Development Nous Ltd
Contact: Jason Kaye Ref: H20180069
212 Queen Street East Hastings 4122 New Zealand
17 January 2019 The Chief Executive Napier City Council Private Bag 6010 Napier 4142
PO Box 385 Hastings 4156 New Zealand 06 876 2159
Resource Consent Application for Land Currently Occupied at 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier Please find enclosed an application for a Non Notified Resource Consent and supporting Assessment of Environmental Effects on behalf of Durham Property Investments Limited for the residential subdivision and development of the above property that is subject to the Te Awa Structure Plan of the Main Residential Zone. Please note the following debtor information for your records: Address for (debtor):
invoicing
Durham Property Investments Limited C/- Development Nous Ltd 212 Queen Street East Hastings 4122
Address for service of applicant:
Durham Property Investments Limited C/- Development Nous Ltd 212 Queen Street East Hastings 4122
Telephone:
022 088 0360
Fax/email:
jason.kaye@developmentnous.nz
Contact person:
Jason Kaye
We would appreciate it if you could contact us prior to a site assessment, so one of our staff can accompany you due to Health and Safety requirements. We trust that the enclosed information is complete, but please do not hesitate to contact me should you require any further information or have any queries. Yours faithfully Development Nous Ltd
Jason Kaye Senior Planner 022 088 0360 jason.kaye@developmentnous.nz
Form 9 – Application for Resource Consent Residential Subdivision and Development 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier (Our Ref H20180069) Prepared for Durham Property Investments Limited
Form 9 Application for Resource Consent Section 88, Resource Management Act 1991 To
The Chief Executive Napier City Council Private Bag 6010 Napier 4142
I/We, Durham Property Limited C/- Development Nous Ltd, apply for the following type(s) of Resource Consent:
Land use consent is sought for the following:
Staged Subdivision to form 187 residential lots with associated earthworks, access formation and construction of stormwater swale within the Te Awa Structure Plan area in advance of structure plan staging. Staged Multi Unit Consent relating to the construction of stages 2 – 9 of the development. Access Related Code of Practice Infringements resulting from the construction of a vehicle crossing exceeding 6m width and retention of internal vehicle access as private rather than vested roads. Subdivision, land disturbance and change of use of HAIL site in the presence of a detailed site investigation confirming soil contaminant standard compliance.
The proposal is outlined in the accompanying Assessment of Environmental Effects, staged scheme plans, and supporting technical documents. The names and addresses of the owner and occupier of land to which the application relates are as follows: Durham Property Investments Limited The location of the proposed activity is as follows: 16 Willowbank Avenue Lot 1 DP 14417 held in Certificate of Title HBG2/863 comprising an area of 4.5526ha, and 38 Willowbank Avenue Lot 2 DP 14417 held in Certificate of Title 420376 comprising an area of 9.2648 Additional Resource Consents are needed for the proposed activity:
Nil
I/We attach, in accordance with the Fourth Schedule of the Resource Management Act 1991, an assessment of environmental effects in the detail that corresponds with the scale and significance of the effects that the proposed activity may have on the environment.
Jan 2019
Form 9 Application for Resource Consent Development Nous Ltd
i
I/We attach any information required to be included in this application by the district plan, the Resource Management Act 1991, or any regulations made under that Act:

Nil
Jason Kaye for Development Nous Ltd Consultant to and duly authorised to sign on behalf of Applicant
17 January 2019
Address (debtor):
for
invoicing
Durham Property Limited C/- Development Nous Ltd PO Box 385 Hastings
Address for service of applicant:
Durham Property Limited C/- Development Nous Ltd PO Box 385 Hastings
Telephone:
06 876 2159 022 088 0360
Email:
jason.kaye@developmentnous.nz
Contact person:
Jason Kaye
Jan 2019
Form 9 Application for Resource Consent Development Nous Ltd
ii
Assessment of Environmental Effects Residential Subdivision and Development 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier (Our Ref H20180069) Prepared for Durham Property Investments Limited November 2018
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Assessment of Environmental Effects
1.0
INTRODUCTION
This Resource Consent application is prepared on behalf of Durham Property Investments Ltd in accordance with the requirements of Section 88 and the Fourth Schedule of the Resource Management Act 1991. This report is intended to provide the information necessary to fully understand the proposed residential development, as detailed in Section 3.0 of this report, and any actual and potential effects that the development may have on the environment in support of resource consent for subdivision and associated interim resource consent for multi unit development. The principle of the proposed residential use on the site is consistent with the Main Residential Zoning and inclusion within the Te Awa Structure Plan Area, which guides the delivery of residential development across the Te Awa greenfield development area to assist in meeting the housing needs of Napier. However, as the development is out of sequence with the generally stalled Te Awa Structure Plan, the development is elevated to Discretionary Activity status against the provisions of the structure plan. Comparatively minor consenting matters arise in relation to the retention of the access routes within the development as private rather than vested roads. Notwithstanding the discretionary activity classification of the development, there is a clear supporting presumption within the City of Napier District Plan in relation to the fundamental principle of residential development of the site, and this report demonstrates that the sequencing of the development does not result in the generation of any adverse effects. More specifically, resource consent pursuant to Section 88 of the Resource Management Act 1991 is therefore sought from the Napier City Council for the residential subdivision and development of the site to create a managed village of 168 lots that will each contain a three bedroom home and 19 lots outside of the village for general residential development. Specifically, consent is sought for:
Staged Subdivision to form 187 residential lots with associated earthworks, access formation and construction of stormwater swale within the Te Awa Structure Plan area in advance of structure plan staging. Staged Multi Unit Consent relating to the construction of stages 2 – 9 of the development. Access Related Code of Practice Infringements resulting from the construction of a vehicle crossing exceeding 6m width and retention of internal vehicle access as private rather than vested roads.
As current horticultural land, intrusive investigation for potential site contamination has been undertaken pursuant to the Resource Management (National Environmental Standard for Assessing and Managing Contaminants in Soil to Protect Human Health) Regulations (NESCS), with an associated consenting matter.
Subdivision, land disturbance and change of use of HAIL site in the presence of a detailed site investigation confirming soil contaminant standard compliance.
Pursuant to the established principle of bundling of consent matters within an application, the application falls to be assessed against the highest order activity classification within the consenting matters. Accordingly, the development is classified as a Discretionary Activity. 1
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Assessment of Environmental Effects
2.0
SITE & LOCATION
Legal and Physical Descriptions The application site comprises two adjoining land parcels that have been assembled to form a suitably sized development site. These parcels are formally described as:  
16 Willowbank Avenue Lot 1 DP 14417 held in Certificate of Title HBG2/863 comprising an area of 4.5526ha, and 38 Willowbank Avenue Lot 2 DP 14417 held in Certificate of Title 420376 comprising an area of 9.2648
The extent of the title areas is shown in Figure 1 and a copy of the Title documents are provided at Appendix A.
Figure 1: Aerial Site Photo (Sourced from Google Maps)
Relevant Certificate of Title Interests In terms of these titles and associated registered interests, there is no impediment to the form of development proposed by this application. Title 420376 is subject to a drainage easement and fencing covenant.
2
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Assessment of Environmental Effects
Title HBG2/863 is also subject to the drainage easement (as beneficiary) and a subject to a lease agreement relating to occupation of the dwelling located at the northern end of the property. This agreement has been prepared in expectation of the proposed development and accordingly provides for the application. Site Description In combination, the two “L� shaped lots form a 13.8 hectare site that occupies a generally rectangular area between Willowbank Avenue and Eriksen Road in the south eastern Napier suburb of Te Awa. As is evident in the aerial photograph of the site and surrounds provided at Figure 1, the site is located within an area of rural land use adjacent to consolidated suburban development. Development within the wider area includes the established suburban development of Maraenui and progressing suburban development of consented Te Awa Estates residential development, mixed with retained rural uses of the neighbouring land and larger scale rural uses further to the south, away from the urban boundary. A house has been developed on each of the two lots with the balance of the land beyond the respective residential curtilages and accesses held as open land in low intensity productive use. The house at 16 Willowbank is located in the north west corner of that lot (and overall application site) and is accessed from Willowbank Avenue. The house at 38 Willowbank Avenue is located within the northern area of that lot (generally centrally within the application site) and is also accessed from Willowbank Avenue. The pattern of development and relationship with the surrounding area can be seen in the aerial photograph provided at Figure 2.
Figure 2: Aerial Site Photo (Sourced from Napier City Council GIS)
3
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Assessment of Environmental Effects
The application site presents a 482m frontage to Willowbank Avenue to the west and a 457m frontage to Eriksen Road to the east. Both of these roads are aligned generally north south and extend southward to the Meeanee Road – Awatoto Road arterial route that connects the coastal State Highway 2 route to the Hawke’s Bay Expressway. Eriksen Road is however, more readily accessed from Te Awa Avenue via Kenny Road. Further to the west of the site, beyond Willowbank Avenue, is the consolidated suburban development of Maraenui. The southern limit of Maraenui is around 200m to the south of the site, marking the urban limit of Napier in this location. A 47m wide linear strip of Main Rural Zone land separates the rear of the residential properties of Masefield Avenue from Willowbank Avenue. Beyond Eriksen Road to the east of the site is the progressing residential development area of Te Awa Estates. Further to the east, Te Awa Avenue and associated residential development, the Rail Corridor and State Highway 2 occupy the land between the site and the coast. To the north, the site adjoins 6 Willowbank Avenue, a 4 hectare rural lot with a single dwelling positioned adjacent to the Willowbank Avenue frontage. Eriksen Road curves to bound both eastern and northern boundaries of this neighbouring property, with Napier Boys High School located beyond Eriksen Road to the north. To the south, the site adjoins circa 16 hectares of open land in rural use, extending southward to Kenny Road. Rural land use continues beyond Kenny Road to the south, albeit with related dwellings accompanying open land. Notably within the surrounding area to the south of the site is the Cross Country Drain, a property that has been developed as a motor caravan park and the Maraenui golf course. District Plan Zoning As shown in Figure 3, the site is within the Main Residential Zone of the City of Napier District Plan, which describes the existing character of development and purpose of the zone as follows: “The Main Residential zone applies to broad residential areas covering most of the City where there are no significant environmental constraints that may otherwise indicate intensified residential development should not occur. This zone also includes residential growth areas including the Te Awa Development area.” The Te Awa residential development area is also subject to the Te Awa Structure Plan. The Structure Plan provides a framework to guide the staged development of approximately 125 hectares of land, which was rezoned from Rural to Main Residential by Plan Change 6 to the City of Napier District Plan in 2012. Required infrastructure is identified and delivery of this planned within the Structure Plan, along with the specification of design outcomes to ensure the achievement of a suitably high-quality suburban environment. The Te Awa Structure Plan arose from identification of the land in the 1999 Napier Urban Growth Strategy as a potential future residential growth area, followed by the consenting (and implementation) of the Te Awa Estates land in 2005 and 2010. Development beyond the Te Awa Estates land has been generally stalled as adjusting land values rise to meet the significant costs of infrastructure required to facilitate suburban development. 4
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Assessment of Environmental Effects
Integral to the Te Awa Structure Plan are Designations 171 and 172 that provide for the formation of a wide swale drain adjacent to the Willowbank Avenue boundary of the Structure Plan area for the coordinated management of stormwater within the future development. As shown in Figure 3, Designation D172 occupies a 40m wide corridor along the western and southern boundaries of the application site. The Te Awa Structure Plan also introduced a noise boundary relating to Willowbank Avenue traffic noise, with acoustic insulation requirements for development within the boundary. This is expressed as a dashed line parallel to Willowbank Avenue on the Figure 3 District Plan map. Te Awa Avenue is identified in the Council’s District Plan as a Principal Road and Willowbank Road is identified as a Collector Road. No specific archaeological heritage is recorded on the site, but it is noted that an identified site of significance to Maori is located 500m to the west of the application site. However this does not provide any specific impediment to the proposed development.
Figure 3. City of Napier District Plan Map (Sourced from Napier City Council GIS)
Hazards The Napier City Council public GIS identifies the site as being at risk of earthquake derived liquefaction and associated earthquake amplification and part of the site as being at risk from flooding in a 1 in 50 year event. The HBRC Hazards Portal repeats the liquefaction and flooding risk and additionally identifies the site as being at risk of inundation in both distant and near source tsunami events. 5
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Assessment of Environmental Effects
3.0
DESCRIPTION OF APPLICATION PROPOSAL
The application seeks subdivision consent and accompanying multi unit consent (excluding Stage 1) for the staged residential development of the site comprising:
19 residential lots within Stages 1A, 1B and 1C fronting onto Eriksen Road ranging in size from 632m2 to 789m2 (these lots are excluded from the multi-unit consent application), 168 residential lots within Stages 2 – 9 ranging in size from 302m2 to 488m2 with accompanying internal access driveway network, An open stormwater swale drain within a 40m wide reserve to the western and southern site boundaries, Four reserve lots (Lots 301 – 304) enabling pedestrian and service connection from the development to the swale, One lot (Lot 24) for use as vehicle parking.
Figure 4. Application Scheme Plan
6
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Assessment of Environmental Effects
The 168 lots of stages 2 – 9 will be developed to create a managed lifestyle village targeted at occupiers over the age of 55, with controlled access in the form of entrance gates. The controlled access prevents the internal access network from being vested with the Council as road but is necessary for the character of development and resulting perception of safety that is desired by the target demographic. Individual titles are proposed for all of the lots within the residential village, which will be linked to an incorporated society entity controlling the common area throughout the development. For clarity, the structure will not be a unit title development. The 19 lots of Stages 1A, 1B and 1C fronting Eriksen Road are not part of the village and the housing on these formed lots will be developed independently from the wider development. As these will be developed independently, no house plans are presented for these lots, and these lots are excluded from the scope of the multi-unit consent. As detailed on the accompanying plans, the lifestyle village lots will be developed to provide a mix of detached and semi-detached (duplex) single storey, three-bedroom housing. The supporting plan detail includes demonstration that the form of development can be accommodated on the smallest of the lots. Detailed plans for all lots have not been provided with this application, and it is proposed that these are provided for each stage pursuant to a condition of the multi-unit resource consent. All of the dwellings will have an integral double garage with an additional standing space for a vehicle accommodated to the frontage of each dwelling. Additional large vehicle parking will be provided on and adjacent to proposed Lot 24. The internal configuration of the development has been driven by the resulting shape of the site following the definition of the 40m wide reserve corridor to the western and southern boundaries. As can be seen in Figure 4, the configuration is based on two north-south routes and seven eastwest connecting routes, accessed by two entrances from Eriksen Road. This pattern enables small blocks of housing to be formed, with requirement for only two backland lots. The internal access routes are based on a meandering rather than straight alignment to differentiate the internal environment and encourage reduced vehicle speed without compromising visibility. The title structure will provide rights of access for all of the lots over the internal access driveways to Eriksen Road. Specific easements will be imposed over proposed Lot 417 providing access to proposed Lots 108 and 118. The 40m wide reserve corridor to the western and southern boundaries will accommodate a necessary stormwater swale drain and will be finished to function as reserve land with a shared pedestrian and cyclist pathway. This land will be vested in Council. The swale and reserve land accords with the provisions and design of the Te Awa Structure Plan and the Designation within the City of Napier District Plan. However, the formation of this has been included within the scope of the resource consent rather than through an outline plan process as this is proposed by the Developer as opposed to the Requiring Authority. As identified within the site description, a legal agreement entitles the existing house at the northern end of the site to be retained for use by the current occupier. Accordingly, the detailed design of the swale will incorporate any necessary entrance bridging structure to retain access to this dwelling. 7
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Assessment of Environmental Effects
Three pocket parks are located on the western side of the development and one on the southern side (proposed Lots 101 – 104). These parks provide green spaces and access from the development to the adjacent swale parkland. These pocket parks also accommodate the 450mm stormwater pipes that drain the development to the open swale drain. The development will be complemented by extensive parkland landscaping of the swale reserve land and pocket parks and coordinated planting of street trees through the common areas of the development. Servicing of the development will be achieved through connection to adjacent Council infrastructure. It is understood that the Council is extending an existing water main in Eriksen Road, enabling two connection points to the site. Stormwater will generally be drained across the site to the swale drain, through the four pocket park lots. The swale drain will be connected to the adjacent Cowshed Drain, which links to the Serpentine stormwater system. The Stage 1 lots fronting Eriksen Road will benefit from a gravity fed sewer, while wastewater from the remainder of the development will be drained to the west and pumped through two pump stations that will be constructed within the swale reserve land. The servicing infrastructure within the site will be vested in Council and addressed through easements in gross. Further easements will also be required for power and telecommunications servicing of the lots. Earthworks required for site preparation and formation will generally comprise the initial stripping and stockpiling of around 40,000m3 of topsoil, the excavation of around 33,000m 3 of material to form the stormwater swale to the western and southern site boundaries, and the filling of isolated areas of low lying land within the site by up to 600mm to meet the RL 11.28m development level required by the Te Awa Structure Plan Three Waters Report. The filling of low spots across the site will utilise material cut from the swale formation and approximately 7,000m 3 of imported fill. Once site formation has been completed, the stockpiled topsoil will be utilised for final site formation, with any excess material exported from the site. As the land has been in a combination of agricultural and horticultural uses, it is classified as HAIL land and subject to the reporting requirements of the 2011 NESCS. A detailed site investigation has confirmed that the site is suited to the proposed residential development, with all samples within the allowable levels of the applicable soil contaminant standards. The HAIL status and completion of a detailed site investigation results in an NESCS consenting matter. Application Documents In addition to the staged scheme plans prepared by Development Nous, the application is supported by the following technical documents:
Landscape Design Report prepared by Development Nous Ltd Urban Design Report prepared by Development Nous Ltd Detailed Site Investigation prepared by Development Nous Ltd and Geosciences Ltd Transport Assessment prepared by Traffic Solutions Ltd Land Development Engineering Services Report prepared by Strata Group Liquefaction Potential Assessment prepared by Resource Development Consultants Ltd
8
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Assessment of Environmental Effects
4.0
DISTRICT PLAN PROVISIONS
Zoning The site is within the Te Awa Structure Plan area of the Main Residential Zone of the City of Napier District Plan. While residential development is therefore supported in principle by the provisions of the underlying zone, the specific nature of residential development is required to accord with the Te Awa Structure Plan Principles, which have been developed to guide the greenfield development of the structure plan area. Definition of Activity While the development will provide housing targeted at retired occupiers over the age of 55, each home will be on a separate title, as set out in the scheme plan, and the dwellings will all be selfcontained with no managed personal care element available for occupiers. Accordingly, while the development will provide a niche community of self contained housing opportunities for retired persons, the activity is classified as standard residential development comprising individual households. District Plan Activity Classification Te Awa Structure Plan Compliance The Te Awa Structure Plan specifies eighteen design principles to guide greenfield residential development across the rezoned area in terms of the resulting residential environment and to provide for the most effective delivery of infrastructure to facilitate the land use change. The following provides a summary of, and assessment against, these design outcomes: 
Design Outcome 1
The Te Awa Development Area shall be zoned Main Residential and subject to the related Rules and Conditions of the City of Napier District Plan for that zone. Development will generally be of a low to moderate density and subject to the subdivision and density requirements of the Main Residential Zone, provided that a minimum of 12 dwellings per hectare (d/ha) (net of roads and reserves) is generally achieved and the maximum density does not exceed 1 dwelling per 350m2. Response to Design Outcome 1 The proposed development complies with the subdivision and density requirements of the City of Napier District Plan, and this is detailed in the relevant section of the wider District Plan assessment within this report. The development exceeds the specified minimum density of 12 d/ha with a gross density (based on full site area) of 13.5 d/ha and a net density (excluding the 5.97ha of land devoted to drainage reserve, general reserve and roads within the overall site) of 23 d/ha. It is noted that this residential density has not been achieved through a proliferation of small and inflexible studio and one bedroomed units, with all houses providing three bedrooms. 9
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Assessment of Environmental Effects
The 187 residential lots across the 7.8262ha of residential land within the site provides an average residential lots size of 418m2, in compliance with the specified maximum density of 1 dwelling per 350m2. The development therefore accords with Design Outcome 1.
Design Outcome 2
Relates to the provision of a suburban commercial node within the Structure Plan area and is not relevant to this site.
Design Outcome 3
Requires the rezoning of the Te Awa Development Area as a single block of land to Main Residential, as achieved through Plan Change 6 in 2012, and retention of rural land activities on sites until developed in accordance with the Structure Plan. Response to Design Outcome 3 The development does not preclude the interim continuation of rural activities on neighbouring sites and the development accords with this Design Outcome.
Design Outcome 4
Specifies a staged sequencing of Structure Plan development based on the planned provision of infrastructure extension to facilitate the land use change from rural to residential. This sequential staging excludes the consented land of the Te Awa Estates development, which occupies much of the eastern half of the Development Area. Response to Design Outcome 4 The application site is within Stage 5 of the Structure Plan, and in accordance with the specified staged sequencing, the site should not be developed prior to 70% of lots within preceding stages 1 – 4 having gained 224 certification. As a result of slow uptake of the structure plan opportunities, residential development within the Development Area is limited to the consented development of Te Awa Estates, and no land within stages 1 – 4 has been developed since the Plan Change enabling residential development was completed in 2012. It is noted that resource consent has recently been granted for the construction of a managed care facility within Stage 1 of the Structure Plan area, at the junction of Kenny Road and Eriksen Road, but at the time of this report, this consent has not been implemented. Accordingly, the development is proposed in advance of the implementation of any development in the earlier Te Awa Structure Plan phases, and is inconsistent with Design Outcome 4.
Design Outcome 5
Seeks to discourage out of sequence development and enable appropriate consideration of the consequences of development undertaken in advance of the planned sequencing through the 10
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Assessment of Environmental Effects
elevation of resource consent applications for out of sequence development to Discretionary Activity status, a requirement for developers to fund the full cost of necessary infrastructure to facilitate the development and the requirement for provision of internal buffers to neighbouring rural land use activities. Response to Design Outcome 5 As confirmed in the response to the preceding Design Outcome, the development is proposed in advance of the implementation of any development across stages 1 – 4 of the Te Awa Structure Plan. The elevation to discretionary activity status of the resource consent application directed by Design Outcome 5 is recognised and addressed through the scheme assessment provided in the application. The elevation to discretionary activity status enables appropriate consideration by the Council of the effects of out of sequence development on the achievement of the long term Structure Plan objectives, on the provision of required infrastructure and any effects on other land within the structure plan. The required infrastructure is identified in the accompanying Servicing Report as the construction of the stormwater swale to the western and southern property boundaries (which will then link to the existing cowshed drain), the provision of two wastewater pumping stations to address areas that will not gravity flow to the existing (extended) Eriksen Road network, connection to existing and planned extension to the adjacent water supply main and upgrading of Eriksen Road to the property frontage. These infrastructure requirements have been considered and incorporated into the planned development, and this will not place an unfair burden on Council’s infrastructure resourcing of the future development of sites within the Te Awa Structure Plan area. Conversely, the implementation of comprehensive development on this site will provide greater flexibility for other neighbouring sites to also be brought forward for out of sequence development, following the required and beneficial implementation and completion of stormwater and road infrastructure required to service the application scheme. This greater flexibility may assist in realising greater implementation of structure plan development. The stormwater swale to the southern property boundary will provide a buffer to the rural land use to the south. In the absence of an internal buffer to the low intensity rural land use to the north, a ‘no-complaints’ style consent notice is offered to be imposed on the title of the lots adjoining the northern property boundary, if this is considered necessary by the Council to mitigate any potential reverse sensitivity effects on the existing rural use of this neighbouring land.
Design Outcome 6
Seeks the provision of a north to south “sub-spine” street running between Willowbank Avenue and Eriksen Road, integrating with the open drainage network where practicable. Response to Design Outcome 6 Due to the shape and dimensions of the parent site and the configuration of the development in terms of lot sizes and layout required to form a coherent suburban layout, a single sub-spine road is not provided through the development. Provision of a secondary spine road through the site would be largely incompatible with the finer urban grain and character of the residential 11
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Assessment of Environmental Effects
development and would compromise the suburban form of the development blocks within the development given the narrow width of the site remaining after the allocation of land to form the stormwater swale. Two north south access routes are however, provided within the layout and the stormwater swale corridor will provide off road, north south and east west pedestrian and cyclist routes which can be readily connected to future phases of Structure Plan development. In this manner, and in recognition of the site constraints, Design Outcome 6 has been addressed by the development layout.
Design Outcome 7
Seeks the north-south orientation of streets and specifies desirable urban block design dimensions. The design outcome also specifies that the collector street network shall intersect through single lane roundabouts and encourages the incorporation of traffic calming measures into the design of roads. Response to Design Outcome 7 The development layout is based on principal north – south aligned access routes within the site with linking connections between them. The block sizes are derived from the site dimensions and the avoidance of backland sites (only two such backland sites are included within the layout) on the premise that public frontage provides for a more accessible, inclusive and secure development of this nature (retired occupiers). The access driveway network within the site will not be vested in the Council as road and cannot therefore be elevated to collector status within the Council’s hierarchy.
Design Outcome 8
Seeks passive surveillance of public spaces and the activation of street frontage through the orientation of dwellings to face streets and overlook public open space. Response to Design Outcome 8 The development layout maximises overlooking of public spaces within the development with only two backland sections incorporated into the design. Boundary treatment for the rear of properties adjoining the stormwater swale land will be visually permeable to enable overlooking for passive surveillance of the adjoining public area. The layout is therefore consistent with this Design Outcome.
Design Outcome 9
Seeks the consistent landscape treatment of streets and reserves through the Te Awa Development Area. Response to Design Outcome 9 The accompanying Landscape Design Report provides concept detail of a landscaping scheme for the public and communal areas of the development and provides indication of the potential for 12
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Assessment of Environmental Effects
landscaping of the individual properties within the development. While the concept scheme will be refined at detailed design stage, the coherent scheme of high quality landscaping across the site is consistent with the Design Outcome.
Design Outcome 10
Requires the provision of a generously landscaped 3m wide strip adjacent to Willowbank Road, specifying a minimum of 75% of the strip is densely planted with specimens that will reach 3-5m at maturity. Response to Design Outcome 10 Within this development site, the provision of a landscaped buffer to the edge of Willowbank Road requires consideration of the resulting enclosure and potential loss of passive surveillance of the public space and the potential for trees acting as solid objects adjacent to the road to conflict with traffic safety. The concept landscape design includes planting of this buffer strip with ground cover plants and trees that will have clear trunks to best retain visibility into the public area of the stormwater swale in accordance with the requirements of the Design Outcome.
Design Outcome 11
Specifies the requirement for off road pedestrian and cycle linkages to be wide, open, safe and connected to the wider network. Response to Design Outcome 11 The 2.5m wide shared pedestrian and cycle pathway within the stormwater swale area to the western and southern boundaries of the site meets the design requirement and enables connection to the Cowshed Drain heading eastward to the Serpentine Pond area.
Design Outcome 12
Specifies staged road upgrading required to facilitate the overall staged residential development of the Te Awa Development Area. Response to Design Outcome 12 The schedule of specified staged road upgrading requires the improvement of Eriksen Road to provide a “10m carriageway with cycle lanes, footpaths, car park / landscape berm areas, pedestrian footpaths and verge”. This work will be completed by the Applicant for the length of the Eriksen Road property frontage to meet the requirements of this Design Outcome.
Design Outcome 13
States that no additional collector status streets are required within the Te Awa Development Area and requires that internal streets constructed with development shall generally comply with the Council’s standards for local streets albeit that alternative road environment design solutions will be considered.
13
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Assessment of Environmental Effects
Response to Design Outcome 13 As the internal access network within the site will not be vested in Council, it will not be formally classified as road (as defined by the City of Napier District Plan and the Act) and is more accurately described as an internal driveway network. The internal driveway network will be 6.0m wide, readily accommodating two-way vehicle flow and service and emergency vehicles and will utilise roundabouts to control cross intersections in the interests of avoiding ambiguity of user priority and vehicle conflict. The resulting internal access environment will comply with the requirements of the Design Outcome.
Design Outcome 14
Specifies that the staged requirement for stormwater infrastructure shall comprise a combination of piped and open drainage networks as detailed in the Te Awa Structure Plan – Three Waters report. This Design Outcome is supported by Appendix 29D (of the City of Napier District Plan) Te Awa Structure Plan – Stormwater Network and stormwater Designations 171 and 172 within the City of Napier District Plan. Response to Design Outcome 14 Of specific relevance to the application site is the requirement within the schedule of stormwater requirements for the construction of open drains adjacent to Willowbank Avenue that will then link to an upgraded Cowshed Drain. The proposed stormwater servicing is summarised in the accompanying Servicing Report and Proposed Stormwater Layout drawing. The development includes provision for the construction of an open stormwater swale within a wider open space corridor to the western and southern boundaries of the site in accordance with the direction of the Design Outcome and related Appendix 29D and stormwater Designations 171 and 172 of the City of Napier District Plan. The piped controlled stormwater network within the site will be vested in Council and served by easement in gross. Consideration has also been given to the formation and management of secondary overland stormwater flowpaths linked to the planned piped and open drainage networks. The stormwater infrastructure will therefore comply with the requirements of the Design Outcome.
Design Outcome 15
Specifies the requirement for development to meet minimum front boundary levels to address the 1 in 50 year modelled event, as detailed in the Te Awa Structure Plan – Three Waters report. Response to Design Outcome 15 The site development includes provision for filling, where required, to meet the specified minimum boundary levels, and the development will therefore comply with the requirements of this Design Outcome.
14
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Assessment of Environmental Effects
Design Outcome 16
Specifies the requirement for three wastewater pumping stations to accompany a reticulated pipe network to address wastewater servicing requirements of the Te Awa Development Area. This Design Outcome is supported by Appendix 29E (to the City of Napier District Plan) Te Awa Structure Plan – Wastewater Network. Response to Design Outcome 16 The proposed wastewater servicing is summarised in the accompanying Servicing Report and Proposed Sewer Layout drawing. The 19 larger sized lots of Stage 1A, 1B and 1C fronting Eriksen Road will benefit from gravity fed extension to the Council’s existing wastewater infrastructure on the eastern side of Eriksen Road. Wastewater servicing of the remainder of the development will be dependent on two wastewater pumping stations that will be located within the western swale land and provided as necessitated by progression of the staged development. These pumping stations are additional to those identified as necessary within the Structure Plan documents. The piped infrastructure within the development will be vested in Council and served by easements in gross. The proposed wastewater infrastructure will suitably service the site and is generally compliant with the aims of Design Outcome 15.
Design Outcome 17
Specifies design requirements for the formation of a water supply network throughout the Te Awa Development Area. Response to Design Outcome 17 The proposed potable water servicing is summarised in the accompanying Servicing Report and Proposed Water Layout drawing. Water supply will be drawn from the existing Council water main in Eriksen Road. As it is understood that the Council are extending the existing water main, this will provide the opportunity for a second connection to the development through the corridor of the northern access to the site. The detailed design of the water infrastructure within the site will meet Council’s requirements and this will comply with the Design Outcome.
Design Outcome 18
Requires that Developers meet the fair and reasonable costs towards the provision of infrastructure services required to facilitate the conversion of the area from rural to residential use and recognises that this can be through a combination of both physical works and financial 15
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Assessment of Environmental Effects
contributions. This Design Outcome is linked to the schedule of financial contributions provided at Chapter 65 of the City of Napier District Plan. Response to Design Outcome 18 The majority of the infrastructure work required for the development, including the improvements to the Eriksen Road frontage, will be constructed by the Applicant. The balance of financial contribution, including consideration of land vested in Council as drainage reserve, is anticipated to be resolved through the consideration and determination of the resource consent application. Summary of Structure Plan Compliance The proposed residential development is consistent with the Main Residential zoning of the Te Awa Development Area that arose from the Te Awa Structure Plan and the form of development, in providing smaller lot sizes of the scheme best utilises the greenfield residential land resource and the required physical infrastructure resource. The form of development offsets the loss of substantial site area to the formation of a 40m wide swale and public parkland area to the western and southern site boundaries that will serve the wider residential area, with a resulting gross residential density of 13.5d/ha and net density of 23 d/ha within a suburban layout that minimises backland development. The site is within the stage 5 development area of the Te Awa Structure Plan and the terms of the staging framework provided at Design Outcome 4 envisage this area not being developed until 70% of the potential development of preceding stages has obtained s224(c) certification. As no development within the preceding stages of the Te Awa Structure Plan has proceeded since being enabled in 2012, the development of the site is inconsistent with this aspect of the overall planning for the Te Awa Development Area. In accordance with Design Outcome 5, this staging inconsistency elevates the resource consent to discretionary activity status. While being promoted in advance of the planned Te Awa Structure Plan staging, all required physical infrastructure for the site can be readily provided without creating an unreasonable burden on the Council or on other Te Awa Development Area land. The inconsistency of the development against the planned staging of the Te Awa Structure Plan does not, therefore, result in any adverse effects or any implications for future Structure Plan development on other sites. As detailed, all required infrastructure can be readily provided to meet Council’s expectations to suitably service the development. While the development will not be public, with private ownership of the internal access driveway network and controlled entrance gates, public access will be provided through the 40m wide drain corridor to the western and southern site boundaries, thereby suitably providing for an off road north-south corridor for pedestrians and cyclists. Easements in gross will be utilised to address access to infrastructure within the development. The proposed scheme is therefore generally compliant with the long term residential development expectations of the Te Awa Structure Plan, albeit that the site is being promoted ahead of the planned development staging as a consequence of an absence to date of structure plan implementation. 16
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Assessment of Environmental Effects
Main Residential Zone As detailed in the preceding assessment of the development against the provisions of the Te Awa Structure Plan, the proposed development is being forwarded out of sequence with the defined staging strategy of the Te Awa Structure Plan. This deviation from the detail of the Te Awa Structure Plan results in classification of the activity as a discretionary activity through the provisions of Rule 5.13 of the City of Napier District Plan. As apparent in the below Rule table, residential activity is permitted within the zone and, were it not for the sequencing, the development would have otherwise been classified as a controlled or restricted discretionary activity, dependant on compliance with all specified Conditions. Chapter 5 Main Residential Zone Rule Table Rule
Land use activities
Activity status
5.2
Residential Activities 1. Any residential activity is a permitted activity provided that: a) It complies in all respects with the relevant conditions in the Main Residential Zone activity table and condition table.
Permitted
5.10
Land Development (including Subdivision, but excluding Multi Unit development for Commercial and Industrial Activities) 1. Land development, including subdivision but excluding multi unit development for commercial and industrial activities, is a controlled activity provided that: a) It complies in all respects with the standards and terms specified in Chapter 66 (Volume II) of this Plan. b) It complies in all respects with the relevant conditions in the Main Residential Zone Activity Table and Condition Table. c) It is assessed according to the matters in Chapter 66 (Volume II) over which the Council has reserved its control. 2. Applications for resource consent will not be publicly notified in respect of land development (including subdivision) that fully complies with the standards and terms, and notice of applications need not be served.
Controlled
5.12
Land Uses Not Complying With Conditions 1. Any subdivision, use or development of land referred to in Rules 5.2 to 5.11 that does not comply with all of the relevant conditions in the Main Residential Zone activity table and condition table is a restricted discretionary activity, unless stated by a rule elsewhere in this Chapter.
Restricted Discretionary
5.13
Discretionary Activities 1. The following land uses are discretionary activities. A resource consent application must be made and consent may be declined or granted with or without conditions. The Council will have regard to the objectives and policies of this Plan and the assessment criteria in Chapter 12. The Council’s discretion is unrestricted. a) A supplementary unit that does not comply with all the relevant conditions. b) Retirement complexes. c) Any non-residential activity not stated by a rule elsewhere in this Chapter. d) Use of explosives, other than for temporary military training purposes. e) The establishment of any noise sensitive activity within the Airport Noise Boundary as shown on Planning Map G5 or Appendix 27 and 27A.
Discretionary
17
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Assessment of Environmental Effects
f) Any business of prostitution (including those that do not comply with all of the relevant conditions as a Home Occupation). g) Any land use that does not comply with the conditions in Rule 5.36 (Development of Land within Structure Plan Areas).
While the development is classified as a discretionary activity due to the sequencing of development within the Te Awa Structure Plan, the following table provides an assessment of compliance against the relevant conditions of the Main Residential Zone to confirm the otherwise generally compliant nature of the development, with the exception of the retention of the internal access network as private rather than this being vested in Council as road (to enable creation of a gated community) and the site coverage on smaller lots. These condition infringements would have otherwise resulted in classification as a restricted discretionary activity. Chapter 5 Main Residential Zone Condition Compliance Table: Proposed
Compliance
5.15 Density There is no density condition; subject to compliance with the other conditions for all land uses elsewhere in the Main Residential Zone activity table and condition table.
Condition requirement
The net density of development (excluding land lost to stormwater swale, parks and roads) is one dwelling per 418m2 of site area. This density is below the maximum one dwelling per 350m2 density that triggers the concept plan requirement.
Yes
5.16 Yards a) Front Yards i) Any part of a building must not be erected closer than 3 metres to the road boundary, except that:
The 19 lots of Stage 1 fronting Eriksen Road will be required to accord with the front boundary standard. However, as the internal access network will not be vested in Council as road, none of the lots of the residential village will have a front boundary (as defined by the City of Napier District Plan). The Development will exceed the 40% minimum landscaping requirement for the de facto front yards. The side yard standard does not specifically provide for terrace or semi detached housing, with no exemption provided within the condition for this form of development. Accordingly, while detached dwellings will all comply with the specified setback requirements for other yards, the duplex units will not. However, as this is part of a planned form of development within single ownership, the “with written approval of adjacent landowner” exclusion is applicable exempting the duplex unit infringement of side yard from requiring resource consent.
Yes
Eaves, fascias, gutters, down pipes, chimneys and flues may encroach on the front yard by a distance of up to 1m measured horizontally. Any part of a garage/carport must not be erected closer than 5m to the road boundary, so as to provide a vehicle standing bay. b) Front Yard Landscaping On all sites other than rear sites, 40% of the front yard must comprise landscaped permeable surface. c) Other Yards i) Any part of a building (including eaves and guttering) must not be erected closer than 1 metre to a side or rear site boundary. ii) Any part of a building, fence or permanently fixed structure must not be erected closer than 6 metres from the top of the bank of any watercourse or open drain.
18
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Assessment of Environmental Effects
5.17 Height a) Any part of a building or structure must not exceed 8 metres in height,
The single storey dwellings throughout the development will not exceed the 8m height limit of this condition.
Yes
5.18 Height in Relation to Boundary a) Any part of a building or structure, must not project beyond a building envelope constructed by drawing planes along all parts of all site boundaries. The planes must commence 3.0 metres above ground level at the site boundary and must be inclined to the horizontal at an angle of 45 degrees. b) Provided that: i) In relation to multi-unit development, the building envelope must be constructed by drawing planes along all parts of all building site boundaries and must commence at the building site boundary. ii) The height in relation to boundary control does not apply to the length of common wall between two or more attached buildings. iii) Where the site abuts an entrance strip or access lot, the furthest boundary of the entrance strip or access lot may be deemed to be the site boundary for the purpose of applying the height in relation to boundary control. iv) No account must be taken of aerials, lines, support structures, solar heating devices, air conditioning units and similar structures housing electronic or mechanical equipment or chimneys, no more than 1 metre wide in any horizontal direction and less than 2.5 metres in height beyond the building envelope.
The detached dwellings will all readily comply with this standard and the party wall of the duplex units, which would otherwise infringe the condition, is subject to the exemption clause of 5.18 b) ii).
Yes
5.19 Site Coverage a) Site coverage (measured from gross building area) must not exceed 50% of the net site area.
The standard format of both the detached and duplex dwellings to be constructed within the village will have a roof area of 186m2. The lots below 372m2 in area will infringe the 50% site coverage standard.
No
5.20 Landscaped Area All sites must have a landscaped area not less than 30% of the net site area.
Excluding the total building area and hard surfaced area of the site, individual lot development will retain a landscaped area exceeding the 30% requirement of the Condition.
Yes
5.21 Open Space a) Each dwelling unit must have an amount of open space on the building site of not less than 50% of the gross floor area of all buildings on the site, except that a minimum of 50m2 per dwelling unit must be provided. b) Where there is no garage or carport proposed or existing on the site, the gross floor area must include a notional garage of 18.5m2 for each dwelling unit on the site. c) The maximum area of open space required to be provided on a building site is 100m2 per dwelling unit. d) Provided that: i) Open space may comprise of more than one area.
It is intended that the development of all lots will comply with the open space standard and this will be worked through at the time of layout refinement at the detailed design stage and confirmed through detailed plans intended to be provided by condition.
Yes
19
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Assessment of Environmental Effects
ii) Open space may take the form of a deck or terrace but must be unobstructed by buildings, parking spaces, or vehicle manoeuvring areas. iii) Open space must be directly accessible from the dwelling unit to which it relates. iv) The open space must: Include at least one area capable of containing a 6m diameter circle; and Have a minimum dimension of 3m measured at right angles to the perimeter of the area. 5.22 Noise 1. The following noise conditions shall apply to all land uses (including noise from fixed plants such as air conditioning units and other similar devices), other than those exempted in 57.9: a) The following noise limits must not be exceeded at any point beyond the site boundary, except where expressly provided for elsewhere in this Plan: Control Hours Noise Level 0700 to 1900 hours 50 dB LAeq (15 min) 1900 to 2200 hours 45 dB LAeq (15 min) 2200 to 0700 hours 40 dB LAeq (15 min) 2200 to 0700 hours 70 dB LAFmax b) All land uses must comply in all respects with the relevant conditions in Chapter 57 (Noise) of this Plan. 2. The following acoustic insulation conditions shall apply to all new noise sensitive activities within the State Highway Noise Boundary and/or Willowbank Noise Boundary: a) Where any building used for a noise sensitive activity is to be located within the State Highway Noise Boundary and/or Willowbank Noise Boundary as shown on the planning maps: (i) The habitable room within the noise sensitive activity shall achieve a minimum External Sound Insulation Level of the building envelope of Dtr,2m,nTw + Ctr>30 dB for outside walls of any habitable rooms. (ii) Where it is necessary to have windows closed to achieve the acoustic design requirements, an alternative ventilation system shall be provided. Any such ventilation system shall be designed to satisfy the requirements of the Building Code and achieve a level of no more than NC30 in any habitable room. b) The standard in (a) above does not apply to noise sensitive activities which can comply with the following: (i) The habitable room within the noise sensitive activity is greater than 80 metres from the edge of the nearest traffic lane where the posted speed limit is at least 70km/hour; or (ii) Noise screening (such as a noise barrier fence) is constructed so that noise levels measured at the location of the building housing the noise sensitive activity, do not exceed 55 dB LAeq (24hour) outdoors.
The residential activity will not exceed the noise standards.
Yes
Residential development of lots 56 – 81 will be within the Willowbank Avenue noise boundary. In accordance with the requirements of Condition 5.22, details of acoustic insulation to meet the standard will be provided with the building consent application for the subject dwellings.
20
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Assessment of Environmental Effects
c) An acoustic design report must be provided to the Council prior to any building consent being granted or where no building consent is required, prior to the commencement of the use. The acoustic design report must be prepared by a person qualified and experienced in acoustics. The report is to indicate the means by which the noise limits specified in this standard will be complied with and is to contain a certificate by its author that the means given therein will be adequate to ensure compliance with the acoustic design requirements specified in this standard. d) Prior to any person requesting a Certificate of Compliance, an acoustic design certificate prepared by a person qualified and experienced in acoustics must be supplied, verifying compliance with the standards in (a) above. 5.23 Light Spill a) Between the hours of 2200 and 0700 the following day, any outdoor lighting must not cause an added illuminance in excess of 10 lux, measured horizontally or vertically as an average (at any window of a habitable space within a building located on any other site). b) The outdoor lighting must be so selected, located aimed, adjusted, screened and maintained to ensure that glare resulting from the lighting does not cause significant adverse effects on the occupants of residential activities, road users or aircraft.
The internal access driveways will be furnished with appropriate street lighting, which will comply with the condition requirements.
Yes
5.24 Vibration Land uses must not generate any vibration that causes an unreasonable adverse effect on any adjacent land use.
The activity will not generate vibration that would cause an adverse effect on neighbouring properties.
Yes
5.25 Fencing Any fence erected within front, side and rear yards must not exceed 2 metres in height.
New fencing erected as part of the development will not exceed 2m in height.
Yes
5.26 Aerials, Lines and Support Structures & Trees a) Aerials, lines or support structures must not exceed 12 metres in height. b) Aerials, lines or support structures, and trees must not exceed the Airport Height Control Designation in Appendix 7, except where located in a Surface Penetration Area, where the maximum height shall not exceed 12 metres. e) Dish antenna must not exceed 1.2m in diameter.
External aerials required for domestic purposes will be limited to standard television and will not exceed 12m in height and will accord with all other specified requirements.
Yes
5.27 Earthworks The relevant provisions of Chapter 52A (Earthworks) of this Plan must be complied with.
As the earthworks required for site formation are associated with a scheme of subdivision, the earthworks are exempted from the controls of Chapter 52A by Rule 52A.8 a).
Yes
5.28 Heritage The relevant provisions of Chapter 56 (Heritage) of this Plan must be complied with.
The proposal does not affect built or archaeological heritage assets.
Yes
5.29 Signs The relevant provisions of Chapter 58 (Signs) of this Plan must be complied with.
No signs are application.
Yes
proposed
by
this
21
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Assessment of Environmental Effects
5.30 Trees The relevant provisions of Chapter 60 (Trees) of this Plan must be complied with.
The proposed development does not affect a notable tree.
Yes
5.31 Transport The relevant provisions of Chapter 61 (Transport) of this Plan must be complied with.
The proposal generally complies with these provisions, as separately demonstrated elsewhere in this report. Non complying matters generate consenting requirements as specified by the rule structure.
Yes
5.32 Natural Hazards The relevant provisions of Chapter 62 (Natural Hazards) of this Plan must be complied with.
The site is subject to amplification and liquefaction hazards that are widespread across the urban area of Napier and are accepted to be adequately addressed through compliance with Building Act provisions. Site specific geotechnical testing including nine CPT has been undertaken to confirm site conditions and the view that the site is geotechnically suitable for the development, and that the liquefaction risk can be adequately mitigated through detailed shallow foundation design.
Yes
5.33 Hazardous Substances The relevant provisions of Chapter 63 (Hazardous Substances) of this Plan must be complied with.
The proposal does hazardous substances.
involve
Yes
5.34 Activities on the Surface of Water The relevant provisions of Chapter 62A (Activities on the Surface of Water) of this Plan must be complied with.
The development is not on the surface of a water body.
Yes
5.35 Contaminated Sites The relevant provisions of Chapter 64 (Contaminated Sites) of this Plan must be complied with.
A detailed site investigation has been completed for the site in recognition of the potential for the previous productive activities to have resulted in residual land contamination. The investigation did not identify any contamination within the site.
Yes
5.36 Financial Contributions The relevant provisions of Chapter 65 (Financial Contributions) of this Plan must be complied with.
The specific level of contribution will be the subject of further assessment to determine the extent of infrastructure work completed by the Developer as a credit against the baseline financial contribution calculation.
Yes
5.37 Code of Practice for Subdivision Land Development The relevant provisions of Chapter 66 (Volume II - Code of Practice for Subdivision and Land Development) must be complied with.
The development generally accords with the Council’s Code requirements albeit that this will be addressed at detailed design stage. However, as a gated development, the internal access network will not be vested as road, contrary to the Code standard, and the southern vehicle crossing entering the site exceeds the maximum width allowance.
No
5.38 Development of Land within Structure Plan Areas
As detailed in the preceding section of this report, the development is generally compliant with the long term aspirations
No
not
22
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Assessment of Environmental Effects
The relevant provisions of any Structure Plan must be complied with.
of the Te Awa Structure Plan, but is inconsistent with the proposed staging of the Structure Plan.
District Wide Activities Earthworks The City of Napier District Plan defines earthworks as meaning: the disturbance of land by moving, placing or replacing earth, or by excavation or cutting; filling or backfilling and the removal of or importation of earth (including topsoil) to and from any site, but does not include tilling or cultivating of soil and harvesting and maintaining of crops for land based primary production. The volume of earthworks is the sum of both cut and fill operations.
Required site formation earthworks comprise the initial stripping and stockpiling of around 40,000m3 of topsoil, the excavation of around 33,000m3 required for the formation of the stormwater swale to the western and southern site boundaries, and the filling of isolated areas of low lying land within the site by up to 600mm to meet the RL 11.28m development level required by the Te Awa Structure Plan Three Waters Report. The filling of low spots across the site will utilise material cut from the swale formation and imported river silt fill of approximately 7,000m 3. Once site formation has been completed, the stockpiled topsoil will be utilised for final site formation, with any excess material exported from the site. It is envisaged that an earthworks and silt management plan and wider construction management plan will be submitted prior to commencement of development, and conditions of consent are welcomed in this respect. The City of Napier District Plan seeks to address the environmental effects that can arise from earthworks land disturbance or alteration. Controls are imposed by the City of Napier District Plan to enable earthworks to be undertaken in a manner that addresses potential and actual adverse effects. However, earthworks associated with subdivision are specifically exempted from the controls of Chapter 52A by Rule 52A8 a). This Rule States: 52A.8 Earthworks exempted from Earthworks Provisions 1. Earthworks will be considered a permitted activity and do not have to comply with the relevant conditions in the Earthworks Activity Table, provided that they are: a) Earthworks assessed with any subdivision consent and/or designations.
Assessment and required control of earthworks activity is therefore incorporated into the overall subdivision assessment and as a permitted activity, no resource consent is required for this aspect of the development. Network Utility Operations Chapter 53 of the City of Napier District Plan provides permitted development allowances and other activity classifications for the formation and maintenance of network utility operations. While the stormwater swale to the western and southern site boundaries will form part of a wider stormwater network utility, as the formation of this swale is proposed by the Developer and not 23
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Assessment of Environmental Effects
the applicable network utility operator (Council), it is outside of the definition of a Network Utility Operation (which is specifically linked to the undertaking of the activity by a Network Utility Operator) and therefore not within the scope of control of the Chapter 53 provisions. Noise The City of Napier District Plan recognises that the acoustic environment throughout Napier varies from the low background noise environment of the rural areas to the elevated noise environments of the urban areas. The District Plan recognises that the two main sources of noise generation are road traffic and industrial and commercial activity. In addressing the varying noise environment and the effects of noise generation on different land use activities, the City of Napier District Plan provides a management regime to protect the amenity of the community while providing for operation of noise generating activities in a practical environment. The City of Napier District Plan specifies Conditions for development with permitted and restricted discretionary status for activities complaint and non-compliant with these provisions pursuant to Rules 57.8 and 57.10, and a specified set of exemptions, as detailed in the following table. Chapter 57 Noise Rule Table Rule
Activity
Activity Status
Rule 57.8
Any noise created by any activity that complies with all relevant conditions. Any noise created that complies with all of the relevant conditions and standards within the Noise Condition Table are permitted activities.
Permitted
Rule 57.9
Exemptions from Maximum Noise Limits The noise conditions and vibration conditions in any part of the Plan, unless specifically stated, will not apply to the following, and are therefore considered permitted activities: h) To construction noise Construction noise in any zone shall not exceed the recommended limits in, and shall be measured in accordance with the provisions of NZ Standard 6803:1999 Acoustics – Construction Noise “Measurement and Assessment of Noise from Construction, Maintenance and Demolition Works”.
Permitted
Rule 57.10
Any noise not complying with conditions Any noise referred to in Rule 57.8 that does not comply with all of the relevant conditions in the Noise Activity Table and Condition Table is a restricted discretionary activity, unless stated by a rule elsewhere in this Chapter.
Restricted Discretionary
Assessment against the relevant Conditions is provided in the following table. Chapter 57 Noise Condition Compliance Table: Condition Requirement
Proposed
Compliance
57.13 Measurement and Assessment of Noise Unless stated by a rule or standard elsewhere in this Plan, noise shall be measured in accordance with New Zealand Standard 6801:2008 Acoustics - Measurement of Environmental Sound and assessed in accordance with New Zealand Standard 6802:2008 Acoustics Environmental Noise.
Assessment format is noted.
Yes
24
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Assessment of Environmental Effects
57.14 Construction Noise The following construction noise conditions shall apply to all land uses: a) Any noise arising from construction, maintenance and demolition work in any zone: i) Must comply with New Zealand Standard NZS6803:1999 Acoustics: Construction Noise. b) Construction noise must be measured and assessed in accordance with New Zealand Standard NZS6803:1999 Acoustics: Construction Noise.
Construction noise will accord with the specified limits.
Yes
As the development is compliant with the specified noise standards, it is classified as a Permitted Activity by Rule 57.8 of the City of Napier District Plan. Transport The City of Napier District Plan seeks to manage the transport related effects of development through consideration of traffic generation and the provision of convenient and safe access, parking, and loading with the goal of achieving an efficient traffic network. The City of Napier District Plan defines a road hierarchy for the District, which outlines the purpose of each road and relates land use and access provision to ensure safe and efficient operation of the road network. The City of Napier District Plan also specifies General and Specific Performance Standards and Terms for parking, loading and access of new development, with Permitted and Restricted Discretionary status for activities complaint and non-compliant with these provisions pursuant to Rules 61.7 and 61.9 with elevation to Discretionary status for activities already elevated to Discretionary by the Zone Rules, as detailed in the below table. As the site is zoned for medium density residential development in accordance with the density provisions of the Te Awa Structure Plan, the traffic generation arising from compliant development has been anticipated by the Council. As detailed previously in this report, the internal access network will not be vested in the Council as road and will be retained as private internal driveways that access the Council’s road network from two vehicle crossings to Eriksen Road. The 19 lots fronting Eriksen Road will all be directly accessed from Eriksen Road. Chapter 57 Noise Rule Table Rule
Land Use Activity
Activity Status
61.7
Permitted Activities Any land use that is a permitted activity in accordance with the rules of the respective zone is a permitted activity provided that it complies in all respects with the relevant conditions of the activity table and condition table of this Chapter and the respective zone.
Permitted
61.9
Land Uses Not Complying With Conditions Any subdivision, use or development of land referred to in rules 61.7 and 61.8 that does not comply with all of the relevant conditions in the Transport Activity Table and Condition Table is a restricted discretionary activity, unless stated by a rule elsewhere in this Plan.
Restricted Discretionary
61.11
Discretionary Activities
Discretionary
25
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Assessment of Environmental Effects
The following land uses are discretionary activities. A resource consent application must be made and consent may be declined or granted with or without conditions. The Council will have regard to the objectives and policies of this Plan and the relevant assessment criteria elsewhere in this Plan. The Council’s discretion is unrestricted. a) Any land use that is a discretionary activity in accordance with the rules of the respective zone.
Assessment against the relevant General and Specific Performance Standards and Terms for Transport and Parking is provided in the following table. Chapter 61 Transport Condition Compliance Table: Condition Requirement
Proposed
Compliance
61.13 General Subject to Section 10 of the Act, where a building is constructed, substantially reconstructed, altered or added to, or where there is a change in the use of any land or building which has a different requirement for carparking or loading spaces under this Rule Table, provision in accordance with this Condition Table shall be made for the following: a) The parking of vehicles. b) The loading and unloading of goods where the site is used for the manufacture, servicing, storage, sale or hire of goods or materials. c) Physical and legal vehicular access from a formed legal road. d) The parking of bicycles e) The provision of bicycle end of journey facilities
As detailed in subsequent rows.
Yes
61.14A Vehicle Parking Spaces The following minimum on-site vehicle parking space conditions, unless stated by a rule elsewhere in this Plan shall be complied with: Dwelling unit, including an apartment, flat, supplementary unit: 1 vehicle parking space per unit, plus one additional vehicle parking space clear of the road between the entrance to any notional garage, garage, or carport and the road frontage.
Each dwelling will include a double garage capable of accommodating two vehicles. A vehicle standing bay will be provided to the property frontage.
Yes
61.14B Alternative Modes of Travel The following minimum on-site bicycle parking space conditions and end of bicycle journey facilities, unless stated by a rule elsewhere in this Plan shall be complied with: Bicycle Spaces. (applicable where on-site car parking is required): 1 bicycle stand per 5 car park spaces. Bicycle End of Journey Facilities: Commercial or Industrial activities having more than 15 full time equivalent staff members shall provide one male and one female shower and changing facilities for staff to encourage the use of alternative transport modes.
The requirements of this condition are not applicable to private residential development. It is however, noted that cycles can be readily accommodated within each resulting property.
Yes
26
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Assessment of Environmental Effects
61.14C Exemptions from the Above On-Site Parking Requirements 1. For sites located in the 100% Parking Exemption Area identified in Appendix 24 of this Plan, an exemption of 100% from the above standards for on-site parking standards shall apply. 2. For sites located in the 50% Parking Exemption Area identified in Appendix 24 of this Plan, an exemption of 50% from the above onsite standards shall apply.
The site is beyond the exemption zone.
N/A
61.15 Loading Spaces The following loading space conditions shall apply to all land uses involving on-site manufacturing, servicing, storage, hire or sale of goods or materials including retail activities, office accommodation, travellers accommodation, freight and transport depots, warehouses:
The requirements of this condition are not applicable to private residential development.
N/A
61.16 Residential Activities 1. All residential activities shall comply with the following, unless stated by a rule elsewhere in this Plan: a) Each dwelling unit must provide a notional garage, with vehicular access, with minimum dimensions of 5.5 metres (length) by 3 metres (width). These dimensions are clear interior dimensions for a garage and not an overall exterior dimension.� b) An additional vehicle parking space must be provided on site between the entrance to any notional garage, garage or carport and the road frontage, or separately adjacent thereto. This space must have minimum dimensions of 5 metres (length) by 2.5 metres (width). c) All vehicle movement paths must be designed using the New Zealand 99 percentile tracking curve as in Appendix 17. d) Vehicle manoeuvring must be provided on the site as follows: i) On all sites which have direct access to an Arterial Road or State Highway. ii) On all rural sites. iii) All manoeuvring areas must be provided and maintained in accordance with Appendices 17 and 18. e) The access drive or aisle from the vehicular entrance to vehicular parking spaces must have a gradient not exceeding 1 in 4. f) The minimum accessway width must be clear of eaves unless there is a height clearance of 4.2 metres above the driveway. g) The minimum accessway width and manoeuvring provisions, must comply with Chapter 66 (Volume II) C5.7.1 in the Code of Practice for Subdivision and Land Development.�
Internally accessed double garages are provided for all proposed residential units measuring 5.8m x 5.8m. This provides internal space for a 5.5m x 3.0m parking space as required and suitable area for a second 5.5m x 2.8m space (albeit that both spaces can share the separation space between parked vehicles for access). Vehicle standing spaces are accommodated to the front of each garage. No complicated manoeuvring is required to access the sites. The formed site will be relatively flat and there will be no notable grade between the internal access drive and car parking spaces. The width of access lot 417 will exceed the 3.0m width requirement.
Yes
61.17 Non-Residential Activities All non-residential activities, (including Temporary Activities requiring access from a State Highway), shall
The requirements of this condition are not applicable to private residential development.
N/A
27
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Assessment of Environmental Effects
comply with the following parking access provisions, unless stated by a rule elsewhere in this Chapter: 61.18 Vehicle Crossings All subdivision, use or development of land shall comply with the following vehicle crossing condition: a) Before the construction of a vehicle crossing, permission must be obtained from the Council and all vehicle crossings must be constructed in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 66 (Volume II - Code of Practice for Subdivision and Land Development). Construction details of vehicle crossings may be obtained from the Napier City Council. b) Minimum Distance for a new Vehicle Access from Rail Level Crossings i) Any new vehicle crossings shall be a minimum of 30m from any railway level crossing.
Individual; vehicle crossings are proposed for each of the 19 lots fronting Eriksen Road. As the internal access network will be private, the two entrances to the main village are vehicle crossings. The Council’s Code specifies a maximum vehicle crossing width of 6m, albeit that the Council’s Code states that Council may approve wider vehicle crossings where special circumstances exist. While the 6m wide northern vehicle crossing complies with the Code, the 12.5m wide southern crossing exceeds the maximum limit.
No
61.19 Right Of Ways The following condition shall apply to all land uses where access to a site is provided by a right of way from a road: a) Sufficient manoeuvring space must be provided either wholly within the site or where right-of-ways are shared by 2 or 3 dwelling units, provision must be made for manoeuvring within each section or within the right-ofway, so that no reverse manoeuvring onto or off the road is necessary. b) Where right-of-ways are shared by 4 or more dwelling units, the right-of-way must incorporate a specifically designed turning head.
Access lot 417 serves two properties and will exceed the 3.0m width. The proposed development of lots 108 and 118 provides adequate manoeuvring flexibility to readily enable forward entry and exit.
Yes
61.20 Offers of Cash in Lieu of Parking The provision of vehicle parking may not be possible or desirable for every development. The Council will consider offers of cash in lieu of parking in the following circumstances: a) Where the provision of vehicle parking will have a negative impact on a heritage building identified in Chapter 56, or Advocacy Areas identified on the planning maps. b) Where the provision of vehicle parking would alter the traditional streetscape of the area, for example: where there is a continuity of zero lot lines.
The development complies with the specified car parking requirements.
N/A
As the internal access network will not be vested in Council, the two accesses to the site from Eriksen Road are technically vehicles crossings entering the site. The southern crossing will exceed the maximum 6m width for vehicle crossings, thereby infringing Condition 61.18. The infringement of Condition 61.18 results in classification as a restricted discretionary activity by Rule 61.9. However, as the development is classified as a discretionary activity by the Main Residential Zone Rules, Rule 61.11 elevates the transport matters to discretionary activity status.
28
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Assessment of Environmental Effects
Natural Hazards In recognition of the exposure to Natural Hazards of land throughout the City, the City of Napier District Plan seeks to manage new development to best avoid, remedy or mitigate the risk of natural hazards. The plan specifically identifies coastal hazard, earthquake hazard, flooding hazard, and slippage/hill erosion hazard. The site is subject to an earthquake liquification hazard but not a coastal, river flood or slippage hazard. A preliminary geotechnical report has confirmed that suitable foundations can be designed for the building and that the risk of liquefaction can be addressed through such design. The Rule set for Natural Hazards relates to coastal and river flood hazard and is therefore not applicable to this scheme. Financial Contributions Chapter 65 of the City of Napier District Plan provides a series of specified Conditions that link to land development, requiring the payment of financial contributions with new development to ensure that the impact of development on infrastructure is suitably offset. The appropriate level of financial contribution to reasonably offset the impact of the development on physical and social infrastructure is intended to be the subject of further discussion during the application to ensure that all aspects of the Developer works and land contribution is incorporated into consideration.
5.0
NESCS Provisions
The 2011 National Environmental Standard for Assessing and Managing Contaminants in Soil to Protect Human Health (NESCS) imposes a nationally consistent regulatory framework to the identification, assessment and reporting of sites at the time of development that are currently in use for, or are known or likely to have been in previous uses involving activities identified on the Hazardous Industries and Activities List (HAIL). As the site was previously utilised for commercial agricultural and horticultural activities, there is potential for related residual elevated contaminant levels within the site soils. The development of the site will include subdivision, substantial soil disturbance and a resulting change of use. Accordingly, the development is subject to the investigation and reporting requirements of the NESCS. A detailed site investigation has been completed to investigate site contamination and this is provided at Appendix E. The detailed site investigation identified isolated areas of low level elevated contaminant levels within the site, but confirmed overall compliance with the relevant soil contaminant standards for residential use. As a detailed site investigation has been undertaken to confirm compliance of the development with specified soil contaminant standards, Regulation 9 of the 2011 NESCS classifies the development as a controlled activity. 29
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Assessment of Environmental Effects
6.0
APPLICATION STATUS SUMMARY
The assessment against the relevant planning framework of the City of Napier District Plan and the 2011 NESCS results in the following activity classifications for the consenting matters:
Staged Subdivision to form 187 residential lots with associated earthworks, access formation and construction of stormwater swale within Te Awa Structure Plan area in advance of structure plan staging. Staged Multi Unit Consent relating to the construction of stages 2 – 9 of the development. Access Related Code of Practice Infringements resulting from the construction of a vehicle crossing exceeding 6m width and retention of internal vehicle access as private rather than vested roads. Subdivision, land disturbance and change of use of a HAIL site in the presence of a detailed site investigation confirming soil contaminant standard compliance.
Pursuant to the established principle of bundling of consent matters within an application, the application falls to be assessed against the highest order activity classification within the consenting matters. Accordingly, the development is classified as a Discretionary Activity.
7.0
STATUTORY CONSIDERATIONS
The following sections of the Resource Management Act are applicable to the consideration of this application for resource consent: Section 104 Consideration of Applications When considering an application for resource consent and any submissions received, the Council as consent authority must, subject to Part 2, have regard to – Section 104(1) (a)
any actual and potential effects on the environment of allowing the activity; and
(ab)
any measure proposed or agreed to by the applicant for the purpose of ensuring positive effects on the environment to offset or compensate for any adverse effects on the environment that will or may result from allowing the activity; and
(b)
any relevant provisions of – (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi)
a national environmental standard: other regulations: a national policy statement: a New Zealand coastal policy statement: a regional policy statement or proposed regional policy statement: a plan or proposed plan; and
30
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Assessment of Environmental Effects
(c) any other matter the consent authority considers relevant and reasonably necessary to determine the application. Section 104(2) When forming an opinion for the purposes of subsection (1)(a), a consent authority may disregard an adverse effect of the activity on the environment if the plan permits an activity with that effect.
Section 104B Determination of Applications Discretionary or Non-Complying Activities After considering an application for a resource consent for a discretionary activity or non-complying activity, a consent authority— (a) may grant or refuse the application; and (b) if it grants the application, may impose conditions under section 108.
Part 2 Matters Section 104 is subject to Part 2 (Sections 5-8) of the Act, which establishes the purposes and principles of the Act. In accordance with the direction of s 104(1) of the Act, these purposes and principles are relevant to the consideration of a resource consent application. These sections state: 5. Purpose (1)
The purpose of this Act is to promote the sustainable management of natural and physical resources.
(2)
In this Act, “sustainable management” means managing the use, development, and protection of natural and physical resources in a way, or at a rate, which enables people and communities to provide for their social, economic, and cultural well-being and for their health and safety while – (a) (b) (c)
Sustaining the potential of natural and physical resources (excluding minerals) to meet the reasonably foreseeable needs of future generations; and Safeguarding the life-supporting capacity of air, water, soil, and ecosystems; and Avoiding, remedying, or mitigating any adverse effects of activities on the environment.
6. Matters of national importance In achieving the purpose of this Act, all persons exercising functions and powers under it, in relation to managing the use, development, and protection of natural and physical resources, shall recognize and provide for the following matters of national importance: (a) (b) (c) (d)
The preservation of the natural character of the coastal environment (including the coastal marine area), wetlands, and lakes and rivers and their margins, and the protection of them from inappropriate subdivision, use, and development: The protection of outstanding natural features and landscapes from inappropriate subdivision, use, and development: The protection of areas of significant indigenous vegetation and significant habitats of indigenous fauna: The maintenance and enhancement of public access to and along the coastal marine area, lakes, and rivers:
31
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Assessment of Environmental Effects
(e) (f) (g) (h)
The relationship of Maori and their culture and traditions with their ancestral lands, water, sites, waahi tapu, and other taonga. The protection of historic heritage from inappropriate subdivision, use, and development. The protection of recognised customary activities. The management of significant risks from natural hazards.
7. Other matters In achieving the purpose of this Act, all persons exercising functions and powers under it, in relation to managing the use, development, and protection of natural and physical resources, shall have particular regard to – (a) kaitiakitanga: (aa) the ethic of stewardship: (b) the efficient use and development of natural and physical resources: (ba) the efficiency of the end use of energy: (c) the maintenance and enhancement of amenity values: (d) intrinsic values of ecosystems: (e) [Repealed] (f) maintenance and enhancement of the quality of the environment: (g) any finite characteristics of natural and physical resources: (h) the protection of the habitat of trout and salmon: (i) the effects of climate change: (j) the benefits to be derived from the use and development of renewable energy 8. Treaty of Waitangi In achieving the purpose of this Act, all persons exercising functions and powers under it, in relation to managing the use, development, and protection of natural and physical resources, shall take into account the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi (Te Tiriti O Waitangi).
Section 176 of Resource Management Act - Effect of Designation While the swale to the western and southern site boundaries is entirely consistent with the intent of the City of Napier District Plan designations on the land, as it is being proposed and constructed by the Developer, it is not in strict accordance with the designations and the provisions of s176, as these specifically provide for the swale to be constructed by the designating authority (Napier City Council). S176 states: (1)
If a designation is included in a district plan, then— (a) section 9(3) does not apply to a public work or project or work undertaken by a requiring authority under the designation; and (b) no person may, without the prior written consent of that requiring authority, do anything in relation to the land that is subject to the designation that would prevent or hinder a public work or project or work to which the designation relates, including— (i) undertaking any use of the land; and (ii) subdividing the land; and (iii) changing the character, intensity, or scale of the use of the land.
(2)
The provisions of a district plan or proposed district plan shall apply in relation to any land that is subject to a designation only to the extent that the land is used for a purpose other than the designated purpose.
(3)
This section is subject to section 177.
32
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Assessment of Environmental Effects
8.0
RELEVANT ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
While the discretionary activity status of the application provides the Council with an unfettered scope of assessment, the City of Napier District Plan provides a range of assessment matters for development within the Zone and District Wide topic chapters and within the Code of Practice. The following provides consideration of the development against this assessment criteria. Chapter 12 Assessment Criteria (Residential Environments) The generic criteria specified at Chapter 12 require consideration of: a)
Any unusual circumstances including, but not limited to, those listed below: i) ii)
iii) iv) v)
a)
Inherent site considerations: including unusual size, shape, topography, substratum, vegetation or flood susceptibility; Particular site development characteristics: including the location of existing buildings or their internal layout, achievement of architectural harmony, compliance with engineering or bylaw standards, enhancement of private open space, achievement of a better relationship between the site and the road, building renovation or restoration of demonstrable merit, the design and arrangement to facilitate access for the disabled, or legal impediments; Unusual environmental circumstances: including adverse topography, unusual use or location of buildings on adjacent sites, improved amenity for neighbouring sites, the presence of effective on-site screening. Proximity to the Rural Environment. In the absence of adequate private open space, whether the maintenance and enhancement of public reserves or amenity treatment appropriate with the level of impact of the development is required.
Where the site is located within the Te Awa Development area the extent to which the relevant Te Awa Structure Plan Design Outcomes can be met (in Appendix 29A-F of the District Plan)
The site is generally unconstrained, being of a large area and regular shape with no unusual circumstances or constraining factors. While areas of the site require filling to raise the level above the design flood level, this can be readily achieved without technical difficulty. The surrounding area of the Te Awa Development Area is a combination of undeveloped rural sites and the contemporary residential development of the Te Awa Estates development to the east. This surrounding context does not present any specific design requirements to assimilate site development with the surrounding character. Assessment against the Te Awa Structure Plan Design Outcomes has been provided in this report. This assessment concluded that the development was consistent with the long term objectives of the Design Outcomes but was contrary to the planned implementation staging of the Structure Plan, albeit that this is readily addressed through the specific spatial relationship of the site to existing surrounding infrastructure. Site Coverage Assessment Matters The proposed development of the residential village will comprise of a combination of detached and duplex units, both of which will result in 186m2 of site coverage per lot. Condition 5.19 of the City of Napier District Plan specifies a maximum site coverage of 50% and the lots below 372m 2 in area will therefore exceed this limit. 33
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Assessment of Environmental Effects
The scheme plan incorporates 48 units that are below 372m2 in area, thereby infringing the site coverage standard. However, the extent of the site coverage infringement is minimal on the vast majority of the lots, with all but five of the 48 lots infringing the standard by no more than 4% (to 54% site coverage). Notwithstanding the discretionary status of the application, the specific restricted discretionary matters specified at Condition 5.19 are:
The availability of useable open space on site. The scale and bulk of the building in relation to the site. The existing built density of the neighbourhood. The effect on the open space appearance of the neighbourhood. The control of stormwater runoff.
The external living space that will be provided within each lot will be of an area and configuration that is highly useable. It is also noted that the intended occupier demographic is unlikely to result in family occupation of the homes and the external living space of each dwelling will be for more passive forms of recreation as opposed to children’s play space. While the site coverage standard will be exceeded, the coherent layout and configuration of lot boundaries will assist in readily accommodating the development form without a resulting cramped appearance, and the open nature and absence of formal boundary treatment within the site will result in visually fluid lot boundaries that will assist in blending the appearance of density across the development. The smaller lots and site coverage infringement will not be visually apparent across the development and this will not be visually incongruous with the existing density of the adjacent Te Awa Estates development. The comprehensive stormwater design for the site will readily incorporate the complete form of development across the site, and the areas of site coverage infringement will be balanced with the larger lots and resulting lower site coverage percentages across the development. The specific circumstances of the development and intended occupation are such that the site coverage will not therefore, result in adverse effects on the living conditions of future occupiers, the open and residential character of the overall development or on resulting stormwater control. Vehicle Crossing Assessment Matters The southern entrance to the development exceeds the maximum design width of a vehicle crossing, thereby infringing Condition 61.18. The specified Restricted Discretionary Assessment Matters refers to the Council’s Code for matters in relation to vehicle crossing construction. Part B 11.2.2 of the Code states the width of vehicle crossings shall be: “(a) Of adequate width to safely accommodate the expected volume and type of vehicles (b) Limited in width having regard for pedestrian safety and to conserve on-road parking.” 34
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Assessment of Environmental Effects
The 6m maximum crossing width is specified at F1.6.14.3 of the Code with the caveat that “Council may approve wider vehicle crossings where special circumstances exist�. The vehicle crossings to the site from Eriksen Road are clearly not typical crossings as they will serve the internal driveway network of the development rather than individual properties. The designed width is necessary to facilitate suitably free flowing access. The vehicle crossing and overall entrance design has been assessed as appropriate for the use in the Transport Assessment provided at Appendix F. Eriksen Road is not subject to any car parking stress, and the density of proposed development fronting Eriksen Road is not expected to generate car parking stress. The increased width of the entrance will not therefore have any impact on car parking availability. The entrance and exit lanes of the access will be separated by a central median. This will provide a pedestrian refuge for Eriksen Road pedestrians crossing the entrance. The increased width of the vehicle crossing is therefore necessary to adequately service the development and will not result in adverse effects on safety or car parking capacity. Non Public Accessway Assessment Matters To enable the creation of a gated community to assist with the perception of a comfortable, safe and secure environment for the target occupier demographic, many of who are at a stage in life where they feel more vulnerable, a gated form of development is proposed. The control of access to the development prevents the vesting of the internal access network as road with the Council, necessitating that this is retained as a private network. Part C 5.7 of the Council’s Code requires that where vehicle access is provided to greater than eight residential units, the access shall be vested in the Council as road and designed and formed accordingly. Part B 10.2.1 requires that non public accessways shall: (a) (b) (c)
Provide adequate vehicular access to each lot Provide adequate access for emergency vehicles Minimise the visual effects of the accessway formation
Part B 10.2.2 requires that non public accessways shall be designed and constructed to: (a) (b) (c) (d)
Withstand the expected loads for the required design life period. Ensure there are no adverse effects on any underlying utility services or on adjacent and abutting properties. Intersect safely and efficiently with the road network. Be protected from the adverse effects of surface or groundwater.
As set out in the Transport Assessment provided at Appendix F, the internal driveway layout will provide a suitable access environment for all users. The design and specification of the pavement formation and surfacing of the access network will accord with the Code standard and this will be addressed through the detailed design phase.
35
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Assessment of Environmental Effects
Code of Practice A.8 Assessment Criteria for Land Development (a)
The assessment in terms of performance criteria in Part B and the requirements of Part C of this Code.
The detailed design of the development will generally accord with the specific detail of Parts B and C of the Code. However, the internal driveway network will not be vested in Council as road, enabling a gated entrance and low speed environment consistent with the purpose of the development to provide comfortable, safe and secure homes for the retired over 55 demographic. The retention of the internal driveway network as private is contrary to the Code requirements, as is the width of the southern entrance (which becomes a vehicle crossing due to the private internal network). The detailed engineering design of the roads and three waters servicing of the development is expected to otherwise accord with the Code (and the site specific requirements of the Te Awa Structure Plan). Earthworks will be appropriately supervised and certified, and the technical simplicity of these is such that they raise no issues of impact on surrounding land, erosion or instability, and the resulting landform alteration will not be visually prominent from the surrounding or wider area. Refuse and recycling storage will be accommodated within individual homes and is intended to utilise the Council’s collection service. Scale and Intensity (b) (c) (d) (e) (f)
Whether the impact of the scale and intensity of the subdivision and/or land development is compatible with the surrounding land uses, including the impact on landscape and amenity values. Whether the proposed subdivision and/or land development will have any effects on ecosystems, including flora and fauna and their habitat. Whether the establishment and operation of the subdivision and/or land development will adversely affect the efficient functioning of the immediate area and the surrounding areas and/or result in significant adverse economic, social or cultural impacts. Whether the proposed subdivision and/or land development has the potential to adversely affect waahi tapu, heritage sites, significant and notable trees and/or other sites of significance. Whether the proposed subdivision and/or land development has the potential to adversely affect the efficient use and operation of overhead high voltage transmission lines and the potential for site development to place human health and safety at risk from such lines, including: - The degree to which the subdivision design, including the location of roads and reserves, landscaping and any earthworks, recognises and provides for existing electricity lines so that reasonable access to, and appropriate separation from, the lines is maintained.
The scale and intensity of the development is as envisaged by the Te Awa Structure Plan. All properties readily accommodate a three bedroom home with suitable external living area and servicing provision. While smaller lots within the development will result in individual site coverage infringements against the 50% standard, averaging of site coverage across the development readily offsets site coverage on the smaller lots, preventing any perception of cramped development. This is a sustainable utilisation of the greenfield land resource and infrastructure servicing of the land that is generally consistent with the character of the adjacent Te Awa Estates development. As flat land, the single storey development will not be visually prominent from the surrounding or wider area. 36
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Assessment of Environmental Effects
The site is currently utilised for low intensity rural production and has limited flora and fauna values, with minimal subsequent impact in this respect arising from the development. The intensity and population yield from the development is as envisaged for development within the Te Awa Development Area and the impact on social infrastructure is addressed through required financial contribution. There are no identified wahi tapu, heritage sites, significant or notable trees or any other features identified in the vicinity of the site. There are no overhead power transmission lines crossing the site. Access (g) (h) (i)
Whether access, roads, parking, manoeuvring and loading for vehicles, pedestrians and cyclists is adequate. Requirements for provision of fencing adjoining public land, including pedestrian accessways, service lanes and roads. Whether the requirements of New Zealand Transport Agency including the access onto state highways has been adequately met.
The residential layout provides a suitable internal access environment to facilitate pedestrian, cycle, private car and service vehicle movement without pinch points or other constraint, while avoiding opportunities for increased speeds. The Landscape Design Report provided at Appendix C details proposed fencing of public boundaries and there will not be a burden on the Council in this respect. The site does not front onto a State Highway and traffic flows onto the nearby State Highway network routes of SH2 and SH50A would be readily mixed and indistinguishable from the traffic flows of the wider urban areas of this part of Napier. Infrastructure (j) (k) (l)
Whether the proposed subdivision and/or land development provides for adequate water supply and disposal of stormwater and sewage. Whether the subdivision and/or land development provides adequate measures to met any potential increases in traffic. The details of any works required to develop each site from its existing state to a fully serviced accessed site ready for its proposed use, including energy supply (electricity and/or gas), water supply, telecommunications and information cabling and safe provision for solid waste storage and collection.
The site is within the Te Awa Development Area that was rezoned from Rural to Main Residential in accordance with the Te Awa Structure Plan. The result of this is that the development is ‘zone appropriate’ and the servicing demand of residential development has been anticipated by the Council. The Servicing Report provided at Appendix G provides a framework of the proposed servicing of the development, confirming that this can be readily achieved.
37
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Assessment of Environmental Effects
The Transport Assessment provided at Appendix F includes assignment modelling concluding that traffic flows arising from the development can be readily accommodated within the network, albeit with improvement to the adjacent section of Eriksen Road to accord with Te Awa Structure Plan requirements. Hazards and Contaminated Sites (m) (n) (o) (p) (q)
Whether the site or any potential building or structure on that site will be subject to material damage by erosion, falling debris, subsidence, slippage or inundation from any source. Whether the site has adequate protection to minimise the risk of fire. The effects of any proposed earthworks on stormwater runoff and land stability. Whether there is any contamination on the site and any remedial works that could minimise this risk for future occupiers of the site. The provision of any consent notice in terms of Section 221 of the Act for subdivision in hazard areas.
The site is subject to the risk of liquefaction. The Geotechnical Assessment Report provided at Appendix H confirms that the site is suited to the proposed development and that the risk of liquefaction and lateral spread, specifically considering the formation of the swale, is expected to be readily addressed through standard detailed foundation design at the time of building consent. The site will be connected to the Council’s reticulated water supply and fire hydrants will be installed throughout the development in accordance with a layout to be undertaken at the detailed design stage. The Servicing Report provided at Appendix G provides the framework stormwater design through the development staging. This framework generally drains the development westward across the site to the western swale. This design will control stormwater to prevent ponding or inundation on the site. The Detailed Site Investigation provided at Appendix E confirms that the site is not subject to residual contamination and that there is no risk to human health from the development. It is accepted that a consent notice will be imposed on titles stating the need for geotechnical design of foundations to ensure mitigation of the liquefaction risk. Cumulative Effects (r) (s) (t)
Whether the proposed land development including subdivision will have an adverse cumulative effect on the surrounding environment. The effects of property access on the site, road reserves and drainage reserves on the landscape amenity. In assessing the appropriateness of allowing land development including subdivision, consideration will be given to the presence of land uses already located in the area and on the site, and their effect on the surrounding land use. Of particular concern is the cumulative effect of locating additional land development (including subdivision) on a site adjacent to or already accommodating land uses that may currently generate traffic, noise and other effects not in keeping with the surrounding zone.
The residential development is as provided for in the City of Napier District Plan and is consistent with the long term objectives of the Te Awa Structure Plan. The impact of residential development on the social and physical infrastructure of the City has therefore been anticipated by the Council.
38
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Assessment of Environmental Effects
No development access is provided through the wide open space of the swale to the western and southern boundaries, maintaining the park setting of this area. Medium density residential development of the land is as envisaged by the City of Napier District Plan and Te Awa Structure Plan. The Te Awa Development Area has been rezoned to provide a source of residential development land to assist in satisfying the land supply requirements of the City. Accordingly, there are no cumulative effects from development not already envisaged and planned for by the Council. General (u) Whether a land use consent is required and details of any works to be undertaken that are necessary for the completion of the subdivision and/or land development. (v) Whether the alteration of any lot boundary is proposed. (w) Whether alternative methods have been considered and why they were not implemented if the proposed subdivision and/or land development is likely to have a significant adverse effect on the environment
Accompanying multi unit land use consent is sought in tandem with the subdivision to enable progression of development in parallel with the title certification and release process. The scheme does not include a boundary adjustment. The proposed layout is the result of an iterative multi-disciplinary design process that has incorporated feedback provided through Council consultation. The proposed layout best meets the objectives of assimilating with the development principles of the Te Awa Structure Plan and the achievement and perception of a desirable, safe and secure internal residential environment for the target occupier demographic. National Environmental Standard for Contaminated Soils As a controlled activity, the NESCS limits consideration to: (2) The matters over which control is reserved are as follows: (a)
the adequacy of the detailed site investigation, including— (i) site sampling: (ii) laboratory analysis: (iii) risk assessment:
(b)
how the activity must be— (i) managed, which may include the requirement of a site management plan: (ii) monitored: (iii) reported on:
(c)
the transport, disposal, and tracking of soil and other materials taken away in the course of the activity:
(d)
the timing and nature of the review of the conditions in the resource consent:
(e)
the duration of the resource consent. 39
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Assessment of Environmental Effects
As the detailed site investigation has confirmed compliance with the soil contaminant standards, assessment is only required of the adequacy of the detailed site investigation. The detailed site investigation has been undertaken by a suitably qualified and experienced contaminated land professional following the established methodology guidance of Contaminated Land Management Guidelines 1. Soil samples have been collected from the site following an established sampling pattern and methodology, and these have been tested by an accredited laboratory.
9.0
ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
The Resource Management Act 1991 provides for the following exceptions when considering the actual and potential effects of the proposed activity on the environment:
Any adverse effect of the proposed activity on the environment if the District Plan permits an activity with that effect
The following evaluation of the actual and potential effects on the environment has taken into account the above exceptions insofar as they apply to the proposed use and development of the site, and is guided by the assessment criteria provided by the City of Napier District Plan. Actual or Potential Effects The actual or potential effects on the environment of the proposed activity are considered to be no more than minor and related to
Effects on City-Wide Strategic Land Use Allocation Amenity and Visual Effects Effects on Neighbouring Properties Access, Car Parking and Servicing Effects Effects on Other Infrastructure Natural Hazards Soil contaminants and Risk to Human Health Archaeology, Cultural and Spiritual Effects Earthworks and Temporary Effects Other matters- including ecosystems and hazardous substances.
Effects on Strategic Land Allocation The principle of the proposed residential development of the site is entirely consistent with the strategic direction of the City of Napier District Plan in relation to long term planned urban expansion and the area specific objectives of the Te Awa Structure Plan. The Te Awa Development Area was identified by the Council as an urban extension area and has accordingly been zoned for residential development. This area provides a substantial residential land supply making a significant contribution to the residential development capacity of the City. However, despite the currently buoyant residential market, there has been limited uptake of the development opportunity of the rezoned Te Awa Structure Plan area. 40
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Assessment of Environmental Effects
In fulfilling the City of Napier District Plan expectations for the site, the residential development yields positive effects in relation to implementation of the strategic land use pattern set out by the Council. The development demonstrates that residential development can be financially viable within the Te Awa Structure Plan area and the specific form of development maximises the sustainable utility of the greenfield land resource and the servicing infrastructure. Effects in relation to the strategic allocation of land by the Council and implementation of the Council’s urban growth direction are therefore positive. Further related positive effects arise through the supply of housing to Napier that will be delivered by the development. This additional supply of housing is a significant positive effect from the development in the context of the high demand for housing currently experienced in Napier’s residential market. Amenity and Visual Effects Amenity Values are defined in Section 2 of the Resource Management Act 1991 as “those natural or physical qualities and characteristics of an area that contribute to people’s appreciation of its pleasantness, aesthetic coherence, and cultural and recreational attributes”. The greenfield development will obviously result in substantial visual change to the site, introducing consolidated suburban development to a rural site. However, the development of the site and resulting suburban appearance are entirely consistent with the expectations of the City of Napier District Plan and Te Awa Structure Plan. The resulting appearance will be consistent with the contemporary residential development of the adjacent Te Awa Estates development and in keeping with the residential character of the older, ordered Maraenui development of Masefield Avenue. The 19 larger lots of the development fronting Eriksen Road will provide a visual transition from the Te Awa Estates development to the tighter grain of the main body of the development. The 40m wide stormwater swale corridor to the western site boundary will provide substantial visual separation from the form of the Maraenui development, preventing direct visual comparison of development density. As set out in the Landscape Design Report provided at Appendix C, a comprehensive scheme of landscaping will be implemented across the development, assisting in the formation of a desirable residential environment for future occupiers and visitors and softening views into and across the site. Although the uniform form of single storey development within the site will be distinguished by individual landscaping and site detailing, the fundamental repeating form of development will enable the formation of a coherent and coordinated development. The development will therefore have less than minor effects on the existing visual amenity, character and appearance of the surrounding area.
41
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Assessment of Environmental Effects
Effects on Neighbouring Properties The neighbouring property to the north of the site is a four hectare rural property with a dwelling located along the Willowbank Avenue frontage, approximately 90m from the boundary with the application property. While the City of Napier District Plan envisages the eventual residential development of this neighbouring property, it also provides for the continued rural utilisation of the land until it is developed. As the application site is being developed out of sequence with the specified staging of the Te Awa Structure Plan, the impact of development on this property is a necessary consideration. The 90m separation between the application site and the dwelling effectively mitigates against any effects on the living conditions of the existing dwelling. The development has the potential to result in reverse sensitivity effects on the current farming practices on the site and requirement for ‘no complaints’ style consent notices to be imposed on the row of properties along the northern property boundary is welcomed to mitigate this potential impact. The neighbouring property to the south is open rural land in linked multiple land parcels extending to Kenny Road and totalling approximately 16ha in area. While this land is not sensitive to surrounding development, any potential effects of the development, including reverse sensitivity, are mitigated by the 40m wide corridor of the open swale land that will extend along the southern boundary of the application site. The development will be consistent with the character of the adjacent Te Awa Estates development to the east and will not cause any adverse effects on these properties. The significant separation to the rear of Masefield Avenue properties to the west mitigates against any effects being experienced by these properties. The development of the site is consistent with the expectations for the site as envisaged by the City of Napier District Plan and, subject to implementation of reverse sensitivity related consent notices, the development will not generate any adverse effects on neighbouring properties. Effects in this respect are therefore less than minor. Access, Parking and Servicing The application site is located on the periphery of Napier’s urban area in a growth area currently being developed. As the site and surrounding area are zoned for residential development with a specified minimum residential density, the impact of traffic generation resulting from residential development has generally been anticipated by the Council. This planning for development is reflected in the series of road improvement works that are set out in the Te Awa Structure Plan. The development is compliant with all specified transport related standards within the City of Napier District Plan with the exception of the width of the vehicle crossing required to form the southern site access. Traffic Generation The intended retirement village character of the development is anticipated to result in trip generation somewhere between the level generated by a care home and that generated by standard residential development. Based on modelled levels the trip generation has been 42
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Assessment of Environmental Effects
estimated as 5 vehicle trips per day per dwelling and a peak hour generation of 0.5 vehicle trips per dwelling. This equates to a total of approximately 900 vehicle trips per day and a peak hourly flow of approximately 90 vehicle trips. The Te Awa Structure Plan includes provision for the future connection to the northern end of Eriksen Road to Willowbank Road by means of a roundabout junction. Until that work has been implemented, all traffic accessing the site will arrive and depart from the south. The Transport Assessment provided at Appendix F concludes that the traffic generated from the site can be readily accommodated within the surrounding road network, as is expected for zone appropriate development within the Te Awa Development Area. Access The 19 Stage 1 lots will be accessed directly from Eriksen Road consistent with the emerging and intended future residential character of this road. Two entrances are provided to the village development from Eriksen Road. The southern entrance is intended to be the main and more formal entrance, with median divided entrance and exit lanes. The northern entrance is intended to be secondary with no lane separation. The vertical and horizontal alignment of Eriksen Road enables sight distances to be achieved to each of these accesses significantly in excess of the NZTA RTS6 guidance distances. The village entrances will be gated, consistent with the intended character and occupation of the development. The northern entrance gates will be recessed 6m within the site, comfortably accommodating a car waiting to enter the site and the southern entrance will be recessed 10m into the site comfortably accommodating service vehicles waiting to enter the site or multiple cars. As a gated development, the entrances to the village function as vehicle crossings. While the northern entrance accords with the 6m maximum crossing width, the 12.5m wide southern entrance will exceed this standard. The southern site entrance will be designed as two separate traffic lanes with a central median, providing a refuge area for pedestrians crossing the entrance. In the absence of any car parking stress on Eriksen Road the crossing width infringement does not result in any detrimental effects to on street car parking capacity. No new access is proposed to the site from Willowbank Road. The existing Willowbank Road entrance to 38 Willowbank Road will be closed. The existing Willowbank Road entrance to 16 Willowbank Road will be retained for the duration of the continued use of the related dwelling. As no new access will be formed to Willowbank Road, there will be no effects on this Road. The access arrangement will not therefore result in any adverse effects on the surrounding area. Internal Access Driveway Environment Access control by way of gated entrances is necessary to provide the required perception of a comfortable, safe and secure internal environment for the proposed occupier demographic. The gating of the development prevents the internal access network from being vested in Council as road, and this is more accurately described as an internal access driveway network. 43
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Assessment of Environmental Effects
The internal access driveways have been designed to provide a 6.0m wide roadway to readily accommodate regular two-way traffic and larger service vehicles. The alignment of the internal access driveways will meander within the overall corridor to provide variation and assist in encouraging a lower speed environment. The two cross intersections within the layout will be controlled by roundabouts to avoid potential priority confusion by users. The proposed internal access layout is appropriate to the specific form of development providing a suitably safe and useable access arrangement for future residents and visitors. Car and Cycle Parking Each dwelling within the village will have an integral double garage and will provide a vehicle standard space between the garage and the property boundary fronting the internal access driveway. This provision exceeds the City of Napier District Plan requirement for two car parking spaces (one of which is to be provided as a vehicle standing space) per dwelling. The size of the 19 Stage 1 lots provides ample opportunity for subsequent residential development to comply with the car parking standards. Additional car parking is provided on and adjacent to Lot 24 for additional vehicles or oversized vehicles, such as motor homes, caravans or boats. Kerb side car parking will also be available throughout the development, providing additional capacity for visitors. The City of Napier District Plan requires the provision of cycle parking at a rate of 1 cycle stand per 5 required car parking spaces. No specific provision for cycle parking is made within the village development and cycle parking can be readily accommodated within individual houses, as required by occupiers. There is not expected to be any overspill car parking onto neighbouring roads and as the development accords with the specified standards, there are not considered to be any adverse effects in this respect. Servicing The site layout can readily accommodate required service vehicle movements, from regular refuse and recyclables collection vehicles and goods delivery vehicles to less frequent household removal vehicles. Such vehicles could readily access the village from either the northern or southern entrances. Service vehicles accessing the site would not result in any adverse effects on road function. Road Improvements As directed by the Te Awa Structure Plan, the development includes provision for improvement to Eriksen Road for the length of the property frontage. Kerb and channel and a footpath will be constructed on the western side of Eriksen Road providing for a 10m wide roadway.
