ammonium nitrate and 10-34-0 ammonium phosphate) and 1.32 qt of potassium thiosulfate were applied 20 times at weekly intervals through fertigation.

This fertilizer program was used as the standard for all treatments except for the addition of biostimulant materials.

GS + Abound: Transplants were dipped in 7 fl oz of Abound (azoxystrobin) November / December 2020

fungicide in 100 gal of water for four minutes immediately before planting.

Transplant dip in a fungicide is practiced by several growers to protect from fungal diseases and is considered as another standard in this study.

GS + Str10 + Rhizolizer: Str10 (Wickerhamomyces sp.) was applied at 5 fl oz/ac with molasses at 10 fl oz/ac immediately after planting and Rhizolizer (Trichoderma harzianum and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens) at 3 fl oz with a food source blend at 10 fl oz two weeks after Str10 application through the drip system. The same pattern was repeated starting from mid-February 2020. From February to May, 6 fl oz/ac of Rhizolizer was applied with 20 fl oz/ac of food source once a month. Str10 is an unregistered product with yeast that is expected to help with nutrient uptake and phosphorous mobilization for improved plant vigor and yield.

Rhizolizer is expected to solubilize soil nutrients and improve crop growth and yield.

GS + ON-Gard: 32 fl oz of ON-Gard was applied every two weeks through the drip system from planting until canopy development and then sprayed in 50 gpa.

ON-Gard is expected to increase the nutrient use efficiency and decrease abiotic stress to the plants.

GS + ON-Gard + RootShield Plus: 32 fl oz of ON-Gard (soy protein-based) was applied every two weeks through the drip system from planting until canopy develops and then sprayed in 50 gpa.

RootShield Plus WP (T. harzianum and

The study measured the impact on growth, health and yield parameters for each treatment.

Field assistant Tamas Zold measures fruit weight to further determine impacts on treatments.

T. virens) was also applied at 2 lb/ac through drip immediately after planting with 1 lb/ac at the end of November and again at the end of December 2019. RootShield is a biofungicide expected to protect strawberry from phytopathogens and improve water and nutrient uptake.

GS + CropSignal: CropSignal was applied at 10 gpa six days before planting and at 5 gpa 30 days after transplanting through the drip system. CropSignal is a carbon-based nutrient formula containing botanical extracts along with cobalt, copper, manganese and zinc, and is expected to support the growth and diversity of beneficial aerobic soil microbes for improved soil structure, water retention, nutrient cycling and plant protection.

Parameters observed during the study included canopy growth (area of the canopy) in January, February and March; first flower and fruit count in January; leaf chlorophyll and leaf nitrogen (with chlorophyll meter) in January, February and May, fruit sugar (with refractometer) in March and May; fruit firmness (with penetrometer) in March, April and May; severity of gray mold (caused by Botrytis cinereae) and other fruit diseases (mucor fruit rot caused by Mucor spp. and Rhizopus fruit rot caused by Rhizopus spp.) 3 and 5 days after harvest (on a scale of 0 to 4 where 0=no infection; 1=1-25%, 2=26-50%, 3=51-75% and 4=76-100% fungal growth) in March and May; sensitivity to heat stress (expressed as the number of dead and dying plants) in May; and fruit yield per plant from 11 weekly harvests between March 11 and May 14, 2020. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance in Statistix software and significant means were separated using the Least Significant Difference test.

Results and Discussion

The impact of treatments varied with different measured parameters. The interactions among plants, beneficial and pathogenic microorganisms in the crop environment, the influence of environmental factors and how all these biotic and abiotic factors respond to various biostimulant inputs can be very complex. The scope of this study was only to measure the impact on growth, health and yield parameters, not to investigate those complex interactions.

The canopy size does not always correspond with yields but could be indicative of stresses and how the plant is responding to them in the presence of treatment materials. Plants in some treatments had significantly larger canopy size in January and February, but the grower standard plants were significantly larger than the rest by March. Leaf chlorophyll and nitrogen contents were significantly different among treatments only in January where the grower standard plants had the lowest

Continued on Page 34

Beat the Heat & Care for Your Crops with:

Anti-Stress 550 ®

Frost & Freeze

Additional Environmental Stress Conditions that the product is useful for:

• High Temperatures & Extreme Heat • Drought Conditions • Transplanting • Drying Winds

What is Anti-Stress 550®?

A foliar spray that creates a semi-permeable membrane over the plant surface.

When to apply Anti-Stress 550®?

Optimal application period is one to two weeks prior to the threat of high heat.

When is Anti-Stress 550® most effective?

The coating of Anti-Stress becomes effective when the product has dried on the plant.

The drying time of Anti-Stress is the same as water in the same weather conditions.

*One application of Anti-Stress 550® will remain effective 30 to 45 days, dependent on the rate of plant growth, application rate of product and weather conditions.

559.495.0234 • 800.678.7377 polymerag.com • customerservice@polymerag.com Order from your PCA or local Ag Retailer / Crop Protection Supplier

November / December 2020

www.progressivecrop.com

33

Continued from Page 33

A similar trend was also seen for the average fruit sugar content. There was no statistically significant difference in the average fruit firmness among the treatments, although the value was numerically higher for the fruits in the CropSignal treatment. Severity of the gray mold, which occurred at low levels during the observation period, did not statistically differ among the treatments, but it was numerically higher in fruits from the grower standard plots. However, the severity of other diseases was significantly different among various treatments with the highest level in fruits from the grower standard and the lowest in fruits from plants that were treated with Abound. Temperatures were unusually high during the last week of May, and several plants exhibited heat stress and started to die. The number of dead or dying plants on May 28 was the highest grower standard and the lowest in Str10 + Rhizolizer and Abound treatments, although the differences were not statistically significant.

There were significant differences in marketable and unmarketable fruit yields among treatments (see Figure 1.)

Highest marketable yields were seen in ON-Gard and CropSignal treatments followed by the grower standard, ONGard + RootShield and Str10 + Rhizolizer. Transplant dip in a fungicide seems to have a negative impact on fruit yields as observed in the current study or earlier studies (Dara and Peck, 2017 and 2018; Peck unpublished data). While the grower standard had the highest amount of unmarketable fruits, the Str10 + Rhizolizer treatment had the lowest in this study. Fruit yield and some of the observed parameters appeared to be better in the grower standard with no fungicide or biostimulant treatments, which has also been seen in some earlier strawberry studies.

34

Progressive Crop Consultant

!"#$%&'$()*+,-.(/01

and the plants that received CropSignal had the highest. When the counts of the first onset of flowers and developing fruits were taken in January, plants that received ON-Gard alone had the highest number followed by the CropSignal and Abound treatments.

Fruit yield from two months Marketable

400

ab

a

300

Unmarketable

bc

ab

bc

c

P < 0.01 P < 0.01

200 100 0

abStandard Grower

c GS+Abound

bc GS+Str10+Rhizo.

a GS+ON-Gard

abc GS+ON-G+RSP

a GS+CropSignal

Figure 1.The trial showed significant differences in marketable and unmarketable fruit yields among treatments.

Compared to the grower standard, marketable fruit yield improvement was seen only in ON-Gard and CropSignal treatments. However, marketable fruit yield was higher in all treatments compared to the grower standard with Abound. Sometimes, natural balance of the nutrients, organic matter and microbial community in the soil might result in optimal yields in the absence of pathogens or other stressors. However, it is very common to use fungicidal treatments or add biological or synthetic amendments to protect from potential threats and improving yields. These results help understand the impact of various biostimulant materials and warrant the need to continue such studies under various environmental,

References

Berg, G. 2009. Plant-microbe interactions promoting plant growth and health: perspectives for controlled use of microorganisms in agriculture. Appl. Microbiol.

Biotechnol. 84: 11-18.

Dara, S. K. 2019a. Effect of microbial and botanical biostimulants with nutrients on tomato yield. CAPCA Adviser, 22(5): 40-45.

Dara, S. K. 2019b. Improving strawberry yields with biostimulants: a 2018-2019 study. UCANR eJournal of Entomology and Biologicals. https://ucanr.edu/blogs/ blogcore/postdetail.cfm?postnum=31096.

Dara, S. K. and D. Peck. 2017. Evaluating beneficial microbe-based products for their impact on strawberry plant growth, health, and fruit yield. UCANR eJournal of Entomology and Biologicals.

November / December 2020

https://ucanr.edu/blogs/blogcore/postdetail.cfm?postnum=25122.