44
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Assessment of Environmental Effects
These improvements are consistent with the Te Awa Structure Plan and will provide for suitable connection of the improvements to subsequent Te Awa Structure Plan development on adjacent sites. The road improvements will therefore provide positive effects for the area. Transport Related Summary As detailed through this assessment, the traffic generation arising from the development will be lower than that of a more standard residential development and will be readily absorbed by the surrounding network without detrimental effects on road function or safety. The development can be readily contained within the site with no adverse external effects on the surrounding area. Effects on Other Infrastructure Servicing The Land Development Report provided at Appendix G details the proposed servicing arrangements for the development, confirming that the site can be adequately serviced by Council infrastructure, as is anticipated for zone appropriate development within the Te Awa Structure Plan Area. The in-ground infrastructure within the site will be vested in Council and addressed through an easement in gross. Water Connection to an extended Eriksen Road main is proposed to service the development, with the extended main providing opportunity for two connection points (through each of the site entrances). While this differs from the approach set out in the Te Awa Structure Plan, it is nevertheless an effective and suitable means of servicing the development. Wastewater Wastewater servicing of the Stage 1 lots fronting Eriksen Road can be achieved through a gravity fed connection to the existing infrastructure in Eriksen Road. The remainder of the development will drain wastewater westward and be reliant on two pump stations to pump this onward to the existing Council network. Stormwater The stormwater servicing arrangement will generally drain the site westward and southward through four connection points to the open swale drain to be formed along the western and southern site boundaries. This proposed drain will then connect to the existing Cowshed Drain to the east of the site, which in turn drains to the Serpentine Pond stormwater system. Overland stormwater flow within the development will be controlled and directed to the internal access network and formed stormwater system. This arrangement accords with the provisions of the Te Awa Structure Plan.
45
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Assessment of Environmental Effects
Power and Telecommunications Power and telecommunications connections to the site are readily available as this infrastructure has been installed in earlier stages of Te Awa Development Area development. Summary The development can be readily connected to Council’s services, which have been installed in the area with the expectation of Te Awa Structure Plan development. Financial contributions will be paid to address the impact on this physical infrastructure and any resulting effects on infrastructure will be less than minor. Natural Hazards The site is subject to an elevated liquefaction risk, which is present across much of the urban area of Napier. In response to this risk, geotechnical investigation of the site has been undertaken and the reporting of this is provided at Appendix H. The geotechnical investigation is informed by nine CPT pushed to a termination depth varying between 6m to 14m below ground. The CPT results indicate that the site is generally underlain by sand and silt compositions with intermittent layers of clay and occasional organic soil horizons. Liquefaction assessment utilising the CPT results confirms that the site is subject to liquefaction risk from both SLS and ULS design events. Assessment has also confirmed the potential for lateral spread arising from the adjacent swale drain. The assessment concludes that the risk of liquefaction and lateral spread can be suitably mitigated through detailed geotechnical design of building foundations at the time of building consent and that the site is suitable, in geotechnical terms, for the proposed residential development. The requirement for geotechnical foundation design can be readily secured by way of a consent notice. The site is also subject to an identified risk of flooding in a 1 in 50 year event. This risk will be mitigated by the site filling required to meet the minimum development level of the Te Awa Structure Plan. The effects arising from the potential natural hazard exposure of the site are therefore less than minor. Soil Contaminants and Risk to Human Health The site has been used for a combination of agricultural and horticultural activities for many decades, including use for market gardening and orcharding. The horticultural activities are included on the Hazardous Activities and Industries List (HAIL), as they have the recognised potential to result in residual site contamination. Accordingly, development of the site is subject to the investigation and reporting provisions of the National Environmental Standard for Assessing and Managing Contaminated Soil to Protect Human Health (NESCS).
46
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Assessment of Environmental Effects
A detailed site investigation has been completed for the property, and this is provided at Appendix E of this report. This investigation identified isolated areas of the site where soil contaminants exceeded recognised background levels, however found all samples to be compliant with the relevant soil contaminant standards applicable to the future residential use. In accordance with the provisions of the NESCS, the site development does not present a risk to human health and there are therefore no adverse effects in this respect. Archaeology The site is not known to contain any archaeological or other cultural heritage assets. While there are no known culturally significant sites within the development, should any remains be discovered through construction, the established Accidental Discovery Protocol of Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga will obviously be followed. Subject to adherence to the accidental discovery protocol, effects in this respect are less than minor. Earthworks and Temporary Effects The scheme of earthworks will raise areas of the generally flat site to ensure that the development site is flat and above the minimum flood level of the Te Awa Structure Plan. This will result in minimal change to the land form across the site and is as envisaged by the City of Napier District Plan for site development. The principal of the earthworks, insofar as it relates to the raising of the land, will not have any adverse environmental effects on neighbouring properties or the surrounding area. The earthworks are relativity straightforward as they relate to a flat and unconstrained site. Accordingly, externalities from the earthworks can be readily mitigated by standard construction practices. It is expected that conditions of consent will require submission of such construction controls and management. Wider construction work will generate noise and other such disturbance. The separation to surrounding properties and surrounding rural and construction context ensures that the effects of such disturbance will not be notable beyond the site. Other Matters Ecological Effects Existing productive vegetation within the site will be cleared as part of the site formation. This vegetation is of limited ecological value and the loss of this from the site will cause negligible adverse effects. Hazard Substances The proposed residential land use will not cause any adverse environmental effects on the surrounding environment in terms of hazardous substances, air emissions or the discharge of contaminants.
47
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Assessment of Environmental Effects
Monitoring In terms of Clause 1(i) of the Fourth Schedule to the Act, no monitoring is proposed and the scale or significance of the subject activity’s effects are such that monitoring will not be required, other than that undertaken by the Council as part of its normal monitoring programme. Alternative Location or Methods Clause 1(b) of the Fourth Schedule to the Resource Management Act 1991 requires a description of any locations or methods for undertaking the activity where there is a significant adverse effect. In this regard, the proposed development does not represent a significant adverse effect on the environment and therefore any assessment of alternatives is not required. As stated throughout this report, the development is zone appropriate and entirely consistent with the strategic approach of the City of Napier District Plan. Summary of Effects Assessment As detailed in the preceding assessment of environmental effects arising from the development (including consideration of proposed mitigation measures), the negative effects of the development are generally negligible as a consequence of the consistency of the development with the City of Napier District Plan zoning, with significant positive effects arising from the implementation of the Te Awa Structure Plan and provision of additional housing to meet the pressing needs of the City. The location of the development is entirely consistent with the strategic pattern of land allocation that is set out in the City of Napier District Plan and reinforces the residential focus of the area that has commenced through the adjacent Te Awa Estates development. The development would therefore have positive effects on the achievement of the overarching land use objectives of the City of Napier District Plan. The coordinated development of the site will provide a consistent and coherent appearance complemented by landscaping to provide a suitably high quality suburban setting for occupiers. Extensive car parking is accommodated on the site to meet the needs of future residents and visitors to the site, and the development layout ensures adequate provision for general and service vehicle manoeuvring. The development therefore provides for the related traffic needs within the site and the surrounding road network can readily accommodate the anticipated traffic generation arising from the development. Effects in this respect are no more than minor. The development is proposed out of sequence with the staging of the Te Awa Structure Plan and therefore precedes the delivery of infrastructure anticipated to be provided in the planned earlier development stages. However, the site can be readily connected to the Council’s existing infrastructure in the surrounding area, suggesting that an alternative structure plan staging could have advanced this site to an early development stage. The additional impact on Council’s infrastructure will be addressed through the development contribution framework, and effects on this Council infrastructure are therefore less than minor. Standard construction management measures will prevent adverse effects on neighbouring properties and the surrounding environment. 48
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Assessment of Environmental Effects
10.0
DISTRICT PLAN OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
As required by the Resource Management Act 1991, the City of Napier District Plan provides a range of objectives, policies and methods that underpin the zone rules. The primary focus of these is to address those issues that the Council considers to be significant in carrying out its functions under the Resource Management Act 1991. The relevant Objectives and Policies from the City of Napier District Plan are specified within the following sections:
Chapter 4 – Residential Environments Chapter 52A – Earthworks Chapter 61 – Transportation Chapter 62 – Natural Hazards
Chapter 4 – Residential Environments Objectives
Objective 4.2- To enable the diverse housing needs and preferences of the City’s residents to be met while ensuring that the adverse effects on the environment of residential land use, development and subdivision are avoided, remedied or mitigated.
Policies
Policy 4.2.-1 Enable the development of a range of housing types within the urban area and where appropriate, more intensive forms of housing such as papakainga housing and multi unit development.
Policy 4.2.2- Ensure intensive forms of housing development such as papakainga housing and multi unit development do not adversely affect the surrounding environment. Particular regard will be given to: a) protecting the privacy and amenity of surrounding residential properties, residential areas and any nearby rural areas; b) maintaining the character of the surrounding residential areas; c) integrating the development with any adjacent public reserve and road system, ensuring the safe use of these areas; d) integrating the development with the surrounding neighbourhood, and community focal points, so that where possible, they are accessible to pedestrians; and e) designing for visual and aural privacy, sunlight and daylight access, adequate outdoor space (either private or communal), safety, and on-site parking and manoeuvring in a way that is appropriate to and consistent with the more intensive settlement pattern. f) Ensuring multi unit development is only located where the roading network is able to support the additional traffic movements and demand for on street parking generated by the proposal.
Policy 4.2.3- Manage land uses and subdivision to ensure any adverse effects on outstanding natural features and significant landscapes are avoided, remedied or mitigated.
49
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Assessment of Environmental Effects
Policy 4.2.4- Require specific consideration of the landscape and visual effects of development proposals where they are located on landscapes identified as outstanding or significant in the Napier City Landscape Assessment Study.
Response: The greenfield site is within an identified urban growth area for the City that has been the subject of a detailed structure planning exercise to confirm residential capacity and servicing. The development will provide a large volume of dwellings targeted at addressing the housing needs of the retired/over 55 years of age demographic, with specific development details catering to the needs of this group. The site does not have sensitive boundaries and will not impact on the existing living conditions of other properties. The development will integrate with the open space of the swale corridor, which in turn links to the Cowshed Drain and open space of the Te Awa Estates development. The layout of the development has been designed to maximise the utility of the greenfield land resource and infrastructure servicing resource. The compact housing design will provide good internal and external living conditions for future occupiers. The site is not within or adjacent to an outstanding or significant landscape.
Objective 4.3- To accommodate growth through residential intensification in appropriate areas and planned development of identified residential greenfield growth areas, and to create a City-wide settlement pattern that maintains the vitality of the City’s commercial and community nodes, supports public transport and reduces private vehicle use in accordance with OBJ UD1 of the Hawke’s Bay Regional Policy Statement.
Policy 4.3.1- Enable residential intensification where appropriate, primarily around commercial and community nodes, but also in areas which have reasonable access to significant transport corridors.
Policy 4.3.2- Restrict residential intensification in areas of special character.
Policy 4.3.3 Manage the intensity of residential settlement in all parts of the City to ensure that any adverse effects on the environment are avoided, remedied or mitigated.
Policy 4.3.4- Recognise the need for residential growth and positive effects of infill or multi-unit development on appropriate sites where any adverse effects associated with such development are adequately avoided, remedied or mitigated. Sites located within the Port Inner Noise Boundary are not considered to be appropriate sites in terms of this policy.
Policy 4.3.5- A Structure Planning process must be undertaken where areas for future urban development are identified in District or Regional growth strategies before a plan change is initiated to avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse effects on the environment associated with ad hoc development and infrastructure provision. The Structure Planning process shall be undertaken in accordance with Policy UD10.1 and UD10.3 of the Hawke’s Bay Regional Resource Management Plan.
50
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Assessment of Environmental Effects
Policy 4.3.6- New residential greenfield growth outside of those residential greenfield growth areas identified in Appendix 35 will be assessed in accordance with the criteria outlined in Policy UD4.2 of the Hawke’s Bay Regional Resource Management Plan.
Response: The greenfield site is part of the Te Awa Structure Plan area, which has been the subject of extensive planning to facilitate the change in land use to residential to provide residential growth capacity for the City. As expected the site is within an identified residential greenfield growth area.
Objective 4.4- To ensure that all developments and structures within the City’s residential character areas maintain, enhance and are sympathetic to the dominant natural and physical features which contribute to the amenity and character of those areas.
Response: The greenfield development site is not within an identified housing character area (as referenced in the associated policies). The extensive landscaping and swale corridor will ensure that the development does not dominate the surrounding area. Chapter 52A - Earthworks
Objective 52A.3- To enable earthworks within Napier City while ensuring that the life-supporting capacity of soils and eco-systems are safeguarded and adverse effects on outstanding natural features and significant landscapes, historic heritage values and human health and safety are avoided, remedied or mitigated.
Policy 52A.3.1- Require the re-pasture or revegetation of land where vegetation is cleared in association with earthworks.
Policy 52A.3.2- To avoid duplication in regulation by District Plan rules and standards where earthworks activities are already subject to regulatory assessment.
Policy 52A.3.3- Protection of productive soils within the City from large-scale stripping, stockpiling, alteration and removal to ensure the land can still support a range of productive land uses.
Policy 52A.3.4- Control earthworks to ensure that they will not adversely affect the natural and physical environment, and the amenity of the community, adjoining land uses, historic heritage values and culturally sensitive sites.
Policy 52A.3.5- Allow earthworks where the adverse effects on the environment will be minor.
Policy 52A.3.6- Historic and cultural heritage (including archaeology) will be protected from the effects of earthworks wherever practicable.
Objective 52A.4- Minimise the hazard and environmental effects of earthworks.
Policy 52A.4.1 Control the adverse effects of earthworks on the natural and physical environment, including the potential for an increased risk of hazard and the potential effects on adjoining property owners.
51
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Assessment of Environmental Effects
Response: The earthworks required for site preparation and formation and the subsequent construction of building and roadway foundations are limited in scale and complexity. Existing topsoil will be stripped from the site and stockpiled for reuse as topsoil within the completed development, retaining use of the soil resource. Any stripped soil not required will be exported from the site for use as topsoil elsewhere. Notwithstanding the reuse of the topsoil, the loss of productive use of the soil resource of the site has been accepted through the residential zoning of the area. Standard protocols will be followed to ensure that health and safety within the site is secured. The scheme of earthworks does not present health and safety risk to properties beyond the site. No heritage assets are recorded within the site or immediate surrounding area, but the Heritage New Zealand Accidental Discovery protocol will be followed should works reveal any artefacts of interest. The imposition of standard construction management measures will ensure that effects on the environment are less than minor. Subject to imposition of standard construction management controls, the earthworks are consistent with the relevant objectives and policies of the City of Napier District Plan. Chapter 61 – Transport
Objective 61.3- To maintain a safe and efficient transport network that meets the needs of the community and the future growth of Napier without creating significant adverse effects.
Policy- 61.3.2 Inform intending residential property owners adjacent to existing arterial routes, that levels of noise will be higher than that experienced adjacent to other roads in the network.
Policy 61.3.3- Control the design and location of subdivision, use and development of land so as to minimise traffic patterns that will interfere with the safe and efficient operation of the transport network.
Policy 61.3.4 Minimise the effects of the road transport network by identifying the purpose of each road within the City and managing the location of land uses appropriate to the purpose.
Policy 61.3.6 Avoid, remedy or mitigate the effects of vehicle parking, access and manoeuvring on the transport network.
Response: The greenfield site is within an area that has been rezoned to enable residential use and the development is consistent with the strategic land allocation of the City of Napier District Plan. The site is not adjacent an arterial route and is separated from Willowbank Avenue, a collector road, by the wide swale. Development of the site is part of the planned development of the area, which includes staged road upgrades as the population and traffic demand increases. The development will not generate any adverse effects on the transport network, with parking internalised and the trip generation readily accommodated by the surrounding network.
52
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Assessment of Environmental Effects
Objective 61.4- To maintain an integrated transportation network (road, rail, sea, and air) while avoiding, remedying or mitigating any adverse effects on the environment.
Policy 61.4.2 Control the location and design of land uses so that traffic generation on strategic routes that are at capacity is minimised and adverse effects are avoided, remedied, or mitigated.
Policy 61.4.4 Control the positions of new access points to properties that are adjacent to the rail network to minimise the adverse effects of queuing vehicles.
Response: The site is not adjacent strategic road corridors and will not have any effect on the rail, sea or air transport infrastructure of the City.
Objective 61.5- To encourage alternative means of safe transport to reduce the effects of vehicle based transport systems.
Policy 61.5.1 Encourage the provision of a system of new walkways to link with the existing walkways, to provide opportunities for energy efficient recreation.
Policy 61.5.2 Improve the safety and amenity of existing pedestrian accessways throughout the City.
Policy 61.5.4 Encourage a decrease in the reliance on motor vehicles by establishing safe cycling facilities and enhancing the safety of existing facilities within the City.
Policy 61.5.5 Support initiatives to increase the use of public transport to mitigate the effects of the use of private vehicles on the environment.
Policy 61.5.6 Ensure linkages and facilities are available to enable the provision for alternative modes.
Policy 61.5.7 Ensure that infrastructure associated with alternative transport modes is safe, convenient and accessible to all sectors of the community.
Response: The parkland environment of the stormwater swale will provide a pedestrian and cycle route traversing the site that will eventually link into a wider network within the area. Overall Summary of Objectives and Policy As set out above, as a whole the development is clearly not contrary to the Objectives and Policies of the City of Napier District Plan. The principle of the development is entirely consistent with the residential zoning of the site and strategic growth provisions of the City of Napier District Plan and the detail of the development accords with the Objectives and Policies of the relevant District Wide provisions of the City of Napier District Plan.
53
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Assessment of Environmental Effects
11.0 PART 2 MATTERS Section 5, 6, 7 and 8 of the Act, forms part 2 of the Resource Management Act. Section 5 sets out the Acts purpose and Section 6, 7 and 8 provide guidance in achieving this purpose. Assessment under Part 2 Matters Section 5 The purpose of the Act is to promote the sustainable management of natural and physical resources. This is achieved by managing the use, development and protection of natural and physical resources in a way that enables people to provide for their social, economic and cultural well-being for their health and safety As the site utilises greenfield land that has been zoned and planned to provide residential growth capacity for the City, the development assists in the implementation of the strategic planning direction of the City of Napier District Plan. The development of the lower quality rural land of the site, within a developing suburban area will provide a significant contribution to the City’s housing stock, assisting in relieving the pressure for development of more sensitive or productive sites. The development follows the strategic direction of the City of Napier District Plan, and at this level, represents a sustainable land utilisation. In providing a compact form of development that maximises residential density while maintaining suitable living conditions for future occupiers, the form of the development is a sustainable utilisation of the specific land resource. Section 6 No matters of national importance identified within Section 6 of Part II of the Act are of any particular significance to this application. Section 7 Section 7 of Part II of the Act sets out matters that Council shall have particular regard to in administering the Act. Of particular relevance are: Section 7(b), which requires regard to: “the efficient use and development of natural and physical resources”.
The density of the development maximises the utility of the greenfield land resource and of the servicing infrastructure, and accordingly is an efficient use and development of the available natural and physical resources. Section 7(c), which requires regard to: “the maintenance and enhancement of amenity values”.
54
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Assessment of Environmental Effects
The amenity values of this area will be maintained, with quality landscaping to the parkland environment of the swale area and within the site providing a high quality suburban environment. Section 8 Section 8 of the Act requires the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi to be taken into account in relation to the management, use, development and protection of natural and physical resources. The land is not the subject to a statutory acknowledgement and is not identified as containing a site of significance to Maori. The proposed development does not have any Treaty of Waitangi implications. Overall, as a sustainable form of development, the proposal is consistent with Part 2 of the Act.
12.0
NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
Section 95A of the Act provides a prescribed format for the determination of whether a resource consent application should be publicly notified. Step 1: Mandatory Public Notification The applicant does not request public notification of the application. Assessment against the provisions of s95C cannot be undertaken at the time of application submission. The application does not relate to recreation reserve land. Subject to compliance with s95C, the application is not subject to mandatory public notification. Step 2: Public Notification Precluded in Certain Circumstances The application is for a discretionary activity subdivision of land and multi unit consent for a residential activity and therefore meets the notification preclusion criteria of s95A(5)(b)(ii). Step 3: Public Notification Required in Certain Circumstances This step is precluded by Step 2. Step 4: Public Notification in Special Circumstances There are no special circumstances applicable to the application. The land has been zoned for residential development and, while the development will be undertaken in advance of the Te Awa Structure Plan staged sequence of development, the development can be readily serviced by Council infrastructure and this does not result in any external effects on the surrounding structure plan land or wider effects on the environment. Having considered the tests of s95A of the Act, there is no requirement for public notification.
55
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Assessment of Environmental Effects
Where an application is not publicly notified, s95B of the Act provides a prescribed process for the determination of whether a resource consent application should be subject to limited notification. Step 1: Certain Affected Groups and Affected Persons Must Be Notified There are no protected customary rights groups or customary marine title groups affected by the proposal. No neighbouring land is subject to a statutory acknowledgment pursuant to an Act listed in Schedule 11. Step 2: Limited Notification Precluded in Certain Circumstances The application is not for a controlled activity or for an activity prescribed pursuant to s360H(1)(a)(ii). Step 3: Certain Other Affected Persons Must Be Notified In accordance with s95E of the Act, there are not considered to be any affected persons to the application. The principle and overall density of the residential development is entirely consistent with the City of Napier District Plan expectations for the site and the significant size of the site and substantial boundary separation ensures that the development will not have any adverse effects on neighbouring properties. Reverse sensitivity effects on the neighbouring rural property to the south will be mitigated by the swale extending along the southern property boundary and a ‘no complaints’ style consent notice on the northern row of lots can readily address any potential for reverse sensitivity effects on the neighbouring property to the north. Step 4: Further Notification in Special Circumstances There are no special circumstances applicable to the notification assessment that warrant notification of any persons not already eligible for limited notification. Accordingly, there is no requirement for limited notification of the application. As notification is unwarranted and there is no need for limited notification, the application is able to be determined on a non-notified basis.
56
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Assessment of Environmental Effects
13.0
SUMMARY
Resource Consent pursuant to Section 88 of the Resource Management Act 1991 is sought from Napier City Council for the residential subdivision and development of the site to create a managed village of 168 lots that will each contain a three bedroom home and 19 lots outside of the village for general residential development. Specifically, consent is sought for:
Staged Subdivision to form 187 residential lots with associated earthworks, access formation and construction of stormwater swale within the Te Awa Structure Plan area in advance of structure plan staging. Staged Multi Unit Consent relating to the construction of stages 2 – 9 of the development. Access Related Code of Practice Infringements resulting from the construction of a vehicle crossing exceeding 6m width and retention of internal vehicle access as private rather than vested roads. Subdivision, land disturbance and change of use of HAIL site in the presence of a detailed site investigation confirming soil contaminant standard compliance.
Pursuant to the established principle of bundling of consent matters within an application, the application falls to be assessed against the highest order activity classification within the consenting matters. Accordingly, the development is classified as a Discretionary Activity. The application site is within the Main Residential Zone of the City of Napier District Plan, and is further subject to the Te Awa Structure Plan, which has been prepared to guide development of the area. While the residential development is consistent with the Council’s long term land use aspirations for the site, the development is proposed in advance of the established development sequencing of the generally stalled Te Awa Structure Plan. While the inconsistency with the defined sequencing of structure plan development elevates the application to a discretionary activity, the site can be readily serviced by adjacent Council infrastructure without causing adverse effects on the infrastructure resource or any other property within the structure plan area. The development incorporates the 40m wide combined stormwater swale and reserve corridor to the western and southern boundaries of the site that is set out in the Te Awa Structure Plan and protected by Designations within the City of Napier District Plan. The application proposes parkland landscaping of this corridor to create an attractive space to complement the suburban development. The development also achieves the minimum residential density required within the Te Awa Structure Plan area, making best use of the zoned greenfield land resource and the servicing infrastructure. As demonstrated in this report, the zone appropriate greenfield residential development would result in no more than minor effects on the surrounding environment and less than minor effects on neighbouring properties. The development would also be consistent with the relevant objectives and policies of the City of Napier District Plan and would be consistent with all but the development sequencing provisions of the Te Awa Structure Plan.
57
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Assessment of Environmental Effects
The proposed activity is considered consistent with the purpose and principles of the Act, in that it represents a sustainable and efficient use of the land and physical resources and there are no ‘other matters’ which would give reason for Council to decline the application. On this basis it is submitted that the application be approved in accordance with Section 104, 104B, and 176 of the Resource Management Act 1991 and the Resource Management (National Environmental Standard for Assessing and Managing Contaminants in Soil to Protect Human Health) Regulations 2011 subject to conditions. ...............................................................
...............................................................
Prepared by:
Reviewed and approved for release by:
Jason Kaye Senior Planner Development Nous Limited
Matthew Holder Principal Planner Development Nous Limited
On behalf of the applicant
On behalf of the applicant
............................................................... 21 December 2018
............................................................... 21 December 2018
58
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier Assessment of Environmental Effects
APPENDIX A Computer Freehold Register (Title) Documents
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier Assessment of Environmental Effects
APPENDIX B Staged Subdivision Scheme Plans and House Plans
HBV2/873
.0
.2
24
24.2
24 .2
.2
.8
20
16.1
1 1.0 .0
12.7 18.9
C014 )
20.0
STA GE 1 C
14.2
20.0
(SHE ET
20.0 16.0
16 20.0 .0
16.0 20.0
17.00 m 16.9 20.0 20.0
)
C013
E 1B
(SHE ET
20.0
STA G 20.0
20.0
D
SEN
20.0
Lot 381 DP 513468 0.0483
Lot 382 DP 513468 0.0483
Lot 383 DP 513468 0.0483
795983
795984
795985
795986
795987
Lot 384 DP 516362 0.0483 804715
Lot 385 DP 516362 0.0483 804716
Lot 386 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 387 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 388 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 389 DP 516362 0.0483
804717
804718
804719
804720
22.4
22.4
ET C
(SHE
21.8
20.0
Lot 370 DP 513468 0.0462 795979
20.0
16.0
795981
Lot 345 DP 513468 0.0544
Lot 350 DP 513468 0.0521
Lot 377 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 378 DP 516362 0.0490
804711
804712
804714
804710
804713
795982
Lot 368 DP 513468 0.0469
Lot 367 DP 513468 0.0550
Lot 366 DP 513468 0.0578
794507
794506
Lot 365 DP 513468 0.0914 793447
Lot 364 DP 513468 0.0621
Date
17/12/2017 Date
KRC
17/12/2017
Designed
Date
Approved
Date
Client
DURHAM PROPERTY INVESTMENTS PROPOSED SUBDIVISION OF LOT 1 & 2 DP 14417 COMPRISED IN RT HBG2/863 & 420376
793446
793433
Lot 356 DP 513468 0.0604
Lot 352 DP 513468 0.0544
793438
793434
Lot 355 DP 513468 0.0527
793435
All Rights Reserved. This document is produced by Development Nous Ltd solely for the benefit of and use by the client in accordance with the terms of engagement. Development Nous Ltd does not and shall not assume any responsibility or liability whatsoever to any third party arising out of any use or reliance by third party on the content of this document.
795977
793432
Lot 353 DP 513468 0.1185 40.0
Lot 376 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 351 DP 513468 0.0544
793427
0
Lot 375 DP 516362 0.0470
795978
Lot 347 DP 513468 0.0544
Lot 346 DP 513468 0.0544
Lot 374 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 369 DP 513468 0.0509
793431
793430
793429
Lot 373 DP 513468 0.0562
795980
Lot 348 DP 513468 0.0544
22.6
22.6
Lot 371 DP 513468 0.0520
Lot 349 DP 513468 0.0565
20.0
17.7
Lot 372 DP 513468 0.0543
HBB2/1223
169.
Drawn
GG
22.5
305 7421m²
Date
Checked
012)
A
GE 1
STA
16.0
16.0
16.8
17.0
13.0
20.0 16.0 20.0 17.0
16.9 20.0
16.0
Lot 380 DP 513468 0.0483
Fieldwork
793428
35.0
Lot 9 DP 6055 2.1650
Lot 379 DP 513468 0.0500
KAITUNA PLACE
16.7
24.2
3.6 5.8
24.2
24.2
8.8
24.2
24.2
378863
23 23 .2 .2
7.5
10.5 14.2 16.0
ROA 20.0
16.0
16.0
m 17.20
ERIK
15.9 20.0
32.0
14.4
17.8 21.8
16.0
12.9
2 24 4.2 .2
40.0
40.0
5.3
Lot 3 DP 394762 6.7380
4.2
LOT 7 695m²
71899
35.0
17.8
16.6
24.2 15.9
.2
24
24.1
HBG3/590
20.0
LOT 8 695m²
RY
12.9
16.6
24.2
24.2
.2
24
Lot 93 DP 10451 0.0713
16.0 20.0
16.0 20.0
16.0
35.0
16.0
24
24.2
24.2
14.4 14.4
.2
24
STAGE 3
HBG2/209
20.0
16.0 13.0
LOT 36 388m²
14.4
15.9
24.2
10.0 10.0
.2 23 .2
23
24 .2
HBC4/814
Lot 94 DP 10451 0.0733
LOT 9 700m²
32.0
ENT
LOT 35 383m²
12.9
35.0
21.2
STAGE 2
24.2 24.2
24.2
.2
23
.2
24
Lot 95 DP 10451 0.0713
35.0
LOT 10 700m²
16.0
25.8
24
21
HBF4/40
35.0
LOT 11 700m²
Lot 1 DP 318389 6.1891
Superseded
LOT 12 700m²
24.2
4.2
Lot 96 DP 10451 0.0672
35.0
ROA
16.0
16.0
16.0
12.0
14.8
11.8
12.9
15.9
LOT 32 388m²
LOT 34 383m²
24.2
24.2
LOT 167 381m²
16.0
D1
17.0
20.0
18.9
16.6
16.6
LOT 166 404m²
LOT 31 388m²
LOT 33 388m²
MAIN
4.2
D1
24.2
LOT 163 459m² FA
24.2
FB 15.1
LOT 165 381m² 24.2
18.9 18.9
LOT 162
24.2
24.2
21.2
8
18.1 18.1 21.2
12.1
458m²
LOT 30 388m² 24.2
21.2
401 5361m²
LOT 13 700m²
24.2
ROA
17.6
D6
21.2
LOT 164
ROA
13.8
ROA D
16.2
436m²
15.9
.3
ROA
LOT 161
436m²
Lot 2 DP 14417 9.2648
7.5
LOT 150 356m²
35.0
LOT 14 700m² 35.0
24.2
24.2
4.2
15.1
LOT 29 388m²
24.2
21.2 4.2
3.2 4.2
16 .1
15.0
14.9 14.9
18.1
LOT 149 361m²
LOT 15 695m²
24.2
10.0
21.0
14.9
21.8 14.9
4.0
6
LOT 147 396m² GA
4.2
Y2
32.0
16.0
.2
19
.5
21
2.3
.6
22
20.1
18.8
387m² GB
12.9
.2
24
.2
HBK1/825
D1
16.0
.5
21
.6
22
12.6
13.0
ROA
D8
15.2
.0
15
.2
.3 16 .3
16
8.1 8.1
4.1
.2
6.7
.0
28
20 .5
15 .9
4.2
4.2
14.9
12.8 13.0 16.0
.6
22
.6
24.2 24.2
LOT 28 388m²
.2 9.1 LOT 176 13 420376 21.2 LOT 171 16.5 13 .7 ROA .7 LOT 6 4.2 D7 LOT 37 477m² LOT 178 2.8 13 16.4 374m² LOT 56 .0 700m² 388m² LOT 174 LOT 180 15 21 .4 16.4 405m² .6 418m² DB 24.2 LOT 183 1 1 R 6 5 LOT 55 366m² .0 .4 400m² 35.0 OA 9.0 21(SHEET C015) LOT 175 .2 16 D9 DA 16.5 .0 LOT 38 5.0 388m² 400m² LOT 184 LOT 188 15 16 359m² LOT 177 14.6 LOT 54 .5 402 .0 16.5 LOT 5 349m² 400m² 16 15.4 .0 381m² 24.2 3579m² CB 388m² 16.5 364m² 15 784m² 16 .3 LOT 53 .0 15.4 LOT 179 24.2 16.5 16 CA .0 LOT 39 LOT 181 15.4 388m² 385m² 16 1 35.0 .6 6.0 LOT 52 LOT 187 LOT 182 431m² 374m² BB 16 .0 306 388m² 17.3 403m² LOT 4 24.2 374m² LOT 185 11 BA 16 2.0 LOT 51 .0 9954m² 15.4 373m² 24.2 16 AB .0 13.50 763m² 388m² LOT 40 13 15.4 m .6 AA LOT 50 LOT 186 4.6 15.4 387m² 16 .0 ROA 381m² 388m² 35.0 16.0 D 24 9 .2 301 21.2 (SHEET C016) 16.0 16 4.2 LOT 3 B .0 508m² LOT 41 LOT 49 15.9 700m² 15 16 387m² 2.0 388m² LOT 48 16.0 .0 16 .0 24.2 388m² 16.0 LOT 47 7.6 35.0 16.0 11.1 388m² LOT 46 5.0 7.2 LOT 45 LOT 2 16.0 LOT 42 388m² 16.0 LOT 44 700m² 420m² 388m² 21.2 16.0 411m² A 35.0 16.0 LOT 43 165.0 21.2 LOT 1 416m² 20 .7 24.9 789m²
4.2
HBK1/977
Lot 97 DP 10451 0.0672
LOT 27 388m²
22
.5
15
17.0 18.1
LOT 144
LOT 26 388m²
16.0 20.0
.6
.2 22
24 .8 15
.2
24
.2
24
LOT 158 456m² 2
LOT 148 360m²
21.2
24.2
21.2
24.2
18.9
27 .0
16 .5
LOT 173 410m²
LOT 146 391m²
18.2 17.0
15.9
LOT 160 377m²
LOT 159 415m²
STAGE 5 (SHEET C018)
16.9
LOT 145 394m²
32.0
16.0
24.2 24.2
22
.2
15
.2 15
.3
24 .2 24 .2
.7 17
24 .2
23.7
.7
35.0
LOT 16 695m²
NTR
24.2 16.0
23.1
16.0
20
19
24.2
LOT 24 383m²
LOT 25 383m²
14.1
.7
14
9.6
24.2
LOT 115 388m²
34.6
LOT 18 698m²
LOT 17 700m²
21.2
4.2 16.0
LOT 119 14 .6 378m² LOT 117 LB 13 397m² .2 LA
24
.2 24
24 .2
15.4
10.4 10.4
7.4
14.2 16.0
LOT 114 388m²
LOT 19 632m²
35.0
STAGE 8 (SHEET C021) E
16.5
344m²
24
.2
24 .2
.2
24
24.2
21.2
15.6
31 .0
.3
15.9
24 .2
24 .2
24 .2
m²
15
239
.2
.3 15
16
408 3324m²
.1
LOT 113 363m²
.1
41 7
.6
15 .3
16.2
16 .0
24 .2
16.2 24.2
15 .0 .0 16
15.3
D4
22
.8
.6
21
LOT 22 345m²
NOTES 1. This plan has been produced for resource consent purposes. Boundaries and dimensions are subject to resource consent approval and land transfer survey. 2. Easements may be required for cross-boundary services. 3. Current Napier City Council Zoning: Main Residential. NCC Planning Maps: I7, I8 and H8. 4. All private shared lots are to be held by a Residents Society. 5. Lot 417 is to be a private shared access lot subject to an amalgamation condition. 6. This plan is to be read in conjunction with the proposed stage plans C012 - C022.
30 .3
24.2
3
16.0
.2 13
.2 15
24 .2
16 .0
15 .2 22 .6
24 .2
9.2 15 .2
0 .0 16
.2
12 .2 16 .0
12.2
NORTH
14 .8
5.9 0.9
6.8
16 .0
AD 1 RO
15 .2
15 .2
8.0 15 .2
15 .5
RO AD 10
16 .0
16 .0
12 .3 .0 16
.7
14
.2 12
.0 16 .2
24
.2 15
15 .9 24 .2 .6 16
.2 24 .9
15
AD
18 .4
24
1.7 1.7
15 .2
15 .2 8.0
15 .2
6.1 22 15 .5
16 .0 16 .0
12 .9 12 .9 24
15 15 .4 .4
26 .6
25 .1
D7
.2
16 .6
16
LOT 170 371m²
.0 16
.0
RO AD 10
16 12
.2
.9
EB
25 .2
12 .2
16 .0
15 .2 16 .0
RO A
17 .1
LOT 172 416m²
LOT 142 387m²
RO
LOT 156 372m²
16 .0
15
12 .9
.2 15
AD
10
23 .5
.9
LOT 57 365m²
Lot 98 DP 10451 0.0672
23 .5
LOT 169 392m²
15 .2
.4
4.6
15 .2
LOT 157 384m² EA
.2
HBE2/1003
RO
15
.2
24 .2
12
97
.0
LOT 58 369m²
15
3.9
15 .2 16 .0
20 .5
LOT 168 370m²
AD
15 .7
LOT 21 350m²
LOT 23 387m²
4.2
Lot 210 DP 10451 0.0728
4.2
24 .2
15 .2
HBK1/626
15 .2
LOT 154 388m²
16 .0
RO A
1
5.2 LOT 124 344m² LOT 125
LOT 143 25 435m² .7
403 4046m²
LOT 155 369m²
15
.2 15
7.0
LOT 59 369m²
15 .6
8.0
.2 .0 16
.6 15
8.0
.2 15
8.0
20 .5
24 .2
13
Lot 209 DP 10451 0.0741
LOT 60 369m²
23 .5
LOT 153 370m²
4.2
.2
19
27
LOT 118 446m²
3.7
RO
LOT 112 420m²
4.2
HBA3/306
.2
.2
.0
.5
.4
15
.9
15
.0
.2
4.2
HBA3/1092
24
4.2
Lot 208 DP 10451 0.0741
Lot 114 DP 10248 0.0419
24 .2
23 .5
LOT 152 392m²
302 194m²
HBA2/1403
HBA3/306
15 .2
Lot 118 DP 10451 0.0407
24 .2
31
NB
29
15
4.1
6.3
24.2
LOT 92 469m² NA
15 .2
.0
4.7
LOT 91 421m²
29
LOT 111 369m²
15 .2 31 .9
4.2
Lot 207 DP 9997 0.0687
LOT 151 375m²
.6
15
LOT 61 378m²
HBA3/1372
20 .5
16
.6
24 .2
LOT 139
19 .5
4.2
16
.0
.0
13
LOT 121 347m²
473m²
STAGE 4 (SHEET C017)
.0
40
40 .0
LOT 137
LOT 138 364m²
16
.0 .0 16
LOT 62 388m²
HBA1/525
Lot 206 DP 9997 0.0687
.6
HBD2/756
24 .2
16
.5
.2
LOT 110 369m²
LOT 108 488m²
.6
4.2
Lot 205 DP 9997 0.0675
24 .2
21 .2
LOT 63 388m²
LOT 109 370m²
16
3
15
.2
LOT 105 367m²
LOT 120 359m² 23
7.9 7.9
.0
9.6
16
11 .0
24 .2
16
C
HBA1/801
.2
24 .2
4.2
Lot 204 DP 9997 0.0703
HBK1/439
.2
LOT 90 413m² 25
15 .2 LOT 116 404m² 15 LOT 128 .2 21 .8 15 .2 344m² 15 LOT 123 .4 3.7 15 0.5 .2 LOT 129 348m² LOT 126 15 .2 15 337m² LOT 132 .4 0.5 15 HB 23 348m² .2 .4 13.4 323m² 13.4 1.3 HA LOT 127 LOT 133 1.3 15 .4 14 .7 348m² LOT 130 444m² 30.2 14.7 15 LOT 131 348m² .4 19 .5 15.4 302m² LOT 134 4.1 IB 14.0 LOT 135 RO IA 307m² LOT 140 19 AD .5 15.4 303m² 5 JB 433m² LOT 141 15.6 JA 404 12.4 19 362m² .5 4.2 4298m² 13 4.4 2
21
388m²
LOT 64 388m²
HBA2/1222
Lot 165 DP 9997 0.0784
XREF's: QuickMap_TE Awa_willowbank CAD FILE: H:\_2018\H20180069 - Durham Property Investments\CAD\H20180069-CONSENT-R1.dwg
24 .2
RO AD
15
15
24 .2 24 .2
.5
.4
16 .5 .5
LOT 94 402m² MA
MB
16
17
LOT 89 15 .8 401m² OA LOT 20 384m² 5.8
7.7
16
4.5
Lot 203 DP 9997 0.0718
Lot 164 DP 9997 0.0725
HBA1/624
15 .2
22 6.1
16 .0 16 .0
16 .0 .0 16
HBH2/141
HBJ2/292
Lot 166 DP 9997 0.0682
LOT 103 388m²
LOT 104 389m²
21
23 .5
LOT 136 365m²
16 .1 16 .1
9.6 11
24 .2
LOT 65 388m²
.2
16 LOT 106 .0 .2 370m² LOT 107 KB 16 370m² .0 4.2 (SHEET C019) KA 20 .5
LOT 122 354m² 2
4.2
LOT 66 388m²
307 4784m²
LOT 102 365m² 24
.5
.4
15
4.6
Lot 202 DP 9997 0.0693
Lot 163 DP 9997 0.0786
24 .2
0
HBW1/356
HBD3/1295
4.2
LOT 67 388m² .0
Lot 201 DP 10396 0.1090
Lot 162 DP 9997 0.0776
15
WI LL
HBE1/551
4.2
303 194m² 2
4.2
Lot 161 DP 9997 0.0789
24 .2
.0
HBC4/792
24 .2
LOT 68 378m² 2
.0
HBW1/355
.0
.2
.4
18 .7
LOT 93 402m²
LOT 95 402m²
15
LOT 88 374m² OB
16 .5 16 .5
LOT 98 402m²
406 2076m²
21
15
16 .5
LOT 96 402m²
16 .5 16 .5
.2
STAGE 6
16
Lot 198 DP 10396 0.1778
Lot 160 DP 9997 0.0786
HBM1/694
40
16
HBH4/1235
21
PA
4.2
HBM1/695
24 .2
LOT 69 388m²
40 .0
405 2363m²
.2
4.2
Lot 150 DP 9997 0.1039
Lot 159 DP 9997 0.0814
OW BA NK
HBA1/716
Lot 151 DP 9997 0.0753
AD 1
HBJ3/1004
LOT 70 388m²
RO
Bisson Place
Lot 197 DP 9997 0.0687
24 .2
12
Lot 158 DP 9997 0.0710
HBM1/696
LOT 71 388m²
.6
HBE1/318
16
Lot 196 DP 9997 0.0703
8.0
Lot 152 DP 9997 0.0819
24
15 .4
LOT 87 374m²
15 .4
2
16 .5
LOT 97 402m²
.2
LOT 101 393m²
PB
AD
.5
16
.2
24 .2
LOT 100 388m² 24
RO
16
4.6
MA
HB200/23
LOT 99 389m²
HBG2/863
24
LOT 72 388m²
Lot 195 DP 9997 0.0758
4.2
UE HBB3/848
24 24 .2 .2
Lot 1 DP 14417 4.5526
.4
4.2
HBJ3/948
HBM1/697
388m²
.0
HBA1/516
24 .2
QB
15 .4
1729m²
.2
4.2
LOT 73
16
Lot 157 DP 9997 0.0786
HBF2/1462
Lot 194 DP 9997 0.0753
.0
Lot 156 DP 9997 0.0690
LOT 75 369m² LOT 74 375m²
16
HBB4/640
Lot 153 DP 9997 0.0839
NU E
304 194m² 2
24 .2
Lot 193 DP 9997 0.0741
.0
Lot 155 DP 9997 0.0672
.2
4.2
HBA3/1263
16
HBA1/619
24
21 .2
24
LOT 76 369m²
4.2
N SO S BI
A PL
CE
HBM1/677
VE
Lot 192 DP 9997 0.0741
E
HBM1/687
Lot 12 DP 10375 0.0935
AV EN U
Lot 154 DP 9997 0.0789
308 9045m²
HBA3/48
15
LOT 85 15 .4 374m² LOT 86 QA 374m² 15 .4
4.6
Lot 23 DP 10192 0.0799
STAGE 7 (SHEET C020)
Lot 191 DP 9997 0.0728
AVE N
HBY1/923
ELD
Lot 6 DP 28293 0.0603
HBJ4/1500
4.2 24 .2
4.2
PE RC YS PIL LER A
HBM1/686
HBM1/676
SEF I
HBY1/922
SER VIC EL AN E
Lot 22 DP 10192 0.2137
LOT 77 369m² 2
.4
LOT 83 15 .4 373m² LOT 84 RA 373m² 15 .4
RB
STAGE 9 (SHEET C022) 407
.2
Appr. Issued KRC KRC
15
409m²
4.2
24
HBB3/843
Lot 190 DP 9997 0.0715
7.8
.7
.2
LOT 78 369m²
LOT 82
11
24
HBF4/39
Lot 189 DP 9997 0.0703 Lot 11 DP 10375 0.1464
.2
LOT 79 369m² 15 .2
HBY1/918
Lot 2 DP 28293 0.0286 Lot 3 DP 28293 HBY1/919 0.0310 Lot 4HBY1/920 DP 28293 0.0319 Lot 5 DP 28293 HBY1/921 0.0276
24
HBG2/478
Lot 188 DP 9997 0.0718
HBM1/673
17 .6
23 .0
LOT 80 384m²
15 .2
Lot 187 DP 9997 0.0705 Lot 10 DP 10192 0.1224
Lot 1 DP 28293 0.0596
.1
LOT 81 388m²
HBH2/114
Lot 24 DP 10192 0.3819
26
14 .8
HBM1/678
Lot 186 DP 9997 0.0748
HBM1/672
16.0
Lot 9 DP 10192 0.1274
HBM1/675
13
Lot 8 DP 10375 0.2324
Description Rev Date 1 17/12/2018 FOR APPROVAL
40
Pt Section 92 Blk VIII Heretaunga SD 0.0916
16 .0
HBW1/1021
EE T
22 .6
HBW1/1023
STR
21.8
FIT ZG ER AL DP LA
HBW1/1022
DP 26433 0.0498
4.8
DATE PLOTTED: 12/20/2018 9:04:21 AM BY : GEMMA GUILFORD
DP 26433 0.0442
Lot 1 DP 26433 0.1325
BE S TA LL
793437
Lot 354 DP 513468 0.0527
Lot 363 DP 513468 0.0560
Lot 357 DP 513468 0.0584
793445
793439
Lot 358 DP 513468 0.0527
Lot 362 DP 513468 0.0526
16 & 38 WILLOWBANK AVE TE AWA, NAPIER OVERALL SCHEME PLAN Status
FOR APPROVAL
NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES
793444
Datum
793440
Lot 361 DP 513468 0.0526
793436
Lot 359 DP 513468 0.1125 793441
793443
Lot 360 DP 513468
Council Ref.
HB2000
Scale
1:1000
Drawing Number
H20180069-C011
Size
A3 Revision
1
HBW1/1023
HBW1/1021
STA LL STR
EE T
HBV2/873
Description Rev Date 1 17/12/2018 FOR APPROVAL
Lot 8 DP 10375 0.2324
Lot 9 DP 10192 0.1274
HBM1/675
HBM1/678
Lot 186 DP 9997 0.0748
HBM1/672
HBH2/114
Lot 187 DP 9997 0.0705
Lot 24 DP 10192 0.3819
Lot 10 DP 10192 0.1224
Lot 1 DP 28293 0.0596
HBG2/478
Lot 188 DP 9997 0.0718
HBM1/673
HBY1/918
HBB4/640
Lot 156 DP 9997 0.0690
Lot 153 DP 9997 0.0839
AN E
Lot 157 DP 9997 0.0786
HBA1/516
HBJ3/948
HBM1/697
Lot 152 DP 9997 0.0819
HBG2/863
Lot 193 DP 9997 0.0741 HBF2/1462
Lot 194 DP 9997 0.0753 HBB3/848
Lot 195 DP 9997 0.0758 HB200/23
Lot 196 DP 9997 0.0703 HBE1/318
Lot 158 DP 9997 0.0710
HBM1/696 Bisson Place
HBA3/1263
Lot 197 DP 9997 0.0687
HBJ3/1004
HBA1/716
HBH4/1235
HBM1/695
Lot 198 DP 10396 0.1778
Lot 160 DP 9997 0.0786
HBM1/694
OW BA
Lot 150 DP 9997 0.1039
NK
Lot 159 DP 9997 0.0814
Lot 151 DP 9997 0.0753
NOTES 1. This plan has been produced for resource consent purposes. Boundaries and dimensions are subject to resource consent approval and land transfer survey. 2. Easements may be required for cross-boundary services. 3. Current Napier City Council Zoning: Main Residential. NCC Planning Maps: I7, I8 and H8. 4. Existing Easement area A on DP 14417 (E.C.322767.4) is to be surrendered.
E
Lot 155 DP 9997 0.0672
Lot 1 DP 14417 4.5526
AV E
P
HBA1/619
HBM1/677
AV EN UE
MA
S BI
N SO
CE A L
Lot 192 DP 9997 0.0741
HBA3/48
Lot 12 DP 10375 0.0935
NU
Lot 154 DP 9997 0.0789
HBM1/687
HBJ4/1500
Lot 191 DP 9997 0.0728
UE
HBY1/923
HBM1/676
VEN
HBM1/686
Lot 190 DP 9997 0.0715
DA
Lot 6 DP 28293 0.0603
HBB3/843
Lot 11 DP 10375 0.1464
IEL
HBY1/922
PE RC YS PIL LER
Lot 189 DP 9997 0.0703
SEF
Lot 22 DP 10192 0.2137
HBF4/39
SER VIC EL
Lot 2 DP 28293 0.0286 Lot 3 DP 28293 HBY1/919 0.0310 Lot 4HBY1/920 DP 28293 0.0319 Lot 5 DP 28293 HBY1/921 0.0276
Lot 23 DP 10192 0.0799
HBW1/355
HBC4/792
HBE1/551
WI LL
Lot 161 DP 9997 0.0789 Lot 201 DP 10396 0.1090
Lot 162 DP 9997 0.0776
HBW1/356
Lot 1 DP 318389 6.1891
HBD3/1295
71899
Lot 202 DP 9997 0.0693
Lot 163 DP 9997 0.0786
LOT 500
Lot 203 DP 9997 0.0718
Lot 164 DP 9997 0.0725
HBA1/624
Superseded
HBH2/141
HBJ2/292
Lot 166 DP 9997 0.0682
13.3ha
HBA2/1222
Lot 204 DP 9997 0.0703
HBK1/439
HBA1/801
Lot 165 DP 9997 0.0784
Lot 205 DP 9997 0.0675
HBD2/756
HBA1/525
AD
Lot 206 DP 9997 0.0687 HBA3/1372
EN R O
Lot 207 DP 9997 0.0687
Lot 118 DP 10451 0.0407
HBA2/1403
HBA3/306
Lot 208 DP 10451 0.0741
Lot 114 DP 10248 0.0419
ERIK S
HBA3/1092
HBA3/306
Lot 209 DP 10451 0.0741 HBK1/626
32.0
20.0
LOT 7 695m²
16.9
Lot 2 DP 14417 9.2648
35.0 20.0
420376
HBK1/977
LOT 6 700m²
Lot 97 DP 10451 0.0672 HBK1/825
20.0
HBE2/1003
Lot 98 DP 10451 0.0672
4.2
Lot 210 DP 10451 0.0728
Lot 379 DP 513468 0.0500
Lot 380 DP 513468 0.0483
Lot 381 DP 513468 0.0483
Lot 382 DP 513468 0.0483
Lot 383 DP 513468 0.0483
795983
795984
795985
795986
795987
Lot 384 DP 516362 0.0483 804715
Lot 385 DP 516362 0.0483 804716
Lot 386 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 387 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 388 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 389 DP 516362 0.0483
804717
804718
804719
804720
35.0
Fieldwork
Lot 95 DP 10451 0.0713
35.0 21.8
HBC4/814
LOT 4
Lot 94 DP 10451 0.0733
35.0
LOT 3 700m²
HBG3/590
Lot 370 DP 513468 0.0462 795979
35.0
Lot 9 DP 6055 2.1650
795981
Lot 346 DP 513468 0.0544 793428
Lot 345 DP 513468 0.0544
Lot 374 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 375 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 376 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 377 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 378 DP 516362 0.0490
804711
804712
804714
804710
804713
795982
Lot 369 DP 513468 0.0509
793431
795978
Lot 350 DP 513468 0.0521
Lot 347 DP 513468 0.0544 793429
Lot 373 DP 513468 0.0562
795980
793430
22.6
22.5
LOT 1 789m²
Lot 371 DP 513468 0.0520
Lot 348 DP 513468 0.0544
35.0
378863
Lot 372 DP 513468 0.0543
Lot 349 DP 513468 0.0565
22.6
20.0
Lot 3 DP 394762 6.7380
Drawn
Lot 368 DP 513468 0.0469
Lot 367 DP 513468 0.0550
Lot 366 DP 513468 0.0578
794507
794506
Lot 365 DP 513468 0.0914 793447
17/12/2017
793432
Lot 364 DP 513468 0.0621
793433
Lot 356 DP 513468 0.0604 793438
793434
Lot 355 DP 513468 0.0527 Lot 353 DP 513468 0.1185 793435
17/12/2017
Designed
Date
Approved
Date
Client
DURHAM PROPERTY INVESTMENTS PROPOSED SUBDIVISION OF LOT 1 & 2 DP 14417 COMPRISED IN RT HBG2/863 & 420376
793446
Lot 352 DP 513468 0.0544
793427
Date
KRC
This document is produced by Development Nous Ltd solely for the benefit of and use by the client in accordance with the terms of engagement. Development Nous Ltd does not and shall not assume any responsibility or liability whatsoever to any third party arising out of any use or reliance by third party on the content of this document.
795977
Lot 351 DP 513468 0.0544
HBB2/1223
All Rights Reserved.
Date
GG
35.0
LOT 2 700m²
Date
Checked
20.0
Lot 93 DP 10451 0.0713
STA G
763m²
HBG2/209
KAITUNA PLACE
21.8
HBF4/40
E 1A
LOT 5 784m²
22.4
22.4
Lot 96 DP 10451 0.0672
20.0
XREF's: QuickMap_TE Awa_willowbank CAD FILE: H:\_2018\H20180069 - Durham Property Investments\CAD\H20180069-CONSENT-R1.dwg
Appr. Issued KRC KRC
Pt Section 92 Blk VIII Heretaunga SD 0.0916
NORTH
DP 26433 0.0498
FIT ZG E
HBW1/1022
LD P
DP 26433 0.0442
Lot 1 DP 26433 0.1325
RA
DATE PLOTTED: 12/20/2018 9:04:14 AM BY : GEMMA GUILFORD
LA
BE
793437
Lot 354 DP 513468 0.0527
Lot 363 DP 513468 0.0560
Lot 357 DP 513468 0.0584
793445
793439
Lot 358 DP 513468 0.0527
Lot 362 DP 513468 0.0526
16 & 38 WILLOWBANK AVE TE AWA, NAPIER STAGE 1A - SCHEME PLAN Status
FOR APPROVAL
NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES
793444
Datum
793440
Lot 361 DP 513468 0.0526
793436
Lot 359 DP 513468 0.1125 793441
793443
Lot 360 DP 513468
Council Ref.
HB2000
Scale
1:1000
Drawing Number
H20180069-C012
Size
A3 Revision
1
HBW1/1023
HBW1/1021
STA LL STR
EE T
HBV2/873
Description Rev Date 1 17/12/2018 FOR APPROVAL
Lot 8 DP 10375 0.2324
Lot 9 DP 10192 0.1274
HBM1/675
HBM1/678
Lot 186 DP 9997 0.0748
HBM1/672
HBH2/114
Lot 187 DP 9997 0.0705
Lot 24 DP 10192 0.3819
Lot 10 DP 10192 0.1224
Lot 1 DP 28293 0.0596
HBG2/478
Lot 188 DP 9997 0.0718
HBM1/673
HBY1/918
AN E
HB200/23
Lot 196 DP 9997 0.0703 HBE1/318
Lot 158 DP 9997 0.0710
Lot 197 DP 9997 0.0687
HBJ3/1004
HBW1/355
HBC4/792
HBE1/551
Lot 201 DP 10396 0.1090
Lot 162 DP 9997 0.0776
20.0
35.0
WI LL
Lot 161 DP 9997 0.0789
16.9
Lot 198 DP 10396 0.1778
Lot 160 DP 9997 0.0786
HBM1/694
32.0
HBW1/356
LOT 15 695m²
20.0
HBH4/1235
OW BA
HBM1/695
LOT 14 700m² 35.0
LOT 13 700m²
HBD3/1295
35.0 20.0
HBA2/1222
LOT 11 700m²
Lot 204 DP 9997 0.0703
35.0
HBA1/525
35.0 20.0
HBA2/1403
HBA3/306
Lot 208 DP 10451 0.0741
Lot 114 DP 10248 0.0419
32.0
HBA3/1092
HBA3/306
LOT 8 695m²
17.0
Lot 207 DP 9997 0.0687
Lot 118 DP 10451 0.0407
20.0
20.0
35.0
LOT 9 700m²
HBA3/1372
EN R O
Lot 206 DP 9997 0.0687
20.0
HBD2/756
LOT 10 700m²
4.2
Lot 209 DP 10451 0.0741 HBK1/626
Lot 210 DP 10451 0.0728
LOT 7 STAGE 1A
HBE2/1003
AD
20.0
HBA1/801
Lot 205 DP 9997 0.0675
ERIK S
HBK1/439
Lot 165 DP 9997 0.0784
71899
Superseded 35.0
20.0
Lot 164 DP 9997 0.0725
HBA1/624
LOT 501 12.7ha
Lot 203 DP 9997 0.0718
STA
HBH2/141
HBJ2/292
Lot 166 DP 9997 0.0682
LOT 12 700m²
Lot 1 DP 318389 6.1891
20.0
Lot 202 DP 9997 0.0693
Lot 163 DP 9997 0.0786
4.2
Lot 150 DP 9997 0.1039
Lot 159 DP 9997 0.0814
NK
HBA1/716
Lot 151 DP 9997 0.0753
20.0
HBM1/696
20.0
HBJ3/948
Lot 152 DP 9997 0.0819
20.0
HBA1/516
HBB3/848
Lot 195 DP 9997 0.0758
B
Lot 157 DP 9997 0.0786
GE 1
Lot 156 DP 9997 0.0690
HBM1/697
Bisson Place
HBF2/1462
Lot 194 DP 9997 0.0753
20.0
HBB4/640
Lot 153 DP 9997 0.0839
HBA3/1263
Lot 193 DP 9997 0.0741
E
Lot 155 DP 9997 0.0672
Lot 192 DP 9997 0.0741
AV E
P
HBA1/619
HBM1/677
AV EN UE
MA
S BI
N SO
CE A L
NOTES 1. This plan has been produced for resource consent purposes. Boundaries and dimensions are subject to resource consent approval and land transfer survey. 2. Easements may be required for cross-boundary services. 3. Current Napier City Council Zoning: Main Residential. NCC Planning Maps: I7, I8 and H8.
HBA3/48
Lot 12 DP 10375 0.0935
NU
Lot 154 DP 9997 0.0789
HBM1/687
HBJ4/1500
Lot 191 DP 9997 0.0728
UE
HBY1/923
HBM1/676
VEN
HBM1/686
Lot 190 DP 9997 0.0715
DA
Lot 6 DP 28293 0.0603
HBB3/843
Lot 11 DP 10375 0.1464
IEL
HBY1/922
PE RC YS PIL LER
Lot 189 DP 9997 0.0703
SEF
Lot 22 DP 10192 0.2137
HBF4/39
SER VIC EL
Lot 2 DP 28293 0.0286 Lot 3 DP 28293 HBY1/919 0.0310 Lot 4HBY1/920 DP 28293 0.0319 Lot 5 DP 28293 HBY1/921 0.0276
Lot 23 DP 10192 0.0799
Lot 98 DP 10451 0.0672 HBK1/977
XREF's: QuickMap_TE Awa_willowbank CAD FILE: H:\_2018\H20180069 - Durham Property Investments\CAD\H20180069-CONSENT-R1.dwg
Appr. Issued KRC KRC
Pt Section 92 Blk VIII Heretaunga SD 0.0916
NORTH
DP 26433 0.0498
FIT ZG E
HBW1/1022
LD P
DP 26433 0.0442
Lot 1 DP 26433 0.1325
RA
DATE PLOTTED: 12/20/2018 9:04:06 AM BY : GEMMA GUILFORD
LA
BE
LOT 6 STAGE 1A
Lot 97 DP 10451 0.0672
Lot 379 DP 513468 0.0500
Lot 380 DP 513468 0.0483
Lot 381 DP 513468 0.0483
Lot 382 DP 513468 0.0483
Lot 383 DP 513468 0.0483
795983
795984
795985
795986
795987
Lot 384 DP 516362 0.0483 804715
Lot 385 DP 516362 0.0483 804716
Lot 386 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 387 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 388 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 389 DP 516362 0.0483
804717
804718
804719
804720
HBK1/825
Fieldwork
Lot 96 DP 10451 0.0672
KAITUNA PLACE
LOT 5 STAGE 1A
HBF4/40
Date
Drawn
Date
GG
Lot 95 DP 10451 0.0713
17/12/2018
Checked
HBC4/814
LOT 4 STAGE 1A
Lot 94 DP 10451 0.0733
Lot 370 DP 513468 0.0462
HBG2/209
795979
Lot 93 DP 10451 0.0713
Lot 372 DP 513468 0.0543
Lot 371 DP 513468 0.0520
795981
Lot 349 DP 513468 0.0565 Lot 348 DP 513468 0.0544
Lot 350 DP 513468 0.0521
Lot 347 DP 513468 0.0544
LOT 1 STAGE 1A
378863
Lot 346 DP 513468 0.0544 793428
Lot 9 DP 6055 2.1650
Lot 345 DP 513468 0.0544
Lot 376 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 377 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 378 DP 516362 0.0490
804711
804712
804714
804710
804713
795982
795978
793430
793429
Lot 375 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 369 DP 513468 0.0509
793431
LOT 2 STAGE 1A
Lot 3 DP 394762 6.7380
Lot 374 DP 516362 0.0470
795980
LOT 3 STAGE 1A
HBG3/590
Lot 373 DP 513468 0.0562
Lot 368 DP 513468 0.0469
Lot 367 DP 513468 0.0550
Lot 366 DP 513468 0.0578
794507
794506
Lot 365 DP 513468 0.0914 793447
793432
Lot 364 DP 513468 0.0621
793433
Lot 356 DP 513468 0.0604 793438
793434
Lot 355 DP 513468 0.0527 Lot 353 DP 513468 0.1185 793435
17/12/2018
Designed
Date
Approved
Date
Client
DURHAM PROPERTY INVESTMENTS PROPOSED SUBDIVISION OF LOT 1 & 2 DP 14417 COMPRISED IN RT HBG2/863 & 420376
793446
Lot 352 DP 513468 0.0544
793427
Date
KRC
795977
Lot 351 DP 513468 0.0544
HBB2/1223
All Rights Reserved. This document is produced by Development Nous Ltd solely for the benefit of and use by the client in accordance with the terms of engagement. Development Nous Ltd does not and shall not assume any responsibility or liability whatsoever to any third party arising out of any use or reliance by third party on the content of this document.
793437
Lot 354 DP 513468 0.0527
Lot 363 DP 513468 0.0560
Lot 357 DP 513468 0.0584
793445
793439
Lot 358 DP 513468 0.0527
Lot 362 DP 513468 0.0526
16 & 38 WILLOWBANK ROAD TE AWA, NAPIER STAGE 1B - SCHEME PLAN Status
FOR APPROVAL
NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES
793444
Datum
793440
Lot 361 DP 513468 0.0526
793436
Lot 359 DP 513468 0.1125 793441
793443
Lot 360 DP 513468
Council Ref.
HB2000
Scale
1:1000
Drawing Number
H20180069-C013
Size
A3 Revision
1
HBW1/1023
HBW1/1021
STA LL STR
EE T
HBV2/873
Description Rev Date 1 17/12/2018 FOR APPROVAL
Lot 8 DP 10375 0.2324
Lot 9 DP 10192 0.1274
HBM1/675
HBM1/678
Lot 186 DP 9997 0.0748
HBM1/672
HBH2/114
Lot 187 DP 9997 0.0705
Lot 24 DP 10192 0.3819
Lot 10 DP 10192 0.1224
Lot 1 DP 28293 0.0596
HBG2/478
Lot 188 DP 9997 0.0718
HBM1/673
HBY1/918
HBA1/516
HBJ3/948
Lot 152 DP 9997 0.0819
.2 23
35.0
HB200/23
HBE1/318
Lot 197 DP 9997 0.0687
HBJ3/1004
HBM1/695
HBH4/1235
Lot 198 DP 10396 0.1778
Lot 160 DP 9997 0.0786
HBM1/694
HBW1/355
HBC4/792
HBE1/551
Lot 201 DP 10396 0.1090
Lot 162 DP 9997 0.0776
HBW1/356
C
20.0
LOT 15 STAGE 1B
LOT 14 STAGE 1B
WI LL
Lot 161 DP 9997 0.0789
GE 1
4.2
OW BA
Lot 150 DP 9997 0.1039
Lot 159 DP 9997 0.0814
LOT 16 695m² 32.0
NK
HBA1/716
Lot 151 DP 9997 0.0753
16.1
1.0 18.9
20.0
HBB3/848
Lot 195 DP 9997 0.0758
Lot 196 DP 9997 0.0703
Lot 158 DP 9997 0.0710
Bisson Place
35.0
LOT 17 700m²
20.0
AN E
Lot 157 DP 9997 0.0786
HBM1/697
HBM1/696
HBF2/1462
Lot 194 DP 9997 0.0753
17.0
Lot 156 DP 9997 0.0690
LOT 18 698m²
STA
HBB4/640
Lot 153 DP 9997 0.0839
34.6
20.0
Lot 155 DP 9997 0.0672
LOT 19 632m²
HBA3/1263
Lot 193 DP 9997 0.0741
E
P
HBA1/619
MA
S BI
N SO
CE A L
Lot 192 DP 9997 0.0741
AV E
HBM1/687
HBM1/677
AV EN UE
NOTES 1. This plan has been produced for resource consent purposes. Boundaries and dimensions are subject to resource consent approval and land transfer survey. 2. Easements may be required for cross-boundary services. 3. Current Napier City Council Zoning: Main Residential. NCC Planning Maps: I7, I8 and H8.
30 .3
HBA3/48
Lot 12 DP 10375 0.0935
NU
Lot 154 DP 9997 0.0789
HBJ4/1500
Lot 191 DP 9997 0.0728
UE
HBY1/923
HBM1/676
VEN
HBM1/686
Lot 190 DP 9997 0.0715
DA
Lot 6 DP 28293 0.0603
HBB3/843
Lot 11 DP 10375 0.1464
IEL
HBY1/922
PE RC YS PIL LER
Lot 189 DP 9997 0.0703
SEF
Lot 22 DP 10192 0.2137
HBF4/39
SER VIC EL
Lot 2 DP 28293 0.0286 Lot 3 DP 28293 HBY1/919 0.0310 Lot 4HBY1/920 DP 28293 0.0319 Lot 5 DP 28293 HBY1/921 0.0276
Lot 23 DP 10192 0.0799
LOT 13 STAGE 1B Lot 1 DP 318389 6.1891
HBD3/1295
71899
Lot 202 DP 9997 0.0693
Lot 163 DP 9997 0.0786
LOT 12 STAGE 1B
HBH2/141
HBJ2/292
Lot 166 DP 9997 0.0682
LOT 502
Lot 203 DP 9997 0.0718
Lot 164 DP 9997 0.0725
HBA1/624
12.4ha
Superseded
LOT 11 STAGE 1B
HBA2/1222
Lot 204 DP 9997 0.0703
HBK1/439
HBA1/801
Lot 165 DP 9997 0.0784
LOT 10 STAGE 1B
Lot 205 DP 9997 0.0675
HBD2/756
Lot 206 DP 9997 0.0687
AD
HBA1/525
LOT 9 STAGE 1B
HBA3/1372
EN R O
Lot 207 DP 9997 0.0687
Lot 118 DP 10451 0.0407
HBA2/1403
HBA3/306
LOT 8 STAGE 1B
Lot 208 DP 10451 0.0741
Lot 114 DP 10248 0.0419
ERIK S
HBA3/1092
HBA3/306
Lot 209 DP 10451 0.0741 HBK1/626
Lot 210 DP 10451 0.0728
LOT 7 STAGE 1A
HBE2/1003
Lot 98 DP 10451 0.0672 HBK1/977
XREF's: QuickMap_TE Awa_willowbank CAD FILE: H:\_2018\H20180069 - Durham Property Investments\CAD\H20180069-CONSENT-R1.dwg
Appr. Issued KRC KRC
Pt Section 92 Blk VIII Heretaunga SD 0.0916
NORTH
DP 26433 0.0498
FIT ZG E
HBW1/1022
LD P
DP 26433 0.0442
Lot 1 DP 26433 0.1325
RA
DATE PLOTTED: 12/20/2018 9:03:58 AM BY : GEMMA GUILFORD
LA
BE
LOT 6 STAGE 1A
Lot 97 DP 10451 0.0672
Lot 379 DP 513468 0.0500
Lot 380 DP 513468 0.0483
Lot 381 DP 513468 0.0483
Lot 382 DP 513468 0.0483
Lot 383 DP 513468 0.0483
795983
795984
795985
795986
795987
Lot 384 DP 516362 0.0483 804715
Lot 385 DP 516362 0.0483 804716
Lot 386 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 387 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 388 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 389 DP 516362 0.0483
804717
804718
804719
804720
HBK1/825
Fieldwork
Lot 96 DP 10451 0.0672
KAITUNA PLACE
LOT 5 STAGE 1A
HBF4/40
Date
Drawn
Date
GG
Lot 95 DP 10451 0.0713
17/12/2018
Checked
HBC4/814
LOT 4 STAGE 1A
Lot 94 DP 10451 0.0733
Lot 370 DP 513468 0.0462
HBG2/209
795979
Lot 93 DP 10451 0.0713
Lot 372 DP 513468 0.0543
Lot 371 DP 513468 0.0520
795981
Lot 349 DP 513468 0.0565 Lot 348 DP 513468 0.0544
Lot 350 DP 513468 0.0521
Lot 347 DP 513468 0.0544
LOT 1 STAGE 1A
378863
Lot 346 DP 513468 0.0544 793428
Lot 9 DP 6055 2.1650
Lot 345 DP 513468 0.0544
Lot 376 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 377 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 378 DP 516362 0.0490
804711
804712
804714
804710
804713
795982
795978
793430
793429
Lot 375 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 369 DP 513468 0.0509
793431
LOT 2 STAGE 1A
Lot 3 DP 394762 6.7380
Lot 374 DP 516362 0.0470
795980
LOT 3 STAGE 1A
HBG3/590
Lot 373 DP 513468 0.0562
Lot 368 DP 513468 0.0469
Lot 367 DP 513468 0.0550
Lot 366 DP 513468 0.0578
794507
794506
Lot 365 DP 513468 0.0914 793447
793432
Lot 364 DP 513468 0.0621
793433
Lot 356 DP 513468 0.0604 793438
793434
Lot 355 DP 513468 0.0527 Lot 353 DP 513468 0.1185 793435
17/12/2018
Designed
Date
Approved
Date
Client
DURHAM PROPERTY INVESTMENTS PROPOSED SUBDIVISION OF LOT 1 & 2 DP 14417 COMPRISED IN RT HBG2/863 & 420376
793446
Lot 352 DP 513468 0.0544
793427
Date
KRC
795977
Lot 351 DP 513468 0.0544
HBB2/1223
All Rights Reserved. This document is produced by Development Nous Ltd solely for the benefit of and use by the client in accordance with the terms of engagement. Development Nous Ltd does not and shall not assume any responsibility or liability whatsoever to any third party arising out of any use or reliance by third party on the content of this document.
793437
Lot 354 DP 513468 0.0527
Lot 363 DP 513468 0.0560
Lot 357 DP 513468 0.0584
793445
793439
Lot 358 DP 513468 0.0527
Lot 362 DP 513468 0.0526
16 & 38 WILLOWBANK AVE TE AWA, NAPIER STAGE 1C - SCHEME PLAN Status
FOR APPROVAL
NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES
793444
Datum
793440
Lot 361 DP 513468 0.0526
793436
Lot 359 DP 513468 0.1125 793441
793443
Lot 360 DP 513468
Council Ref.
HB2000
Scale
1:1000
Drawing Number
H20180069-C014
Size
A3 Revision
1
HBW1/1023
HBW1/1021
STA LL STR
EE T
HBV2/873
Description Rev Date 1 17/12/2018 FOR APPROVAL
Lot 8 DP 10375 0.2324
Lot 9 DP 10192 0.1274
HBM1/675
HBM1/678
Lot 186 DP 9997 0.0748
HBM1/672
HBH2/114
Lot 187 DP 9997 0.0705
Lot 24 DP 10192 0.3819
Lot 10 DP 10192 0.1224
Lot 1 DP 28293 0.0596
HBG2/478
Lot 188 DP 9997 0.0718
HBM1/673
HBY1/918
HBB4/640
Lot 156 DP 9997 0.0690
Lot 153 DP 9997 0.0839
AN E
Lot 157 DP 9997 0.0786
HBA1/516
HBJ3/948
HBM1/697
Lot 152 DP 9997 0.0819
LOT 18 STAGE 1C
HBF2/1462
Lot 194 DP 9997 0.0753
LOT 17 STAGE 1C
HBB3/848
Lot 195 DP 9997 0.0758 HB200/23
Lot 196 DP 9997 0.0703 HBE1/318
Lot 158 DP 9997 0.0710
HBM1/696 Bisson Place
HBA3/1263
Lot 193 DP 9997 0.0741
E
Lot 155 DP 9997 0.0672
Lot 197 DP 9997 0.0687
HBJ3/1004
HBM1/695
HBH4/1235
Lot 198 DP 10396 0.1778
Lot 160 DP 9997 0.0786
HBM1/694
HBW1/355
HBC4/792
HBE1/551
LOT 14 STAGE 1B
WI LL
Lot 161 DP 9997 0.0789 Lot 201 DP 10396 0.1090
Lot 162 DP 9997 0.0776
LOT 15 STAGE 1B
OW BA
Lot 150 DP 9997 0.1039
Lot 159 DP 9997 0.0814
LOT 16 STAGE 1C
NK
HBA1/716
Lot 151 DP 9997 0.0753
NOTES 1. This plan has been produced for resource consent purposes. Boundaries and dimensions are subject to resource consent approval and land transfer survey. 2. Easements may be required for cross-boundary services. 3. Current Napier City Council Zoning: Main Residential. NCC Planning Maps: I7, I8 and H8. 4. Proposed Amalgamation Conditions: 4.1. "That Lots 301 & 401 hereon are to be held in one record of title". 5. Lot 305 is to vest in the Napier City Council as local purpose reserve upon deposit.
LOT 19 STAGE 1C
Lot 192 DP 9997 0.0741
AV E
HBA1/619
HBM1/677
AV EN UE
MA
N SO S BI
P
CE A L
HBA3/48
Lot 12 DP 10375 0.0935
NU
Lot 154 DP 9997 0.0789
HBM1/687
HBJ4/1500
Lot 191 DP 9997 0.0728
UE
HBY1/923
HBM1/676
VEN
HBM1/686
Lot 190 DP 9997 0.0715
DA
Lot 6 DP 28293 0.0603
HBB3/843
Lot 11 DP 10375 0.1464
IEL
HBY1/922
PE RC YS PIL LER
Lot 189 DP 9997 0.0703
SEF
Lot 22 DP 10192 0.2137
HBF4/39
SER VIC EL
Lot 2 DP 28293 0.0286 Lot 3 DP 28293 HBY1/919 0.0310 Lot 4HBY1/920 DP 28293 0.0319 Lot 5 DP 28293 HBY1/921 0.0276
Lot 23 DP 10192 0.0799
HBW1/356
LOT 13 STAGE 1B Lot 1 DP 318389 6.1891
HBD3/1295
71899
Lot 202 DP 9997 0.0693
Lot 163 DP 9997 0.0786
LOT 12 STAGE 1B
HBH2/141
HBJ2/292
Lot 166 DP 9997 0.0682
LOT 503
Lot 203 DP 9997 0.0718
Lot 164 DP 9997 0.0725
HBA1/624
9.9ha
Superseded
LOT 11 STAGE 1B
HBA2/1222
Lot 204 DP 9997 0.0703
HBK1/439
HBA1/801
Lot 165 DP 9997 0.0784
LOT 10 STAGE 1B
Lot 205 DP 9997 0.0675
HBD2/756
Lot 206 DP 9997 0.0687
AD
HBA1/525
LOT 9 STAGE 1B
HBA3/1372
EN R O
Lot 207 DP 9997 0.0687
Lot 118 DP 10451 0.0407
HBA2/1403
11.1
16.0
A
LOT 45 388m²
16.0
378863
20
.7
m
15.9
16.0
16.0
16.6
14.4
LOT 44 411m²
16.0 165.0
5.0 7.2
5.3
40.0
16.0
LOT 41 387m²
21.2
LOT 42 420m²
24.9
Lot 383 DP 513468 0.0483
795983
795984
795985
795986
795987
Lot 384 DP 516362 0.0483 804715
Lot 385 DP 516362 0.0483 804716
Lot 386 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 387 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 388 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 389 DP 516362 0.0483
804717
804718
804719
804720
Date
Drawn
17.8
LOT 4 STAGE 1A
16.0
Lot 370 DP 513468 0.0462 795979
Lot 372 DP 513468 0.0543
Lot 371 DP 513468 0.0520
795981
Lot 349 DP 513468 0.0565 Lot 348 DP 513468 0.0544
Lot 350 DP 513468 0.0521
Lot 347 DP 513468 0.0544
305 7421m²
Lot 345 DP 513468 0.0544
17/12/2018
804711
804712
804714
804710
804713
795982
Lot 368 DP 513468 0.0469
Lot 367 DP 513468 0.0550
Lot 366 DP 513468 0.0578
794507
794506
Lot 365 DP 513468 0.0914 793447
Lot 364 DP 513468 0.0621
22/08/2017
Designed
Date
Approved
Date
Client
DURHAM PROPERTY INVESTMENTS PROPOSED SUBDIVISION OF LOT 1 & 2 DP 14417 COMPRISED IN RT HBG2/863 & 420376
793446
793433
Lot 356 DP 513468 0.0604 793438
793434
Lot 355 DP 513468 0.0527
793435
Date
KRC
This document is produced by Development Nous Ltd solely for the benefit of and use by the client in accordance with the terms of engagement. Development Nous Ltd does not and shall not assume any responsibility or liability whatsoever to any third party arising out of any use or reliance by third party on the content of this document.
795977
Lot 352 DP 513468 0.0544
Lot 353 DP 513468 0.1185 40.0
Lot 378 DP 516362 0.0490
793432
793427
0
Lot 377 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 351 DP 513468 0.0544
HBB2/1223
169.
Lot 376 DP 516362 0.0470
795978
793430
Lot 346 DP 513468 0.0544
Lot 375 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 369 DP 513468 0.0509
793431
LOT 2 STAGE 1A
LOT 1 STAGE 1A
Lot 374 DP 516362 0.0470
795980
LOT 3 STAGE 1A
793429
Lot 373 DP 513468 0.0562
All Rights Reserved.
Date
GG
793428
Lot 9 DP 6055 2.1650
Lot 382 DP 513468 0.0483
Checked
21.2
LOT 43 416m²
Lot 381 DP 513468 0.0483
Fieldwork
24.2
16.0
24.2
16.0
16.0
LOT 47 388m² LOT 46 388m²
16.7
7.6
24.2
.0
Lot 3 DP 394762 6.7380
4.2
24.2
16 .0
16
LOT 40 387m²
Lot 380 DP 513468 0.0483
KAITUNA PLACE
24.2
15.9
24.2
24.1
HBG3/590
m
21.2
16.0
LOT 49 388m² LOT 48 388m²
13.50
16.0
301 508m²
24.2
24 .2
Lot 93 DP 10451 0.0713
LOT 186 381m²
24.2
Lot 379 DP 513468 0.0500
LOT 5 STAGE 1A
8.8
4.6
24.2
3.6 5.8
13 .6
HBG2/209
LOT 39 431m²
17.8
16.6
24.2 15.9
24.2
24.2
14.4
HBC4/814
Lot 94 DP 10451 0.0733
24.2
24.2
LOT 187 403m²
LOT 38 349m²
LOT 7 STAGE 1A
16.0
15.4 LOT 179 16.5 15.4 385m² LOT 181 LOT 182 374m² BB LOT 185 17.3 374m² BA 15.4 373m² AB 15.4 AA 15.4 ROA 16.0 D9
381m²
17.7
16.5
16.6
24.2
21.2
LOT 188
24.2
Lot 95 DP 10451 0.0713
400m²
24.2
10.0
15.4
HBF4/40
LOT 184
15.9
24.2
400m²
14.6
24.2
4.2
Lot 96 DP 10451 0.0672
STAGE 2
16.4
LOT 183
12.9
16.4
4.2
RY
LOT 6 STAGE 1A
LOT 37 388m²
16.0
D7
LOT 36 388m² 24.2
21.2
ROA
HBK1/825
12.9
LOT 167 381m²
18.9
HBK1/977
LOT 35 383m² 24.2
ROA D1
16.6
24.2
15.9
15.1
Lot 97 DP 10451 0.0672
LOT 166 404m²
12.9
24.2
FB
Lot 98 DP 10451 0.0672
LOT 163 459m² FA
24.2
4.2
436m²
HBE2/1003
18.9
LOT 162
12.9
21.2
Lot 210 DP 10451 0.0728
ENT
21.2
16.0
24.2
HBK1/626
MAIN
4.2
14.4
18.1
12.9
15.9
LOT 165 381m²
4.2
Lot 209 DP 10451 0.0741
17.20
401 5361m²
21.2
HBA3/1092
HBA3/306
ERIK S
D6
16.0
Lot 114 DP 10248 0.0419
LOT 8 STAGE 1B
ROA
Lot 208 DP 10451 0.0741
16.8
HBA3/306
XREF's: QuickMap_TE Awa_willowbank CAD FILE: H:\_2018\H20180069 - Durham Property Investments\CAD\H20180069-CONSENT-R1.dwg
Appr. Issued KRC KRC
Pt Section 92 Blk VIII Heretaunga SD 0.0916
NORTH
DP 26433 0.0498
FIT ZG E
HBW1/1022
LD P
DP 26433 0.0442
Lot 1 DP 26433 0.1325
RA
DATE PLOTTED: 12/20/2018 9:03:51 AM BY : GEMMA GUILFORD
LA
BE
793437
Lot 354 DP 513468 0.0527
Lot 363 DP 513468 0.0560
Lot 357 DP 513468 0.0584
793445
793439
Lot 358 DP 513468 0.0527
Lot 362 DP 513468 0.0526
16 & 38 WILLOWBANK AVE TE AWA, NAPIER STAGE 2 - SCHEME PLAN Status
FOR APPROVAL
NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES
793444
Datum
793440
Lot 361 DP 513468 0.0526
793436
Lot 359 DP 513468 0.1125 793441
793443
Lot 360 DP 513468
Council Ref.
HB2000
Scale
1:1000
Drawing Number
H20180069-C015
Size
A3 Revision
1
HBW1/1023
HBW1/1021
STA LL STR
EE T
HBV2/873
Description Rev Date 1 17/12/2018 FOR APPROVAL
Lot 8 DP 10375 0.2324
Lot 9 DP 10192 0.1274
HBM1/675
HBM1/678
Lot 186 DP 9997 0.0748
HBM1/672
HBH2/114
Lot 187 DP 9997 0.0705
Lot 24 DP 10192 0.3819
Lot 10 DP 10192 0.1224
Lot 1 DP 28293 0.0596
HBG2/478
Lot 188 DP 9997 0.0718
HBM1/673
HBY1/918
HBB4/640
Lot 156 DP 9997 0.0690
Lot 153 DP 9997 0.0839
AN E
Lot 157 DP 9997 0.0786
HBA1/516
HBJ3/948
HBM1/697
Lot 152 DP 9997 0.0819
LOT 18 STAGE 1C
HBF2/1462
Lot 194 DP 9997 0.0753
LOT 17 STAGE 1C
HBB3/848
Lot 195 DP 9997 0.0758 HB200/23
Lot 196 DP 9997 0.0703 HBE1/318
Lot 158 DP 9997 0.0710
HBM1/696 Bisson Place
HBA3/1263
Lot 193 DP 9997 0.0741
E
Lot 155 DP 9997 0.0672
Lot 197 DP 9997 0.0687
HBJ3/1004
HBM1/695
HBH4/1235
Lot 198 DP 10396 0.1778
Lot 160 DP 9997 0.0786
HBM1/694
HBW1/355
HBC4/792
HBE1/551
LOT 14 STAGE 1B
WI LL
Lot 161 DP 9997 0.0789 Lot 201 DP 10396 0.1090
Lot 162 DP 9997 0.0776
LOT 15 STAGE 1B
OW BA
Lot 150 DP 9997 0.1039
Lot 159 DP 9997 0.0814
LOT 16 STAGE 1C
NK
HBA1/716
Lot 151 DP 9997 0.0753
NOTES 1. This plan has been produced for resource consent purposes. Boundaries and dimensions are subject to resource consent approval and land transfer survey. 2. Easements may be required for cross-boundary services. 3. Current Napier City Council Zoning: Main Residential. NCC Planning Maps: I7, I8 and H8. 4. Proposed Amalgamation Conditions: 4.1. "That Lots 302 & 402 & Lots 301 & 401 DP (Stage 2 LT#) hereon are to be held in one record of title". 5. Lot 306 is to vest in the Napier City Council as local purpose reserve upon deposit.
LOT 19 STAGE 1C
Lot 192 DP 9997 0.0741
AV E
HBA1/619
HBM1/677
AV EN UE
MA
N SO S BI
P
CE A L
HBA3/48
Lot 12 DP 10375 0.0935
NU
Lot 154 DP 9997 0.0789
HBM1/687
HBJ4/1500
Lot 191 DP 9997 0.0728
UE
HBY1/923
HBM1/676
VEN
HBM1/686
Lot 190 DP 9997 0.0715
DA
Lot 6 DP 28293 0.0603
HBB3/843
Lot 11 DP 10375 0.1464
IEL
HBY1/922
PE RC YS PIL LER
Lot 189 DP 9997 0.0703
SEF
Lot 22 DP 10192 0.2137
HBF4/39
SER VIC EL
Lot 2 DP 28293 0.0286 Lot 3 DP 28293 HBY1/919 0.0310 Lot 4HBY1/920 DP 28293 0.0319 Lot 5 DP 28293 HBY1/921 0.0276
Lot 23 DP 10192 0.0799
HBW1/356
LOT 13 STAGE 1B Lot 1 DP 318389 6.1891
HBD3/1295
71899
Lot 202 DP 9997 0.0693
Lot 163 DP 9997 0.0786
LOT 12 STAGE 1B
HBH2/141
HBJ2/292
7.7ha
Lot 204 DP 9997 0.0703 HBA1/801
Lot 165 DP 9997 0.0784
LOT 10 STAGE 1B
Lot 205 DP 9997 0.0675
HBD2/756
HBA1/525
Lot 206 DP 9997 0.0687
40 .0
LOT 9 STAGE 1B
HBA3/1372
302 194m²
LOT 60 369m²
LOT 8 STAGE 1B
15
.2
401 STAGE 2
.9 15
.2
.3
24
25 .2
16 .6
LOT 167 STAGE 2
7.5
.2
25.8
.2
16 .0
STAGE 2
LOT 184 STAGE 2
LOT 182 STAGE 2
16 .0
24
LOT 51 388m²
14.4
16 .6
LOT 50 388m²
24
16 .0
2.0
40.0
Lot 382 DP 513468 0.0483
Lot 383 DP 513468 0.0483
795983
795984
795985
795986
795987
Lot 384 DP 516362 0.0483 804715
Lot 385 DP 516362 0.0483 804716
Lot 386 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 387 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 388 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 389 DP 516362 0.0483
804717
804718
804719
804720
Fieldwork
LOT 185 STAGE 2
KAITUNA PLACE Lot 370 DP 513468 0.0462
LOT 40 STAGE 2
795979
Lot 371 DP 513468 0.0520
795981
Lot 349 DP 513468 0.0565 Lot 348 DP 513468 0.0544
LOT 44 STAGE 2
LOT 42 STAGE 2
378863
LOT 1 STAGE 1A
Lot 346 DP 513468 0.0544 793428
305 STAGE 2
Lot 350 DP 513468 0.0521
Lot 347 DP 513468 0.0544 LOT 43 STAGE 2
Lot 345 DP 513468 0.0544
Lot 375 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 376 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 377 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 378 DP 516362 0.0490
804711
804712
804714
804710
804713
795982
795978
LOT 2 STAGE 1A
793429
Lot 374 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 369 DP 513468 0.0509
793431
793430
LOT 45 STAGE 2
Lot 373 DP 513468 0.0562
795980
LOT 3 STAGE 1A
LOT 41 STAGE 2
LOT 46 STAGE 2
Lot 372 DP 513468 0.0543
Lot 368 DP 513468 0.0469
Lot 367 DP 513468 0.0550
Lot 366 DP 513468 0.0578
794507
794506
Lot 365 DP 513468 0.0914 793447
17/12/2018
793432
Lot 364 DP 513468 0.0621
793433
Lot 356 DP 513468 0.0604 793438
793434
Lot 355 DP 513468 0.0527 Lot 353 DP 513468 0.1185 793435
17/12/2018
Designed
Date
Approved
Date
Client
DURHAM PROPERTY INVESTMENTS PROPOSED SUBDIVISION OF LOT 1 & 2 DP 14417 COMPRISED IN RT HBG2/863 & 420376
793446
Lot 352 DP 513468 0.0544
793427
Date
KRC
This document is produced by Development Nous Ltd solely for the benefit of and use by the client in accordance with the terms of engagement. Development Nous Ltd does not and shall not assume any responsibility or liability whatsoever to any third party arising out of any use or reliance by third party on the content of this document.
795977
Lot 351 DP 513468 0.0544
HBB2/1223
All Rights Reserved.
Date
GG
Checked LOT 4 STAGE 1A
LOT 48 STAGE 2
Date
Drawn
LOT 39 STAGE 2
LOT 187 STAGE 2
Lot 3 DP 394762 6.7380
Lot 9 DP 6055 2.1650
Lot 381 DP 513468 0.0483
LOT 5 STAGE 1A
LOT 186 STAGE 2
LOT 47 STAGE 2
Lot 380 DP 513468 0.0483
LOT 38 STAGE 2
LOT 188 STAGE 2
301 STAGE 2 LOT 49 STAGE 2
Lot 379 DP 513468 0.0500
LOT 183 STAGE 2
10.0
24.2
24.2
23 .2
LOT 6 STAGE 1A
LOT 37 STAGE 2
.2 23 .2
2.0
16 .0
15
1.7
16 .0
B
HBG3/590
LOT 7 STAGE 1A LOT 36 STAGE 2
16 .1
23
11
Lot 93 DP 10451 0.0713
LOT 173 410m²
24
16 .0
LOT 52 388m²
STAGE 3
HBG2/209
15 15 .4 .4
9.1 1.7 LOT 176 13 LOT 171 16.5 13 .7 .7 477m² LOT 178 2.8 374m² LOT 174 LOT 180 15 21 .4 405m² .6 DB 15 366m² .4 400m² LOT 175 9.0 DA 16.5 5.0 15 359m² LOT 177 .5 402 16.5 3579m² CB 364m² 15 .3 LOT 179 STAGE 2 CA LOT 181
24 .2
16 .0
306 9954m²
24
.6
LOT 53 388m²
24
HBC4/814
D9
16 .0
16 .0
Lot 94 DP 10451 0.0733
LOT 35 STAGE 2
LOT 166 STAGE 2
LOT 163 STAGE 2
.2
Lot 95 DP 10451 0.0713
LOT 162 STAGE 2
16 .5
24
LOT 54 388m²
24 .2
.0
RO A
16 .0
24
HBF4/40
16
20 .5
13 .0
LOT 55 388m²
16
LOT 170 371m²
RO AD 7
17 .1
LOT 172 416m²
.2
.2 21 16 .0
Lot 96 DP 10451 0.0672
6.7
.0 28
LOT 56 418m²
HBK1/825
23 .5
LOT 169 392m²
15 .9
4.2
4.2 4.2
12 .9
.2 15
0 D1 RO A
12 .2
16 .0
HBK1/977
Lot 97 DP 10451 0.0672
LOT 168 370m²
23 .5
.9
LOT 57 365m²
12
97 15
.2
24 .2
HBE2/1003
Lot 98 DP 10451 0.0672
15 .2
LOT 58 369m²
.0
Lot 210 DP 10451 0.0728
20 .5
24 .2
15 .2
HBK1/626
LOT 165 STAGE 2
4.2
.2
7.0
15
.2
24 .2
LOT 59 369m²
.2
Lot 209 DP 10451 0.0741
13
HBA3/1092
HBA3/306
.2
8.0
15
Lot 208 DP 10451 0.0741
Lot 114 DP 10248 0.0419
24
.2
HBA2/1403
HBA3/306
24 .2
8.0
Lot 207 DP 9997 0.0687
Lot 118 DP 10451 0.0407
AD
HBK1/439
Superseded LOT 11 STAGE 1B
HBA2/1222
EN R O
Lot 164 DP 9997 0.0725
HBA1/624
LOT 504
Lot 203 DP 9997 0.0718
ERIK S
Lot 166 DP 9997 0.0682
XREF's: QuickMap_TE Awa_willowbank CAD FILE: H:\_2018\H20180069 - Durham Property Investments\CAD\H20180069-CONSENT-R1.dwg
Appr. Issued KRC KRC
Pt Section 92 Blk VIII Heretaunga SD 0.0916
NORTH
DP 26433 0.0498
FIT ZG E
HBW1/1022
LD P
DP 26433 0.0442
Lot 1 DP 26433 0.1325
RA
DATE PLOTTED: 12/20/2018 9:03:42 AM BY : GEMMA GUILFORD
LA
BE
793437
Lot 354 DP 513468 0.0527
Lot 363 DP 513468 0.0560
Lot 357 DP 513468 0.0584
793445
793439
Lot 358 DP 513468 0.0527
Lot 362 DP 513468 0.0526
16 & 38 WILLOWBANK AVE TE AWA, NAPIER STAGE 3 - SCHEME PLAN Status
FOR APPROVAL
NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES
793444
Datum
793440
Lot 361 DP 513468 0.0526
793436
Lot 359 DP 513468 0.1125 793441
793443
Lot 360 DP 513468
Council Ref.