Dara, S. K. and D. Peck. 2018. Evaluation of additive, soil amendment, and biostimulant products in Santa Maria strawberry. CAPCA Adviser, 21 (5): 44-50.

Dara, S. K. and E. Lewis. 2019. Evaluating biostimulant and nutrient inputs to improve tomato yields and crop health.

Progressive Crop Consultant 4(5): 38-42.

Fiorentino, N., V. Ventorino, S. L. Woo, O. Pepe, A. De Rosa, L. Gioia, I. Romano, N. Lombardi, M. Napolitano, G. Colla, and Y. Rouphael. 2018. Trichoderma-based biostimulants modulate rhizosphere microbial populations and improve N uptake efficiency, yield, and nutritional quality of leafy vegetables.

Frontiers in Plant Sci. 9: 743.

Parađiković, N., T. Vinković, I. V. Vrček, I. Žuntar, M. Bojić, and M. Medić-Šarić.

2011. Effect of natural biostimulants on yield and nutritional quality: an example of sweet yellow pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) plants. J. Sci. Food. Agric.

91: 2146-2152.

(The author would like to thank BioWorks, Inc., Fauna Soil Production and Locus Agricultural Solutions for the financial support of the study and Marjan Heidarian Dehkordi and Tamas Zold for their technical assistance.)

Comments about this article? We want to hear from you. Feel free to email us at article@jcsmarketinginc.com

Driven by Science.

Backed by Growers.

Trusted to Reduce Pest Damage.

Suterra offers better chemistry, better hardware, and better quality control.

From nuts to fruit to vegetables, CheckMate® and Puffer® are trusted on more acres than any other mating disruption brand.

Ready for 2021?

Contact your local representative to schedule a virtual or outdoor consultation.

customercare@suterra.com www.suterra.com

BACTERIAL LEAF SPOT IN LETTUCE

INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES REQUIRED FOR THIS POTENTIALLY DEVASTATING DISEASE

By GERMÁN SANDOYA-MIRANDA | Assistant Professor, Horticultural Sciences, University of Florida

Bacterial leaf spot, shown here in iceberg lettuce, is found in most lettuce growing regions of the country, including California, Arizona and Florida (photos courtesy Richard N. Raid UF/IFAS.)

36

Progressive Crop Consultant

November / December 2020

BLS is caused by the bacterium Xanthomonas hortorum patovar. vitians, formerly described as X. campestris pv. vitians (the pathovar (pv) vitians is unique to lettuce.) The bacterium can attack any type of cultivated lettuce; no relationship between lettuce type and immunity to the pathogen is known.

The bacterium has three races identified thus far: races 1, 2 and 3, but race 1 has been reported in western and eastern lettuce production areas in the U.S. BLS is sporadic in lettuce with losses up to 100% in subtropical productions areas.

Xanthomonas hortorum pv. vitians reproduces quickly when high humidity, leaf wetness and high temperatures are conducive for disease development. The infection starts as small brown spots that in later stages of disease development coalesce to form bigger spots.

Here in Florida at least one small outbreak is reported by growers during the growing season from October to May. Lettuce growers in Florida are the most affected by this disease because the warmer and more humid conditions in the state are more conducive for disease development; after a severe infection occurs, lettuce cannot be commercialized.

,

B

acterial Leaf Spot (BLS) of lettuce was first reported in the U.S. in 1918 in South Carolina. The disease then expanded to other production areas in California, Arizona and ultimately in Florida. The disease causes losses of entire production when outbreaks are significant. This disease is particularly devastating to the leafy vegetable industry because it is favored by warm and humid conditions. Besides the U.S., the disease has been reported in lettuce production in Europe, Asia and South America as well.

The high variability of disease outbreaks each year makes it impossible to predict when preventative applications of copper should be used.

Control Methods

The disease is not prophylactically controlled as other lettuce diseases such as downy mildew, sclerotinia drop and powdery mildew because it is uncertain when the pathogen population will increase and develop to cause diseases. There are no bactericides that

can eradicate BLS from lettuce production. Copper-based compounds can be effective in reducing the severity and incidence of outbreaks of BLS when the disease first appears. However, there is a potential for development of resis-

Continued on Page 38

Extremely Effective Post Emergent Herbicide!Continued on Page 38  ACTIVE INGREDIENT - 15.9 % Phenmedipham  ONLY A.I. REGISTERED for Control of Broadleaf Weeds in Spinach (grown for processing and seeding) and Red Garden Beets.  NEW FIFRA 2(ee)* Spinach Recommendation (CA & AZ) Offers Application Window Flexibility  NOW AVAILABLE in One Gallon Other Innovative Products* From Belchim Crop Protection: Containers!!

Visit:www.belchimusa.com

Other Innovative Products From Belchim Crop Protection:

Visit:www.belchimusa.com

In the last five years, growers have been able to contain the disease from spreading to other lettuce farms nearby by destroying infested crop areas with lettuce BLS; therefore, small losses were manageable, and growers did not lose entire crops.

EPA Reg. No. 264-616-87865

November / December 2020

Belchim Crop Protection USA, LLC 2751 Centerville Road | Suite 100 Wilmington, DE 19808 Phone: 855-445-7990 Email: info.usa@belchim.com

www.progressivecrop.com

37

,

Continued from Page 37 tance to copper in the pathogen population following repeated applications.

The high variability of disease outbreaks each year makes it impossible to predict when preventative applications of copper should be used. A combination of a copper fungicide with mancozeb may be effective to reduce BLS in lettuce; both compounds have some efficacy against bacteria but are protectants and not curative. Systemic Acquired Resistance based fungicides probably have limited activity but can be used as preventative as well.

Several practices may help reduce outbreaks of lettuce BLS. These practices, however, should be part of an integrated disease management program instead of recommended alone.

Crop destruction at the point of infection and surrounding areas have proved to be effective to avoid other neighboring lettuce fields from becoming infected. This strategy has been successful in containing disease spread to other fields during recent small outbreaks in Florida. However, when the disease is highly spread, this strategy may not be economically feasible. This recommendation may only help in early detection of the disease.

The bacterium is believed to be transmitted in infested seed, which is the most common avenue of disease introduction. The use of disease-free seed is highly recommended, but to date there is no effective method to detect the pathogen on seeds and assure cleanliness from BLS. Seed production should be conducted in dry, cool environments with less likelihood of bacterium development.

The BLS pathogen spreads by rain and overheard irrigation. Drip irrigation can be used to mitigate spread of the disease by keeping foliage as dry as possible. In California and Arizona, most lettuce fields are drip irrigated.

However, drip irrigation is not economically feasible in Florida’s commercial field production currently.

38

Progressive Crop Consultant

Baterial leaf spot symptoms in romaine lettuce(top) and iceberg lettuce(bottom).

An adequate weed control in nearby areas of lettuce fields is highly recommended because the pathogen may be epiphytic on weeds. Many weed species such as those in the families Asteraceae, Amaranthaceae, Aizoaceae, Chenopodiaceae, Portulacaceae, Solanaceae and Malvaceae may host the pathogen, X. hortorum pv. vitians.

Ultimately, host resistance is the most efficient control method against the BLS disease. BLS resistance can be found in certain heirloom lettuce cultivars that are not acceptable for commercial production. Disease resistance towards race 1 strains of the pathogen can be easily transferred to romaine, iceberg and leaf lettuce cultivars using traditional breeding methods. There have been releases from the USDA Agricultural Research Service of lettuce lines with resistance to race 1 for the California/Arizona lettuce production system. The University of Florida is developing such resistances for the Florida production system. Resistance November / December 2020

to races 2 and 3 against X. campestris pv, vitians remains to be reported.

Further Research

A partnership was formed between plant breeders, geneticists, plant pathologists, weed management scientists and extension agents from the University of Florida Institute for Food and Agricultural Sciences, Pennsylvania State University and USDA-ARS. This partnership will investigate the lettuce BLS interactions using several approaches that include breeding, lettuce genetics, pathogen genetics and detection. Researchers will improve lettuce cultivars against several races of X. hortorum pv. vitians and provide information on pathogen and lettuce genetics that will help the industry to efficiently manage this detrimental disease; this information will be released to growers, producers, the seed industry and other stakeholders in English and Spanish.