HB2000
Scale
1:1000
Drawing Number
H20180069-C016
Size
A3 Revision
1
HBW1/1023
HBW1/1021
STA LL STR
EE T
HBV2/873
Description Rev Date 1 17/12/2018 FOR APPROVAL
Lot 8 DP 10375 0.2324
Lot 9 DP 10192 0.1274
HBM1/675
HBM1/678
Lot 186 DP 9997 0.0748
HBM1/672
HBH2/114
Lot 187 DP 9997 0.0705
Lot 24 DP 10192 0.3819
Lot 10 DP 10192 0.1224
Lot 1 DP 28293 0.0596
HBG2/478
Lot 188 DP 9997 0.0718
HBM1/673
HBY1/918
AN E
HB200/23
Lot 196 DP 9997 0.0703 HBE1/318
8.0
HBE2/1003
LOT 170 STAGE 3
HBC4/814
306 STAGE 3
Lot 94 DP 10451 0.0733
.2 15
.2
LOT 166 STAGE 2
LOT 163 STAGE 2
LOT 7 STAGE 1A LOT 36 STAGE 2
LOT 180 STAGE 3
LOT 181 STAGE 2
LOT 182 STAGE 2
LOT 51 STAGE 3
HBG3/590
Lot 381 DP 513468 0.0483
Lot 382 DP 513468 0.0483
Lot 383 DP 513468 0.0483
795983
795984
795985
795986
795987
Lot 384 DP 516362 0.0483 804715
Lot 385 DP 516362 0.0483 804716
Lot 386 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 387 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 388 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 389 DP 516362 0.0483
804717
804718
804719
804720
Lot 370 DP 513468 0.0462
LOT 40 STAGE 2
Lot 371 DP 513468 0.0520
795981
Lot 349 DP 513468 0.0565 Lot 348 DP 513468 0.0544
LOT 44 STAGE 2 Lot 3 DP 394762 6.7380
LOT 42 STAGE 2
378863
LOT 1 STAGE 1A
Lot 346 DP 513468 0.0544 793428
305 STAGE 2
Lot 350 DP 513468 0.0521
Lot 347 DP 513468 0.0544 LOT 43 STAGE 2
Lot 345 DP 513468 0.0544
Lot 375 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 376 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 377 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 378 DP 516362 0.0490
804711
804712
804714
804710
804713
795982
795978
LOT 2 STAGE 1A
793429
Lot 374 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 369 DP 513468 0.0509
793431
793430
LOT 45 STAGE 2
Lot 373 DP 513468 0.0562
795980
LOT 3 STAGE 1A
LOT 41 STAGE 2
LOT 46 STAGE 2
Lot 372 DP 513468 0.0543
Lot 368 DP 513468 0.0469
Lot 367 DP 513468 0.0550
Lot 366 DP 513468 0.0578
794507
794506
Lot 365 DP 513468 0.0914 793447
17/12/2018
793432
Lot 364 DP 513468 0.0621
793433
Lot 356 DP 513468 0.0604 793438
793434
Lot 355 DP 513468 0.0527 Lot 353 DP 513468 0.1185 793435
17/12/2018
Designed
Date
Approved
Date
Client
DURHAM PROPERTY INVESTMENTS PROPOSED SUBDIVISION OF LOT 1 & 2 DP 14417 COMPRISED IN RT HBG2/863 & 420376
793446
Lot 352 DP 513468 0.0544
793427
Date
KRC
This document is produced by Development Nous Ltd solely for the benefit of and use by the client in accordance with the terms of engagement. Development Nous Ltd does not and shall not assume any responsibility or liability whatsoever to any third party arising out of any use or reliance by third party on the content of this document.
795977
Lot 351 DP 513468 0.0544
HBB2/1223
All Rights Reserved.
Date
GG
Checked LOT 4 STAGE 1A
LOT 48 STAGE 2
Date
Drawn
LOT 39 STAGE 2
LOT 187 STAGE 2
LOT 185 STAGE 2
Fieldwork
KAITUNA PLACE
LOT 5 STAGE 1A
795979
LOT 47 STAGE 2
Lot 9 DP 6055 2.1650
Lot 380 DP 513468 0.0483
LOT 38 STAGE 2
LOT 188 STAGE 2
LOT 186 STAGE 2
LOT 49 STAGE 2
Lot 379 DP 513468 0.0500
LOT 183 STAGE 2
301 STAGE 2
Lot 93 DP 10451 0.0713
LOT 6 STAGE 1A
LOT 37 STAGE 2
LOT 184 STAGE 2
LOT 179 STAGE 2
AD
LOT 35 STAGE 2
18.9
LOT 177 STAGE 2
LOT 52 STAGE 3
EN R O
21.8
LOT 165 STAGE 2
24.2
24.2
21.2
401 STAGE 2
LOT 164 458m²
18.1
LOT 162 STAGE 2
LOT 175 STAGE 3 402 STAGE 3
Superseded
ERIK S
13.8
8
436m²
LOT 50 STAGE 3
HBG2/209
21.8
4.0
18.8
LOT 178 STAGE 3
LOT 53 STAGE 3
Lot 95 DP 10451 0.0713
LOT 161
LOT 167 STAGE 2
LOT 174 STAGE 3
LOT 54 STAGE 3
HBF4/40
LOT 8 STAGE 1B
LOT 176 STAGE 3
LOT 55 STAGE 3
Lot 96 DP 10451 0.0672
LOT 9 STAGE 1B
15.1
3.2 4.2
LOT 171 STAGE 3
LOT 56 STAGE 3
HBK1/825
4.2
LOT 173 STAGE 3
HBK1/977
Lot 97 DP 10451 0.0672
24
.3 16 .3
16
4.1
LOT 57 STAGE 3
Lot 98 DP 10451 0.0672
27 .0
LOT 172 STAGE 3
LOT 169 STAGE 3
LOT 147 396m² GA
18.9
LOT 159 415m²
LOT 158 456m² 2
LOT 58 STAGE 3
Lot 210 DP 10451 0.0728
.0 16
.2 15
16 .0
LOT 168 STAGE 3
HBK1/626
387m² GB
6
LOT 160 377m² 25 .1
LOT 157 384m² EA
LOT 144
18.1
16.2
LOT 59 STAGE 3
Lot 209 DP 10451 0.0741
EB
18.1
15.9
ROA D
15 .9 24 .2
.2
15 .2 16 .0
LOT 154 388m²
16 .0
18 .4
AD
12.1
HBA3/306
15 .2 16 .0
16 .1 16 .1
HBA3/1092
RO
LOT 156 372m²
.6
.2 24 .9
20 .5
15 .2
.2
Lot 114 DP 10248 0.0419
LOT 153 370m² 15
LOT 60 STAGE 3
Lot 208 DP 10451 0.0741
16
.9 12
4.2
HBA2/1403
HBA3/306
23 .5
17.0
24
.6
302 STAGE 3
LOT 10 STAGE 1B
403 4046m²
LOT 155 369m²
LOT 152 392m²
15
24 .2
.0 16 .2
.9 12 16
LOT 61 378m²
15 .2
4.2
Lot 207 DP 9997 0.0687
23 .5
.6
24 .2
.6 15
HBA3/1372
20 .5
16
.0
19 .5
4.2
LOT 151 375m²
LOT 11 STAGE 1B
LOT 139 473m²
STAGE 4
.0
.0 16
40
Lot 206 DP 9997 0.0687
Lot 118 DP 10451 0.0407
24 .2
LOT 62 388m²
HBA1/525
16
LOT 63 388m²
Lot 205 DP 9997 0.0675
HBD2/756
21 .2
.0
16
C
HBA1/801
Lot 165 DP 9997 0.0784
LOT 505 5.8ha 19 .5
LOT 138 364m²
16
24 .2
.0
Lot 204 DP 9997 0.0703
HBK1/439
24 .2
.2
.0
9.6 11
HBA2/1222
.0
HBA1/624
LOT 12 STAGE 1B
LOT 137 388m²
LOT 64 388m²
4.2
Lot 164 DP 9997 0.0725
24 .2
16
Lot 203 DP 9997 0.0718
71899
24 .2
7.9 7.9
HBH2/141
HBJ2/292
Lot 166 DP 9997 0.0682
.2
LOT 136 365m²
24
16
.0
24
LOT 65 388m²
Lot 1 DP 318389 6.1891
21 .2
8.1 8.1
11
Lot 202 DP 9997 0.0693
Lot 163 DP 9997 0.0786
.2
307 4784m²
9.6
HBD3/1295
LOT 13 STAGE 1B
4.2
LOT 66 388m²
12
HBW1/356
LOT 67 388m² 24 .2
10
Lot 201 DP 10396 0.1090
LOT 14 STAGE 1B
24 .2
AD
HBE1/551
24 .2
303 194m²
WI LL
Lot 161 DP 9997 0.0789
8.0
HBW1/355
HBC4/792
Lot 162 DP 9997 0.0776
.0
.0
Lot 160 DP 9997 0.0786
HBM1/694
LOT 15 STAGE 1B 40
16
Lot 198 DP 10396 0.1778
.0
HBH4/1235
16
HBM1/695
OW BA
Lot 150 DP 9997 0.1039
NK
HBA1/716
Lot 159 DP 9997 0.0814
.0
HBJ3/1004
Lot 151 DP 9997 0.0753
16
Lot 197 DP 9997 0.0687
RO
Lot 158 DP 9997 0.0710
HBM1/696 Bisson Place
LOT 16 STAGE 1C
12
Lot 152 DP 9997 0.0819
24
HBJ3/948
HBM1/697
Lot 195 DP 9997 0.0758
.0
Lot 157 DP 9997 0.0786
HBA1/516
LOT 17 STAGE 1C
HBB3/848
16
Lot 153 DP 9997 0.0839
Lot 194 DP 9997 0.0753
.0
Lot 156 DP 9997 0.0690
LOT 18 STAGE 1C
HBF2/1462
16
HBB4/640
HBA3/1263
Lot 193 DP 9997 0.0741
E
Lot 155 DP 9997 0.0672
NOTES 1. This plan has been produced for resource consent purposes. Boundaries and dimensions are subject to resource consent approval and land transfer survey. 2. Easements may be required for cross-boundary services. 3. Current Napier City Council Zoning: Main Residential. NCC Planning Maps: I7, I8 and H8. 4. Proposed Amalgamation Conditions: 4.1. "That Lots 303 & 403 & Lots 302 & 402 DP (Stage 3 LT#) & Lots 301 & 401 DP (Stage 2 LT#) hereon are to be held in one record of title". 5. Lot 307 is to vest in the Napier City Council as local purpose reserve upon deposit.
LOT 19 STAGE 1C
Lot 192 DP 9997 0.0741
AV E
HBA1/619
HBM1/677
AV EN UE
MA
N SO S BI
P
CE A L
HBA3/48
Lot 12 DP 10375 0.0935
NU
Lot 154 DP 9997 0.0789
HBM1/687
HBJ4/1500
Lot 191 DP 9997 0.0728
UE
HBY1/923
HBM1/676
VEN
HBM1/686
Lot 190 DP 9997 0.0715
DA
Lot 6 DP 28293 0.0603
HBB3/843
Lot 11 DP 10375 0.1464
IEL
HBY1/922
PE RC YS PIL LER
Lot 189 DP 9997 0.0703
SEF
Lot 22 DP 10192 0.2137
HBF4/39
SER VIC EL
Lot 2 DP 28293 0.0286 Lot 3 DP 28293 HBY1/919 0.0310 Lot 4HBY1/920 DP 28293 0.0319 Lot 5 DP 28293 HBY1/921 0.0276
Lot 23 DP 10192 0.0799
XREF's: QuickMap_TE Awa_willowbank CAD FILE: H:\_2018\H20180069 - Durham Property Investments\CAD\H20180069-CONSENT-R1.dwg
Appr. Issued KRC KRC
Pt Section 92 Blk VIII Heretaunga SD 0.0916
NORTH
DP 26433 0.0498
FIT ZG E
HBW1/1022
LD P
DP 26433 0.0442
Lot 1 DP 26433 0.1325
RA
DATE PLOTTED: 12/20/2018 9:03:32 AM BY : GEMMA GUILFORD
LA
BE
793437
Lot 354 DP 513468 0.0527
Lot 363 DP 513468 0.0560
Lot 357 DP 513468 0.0584
793445
793439
Lot 358 DP 513468 0.0527
Lot 362 DP 513468 0.0526
16 & 38 WILLOWBANK AVE TE AWA, NAPIER STAGE 4 - SCHEME PLAN Status
FOR APPROVAL
NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES
793444
Datum
793440
Lot 361 DP 513468 0.0526
793436
Lot 359 DP 513468 0.1125 793441
793443
Lot 360 DP 513468
Council Ref.
HB2000
Scale
1:1000
Drawing Number
H20180069-C017
Size
A3 Revision
1
HBW1/1023
HBW1/1021
STA LL STR
EE T
HBV2/873
Description Rev Date 1 17/12/2018 FOR APPROVAL
Lot 8 DP 10375 0.2324
Lot 9 DP 10192 0.1274
HBM1/675
HBM1/678
Lot 186 DP 9997 0.0748
HBM1/672
HBH2/114
Lot 187 DP 9997 0.0705
Lot 24 DP 10192 0.3819
Lot 10 DP 10192 0.1224
Lot 1 DP 28293 0.0596
HBG2/478
Lot 188 DP 9997 0.0718
HBM1/673
HBY1/918
HBB4/640
Lot 156 DP 9997 0.0690
Lot 153 DP 9997 0.0839
AN E
Lot 157 DP 9997 0.0786
HBA1/516
HBJ3/948
HBM1/697
Lot 152 DP 9997 0.0819
LOT 18 STAGE 1C
HBF2/1462
Lot 194 DP 9997 0.0753
LOT 506 4.4ha
Lot 195 DP 9997 0.0758 HB200/23
HBE1/318
Lot 197 DP 9997 0.0687
HBJ3/1004
.6
LOT 168 STAGE 3
HBE2/1003
LOT 57 STAGE 3
Lot 98 DP 10451 0.0672
LOT 170 STAGE 3
402 STAGE 3
HBC4/814
306 STAGE 3
Lot 94 DP 10451 0.0733
LOT 180 STAGE 3
LOT 179 STAGE 2
LOT 181 STAGE 2
LOT 182 STAGE 2
LOT 51 STAGE 3
16.0
16.0
16.0
16.0
10.0
1
16.0
16.0
16.0
16.0
16.0
16.0
AD
EN R O
16.0
16.0
16.0
14.8
LOT 6 STAGE 1A
Lot 380 DP 513468 0.0483
Lot 381 DP 513468 0.0483
Lot 382 DP 513468 0.0483
Lot 383 DP 513468 0.0483
795983
795984
795985
795986
795987
Lot 384 DP 516362 0.0483 804715
Lot 385 DP 516362 0.0483 804716
Lot 386 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 387 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 388 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 389 DP 516362 0.0483
804717
804718
804719
804720
LOT 185 STAGE 2
Fieldwork
KAITUNA PLACE
LOT 5 STAGE 1A
Lot 370 DP 513468 0.0462
LOT 40 STAGE 2
Lot 371 DP 513468 0.0520
795981
Lot 349 DP 513468 0.0565 Lot 348 DP 513468 0.0544
LOT 44 STAGE 2 Lot 3 DP 394762 6.7380
LOT 42 STAGE 2
378863
LOT 1 STAGE 1A
Lot 346 DP 513468 0.0544 793428
305 STAGE 2
Lot 350 DP 513468 0.0521
Lot 347 DP 513468 0.0544 LOT 43 STAGE 2
Lot 345 DP 513468 0.0544
Lot 375 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 376 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 377 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 378 DP 516362 0.0490
804711
804712
804714
804710
804713
795982
795978
LOT 2 STAGE 1A
793429
Lot 374 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 369 DP 513468 0.0509
793431
793430
LOT 45 STAGE 2
Lot 373 DP 513468 0.0562
795980
LOT 3 STAGE 1A
LOT 41 STAGE 2
LOT 46 STAGE 2
Lot 372 DP 513468 0.0543
Lot 368 DP 513468 0.0469
Lot 367 DP 513468 0.0550
Lot 366 DP 513468 0.0578
794507
794506
Lot 365 DP 513468 0.0914 793447
17/12/2018
793432
Lot 364 DP 513468 0.0621
793433
Lot 356 DP 513468 0.0604 793438
793434
Lot 355 DP 513468 0.0527 Lot 353 DP 513468 0.1185 793435
17/12/2018
Designed
Date
Approved
Date
Client
DURHAM PROPERTY INVESTMENTS PROPOSED SUBDIVISION OF LOT 1 & 2 DP 14417 COMPRISED IN RT HBG2/863 & 420376
793446
Lot 352 DP 513468 0.0544
793427
Date
KRC
This document is produced by Development Nous Ltd solely for the benefit of and use by the client in accordance with the terms of engagement. Development Nous Ltd does not and shall not assume any responsibility or liability whatsoever to any third party arising out of any use or reliance by third party on the content of this document.
795977
Lot 351 DP 513468 0.0544
HBB2/1223
All Rights Reserved.
Date
GG
Checked LOT 4 STAGE 1A
LOT 48 STAGE 2
Date
Drawn
LOT 39 STAGE 2
795979
LOT 47 STAGE 2
Lot 9 DP 6055 2.1650
Lot 379 DP 513468 0.0500
LOT 38 STAGE 2
LOT 188 STAGE 2
LOT 186 STAGE 2
LOT 49 STAGE 2
HBG3/590
ROA D
17.0
12.0
15.0
LOT 7 STAGE 1A
301 STAGE 2
Lot 93 DP 10451 0.0713
Superseded
LOT 36 STAGE 2
LOT 187 STAGE 2
LOT 50 STAGE 3
HBG2/209
LOT 8 STAGE 1B
LOT 35 STAGE 2
LOT 166 STAGE 2
LOT 163 STAGE 2
LOT 184 STAGE 2
LOT 52 STAGE 3
LOT 9 STAGE 1B
LOT 183 STAGE 2
LOT 177 STAGE 2
LOT 53 STAGE 3
Lot 95 DP 10451 0.0713
LOT 34 383m²
LOT 37 STAGE 2
LOT 175 STAGE 3 LOT 54 STAGE 3
HBF4/40
LOT 178 STAGE 3
LOT 10 STAGE 1B
LOT 165 STAGE 2
LOT 167 STAGE 2
LOT 174 STAGE 3 LOT 55 STAGE 3
Lot 96 DP 10451 0.0672
LOT 33 388m²
LOT 176 STAGE 3
LOT 171 STAGE 3
LOT 56 STAGE 3
HBK1/825
LOT 162 STAGE 2
LOT 173 STAGE 3
HBK1/977
Lot 97 DP 10451 0.0672
14.9
LOT 164 STAGE 4
LOT 158 STAGE 4
LOT 172 STAGE 3
LOT 169 STAGE 3
LOT 32 388m²
401 STAGE 2
LOT 161 STAGE 4
LOT 58 STAGE 3
Lot 210 DP 10451 0.0728
LOT 31 388m²
24.2
4.2
LOT 59 STAGE 3
HBK1/626
14.9
21.2
LOT 159 STAGE 4
LOT 11 STAGE 1B
24.2
21.2
LOT 157 STAGE 4
Lot 209 DP 10451 0.0741
19
20.0
17.6
21.0
22
.5
LOT 160 STAGE 4
LOT 150 356m²
LOT 30 388m²
24.2
LOT 154 STAGE 4
HBA3/1092
HBA3/306
24.2
LOT 12 STAGE 1B
ERIK S
Lot 114 DP 10248 0.0419
LOT 149 361m²
4.2
LOT 153 STAGE 4
LOT 60 STAGE 3
Lot 208 DP 10451 0.0741
LOT 147 STAGE 4
Lot 1 DP 318389 6.1891 71899
24.2
13.0
LOT 156 STAGE 4
302 STAGE 3
HBA2/1403
HBA3/306
LOT 144 STAGE 4
14.9
Lot 207 DP 9997 0.0687
24.2
LOT 29 388m² 24.2
21.2
LOT 148 360m²
17.0
LOT 155 STAGE 4
LOT 152 STAGE 4
LOT 146 391m²
18.2
3.9
LOT 61 STAGE 4
HBA3/1372
Lot 118 DP 10451 0.0407
LOT 145 394m²
LOT 13 STAGE 1B
24.2
STAGE 5
16.9
11.8
Lot 206 DP 9997 0.0687
.3
14.9
HBA1/525
LOT 143 25 435m² .7
403 STAGE 4
LOT 151 STAGE 4
2.3
.6
15
LOT 62 STAGE 4
4.6
LOT 142 387m² 26 .6
.8
HBD2/756
LOT 133 444m²
1.3
4.2
Lot 205 DP 9997 0.0675
.2
.6
22
LOT 139 STAGE 4
20.1
LOT 138 STAGE 4
LOT 63 STAGE 4
HBA1/801
Lot 165 DP 9997 0.0784
13.4
4.5
LOT 64 STAGE 4
HBA2/1222
Lot 204 DP 9997 0.0703
LOT 140 433m²
LOT 28 388m²
.2
14 .7 348m² LOT 130 30.2 14.7 15 348m² LOT 131 .4 15.4 302m² LOT 134 4.1 IB 14.0 LOT 135 RO IA 307m² 19 AD .5 15.4 303m² 5 JB LOT 141 15.6 JA 404 12.4 362m² 4.2 4298m² 13 4.4 2 12.6
LOT 137 STAGE 4
15
HBH2/141
HBK1/439
24.2
22
19 .5
LOT 65 STAGE 4
Lot 203 DP 9997 0.0718
Lot 164 DP 9997 0.0725
HBA1/624
3.7
23
.4
15.2
Lot 202 DP 9997 0.0693
15
LOT 136 STAGE 4
HBJ2/292
Lot 166 DP 9997 0.0682
.8
4.6
LOT 66 STAGE 4
307 STAGE 4
LOT 14 STAGE 1B
16.5
14.1 .6
LOT 67 STAGE 4
HBD3/1295
Lot 163 DP 9997 0.0786
LOT 116 404m² 21
D8
HBW1/356
.4
ROA
Lot 201 DP 10396 0.1090
Lot 162 DP 9997 0.0776
15
15 LOT 123 .4 348m² LOT 126 15 .4 HB 15 348m² .4 HA LOT 127
.0
HBE1/551
WI LL
Lot 161 DP 9997 0.0789
24.2
303 STAGE 4
22
HBW1/355
HBC4/792
.2
Lot 160 DP 9997 0.0786
HBM1/694
LOT 15 STAGE 1B
13.0
Lot 198 DP 10396 0.1778
22
HBH4/1235
15
HBM1/695
OW BA
Lot 150 DP 9997 0.1039
Lot 159 DP 9997 0.0814
LOT 16 STAGE 1C
NK
HBA1/716
Lot 151 DP 9997 0.0753
LOT 17 STAGE 1C
HBB3/848
Lot 196 DP 9997 0.0703
Lot 158 DP 9997 0.0710
HBM1/696 Bisson Place
HBA3/1263
Lot 193 DP 9997 0.0741
E
Lot 155 DP 9997 0.0672
NOTES 1. This plan has been produced for resource consent purposes. Boundaries and dimensions are subject to resource consent approval and land transfer survey. 2. Easements may be required for cross-boundary services. 3. Current Napier City Council Zoning: Main Residential. NCC Planning Maps: I7, I8 and H8. 4. Proposed Amalgamation Conditions: 4.1. "That Lot 404 & Lots 303 & 403 DP (Stage 4 LT#) & Lots 302 & 402 DP (Stage 3 LT#) & Lots 301 & 401 DP (Stage 2 LT#) hereon are to be held in one record of title".
LOT 19 STAGE 1C
Lot 192 DP 9997 0.0741
AV E
HBA1/619
HBM1/677
AV EN UE
MA
N SO S BI
P
CE A L
HBA3/48
Lot 12 DP 10375 0.0935
NU
Lot 154 DP 9997 0.0789
HBM1/687
HBJ4/1500
Lot 191 DP 9997 0.0728
UE
HBY1/923
HBM1/676
VEN
HBM1/686
Lot 190 DP 9997 0.0715
DA
Lot 6 DP 28293 0.0603
HBB3/843
Lot 11 DP 10375 0.1464
IEL
HBY1/922
PE RC YS PIL LER
Lot 189 DP 9997 0.0703
SEF
Lot 22 DP 10192 0.2137
HBF4/39
SER VIC EL
Lot 2 DP 28293 0.0286 Lot 3 DP 28293 HBY1/919 0.0310 Lot 4HBY1/920 DP 28293 0.0319 Lot 5 DP 28293 HBY1/921 0.0276
Lot 23 DP 10192 0.0799
XREF's: QuickMap_TE Awa_willowbank CAD FILE: H:\_2018\H20180069 - Durham Property Investments\CAD\H20180069-CONSENT-R1.dwg
Appr. Issued KRC KRC
Pt Section 92 Blk VIII Heretaunga SD 0.0916
NORTH
DP 26433 0.0498
FIT ZG E
HBW1/1022
LD P
DP 26433 0.0442
Lot 1 DP 26433 0.1325
RA
DATE PLOTTED: 12/20/2018 9:03:24 AM BY : GEMMA GUILFORD
LA
BE
793437
Lot 354 DP 513468 0.0527
Lot 363 DP 513468 0.0560
Lot 357 DP 513468 0.0584
793445
793439
Lot 358 DP 513468 0.0527
Lot 362 DP 513468 0.0526
16 & 38 WILLOWBANK AVE TE AWA, NAPIER STAGE 5 - SCHEME PLAN Status
FOR APPROVAL
NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES
793444
Datum
793440
Lot 361 DP 513468 0.0526
793436
Lot 359 DP 513468 0.1125 793441
793443
Lot 360 DP 513468
Council Ref.
HB2000
Scale
1:1000
Drawing Number
H20180069-C018
Size
A3 Revision
1
HBW1/1023
HBW1/1021
STA LL STR
EE T
HBV2/873
Description Rev Date 1 17/12/2018 FOR APPROVAL
Lot 8 DP 10375 0.2324
Lot 9 DP 10192 0.1274
HBM1/675
HBM1/678
Lot 186 DP 9997 0.0748
HBM1/672
HBH2/114
Lot 187 DP 9997 0.0705
Lot 24 DP 10192 0.3819
Lot 10 DP 10192 0.1224
Lot 1 DP 28293 0.0596
HBG2/478
Lot 188 DP 9997 0.0718
HBM1/673
HBY1/918
HBA1/624
Lot 204 DP 9997 0.0703
HBK1/439
Lot 205 DP 9997 0.0675
HBD2/756
Lot 206 DP 9997 0.0687 HBA3/1372
Lot 118 DP 10451 0.0407
Lot 114 DP 10248 0.0419
LOT 153 STAGE 4
HBE2/1003
15 .0
LOT 170 STAGE 3
HBF4/40
HBC4/814
306 STAGE 3
Lot 94 DP 10451 0.0733
15.6
.3 15
m²
239
41 7
20
.1
23.7
23
.3
15 .6
.6
.5
.5
.7
22
22
12.2
.7
.2
22 .6
LOT 11 STAGE 1B
LOT 146 STAGE 5
LOT 148 STAGE 5
LOT 149 STAGE 5
LOT 147 STAGE 4
LOT 33 STAGE 5
LOT 164 STAGE 4
LOT 35 STAGE 2
LOT 166 STAGE 2
LOT 163 STAGE 2
LOT 7 STAGE 1A LOT 36 STAGE 2
LOT 180 STAGE 3
LOT 179 STAGE 2
LOT 181 STAGE 2
LOT 182 STAGE 2
LOT 51 STAGE 3
Lot 380 DP 513468 0.0483
Lot 381 DP 513468 0.0483
Lot 382 DP 513468 0.0483
Lot 383 DP 513468 0.0483
795983
795984
795985
795986
795987
Lot 384 DP 516362 0.0483 804715
Lot 385 DP 516362 0.0483 804716
Lot 386 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 387 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 388 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 389 DP 516362 0.0483
804717
804718
804719
804720
KAITUNA PLACE
LOT 5 STAGE 1A
Lot 370 DP 513468 0.0462
LOT 40 STAGE 2
795979
Lot 371 DP 513468 0.0520
795981
Lot 349 DP 513468 0.0565 Lot 348 DP 513468 0.0544
LOT 44 STAGE 2 Lot 3 DP 394762 6.7380
LOT 42 STAGE 2
378863
LOT 1 STAGE 1A
Lot 346 DP 513468 0.0544 793428
305 STAGE 2
Lot 350 DP 513468 0.0521
Lot 347 DP 513468 0.0544 LOT 43 STAGE 2
Lot 345 DP 513468 0.0544
Lot 375 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 376 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 377 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 378 DP 516362 0.0490
804711
804712
804714
804710
804713
795982
795978
LOT 2 STAGE 1A
793429
Lot 374 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 369 DP 513468 0.0509
793431
793430
LOT 45 STAGE 2
Lot 373 DP 513468 0.0562
795980
LOT 3 STAGE 1A
LOT 41 STAGE 2
LOT 46 STAGE 2
Lot 372 DP 513468 0.0543
Lot 368 DP 513468 0.0469
Lot 367 DP 513468 0.0550
Lot 366 DP 513468 0.0578
794507
794506
Lot 365 DP 513468 0.0914 793447
17/12/2018
793432
Lot 364 DP 513468 0.0621
793433
Lot 356 DP 513468 0.0604 793438
793434
Lot 355 DP 513468 0.0527 Lot 353 DP 513468 0.1185 793435
17/12/2018
Designed
Date
Approved
Date
Client
DURHAM PROPERTY INVESTMENTS PROPOSED SUBDIVISION OF LOT 1 & 2 DP 14417 COMPRISED IN RT HBG2/863 & 420376
793446
Lot 352 DP 513468 0.0544
793427
Date
KRC
This document is produced by Development Nous Ltd solely for the benefit of and use by the client in accordance with the terms of engagement. Development Nous Ltd does not and shall not assume any responsibility or liability whatsoever to any third party arising out of any use or reliance by third party on the content of this document.
795977
Lot 351 DP 513468 0.0544
HBB2/1223
All Rights Reserved.
Date
GG
Checked LOT 4 STAGE 1A
LOT 48 STAGE 2
Date
Drawn
LOT 39 STAGE 2
LOT 187 STAGE 2
LOT 185 STAGE 2
Fieldwork
LOT 38 STAGE 2
LOT 188 STAGE 2
LOT 186 STAGE 2
LOT 47 STAGE 2
Lot 9 DP 6055 2.1650
Lot 379 DP 513468 0.0500
LOT 183 STAGE 2 LOT 184 STAGE 2
LOT 52 STAGE 3
LOT 6 STAGE 1A
LOT 37 STAGE 2
LOT 177 STAGE 2
LOT 49 STAGE 2
HBG3/590
LOT 9 STAGE 1B
LOT 165 STAGE 2
301 STAGE 2
Lot 93 DP 10451 0.0713
LOT 10 STAGE 1B
401 STAGE 2
LOT 161 STAGE 4
LOT 159 STAGE 4
Superseded
LOT 31 STAGE 5
LOT 34 STAGE 5
LOT 50 STAGE 3
HBG2/209
LOT 135 STAGE 5
LOT 160 STAGE 4
LOT 175 STAGE 3 402 STAGE 3
71899
LOT 12 STAGE 1B
LOT 150 STAGE 5
LOT 178 STAGE 3
LOT 53 STAGE 3
Lot 95 DP 10451 0.0713
LOT 134 STAGE 5
LOT 167 STAGE 2
LOT 174 STAGE 3
LOT 54 STAGE 3
LOT 131 STAGE 5
LOT 176 STAGE 3
LOT 55 STAGE 3
Lot 96 DP 10451 0.0672
Lot 1 DP 318389 6.1891
LOT 32 STAGE 5
LOT 162 STAGE 2
LOT 171 STAGE 3
LOT 13 STAGE 1B
LOT 29 STAGE 5
LOT 143 STAGE 5
LOT 172 STAGE 3
LOT 56 STAGE 3
HBK1/825
.1
12 .3 .0 16
.0 16
10 14
15 .2 22 .6
LOT 145 STAGE 5
LOT 173 STAGE 3
HBK1/977
Lot 97 DP 10451 0.0672
LOT 28 STAGE 5 LOT 133 STAGE 5
LOT 158 STAGE 4
LOT 57 STAGE 3
Lot 98 DP 10451 0.0672
1.3
LOT 30 STAGE 5
LOT 142 STAGE 5
LOT 58 STAGE 3 LOT 169 STAGE 3
LOT 14 STAGE 1B
LOT 8 STAGE 1B
LOT 168 STAGE 3
Lot 210 DP 10451 0.0728
LOT 116 STAGE 5
404 STAGE 5
LOT 59 STAGE 3
HBK1/626
.7
.2
LOT 154 STAGE 4 LOT 157 STAGE 4
Lot 209 DP 10451 0.0741
LOT 15 STAGE 1B
19
15
LOT 155 STAGE 4
HBA3/1092
HBA3/306
.2
.0
LOT 140 STAGE 5
LOT 156 STAGE 4
LOT 60 STAGE 3
Lot 208 DP 10451 0.0741
LOT 123 STAGE 5
31
.3
15 LOT 128 .2 344m² 15 .2 LOT 129 15 .2 337m² LOT 132 0.5 13.4 323m²
LOT 144 STAGE 4
LOT 152 STAGE 4
HBA2/1403
HBA3/306
344m²
LOT 130 STAGE 5
403 STAGE 4
LOT 151 STAGE 4
302 STAGE 3
15 .2
15
LOT 139 STAGE 4
LOT 61 STAGE 4
Lot 207 DP 9997 0.0687
LOT 124 344m² LOT 125
LOT 138 STAGE 4
LOT 62 STAGE 4
HBA1/525
D4
LOT 141 STAGE 5
LOT 63 STAGE 4
HBA1/801
Lot 165 DP 9997 0.0784
RO A
LOT 127 STAGE 5
LOT 137 STAGE 4
LOT 64 STAGE 4
HBA2/1222
.2
.2
16
LOT 119 14 .6 378m² LOT 117 LB 13 397m² .2 LA
AD
Lot 164 DP 9997 0.0725
LOT 122 354m² 2
15
15
.6
EN R O
HBH2/141
4.2
LOT 136 STAGE 4
LOT 65 STAGE 4
Lot 203 DP 9997 0.0718
.0
LOT 126 STAGE 5
HBJ2/292
Lot 166 DP 9997 0.0682
13
27
LOT 118 446m²
ERIK S
Lot 202 DP 9997 0.0693
23 .5
0.5
LOT 66 STAGE 4
307 STAGE 4
Lot 163 DP 9997 0.0786
RO AD
LOT 67 STAGE 4
HBD3/1295
16 LOT 106 .0 370m² LOT 107 KB 16 370m² .0 KA
21
HBW1/356
LOT 121 347m²
LOT 16 STAGE 1C
21
Lot 201 DP 10396 0.1090
23 .5
31 .9
31
.9
20 .5
LOT 120 359m²
14
16 .0
WI LL
HBE1/551
Lot 162 DP 9997 0.0776
4.2
.0
4.2
4.2
Lot 161 DP 9997 0.0789
LOT 68 378m² 2 303 STAGE 4
16 .0
16 .0
HBW1/355
HBC4/792
.2
15
Lot 160 DP 9997 0.0786
HBM1/694
21
16
STAGE 6
.2
Lot 198 DP 10396 0.1778
24 .2
.6
HBH4/1235
OW BA
HBM1/695
.2
4.2
Lot 150 DP 9997 0.1039
24 .2
LOT 69 388m²
NK
HBA1/716
Lot 159 DP 9997 0.0814
405 2363m²
LOT 108 488m²
24
LOT 105 367m²
12
HBJ3/1004
Lot 151 DP 9997 0.0753
15
Bisson Place
24 .2
LOT 70 388m²
.0
HBE1/318
Lot 197 DP 9997 0.0687
24 .2
LOT 71 388m² .0
MA
HB200/23
Lot 196 DP 9997 0.0703
Lot 158 DP 9997 0.0710
HBM1/696
LOT 72 388m²
Lot 195 DP 9997 0.0758
16
HBJ3/948
HBM1/697
Lot 152 DP 9997 0.0819
LOT 17 STAGE 1C
24 .2
15.2
AN E
Lot 157 DP 9997 0.0786
HBA1/516
HBB3/848
16
Lot 153 DP 9997 0.0839
Lot 194 DP 9997 0.0753
15 .6
Lot 156 DP 9997 0.0690
LOT 18 STAGE 1C
HBF2/1462
16 .0
HBB4/640
HBA3/1263
Lot 193 DP 9997 0.0741
E
Lot 155 DP 9997 0.0672
HBM1/677
AV EN UE
NOTES 1. This plan has been produced for resource consent purposes. Boundaries and dimensions are subject to resource consent approval and land transfer survey. 2. Easements may be required for cross-boundary services. 3. Current Napier City Council Zoning: Main Residential. NCC Planning Maps: I7, I8 and H8. 4. Proposed Amalgamation Conditions: 4.1. "That Lot 405 & Lot 404 DP (Stage 5 LT#) & Lots 303 & 403 DP (Stage 4 LT#) & Lots 302 & 402 DP (Stage 3 LT#) & Lots 301 & 401 DP (Stage 2 LT#) hereon are to be held in one record of title". 4.2. "That Lot 417 hereon (Legal Access) be held in two undivided one half shares by the owners of Lots 108 & 118 hereon as tenants in common in the said shares and that individual records of title be issued in accordance herewith."
LOT 19 STAGE 1C
Lot 192 DP 9997 0.0741
AV E
HBA1/619
Lot 12 DP 10375 0.0935
4.2
N SO S BI
P
CE A L
LOT 507 3.4ha
HBA3/48
NU
Lot 154 DP 9997 0.0789
HBM1/687
HBJ4/1500
Lot 191 DP 9997 0.0728
UE
HBY1/923
HBM1/676
VEN
HBM1/686
Lot 190 DP 9997 0.0715
DA
Lot 6 DP 28293 0.0603
HBB3/843
Lot 11 DP 10375 0.1464
IEL
HBY1/922
PE RC YS PIL LER
Lot 189 DP 9997 0.0703
SEF
Lot 22 DP 10192 0.2137
HBF4/39
SER VIC EL
Lot 2 DP 28293 0.0286 Lot 3 DP 28293 HBY1/919 0.0310 Lot 4HBY1/920 DP 28293 0.0319 Lot 5 DP 28293 HBY1/921 0.0276
Lot 23 DP 10192 0.0799
XREF's: QuickMap_TE Awa_willowbank CAD FILE: H:\_2018\H20180069 - Durham Property Investments\CAD\H20180069-CONSENT-R1.dwg
Appr. Issued KRC KRC
Pt Section 92 Blk VIII Heretaunga SD 0.0916
NORTH
DP 26433 0.0498
FIT ZG E
HBW1/1022
LD P
DP 26433 0.0442
Lot 1 DP 26433 0.1325
RA
DATE PLOTTED: 12/20/2018 9:03:17 AM BY : GEMMA GUILFORD
LA
BE
793437
Lot 354 DP 513468 0.0527
Lot 363 DP 513468 0.0560
Lot 357 DP 513468 0.0584
793445
793439
Lot 358 DP 513468 0.0527
Lot 362 DP 513468 0.0526
16 & 18 WILLOWBANK AVE TE AWA, NAPIER STAGE 6 - SCHEME PLAN Status
FOR APPROVAL
NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES
793444
Datum
793440
Lot 361 DP 513468 0.0526
793436
Lot 359 DP 513468 0.1125 793441
793443
Lot 360 DP 513468
Council Ref.
HB2000
Scale
1:1000
Drawing Number
H20180069-C019
Size
A3 Revision
1
HBW1/1023
HBW1/1021
STA LL STR
EE T
HBV2/873
Lot 8 DP 10375 0.2324
Lot 9 DP 10192 0.1274
HBM1/675
.0
HBM1/678
Lot 186 DP 9997 0.0748
HBM1/672
Appr. Issued KRC KRC
HBH2/114
Lot 187 DP 9997 0.0705
Lot 24 DP 10192 0.3819
Lot 10 DP 10192 0.1224
Lot 1 DP 28293 0.0596
HBG2/478
Lot 188 DP 9997 0.0718
HBM1/673
HBY1/918
HBW1/355
HBC4/792
HBE1/551
Lot 201 DP 10396 0.1090 HBW1/356
HBA1/624
LOT 69 STAGE 6
HBA3/1372
LOT 153 STAGE 4
LOT 60 STAGE 3
Lot 208 DP 10451 0.0741
Lot 114 DP 10248 0.0419
HBE2/1003
LOT 170 STAGE 3
HBF4/40
HBC4/814
306 STAGE 3
Lot 94 DP 10451 0.0733
24 .2
24 .2
.2
.2
24
24
24 .2
24 .2
.2
24
6
LOT 7 STAGE 1A LOT 36 STAGE 2
LOT 180 STAGE 3
LOT 184 STAGE 2
LOT 179 STAGE 2
LOT 181 STAGE 2
LOT 182 STAGE 2
LOT 51 STAGE 3
Lot 380 DP 513468 0.0483
Lot 381 DP 513468 0.0483
Lot 382 DP 513468 0.0483
Lot 383 DP 513468 0.0483
795983
795984
795985
795986
795987
Lot 384 DP 516362 0.0483 804715
Lot 385 DP 516362 0.0483 804716
Lot 386 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 387 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 388 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 389 DP 516362 0.0483
804717
804718
804719
804720
KAITUNA PLACE
LOT 5 STAGE 1A
Lot 370 DP 513468 0.0462
LOT 40 STAGE 2
795979
Lot 371 DP 513468 0.0520
795981
Lot 349 DP 513468 0.0565 Lot 348 DP 513468 0.0544
LOT 44 STAGE 2 Lot 3 DP 394762 6.7380
LOT 42 STAGE 2
378863
LOT 1 STAGE 1A
Lot 346 DP 513468 0.0544 793428
305 STAGE 2
Lot 350 DP 513468 0.0521
Lot 347 DP 513468 0.0544 LOT 43 STAGE 2
Lot 345 DP 513468 0.0544
Lot 375 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 376 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 377 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 378 DP 516362 0.0490
804711
804712
804714
804710
804713
795982
795978
LOT 2 STAGE 1A
793429
Lot 374 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 369 DP 513468 0.0509
793431
793430
LOT 45 STAGE 2
Lot 373 DP 513468 0.0562
795980
LOT 3 STAGE 1A
LOT 41 STAGE 2
LOT 46 STAGE 2
Lot 372 DP 513468 0.0543
Lot 368 DP 513468 0.0469
Lot 367 DP 513468 0.0550
Lot 366 DP 513468 0.0578
794507
794506
Lot 365 DP 513468 0.0914 793447
17/12/2018
793432
Lot 364 DP 513468 0.0621
793433
Lot 356 DP 513468 0.0604 793438
793434
Lot 355 DP 513468 0.0527 Lot 353 DP 513468 0.1185 793435
17/12/2018
Designed
Date
Approved
Date
Client
DURHAM PROPERTY INVESTMENTS PROPOSED SUBDIVISION OF LOT 1 & 2 DP 14417 COMPRISED IN RT HBG2/863 & 420376
793446
Lot 352 DP 513468 0.0544
793427
Date
KRC
This document is produced by Development Nous Ltd solely for the benefit of and use by the client in accordance with the terms of engagement. Development Nous Ltd does not and shall not assume any responsibility or liability whatsoever to any third party arising out of any use or reliance by third party on the content of this document.
795977
Lot 351 DP 513468 0.0544
HBB2/1223
All Rights Reserved.
Date
GG
Checked LOT 4 STAGE 1A
LOT 48 STAGE 2
Date
Drawn
LOT 39 STAGE 2
LOT 187 STAGE 2
LOT 185 STAGE 2
Fieldwork
LOT 38 STAGE 2
LOT 188 STAGE 2
LOT 186 STAGE 2
LOT 47 STAGE 2
Lot 9 DP 6055 2.1650
Lot 379 DP 513468 0.0500
LOT 183 STAGE 2
LOT 177 STAGE 2
LOT 52 STAGE 3
LOT 6 STAGE 1A
LOT 37 STAGE 2
LOT 175 STAGE 3 402 STAGE 3
LOT 49 STAGE 2
HBG3/590
14.2
LOT 35 STAGE 2
301 STAGE 2
Lot 93 DP 10451 0.0713
10.4
.2
24 .2
12 .2 16 .0
15
LOT 165 STAGE 2
LOT 166 STAGE 2
LOT 163 STAGE 2
LOT 50 STAGE 3
HBG2/209
16 .0
LOT 164 STAGE 4
LOT 167 STAGE 2
LOT 178 STAGE 3
LOT 53 STAGE 3
Lot 95 DP 10451 0.0713
LOT 9 STAGE 1B
LOT 8 STAGE 1B
LOT 174 STAGE 3
LOT 54 STAGE 3
LOT 33 STAGE 5
LOT 176 STAGE 3
LOT 55 STAGE 3
Lot 96 DP 10451 0.0672
LOT 149 STAGE 5
LOT 147 STAGE 4
401 STAGE 2
LOT 161 STAGE 4
LOT 159 STAGE 4
LOT 162 STAGE 2
LOT 171 STAGE 3
Superseded
LOT 10 STAGE 1B
LOT 34 STAGE 5
LOT 172 STAGE 3
LOT 56 STAGE 3
HBK1/825
LOT 148 STAGE 5
LOT 160 STAGE 4
LOT 173 STAGE 3
HBK1/977
LOT 146 STAGE 5
LOT 158 STAGE 4
LOT 57 STAGE 3
Lot 97 DP 10451 0.0672
LOT 11 STAGE 1B LOT 31 STAGE 5
LOT 150 STAGE 5
LOT 58 STAGE 3
Lot 98 DP 10451 0.0672
LOT 135 STAGE 5
LOT 154 STAGE 4
LOT 168 STAGE 3
LOT 169 STAGE 3
71899
LOT 12 STAGE 1B
LOT 32 STAGE 5
LOT 59 STAGE 3
HBK1/626
Lot 210 DP 10451 0.0728
16.2
13
.2
15 .2
8.0 15 .2
10
LOT 145 STAGE 5
LOT 144 STAGE 4
LOT 157 STAGE 4
Lot 209 DP 10451 0.0741
LOT 134 STAGE 5
LOT 30 STAGE 5
LOT 155 STAGE 4
HBA3/1092
HBA3/306
LOT 131 STAGE 5
LOT 143 STAGE 5
LOT 156 STAGE 4
302 STAGE 3
Lot 1 DP 318389 6.1891
404 STAGE 5
LOT 142 STAGE 5
403 STAGE 4
LOT 13 STAGE 1B
LOT 29 STAGE 5
LOT 140 STAGE 5
LOT 139 STAGE 4
HBA2/1403
HBA3/306
LOT 130 STAGE 5
LOT 138 STAGE 4
LOT 152 STAGE 4
LOT 28 STAGE 5 LOT 133 STAGE 5
LOT 141 STAGE 5
LOT 61 STAGE 4
Lot 207 DP 9997 0.0687
Lot 118 DP 10451 0.0407
8.0
LOT 136 STAGE 4
LOT 151 STAGE 4
LOT 14 STAGE 1B
LOT 132 STAGE 6
LOT 127 STAGE 5
LOT 137 STAGE 4
LOT 62 STAGE 4
Lot 206 DP 9997 0.0687
LOT 129 STAGE 6
LOT 126 STAGE 5
LOT 63 STAGE 4
HBA1/525
LOT 116 STAGE 5 LOT 128 STAGE 6
LOT 123 STAGE 5
LOT 64 STAGE 4
HBA2/1222
LOT 15 STAGE 1B
LOT 125 STAGE 6
LOT 65 STAGE 4
HBH2/141
HBD2/756
.8
LOT 118 STAGE 6
LOT 117 STAGE 6
LOT 122 STAGE 6
LOT 66 STAGE 4
HBA1/801
LOT 16 STAGE 1C
LOT 124 STAGE 6
LOT 67 STAGE 4
Lot 205 DP 9997 0.0675
.2
LOT 112 420m²
LOT 119 STAGE 6
LOT 121 STAGE 6
LOT 68 STAGE 6
Lot 203 DP 9997 0.0718
Lot 165 DP 9997 0.0784
15
19
LOT 106 STAGE 6
LOT 120 STAGE 6
.0
Lot 204 DP 9997 0.0703
LOT 17 STAGE 1C 15 .2
LOT 111 369m²
.2
LOT 107 STAGE 6
40
Lot 202 DP 9997 0.0693
HBK1/439
.5
.2
405 STAGE 6
307 STAGE 4
Lot 164 DP 9997 0.0725
16
LOT 105 STAGE 6
LOT 70 STAGE 6
HBJ2/292
Lot 166 DP 9997 0.0682
AD 3
LOT 110 369m²
15
LOT 108 STAGE 6
LOT 18 STAGE 1C
.2
15
303 STAGE 4
HBD3/1295
Lot 163 DP 9997 0.0786
RO AD
LOT 71 STAGE 6
WI LL
Lot 161 DP 9997 0.0789
.2
.5
15
.2
24
16
.2
LOT 109 370m²
.5
AD
Lot 198 DP 10396 0.1778
Lot 162 DP 9997 0.0776
.2
16
LOT 94 402m² MA
MB
RO
15
15
LOT 104 389m²
.5
GE
HBE1/318
Lot 160 DP 9997 0.0786
HBM1/694
24
LOT 103 388m²
.0
HB200/23
.5
LOT 95 402m²
EN R O
HBH4/1235
LOT 102 365m²
.2
LOT 72 STAGE 6
Lot 195 DP 9997 0.0758
406 2076m²
.2
24
NK
HBM1/695
15 .2
HBB3/848
OW BA
Lot 150 DP 9997 0.1039
15 .2
24 .2
HBA1/716
Lot 159 DP 9997 0.0814
16 .0
388m²
Lot 197 DP 9997 0.0687
HBJ3/1004
Lot 151 DP 9997 0.0753
22 6.1 15 .5
16 .0
LOT 73
15 .5
UE
24 .2
LOT 98 402m²
16
21
LOT 19 STAGE 1C
16
ERIK S
Bisson Place
HBF2/1462
Lot 196 DP 9997 0.0703
Lot 158 DP 9997 0.0710
HBM1/696
LOT 74 375m²
16 .5
.2
4.2
Lot 193 DP 9997 0.0741
Lot 194 DP 9997 0.0753
21
NOTES 1. This plan has been produced for resource consent purposes. Boundaries and dimensions are subject to resource consent approval and land transfer survey. 2. Easements may be required for cross-boundary services. 3. Current Napier City Council Zoning: Main Residential. NCC Planning Maps: I7, I8 and H8. 4. Proposed Amalgamation Conditions: 4.1. "That Lots 304 & 406 & Lot 405 DP (Stage 6 LT#) & Lot 404 DP (Stage 5 LT#) & Lots 303 & 403 DP (Stage 4 LT#) & Lots 302 & 402 DP (Stage 3 LT#) & Lots 301 & 401 DP (Stage 2 LT#) hereon are to be held in one record of title". 5. Lot 308 is to vest in the Napier City Council as local purpose reserve upon deposit.
.2
ST A
Lot 152 DP 9997 0.0819
LOT 75 369m² 24 .2
24
LOT 101 393m²
417
HBJ3/948
HBM1/697
22 6.1
AN E
Lot 157 DP 9997 0.0786
HBA1/516
.2
16
Lot 153 DP 9997 0.0839
24 .2
16 .0
Lot 156 DP 9997 0.0690
.2
24
HBA3/1263
E
HBB4/640
HBM1/677
AV EN UE
Lot 192 DP 9997 0.0741
NU
Lot 155 DP 9997 0.0672
Lot 12 DP 10375 0.0935
24
LOT 76 369m²
304 194m²
308 9045m²
AV E
HBA1/619
STAGE 7
HBA3/48
MA
N SO S BI
P
CE A L
HBJ4/1500
Lot 191 DP 9997 0.0728
VEN
Lot 154 DP 9997 0.0789
HBM1/687
Lot 190 DP 9997 0.0715
HBM1/676
DA
HBY1/923
Lot 11 DP 10375 0.1464
4.2
PE RC YS PIL LER
HBM1/686
HBB3/843
IEL
HBY1/922
Lot 6 DP 28293 0.0603
LOT 508 1.7ha
Lot 189 DP 9997 0.0703
SEF
Lot 22 DP 10192 0.2137
HBF4/39
SER VIC EL
Lot 2 DP 28293 0.0286 Lot 3 DP 28293 HBY1/919 0.0310 Lot 4HBY1/920 DP 28293 0.0319 Lot 5 DP 28293 HBY1/921 0.0276
Lot 23 DP 10192 0.0799
XREF's: QuickMap_TE Awa_willowbank CAD FILE: H:\_2018\H20180069 - Durham Property Investments\CAD\H20180069-CONSENT-R1.dwg
Description Rev Date 1 17/12/2018 FOR APPROVAL
40
Pt Section 92 Blk VIII Heretaunga SD 0.0916
NORTH
DP 26433 0.0498
FIT ZG E
HBW1/1022
LD P
DP 26433 0.0442
Lot 1 DP 26433 0.1325
RA
DATE PLOTTED: 12/20/2018 9:03:07 AM BY : GEMMA GUILFORD
LA
BE
793437
Lot 354 DP 513468 0.0527
Lot 363 DP 513468 0.0560
Lot 357 DP 513468 0.0584
793445
793439
Lot 358 DP 513468 0.0527
Lot 362 DP 513468 0.0526
16 & 38 WILLOWBANK AVE TE AWA, NAPIER STAGE 7 - SCHEME PLAN Status
FOR APPROVAL
NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES
793444
Datum
793440
Lot 361 DP 513468 0.0526
793436
Lot 359 DP 513468 0.1125 793441
793443
Lot 360 DP 513468
Council Ref.
HB2000
Scale
1:1000
Drawing Number
H20180069-C020
Size
A3 Revision
1
HBW1/1023
HBW1/1021
STA LL STR
EE T
HBV2/873
Description Rev Date 1 17/12/2018 FOR APPROVAL
Lot 8 DP 10375 0.2324
Lot 9 DP 10192 0.1274
HBM1/675
HBM1/678
Lot 186 DP 9997 0.0748
HBM1/672
HBH2/114
Lot 187 DP 9997 0.0705
Lot 24 DP 10192 0.3819
Lot 10 DP 10192 0.1224
Lot 1 DP 28293 0.0596
HBG2/478
Lot 188 DP 9997 0.0718
HBM1/673
HBY1/918
HBA1/624
Lot 205 DP 9997 0.0675
HBD2/756
HBA1/525
Lot 206 DP 9997 0.0687 HBA3/1372
LOT 153 STAGE 4
HBA2/1403
HBA3/306
LOT 60 STAGE 3
Lot 208 DP 10451 0.0741
Lot 114 DP 10248 0.0419
LOT 145 STAGE 5
HBE2/1003
LOT 170 STAGE 3
LOT 164 STAGE 4
HBF4/40
LOT 178 STAGE 3
HBC4/814
306 STAGE 3
Lot 94 DP 10451 0.0733
LOT 180 STAGE 3
LOT 184 STAGE 2
LOT 177 STAGE 2 LOT 179 STAGE 2
LOT 52 STAGE 3
LOT 181 STAGE 2
LOT 182 STAGE 2
LOT 51 STAGE 3
HBG3/590
7.5
23 .2
1.0
14.2
16.0
16.0
9.6
14.2 13.0
16.0
17.00 m
15 .3
12.7
10.5 14.9
15.9
16.0
RO A D1
12.8
13.0
16.0 16.0
16.0
Lot 381 DP 513468 0.0483
Lot 382 DP 513468 0.0483
Lot 383 DP 513468 0.0483
795983
795984
795985
795986
795987
Lot 384 DP 516362 0.0483 804715
Lot 385 DP 516362 0.0483 804716
Lot 386 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 387 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 388 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 389 DP 516362 0.0483
804717
804718
804719
804720
Lot 370 DP 513468 0.0462
LOT 40 STAGE 2
Lot 371 DP 513468 0.0520
795981
Lot 349 DP 513468 0.0565 Lot 348 DP 513468 0.0544
LOT 44 STAGE 2 Lot 3 DP 394762 6.7380
LOT 42 STAGE 2
378863
LOT 1 STAGE 1A
Lot 346 DP 513468 0.0544 793428
305 STAGE 2
Lot 350 DP 513468 0.0521
Lot 347 DP 513468 0.0544 LOT 43 STAGE 2
Lot 345 DP 513468 0.0544
Lot 375 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 376 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 377 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 378 DP 516362 0.0490
804711
804712
804714
804710
804713
795982
795978
LOT 2 STAGE 1A
793429
Lot 374 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 369 DP 513468 0.0509
793431
793430
LOT 45 STAGE 2
Lot 373 DP 513468 0.0562
795980
LOT 3 STAGE 1A
LOT 41 STAGE 2
LOT 46 STAGE 2
Lot 372 DP 513468 0.0543
Lot 368 DP 513468 0.0469
Lot 367 DP 513468 0.0550
Lot 366 DP 513468 0.0578
794507
794506
Lot 365 DP 513468 0.0914 793447
17/12/2018
793432
Lot 364 DP 513468 0.0621
793433
Lot 356 DP 513468 0.0604 793438
793434
Lot 355 DP 513468 0.0527 Lot 353 DP 513468 0.1185 793435
17/12/2018
Designed
Date
Approved
Date
Client
DURHAM PROPERTY INVESTMENTS PROPOSED SUBDIVISION OF LOT 1 & 2 DP 14417 COMPRISED IN RT HBG2/863 & 420376
793446
Lot 352 DP 513468 0.0544
793427
Date
KRC
This document is produced by Development Nous Ltd solely for the benefit of and use by the client in accordance with the terms of engagement. Development Nous Ltd does not and shall not assume any responsibility or liability whatsoever to any third party arising out of any use or reliance by third party on the content of this document.
795977
Lot 351 DP 513468 0.0544
HBB2/1223
All Rights Reserved.
Date
GG
Checked LOT 4 STAGE 1A
LOT 48 STAGE 2
Date
Drawn
LOT 39 STAGE 2
LOT 187 STAGE 2
LOT 185 STAGE 2
Fieldwork
KAITUNA PLACE
795979
LOT 47 STAGE 2
Lot 9 DP 6055 2.1650
Lot 380 DP 513468 0.0483
LOT 5 STAGE 1A
LOT 186 STAGE 2
LOT 49 STAGE 2
Lot 379 DP 513468 0.0500
LOT 38 STAGE 2
LOT 188 STAGE 2
301 STAGE 2
Lot 93 DP 10451 0.0713
LOT 6 STAGE 1A
LOT 183 STAGE 2
LOT 50 STAGE 3
HBG2/209
LOT 7 STAGE 1A LOT 36 STAGE 2
LOT 37 STAGE 2
LOT 175 STAGE 3 402 STAGE 3 LOT 53 STAGE 3
Lot 95 DP 10451 0.0713
LOT 35 STAGE 2
LOT 166 STAGE 2
LOT 163 STAGE 2
LOT 167 STAGE 2
LOT 174 STAGE 3
LOT 54 STAGE 3
LOT 9 STAGE 1B
LOT 165 STAGE 2
LOT 176 STAGE 3
LOT 171 STAGE 3
LOT 55 STAGE 3
Lot 96 DP 10451 0.0672
LOT 162 STAGE 2
LOT 172 STAGE 3
LOT 56 STAGE 3
HBK1/825
LOT 33 STAGE 5
401 STAGE 2
LOT 161 STAGE 4
LOT 173 STAGE 3
HBK1/977
Lot 97 DP 10451 0.0672
LOT 149 STAGE 5
LOT 147 STAGE 4
LOT 158 STAGE 4
LOT 57 STAGE 3
Lot 98 DP 10451 0.0672
LOT 10 STAGE 1B
LOT 8 STAGE 1B
LOT 168 STAGE 3
LOT 169 STAGE 3
LOT 148 STAGE 5
LOT 34 STAGE 5
LOT 58 STAGE 3
Lot 210 DP 10451 0.0728
LOT 146 STAGE 5
LOT 160 STAGE 4
LOT 159 STAGE 4
Superseded
LOT 11 STAGE 1B LOT 31 STAGE 5
LOT 154 STAGE 4 LOT 157 STAGE 4
HBK1/626
LOT 135 STAGE 5
LOT 150 STAGE 5
LOT 59 STAGE 3
Lot 209 DP 10451 0.0741
71899
LOT 12 STAGE 1B
LOT 32 STAGE 5
LOT 155 STAGE 4
HBA3/1092
HBA3/306
LOT 134 STAGE 5
LOT 143 STAGE 5
LOT 156 STAGE 4
302 STAGE 3
Lot 1 DP 318389 6.1891
LOT 30 STAGE 5
LOT 144 STAGE 4
LOT 152 STAGE 4
LOT 13 STAGE 1B
404 STAGE 5
LOT 142 STAGE 5
403 STAGE 4
LOT 151 STAGE 4
LOT 61 STAGE 4
Lot 207 DP 9997 0.0687
Lot 118 DP 10451 0.0407
LOT 139 STAGE 4
LOT 14 STAGE 1B
LOT 28 STAGE 5
LOT 140 STAGE 5
LOT 138 STAGE 4
LOT 62 STAGE 4
24.2
LOT 29 STAGE 5
LOT 131 STAGE 5
LOT 141 STAGE 5
LOT 63 STAGE 4
HBA1/801
Lot 165 DP 9997 0.0784
.8
20
Lot 204 DP 9997 0.0703
LOT 15 STAGE 1B
LOT 133 STAGE 5 LOT 130 STAGE 5
LOT 137 STAGE 4
LOT 64 STAGE 4
HBA2/1222
HBK1/439
24 .2 24 .2
24 .2
HBH2/141
LOT 26 388m² LOT 27 388m²
LOT 132 STAGE 6
LOT 127 STAGE 5
LOT 136 STAGE 4
NTR Y2
21.2
LOT 25 383m²
24.2
LOT 129 STAGE 6
LOT 16 STAGE 1C
24.2
LOT 116 STAGE 5
LOT 126 STAGE 5
24.2
LOT 24 383m²
STAGE 8E
LOT 128 STAGE 6 LOT 123 STAGE 5
LOT 65 STAGE 4
Lot 203 DP 9997 0.0718
Lot 164 DP 9997 0.0725
.7 17
LOT 125 STAGE 6
HBJ2/292
Lot 166 DP 9997 0.0682
LOT 124 STAGE 6
LOT 67 STAGE 4
Lot 202 DP 9997 0.0693
24.2
LOT 122 STAGE 6
LOT 66 STAGE 4
LOT 115 388m²
LOT 17 STAGE 1C
21.2
4.2
24.2
LOT 117 STAGE 6
LOT 121 STAGE 6
LOT 68 STAGE 6
307 STAGE 4
Lot 163 DP 9997 0.0786
LOT 114 388m²
LOT 119 STAGE 6
LOT 120 STAGE 6
408 3324m²
16.0
LOT 69 STAGE 6
303 STAGE 4
HBD3/1295
21.2
LOT 118 STAGE 6
LOT 23 387m²
AD
HBW1/356
LOT 107 STAGE 6
LOT 18 STAGE 1C
LOT 22 345m²
EN R O
Lot 201 DP 10396 0.1090
LOT 106 STAGE 6
3.7
.1
LOT 113 363m²
.7
ERIK S
HBE1/551
7.4
405 STAGE 6 LOT 70 STAGE 6
WI LL
Lot 161 DP 9997 0.0789
LOT 112 STAGE 7
LOT 105 STAGE 6
15
LOT 21 350m²
24.2
3
21
10.4
LOT 71 STAGE 6
RO AD
LOT 111 STAGE 7
LOT 108 STAGE 6
16.0
HBW1/355
HBC4/792
LOT 104 STAGE 7
16.0
HB200/23
Lot 198 DP 10396 0.1778
Lot 162 DP 9997 0.0776
29
LOT 110 STAGE 7
LOT 72 STAGE 6
Lot 195 DP 9997 0.0758
HBE1/318
Lot 160 DP 9997 0.0786
HBM1/694
LOT 92 469m² NA
16.0
HBH4/1235
NB
.0
NOTES 1. This plan has been produced for resource consent purposes. Boundaries and dimensions are subject to resource consent approval and land transfer survey. 2. Easements may be required for cross-boundary services. 3. Current Napier City Council Zoning: Main Residential. NCC Planning Maps: I7, I8 and H8. 4. Proposed Amalgamation Conditions: 4.1. "That Lot 408 & Lots 304 & 406 DP (Stage 7 LT#) & Lot 405 DP (Stage 6 LT#) & Lot 404 DP (Stage 5 LT#) & Lots 303 & 403 DP (Stage 4 LT#) & Lots 302 & 402 DP (Stage 3 LT#) & Lots 301 & 401 DP (Stage 2 LT#) hereon are to be held in one record of title".
LOT 19 STAGE 1C
24.2
.4
NK
Lot 159 DP 9997 0.0814
HBM1/695
LOT 109 STAGE 7
LOT 103 STAGE 7
4.1
6.3
4.7
LOT 91 421m² 29
15.4
LOT 73 STAGE 7
Lot 194 DP 9997 0.0753
OW BA
Lot 151 DP 9997 0.0753
LOT 94 STAGE 7
16.0
UE HBF2/1462
HBA1/716
Lot 150 DP 9997 0.1039
.6
LOT 102 STAGE 7
Lot 197 DP 9997 0.0687
HBJ3/1004
25
406 STAGE 7
LOT 74 STAGE 7
HBB3/848
MA
Bisson Place
Lot 193 DP 9997 0.0741
Lot 196 DP 9997 0.0703
Lot 158 DP 9997 0.0710
HBM1/696
LOT 95 STAGE 7
6
HBJ3/948
HBM1/697
Lot 152 DP 9997 0.0819
LOT 90 413m²
LOT 98 STAGE 7
LOT 75 STAGE 7
HBA3/1263
GE
AN E
Lot 157 DP 9997 0.0786
HBA1/516
.0
4.2
Lot 153 DP 9997 0.0839
18 .7
ST A
Lot 156 DP 9997 0.0690
7.7
LOT 101 STAGE 7
417
HBB4/640
HBM1/677
AV EN UE
Lot 192 DP 9997 0.0741
E
Lot 155 DP 9997 0.0672
Lot 12 DP 10375 0.0935
17
LOT 89 15 .8 401m² OA LOT 20 384m² 5.8
15 .4
304 STAGE 7
308 STAGE 7
HBA3/48
AV E
HBA1/619
Lot 191 DP 9997 0.0728
LOT 88 374m² OB
LOT 76 STAGE 7
4.6
N SO S BI
P
CE A L
HBJ4/1500
NU
Lot 154 DP 9997 0.0789
HBM1/687
HBM1/676
VEN
HBY1/923
Lot 190 DP 9997 0.0715
DA
Lot 6 DP 28293 0.0603
.4
Lot 11 DP 10375 0.1464
4.6
PE RC YS PIL LER
HBM1/686
15
HBB3/843
IEL
HBY1/922
LOT 509 0.85ha
Lot 189 DP 9997 0.0703
SEF
Lot 22 DP 10192 0.2137
HBF4/39
SER VIC EL
Lot 2 DP 28293 0.0286 Lot 3 DP 28293 HBY1/919 0.0310 Lot 4HBY1/920 DP 28293 0.0319 Lot 5 DP 28293 HBY1/921 0.0276
Lot 23 DP 10192 0.0799
XREF's: QuickMap_TE Awa_willowbank CAD FILE: H:\_2018\H20180069 - Durham Property Investments\CAD\H20180069-CONSENT-R1.dwg
Appr. Issued KRC KRC
Pt Section 92 Blk VIII Heretaunga SD 0.0916
NORTH
DP 26433 0.0498
FIT ZG E
HBW1/1022
LD P
DP 26433 0.0442
Lot 1 DP 26433 0.1325
RA
DATE PLOTTED: 12/20/2018 9:02:50 AM BY : GEMMA GUILFORD
LA
BE
793437
Lot 354 DP 513468 0.0527
Lot 363 DP 513468 0.0560
Lot 357 DP 513468 0.0584
793445
793439
Lot 358 DP 513468 0.0527
Lot 362 DP 513468 0.0526
16 & 38 WILLOWBANK AVE TE AWA, NAPIER STAGE 8 - SCHEME PLAN Status
FOR APPROVAL
NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES
793444
Datum
793440
Lot 361 DP 513468 0.0526
793436
Lot 359 DP 513468 0.1125 793441
793443
Lot 360 DP 513468
Council Ref.
HB2000
Scale
1:1000
Drawing Number
H20180069-C021
Size
A3 Revision
1
LD P
EE T
Description Rev Date 1 17/12/2018 FOR APPROVAL
LOT 73 STAGE 7
Lot 194 DP 9997 0.0753
HB200/23
HBE1/318
HBH4/1235
Lot 198 DP 10396 0.1778
Lot 160 DP 9997 0.0786
HBM1/694
HBW1/355
HBC4/792
LOT 71 STAGE 6
HBE1/551
Lot 201 DP 10396 0.1090
Lot 162 DP 9997 0.0776
HBW1/356
405 STAGE 6
LOT 69 STAGE 6
Lot 202 DP 9997 0.0693 HBH2/141
Lot 203 DP 9997 0.0718
Lot 164 DP 9997 0.0725
HBA1/624
Lot 204 DP 9997 0.0703
Lot 205 DP 9997 0.0675
HBD2/756
HBA1/525
Lot 206 DP 9997 0.0687
LOT 136 STAGE 4
HBA3/1372
Lot 118 DP 10451 0.0407
LOT 153 STAGE 4
LOT 60 STAGE 3
Lot 208 DP 10451 0.0741
Lot 114 DP 10248 0.0419 HBA3/306
HBE2/1003
NORTH
14 .8
24 .2
LOT 170 STAGE 3
HBF4/40
HBC4/814
306 STAGE 3
.2
24
16.2
24.2
24 .2
24 .2
24 .2
.2
16 .0
24 .2
LOT 165 STAGE 2
LOT 35 STAGE 2
LOT 166 STAGE 2
LOT 163 STAGE 2
LOT 7 STAGE 1A LOT 36 STAGE 2
LOT 180 STAGE 3
LOT 184 STAGE 2
LOT 179 STAGE 2
LOT 181 STAGE 2
LOT 182 STAGE 2
LOT 51 STAGE 3
Lot 380 DP 513468 0.0483
Lot 381 DP 513468 0.0483
Lot 382 DP 513468 0.0483
Lot 383 DP 513468 0.0483
795983
795984
795985
795986
795987
Lot 384 DP 516362 0.0483 804715
Lot 385 DP 516362 0.0483 804716
Lot 386 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 387 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 388 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 389 DP 516362 0.0483
804717
804718
804719
804720
KAITUNA PLACE
LOT 5 STAGE 1A
Lot 370 DP 513468 0.0462
LOT 40 STAGE 2
795979
Lot 371 DP 513468 0.0520
795981
Lot 349 DP 513468 0.0565 Lot 348 DP 513468 0.0544
LOT 44 STAGE 2 Lot 3 DP 394762 6.7380
LOT 42 STAGE 2
378863
LOT 1 STAGE 1A
Lot 346 DP 513468 0.0544 793428
305 STAGE 2
Lot 350 DP 513468 0.0521
Lot 347 DP 513468 0.0544 LOT 43 STAGE 2
Lot 345 DP 513468 0.0544
Lot 375 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 376 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 377 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 378 DP 516362 0.0490
804711
804712
804714
804710
804713
795982
795978
LOT 2 STAGE 1A
793429
Lot 374 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 369 DP 513468 0.0509
793431
793430
LOT 45 STAGE 2
Lot 373 DP 513468 0.0562
795980
LOT 3 STAGE 1A
LOT 41 STAGE 2
LOT 46 STAGE 2
Lot 372 DP 513468 0.0543
Lot 368 DP 513468 0.0469
Lot 367 DP 513468 0.0550
Lot 366 DP 513468 0.0578
794507
794506
Lot 365 DP 513468 0.0914 793447
17/12/2018
793432
Lot 364 DP 513468 0.0621
793433
Lot 356 DP 513468 0.0604 793438
793434
Lot 355 DP 513468 0.0527 Lot 353 DP 513468 0.1185 793435
17/12/2018
Designed
Date
Approved
Date
Client
DURHAM PROPERTY INVESTMENTS PROPOSED SUBDIVISION OF LOT 1 & 2 DP 14417 COMPRISED IN RT HBG2/863 & 420376
793446
Lot 352 DP 513468 0.0544
793427
Date
KRC
This document is produced by Development Nous Ltd solely for the benefit of and use by the client in accordance with the terms of engagement. Development Nous Ltd does not and shall not assume any responsibility or liability whatsoever to any third party arising out of any use or reliance by third party on the content of this document.
795977
Lot 351 DP 513468 0.0544
HBB2/1223
All Rights Reserved.
Date
GG
Checked LOT 4 STAGE 1A
LOT 48 STAGE 2
Date
Drawn
LOT 39 STAGE 2
LOT 187 STAGE 2
LOT 185 STAGE 2
Fieldwork
LOT 38 STAGE 2
LOT 188 STAGE 2
LOT 186 STAGE 2
LOT 47 STAGE 2
Lot 9 DP 6055 2.1650
Lot 379 DP 513468 0.0500
LOT 183 STAGE 2
LOT 177 STAGE 2
LOT 52 STAGE 3
LOT 6 STAGE 1A
LOT 37 STAGE 2
LOT 175 STAGE 3
LOT 49 STAGE 2
HBG3/590
24
.2
LOT 164 STAGE 4
301 STAGE 2
Lot 93 DP 10451 0.0713
LOT 9 STAGE 1B
401 STAGE 2
LOT 161 STAGE 4
LOT 50 STAGE 3
HBG2/209
LOT 33 STAGE 5
LOT 34 STAGE 5
LOT 159 STAGE 4
LOT 178 STAGE 3
402 STAGE 3
Superseded
LOT 10 STAGE 1B
LOT 149 STAGE 5
LOT 147 STAGE 4
LOT 176 STAGE 3
LOT 53 STAGE 3
Lot 95 DP 10451 0.0713
LOT 148 STAGE 5
LOT 167 STAGE 2
LOT 174 STAGE 3
LOT 54 STAGE 3
LOT 146 STAGE 5
LOT 160 STAGE 4
LOT 162 STAGE 2
LOT 171 STAGE 3
LOT 55 STAGE 3
Lot 96 DP 10451 0.0672
LOT 11 STAGE 1B LOT 31 STAGE 5
LOT 150 STAGE 5
LOT 172 STAGE 3
LOT 56 STAGE 3
HBK1/825
Lot 94 DP 10451 0.0733
24.2
6.8
5.9 0.9 9.2
15 .2
0 LOT 145 STAGE 5
LOT 173 STAGE 3
HBK1/977
Lot 97 DP 10451 0.0672
LOT 135 STAGE 5
LOT 158 STAGE 4
LOT 57 STAGE 3
Lot 98 DP 10451 0.0672
71899
LOT 12 STAGE 1B
LOT 32 STAGE 5
LOT 58 STAGE 3 LOT 169 STAGE 3
LOT 134 STAGE 5
LOT 8 STAGE 1B
LOT 168 STAGE 3
Lot 210 DP 10451 0.0728
XREF's: QuickMap_TE Awa_willowbank CAD FILE: H:\_2018\H20180069 - Durham Property Investments\CAD\H20180069-CONSENT-R1.dwg
LOT 142 STAGE 5
LOT 59 STAGE 3
HBK1/626
LOT 131 STAGE 5
LOT 154 STAGE 4 LOT 157 STAGE 4
Lot 209 DP 10451 0.0741
Lot 1 DP 318389 6.1891
LOT 30 STAGE 5
LOT 155 STAGE 4
HBA3/1092
LOT 13 STAGE 1B
LOT 29 STAGE 5
LOT 143 STAGE 5
LOT 156 STAGE 4
302 STAGE 3
LOT 28 STAGE 5
404 STAGE 5
LOT 144 STAGE 4
LOT 152 STAGE 4
LOT 132 STAGE 6
LOT 140 STAGE 5
403 STAGE 4
LOT 151 STAGE 4
HBA2/1403
HBA3/306
LOT 130 STAGE 5
LOT 139 STAGE 4
LOT 14 STAGE 1B
LOT 27 STAGE 8
LOT 133 STAGE 5
LOT 138 STAGE 4
LOT 61 STAGE 4
Lot 207 DP 9997 0.0687
LOT 129 STAGE 6
LOT 141 STAGE 5
LOT 62 STAGE 4
LOT 26 STAGE 8
LOT 116 STAGE 5
LOT 127 STAGE 5
LOT 137 STAGE 4
LOT 15 STAGE 1B
LOT 115 STAGE 8
LOT 128 STAGE 6
LOT 126 STAGE 5
LOT 63 STAGE 4
HBA1/801
Lot 165 DP 9997 0.0784
LOT 25 STAGE 8
LOT 124 STAGE 6
LOT 123 STAGE 5
LOT 64 STAGE 4
HBA2/1222
HBK1/439
LOT 114 STAGE 8
LOT 125 STAGE 6
HBJ2/292
Lot 166 DP 9997 0.0682
LOT 113 STAGE 8
LOT 118 STAGE 6
LOT 117 STAGE 6
LOT 122 STAGE 6
LOT 65 STAGE 4
LOT 16 STAGE 1C
408 STAGE 8
LOT 119 STAGE 6
LOT 120 STAGE 6
LOT 67 STAGE 4
307 STAGE 4
Lot 163 DP 9997 0.0786
LOT 106 STAGE 6
LOT 121 STAGE 6
LOT 66 STAGE 4
LOT 17 STAGE 1C
LOT 24 STAGE 8 LOT 112 STAGE 7
LOT 107 STAGE 6
LOT 68 STAGE 6
HBD3/1295
LOT 23 STAGE 8
LOT 111 STAGE 7
LOT 105 STAGE 6
LOT 70 STAGE 6
WI LL
Lot 161 DP 9997 0.0789
LOT 104 STAGE 7 LOT 108 STAGE 6
303 STAGE 4
LOT 18 STAGE 1C
LOT 22 STAGE 8
LOT 110 STAGE 7
LOT 72 STAGE 6
Lot 195 DP 9997 0.0758
NK
HBM1/695
LOT 91 STAGE 8
LOT 92 STAGE 8
LOT 109 STAGE 7
LOT 103 STAGE 7
HBB3/848
OW BA
Lot 150 DP 9997 0.1039
Lot 159 DP 9997 0.0814
LOT 21 STAGE 8
.5
LOT 94 STAGE 7
LOT 102 STAGE 7
HBA1/716
Lot 151 DP 9997 0.0753
AD 1
LOT 74 STAGE 7
HBF2/1462
Lot 197 DP 9997 0.0687
HBJ3/1004
406 STAGE 7
NOTES 1. This plan has been produced for resource consent purposes. Boundaries and dimensions are subject to resource consent approval and land transfer survey. 2. Easements may be required for cross-boundary services. 3. Current Napier City Council Zoning: Main Residential. NCC Planning Maps: I7, I8 and H8. 4. Proposed Amalgamation Conditions: 4.1. "That Lot 407 & Lot 408 DP (Stage 8 LT#) & Lots 304 & 406 DP (Stage 7 LT#) & Lot 405 DP (Stage 6 LT#) & Lot 404 DP (Stage 5 LT#) & Lots 303 & 403 DP (Stage 4 LT#) & Lots 302 & 402 DP (Stage 3 LT#) & Lots 301 & 401 DP (Stage 2 LT#) hereon are to be held in one record of title".
LOT 19 STAGE 1C
LOT 90 STAGE 8
AD
Bisson Place
16
LOT 95 STAGE 7
Lot 193 DP 9997 0.0741
LOT 20 STAGE 8
LOT 93 402m²
LOT 98 STAGE 7
LOT 75 STAGE 7
Lot 196 DP 9997 0.0703
Lot 158 DP 9997 0.0710
HBM1/696
.5
LOT 89 STAGE 8
.4
16 .5
LOT 96 402m²
LOT 101 STAGE 7
LOT 88 STAGE 9
PA 15
16 .5
EN R O
Lot 152 DP 9997 0.0819
.2
PB
15 .4
D2
ERIK S
HBJ3/948
HBM1/697
15 .2
AN E
Lot 157 DP 9997 0.0786
HBA1/516
RO A
.5
LOT 97 402m²
6
Lot 153 DP 9997 0.0839
LOT 100 388m²
GE
Lot 156 DP 9997 0.0690
16
ST A
HBB4/640
.2
15 .4
LOT 87 374m²
417
Lot 155 DP 9997 0.0672
LOT 99 389m²
HBA3/1263
E
HBA1/619
MA
N SO S BI
P
CE A L
AV EN UE
QB
15 .4
.5
NU
Lot 154 DP 9997 0.0789
HBM1/687
HBM1/677
.4
16
Lot 192 DP 9997 0.0741
AV E
Lot 23 DP 10192 0.0799
Lot 12 DP 10375 0.0935
15
LOT 85 15 .4 374m² LOT 86 QA 374m² 15 .4
1729m²
16
304 STAGE 7
308 STAGE 7
21 .2
24
24
HBA3/48
UE
HBY1/923
VEN
HBM1/686
STAGE 9 407
.2
LOT 76 STAGE 7
Lot 191 DP 9997 0.0728
DA
Lot 6 DP 28293 0.0603
IEL
PE RC YS PIL LER
HBJ4/1500
SEF
HBY1/922
SER VIC EL
Lot 22 DP 10192 0.2137
HBM1/676
.4
LOT 83 15 .4 373m² LOT 84 RA 373m² 15 .4
RB
4.2
24
4.2
15
409m² .7
.2
LOT 77 369m² 2
HBB3/843
Lot 190 DP 9997 0.0715
7.8
11
24
LOT 78 369m²
HBF4/39
Lot 189 DP 9997 0.0703 Lot 11 DP 10375 0.1464
.2
LOT 79 369m²
15 .2
HBY1/918
24
LOT 82
13
HBG2/478
Lot 188 DP 9997 0.0718
HBM1/673
15 .2
Lot 1 DP 28293 0.0596
17 .6
23 .0
LOT 80 384m²
15 .2
Lot 187 DP 9997 0.0705 Lot 10 DP 10192 0.1224
.1
LOT 81 388m²
HBH2/114
Lot 24 DP 10192 0.3819
26
14 .8
HBM1/678
Lot 186 DP 9997 0.0748
HBM1/672
.0
Lot 9 DP 10192 0.1274
HBM1/675
16
Lot 8 DP 10375 0.2324
Lot 2 DP 28293 0.0286 Lot 3 DP 28293 HBY1/919 0.0310 Lot 4HBY1/920 DP 28293 0.0319 Lot 5 DP 28293 HBY1/921 0.0276
Appr. Issued KRC KRC
Pt Section 92 Blk VIII Heretaunga SD 0.0916
16 .0
HBW1/1021
HBV2/873
15 .2
HBW1/1023
RO
DP 26433 0.0498
FIT ZG E
HBW1/1022
RA
DP 26433 0.0442
Lot 1 DP 26433 0.1325
STA LL STR
4.8
DATE PLOTTED: 12/20/2018 9:02:30 AM BY : GEMMA GUILFORD
LA
BE
793437
Lot 354 DP 513468 0.0527
Lot 363 DP 513468 0.0560
Lot 357 DP 513468 0.0584
793445
793439
Lot 358 DP 513468 0.0527
Lot 362 DP 513468 0.0526
16 & 38 WILLOWBANK AVE TE AWA, NAPIER STAGE 9 - SCHEME PLAN Status
FOR APPROVAL
NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES
793444
Datum
793440
Lot 361 DP 513468 0.0526
793436
Lot 359 DP 513468 0.1125 793441
793443
Lot 360 DP 513468
Council Ref.
HB2000
Scale
1:1000
Drawing Number
H20180069-C022
Size
A3 Revision
1
0
2
4
6
10m
1:100 BOUNDARY 16.00m
LIVING 4.0 x 5.7 m
GARAGE 5.8 x 5.8 m
KITCHEN 2.8 x 3.6 m
BOUNDARY 25.00m
DINING 3.4 x 4.7 m
BED 2 3.0 x 3.3 m
BED 3/STUDY 3.0 x 3.4 m
BATH 3.0 x 1.8 m
OUTDOOR LIVING
W/R 3.0 x 1.6 m
7.0 x 11.7 m
BED 1 4.1 x 3.5 m
ENSUITE 3.0 x 1.8 m
Floor Plan - 158m² 1:100
BOUNDARY 16.00m
Project
Date
ERIKSEN ROAD DEVELOPMENT [Concept]
18/09/2018
Drawing
c Copyright
Floor Plan
Page
Andrew: 022 658 6211
Job No.
1834 Rev
04 Geoff: 027 630 8352
Email: info@innovativearch.co.nz
innovative architecture ltd
0
2
6
4
10m
1:100 BOUNDARY 16.00m
OUTDOOR LIVING
BOUNDARY 16.00m
LIVING
LIVING
5.1 x 4.6 m
5.1 x 4.6 m
OUTDOOR LIVING
BOUNDARY 25.00m
OPTION Sliding Door
BED 2 3.0 x 3.4 m
6.0 x 4.0 m
OPTION Sliding Door
BED 3/STUDY
KITCHEN
3.0 x 3.0 m
2.8 x 4.2 m
DINING
DINING
3.4 x 3.7 m
3.4 x 3.7 m
SCULLERY
SCULLERY
2.4 x 1.7 m
2.4 x 1.7 m
OPTION Sliding Door
3.0 x 1.7 m
STORE
STORE 1.8 x 1.1 m
1.8 x 2.3 m
ENTRY 1.7 x 2.1 m
BED 2 3.0 x 3.4 m
LAUNDRY
1.8 x 1.1 m
W/R
GARAGE
GARAGE
5.8 x 5.8 m
5.8 x 5.8 m
ENTRY 1.7 x 2.1 m
BATHROOM 3.0 x 1.7 m
W/R 1.8 x 2.3 m
ENSUITE
ENSUITE
3.0 x 1.7 m
3.0 x 1.7 m
BED 1
BED 1
4.1 x 3.2 m
4.1 x 3.2 m
BOUNDARY 16.00m
Floor Plan - 159m²
3.0 x 3.0 m
2.8 x 4.2 m
LAUNDRY BATHROOM
BED 3/STUDY
KITCHEN
OPTION Sliding Door
BOUNDARY 25.00m
6.0 x 4.0 m
PARKING
PARKING
2x Off-street carparks
2x Off-street carparks
Project
Date
ERIKSEN ROAD DEVELOPMENT [Concept]
7/09/2018
Drawing
c Copyright
Floor Plan
Page
1834 Rev
04
1:100 Andrew: 022 658 6211
Job No.
Geoff: 027 630 8352
Email: info@innovativearch.co.nz
innovative architecture ltd
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier Assessment of Environmental Effects
APPENDIX C Landscape Design Report
LOT 1 DP 6369 40m wide drainage reserve
MARAENUI 8m wide drainage corridor/ reserve
Additional parking extra 7 bays RV, Boat and Camper Parking 15 bays
8m wide drainage corridor/ reserve
WB AN K
AVE
Secondary Entry
WIL
LO
Single Dwelling Lots
Duplex Dwelling Lots
8m wide drainage corridor/ reserve 13.5m wide Minor Local Roads within site 1.4m wide pathway to one side of road
ERIK
SEN
ROAD
Main Entry with feature entry walls, signage and automatic gates.
LOT 9 DP 6055
Upgraded berm with new kerb and channel, 1.5m wide footpath and street trees
Pocket Park/ reserve connecting to broader recreational network
LOT 10 DP 6055
SCHEME PLAN TOTAL LOTS = 188
Layout in accordance with NCC Te Awa Structure Plan 40m wide drainage line to western boundary 0 20 40 60 80 100m
TE AWA
N
Superseded
18/12/2018 Revision H [H20180069]
Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village, Te Awa - landscape concept design
SINGLE DWELLING
DUPLEX DWELLINGS
N
Orange = Living/ Kitchen Pink = Bedrooms/ Bathrooms
LOT 1 DP 6369
Blue = Double Garage
WIL
LO
WB AN K
AVE
MARAENUI
Single Dwelling
ERIK
SEN
ROAD
Duplex Dwellings
TE AWA
LOT 9 DP 6055
Pocket Park/ reserve connecting to broader recreational network
LOT 10 DP 6055
ARCHITECTURAL OVERLAY TOTAL LOTS = 188 (18 Duplex, 132 Single)
Layout in accordance with NCC Te Awa Structure Plan 40m wide drainage line to western boundary 0 20 40 60 80 100m
N
Superseded 18/12/2018 Revision H [H20180069]
Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village, Te Awa - landscape concept design
Estate Entry
Superseded 18/12/2018 Revision H [H20180069]
Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village, Te Awa - landscape concept design
AVE WB AN K LO
ERIK SEN RO
AD
WIL N
Not to Scale
Indicative Fencing Diagram LEGEND 1.8m high Butted Paling (or approved equivalent) max. 1.2 high fence or low planted boundary 1.8m high semi-transparent fence for passive surveillance Semi-transparent pedestrian gate with key or swipe access Pedestrian bridge across open swale Planted buffer to soften long fence line and provide further separation from roadway - to be semi transparent to retain visual connection i.e. low shrubs and ground covers with clear trunk trees
Road Corridor Profile 13.5m wide corridor with 1.5m meander
Superseded 18/12/2018 Revision H [H20180069]
Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village, Te Awa - landscape concept design
Indicative cross section - road corridor Not to scale
Indicative cross section - drainage reserve Not to scale
Passive open space
Passive open space Inundation zone (approx. 12m)
P. BOUNDARY
Willowbank Avenue Berm
P. BOUNDARY
40M Wide Drainage Reserve
Rear yard
Max. 1:5 batter
Meandering shared pathway 3.0m wide with potential breakout and seating opportunities
Superseded
Potential bridge crossing points to connect pedestrians from development
Open style fences to rear boundaries interfacing open space
18/12/2018 Revision H [H20180069]
Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village, Te Awa - landscape concept design
PLANTING CHARACTER Indicative only - to be finalised at Detail Design phase
PARKLAND PALETTE EN
RA
CT
R RO
ULAR
CIR
MINO
PARKLAND PALETTE
ENTR Y CH
R RO AD
ENTR PALE Y TTE
BU
EN R
OAD
PALE T
S
TER
TE
RO
MINO
OR
ADS
ARAC
ADS
R FFE BU
MIN
EN R
D
S
CU
LAR
AD
ERIKS
RO
BOUL EVAR
OR
CIRC
MIN
BO
WIL LO W
BA
UL EVA
NK
RD
AVE
ENTR PALE Y TTE
PALE T
TE
ER
BU
NU
E
FFE R
HA
OAD
TR YC
FFE
ERIKS
R
PARKLAND PALETTE
BUF
FER
ERIKSEN ROAD PALETTE - Street trees to Rriksen Road edge to tie into council approved character and tie in with adjacent developments
MINOR ROADS - Trees in mulch with less understory planting. Species to differ from main circulation to provide sense of place/ wayfinding for residents
ENTRY PALETTE/ ENTRY CHARACTER - To include specimen trees and a dense understory that creates a specific character for the development with the palette continuing out along roads adjacent entries with understory planting to street trees to be more prevalent along these street (trees in mulch only to other minor streets)
PARKLAND PALETTE - Larger specimen trees within parklands to tie character to existing drainage lines within the broader community species to be mainly natives with some flowering exotics for seasonal interest. Parkland entering the project site to tie in with specific character of the development through the use of feature trees found in entry palette.
CIRCULAR BOULEVARD - Road to have different tree species for ease of wayfinding. Boulevard to include planted buildouts and understory planting to street trees.
BUFFER - Trees and groundcover understory planting to provide separation for residents and buffering from busy road. Mix of native species to be loosely planted to allow for visual permeability along fence line.