Comments about this article? We want to hear from you. Feel free to email us at article@jcsmarketinginc.com

ISOMATE® Mist NOW SCIENCE FOR SOLUTIONS

Navel Orangeworm

Pheromone Mating Disruption

in Traps

Average NOW / Trap / Season

120 Grower Standard 100

ISOMATE Mist NOW

80 46% Reduction

60 40 20

99% Reduction

0

Pheromone

Egg Replicated 4x

Simple Deployment!

- Chico, CA - 2019

1 Mist Unit/Acre Use Rate

- Almond Harvest

Average NOW Infested Nuts (%)

7

225+ Days

6

Pheromone Release

5 4 3

75% Reduction

2 1 0

Grower Standard Replicated 4x

ISOMATE® Mist NOW

- Chico, CA - 2019

PACIFIC BIOCONTROL CORPORATION www.pacificbiocontrol.com ISOMATE® is a registered trademark of Pacific Biocontrol

Jeannine Lowrimore Northern California 209.603.9244

Christeen Abbott-Hearn

Central California 559.334.7664

Foliar Feeding of Plant Nutrition Nutrient Applications Can Improve Yield, Quality and Shelf Life

By JW LEMONS | CCA, CPAG, Western Region CCA Foliar nutrient applications offer a number of benefits over, or in addition to, soil applied applications under the right conditions (photo by Cathy Merlo.)

A

ccording to studies from the United Nations, the world population will increase by 1 billion people over the next decade, reaching an estimated 8.6 billion people by 2030. By 2050, Earth will have 9.8 billion inhabitants. This enormous population growth will be coupled with a corresponding increase in demand for food. Projections from the FAO have indicated that agricultural production worldwide will have to increase by an estimated 50% by 2050 to meet the needs of a growing population.

Proportionately, agricultural land is becoming scarce. Therefore, one of the biggest challenges is to improve the yield, quality and shelf life of crops by using the best fertilizers, applied in very precise doses and with proven methods. One of the best procedures to reach those goals is foliar application of nutrients in customized doses based on critical timing for each crop.

Foliar feeding is the entry of small amounts of liquid fertilizer through the surface of plant tissue. This can allow for rapid nutrient utilization by the plant. Foliar feeding provides the consultant and applicator the ability to blend the fertilizer with other products such as pesticides and micronutrients.

Current formulations of liquid fertilizers are believed to penetrate mostly the transcuticular pores on foliage, which are open virtually all the time compared to stomata. Nutrients also enter stomata, but these often are closed due to environmental stresses and darkness. Most stomata are located underneath leaves away from fertilizer spray patterns. Drawbacks to foliar feeding include the inability to apply large amounts of N, phosphorous (P) and potassium (K) without potentially burning the foliage and possibly scarring the fruit. Therefore,

40

Progressive Crop Consultant

frequent applications of the right fertilizer and fertilizer blends at a low volume are required to maintain optimum tissue levels of key nutrients, resulting in consistent plant growth and functions like the production and transference of assimilates.

Foliar Nutrient Applications

Selecting the right fertilizers will continue to be an important part of the equation to improving yield, quality and shelf life of crops. How we apply the nutrient is also vital. Let us examine foliar spraying more closely. Crops treated with foliar spray tend to have a higher nutritional value. Improved Total Soluble Solids (TSS) have contributed to increased sugar, vitamins, minerals and proteins in the harvested crops. It is not enough just to grow more crops, but those crops must have better nutritional value for us as well.

We can see very positive effects by examining just one mineral nutrient such as K. K regulates plant functions and increases nitrogen efficiency. By increasing the saline concentration of the cells, the plants are better able to resist frosts. Applied at the right time and in the correct amount, K promotes the development of a stronger cell structure, which allows the crops to better withstand drought, disease and pests. A better internal structure promotes a prolonged shelf life. In many of our soils, we lack adequate available K to meet the crop demands. One way to meet those phenological growth stages is to supplement K sprays. This could affect the production levels and quality of numerous crops such as tuber fill and skin condition in potato, nut meat density in almond and even oil production in mint.

November / December 2020

Continued on Page 42

Calcium Improve water penetration Apply the convenient liquid formulation of CaTs® during the dormant season for easy calcium application ahead of winter rains.

The 100% soluble calcium and thiosulfate immediately begin displacing sodium and flocculating soil colliods. Prepare your fields for next season with CaTs.