Superseded
18/12/2018 Revision H [H20180069]
Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village, Te Awa - landscape concept design
Smaller ornamental trees as feature within garden beds
timber open paling fence to rear boundary for some privacy to outdoor living area - hedge to continue within lot along fence line
LAWN WASHING LINE
Hardy, drought tolerant groundcover species to garden beds
Deciduous trees to northern boundaries to allow sun in winter and shade in summer. Trees to be thoughtfully located to provide to not block light/ sun from neighbouring property
Shared hedge - planted along boundary
PATIO
3m min. building setback
BERM
Duplex units - Typical Landscape Concept Plan N
Low shared hedge to the first 6m of boundary to provide visibility and passive surveillance- planted along boundary 1m min. building setback
North indicative only
18/12/2018 Revision H [H20180069]
Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village, Te Awa - landscape concept design
5m min. vehicle standing bay
Timber screen to bin bay
BIN BAY
1m min. building setback
1m min. building setback
BERM
Hardy, drought tolerant groundcover species to garden beds
LAWN Timber screen to bin bay
Shared hedge - planted along boundary
BIN BAY
5m min. vehicle standing bay
3m min. building setback
Deciduous trees to northern boundaries to allow sun in winter and shade in summer. Trees to be thoughtfully located to provide to not block light/ sun from neighbouring property
Low shared hedge to the first 6m of boundary to provide visibility and passive surveillanceplanted along boundary
Evergreen tree to edge of driveway
PATIO
Hardy, drought tolerant groundcover species to garden beds
WASHING LINE
Single units - Typical Landscape Concept Plan N
timber open paling fence to rear boundary for some privacy to outdoor living area - hedge to continue within lot along fence line
North indicative only
18/12/2018 Revision H [H20180069]
Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village, Te Awa - landscape concept design
PLANTING PALETTE Indicative planting palette only - to be finalised at Detail Design phase
CODE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME Street TREES 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.
ALE exe Alectryon execelsus Titoki COR lae Corynocarpus laevigatus Karaka HED arb Hedycarya arborea Porokaiwhiri HOH ang Hoheria angustifolia Lacebark MET mis Metrosideros ‘Mistral’ Pohutakawa MET MP Metrosideros ‘Maori Princess’ Pohutakawa VIT luc Vitex lucens Puriri
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
SPECIMEN TREES - For Parklands/ Open Space + FEature areas 8. COR aus Cordyline australis Cabbage tree 9. KNI exc Knightia excelsa Rewarewa 10. MAG gra Magnolia grandiflora Magnolia 11. NOT sol Nothofagus solandri Black Beech 12. POD tot Podocarpus totara Totara
ORNAMENTAL TREES - for unit Gardens 13. COR kou Cornus kousa Kousa Dogwood 14. MIC bub Michelia ‘Bubbles’ False Magnolia 15. PRU aco Prunus ‘Acolade’ Flowering Cherry 16. PSE cra Pseudopanax crassifolius Lancewood 17. SOP tet Sophora tetraptera Kowhai
Shrubs - Hedge species 18. COR GG Corokia virgata ‘Geentys Green’ Corokia 19. GRI whe Griselinia littoralis ‘Whenuapai’ Broadleaf 20. MET tah Metrosideros collina ‘Tahiti’ Pohutukawa 21. OLE pan Olearia paniculata Akiraho
Groundcovers 22. APO sim Apodasmia similis Oioi 23. ART cir Arthropodium cirratum Renga Renga 24. AST fra Astelia fragrans Bush Flax 25. CAL sol Calystegia soldanella False Bindweed 26. CAR vir Carex virgata Carex 27. CHI fla Chionochloa flavicans Dwarf Toitoi 28. COP PK Coprosma 'Poor Knights' Coprosma 29. DIA nig Dianella nigra Turutu Blueberry 30. HEB WD Hebe ‘Wiri Dawn’ Dwarf Hebe 31. HEB WM Hebe ‘Wiri Mist’ Dwarf Hebe 32. LIB for Libertia spp. Libertia 33. LOM LW Lomandra cylindrica ‘Lime Wave’ Mat Rush 34. PHO GD Phormium ‘Green Dwarf’ Flax
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
18/12/2018 Revision H [H20180069]
Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village, Te Awa - landscape concept design
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier Assessment of Environmental Effects
APPENDIX D Urban Design Report
Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village Te Awa Urban Design Report
Superseded
18/12/2018 Revision B [H20180069]
PURPOSE OF REPORT
Eriksen Road. The internal layout has been developed considering open space connections, road layout and orientation providing good urban design outcomes.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The purpose of this report is to provide an Urban Design assessment for a proposed lifestyle village development at 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Te Awa, Napier. The report has been prepared as part of the resource consent application. This report has been prepared by Development Nous Pty Ltd for Durham Property Investments (DPI) in accordance with the City of Napier District Plan with specific reference to Appendix 29A the Te Awa Structure Plan Design Outcomes. This report has also been created with reference to the following: •
NZ Urban Design Protocol (Ministry for the Environment – March 2005)
•
NCC Code of Practice for Subdivision and Land Development
•
National Guidelines for Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design in New Zealand (CPTED)
This report initially focuses on the context of the proposal that guides the design response, following on to reviews against Good Practice Urban Design parameters and against the District Plan conditions. The design responds to the following sections of the District Plan: •
Appendix 29A – Te Awa Structure Plan Design Outcomes
•
District Plan Chapter 5 – Main Residential Zone Rules
•
District Plan Map H8 and I7
This report is to be read in conjunction with the Civil Engineering and Servicing reports, Traffic Report and Architectural design package.
BACKGROUND To assess the urban design aspects of this project a multidisciplinary team have been put together who have knowledge of the site and its context. The team includes: •
Civil Engineering: Strata Group Consulting – Russell Nettlingham
•
Traffic Surveyor: Traffic Solutions Ltd – Ian Constable
•
Architecture: Innovative Architecture – Andrew Young
•
Landscape Architecture: Development Nous Gemma Guilford
•
Planning: Development Nous – Matthew Holder and Jason Kaye
•
Survey: Development Nous - Karl Carew
The applicant has undertaken several developments on a similar basis and is confident that this development will meet the lifestyle needs of the residents.
The resource consent application is for the greenfield redevelopment of 2 lots of existing agricultural land in the suburb of Te Awa, Napier.
The following summarises the proposed development:
The site comprises Lot 1 and 2 DP 14417, 13.8ha of land fronting Eriksen Road and Willowbank Avenue. The site is zoned Main Residential under the District Plan and is subject to the Te Awa Structure Plan (Appendix 29A - District Plan).
Total Area:
13.8ha
Reserve area:
1,090 m² (4 lots)
40m Designation:
31,208m² (to be vested)
Road Reserve: 26,610m² The site lies around 3.7km south of Napier CBD. The redevelopment of this site is to provide Napier with a Total House Lots: 188 (excl. 4x reserve lots) freehold lifestyle village comprising approximately 188 lots. It is proposed that for the most part, all roads will be Total house Lot area: 79,045m² encapsulated within a gated style development. Average lot size: 420m² The site includes a designated stormwater drain 36 Duplex Units (D172) that runs parallel with Willowbank Avenue to the House Type: (159m² floor area) western edge of the site, then dog-legs east towards Eriksen Road and the foreshore, connecting into 151 Single Units existing stormwater systems east of the site (refer to (158m² floor area) NCC District Plan Maps H8 and I7). This designation is required to be a 40m wide drainage corridor which is to This equates to 13.6 dwellings per hectare - which be vested to Council (Refer Design Outcome 14 of the exceeds the structure plan minimum of 12 dwellings per Structure Plan). It is proposed that the development will hectare. be privatised with internal open space and road reserves Average lot size is 422m² based on the 78,645m² area to be owned privately. Detailed design will ensure of developed lots (excl. reserve/park area and roading). that each lot has access to private outdoor space for As an average, this complies with the City of Napier recreation and utility purposes. District Plan maximum density limit of 1 dwelling per Appendix 29 of the District Plan contains Council’s 350m2 (Condition 5.15). Structure Plan for the area. Appendix Plan 29F shows the subject site is Stage 5 of the Te Awa development area and therefore will occur outside of the Structure Plan sequencing (Refer Design Outcome 4). It is believed that this will not directly impact upon longer term infrastructure planning for the area. In preparing the concept plan consideration has been given to amenity effects, ensuring that the proposal fits comfortably within the location and is a desirable living environment. Care has been given to the treatment of the frontage to Willowbank Avenue and
Engineering inputs have been sought and solutions developed that are environmentally responsible, which is encouraged by the Urban Design Protocol as an attribute of successful towns and cities. While it is acknowledged that the team does not include specific urban design expertise it is considered that the design experience across the combination of disciplines identified above, along with the local knowledge base are commensurate with the site context and constraints, and the complexity and nature of the scheme to suitably assess the urban design aspects associated with the site and the site-specific proposal.
2
Superseded
18/12/2018 Revision B [H20180069]
Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village, Te Awa - Urban Design Report
EXISTING ROAD HIERARCHY
SITE DESCRIPTION
The surrounding road hierarchy classification are as follows: ERIKSEN ROAD - LOCAL ROAD (70KM)
THE EXISTING SITE The subject site comprises 2 existing lots covering 13.8ha of agricultural land in the suburb of Te Awa, Napier. The street address for the 2 lots are 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue. The site is bound by Willowbank to the west and Eriksen Road on the eastern edge which runs almost parallel with Willowbank Ave. North and south, the site is bound by neighbouring agricultural lots.
Eriksen Road provides the eastern frontage to the site. Currently it is a moderate speed back block road with no road markings and low usage due to existing adjacent land use. It will likely get a lot busier with the current and proposed residential development in the area. The road speed may need to be reduced when the area becomes more populated.
Design Outcome 12 of the Structure Plan proposed the The broader neighbourhood consists of Main Residential following road upgrades to Eriksen Road: Areas to the east, west and north and Rural land to the south west and further south beyond the Te Awa • 10m carriageway with cycle lanes structure plan area. The Napier foreshore is around • Footpaths 500m to the east of the site. Site topography could be generally termed as “flat”. The site varies in level about 500mm over 300m, falling generally from west to east from RL 12.00 to RL 11.00 at its lowest. There is an invert/ low point running along the southern boundary of Lot 2 which sits at RL 11.00 reflecting the proposed stormwater designation. The residential area east of Eriksen Road (Stage 1 and 2 of the Structure Plan) is currently under development providing established precedent for urban design and neighbourhood design outcomes.
EXISTING SITE CONNECTIONS The site is removed from existing centres in terms of walkable neighbourhoods. The closest locality is the Maraenui Shops located on Bledisoe Road which is 2.3km (a 28min walk from the Eriksen Road frontage) to the west of the site. The Onekawa New World and shopping precinct would be the next closest without going into the CBD itself. Onekawa, Maadi Road is 4.1km (52min walk) and Pak n Save, Raffles Street Napier is 4.8km (58min walk) from the site. The structure plan proposes a small Suburban Commercial node which is to be located in Stage 3 of the Structure Plan Development. This would provide a smaller shopping precinct, but major shopping would require further travel (refer Design Outcome 2).
•
Car parking/ landscaped berm areas
•
Single lane roundabouts at all major intersections (to assist in reducing traffic speeds)
Currently the northern end of Eriksen Road is a deadend not connecting back onto Willowbank Avenue. Design Outcome 12 of the Structure Plan does describe future provision for a single lane round about on to Willowbank/ Chambers Street at this intersection, however this is not a part of the subject site works interface. WILLOWBANK AVENUE - COLLECTOR ROAD (100KM) Willowbank Ave runs along the western edge of the site. This is a high speed 2 lane collector road connecting the suburbs of Meeanee, Te Awa and Napier South. The proposed development does not interface with Willowbank Avenue. Entry into the development is from Eriksen Road. The designated drainage reserve is to run the length of the site along the Willowbank Avenue boundary. This 40m wide reserve will provide separation of the proposed subdivision from this major road. Fencing and buffer planting is being provided to the development edge of the reserve. (Refer Design Outcome 8-11 and 14).
Understanding the proposed demographic of the subject development, the travel distance to local centres would not be a deemed a hindrance to the future residents.
EXISTING VEGETATION
The site has great potential to provide pedestrian and bicycle connection to broader recreation networks such as shared pathways along Marine Parade, and the Marewa Walk just north of the site. Connection to these networks would add value to the lifestyle of residents in the area.
Vegetation to the site is minimal, located mainly to fence lines and within gardens beds surrounding the existing residence on the northern most corner of Lot 1. There is potential to retain significant mature trees along the site boundaries and within the drainage designation if minimal earthworks are being undertaken and they do not impede proposed building footprints. Tree retention is to be investigated further at detail design.
3
Superseded
18/12/2018 Revision B [H20180069]
Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village, Te Awa - Urban Design Report
View to Ranges from Eriksen Road - looking west
View of southern lot boundary (Lot 2) from Eriksen Road - looking west
View to Lot 2 from Eriksen Road - looking west
Existing shed etc on Lot 2 - view from Eriksen Road looking west
View to boundary between Lot 1 and 2 from Eriksen Road - looking west
View to existing dwelling and trees on northern boundary of Lot 1 from Eriksen Road - north west
View south to existing trees on northern boundary of Lot 1 from northern dogleg of Eriksen Road
Cyclists heading towards Napier - view south along Eriksen Road
View of existing residence from Willowbank Avenue looking south east
View of existing residence from Willowbank Ave looking south east
Existing lot 2 access from Willowbank Avenue - looking east
Existing vegetation along boundary on Willowbank Ave looking south east
Superseded 18/12/2018 Revision B [H20180069]
4
Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village, Te Awa - Urban Design Report
THE PROPOSAL
BUILT FORM
Private DEVELOPMENT
The Urban Design and Architecture teams have worked together to provide plan that provides the best built form and urban design layout for the site.
The proposal is for the development of 2 lots of existing agricultural land covering 13.8ha of agricultural land in the suburb of Te Awa, Napier freehold lifestyle village comprising approximately 188 residential lots.
Architectural design has been based on 400m² lots providing two building types, double garage duplex and double garage single dwellings with design flexibility for the footprint to be flipped and orientated to allow for the best lot aspect and solar gain.
With the proposed subdivision being a gated style development, it is important to discuss the provision or design and consideration of fencing with relation to road frontages and connection to the visual and physical broader community as well as CPTED and urban design principles.
In accordance with the Te Awa Structure Plan the development is a low to moderate density subdivision providing 13.6 dwellings per hectare - which exceeds the structure plan minimum of 12 dwellings per hectare.
The following fencing typologies are proposed:
Each lot has been considered with dwellings laid out to allow best design outcomes.
Average lot size is 422m² based on the 78,645m² area of developed lots (excl. reserve/park area and roading). As an average, this complies with the City of Napier District Plan maximum density limit of 1 dwelling per 350m2 (Condition 5.15).
The layout has tried to reduce the amount of back block lots and shared access, resulting in only 6 lots located in harder to reach corners of the parent site and within larger urban blocks requiring shared/ back block access. Built form has still been located on these sites to allow best living conditions for the future owners.
SITE LAYOUT
OPEN SPACE
The proposed site plan shows a comprehensive freehold lifestyle village subdivision. The scheme proposes larger lots to the Eriksen Road frontage (19 x 700m²) with more densely designed lots internally (164 x lifestyle lots averaging 376m²).
The proposal is to include a 40m wide drainage corridor along the western edge of the subject site following the Willowbank Avenue alignment with a dogleg east where it meets the southern boundary of the site. The drainage corridor will connect through to the east of Eriksen Road with 4.4ha Serpentine Pond and further to discharge pipes on Marine Parade foreshore.
ROAD LAYOUT AND DESIGN The proposed road layout provides internal local streets that are orientated generally in a north-south direction. The main streets follow the block layout which is orientated in a northeast-southwest direction – parallel with lot boundaries and following the direction of both Eriksen Road and Willowbank Avenue. Internal east-west cross block local roads are provided to create a range of walkable urban blocks within the development. The 40m wide stormwater/ drainage designation located along the Willowbank Ave. boundary of the site has provided the development with one active interface with the broader neighbourhood, being Eriksen Road. Larger lots (700 m²) have been located fronting Eriksen to reflect the existing urban grain located within the Te Awa/ South Napier area including new development opposite the site. The Eriksen Road interface will provide road profiles and pedestrian connection in accordance to Council standard and design outcomes noted in the Structure Plan and noted previously in this report. With demand in the area, the subdivision proposes to provide Napier with a freehold lifestyle village. It is proposed that for the most part, all internal roads will be encapsulated within a gated style development. Road profiles internally are as follows: •
13.5m wide carriageway (NCC Minor Local Road) – Road is to meander 1.5m along centerline, to act as a traffic calming device and to provide landscaped buildouts and provide added amenity within long runs of roadway
•
Minimum pedestrian 1.4m wide footpaths to 1 side of every road
•
Pedestrian connection to shared pathways within designated drainage reserve
•
Landscaped berm areas including street trees
The site includes a 40m wide designated stormwater drainage corridor (D172) which runs along the western edge of the subject site following the Willowbank Avenue alignment with a dogleg east where it meets the southern boundary of the site. The drainage corridor will connect through to the east of Eriksen Road with 4.4ha Serpentine Pond, that lies north of Waimakariri Drive, and further to discharge pipes on Marine Parade Foreshore Reserve.
•
1.8m high butted paling fence - Minimal provision of paling fencing has been provided to the northern most boundary, abutting potential future development area, and highly trafficked areas such as the main entry road and the northern entry/exit road and parking area. This fencing is being used for privacy and noise/ traffic disturbance mitigation.
•
max. 1.2 high fence or low planted boundary -This fence type is being provided to the Eriksen Road frontage to provide active frontage to the broader community and passive surveillance both to and from dwellings fronting this road.
•
1.8m high semi-transparent fence for passive surveillance - Semi-transparent fencing will be provided to lots fronting open space to allow for passive surveillance and provide a pleasant outlook for owners. This also provides a development that does not “turn its back” on the broader community.
•
Planted buffer to soften long fence lines and provide further separation from roadway - this planting is to be visually permeable to retain visual connection between the development, open space and roadways. Planting is to be low shrubs and groundcovers with clear trunked trees to allow visibility below crown.
The site drainage reserve comprises an area of 31,212m². the 40m wide reserve will be profiled to form an open mown grass lined channel to a maximum grade of 1:3. The channel will only contain water during major rain events with water draining quickly after the event. The area will remain dry for the bulk of the time being a fully functioning open space. This provides an open space area with dual capacity to function as a drainage reserve and parkland providing recreational area for residents and the community. This area of land is to be vested to Council.
N
The parkland has potential to incorporate elements such as pathways, bench seats, rubbish bins and pedestrian lighting creating a public area for walking, cycling and passive recreation. Lots that back onto the reserve will have a great outlook onto open space, and concurrently, residents will provide passive surveillance for a safer community, fostering a local sense of ownership of the reserve. Smaller areas of open space are proposed within the subdivision. The structure plan indicates an area of open space to be provided to the central southern boundary of the site connecting to the drainage designation. The proposed area provided in this location in the scheme plan is located between proposed lots 49 and 50 where there is provision of 508m² lot to be used as parkland/ open space. A pathway connection, seating and landscaping will be provided within this lot for residents of the lifestyle development. This park will be gated and not accessible to the general public. It is believed that the provision of the drainage reserve with provide adequate public open space for the broader community. Further to this, 3 x 194m² lots have been incorporated into the scheme, located at the end of east west running cross block roads to allow for stormwater connection to the designated corridor. These are located at the western end of proposed roads 3,5 and 7 – Refer to plan.
INDICATIVE FENCING DIAGRAM Not to Scale Legend
1.8m high Butted Paling max. 1.2 high fence or low planted boundary 1.8m high semi-transparent fence for passive surveillance Semi-transparent pedestrian gate with key or swipe access Pedestrian bridge across open swale Planted buffer
Superseded 18/12/2018 Revision B [H20180069]
5
Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village, Te Awa - Urban Design Report
Superseded
18/12/2018 Revision B [H20180069]
6
Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village, Te Awa - Urban Design Report
7
Superseded
18/12/2018 Revision B [H20180069]
Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village, Te Awa - Urban Design Report
BOUNDARY 16.00m
LIVING
4.0 x 5.7 m
GARAGE 5.8 x 5.8 m
KITCHEN 2.8 x 3.6 m
BOUNDARY 25.00m
DINING
3.4 x 4.7 m
BED 2
3.0 x 3.3 m
BED 3/STUDY 3.0 x 3.4 m
BATH
3.0 x 1.8 m
OUTDOOR LIVING
W/R
3.0 x 1.6 m
7.0 x 11.7 m
BED 1
4.1 x 3.5 m
Proposed Architecture
ENSUITE 3.0 x 1.8 m
Floor Plan - 158m²
Not to Scale
0
2
6
4
1:100
10m
1:100 BOUNDARY 16.00m
BOUNDARY 16.00m
BOUNDARY 16.00m
BOUNDARY 16.00m
LIVING
4.0 x 5.7 m
LIVING
OUTDOOR LIVING
GARAGE
LIVING
5.1 x 4.6 m
OPTION Sliding Door
DINING
3.4 x 3.7 m
BED 3/STUDY
KITCHEN
3.0 x 3.0 m
SCULLERY
2.8 x 4.2 m
2.4 x 1.7 m
OPTION Sliding Door
DINING
3.4 x 3.7 m
BED 3/STUDY
KITCHEN
SCULLERY
3.0 x 3.0 m
2.8 x 4.2 m
2.4 x 1.7 m
KITCHEN
OPTION Sliding Door
BED 2
3.0 x 3.4 m
2.8 x 3.6 m
DINING
BOUNDARY 25.00m
BOUNDARY 25.00m
BED 2
3.0 x 3.4 m
6.0 x 4.0 m
BOUNDARY 25.00m
6.0 x 4.0 m
OPTION Sliding Door
5.8 x 5.8 m
OUTDOOR LIVING
5.1 x 4.6 m
3.4 x 4.7 m
BED 2
3.0 x 3.3 m
LAUNDRY BATHROOM 3.0 x 1.7 m
LAUNDRY
STORE
STORE
1.8 x 1.1 m
1.8 x 1.1 m
BED 3/STUDY
BATHROOM
3.0 x 3.4 m
3.0 x 1.7 m
BATH
3.0 x 1.8 m
W/R
1.8 x 2.3 m
ENTRY
1.7 x 2.1 m
GARAGE 5.8 x 5.8 m
GARAGE 5.8 x 5.8 m
ENTRY
1.7 x 2.1 m
W/R
1.8 x 2.3 m
ENSUITE
ENSUITE
3.0 x 1.7 m
OUTDOOR LIVING
3.0 x 1.7 m
W/R
3.0 x 1.6 m
7.0 x 11.7 m
BED 1
4.1 x 3.5 m
BED 1
4.1 x 3.2 m
4.1 x 3.2 m
PARKING
2x Off-street carparks
BOUNDARY 16.00m
Floor Plan - 159m²
:100
ENSUITE 3.0 x 1.8 m
BED 1
Floor Plan - 158m²
PARKING
1:100
2x Off-street carparks
Project
Date
Drawing
c Copyright
ERIKSEN ROAD DEVELOPMENT [Concept] Floor Plan Andrew: 022 658 6211
7/09/2018
Page
Geoff: 027 630 8352
Email: info@innovativearch.co.nz
04
Job No.
1834
BOUNDARY 16.00m
Rev
innovative architecture ltd
Superseded 18/12/2018 Revision B [H20180069]
8
Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village, Te Awa - Urban Design Report
Existing Site Imagery
Eriksen Road looking north - new subdivision to the east - subject site to the left
Suburb east of Eriksen Road - towards the foreshore
Suburb east of Eriksen Road - towards the foreshore
Suburb east of Eriksen Road - towards the foreshore
Superseded
18/12/2018 Revision B [H20180069]
9
Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village, Te Awa - Urban Design Report
Choice
URBAN DESIGN ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
“Quality urban design fosters diversity and offers people choice in the urban form of our towns and cities, and choice in densities, building types, transport options, and activities. Flexible and adaptable design provides for unforeseen uses, and creates resilient and robust towns and cities.”
URBAN DESIGN PROTOCOL
•
The New Zealand Urban Design Protocol provides a platform to make New Zealand towns and cities more successful through quality urban design. The Urban Design Protocol identifies seven essential design qualities that are collectively called the “Seven C’s”. They are:
•
There is demand in region for retirement lifestyle developments as proposed. The development area is a sufficient size to service the community in this manner.
•
The housing product proposed and size of lot fits with the demographic of potential buyers. Investigation was undertaken into providing a larger mix of housing products including smaller single garage dwellings. The applicant has undertaken several developments on a similar basis but it was deemed that this a mix of sizes and types was not in demand for this demographic and is confident that this development will meet the lifestyle needs of the residents.
Context, Character, Choice, Connections, Creativity, Custodianship, and Collaboration An assessment of the proposal against the Seven C’s has been undertaken as follows:
Context “Quality urban design sees buildings, places and spaces not as isolated elements but as part of the whole town or city.” •
The site is located adjacent to an existing fully urbanised area on the southern edge of Napier. This area includes a number of residential subdivisions of a similar urban design character to the proposed including currently under construction subdivisions to the east of Eriksen Road. This project aims to seamlessly integrate into the existing local character by tying in streetscape character, planting species and applying similar architectural typologies, particularly on edges interfacing existing residential areas. The development will blend seamlessly into the wider area, fitting neatly into the urban fringe.
•
•
•
10
The area is zoned appropriate for this type of development. Neighbouring lots consist of residential areas to the north and east with newer development areas directly opposite the site on the east of Eriksen Road through to the Foreshore. Older suburbs such as Maraenui lie to the west beyond Willowbank Avenue. Neighbouring suburbs are of varying age and design. The proposed development will integrate with the character of the more modern subdivisions to the east, using similar landscape and public realm treatments and building materials. The rural and agricultural plains extending to the west and south of the site also provide a character common in the area, with the urban fringe overlapping the rural countryside. The proposed planting palettes for the development will help to integrate and tie the site in to its broader context. Palettes are to include vegetation that is appropriate to the area and in keeping with the both the eastern coastal character while respecting the existing rural/ agricultural character. The character of the proposed drainage designation along Willowbank Ave will provide a continuation of the existing open space network within the area such as the Marewa Walk starting at Geddis Ave and Te Awa Park, the linear open space following along the western edge of Chambers Street. This designation will incorporate meandering pathways and open swale drain with large specimen trees and an expanse of grassed open space providing clear continuation of the existing open space network.
The compact living solution proposed is consistent with other developments of this nature.
•
Restricted vehicle access to the Willowbank Avenue boundary means a creative solution is required for rear lot boundaries. This will ensure that the visually amenity of the road is maintained so a rear wall or a “back of estate” aesthetic does not develop. Boundary fences will be required to have a percentage of transparency maintaining an attractive open aesthetic.
•
The drainage designation has potential to provide the community with a vibrant, inviting open space area. A simple and thoughtful design is to be provided at the detail design phase to incorporate simple parkland elements and landscape embellishment that creates a great passive recreation space.
Custodianship “Quality urban design reduces the environmental impacts of our towns and cities through environmentally sustainable and responsive design solutions. Custodianship recognises the lifetime costs of buildings and infrastructure and aims to hand on places to the next generation in as good or better condition.” •
This subject site is appropriate for the type of development proposed and the development is of a quality consistent with other similar successful developments undertaken by the applicant.
•
Sustainable engineering solutions have been sought to ensure that any negative effects on the site and surrounding area are minimised.
•
Road widths are kept to a minimum reducing runoff, managing speed and providing a pedestrian friendly environment.
•
The lots backing onto the drainage reserve will provide residents with a sense of stewardship, sense of place and will provide opportunity for passive surveillance for a safer community.
•
As the proposed custodianship of site will be via a body corporate the site will be maintained to a consistent and high standard. Landscaping will be included within the streetscape and each unit by the applicant to ensure that each lot is provided with landscaping, giving a cohesive appearance to the whole development. Consistency in landscape design provides ease of maintenance and a tidy and comfortable living environment for future residents.
Connections “Good connections enhance choice, support social cohesion, makes place lively and safe, and facilitate contact among people. Quality urban design recognises how all networks – streets, railways, walking and cycling routes, services, infrastructure, and communication networks – connect and support healthy neighbourhoods, towns and cities.” •
Character “Quality urban design reflects and enhances the distinctive character and culture of the urban environment, and recognises that character is evolving and dynamic not static. It ensures that new buildings and spaces are unique, are appropriate to their location and compliment their historic identity, adding value to our towns and cities by increasing tourism, investment and community pride.”
The scale of Napier is such that there is considerable diversity in the type and scale of residential types in the area. The introduction of this development will contribute positively to the choices available around the fringes of the city.
•
The proposed streetscape layouts aim to connect cohesively to the broader network linking with the established neighbouring developments creating great walkable communities. Concept layouts have been explored to create a neighbourhood that provides maximum dwellings with street frontage limiting rear block and shared access.
•
Internal access for both pedestrians and vehicles around the site will be straight forward, safe and attractive. There are plenty of options for pedestrian activity with pedestrian flows not compromised by vehicle movements.
•
The 40m wide drainage designation proposed allows pedestrian and cycle connections to and from the site, connecting to the broader recreational and green space networks. Accessible pathways and picnic nodes should be provided encompassing all levels of ability.
•
Vehicle circulation is simple and easily navigated with no dead-ends or culdesacs. The road corridor has been kept to a minimum within the site to provide a slow speed environment with permeable edges and meandering roads to provide added amenity and interest.
•
The introduction of home zone style speed control devices at strategic locations is considered important. This will identify crossing points which link to areas of open space within the development. Pedestrian access throughout the site is considered important along with a strong desire to provide linkages to the wider area. Connections will be emphasised by appropriate hard and soft landscape embellishment.
Collaboration “Towns and cities are designed incrementally as we make decisions on individual projects. Quality urban design requires good communication and coordinated action from all decision makers: central government, local government, professionals, transport operators, developers and users. To improve our urban design capability we need integrated training, adequately funded research and shared examples of best practice.” •
The Urban Design Report provides overarching design guidelines for the implementation of the future detail design as well as reference to statutory documents.
•
This is a project in which a multidisciplinary team has been employed to ensure that appropriate consideration is given to the range of issues that will impact on the development of the site ensuring a credible solution for the site and wider area.
•
A collaborative approach between disciplines for the planning, detail design and construction of the site is important to incorporate and acknowledge the contributions of different disciplines and perspectives creating a better long-term outcome.
•
Close consultation with council also helps to provide outcomes that are appropriate in all levels of development and meet the needs of the community.
Creativity “Quality urban design encourages creative and innovative approaches. Creativity adds richness and diversity, and turns a functional place into a memorable place. Creativity facilitates new ways of thinking, adding willingness to think through problems afresh, to experiment and rewrite rules, to harness new technology, and to visualise new futures. Creative urban design supports a dynamic urban cultural life and fosters string urban identities.”
Superseded
18/12/2018 Revision B [H20180069]
Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village, Te Awa - Urban Design Report
PLANNING AND POLICY CONSIDERATIONS
locations such as entries and in buildouts and traffic calming devices.
- Requiring developers to fund the full cost of infrastructure
Design Outcome 10:
- Requiring out of sequence developments to provide at their own cost an internal buffer from surrounding rural landuse activities As per Outcome 4.
The site is located in the Main Residential Zone with specific reference to the Te Awa Structure Plan. The proposed residential lifestyle proposal is zone appropriate. The proposal is assessed against criteria from: •
Appendix 29A – Te Awa Structure Plan Design Outcomes
•
District Plan Chapter 5 – Main Residential Zone Rules
Appendix 29A – Te Awa Structure Plan Design Outcomes Design Outcomes of the Structure Plan not applicable to the Urban Design aspect of this application have been excluded from the following design responses – this report is to be read in conjunction with the Civil Engineering and Servicing reports.
Design Outcome 1: Development will generally be of a low to moderate density. Subdivision and density requirements for permitted activities will be those applied in the Main Residential zone provided a minimum of 12 dwellings per hectare (net of roads and reserves) is generally achieved and the maximum density does not exceed 1 dwelling per 350m². Plan. The following summarises the proposed development: Total Area:
13.8ha
Reserve area:
1,090 m² (4 lots)
40m Designation:
31,208m² (to be vested)
Road Reserve:
26,610m²
Total House Lots:
188
420m²
House Type:
36 Duplex Units
151 Single Units
Local streets shall be orientated north-south where possible. Urban blocks shall be designed within the range of 60 to 100m to 90 by 170m. The collector street network providing the structure of the transport network shall intersect via single lane roundabouts. The use of on-street traffic calming using cycle lanes and on-street car parking and berm design, together with future provision for public transport infrastructure on collector streets, shall be considered fundamental design elements of the street cross section. The proposed road layout provides internal local streets that are orientated generally in a north-south direction. The main streets follow the block layout which is orientated in a northeast-southwest direction – parallel with lot boundaries and following the direction of both Eriksen Road and Willowbank Avenue. Internal east-west cross block local roads are provided to create a range of walkable urban blocks within the development. With demand in the area, the subdivision proposes to provide Napier with a freehold lifestyle village. It is proposed that for the most part, all internal roads will be encapsulated within a gated style development. Road profiles internally are as follows: •
•
Total house Lot area: 79,045m² Average lot size:
URBAN AMENITY DESIGN OUTCOMES Design Outcome 7:
Minimum pedestrian 1.4m wide footpaths to 1 side of every road
•
Pedestrian connection to shared pathways within designated drainage reserve
•
Landscaped berm areas including street trees
Subdivision design shall seek to activate the street frontage through the orientation of dwellings to face the street and overlook public open space (where applicable) to enable passive surveillance and improved street amenity outcomes. •
Average lot size is 422m² based on the 78,645m² area of developed lots (excl. reserve/park area and roading). As an average, this complies with the City of Napier District Plan maximum density limit of 1 dwelling per 350m2 (Condition 5.15).
Design Outcome 4: “Orderly and cost efficient staging will be achieved through the progressive construction of infrastructure in cells illustrated on the Structure Plan Map –Staging (Appendix 29F).” Appendix 29 of the District Plan contains the indicative Structure Plan for the area. Appendix Plan 29F shows the subject site is Stage 5 of the Te Awa development area and therefore will occur outside of the Structure Plan sequencing (Refer Design Outcome 4). It is believed that this will not directly impact upon longer term infrastructure planning for the area.
Design Outcome 5: Out of sequence development will be discouraged by:
•
The 40m wide stormwater/ drainage designation located along the Willowbank Ave. boundary of the site has provided the development with one active interface with the broader neighbourhood, being Eriksen Road. Larger lots (700 m²) have been located fronting Eriksen to reflect the existing urban grain located within the Te Awa/ South Napier area including new development opposite the site. The Eriksen Road interface will provide road profiles and pedestrian connection in accordance to Council standard and design outcomes noted in the Structure Plan and noted previously in this report.
Design Outcome 9: Provide for the consistent landscaping treatment of streets and reserves (including the Serpentine Pond environments and open drainage channels) that contribute to urban amenity and landscape values and retains and enhances vistas through the Te Awa Development area. •
Landscaping to streetscapes will be provided to meet council standard and will include street tree planting where services allow (predominantly to northern berms) and street planting in prominent
Superseded
- Requiring out of sequence development to be a Discretionary activity
•
A planted buffer will be incorporated along the drainage designation running along Willowbank Avenue providing separation from roadway and to soften the long fence line.
•
This planting is to be visually permeable to retain visual connection between the development, open space and roadways. Planting is to be low shrubs and groundcovers with clear trunked trees to allow visibility below crown. Trees will be installed in large container sizes to meet the mature height parameters.
Design Outcome 11: Off road pedestrian and cycle linkages (indicatively shown on the Te Awa Structure Plan Map) which link open spaces to each other, to the street network and the Serpentine stormwater pond shall be wide, open and safe and connect to one another. •
An allowance for a 2.5m wide shared pathway has been shown in the design within the 40m wide drainage designation connecting the broader recreation networks.
•
All other pathways proposed with the development are minimum 1.4m wide provided to one side of every road. These pathways are however not accessible to the public as they will be within the internal gated lifestyle village.
•
A pedestrian pathway is proposed to the Eriksen Road frontage which will match existing connecting the existing pedestrian network
Design Outcome 12:
Design Outcome 8:
This equates to 13.6 dwellings per hectare - which exceeds the structure plan minimum of 12 dwellings per hectare.
11
13.5m wide carriageway (NCC Minor Local Road) – The road is to meander 1.5m along centerline, to act as a traffic calming device and to provide landscaped buildouts and provide added amenity within long runs of roadway.
A consistent generously landscaped buffer strip of 3m will be provided along the western extent of the Te Awa Development area (fronting Willowbank Avenue) in accordance with the Te Awa Structure Plan Map (the 3m buffer is indicatively shown on the western boundary of the Te Awa Development area to the north and south of the open drain channel). This Design Outcome requires that 75% of the buffer setback is densely planted at the time of development with specimens that will reach 3-5m at maturity.
Road upgrading shall proceed in conjunction with staging of development within the Te Awa Development area. The road upgrading is shown indicatively on the Te Awa Structure Plan Map. The following works are required: •
riksen Road, 10m carriageway with cycle lanes, E footpaths, car park / landscape berm areas, pedestrian footpaths and verge. Eriksen Road will be designed and upgraded with single lane roundabouts at all major intersections (see below) with 120° deflection designed into the roundabout design to assist in reducing traffic speeds along this length of road.
•
treet design shall provide for consistent S landscaping treatment that contributes to urban amenity and landscape.
•
Eriksen Road will be upgraded as noted above. No roundabouts are proposed in the design.
•
This project aims to seamlessly integrate into the existing local character by tying in streetscape character, planting species and applying similar architectural typologies and built form, particularly on edges interfacing existing residential areas. The development will blend seamlessly into the wider area, fitting neatly into the urban fringe.
Design Outcome 13: No additional collector streets are necessary within the Te Awa Development area. Internal streets shall generally comply with Napier City Council standards and design for local streets, except where Council may wish to promote with a developer innovative
18/12/2018 Revision B [H20180069]
Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village, Te Awa - Urban Design Report
and attractive solutions that enhance residential amenity, safety and sense of place. Therefore, Council will look favourably on alternative subdivision concepts that achieve safe, pedestrian and cycle friendly streets and discourage through traffic.
District Plan - Chapter 5 Main Residential Zone - Rules Refer to Assessment of Environmental Effects (AEE)
Road profiles within the development site are as follows: •
13.5m wide carriageway (NCC Minor Local Road) – the road is to meander 1.5m along centerline, to act as a traffic calming device and to provide landscaped buildouts and provide added amenity within long runs of roadway
•
Minimum pedestrian 1.4m wide footpaths to 1 side of every road
•
Pedestrian connection to shared pathways within designated drainage reserve
•
Landscaped berm areas including street trees
Superseded 18/12/2018 Revision B [H20180069]
12
Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village, Te Awa - Urban Design Report
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier Assessment of Environmental Effects
APPENDIX E Detailed Site Investigation
Detailed Site Investigation Undertaken in accordance with the National Environmental Standards for Assessing and Managing Contaminants in Soil to Protect Human Health 2011
Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village - 38 & 16 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069
Prepared for Durham Property Investments Ltd By Development Nous Limited and Geosciences Limited 16 January 2019
Detailed Site Investigation Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village - 38 & 16 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180119
Contact Information
Document Information
Development Nous Limited 212 Queen Street East Hastings
Prepared for
Durham Property Investments Ltd
Project Name
Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village - 38 & 16 Willowbank Avenue, Napier
File Reference
Document1
Job Reference
H20180069
Date
17 January 2019
Version Number
1
Effective Date:
16 January 2014
Date Approved:
16 January 2014
PO Box 385 Hastings 4156 Telephone: (06) 876 2159
Author(s):
Sophia Edmead Environmental Consultant- Development Nous Ltd and
Johan Faurie Principle for Geosciences Ltd
Approved by:
Johan Faurie Principle for Geosciences Ltd
17 January 2019
Development Nous Ltd & Geosciences Ltd
i
Detailed Site Investigation Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village - 38 & 16 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180119
Executive Summary Development Nous Ltd (DNL), in collaboration with Geosciences Ltd (GSL), were engaged by Durham Property Investments Ltd (the Client) to conduct a Detailed Site Investigation (DSI) at 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier (the site) in order to confirm the suitability of the soil in regard to any adverse effects on human health given the proposed redevelopment of the site for residential use. The subject site has past history with pastoral farming, market gardening and orcharding uses. Under the National Environmental Standard for Assessing and Managing Contaminants in Soil to Protect Human Health Regulations 2011 (NES), orchards and market gardens are considered a potentially hazardous land use due to the application of persistent pesticides as identified (as item A.10) on the Regulations Hazardous Activities and Industries List (HAIL). Additionally, consideration of past farm management practices having occurred on the land is required. For example, the control of ectoparasites on sheep / other animals are also identified on the HAIL (as item A.8) as being potentially hazardous due to the chemicals historically used (). Based on the conceptual model for potential contamination and site observations, DNL personnel collected twelve composite surface soil samples uniformly from across the areas of the site historically identified as being used for HAIL activities, and a further eight discrete samples (including a field duplicate) from areas used for chemical storage and/or livestock runs. Soil samples (in accordance with the NES) were analysed by an accredited laboratory for heavy metals (including arsenic, lead and copper), organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) All soil samples returned concentrations for contaminants below NES soil contaminant standards and other relevant guideline criteria for the proposed residential use (Based on the specified level of 10% home grown produce). Accordingly, whilst on the site has been mildly impacted by the former and current site activities, it poses no risk to human health and to current and future land users based on the acceptable statutory guideline level under the NES and therefore in terms of the NES there is no impediment to its change of use to that of residential.
17 January 2019
Development Nous Ltd & Geosciences Ltd
ii
Detailed Site Investigation Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village - 38 & 16 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180119
Disclaimer
This report is provided on the condition that Geosciences Ltd and Development Nous Ltd disclaims all liability to any person or entity other than the client and the Napier City Council in respect of anything done or omitted to be done and of the consequence of anything done or omitted by any such person in reliance, whether in whole or part, on the contents of this report. Furthermore, Geosciences Ltd and Development Nous Ltd disclaim all liability in respect of anything done by the client, or any such person in reliance, whether in whole or any part of the contents of this report of all matters not stated in the brief outlined in our proposal and according to our general terms and conditions and special terms and conditions for contaminated sites. Statement
This site investigation has been prepared in accordance with the Resource Management (National Environmental Standard for Assessing and Managing Contaminants in Soil to Protect Human Health) Regulation 2011. It has been managed by a suitably qualified and experienced practitioner (SQEP); with site investigations and analysis undertaken in accordance with the current edition of the Ministry for the Environments Contaminated Land Management Guidelines No.5 – Site Investigation and Analysis of Soils, and reported on in accordance with the current edition of the Ministry for the Environments Contaminated Land Management Guidelines No.1 – Reporting on Contaminated Sites.
17 January 2019
Development Nous Ltd & Geosciences Ltd
iii
Detailed Site Investigation Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village - 38 & 16 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180119
Table of Contents 1
Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 7
2
Property Details ............................................................................................................................... 7 2.1
Environmental Setting ............................................................................................................... 8
2.2
Development at the Site ............................................................................................................ 8
3
Proposed Development ................................................................................................................. 9
4
Standards and Regulations ......................................................................................................... 10 4.1
National Environmental Standard .......................................................................................... 10
4.2
Napier District Plan and Regional Resource Management Plan ...................................... 10 Objectives and Scope of Works ................................................................................................. 10
5 5.1
Objectives .................................................................................................................................. 10
5.2
Works ......................................................................................................................................... 10 Site History..................................................................................................................................... 11
6 6.1
Certificates of Title ................................................................................................................... 11
6.2
Napier City Council Records .................................................................................................. 11
6.3
Aerial Photography................................................................................................................... 11
7
Site Inspection ............................................................................................................................... 18
8
Potential for Contamination ......................................................................................................... 19 8.1
Soil Sampling Methodology .................................................................................................... 20
8.2
Quality Control .......................................................................................................................... 22
8.3
Soil Sampling Procedures ....................................................................................................... 23 Analytical Results.......................................................................................................................... 23
9 9.1
Acceptance Criteria and Guidelines ...................................................................................... 23
9.2
Laboratory Results ................................................................................................................... 23
10
Quality Control ............................................................................................................................... 27
11
Conclusion ..................................................................................................................................... 27
12
Additional Requirements .............................................................................................................. 28
13
Activity Status of Future Development ...................................................................................... 28
Limitations .................................................................................................................................................. 29 References................................................................................................................................................. 30
17 January 2019
Development Nous Ltd & Geosciences Ltd
iv
Detailed Site Investigation Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village - 38 & 16 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180119
List of Tables Table 1: Certificate of Title Information.......................................................................................... 11 Table 2: Historic Aerial Photos ...................................................................................................... 12 Table 3: Potential for Contamination ............................................................................................ 19 Table 4: Heavy Metal Concentrations (mg/kg) .............................................................................. 24 Table 5: OCP and TPH (mg/kg) .................................................................................................... 26 Table 6: Duplicate Sample Analytical Results ............................................................................... 27
List of Figures Figure 1: The location of the site, the northern lot being 16 Willowbank Avenue and the southern lot being 38 Willowbank Avenue (Source NCC GIS) ............................................................................ 8 Figure 2: Scheme Plan (Source: Development Nous Ltd) ............................................................... 9 Figure 3: Buildings Identified in the Centre of the Site ................................................................... 18 Figure 4: Soil Sampling Strategy ................................................................................................... 21
List of Appendices Appendix A – Certificates of Title Appendix B – Proposed Scheme Plan Appendix C – Historic Aerial Images Appendix D – Site Photographs Appendix E – Soil Sampling Strategy Appendix F – Chain of Custody Form Appendix G – Laboratory Results
17 January 2019
Development Nous Ltd & Geosciences Ltd
v
Detailed Site Investigation Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village - 38 & 16 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180119
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND UNITS Chemical Names BTEX
Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes
CCA
Chromated Copper Arsenate
OCP
Organochlorine Pesticides
OPP
Organophosphate Pesticides
PAH
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
PCB
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
PHC
Petroleum Hydrocarbons
TPH
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
TRH
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons
VOC
Volatile Organic Compounds
Technical Terms ACM
Asbestos Containing Material
AEC
Area of Environmental Concern
AF
Asbestos Fines
AST
Aboveground Storage Tank
CoPC
Contaminants of Potential Concern
CSM
Conceptual Site Model
DSI
Detailed Site Investigation
EAA
Environmental Assessment Area
HAIL
Hazardous Activities and Industries List
LINZ
Land Information New Zealand
LUR
Land-use Register
MfE
Ministry for the Environment
NES
Resource Management (National Environmental Standard for Assessing and Managing Contaminants in Soil to Protect Human Health) Regulations 2011
SCS
Soil Contamination Standards
PSI
Preliminary Site Investigation
TIT
Triple Interceptor Trap
UST
Underground Storage Tank
17 January 2019
6
Detailed Site Investigation Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village - 38 & 16 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180119
1
Introduction
Development Nous Ltd (DNL), in collaboration with Geosciences Ltd (GSL), were engaged by Durham Property Investments Limited (the Client) to conduct a Detailed Site Investigation (DSI) at the property located at 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier (the ‘Site’) to confirm the suitability of surface soil onsite with respect to the proposed development. The Ministry for the Environment Resource Management (National Environmental Standard for Assessing and Managing Contaminants in Soil to Protect Human Health) Regulations 2011 (NESCS Regulations) (Reference 1) applies to sites where an activity or industry identified on the Hazardous Activities and Industries List (HAIL) is, has, or is likely to have occurred. A desktop study and site inspection confirmed that portions of the site has historically been used as an orchard, while the majority of the site is currently being used as a market garden. The bulk storage and use of persistent pesticides (historically associated with orchards and market gardens) is identified on MfE’s Hazardous Industries and Environment List (HAIL) as item A.10 subsequently a detailed site investigation of the site will be required under the rules of the NESCS. This report has been prepared in general accordance with:
2
Ministry for the Environment (MfE) Contaminated Land Management Guidelines (CLMG): No. 1 - "Guidelines for Reporting on Contaminated Sites in New Zealand (Reference 2)"; No. 5 – "Site Investigation and Analysis of Soils” (Reference 3); and NZ Petroleum Guidelines ‘Guidelines for Assessing and Managing Petroleum Hydrocarbon Contaminated Sites in New Zealand’ (Revised 2011) (Reference 4).
Property Details
The site consists of two properties located at 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, with access also available from Eriksen Road., as shown below. 16 Willowbank Avenue is legally described as Lot 1 DP 14417 and comprises of approximately 4.5 hectares in area. 38 Willowbank Ave is legally described as Lot 2 DP 14417 comprising of approximately 9.2 hectares in area.
17 January 2019
7
Detailed Site Investigation Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village - 38 & 16 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180119
Figure 1: The location of the site, the northern lot being 16 Willowbank Avenue and the southern lot being 38 Willowbank Avenue (Source NCC GIS)
2.1
Environmental Setting
The site is located, approximately 3 km south of Napier Town Centre and 0.6 km west of the foreshore and State Highway 2 on a rural landscaped strip of land within the wider Napier urban residential area. Willowbank Avenue bounds the site to the west and Eriksen Road bounds the site to the east Land to the north, north-east and south of the site consists of open agricultural fields while residential developments are evident to the east and south-west of the site. The geology of the site is described by Griffiths (Reference 8) as silt loam on shelly sandy loam with slowly permeable lagoon sediments. Resource Development Consultants Ltd (RDCL) conducted a liquefaction potential assessment, including CPT investigation, of the site which confirmed the subsurface soil profile, to be sand and silt in composition with intermittent layers of clay and occasional organic soil horizons. The groundwater flow in this area is in an eastward direction towards the sea (Reference 8). 2.2
Development at the Site
The site is currently in pasture, with an associated residential dwelling and curtilage to the north western corner of 16 Willowbank Avenue with a number of detached buildings within the centre of the site; to the northern section of 38 Willowbank Avenue. The site is currently accessed by two access roads leading off Willowbank Avenue, to the west.
17 January 2019
8
Detailed Site Investigation Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village - 38 & 16 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180119
Although pastural in nature the Napier City District Plan has signalled an expected change of use to that of residential commensurate with a new General Residential zoning, as opposed to its former Main Rural zoning.
3
Proposed Development
It is proposed to develop the site into intensive residential housing over a number of stages as shown below (subject to any changes that may be required as part of any consent approval conditions or other requirements)
Figure 2: Scheme Plan (Source: Development Nous Ltd)
17 January 2019
9
Detailed Site Investigation Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village - 38 & 16 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180119
4
Standards and Regulations
As part of the proposed development it will be necessary to address the requirements of the following standards, rules and regulations
National Environmental Standard
4.1
The ‘National Environmental Standard for Assessing and Managing Contaminants in Soil to Protect Human Health’ (NES) (2011) (Reference 1) ensures that land affected by contaminants in soil is appropriately identified and assessed. When soil disturbance and / or land development activities take place it should be, if necessary, remediated or the contaminants contained to make the land safe for human use. Under the NES, land is considered to be actually or potentially contaminated if an activity or industry on the Ministry for the Environment (MfE) Hazardous Activities and Industries List (HAIL) has been, is, or is more likely than not have been, undertaken on the land. Consequently, a change in landuse, subdivision, earthworks or development requires a site investigation of the land to determine if there is a risk to human health because of any current or former landuse activities.
Napier District Plan and Regional Resource Management Plan
4.2
Chapter 64 of the Napier City District Plan delegates the assessment of soil contamination to the national level NES (2011) instrument. In terms of the Regional Plan again the requirements of the NES take precedent over any specific requirements of this plan, to which there are none.
5
Objectives and Scope of Works
5.1
Objectives
The objectives of this investigation were to assess:
The extent of any current or former HAIL activities on site;
The soil quality and associated risk to human health and the environment resulting from current and former activities on the site;
If the activity can comply with NES permitted activity conditions; and,
The need, if any, for further detailed investigation and / or remedial work.
Works
5.2
To achieve the objectives of the DSI, DNL and GSL have undertaken the following:
A review of historic aerial photographs of the site;
A review of the Certificate of Title for the property;
A review of the property file held by Napier City Council;
A site visit for the purpose of inspection and of the collection of soil samples;
The collection of composite and discrete soil samples from the site;
The analysis of those soil samples for horticultural contaminants of concern, these being arsenic, copper, lead and a suite of organochlorine pesticides (OCPs); and
17 January 2019
10
Detailed Site Investigation Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village - 38 & 16 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180119
6
The preparation of a report in accordance with MfE Contaminated Land Management Guidelines (CLMG); No. 1 – “Guidelines for Reporting on Contaminated Sites in New Zealand” detailing the findings of this investigation and the need, if any, for further work and/or remediation.
Site History
A desktop assessment of publicly available files and photographs was undertaken to determine the history of the site with respect to any current or historic potentially contaminating land uses. The findings of the assessment are presented below. 6.1
Certificates of Title
A search of Land Information New Zealand (LINZ) was conducted in order to obtain current and historic information for the subject site. The land record includes the Certificate of Title, Historic Titles and Cadastral Survey Plan and is provided in Appendix C. The certificate of title ownership is summarised in the table below. Table 1: Certificate of Title Information Title Reference
Owner
10.04.35
HB93/134
The Napier Harbour Board
02.07.65
HBB2/1222
The Napier Harbour Board
27.02.76
HBG2/864
The Hawke Bay Regional Council
11.05.81
3252786
William Jesse Lawrence Bowell and Nancy Melba Bowell
30.04.18
420376
Durham Property Investments Ltd
Date
Information Upon trust for the use, benefit and endowment of the said Board Upon trust for the use, benefit and endowment of the said Board Upon trust for the use, benefit and endowment of the said Board
No additional information pertinent to potential HAIL activities has been identified on site through the search of the historic titles. 6.2
Napier City Council Records
A search in Napier City Council property file for the two properties did not reveal any information regarding potentially HAIL activities occurring onsite. 6.3
Aerial Photography
Historic aerial photographs from the Napier City Council’s GIS System were searched in addition those from Retrolens (http://retrolens.nz) The aerial photographs are presented in Appendix D and key events relevant to site usage are summarised in Table 2.
17 January 2019
11
Detailed Site Investigation Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village - 38 & 16 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180119
Table 2: Historic Aerial Photos Aerial Photo
Year Taken and Description 1948 The majority of the area appears to be in agricultural / pastoral use. Livestock can be seen grazing in the central eastern section of the site. There is a residential dwelling located in the north western corner of the site
Approximate site boundary
1969 The residential dwelling identified in the north western corner of the site in the 1948 image is no longer visible in this photograph. The photograph is of poor quality but it appears that the site is still in agricultural use, market gardening activities cannot be ruled out. There is a structure at the centre of the site that bears resemblance to that of a storage shed. The land to the north west and west of the site had been subdivided by 1969 for residential development.
Approximate site boundary
17 January 2019
12
Detailed Site Investigation Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village - 38 & 16 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180119
1977 The site is still in agricultural use with potentially market gardening occurring as well. A new residential dwelling has been established in a similar north western location (16 Willowbank Ave) to the one identified in the 1948 image. Recorded on the property file, indicate that this building was developed circa 1975. The structure identified at the centre of the site in the 1969 image is still visible in this image.
Approximate site boundary
1980 The site appears to be in configuration as the 1977 image.
a
similar
The structure at the centre of the site as identified in 1969 and 1977 is no longer visible.
Approximate site boundary
17 January 2019
13
Detailed Site Investigation Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village - 38 & 16 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180119
1987 An orchard has been established at the south western quarter of the site (38 Willowbank Ave) and a new access road leading off Willowbank Ave has been established. This access road leads to a newly established yard and residence at the centre of the site. The balance of the land appears to be in agricultural / market garden use. The residential dwelling established by the 1977 image remains and now has an established curtilage occupying the north west corner of the site.
Approximate site boundary
1996 The site appears to be in a similar configuration to the 1987 image.
Approximate site boundary
17 January 2019
14
Detailed Site Investigation Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village - 38 & 16 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180119
1999 The orchard identified previously at 38 Willowbank Ave remains and a number of new buildings have been developed within the service yard in the centre of the site. This includes a new residential building which was developed by 2000 – see plan of BC001665. The residential dwelling in the north west corner of the site at 16 Willowbank Avenue is still in place. The balance of 16 Willowbank Avenue and the south eastern quarter 38 Willowbank Avenue appears to be used for pastoral grazing..
2004 The site appears to be in a similar configuration to the 1999 image.
17 January 2019
15
Detailed Site Investigation Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village - 38 & 16 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180119
2009 By 2009, the orchard in the south west corner of the site has been cleared and a tree belt in the central eastern portion of the site has been reduced. The buildings present in the yard at the centre of the site are clearly visible. These include the shed identified in the 1987 plate, a storage shed to the south of it and more recent additions including a large shed / residential dwelling and storage sheds. There are also animal pens to the north-east of this group of buildings. The balance of the site appears to have remained in pastoral grazing land and broadacre cropping.
2011 By 2011, the entire site appears to be used for pastoral grazing, with some livestock visible on the lands. The residential dwelling and established curtilage in the north western corner of the site is still in place while the collection of utility buildings remains in the centre of the site.
17 January 2019
16
Detailed Site Investigation Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village - 38 & 16 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180119
2014 The site appears to be in a similar configuration to the 2011 image.
2018 The southern portion of the site appears to be planted as a market garden while the northern portion appears to be still in agricultural / pastoral use. The residential dwelling in the north western corner of the site is still in place while the collection of utility buildings remains in the centre of the site. However, the animal pens to the east of the central utility buildings, identified in the 2009 image, have been remove.
As identified in the historic aerial photo search above the majority of the site has historically been, or is currently being used for agricultural / market garden activities. Additionally, the south western quarter of the site at 38 Willowbank Avenue was planted as an orchard between 1987 and 2009. A number of structures present at the centre of the site could have been associated with the orchard / agricultural uses. The HAIL identifies persistent pesticide bulk storage or use including market gardens, orchards and spray sheds as item A.10, consequently the entire site is considered to be a ‘piece of land’ under Regulation 5(7) of the NESCS.
17 January 2019
17
Detailed Site Investigation Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village - 38 & 16 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180119
The site has also been the location of pastoral farming from as early as 1948 to recently. However, there were no evidence of any structures on any of the historical aerial photographs that resemble animal spry races or sheep dips.
7
Site Inspection
DNL personnel undertook inspection of the site on 27.11.18, in order to verify the findings of the desktop investigation and to collect soil samples from the site. Site photographs taken during the site inspection are presented in Appendix D, Plates 1 – 22. At the time of the site inspection, the entire productive areas on the site (both 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue) were planted in cucurbits. An open surface drain separated the two properties and a shelter belt is located on the south western boundary of the site. 38 Willowbank Avenue was accessed via a vehicle access road from Willowbank Avenue that also formed the boundary between the two properties that comprise the site. 16 Willowbank was also accessed from Willowbank Avenue via a vehicle access road to the northwest of the site leading to the well-established residential curtilage in the north west corner of the site. The residential curtilage included a large shed to the rear of the house.and defunct livestock pens with a loading ramp at the south east corner of the curtilage. The group of buildings at the centre of the site as identified in the 2009 to recent historic aerial photographs are shown in Figure 4 below, along with a description of each building structure.
Figure 3: Buildings Identified in the Centre of the Site
Pump Shed A small pump shed was present at the very south of the group of buildings. This shed had a hazardous chemical sign attached to the back wall (facing the access road). However, the hazardous chemical sign appears to signify use of chemicals across the entire site rather than
17 January 2019
18
Detailed Site Investigation Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village - 38 & 16 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180119
indicating the specific contents of the pump shed. There were no chemicals stored or noted inside the pump shed at the time of the inspection. The area behind the pump shed (to the west), was used for the storage of aluminium sheeting, farming equipment, PVC piping and a small pile of burnt material. A neglected argic-chemical mixing unit consisting of a 44 gal drum was also noted amongst the scrap material. The pump shed was located on a concrete slab foundation and consisted of a timber frame and plywood walls. A panel adjacent to the door of the building consisted of a fibrous cement sheet while the roof of the building also appears to consist of fibrous cement that is most likely asbestos product. The suspected ACM appeared to be in generally good condition (nonfriable). The ground surface in the proximity of the pump shed was closely inspected but no fragments of potentially ACM product were noted. Wooden Storage Shed Adjacent to the pump shed, and to the south of the group of buildings was a larger storage shed. Access to this shed was limited, however the contents could be viewed through windows and it appeared that the shed was being used to store miscellaneous residential items. This shed consists of a timber frame, plywood cladding, a corrugated iron roof and transparent PVC sheeting. The building has a compacted earth floor. Defunct livestock pens and a loading ramp was located to the south of this storage shed. Aluminium Pole Shed A large aluminium pole shed of recent construction and located on a concrete foundation pad was also present on site (see Figure 4). Both access doors (garage and pedestrian) to the shed was locked at the time of the inspection and the contents of the shed could therefore not be inspected. Three apple crates containing miscellaneous pieces of rubbish were located to the south of the aluminium shed. Bottles of PruneTec and Garrison Rapid (pruning wound dressings) were also noted on the ground by the aluminium shed. This aluminium shed was constructed between 1980 and 1987, when the orchard at the south western portion of the site was established. Other Also present on site was a residential campervan, a car port, for the storage of residential equipment (lawn mower, food items etc.), a storage container and a small residential dwelling in a well established curtilage. During the site inspection no evidence of above ground or underground fuel storage were noted on site.
8
Potential for Contamination
Based on the findings of the desktop study and site inspection outlined above, The potential for soil contamination at the site is summarised in Table 3 below. Table 3: Potential for Contamination Source
Area
Bulk use of persistent pesticides
All cropped land and former orchard land
17 January 2019
Depth Surface and Shallow depths
Likely Contaminants Arsenic, lead, copper & Organochlorine pesticides.
19
Detailed Site Investigation Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village - 38 & 16 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180119
Bulk storage of persistent pesticides
Around storage sheds
Surface and Shallow depths
Arsenic, lead, copper & Organochlorine pesticides.
Chemical mixing areas
At the mixing location
Surface and Shallow depths
Arsenic, lead, copper & Organochlorine pesticides.
Animal dosing location
Animal holding pens
Surface and Shallow depths
Arsenic, DDT & Dieldrin
Burning of miscellaneous items
Burning rank
Surface and Shallow depths
Heavy metals & Polyclinic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
As summarised in Table 3 above the superficial topsoil layer is considered the most likely strata to have been impacted. Any impacts from the application of spraying chemicals to crop is generally of low concentration, uniform across the application area and generally confined to the surface layers (0 mm – 250 mm) only. However, areas where chemical were stored or mixed could contain higher concentrations of contaminants. 8.1
Soil Sampling Methodology
Based on the findings of the desktop study and site inspection, a soil sampling plan was developed to target the potential for contamination as described above. The soil sampling regime was based on the potential wide spread and uniform chemical application associated with the horticultural spraying and application activities within the site, and the potential for hotspots of contamination from the leaks and spillages where pesticides were stored or mixed. Additional soil samples were taken on a judgemental basis based on site observations during the site inspection. The soil sampling was conducted by DNL personnel, on 27 November 2018 under supervision of Johan Faurie, of Geosciences Ltd, suitably qualified and experienced professional (SQEP)., The soil sampling plan is shown in Figure 5 and also presented in Appendix E, while the rationale behind the composite and discrete soil samples collected are summarised below.
17 January 2019
20
Detailed Site Investigation Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village - 38 & 16 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180119
Figure 4: Soil Sampling Strategy
Composite Samples (COMP) 1 - 12 The CLMG 5 guidelines states that the “investigation of horticultural land and broadscale contamination typically uses composite techniques, often with more than four sub-samples per composite. This method is appropriate where low-concentration, uniform contamination is present and can be confirmed by site history.� The application of agrichemicals to orchard / market garden is predominantly through direct spraying applications to the crop and can generally be regarded as uniform in distribution (Gaw, S.K., Reference 6). As such, a series of 12 composite shallow soil samples (consisting of 10 sub-samples each) were taken covering the majority of the site to cover the land used for market gardening as well as the land that was formerly under orchard. The historic aerial photographs show different areas of the site under different management practises and time periods (i.e. the south eastern corner of the site as orchard established between 1987 and 2009). Consequently, the areas of current and historic orchard and market garden activities were divided into approximately 1ha blocks of equally cropped/planted regimes for soil sampling. Ten sub-samples were collected in a zig-zag pattern as shown in Figure 5 above from each of these blocks. The soil sampling procedures followed are further described in Section 8.3 Soil Sampling Procedures below.
17 January 2019
21
Detailed Site Investigation Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village - 38 & 16 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180119
These soil samples were analysed for arsenic (As), copper (Cu), lead (Pb) and a suite of organochlorine pesticides (OCP) which are the primary contaminants of concern relating to historical horticultural practices. DISCRETE SOIL SAMPLES Soil Sample 1 (SS1) Soil sample SS1 was collected from the entrance of the pump shed (which was most likely used for the storage of chemicals in the past) at the edge of the concrete slab floor. It is considered that any leakages or spillage within the shed will flow to this location. This soil sample was analysed for a suite of heavy metals, organochlorine pesticides Soil Sample 2 (SS2) Soil sample SS2 was taken from the back of the pump shed in the area of miscellaneous farm storage, spray unit and possible burnt materials. This soil sample was analysed for a suite of heavy metals, organochlorine pesticides and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Soil Sample 3 (SS3) & Soil Sample 4 (SS4) Soil sample SS3 was taken from the entrance and soil sample SS4 from the rear of the wooden storage shed. Although this shed was being used for miscellaneous storage and not being used to store chemicals at the time of inspection, it was considered likely that persistent chemicals may have been stored at this location due to the age of the building. It is further noted that the soil sample SS4 was also collected at the location of the defunct animal pens and an animal loading ramp where animal spraying/dosing is also most likely to have taken place. Both these soil samples were analysed for a suite of heavy metals and organochlorine pesticides. Soil Sample 5 and 6 (SS5 and SS6) Soil samples SS5 and SS6 were taken at the two entrances of the modern pole shed of aluminium construction. SS5 was taken by the eastern, vehicular (garage) entrance while SS6 was taken at the western, pedestrian entrance. This building was constructed on a concrete slab foundation that lack of internal drainage (information obtained from the property file), it was considered that any leaks and spills of chemicals stored in the shed would have pooled or been tracked out the entrances. These soil samples were analysed for a suite of heavy metals and OCPs. Soil Sample 7 (SS7) Soil sample SS7 was collected from a location in the north west corner of the site, were additional defunct animal pens and an animal loading ramp were located. Similar to location SS4, these pens could have been the location of spraying/dosing of animals. This soil sample was also analysed for a suite of heavy metals and organochlorine pesticides. 8.2
Quality Control
The MfE’s CLMG No.5 Site Investigation and Analysis of Soils, requires that one blind duplicate sample should be collected for every ten soil samples collected and submitted to the laboratory as two separate samples (blind field duplicate). Accordingly, DNL collected a duplicate sample of soil at the location of SS2 that was labelled SS12.
17 January 2019
22
Detailed Site Investigation Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village - 38 & 16 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180119
8.3
Soil Sampling Procedures
Composite soil samples were collected from the 0mm - 75mm surface horizon of soil using a stainless-steel foot corer following the removal of surficial vegetation and placed directly into plastic sampling bags with date, sample identification number, sample depth and job number noted on the bag. Discrete soil samples were taken from the surface horizon 0mm – 150mm using a stainless steel hand trowel and placed directly into laboratory supplied glass jars or sampling bags (depending on the analysis to be undertaken) with date, sample identification number, sample depth and job number noted on the jars and bags. Sampling equipment was decontaminated between each sample in accordance with GSL’s quality control procedures. Samples were placed in a box with a chain of custody form (COC) indicating the analysis to be performed. The samples were dispatched via courier to Analytica Laboratories in Hamilton on 27.11.18 and received by the laboratory on 28.11.18 (COC forms are presented in Appendix F). Analytica Laboratories is accredited by International Accreditation New Zealand (IANZ) for the analysis undertaken. The sampling protocol was in accordance with the Contaminated Land Management Guidelines (CLMG) No. 5 – Site Investigation and Analysis of Soils (Reference 3).
9
Analytical Results
9.1
Acceptance Criteria and Guidelines
The NES mandates fourteen soil contaminant standards (SCS) for the protection of human health for organic compounds and inorganic elements for various land use criteria. The NES human health SCS criteria for a standard residential block with 10% produce (residential 10%) have been applied as a suitably conservative risk assessment. The NES does not contain specific standards for petroleum hydrocarbons, therefore analytical results are compared against the Tier 1 Soil acceptance criteria for residential land use set by the MfE “Guidelines for Assessing and Managing Petroleum Hydrocarbon Contaminated Sites in New Zealand” (‘Petroleum Guidelines’) 9.2
Laboratory Results
Inorganics The analytical results for heavy metals are summarised in Table 4 below. The results are compared with the NES Soil Contamination Standards (NES SCS) as well as the Landcare estimated upper limit of background concentrations of soil in the Hawke’s Bay. Full laboratory transcripts are presented in Appendix G.
17 January 2019
23
Detailed Site Investigation Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village - 38 & 16 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180119
Table 4: Heavy Metal Concentrations (mg/kg) Sample Reference
Arsenic (As)
Cadmium (Cd)
Chromium (Cr)
Copper (Cu)
Lead (Pb)
Nickel (Ni)
Zinc (Zn)
SS1
18.8
0.28
21.0
128
56.5
12.4
528
SS2
8.59
0.25
18.5
33.8
20.3
11.1
189
SS3
14.7
0.20
24.0
20.3
22.0
12.1
155
SS4
14.9
0.19
19.8
19.8
20.3
6.82
133
SS5
6.62
0.80
18.9
37.4
40.0
18.7
831
SS6
13.2
0.91
16.4
26.3
28.6
8.46
639
SS7
3.34
0.094
11.3
7.68
12.9
7.51
68.9
COMP 1
4.38
0.11
14.8
12.7
10.7
10.2
52.5
COMP 2
5.63
0.17
16.2
10.6
13.2
11.7
57.6
COMP 3
10.8
0.20
17.7
15.5
13.0
11.7
71.0
COMP 4
4.36
0.11
14.5
13.2
10.7
10.4
50.3
COMP 5
6.58
0.11
18.5
12.2
16.8
13.5
64.2
COMP 6
6.71
0.13
18.6
12.1
16.6
13.5
62.7
COMP 7
5.56
0.11
16.9
10.3
13.6
12.0
54.2
COMP 8
4.47
0.091
14.5
8.05
10.8
10.8
47.8
COMP 9
3.39
0.071
12.8
5.29
8.87
8.84
39.9
COMP 10
4.24
0.096
15.2
7.25
12.8
11.0
47.3
COMP 11
4.93
0.12
15.0
10.9
22.0
10.5
77.2
COMP 12
4.91
0.10
14.6
8.56
12.3
11.4
52.5
NES SCS for Residential Use (10% Produce)
20
3
460
>10,000
210
400iv
8,000iv
Estimated upper limit of background concentration in Hawke’s Bay iv
9.0
0.7
24
32
27
17
105
17 January 2019
24
Detailed Site Investigation Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village - 38 & 16 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180119 Notes: i.
Red text colour indicates exceedances of NES SCS / other relevant guideline
ii.
Blue text colour indicates exceedances of the estimated upper background limit
iii.
NES SCS for Residential Use (10% Produce)
iv.
NEPM (2013) criteria for Residential A (residential with garden / accessible soil) taken in absence of NESCS SCS criteria
v.
Cavanagh, J. E for Landcare Research (2014) Hawke’s Bay Region: Background soil concentration for managing soil quality. Report no. RM 14-03, HBRC Plan no. 4611.
vi.
A ‘-‘ will indicate that the sample was not analysed for the particular contaminant
Analytical results for the soil samples (both discrete and composite soil samples) across the entire site returned concentrations of heavy metals, including arsenic, copper and lead below the NES SCS for the proposed residential land use (10% produce). A number of results returned concentrations of contaminants above the estimated upper background limit for Hawke’s Bay, reflecting the long horticultural use of the site. Organic Compounds The analytical results for OCPs and PAHs have been summarised and compared with the NES Soil Contamination Standards (NES SCS) and are presented in Table 5. Full laboratory transcripts are presented in Appendix G. All soil samples (with the exception of one (SS6) returned concentrations of ΣDDT, Dieldrin and PAHs below the laboratory’s instrumentation detection limit at screen level. Soil sample SS6 revealed a concentration of ΣDDT of 0.68 mg/kg that is well below the NES SCS criteria of 70 mg/kg for the proposed land use.
17 January 2019
25
Detailed Site Investigation Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village - 38 & 16 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180119
Table 5: OCP and TPH (mg/kg) OCPs
PAH
Sample Reference ∑DDT
Dieldrin
BaP TEQ (LOR)
SS1
<0.02
<0.05
-
SS2
<0.02
<0.05
0.03
SS3
<0.02
<0.05
-
SS4
<0.02
<0.05
-
SS5
<0.02
<0.05
-
SS6
0.68
<0.05
-
SS7
<0.02
<0.05
-
COMP 1
<0.02
<0.05
-
COMP 2
<0.02
<0.05
-
COMP 3
<0.02
<0.05
-
COMP 4
<0.02
<0.05
-
COMP 5
<0.02
<0.05
-
COMP 6
<0.02
<0.05
-
COMP 7
<0.02
<0.05
-
COMP 8
<0.02
<0.05
-
COMP 9
<0.02
<0.05
-
COMP 10
<0.02
<0.05
-
COMP 11
<0.02
<0.05
-
COMP 12
<0.02
<0.05
-
NES SCS for standard residential land use (10% produce)
70
2.6
10
Notes: i.
Red text colour indicates exceedances of NES SCS
ii.
NES SCS for commercial / industrial (unpaved) scenario
iii.
A ‘-‘ will indicate that the sample was not analysed for the particular contaminant
17 January 2019
26
Detailed Site Investigation Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village - 38 & 16 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180119
10
Quality Control
The MfE’s CLMG No.5 Site Investigation and Analysis of Soils, requires that one duplicate soil sample to be collected and analysed for every ten soil samples and submitted to the laboratory as two separate samples (blind field duplicate), Soil sample SS12 was therefore submitted as a split duplicate of soil sample SS2 for analysis of heavy metals. A comparison of the analytical results from the two split duplicate samples SS2 and SS12 is provided below in Table 5 below. Table 6: Duplicate Sample Analytical Results Arsenic (As)
Cadmium (Cd)
Chromium (Cr)
Copper (Cu)
Lead (Pb)
Nickel (Ni)
Zinc (Zn)
SS2
8.59
0.25
18.5
33.8
20.3
11.1
189
Duplicate (SS12)
9.17
0.26
19.8
33.0
16.8
11.4
182
% Variation2
6.5%
3.9%
6.8%
2.4%
18.9%
2.7%
3.8%
Ref
Notes: 1. 2.
All metal concentrations measured in mg/kg. % Variation calculated in accordance with CLMG 5(Reference 2) using equation: ((Result 1 – Result 2)/Mean Result) x 100
A relative percentage difference (RPD) of between 30% - 50% is considered a suitable repeatability standard. It is noted that all pairs revealed a RPD that below the acceptable limit indicating that the data set is consistent and the soil samples are representative of the site conditions.
11
Conclusion
Development Nous Ltd (DNL), in collaboration with Geosciences Ltd (GSL), was engaged by Durham Property Investments Ltd to conduct a Detailed Site Investigation (DSI) at No’s16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier (the site) to investigate the suitability of the soil at the site with respect to the proposed redevelopment at the site. The subject site has a long history with pastoral farming, market gardening and orcharding. Under the National Environmental Standard for Assessing and Managing Contaminants in Soil to Protect Human Health Regulations 2011 (NES), orchards and market gardens are considered a potentially hazardous land use due to the historical application of persistent pesticides. Based on the conceptual model for potential contamination and site observations, twelve composite surface soil samples were collected from across the areas of the site that were identified as being part of an orchard and/or market gardens. An additional eight discrete soil samples (including one field duplicate) were collected from the areas of structures on site where spot contamination could have occurred as a result of spillage or leakage of spraying chemicals.
17 January 2019
27
Detailed Site Investigation Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village - 38 & 16 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180119
Soil samples were analysed for heavy metals (including arsenic, lead and copper), organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) where some material was burnt onsite. All soil samples returned concentrations of contaminants of concern below NES soil contaminant standards for the proposed standard residential land use with 10% home grown produce. However, there was some exceedance of the estimated background concentrations of heavy metals in Hawkeâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Bay indicating the former horticultural land use has had a minor impact on surfaces soil at the site. It is therefore concluded that although soil on the site has been mildly impacted by the former and current site activities, it poses no risk to human health under the current land use or the proposed land use as a retirement village.
12
Additional Requirements
The historical investigation and site inspection have revealed that almost all buildings and structures on site were constructed before 1 January 2000. As these buildings will be demolished as part of the proposed development the Health and Safety at Work (Asbestos) Regulation 2016 will apply to the demolition of these buildings. It would therefore be a requirement under these regulations that the buildings to be demolished are subject to an asbestos demolition survey and that any asbestos materials identified during the survey are removed from site by a WorkSafe NZ approved asbestos removal service before any demolition or earthworks can commence on site.
13
Activity Status of Future Development
It is proposed to develop a current orchard to a residential retirement village and based on the findings of the DSI described above it is concluded that it is highly unlikely that the development will be a risk to human health. As the soil sampling results did not exceed the applicable standard, but exceeded background concentrations, the activity will most likely be regarded as a Controlled Activity under Regulation 9(1) of the NES.
17 January 2019
28
Detailed Site Investigation Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village - 38 & 16 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180119
Limitations This report has been prepared solely for the use of the Client to whom this report is addressed and the Napier City Council and must not be reproduced in whole or part or included in any other document without our express permission in writing. No responsibility or liability to any third party is accepted for any damages arising out of the use of this report by any third party. The site should only be used for one or more of the beneficial uses and land-uses identified in the DSI as suitable. The conditions and qualifications may apply to the suitability of the site for use, and it is the responsibility of the Client to be cognisant of and accept these in accepting the report. DNL and GNL is only responsible for the issuing of this report but accepts no liability for the costs incurred in the implementation of the report findings. The investigation provides a â&#x20AC;&#x153;snapshotâ&#x20AC;? of the site conditions at the time of the site investigation. Consequently, the report may not be valid at a later time if there has been any change to the contamination status of the site in that time. Verification of the status of the site may be required in cases where a significant time has elapsed, or site conditions have changed since the assessment and audit. The investigation is necessarily limited by constraints such as time, cost and available information; although normal professional practice at the time has been applied with all due care to prepare the report. There is a risk that contamination may occur at the site and not be identified by a competent investigation and assessment. The sampling plan was based on information from a desktop investigation, which used information obtained from third party database sources, anecdotal information and a visual inspection of the site. Therefore, there is a possibility of gaps in the data and not all areas of potential concern may have been identified. Likewise, the information obtained from the intrusive investigation is only representative of the site conditions at that time and should not be inferred to represent site conditions at some point in the past or future. This report is not and does not purport to be anything other than a contaminated land DSI. It is not a geotechnical report and bore logs reproduced are for interpretation of the likely distribution of contamination. They are not intended for geotechnical interpretations and may not be adequate for this purpose. This investigation has been undertaken under the guidance of a Suitably Qualified and Experienced Person. Johan Faurie is a principal scientist with an MSc in Geology. He has more than 20 yearsâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; experience in contaminated site investigations and has advised the former Auckland Regional Council, Waitakere City Council and Franklin District Council on contaminated site issues for more than five years. He has also provided expert advice as witness in both the Environment and District Courts and meets the criteria for 'a suitably qualified and experienced practitioner' as defined by the National Environmental Standard.
17 January 2019
29
Detailed Site Investigation Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village - 38 & 16 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180119
References 1. Ministry for the Environment (2011). Resource Management (National Environmental Standard for Assessing and Managing Contaminants in Soil to Protect Human Health) Regulations 2011 (NES). Ministry for the Environment, Wellington, New Zealand. 2. Ministry for the Environment (2003). Contaminated Land Management Guidelines No.1: Reporting on contaminated Sites in New Zealand. Ministry for the Environment, Wellington, New Zealand. 3. Ministry for the Environment (2003). Contaminated Land Management Guidelines No.5: Site Investigation and Analysis of Soils. Ministry for the Environment, Wellington, New Zealand. 4. Ministry for the Environment (1999). Guidelines for Assessing and Managing Petroleum Hydrocarbon Contaminated Sites in New Zealand (Revised 2011). Ministry for the Environment, Wellington, New Zealand. 5. Branz (2017) New Zeakabd Guidelines for Assessing and Managing Asbestos in Soil. Branz, New Zealand. 6. Health and Safety at Work (Abestos) Regulations 2016 (LI 2017/63) 7. Work Safe (2016) Management and Removal of Asbestos. New Zealand Government. 8. Hawkeâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Bay Regional Council (HBRC) (2018) Heretaunga Aquifer Groundwater Model Development Report (Report No. RM18-14, Publication No. 4997). Hawkeâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Bay, New Zealand
17 January 2019
30
Detailed Site Investigation Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village - 38 & 16 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180119
APPENDIX A
HISTORIC CERTIFICATES OF TITLE
17 January 2019
31
COMPUTER INTEREST REGISTER UNDER LAND TRANSFER ACT 1952 Historical Search Copy
Identifier Land Registration District Date Registered
Cancelled
352786 Hawkes Bay 11 June 1981 11:51 am
Prior References HBG2/864
Estate Area
Leasehold 9.2648 hectares more or less
Instrument Term
L 392973.1
21 years computed from 10.8.1980 and extended to 10.8.2022
Legal Description Lot 2 Deposited Plan 14417
Original Proprietors William Jesse Lawrence Bowell and Nancy Melba Bowell
Interests 681396.2 Mortgage to Heretaunga Permanent Building Society - 23.12.1998 at 3:13 pm 718545.2 Variation of Lease 392973.1 and extension of term to 10.8.2022 - 30.7.2001 at 2.11 pm
7358837.1 Transfer to Durham Property Investments Limited - 8.5.2007 at 9:00 am
7800014.1 Transfer and merger of lease to Durham Property Investments Limited - 30.4.2008 at 9:00 am 7800014.1 CT 420376 issued - 30.4.2008 at 9:00 am. CANCELLED
Transaction Id Client Reference
Historical Search Copy Dated 12/12/18 5:04 pm, Page 1 of 1 sjones014
RECORD OF TITLE UNDER LAND TRANSFER ACT 2017 FREEHOLD Historical Search Copy
Constituted as a Record of Title pursuant to Sections 7 and 12 of the Land Transfer Act 2017 - 12 November 2018 Identifier Land Registration District Date Issued
420376 Hawkes Bay 30 April 2008
Prior References HBG2/864
352786
Fee Simple
Estate Area
9.2648 hectares more or less Legal Description Lot 2 Deposited Plan 14417
Original Registered Owners Durham Property Investments Limited
Interests Subject to a right to drain water over part marked A on DP 14417 specified in Easement Certificate 322767.4 27.2.1976 at 9.48 am
Fencing Covenant in Transfer 7358837.2 - 8.5.2007 at 9:00 am
7358837.3 Mortgage to Nancy Melba Bowell and William Jesse Lawrence Bowell - 8.5.2007 at 9:00 am (affects part formerly CTHB2/864)
681396.2 Mortgage to Heretaunga Permanent Building Society - 23.12.1998 at 3:13 pm (affects part formerly Lease 392973.1) 8877714.1 Discharge of Mortgage 681396.2 - 14.10.2011 at 2:53 pm
8919862.1 Discharge of Mortgage 7358837.3 - 30.11.2011 at 4:57 pm
8919862.2 Mortgage to Killarney Capital Limited - 30.11.2011 at 4:57 pm
9142515.1 Mortgage to Southland Building Society - 3.8.2012 at 10:38 am 9186048.1 Discharge of Mortgage 8919862.2 - 23.10.2012 at 3:49 pm 9186048.2 Discharge of Mortgage 9142515.1 - 23.10.2012 at 3:49 pm
9186048.3 Mortgage to ASB Bank Limited - 23.10.2012 at 3:49 pm 10844751.1 Discharge of Mortgage 9186048.3 - 20.7.2017 at 1:52 pm
Transaction Id Client Reference
Historical Search Copy Dated 12/12/18 5:02 pm, Page 1 of 1 sjones014
Detailed Site Investigation Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village - 38 & 16 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180119
APPENDIX B
PROPOSED SCHEME PLAN
17 January 2019
32
Detailed Site Investigation Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village - 38 & 16 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180119
APPENDIX C
HISTORIC AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS
17 January 2019
33
2004 Scale: 1:3000 Original Sheet Size A4 Print Date: 11/10/2018 Digital map data sourced from Land Information New Zealand. CROWN COPYRIGHT RESERVED. The information displayed in the GIS has been taken from Napier City Council's databases and maps. It is made available in good faith but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. If the information is relied on in support of a resource consent it should be verified independently.
2009 Scale: 1:3000 Original Sheet Size A4 Print Date: 11/10/2018 Digital map data sourced from Land Information New Zealand. CROWN COPYRIGHT RESERVED. The information displayed in the GIS has been taken from Napier City Council's databases and maps. It is made available in good faith but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. If the information is relied on in support of a resource consent it should be verified independently.
Scale: 1:3000 Original Sheet Size A4
2014
Print Date: 11/10/2018 Digital map data sourced from Land Information New Zealand. CROWN COPYRIGHT RESERVED. The information displayed in the GIS has been taken from Napier City Council's databases and maps. It is made available in good faith but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. If the information is relied on in support of a resource consent it should be verified independently.
Scale: 1:3000 Original Sheet Size A4
2011
Print Date: 11/10/2018 Digital map data sourced from Land Information New Zealand. CROWN COPYRIGHT RESERVED. The information displayed in the GIS has been taken from Napier City Council's databases and maps. It is made available in good faith but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. If the information is relied on in support of a resource consent it should be verified independently.
Scale: 1:3000 Original Sheet Size A4
2018
Print Date: 11/10/2018 Digital map data sourced from Land Information New Zealand. CROWN COPYRIGHT RESERVED. The information displayed in the GIS has been taken from Napier City Council's databases and maps. It is made available in good faith but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. If the information is relied on in support of a resource consent it should be verified independently.
1999 Scale: 1:3000 Original Sheet Size A4 Print Date: 11/10/2018 Digital map data sourced from Land Information New Zealand. CROWN COPYRIGHT RESERVED. The information displayed in the GIS has been taken from Napier City Council's databases and maps. It is made available in good faith but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. If the information is relied on in support of a resource consent it should be verified independently.
Detailed Site Investigation Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village - 38 & 16 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180119
APPENDIX D
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
17 January 2019
34
Detailed Site Investigation Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village - 38 & 16 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180119
Plate 1: The site is currently planted in cucurbits (squash) a market garden activity
Plate 2: The group of buildings at the centre of the site
17 January 2019
35
Detailed Site Investigation Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village - 38 & 16 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180119
Plate 3: The site at 38 Willowbank Avenue, the shelterbelt of trees defining the south western boundary.
Plate 4: The property at 16 Willowbank Avenue
17 January 2019
36
Detailed Site Investigation Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village - 38 & 16 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180119
Plate 5: The pump shed and the larger wooden storage shed at the south of the group of buildings
Plate 6: The rear of the wooden pump shed â&#x20AC;&#x201C; warning signs erected to the pump shed. In the foreground, miscellaneous storage, including a mixing unit identified.
17 January 2019
37
Detailed Site Investigation Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village - 38 & 16 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180119
Plate 7: Additional material stored to the west of the pump shed (aluminium sheeting visible)
Plate 8: The pump shed â&#x20AC;&#x201C; potentially ACM roof.
17 January 2019
38
Detailed Site Investigation Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village - 38 & 16 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180119
Plate 9: The contents of the pump shed
Plate 10: Concrete sheeting next to the door of the pump shed (suspected ACM)
17 January 2019
39
Detailed Site Investigation Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village - 38 & 16 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180119
Plate 11: A burn pile to the west of the pump shed
Plate 12: The larger wooden storage shed
17 January 2019
40
Detailed Site Investigation Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village - 38 & 16 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180119
Plate 13: The disused animal pens and run to the south of the wooden stroage shed
Plate 14: The contents of the wooden storage shed.
17 January 2019
41
Detailed Site Investigation Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village - 38 & 16 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180119
Plate 15: The rear of the aluinium storage shed â&#x20AC;&#x201C; the pedestrian entrance to the west visible.
Plate 16: The front (eastern side) if the aluminium shed â&#x20AC;&#x201C; roller garage door visible
17 January 2019
42
Detailed Site Investigation Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village - 38 & 16 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180119
Plate 17: Spray schedule visible on inside of aluminium shed
Plate 18: Prune wound dressing bottles found outside the aluminium pole shed
17 January 2019
43
Detailed Site Investigation Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village - 38 & 16 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180119
Plate 19: The car port being used to store residential equiptment (food, lawn mower etc).
Plate 20: Campervan apparently being used as a permenant place of residence
17 January 2019
44
Detailed Site Investigation Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village - 38 & 16 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180119
Plate 21: Small residential dwelling with storage container.
Plate 22: The defunct sheep pens and run at the northern section of 16 Willowbank Ave
17 January 2019
45
Detailed Site Investigation Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village - 38 & 16 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180119
Plate 23: The defunct sheep pens and run at the northern section of 16 Willowbank Ave
17 January 2019
46
Detailed Site Investigation Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village - 38 & 16 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180119
APPENDIX E
SOIL SAMPLING PLAN
17 January 2019
47
COMP 11 COMP 12 SS7 COMP 10
COMP 9
SS6
COMP 1
SS2 SS4 COMP 4
COMP 8
SS5 SS1 SS3
COMP 2 COMP 5
COMP 6 COMP 3 COMP 7
Scale: 1:3000 Original Sheet Size A4 Print Date: 11/10/2018 Digital map data sourced from Land Information New Zealand. CROWN COPYRIGHT RESERVED. The information displayed in the GIS has been taken from Napier City Council's databases and maps. It is made available in good faith but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. If the information is relied on in support of a resource consent it should be verified independently.
Detailed Site Investigation Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village - 38 & 16 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180119
APPENDIX F
CHAIN OF CUSTODY FORM
17 January 2019
48
Detailed Site Investigation Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village - 38 & 16 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180119
APPENDIX G LABORATORY RESULTS
17 January 2019
49
Development Nous Ltd P.O Box 385 Hastings 4156 Attention: Sophia Edmead Phone: 027 3000262 Email: sophia.edmead@developmentnous.nz Sampling Site:
Lab Reference: Submitted by: Date Received: Date Completed: Order Number: Reference:
18-36759 Sophia Edmead and Gemma Guilford 28/11/2018 30/11/2018 H20180069
Te Awa
Report Comments Samples were collected by yourselves (or your agent) and analysed as received at Analytica Laboratories. Samples were in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted on this report.