Learn more about CaTs at www.cropvitality.com

Or call (800) 525-2803 - Email info@cropvitality.com ©2020 Tessenderlo Kerley, Inc. All rights reserved. CaTs® is a registered trademark of Tessenderlo Kerley, Inc.

PCC SEP 2020.indd 1

8/11/2020 1:25:18 PM

Continued from Page 40 Originally, it was thought that using foliar nutrient applications was only appropriate when a nutritional deficiency was present. This is definitely not the case.

Ongoing scientific research has consistently shown that periodic applications of certain nutrients in various crops can have a positive effect on both quantity and quality of fruits, nuts, vegetables and grain crops. Although most supplemental nutrients are absorbed through the root system, it is also important to note that leaves (and to a lesser degree stems,) flowering plant tissues and even fruit surfaces can absorb limited amounts of nutrients. It is crucial to understand which nutrients can be supplied effectively by foliar applications if the soil-supplied nutrients are inadequate or impaired in some way.

In agriculture, our scientists have identified many cases where nutrient supplementation using a foliar application may be considered more effective than an incrop topdressing application. One such situation that has had success is during late stages of fruit development where Ca sprays applied through the season to apples has shown ability to combat Ca deficiency. This deficiency is directly connected with the physiological disorder called bitter pit. The application of Ca making direct contact with the fruit has shown good results in controlling this disorder. Also, Ca being sprayed on cherries preharvest amounted to less cracking in fruit during late maturation stages.

Research trials done in almonds have also demonstrated where a foliar-applied nutrient can have a huge impact on a crop. Knowing that fruit set is crucial in almond trees, it has been proven that micronutrients, zinc (Zn) and especially boron (B), have a significant impact on fruit set as well as on fruitlet abscission.

In several fruit trees, it has been reported that even foliar spraying of one or both elements has improved productivity. In one experiment, Nonpareil trees were sprayed at full blossom with boric acid at 0.2%, Zn-50 at 0.3% and, with the combination of these micronutrients as a separate treatment, compared with a 42

Progressive Crop Consultant

non-sprayed control. Fruit set of the B treatment was 27.7% and Zn was 22.2%.

However, the B + Zn combination produced a significantly higher fruit set (38.1%) (Sotomayor et al., 2002).

ing an alternative way to increase plant nutrition and prolong the life and productivity of the infected tree was crucial.

Numerous combinations and timings were trialed.

Additional Benefits

Trials show that in the case of one nutrient combination, potassium nitrate feeding increased yields in citrus. Foliar applications with potassium nitrate have proven to be highly efficient in fulfilling the potassium requirements for many crops. The combination of potassium and nitrate in this fertilizer has been found to be beneficial in improving fruit size, dry matter, color, taste and integrity as well as resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses for citrus and tomato fruit.

Moreover, the integration of potassium nitrate in routine management or in specific growth stages resulted in remarkably positive benefits to cost ratio.

As consultants, we must understand that at times only a small amount of a specific nutrient is required, and due to low soil mobility of the nutrient, it is actually more efficient to supply the small amount of needed nutrient as a foliar application. This can be the case for both macronutrients and micronutrients.

There can also be other conditions that cause a nutrient to be less available to crop roots. One example is cool, excessively wet conditions on an alkaline soil (e.g. pH >8.0) where iron is less available to certain crops (e.g. iron chlorosis of citrus trees) in heavy wet clay. Even if supplemental iron fertilizer has been applied to the soil before or at planting, it may not be available through the roots.

This can also be true for numerous other crops. By monitoring the trees and observing patterns, we can offset the chlorosis in our crop with a supplemental iron foliar application. Spray applications of elements such as iron, zinc, copper and manganese may have to be repeated every three weeks when we get deficiencies of these nutrients.

Many studies include yield data collected after applying foliar sprays of various fertilizer solutions, not only to nutritionally deficient crops, but even to crops that have adequate levels of nutrients such as potassium. Crops including wheat, almonds, tomatoes, citrus, cucurbits, pome fruits and rice among many others react positively to certain nutrient sprays even when adequate soil nutrient levels are present.