Heavy Metals in Soil SS1 0-75mm
SS2 0-75mm
SS3 0-75mm
SS4 0-75mm
SS5 0-75mm
27/11/2018
27/11/2018
27/11/2018
27/11/2018
27/11/2018
Reporting Limit
18-36759-1
18-36759-2
18-36759-3
18-36759-4
18-36759-5
Client Sample ID Date Sampled Analyte
Unit
Arsenic
mg/kg dry wt
0.125
18.8
8.59
14.7
14.9
6.62
Cadmium
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
0.28
0.25
0.20
0.19
0.80
Chromium
mg/kg dry wt
0.125
21.0
18.5
24.0
19.8
18.9
Copper
mg/kg dry wt
0.075
128
33.8
20.3
19.8
37.4
Lead
mg/kg dry wt
0.05
56.5
20.3
22.0
20.3
40.0
Mercury
mg/kg dry wt
0.025
0.069
0.21
0.063
0.044
0.083
Nickel
mg/kg dry wt
0.05
12.4
11.1
12.1
6.82
18.7
Zinc
mg/kg dry wt
0.05
528
189
155
133
831
SS6 0-75mm
SS7 0-75mm
SS12 0-75mm
Comp 1 0-75mm
Comp 2 0-75mm
27/11/2018
27/11/2018
27/11/2018
27/11/2018
27/11/2018
Reporting Limit
18-36759-6
18-36759-7
18-36759-8
18-36759-9
18-36759-10
Heavy Metals in Soil Client Sample ID Date Sampled Analyte
Unit
Arsenic
mg/kg dry wt
0.125
13.2
3.34
9.17
4.38
5.63
Cadmium
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
0.91
0.094
0.26
0.11
0.17
Chromium
mg/kg dry wt
0.125
16.4
11.3
19.8
14.8
16.2
Copper
mg/kg dry wt
0.075
26.3
7.68
33.0
12.7
10.6
Lead
mg/kg dry wt
0.05
28.6
12.9
16.8
10.7
13.2
Mercury
mg/kg dry wt
0.025
0.088
0.051
0.22
0.048
0.064
Nickel
mg/kg dry wt
0.05
8.46
7.51
11.4
10.2
11.7
Zinc
mg/kg dry wt
0.05
639
68.9
182
52.5
57.6
Report ID 18-36759-[R00] Page 1 of 6 Report Date 30/11/2018 This test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written permission of Analytica Laboratories
Heavy Metals in Soil Comp 3 0-75mm
Comp 4 0-75mm
Comp 5 0-75mm
Comp 6 0-75mm
Comp 7 0-75mm
27/11/2018
27/11/2018
27/11/2018
27/11/2018
27/11/2018
Reporting Limit
18-36759-11
18-36759-12
18-36759-13
18-36759-14
18-36759-15
Client Sample ID Date Sampled Analyte
Unit
Arsenic
mg/kg dry wt
0.125
10.8
4.36
6.58
6.71
5.56
Cadmium
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
0.20
0.11
0.11
0.13
0.11
Chromium
mg/kg dry wt
0.125
17.7
14.5
18.5
18.6
16.9
Copper
mg/kg dry wt
0.075
15.5
13.2
12.2
12.1
10.3
Lead
mg/kg dry wt
0.05
13.0
10.7
16.8
16.6
13.6
Mercury
mg/kg dry wt
0.025
0.059
0.049
0.080
0.075
0.069
Nickel
mg/kg dry wt
0.05
11.7
10.4
13.5
13.5
12.0
Zinc
mg/kg dry wt
0.05
71.0
50.3
64.2
62.7
54.2
Comp 8 0-75mm
Comp 9 0-75mm
Comp 10 0-75mm
Comp 11 0-75mm
Comp 12 0-75mm
27/11/2018
27/11/2018
27/11/2018
27/11/2018
27/11/2018
18-36759-16
18-36759-17
18-36759-18
18-36759-19
18-36759-20
Heavy Metals in Soil Client Sample ID Date Sampled Reporting Limit
Analyte
Unit
Arsenic
mg/kg dry wt
0.125
4.47
3.39
4.24
4.93
4.91
Cadmium
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
0.091
0.071
0.096
0.12
0.10
Chromium
mg/kg dry wt
0.125
14.5
12.8
15.2
15.0
14.6
Copper
mg/kg dry wt
0.075
8.05
5.29
7.25
10.9
8.56
Lead
mg/kg dry wt
0.05
10.8
8.87
12.8
22.0
12.3
Mercury
mg/kg dry wt
0.025
0.049
0.045
0.049
0.064
0.059
Nickel
mg/kg dry wt
0.05
10.8
8.84
11.0
10.5
11.4
Zinc
mg/kg dry wt
0.05
47.8
39.9
47.3
77.2
52.5
SS1 0-75mm
SS2 0-75mm
SS3 0-75mm
SS4 0-75mm
SS5 0-75mm
27/11/2018
27/11/2018
27/11/2018
27/11/2018
27/11/2018
Reporting Limit
18-36759-1
18-36759-2
18-36759-3
18-36759-4
18-36759-5
Organochlorine Pesticides - Soil Client Sample ID Date Sampled Analyte
Unit
2,4'-DDD
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
2,4'-DDE
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
2,4'-DDT
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
4,4'-DDD
mg/kg dry wt
0.003
<0.003
<0.003
<0.003
<0.003
<0.003
4,4'-DDE
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
0.007
<0.005
0.011
<0.005
<0.005
4,4'-DDT
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
Total DDT
mg/kg dry wt
0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
alpha-BHC
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
Aldrin
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
beta-BHC
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
cis-Chlordane
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
cis-Nonachlor
mg/kg dry wt
0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
delta-BHC
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
Dieldrin
mg/kg dry wt
0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
Endosulfan I
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
Endosulfan II
mg/kg dry wt
0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
Endosulfan sulphate
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
Endrin
mg/kg dry wt
0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
Endrin aldehyde
mg/kg dry wt
0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
Endrin ketone
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
gamma-BHC
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
Report ID 18-36759-[R00] Page 2 of 6 Report Date 30/11/2018 This test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written permission of Analytica Laboratories
Organochlorine Pesticides - Soil Client Sample ID Date Sampled
SS1 0-75mm
SS2 0-75mm
SS3 0-75mm
SS4 0-75mm
SS5 0-75mm
27/11/2018
27/11/2018
27/11/2018
27/11/2018
27/11/2018
Heptachlor
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
Heptachlor epoxide
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
Hexachlorobenzene
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
Methoxychlor
mg/kg dry wt
0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
trans-nonachlor
mg/kg dry wt
0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
trans-Chlordane
mg/kg dry wt
0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
Chlordane (sum)
mg/kg dry wt
0.02
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
1
114.5
111.8
105.5
106.7
85.4
SS6 0-75mm
SS7 0-75mm
SS12 0-75mm
Comp 1 0-75mm
Comp 2 0-75mm
27/11/2018
27/11/2018
27/11/2018
27/11/2018
27/11/2018
18-36759-6
18-36759-7
18-36759-8
18-36759-9
18-36759-10
TCMX (Surrogate)
%
Organochlorine Pesticides - Soil Client Sample ID Date Sampled Analyte
Unit
Reporting Limit
2,4'-DDD
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
0.008
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
2,4'-DDE
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
2,4'-DDT
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
0.157
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
4,4'-DDD
mg/kg dry wt
0.003
0.026
<0.003
<0.003
<0.003
<0.003
4,4'-DDE
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
0.176
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
0.006
4,4'-DDT
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
0.309
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
Total DDT
mg/kg dry wt
0.02
0.68
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
alpha-BHC
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
Aldrin
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
beta-BHC
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
cis-Chlordane
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
cis-Nonachlor
mg/kg dry wt
0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
delta-BHC
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
Dieldrin
mg/kg dry wt
0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
Endosulfan I
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
Endosulfan II
mg/kg dry wt
0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
Endosulfan sulphate
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
Endrin
mg/kg dry wt
0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
Endrin aldehyde
mg/kg dry wt
0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
Endrin ketone
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
gamma-BHC
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
Heptachlor
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
Heptachlor epoxide
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
Hexachlorobenzene
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
Methoxychlor
mg/kg dry wt
0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
trans-nonachlor
mg/kg dry wt
0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
trans-Chlordane
mg/kg dry wt
0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
Chlordane (sum)
mg/kg dry wt
0.02
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
1
99.8
102.0
105.9
108.8
108.5
Comp 3 0-75mm
Comp 4 0-75mm
Comp 5 0-75mm
Comp 6 0-75mm
Comp 7 0-75mm
27/11/2018
27/11/2018
27/11/2018
27/11/2018
27/11/2018
Reporting Limit
18-36759-11
18-36759-12
18-36759-13
18-36759-14
18-36759-15
TCMX (Surrogate)
%
Organochlorine Pesticides - Soil Client Sample ID Date Sampled Analyte
Unit
2,4'-DDD
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
2,4'-DDE
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
Report ID 18-36759-[R00] Page 3 of 6 Report Date 30/11/2018 This test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written permission of Analytica Laboratories
Organochlorine Pesticides - Soil Client Sample ID Date Sampled
Comp 3 0-75mm
Comp 4 0-75mm
Comp 5 0-75mm
Comp 6 0-75mm
Comp 7 0-75mm
27/11/2018
27/11/2018
27/11/2018
27/11/2018
27/11/2018
2,4'-DDT
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
4,4'-DDD
mg/kg dry wt
0.003
<0.003
<0.003
<0.003
<0.003
<0.003
4,4'-DDE
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
0.007
0.005
4,4'-DDT
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
Total DDT
mg/kg dry wt
0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
alpha-BHC
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
Aldrin
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
beta-BHC
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
cis-Chlordane
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
cis-Nonachlor
mg/kg dry wt
0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
delta-BHC
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
Dieldrin
mg/kg dry wt
0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
Endosulfan I
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
Endosulfan II
mg/kg dry wt
0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
Endosulfan sulphate
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
Endrin
mg/kg dry wt
0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
Endrin aldehyde
mg/kg dry wt
0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
Endrin ketone
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
gamma-BHC
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
Heptachlor
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
Heptachlor epoxide
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
Hexachlorobenzene
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
Methoxychlor
mg/kg dry wt
0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
trans-nonachlor
mg/kg dry wt
0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
trans-Chlordane
mg/kg dry wt
0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
Chlordane (sum)
mg/kg dry wt
0.02
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
1
106.4
103.2
105.8
104.8
104.1
Comp 8 0-75mm
Comp 9 0-75mm
Comp 10 0-75mm
Comp 11 0-75mm
Comp 12 0-75mm
27/11/2018
27/11/2018
27/11/2018
27/11/2018
27/11/2018
Reporting Limit
18-36759-16
18-36759-17
18-36759-18
18-36759-19
18-36759-20
TCMX (Surrogate)
%
Organochlorine Pesticides - Soil Client Sample ID Date Sampled Analyte
Unit
2,4'-DDD
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
2,4'-DDE
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
2,4'-DDT
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
4,4'-DDD
mg/kg dry wt
0.003
<0.003
<0.003
<0.003
<0.003
<0.003
4,4'-DDE
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
0.006
0.006
<0.005
4,4'-DDT
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
Total DDT
mg/kg dry wt
0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
alpha-BHC
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
Aldrin
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
beta-BHC
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
cis-Chlordane
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
cis-Nonachlor
mg/kg dry wt
0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
delta-BHC
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
Dieldrin
mg/kg dry wt
0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
Endosulfan I
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
Endosulfan II
mg/kg dry wt
0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
Endosulfan sulphate
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
Endrin
mg/kg dry wt
0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
Endrin aldehyde
mg/kg dry wt
0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
Endrin ketone
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
Report ID 18-36759-[R00] Page 4 of 6 Report Date 30/11/2018 This test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written permission of Analytica Laboratories
Organochlorine Pesticides - Soil Client Sample ID Date Sampled
Comp 8 0-75mm
Comp 9 0-75mm
Comp 10 0-75mm
Comp 11 0-75mm
Comp 12 0-75mm
27/11/2018
27/11/2018
27/11/2018
27/11/2018
27/11/2018
gamma-BHC
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
Heptachlor
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
Heptachlor epoxide
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
Hexachlorobenzene
mg/kg dry wt
0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
Methoxychlor
mg/kg dry wt
0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
trans-nonachlor
mg/kg dry wt
0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
trans-Chlordane
mg/kg dry wt
0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
Chlordane (sum)
mg/kg dry wt
0.02
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
1
103.4
102.9
102.0
102.9
101.5
TCMX (Surrogate)
%
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons - Soil Client Sample ID Date Sampled Analyte
Unit
SS2 0-75mm 27/11/2018
Reporting Limit
18-36759-2
1-Methylnaphthalene
mg/kg dry wt
0.01
<0.01
2-Methylnaphthalene
mg/kg dry wt
0.01
<0.01
Acenaphthene
mg/kg dry wt
0.01
<0.01
Acenaphthylene
mg/kg dry wt
0.01
<0.01
Anthracene
mg/kg dry wt
0.01
<0.01
Benz[a]anthracene
mg/kg dry wt
0.02
<0.02
Benzo[a]pyrene
mg/kg dry wt
0.01
<0.01
Benzo[b]&[j] fluoranthene
mg/kg dry wt
0.02
<0.02
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
mg/kg dry wt
0.02
<0.02
Benzo[k]fluoranthene
mg/kg dry wt
0.01
<0.01
Chrysene
mg/kg dry wt
0.01
<0.01
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
mg/kg dry wt
0.01
<0.01
Fluoranthene
mg/kg dry wt
0.02
<0.02
Fluorene
mg/kg dry wt
0.01
<0.01
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
mg/kg dry wt
0.01
<0.01
Naphthalene
mg/kg dry wt
0.01
<0.01
Phenanthrene
mg/kg dry wt
0.01
<0.01
Pyrene
mg/kg dry wt
0.02
<0.02
Benzo[a]pyrene TEQ (LOR)
mg/kg dry wt
0.01
0.03
Benzo[a]pyrene TEQ (Zero)
mg/kg dry wt
0.01
<0.01
1
96.7
Anthracene-d10 (Surrogate)
%
Moisture Content Client Sample ID Date Sampled Analyte Moisture Content
Unit %
SS2 0-75mm 27/11/2018
Reporting Limit
18-36759-2
1
21
Method Summary Elements in Soil
Acid digestion followed by ICP-MS analysis. (US EPA method 200.8).
Report ID 18-36759-[R00] Page 5 of 6 Report Date 30/11/2018 This test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written permission of Analytica Laboratories
Method Summary OCP in Soil
Samples are extracted with hexane, pre-concetrated then analysed by GC-MSMS.(In-house procedure). (Chlordane (sum) is calculated from the main actives in technical Chlordane: Chlordane, Nonachlor and Heptachlor)
Total DDT
Sum of DDT, DDD and DDE (4,4' and 2,4 isomers)
PAH in Soil
Solvent extraction, silica cleanup, followed by GC-MS analysis. Benzo[a]pyrene TEQ (LOR): The most conservative TEQ estimate, where a result is reported as less than the limit of reporting (LOR) the LOR value is used to calculate the TEQ for that PAH. Benzo[a]pyrene TEQ (Zero): The least conservative TEQ estimate, PAHs reported as less than the limit of reporting (LOR) are not included in the TEQ calculation. Benzo[a]pyrene toxic equivalence (TEQ) is calculated according to 'Methodology for Deriving Standards for Contaminants in Soil to Protect Human Health'. Ministry for the Environment. 2011.
Moisture
Moisture content is determined gravimetrically by drying at 103 °C.
Report ID 18-36759-[R00] Page 6 of 6 Report Date 30/11/2018 This test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written permission of Analytica Laboratories
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier Assessment of Environmental Effects
APPENDIX F Transport Assessment
Traffic Solutions Ltd
PROPOSED LIFESTYLE VILLAGE 16 AND 38 WILLOWBANK AVENUE, NAPIER
Traffic Impact Assessment
Date:
Issue A: 14 December 2018
Client:
Durham Property Limited c/- Development Nous Limited P O Box 385 Hastings 4156
File: 951ITA.docx
82 Hindmarsh Drive, Taupo 3330 T (07) 376-5031 • M: 021 315 882 • E: ian@tsol.co.nz
2
1.
INTRODUCTION
This report assesses the traffic effects of a proposed new lifestyle village to be located at 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue in Napier. The site is located between Willowbank Avenue and Eriksen Road as indicated on Figure 1: Figure 1: Site Location
SITE
The site has frontage to both roads. Although it has a Willowbank Avenue address, it will only be accessible by motor vehicle off Eriksen Road. Matters that this report addresses include: •
A description of the proposal;
•
A description of the surrounding transport network;
•
Assessment of the amount of traffic that the development will generate and its effect on the road network;
•
Site access;
•
On-site parking provisions;
•
The layout of the internal roading and parking within the site.
3
2.
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
The proposed development is shown on the scheme plan prepared by Development Nous Limited (Revision G dated 12/12/2018). The site shares common boundaries with Eriksen Road on its eastern side and Willowbank Avenue on its western side. It is presently undeveloped. The development will contain 188 lots. Each of the lots will contain one dwelling except Lot 24, which will be used as a parking area. Therefore the development will have capacity for 187 dwellings. The proposed dwellings within the development will be targeted as housing for residents aged 55 years and above. These residents will be independent, and mobile. The development will be served by two vehicle crossings and two pedestrian footpaths off Eriksen Road. An additional footpath connection will be provided to an adjacent reserve along the southern site boundary. The development will be gated. There will be no direct vehicle access to Willowbank Avenue. A network of internal roadways and footpaths will provide access to and between the various parts of the development. As part of the development, Eriksen Road will be kerbed and channelled along its western side adjacent to the site frontage, and a new public footpath will be provided. Each dwelling will have a double garage attached. In addition, 22 parking spaces will also be provided for residents to park any other vehicles such as boats or camper vans. There will also be room for parking on the driveway aprons in front of each garage for visitor or residentsâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; use. Parking for 770 vehicles will be provided in total.
3.
DISTRICT PLAN REQUIREMENTS
3.1
Zone
The site is located in the Main Residential zone in the operative Napier City District Plan.
3.2
Te Awa Structure Plan
The site is within the Te Awa Structure Plan area. Design outcomes listed in the Structure Plan that are relevant to transport are: Design Outcome 11: Off road pedestrian and cycle linkages (indicatively shown on the Te Awa Structure Plan Map) which link open spaces to each other, to the street network and the Serpentine stormwater pond shall be wide, open and safe and connect to one another. Design Outcome 12: Road upgrading shall proceed in conjunction with staging of development within the Te Awa Development area. The road upgrading is shown indicatively on the Te Awa Structure Plan Map. The following works are required:
4
Off Site Non Local
•
The following intersections will be upgraded: -
Riverbend / Latham Street intersection shall be upgraded to a single lane roundabout.
-
State Highway 2 / Kennedy Road intersection shall be upgraded to incorporate intersection control (improvements to signals).
Off Site Local
•
•
•
The following intersections shall be upgraded: -
State Highway 2 / Awatoto Road. - State Highway 2 / Te Awa Avenue / McGrath Street.
-
State Highway 2 / Marine Parade.
The following local collector streets shall be upgraded or constructed to Napier City Council standards and design and in general accordance with the Main Street and Local Street typical cross sections (see the Te Awa Structure Plan – Transportation report) to serve as the primary connections through the Te Awa Development area: -
Kenny Road, 10m carriageway with cycle lanes, footpaths, car park / landscaped berm areas, pedestrian footpaths and verge.
-
Eriksen Road, 10m carriageway with cycle lanes, footpaths, car park / landscape berm areas, pedestrian footpaths and verge. Eriksen Road will be designed and upgraded with single lane roundabouts at all major intersections (see below) with 120o deflection designed into the roundabout design to assist in reducing traffic speeds along this length of road.
-
Three (no. 3) additional cross link roads (linking Eriksen Road to Willowbank Avenue and Te Awa Avenue), 10m carriageway with cycle lanes, footpaths, car park / landscape berm areas, pedestrian footpaths and verge.
-
Three (no. 3) priority intersections shall be provided to Te Awa Avenue.
-
One (no. 1) priority intersection shall be provided to Willowbank Avenue.
Single lane roundabouts shall be provided at the following intersections: -
Eriksen Road / Kenny Road.
-
Along Eriksen Road at all junctions with cross link roads – three (no. 3) intersections.
-
Willowbank Avenue / Kenny Road.
-
Willowbank Avenue / Eriksen Road.
-
Street design shall provide for consistent landscaping treatment that contributes to urban amenity and landscape.
Design Outcome 13: No additional collector streets are necessary within the Te Awa Development area. Internal streets shall generally comply with Napier City Council standards and design for local streets, except where Council may wish to promote with a developer innovative and attractive solutions that enhance residential amenity, safety and sense of place. Therefore Council will look favourably on alternative subdivision concepts that achieve safe, pedestrian and cycle friendly streets and discourage through traffic.
The design outcomes relevant to this particular development are highlighted in bold.
5
3.3
Road Classifications
Roads in the immediate site vicinity are classified in the Council’s road hierarchy as follows: • • •
3.4
Willowbank Avenue Eriksen Road Hurunui Drive
collector local local
Parking Space Requirement
The District Plan parking requirement of the proposed development is assessed as follows: •
Dwelling units
187 units @ 2 spaces per unit
374 spaces
With 770 on-site spaces proposed, the development will exceed the requirement by a significant margin.
3.5
Cycle Parking Requirement
Rule 61.14B requires 1 cycle park per 5 carpark spaces. Cycles can be stored in the garages of each dwelling. The requirement is met.
3.6
Vehicle Access Requirements
The District Plan refers to the Napier City Code of Practice for vehicle crossing requirements. Drawing F2.7 in The Code of Practice requires vehicle crossings in residential zones to be no more than 6m wide at the site boundary. Two crossings will be provided. The northern crossing will be 6m wide in accordance with the Code. The southern crossing will have an overall 12.5m width, which does not comply with the Code, but will be specifically designed as a main gateway entry. This access assessed in more detail later in this report.
4.
TRANSPORT ENVIRONMENT
4.1
Existing Road Geometrics
North of Hurunui Drive, Eriksen Road is a rural unkerbed road with 6.4m width between seal edges. The road is two-laned. There are no paint markings or parking controls. There are also no footpaths or cycle facilities. South of Hurunui Drive the road is 8.4m wide between a kerb on the eastern side and the seal edge on the western side. The eastern side was recently kerbed and channelled, and a footpath provided, as part of a residential land development on the eastern side of the road. Eriksen Road has a straight and level alignment, with clear visibility along it. There is a slight curve in the horizontal alignment near the northern site boundary. There are two speed thresholds adjacent to the site. These consist of kerbed side islands and paint hatching, which effectively reduce the roadway width through the thresholds to one-lane flow at a time.
6
Hurunui Drive is a newly constructed residential road that intersects with Eriksen Road directly opposite the site and connects to Te Awa Avenue at its eastern end. The road is 9m wide between kerbs. It has a straight and level alignment. The intersection at Eriksen Road has a “Give Way” control. Willowbank Avenue is a high speed rural road. It is 10.5m wide between seal edges, including sealed shoulders. It has a straight and level alignment with clear visibility along it. The northern end of Eriksen Road intersects with Willowbank Avenue some distance north of the site. The intersection is presently barriered off, so Eriksen Road is effectively a cul-de-sac. Design Outcome 12 in the Te Awa Structure Plan indicates that Eriksen Road will be realigned at its northern end to intersect with Willowbank Avenue directly opposite Geddis Avenue, and a roundabout control installed at the intersection at some future time.
4.2
Proposed Eriksen Road Upgrade
The development plans show that a new kerb and channel will be installed along the western side of Eriksen Road adjacent to the site. The roadway width between the proposed kerb and the existing kerb where it is already installed on the eastern side will be 10m, as specified in Design Outcome 12 in the Structure Plan. A footpath will also be provided along the western side adjacent to the site as indicated, for general public use.
4.3
Passenger Transport Services
There are no bus services on Eriksen Road or Willowbank Avenue. The nearest available service routes are: •
Route 11 – Napier to Havelock North via Te Awa Avenue. Frequency of service 2 buses each way in the weekday morning commuter peak and 2 buses each way in the evening commuter peak only.
•
Route 14 – Napier, Maraenui and Onekawa loop via Geddis Avenue. Frequency of service half hourly in commuter peaks, hourly at other times, 4 buses on a Saturday and no services Sunday.
Bus stops are located on Te Awa Avenue about 600m walk from the site, and on Geddis Avenue just west of its intersection with Willowbank Avenue, about 450m walk from the site. Available bus services in the site vicinity are sparse.
4.4
Traffic Volumes
Traffic count data shows that Eriksen Road south of Kenny Road carries 400 vehicles per day. Existing traffic flows north of Kenny Road, close to the site, are lower, probably no more than 200 vehicles per day, although this will increase with development in the surrounding area. Willowbank Avenue presently carries about 4,000 vehicles per day. There is a considerable amount of unused capacity on both roads.
7
4.5
Traffic Safety
During the 5-year period 2013 to 2017 the New Zealand Transport Agency recorded two accidents on Eriksen Road north of Kenny Road. Both of these accidents involved lost control vehicles, one causing serious injuries, the other caused no injuries. Speed, alcohol and unfamiliarity with the vehicle were contributing factors. During the same period six accidents were recorded on Willowbank Avenue between Eriksen Road and Kenny Road. These included two losses of control, two right turn collisions, one left turn collision and one involving a vehicle manoeuvring on the roadway. The two right turn collisions occurred at the intersection at Geddis Avenue. A future roundabout control at this intersection referred to in the Te Awa Structure Plan, if constructed, would address this existing traffic safety issue. No existing traffic safety issues of relevance to the proposed development are evident in the accident statistics.
5.
TRAFFIC GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION
5.1
Trip Generation
The following sources have been used to assess the traffic generation of the proposed development: •
New Zealand Trips and Database Bureau (NZTPDB);
•
RTA Guide to Traffic Generating Developments (Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales) - October 2002;
•
ITE Trip Generation 7th Edition (Institute of Transportation Engineers, USA);
•
Surveys of traffic flows and at other residential subdivisions and retirement villages, carried out by Traffic Solutions Limited.
The sources above indicate that retirement villages typically generate traffic flows up to 3 vehicle trips per day per dwelling, and peak hourly flows of approximately 0.3 vehicle trips per hour (tph) per dwelling. Surveys also show that normal residential subdivisions generate about 9 vehicle trips per day per dwelling, and peak hourly flows of about 0.9 tph per dwelling. While this particular development will be targeted to seniors, it will not be a retirement village. Therefore I expect the development will generate traffic at a ratio somewhere between that of a normal residential subdivision and a retirement village. It is anticipated that about 30% of residents will still be of working age, and on that basis I consider that the development will generate traffic flows at ratios of about 5 vehicle trips per day per dwelling, and 0.5 tph per dwelling in a peak hour. These ratios equate to actual flows of about 900 vehicle trips per day and a peak hourly flow of about 90 tph.
5.2
Trip Distribution
While Eriksen Road remains disconnected from Willowbank Avenue at its northern end, traffic flows the development will generate towards the north will need to hook around via Eriksen Road south and Kenny Road, or use Hurunui Drive and Te Awa Avenue. Figure
8
2 shows how I consider generated traffic will be distributed on the network immediately adjoining the site, under this scenario. Figure 2: Distribution of Generated Traffic â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Eriksen Road Disconnected
Figure 3 shows how I predict generated traffic will be distributed on the network immediately adjoining the site, if Eriksen Road is reconnected to Willowbank Avenue at its northern end in accordance with the Structure Plan.
9
Figure 3: Distribution of Generated Traffic â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Eriksen Road Reconnected
In Figures 2 and 3 I have assumed that 50% of traffic is entering traffic and 50% is exiting traffic. This will not necessarily be the case, however the flows do provide an indication of the magnitude of additional traffic that will likely use each approach road. Regardless of whether Eriksen Road is eventually reconnected to Willowbank Avenue or not, Figures 2 and 3 show that the traffic that will be generated on any one part of the transport network will be low, and well within available capacity.
6.
SITE ACCESS
6.1
Vehicle Access
The site will be accessed via two new vehicle crossings. The southern crossing will be the grand entry and some effort will be made to make it attractive. The northern access may also likely be well used by future residents, particularly if Eriksen Road is reconnected to Willowbank Avenue at its northern end, albeit it will be less conspicuous. The northern access will be 6m wide at the site frontage boundary. Such width will cater for simultaneous two-way vehicle flow, and service and emergency vehicles adequately. The southern access will have an overall 12.5m width. This will consist of separate entry and exit carriageways each 4m wide with a kerbed median separating them. The overall width exceeds the 6m maximum permitted in the Councilâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Code of Practice, however, the entry and exit carriageways considered separately will be within the requirement. Such a
10
width is suitable for cars to enter and exit the site simultaneously and is wide enough to accommodate larger vehicles such as emergency vehicles and service vehicles. The separation between the entry and exit lanes will provide a median shelter for any passing pedestrians, thus mitigating any adverse effects of the overall wider crossing. The northern access will not be located near any road intersections. The southern access will be located 35m north of the intersection at Hurunui Drive. Such a separation is considered to be sufficient to avoid conflicts occurring between vehicles turning at the access and vehicles turning at the intersection. I consider there will be no adverse traffic effects arising from the location of either access. Both accesses will be gated for security. The gate across the northern access will be located 6m inside the site boundary, which will provide enough room for an entering car to wait entirely within the site for the gate to open without overhanging into the road reserve. The gate at the southern access will be 10m inside the boundary, which will enable one or two cars to wait within the site for it to open. I consider that the gate arrangement can be accommodated satisfactorily at the accesses. Available sight distances from both vehicle crossings are as follows: •
Northern access:
220m northwards, 300m+ southwards
•
Southern access:
300m northwards, 300m+ southwards
The NZTA publication RTS 6 “Guidelines for Visibility at Driveways” recommends at least 40m of sight distance at property accesses on local roads operating at 50 km/h. For a higher operating speed of 100 km/h, which will become less likely with increasing urbanisation of the neighbourhood, the recommendation is 160m. The available sight distances will exceed both recommendations, even at the higher operating speed. I consider that visibility is adequate to enable both accesses to operate safely.
6.2
Pedestrian Access
Pedestrian footpaths will be provided into the site adjacent to both vehicle accesses. These will connect to the new public footpath to be provided along Eriksen Road. The footpaths will provide direct and safe pedestrian links to and from the site. It is also proposed to install a walkway link to a reserve at the southern site boundary. The link will connect to a proposed new footpath within the reserve that will provide a pedestrian connection between Eriksen Road and Willowbank Avenue, and then northwards along Willowbank Avenue though a drainage reserve. In my opinion, the proposed footpath accesses will provide safe and convenient routes on and off the site for pedestrians.
7.
SITE LAYOUT
The individual lots will be accessed from the internal driveway network. The internal driveways will be 6.0m wide, which will easily accommodate two-way vehicle flow, and emergency and other larger vehicles that may access the site from time to time. Two cross-intersections are proposed within the site. Uncontrolled cross-intersections can be notorious for creating conflicts between vehicles manoeuvring through them, and often drivers are uncertain who has priority. To improve traffic management at the cross intersections within this development it is proposed to install roundabout controls. The central islands will be small and mountable so that larger vehicles can drive over them if
11
necessary. In my opinion, these roundabouts will provide effective traffic control, and I support their use. Each of the dwellings will have a double garage attached for residentsâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; use. Driveway aprons in front of each garage will also accommodate additional parked vehicles such as for visitors. Some limited parking could also be accommodated along the internal roads if desired, without unduly obstructing vehicle movement. Some parking will also be provided within the site for additional residentsâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; vehicles, such as boat trailers or camper vans. These spaces will be provided along the northern driveway entry and is a separate carpark area on Lot 24 immediately adjacent. Parking spaces will be oriented at 90-degrees to the driveway aisles. All of these spaces will be at least 7m long and 3.1m wide, and available manoeuvring widths will be at least 6.9m. The parking areas will be over-sized compared to the dimension requirements specified in Appendix 23 in the District Plan. Vehicle tracking shows that the carpark areas will accommodate vehicles of 6.4m length. Internal footpaths will be provided through the site, along one side of every internal driveway. Pedestrians will also be able to walk around the site easily and safely, separate from motor traffic.
8.
CONCLUSIONS
The amount of traffic that the proposed development will generate onto the road network will be low, too low to have a significant effect on the network capacity or traffic safety. That part of Eriksen Road immediately adjacent to the site will be widened and kerbed and channelled, and a footpath provided, along its western side to an urban standard. The work will be carried out in to satisfy the relevant design outcomes in the Te Awa Structure Plan. The proposed vehicle crossings will have adequate sight lines to enable them to operate safely. The accesses will both be remote enough from any road intersections that conflicts with turning vehicles will not occur. Separate footpath accesses will be provided into the site for pedestrians all around the site, which will enable pedestrians to access the site conveniently and safely. The proposal will exceed the District Plan parking requirement by a significant margin. I consider that there will be an adequate supply of on-site parking to accommodate expected demands. Adverse off-site parking effects are unlikely to occur. The proposed on-site parking will comply with the dimension requirements specified in the District Plan. I consider that the parking spaces shown on the plans will be accessible by the types of vehicles they are intended for. Taking into consideration all of the above, I consider that the traffic and parking effects of the proposed development will be less than minor, and that resource consent could be granted from a traffic engineering perspective.
Ian Constable Traffic Engineer
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier Assessment of Environmental Effects
APPENDIX G Land Development Servicing Report
LAND DEVELOPMENT REPORT
REV A
DURHAM PROPERTIES LTD
16-38 WILLOWBANK AVE NAPIER
Superseded 308 Queen Street E, Hastings 4122 | PO Box 758, Hastings | +64 6 876 7646 | admin@sgl.nz |www.stratagroup.net.nz
J4345
DURHAM PROPERTIES LTD Te Awa Development Document Prepared for and on behalf of Strata Group Consulting Engineers Ltd by:
Daniel Joblin Civil Engineer
Document Reviewed By Russell Nettlingham Civil Engineer/Principal
Strata Group Consulting Engineers Ltd P.O Box 758 Hastings 4156 New Zealand Telephone Email Website
+ 64 6 8767646 dan@sgl.nz www.stratagroup.net.nz
Document Control Project Name
Durham Property Ltd 138 Eriksen Road, Napier
Project Ref
J4345
Version Revision A
Date
Status Issued for Resource Consent
Version
Extent of Revision
Prepared DJ / RN
This report caters specifically for the requirements for this project and this client. No warranty is intended or implied for use by any third party and no responsibility is undertaken to any third party for any material contained herein.
Superseded
308 Queen Street E, Hastings 4122 | PO Box 758, Hastings | +64 6 876 7646 | admin@sgl.nz |www.stratagroup.net.nz
Table of Contents 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 4 2. Design Considerations ........................................................................................................................ 5 2.1
Topographical Information ...................................................................................................... 5
2.2
Staging .................................................................................................................................... 5
3. Preliminary Road Design .................................................................................................................... 7 3.1
Existing Roads ........................................................................................................................ 7
3.2
Proposed Roads ..................................................................................................................... 7
4. Earthworks .......................................................................................................................................... 8 5. Stormwater .......................................................................................................................................... 9 6. Wastewater ....................................................................................................................................... 10 7. Water Supply ..................................................................................................................................... 11 8. Utility Services ................................................................................................................................... 12 9. Summary ........................................................................................................................................... 13 Appendix A. Drawings ........................................................................................................................... 14
Superseded 308 Queen Street E, Hastings 4122 | PO Box 758, Hastings | +64 6 876 7646 | admin@sgl.nz |www.stratagroup.net.nz
1. Introduction Strata Group Consulting Engineers Ltd has been engaged by Durham Property Ltd (the Applicant) to investigate the civil engineering aspects of the proposed subdivision at 16-38 Willowbank Ave. This report forms an engineering assessment for the proposal and includes investigation into the following aspects: • • • • • •
Preliminary Roading design Earthworks Stormwater collection and disposal Wastewater disposal Water supply Utilities
The purpose of the investigations summarised in this report is to accompany an application to be made to the Napier City Council for a residential subdivision. The legal description for the site is Lot 1 DP14417 4.5526Ha and Lot 2 DP14417 9.2648Ha. The proposed subdivision consists of: • • • •
19 Residential allotments fronting Eriksen Road 167 Lifestyle Units 2,010m of private accessway A drainage reserve and service corridors
Figure 1: Location Map
Superseded 308 Queen Street E, Hastings 4122 | PO Box 758, Hastings | +64 6 876 7646 | admin@sgl.nz |www.stratagroup.net.nz
2. Design Considerations To complete the engineering assessment of the proposed subdivision it was first necessary to obtain the following: • • • 2.1
Sufficient topographical information regarding the site, including suitably detailed contour data and aerial imagery. Information regarding any protected areas, easements or areas of significance within the site which may have an impact on the layout Sufficient information with regards to existing services within & surrounding the site Topographical Information
A current aerial photograph was captured by drone and a detailed topo survey undertaken Surveying the Bay for the proposed development site and existing services. The subdivision scheme plan was prepared by Development Nous. 2.2
Staging
The development would be undertaken in stages commencing from Eriksen Road with the road frontage residential lots. The development would progress from there in groups of approximately 20 lots. The first stage involves connection to the underground services. Roading is available at the site boundary. The water supply connection can also be made to existing services in Ericksen Road. The stormwater would require NCC to install the proposed box culvert under Eriksen Road to the Cowshed Drain on the western side. A gravity sewer connection is available in Ericksen Road adjacent to the residential lots which provides services without having to install a pump station. Beyond the road frontage lots, the staging would commence from the main entrance to the lifestyle village and the extents that can be serviced by the first pump station. There are two sewer pump stations proposed within the development area. The first pump station could be connected to the existing 100mm diameter pumping at the front of the development, however we have proposed that the connection be made further to the south where the pump main increases in size from 100mm to 150mm. This connection is some 250m south of the development and would be undertaken at the developer’s expense as provided for in the structure plan. Refer to the proposed staging plan on the following page.
Superseded 308 Queen Street E, Hastings 4122 | PO Box 758, Hastings | +64 6 876 7646 | admin@sgl.nz |www.stratagroup.net.nz
Figure 2: Proposed Development Staging
Superseded 308 Queen Street E, Hastings 4122 | PO Box 758, Hastings | +64 6 876 7646 | admin@sgl.nz |www.stratagroup.net.nz
3. Preliminary Road Design 3.1
Existing Roads
The existing roads consist of Eriksen Road and Willowbank Road. There is no access onto Willowbank Road from the proposed development. Eriksen Road is partially formed to service the residential development on the Eastern side. A similar upgrade and widening on the western side is required to service the proposed development. 3.2
Proposed Roads
The 19 Lots fronting Eriksen Road would have access directly from the upgraded road. The remainder of the development would be serviced with two entry points onto Eriksen Road. Within the development the roading network is constructed in a 13.5m wide road reserve. The carriageway width is 6m with asphalt surfacing and kerb and channel both sides. A single 1.4m wide concrete foot path on one side provides safe pedestrian linkages to the open space areas and walkway network. The roading philosophy is one of connectivity for both pedestrians and vehicles. Cul-de-sac streets and rear sections have been avoided where possible. The narrow roads are designed to encourage a slow speed environment and pedestrians to have a number of route selections to gain access to the open space and wider walkway network. The road design and formations are generally in accordance with the Code of Practice and District Plan requirements for minor roads. Final pavement design will be based on design traffic volumes and subgrade CBR strengths as determined by the geotechnical engineer.
Photograph 1: Existing Eriksen Road formation (to be replicated)
Superseded 308 Queen Street E, Hastings 4122 | PO Box 758, Hastings | +64 6 876 7646 | admin@sgl.nz |www.stratagroup.net.nz
4. Earthworks The majority of the existing site contour is above the modeled flood level of RL 11.28m for the Te Awa area (Beca three waters report), however the lower lying areas would require imported structural fill of up to 0.6m to mitigate potential flood risks. It is expected river silt will be used as bulk fill which is common practice for the Te Awa and Parklands development areas. Land to the East of the proposed site has been lifted with imported material during previous construction. It is intended to match into these existing levels and shape lots to fall toward roads and accessways. The structure plan drainage swale along the Western and Southern boundaries will provide fill material for raising the land and will minimise the volume of imported material. It is proposed to batter back into adjacent land at the northern boundary. Land owner approval for the batter has been sought and an agreement reached. Topsoil will be stripped and stockpiled prior to bulk filling and placed back on lots before grassing. Approximately 40,000 m3 of topsoil will be stripped to stockpile. Excess topsoil would be removed from site on completion of the bulk earthworks. A site-specific earthworks and silt management plan will be submitted to Napier City Council for approval prior to earthworks commencing on site. Preliminary earthworks volumes are as follows: • • • •
Strip top soil to stockpile 40,000m³ Cut open drainage channel 33,000m³ Fill low lying land 26,000m³ Import river silt 7,000m³
Superseded 308 Queen Street E, Hastings 4122 | PO Box 758, Hastings | +64 6 876 7646 | admin@sgl.nz |www.stratagroup.net.nz
5. Stormwater The proposed stormwater system has been designed to convey the development catchment through a piped network to the proposed structure plan swale drain along Western and Southern boundaries. This connects into Te Awa structure plan attenuation pond via the upgraded Cowshed drain swale. The swale drains are located within the 40m wide designation area and would be constructed to the profile determined in the Beca report and the structure plan. This is a similar profile to the Cowshed Drain re-construction on the Western side of Eriksen Road. Refer Photograph 2 below.
Photograph 2: Cowshed Drain West of Eriksen Road
The piped network has four discharge points into the swale drain. Three of these are into the Willowbank Road drain and one into the Cowshed Drain. The Eriksen Road allotments are serviced with a 375mm diameter pipe that would discharge into the proposed box culvert under Eriksen Road. The pipes range in size from 300mm to 450mm diameter and the length of each run has been controlled by the outlet invert level to avoid a “bubble-up” system into the open drain network. Stormwater design parameters have been taken from NCC CoP 2015; I1.9. Coefficients have been set at 0.55 for all allotments except lots 12-19 of Stage 1 where owing to the potential for higher site coverage (up to 56%) a higher coefficient of 0.65 (‘Town house development’ from NZBC E1/VM1) has been adopted. Roads and reserves have been assigned coefficients of 0.85 and 0.30 respectively. The pipe network has been designed to allow for both a 10% and combined 10/2% AEP events. Rainfall data has been taken from HIRDS V3 with a 2.1 degree increase for expected 2090 climate change. Stormwater calculations will be submitted with detailed design at the Engineering approval phase.
Superseded 308 Queen Street E, Hastings 4122 | PO Box 758, Hastings | +64 6 876 7646 | admin@sgl.nz |www.stratagroup.net.nz
6. Wastewater Wastewater services can be provided to the site through the existing gravity and pumping mains in Ericksen Road. The gravity connection is on the eastern side of Eriksen Road and is at adequate depth to extend it along the full length of the road frontage allotments. The remainder of the development would be serviced with two pump stations located beside the swale drain for ease of access. These pump stations are positioned to keep the gravity pipe and chamber depths to a minimum for safety in design considerations. A 100mm sewer pumping main in Ericksen Road could be used to provide a connection for the first pump station, however when the second pump station comes on line, it is likely that the connection point would need to be extended to where it enlarges to a 150mm pumping main some 250m south of the development site. Appropriate easements in gross are proposed to cater for council assets laid in private land. The wastewater demand is as follows: Pump Station 1 • • • •
Allotments serviced: 97 Units Land area: 97 x 400m2 = 3.88 Ha Peak wet weather flow (PWWF): 3.88 x 0.3 Litres/sec/Ha = 1.16 Litres/sec Storage: 5.6m3
Pump Station 2 • • • •
Allotments serviced: 67 Units Land area: 67 x 400m2 = 2.68 Ha Peak wet weather flow (PWWF): 2.68 x 0.3 Litres/sec/Ha = 0.8 Litres/sec Storage: 3.8m3
Gravity to Existing Eriksen Road Network • • •
Allotments serviced: 19 Lots Land area: 19 x 700m2 = 1.33 Ha Peak wet weather flow (PWWF): 1.33 x 0.3 Litres/sec/Ha = 0.4 Litres/sec
The total PWWF for the development is 2.36 Litres/sec.
Superseded 308 Queen Street E, Hastings 4122 | PO Box 758, Hastings | +64 6 876 7646 | admin@sgl.nz |www.stratagroup.net.nz
7. Water Supply A water supply for the development can be fed from the 200mm diameter main in Ericksen Road. This main currently terminates at the Hurunui Drive intersection, but we understand that NCC are intending to extend the main along Ericksen Drive. The extended Council main would provide two connection points to the development as shown on the proposed water layout plan, Appendix A. Within the development, a principal DN150 main would run along one side of the road with a looped 63mm rider main running back along the opposite side. A series of appropriately sized feeder branches will be run up each accessway to serve the required Lots. The site also has a 100mm and a 75mm bore for irrigation and domestic water supply as per Figure 3 below. It is proposed that the bore will be professionally plugged and removed below ground level.
Figure 3: Existing Water Bores
The water demand for the development is as follows: • • • • • • •
Residential dwellings: 19 houses x 3.5 people per dwelling = 67 people Lifestyle village: 164 units x 1.25 people per unit = 205 people Total occupancy = 272 people Average daily demand per person: 250 Litres/person/day Average daily demand: 250 L/p/d x 272 people = 68 m3/day Peaking Factor 5 Peak daily demand: 3.93 Litres/sec
Superseded 308 Queen Street E, Hastings 4122 | PO Box 758, Hastings | +64 6 876 7646 | admin@sgl.nz |www.stratagroup.net.nz
8. Utility Services Power and telecommunications have been laid through to the proposed development site as part of the Eriksen Road and Hurunui Road residential development. It is intended to extend these services through the development. Provisional width for laying utilities will be allowed for within the proposed road corridor in accordance with NCC code. The existing overhead power lines in Eriksen Road would remain in place. Undergrounding would be undertaken in the future by Unison as part of their seismic upgrade programme. Power-Co have been approached to service the site for Gas. It is expected this service will run with others in the proposed trenches.
Superseded 308 Queen Street E, Hastings 4122 | PO Box 758, Hastings | +64 6 876 7646 | admin@sgl.nz |www.stratagroup.net.nz
9. Summary From our assessment of the site, engineering servicing for the proposed development can be achieved to an acceptable standard as follows: •
Earthworks will be required to bring the proposed land above the modeled 2% AEP flood level for the Te Awa development area of RL 11.28 (300mm freeboard is required above the flood level for building platforms – RL 11.58). Approximately 6,000m³ of imported structural fill is proposed.
•
All proposed roading for the development can be constructed in accordance with the NCC Engineering Code of Practice.
•
Conveyance of onsite stormwater up to 2% AEP event can be provided for via a piped network discharging into the Te Awa stormwater system which includes the proposed Willowbank Avenue and Cowshed Drain open channels
•
Potable water can be supplied via the DN200 Eriksen Road trunk main and proposed extension.
•
A gravity sewer network can service the Eriksen Road frontage lots
•
Two sewer pump stations within the lifestyle village would collect and pump to the common main in Eriksen Road.
•
Utility services can be provided to all sites.
All final designs and calculations for engineering approval will comply with NCC code of practice and district plan rules and regulations. Preliminary desktop and site investigations have not revealed any significant engineering issues for the proposed development.
Superseded 308 Queen Street E, Hastings 4122 | PO Box 758, Hastings | +64 6 876 7646 | admin@sgl.nz |www.stratagroup.net.nz
Appendix A. Drawings
Superseded 308 Queen Street E, Hastings 4122 | PO Box 758, Hastings | +64 6 876 7646 | admin@sgl.nz |www.stratagroup.net.nz
LOT 1 DP 6396 GENERAL NOTES:
· BOUNDARY INFORMATION/DATA SHOWN IN THIS DRAWING HAS BEEN SOURCED FROM QUICKMAP. STRATA GROUP CONSULTING ENGINEERS TAKE NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ACCURACY OF THIS INFORMATION/DATA.
LOT 2 DP 6396
· COORDINATE DATUM: NZGD 2000 HB CIRCUIT HEIGHT DATUM IS LOCAL AUTHORITY DATUM 1972 (MSL = 10.00m) ORIGIN OF HEIGHTS: BP 68 SO 9387.
· DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING. ANY ADDITIONAL DIMENSIONS SHOULD CONTACTS BELOW.
BE
REQUESTED
FROM
THE
· ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN METRES UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE.
LOT 1 DP 14417
· AERIAL IMAGE IS SOURCED FROM LINZ IS INDICATIVE ONLY.
BA N
KA
VE
LOT 3 DP 394762
ERIK S
EN R
OAD
WI LL
OW
LOT 1 DP 318389
LOT 2 DP 14417 HURUNUI DRIVE
LOT 9 DP 6055
Superseded
LOT 10 DP 6055 CLIENT:
SAFETY IN DESIGN ALL REASONABLY PRACTICABLE STEPS HAVE BEEN TAKEN TO ENSURE SAFETY IN DESIGN HAS BEEN CONSIDERED WITHIN STRATA GROUP'S SCOPE OF WORK FOR THIS DESIGN IN ACCORDANCE WITH IPENZ PRACTICE NOTE 07 "DESIGN FOR SAFETY IN BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES (JULY 2006)". IT REMAINS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER AND/OR OPERATOR TO ENSURE APPROPRIATE PRACTICES ARE IN PLACE TO PROTECT THE SAFETY OF THE WORKERS AND THE PUBLIC IN THE OPERATION OF THE FACILITY.
1
-
-
-
REV
REASON FOR ISSUE
DATE
BY
THE CONTRACTOR IS TO BE AWARE OF ALL INSPECTIONS TO BE MADE BY THE ENGINEER AS A REQUIREMENT OF THE PRODUCER STATEMENT PS4 CONSTRUCTION REVIEW DOCUMENTATION. THE ENGINEER WILL REQUIRE 24 HOURS PRIOR NOTIFICATION FOR ALL INSPECTIONS.
PATH:J:\DUR - DURHAM PROPERTIES\J4345 - TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)\2 - DWGS\XREF'S\PRELIM SCHEME.DWG DATE:7/2/2018
DURHAM PROPERTY LTD P 06 876 7646 F 06 876 7645 www.stratagroup.net.nz Structural
Fire
PO BOX 758 Business HQ 1/308 Queen Street East Hastings, New Zealand Civil Project Management
PROJECT:
TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)
TITLE:
SITE LOCATION PLAN
DJ EM CHECKED DJ DATE OCT 18 DESIGNED DRAWN
0
500
SHEET:
PROJECT NO.:
J4345 This drawing and its contents are the property of Strata Group Consulting Engineers Ltd. Any unauthorized employment or reproduction in full or part is forbidden.
250
750
Full Size 1:12500 ; Half Size 1:25000 Scale (m)
C001
REVISION:
1
LOT 1 DP 6396 GENERAL NOTES: LOT 81
· BOUNDARY INFORMATION/DATA SHOWN IN THIS DRAWING HAS BEEN SOURCED FROM QUICKMAP. STRATA GROUP CONSULTING ENGINEERS TAKE NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ACCURACY OF THIS INFORMATION/DATA.
LOT 83 LOT 79
· COORDINATE DATUM: NZGD 2000 HB CIRCUIT HEIGHT DATUM IS LOCAL AUTHORITY DATUM 1972 (MSL = 10.00m) ORIGIN OF HEIGHTS: BP 68 SO 9387.
8m WIDE DRAINAGE CORRIDOR/ RESERVE
LOT 84 LOT 85
LOT 78
STAGE 9
· DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING. ANY ADDITIONAL REQUESTED
FROM
LOT 97
LOT 89 LOT 96
OTHERWISE.
104
SHOWN
ON
LOT 101
THE
LOT 3 DP 394762
LOT 94
LOT 102
LOT 73
LOT 92
LOT 104
LOT 70
VE KA BA N
LOT 127
LOT 142
OW
LOT 131 LOT 134 LOT 135
LOT 146
LOT 160
LOT 153
LOT 8 LOT 161
LOT 159
LOT 164
LOT 59 LOT 168
LOT 165
LOT 158
LOT 35
LOT 58
LOT 166
LOT 162 LOT 169
LOT 172
LOT 57
LOT 163
LOT 7 LOT 36
LOT 173 LOT 170
LOT 9
LOT 34
LOT 154 LOT 157
LOT 56
LOT 33 LOT 150
LOT 156
LOT 60
LOT 10
LOT 149 LOT 147
LOT 155
102
LOT 11
LOT 32 LOT 144
LOT 152
STAGE 1b
LOT 148
LOT 143
LOT 151
LOT 61
LOT 12 LOT 30
LOT 31
LOT 145
LOT 63
LOT 167
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ENTRANCE
LOT 176
STAGE 3
LOT 171
LOT 55
LOT 178
LOT 174
LOT 6
LOT 37 LOT 180 LOT 183 LOT 184
LOT 175
LOT 54
LOT 38
LOT 188
LOT 179
LOT 52 LOT 51
LOT 181 LOT 182 LOT 185
LOT 50
LOT 39 LOT 187
LOT 4
STAGE 2
LOT 49
STAGE 1a
LOT 40
LOT 186
101
HURUNUI DRIVE
LOT 5
LOT 177
LOT 53
LOT 1 DP 318389
LOT 13
LOT 29
STAGE 5
LOT 138
STAGE 4
LOT 28 LOT 133
LOT 140
LOT 139
LOT 14
LOT 27
LOT 129 LOT 132
LOT 141 LOT 64
LOT 26 LOT 116
LOT 126
WI LL
LOT 117
LOT 128
LOT 136
LOT 137
LOT 15
LOT 115
LOT 124
LOT 123
LOT 65
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ENTRANCE
LOT 119
LOT 125
LOT 67
LOT 62
LOT 25
STAGE 6
LOT 130
8m WIDE DRAINAGE CORRIDOR/ RESERVE
LOT 114
LOT 120 LOT 121
LOT 16
STAGE 8
LOT 118
LOT 107
LOT 122
LOT 66
LOT 17
LOT 113
LOT 106
LOT 68
STAGE 1c
LOT 24
LOT 112
LOT 105
103
LOT 23
LOT 111
LOT 108 LOT 71
LOT 69
LOT 18
LOT 22
LOT 110
LOT 72
8m WIDE DRAINAGE CORRIDOR/ RESERVE
LOT 91
LOT 109
LOT 103
LOT 21
LOT 95
STAGE 7
LOT 74
ONLY.
· PROPOSED CONTOUR INTERVALS ARE AT 0.10m.
LOT 19 LOT 90
LOT 98
LOT 75
· AERIAL IMAGE IS SOURCED FROM LINZ IS INDICATIVE
LOT 20 LOT 93
OAD
UNDERGROUND SERVICES DRAWINGS ARE INDICATIVE ONLY.
LOT 87 LOT 88
LOT 100
LOT 76
· ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN METRES UNLESS SHOWN · ALL
LOT 86
LOT 99
LOT 77
THE
EN R
BE
ERIK S
DIMENSIONS SHOULD CONTACTS BELOW.
LOT 2 DP 6396
LOT 82
LOT 80
LOT 3
LOT 41
LOT 48 LOT 47 LOT 46
LOT 45
LOT 42
LOT 2
LOT 44
POCKET PARK/ RESERVE CONNECTING TO BROADER RECREATIONAL NETWORK
LOT 43 LOT 1
LOT 9 DP 6055
Superseded LOT 10 DP 6055 CLIENT:
SAFETY IN DESIGN ALL REASONABLY PRACTICABLE STEPS HAVE BEEN TAKEN TO ENSURE SAFETY IN DESIGN HAS BEEN CONSIDERED WITHIN STRATA GROUP'S SCOPE OF WORK FOR THIS DESIGN IN ACCORDANCE WITH IPENZ PRACTICE NOTE 07 "DESIGN FOR SAFETY IN BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES (JULY 2006)". IT REMAINS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER AND/OR OPERATOR TO ENSURE APPROPRIATE PRACTICES ARE IN PLACE TO PROTECT THE SAFETY OF THE WORKERS AND THE PUBLIC IN THE OPERATION OF THE FACILITY.
1
-
-
-
REV
REASON FOR ISSUE
DATE
BY
THE CONTRACTOR IS TO BE AWARE OF ALL INSPECTIONS TO BE MADE BY THE ENGINEER AS A REQUIREMENT OF THE PRODUCER STATEMENT PS4 CONSTRUCTION REVIEW DOCUMENTATION. THE ENGINEER WILL REQUIRE 24 HOURS PRIOR NOTIFICATION FOR ALL INSPECTIONS.
PATH:J:\DUR - DURHAM PROPERTIES\J4345 - TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)\2 - DWGS\XREF'S\PRELIM SCHEME.DWG DATE:7/2/2018
DURHAM PROPERTY LTD P 06 876 7646 F 06 876 7645 www.stratagroup.net.nz Structural
Fire
PO BOX 758 Business HQ 1/308 Queen Street East Hastings, New Zealand Civil Project Management
PROJECT:
TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)
TITLE:
PROPOSED SITE PLAN
DJ EM CHECKED DJ DATE OCT 18 DESIGNED DRAWN
0
500
SHEET:
PROJECT NO.:
J4345 This drawing and its contents are the property of Strata Group Consulting Engineers Ltd. Any unauthorized employment or reproduction in full or part is forbidden.
250
750
Full Size 1:12500 ; Half Size 1:25000 Scale (m)
C002
REVISION:
1
LOT 1 DP 6396 GENERAL NOTES:
· BOUNDARY INFORMATION/DATA SHOWN IN THIS DRAWING HAS BEEN SOURCED FROM QUICKMAP. STRATA GROUP CONSULTING ENGINEERS TAKE NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ACCURACY OF THIS INFORMATION/DATA.
LOT 2 DP 6396
· COORDINATE DATUM: NZGD 2000 HB CIRCUIT HEIGHT
.00 12
DATUM IS LOCAL AUTHORITY DATUM 1972 (MSL = 10.00m) ORIGIN OF HEIGHTS: BP 68 SO 9387.
· DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING. ANY ADDITIONAL THE
.90 11
· ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN METRES UNLESS SHOWN
0
.8 11
OTHERWISE.
· ALL
UNDERGROUND SERVICES DRAWINGS ARE INDICATIVE ONLY.
SHOWN
ON
THE
0 .7
11
LOT 1 DP 14417
· AERIAL IMAGE IS SOURCED FROM LINZ IS INDICATIVE ONLY.
· EXISTING CONTOUR INTERVALS ARE AT 0.10m.
11.80
11
.9
0
LOT 3 DP 394762
OVERLAND FLOW:
11
11
0
LOT 1 DP 318389
EN R
0
LOT 2 DP 14417 11.40
11.50
11.6
0
0
.80 11
11.7
.00
.90
12
11
ERIK S
.2 11
11.00
11 .30
11 .40
11
.50
OAD
WI LL
12.0
BA N
KA
11
.7 0
VE
SECONDARY OVERLAND ARROW
11.50
11.70
PRIMARY OVERLAND FLOW ARROW
OW
60
. 11
.40
FROM
11 .30
REQUESTED
11 .50
BE
.60
DIMENSIONS SHOULD CONTACTS BELOW.
HURUNUI DRIVE
0
11.3
50
0 11.4
11.
11
11.50
.4 0
LOT 9 DP 6055
Superseded
LOT 10 DP 6055 CLIENT:
SAFETY IN DESIGN ALL REASONABLY PRACTICABLE STEPS HAVE BEEN TAKEN TO ENSURE SAFETY IN DESIGN HAS BEEN CONSIDERED WITHIN STRATA GROUP'S SCOPE OF WORK FOR THIS DESIGN IN ACCORDANCE WITH IPENZ PRACTICE NOTE 07 "DESIGN FOR SAFETY IN BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES (JULY 2006)". IT REMAINS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER AND/OR OPERATOR TO ENSURE APPROPRIATE PRACTICES ARE IN PLACE TO PROTECT THE SAFETY OF THE WORKERS AND THE PUBLIC IN THE OPERATION OF THE FACILITY.
1
-
-
-
REV
REASON FOR ISSUE
DATE
BY
THE CONTRACTOR IS TO BE AWARE OF ALL INSPECTIONS TO BE MADE BY THE ENGINEER AS A REQUIREMENT OF THE PRODUCER STATEMENT PS4 CONSTRUCTION REVIEW DOCUMENTATION. THE ENGINEER WILL REQUIRE 24 HOURS PRIOR NOTIFICATION FOR ALL INSPECTIONS.
PATH:J:\DUR - DURHAM PROPERTIES\J4345 - TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)\2 - DWGS\XREF'S\PRELIM SCHEME.DWG DATE:7/2/2018
DURHAM PROPERTY LTD P 06 876 7646 F 06 876 7645 www.stratagroup.net.nz Structural
Fire
PO BOX 758 Business HQ 1/308 Queen Street East Hastings, New Zealand Civil Project Management
PROJECT:
TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)
TITLE:
EXISTING CONTOUR & OVERLAND FLOW PLAN
DJ EM CHECKED DJ DATE OCT 18 DESIGNED DRAWN
0
500
SHEET:
PROJECT NO.:
J4345 This drawing and its contents are the property of Strata Group Consulting Engineers Ltd. Any unauthorized employment or reproduction in full or part is forbidden.
250
750
Full Size 1:12500 ; Half Size 1:25000 Scale (m)
C003
REVISION:
1
LOT 1 DP 6396 GENERAL NOTES:
· BOUNDARY INFORMATION/DATA SHOWN IN THIS DRAWING
LOT 2 DP 6396
HAS BEEN SOURCED FROM QUICKMAP. STRATA GROUP CONSULTING ENGINEERS TAKE NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ACCURACY OF THIS INFORMATION/DATA.
· COORDINATE DATUM: NZGD 2000 HB CIRCUIT HEIGHT DATUM IS LOCAL AUTHORITY DATUM 1972 (MSL = 10.00m) ORIGIN OF HEIGHTS: BP 68 SO 9387.
8m WIDE DRAINAGE CORRIDOR/ RESERVE
· DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING. ANY ADDITIONAL DIMENSIONS SHOULD CONTACTS BELOW.
BE
REQUESTED
FROM
THE
· ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN METRES UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE.
· ALL
UNDERGROUND SERVICES DRAWINGS ARE INDICATIVE ONLY.
SHOWN
ON
THE
· AERIAL IMAGE IS SOURCED FROM LINZ IS INDICATIVE ONLY.
· PROPOSED CONTOUR INTERVALS ARE AT 0.10m.
LOT 3 DP 394762
OVERLAND FLOW:
PRIMARY
8m WIDE DRAINAGE CORRIDOR/ RESERVE
SECONDARY
BA N
KA
VE
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ENTRANCE
OAD
WI LL
OW
LOT 1 DP 318389
ERIK S
EN R
8m WIDE DRAINAGE CORRIDOR/ RESERVE
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ENTRANCE
HURUNUI DRIVE
POCKET PARK/ RESERVE CONNECTING TO BROADER RECREATIONAL NETWORK
LOT 9 DP 6055
Superseded LOT 10 DP 6055 CLIENT:
SAFETY IN DESIGN ALL REASONABLY PRACTICABLE STEPS HAVE BEEN TAKEN TO ENSURE SAFETY IN DESIGN HAS BEEN CONSIDERED WITHIN STRATA GROUP'S SCOPE OF WORK FOR THIS DESIGN IN ACCORDANCE WITH IPENZ PRACTICE NOTE 07 "DESIGN FOR SAFETY IN BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES (JULY 2006)". IT REMAINS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER AND/OR OPERATOR TO ENSURE APPROPRIATE PRACTICES ARE IN PLACE TO PROTECT THE SAFETY OF THE WORKERS AND THE PUBLIC IN THE OPERATION OF THE FACILITY.
1
-
-
-
REV
REASON FOR ISSUE
DATE
BY
THE CONTRACTOR IS TO BE AWARE OF ALL INSPECTIONS TO BE MADE BY THE ENGINEER AS A REQUIREMENT OF THE PRODUCER STATEMENT PS4 CONSTRUCTION REVIEW DOCUMENTATION. THE ENGINEER WILL REQUIRE 24 HOURS PRIOR NOTIFICATION FOR ALL INSPECTIONS.
PATH:J:\DUR - DURHAM PROPERTIES\J4345 - TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)\2 - DWGS\XREF'S\PRELIM SCHEME.DWG DATE:7/2/2018
DURHAM PROPERTY LTD P 06 876 7646 F 06 876 7645 www.stratagroup.net.nz Structural
Fire
PO BOX 758 Business HQ 1/308 Queen Street East Hastings, New Zealand Civil Project Management
PROJECT:
TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)
TITLE:
PROPOSED CONTOUR & OVERLAND FLOW PLAN
DJ EM CHECKED DJ DATE OCT 18 DESIGNED DRAWN
0
500
SHEET:
PROJECT NO.:
J4345 This drawing and its contents are the property of Strata Group Consulting Engineers Ltd. Any unauthorized employment or reproduction in full or part is forbidden.
250
750
Full Size 1:12500 ; Half Size 1:25000 Scale (m)
C004
REVISION:
1
LOT 1 DP 6396 EARTHWORKS NOTES:
0.0 0
· CUT AND FILL INDICATES EG UNDERCUT (TOPSOIL
LOT 2 DP 6396
STRIP) TO FINISHED SURFACE PRIOR TO TOPSOIL FILL.
· ALL VOLUMES HAVE BEEN CALCULATED IN SOLID ON FIXED DESIGN DEPTHS. VOLUMES EXCLUDE POSSIBLE UNDER-CUT OF SOFT SPOTS, UNDERGROUND FEATURES AND CONTAMINATED MATERIALS.
50
.00
SE
· DO NOT SCALE FROM DRAWING, IF EXTRA INFORMATION
0.00
IS REQUIRED, PLEASE CONTACT CONSULTING ENGINEERS.
0
Number Minimum Level Maximum Level Colour
50.0
0
150 .
0
100.
0.0
150.0
50.
100
OW
.00
BA
LOT 1 DP 318389
0
00
.00
-0.60
-0.20
5
-0.20
-0.10
6
-0.10
0.10
7
0.10
0.30
8
0.30
1.80
EXISTING GROUND TO TOPSOIL UNDERCUT (300mm DEPTH) - 41,466m³ CUT
ROA
00
.44
250 .
ERIK
297
0
300. 0
0
5
40
-0.60
4
D
00
0.0
0.0
0
50.
00
0.0
0
ION
-0.70
SEN
35
-0.70
3
DESIGN SURFACE IMPORTED TOPSOIL - 22,268m³ FILL
0
200 .
0.0
-1.50
-1.50
IMPORTED HARDFILL FROM TOPSOIL UNDERCUT TO TOP OFF OF DESIGN FILL SURFACE LEVELS - 26,481m³ FILL
200.
150
LL WI
30
-2.30
CUT AND FILL VOLUMES:
00
NK
AV
0
250. 00
SE CT
.04
0
E 0
N4
0.0
1 2
267
20
CT IO
250 .
SE
00
00
200 .
0.0
00
00
100 . 15
0.0
GROUP
CUT/FILL TABLE
0.0
00
50. 00
10
LOT 3 DP 394762
25
STRATA
3
0.0 0
CT ION
350.0
0
.00
45
HURUNUI DRIVE
100
0.0
400.0
200
2.8 4
0
86
SEC
TION
2
476.
00
343
450.
LOT 9 DP 6055
.55
300
.00
SE
CT
250
ION
.00
1
49
.00
150
.00
0
LOT 10 DP 6055
Superseded CLIENT:
SAFETY IN DESIGN ALL REASONABLY PRACTICABLE STEPS HAVE BEEN TAKEN TO ENSURE SAFETY IN DESIGN HAS BEEN CONSIDERED WITHIN STRATA GROUP'S SCOPE OF WORK FOR THIS DESIGN IN ACCORDANCE WITH IPENZ PRACTICE NOTE 07 "DESIGN FOR SAFETY IN BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES (JULY 2006)". IT REMAINS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER AND/OR OPERATOR TO ENSURE APPROPRIATE PRACTICES ARE IN PLACE TO PROTECT THE SAFETY OF THE WORKERS AND THE PUBLIC IN THE OPERATION OF THE FACILITY.
1
-
-
-
REV
REASON FOR ISSUE
DATE
BY
THE CONTRACTOR IS TO BE AWARE OF ALL INSPECTIONS TO BE MADE BY THE ENGINEER AS A REQUIREMENT OF THE PRODUCER STATEMENT PS4 CONSTRUCTION REVIEW DOCUMENTATION. THE ENGINEER WILL REQUIRE 24 HOURS PRIOR NOTIFICATION FOR ALL INSPECTIONS.
PATH:J:\DUR - DURHAM PROPERTIES\J4345 - TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)\2 - DWGS\XREF'S\PRELIM SCHEME.DWG DATE:7/2/2018
DURHAM PROPERTY LTD P 06 876 7646 F 06 876 7645 www.stratagroup.net.nz Structural
Fire
PO BOX 758 Business HQ 1/308 Queen Street East Hastings, New Zealand Civil Project Management
PROJECT:
TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)
TITLE:
EARTHWORKS PLAN
DJ EM CHECKED DJ DATE OCT 18 DESIGNED DRAWN
0
500
SHEET:
PROJECT NO.:
J4345 This drawing and its contents are the property of Strata Group Consulting Engineers Ltd. Any unauthorized employment or reproduction in full or part is forbidden.
250
750
Full Size 1:12500 ; Half Size 1:25000 Scale (m)
C005
REVISION:
1
EXISTING GROUND LEVEL PROPOSED FINISHED LEVEL
EXISTING GROUND TOPSOIL UNDERCUT
PROPOSED FINISHED TOPSOIL UNDERCUT
LOT 1 DP6396 LOT 9 DP6055
492.84
474.70 11.60 -0.54 11.10 480 11.64 -0.39 11.27
9.77 460 11.59 -1.82
0.01 11.56 420 11.54
-0.13 11.43
0.05 11.58 400 11.53 401.66 11.53
440 11.57 -0.25 11.32
0.04 11.58 0.04 11.58 380 11.54
0.02 11.58 337.06 11.57 340 11.56
0.03 11.58
0.01 11.58 0.01 11.58 320 11.57
360 11.55
0.00 11.58 300 11.58
280 11.61 -0.03 11.58
260 11.65 -0.07 11.58 -0.06 11.58
267.64 11.63
240 11.70 -0.12 11.58
220 11.75 -0.17 11.58
200 11.78 -0.20 11.58 203.62 11.78
180 11.76 -0.18 11.58
160 11.75 -0.17 11.58
140 11.73 -0.15 11.58
129.91 11.72
120 11.76 -0.18 11.58
100 11.84 -0.26 11.58
11.91 -0.33 11.58 80
72.40 11.94
CHAINAGE
20
0.00
EXISTING LEVELS
-0.39 11.58 60 11.96 -0.38 11.58
CUT/FILL DEPTHS
-0.41 11.58
DESIGN LEVELS
40 11.99
12.01 -0.39 11.62
SCALE: 1:500H, 1:25V DATUM: 8.00
SECTION 1 LONG SECTION
EXISTING GROUND LEVEL
PROPOSED FINISHED LEVEL
EXISTING GROUND TOPSOIL UNDERCUT
PROPOSED FINISHED TOPSOIL UNDERCUT
LOT 1 DP6396 LOT 9 DP6055
476.86
460 11.48 -1.25 10.23 465.58 11.49
0.05 11.49
440 11.45 -0.87 10.58
0.11 11.54
0.21 11.58 0.20 11.58 380 11.38
420 11.43
0.28 11.58 360 11.30
0.18 11.58
0.37 11.58 333.37 11.16 340 11.21
400 11.40
0.44 11.58 320 11.14
388.58 11.42
0.47 11.58 300 11.11
0.47 11.58 260 11.11 262.97 11.09
0.51 11.58 0.50 11.58
0.39 11.58 240 11.19
280 11.08
0.30 11.58 0.31 11.58
0.20 11.58 200 11.38 205.85 11.34
220 11.28
0.09 11.58 180 11.49
160 11.61 -0.03 11.58
138.97 11.70 -0.11 11.58 140 11.71 -0.13 11.58
120 11.66 -0.08 11.58
0.01 11.58
100 11.61 -0.03 11.58
CHAINAGE
80 11.57
0.00
EXISTING LEVELS
0.02 11.58 0.05 11.58
CUT/FILL DEPTHS
53.82 11.56 60 11.56
DESIGN LEVELS
40 11.60 -0.02 11.58
20 11.67 -0.04 11.63
SCALE: 1:500H, 1:25V DATUM: 8.00
SECTION 2 LONG SECTION FILL
Superseded CLIENT:
SAFETY IN DESIGN ALL REASONABLY PRACTICABLE STEPS HAVE BEEN TAKEN TO ENSURE SAFETY IN DESIGN HAS BEEN CONSIDERED WITHIN STRATA GROUP'S SCOPE OF WORK FOR THIS DESIGN IN ACCORDANCE WITH IPENZ PRACTICE NOTE 07 "DESIGN FOR SAFETY IN BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES (JULY 2006)". IT REMAINS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER AND/OR OPERATOR TO ENSURE APPROPRIATE PRACTICES ARE IN PLACE TO PROTECT THE SAFETY OF THE WORKERS AND THE PUBLIC IN THE OPERATION OF THE FACILITY.
1
-
-
-
REV
REASON FOR ISSUE
DATE
BY
THE CONTRACTOR IS TO BE AWARE OF ALL INSPECTIONS TO BE MADE BY THE ENGINEER AS A REQUIREMENT OF THE PRODUCER STATEMENT PS4 CONSTRUCTION REVIEW DOCUMENTATION. THE ENGINEER WILL REQUIRE 24 HOURS PRIOR NOTIFICATION FOR ALL INSPECTIONS.
PATH:J:\DUR - DURHAM PROPERTIES\J4345 - TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)\2 - DWGS\XREF'S\PRELIM SCHEME.DWG DATE:7/2/2018
DURHAM PROPERTY LTD P 06 876 7646 F 06 876 7645 www.stratagroup.net.nz Structural
Fire
PO BOX 758 Business HQ 1/308 Queen Street East Hastings, New Zealand Civil Project Management
CUT
PROJECT:
TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)
TITLE:
EARTHWORKS SECTIONS
DJ EM CHECKED DJ DATE OCT 18 DESIGNED DRAWN
0
5
20
SHEET:
PROJECT NO.:
J4345 This drawing and its contents are the property of Strata Group Consulting Engineers Ltd. Any unauthorized employment or reproduction in full or part is forbidden.
10
30
Full Size 1:500 ; Half Size 1:1000 Scale (m)
C006
REVISION:
1
EXISTING GROUND LEVEL
PROPOSED FINISHED LEVEL
EXISTING GROUND TOPSOIL UNDERCUT
PROPOSED FINISHED TOPSOIL UNDERCUT
WILLOWBANK AVE ERIKSEN ROAD
0.25 11.58 0.25 11.58 260 11.33
267.04
0.27 11.58 240 11.31
0.23 11.60 220 11.37
227.86 11.29
0.02 11.58 200 11.56
174.93 11.59 180 11.60 -0.02 11.58 -0.03 11.58
160 11.66 -0.08 11.58
140 11.76 -0.18 11.58
-0.21 11.58 120 11.79
100 11.80 -0.22 11.58 105.29 11.79
80 11.84 -0.26 11.58
CHAINAGE
60 11.87 -0.24 11.63
0.00
EXISTING LEVELS
51.94 11.89 -0.23 11.66
CUT/FILL DEPTHS
40 11.88 -0.67 11.21
DESIGN LEVELS
20 11.87 -1.60 10.27
SCALE: 1:500H, 1:25V DATUM: 9.00
SECTION 3 LONG SECTION PROPOSED FINISHED LEVEL PROPOSED FINISHED TOPSOIL UNDERCUT
EXISTING GROUND LEVEL EXISTING GROUND TOPSOIL UNDERCUT
WILLOWBANK AVE
ERIKSEN ROAD
0.39 11.62 0.41 11.63
0.46 11.63
0.51 11.63
240 11.23
260 11.17
278.22 11.12 280 11.11
0.54 11.58
0.29 11.58 220 11.29
297.44
0.25 11.58
0.22 11.58
0.14 11.58 160 11.44
198.30 11.33 200 11.33
0.07 11.58 140 11.51
0.19 11.58
0.02 11.58
180 11.39
0.00 11.58 120 11.58
127.28 11.56
100 11.63 -0.05 11.58
CHAINAGE
80 11.70 -0.12 11.58
0.00
EXISTING LEVELS
-0.31 11.53 58.54 11.82 -0.22 11.59 60 11.81
CUT/FILL DEPTHS
40 11.86 -0.80 11.06
DESIGN LEVELS
20 11.94 -1.55 10.39
SCALE: 1:500H, 1:25V DATUM: 9.00
SECTION 4 LONG SECTION PROPOSED FINISHED LEVEL PROPOSED FINISHED TOPSOIL UNDERCUT EXISTING GROUND LEVEL EXISTING GROUND TOPSOIL UNDERCUT
WILLOWBANK AVE
ERIKSEN ROAD
1
-
-
-
REV
REASON FOR ISSUE
DATE
BY
THE CONTRACTOR IS TO BE AWARE OF ALL INSPECTIONS TO BE MADE BY THE ENGINEER AS A REQUIREMENT OF THE PRODUCER STATEMENT PS4 CONSTRUCTION REVIEW DOCUMENTATION. THE ENGINEER WILL REQUIRE 24 HOURS PRIOR NOTIFICATION FOR ALL INSPECTIONS.
PATH:J:\DUR - DURHAM PROPERTIES\J4345 - TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)\2 - DWGS\XREF'S\PRELIM SCHEME.DWG DATE:7/2/2018
Structural
Fire
PO BOX 758 Business HQ 1/308 Queen Street East Hastings, New Zealand Civil Project Management
0.45 11.71
PROJECT:
TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)
FILL
340 343.55
331.30 11.45
0.14 11.58 260 11.44 260.40 11.44
0.29 11.73
0.17 11.58 240 11.41
320 11.44
0.20 11.58 0.20 11.58 220 11.38
0.34 11.75
0.23 11.58 200 11.35
300 11.42
0.23 11.58 180 11.35 183.57 11.35
280 11.40
0.22 11.58 160 11.36
DURHAM PROPERTY LTD
P 06 876 7646 F 06 876 7645 www.stratagroup.net.nz
0.18 11.58 0.21 11.62
0.22 11.58
0.20 11.58 115.75 11.39 120 11.38
Superseded CLIENT:
SAFETY IN DESIGN ALL REASONABLY PRACTICABLE STEPS HAVE BEEN TAKEN TO ENSURE SAFETY IN DESIGN HAS BEEN CONSIDERED WITHIN STRATA GROUP'S SCOPE OF WORK FOR THIS DESIGN IN ACCORDANCE WITH IPENZ PRACTICE NOTE 07 "DESIGN FOR SAFETY IN BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES (JULY 2006)". IT REMAINS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER AND/OR OPERATOR TO ENSURE APPROPRIATE PRACTICES ARE IN PLACE TO PROTECT THE SAFETY OF THE WORKERS AND THE PUBLIC IN THE OPERATION OF THE FACILITY.
140 11.36
0.12 11.58 100 11.46
SECTION 5 LONG SECTION
0.21 11.58
0.04 11.58
CHAINAGE
80 11.54
0.00
EXISTING LEVELS
-0.35 11.37 53.66 11.70 60 11.65 -0.08 11.56
CUT/FILL DEPTHS
40 11.83 -0.96 10.87
DESIGN LEVELS
20 12.02 -1.68 10.34
SCALE: 1:500H, 1:25V DATUM: 9.00
CUT
TITLE:
EARTHWORKS SECTIONS
DJ EM CHECKED DJ DATE OCT 18 DESIGNED DRAWN
0
5
20
SHEET:
PROJECT NO.:
J4345 This drawing and its contents are the property of Strata Group Consulting Engineers Ltd. Any unauthorized employment or reproduction in full or part is forbidden.
10
30
Full Size 1:500 ; Half Size 1:1000 Scale (m)
C007
REVISION:
1
LOT 81 LOT 82
LOT 80
LOT 83 LOT 79
LOT 84 LOT 85
LOT 78
STORMWATER OUTLET 1
LOT 86 LOT 99
LOT 77
LOT 87 LOT 88
LOT 100
LOT 76
LEGEND:
LOT 97
LOT 89 LOT 96
104
EXISTING STORMWATER
LOT 101
LOT 20 LOT 93
LOT 19 LOT 90
LOT 98
LOT 75
LOT 21
LOT 95
PROPOSED STORMWATER
LOT 74
EXISTING SEWER
LOT 94
LOT 102
LOT 73
RA IN SEWER PUMP STATION 1
PROPOSED WATER STORMWATER OUTLET 2
LOT 23
LOT 17
LOT 110
LOT 72 LOT 104
LOT 111
LOT 108
OP EN D
EXISTING WATER
LOT 18
LOT 22
LOT 92
LOT 109
LOT 103
PROPOSED SEWER
LOT 91
LOT 24
LOT 112
LOT 71
LOT 16
LOT 113
LOT 105 LOT 106 LOT 70
LOT 118
LOT 107
LOT 114 LOT 25 LOT 119
LOT 120
LOT 125
LOT 116
LOT 123
LOT 129 LOT 132
LOT 126 LOT 66
LOT 127
LOT 136
LOT 137
LOT 28
LOT 140
LOT 29 LOT 131 LOT 134 LOT 135
LOT 12 LOT 30
LOT 141 LOT 64
LOT 138
LOT 11 LOT 139
LOT 31
LOT 142
LOT 145
LOT 63
STORMWATER OUTLET 3
LOT 62
LOT 146
LOT 149 LOT 147
LOT 155
LOT 152
LOT 33
LOT 160
LOT 153
LOT 34 LOT 8
LOT 154 LOT 157
LOT 161
LOT 159
LOT 164
LOT 59 LOT 168
LOT 165
LOT 158
LOT 35
LOT 58
LOT 166
LOT 162 LOT 169
LOT 172
LOT 57
LOT 163
LOT 7 LOT 36
LOT 173 LOT 170
LOT 9
LOT 150
LOT 156
LOT 60
LOT 10
LOT 32 LOT 144
LOT 61
LOT 148
LOT 143
LOT 151
102
LOT 13
LOT 133
LOT 130 LOT 65
LOT 14
LOT 27
LOT 128
LOT 122
OAD
WI LL OW BA NK
103 LOT 67
LOT 26
LOT 124
EN R
AV
LOT 117 LOT 121
LOT 68
LOT 15
LOT 115
ERIK S
E
LOT 69
LOT 167
LOT 176 LOT 171
LOT 56
LOT 178
LOT 174
LOT 55
LOT 183 LOT 184
LOT 175
LOT 54
LOT 6
LOT 37 LOT 180 LOT 38
LOT 188
LOT 5
LOT 177 LOT 53 LOT 179
LOT 52 LOT 51
OP EN DR AIN
LOT 181 LOT 182 LOT 185
LOT 50
LOT 39
HURUNUI DRIVE
LOT 187 LOT 4 LOT 40
LOT 186 101
LOT 3
LOT 41
LOT 49
EXISTING Ø375 SEWER MAIN
LOT 48 LOT 47 LOT 46
LOT 45
LOT 42
LOT 2
EXISTING Ø550 WATER MAIN
LOT 44 LOT 43 LOT 1
STORMWATER OUTLET 4
SEWER PUMP STATION 2 BOX CULVERTS BY NCC
NEW PUMP LINE
EXISTING Ø100 SEWER MAIN
Superseded CLIENT:
SAFETY IN DESIGN ALL REASONABLY PRACTICABLE STEPS HAVE BEEN TAKEN TO ENSURE SAFETY IN DESIGN HAS BEEN CONSIDERED WITHIN STRATA GROUP'S SCOPE OF WORK FOR THIS DESIGN IN ACCORDANCE WITH IPENZ PRACTICE NOTE 07 "DESIGN FOR SAFETY IN BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES (JULY 2006)". IT REMAINS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER AND/OR OPERATOR TO ENSURE APPROPRIATE PRACTICES ARE IN PLACE TO PROTECT THE SAFETY OF THE WORKERS AND THE PUBLIC IN THE OPERATION OF THE FACILITY.
CONNECT NEW PUMP LINE INTO EXISTING
1
-
-
-
REV
REASON FOR ISSUE
DATE
BY
THE CONTRACTOR IS TO BE AWARE OF ALL INSPECTIONS TO BE MADE BY THE ENGINEER AS A REQUIREMENT OF THE PRODUCER STATEMENT PS4 CONSTRUCTION REVIEW DOCUMENTATION. THE ENGINEER WILL REQUIRE 24 HOURS PRIOR NOTIFICATION FOR ALL INSPECTIONS.
PATH:J:\DUR - DURHAM PROPERTIES\J4345 - TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)\2 - DWGS\XREF'S\PRELIM SCHEME.DWG DATE:7/2/2018
DURHAM PROPERTY LTD P 06 876 7646 F 06 876 7645 www.stratagroup.net.nz Structural
Fire
PO BOX 758 Business HQ 1/308 Queen Street East Hastings, New Zealand Civil Project Management
PROJECT:
TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)
TITLE:
SERVICES OVERVIEW
DJ EM CHECKED DJ DATE OCT 18 DESIGNED DRAWN
0
200
600
SHEET:
PROJECT NO.:
J4345 This drawing and its contents are the property of Strata Group Consulting Engineers Ltd. Any unauthorized employment or reproduction in full or part is forbidden.
400
800
Full Size 1:15000 ; Half Size 1:30000 Scale (m)
C008
REVISION:
1
WILL STORMWATER OUTLET 3
OWB AN
K AVE LEGEND CATCHMENT BOUNDARY
DRAI
N
STORMWATER OUTLET 2
39.98
m CO NCRE TE PIP E PIPE
450m
PIPE
m CO
NCRE TE PIP E
450m
STORMWATER OUTLET 1
RETE CONC 375mm
PIPE RETE 375mm
375mm CONCRETE PIPE
375mm CONCRETE PIPE
EXISTING OPEN DRAIN
375mm CONCRETE PIPE
375m
375mm
m CO
CONC
NCRE
RETE
TE PIP
PIPE
E
CONCR ETE PIPE
CONC
450mm
STORMWATER OUTLET 4
375mm
375mm
CONC
CONC
RETE
RETE
375m m
PIPE
CONC R
OPEN
ETE P IPE
DRAI
N
EXIST ING
450m
m CO
OPEN
NCRE T
DRAIN
E PIP
E
OPEN
375mm CONCRETE PIPE
300mm CONCRETE PIPE
300mm CONCRETE PIPE
40m
BOX CULVERTS BY NCC
375mm CONCRETE PIPE
375mm CONCRETE PIPE
ERIKSEN ROAD
Superseded
EXISTING DN600 CULVERT
CLIENT:
SAFETY IN DESIGN ALL REASONABLY PRACTICABLE STEPS HAVE BEEN TAKEN TO ENSURE SAFETY IN DESIGN HAS BEEN CONSIDERED WITHIN STRATA GROUP'S SCOPE OF WORK FOR THIS DESIGN IN ACCORDANCE WITH IPENZ PRACTICE NOTE 07 "DESIGN FOR SAFETY IN BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES (JULY 2006)". IT REMAINS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER AND/OR OPERATOR TO ENSURE APPROPRIATE PRACTICES ARE IN PLACE TO PROTECT THE SAFETY OF THE WORKERS AND THE PUBLIC IN THE OPERATION OF THE FACILITY.
1
-
-
-
REV
REASON FOR ISSUE
DATE
BY
THE CONTRACTOR IS TO BE AWARE OF ALL INSPECTIONS TO BE MADE BY THE ENGINEER AS A REQUIREMENT OF THE PRODUCER STATEMENT PS4 CONSTRUCTION REVIEW DOCUMENTATION. THE ENGINEER WILL REQUIRE 24 HOURS PRIOR NOTIFICATION FOR ALL INSPECTIONS.
PATH:J:\DUR - DURHAM PROPERTIES\J4345 - TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)\2 - DWGS\XREF'S\PRELIM SCHEME.DWG DATE:7/2/2018
DURHAM PROPERTY LTD P 06 876 7646 F 06 876 7645 www.stratagroup.net.nz Structural
Fire
PO BOX 758 Business HQ 1/308 Queen Street East Hastings, New Zealand Civil Project Management
PROJECT:
TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)
TITLE:
PROPOSED STORMWATER LAYOUT
DJ EM CHECKED DJ DATE OCT 18 DESIGNED DRAWN
0
7.5
30
SHEET:
PROJECT NO.:
J4345 This drawing and its contents are the property of Strata Group Consulting Engineers Ltd. Any unauthorized employment or reproduction in full or part is forbidden.
15
45
Full Size 1:750 ; Half Size 1:1500 Scale (m)
C009
REVISION:
1
WILL
OWB
ANK
AVE LEGEND: PROPOSED GRAVITY SEWER PIPE
SEWE R
OPEN
PUMP IN
G LIN
E
PROPOSED SEWER PUMP PIPE
DRAIN
EXISTING SEWER PIPE
150mm uPVC
OPEN
DRAI
N
PUMP STATION
m uP
VC
150mm uP
VC
150mm
uPVC
150mm
uPVC
150m
SEWER PUMPING LINE
150mm uPVC
150m
m uPV
C
150m
m uPV
C
150m m uP VC
PUMP STATION
150mm uPVC
150mm uPVC
SEWER PUMPING LINE 150mm uPVC
150mm uPVC
ERIKSEN ROAD
CONNECT INTO EXISTING GRAVITY SYSTEM
Superseded CLIENT:
SAFETY IN DESIGN ALL REASONABLY PRACTICABLE STEPS HAVE BEEN TAKEN TO ENSURE SAFETY IN DESIGN HAS BEEN CONSIDERED WITHIN STRATA GROUP'S SCOPE OF WORK FOR THIS DESIGN IN ACCORDANCE WITH IPENZ PRACTICE NOTE 07 "DESIGN FOR SAFETY IN BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES (JULY 2006)". IT REMAINS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER AND/OR OPERATOR TO ENSURE APPROPRIATE PRACTICES ARE IN PLACE TO PROTECT THE SAFETY OF THE WORKERS AND THE PUBLIC IN THE OPERATION OF THE FACILITY.
1
-
-
-
REV
REASON FOR ISSUE
DATE
BY
THE CONTRACTOR IS TO BE AWARE OF ALL INSPECTIONS TO BE MADE BY THE ENGINEER AS A REQUIREMENT OF THE PRODUCER STATEMENT PS4 CONSTRUCTION REVIEW DOCUMENTATION. THE ENGINEER WILL REQUIRE 24 HOURS PRIOR NOTIFICATION FOR ALL INSPECTIONS.
PATH:J:\DUR - DURHAM PROPERTIES\J4345 - TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)\2 - DWGS\XREF'S\PRELIM SCHEME.DWG DATE:7/2/2018
DURHAM PROPERTY LTD P 06 876 7646 F 06 876 7645 www.stratagroup.net.nz Structural
Fire
PO BOX 758 Business HQ 1/308 Queen Street East Hastings, New Zealand Civil Project Management
EXISTING DN275 SEWER PUMPING MAIN
PROJECT:
TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)
TITLE:
PROPOSED SEWER LAYOUT
DJ EM CHECKED DJ DATE OCT 18 DESIGNED DRAWN
0
7.5
30
SHEET:
PROJECT NO.:
J4345 This drawing and its contents are the property of Strata Group Consulting Engineers Ltd. Any unauthorized employment or reproduction in full or part is forbidden.
15
45
Full Size 1:750 ; Half Size 1:1500 Scale (m)
C010
REVISION:
1
LEGEND: PROPOSED WATER MAIN
WILL
OWB
PROPOSED RIDER MAIN
ANK
EXISTING WATER MAIN
OPEN
AVE
DRAIN
OPEN
DRAI
N
63mm PE
100mm PVC PN12
63mm PE
63mm PE
100mm mPVC PN12 63mm PE
63mm PE
63mm PE 100mm mPVC PN12 63mm PE
63mm PE
100mm mPVC PN12
100mm mPVC PN12
63mm PE
63mm PE
150mm mPVC PN12
150mm mPVC PN12
63mm PE
63mm PE
63mm PE
ERIKSEN ROAD
Superseded
EXISTING Ø550 MAIN CONNECT INTO EXISTING Ø200 BY NCC
EXISTING Ø200
PROPOSED DN200 WATERMAIN
CLIENT:
SAFETY IN DESIGN ALL REASONABLY PRACTICABLE STEPS HAVE BEEN TAKEN TO ENSURE SAFETY IN DESIGN HAS BEEN CONSIDERED WITHIN STRATA GROUP'S SCOPE OF WORK FOR THIS DESIGN IN ACCORDANCE WITH IPENZ PRACTICE NOTE 07 "DESIGN FOR SAFETY IN BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES (JULY 2006)". IT REMAINS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER AND/OR OPERATOR TO ENSURE APPROPRIATE PRACTICES ARE IN PLACE TO PROTECT THE SAFETY OF THE WORKERS AND THE PUBLIC IN THE OPERATION OF THE FACILITY.
1
-
-
-
REV
REASON FOR ISSUE
DATE
BY
THE CONTRACTOR IS TO BE AWARE OF ALL INSPECTIONS TO BE MADE BY THE ENGINEER AS A REQUIREMENT OF THE PRODUCER STATEMENT PS4 CONSTRUCTION REVIEW DOCUMENTATION. THE ENGINEER WILL REQUIRE 24 HOURS PRIOR NOTIFICATION FOR ALL INSPECTIONS.
PATH:J:\DUR - DURHAM PROPERTIES\J4345 - TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)\2 - DWGS\XREF'S\PRELIM SCHEME.DWG DATE:7/2/2018
DURHAM PROPERTY LTD P 06 876 7646 F 06 876 7645 www.stratagroup.net.nz Structural
Fire
PO BOX 758 Business HQ 1/308 Queen Street East Hastings, New Zealand Civil Project Management
PROJECT:
TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)
PROPOSED DN200 WATERMAIN
TITLE:
PROPOSED WATER LAYOUT
DJ EM CHECKED DJ DATE OCT 18 DESIGNED DRAWN
0
7.5
30
SHEET:
PROJECT NO.:
J4345 This drawing and its contents are the property of Strata Group Consulting Engineers Ltd. Any unauthorized employment or reproduction in full or part is forbidden.
15
45
Full Size 1:750 ; Half Size 1:1500 Scale (m)
C011
REVISION:
1
13.5
6.0m FORMED WIDTH
BOUNDARY
1.25
3.75 BERM
3.0
3.0
KERB AND CHANNEL
BOUNDARY
3.75 BERM 1.4 NEW FOOTPATH
1.1
STORMWATER KERB CONNECTION REFER TO NCC COP DETAIL M3.15
KERB AND CHANNEL
4%
4% 3%
3% 1.8
1.8
SUBSOIL DRAIN
SUBSOIL DRAIN TREE PIT
TREE PIT STORMWATER PIPE
POWER
TELECOM
GAS
DN100 PN9 uPVC WATER MAIN
DN150 SN16 uPVC
NEW DN63 SDR13.6 PE RIDER MAIN
TELECOM
GAS
POWER
13.5m TYPICAL CROSS SECTION NORTHERN ROAD
Superseded CLIENT:
SAFETY IN DESIGN ALL REASONABLY PRACTICABLE STEPS HAVE BEEN TAKEN TO ENSURE SAFETY IN DESIGN HAS BEEN CONSIDERED WITHIN STRATA GROUP'S SCOPE OF WORK FOR THIS DESIGN IN ACCORDANCE WITH IPENZ PRACTICE NOTE 07 "DESIGN FOR SAFETY IN BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES (JULY 2006)". IT REMAINS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER AND/OR OPERATOR TO ENSURE APPROPRIATE PRACTICES ARE IN PLACE TO PROTECT THE SAFETY OF THE WORKERS AND THE PUBLIC IN THE OPERATION OF THE FACILITY.
1
-
-
-
REV
REASON FOR ISSUE
DATE
BY
THE CONTRACTOR IS TO BE AWARE OF ALL INSPECTIONS TO BE MADE BY THE ENGINEER AS A REQUIREMENT OF THE PRODUCER STATEMENT PS4 CONSTRUCTION REVIEW DOCUMENTATION. THE ENGINEER WILL REQUIRE 24 HOURS PRIOR NOTIFICATION FOR ALL INSPECTIONS.
PATH:J:\DUR - DURHAM PROPERTIES\J4345 - TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)\2 - DWGS\XREF'S\PRELIM SCHEME.DWG DATE:7/2/2018
DURHAM PROPERTY LTD P 06 876 7646 F 06 876 7645 www.stratagroup.net.nz Structural
Fire
PO BOX 758 Business HQ 1/308 Queen Street East Hastings, New Zealand Civil Project Management
PROJECT:
TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)
TITLE:
TYPICAL ROAD CROSS SECTION
DJ EM CHECKED DJ DATE OCT 18 DESIGNED DRAWN
NTS SHEET:
PROJECT NO.:
J4345 This drawing and its contents are the property of Strata Group Consulting Engineers Ltd. Any unauthorized employment or reproduction in full or part is forbidden.