A good reference to the benefits of foliar spraying is in citrus research. After years of trials addressing HLB or Huanglongbing citrus greening disease in Florida, it was determined that a foliar nutrition approach to the disease was a very viable option (www.citrusbr.com.br/download/ Foliar_nutrition_forHLB.pdf). The nature of the disease restricts the ability of the plant to adequately take up nutrients though its damaged root system. FindNovember / December 2020

Take Caution

In our management plan, caution should be used when foliar application might be more efficient but not practical. When a foliar application is relatively effective, but we cannot supply the needed nutrient in one application, multiple applications would be needed, spaced out sufficiently and timed as often as once a week. Multiple applications in field crops can be expensive due to fuel, equipment and labor costs, or where there may not be sufficient time to apply enough of the needed nutrient. We must measure the economics and limitations when determining our fertilizer plan.

In the case of a severe P deficiency, there may not be time to apply sufficient applications of low rates of foliar P to be effective. The application costs can become excessive based on the return in production. In this situation, it may be better to realize there is not much that can be done in the current season to correct the issue. Recognizing the deficiency, the preferred course of action is to apply sufficient P fertilizer to the soil prior to the planting of subsequent crops to correct the P deficiency.

If we continue to use phosphorus P as an example, we also need to understand foliar P efficiency and when it does have a fit in our fertilizer program. Foliar-ap-

plied nutrients have the benefit of being 4 to 30 times more efficient, and there is no risk of groundwater contamination.

Studies using labeled P on apple, cherry, corn, tomato, potato and bean crops have shown that as much as 12 to 14% of the total P can be supplied by multiple foliar sprays. Since P can be very immobile in the soil, foliar applications can be up to 20 times more effective than soil applications.

Recognizing another nutrient use as a foliar, we can see that some foliar N sprays compared to soil applications of N include lower application rates and the ease of obtaining timely, uniform applications. With attention to best-use guidelines, the efficiency of foliar-applied N may be optimized at nearly 95 to 100%. Based on the foregoing information, if the recovery of soil-applied N can be impaired to as low as 15 to 62%, it can then be concluded by the method of estimation that foliar-applied N has an efficiency of 1.3 to 1.6 times soil-applied N at the low end and seven times

at the upper end. If foliar-applied N can be up to seven times more efficient than soil-applied N, then on a poundfor-pound basis, it makes sense that we could use this information to prevent N loading to ground water. In crops such as citrus, cherries and wine grapes, we may be able to achieve 100% of the needed N by foliar application. This is not always the case, but understanding your N efficiency in your soils may prompt the need for a supplemental foliar N application. Mature, low-N-requiring crops could acquire 40 to 50 pounds N with foliar application alone. This in no way warrants replacing all of our soil applied N in all crops by using foliar.

Conclusion

In summary, it should be pointed out that we have barely scratched the surface of all the features and benefits of foliar nutrition sprays. Get to know your crop and soils as well as the correlation between total nutrients and available nutrients. Understand if your crop has shown positive response to foliar treat-

November / December 2020

ment even when adequate nutrient levels are in the soil. Ask yourself: when do soil conditions prevent adequate nutrient uptake? What conditions should I be aware of to optimize foliar applications (rain, temperature, wind, sprayer capability, pH of my solution, humidity, physiological growth stage, activity of plant parts like stomate, additives such as pesticides or adjuvants and antagonist as well as synergistic reactions with other nutrients.) Study absorption rates and what affects them. Like all other things in agriculture, foliar nutrition is a tool.

References Sotomayor, C., Silva, H. and Castro, J. (2002). Effectiveness of boron and zinc foliar sprays on fruit setting of two almond cultivars. Acta Hortic. 591, 437440, https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2002.591.67.

Comments about this article? We want to hear from you. Feel free to email us at article@jcsmarketinginc.com

www.progressivecrop.com

43

A B I OT I C ST R E SS DEFENSE Abiotic Stress reduces yield and quality and can potentially lead to biotic stress.

Redox has four products that are essential for Abiotic Stress Defense:

RootRx

0-4-20

14% Ca | 7% S

ACCELERATES PHOTOSYNTHETIC ACTIVITY

0-0-5

0-31-50

10% Ca | 22% Si

STIMULATES ROOT GROWTH & METABOLISM

INCREASES PLANT RESPIRATION

FORTIFIES CELL WALL STRENGTH

Botanical Extract

Redox is your solution for Abiotic Stress Defense.

Contact Redox to learn how this technology can be of benefit.

(208) 678-2610 or

info@redoxgrows.com @redoxgrows

REDOXGROWS.COM