C012
REVISION:
1
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier Assessment of Environmental Effects
APPENDIX H Geotechnical Liquefaction Assessment
REPORT ON:
LIQUEFACTION POTENTIAL ASSESSMENT PROJECT: WILLOWBANK SUBDIVISION, TE AWA CLIENT: DURHAM PROPERTY INVESTMENTS LTD
DURHAM PROPERTY INVESTMENTS LTD C/- STRATA GROUP CONSULTING ENGINEERS
R-185060602-01
Client: Durham Property Investments Ltd ii Liquefaction Potential Assessment for Willowbank Subdivision, Te Awa
9 October 2018
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On behalf of Durham Property Investments Ltd, Strata Group Consulting Engineers engaged Resource Development Consultants Ltd (RDCL) to undertake a geotechnical investigation for proposed Willowbank Subdivision in Te Awa. It is understood that the client intends to subdivide two lots into ~168 lots for the purpose of residential development. A preliminary geotechnical assessment has been requested to address liquefaction potential and site suitability for the proposed development. A factual geotechnical report is issued to guide subdivision consent application. Nine (9) Cone Penetrometer Tests were completed at this site with termination varying between 6 to 14 m below ground level. Based on the CPT investigation, the site is generally underlain by:
Sand and silt compositions, with
Intermittent layers of clay, and
Occasional organic soil horizons.
Liquefaction assessment indicates the site is prone to vertical, lateral and differential movements resulting from Serviceability Limit State (SLS) and Ultimate Limit State (ULS) design seismic events. We consider the site to be suitable, in a geotechnical perspective, for the proposed development provided geotechnical risks identified in this report are considered. In all cases, shallow foundations in accordance with guidance for repairing and rebuilding houses affected by the Canterbury earthquakes (MBIE, 2012) are considered suitable. The specific type of foundation will need to be confirmed for each lot, primarily considering potential lateral spread. The site is otherwise considered “soft” near surface with a likely at least temporarily elevated groundwater level with prolonged heavy rain as evidenced by our experience during testing.
R-185060602-01
Client: Durham Property Investments Ltd iii Liquefaction Potential Assessment for Willowbank Subdivision, Te Awa
9 October 2018
CONTENTS 1
INTRODUCTION
4
UNDERSTANDING OF THE PROJECT SCOPE OF W ORK
4 4
SITE DESCRIPTION
5
PUBLISHED GEOLOGY Active Faults LIQUEFACTION SUSCEPTIBILITY
5 5 5
SITE INVESTIGATION
6
SUBSURFACE SOIL PROFILE GROUNDWATER
6 6
GEOTECHNICAL ASSESSMENT
7
4.1 4.1.1 4.1.2
LIQUEFACTION ASSESSMENT Lateral Spread Basis of Assessment
7 8 8
4.1.2.1
Seismic Soil Classification
9
1.1 1.2 2 2.1 2.1.1 2.2 3 3.1 3.2 4
5
GEOTECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS
10
5.1 5.1.1 5.1.2
GEOTECHNICAL SUITABILITY Overview Magnitude of Lateral Spread
10 10 10
5.1.2.1
Likely Foundations
11
5.2 5.3
ROADS AND SERVICES FURTHER GEOTECHNICAL INPUT
11 11
6
REFERENCES
12
7
LIMITATIONS
13
GRAPHS GRAPH 1: LATERAL SPREAD AND LATERAL STRETCH VS DISTANCE FROM THE PROPOSED DRAIN
10
TABLES TABLE 1: CPT INVESTIGATION SUMMARY TABLE 2: LIQUEFACTION POTENTIAL IN A SLS DESIGN SEISMIC EVENT TABLE 3: LIQUEFACTION POTENTIAL IN AN ULS DESIGN SEISMIC EVENT
6 7 8
FIGURES FIGURE 1: SITE INVESTIGATION LAYOUT
14
APPENDICES APPENDIX A: CPT LOGS APPENDIX B: LIQUEFACTION ASSESSMENT OUTPUTS
R-185060602-01
A B
Client: Durham Property Investments Ltd 4 Liquefaction Potential Assessment for Willowbank Subdivision, Te Awa
1
9 October 2018
INTRODUCTION Strata Group Consulting Engineers, on behalf of Durham Property Investments Ltd, engaged Resource Development Consultants Ltd (RDCL) to undertake a preliminary geotechnical investigation for proposed Willowbank Subdivision in Te Awa.
1.1
UNDERSTANDING OF THE PROJECT It is understood that the client intends to subdivide Lots 1 and 2, DP 14417 into ~168 lots for the purpose of residential development. A geotechnical investigation has been requested to guide subdivision consent application, including assessment of liquefaction potential and site suitability for the proposed development. Based on a concept scheme plan supplied to RDCL an open channel, ~ 1.5 m deep and ~ 40 m wide, along the south and west boundaries are proposed as part of the intended work.
1.2
SCOPE OF WORK Our scope of work was in general accordance with the RDCL proposal (reference: 18506) issued to the client. Geotechnical site investigation comprised nine (9) Cone Penetrometer Tests. Excavated Test Pit (TP) and ground bearing investigations could not be completed due to extremely wet site conditions and then time contsraints around ploughing the existing field.
R-185060602-01
Client: Durham Property Investments Ltd 5 Liquefaction Potential Assessment for Willowbank Subdivision, Te Awa
2
9 October 2018
SITE DESCRIPTION The proposed subdivision is located between Willowbank Avenue and Ericksen Road in Te Awa, Napier. Lot 1 is currently occupied by a residential dwelling towards the north, and Lot 2 is occupied by a small number of farm buildings toward the center. Both sections are relatively flat with no noticeable change in elevation.
2.1
PUBLISHED GEOLOGY Based on geological maps published by GNS, the site is underlain by Quaternary estuarine deposits comprising unconsolidated silt, mud, peat and sand (Lee et al., 2011).
2.1.1 ACTIVE FAULTS There are no active faults directly impacting the site as identified by the Hawke’s Bay Emergency Management Group (2015).
2.2
LIQUEFACTION SUSCEPTIBILITY The site is mapped as having “high” liquefaction susceptibility (Hawke’s Bay Emergency Management Group, 2015).
R-185060602-01
Client: Durham Property Investments Ltd 6 Liquefaction Potential Assessment for Willowbank Subdivision, Te Awa
3
9 October 2018
SITE INVESTIGATION Nine (9) CPTs were completed, as per Table 1, at this site with termination depths varying between 6.0 m to 14.0 m. TABLE 1: CPT INVESTIGATION SUMMARY
Test ID
Completion date (dd/mm/yy)
Depth reached (m)
CPT01
10/09/18
6.0
CPT02
10/09/18
14
CPT03
10/09/18
12.8
CPT04
05/09/18
10.4
CPT05
04/09/18
11.3
CPT06
04/09/18
10.7
CPT07
04/09/18
9.8
CPT08
05/09/18
13.2
CPT09
05/09/18
9.3
Site investigation layout illustrating CPT locations is presented in Figure 1. CPT investigation logs are attached as Appendix A.
3.1
SUBSURFACE SOIL PROFILE Subsurface soil profile as inferred from the Soil Behaviour Type (SBT) of the CPT investigation suggests the site is underlain by:
3.2
Sand and silt compositions with intermittent layers of clay; and
Occasional organic soil horizons.
GROUNDWATER The site was severely waterlogged (flooded) during the site investigation and is anticipated to vary seasonally.
R-185060602-01
Client: Durham Property Investments Ltd 7 Liquefaction Potential Assessment for Willowbank Subdivision, Te Awa
4
GEOTECHNICAL ASSESSMENT
4.1
LIQUEFACTION ASSESSMENT
9 October 2018
A liquefaction assessment was carried out on the results of CPT investigation (Appendix B). The assessment indicates the site is at risk of liquefaction under Serviceability Limit State (SLS) and Ultimate Limit State (ULS) design seismic events.
During SLS design seismic event: -
vertical settlement estimated between 90 mm and 230 mm; and
-
lateral displacement estimated between 90 mm and 230 mm.
During ULS design seismic event: -
vertical settlement estimated between 110 mm and 310 mm; and
-
lateral displacement estimated between 110 mm and 380 mm.
A summary of liquefaction potential during a SLS design seismic event is in Table 2. TABLE 2: LIQUEFACTION POTENTIAL IN A SLS DESIGN SEISMIC EVENT
Test ID
Liquefaction Potential Index
Vertical settlement (mm) (order of 10)
Lateral Displacement (mm) (order of 10)
Differential Settlement over 10 m (mm)
CPT01
High risk
90
90
50
CPT02
High risk
180
130
90
CPT03
High risk
230
280
120
CPT04
High risk
180
-
90
CPT05
Low risk
100
-
50
CPT06
High risk
150
-
70
CPT07
High risk
120
170
60
CPT08
High risk
180
10
90
CPT09
High risk
190
-
90
R-185060602-01
Client: Durham Property Investments Ltd 8 Liquefaction Potential Assessment for Willowbank Subdivision, Te Awa
9 October 2018
A summary of liquefaction potential during an ULS design seismic event is in Table 3. TABLE 3: LIQUEFACTION POTENTIAL IN AN ULS DESIGN SEISMIC EVENT
Test ID
Liquefaction Potential Index
Vertical settlement (mm) (order of 10)
Lateral Displacement (mm) (order of 10)
Differential Settlement over 10 m (mm)
CPT01
High risk
110
110
50
CPT02
Very high risk
250
150
130
CPT03
Very high risk
310
380
150
CPT04
Very high risk
200
-
100
CPT05
High risk
140
-
70
CPT06
Very high risk
190
-
90
CPT07
High risk
170
200
80
CPT08
Very high risk
240
120
120
CPT09
Very high risk
140
-
70
4.1.1 LATERAL SPREAD Lateral spread is only considered possible at this site due to the planned surface water drain bordering the west and south side of the site. There are otherwise no natural or man made pre-existing features (drains) that are likely to allow lateral spread to occur. The proposed drain is designed with a 1.5 m deep cut, which creates a free face allowing ground movement.
4.1.2 BASIS OF ASSESSMENT The liquefaction assessment for the site was carried out using CLiq, accepted industry software package, CPT data of current ground conditions and the following input parameters (NZS1170.5 section 3.1.3 (Standards New Zealand, 2004)):
Magnitude (M) = 7.5 (SLS & ULS);
PGA = 0.11g (SLS) & 0.43g (ULS), based on:
R-185060602-01
-
Z = 0.38 (Napier),
-
C = 1.12 (Class D Soil), and
-
R = 0.25 (SLS) & 1 (ULS).
Groundwater level assumed 1 m deep.
Client: Durham Property Investments Ltd 9 Liquefaction Potential Assessment for Willowbank Subdivision, Te Awa
9 October 2018
The design earthquake was chosen on the basis of probability of recurrence. The probability is based on historical earthquakes. A 7.5 magnitude earthquake for an importance level 2 correlates with a 25 year return period (SLS) and 500 year return period (ULS). A 50 year design life was assigned. 4.1.2.1SEISMIC SOIL CLASSIFICATION The site is classified as site subsoil “Class D – Deep or Soft Soil Site” in accordance with NZS1170.5:2004, part 5: Earthquake Actions – New Zealand. The site subsoil class was assessed based on review of borehole lithology in the surrounding area in Hawke’s Bay Well Database.
R-185060602-01
Client: Durham Property Investments Ltd 10 Liquefaction Potential Assessment for Willowbank Subdivision, Te Awa
5
9 October 2018
GEOTECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS Recommendations and opinions contained in this report are based on data from site investigations as outlined in Section 3 and geotechnical assessment outlined in Section 4. The nature and continuity of subsoils away from these locations are inferred and actual conditions may vary from the assumed model.
5.1
GEOTECHNICAL SUITABILITY We consider the site to be suitable, from a geotechnical perspective, provided development is undertaken with reference to the following considerations. Additional geotechnical input will be required as the project develops.
5.1.1 OVERVIEW This site is generally prone to liquefaction induced vertical settlement as a result of SLS and ULS earthquake events, liquefaction induced lateral spread site bordering the proposed drain.
5.1.2 MAGNITUDE OF LATERAL SPREAD The magnitude of lateral spread is expected to reduce with distance from the drain (Graph 1), the effect of which should be considered in earthworks planning, consideration of foundation solutions, road layouts and construction requirements. GRAPH 1: LATERAL SPREAD AND LATERAL STRETCH VS DISTANCE FROM THE PROPOSED DRAIN
400
400
350
350
300
300
250
250
200
200
150
150
100
100
50
50 0
0 0
10
20 30 40 50 Distance from the proposed drain (m) Lateral spread (mm)
R-185060602-01
Lateral stretch
60
70
Lateral stretch (mm)
Lateral spread (mm)
Lateral spread and lateral stretch vs distance from the proposed drain
Client: Durham Property Investments Ltd 11 Liquefaction Potential Assessment for Willowbank Subdivision, Te Awa
9 October 2018
5.1.2.1LIKELY FOUNDATIONS Foundations need to be confirmed based on more investigation and as civil plans are reviewed and developed. In all cases, shallow foundations in accordance with guidance for repairing and rebuilding houses affected by the Canterbury earthquakes (MBIE, 2012) are considered suitable. The specific type of foundation adopted for each lot will be based primarily on the susceptibility to lateral spread and stretch.
5.2
ROADS AND SERVICES The location of roads and services with respect to proximity of the cut drain and potential for lateral spread should be specifically considered. Otherwsie, the site is generally soft with groundwater levels at least temporarily elevated associated with prolonged heavy rain as evidenced by our experience during testing. ď&#x201A;ˇ
Road formations are likely to require geofabric/geogrid and imported materials, with CBR% for the site likely low (< 3).
ď&#x201A;ˇ
5.3
Services trenches need to account of groundwater levels.
FURTHER GEOTECHNICAL INPUT Further geotechnical testing should be undertaken at Building Consent level to determine specific design recommendations at individual Lot Level and to confirm zones and extents. We recommend a suitably qualified geotechnical professional be engaged as the project develops.
R-185060602-01
Client: Durham Property Investments Ltd 12 Liquefaction Potential Assessment for Willowbank Subdivision, Te Awa
6
9 October 2018
REFERENCES 1. Hawke’s
Bay
Emergency
Management
Group
(2015).
Retrieved
from
https://hbhazards.intramaps.co.nz/IntraMaps80/?default.html&project=Natural%20 Hazards&configId=356ffec6-603c-480b-be35-564fe341f71d 2. Lee, J., Bland, K., Townsend, D. and Kamp, P. (compilers) (2011). Geology of the Hawke's Bay area. Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences 1:250 000 geological map 8. Lower Hutt: GNS Science 3. MBIE (2012). Guidance – Repairing and rebuilding houses affected by the Canterbury earthquakes. Version 3. Canterbury, New Zealand. 4. Standards New Zealand (2004). Structural Design Actions Part 5: Earthquake Actions. NZS 1170.5:2004. Wellington: Standards New Zealand
R-185060602-01
Client: Durham Property Investments Ltd 13 Liquefaction Potential Assessment for Willowbank Subdivision, Te Awa
7
9 October 2018
LIMITATIONS
This report has been prepared for the particular purpose outlined in the project brief and no responsibility is accepted for the use of any part in other contexts or for any other purpose.
Ground conditions assessed in this report are inferred from published sources, site inspection and the investigations described. Variations from the interpreted conditions may occur, and special conditions relating to the site may not have been revealed by this investigation, and which are therefore not taken into account. No warranty is included either expressed or implied that the actual conditions will conform to the interpretation contained in this report.
No responsibility is accepted by Resource Development Consultants Ltd for inaccuracies in data supplied by others. Where data has been supplied by others, it has been assumed that this information is correct.
Groundwater conditions can vary with season or due to other events. Any comments on groundwater conditions are based on observations at the time.
This report is provided for sole use by the client and is confidential to the client, Napier City Council and their professional advisors. No responsibility whatsoever for the contents of this report shall be accepted for any person other than the client.
We trust this meets your current needs and look forward to working with you. Please call the undersigned on 06 877 1652 should you wish to discuss the matter further. Sincerely, Prepared by:
Approved by:
___________________
____________________
S De Silva
C A Wylie
BSc (Hons)
MSc; CMEngNZ; CPEng
Engineering Geologist
Principal
Attachments: Figure 1: Site Investigation Layout Appendix A: CPT Logs Appendix B: Liquefaction Assessment Outputs Important Information about this Geotechnical Report
R-185060602-01
Client: Durham Property Investments Ltd Liquefaction Potential Assessment at Willowbank Subdivision, Te Awa
FIGURE 1 SITE INVESTIGATION LAYOUT
R-185060602-01
1 October 2018
1936155
1936205
1936255
1936305
1936355
1936405
1936455
GENERAL LOCATION PLAN :
1936025
1936525
1937025
1935025
1935525
1936025
1936525
1937025
5618025
5618525
1935525
5617525
5618355 5618305 5618255
5618355 5618305 5618255
1935025
5618205
5618205
GENERAL LOCATION PLAN SCALE :
250
0
250
5618155
5618155
500
750 m
SCALE :
0
50
GEODETIC DATUM:
100
150 m
VERTICALDATUM:
PROJECTION: NZTM2000
Legend Cone Penetration Test
5618105
5618105
Proposed Lots Proposed drain NZ Topo50 Maps
5618055
5618055
NZ Aerial Imagery
NOTES : 1. 2.
CLIENT :
5618005
5618005
Durham Property Investments Ltd PROJECT :
Willowbank Subdivision
5617955
5617955
TITLE :
Geotechnical Investigation
SD
5617905
CHECKED BY :
5617905
185060602
PROJECT NUMBER :
DRAWN BY :
FIGURE NUMBER :
TB
DATE :
09/10/2018
APPROVED BY :
DATE :
09/10/2018
FILE NAME:
01
RDCL PO Box 28057 | 15 Havelock Road Havelock North | New Zealand Tel: +64 6 8771652 | Fax: +64 6 877 5015 Email: info@rdcl.co.nz www.rdcl.co.nz
1935905
1935955
1936005
1936055
1936105
1936155
1936205
1936255
1936305
1936355
1936405
1936455
5619025
1936105
5618525
1936055
5618025
1936005
5617525
1935955
5619025
1935905
CAW
PLOTTED DRAWING SIZE :
DATE :
09/10/2018
A3 (420 x 297)
Client: Durham Property Investments Ltd Liquefaction Potential Assessment at Willowbank Subdivision, Te Awa
APPENDIX A CPT LOGS
R-185060602-01
1 October 2018
CPT01
CONE PENETRATION TEST LOG
SHEET 1 OF 1 CLIENT: Durham Property Investments Ltd
PROJECTION: NZTM2000
LOCATION:
PROJECT:
EASTING:
1936014.00
STARTED: 10/09/2018
NORTHING: 5618011.00
FINISHED: 10/09/2018
185060602
LOCATION: Willowpark Road, Te Awa
DATUM: CHECKED BY: TB
SWL:
STATUS: Final data
POREWATER PRESSURE, u2 (kPa)
8
3
7
4
6
5
5
EOH: 6.02m Termination: Anchor Failure
4
7
3
8
2
9
1
10
0
11
-1
12
-2
13
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
-3
14
REMARKS SOIL ANCHORS W/EXTN
CONE INFORMATION CONE ID: 4447
CONE TYPE: INITIAL
FINAL
CONE RESISTANCE:
7.6551
-0.0579
SLEEVE FRICTION RESISTANCE:
123.5
0.1
POREWATER PRESSURE:
237.9
-0.3
SYMBOLS Water level
RDCL 8/308 QUEEN ST EAST, HASTINGS | PO BOX 28057, HAVELOCK NORTH 4130 | NEW ZEALAND Ph: +64 6 8771652 | Email: info@rdcl.co.nz
2 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
800
600
400
0
200
400
300
200
45
10 9
2
FRICTION RATIO (%)
Total 1
1
6
SLOPE (°)
SPEED (cm/sec)
4 40
35
3 30
25
2 20
15
1 10
5
RL (m)
SLEEVE FRICTION RESISTANCE, f s (kPa)
11
DEPTH (m)
CONE RESISTANCE, qc (MPa)
OPERATOR: TS
5
Geoprobe 54LT
DATE: 01/10/2018
10
MACHINE:
0
-5
CONTRACTOR: RDCL
ELEVATION: 11.64
-10
RDCL - Hastings
ENGINEER: TB
100
OFFICE:
CPT02
CONE PENETRATION TEST LOG
SHEET 1 OF 1 CLIENT: Durham Property Investments Ltd
PROJECTION: NZTM2000
LOCATION:
PROJECT:
EASTING:
1936120.00
STARTED: 10/09/2018
NORTHING: 5617954.00
FINISHED: 10/09/2018
185060602
LOCATION: Willowpark Road, Te Awa
DATUM: CHECKED BY: TB
SWL:
STATUS: Final data
1
POREWATER PRESSURE, u2 (kPa)
7
4
6
5
5
6
4
7
3
8
2
9
1
10
0
11
-1
12
-2
13
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
-3
EOH: 14m Termination: Anchor Failure
REMARKS SOIL ANCHORS W/EXTN
CONE INFORMATION CONE ID: 4447
CONE TYPE: INITIAL
FINAL
CONE RESISTANCE:
7.6463
-0.0113
SLEEVE FRICTION RESISTANCE:
123.5
0.2
POREWATER PRESSURE:
239.4
-1.9
SYMBOLS Water level
RDCL 8/308 QUEEN ST EAST, HASTINGS | PO BOX 28057, HAVELOCK NORTH 4130 | NEW ZEALAND Ph: +64 6 8771652 | Email: info@rdcl.co.nz
2 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
800
600
400
0
200
400
300
200
45
9 8
3
FRICTION RATIO (%)
Total 1
2
14
SLOPE (°)
SPEED (cm/sec)
4 40
35
3 30
25
2 20
15
1 10
5
11 RL (m)
SLEEVE FRICTION RESISTANCE, f s (kPa)
10
DEPTH (m)
CONE RESISTANCE, qc (MPa)
OPERATOR: TS
5
Geoprobe 54LT
DATE: 01/10/2018
10
MACHINE:
0
-5
CONTRACTOR: RDCL
ELEVATION: 11.20
-10
RDCL - Hastings
ENGINEER: TB
100
OFFICE:
CPT03
CONE PENETRATION TEST LOG
SHEET 1 OF 1 CLIENT: Durham Property Investments Ltd
PROJECTION: NZTM2000
LOCATION:
PROJECT:
EASTING:
1936235.00
STARTED: 10/09/2018
NORTHING: 5617919.00
FINISHED: 10/09/2018
185060602
LOCATION: Willowpark Road, Te Awa
DATUM: CHECKED BY: TB
SWL:
STATUS: Final data
POREWATER PRESSURE, u2 (kPa)
8
3
7
4
6
5
5
6
4
7
3
8
2
9
1
10
0
11
-1
12
EOH: 12.76m Termination: Anchor Failure -2
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
-3
14
REMARKS SOIL ANCHORS W/EXTN
CONE INFORMATION CONE ID: 4447
CONE TYPE: -
CONE RESISTANCE: SLEEVE FRICTION RESISTANCE: POREWATER PRESSURE:
INITIAL
FINAL
7.6699
-
123
-
239.4
-
SYMBOLS Water level
RDCL 8/308 QUEEN ST EAST, HASTINGS | PO BOX 28057, HAVELOCK NORTH 4130 | NEW ZEALAND Ph: +64 6 8771652 | Email: info@rdcl.co.nz
2 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
800
600
400
0
200
400
300
200
45
10 9
2
FRICTION RATIO (%)
Total 1
1
13
SLOPE (°)
SPEED (cm/sec)
4 40
35
3 30
25
2 20
15
1 10
5
RL (m)
SLEEVE FRICTION RESISTANCE, f s (kPa)
11
DEPTH (m)
CONE RESISTANCE, qc (MPa)
OPERATOR: TS
5
Geoprobe 54LT
DATE: 01/10/2018
10
MACHINE:
0
-5
CONTRACTOR: RDCL
ELEVATION: 11.56
-10
RDCL - Hastings
ENGINEER: TB
100
OFFICE:
CPT04
CONE PENETRATION TEST LOG
SHEET 1 OF 1 CLIENT: Durham Property Investments Ltd
PROJECTION: NZTM2000
LOCATION:
PROJECT:
EASTING:
1936302.00
STARTED: 05/09/2018
NORTHING: 5618111.00
FINISHED: 05/09/2018
185060602
LOCATION: Willowpark Road, Te Awa
DATUM: CHECKED BY: TB
SWL:
STATUS: Final data
POREWATER PRESSURE, u2 (kPa)
8
3
7
4
6
5
5
6
4
7
3
8
2
9
1
10
0
EOH: 10.38m Termination: QC Exceed 35mpa
-1
12
-2
13
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
-3
14
REMARKS SOIL ANCHORS W/EXTN
CONE INFORMATION CONE ID: 4447
CONE TYPE: INITIAL
FINAL
CONE RESISTANCE:
7.6611
-0.0331
SLEEVE FRICTION RESISTANCE:
123.5
0
POREWATER PRESSURE:
240.1
-0.8
SYMBOLS Water level
RDCL 8/308 QUEEN ST EAST, HASTINGS | PO BOX 28057, HAVELOCK NORTH 4130 | NEW ZEALAND Ph: +64 6 8771652 | Email: info@rdcl.co.nz
2 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
800
600
400
0
200
400
300
200
45
10 9
2
FRICTION RATIO (%)
Total 1
1
11
SLOPE (°)
SPEED (cm/sec)
4 40
35
3 30
25
2 20
15
1 10
5
RL (m)
SLEEVE FRICTION RESISTANCE, f s (kPa)
11
DEPTH (m)
CONE RESISTANCE, qc (MPa)
OPERATOR: TS
5
Geoprobe 54LT
DATE: 01/10/2018
10
MACHINE:
0
-5
CONTRACTOR: RDCL
ELEVATION: 11.37
-10
RDCL - Hastings
ENGINEER: TB
100
OFFICE:
CPT05
CONE PENETRATION TEST LOG
SHEET 1 OF 1 CLIENT: Durham Property Investments Ltd
PROJECTION: NZTM2000
LOCATION:
PROJECT:
EASTING:
1936364.00
STARTED: 04/09/2018
NORTHING: 5618267.00
FINISHED: 04/09/2018
185060602
LOCATION: Willowpark Road, Te Awa
DATUM: CHECKED BY: TB
SWL:
STATUS: Final data
POREWATER PRESSURE, u2 (kPa)
8
3
7
4
6
5
5
6
4
7
3
8
2
9
1
10
0
11
EOH: 11.34m Termination: QC Exceed 35mpa
-1
12
-2
13
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
-3
14
REMARKS SOIL ANCHORS W/EXTN
CONE INFORMATION CONE TYPE: INITIAL
FINAL
CONE RESISTANCE:
7.6599
-0.0113
SLEEVE FRICTION RESISTANCE:
123.4
0.1
239
0.2
POREWATER PRESSURE:
SYMBOLS Water level
RDCL 8/308 QUEEN ST EAST, HASTINGS | PO BOX 28057, HAVELOCK NORTH 4130 | NEW ZEALAND Ph: +64 6 8771652 | Email: info@rdcl.co.nz
2 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
800
600
400
0
200
400
300
200
45
10 9
2
CONE ID: 4447
Total 1
1
FRICTION RATIO (%)
SLOPE (°)
SPEED (cm/sec)
4 40
35
3 30
25
2 20
15
1 10
5
RL (m)
SLEEVE FRICTION RESISTANCE, f s (kPa)
11
DEPTH (m)
CONE RESISTANCE, qc (MPa)
OPERATOR: TS
5
Geoprobe 54LT
DATE: 01/10/2018
10
MACHINE:
0
-5
CONTRACTOR: RDCL
ELEVATION: 11.61
-10
RDCL - Hastings
ENGINEER: TB
100
OFFICE:
CPT06
CONE PENETRATION TEST LOG
SHEET 1 OF 1 CLIENT: Durham Property Investments Ltd
PROJECTION: NZTM2000
LOCATION:
PROJECT:
EASTING:
1936281.00
STARTED: 04/09/2018
NORTHING: 5618318.00
FINISHED: 04/09/2018
185060602
LOCATION: Willowpark Road, Te Awa
DATUM: CHECKED BY: TB
SWL:
STATUS: Final data
5
6
7
13
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
FRICTION RATIO (%)
REMARKS SOIL ANCHORS W/EXTN
CONE INFORMATION CONE ID: 4447
CONE TYPE: INITIAL
FINAL
CONE RESISTANCE:
7.6575
0.0047
SLEEVE FRICTION RESISTANCE:
123.4
0.2
POREWATER PRESSURE:
240.1
-0.9
SYMBOLS Water level
RDCL 8/308 QUEEN ST EAST, HASTINGS | PO BOX 28057, HAVELOCK NORTH 4130 | NEW ZEALAND Ph: +64 6 8771652 | Email: info@rdcl.co.nz
2 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
800
600
400
0
200
400
300
200
45
4 40
35
3 30
25
2 20
15
1 10
0 -3
14
-1
12
EOH: 10.74m Termination: Anchor Failure
-2
11
5
RL (m) 11 10 9 3
10
1
9
2
8
8
4
Total 1
7
3
SLOPE (°)
SPEED (cm/sec)
6
2
POREWATER PRESSURE, u2 (kPa)
5
1
SLEEVE FRICTION RESISTANCE, f s (kPa)
4
DEPTH (m)
CONE RESISTANCE, qc (MPa)
OPERATOR: TS
5
Geoprobe 54LT
DATE: 01/10/2018
10
MACHINE:
0
-5
CONTRACTOR: RDCL
ELEVATION: 11.97
-10
RDCL - Hastings
ENGINEER: TB
100
OFFICE:
CPT07
CONE PENETRATION TEST LOG
SHEET 1 OF 1 CLIENT: Durham Property Investments Ltd
PROJECTION: NZTM2000
LOCATION:
PROJECT:
EASTING:
1936195.00
STARTED: 04/09/2018
NORTHING: 5618341.00
FINISHED: 04/09/2018
185060602
LOCATION: Willowpark Road, Te Awa
DATUM: CHECKED BY: TB
SWL:
STATUS: Final data
POREWATER PRESSURE, u2 (kPa)
9
3
8
4
7
5
6
6
5
7
4
8
3
9
2
EOH: 9.78m Termination: Anchor Failure
1
11
0
12
-1
13
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
-2
14
REMARKS SOIL ANCHORS W/EXTN
CONE INFORMATION CONE ID: 4447
CONE TYPE: INITIAL
FINAL
CONE RESISTANCE:
7.6551
-0.0183
SLEEVE FRICTION RESISTANCE:
123.6
0
POREWATER PRESSURE:
240.4
-1.2
SYMBOLS Water level
RDCL 8/308 QUEEN ST EAST, HASTINGS | PO BOX 28057, HAVELOCK NORTH 4130 | NEW ZEALAND Ph: +64 6 8771652 | Email: info@rdcl.co.nz
2 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
800
600
400
0
200
400
300
200
45
11 10
2
FRICTION RATIO (%)
Total 1
1
10
SLOPE (°)
SPEED (cm/sec)
4 40
35
3 30
25
2 20
15
1 10
5
RL (m)
SLEEVE FRICTION RESISTANCE, f s (kPa)
12
DEPTH (m)
CONE RESISTANCE, qc (MPa)
OPERATOR: TS
5
Geoprobe 54LT
DATE: 01/10/2018
10
MACHINE:
0
-5
CONTRACTOR: RDCL
ELEVATION: 12.28
-10
RDCL - Hastings
ENGINEER: TB
100
OFFICE:
CPT08
CONE PENETRATION TEST LOG
SHEET 1 OF 1 CLIENT: Durham Property Investments Ltd
PROJECTION: NZTM2000
LOCATION:
PROJECT:
EASTING:
1936105.00
STARTED: 05/09/2018
NORTHING: 5618158.00
FINISHED: 05/09/2018
185060602
LOCATION: Willowpark Road, Te Awa
DATUM: CHECKED BY: TB
SWL:
STATUS: Final data
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
FRICTION RATIO (%)
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
-3
14
-2
EOH: 13.18m Termination: QC Exceed 35mpa
REMARKS SOIL ANCHORS W/EXTN
CONE INFORMATION CONE ID: 4447
CONE TYPE: INITIAL
FINAL
CONE RESISTANCE:
7.664
-0.0047
SLEEVE FRICTION RESISTANCE:
123.4
0
POREWATER PRESSURE:
240.6
-1.4
SYMBOLS Water level
RDCL 8/308 QUEEN ST EAST, HASTINGS | PO BOX 28057, HAVELOCK NORTH 4130 | NEW ZEALAND Ph: +64 6 8771652 | Email: info@rdcl.co.nz
2 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
800
600
400
0
200
400
300
200
45
4 40
35
3 30
25
2 20
15
1 10
5
RL (m) 11 10 9 8 7 6 5
6
4
5
3
4
Total 1
2
3
SLOPE (°)
SPEED (cm/sec)
1
2
POREWATER PRESSURE, u2 (kPa)
0
1
SLEEVE FRICTION RESISTANCE, f s (kPa)
-1
DEPTH (m)
CONE RESISTANCE, qc (MPa)
OPERATOR: TS
5
Geoprobe 54LT
DATE: 01/10/2018
10
MACHINE:
0
-5
CONTRACTOR: RDCL
ELEVATION: 11.82
-10
RDCL - Hastings
ENGINEER: TB
100
OFFICE:
CPT09
CONE PENETRATION TEST LOG
SHEET 1 OF 1 CLIENT: Durham Property Investments Ltd
PROJECTION: NZTM2000
LOCATION:
PROJECT:
EASTING:
1936203.00
STARTED: 05/09/2018
NORTHING: 5618103.00
FINISHED: 05/09/2018
185060602
LOCATION: Willowpark Road, Te Awa
DATUM: CHECKED BY: TB
SWL:
STATUS: Final data
POREWATER PRESSURE, u2 (kPa)
8
3
7
4
6
5
5
6
4
7
3
8
2
9
EOH: 9.34m Termination: Anchor Failure 1
10
0
11
-1
12
-2
13
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
-3
14
REMARKS SOIL ANCHORS W/EXTN
CONE INFORMATION CONE TYPE: INITIAL
FINAL
CONE RESISTANCE:
7.6593
-0.0071
SLEEVE FRICTION RESISTANCE:
123.4
0
241
-0.8
POREWATER PRESSURE:
SYMBOLS Water level
RDCL 8/308 QUEEN ST EAST, HASTINGS | PO BOX 28057, HAVELOCK NORTH 4130 | NEW ZEALAND Ph: +64 6 8771652 | Email: info@rdcl.co.nz
2 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
800
600
400
0
200
400
300
200
45
10 9
2
CONE ID: 4447
Total 1
1
FRICTION RATIO (%)
SLOPE (°)
SPEED (cm/sec)
4 40
35
3 30
25
2 20
15
1 10
5
RL (m)
SLEEVE FRICTION RESISTANCE, f s (kPa)
11
DEPTH (m)
CONE RESISTANCE, qc (MPa)
OPERATOR: TS
5
Geoprobe 54LT
DATE: 01/10/2018
10
MACHINE:
0
-5
CONTRACTOR: RDCL
ELEVATION: 11.22
-10
RDCL - Hastings
ENGINEER: TB
100
OFFICE:
Client: Durham Property Investments Ltd Liquefaction Potential Assessment at Willowbank Subdivision, Te Awa
APPENDIX B LIQUEFACTION ASSESSMENT OUTPUTS
R-185060602-01
1 October 2018
RDCL Geotechnical Specialists 8/308 Queen St, Hastings http://www.rdcl.co.nz Project title : 185060602 Location : Willowbank Subdivision - Te Awa
Overall Probability for Liquefaction report Probability color scheme Very High Probability High Probability Low Probability
Basic statistics Total CPT number: 18 5.56% low probability 55.56% high probability 38.89% very high probability
CLiq v.2.1.6.7 - CPT Liquefaction Assessment Software Project file: S:\Projects\185060602_WillowBank Subdivision_Durham Propery Investments\06 Assessment\185060602_CLiq.clq
1
RDCL Geotechnical Specialists 8/308 Queen St, Hastings http://www.rdcl.co.nz Project title : 185060602 Location : Willowbank Subdivision - Te Awa
Overall Liquefaction Severity Number report LSN color scheme Severe damage Major expression of liquefaction Moderate to severe exp. of liquefaction Moderate expression of liquefaction Minor expression of liquefaction Little to no expression of liquefaction
Basic statistics Total CPT number: 18 0.00% little liquefaction 0.00% minnor liquefaction 33.33% moderate liquefaction 38.89% moderate to major liquefaction 11.11% major liquefaction 16.67% severe liquefaction
CLiq v.2.1.6.7 - CPT Liquefaction Assessment Software Project file: S:\Projects\185060602_WillowBank Subdivision_Durham Propery Investments\06 Assessment\185060602_CLiq.clq
1
RDCL Geotechnical Specialists 8/308 Queen St, Hastings http://www.rdcl.co.nz Project title : 185060602 Location : Willowbank Subdivision - Te Awa
Overall Liquefaction Potential Index report LPI color scheme Very high risk High risk Low risk
Basic statistics Total CPT number: 18 5.56% low risk 55.56% high risk 38.89% very high risk
CLiq v.2.1.6.7 - CPT Liquefaction Assessment Software Project file: S:\Projects\185060602_WillowBank Subdivision_Durham Propery Investments\06 Assessment\185060602_CLiq.clq
1
RDCL Geotechnical Specialists 8/308 Queen St, Hastings http://www.rdcl.co.nz Project title : 185060602 Location : Willowbank Subdivision - Te Awa
Overall vertical settlements report
CLiq v.2.1.6.7 - CPT Liquefaction Assessment Software Project file: S:\Projects\185060602_WillowBank Subdivision_Durham Propery Investments\06 Assessment\185060602_CLiq.clq
1
RDCL Geotechnical Specialists 8/308 Queen St, Hastings http://www.rdcl.co.nz Project title : 185060602 Location : Willowbank Subdivision - Te Awa
Overall lateral displacements report
CLiq v.2.1.6.7 - CPT Liquefaction Assessment Software Project file: S:\Projects\185060602_WillowBank Subdivision_Durham Propery Investments\06 Assessment\185060602_CLiq.clq
1
RDCL Geotechnical Specialists 8/308 Queen St, Hastings http://www.rdcl.co.nz
LIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS REPORT Project title : 185060602
Location : Willowbank Subdivision - Te Awa
CPT file : CPT01_SLS Input parameters and analysis data Moss et al. (2006) Moss et al. (2006) Based on Ic value 7.50 0.11 .
G.W.T. (in-situ): G.W.T. (earthq.): Average results interval: Ic cut-off value: Unit weight calculation:
1.00 m 1.00 m 3 2.60 Based on SBT
No N/A N/A No No
Clay like behavior applied: Limit depth applied: Limit depth: MSF method:
Sands only No N/A Method based
Summary of liquefaction potential
CLiq v.2.1.6.7 - CPT Liquefaction Assessment Software - Report created on: 24-Sep-18, 4:09:38 PM Project file: S:\Projects\185060602_WillowBank Subdivision_Durham Propery Investments\06 Assessment\185060602_CLiq.clq
1
This software is licensed to: Cameron Wylie
CPT name: CPT01_SLS
CPT basic interpretation plots (normalized)
Input parameters and analysis data Moss et al. (2006) Moss et al. (2006) Based on Ic value 7.50 0.11 1.00 m
Depth to water table (erthq.): Average results interval: Ic cut-off value: Unit weight calculation: Use fill: Fill height:
1.00 m 3 2.60 Based on SBT No N/A
CLiq v.2.1.6.7 - CPT Liquefaction Assessment Software - Report created on: 24-Sep-18, 4:09:38 PM Project file: S:\Projects\185060602_WillowBank Subdivision_Durham Propery Investments\06 Assessment\185060602_CLiq.clq
N/A No No Sands only No N/A
SBTn legend 1. Sensitive fine grained 2. Organic material
4. Clayey silt to silty clay 5. Silty sand to sandy silt
3. Clay to silty clay
6. Clean sand to silty sand
7. Gravely sand to sand 8. Very stiff sand to clayey sand 9. Very stiff fine grained
2
This software is licensed to: Cameron Wylie
CPT name: CPT01_SLS
Liquefaction analysis overall plots
F.S. color scheme
Input parameters and analysis data Moss et al. (2006) Moss et al. (2006) Based on Ic value 7.50 0.11 1.00 m
Depth to water table (erthq.): Average results interval: Ic cut-off value: Unit weight calculation: Use fill: Fill height:
1.00 m 3 2.60 Based on SBT No N/A
CLiq v.2.1.6.7 - CPT Liquefaction Assessment Software - Report created on: 24-Sep-18, 4:09:38 PM Project file: S:\Projects\185060602_WillowBank Subdivision_Durham Propery Investments\06 Assessment\185060602_CLiq.clq
N/A No No Sands only No N/A
LPI color scheme
Almost certain it will liquefy
Very high risk
Very likely to liquefy
High risk
Liquefaction and no liq. are equally likely
Low risk
Unlike to liquefy Almost certain it will not liquefy
3
RDCL Geotechnical Specialists 8/308 Queen St, Hastings http://www.rdcl.co.nz
LIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS REPORT Project title : 185060602
Location : Willowbank Subdivision - Te Awa
CPT file : CPT01_ULS Input parameters and analysis data Moss et al. (2006) Moss et al. (2006) Based on Ic value 7.50 0.43 .
G.W.T. (in-situ): G.W.T. (earthq.): Average results interval: Ic cut-off value: Unit weight calculation:
1.00 m 1.00 m 3 2.60 Based on SBT
No N/A N/A No No
Clay like behavior applied: Limit depth applied: Limit depth: MSF method:
Sands only No N/A Method based
Summary of liquefaction potential
CLiq v.2.1.6.7 - CPT Liquefaction Assessment Software - Report created on: 24-Sep-18, 4:09:39 PM Project file: S:\Projects\185060602_WillowBank Subdivision_Durham Propery Investments\06 Assessment\185060602_CLiq.clq
4
This software is licensed to: Cameron Wylie
CPT name: CPT01_ULS
CPT basic interpretation plots (normalized)
Input parameters and analysis data Moss et al. (2006) Moss et al. (2006) Based on Ic value 7.50 0.43 1.00 m
Depth to water table (erthq.): Average results interval: Ic cut-off value: Unit weight calculation: Use fill: Fill height:
1.00 m 3 2.60 Based on SBT No N/A
CLiq v.2.1.6.7 - CPT Liquefaction Assessment Software - Report created on: 24-Sep-18, 4:09:39 PM Project file: S:\Projects\185060602_WillowBank Subdivision_Durham Propery Investments\06 Assessment\185060602_CLiq.clq
N/A No No Sands only No N/A
SBTn legend 1. Sensitive fine grained 2. Organic material
4. Clayey silt to silty clay 5. Silty sand to sandy silt
3. Clay to silty clay
6. Clean sand to silty sand
7. Gravely sand to sand 8. Very stiff sand to clayey sand 9. Very stiff fine grained
5
This software is licensed to: Cameron Wylie
CPT name: CPT01_ULS
Liquefaction analysis overall plots
F.S. color scheme
Input parameters and analysis data Moss et al. (2006) Moss et al. (2006) Based on Ic value 7.50 0.43 1.00 m
Depth to water table (erthq.): Average results interval: Ic cut-off value: Unit weight calculation: Use fill: Fill height:
1.00 m 3 2.60 Based on SBT No N/A
CLiq v.2.1.6.7 - CPT Liquefaction Assessment Software - Report created on: 24-Sep-18, 4:09:39 PM Project file: S:\Projects\185060602_WillowBank Subdivision_Durham Propery Investments\06 Assessment\185060602_CLiq.clq
N/A No No Sands only No N/A
LPI color scheme
Almost certain it will liquefy
Very high risk
Very likely to liquefy
High risk
Liquefaction and no liq. are equally likely
Low risk
Unlike to liquefy Almost certain it will not liquefy
6
RDCL Geotechnical Specialists 8/308 Queen St, Hastings http://www.rdcl.co.nz
LIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS REPORT Project title : 185060602
Location : Willowbank Subdivision - Te Awa
CPT file : CPT02_SLS Input parameters and analysis data Moss et al. (2006) Moss et al. (2006) Based on Ic value 7.50 0.11 .
G.W.T. (in-situ): G.W.T. (earthq.): Average results interval: Ic cut-off value: Unit weight calculation:
1.00 m 1.00 m 3 2.60 Based on SBT
No N/A N/A No No
Clay like behavior applied: Limit depth applied: Limit depth: MSF method:
Sands only No N/A Method based
Summary of liquefaction potential
CLiq v.2.1.6.7 - CPT Liquefaction Assessment Software - Report created on: 24-Sep-18, 4:09:40 PM Project file: S:\Projects\185060602_WillowBank Subdivision_Durham Propery Investments\06 Assessment\185060602_CLiq.clq
7
This software is licensed to: Cameron Wylie
CPT name: CPT02_SLS
CPT basic interpretation plots (normalized)
Input parameters and analysis data Moss et al. (2006) Moss et al. (2006) Based on Ic value 7.50 0.11 1.00 m
Depth to water table (erthq.): Average results interval: Ic cut-off value: Unit weight calculation: Use fill: Fill height:
1.00 m 3 2.60 Based on SBT No N/A
CLiq v.2.1.6.7 - CPT Liquefaction Assessment Software - Report created on: 24-Sep-18, 4:09:40 PM Project file: S:\Projects\185060602_WillowBank Subdivision_Durham Propery Investments\06 Assessment\185060602_CLiq.clq
N/A No No Sands only No N/A
SBTn legend 1. Sensitive fine grained 2. Organic material
4. Clayey silt to silty clay 5. Silty sand to sandy silt
3. Clay to silty clay
6. Clean sand to silty sand
7. Gravely sand to sand 8. Very stiff sand to clayey sand 9. Very stiff fine grained
8
This software is licensed to: Cameron Wylie
CPT name: CPT02_SLS
Liquefaction analysis overall plots
F.S. color scheme
Input parameters and analysis data Moss et al. (2006) Moss et al. (2006) Based on Ic value 7.50 0.11 1.00 m
Depth to water table (erthq.): Average results interval: Ic cut-off value: Unit weight calculation: Use fill: Fill height:
1.00 m 3 2.60 Based on SBT No N/A
CLiq v.2.1.6.7 - CPT Liquefaction Assessment Software - Report created on: 24-Sep-18, 4:09:40 PM Project file: S:\Projects\185060602_WillowBank Subdivision_Durham Propery Investments\06 Assessment\185060602_CLiq.clq
N/A No No Sands only No N/A
LPI color scheme
Almost certain it will liquefy
Very high risk
Very likely to liquefy
High risk
Liquefaction and no liq. are equally likely
Low risk
Unlike to liquefy Almost certain it will not liquefy
9
RDCL Geotechnical Specialists 8/308 Queen St, Hastings http://www.rdcl.co.nz
LIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS REPORT Project title : 185060602
Location : Willowbank Subdivision - Te Awa
CPT file : CPT02_ULS Input parameters and analysis data Moss et al. (2006) Moss et al. (2006) Based on Ic value 7.50 0.43 .
G.W.T. (in-situ): G.W.T. (earthq.): Average results interval: Ic cut-off value: Unit weight calculation:
1.00 m 1.00 m 3 2.60 Based on SBT
No N/A N/A No No
Clay like behavior applied: Limit depth applied: Limit depth: MSF method:
Sands only No N/A Method based
Summary of liquefaction potential
CLiq v.2.1.6.7 - CPT Liquefaction Assessment Software - Report created on: 24-Sep-18, 4:09:41 PM Project file: S:\Projects\185060602_WillowBank Subdivision_Durham Propery Investments\06 Assessment\185060602_CLiq.clq
10
This software is licensed to: Cameron Wylie
CPT name: CPT02_ULS
CPT basic interpretation plots (normalized)
Input parameters and analysis data Moss et al. (2006) Moss et al. (2006) Based on Ic value 7.50 0.43 1.00 m
Depth to water table (erthq.): Average results interval: Ic cut-off value: Unit weight calculation: Use fill: Fill height:
1.00 m 3 2.60 Based on SBT No N/A
CLiq v.2.1.6.7 - CPT Liquefaction Assessment Software - Report created on: 24-Sep-18, 4:09:41 PM Project file: S:\Projects\185060602_WillowBank Subdivision_Durham Propery Investments\06 Assessment\185060602_CLiq.clq
N/A No No Sands only No N/A
SBTn legend 1. Sensitive fine grained 2. Organic material
4. Clayey silt to silty clay 5. Silty sand to sandy silt
3. Clay to silty clay
6. Clean sand to silty sand
7. Gravely sand to sand 8. Very stiff sand to clayey sand 9. Very stiff fine grained
11
This software is licensed to: Cameron Wylie
CPT name: CPT02_ULS
Liquefaction analysis overall plots
F.S. color scheme
Input parameters and analysis data Moss et al. (2006) Moss et al. (2006) Based on Ic value 7.50 0.43 1.00 m
Depth to water table (erthq.): Average results interval: Ic cut-off value: Unit weight calculation: Use fill: Fill height:
1.00 m 3 2.60 Based on SBT No N/A
CLiq v.2.1.6.7 - CPT Liquefaction Assessment Software - Report created on: 24-Sep-18, 4:09:41 PM Project file: S:\Projects\185060602_WillowBank Subdivision_Durham Propery Investments\06 Assessment\185060602_CLiq.clq
N/A No No Sands only No N/A
LPI color scheme
Almost certain it will liquefy
Very high risk
Very likely to liquefy
High risk
Liquefaction and no liq. are equally likely
Low risk
Unlike to liquefy Almost certain it will not liquefy
12
RDCL Geotechnical Specialists 8/308 Queen St, Hastings http://www.rdcl.co.nz
LIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS REPORT Project title : 185060602
Location : Willowbank Subdivision - Te Awa
CPT file : CPT03_SLS Input parameters and analysis data Moss et al. (2006) Moss et al. (2006) Based on Ic value 7.50 0.11 .
G.W.T. (in-situ): G.W.T. (earthq.): Average results interval: Ic cut-off value: Unit weight calculation:
1.00 m 1.00 m 3 2.60 Based on SBT
No N/A N/A No No
Clay like behavior applied: Limit depth applied: Limit depth: MSF method:
Sands only No N/A Method based
Summary of liquefaction potential
CLiq v.2.1.6.7 - CPT Liquefaction Assessment Software - Report created on: 24-Sep-18, 4:09:43 PM Project file: S:\Projects\185060602_WillowBank Subdivision_Durham Propery Investments\06 Assessment\185060602_CLiq.clq
13
This software is licensed to: Cameron Wylie
CPT name: CPT03_SLS
CPT basic interpretation plots (normalized)
Input parameters and analysis data Moss et al. (2006) Moss et al. (2006) Based on Ic value 7.50 0.11 1.00 m
Depth to water table (erthq.): Average results interval: Ic cut-off value: Unit weight calculation: Use fill: Fill height:
1.00 m 3 2.60 Based on SBT No N/A
CLiq v.2.1.6.7 - CPT Liquefaction Assessment Software - Report created on: 24-Sep-18, 4:09:43 PM Project file: S:\Projects\185060602_WillowBank Subdivision_Durham Propery Investments\06 Assessment\185060602_CLiq.clq
N/A No No Sands only No N/A
SBTn legend 1. Sensitive fine grained 2. Organic material
4. Clayey silt to silty clay 5. Silty sand to sandy silt
3. Clay to silty clay
6. Clean sand to silty sand
7. Gravely sand to sand 8. Very stiff sand to clayey sand 9. Very stiff fine grained
14
This software is licensed to: Cameron Wylie
CPT name: CPT03_SLS
Liquefaction analysis overall plots
F.S. color scheme
Input parameters and analysis data Moss et al. (2006) Moss et al. (2006) Based on Ic value 7.50 0.11 1.00 m
Depth to water table (erthq.): Average results interval: Ic cut-off value: Unit weight calculation: Use fill: Fill height:
1.00 m 3 2.60 Based on SBT No N/A
CLiq v.2.1.6.7 - CPT Liquefaction Assessment Software - Report created on: 24-Sep-18, 4:09:43 PM Project file: S:\Projects\185060602_WillowBank Subdivision_Durham Propery Investments\06 Assessment\185060602_CLiq.clq
N/A No No Sands only No N/A
LPI color scheme
Almost certain it will liquefy
Very high risk
Very likely to liquefy
High risk
Liquefaction and no liq. are equally likely
Low risk
Unlike to liquefy Almost certain it will not liquefy
15
RDCL Geotechnical Specialists 8/308 Queen St, Hastings http://www.rdcl.co.nz
LIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS REPORT Project title : 185060602
Location : Willowbank Subdivision - Te Awa
CPT file : CPT03_ULS Input parameters and analysis data Moss et al. (2006) Moss et al. (2006) Based on Ic value 7.50 0.43 .
G.W.T. (in-situ): G.W.T. (earthq.): Average results interval: Ic cut-off value: Unit weight calculation:
1.00 m 1.00 m 3 2.60 Based on SBT
No N/A N/A No No
Clay like behavior applied: Limit depth applied: Limit depth: MSF method:
Sands only No N/A Method based
Summary of liquefaction potential
CLiq v.2.1.6.7 - CPT Liquefaction Assessment Software - Report created on: 24-Sep-18, 4:09:44 PM Project file: S:\Projects\185060602_WillowBank Subdivision_Durham Propery Investments\06 Assessment\185060602_CLiq.clq
16
This software is licensed to: Cameron Wylie
CPT name: CPT03_ULS
CPT basic interpretation plots (normalized)
Input parameters and analysis data Moss et al. (2006) Moss et al. (2006) Based on Ic value 7.50 0.43 1.00 m
Depth to water table (erthq.): Average results interval: Ic cut-off value: Unit weight calculation: Use fill: Fill height:
1.00 m 3 2.60 Based on SBT No N/A
CLiq v.2.1.6.7 - CPT Liquefaction Assessment Software - Report created on: 24-Sep-18, 4:09:44 PM Project file: S:\Projects\185060602_WillowBank Subdivision_Durham Propery Investments\06 Assessment\185060602_CLiq.clq
N/A No No Sands only No N/A
SBTn legend 1. Sensitive fine grained 2. Organic material
4. Clayey silt to silty clay 5. Silty sand to sandy silt
3. Clay to silty clay
6. Clean sand to silty sand
7. Gravely sand to sand 8. Very stiff sand to clayey sand 9. Very stiff fine grained
17
This software is licensed to: Cameron Wylie
CPT name: CPT03_ULS
Liquefaction analysis overall plots
F.S. color scheme
Input parameters and analysis data Moss et al. (2006) Moss et al. (2006) Based on Ic value 7.50 0.43 1.00 m
Depth to water table (erthq.): Average results interval: Ic cut-off value: Unit weight calculation: Use fill: Fill height:
1.00 m 3 2.60 Based on SBT No N/A
CLiq v.2.1.6.7 - CPT Liquefaction Assessment Software - Report created on: 24-Sep-18, 4:09:44 PM Project file: S:\Projects\185060602_WillowBank Subdivision_Durham Propery Investments\06 Assessment\185060602_CLiq.clq
N/A No No Sands only No N/A
LPI color scheme
Almost certain it will liquefy
Very high risk
Very likely to liquefy
High risk
Liquefaction and no liq. are equally likely
Low risk
Unlike to liquefy Almost certain it will not liquefy
18
RDCL Geotechnical Specialists 8/308 Queen St, Hastings http://www.rdcl.co.nz
LIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS REPORT Project title : 185060602
Location : Willowbank Subdivision - Te Awa
CPT file : CPT04_SLS Input parameters and analysis data Moss et al. (2006) Moss et al. (2006) Based on Ic value 7.50 0.11 .
G.W.T. (in-situ): G.W.T. (earthq.): Average results interval: Ic cut-off value: Unit weight calculation:
1.00 m 1.00 m 3 2.60 Based on SBT
No N/A N/A No No
Clay like behavior applied: Limit depth applied: Limit depth: MSF method:
Sands only No N/A Method based
Summary of liquefaction potential
CLiq v.2.1.6.7 - CPT Liquefaction Assessment Software - Report created on: 24-Sep-18, 4:09:46 PM Project file: S:\Projects\185060602_WillowBank Subdivision_Durham Propery Investments\06 Assessment\185060602_CLiq.clq
19
This software is licensed to: Cameron Wylie
CPT name: CPT04_SLS
CPT basic interpretation plots (normalized)
Input parameters and analysis data Moss et al. (2006) Moss et al. (2006) Based on Ic value 7.50 0.11 1.00 m
Depth to water table (erthq.): Average results interval: Ic cut-off value: Unit weight calculation: Use fill: Fill height:
1.00 m 3 2.60 Based on SBT No N/A
CLiq v.2.1.6.7 - CPT Liquefaction Assessment Software - Report created on: 24-Sep-18, 4:09:46 PM Project file: S:\Projects\185060602_WillowBank Subdivision_Durham Propery Investments\06 Assessment\185060602_CLiq.clq
N/A No No Sands only No N/A
SBTn legend 1. Sensitive fine grained 2. Organic material
4. Clayey silt to silty clay 5. Silty sand to sandy silt
3. Clay to silty clay
6. Clean sand to silty sand
7. Gravely sand to sand 8. Very stiff sand to clayey sand 9. Very stiff fine grained
20
This software is licensed to: Cameron Wylie
CPT name: CPT04_SLS
Liquefaction analysis overall plots
F.S. color scheme
Input parameters and analysis data Moss et al. (2006) Moss et al. (2006) Based on Ic value 7.50 0.11 1.00 m
Depth to water table (erthq.): Average results interval: Ic cut-off value: Unit weight calculation: Use fill: Fill height:
1.00 m 3 2.60 Based on SBT No N/A
CLiq v.2.1.6.7 - CPT Liquefaction Assessment Software - Report created on: 24-Sep-18, 4:09:46 PM Project file: S:\Projects\185060602_WillowBank Subdivision_Durham Propery Investments\06 Assessment\185060602_CLiq.clq
N/A No No Sands only No N/A
LPI color scheme
Almost certain it will liquefy
Very high risk
Very likely to liquefy
High risk
Liquefaction and no liq. are equally likely
Low risk
Unlike to liquefy Almost certain it will not liquefy
21
RDCL Geotechnical Specialists 8/308 Queen St, Hastings http://www.rdcl.co.nz
LIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS REPORT Project title : 185060602
Location : Willowbank Subdivision - Te Awa
CPT file : CPT04_ULS Input parameters and analysis data Moss et al. (2006) Moss et al. (2006) Based on Ic value 7.50 0.43 .
G.W.T. (in-situ): G.W.T. (earthq.): Average results interval: Ic cut-off value: Unit weight calculation:
1.00 m 1.00 m 3 2.60 Based on SBT
No N/A N/A No No
Clay like behavior applied: Limit depth applied: Limit depth: MSF method:
Sands only No N/A Method based
Summary of liquefaction potential
CLiq v.2.1.6.7 - CPT Liquefaction Assessment Software - Report created on: 24-Sep-18, 4:09:47 PM Project file: S:\Projects\185060602_WillowBank Subdivision_Durham Propery Investments\06 Assessment\185060602_CLiq.clq
22
This software is licensed to: Cameron Wylie
CPT name: CPT04_ULS
CPT basic interpretation plots (normalized)
Input parameters and analysis data Moss et al. (2006) Moss et al. (2006) Based on Ic value 7.50 0.43 1.00 m
Depth to water table (erthq.): Average results interval: Ic cut-off value: Unit weight calculation: Use fill: Fill height:
1.00 m 3 2.60 Based on SBT No N/A
CLiq v.2.1.6.7 - CPT Liquefaction Assessment Software - Report created on: 24-Sep-18, 4:09:47 PM Project file: S:\Projects\185060602_WillowBank Subdivision_Durham Propery Investments\06 Assessment\185060602_CLiq.clq
N/A No No Sands only No N/A
SBTn legend 1. Sensitive fine grained 2. Organic material
4. Clayey silt to silty clay 5. Silty sand to sandy silt
3. Clay to silty clay
6. Clean sand to silty sand
7. Gravely sand to sand 8. Very stiff sand to clayey sand 9. Very stiff fine grained
23
This software is licensed to: Cameron Wylie
CPT name: CPT04_ULS
Liquefaction analysis overall plots
F.S. color scheme
Input parameters and analysis data Moss et al. (2006) Moss et al. (2006) Based on Ic value 7.50 0.43 1.00 m
Depth to water table (erthq.): Average results interval: Ic cut-off value: Unit weight calculation: Use fill: Fill height:
1.00 m 3 2.60 Based on SBT No N/A
CLiq v.2.1.6.7 - CPT Liquefaction Assessment Software - Report created on: 24-Sep-18, 4:09:47 PM Project file: S:\Projects\185060602_WillowBank Subdivision_Durham Propery Investments\06 Assessment\185060602_CLiq.clq
N/A No No Sands only No N/A
LPI color scheme
Almost certain it will liquefy
Very high risk
Very likely to liquefy
High risk
Liquefaction and no liq. are equally likely
Low risk
Unlike to liquefy Almost certain it will not liquefy
24
RDCL Geotechnical Specialists 8/308 Queen St, Hastings http://www.rdcl.co.nz
LIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS REPORT Project title : 185060602
Location : Willowbank Subdivision - Te Awa
CPT file : CPT05_SLS Input parameters and analysis data Moss et al. (2006) Moss et al. (2006) Based on Ic value 7.50 0.11 .
G.W.T. (in-situ): G.W.T. (earthq.): Average results interval: Ic cut-off value: Unit weight calculation:
1.00 m 1.00 m 3 2.60 Based on SBT
No N/A N/A No No
Clay like behavior applied: Limit depth applied: Limit depth: MSF method:
Sands only No N/A Method based
Summary of liquefaction potential
CLiq v.2.1.6.7 - CPT Liquefaction Assessment Software - Report created on: 24-Sep-18, 4:09:49 PM Project file: S:\Projects\185060602_WillowBank Subdivision_Durham Propery Investments\06 Assessment\185060602_CLiq.clq
25
This software is licensed to: Cameron Wylie
CPT name: CPT05_SLS
CPT basic interpretation plots (normalized)
Input parameters and analysis data Moss et al. (2006) Moss et al. (2006) Based on Ic value 7.50 0.11 1.00 m
Depth to water table (erthq.): Average results interval: Ic cut-off value: Unit weight calculation: Use fill: Fill height:
1.00 m 3 2.60 Based on SBT No N/A
CLiq v.2.1.6.7 - CPT Liquefaction Assessment Software - Report created on: 24-Sep-18, 4:09:49 PM Project file: S:\Projects\185060602_WillowBank Subdivision_Durham Propery Investments\06 Assessment\185060602_CLiq.clq
N/A No No Sands only No N/A
SBTn legend 1. Sensitive fine grained 2. Organic material
4. Clayey silt to silty clay 5. Silty sand to sandy silt
3. Clay to silty clay
6. Clean sand to silty sand
7. Gravely sand to sand 8. Very stiff sand to clayey sand 9. Very stiff fine grained
26
This software is licensed to: Cameron Wylie
CPT name: CPT05_SLS
Liquefaction analysis overall plots
F.S. color scheme
Input parameters and analysis data Moss et al. (2006) Moss et al. (2006) Based on Ic value 7.50 0.11 1.00 m
Depth to water table (erthq.): Average results interval: Ic cut-off value: Unit weight calculation: Use fill: Fill height:
1.00 m 3 2.60 Based on SBT No N/A
CLiq v.2.1.6.7 - CPT Liquefaction Assessment Software - Report created on: 24-Sep-18, 4:09:49 PM Project file: S:\Projects\185060602_WillowBank Subdivision_Durham Propery Investments\06 Assessment\185060602_CLiq.clq
N/A No No Sands only No N/A
LPI color scheme
Almost certain it will liquefy
Very high risk
Very likely to liquefy
High risk
Liquefaction and no liq. are equally likely
Low risk
Unlike to liquefy Almost certain it will not liquefy
27
RDCL Geotechnical Specialists 8/308 Queen St, Hastings http://www.rdcl.co.nz
LIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS REPORT Project title : 185060602
Location : Willowbank Subdivision - Te Awa
CPT file : CPT05_ULS Input parameters and analysis data Moss et al. (2006) Moss et al. (2006) Based on Ic value 7.50 0.43 .
G.W.T. (in-situ): G.W.T. (earthq.): Average results interval: Ic cut-off value: Unit weight calculation:
1.00 m 1.00 m 3 2.60 Based on SBT
No N/A N/A No No
Clay like behavior applied: Limit depth applied: Limit depth: MSF method:
Sands only No N/A Method based
Summary of liquefaction potential
CLiq v.2.1.6.7 - CPT Liquefaction Assessment Software - Report created on: 24-Sep-18, 4:09:51 PM Project file: S:\Projects\185060602_WillowBank Subdivision_Durham Propery Investments\06 Assessment\185060602_CLiq.clq
28
This software is licensed to: Cameron Wylie
CPT name: CPT05_ULS
CPT basic interpretation plots (normalized)
Input parameters and analysis data Moss et al. (2006) Moss et al. (2006) Based on Ic value 7.50 0.43 1.00 m
Depth to water table (erthq.): Average results interval: Ic cut-off value: Unit weight calculation: Use fill: Fill height:
1.00 m 3 2.60 Based on SBT No N/A
CLiq v.2.1.6.7 - CPT Liquefaction Assessment Software - Report created on: 24-Sep-18, 4:09:51 PM Project file: S:\Projects\185060602_WillowBank Subdivision_Durham Propery Investments\06 Assessment\185060602_CLiq.clq
N/A No No Sands only No N/A
SBTn legend 1. Sensitive fine grained 2. Organic material
4. Clayey silt to silty clay 5. Silty sand to sandy silt
3. Clay to silty clay
6. Clean sand to silty sand
7. Gravely sand to sand 8. Very stiff sand to clayey sand 9. Very stiff fine grained
29
This software is licensed to: Cameron Wylie
CPT name: CPT05_ULS
Liquefaction analysis overall plots
F.S. color scheme
Input parameters and analysis data Moss et al. (2006) Moss et al. (2006) Based on Ic value 7.50 0.43 1.00 m
Depth to water table (erthq.): Average results interval: Ic cut-off value: Unit weight calculation: Use fill: Fill height:
1.00 m 3 2.60 Based on SBT No N/A
CLiq v.2.1.6.7 - CPT Liquefaction Assessment Software - Report created on: 24-Sep-18, 4:09:51 PM Project file: S:\Projects\185060602_WillowBank Subdivision_Durham Propery Investments\06 Assessment\185060602_CLiq.clq
N/A No No Sands only No N/A
LPI color scheme
Almost certain it will liquefy
Very high risk
Very likely to liquefy
High risk
Liquefaction and no liq. are equally likely
Low risk
Unlike to liquefy Almost certain it will not liquefy
30
RDCL Geotechnical Specialists 8/308 Queen St, Hastings http://www.rdcl.co.nz
LIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS REPORT Project title : 185060602
Location : Willowbank Subdivision - Te Awa
CPT file : CPT06_SLS Input parameters and analysis data Moss et al. (2006) Moss et al. (2006) Based on Ic value 7.50 0.11 .
G.W.T. (in-situ): G.W.T. (earthq.): Average results interval: Ic cut-off value: Unit weight calculation:
1.00 m 1.00 m 3 2.60 Based on SBT
No N/A N/A No No
Clay like behavior applied: Limit depth applied: Limit depth: MSF method:
Sands only No N/A Method based
Summary of liquefaction potential
CLiq v.2.1.6.7 - CPT Liquefaction Assessment Software - Report created on: 24-Sep-18, 4:09:53 PM Project file: S:\Projects\185060602_WillowBank Subdivision_Durham Propery Investments\06 Assessment\185060602_CLiq.clq
31
This software is licensed to: Cameron Wylie
CPT name: CPT06_SLS
CPT basic interpretation plots (normalized)
Input parameters and analysis data Moss et al. (2006) Moss et al. (2006) Based on Ic value 7.50 0.11 1.00 m
Depth to water table (erthq.): Average results interval: Ic cut-off value: Unit weight calculation: Use fill: Fill height:
1.00 m 3 2.60 Based on SBT No N/A
CLiq v.2.1.6.7 - CPT Liquefaction Assessment Software - Report created on: 24-Sep-18, 4:09:53 PM Project file: S:\Projects\185060602_WillowBank Subdivision_Durham Propery Investments\06 Assessment\185060602_CLiq.clq
N/A No No Sands only No N/A
SBTn legend 1. Sensitive fine grained 2. Organic material
4. Clayey silt to silty clay 5. Silty sand to sandy silt
3. Clay to silty clay
6. Clean sand to silty sand
7. Gravely sand to sand 8. Very stiff sand to clayey sand 9. Very stiff fine grained
32
This software is licensed to: Cameron Wylie
CPT name: CPT06_SLS
Liquefaction analysis overall plots
F.S. color scheme
Input parameters and analysis data Moss et al. (2006) Moss et al. (2006) Based on Ic value 7.50 0.11 1.00 m
Depth to water table (erthq.): Average results interval: Ic cut-off value: Unit weight calculation: Use fill: Fill height:
1.00 m 3 2.60 Based on SBT No N/A
CLiq v.2.1.6.7 - CPT Liquefaction Assessment Software - Report created on: 24-Sep-18, 4:09:53 PM Project file: S:\Projects\185060602_WillowBank Subdivision_Durham Propery Investments\06 Assessment\185060602_CLiq.clq
N/A No No Sands only No N/A
LPI color scheme
Almost certain it will liquefy
Very high risk
Very likely to liquefy
High risk
Liquefaction and no liq. are equally likely
Low risk
Unlike to liquefy Almost certain it will not liquefy
33
RDCL Geotechnical Specialists 8/308 Queen St, Hastings http://www.rdcl.co.nz
LIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS REPORT Project title : 185060602
Location : Willowbank Subdivision - Te Awa
CPT file : CPT06_ULS Input parameters and analysis data Moss et al. (2006) Moss et al. (2006) Based on Ic value 7.50 0.43 .
G.W.T. (in-situ): G.W.T. (earthq.): Average results interval: Ic cut-off value: Unit weight calculation:
1.00 m 1.00 m 3 2.60 Based on SBT
No N/A N/A No No
Clay like behavior applied: Limit depth applied: Limit depth: MSF method:
Sands only No N/A Method based
Summary of liquefaction potential
CLiq v.2.1.6.7 - CPT Liquefaction Assessment Software - Report created on: 24-Sep-18, 4:09:56 PM Project file: S:\Projects\185060602_WillowBank Subdivision_Durham Propery Investments\06 Assessment\185060602_CLiq.clq
34
This software is licensed to: Cameron Wylie
CPT name: CPT06_ULS
CPT basic interpretation plots (normalized)
Input parameters and analysis data Moss et al. (2006) Moss et al. (2006) Based on Ic value 7.50 0.43 1.00 m
Depth to water table (erthq.): Average results interval: Ic cut-off value: Unit weight calculation: Use fill: Fill height:
1.00 m 3 2.60 Based on SBT No N/A
CLiq v.2.1.6.7 - CPT Liquefaction Assessment Software - Report created on: 24-Sep-18, 4:09:56 PM Project file: S:\Projects\185060602_WillowBank Subdivision_Durham Propery Investments\06 Assessment\185060602_CLiq.clq
N/A No No Sands only No N/A
SBTn legend 1. Sensitive fine grained 2. Organic material
4. Clayey silt to silty clay 5. Silty sand to sandy silt
3. Clay to silty clay
6. Clean sand to silty sand
7. Gravely sand to sand 8. Very stiff sand to clayey sand 9. Very stiff fine grained
35
This software is licensed to: Cameron Wylie
CPT name: CPT06_ULS
Liquefaction analysis overall plots
F.S. color scheme
Input parameters and analysis data Moss et al. (2006) Moss et al. (2006) Based on Ic value 7.50 0.43 1.00 m
Depth to water table (erthq.): Average results interval: Ic cut-off value: Unit weight calculation: Use fill: Fill height:
1.00 m 3 2.60 Based on SBT No N/A
CLiq v.2.1.6.7 - CPT Liquefaction Assessment Software - Report created on: 24-Sep-18, 4:09:56 PM Project file: S:\Projects\185060602_WillowBank Subdivision_Durham Propery Investments\06 Assessment\185060602_CLiq.clq
N/A No No Sands only No N/A
LPI color scheme
Almost certain it will liquefy
Very high risk
Very likely to liquefy
High risk
Liquefaction and no liq. are equally likely
Low risk
Unlike to liquefy Almost certain it will not liquefy
36
RDCL Geotechnical Specialists 8/308 Queen St, Hastings http://www.rdcl.co.nz
LIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS REPORT Project title : 185060602
Location : Willowbank Subdivision - Te Awa
CPT file : CPT07_SLS Input parameters and analysis data Moss et al. (2006) Moss et al. (2006) Based on Ic value 7.50 0.11 .
G.W.T. (in-situ): G.W.T. (earthq.): Average results interval: Ic cut-off value: Unit weight calculation:
1.00 m 1.00 m 3 2.60 Based on SBT
No N/A N/A No No
Clay like behavior applied: Limit depth applied: Limit depth: MSF method:
Sands only No N/A Method based
Summary of liquefaction potential
CLiq v.2.1.6.7 - CPT Liquefaction Assessment Software - Report created on: 24-Sep-18, 4:09:58 PM Project file: S:\Projects\185060602_WillowBank Subdivision_Durham Propery Investments\06 Assessment\185060602_CLiq.clq
37
This software is licensed to: Cameron Wylie
CPT name: CPT07_SLS
CPT basic interpretation plots (normalized)
Input parameters and analysis data Moss et al. (2006) Moss et al. (2006) Based on Ic value 7.50 0.11 1.00 m
Depth to water table (erthq.): Average results interval: Ic cut-off value: Unit weight calculation: Use fill: Fill height:
1.00 m 3 2.60 Based on SBT No N/A
CLiq v.2.1.6.7 - CPT Liquefaction Assessment Software - Report created on: 24-Sep-18, 4:09:58 PM Project file: S:\Projects\185060602_WillowBank Subdivision_Durham Propery Investments\06 Assessment\185060602_CLiq.clq
N/A No No Sands only No N/A
SBTn legend 1. Sensitive fine grained 2. Organic material
4. Clayey silt to silty clay 5. Silty sand to sandy silt
3. Clay to silty clay
6. Clean sand to silty sand
7. Gravely sand to sand 8. Very stiff sand to clayey sand 9. Very stiff fine grained
38
This software is licensed to: Cameron Wylie
CPT name: CPT07_SLS
Liquefaction analysis overall plots
F.S. color scheme
Input parameters and analysis data Moss et al. (2006) Moss et al. (2006) Based on Ic value 7.50 0.11 1.00 m
Depth to water table (erthq.): Average results interval: Ic cut-off value: Unit weight calculation: Use fill: Fill height:
1.00 m 3 2.60 Based on SBT No N/A
CLiq v.2.1.6.7 - CPT Liquefaction Assessment Software - Report created on: 24-Sep-18, 4:09:58 PM Project file: S:\Projects\185060602_WillowBank Subdivision_Durham Propery Investments\06 Assessment\185060602_CLiq.clq
N/A No No Sands only No N/A
LPI color scheme
Almost certain it will liquefy
Very high risk
Very likely to liquefy
High risk
Liquefaction and no liq. are equally likely
Low risk
Unlike to liquefy Almost certain it will not liquefy
39
RDCL Geotechnical Specialists 8/308 Queen St, Hastings http://www.rdcl.co.nz
LIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS REPORT Project title : 185060602
Location : Willowbank Subdivision - Te Awa
CPT file : CPT07_ULS Input parameters and analysis data Moss et al. (2006) Moss et al. (2006) Based on Ic value 7.50 0.43 .
G.W.T. (in-situ): G.W.T. (earthq.): Average results interval: Ic cut-off value: Unit weight calculation:
1.00 m 1.00 m 3 2.60 Based on SBT
No N/A N/A No No
Clay like behavior applied: Limit depth applied: Limit depth: MSF method:
Sands only No N/A Method based
Summary of liquefaction potential
CLiq v.2.1.6.7 - CPT Liquefaction Assessment Software - Report created on: 24-Sep-18, 4:09:59 PM Project file: S:\Projects\185060602_WillowBank Subdivision_Durham Propery Investments\06 Assessment\185060602_CLiq.clq
40
This software is licensed to: Cameron Wylie
CPT name: CPT07_ULS
CPT basic interpretation plots (normalized)
Input parameters and analysis data Moss et al. (2006) Moss et al. (2006) Based on Ic value 7.50 0.43 1.00 m
Depth to water table (erthq.): Average results interval: Ic cut-off value: Unit weight calculation: Use fill: Fill height:
1.00 m 3 2.60 Based on SBT No N/A
CLiq v.2.1.6.7 - CPT Liquefaction Assessment Software - Report created on: 24-Sep-18, 4:09:59 PM Project file: S:\Projects\185060602_WillowBank Subdivision_Durham Propery Investments\06 Assessment\185060602_CLiq.clq
N/A No No Sands only No N/A
SBTn legend 1. Sensitive fine grained 2. Organic material
4. Clayey silt to silty clay 5. Silty sand to sandy silt
3. Clay to silty clay
6. Clean sand to silty sand
7. Gravely sand to sand 8. Very stiff sand to clayey sand 9. Very stiff fine grained
41
This software is licensed to: Cameron Wylie
CPT name: CPT07_ULS
Liquefaction analysis overall plots
F.S. color scheme
Input parameters and analysis data Moss et al. (2006) Moss et al. (2006) Based on Ic value 7.50 0.43 1.00 m
Depth to water table (erthq.): Average results interval: Ic cut-off value: Unit weight calculation: Use fill: Fill height:
1.00 m 3 2.60 Based on SBT No N/A
CLiq v.2.1.6.7 - CPT Liquefaction Assessment Software - Report created on: 24-Sep-18, 4:09:59 PM Project file: S:\Projects\185060602_WillowBank Subdivision_Durham Propery Investments\06 Assessment\185060602_CLiq.clq
N/A No No Sands only No N/A
LPI color scheme
Almost certain it will liquefy
Very high risk
Very likely to liquefy
High risk
Liquefaction and no liq. are equally likely
Low risk
Unlike to liquefy Almost certain it will not liquefy
42
RDCL Geotechnical Specialists 8/308 Queen St, Hastings http://www.rdcl.co.nz
LIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS REPORT Project title : 185060602
Location : Willowbank Subdivision - Te Awa
CPT file : CPT08_SLS Input parameters and analysis data Moss et al. (2006) Moss et al. (2006) Based on Ic value 7.50 0.11 .
G.W.T. (in-situ): G.W.T. (earthq.): Average results interval: Ic cut-off value: Unit weight calculation:
1.00 m 1.00 m 3 2.60 Based on SBT
No N/A N/A No No
Clay like behavior applied: Limit depth applied: Limit depth: MSF method:
Sands only No N/A Method based
Summary of liquefaction potential
CLiq v.2.1.6.7 - CPT Liquefaction Assessment Software - Report created on: 24-Sep-18, 4:10:02 PM Project file: S:\Projects\185060602_WillowBank Subdivision_Durham Propery Investments\06 Assessment\185060602_CLiq.clq
43
This software is licensed to: Cameron Wylie
CPT name: CPT08_SLS
CPT basic interpretation plots (normalized)
Input parameters and analysis data Moss et al. (2006) Moss et al. (2006) Based on Ic value 7.50 0.11 1.00 m
Depth to water table (erthq.): Average results interval: Ic cut-off value: Unit weight calculation: Use fill: Fill height:
1.00 m 3 2.60 Based on SBT No N/A
CLiq v.2.1.6.7 - CPT Liquefaction Assessment Software - Report created on: 24-Sep-18, 4:10:02 PM Project file: S:\Projects\185060602_WillowBank Subdivision_Durham Propery Investments\06 Assessment\185060602_CLiq.clq
N/A No No Sands only No N/A
SBTn legend 1. Sensitive fine grained 2. Organic material
4. Clayey silt to silty clay 5. Silty sand to sandy silt
3. Clay to silty clay
6. Clean sand to silty sand
7. Gravely sand to sand 8. Very stiff sand to clayey sand 9. Very stiff fine grained
44
This software is licensed to: Cameron Wylie
CPT name: CPT08_SLS
Liquefaction analysis overall plots
F.S. color scheme
Input parameters and analysis data Moss et al. (2006) Moss et al. (2006) Based on Ic value 7.50 0.11 1.00 m
Depth to water table (erthq.): Average results interval: Ic cut-off value: Unit weight calculation: Use fill: Fill height:
1.00 m 3 2.60 Based on SBT No N/A
CLiq v.2.1.6.7 - CPT Liquefaction Assessment Software - Report created on: 24-Sep-18, 4:10:02 PM Project file: S:\Projects\185060602_WillowBank Subdivision_Durham Propery Investments\06 Assessment\185060602_CLiq.clq
N/A No No Sands only No N/A
LPI color scheme
Almost certain it will liquefy
Very high risk
Very likely to liquefy
High risk
Liquefaction and no liq. are equally likely
Low risk
Unlike to liquefy Almost certain it will not liquefy
45
RDCL Geotechnical Specialists 8/308 Queen St, Hastings http://www.rdcl.co.nz
LIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS REPORT Project title : 185060602
Location : Willowbank Subdivision - Te Awa
CPT file : CPT08_ULS Input parameters and analysis data Moss et al. (2006) Moss et al. (2006) Based on Ic value 7.50 0.43 .
G.W.T. (in-situ): G.W.T. (earthq.): Average results interval: Ic cut-off value: Unit weight calculation:
1.00 m 1.00 m 3 2.60 Based on SBT
No N/A N/A No No
Clay like behavior applied: Limit depth applied: Limit depth: MSF method:
Sands only No N/A Method based
Summary of liquefaction potential
CLiq v.2.1.6.7 - CPT Liquefaction Assessment Software - Report created on: 24-Sep-18, 4:10:04 PM Project file: S:\Projects\185060602_WillowBank Subdivision_Durham Propery Investments\06 Assessment\185060602_CLiq.clq
46
This software is licensed to: Cameron Wylie
CPT name: CPT08_ULS
CPT basic interpretation plots (normalized)
Input parameters and analysis data Moss et al. (2006) Moss et al. (2006) Based on Ic value 7.50 0.43 1.00 m
Depth to water table (erthq.): Average results interval: Ic cut-off value: Unit weight calculation: Use fill: Fill height:
1.00 m 3 2.60 Based on SBT No N/A
CLiq v.2.1.6.7 - CPT Liquefaction Assessment Software - Report created on: 24-Sep-18, 4:10:04 PM Project file: S:\Projects\185060602_WillowBank Subdivision_Durham Propery Investments\06 Assessment\185060602_CLiq.clq
N/A No No Sands only No N/A
SBTn legend 1. Sensitive fine grained 2. Organic material
4. Clayey silt to silty clay 5. Silty sand to sandy silt
3. Clay to silty clay
6. Clean sand to silty sand
7. Gravely sand to sand 8. Very stiff sand to clayey sand 9. Very stiff fine grained
47
This software is licensed to: Cameron Wylie
CPT name: CPT08_ULS
Liquefaction analysis overall plots
F.S. color scheme
Input parameters and analysis data Moss et al. (2006) Moss et al. (2006) Based on Ic value 7.50 0.43 1.00 m
Depth to water table (erthq.): Average results interval: Ic cut-off value: Unit weight calculation: Use fill: Fill height:
1.00 m 3 2.60 Based on SBT No N/A
CLiq v.2.1.6.7 - CPT Liquefaction Assessment Software - Report created on: 24-Sep-18, 4:10:04 PM Project file: S:\Projects\185060602_WillowBank Subdivision_Durham Propery Investments\06 Assessment\185060602_CLiq.clq
N/A No No Sands only No N/A
LPI color scheme
Almost certain it will liquefy
Very high risk
Very likely to liquefy
High risk
Liquefaction and no liq. are equally likely
Low risk
Unlike to liquefy Almost certain it will not liquefy
48
RDCL Geotechnical Specialists 8/308 Queen St, Hastings http://www.rdcl.co.nz
LIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS REPORT Project title : 185060602
Location : Willowbank Subdivision - Te Awa
CPT file : CPT09_SLS Input parameters and analysis data Moss et al. (2006) Moss et al. (2006) Based on Ic value 7.50 0.11 .
G.W.T. (in-situ): G.W.T. (earthq.): Average results interval: Ic cut-off value: Unit weight calculation:
1.00 m 1.00 m 3 2.60 Based on SBT
No N/A N/A No No
Clay like behavior applied: Limit depth applied: Limit depth: MSF method:
Sands only No N/A Method based
Summary of liquefaction potential
CLiq v.2.1.6.7 - CPT Liquefaction Assessment Software - Report created on: 24-Sep-18, 4:10:07 PM Project file: S:\Projects\185060602_WillowBank Subdivision_Durham Propery Investments\06 Assessment\185060602_CLiq.clq
49
This software is licensed to: Cameron Wylie
CPT name: CPT09_SLS
CPT basic interpretation plots (normalized)
Input parameters and analysis data Moss et al. (2006) Moss et al. (2006) Based on Ic value 7.50 0.11 1.00 m
Depth to water table (erthq.): Average results interval: Ic cut-off value: Unit weight calculation: Use fill: Fill height:
1.00 m 3 2.60 Based on SBT No N/A
CLiq v.2.1.6.7 - CPT Liquefaction Assessment Software - Report created on: 24-Sep-18, 4:10:07 PM Project file: S:\Projects\185060602_WillowBank Subdivision_Durham Propery Investments\06 Assessment\185060602_CLiq.clq
N/A No No Sands only No N/A
SBTn legend 1. Sensitive fine grained 2. Organic material
4. Clayey silt to silty clay 5. Silty sand to sandy silt
3. Clay to silty clay
6. Clean sand to silty sand
7. Gravely sand to sand 8. Very stiff sand to clayey sand 9. Very stiff fine grained
50
This software is licensed to: Cameron Wylie
CPT name: CPT09_SLS
Liquefaction analysis overall plots
F.S. color scheme
Input parameters and analysis data Moss et al. (2006) Moss et al. (2006) Based on Ic value 7.50 0.11 1.00 m
Depth to water table (erthq.): Average results interval: Ic cut-off value: Unit weight calculation: Use fill: Fill height:
1.00 m 3 2.60 Based on SBT No N/A
CLiq v.2.1.6.7 - CPT Liquefaction Assessment Software - Report created on: 24-Sep-18, 4:10:07 PM Project file: S:\Projects\185060602_WillowBank Subdivision_Durham Propery Investments\06 Assessment\185060602_CLiq.clq
N/A No No Sands only No N/A
LPI color scheme
Almost certain it will liquefy
Very high risk
Very likely to liquefy
High risk
Liquefaction and no liq. are equally likely
Low risk
Unlike to liquefy Almost certain it will not liquefy
51
RDCL Geotechnical Specialists 8/308 Queen St, Hastings http://www.rdcl.co.nz
LIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS REPORT Project title : 185060602
Location : Willowbank Subdivision - Te Awa
CPT file : CPT09_ULS Input parameters and analysis data NCEER (1998) NCEER (1998) Based on Ic value 7.50 0.43 .
G.W.T. (in-situ): G.W.T. (earthq.): Average results interval: Ic cut-off value: Unit weight calculation:
1.00 m 1.00 m 3 2.60 Based on SBT
No N/A N/A No Yes
Clay like behavior applied: Limit depth applied: Limit depth: MSF method:
Sands only No N/A Method based
Summary of liquefaction potential
CLiq v.2.1.6.7 - CPT Liquefaction Assessment Software - Report created on: 24-Sep-18, 4:10:11 PM Project file: S:\Projects\185060602_WillowBank Subdivision_Durham Propery Investments\06 Assessment\185060602_CLiq.clq
52
This software is licensed to: Cameron Wylie
CPT name: CPT09_ULS
CPT basic interpretation plots (normalized)
Input parameters and analysis data NCEER (1998) NCEER (1998) Based on Ic value 7.50 0.43 1.00 m
Depth to water table (erthq.): Average results interval: Ic cut-off value: Unit weight calculation: Use fill: Fill height:
1.00 m 3 2.60 Based on SBT No N/A
CLiq v.2.1.6.7 - CPT Liquefaction Assessment Software - Report created on: 24-Sep-18, 4:10:11 PM Project file: S:\Projects\185060602_WillowBank Subdivision_Durham Propery Investments\06 Assessment\185060602_CLiq.clq
N/A No Yes Sands only No N/A
SBTn legend 1. Sensitive fine grained 2. Organic material
4. Clayey silt to silty clay 5. Silty sand to sandy silt
3. Clay to silty clay
6. Clean sand to silty sand
7. Gravely sand to sand 8. Very stiff sand to clayey sand 9. Very stiff fine grained
53
This software is licensed to: Cameron Wylie
CPT name: CPT09_ULS
Liquefaction analysis overall plots
F.S. color scheme
Input parameters and analysis data NCEER (1998) NCEER (1998) Based on Ic value 7.50 0.43 1.00 m
Depth to water table (erthq.): Average results interval: Ic cut-off value: Unit weight calculation: Use fill: Fill height:
1.00 m 3 2.60 Based on SBT No N/A
CLiq v.2.1.6.7 - CPT Liquefaction Assessment Software - Report created on: 24-Sep-18, 4:10:11 PM Project file: S:\Projects\185060602_WillowBank Subdivision_Durham Propery Investments\06 Assessment\185060602_CLiq.clq
N/A No Yes Sands only No N/A
LPI color scheme
Almost certain it will liquefy
Very high risk
Very likely to liquefy
High risk
Liquefaction and no liq. are equally likely
Low risk
Unlike to liquefy Almost certain it will not liquefy
54
Important Information about This
Geotechnical-Engineering Report Subsurface problems are a principal cause of construction delays, cost overruns, claims, and disputes. While you cannot eliminate all such risks, you can manage them. The following information is provided to help. The Geoprofessional Business Association (GBA) has prepared this advisory to help you – assumedly a client representative – interpret and apply this geotechnical-engineering report as effectively as possible. In that way, clients can benefit from a lowered exposure to the subsurface problems that, for decades, have been a principal cause of construction delays, cost overruns, claims, and disputes. If you have questions or want more information about any of the issues discussed below, contact your GBA-member geotechnical engineer. Active involvement in the Geoprofessional Business Association exposes geotechnical engineers to a wide array of risk-confrontation techniques that can be of genuine benefit for everyone involved with a construction project. Geotechnical-Engineering Services Are Performed for Specific Purposes, Persons, and Projects
Geotechnical engineers structure their services to meet the specific needs of their clients. A geotechnical-engineering study conducted for a given civil engineer will not likely meet the needs of a civilworks constructor or even a different civil engineer. Because each geotechnical-engineering study is unique, each geotechnicalengineering report is unique, prepared solely for the client. Those who rely on a geotechnical-engineering report prepared for a different client can be seriously misled. No one except authorized client representatives should rely on this geotechnical-engineering report without first conferring with the geotechnical engineer who prepared it. And no one – not even you – should apply this report for any purpose or project except the one originally contemplated.
Read this Report in Full
Costly problems have occurred because those relying on a geotechnical engineering report did not read it in its entirety. Do not rely on an executive summary. Do not read selected elements only. Read this report in full.
You Need to Inform Your Geotechnical Engineer about Change
Your geotechnical engineer considered unique, project-specific factors when designing the study behind this report and developing the confirmation-dependent recommendations the report conveys. A few typical factors include: • the client’s goals, objectives, budget, schedule, and risk-management preferences; • the general nature of the structure involved, its size, configuration, and performance criteria; • the structure’s location and orientation on the site; and • other planned or existing site improvements, such as retaining walls, access roads, parking lots, and underground utilities.
Typical changes that could erode the reliability of this report include those that affect: • the site’s size or shape; • the function of the proposed structure, as when it’s changed from a parking garage to an office building, or from a light-industrial plant to a refrigerated warehouse; • the elevation, configuration, location, orientation, or weight of the proposed structure; • the composition of the design team; or • project ownership. As a general rule, always inform your geotechnical engineer of project changes – even minor ones – and request an assessment of their impact. The geotechnical engineer who prepared this report cannot accept responsibility or liability for problems that arise because the geotechnical engineer was not informed about developments the engineer otherwise would have considered.
This Report May Not Be Reliable
Do not rely on this report if your geotechnical engineer prepared it: • for a different client; • for a different project; • for a different site (that may or may not include all or a portion of the original site); or • before important events occurred at the site or adjacent to it; e.g., man-made events like construction or environmental remediation, or natural events like floods, droughts, earthquakes, or groundwater fluctuations. Note, too, that it could be unwise to rely on a geotechnical-engineering report whose reliability may have been affected by the passage of time, because of factors like changed subsurface conditions; new or modified codes, standards, or regulations; or new techniques or tools. If your geotechnical engineer has not indicated an “apply-by” date on the report, ask what it should be, and, in general, if you are the least bit uncertain about the continued reliability of this report, contact your geotechnical engineer before applying it. A minor amount of additional testing or analysis – if any is required at all – could prevent major problems.
Most of the “Findings” Related in This Report Are Professional Opinions
Before construction begins, geotechnical engineers explore a site’s subsurface through various sampling and testing procedures. Geotechnical engineers can observe actual subsurface conditions only at those specific locations where sampling and testing were performed. The data derived from that sampling and testing were reviewed by your geotechnical engineer, who then applied professional judgment to form opinions about subsurface conditions throughout the site. Actual sitewide-subsurface conditions may differ – maybe significantly – from those indicated in this report. Confront that risk by retaining your geotechnical engineer to serve on the design team from project start to project finish, so the individual can provide informed guidance quickly, whenever needed.
This Report’s Recommendations Are Confirmation-Dependent
The recommendations included in this report – including any options or alternatives – are confirmation-dependent. In other words, they are not final, because the geotechnical engineer who developed them relied heavily on judgment and opinion to do so. Your geotechnical engineer can finalize the recommendations only after observing actual subsurface conditions revealed during construction. If through observation your geotechnical engineer confirms that the conditions assumed to exist actually do exist, the recommendations can be relied upon, assuming no other changes have occurred. The geotechnical engineer who prepared this report cannot assume responsibility or liability for confirmationdependent recommendations if you fail to retain that engineer to perform construction observation.
This Report Could Be Misinterpreted
Other design professionals’ misinterpretation of geotechnicalengineering reports has resulted in costly problems. Confront that risk by having your geotechnical engineer serve as a full-time member of the design team, to: • confer with other design-team members, • help develop specifications, • review pertinent elements of other design professionals’ plans and specifications, and • be on hand quickly whenever geotechnical-engineering guidance is needed. You should also confront the risk of constructors misinterpreting this report. Do so by retaining your geotechnical engineer to participate in prebid and preconstruction conferences and to perform construction observation.
Give Constructors a Complete Report and Guidance
Some owners and design professionals mistakenly believe they can shift unanticipated-subsurface-conditions liability to constructors by limiting the information they provide for bid preparation. To help prevent the costly, contentious problems this practice has caused, include the complete geotechnical-engineering report, along with any attachments or appendices, with your contract documents, but be certain to note conspicuously that you’ve included the material for informational purposes only. To avoid misunderstanding, you may also want to note that “informational purposes” means constructors have no right to rely on the interpretations, opinions, conclusions, or recommendations in the report, but they may rely on the factual data relative to the specific times, locations, and depths/elevations referenced. Be certain that constructors know they may learn about specific project requirements, including options selected from the report, only from the design drawings and specifications. Remind constructors that they may
perform their own studies if they want to, and be sure to allow enough time to permit them to do so. Only then might you be in a position to give constructors the information available to you, while requiring them to at least share some of the financial responsibilities stemming from unanticipated conditions. Conducting prebid and preconstruction conferences can also be valuable in this respect.
Read Responsibility Provisions Closely
Some client representatives, design professionals, and constructors do not realize that geotechnical engineering is far less exact than other engineering disciplines. That lack of understanding has nurtured unrealistic expectations that have resulted in disappointments, delays, cost overruns, claims, and disputes. To confront that risk, geotechnical engineers commonly include explanatory provisions in their reports. Sometimes labeled “limitations,” many of these provisions indicate where geotechnical engineers’ responsibilities begin and end, to help others recognize their own responsibilities and risks. Read these provisions closely. Ask questions. Your geotechnical engineer should respond fully and frankly.
Geoenvironmental Concerns Are Not Covered
The personnel, equipment, and techniques used to perform an environmental study – e.g., a “phase-one” or “phase-two” environmental site assessment – differ significantly from those used to perform a geotechnical-engineering study. For that reason, a geotechnicalengineering report does not usually relate any environmental findings, conclusions, or recommendations; e.g., about the likelihood of encountering underground storage tanks or regulated contaminants. Unanticipated subsurface environmental problems have led to project failures. If you have not yet obtained your own environmental information, ask your geotechnical consultant for risk-management guidance. As a general rule, do not rely on an environmental report prepared for a different client, site, or project, or that is more than six months old.
Obtain Professional Assistance to Deal with Moisture Infiltration and Mold
While your geotechnical engineer may have addressed groundwater, water infiltration, or similar issues in this report, none of the engineer’s services were designed, conducted, or intended to prevent uncontrolled migration of moisture – including water vapor – from the soil through building slabs and walls and into the building interior, where it can cause mold growth and material-performance deficiencies. Accordingly, proper implementation of the geotechnical engineer’s recommendations will not of itself be sufficient to prevent moisture infiltration. Confront the risk of moisture infiltration by including building-envelope or mold specialists on the design team. Geotechnical engineers are not buildingenvelope or mold specialists.
Telephone: 301/565-2733 e-mail: info@geoprofessional.org www.geoprofessional.org Copyright 2016 by Geoprofessional Business Association (GBA). Duplication, reproduction, or copying of this document, in whole or in part, by any means whatsoever, is strictly prohibited, except with GBA’s specific written permission. Excerpting, quoting, or otherwise extracting wording from this document is permitted only with the express written permission of GBA, and only for purposes of scholarly research or book review. Only members of GBA may use this document or its wording as a complement to or as an element of a report of any kind. Any other firm, individual, or other entity that so uses this document without being a GBA member could be committing negligent
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier Assessment of Environmental Effects
APPENDIX I HBRC Hazards Report
HAWKE’S BAY NATURAL HAZARD PROPERTY REPORT
Tuesday, 1 January 2019
CROWN COPYRIGHT RESERVED. © Copyright Hawke's Bay Regional Council.
38 Willowbank Avenue, Meeanee, Napier Napier City Lot 2 DP 14417 1010039601 This report summarises the known hazards intersecting this property, based on research commissioned to assess regional risk – these research reports are summarised below. The hazard assessment methodologies, information compilation and presentation techniques used for these assessments include certain qualifications and limitations on the use, noting: a) The hazard information provided is based on the best information available at the time of the studies and was supplied under specific contract arrangements including financial and time constraints. b) The hazard information may be liable to change or review if new information is made available. c) Councils and other organisations may hold more detailed hazard information than provided here. This Natural Hazard Property Report is not a substitute for a Land Information Memorandum (LIM). d) The precision and accuracy of the data varies, therefore it is important that you obtain expert advice to help to interpret the information. The hazard maps in this report are based on the following referenced research reports. Online Natural Hazards Resource Database contains a register of the hazard documents, research material, and publications from either the Council or external organisations and this database may contain other pertinent information related to this area: The referenced reports are: (i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
Earthquake Fault lines - Earthquake hazards in Hawke's Bay Initial assessment - Earthquake hazard analysis - Stage 1. Recurrence of large earthquakes determined from geological and seismological studies in the Hawke's Bay area - Hawke's Bay region earthquake hazard analysis programme, Stage 2 - a numerical assessment of the earthquake hazard in the Hawke's Bay region. - Active Fault Mapping and Fault Avoidance Zones for Central Hawkes Bay District: 2013 Update - Active Fault Mapping and Fault Avoidance Zones for Hastings District and environs - Fault Avoidance Zone Mapping for Wairoa District, Napier City and surrounds Earthquake Liquefaction - Assessment of liquefaction risk in the Hawke`s Bay: Volume 1: The liquefaction hazard model - Assessment of liquefaction risk in the Hawke`s Bay: Appendices for Volume 1 Earthquake Amplification - Hawke's Bay Regional Council earthquake hazard analysis program, Stage III : evaluation of ground shaking amplification potential Volume 1 - Hawke's Bay Regional Council earthquake hazard analysis program, Stage III : evaluation of ground shaking amplification potential Volume 2: Appendices Quaternary Geology - Hawke's Bay Regional Council earthquake hazard analysis program, Stage III : evaluation of ground shaking amplification potential Volume 2: Appendices
(v)
Tsunami Inundation Extents -
(vi)
Hawkes BayTsunami Inundation by Attenuation Rule Review of Tsunami Hazard in New Zealand
Flooding Extents -
Wairoa River Flood Hazard Study TeNgaru Catchment Flood Hazard Study Waipatiki Catchment Flood Hazard Analysis Kopuawhara Opoutama Flood Hazard Analysis
HB Hazards Report - Hawkes Bay Regional Council
Page 1 of 11
HAWKE’S BAY NATURAL HAZARD PROPERTY REPORT
Tuesday, 1 January 2019
CROWN COPYRIGHT RESERVED. © Copyright Hawke's Bay Regional Council.
(vii)
Coastal Hazard -
(viii)
Regional Coastal Environmental Plan Clifton to Tangoio Coastal Hazards Strategy 2120 - Coastal Hazard Assessment Clifton to Tangoio Coastal Hazards Strategy 2120 - Coastal Risk Assessment Other Coastal Hazard Reports Cliff Hazard Zone Delineation Wairoa River Bank Stability Zones
-
Wairoa River Bank Stability Assessment
Online Mapping Conditions of Use 1. Use of these maps is subject to these disclaimers and exclusions. By using these maps the user is signifying his or her agreement to be bound by these exclusions and disclaimers. 2.
Hawke’s Bay Regional Council’s Hazard maps have been compiled using the best information available to the council. The maps indicate the extent of the hazard from analysis of information only. They do not necessarily reflect the greatest extent of the hazard suffered in the past, or likely to be suffered in the future.
3.
The hazard information provided does not imply any actual level of damage to any particular structure, utility service or other infrastructure.
4.
These maps should not be relied upon as the sole basis for making any decision in relation to potential risk.
5. The hazard information provided is regional in scope and cannot be substituted for a site-specific investigation. A suitably qualified and experienced practitioner should be engaged if a site specific investigation is required. 6. Hawke’s Bay Regional Council makes no representations, warranties or undertakings about any of the information in these maps and/or electronic files including, without limitation, their accuracy, completeness, quality or fitness for any particular purpose. 7.
The Hawke’s Bay Regional Council shall not be liable for any loss or damage arising out of, or in connection with, the use of the information contained in these maps and/or electronic files.
8.
Hawke’s Bay Regional Council reserves the right to change the content and/or presentation of any of the information contained in these maps at its sole discretion, including these notes and disclaimer.
9.
These disclaimers and exclusions shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of New Zealand. If any provision of these disclaimers and exclusions is unlawful, void or for any reason unenforceable, that provision shall be deemed severable and shall not affect the validity and enforceability of the remaining provisions.
HB Hazards Report - Hawkes Bay Regional Council
Page 2 of 11
Liquefaction Hazard The information displayed is schematic only and serves as a guide. It has been compiled from Hawke's Bay Regional Council records and is made available in good faith but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. Cadastral Information has been derived from land Information New Zealands (LINZ) Core Record System Database (CRS). CROWN COPYRIGHT RESERVED. Š Copyright Hawke's Bay Regional Council.
HB Hazards Report - Hawkes Bay Regional Council
Scale 1:5000 Tuesday, 1 January 2019 Original Sheet Size 210x297mm
Page 3 of 11
Natural Hazards Report The information displayed is schematic only and serves as a guide. It has been compiled from Hawke's Bay Regional Council records and is made available in good faith but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. Cadastral Information has been derived from land Information New Zealands (LINZ) Core Record System Database (CRS).
Tuesday, 1 January 2019
CROWN COPYRIGHT RESERVED. © Copyright Hawke's Bay Regional Council.
Liquefaction Report Liquefaction occurs when waterlogged sediments are agitated by an earthquake. As a result, the soil behaves like a liquid, has an inability to support weight and can flow down very gentle slopes. This condition is usually temporary, but buildings can sink and underground pipes may rise to the surface. When the shaking stops, groundwater is squeezed out of the ground causing flooding, which can leave areas covered in mud. Liquefaction most often occurs when three conditions are met: 1. loose, granular sediment or fill 2. saturation by groundwater 3. strong shaking There is a liquefaction hazard present in several areas of Hawke’s Bay, and the region has numerous earthquake sources (see earthquake return periods in table below), and liquefaction effects have been reported in the Hawke's Bay region during four historical earthquakes since 1840 at Modified Mercalli (MM) shaking intensities between MM7 and MM10, including in 1931. Low-lying areas in the region, especially these near the coast, and reclaimed land are particularly susceptible. It is important to understand that having land included in a particular zone does not unequivocally mean that the land is "good", "medium" or "bad." The maps indicate what is a strong possibility across those areas. The best areas (cream) have a very low probability of having a liquefaction problem, but there may still be some localised places where the hazard exists. The only sure way of showing whether a specific site has low (cream), medium (orange), or high (brown) liquefaction vulnerability is a site specific geotechnical investigation. If building, it is recommended you reference the Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment (MBIE) and the Ministry for the Environment document “Planning and engineering guidance for potentially liquefaction-prone land” and if necessary obtain expert advice from a qualified and experienced geotechnical engineer. On a property already developed, there are options to mitigate the risk of liquefaction which can be found here https://www.eqc.govt.nz/canterbury/ground-improvement-programme and owners are recommended to obtain expert advice from a qualified and experienced geotechnical engineer if pursuing these options. But the easiest way to mitigate risk of liquefaction if your house is located on land with a high liquefaction hazard, is to ensure your insurance sum-insured is sufficient to rebuild with heavier duty foundations in the event of total loss (noting this could be fire or flood - not just earthquake).
HB Hazards Report - Hawkes Bay Regional Council
Page 4 of 11
Earthquake Amplification The information displayed is schematic only and serves as a guide. It has been compiled from Hawke's Bay Regional Council records and is made available in good faith but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. Cadastral Information has been derived from land Information New Zealands (LINZ) Core Record System Database (CRS). CROWN COPYRIGHT RESERVED. Š Copyright Hawke's Bay Regional Council.
HB Hazards Report - Hawkes Bay Regional Council
Scale 1:5000 Tuesday, 1 January 2019 Original Sheet Size 210x297mm
Page 5 of 11
Natural Hazards Report The information displayed is schematic only and serves as a guide. It has been compiled from Hawke's Bay Regional Council records and is made available in good faith but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. Cadastral Information has been derived from land Information New Zealands (LINZ) Core Record System Database (CRS).
Tuesday, 1 January 2019
CROWN COPYRIGHT RESERVED. Š Copyright Hawke's Bay Regional Council.
Amplification Report Most of the damage during an earthquake is caused by ground shaking. The amplification map indicating the regional hazard from ground shaking in Hawke's Bay. Seismic waves, travelling through the earth at different speeds and amplitudes because of a fault rupture, cause the ground to vibrate and shake in an earthquake. The intensity of the shaking is measured on the Modified Mercalli (MM) scale of 1 to 12, although MM10 is the maximum ever observed in New Zealand. The intensity of ground shaking at any location is affected by the magnitude of the earthquake, proximity to the source of the earthquake, and the geological material underneath that location. Larger earthquakes generally produce greater shaking and shaking is usually more pronounced nearer the source of the earthquake. Deep earthquakes generally produce less shaking because the source is deep in the earth. Fault ruptures often start at one point and propagate along the fault, rather than breaking the whole fault at once. In that case, shaking may be more intense at locations towards which the rupture is propagating, and less intense at locations in the opposite direction, that is, in the direction from which rupture is propagating. The damage caused by shaking depends on how large the ground motion is, how long it lasts, and its frequency. Large motions put great stresses on structures that sit on or in the moving ground and the longer the shaking lasts, the more likely the structures are to sustain serious or permanent damage. Different frequencies of shaking affect buildings differently - in general, low frequency motions affect taller buildings more, while high frequencies affect shorter buildings. The type of material underlying the site can have a great effect on the nature and intensity of the shaking. Sites underlain by hard, stiff material such as bedrock or old compacted sediments usually experience much less shaking than sites located on young, loosely consolidated sediment, which tends to amplify shaking. Closed basins filled with soft sediment overlying bedrock, such as the Poukawa basin, are especially vulnerable to amplification of shaking, as earthquake waves can become trapped within the basin, travelling back and forth increasing the shaking rather than being dissipated. Water-saturated sites, such as river banks and lagoons, are particularly susceptible to shaking-induced ground damage such as liquefaction. WHAT CAN YOU DO? Most people in Hawke's Bay will survive a large earthquake with some loss, but some people will be severely affected. Action you take now can help reduce damage to your home and business and help you survive. Practice Drop, Cover and Hold
HB Hazards Report - Hawkes Bay Regional Council
Page 6 of 11
Quaternary Geology The information displayed is schematic only and serves as a guide. It has been compiled from Hawke's Bay Regional Council records and is made available in good faith but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. Cadastral Information has been derived from land Information New Zealands (LINZ) Core Record System Database (CRS). CROWN COPYRIGHT RESERVED. Š Copyright Hawke's Bay Regional Council.
HB Hazards Report - Hawkes Bay Regional Council
Scale 1:5000 Tuesday, 1 January 2019 Original Sheet Size 210x297mm
Page 7 of 11
Flooding The information displayed is schematic only and serves as a guide. It has been compiled from Hawke's Bay Regional Council records and is made available in good faith but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. Cadastral Information has been derived from land Information New Zealands (LINZ) Core Record System Database (CRS). CROWN COPYRIGHT RESERVED. Š Copyright Hawke's Bay Regional Council.
HB Hazards Report - Hawkes Bay Regional Council
Scale 1:5000 Tuesday, 1 January 2019 Original Sheet Size 210x297mm
Page 8 of 11
Natural Hazards Report The information displayed is schematic only and serves as a guide. It has been compiled from Hawke's Bay Regional Council records and is made available in good faith but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. Cadastral Information has been derived from land Information New Zealands (LINZ) Core Record System Database (CRS).
Tuesday, 1 January 2019
CROWN COPYRIGHT RESERVED. Š Copyright Hawke's Bay Regional Council.
Flooding Report Information provided on the flooding maps shows general details about flooding patterns and areas at risk. They have been produced using computer models using verification with actual events where possible. Flood extents shown in the maps are not meant to show specific flooding details on each property. These maps should not be relied upon as the sole basis for making any decision in relation to potential flood risk. Contact the Hawkeâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Bay Regional Council Engineering Department if further information is required with regards to a specific property. Urban pipe networks and flooding on the street network in the urban areas have not been considered in the flood modelling. Urban areas show flood risk areas that are the result of the capacity of open drains being exceeded. In some flood risk areas, houses and other structures may be elevated above the ground, and would be considered not floodable. These cases are not identified in this flood modelling. Flood modelling is based on 100 year return period events (1% annual exceedance probability) for river flood risk areas, and 50 year return period events (2% annual exceedance probability) for floodplain flood risk areas. The effects of climate change have not been included in this flood modelling Flooding vs. Ponding Major flooding happens when the capacity of a stream or drain is exceeded. Small scale, localised ponding may occur in areas where water cannot get to the stream through the normal paths of overland flow when the streams are not in flood. The flood hazard study does not consider this type of localised ponding in detail.
HB Hazards Report - Hawkes Bay Regional Council
Page 9 of 11
Tsunami Inundation Extents The information displayed is schematic only and serves as a guide. It has been compiled from Hawke's Bay Regional Council records and is made available in good faith but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. Cadastral Information has been derived from land Information New Zealands (LINZ) Core Record System Database (CRS). CROWN COPYRIGHT RESERVED. Š Copyright Hawke's Bay Regional Council.
HB Hazards Report - Hawkes Bay Regional Council
Scale 1:5000 Tuesday, 1 January 2019 Original Sheet Size 210x297mm
Page 10 of 11
Natural Hazards Report The information displayed is schematic only and serves as a guide. It has been compiled from Hawke's Bay Regional Council records and is made available in good faith but its accuracy or completeness is not guaranteed. Cadastral Information has been derived from land Information New Zealands (LINZ) Core Record System Database (CRS).
Tuesday, 1 January 2019
CROWN COPYRIGHT RESERVED. © Copyright Hawke's Bay Regional Council.
Tsunami Report RISK The East Coast of New Zealand has been identified with a significant tsunami risk because of our subduction zone marked by the Hikurangi Trough. The massive tsunami in 2004 in the Indian Ocean, in 2009 in the South Pacific and in 2011 in Japan overturned many assumptions regarding the potential for severe tsunami to be generated on subduction zones throughout the Pacific. As new research into New Zealand’s subduction tsunami sources will take time, it is best to assume that our subduction zone could generate severe tsunami from earthquake sizes of MW 8-9. LOCATION Hawke's Bay's position on the Pacific Ocean means there are risks of tsunami from both local, regional and distance sources, and the East Coast of NZ has the highest risk in the country. Tsunami (pronounced tsu - nam - ee) is a Japanese word meaning 'harbour wave'. It describes a series of fast travelling waves caused by large disturbances on the ocean floor, such as earthquakes, landslides or volcanic eruptions. In the deep ocean tsunami pass almost unnoticed, but as they approach land and therefore shallower coastal waters, they change dramatically - a wave 1-2 metres at sea grows into waves that can be over 30 metres in height. INUNDATION As New Zealand’s entire coast is at risk of tsunami, the Hawke’s Bay Regional Council has developed tsunami hazard maps to help residents and councils prepare for a large tsunami impacting our region. These are overview maps only and are not specific enough to predict impact on your individual property. They show some of the worst case scenarios (2,500 year return period) for Hawke’s Bay for tsunami coming from both a very large local earthquake or from across the Pacific Ocean. The maps from Clive to Tangoio are shown below and maps for Wairoa are attached. Further mapping for the remaining Hawke’s Bay coastline is due to be published in 2015.
Wave height predictions are shown on this graph based on probabilistic tsunami hazard from all sources for Napier. Our risks include destruction of homes, businesses and infrastructure in inundation zones, along with injuries and loss of life, with environmental devastation and the slow process of recovery. Tsunami modelled results are being used by District and City Councils working with local people to prepare community response plans and evacuation maps. If you are keen to be involved, please contact your local Council for information. The Hawke’s Bay CDEM is the lead agency for managing any natural hazard event, like tsunami that affects the people of Hawke’s Bay. HB Hazards Report - Hawkes Bay Regional Council
Page 11 of 11
22 February 2019
Durham Property Investments Limited C/- Development Nous Limited PO Box 385 HASTINGS 4156
Dear Jason, Resource Consent Decision (RMS19006) – 16 Willowbank Avenue, Napier Thank you for your application for the residential subdivision and development of the above property that is subject to the Te Awa Structure Plan of the Main Residential Zone. Further Information Given the extent of the issues listed below it is suggested that a meeting is arranged between the applicant and Councils Infrastructure Department, Urban Design Lead and Processing Planners to reach agreement. Please advise what date/time would be suitable and I can coordinate a meeting. The further information required is listed below and is requested under section 92(1) of the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA): General (Servicing)
The proposed concept is for a gated community with Council services covered by easements. Councils Infrastructure Department have advised that the proposed consent would not allow Council free access to work on any of its infrastructure within the Gated Community. Further discussion on this matter would be required. The Engineering Approval will need to be prepared for the full development and submitted for approval. Please note: Staging can then be undertaken within the overall approval as appropriate. The proposed road/services section does not match the Code. Further discussion will be required to determine an acceptable solution.
Stormwater
It appears that the proposed staging of the subdivision will not correspond with the stormwater drainage plan. Please provide further details. Please provide calculations to determine connection sizes for stormwater (the design of the stormwater system needs to show secondary flow paths with levels and floor levels that will protect dwellings from flooding in a 50 year return period event. Councils Infrastructure Department have advised that the culvert across Eriksen Road is to be upgraded to a standard that matches the design capacity. The responsibility for the construction will need to be discussed with Council. Please note the approved point of connection for stormwater is the Cowshed Drain on the eastern side of Eriksen Road.
The design of the stormwater needs to be revised. Stormwater treatment shall be provided to allow for the at least the first flush, gross pollutant capture, treatment features in the open drain. Pipe sizing, particularly along Eriksen Road needs to be clarified.
Wastewater
Revised plans are required as the full development shall be serviced with a single wastewater pump station. Note: The wastewater pump station and pipelines shall not be located within the drainage reserves or generally within 40m of the reserve, as the liquefaction risk to infrastructure and erosion from uncontrolled surface water is undesirable. Please advise how the sewer connections will be provided for the lots facing Eriksen Road. Please provide details of the staging for the proposed wastewater installation. Please relocate the pump station as it is indicated in the over land flow path. Please note the connection for the sewer shall be to the existing DN100 wastewater rising main near the corner of Eriksen Road and Hurunui Drive. A cross connection shall be provided to allows flows to be diverted between the existing rising main and the existing gravity wastewater networks.
Water
The proposed water supply network needs to be further discussed with Councils Infrastructure Department as it is to be fully owned and operated by the Napier City Council. Please clarify the use of a dwelling occupancy rate of 1.25. Please justify and update water demand calculations accordingly. Please confirm fire fighting requirements can be met.
Reserves
The Te Awa Structure Plan requires pedestrian linkages through the subdivision. Councils Reserves Department and the Developer need to come to an agreement as to what level of service is required. Fencing is to be provide along Willowbank Road. The standard of performance needs to be agreed with Council. The Te Awa Structure Plan requires the establishment of a neighbourhood reserve. The location and size needs to be agreed with Council and this land will need to be vested. The proposed walkway is physically separated from the development by the proposed drainage swale. The proposed ‘Pocket Park’ is proposed to be fenced internally to exclude public access, and is nowhere near a suitable size to be a functional open space. Both connectivity and public open space are heavily identified in the Structure Plan and the relating outcomes. This subdivision does not achieve this. The Scheme Plan does not identify the Pocket Park and Drainage Reserve links as being vested in Council. Plans need to show all lots to be vested and purpose.
Foundations/Earthworks
Please provide a Geotechnical report to confirm foundation and lateral spread requirements, particularly within the vicinity of the drainage reserve.
ď&#x201A;ˇ
Please provide full details of the proposed cut and fill works that are to be undertaken on the site.
Urban Design ď&#x201A;ˇ ď&#x201A;ˇ
Please find attached Councils Urban Design Leads comments and recommendations. Please address accordingly. The concept plan provided show the open space circle extending over the boundary. Please provide an overall assessment for the full development in terms of compliance with the open space rules and update the assessment accordingly.
Please provide the above information by 15th March 2019. Under section 92A of the RMA, you must, within 15 working days of the date of the request, take one of the following options: a) provide the information; or b) tell us in writing that you agree to provide the requested information but cannot provide it by the date, at which point we would negotiate a reasonable time within which you will provide the information; or c) tell us in writing you refuse to provide the information. Processing of the application will resume once the information has been received and a decision regarding notification will be made. If you have any questions please contact myself on 06 834 4132 or Colin Hunt on 06 833 9720. Yours sincerely
Bridget Nicholson Resource Consents Planner
Contact: Jason Kaye/Matthew Holder
15 March 2019
Development Nous Ltd 212 Queen Street East Hastings 4122 New Zealand
Napier City Council Private Bag 6010 Hastings 4142
PO Box 385 Hastings 4156 New Zealand 06 876 2159
Attention: Bridget Nicholson and Colin Hunt Dear Bridget and Colin, Clarification of Further Information Request (RMS19006) - 16 Willowbank Avenue, Napier We write in response to your further information request with respect to the above resource consent application dated 22 February 2019 and following informal discussions with Paul O’Shaughnessy. This letter is intended as a preliminary response to the s92 request to guide upcoming discussion with your engineering colleagues. A response to the following matters would be of great assistance prior to meeting to ensure that we can maximise clarity of issues and benefit from the meeting. General (Servicing)
The proposed concept is for a gated community with Council services covered by easements. Councils Infrastructure Department have advised that the proposed consent would not allow Council free access to work on any of its infrastructure within the Gated Community. Further discussion on this matter would be required.
Please see schedule of easements on the proposed scheme plan. The internal infrastructure will be covered by this easement in gross and provides the legal means of access to the site. This naturally can form a condition of consent. Physical access through the controlled entrance can be readily maintained through provision of gate key/code to Council. This approach was discussed with Council’s engineering staff during several pre-application meetings.
The Engineering Approval will need to be prepared for the full development and submitted for approval. Please note: Staging can then be undertaken within the overall approval as appropriate.
Accepted and expected. A consent condition is appropriate. Therefore, no further action is required
The proposed road/services section does not match the Code. Further discussion will be required to determine an acceptable solution.
Roads are designed to the minor local standard (<200vpd) on the basis of the number of dwellings served by each road through the internal network. This was also an aspect discussed with Council’s engineering/roading staff during pre-application discussion. Can you please clarify the aspects of code non-compliance. Stormwater
It appears that the proposed staging of the subdivision will not correspond with the stormwater drainage plan. Please provide further details.
We have identified one inconsistency that we note can be readily resolved at detailed design stage. Please clarify the areas of inconsistency identified by the Council to enable to confirm that these also can be resolved.
Please provide calculations to determine connection sizes for stormwater (the design of the stormwater system needs to show secondary flow paths with levels and floor levels that will protect dwellings from flooding in a 50 year return period event.
This detailed design work was expected to be undertaken pursuant to a condition of consent.
Councils Infrastructure Department have advised that the culvert across Eriksen Road is to be upgraded to a standard that matches the design capacity. The responsibility for the construction will need to be discussed with Council.
As these are structure plan works that benefit the wider Te Awa Development Area, it is expected that the works will be undertaken by Napier City Council.
Please note the approved point of connection for stormwater is the Cowshed Drain on the eastern side of Eriksen Road.
Noted and accepted. Advice note is appropriate.
The design of the stormwater needs to be revised. Stormwater treatment shall be provided to allow for the at least the first flush, gross pollutant capture, treatment features in the open drain.
Individual onsite initial treatment is not a specific requirement of the Structure Plan and it is expected that the Napier City Council stormwater swale and pond provides required quality treatment. If initial onsite treatment is necessary, please advise where this has been required in other recently consented development.
Pipe sizing, particularly along Eriksen Road needs to be clarified.
This detailed design is expected to be undertaken at engineering approval stage by consent condition. Can you please advise why it is necessary to define this detail now. Wastewater
Revised plans are required as the full development shall be serviced with a single wastewater pump station. Note: The wastewater pump station and pipelines shall not be located within the drainage reserves or generally within 40m of the reserve, as the liquefaction risk to infrastructure and erosion from uncontrolled surface water is undesirable.
The Structure Plan shows the single pump design as ‘indicative only’. Multiple smaller pump stations are considered preferable for safety in design and resilient infrastructure. Please advise why a single pump is now considered the only option. This could be addressed via a condition of consent.
Please advise how the sewer connections will be provided for the lots facing Eriksen Road.
The submitted scheme plan details show the connections for these properties as a gravity feed to the existing network.
Please provide details of the staging for the proposed wastewater installation.
The wastewater installation will proceed in accordance with both the staged scheme plans and the proposed sewer layout. This is however, generally a matter for detailed design that we expect to be conditioned, and conditions would ensure that no lot could receive title prior to being fully serviced.
Please relocate the pump station as it is indicated in the over land flow path.
The pump station was intended to be stormwater water resilient. This is obviously part of the wider issue of pump design (single versus multiple).
Please note the connection for the sewer shall be to the existing DN100 wastewater rising main near the corner of Eriksen Road and Hurunui Drive. A cross connection shall be provided to allows flows to be diverted between the existing rising main and the existing gravity wastewater networks. 2
Noted. Advice note as necessary. Water
The proposed water supply network needs to be further discussed with Councils Infrastructure Department as it is to be fully owned and operated by the Napier City Council.
Noted. Advice note as necessary. Engineering approvals will address where necessary.
Please clarify the use of a dwelling occupancy rate of 1.25. Please justify and update water demand calculations accordingly.
This appears to be a matter for detailed design.
Please confirm fire fighting requirements can be met.
Appliance access can be readily gained throughout the site. Hydrants within the site will be provided in accordance with required standard, and this will be determined at detailed design. As zoned land, there is an expectation that water supply is a structure plan issue. Reserves
The Te Awa Structure Plan requires pedestrian linkages through the subdivision. Councils Reserves Department and the Developer need to come to an agreement as to what level of service is required.
The specific occupancy group perceive themselves to be more vulnerable to anti social behaviour and confidence based fraudulent activity. It is not intended that the site is available as an open public route. Extensive walking routes are available within the site for the future occupiers accessibility. Legible north-south routes bypassing the site are provided, including an attractive route through the landscaped swale land.
Fencing is to be provide along Willowbank Road. The standard of performance needs to be agreed with Council.
The requirement is noted and the detail of this can readily be agreed by condition. If you can provide examples of the form of barrier required, we can provide confirmation of acceptance.
The Te Awa Structure Plan requires the establishment of a neighbourhood reserve. The location and size needs to be agreed with Council and this land will need to be vested.
Further discussion is required, but the significant land accommodating the stormwater swale to the western and southern boundaries of the site provide the opportunity for a large, usable area of high quality open space for community needs. This links with other paths and cycle ways established within similar open space
The proposed walkway is physically separated from the development by the proposed drainage swale. The proposed ‘Pocket Park’ is proposed to be fenced internally to exclude public access, and is nowhere near a suitable size to be a functional open space. Both connectivity and public open space are heavily identified in the Structure Plan and the relating outcomes. This subdivision does not achieve this.
Further discussion is required however, the site does readily provide walking opportunities for those passing through the area (expected to be walking north-south). The pocket park is intended for use by residents of the development and is not intended to be open to the public. Opening this to the public would obviously compromise the fundamental form of the development.
The Scheme Plan does not identify the Pocket Park and Drainage Reserve links as being vested in Council. Plans need to show all lots to be vested and purpose.
Vesting of the swale land as local purpose reserve is detailed on the staged scheme plans. The pocket parks are intended to be retained by the development as opposed to becoming public. Can you please clarify what further action is required on this matter. Foundations/Earthworks
Please provide a Geotechnical report to confirm foundation and lateral spread requirements, particularly within the vicinity of the drainage reserve. 3
The geotechnical reporting provided at Appendix H of the Assessment of Environmental Effects includes full detail of the CPT testing across the site and provides related assessment and conclusions in relation to liquefaction and lateral stretch and spread. The recommendations from the report are that the site is suitable, in geotechnical terms, for the proposed development and that specific shallow Canterbury design foundations should be determined at building consent stage. This can be readily secured by way of a consent notice. We will need guidance as to the nature of further detail required in this respect for the consenting stage, particularly as we believe the requirements of Section 106 of the Resource Management Act have been met. ď&#x201A;ˇ
Please provide full details of the proposed cut and fill works that are to be undertaken on the site.
The earthworks details provided with the application provide detail of the cut and fill required and associated profiles. The anticipated material import/export volumes are also identified in the application. Can you please advise what further detail is required at this consenting stage of development. General Comments/Observations In terms of the engineering comments, we believe that a lot of what has been included in the s92 request is work that would be expected to be completed at detailed design stage and submitted to Council for Engineering Approval. It is difficult to provide an increased level of engineering detail without first having the approval in place and without knowing what conditions of consent will be applied. We believe we have provided adequate information to demonstrate that the development can be serviced and generally fits within the objectives of the structure plan. Hopefully the above provides a good start for all to enable productive progression of the information request. If you required any clarification of the above note, please contact us.
Kind regards
Jason Kaye Development Nous Limited
4
Contact: Jason Kaye/Matthew Holder
02 April 2019
Napier City Council Private Bag 6010 Hastings 4142
Development Nous Ltd 212 Queen Street East Hastings 4122 New Zealand PO Box 385 Hastings 4156 New Zealand 06 876 2159
Attention: Bridget Nicholson and Colin Hunt Dear Bridget and Colin,
Response to Further Information Request (RMS19006) - 16 Willowbank Avenue, Napier We write in response to your s92 request for further information with respect to the above resource consent application dated 22 February 2019. While we provided a preliminary response to engineering matters for discussion purposes on 15/03/19, as this has not led to the intended collaborative discussion with Council’s engineering staff, this letter is intended to formalise our response to the engineering issues and to respond to the remaining questions of the s92 request. General (Servicing)
The proposed concept is for a gated community with Council services covered by easements. Councils Infrastructure Department have advised that the proposed consent would not allow Council free access to work on any of its infrastructure within the Gated Community. Further discussion on this matter would be required.
Please refer to the schedule of easements on the proposed scheme plan. The internal infrastructure will be covered by this easement in gross and provides the legal means of access to the site. This can be further clarified through a specific condition of consent if further comfort is required. Physical access through the controlled entrance can be readily maintained through provision of gate key/code to Council. This approach was discussed with Council’s engineering staff during several pre-application meetings.
The Engineering Approval will need to be prepared for the full development and submitted for approval. Please note: Staging can then be undertaken within the overall approval as appropriate.
The provision of detailed drawings for Engineering Approval subsequent to the approval of resource consent is expected and related conditions are anticipated and accepted. There is therefore, no further action required on this matter.
The proposed road/services section does not match the Code. Further discussion will be required to determine an acceptable solution.
The internal driveway network of the development is designed to the minor local road standard (<200vpd) on the basis of the number of dwellings served by each driveway through the internal network. This was also an aspect discussed with Council’s engineering/roading staff during preapplication discussion. Can you please clarify the specific identified aspects of code non-compliance to enable further work on this aspect as necessary. Stormwater
It appears that the proposed staging of the subdivision will not correspond with the stormwater drainage plan. Please provide further details.
We have identified one inconsistency that we note can be readily resolved at detailed design stage. Please clarify the areas of inconsistency identified by the Council to enable assessment to confirm that these also can be readily resolved at detailed design stage.
Please provide calculations to determine connection sizes for stormwater (the design of the stormwater system needs to show secondary flow paths with levels and floor levels that will protect dwellings from flooding in a 50 year return period event.
This detailed design work was expected to be undertaken pursuant to a condition of consent as part of the Engineering Approval.
Council’s Infrastructure Department have advised that the culvert across Eriksen Road is to be upgraded to a standard that matches the design capacity. The responsibility for the construction will need to be discussed with Council.
As these are structure plan works that benefit the wider Te Awa Development Area, it is expected that the works will be undertaken by Napier City Council.
Please note the approved point of connection for stormwater is the Cowshed Drain on the eastern side of Eriksen Road.
Noted and accepted. An advice note is welcomed in this repect to ensure that this is reflected in the Engineering Approval design drawings.
The design of the stormwater needs to be revised. Stormwater treatment shall be provided to allow for the at least the first flush, gross pollutant capture, treatment features in the open drain.
Individual onsite initial treatment is not a specific requirement of the Structure Plan and it is expected that the Napier City Council stormwater swale and pond provides required quality treatment. If initial onsite treatment is necessary to satisfy Council’s design standards, please advise where this has been required in other recently consented development.
Pipe sizing, particularly along Eriksen Road needs to be clarified.
This detailed design is expected to be undertaken as part of the Engineering Approval design pursuant to consent condition. A condition of consent is welcomed in this respect. Wastewater
Revised plans are required as the full development shall be serviced with a single wastewater pump station. Note: The wastewater pump station and pipelines shall not be located within the drainage reserves or generally within 40m of the reserve, as the liquefaction risk to infrastructure and erosion from uncontrolled surface water is undesirable.
The Structure Plan shows the single pump design as ‘indicative only’. Multiple smaller pump stations are considered preferable for safety in design and resilient infrastructure. Please advise why a single
2
pump is now considered the only option. The detailed pump provision can be readily addressed as part of the Engineering Approval design through a condition of consent.
Please advise how the sewer connections will be provided for the lots facing Eriksen Road.
The submitted Land Development Servicing Report details the connections for these properties as a gravity feed to the existing network.
Please provide details of the staging for the proposed wastewater installation.
The wastewater installation will proceed in accordance with both the staged scheme plans and the proposed sewer layout. This is however, generally a matter for detailed design that we expect to be conditioned for resolution through the detailed Engineering Approval design, in association with conditions to ensure that no lot could receive title prior to being fully serviced.
Please relocate the pump station as it is indicated in the over land flow path.
The pump station was intended to be stormwater resilient. This is obviously part of the wider issue of pump design (single versus multiple) and relocation can be resolved through the detailed design undertaken for Engineering Approval.
Please note the connection for the sewer shall be to the existing DN100 wastewater rising main near the corner of Eriksen Road and Hurunui Drive. A cross connection shall be provided to allows flows to be diverted between the existing rising main and the existing gravity wastewater networks.
The comment is noted and this can be reflected formally as an advice note to inform the detailed Engineering Approval design. Water
The proposed water supply network needs to be further discussed with Council’s Infrastructure Department as it is to be fully owned and operated by the Napier City Council.
The comment is noted and can be reflected formally as an advice note to inform the detailed design undertaken for Engineering Approval.
Please clarify the use of a dwelling occupancy rate of 1.25. Please justify and update water demand calculations accordingly.
This appears to be a matter for the detailed design to be completed for Engineering Approval as opposed to a matter that requires resolution for resource consent.
Please confirm fire fighting requirements can be met.
Appliance access can be readily gained throughout the site. Hydrants within the site will be provided in accordance with required standard, and this will be determined at the detailed design for Engineering Approval. As zoned land, there is an expectation that water supply to the Te Awa Development Area is a structure plan issue. Reserves
The Te Awa Structure Plan requires pedestrian linkages through the subdivision. Councils Reserves Department and the Developer need to come to an agreement as to what level of service is required.
The specific occupancy group perceive themselves to be more vulnerable to anti social behaviour and confidence based fraudulent activity. It is not intended that the site is available as an open public route. 3
Extensive walking routes are available within the site for the future occupiers accessibility. Legible north-south routes bypassing the site are provided, including an attractive route through the landscaped swale land.
Fencing is to be provide along Willowbank Road. The standard of performance needs to be agreed with Council.
The requirement is noted and the detail of this can readily be agreed by condition. If you can provide examples of the form of barrier required, we can provide confirmation of design acceptance.
The Te Awa Structure Plan requires the establishment of a neighbourhood reserve. The location and size needs to be agreed with Council and this land will need to be vested.
The significant land accommodating the stormwater swale to the western and southern boundaries of the site provide the opportunity for a large, usable area of high quality open space for community needs. This links with other paths and cycle ways established within similar open space. The flexible open space area provided within the proposed swale reserve exceeds the reserve area envisaged by the Te Awa Structure Plan.
The proposed walkway is physically separated from the development by the proposed drainage swale. The proposed ‘Pocket Park’ is proposed to be fenced internally to exclude public access, and is nowhere near a suitable size to be a functional open space. Both connectivity and public open space are heavily identified in the Structure Plan and the relating outcomes. This subdivision does not achieve this.
The site readily provides walking opportunities for those passing through the area (expected to be walking north-south or connecting to the development area to the east). The pocket park is intended for use by residents of the development and is not intended to be open to the public. Opening this to the public would obviously compromise the fundamental form of the development and raises concerns of compatibility of active recreation activity within the park and adjacent residential properties.
The Scheme Plan does not identify the Pocket Park and Drainage Reserve links as being vested in Council. Plans need to show all lots to be vested and purpose.
Vesting of the swale land as local purpose reserve is detailed on the staged scheme plans. The pocket parks are intended to be retained by the development as opposed to becoming public. Can you please clarify what further action is required on this matter. Foundations/Earthworks
Please provide a Geotechnical report to confirm foundation and lateral spread requirements, particularly within the vicinity of the drainage reserve.
The geotechnical reporting provided at Appendix H of the Assessment of Environmental Effects includes full detail of the CPT testing across the site and provides related assessment and conclusions in relation to liquefaction and lateral stretch and spread. The recommendations from the report are that the site is suitable, in geotechnical terms, for the proposed development and that specific shallow Canterbury design foundations should be determined at building consent stage. This can be readily secured by way of a consent notice. We will need guidance as to the nature of further detail required in this respect for the consenting stage, particularly as we believe the requirements of Section 106 of the Resource Management Act have been met by the existing reporting.
Please provide full details of the proposed cut and fill works that are to be undertaken on the site.
The earthworks details provided with the application provide detail of the cut and fill required and associated profiles. The anticipated material import/export volumes are also identified in the
4
application. Can you please advise what further detail is required at this consenting stage of development. General Comments/Observations In terms of the engineering comments, we believe that a lot of what has been included in the s92 request is work that is expected to be completed at detailed design stage and submitted to Council for Engineering Approval. It is difficult to provide an increased level of engineering detail without first having the approval in place and without knowing what conditions of consent will be applied. We believe we have provided adequate information to demonstrate that the development can be serviced and generally fits within the objectives of the structure plan and wider City of Napier District Plan provisions.
Response to Urban Design Lead’s Comments
AEE Structure Plan Commentary Design Outcome 6 – suggestion to break the southern block and unbroken mid block to create a further north-south route. As the residential blocks are relatively small, there is limited benefit in terms of walkability through creating a north-south route through the centre of the development. East-west access routes provide links to the three green spaces leading into the swale reserve land, providing more convenient alternative options for residents to conveniently access the reserve. As the block size is already relatively small, the walking distance from any property to the green space is modest, even when considering the potential reduced mobility of the target occupier group. The current pattern will also encourage greater interaction within the development as residents walk through the layout, assisting with the creation of a sense of social community. It would also be potentially less appealing for future residents to walk a road structure with more intersections. The splitting of the two subject blocks to form a central route would fragment the urban form of the development, resulting in the appearance of small pockets of dwelling islands that are isolated within the internal driveway network as opposed to the more reasonable and coherent street lengths created by the current block arrangement. Design Outcome 7 No response required. Design Outcome 8 – recommendation the maximum road frontage fencing height of 1m. The Concept Landscape Design provides for 1.2m height front boundary fencing to the road frontage of the Eriksen Road properties. Within the development, low landscaped hedges were intended to form the boundary of the dwellings with the internal driveway network. This is consistent with the inclusive intent of the development and potential to create a distinct community and has been designed in the context of the City of Napier District Plan 2m fence height allowance. We would readily accept a condition in this respect. Design Outcome 9 No response required. Design Outcome 10 No response required. Design Outcome 11 – recommends increasing width of shared pathway to 3m to meet Council standard. We agree to the increase to 3m width for the shared pathway and 2% crossfall, and welcome a condition for the detailed design in this respect. Design Outcome 12 No response required. Design Outcome 13 No response required.
5
Additional Detailed Matters Raised Consideration of Low Impact Design Solutions for Stormwater Within the development, swales and large tree pits have the potential to create accessibility constraints for those future residents with mobility impairments, which is common (to varying degrees) within the target occupier group. The low volume of traffic within the development is unlikely to generate high level of vehicle related heavy metal deposits that would be lifted in the first flush of a rain event. Further, the stormwater is directed through a swale, rather than a piped system, allowing for energy absorption and reduced flow rates to deposit suspended material. Consideration of Universal Design – maximum 2% crossfall to paths The detailed design will incorporate the 2% maximum, and a condition to secure this is welcomed. Fencing Detail – specify minimum of 50% permeable for fencing to swale reserve boundary We welcome a condition limiting the fencing to a minimum 50% permeability to the swale reserve boundary. Fencing Detail – Allow public access to the pocket parks within the development As set out in the staged scheme plans, these park areas are not intended to be vested in Council to enable them to be retained as private spaces for residents of the development, consistent with the gated nature of the scheme. This assists in the creation of the perception of a safe environment for the future occupiers, who are of a group that are more vulnerable to anti social behaviour and other forms of crime. These parks are not intended as active recreation areas, with furniture to be provided in support of passive use to enable utilisation of these as small and safe communal spaces for future occupiers to meet and mingle. Extension of these to the public is not necessary in the context of the adjacent swale parkland that will be available for public use. Opening these spaces to the public would be potentially incompatible with the adjacent residential properties, as public use would be concentrated to a small area with noise and other disturbance likely to arise, and no control of the activities undertaken or hours of use. Such public active and passive recreation can be readily accommodated within the extensive land area of the swale reserve land. Planting Palette Native species are preferred over exotics for both biodiversity and intrinsic reasons. Further discussion would be appreciated on this planting to best utilise the respective knowledge bases and a condition requiring the submission of landscaping details can provide such an opportunity. RMA s7 Other Matters – recommendation to incorporate sustainable urban drainage As addressed above, incorporation of sustainable urban drainage systems to the scheme has significant potential to conflict with the common mobility impairments of the target occupancy group. UD Assessment Matters – fence permeability and 3m width/2% crossfall for public pathways As addressed previously, conditions to address these matters are welcomed.
Private Open Space Provision
Condition 5.21 of the Main Residential Conditions states the following requirement for open space provision within new residential development: 5.21 Open Space The following open space conditions shall apply to all residential activities: a) Each dwelling unit must have an amount of open space on the building site of not less than 50% of the gross floor area of all buildings on the site, except that a minimum of 50m2 per dwelling unit must be provided. b) Where there is no garage or carport proposed or existing on the site, the gross floor area must include a notional garage of 18.5m2 for each dwelling unit on the site. c) The maximum area of open space required to be provided on a building site is 100m2 per dwelling unit. d) Provided that: i) Open space may comprise of more than one area. ii) Open space may take the form of a deck or terrace but must be unobstructed by buildings (other than cantilevered decks), parking spaces, or vehicle manoeuvring areas. 6
iii) iv)
Open space must be directly accessible from the dwelling unit to which it relates. The open space must: Include at least one area capable of containing a 6 metre diameter circle; and Have a minimum dimension of 3m measured at right angles to the perimeter of the area.
The City of Napier District Plan defines the relevant assessment matters for non compliance with the Condition as being: -
The effects on privacy and amenity of the occupants on-site. The effect on the open space appearance of the neighbourhood.
The detached dwelling plan provides 158m 2 of floorspace and therefore requires 79m 2 of open space to be provided. The semi detached layout provides 160m 2 of floorspace per dwelling, with an associated requirement for 80m2 of open space per unit. The accompanying site layout plan has been annotated to confirm the general compliance of the layout with the 6m circle requirement. The plan identifies six lots (Lots 21, 22, 38, 131, 134, 135) that infringe this standard. Lots 1 – 19 are house lots fronting Eriksen Road of around 700m 2 site area with sufficient flexibility to readily provide a dwelling and associated open space requirements. Lot 20 provides a 6m circle within a total open space area of 58m 2. The open space provided is 72% of the required area and will provide a coherent and usable space for future occupiers without a cramped appearance. The shortfall will not be evident either within or beyond the site. Lot 21 has a marginal infringement of the 6m circle requirement, providing a 5.8m diameter circle within a rear garden area of 92m2. This open space provision readily offsets the minimal 6m circle infringement for future occupiers. Lot 22 has a marginal infringement of the 6m circle requirement, providing a 5.6m diameter circle within a rear garden area of 94m2. This open space provision readily offsets the minimal 6m circle infringement for future occupiers. Lot 23 complies with the quantum and 6m circle requirements. Lot 24 is intended for vehicle parking. Lots 25 – 37 comply with quantum and 6m circle requirements Lot 38 has a marginal infringement of the 6m circle requirement, providing a 5.8m diameter circle within a rear garden area of 96m2. This open space provision readily offsets the minimal 6m circle infringement for future occupiers. Lots 39 – 130 comply with quantum and 6m circle requirements, albeit that lots 120 – 130 are reliant on front garden areas to reach the quantum standard. Lot 131 does not provide a 6m circle and provides a total compliant area of 58m 2 comprising a 7.6m wide rear garden area that varies in depth from 3.7m to 4.7m due to an angled boundary, with the front garden supplementing the open space provision on the lot. While this quantum is 72% of the required area, it is nevertheless a comfortable and appealing open space provision for many potential future occupiers with less ability to maintain larger areas, particularly in the context of the target occupier audience. Located centrally within the site, this shortfall will not have adverse effects on the character of the wider area and can be readily absorbed into the overall spacious character of the development. Lot 132 provides a 6m circle but at 76m 2 total compliant area, has a negligible shortfall against the 79m2 quantum requirement.
7
Lot 133 provides a 6m circle within a generous rear garden area that complies with the quantum standard. Lot 134 provides a 5.6m circle and a total compliant area of 69m 2 (86% of open space standard) and Lot 135 provides a 5.6m circle and a total compliant area of 61m 2 (76% of open space standard). This open space provision will provide suitable external living conditions for future occupiers, with the reduced garden areas appealing to many potential occupiers who do not have the ability to maintain larger areas. The lots are located centrally within the site and will not have any adverse effects beyond the site and the reduced area will not be evident within the site. Lots 136 â&#x20AC;&#x201C; 188 comply with quantum and 6m circle requirements, albeit that lots 151 â&#x20AC;&#x201C; 153 and lots 168 â&#x20AC;&#x201C; 170 are reliant on front garden areas to meet the quantum standard. My apologies for the error of the submission in stating that all units would comply with this open space standard. The addition of this as a consenting matter does not alter the activity classification of the multi unit element of the development or the overall bundled application. The multi unit consent was already subject to the non compliance with the density standard, which had elevated this aspect to a restricted discretionary activity, and bundled to a discretionary activity due to the relationship to the structure plan staging. As outlined in the lot assessment above, the vast majority of the lots comply with the generous open space standards. Where lots infringe the standards, they will still provide attractive living conditions for future occupiers. This is particularly so in the context of the target occupier market, where mobility impairments are common and smaller garden areas (and less required maintenance) are attractive. It is also noted that the development has access to four small park areas within the development and the large swale park land immediately beyond the site to address any open space needs not provided for on the lots. The open space infringements will not be experienced beyond the site and will not be apparent within the site, ensuring that there are no adverse effects on character and appearance of the area from the shortfalls. I trust that the information within this letter addresses the request for further information required to better understand the proposed development and the resulting effects on the environment. Please do not hesitate to contact me to discuss matters further or to clarify any aspect of this response. Kind regards
Jason Kaye Development Nous Limited Encl.:
6m Circle Assessment Plan
8
Assessment of Environmental Effects ADDENDUM Residential Subdivision and Development
16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier (Our Ref H20180069) Prepared for Durham Property Investments Limited March 2020
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Addendum to Assessment of Environmental Effects
1.0
INTRODUCTION
This Addendum to the January 2019 Assessment of Environmental Effects (“parent Assessment of Environmental Effects”) is prepared to support and accompany the formal submission of amendments to the existing land use and subdivision resource consent application by Durham Property Investments Ltd for development of land at 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier that is being considered by Napier City Council under reference RMS19006. This Addendum is intended to detail the accompanying set of revisions to the originally submitted development scheme and to enable understanding of any actual and potential effects that the revised form of development may have on the environment. The structure of this Addendum follows that of the parent Assessment of Environmental Effects, providing replacement sections or commentary as required by scheme revisions. Where no change is required to the existing chapter, this is noted under the section heading. It is intended that this Addendum is read in association with the s92 response and the parent Assessment of Environmental Effects, as information is not repeated in the Addendum where the previous assessment remains relevant. The scheme revisions follow the formal s92 response and the receipt of advice from Napier City Council that they have changed their position stated through pre-application discussion and no longer support the formation of a lifestyle village based on internal driveways, preferring instead the construction of a Code compliant residential subdivision based around vested roads. The amended scheme incorporates a network of Code compliant roads within the site with private driveways extending from turning heads at the termination of the roads, however it still proposes that the internal access roads be held privately. Other notable revisions include the substantial enlargement of the park area at the southern end of the development and the reconfiguration of fencing to open this park to public use. The three smaller parks along the western boundary of the development will be similarly opened to public use and all four parks and the drainage reserve will be vested with Council. The revision has resulted in a reduction of proposed residential development lots from 187 to 181. The scheme revision retains the provision of entrance gates to the vehicle accesses. The Code compliant roads within the site will be available to be vested with Council, should Council seek this structure. However, the expectation based on Council feedback, including that formally expressed in the S95A report, is that Council do not want the internal road network vested due to the presence of entrance gates. Three waters infrastructure is designed to be accommodated within the internal road corridors. This infrastructure is similarly available to vest in Council. The scheme plans have been prepared on the basis of three waters infrastructure being vested in Council and the internal road network remaining private. Alternative ownership arrangements for infrastructure can be readily addressed by way of planning conditions and the retention, management and maintenance of that infrastructure by a residents’ society. Detail of the scheme revision is provided at Section 3.0 and a response to matters raised by the Council’s s95A report is provided within Section 9.0. 1
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Addendum to Assessment of Environmental Effects
2.0
SITE & LOCATION
There is no substantive change to the application site since the preparation of the parent assessment of environmental effects. It is however, noted that since the preparation of the application, resource consent has been approved for the following Te Awa Structure Plan sites: 156 Eriksen Road (Stage 1 of Structure Plan): 180119 – Construct and operate a Retirement Complex in the Main Residential zone (comprising 241 independent living units (homes) and a part 2, part 3 storey building providing 119 assisted living suites and care beds and resident facilities (including restaurant, café and bar). The similarities of the application scheme to the approved gated development at 156 Eriksen Road are noted, albeit that the application scheme, comprising solely residential use, is recognised as being more consistent with the development expectations of the Te Awa Structure Plan. 56 Kenny Road (Stage 2 of Structure Plan): S19069 – Subdivide site to create 48 residential lots and undertake earthworks in Te Awa Structure Plan area. 35 Kenny Road (Stage 4 of Structure Plan): 190019 – Multi-unit commercial development within the Main Residential zone (Te Awa Structure Plan Area) comprising of eight tenancies (including a café, supermarket, childcare facility, medical centre & four assorted retail units). This out of sequence development will provide the suburban commercial development that was indicatively identified to the north of this site by the Te Awa Structure Plan. Wider Te Awa Area Since the preparation of the application, development has also continued across the Te Awa Development Area. The construction of dwellings has continued along Hurunui Drive and notably subdivision construction has proceeded at the below site: 138 Eriksen Road S18020 – Subdivide site into 67 residential lots and undertake earthworks Development of this site was previously consented in 2009 with the early Te Awa residential development, prior to the formation of the Structure Plan. This site was the subject of a new application in 2018 that replaced the previously approved coordinated loop road arrangement that extended from the existing formed Hunter Drive with an arrangement of private JOALs either side of an extended single arm of Hunter Drive.
2
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Addendum to Assessment of Environmental Effects
3.0
DESCRIPTION OF APPLICATION PROPOSAL
The revised application seeks subdivision consent and accompanying multi unit consent (excluding Stage 1) for the staged residential development of the site as indicatively shown in Figure 1, comprising:
19 residential lots within Stages 1A, 1B and 1C fronting onto Eriksen Road ranging in size from 613m2 to 710m2 (these lots are outside of the Lifestyle Village and are excluded from the multi-unit consent application),
162 residential lots within Stages 2 – 9 (a reduction of five from the original scheme) ranging in size from 323m2 to 567m2 forming a gated lifestyle village intended principally for occupation by persons over the age of 55 (and an area for additional vehicle parking at Lot 24),
An internal road and driveway network designed to Council’s Code to enable the road network (excluding driveways) to be vested with Council if required or retained as private roads with management through an accompanying residents’ society,
An internal water, stormwater and wastewater utility network to be designed to Council’s Code and accommodated within the road corridors. This is proposed to be vested with Council. Alternatively, it could be retained privately with maintenance and management being undertaken by the residents’ society,
An open stormwater swale drain within a 40m wide reserve to the western and southern site boundaries,
Four reserve lots (Lots 301 – 304) enabling pedestrian and service connection from the development to the swale (the southern reserve lot has been increased in area to 2059m2,
One lot (Lot 24) for use as vehicle parking.
In summary, the principal differences between the submitted and revised schemes are the redesign of the internal road network to Code standard, the removal of the north south driveway adjacent to the western boundary and replacement with an arrangement of short driveways extending from the termination of the internal east west roads, enlargement of the southern park to provide a public open space and a reduction of five lifestyle village lots, As indicated in the above summary bullet points, the ownership structure of road and three waters infrastructure is proposed to be vested in Council. While Council has formally stated a reluctance to accept the vesting of a gated road network or vesting of the three waters infrastructure across the site if the road network remains private, there will be no physical difference should the road and infrastructure networks be vested or remain private. On the basis that the internal road network remains private, Council access to in ground infrastructure can be offered by way of easement in gross to enable vesting of the three waters infrastructure. Council would then have unfettered access to the network for operational, maintenance and upgrade purposes, and as the roads had been designed and constructed to Council’s Code standard, there would be no difference from vested road in terms of access and reinstatement requirements. The entrance gates will have a code override system fitted enabling emergency vehicle entrance, as is in common operation in similar circumstances across New Zealand. The gates would remain open throughout the daytime (between the hours of 7.00am and 6.00pm) and 3
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Addendum to Assessment of Environmental Effects
would be closed in the evening, requiring a security pass to access the internal road network at nighttime.
Figure 1: Amended Scheme Plan
The description of the development remains generally as set out in the Assessment of Environmental Effects. Nineteen lots will be formed fronting onto Eriksen Road through Stages 1A, 1B and 1C. These lots are not part of the lifestyle village and will be developed independently. No house plans 4
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Addendum to Assessment of Environmental Effects
are provided for these lots with the application, and these lots are beyond the scope of the multi unit consent. The 163 lots of stages 2 – 9 will be developed to create a managed lifestyle village targeted at occupiers over the age of 55. The controlled access gates to the two site entrances from Eriksen Road are proposed to support the character of development and resulting perception of safety that is desired by the target demographic. This is similar to the gated arrangement of the recently approved retirement village at 156 Eriksen Road. While Council have identified the inclusion of gates to the entrances of the development as being “the first application of this type and scale within Napier City”, and notwithstanding the recently approved gated development at 156 Eriksen Road, it is noted that gated arrangements have been approved in relatively large scale and prominent Ahuriri development at Humber Street, Nelson Quay, West Quay and to the Domett Street entrance to the internal driveway network of the Princess Alexandra retirement village, The revision proposes no alteration to the land tenure, and individual freehold titles are proposed for all of the lots within the residential village, which will be linked to a residents society (being an incorporated society) controlling the common area throughout the development. For clarity, the ownership structure will not be by way of unit title development. No change is proposed to the standard three-bedroom house plans of the village. Thirty six semi-detached houses are proposed (with associated party wall easements) and the remaining 126 houses of the village will be detached. These houses all provide an integral double garage with additional standing space for a vehicle(s) to the frontage of each dwelling. Additional large vehicle parking will be provided on and adjacent to proposed Lot 24. Detailed plans for all lots have not been provided with this application, but it is proposed that these are provided for the Council’s approval at each stage of development pursuant to a condition of the multi-unit resource consent. However, the revision to the layout enables all lots to accommodate the standard house design and 80m2 of open space including a 6m diameter circle. The enlargement of the southern open space to provide a pocket park within the revised layout has resulted in the loss of two lots to either side of the park. Wider revision has also removed a lot from the eastern end of the central block between Roads 4 and 5. Redesign of the roads to accord with the Council’s Code standard has resulted in Road 1, the north – south internal road being increased to 17m width to accord with the standard for a Major Local Residential (no thru traffic) road. The remaining roads remain at a 13.5m width to accord with the Minor Local Residential road standard. The east west roads now terminate in 16m turning heads, with driveways extending to the north and south of these to service related lots. The individual road Lots are proposed to be amalgamated onto a single title. In addition to the enlargement of the southern pocket park (Lot 301) and reconfiguration of fencing to enable full public access, the three pocket parks along the western side of the development (Lots 302, 303, 304) have also had proposed fencing reconfigured to enable full public access. Along with the stormwater swale public park extending along the western and southern boundaries of the site (Lots 305 – 308), the four pocket parks are intended to be vested in Council. The site layout is otherwise generally as presented in the originally submitted scheme and extensively described in the parent Assessment of Environmental Effects. 5
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Addendum to Assessment of Environmental Effects
Application Documents The revision to the application as set out in the amended staged scheme plans prepared by Development Nous is supported by the following set of original and revised technical documents:
4.0
Revised Landscape Design Plan Set prepared by Development Nous Ltd dated 28 January 2020. Revised Urban Design Report prepared by Development Nous Ltd dated 27 February 2020. Revised Transport Assessment (Issue B) prepared by Traffic Solutions Ltd dated 15 January 2020. Revised Land Development Engineering Services Report (Revision B) prepared by Strata Group. (Original) Detailed Site Investigation prepared by Development Nous Ltd and Geosciences Ltd dated 16 January 2019. (Original) Liquefaction Potential Assessment prepared by Resource Development Consultants Ltd dated 9 October 2018.
DISTRICT PLAN PROVISIONS
There has been no material change to the relevant district plan provisions since the parent Assessment of Environmental Effects was prepared and the application was lodged with Council. The revisions to the application have the following implications in relation to compliance with the City of Napier District Plan provisions: Te Awa Structure Plan Compliance The reduction of five lots results in a revision to gross and net residential densities of 23.9U/Ha and 13.2U/Ha respectively, and an average lot size of 417m 2. The development therefore continues to comply with the density specifications of Design Outcome 1. Since the preparation of the application, resource consent has been granted for the development of Stage 1 (Summerset Village), the significant majority of Stage 2 (residential subdivision) and around 25% of the Stage 4 area (commercial development). The approved development has been implemented on the Stage 1 and Stage 2 sites. It is also noted that a 67 lot development has proceeded at 138 Eriksen Road, which is within the Te Awa Development Area but beyond the Structure Plan boundary, in accordance with the terms of a resource consent that replaced the previously approved connected road layout with a series of JOALs. The Structure Plan staging plan and an indication of the Structure Plan sites that have resource consent for development is shown at Figures 2 and 3. While the approved consents indicate significant progression of Structure Plan implementation, the development has not reached the Structure Plan threshold for commencement of Stage 5 development, and the proposed development remains out of sequence and is therefore inconsistent with Design Outcome 4. It is noted that the care home format of the gated Summerset Village was not envisaged by the Structure Plan. 6
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Addendum to Assessment of Environmental Effects
Figure 2: Te Awa Staging Plan (City of Napier District Plan)
Figure 3: Approved Development (Base NCC GIS
The alterations have therefore not resulted in any change to the compliance of the scheme with the provisions of the Te Awa Structure Plan, and the scheme remains generally compliant with the Structure Plan with the exception of the staging. Main Residential Zone The revisions result in negligible change to the resulting residential density and average lot size of the development. The 41 house lots within the development below 372m2 in area will infringe the 50% maximum site coverage standard specified at Main Residential Zone condition 5.19 (albeit that site coverage will be low when considered across the full site area). This is a reduction from the 48 units that infringed the site coverage standard in the original scheme. The revisions to the layout now enable all lots to accommodate a 6m circle within garden areas of at least the 80m2 area required by Condition 5.21.
7
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Addendum to Assessment of Environmental Effects
District Wide Activities Earthworks There is no change to the general scheme of earthworks required to facilitate the development or to the resulting compliance of the scheme with the specified Earthworks Rules and Performance Standards. Network Utility Operations There is no change to the compliance of the scheme with the Network Utility Operations provisions. Noise There is no change to the compliance of the scheme with the Noise provisions. Transport There is no change to the compliance of the scheme with the Transport provisions. On the basis that the provision of entrance gates will prevent the vesting of the internal, Code compliant, road network with Council, the entrances will remain as oversized vehicle crossings to a private driveway network (rather than road junctions). The oversized vehicle crossing will infringe Condition 61.18 of the City of Napier District Plan resulting in a related resource consenting matter. Natural Hazards There is no change to the compliance of the scheme with the specific Natural Hazards provisions of the City of Napier District Plan. Financial Contributions There is no change to the compliance of the scheme with the Financial Contributions provisions.
5.0
NESCS Provisions
The scheme revisions have not necessitated any revision to the content of the Detailed Site Investigation or to the previous assessment against the consenting requirements of the 2011 NESCS.
6.0
APPLICATION STATUS SUMMARY
The assessment against the relevant planning framework of the City of Napier District Plan and the 2011 NESCS results in the following activity classifications for the required consenting matters:
8
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Addendum to Assessment of Environmental Effects
Staged Subdivision to form 181 residential lots with associated earthworks, access formation and construction of stormwater swale within Te Awa Structure Plan area in advance of structure plan staging – Discretionary Activity.
Staged Multi Unit Consent relating to the construction of stages 2 – 9 of the development involving infringement of site coverage condition for 41 lots in advance of structure plan staging – Discretionary Activity.
Access Related Code of Practice Infringements resulting from the construction of a vehicle crossing exceeding 6m width and retention of internal vehicle access network as private rather than vested roads – Discretionary Activity.
Subdivision, land disturbance and change of use of a HAIL site in the presence of a detailed site investigation confirming soil contaminant standard compliance – Controlled Activity.
Pursuant to the established principle of bundling of related consent matters within an application, the application falls to be assessed against the highest order activity classification within the consenting matters. Accordingly, the development is classified as a Discretionary Activity.
7.0
STATUTORY CONSIDERATIONS
There has been no change to the statutory assessment requirements since the application was prepared.
8.0
RELEVANT ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
The revisions to the proposed development do not result in any necessary revision to the previous assessment against the City of Napier District Plan Assessment Criteria. Principles expressed in the assessment previously undertaken against the specified site coverage assessment matters remain relevant to the revised scheme and repeat assessment is unnecessary. The previous assessment against the relevant matters set out in the Council’s Code relating to the crossing width and retention of the internal road network as private rather than vested public roads remains relevant. The internal revision to enable Road 1 to meet the width standard of a Major Local Residential road and related reconfiguration to provide east-west roads terminating at turning heads and a driveway network serving the western lots specifically addresses identified Code variance but does not change the overall principles of a private internal road network previously discussed. National Environmental Standard for Contaminated Soils The scheme revisions do not result in a requirement for any revised consideration of the NESCS.
9
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Addendum to Assessment of Environmental Effects
9.0
ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
The evaluation of the actual and potential effects on the environment provided within the parent Assessment of Environmental Effects remains directly applicable, with minor revision and addition, to the revised scheme. Positive Effects As the local housing market continues to fail to provide sufficient supply to meet housing demand, with resulting increased price pressure evident since the time of the preparation of the application, the positive benefits to the overall community arising from the delivery of 181 additional housing lots has increased, with specific benefits to the senior population targeted for occupancy (with obvious chain effects as people vacate larger houses to move to the retirement village). The revisions to the scheme have resulted in the enlargement of the southern pocket park and making this park and the three pocket parks to the western border of the development publicly accessible (in addition to the 3.1ha park to the western and southern property boundaries). Providing public access to these additional park areas provides use benefits to the surrounding community. Tsunami Hazard The Councilâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s s95 report expresses concern regarding the exposure of the development to tsunami risk, and concern at the configuration of the development in providing only two vehicle access points and positioning these on the eastern side of the site, closest to the potential tsunami threat, and constraining western pedestrian access to three points. For clarity, the Structure Plan directs that the application site is accessed solely from Eriksen Road, with no vehicle access permitted by the Structure Plan to Willowbank Avenue. The site is not alone in being exposed to the risk of both near and distant source tsunami, as described by the HBRC Hazards Portal tsunami risk and evacuation zone mapping. The identified area of this risk and the related required evacuation areas are shown in Figure 4 as extending across large developed areas of Napier City. Given the flat surroundings, the defined area of tsunami risk, and the limited warning provided for incoming tsunami, it is unlikely that future residents would choose to walk the required distance to mapped safety in a tsunami warning. Included amongst the wide swathes of Napier residential development exposed to the tsunami risk are both the nearby recently approved Summerset residential care home development at 156 Eriksen Road and the recently approved BUPA care home development at 25 Ulyatt Road. Tsunami risk was not an issue identified by the Councilâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s reporting of the recent consideration and approval of the nearby Summerset Care Home at 156 Eriksen Road. Tsunami risk was readily accepted by the Council for the BUPA development, as was the eastern orientation of the access arrangement (with the Hawkeâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Bay Expressway preventing vehicle access to the west) towards the tsunami risk. There is no material difference between these approved schemes and the application scheme that means the Council should take a different position on potential tsunami risk to that previously taken in respect of other developments. 10
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Addendum to Assessment of Environmental Effects
Figure 4: Tsunami Evacuation Zones (Source HBRC)
Figure 5: Aerial Image of Squire Drive Accessibility (Source Napier City Council GIS)
Council has also relatively recently approved the earlier stages of the Te Awa residential development in similar circumstances in relation to tsunami risk exposure and accessibility. For example, the 87 residential lots of Squire Drive (shown in Figure 5) all exit through a single vehicle and pedestrian outlet to Kenny Road in a similar manner as the proposed development 11
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Addendum to Assessment of Environmental Effects
exits to Eriksen Road. While five JOALs extend from Squire Drive to Kenny Road, the perimeter of the development to Kenny Road and Te Awa Drive is fenced in a similar way to the proposed development and this fencing prevents pedestrian access from the JOALs to Kenny Road. A photo providing an example of this is fencing is provided at Figure 6. On the basis of comparison with recent Council decisions and the established approach to management of tsunami risk by the City of Napier District Plan, the exposure to tsunami risk is recognised and considered a less than minor adverse effect.
Figure 6: Example of Fencing to Squire Drive JOAL Preventing Access to Kenny Road
Emergency Access The Council’s s95 report notes that while the application states that emergency vehicles will not be restricted from entering the development, no detail of the arrangement has been provided. As is in common practice throughout New Zealand, emergency services will be provided with an override code to gain access through the gates. Emergency services will not therefore be hampered from accessing the development and there will be no adverse effects in this respect. Access, Parking and Servicing The revision to the road layout has removed the previous north – south internal road adjacent to the western boundary. Lots on this side of the development are now accessed from a series of driveways extending northward and southward from turning heads at the termination of seven east – west roads. Road 1 provides access to the east west roads from the Eriksen Road accesses and this road corridor has been increased to 17m width to accord with the Code standard for a Major Local Residential road. This revision ensures compliance with the Council’s Code as sought by the Council, and provides for greater traffic flow filtering into and channelling out of the development. Access control by way of gated entrances is necessary to provide the required perception of a comfortable, safe and secure internal environment for the proposed occupier demographic. 12
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Addendum to Assessment of Environmental Effects
Council’s s95 report has highlighted concern that the gating of the proposed development is “the first application of this type and scale within Napier City” and that approval of the gated form may result in “potential for adverse effects and the resultant precedent effect”. Gated development has however, recently been approved with the 156 Eriksen Road Summerset care home development, where the 241 independent dwellings surrounding the managed care unit are within a gated complex. Gated development is also part of the emerging character of Ahuriri development with relatively prominent and large scale gated development present at Nelson Quay, West Quay, Humber Street and Domett Street (to the Princess Alexandra retirement village). The proposed gating of the development therefore follows the recent approval of the large gated Summerset development at 156 Eriksen Road and the established gated form of prominent Ahuriri development. As the Stage 1A, 1B and 1C sites fronting Eriksen Road are independent from the lifestyle village, when developed these Lots will present an active frontage of the development site to Eriksen Road. The development will therefore avoid the walled appearance of development such as the recently approved Summerset care home development at 156 Eriksen Road, the Domett Street frontage of the Princess Alexandra village (image shown at Figure 7) or the Nelson Quay gated development.
Figure 7: Boundary Wall Enclosure of Princess Alexandra Village
In providing active frontage to Eriksen Road, the development minimises the prominence of the gated form of the lifestyle village, thereby minimising any potential perception of community segregation, isolation or exclusivity.
13
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Addendum to Assessment of Environmental Effects
Given the recent Summerset care home approval and the presence of prominent gated development in Napier, it is difficult to define the application as potentially creating a precedent effect in support of gated development. The Council’s Director Infrastructure Services has stated a clear reluctance to accept the vesting of roads within the site in the presence of entrance gates. It is therefore accepted that the gating of the development is likely to prevent the internal access network from being vested in Council as road. In the event that the internal roads are not vested in Council, they will more accurately be described as an internal access driveway network. As described in the following section, retention of the road network can be readily addressed through residents’ society provisions. The revision to the road network within the development will enable compliance with the Council’s Code design standard to meet City of Napier District Plan expectations and the avoidance of adverse effects. The provision of entrance gates will not result in a prominent gated form of development and as the development follows previous gated development in the immediate vicinity and wider, it will not establish a precedent effect. Infrastructure Operation and Management The internal roads have been revised to ensure compliance with the Code design standard, and these roads will be constructed to Code standard. While the internal roads of the development will remain private, they will be entirely consistent with public roads vested with Council in design and construction. Extensive vested three waters assets are located within easements over private land throughout the City, and despite accepting that such arrangement is a common situation, Council’s Director Infrastructure Services is opposed to the vesting of the three waters infrastructure of the development with the Council. The Council’s s95 report provides comments from the Council’s Director Infrastructure Services, stating the belief that the Council ownership of infrastructure assets in private road will result in “risk, cost and complications”. With the benefit of easement in gross providing unrestricted legal access, and the internal roads being designed and constructed to Code standard such that they are entirely consistent with public roads, the potential risk, cost and complications to Council of the arrangement would be effectively obviated. There would effectively be no difference to Council in terms of the access and reinstatement requirements between accessing the infrastructure within the proposed development and within any public road. However, if not vested in Council, the three waters and road network will be managed through the residents’ society contracting the infrastructure operation and management work to a professional provider. The obvious value and significance of the infrastructure asset are recognised however, private management of the asset would be similar to a body corporate contracting out the building fabric management in a unit title development. With a viable alternative to the vesting of infrastructure with the Council available, the reluctance of Council to accept the vesting of the three waters infrastructure does not raise any adverse potential effects.
14
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Addendum to Assessment of Environmental Effects
10.0
DISTRICT PLAN OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
The revisions to the scheme do not necessitate a replacement assessment against the relevant objectives and policies of the City of Napier District Plan. As the general principles of the scheme have not changed, the relationship of the scheme to the objectives and policies has not changed and the scheme remains generally consistent with the expectations for residential development within the Te Awa Structure Plan Area of the Main Residential Zone. The revision to the internal road layout to meet the road design requirements of the Code, and in particular the design of the roads in relation to dwelling units served, does not change the previous assessment of the scheme with the broader transport related objectives and policies.
11.0 PART 2 MATTERS The revisions do not result in any alteration to the previous assessment of consistency with the relevant provisions of s5 – 8 of the Act.
12.0
NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
Notwithstanding the Council’s notification decision that public notification is required, the scheme revisions do not result in different notification conclusions by the Applicant to those presented in the parent Assessment of Environmental Effects.
13.0
SUMMARY
This Addendum to the parent Assessment of Environmental Effects has been prepared to support revisions to the originally submitted application scheme for the development of the site to create a lifestyle village of 162 three bedroom homes and nineteen further independent residential Lots fronting Eriksen Road. The Addendum is intended to be read in association with the original Assessment of Environmental Effects and the detail of the s92 response to the Council’s request for further information. The revisions to the application scheme have resulted in the reconfiguration of the internal road network to increase the design width of the eastern road parallel to Eriksen Road and removal of the mirrored western road and replacement with a network of north and south accesses extending from the turning heads at the termination of the east – west link roads. The southern pocket park has been substantially increased in size and the fencing of this park and the three western pocket parks has been reconfigured to enable public use. The revisions have resulted in the reduction of five units from the lifestyle village from the scheme originally submitted. Due to the Council’s reluctance to accept the vesting of the internal road network in the presence of entrance gates, the application continues to envisage the retention of the internal road network as private roads. The roads would be managed through a residents’ society. 15
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Addendum to Assessment of Environmental Effects
Notwithstanding this expectation of private retention, as the internal roads will be designed and constructed to the Council’s Code standard, they could readily be vested with Council should the Council so desire. The three waters infrastructure will be generally contained within the road corridors and reserve areas of the development. The Council has stated a reluctance to assume ownership of the three waters infrastructure within the road network if the roads are to remain private, notwithstanding the ability of unrestricted legal access to be provided by way of easement in gross and the design and construction of the roads to public road standard. If the Council chooses not to accept the vesting of the three waters infrastructure, it will remain in private management through the resident’s society with the internal roads. The southern pocket park and three western pocket parks will join the extensive swale reserve to the western and southern site boundaries in being vested in Council. The revised application necessitates resource consent for the following matters:
Staged Subdivision to form 181 residential lots with associated earthworks, access formation and construction of stormwater swale within Te Awa Structure Plan area in advance of structure plan staging – Discretionary Activity. Staged Multi Unit Consent relating to the construction of stages 2 – 9 of the development involving infringement of site coverage condition for 41 lots in advance of structure plan staging – Discretionary Activity. Access Related Code of Practice Infringements resulting from the construction of a vehicle crossing exceeding 6m width and retention of internal vehicle access network as private rather than vested roads – Discretionary Activity. Subdivision, land disturbance and change of use of a HAIL site in the presence of a detailed site investigation confirming soil contaminant standard compliance – Controlled Activity.
This Addendum has provided detail of the scheme revisions and detail of any further assessment necessitated by these revisions. The Addendum has also taken the opportunity to provide additional information to assist further consideration of matters identified in the Council’s s95 report. This includes consideration of tsunami risk exposure, the gated form of the lifestyle village and infrastructure management arrangements and risks. Of note, the Addendum draws attention to the approach of Council in the consideration and approval of surrounding and wider development also exposed to tsunami risk and to the recent approval of gated development at 156 Eriksen Road, the mitigation of the external appearance of the development through the independent Eriksen Road frontage lots and the existence of a range of gated and various enclosed development preventing the application from creating a precedence in this respect. The Addendum also notes the significant positive effects that the development will yield through the delivery of an additional 181 house lots to the current constrained residential market of Napier. As demonstrated in this Addendum the revisions improve the scheme and would result in no more than minor effects on the surrounding environment and less than minor effects on neighbouring properties. 16
Resource Consent Application 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier H20180069 Addendum to Assessment of Environmental Effects
The revised development remains consistent with the relevant objectives and policies of the City of Napier District Plan and would be consistent with all but the development sequencing provisions of the Te Awa Structure Plan. On this basis it is submitted that the application be approved in accordance with Section 104, 104B, 176 and 220 of the Resource Management Act 1991 and the Resource Management (National Environmental Standard for Assessing and Managing Contaminants in Soil to Protect Human Health) Regulations 2011 subject to conditions. ...............................................................
...............................................................
Prepared by:
Reviewed and approved for release by:
Jason Kaye Senior Planner Development Nous Limited
Matthew Holder Principal Planner Development Nous Limited
On behalf of the applicant
On behalf of the applicant
............................................................... 04 March 2019
............................................................... 04 March 2019
17
APPENDIX A Staged Scheme Plans
LD P
STR EE T
.0
26
.1
LOT 77 388m²
Lot 186 DP 9997 0.0748
14
24.2
24 .2
24.2
.7
24 .2
16.3 23.6
16.7
16.3
20.0
17.8
C014 )
19.4
GE 1 C 20.0
(SHE ET
19.5 16.3 20.0
16.3
16.3 14.8
STA 17.0
13.0
16.3
1 ROA D
16.0
m 17.00 28.5
LOT 15 625m²
17.0 31.5
20.0
16.0
20.0
20.0
)
C013
20.0
20.0
16.0
Superseded
20.0
ROA D
ERIK
SEN
20.0
17.0
20.0
16.0
17.7
20.0
14.7
20.0
16.0
17.0
D1
16.0
ROA
12.9
Lot 383 DP 513468 0.0483
795986
795987
16.0
22.4
Lot 387 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 388 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 389 DP 516362 0.0483
804717
804718
804719
804720
22.4
ET C
Lot 373 DP 513468 0.0562
Lot 374 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 375 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 376 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 377 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 378 DP 516362 0.0490
804711
804712
804714
804710
804713
795982
20.0
Lot 369 DP 513468 0.0509 795978
Lot 368 DP 513468 0.0469
Lot 367 DP 513468 0.0550
Lot 366 DP 513468 0.0578
794507
794506
Lot 365 DP 513468 0.0914 793447
20.0
Lot 364 DP 513468 0.0621
Lot 356 DP 513468 0.0604
22.5
0
793438
793434
Lot 355 DP 513468 0.0527
793427
40.0
Lot 353 DP 513468 0.1185 793435
Date
KRC
17/12/2017
Designed
Date
Approved
Date
Client
DURHAM PROPERTY INVESTMENTS PROPOSED SUBDIVISION OF LOT 1 & 2 DP 14417 COMPRISED IN RT HBG2/863 & 420376
793446
0.0544
Lot 345 DP 513468 0.0544
169.
HBB2/1223
17/12/2017
This document is produced by Development Nous Ltd solely for the benefit of and use by the client in accordance with the terms of engagement. Development Nous Ltd does not and shall not assume any responsibility or liability whatsoever to any third party arising out of any use or reliance by third party on the content of this document.
795977
22.5
16.8
Lot 9 DP 6055 2.1650
All Rights Reserved.
Date
GG
16.7
378863
Date
Drawn
(SHE
21.8
STA
804716
Lot 386 DP 516362 0.0483
Checked
012)
A
GE 1
16.0 21.8
16.0
20.0
16.0
804715
Lot 385 DP 516362 0.0483
Fieldwork
20.0
16.4
3.6 5.8
Lot 384 DP 516362 0.0483
KAITUNA PLACE
16.0
16.0
16.0
16.0
7.8
Lot 382 DP 513468 0.0483
20.0
16.0
16.0
12.9
16.6
12.9
24.2
0 5.3
24.2
71899
20.0
16.0
16.0
20.0
16.0
13.0
11.8
12.9
16.6
24.2
15.9
15.9
24.2
16.6
24.2
15.9
24.2
Lot 1 DP 318389 6.1891
STA GE 1 B (SHE ET
20.0
20.0
16.0
16.0
16.0
16.0
12.0
14.8
21.8 14.9
15.9
24.2
16.6
24.2
24.2
24.2
24.2
24.2
40
5.1
Lot 3 DP 394762 6.7380
14.9 16.0
D1
17.0
ROA
17.6
15.0
14.9
14.9
21.8
24.2
21.2
4.2
24.2 24.2
24.2
24.2
14.4 14.4
.0
HBG3/590
16.0
16.0
12.4
21.7
14.9
18.8
4.0
21.2
ROA
25.8
10.0 10.0
23 .2 23 .2
24.2
Lot 93 DP 10451 0.0713
13.0
D1
16.0
16.0 16.0
.0
24
20.1
ROA
13.8
16.2
12.1
25 .2
.2
23
.2
24
STAGE 3
HBG2/209
15.9
12.8 9.6
16.0
16.0
4.7
4.7
20 .7
.6
22
12.6
D8
15.2
13.0
.3 16 .3
16
7.9 7.9
16 .1 16 .1
24 .3
.2
24
STAGE 2
24 .2
HBC4/814
Lot 94 DP 10451 0.0733
LOT 26 388m²
22 .6
.6
22
.5
.2
24
.8
15
.2
24
8.1 8.1
.2
24
15 24 .9 .2
.6
16
24 .2
.9
15
24 .2
Lot 95 DP 10451 0.0713
24.2
20.0
.6
15
.0
15
24
.2
15
15 .9 24 .2
16 .6
24 .2
.9
15
12 .9
.6
16
12 .9
.2
21
HBF4/40
LOT 25 383m²
22
.2
22
.0
16
.2
STAGE 5
4.2
Lot 96 DP 10451 0.0672
Y2
15
.2
15
16 .0
.2
12
PR
.9
12
.6
.9
12
8.0
.2
15
.2
15
0
D1
RO A
15 .2
.2
12
3.8
.0
28
HBK1/825
ENT R
21.2
16.0
344m²
16.5
14
.2
.2
16
15 .6
8.0
.2
15
.2
.2
15
.0
97
15 .2
4.2
HBK1/977
Lot 97 DP 10451 0.0672
4.2
4.2
4.2
HBE2/1003
Lot 98 DP 10451 0.0672
LOT 16 625m²
21.2
20.0
10.4 10.4
16.0
LOT 114 388m²
24.2 24.2
LOT 17 630m² 31.5
LOT 24 427m²
16.0
19
31.5
PALOT 23 396m²
32.0
21.2
22 .6
.7
.6
12
15
.4
15
7.0 13
HBK1/626
Lot 210 DP 10451 0.0728
24.2
14.1
23.7
.1
24.2 16.0
23 .1
4
21
LOT 112 388m²
LOT 18 613m²
24.2
STAGE 7 (SHEET C020) LOT 113 363m²
14.2 7.4
24.2
LOT 109 14 .6 374m² LOT 110 LB 13 397m² .2 LA
.4
.1
31.5
LOT 22 PB 396m²
3.7
15.6
.0
17 .7
.2
24
29
16.0
.2 24 31
.3
24 .2
24
24 .2
24 .2
15 .4
.0
24 .2
m²
239
19 .8
LOT 108 446m²
16
LO T4
.6
22
.6
NB
29
NOTES 1. This plan has been produced for resource consent purposes. Boundaries and dimensions are subject to resource consent approval and land transfer survey. 2. Easements may be required for cross-boundary services. 3. Current Napier City Council Zoning: Main Residential. NCC Planning Maps: I7, I8 and H8. 4. All private shared lots are to be held by a Residents Society. 5. This plan is to be read in conjunction with the proposed stage plans C012 - C021.
32
LOT 19 634m²
24.2
LOT 87 469m² NA
24.2
15 .3
22
AD
27
.2
24.2
24 .2
16.2
24 .2
.5
21.3
OALOT 21 391m²
LOT 86 421m²
ROA
16 .2
16 .0
24 .2
15 .3
.2 13
15 .2 24.2 16.0
15 .0 .0
15 .3
RO
.6
15.2
16
.2
15.2
.3 12
.2 12
14 .7
24 .2
15 .2
.0 16
13 .2
12.2 16 .0
16
16
6.9 9.2
15 .2
RO AD 10
15 .2
15 .2 8.0
.2 15
AD S
15 .5
RO 16.0
.0
PR IVA TE
.0 16
16 .0
0
16 .0
AD 1 RO
6.8
16 .2
.2 15 .2 15 .2 8.0 15 .2
16 .0 16 .0
64 .0
.0 16 16 .0
.6
4.2
Lot 209 DP 10451 0.0741
.0
LOT 85 413m² 25
4.2
HBA3/1092
HBA3/306
MB .5
4.3
18 .7
16 .5 .5
4.2
Lot 208 DP 10451 0.0741
4.2
HBA2/1403
HBA3/306
LOT 104 370m²
26 .4
LOT 20 OB 567m²
.0
6.8
LOT 88 402m² MA
3
15
.0
.5
16
15 .2 LOT 105 369m² 15 .2 LOT 106 15 .2 LOT 103 31.9 369m² LOT 107 488m² 15 .2 31 420m² .9
5.2 LOT 126 344m² LOT 123
.0
AD
RO
IVA
.0
16
16 .0
.0
.0
16
.6
15
HBA3/1372
Lot 207 DP 9997 0.0687
Lot 114 DP 10248 0.0419
AD
4.2
.0
16
STAGE 4
16
HBA1/525
Lot 206 DP 9997 0.0687
Lot 118 DP 10451 0.0407
.2
15 .2
S
.0
.0
.0
16 .0
64
16 .0
Lot 205 DP 9997 0.0675
HBD2/756
LOT 91 402m²
RO
15
.0
15
JK
.0
LOT 84 412m²
17
LOT 89 402m²
.5 .5
16
.2
16
16
4.2
HBA1/801
Lot 165 DP 9997 0.0784
.5
LOT 90 402m²
.5
15
1
23 .5
LOT 129 354m² 2
KRC
17
LOT 83 412m²
.0
16
16
LOT 92 402m²
17
17
4.5
HBA2/1222
Lot 204 DP 9997 0.0703
HBK1/439
4.2
Lot 164 DP 9997 0.0725
4.2
16
HBH2/141
Lot 203 DP 9997 0.0718
AD 2
16
16
LOT 406 5035m²
13
LOT 127 355m²
RO .5
16 .5 16 .5
16 LOT 101 .0 370m² LOT 102 KB 16 366m² .0 4.2 (SHEET C019) KA 20 .5
LOT 128 347m²
15
24 .2
LOT 303 194m² 2
16
Lot 202 DP 9997 0.0693
HBJ2/292
HBA1/624
.2
21 .2
28/01/2020 FOR APPROVAL
17 .0
4.7
HBD3/1295
Lot 166 DP 9997 0.0682
.2
12 .2
HBW1/356
LOT 98 388m²
16
Lot 201 DP 10396 0.1090
Lot 163 DP 9997 0.0786
.6
WI LL
HBE1/551
Lot 162 DP 9997 0.0776
.2
.2
LOT 100 367m²
23 .5
4.2
Lot 161 DP 9997 0.0789
24
LOT 64 378m² 2
24
.2
LOT 97 365m²
16
LOT 93 402m²
.2
21
STAGE 6
8.0
HBC4/792
24 .2
LOT 65 388m²
24
LOT 96 389m²
.2
24 .2 24 .2
3
.4
15 .8 LOT 111 24.2 LOT 14 404m² LOT 27 15 LOT 122 .4 21 .8 629m² 4.2 15 .2 388m² 358m² 15 LOT 125 JB .7 .4 3 16 24.2 LOT 63 0.5 .1 LOT 119 31.5 24.2 348m² LOT 124 15 .7 JA 388m² 15 323m² LOT 118 .4 LOT 28 15 HB 348m² 24 LOT 13 15 .4 .2 .4 2 21 4. .55 360m² 388m² 15.4 HA 21 C 629m² LOT 121 .2 LOT 62 15 19 .4 LOT 115 .6 LOT 130 24.2 388m² 356m² LOT 120 19 .6 31.5 448m² LOT 29 365m² 24 16 373m² .2 .0 19 .5 25.0 LOT 117 24 388m² IB .2 LOT 12 4.1 LOT 61 406m² 14.0 RO LOT 131 IA 629m² 388m² LOT 134 19 24.2 AD LOT 116 .5 22.0 5 24 388m² LOT 30 433m² .2 LOT 135 436m² 31.5 24 12.4 .2 388m² LOT 404 LOT 60 19 362m² .5 4.2 LOT 132 40 388m² 5374m² LOT 11 .0 13.3 4.4 24 24.2 .6 364m² 40 24 LOT 133 .0 .2 16.9 629m² 21 LOT 136 LOT 31 .2 LOT 139 LOT 59 473m² (SHEET C018) 21 387m² 388m² .2 LOT 140 31.5 394m² 388m² 19 26 LOT 142 .5 .6 4.2 391m² 24.2 24 (SHEET C017) .2 LOT 10 18.2 20 360m² .5 LOT 137 LOT 32 LOT 403 17.0 24 .2 LOT 58 629m² LOT 159 17.0 25 435m² 3207m² 388m² .7 18.1 388m² 15 375m² LOT 138 .2 LOT 143 31.5 24 24.2 9 23 .2 3. 361m² LOT 141 387m² .5 15 .2 24.2 LOT 57 LOT 158 LOT 33 396m² LOT 160 GB LOT 9 RO 15.9 A 378m² D 369m² GA 388m² 392m² 24 6 18 24 LOT 144 .2 629m² .4 LOT 155 .2 18.1 15 24.2 23 .2 LOT 302 356m² .5 16 LOT 154 372m² .0 21.2 31.5 194m² LOT 34 LOT 161 24 .2 .2 4 15 377m² .2 15.1 4.2 16 LOT 157 383m² 370m² .0 LOT 56 LOT 8 20 25 .5 18.9 21.2 .1 388m² 369m² 625m² LOT 156 LOT 401 LOT 150 LOT 153 21.2 24 .2 28.4 EB 16 5768m² 384m² .0 LOT 149 415m² 436m² 4.2 LOT 145 LOT 55 4.2 20 EA .5 27 458m² 369m² .0 381m² 16 18.1 .0 18 4.2 LOT 162 .1 21.2 24.2 24 LOT 152 .2 18.9 17 370m² RO 18.9 .1 456m² LOT 35 LOT 54 AD 24 28.5 LOT 146 LOT 151 .1 23 .5 7 369m² 424m² 16 LOT 148 LOT 166 404m² .5 LOT 163 3.2 4.2 436m² 24 LOT 7 24.2 .2 24 459m² .2 416m² 392m² Lot 2 FB LOT 53 625m² 16 .1 LOT 167 15.1 LOT 36 FA DP 14417 365m² 23 15 .5 LOT 147 15 .4 7.5 .4 18.9 410m² 21 31.5 387m² 1.7 9.2648 .2 LOT 164 381m² 9.1 1.7 LOT 170 24.2 4.2 Lot 381 Lot 379 13 Lot 380 420376 21.2 LOT 165 16.5 13 .7 371m² DP 513468 DP 513468 DP 513468 .7 LOT 6 4.2 0.0483 477m² 0.0500 2.8 0.0483 20 4.2 LOT 173 13 .5 16.4 374m² LOT 37 LOT 52 .0 629m² 795985 795983 795984 LOT 168 LOT 174 15 21 .4 16.4 405m² .6 387m² 472m² DB LOT 177 1 1 R 6 5 LOT 51 366m² .0 400m² .4 24.2 31.5 OA 9.0 21(SHEET LOT 169 C015) .2 16 D9 DA 16.5 .0 5.0 388m² 400m² LOT 178 LOT 182 15 16 359m² LOT 171 14.6 LOT 50 .0 LOT 38 16.5 LOT 5 LOT 402 .5 400m² 16 15.4 .0 381m² CB 388m² 16.5 387m² 4108m² 364m² 705m² 15 16 .3 LOT 49 15.4 24.2 .0 LOT 172 24.2 16.5 CA 16 .0 15.4 388m² 385m² LOT 175 16 31.5 .6 LOT 48 LOT 181 LOT 39 374m² LOT 176 BB 16 .0 LOT 306 388m² 17.3 403m² 387m² LOT 4 11 BA 374m² LOT 179 B Lot 372 2.0 45 .6 24.2 9938m² DP 513468 15.4 373m² 24.2 16 0.0543 AB .0 686m² Lot 370 Lot 371 15.4 DP 513468 AA LOT 40 DP 513468 795981 LOT 180 0.0462 0.0520 15.4 387m² 381m² 31.5 ROA 795979 795980 D 36.7 LOT 301 9 21.2 24.2 (SHEET C016) 4.2 Lot 349 LOT 3 2059m² DP 513468 15.9 48 LOT 41 0.0565 .0 629m² 12 0.0 16.0 793431 Lot 348 387m² DP 513468 16.0 LOT 47 24.2 31.5 0.0544 11.1 39.6 1 388m² LOT 46 793430 Lot 350 LOT 45 LOT 42 LOT 2 DP 513468 388m² 0.0521 16.0 LOT 44 6.7 387m² 629m² Lot 347 388m² 793432 DP 513468 16.0 21 .2 411m² 0.0544 A 31 .5 16.0 793429 Lot 351 LOT 43 53 .0 DP 513468 165.0 17.5 0.0544 475m² LOT 1 Lot 346 793433 28.5 DP 513468 710m² 0.0544 LOT 305 793428 Lot 352 35 8712m² .0 DP 513468
OW
HBW1/355
LOT 307 7344m²
.2
21
LOT 99 389m²
MH
4.2
Lot 198 DP 10396 0.1778
Lot 160 DP 9997 0.0786
HBM1/694
LOT 66 388m²
LOT 405 2193m²
LOT 94 389m²
HBG2/863
24
.2
24 .2
Lot 1 DP 14417 4.5526
24
.4
2428m²
.2
4.2
HBH4/1235
HBM1/695
24
LOT 67 388m²
15
HBA1/716
Lot 150 DP 9997 0.1039
LOT 68 388m²
16 .0
Lot 196 DP 9997 0.0703
16 .0
HB200/23
Lot 159 DP 9997 0.0814
Lot 151 DP 9997 0.0753
24 24 .2 .2
21
24
.2
VEN HBB3/848
Lot 195 DP 9997 0.0758
Lot 197 DP 9997 0.0687
HBJ3/1004
15 .5
UE
388m²
8.0
Bisson Place
24 .2
LOT 69
HBE1/318
Lot 158 DP 9997 0.0710
HBM1/696
HBF2/1462
15
4.2
LOT 70 375m²
Lot 194 DP 9997 0.0753
STAGE 8 QB (SHEET C021) LOT 407 LOT 95 388m²
15
17 .0 LOT 81 374m² QA LOT 82 15 .4 412m²
4.6
Lot 152 DP 9997 0.0819
Lot 193 DP 9997 0.0741
KRC
.4
4.2
HBJ3/948
HBM1/697
LOT 71 369m² 24 .2
TE
HBA1/516
40 .0
40
.0
16 .0
Lot 157 DP 9997 0.0786
4.2
.0
Lot 156 DP 9997 0.0690
HBA3/1263
18 3.6
HBB4/640
Lot 153 DP 9997 0.0839
UE
24 .2
LOT 304 194m² 2
16
Lot 155 DP 9997 0.0672
Lot 192 DP 9997 0.0741
DA
HBA1/619
MA SEF IEL
CE A PL
Lot 12 DP 10375 0.0935 HBM1/677
AV EN
LOT 308 5255m²
HBA3/48
BA NK AV EN UE
SER
PIL LER
LOT 72 369m²
HBJ4/1500
Lot 191 DP 9997 0.0728
4.2
N SO S BI
HBY1/923
Lot 154 DP 9997 0.0789
HBM1/687
HBM1/676
4.2 24 .2
23/01/2020 FOR APPROVAL
15
15 .4 LOT 79 374m² LOT 80 RA 374m² 15 .4
RB
4.6
CY S
LOT 73 369m² 2
Lot 190 DP 9997 0.0715
2
409m² 11 .7
.2
HBB3/843
Lot 11 DP 10375 0.1464
LOT 78
3.1
4.2
24
4.2
PE R
HBM1/686
LOT 74 369m²
Lot 189 DP 9997 0.0703
D8
L AN E
HBY1/922
Lot 6 DP 28293 0.0603
24 .2
HBF4/39
VIC E
Lot 22 DP 10192 0.2137
LOT 75 369m² 15
HBY1/918
Lot 2 DP 28293 0.0286 Lot 3 DP 28293 HBY1/919 0.0310 Lot 4HBY1/920 DP 28293 0.0319 Lot 5 DP 28293 HBY1/921 0.0276
.2
HBG2/478
Lot 188 DP 9997 0.0718
HBM1/673
LOT 76 384m² 24
22 6.1
Lot 1 DP 28293 0.0596
22 6.1
Lot 10 DP 10192 0.1224
.6
Appr. Issued KRC KRC
.8
.0
15
Lot 187 DP 9997 0.0705
Lot 24 DP 10192 0.3819
17
23
17
HBM1/672
NORTH
HBM1/678
20 .1
Lot 9 DP 10192 0.1274
HBM1/675
.8
Lot 8 DP 10375 0.2324
HBH2/114
Lot 23 DP 10192 0.0799
XREF's: QuickMap_TE Awa_willowbank; Durham Property_LA BASE_v9_culdesacs; Willowbank Rd_QuickMap CAD FILE: H:\_2018\H20180069 - Durham Property Investments\CAD\H20180069-CONSENT-R3.dwg
Description Rev Date 1 17/12/2018 FOR APPROVAL
40
Pt Section 92 Blk VIII Heretaunga SD 0.0916
.0
HBW1/1021
HBV2/873
14
HBW1/1023
FIT ZG E
HBW1/1022
DP 26433 0.0498
RA
DP 26433 0.0442
Lot 1 DP 26433 0.1325
4.8
DATE PLOTTED: 1/28/2020 9:58:21 AM BY : GEMMA GUILFORD
LA
BE STA LL
793437
Lot 354 DP 513468 0.0527
Lot 363 DP 513468 0.0560
Lot 357 DP 513468 0.0584
793445
793439
Lot 358 DP 513468 0.0527
Lot 362 DP 513468 0.0526
16 & 38 WILLOWBANK AVE TE AWA, NAPIER OVERALL SCHEME PLAN Status
FOR APPROVAL
NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES
793444
Datum
793440
Lot 361 DP 513468 0.0526
793436
Lot 359 DP 513468 0.1125 793441
793443
Lot 360 DP 513468
Council Ref.
HB2000
Scale
1:1000
Drawing Number
H20180069-C011
Size
A3 Revision
3
HBW1/1022
DP 26433 0.0498 HBW1/1023
HBW1/1021
LL
STR
EE T
HBV2/873
Description Rev Date 1 17/12/2018 FOR APPROVAL Pt Section 92 Blk VIII Heretaunga SD 0.0916
Lot 8 DP 10375 0.2324
Lot 9 DP 10192 0.1274
HBM1/675
HBM1/678
NORTH
Lot 1 DP 26433 0.1325
STA
LD
DP 26433 0.0442
FIT ZG ER A
DATE PLOTTED: 1/28/2020 9:58:28 AM BY : GEMMA GUILFORD
PL A
BE
Lot 186 DP 9997 0.0748
HBM1/672
Appr. Issued KRC KRC
2
23/01/2020 FOR APPROVAL
KEC
MH
3
28/01/2020 FOR APPROVAL
KRC
JK
HBH2/114
Lot 187 DP 9997 0.0705
Lot 24 DP 10192 0.3819
Lot 10 DP 10192 0.1224
Lot 1 DP 28293 0.0596
HBG2/478
Lot 188 DP 9997 0.0718
HBM1/673
HBY1/918
Lot 2 DP 28293 0.0286 Lot 3 DP 28293 HBY1/919 0.0310 Lot 4HBY1/920 DP 28293 0.0319 Lot 5 DP 28293 HBY1/921 0.0276
HBF4/39
E
LAN
CE A PL
HBA1/619
HBM1/677
AV EN
UE
Lot 155 DP 9997 0.0672 HBB4/640
Lot 156 DP 9997 0.0690
Lot 153 DP 9997 0.0839
Lot 157 DP 9997 0.0786
HBA1/516
HBJ3/948
Lot 152 DP 9997 0.0819
HBG2/863
Lot 193 DP 9997 0.0741 HBF2/1462
Lot 194 DP 9997 0.0753 HBB3/848
HB200/23
Lot 196 DP 9997 0.0703 HBE1/318
Lot 158 DP 9997 0.0710
HBM1/696 Bisson Place
HBA3/1263
Lot 197 DP 9997 0.0687
HBJ3/1004
HBA1/716
HBH4/1235
HBM1/695
Lot 198 DP 10396 0.1778
Lot 160 DP 9997 0.0786
HBM1/694
OW B
Lot 150 DP 9997 0.1039
AN K
Lot 159 DP 9997 0.0814
Lot 151 DP 9997 0.0753
HBW1/355
HBC4/792
HBE1/551
WI LL
Lot 161 DP 9997 0.0789 Lot 201 DP 10396 0.1090
Lot 162 DP 9997 0.0776
NOTES 1. This plan has been produced for resource consent purposes. Boundaries and dimensions are subject to resource consent approval and land transfer survey. 2. Easements may be required for cross-boundary services. 3. Current Napier City Council Zoning: Main Residential. NCC Planning Maps: I7, I8 and H8. 4. Existing Easement area A on DP 14417 (E.C.322767.4) is to be surrendered.
Lot 195 DP 9997 0.0758
MA
HBM1/697
Lot 1 DP 14417 4.5526
UE
ER
Lot 154 DP 9997 0.0789
HBM1/687
N SO S BI
ILL
Lot 192 DP 9997 0.0741
HBA3/48
Lot 12 DP 10375 0.0935
ELD
Lot 23 DP 10192 0.0799
HBJ4/1500
Lot 191 DP 9997 0.0728
AV EN
HBY1/923
SP
HBM1/676
SEF I
CY
SER
HBM1/686
Lot 6 DP 28293 0.0603
Lot 190 DP 9997 0.0715
AVE NU E
HBY1/922
PE R
HBB3/843
Lot 11 DP 10375 0.1464
VIC E
Lot 22 DP 10192 0.2137
Lot 189 DP 9997 0.0703
HBW1/356
Lot 1 DP 318389 6.1891
HBD3/1295
71899
Lot 202 DP 9997 0.0693
Lot 163 DP 9997 0.0786
HBH2/141
HBJ2/292
Lot 166 DP 9997 0.0682
Lot 203 DP 9997 0.0718
Lot 164 DP 9997 0.0725
HBA1/624
HBA2/1222
Lot 204 DP 9997 0.0703
HBK1/439
HBA1/801
Lot 165 DP 9997 0.0784
Superseded
Lot 205 DP 9997 0.0675
HBD2/756
LOT 501 13.3ha
HBA3/1372
Lot 207 DP 9997 0.0687
Lot 118 DP 10451 0.0407
ROA D
HBA1/525
Lot 206 DP 9997 0.0687
HBA2/1403
HBA3/306
SEN
Lot 208 DP 10451 0.0741
Lot 114 DP 10248 0.0419
HBA3/1092
HBA3/306
ERIK
Lot 209 DP 10451 0.0741 HBK1/626 28.5 20.0
31.5 20.0
420376
HBK1/977
LOT 6 629m²
Lot 97 DP 10451 0.0672 HBK1/825
20.0
Lot 98 DP 10451 0.0672
17.0
Lot 2 DP 14417 9.2648
HBE2/1003
Lot 379 DP 513468 0.0500
Lot 380 DP 513468 0.0483
Lot 381 DP 513468 0.0483
Lot 382 DP 513468 0.0483
Lot 383 DP 513468 0.0483
795983
795984
795985
795986
795987
Lot 384 DP 516362 0.0483 804715
Lot 385 DP 516362 0.0483 804716
Lot 386 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 387 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 388 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 389 DP 516362 0.0483
804717
804718
804719
804720
31.5
Fieldwork
LOT 5 705m² 31.5
HBC4/814
LOT 4
Lot 94 DP 10451 0.0733
31.5
20.0
LOT 3 629m²
HBG3/590
Lot 370 DP 513468 0.0462 795979
35.0
Lot 9 DP 6055 2.1650
22.5
793429
Lot 346 DP 513468 0.0544 793428
Lot 345 DP 513468 0.0544
Lot 374 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 375 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 376 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 377 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 378 DP 516362 0.0490
804711
804712
804714
804710
804713
795982
Lot 369 DP 513468 0.0509
793431
795978
Lot 350 DP 513468 0.0521
Lot 347 DP 513468 0.0544
20.0
20.0 22.5
LOT 1 710m²
795981
Lot 373 DP 513468 0.0562
795980
793430
LOT 2 629m² 31.5
378863
Lot 371 DP 513468 0.0520
Lot 348 DP 513468 0.0544
31.5
Lot 3 DP 394762 6.7380
Lot 372 DP 513468 0.0543
Lot 349 DP 513468 0.0565
20.0
Lot 93 DP 10451 0.0713
Drawn
Lot 368 DP 513468 0.0469
Lot 367 DP 513468 0.0550
Lot 366 DP 513468 0.0578
794507
794506
Lot 365 DP 513468 0.0914 793447
17/12/2017
793432
Lot 364 DP 513468 0.0621
793433
Lot 356 DP 513468 0.0604 793438
793434
Lot 355 DP 513468 0.0527 Lot 353 DP 513468 0.1185 793435
17/12/2017
Designed
Date
Approved
Date
Client
DURHAM PROPERTY INVESTMENTS PROPOSED SUBDIVISION OF LOT 1 & 2 DP 14417 COMPRISED IN RT HBG2/863 & 420376
793446
Lot 352 DP 513468 0.0544
793427
Date
KRC
This document is produced by Development Nous Ltd solely for the benefit of and use by the client in accordance with the terms of engagement. Development Nous Ltd does not and shall not assume any responsibility or liability whatsoever to any third party arising out of any use or reliance by third party on the content of this document.
795977
Lot 351 DP 513468 0.0544
HBB2/1223
All Rights Reserved.
Date
GG
STA
686m²
HBG2/209
Date
Checked
21.8
Lot 95 DP 10451 0.0713
KAITUNA PLACE
GE 1
A
HBF4/40
22.4
22.4
Lot 96 DP 10451 0.0672
21.8
XREF's: QuickMap_TE Awa_willowbank; Durham Property_LA BASE_v9_culdesacs; Willowbank Rd_QuickMap CAD FILE: H:\_2018\H20180069 - Durham Property Investments\CAD\H20180069-CONSENT-R3.dwg
LOT 7 625m²
4.2
Lot 210 DP 10451 0.0728
793437
Lot 354 DP 513468 0.0527
Lot 363 DP 513468 0.0560
Lot 357 DP 513468 0.0584
793445
793439
Lot 358 DP 513468 0.0527
Lot 362 DP 513468 0.0526
16 & 38 WILLOWBANK AVE TE AWA, NAPIER STAGE 1A - SCHEME PLAN Status
FOR APPROVAL
NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES
793444
Datum
793440
Lot 361 DP 513468 0.0526
793436
Lot 359 DP 513468 0.1125 793441
793443
Lot 360 DP 513468
Council Ref.
HB2000
Scale
1:1000
Drawing Number
H20180069-C012
Size
A3 Revision
3
HBW1/1022
DP 26433 0.0498 HBW1/1023
HBW1/1021
LL
STR
EE T
HBV2/873
Description Rev Date 1 17/12/2018 FOR APPROVAL Pt Section 92 Blk VIII Heretaunga SD 0.0916
Lot 8 DP 10375 0.2324
Lot 9 DP 10192 0.1274
HBM1/675
HBM1/678
NORTH
Lot 1 DP 26433 0.1325
STA
LD
DP 26433 0.0442
FIT ZG ER A
DATE PLOTTED: 1/28/2020 9:58:34 AM BY : GEMMA GUILFORD
PL A
BE
Lot 186 DP 9997 0.0748
HBM1/672
2
23/01/2020 FOR APPROVAL
KRC
MH
3
28/01/2020 FOR APPROVAL
KRC
JK
HBH2/114
Lot 187 DP 9997 0.0705
Lot 24 DP 10192 0.3819
Lot 10 DP 10192 0.1224
Lot 1 DP 28293 0.0596
HBG2/478
Lot 188 DP 9997 0.0718
HBM1/673
HBY1/918
Lot 2 DP 28293 0.0286 Lot 3 DP 28293 HBY1/919 0.0310 Lot 4HBY1/920 DP 28293 0.0319 Lot 5 DP 28293 HBY1/921 0.0276
HBF4/39
E
LAN
HBW1/355
HBC4/792
HBE1/551
Lot 201 DP 10396 0.1090 HBW1/356
HBD3/1295
LOT 12 629m²
HBH2/141
Lot 203 DP 9997 0.0718
31.5
20.0
Lot 164 DP 9997 0.0725
HBA2/1222
LOT 11 629m²
Lot 204 DP 9997 0.0703
HBK1/439
Lot 205 DP 9997 0.0675
HBD2/756
LOT 10 629m²
HBA1/525
Lot 206 DP 9997 0.0687
20.0
31.5
Lot 207 DP 9997 0.0687
20.0
LOT 9 629m²
HBA3/1372
Lot 118 DP 10451 0.0407
31.5
28.4
HBA3/1092
HBA3/306
LOT 8 625m² 4.2
Lot 209 DP 10451 0.0741 HBK1/626
Lot 210 DP 10451 0.0728
LOT 7 STAGE 1A
HBE2/1003
Superseded
ERIK
Lot 114 DP 10248 0.0419
71899
SEN
Lot 208 DP 10451 0.0741
17.0
20.0
HBA2/1403
HBA3/306
Lot 1 DP 318389 6.1891
31.5
HBA1/801
Lot 165 DP 9997 0.0784
20.0
HBA1/624
LOT 13 629m² 31.5
HBJ2/292
Lot 166 DP 9997 0.0682
LOT 14 629m² 31.5
LOT 502 12.8ha
Lot 202 DP 9997 0.0693
Lot 163 DP 9997 0.0786
31.5
WI LL
Lot 161 DP 9997 0.0789
Lot 162 DP 9997 0.0776
17.0
OW B
Lot 198 DP 10396 0.1778
Lot 160 DP 9997 0.0786
HBM1/694
28.5
LOT 15 625m²
20.0
HBH4/1235
20.0
HBM1/695
4.2
Lot 150 DP 9997 0.1039
AN K
HBA1/716
Lot 159 DP 9997 0.0814
20.0
HBJ3/1004
Lot 151 DP 9997 0.0753
B
Lot 197 DP 9997 0.0687
20.0
HBE1/318
Lot 158 DP 9997 0.0710
HBM1/696 Bisson Place
GE 1
MA
HB200/23
Lot 196 DP 9997 0.0703
STA
HBJ3/948
Lot 152 DP 9997 0.0819
20.0
HBA1/516
HBM1/697
HBB3/848
Lot 195 DP 9997 0.0758
ROA D
Lot 157 DP 9997 0.0786
20.0
Lot 156 DP 9997 0.0690
HBF2/1462
Lot 194 DP 9997 0.0753
20.0
HBB4/640
Lot 153 DP 9997 0.0839
HBA3/1263
Lot 193 DP 9997 0.0741
20.0
UE
Lot 155 DP 9997 0.0672
Lot 192 DP 9997 0.0741
20.0
HBA1/619
HBM1/677
AV EN
ELD
CE A PL
NOTES 1. This plan has been produced for resource consent purposes. Boundaries and dimensions are subject to resource consent approval and land transfer survey. 2. Easements may be required for cross-boundary services. 3. Current Napier City Council Zoning: Main Residential. NCC Planning Maps: I7, I8 and H8.
HBA3/48
Lot 12 DP 10375 0.0935
UE
ER
Lot 154 DP 9997 0.0789
HBM1/687
N SO S BI
ILL
HBJ4/1500
Lot 191 DP 9997 0.0728
AV EN
HBY1/923
SP
HBM1/676
SEF I
CY
SER
HBM1/686
Lot 6 DP 28293 0.0603
HBB3/843
Lot 190 DP 9997 0.0715
AVE NU E
HBY1/922
PE R
Lot 189 DP 9997 0.0703 Lot 11 DP 10375 0.1464
VIC E
Lot 22 DP 10192 0.2137
Lot 23 DP 10192 0.0799
XREF's: QuickMap_TE Awa_willowbank; Durham Property_LA BASE_v9_culdesacs; Willowbank Rd_QuickMap CAD FILE: H:\_2018\H20180069 - Durham Property Investments\CAD\H20180069-CONSENT-R3.dwg
Appr. Issued KRC KRC
Lot 98 DP 10451 0.0672 HBK1/977
LOT 6 STAGE 1A
Lot 97 DP 10451 0.0672
Lot 379 DP 513468 0.0500
Lot 380 DP 513468 0.0483
Lot 381 DP 513468 0.0483
Lot 382 DP 513468 0.0483
Lot 383 DP 513468 0.0483
795983
795984
795985
795986
795987
Lot 384 DP 516362 0.0483 804715
Lot 385 DP 516362 0.0483 804716
Lot 386 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 387 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 388 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 389 DP 516362 0.0483
804717
804718
804719
804720
HBK1/825
Fieldwork
Lot 96 DP 10451 0.0672
LOT 5 STAGE 1A
HBF4/40
KAITUNA PLACE
Date
Drawn
Date
GG
Lot 95 DP 10451 0.0713
17/12/2018
Checked
HBC4/814
LOT 4 STAGE 1A
Lot 94 DP 10451 0.0733
Lot 370 DP 513468 0.0462
HBG2/209
795979
Lot 93 DP 10451 0.0713
Lot 372 DP 513468 0.0543
Lot 371 DP 513468 0.0520
795981
Lot 349 DP 513468 0.0565 Lot 348 DP 513468 0.0544
793429
LOT 1 STAGE 1A
378863
Lot 346 DP 513468 0.0544 793428
Lot 9 DP 6055 2.1650
Lot 345 DP 513468 0.0544
Lot 376 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 377 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 378 DP 516362 0.0490
804711
804712
804714
804710
804713
795982
795978
Lot 350 DP 513468 0.0521
Lot 347 DP 513468 0.0544
Lot 3 DP 394762 6.7380
Lot 375 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 369 DP 513468 0.0509
793431
793430
LOT 2 STAGE 1A
Lot 374 DP 516362 0.0470
795980
LOT 3 STAGE 1A
HBG3/590
Lot 373 DP 513468 0.0562
Lot 368 DP 513468 0.0469
Lot 367 DP 513468 0.0550
Lot 366 DP 513468 0.0578
794507
794506
Lot 365 DP 513468 0.0914 793447
793432
Lot 364 DP 513468 0.0621
793433
Lot 356 DP 513468 0.0604 793438
793434
Lot 355 DP 513468 0.0527 Lot 353 DP 513468 0.1185 793435
17/12/2018
Designed
Date
Approved
Date
Client
DURHAM PROPERTY INVESTMENTS PROPOSED SUBDIVISION OF LOT 1 & 2 DP 14417 COMPRISED IN RT HBG2/863 & 420376
793446
Lot 352 DP 513468 0.0544
793427
Date
KRC
795977
Lot 351 DP 513468 0.0544
HBB2/1223
All Rights Reserved. This document is produced by Development Nous Ltd solely for the benefit of and use by the client in accordance with the terms of engagement. Development Nous Ltd does not and shall not assume any responsibility or liability whatsoever to any third party arising out of any use or reliance by third party on the content of this document.
793437
Lot 354 DP 513468 0.0527
Lot 363 DP 513468 0.0560
Lot 357 DP 513468 0.0584
793445
793439
Lot 358 DP 513468 0.0527
Lot 362 DP 513468 0.0526
16 & 38 WILLOWBANK ROAD TE AWA, NAPIER STAGE 1B - SCHEME PLAN Status
FOR APPROVAL
NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES
793444
Datum
793440
Lot 361 DP 513468 0.0526
793436
Lot 359 DP 513468 0.1125 793441
793443
Lot 360 DP 513468
Council Ref.
HB2000
Scale
1:1000
Drawing Number
H20180069-C013
Size
A3 Revision
3
HBW1/1022
DP 26433 0.0498 HBW1/1023
HBW1/1021
LL
STR
EE T
HBV2/873
Description Rev Date 1 17/12/2018 FOR APPROVAL Pt Section 92 Blk VIII Heretaunga SD 0.0916
Lot 8 DP 10375 0.2324
Lot 9 DP 10192 0.1274
HBM1/675
HBM1/678
NORTH
Lot 1 DP 26433 0.1325
STA
LD
DP 26433 0.0442
FIT ZG ER A
DATE PLOTTED: 1/28/2020 9:58:39 AM BY : GEMMA GUILFORD
PL A
BE
Lot 186 DP 9997 0.0748
HBM1/672
Appr. Issued KRC KRC
2
23/01/2020 FOR APPROVAL
KRC
MH
3
28/01/2020 FOR APPROVAL
KRC
JK
HBH2/114
Lot 187 DP 9997 0.0705
Lot 24 DP 10192 0.3819
Lot 10 DP 10192 0.1224
Lot 1 DP 28293 0.0596
HBG2/478
Lot 188 DP 9997 0.0718
HBM1/673
HBY1/918
Lot 2 DP 28293 0.0286 Lot 3 DP 28293 HBY1/919 0.0310 Lot 4HBY1/920 DP 28293 0.0319 Lot 5 DP 28293 HBY1/921 0.0276
HBF4/39
E
Lot 157 DP 9997 0.0786
HBA1/516
HBJ3/948
Lot 152 DP 9997 0.0819
Bisson Place
23.6
16.7
31.5
HB200/23
HBE1/318
Lot 197 DP 9997 0.0687
HBJ3/1004
HBM1/695
HBH4/1235
Lot 198 DP 10396 0.1778
Lot 160 DP 9997 0.0786
HBM1/694
HBW1/355
HBC4/792
HBE1/551
Lot 201 DP 10396 0.1090 HBW1/356
19.4
4.2
LOT 15 STAGE 1B
LOT 14 STAGE 1B
WI LL
Lot 161 DP 9997 0.0789
Lot 162 DP 9997 0.0776
32.0
OW B
Lot 150 DP 9997 0.1039
Lot 159 DP 9997 0.0814
LOT 503 12.6ha
AN K
HBA1/716
Lot 151 DP 9997 0.0753
LOT 16 625m²
GE 1 C
19.5
HBB3/848
Lot 196 DP 9997 0.0703
Lot 158 DP 9997 0.0710
HBM1/696
31.5
LOT 17 630m²
Lot 195 DP 9997 0.0758
MA
HBM1/697
HBF2/1462
Lot 194 DP 9997 0.0753
17.0
Lot 156 DP 9997 0.0690
LOT 18 613m²
STA
HBB4/640
Lot 153 DP 9997 0.0839
31.5
20.0
UE
Lot 155 DP 9997 0.0672
HBA3/1263
Lot 193 DP 9997 0.0741
20.0
HBA1/619
HBM1/677
AV EN
UE
CE A PL
.1
LOT 19 634m²
Lot 192 DP 9997 0.0741
AV EN
ER
Lot 154 DP 9997 0.0789
HBM1/687
N SO S BI
ILL
NOTES 1. This plan has been produced for resource consent purposes. Boundaries and dimensions are subject to resource consent approval and land transfer survey. 2. Easements may be required for cross-boundary services. 3. Current Napier City Council Zoning: Main Residential. NCC Planning Maps: I7, I8 and H8.
32
HBA3/48
Lot 12 DP 10375 0.0935
ELD
Lot 23 DP 10192 0.0799
HBJ4/1500
Lot 191 DP 9997 0.0728
AVE NU E
HBY1/923
SP
HBM1/676
SEF I
CY
SER
HBM1/686
Lot 6 DP 28293 0.0603
Lot 190 DP 9997 0.0715
20.0
LAN
HBY1/922
PE R
HBB3/843
Lot 11 DP 10375 0.1464
VIC E
Lot 22 DP 10192 0.2137
Lot 189 DP 9997 0.0703
LOT 13 STAGE 1B Lot 1 DP 318389 6.1891
HBD3/1295
71899
Lot 202 DP 9997 0.0693
Lot 163 DP 9997 0.0786
LOT 12 STAGE 1B
HBH2/141
HBJ2/292
Lot 166 DP 9997 0.0682
Lot 203 DP 9997 0.0718
Lot 164 DP 9997 0.0725
HBA1/624
LOT 11 STAGE 1B
HBA2/1222
Lot 204 DP 9997 0.0703
HBK1/439
Superseded
HBA1/801
Lot 165 DP 9997 0.0784
LOT 10 STAGE 1B
Lot 205 DP 9997 0.0675
HBD2/756
Lot 206 DP 9997 0.0687
ROA D
HBA1/525
LOT 9 STAGE 1B
HBA3/1372
Lot 207 DP 9997 0.0687
Lot 118 DP 10451 0.0407
HBA2/1403
LOT 8 STAGE 1B
Lot 208 DP 10451 0.0741
Lot 114 DP 10248 0.0419
SEN
HBA3/306
HBA3/1092
HBA3/306
ERIK
Lot 209 DP 10451 0.0741 HBK1/626
Lot 210 DP 10451 0.0728
LOT 7 STAGE 1A
XREF's: QuickMap_TE Awa_willowbank; Durham Property_LA BASE_v9_culdesacs; Willowbank Rd_QuickMap CAD FILE: H:\_2018\H20180069 - Durham Property Investments\CAD\H20180069-CONSENT-R3.dwg
HBE2/1003
Lot 98 DP 10451 0.0672 HBK1/977
LOT 6 STAGE 1A
Lot 97 DP 10451 0.0672
Lot 379 DP 513468 0.0500
Lot 380 DP 513468 0.0483
Lot 381 DP 513468 0.0483
Lot 382 DP 513468 0.0483
Lot 383 DP 513468 0.0483
795983
795984
795985
795986
795987
Lot 384 DP 516362 0.0483 804715
Lot 385 DP 516362 0.0483 804716
Lot 386 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 387 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 388 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 389 DP 516362 0.0483
804717
804718
804719
804720
HBK1/825
Fieldwork
Lot 96 DP 10451 0.0672
LOT 5 STAGE 1A
HBF4/40
KAITUNA PLACE
Date
Drawn
Date
GG
Lot 95 DP 10451 0.0713
17/12/2018
Checked
HBC4/814
LOT 4 STAGE 1A
Lot 94 DP 10451 0.0733
Lot 370 DP 513468 0.0462
HBG2/209
795979
Lot 93 DP 10451 0.0713
Lot 372 DP 513468 0.0543
Lot 371 DP 513468 0.0520
795981
Lot 349 DP 513468 0.0565 Lot 348 DP 513468 0.0544
793429
LOT 1 STAGE 1A
378863
Lot 346 DP 513468 0.0544 793428
Lot 9 DP 6055 2.1650
Lot 345 DP 513468 0.0544
Lot 376 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 377 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 378 DP 516362 0.0490
804711
804712
804714
804710
804713
795982
795978
Lot 350 DP 513468 0.0521
Lot 347 DP 513468 0.0544
Lot 3 DP 394762 6.7380
Lot 375 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 369 DP 513468 0.0509
793431
793430
LOT 2 STAGE 1A
Lot 374 DP 516362 0.0470
795980
LOT 3 STAGE 1A
HBG3/590
Lot 373 DP 513468 0.0562
Lot 368 DP 513468 0.0469
Lot 367 DP 513468 0.0550
Lot 366 DP 513468 0.0578
794507
794506
Lot 365 DP 513468 0.0914 793447
793432
Lot 364 DP 513468 0.0621
793433
Lot 356 DP 513468 0.0604 793438
793434
Lot 355 DP 513468 0.0527 Lot 353 DP 513468 0.1185 793435
17/12/2018
Designed
Date
Approved
Date
Client
DURHAM PROPERTY INVESTMENTS PROPOSED SUBDIVISION OF LOT 1 & 2 DP 14417 COMPRISED IN RT HBG2/863 & 420376
793446
Lot 352 DP 513468 0.0544
793427
Date
KRC
795977
Lot 351 DP 513468 0.0544
HBB2/1223
All Rights Reserved. This document is produced by Development Nous Ltd solely for the benefit of and use by the client in accordance with the terms of engagement. Development Nous Ltd does not and shall not assume any responsibility or liability whatsoever to any third party arising out of any use or reliance by third party on the content of this document.
793437
Lot 354 DP 513468 0.0527
Lot 363 DP 513468 0.0560
Lot 357 DP 513468 0.0584
793445
793439
Lot 358 DP 513468 0.0527
Lot 362 DP 513468 0.0526
16 & 38 WILLOWBANK AVE TE AWA, NAPIER STAGE 1C - SCHEME PLAN Status
FOR APPROVAL
NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES
793444
Datum
793440
Lot 361 DP 513468 0.0526
793436
Lot 359 DP 513468 0.1125 793441
793443
Lot 360 DP 513468
Council Ref.
HB2000
Scale
1:1000
Drawing Number
H20180069-C014
Size
A3 Revision
3
HBW1/1022
DP 26433 0.0498 HBW1/1023
HBW1/1021
LL
STR
EE T
HBV2/873
Description Rev Date 1 17/12/2018 FOR APPROVAL Pt Section 92 Blk VIII Heretaunga SD 0.0916
Lot 8 DP 10375 0.2324
Lot 9 DP 10192 0.1274
HBM1/675
HBM1/678
NORTH
Lot 1 DP 26433 0.1325
STA
LD
DP 26433 0.0442
FIT ZG ER A
DATE PLOTTED: 1/28/2020 9:58:45 AM BY : GEMMA GUILFORD
PL A
BE
Lot 186 DP 9997 0.0748
HBM1/672
Appr. Issued KRC KRC
2
23/01/2020 FOR APPROVAL
KRC
MH
3
28/01/2020 FOR APPROVAL
KRC
JK
HBH2/114
Lot 187 DP 9997 0.0705
Lot 24 DP 10192 0.3819
Lot 10 DP 10192 0.1224
Lot 1 DP 28293 0.0596
HBG2/478
Lot 188 DP 9997 0.0718
HBM1/673
HBY1/918
Lot 2 DP 28293 0.0286 Lot 3 DP 28293 HBY1/919 0.0310 Lot 4HBY1/920 DP 28293 0.0319 Lot 5 DP 28293 HBY1/921 0.0276
HBF4/39
E
LAN
CE A PL
HBA1/619
HBM1/677
AV EN
UE
Lot 155 DP 9997 0.0672 HBB4/640
Lot 156 DP 9997 0.0690
Lot 153 DP 9997 0.0839
Lot 157 DP 9997 0.0786
HBA1/516
HBJ3/948
Lot 152 DP 9997 0.0819
LOT 18 STAGE 1C
HBF2/1462
Lot 194 DP 9997 0.0753
LOT 17 STAGE 1C
HBB3/848
HB200/23
Lot 196 DP 9997 0.0703 HBE1/318
Lot 158 DP 9997 0.0710
HBM1/696 Bisson Place
HBA3/1263
Lot 193 DP 9997 0.0741
Lot 195 DP 9997 0.0758
MA
HBM1/697
LOT 19 STAGE 1C
Lot 192 DP 9997 0.0741
UE
ER
Lot 154 DP 9997 0.0789
HBM1/687
N SO S BI
ILL
Lot 197 DP 9997 0.0687
HBJ3/1004
HBM1/695
HBH4/1235
Lot 198 DP 10396 0.1778
Lot 160 DP 9997 0.0786
HBM1/694
HBW1/355
HBC4/792
HBE1/551
LOT 14 STAGE 1B
WI LL
Lot 161 DP 9997 0.0789 Lot 201 DP 10396 0.1090
Lot 162 DP 9997 0.0776
LOT 15 STAGE 1B
OW B
Lot 150 DP 9997 0.1039
Lot 159 DP 9997 0.0814
LOT 16 STAGE 1C
AN K
HBA1/716
Lot 151 DP 9997 0.0753
NOTES 1. This plan has been produced for resource consent purposes. Boundaries and dimensions are subject to resource consent approval and land transfer survey. 2. Easements may be required for cross-boundary services. 3. Current Napier City Council Zoning: Main Residential. NCC Planning Maps: I7, I8 and H8. 4. Proposed Amalgamation Conditions: 4.1. "That Lot 401 hereon is to be held in one record of title". 5. Lots 301 & 305 are to vest in the Napier City Council as local purpose reserve upon deposit.
HBA3/48
Lot 12 DP 10375 0.0935
ELD
Lot 23 DP 10192 0.0799
HBJ4/1500
Lot 191 DP 9997 0.0728
AV EN
HBY1/923
SP
HBM1/676
SEF I
CY
SER
HBM1/686
Lot 6 DP 28293 0.0603
Lot 190 DP 9997 0.0715
AVE NU E
HBY1/922
PE R
HBB3/843
Lot 11 DP 10375 0.1464
VIC E
Lot 22 DP 10192 0.2137
Lot 189 DP 9997 0.0703
HBW1/356
LOT 13 STAGE 1B Lot 1 DP 318389 6.1891
HBD3/1295
71899
Lot 202 DP 9997 0.0693
Lot 163 DP 9997 0.0786
LOT 12 STAGE 1B
HBH2/141
HBJ2/292
Lot 166 DP 9997 0.0682
Lot 203 DP 9997 0.0718
Lot 164 DP 9997 0.0725
HBA1/624
LOT 11 STAGE 1B
HBA2/1222
Lot 204 DP 9997 0.0703
HBK1/439
HBA1/801
Lot 165 DP 9997 0.0784
LOT 504 9.9ha
Lot 205 DP 9997 0.0675
HBD2/756
LOT 10 STAGE 1B
Superseded
Lot 206 DP 9997 0.0687
LOT 9 STAGE 1B
HBA3/1372
Lot 207 DP 9997 0.0687
Lot 118 DP 10451 0.0407
HBA2/1403
LOT 401 5768m²
21.2
388m² 16.0
17.5
16.0
ERIK
17.7
Lot 370 DP 513468 0.0462 795979
795987
Lot 372 DP 513468 0.0543
Lot 371 DP 513468 0.0520
804715
804716
Lot 386 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 387 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 388 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 389 DP 516362 0.0483
804717
804718
804719
804720
Date
Drawn
795981
Lot 373 DP 513468 0.0562
Lot 374 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 375 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 376 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 377 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 378 DP 516362 0.0490
804711
804712
804714
804710
804713
795982
795980
Lot 349 DP 513468 0.0565
LOT 3 STAGE 1A Lot 348 DP 513468 0.0544
6.7
LOT 42 387m²
28.5
795978
Lot 350 DP 513468 0.0521
Lot 347 DP 513468 0.0544
21.2
LOT 43 475m²
793429
LOT 1 STAGE 1A
Lot 346 DP 513468 0.0544 793428
Lot 345 DP 513468 0.0544
169.
0
Lot 368 DP 513468 0.0469
Lot 367 DP 513468 0.0550
Lot 366 DP 513468 0.0578
794507
794506
Lot 365 DP 513468 0.0914 793447
793432
Lot 364 DP 513468 0.0621
Date
17/12/2018 Date
KRC
22/08/2017
Designed
Date
Approved
Date
793433
Lot 356 DP 513468 0.0604 793438
793434
Lot 355 DP 513468 0.0527 Lot 353 DP 513468 0.1185 793435
Client
DURHAM PROPERTY INVESTMENTS PROPOSED SUBDIVISION OF LOT 1 & 2 DP 14417 COMPRISED IN RT HBG2/863 & 420376
793446
Lot 352 DP 513468 0.0544
793427
All Rights Reserved. This document is produced by Development Nous Ltd solely for the benefit of and use by the client in accordance with the terms of engagement. Development Nous Ltd does not and shall not assume any responsibility or liability whatsoever to any third party arising out of any use or reliance by third party on the content of this document.
795977
Lot 351 DP 513468 0.0544
HBB2/1223
40.0
Lot 369 DP 513468 0.0509
793431
793430
LOT 2 STAGE 1A
LOT 305 8712m² Lot 9 DP 6055 2.1650
795986
LOT 4 STAGE 1A
7.8
16.7
165.0
378863
5.1 0
LOT 44 411m²
16.0
53 .0
1
3.6 5.8
24.2
24.2
11.1
LOT 45
795985
Lot 385 DP 516362 0.0483
KAITUNA PLACE
24.2
5.3
16.0
A
LOT 41 387m²
16.0
24.2
24.2 39.6
Lot 3 DP 394762 6.7380
16.0 16.0
16.0
LOT 47 388m² LOT 46 388m²
795984
Lot 384 DP 516362 0.0483
24.2
4.2
40 .0
HBG3/590
LOT 40 387m²
21.2
15.9
48 .0
795983
LOT 5 STAGE 1A
16.0
36.7
LOT 180 381m²
15.4
D9
16.8
LOT 301 2059m²
Lot 93 DP 10451 0.0713
ROA
Lot 383 DP 513468 0.0483
Checked
24.2
24.2
15.9
HBG2/209
16.0
16.6
24.2
.6
16.0
45
Lot 382 DP 513468 0.0483
GG
LOT 39 387m²
16.6
24.2
24.2
24.2
14.4
HBC4/814
Lot 94 DP 10451 0.0733
Lot 381 DP 513468 0.0483
24.2
24.2
LOT 181 403m²
12.9
24.2
15.4 LOT 172 16.5 15.4 385m² LOT 175 LOT 176 374m² BB LOT 179 17.3 BA 374m² 15.4 373m² AB 15.4 AA
Lot 380 DP 513468 0.0483
Fieldwork
LOT 38 387m²
12.9
381m²
16.5
LOT 37 387m²
Lot 379 DP 513468 0.0500
24.2
21.2
LOT 182
24.2
Lot 95 DP 10451 0.0713
400m²
24.2
10.0
15.4
HBF4/40
LOT 178
15.9
24.2
400m²
14.6
4.2
Lot 96 DP 10451 0.0672
STAGE 2
16.4
LOT 6 STAGE 1A
16.0
16.4
LOT 177
16.0
4.2
HBK1/825
16.0
24.2
21.2
16.0
18.9
HBK1/977
Lot 97 DP 10451 0.0672
LOT 7 STAGE 1A
24.2
LOT 36 387m²
16.0
LOT 147 381m²
21.2
LOT 35 424m²
16.6
24.2
15.9
15.1
4.2
D1
FB
4.2
LOT 148 459m² FA
24.2
24.2
436m²
HBE2/1003
Lot 98 DP 10451 0.0672
16.6
21.2
Lot 210 DP 10451 0.0728
LOT 146 404m²
14.7
24.2
18.9
LOT 151
16.0
18.1
HBK1/626
12.9
LOT 145 381m²
ROA
Lot 209 DP 10451 0.0741
4.2
15.9
HBA3/1092
HBA3/306
12.9
Lot 114 DP 10248 0.0419
SEN
LOT 8 STAGE 1B
Lot 208 DP 10451 0.0741
16.4
HBA3/306
XREF's: QuickMap_TE Awa_willowbank; Durham Property_LA BASE_v9_culdesacs; Willowbank Rd_QuickMap CAD FILE: H:\_2018\H20180069 - Durham Property Investments\CAD\H20180069-CONSENT-R3.dwg
ROA D
HBA1/525
793437
Lot 354 DP 513468 0.0527
Lot 363 DP 513468 0.0560
Lot 357 DP 513468 0.0584
793445
793439
Lot 358 DP 513468 0.0527
Lot 362 DP 513468 0.0526
16 & 38 WILLOWBANK AVE TE AWA, NAPIER STAGE 2 - SCHEME PLAN Status
FOR APPROVAL
NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES
793444
Datum
793440
Lot 361 DP 513468 0.0526
793436
Lot 359 DP 513468 0.1125 793441
793443
Lot 360 DP 513468
Council Ref.
HB2000
Scale
1:1000
Drawing Number
H20180069-C015
Size
A3 Revision
3
HBW1/1022
DP 26433 0.0498 HBW1/1023
HBW1/1021
LL
STR
EE T
HBV2/873
Description Rev Date 1 17/12/2018 FOR APPROVAL Pt Section 92 Blk VIII Heretaunga SD 0.0916
Lot 8 DP 10375 0.2324
Lot 9 DP 10192 0.1274
HBM1/675
HBM1/678
NORTH
Lot 1 DP 26433 0.1325
STA
LD
DP 26433 0.0442
FIT ZG ER A
DATE PLOTTED: 1/28/2020 9:58:51 AM BY : GEMMA GUILFORD
PL A
BE
Lot 186 DP 9997 0.0748
HBM1/672
Appr. Issued KRC KRC
2
23/01/2020 FOR APPROVAL
KRC
MH
3
28/01/2020 FOR APPROVAL
KRC
JK
HBH2/114
Lot 187 DP 9997 0.0705
Lot 24 DP 10192 0.3819
Lot 10 DP 10192 0.1224
Lot 1 DP 28293 0.0596
HBG2/478
Lot 188 DP 9997 0.0718
HBM1/673
HBY1/918
Lot 2 DP 28293 0.0286 Lot 3 DP 28293 HBY1/919 0.0310 Lot 4HBY1/920 DP 28293 0.0319 Lot 5 DP 28293 HBY1/921 0.0276
HBF4/39
E
LAN
CE A PL
HBA1/619
HBM1/677
AV EN
UE
Lot 155 DP 9997 0.0672 HBB4/640
Lot 156 DP 9997 0.0690
Lot 153 DP 9997 0.0839
Lot 157 DP 9997 0.0786
HBA1/516
HBJ3/948
Lot 152 DP 9997 0.0819
LOT 18 STAGE 1C
HBF2/1462
Lot 194 DP 9997 0.0753
LOT 17 STAGE 1C
HBB3/848
HB200/23
Lot 196 DP 9997 0.0703 HBE1/318
Lot 158 DP 9997 0.0710
HBM1/696 Bisson Place
HBA3/1263
Lot 193 DP 9997 0.0741
Lot 195 DP 9997 0.0758
MA
HBM1/697
LOT 19 STAGE 1C
Lot 192 DP 9997 0.0741
UE
ER
Lot 154 DP 9997 0.0789
HBM1/687
N SO S BI
ILL
Lot 197 DP 9997 0.0687
HBJ3/1004
HBM1/695
HBH4/1235
Lot 198 DP 10396 0.1778
Lot 160 DP 9997 0.0786
HBM1/694
HBW1/355
HBC4/792
HBE1/551
LOT 505 7.4ha
LOT 14 STAGE 1B
WI LL
Lot 161 DP 9997 0.0789 Lot 201 DP 10396 0.1090
Lot 162 DP 9997 0.0776
LOT 15 STAGE 1B
OW B
Lot 150 DP 9997 0.1039
Lot 159 DP 9997 0.0814
LOT 16 STAGE 1C
AN K
HBA1/716
Lot 151 DP 9997 0.0753
NOTES 1. This plan has been produced for resource consent purposes. Boundaries and dimensions are subject to resource consent approval and land transfer survey. 2. Easements may be required for cross-boundary services. 3. Current Napier City Council Zoning: Main Residential. NCC Planning Maps: I7, I8 and H8. 4. Proposed Amalgamation Conditions: 4.1. "That Lot & 402 & 401 DP (Stage 2 LT#) hereon are to be held in one record of title". 5. Lots 302 & 306 are to vest in the Napier City Council as local purpose reserve upon deposit.
HBA3/48
Lot 12 DP 10375 0.0935
ELD
Lot 23 DP 10192 0.0799
HBJ4/1500
Lot 191 DP 9997 0.0728
AV EN
HBY1/923
SP
HBM1/676
SEF I
CY
SER
HBM1/686
Lot 6 DP 28293 0.0603
Lot 190 DP 9997 0.0715
AVE NU E
HBY1/922
PE R
HBB3/843
Lot 11 DP 10375 0.1464
VIC E
Lot 22 DP 10192 0.2137
Lot 189 DP 9997 0.0703
HBW1/356
LOT 13 STAGE 1B Lot 1 DP 318389 6.1891
HBD3/1295
71899
Lot 202 DP 9997 0.0693
Lot 163 DP 9997 0.0786
LOT 12 STAGE 1B
HBH2/141
HBJ2/292
Lot 203 DP 9997 0.0718
Lot 164 DP 9997 0.0725
LOT 11 STAGE 1B
HBA2/1222
Lot 204 DP 9997 0.0703
HBK1/439
40
.0
.0
LOT 9 STAGE 1B
.2
23 .5
16
.5
LOT 164 371m²
16 .1
LOT 165 STAGE 2
.0
RO AD
17
.1
LOT 166 416m²
.6
.2
23
401 STAGE 2
LOT 162 STAGE 2
7
16
15 15 .4 .4
1.7
24 .2
Lot 379 DP 513468 0.0500
Lot 380 DP 513468 0.0483
Lot 381 DP 513468 0.0483
Lot 382 DP 513468 0.0483
Lot 383 DP 513468 0.0483
795983
795984
795985
795986
795987
10.0
23 .2 23 .2
LOT 38 STAGE 2
LOT 5 STAGE 1A
Lot 370 DP 513468 0.0462
LOT 40 STAGE 2
14.4
.2
LOT 186 STAGE 2
795979
LOT 46 STAGE 2
804717
804720
LOT 45 STAGE 2
LOT 42 STAGE 2
795981
Lot 346 DP 513468 0.0544 793428
Lot 345 DP 513468 0.0544
Lot 374 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 375 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 376 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 377 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 378 DP 516362 0.0490
804711
804712
804714
804710
804713
795982
795978
Lot 350 DP 513468 0.0521
Lot 347 DP 513468 0.0544 793429
Lot 373 DP 513468 0.0562
Lot 369 DP 513468 0.0509
793431
793430
LOT 2 STAGE 1A
LOT 1 STAGE 1A 305 STAGE 2
Date
Drawn
795980
Lot 349 DP 513468 0.0565
LOT 43 STAGE 2
378863
Lot 371 DP 513468 0.0520
Lot 348 DP 513468 0.0544
LOT 44 STAGE 2 Lot 3 DP 394762 6.7380
Lot 372 DP 513468 0.0543
LOT 3 STAGE 1A
LOT 41 STAGE 2 LOT 47 STAGE 2
Lot 9 DP 6055 2.1650
Lot 389 DP 516362 0.0483
804719
Lot 368 DP 513468 0.0469
Lot 367 DP 513468 0.0550
Lot 366 DP 513468 0.0578
794507
794506
Lot 365 DP 513468 0.0914 793447
Date
793432
Lot 364 DP 513468 0.0621
793433
Lot 356 DP 513468 0.0604 793438
793434
Lot 355 DP 513468 0.0527 Lot 353 DP 513468 0.1185 793435
17/12/2018
Designed
Date
Approved
Date
Client
DURHAM PROPERTY INVESTMENTS PROPOSED SUBDIVISION OF LOT 1 & 2 DP 14417 COMPRISED IN RT HBG2/863 & 420376
793446
Lot 352 DP 513468 0.0544
793427
Date
KRC
This document is produced by Development Nous Ltd solely for the benefit of and use by the client in accordance with the terms of engagement. Development Nous Ltd does not and shall not assume any responsibility or liability whatsoever to any third party arising out of any use or reliance by third party on the content of this document.
795977
Lot 351 DP 513468 0.0544
HBB2/1223
All Rights Reserved.
17/12/2018
Checked LOT 4 STAGE 1A
12 0.0
HBG3/590
Lot 388 DP 516362 0.0483
804718
LOT 39 STAGE 2
301 STAGE 2
Lot 93 DP 10451 0.0713
Lot 387 DP 516362 0.0483
KAITUNA PLACE
6.0
STAGE 3
HBG2/209
804716
Lot 386 DP 516362 0.0483
GG
LOT 187 STAGE 2
24
HBC4/814
Lot 94 DP 10451 0.0733
804715
Lot 385 DP 516362 0.0483
Fieldwork
LOT 188 STAGE 2
24 .2
Lot 95 DP 10451 0.0713
Lot 384 DP 516362 0.0483
24.2
24.2
.2
24 .2
HBF4/40
LOT 6 STAGE 1A
LOT 37 STAGE 2
25.8
24 .2
23
.2
21
LOT 36 STAGE 2
LOT 167 STAGE 2
7.5
.9
3.8
.0
28
Lot 96 DP 10451 0.0672
15
4.2
HBK1/825
20 .5
4.2
LOT 7 STAGE 1A
16 .1
LOT 167 410m²
9.1 1.7 LOT 170 13 LOT 165 16.5 13 .7 .7 477m² LOT 173 2.8 13 374m² LOT 52 .0 LOT 168 LOT 174 15 21 .4 405m² .6 472m² DB LOT 183 16 15 RO LOT 51 366m² .0 400m² .4 STAGE 2 AD LOT 169 9.0 16 DA 16.5 LOT 184 .0 5.0 9 388m² STAGE 2 15 16 359m² LOT 171 LOT 50 .5 .0 16.5 LOT 402 16 .0 CB 388m² 4108m² 364m² 15 16 .3 LOT 49 .0 LOT 179 CA STAGE 2 16 .0 LOT 181 388m² 16 STAGE 2 .6 LOT 48 LOT 182 16 STAGE 2 .0 LOT 185 LOT 306 388m² 11 B STAGE 2 2.0 9938m² 1
4.2
HBK1/977
Lot 97 DP 10451 0.0672
LOT 35 STAGE 2
LOT 166 STAGE 2
LOT 163 STAGE 2
.5
24 .3
LOT 163 392m²
16
25 .2
.6 16
LOT 162 370m²
15 24 .9 .2
12 .9
15 .2
D1 0
.2 12
21
RO A
LOT 53 365m²
Lot 98 DP 10451 0.0672
12 .9
HBE2/1003
.2
15 .2
97 15 .2
24
EB
20 .5
.2
LOT 54 369m²
.0
Lot 210 DP 10451 0.0728
16 .0
4.2
24
15
HBK1/626
.0
24
.2 7.0
15
.2
LOT 8 STAGE 1B
16
LOT 156 384m² EA
SEN
.5
ERIK
.2 24 .9
20
LOT 157 388m²
8.1
.9
16 .6
16 .0
LOT 161 370m²
15
.2
24
ROA D
.6
.5
23 .5
12
8.0
15
.2
4.2
LOT 55 369m² .2
Lot 209 DP 10451 0.0741
13
HBA3/1092
HBA3/306
16
LOT 302 194m² 2 LOT 56 369m²
Lot 208 DP 10451 0.0741
Lot 114 DP 10248 0.0419
.2
4.2
HBA2/1403
24
.2
LOT 160 392m²
15 .6
24
8.0
Lot 207 DP 9997 0.0687
23
16
15
.2
LOT 57 378m²
HBA3/1372
HBA3/306
LOT 10 STAGE 1B
.2
24
.6
Lot 206 DP 9997 0.0687
Lot 118 DP 10451 0.0407
24
LOT 58 388m²
HBA1/525
15
Lot 205 DP 9997 0.0675
HBD2/756
XREF's: QuickMap_TE Awa_willowbank; Durham Property_LA BASE_v9_culdesacs; Willowbank Rd_QuickMap CAD FILE: H:\_2018\H20180069 - Durham Property Investments\CAD\H20180069-CONSENT-R3.dwg
Superseded
HBA1/801
Lot 165 DP 9997 0.0784
.0
HBA1/624
16
Lot 166 DP 9997 0.0682
793437
Lot 354 DP 513468 0.0527
Lot 363 DP 513468 0.0560
Lot 357 DP 513468 0.0584
793445
793439
Lot 358 DP 513468 0.0527
Lot 362 DP 513468 0.0526
16 & 38 WILLOWBANK AVE TE AWA, NAPIER STAGE 3 - SCHEME PLAN Status
FOR APPROVAL
NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES
793444
Datum
793440
Lot 361 DP 513468 0.0526
793436
Lot 359 DP 513468 0.1125 793441
793443
Lot 360 DP 513468
Council Ref.
HB2000
Scale
1:1000
Drawing Number
H20180069-C016
Size
A3 Revision
3
HBW1/1022
DP 26433 0.0498 HBW1/1023
HBW1/1021
LL
STR
EE T
HBV2/873
Description Rev Date 1 17/12/2018 FOR APPROVAL Pt Section 92 Blk VIII Heretaunga SD 0.0916
Lot 8 DP 10375 0.2324
Lot 9 DP 10192 0.1274
HBM1/675
HBM1/678
NORTH
Lot 1 DP 26433 0.1325
STA
LD
DP 26433 0.0442
FIT ZG ER A
DATE PLOTTED: 1/28/2020 9:58:59 AM BY : GEMMA GUILFORD
PL A
BE
Lot 186 DP 9997 0.0748
HBM1/672
2
23/01/2020 FOR APPROVAL
KRC
MH
3
28/01/2020 FOR APPROVAL
KRC
JK
HBH2/114
Lot 187 DP 9997 0.0705
Lot 24 DP 10192 0.3819
Lot 10 DP 10192 0.1224
Lot 1 DP 28293 0.0596
HBG2/478
Lot 188 DP 9997 0.0718
HBM1/673
HBY1/918
Lot 2 DP 28293 0.0286 Lot 3 DP 28293 HBY1/919 0.0310 Lot 4HBY1/920 DP 28293 0.0319 Lot 5 DP 28293 HBY1/921 0.0276
HBF4/39
E
LAN
HBE1/318
Lot 197 DP 9997 0.0687
Lot 198 DP 10396 0.1778
.2
HBE2/1003
.3 16 .3
16
LOT 170 STAGE 3
402 STAGE 3
HBC4/814
306 STAGE 3
Lot 94 DP 10451 0.0733
LOT 178 STAGE 3
12.1
LOT 35 STAGE 2
LOT 166 STAGE 2
LOT 163 STAGE 2
LOT 7 STAGE 1A LOT 36 STAGE 2
LOT 184 STAGE 2
LOT 179 STAGE 2
LOT 181 STAGE 2
LOT 38 STAGE 2
LOT 187 STAGE 2
Lot 383 DP 513468 0.0483
795983
795984
795985
795986
795987
Lot 384 DP 516362 0.0483 804715
Lot 385 DP 516362 0.0483 804716
Lot 386 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 387 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 388 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 389 DP 516362 0.0483
804717
804718
804719
804720
KAITUNA PLACE
Date
Drawn
LOT 185 STAGE 2
LOT 4 STAGE 1A Lot 370 DP 513468 0.0462
LOT 40 STAGE 2
HBG3/590
LOT 47 STAGE 2
LOT 46 STAGE 2
Lot 372 DP 513468 0.0543
Lot 371 DP 513468 0.0520
795981
LOT 42 STAGE 2
Lot 349 DP 513468 0.0565
LOT 3 STAGE 1A
LOT 44 STAGE 2
793429
LOT 1 STAGE 1A
Lot 346 DP 513468 0.0544 793428
Lot 345 DP 513468 0.0544
Lot 376 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 377 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 378 DP 516362 0.0490
804711
804712
804714
804710
804713
795982
795978
Lot 350 DP 513468 0.0521
Lot 347 DP 513468 0.0544 LOT 43 STAGE 2
Lot 375 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 369 DP 513468 0.0509
793431
793430
LOT 2 STAGE 1A
Lot 374 DP 516362 0.0470
795980
Lot 348 DP 513468 0.0544 LOT 45 STAGE 2
Lot 373 DP 513468 0.0562
Lot 368 DP 513468 0.0469
Lot 367 DP 513468 0.0550
Lot 366 DP 513468 0.0578
794507
794506
Lot 365 DP 513468 0.0914 793447
Date
793432
Lot 364 DP 513468 0.0621
793433
Lot 356 DP 513468 0.0604 793438
793434
Lot 355 DP 513468 0.0527 Lot 353 DP 513468 0.1185 793435
17/12/2018
Designed
Date
Approved
Date
Client
DURHAM PROPERTY INVESTMENTS PROPOSED SUBDIVISION OF LOT 1 & 2 DP 14417 COMPRISED IN RT HBG2/863 & 420376
793446
Lot 352 DP 513468 0.0544
793427
Date
KRC
This document is produced by Development Nous Ltd solely for the benefit of and use by the client in accordance with the terms of engagement. Development Nous Ltd does not and shall not assume any responsibility or liability whatsoever to any third party arising out of any use or reliance by third party on the content of this document.
795977
Lot 351 DP 513468 0.0544
HBB2/1223
All Rights Reserved.
17/12/2018
Checked
LOT 41 STAGE 2
Lot 9 DP 6055 2.1650
Lot 382 DP 513468 0.0483
LOT 39 STAGE 2
301 STAGE 2
305 STAGE 2
Lot 381 DP 513468 0.0483
LOT 5 STAGE 1A
795979
378863
Lot 380 DP 513468 0.0483
Fieldwork
LOT 188 STAGE 2
LOT 186 STAGE 2
Lot 3 DP 394762 6.7380
Lot 379 DP 513468 0.0500
GG
LOT 182 STAGE 2
HBG2/209
Lot 93 DP 10451 0.0713
LOT 6 STAGE 1A
LOT 183 STAGE 2
LOT 177 STAGE 2
LOT 52 STAGE 3
SEN
18.9
LOT 37 STAGE 2
LOT 180 STAGE 3
ERIK
24.2
24.2
21.2
8
LOT 165 STAGE 2
LOT 176 STAGE 3
LOT 53 STAGE 3
Lot 95 DP 10451 0.0713
401 STAGE 2
LOT 149 458m²
18.1
LOT 162 STAGE 2
LOT 175 STAGE 3 LOT 54 STAGE 3
HBF4/40
436m²
LOT 167 STAGE 2
LOT 174 STAGE 3 LOT 55 STAGE 3
Lot 96 DP 10451 0.0672
LOT 150
3.2 4.2
LOT 171 STAGE 3
LOT 56 STAGE 3
HBK1/825
LOT 8 STAGE 1B
15.1
LOT 173 STAGE 3
HBK1/977
Lot 97 DP 10451 0.0672
4.2
13.8
7.9
LOT 172 STAGE 3
LOT 57 STAGE 3
Lot 98 DP 10451 0.0672
ROA D
.2
.1
.0
4.1
LOT 169 STAGE 3
LOT 9 STAGE 1B
18.9
27
LOT 152 456m² 2
LOT 58 STAGE 3
LOT 141 396m² GA 18.1
LOT 154 377m²
LOT 153 415m²
16
LOT 168 STAGE 3
Lot 210 DP 10451 0.0728
.4
25 .1
LOT 59 STAGE 3
HBK1/626
18
387m² GB 15.9
ROA D
.9
24
15 .2
LOT 157 STAGE 4
Lot 209 DP 10451 0.0741
D6
LOT 138
21.8
RO A
18.1
21.8
18.8 .2
4.0
15
LOT 155 372m²
LOT 154 STAGE 4
HBA3/1092
HBA3/306
24 .2
.0 16
LOT 153 STAGE 4
LOT 60 STAGE 3
Lot 208 DP 10451 0.0741
Lot 114 DP 10248 0.0419
17.0
.2
15 .2
302 STAGE 3
Superseded
LOT 10 STAGE 1B
LOT 403 3207m²
15
LOT 158 369m²
LOT 152 STAGE 4
HBA2/1403
HBA3/306
473m²
.5
LOT 159 375m²
LOT 11 STAGE 1B
4.2
Lot 207 DP 9997 0.0687
Lot 118 DP 10451 0.0407
.0
LOT 61 STAGE 4
HBA3/1372
.5
LOT 133
19 .5
20
15 .9 24 .2
Lot 206 DP 9997 0.0687
19
4.2
LOT 62 STAGE 4
HBA1/525
.2
STAGE 4 12
HBD2/756
388m² 24
LOT 132 364m² .2
16
Lot 205 DP 9997 0.0675
LOT 131
21
LOT 59 388m²
HBA1/801
Lot 165 DP 9997 0.0784
24 .2
16 .0
Lot 204 DP 9997 0.0703
.2
16.2
16 .0
LOT 60 388m²
HBA2/1222
HBK1/439
24 .2
4.2
HBA1/624
16
HBH2/141
71899
LOT 12 STAGE 1B
24
.0
16
LOT 61 388m²
Lot 203 DP 9997 0.0718
Lot 164 DP 9997 0.0725
24 .2
.0
Lot 202 DP 9997 0.0693
HBJ2/292
Lot 166 DP 9997 0.0682
Lot 1 DP 318389 6.1891
16
HBD3/1295
Lot 163 DP 9997 0.0786
LOT 13 STAGE 1B
24
LOT 62 388m²
.2
HBW1/356
.2
Lot 201 DP 10396 0.1090
24
WI LL
HBE1/551
Lot 162 DP 9997 0.0776
LOT 14 STAGE 1B
15
HBW1/355
HBC4/792
Lot 161 DP 9997 0.0789
7.9
Lot 160 DP 9997 0.0786
HBM1/694
LOT 15 STAGE 1B
8.1
HBH4/1235
.0
HBM1/695
6.4ha
16
Lot 159 DP 9997 0.0814
OW B
Lot 150 DP 9997 0.1039
Lot 151 DP 9997 0.0753
LOT 506
AN K
HBA1/716
16 .0
HBJ3/1004
.0
Lot 158 DP 9997 0.0710
HBM1/696 Bisson Place
LOT 16 STAGE 1C
16
MA
HB200/23
Lot 196 DP 9997 0.0703
S
HBJ3/948
Lot 152 DP 9997 0.0819
AD
Lot 157 DP 9997 0.0786
HBA1/516
HBM1/697
LOT 17 STAGE 1C
HBB3/848
Lot 195 DP 9997 0.0758
RO
Lot 153 DP 9997 0.0839
Lot 194 DP 9997 0.0753
.2
Lot 156 DP 9997 0.0690
12
HBB4/640
LOT 18 STAGE 1C
HBF2/1462
.0
Lot 155 DP 9997 0.0672
HBA3/1263
Lot 193 DP 9997 0.0741
TE
UE
LOT 19 STAGE 1C
Lot 192 DP 9997 0.0741
PR IVA
HBA1/619
HBM1/677
AV EN
ELD
CE A PL
NOTES 1. This plan has been produced for resource consent purposes. Boundaries and dimensions are subject to resource consent approval and land transfer survey. 2. Easements may be required for cross-boundary services. 3. Current Napier City Council Zoning: Main Residential. NCC Planning Maps: I7, I8 and H8. 4. Proposed Amalgamation Conditions: 4.1. "That Lot 403 & Lot 402 DP (Stage 3 LT#) & Lot 401 DP (Stage 2 LT#) hereon are to be held in one record of title".
HBA3/48
Lot 12 DP 10375 0.0935
UE
ER
Lot 154 DP 9997 0.0789
HBM1/687
N SO S BI
ILL
HBJ4/1500
Lot 191 DP 9997 0.0728
AV EN
HBY1/923
SP
HBM1/676
SEF I
CY
SER
HBM1/686
Lot 6 DP 28293 0.0603
HBB3/843
Lot 190 DP 9997 0.0715
AVE NU E
HBY1/922
PE R
Lot 189 DP 9997 0.0703 Lot 11 DP 10375 0.1464
VIC E
Lot 22 DP 10192 0.2137
Lot 23 DP 10192 0.0799
XREF's: QuickMap_TE Awa_willowbank; Durham Property_LA BASE_v9_culdesacs; Willowbank Rd_QuickMap CAD FILE: H:\_2018\H20180069 - Durham Property Investments\CAD\H20180069-CONSENT-R3.dwg
Appr. Issued KRC KRC
793437
Lot 354 DP 513468 0.0527
Lot 363 DP 513468 0.0560
Lot 357 DP 513468 0.0584
793445
793439
Lot 358 DP 513468 0.0527
Lot 362 DP 513468 0.0526
16 & 38 WILLOWBANK AVE TE AWA, NAPIER STAGE 4 - SCHEME PLAN Status
FOR APPROVAL
NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES
793444
Datum
793440
Lot 361 DP 513468 0.0526
793436
Lot 359 DP 513468 0.1125 793441
793443
Lot 360 DP 513468
Council Ref.
HB2000
Scale
1:1000
Drawing Number
H20180069-C017
Size
A3 Revision
3
HBW1/1022
DP 26433 0.0498 HBW1/1023
HBW1/1021
LL
STR
EE T
HBV2/873
Description Rev Date 1 17/12/2018 FOR APPROVAL Pt Section 92 Blk VIII Heretaunga SD 0.0916
Lot 8 DP 10375 0.2324
Lot 9 DP 10192 0.1274
HBM1/675
HBM1/678
NORTH
Lot 1 DP 26433 0.1325
STA
LD
DP 26433 0.0442
FIT ZG ER A
DATE PLOTTED: 1/28/2020 9:59:05 AM BY : GEMMA GUILFORD
PL A
BE
Lot 186 DP 9997 0.0748
HBM1/672
2
23/01/2020 FOR APPROVAL
KRC
MH
3
28/01/2020 FOR APPROVAL
KRC
JK
HBH2/114
Lot 187 DP 9997 0.0705
Lot 24 DP 10192 0.3819
Lot 10 DP 10192 0.1224
Lot 1 DP 28293 0.0596
HBG2/478
Lot 188 DP 9997 0.0718
HBM1/673
HBY1/918
Lot 2 DP 28293 0.0286 Lot 3 DP 28293 HBY1/919 0.0310 Lot 4HBY1/920 DP 28293 0.0319 Lot 5 DP 28293 HBY1/921 0.0276
HBF4/39
E
LAN
64 .0
LOT 168 STAGE 3
HBE2/1003
LOT 170 STAGE 3
Lot 96 DP 10451 0.0672 HBF4/40
402 STAGE 3
LOT 178 STAGE 3
HBC4/814
306 STAGE 3
Lot 94 DP 10451 0.0733
16.0
16.0
ROA
16.0
16.0
17.0
16.0
ROA D
16.0
SEN
16.0
14.8
11.8
LOT 165 STAGE 2
LOT 35 STAGE 2
LOT 166 STAGE 2
LOT 163 STAGE 2
LOT 184 STAGE 2
LOT 179 STAGE 2 LOT 52 STAGE 3
LOT 181 STAGE 2
LOT 7 STAGE 1A LOT 36 STAGE 2
LOT 6 STAGE 1A
LOT 38 STAGE 2
LOT 187 STAGE 2
Lot 382 DP 513468 0.0483
Lot 383 DP 513468 0.0483
795983
795984
795985
795986
795987
Lot 384 DP 516362 0.0483 804715
Lot 385 DP 516362 0.0483 804716
Lot 386 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 387 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 388 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 389 DP 516362 0.0483
804717
804718
804719
804720
KAITUNA PLACE
Date
Drawn
LOT 185 STAGE 2
LOT 39 STAGE 2 LOT 4 STAGE 1A Lot 370 DP 513468 0.0462
LOT 40 STAGE 2
HBG3/590
LOT 47 STAGE 2
LOT 46 STAGE 2
Lot 372 DP 513468 0.0543
Lot 371 DP 513468 0.0520
795981
LOT 42 STAGE 2
Lot 349 DP 513468 0.0565
LOT 3 STAGE 1A
LOT 44 STAGE 2
793429
LOT 1 STAGE 1A
Lot 346 DP 513468 0.0544 793428
Lot 345 DP 513468 0.0544
Lot 376 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 377 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 378 DP 516362 0.0490
804711
804712
804714
804710
804713
795982
795978
Lot 350 DP 513468 0.0521
Lot 347 DP 513468 0.0544 LOT 43 STAGE 2
Lot 375 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 369 DP 513468 0.0509
793431
793430
LOT 2 STAGE 1A
Lot 374 DP 516362 0.0470
795980
Lot 348 DP 513468 0.0544 LOT 45 STAGE 2
Lot 373 DP 513468 0.0562
Lot 368 DP 513468 0.0469
Lot 367 DP 513468 0.0550
Lot 366 DP 513468 0.0578
794507
794506
Lot 365 DP 513468 0.0914 793447
Date
793432
Lot 364 DP 513468 0.0621
793433
Lot 356 DP 513468 0.0604 793438
793434
Lot 355 DP 513468 0.0527 Lot 353 DP 513468 0.1185 793435
17/12/2018
Designed
Date
Approved
Date
Client
DURHAM PROPERTY INVESTMENTS PROPOSED SUBDIVISION OF LOT 1 & 2 DP 14417 COMPRISED IN RT HBG2/863 & 420376
793446
Lot 352 DP 513468 0.0544
793427
Date
KRC
This document is produced by Development Nous Ltd solely for the benefit of and use by the client in accordance with the terms of engagement. Development Nous Ltd does not and shall not assume any responsibility or liability whatsoever to any third party arising out of any use or reliance by third party on the content of this document.
795977
Lot 351 DP 513468 0.0544
HBB2/1223
All Rights Reserved.
17/12/2018
Checked
LOT 41 STAGE 2
Lot 9 DP 6055 2.1650
Lot 381 DP 513468 0.0483
GG
LOT 182 STAGE 2
301 STAGE 2
305 STAGE 2
Lot 380 DP 513468 0.0483
LOT 5 STAGE 1A
795979
378863
Lot 379 DP 513468 0.0500
Fieldwork
LOT 188 STAGE 2
LOT 186 STAGE 2
Lot 3 DP 394762 6.7380
Superseded
16.0
16.0
12.0
15.0
16.0
16.0
12.4
16.0 17.6
D1 16.0
LOT 8 STAGE 1B
LOT 183 STAGE 2
HBG2/209
Lot 93 DP 10451 0.0713
LOT 34 383m²
LOT 37 STAGE 2
LOT 180 STAGE 3
LOT 177 STAGE 2
LOT 53 STAGE 3
Lot 95 DP 10451 0.0713
LOT 9 STAGE 1B
24.2
LOT 176 STAGE 3
LOT 175 STAGE 3 LOT 54 STAGE 3
14.9
LOT 149 STAGE 4
LOT 167 STAGE 2
LOT 174 STAGE 3 LOT 55 STAGE 3
LOT 33 388m²
401 STAGE 2
LOT 150 STAGE 4
LOT 153 STAGE 4
LOT 162 STAGE 2
LOT 171 STAGE 3
LOT 56 STAGE 3
HBK1/825
LOT 144 356m²
24.2
4.2
LOT 173 STAGE 3
HBK1/977
Lot 97 DP 10451 0.0672
24.2
LOT 32 388m²
LOT 152 STAGE 4
LOT 57 STAGE 3
Lot 98 DP 10451 0.0672
LOT 143 361m²
LOT 147 STAGE 4
LOT 10 STAGE 1B
24.2
21.2
LOT 172 STAGE 3
LOT 169 STAGE 3
14.9
LOT 144 STAGE 4
LOT 154 STAGE 4
LOT 58 STAGE 3
Lot 210 DP 10451 0.0728
24.2
17.0
LOT 11 STAGE 1B
24.2
LOT 31 388m²
21.2
LOT 142 360m²
71899
LOT 12 STAGE 1B
24.2
21.2
LOT 157 STAGE 4
HBK1/626
LOT 140 391m²
18.2
LOT 59 STAGE 3
Lot 209 DP 10451 0.0741
21.7
.0 24
20.1 15.2
LOT 139 394m²
LOT 29 388m² LOT 30 388m²
4.2
STAGE 5
16.9
14.9
.0 15
13.3
12.4
LOT 154 STAGE 4
HBA3/1092
HBA3/306
4.4
Lot 1 DP 318389 6.1891
ERIK
Lot 114 DP 10248 0.0419
LOT 116 436m²
LOT 13 STAGE 1B
24.2
4.2
LOT 60 STAGE 3
Lot 208 DP 10451 0.0741
25.0
22.0
LOT 404 5374m²
LOT 115 448m²
13.0
LOT 153 STAGE 4
HBA2/1403
HBA3/306
4.7
.6
22
LOT 155 STAGE 4
302 STAGE 3
LOT 117 406m² IA
14.9
Lot 207 DP 9997 0.0687
.6
14.0
LOT 158 STAGE 4
LOT 152 STAGE 4
19
5
3.9
LOT 61 STAGE 4
HBA3/1372
Lot 118 DP 10451 0.0407
24 .6
LOT 136 387m²
LOT 137 25 435m² .7
403 STAGE 4
LOT 159 STAGE 4
RO AD
19 .5
LOT 135 362m²
26 .6
.8
Lot 206 DP 9997 0.0687
4.1
12.6
LOT 134 433m²
15
LOT 62 STAGE 4
HBA1/525
.0
LOT 120 373m² IB
4.2
HBD2/756
16
.5
LOT 133 STAGE 4
LOT 59 STAGE 4
HBA1/801
Lot 205 DP 9997 0.0675
356m²
19
LOT 132 STAGE 4
.0
16.0
.6
22
LOT 60 STAGE 4
40
.7 14 .6
22
15 .2
.4
.0 64
HBA2/1222
Lot 204 DP 9997 0.0703
Lot 165 DP 9997 0.0784
LOT 130 365m²
LOT 131 STAGE 4
.55
15
15
HBH2/141
HBK1/439
.2
4.5
HBA1/624
21
.2
LOT 61 STAGE 4
Lot 203 DP 9997 0.0718
24.2
LOT 28 388m²
21
15.4
4.7
LOT 62 STAGE 4
Lot 202 DP 9997 0.0693
Lot 164 DP 9997 0.0725
.4
15 LOT 125 .4 348m² LOT 124 15 .4 HB 15 348m² .4 HA LOT 121
ROA D8
C
HBJ2/292
Lot 166 DP 9997 0.0682
14 .7
.2
0.5
LOT 14 STAGE 1B
15
4.2
HBD3/1295
Lot 163 DP 9997 0.0786
.5
13.0
HBW1/356
LOT 63 388m²
23
LOT 129 354m² 2
.5
Lot 201 DP 10396 0.1090
4.2
4.2
15
WI LL
HBE1/551
Lot 162 DP 9997 0.0776
LOT 64 378m² 2
LOT 303 194m² 2
4.2
Lot 161 DP 9997 0.0789
24 .2
LOT 128 347m²
12
HBW1/355
HBC4/792
LOT 15 STAGE 1B
.2
22
Lot 160 DP 9997 0.0786
HBM1/694
24
.2
Lot 198 DP 10396 0.1778
.2
16 .0
HBH4/1235
24
LOT 65 388m²
16
HBM1/695
OW B
Lot 150 DP 9997 0.1039
LOT 307 7344m²
AN K
HBA1/716
Lot 159 DP 9997 0.0814
.2
HBJ3/1004
Lot 151 DP 9997 0.0753
.6
Lot 197 DP 9997 0.0687
15
HBE1/318
Lot 158 DP 9997 0.0710
HBM1/696 Bisson Place
LOT 16 STAGE 1C
12
MA
HB200/23
Lot 196 DP 9997 0.0703
16 .0
HBJ3/948
Lot 152 DP 9997 0.0819
8.0
Lot 157 DP 9997 0.0786
HBA1/516
HBM1/697
LOT 17 STAGE 1C
HBB3/848
Lot 195 DP 9997 0.0758
.6
Lot 153 DP 9997 0.0839
LOT 18 STAGE 1C
Lot 194 DP 9997 0.0753
15
Lot 156 DP 9997 0.0690
LOT 507 4.0ha
HBF2/1462
.0
HBB4/640
40 .0
8.0
Lot 155 DP 9997 0.0672
HBA3/1263
Lot 193 DP 9997 0.0741
16 .0
UE
LOT 19 STAGE 1C
Lot 192 DP 9997 0.0741
UE
HBA1/619
HBM1/677
AV EN
ELD
CE A PL
NOTES 1. This plan has been produced for resource consent purposes. Boundaries and dimensions are subject to resource consent approval and land transfer survey. 2. Easements may be required for cross-boundary services. 3. Current Napier City Council Zoning: Main Residential. NCC Planning Maps: I7, I8 and H8. 4. Proposed Amalgamation Conditions: 4.1. "That Lot 404 Lot 403 DP (Stage 4 LT#) & Lot 402 DP (Stage 3 LT#) & Lot 401 DP (Stage 2 LT#) hereon are to be held in one record of title". 5. Lots 303 & 307 is to vest in the Napier City Council as local purpose reserve upon deposit.
HBA3/48
Lot 12 DP 10375 0.0935
18 3.6
ER
Lot 154 DP 9997 0.0789
HBM1/687
N SO S BI
ILL
HBJ4/1500
Lot 191 DP 9997 0.0728
AV EN
HBY1/923
SP
HBM1/676
SEF I
CY
SER
HBM1/686
Lot 6 DP 28293 0.0603
HBB3/843
Lot 190 DP 9997 0.0715
AVE NU E
HBY1/922
PE R
Lot 189 DP 9997 0.0703 Lot 11 DP 10375 0.1464
VIC E
Lot 22 DP 10192 0.2137
Lot 23 DP 10192 0.0799
XREF's: QuickMap_TE Awa_willowbank; Durham Property_LA BASE_v9_culdesacs; Willowbank Rd_QuickMap CAD FILE: H:\_2018\H20180069 - Durham Property Investments\CAD\H20180069-CONSENT-R3.dwg
Appr. Issued KRC KRC
793437
Lot 354 DP 513468 0.0527
Lot 363 DP 513468 0.0560
Lot 357 DP 513468 0.0584
793445
793439
Lot 358 DP 513468 0.0527
Lot 362 DP 513468 0.0526
16 & 38 WILLOWBANK AVE TE AWA, NAPIER STAGE 5 - SCHEME PLAN Status
FOR APPROVAL
NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES
793444
Datum
793440
Lot 361 DP 513468 0.0526
793436
Lot 359 DP 513468 0.1125 793441
793443
Lot 360 DP 513468
Council Ref.
HB2000
Scale
1:1000
Drawing Number
H20180069-C018
Size
A3 Revision
3
HBW1/1022
DP 26433 0.0498 HBW1/1023
HBW1/1021
LL
STR
EE T
HBV2/873
Description Rev Date 1 17/12/2018 FOR APPROVAL Pt Section 92 Blk VIII Heretaunga SD 0.0916
Lot 8 DP 10375 0.2324
Lot 9 DP 10192 0.1274
HBM1/675
HBM1/678
NORTH
Lot 1 DP 26433 0.1325
STA
LD
DP 26433 0.0442
FIT ZG ER A
DATE PLOTTED: 1/28/2020 9:59:10 AM BY : GEMMA GUILFORD
PL A
BE
Lot 186 DP 9997 0.0748
HBM1/672
2
23/01/2020 FOR APPROVAL
KRC
MH
3
28/01/2020 FOR APPROVAL
KRC
JK
HBH2/114
Lot 187 DP 9997 0.0705
Lot 24 DP 10192 0.3819
Lot 10 DP 10192 0.1224
Lot 1 DP 28293 0.0596
HBG2/478
Lot 188 DP 9997 0.0718
HBM1/673
HBY1/918
Lot 2 DP 28293 0.0286 Lot 3 DP 28293 HBY1/919 0.0310 Lot 4HBY1/920 DP 28293 0.0319 Lot 5 DP 28293 HBY1/921 0.0276
HBF4/39
E
16 .0
Lot 164 DP 9997 0.0725
HBA1/624
Lot 204 DP 9997 0.0703
Lot 205 DP 9997 0.0675
HBD2/756
HBA1/525
Lot 206 DP 9997 0.0687 HBA3/1372
Lot 207 DP 9997 0.0687
Lot 118 DP 10451 0.0407
LOT 153 STAGE 4
HBA2/1403
HBA3/306
LOT 60 STAGE 3
Lot 208 DP 10451 0.0741
Lot 114 DP 10248 0.0419
.0
15 .0
16
HBE2/1003
LOT 170 STAGE 3
Lot 96 DP 10451 0.0672 HBF4/40
402 STAGE 3
HBC4/814
306 STAGE 3
Lot 94 DP 10451 0.0733
15 .3
m²
15.6
239 41 7
LO T
23.7
23 .1
15 .3 .6
.6
4.7
22
LOT 142 STAGE 5
LOT 33 STAGE 5
LOT 9 STAGE 1B
LOT 8 STAGE 1B
401 STAGE 2
LOT 150 STAGE 4
LOT 153 STAGE 4
LOT 149 STAGE 4
LOT 165 STAGE 2
LOT 35 STAGE 2
LOT 166 STAGE 2
LOT 163 STAGE 2
LOT 178 STAGE 3
LOT 7 STAGE 1A
LOT 184 STAGE 2
LOT 179 STAGE 2
LOT 181 STAGE 2
LOT 38 STAGE 2
LOT 187 STAGE 2
Lot 383 DP 513468 0.0483
795983
795984
795985
795986
795987
Lot 384 DP 516362 0.0483 804715
Lot 385 DP 516362 0.0483 804716
Lot 386 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 387 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 388 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 389 DP 516362 0.0483
804717
804718
804719
804720
KAITUNA PLACE
Date
Drawn
LOT 185 STAGE 2
LOT 39 STAGE 2 LOT 4 STAGE 1A Lot 370 DP 513468 0.0462
LOT 40 STAGE 2
HBG3/590
LOT 47 STAGE 2
LOT 46 STAGE 2
Lot 372 DP 513468 0.0543
Lot 371 DP 513468 0.0520
795981
LOT 42 STAGE 2
Lot 349 DP 513468 0.0565
LOT 3 STAGE 1A
LOT 44 STAGE 2
793429
LOT 1 STAGE 1A
Lot 346 DP 513468 0.0544 793428
Lot 345 DP 513468 0.0544
Lot 376 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 377 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 378 DP 516362 0.0490
804711
804712
804714
804710
804713
795982
795978
Lot 350 DP 513468 0.0521
Lot 347 DP 513468 0.0544 LOT 43 STAGE 2
Lot 375 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 369 DP 513468 0.0509
793431
793430
LOT 2 STAGE 1A
Lot 374 DP 516362 0.0470
795980
Lot 348 DP 513468 0.0544 LOT 45 STAGE 2
Lot 373 DP 513468 0.0562
Lot 368 DP 513468 0.0469
Lot 367 DP 513468 0.0550
Lot 366 DP 513468 0.0578
794507
794506
Lot 365 DP 513468 0.0914 793447
Date
793432
Lot 364 DP 513468 0.0621
793433
Lot 356 DP 513468 0.0604 793438
793434
Lot 355 DP 513468 0.0527 Lot 353 DP 513468 0.1185 793435
17/12/2018
Designed
Date
Approved
Date
Client
DURHAM PROPERTY INVESTMENTS PROPOSED SUBDIVISION OF LOT 1 & 2 DP 14417 COMPRISED IN RT HBG2/863 & 420376
793446
Lot 352 DP 513468 0.0544
793427
Date
KRC
This document is produced by Development Nous Ltd solely for the benefit of and use by the client in accordance with the terms of engagement. Development Nous Ltd does not and shall not assume any responsibility or liability whatsoever to any third party arising out of any use or reliance by third party on the content of this document.
795977
Lot 351 DP 513468 0.0544
HBB2/1223
All Rights Reserved.
17/12/2018
Checked
LOT 41 STAGE 2
Lot 9 DP 6055 2.1650
Lot 382 DP 513468 0.0483
GG
LOT 182 STAGE 2
301 STAGE 2
305 STAGE 2
Lot 381 DP 513468 0.0483
LOT 5 STAGE 1A
795979
378863
Lot 380 DP 513468 0.0483
Fieldwork
LOT 188 STAGE 2
LOT 186 STAGE 2
Lot 3 DP 394762 6.7380
Lot 379 DP 513468 0.0500
LOT 183 STAGE 2
LOT 177 STAGE 2
LOT 52 STAGE 3
LOT 6 STAGE 1A
LOT 37 STAGE 2
LOT 180 STAGE 3
Superseded
LOT 36 STAGE 2
LOT 176 STAGE 3
HBG2/209
Lot 93 DP 10451 0.0713
LOT 10 STAGE 1B
LOT 143 STAGE 5
LOT 147 STAGE 4
LOT 167 STAGE 2
LOT 53 STAGE 3
Lot 95 DP 10451 0.0713
LOT 140 STAGE 5
LOT 34 STAGE 5
LOT 175 STAGE 3 LOT 54 STAGE 3
LOT 11 STAGE 1B LOT 31 STAGE 5
LOT 154 STAGE 4
LOT 162 STAGE 2
LOT 174 STAGE 3 LOT 55 STAGE 3
LOT 30 STAGE 5
LOT 154 STAGE 4
LOT 171 STAGE 3
LOT 56 STAGE 3
HBK1/825
LOT 12 STAGE 1B
LOT 144 STAGE 5
LOT 173 STAGE 3
HBK1/977
Lot 97 DP 10451 0.0672
71899
LOT 29 STAGE 5
LOT 152 STAGE 4
LOT 57 STAGE 3
Lot 98 DP 10451 0.0672
Lot 1 DP 318389 6.1891
LOT 32 STAGE 5
LOT 172 STAGE 3
LOT 169 STAGE 3
20 .1
.0 16
16 .0
.3 12
LOT 139 STAGE 5
LOT 158 STAGE 4
LOT 168 STAGE 3
LOT 13 STAGE 1B
LOT 115 STAGE 5
LOT 137 STAGE 5
LOT 58 STAGE 3
Lot 210 DP 10451 0.0728
.6
LOT 144 STAGE 4
LOT 157 STAGE 4
HBK1/626
LOT 28 STAGE 5
LOT 116 STAGE 5
LOT 59 STAGE 3
Lot 209 DP 10451 0.0741
LOT 14 STAGE 1B
404 STAGE 5
LOT 136 STAGE 5
403 STAGE 4
HBA3/1092
HBA3/306
19
LOT 134 STAGE 5
LOT 155 STAGE 4
302 STAGE 3
.7
15 LOT 122 .4 358m² JB 16 .1 LOT 119 15 .7 JA 323m² LOT 118 15 .4 360m²
LOT 117 STAGE 5
LOT 133 STAGE 4
LOT 152 STAGE 4
LOT 15 STAGE 1B
19
.8
LOT 132 STAGE 4
LOT 61 STAGE 4
4
15
LOT 135 STAGE 5
LOT 159 STAGE 4
.0
LOT 120 STAGE 5
LOT 131 STAGE 4
LOT 62 STAGE 4
31
.3
LOT 121 STAGE 5
LOT 130 STAGE 5
LOT 59 STAGE 4
HBA1/801
Lot 165 DP 9997 0.0784
.2
LOT 124 STAGE 5
LOT 60 STAGE 4
HBA2/1222
HBK1/439
15
LOT 125 STAGE 5
16
LOT 109 14 .6 374m² LOT 110 LB 13 397m² .2 LA
ROA D
HBH2/141
Lot 203 DP 9997 0.0718
344m²
LOT 129 STAGE 5
HBJ2/292
Lot 166 DP 9997 0.0682
16
.2
LOT 61 STAGE 4
AD
.6
SEN
Lot 202 DP 9997 0.0693
Lot 163 DP 9997 0.0786
15
LOT 62 STAGE 4
RO
LOT 126 344m² LOT 123
LOT 63 STAGE 5
HBD3/1295
4.2
15 .2
27
LOT 108 446m²
ERIK
HBW1/356
.0
15 .2
LOT 16 STAGE 1C
16.0
Lot 201 DP 10396 0.1090
.9
20 .7
HBE1/551
Lot 162 DP 9997 0.0776
13
LOT 128 STAGE 5
303 STAGE 5
WI LL
Lot 161 DP 9997 0.0789
.5
31
.9
22 .6
HBW1/355
HBC4/792
.5
23
31
16 LOT 101 .0 370m² LOT 102 KB 16 366m² .0 KA
20
LOT 127 355m²
LOT 103 488m² .0
22
Lot 160 DP 9997 0.0786
HBM1/694
16
4.2
LOT 64 STAGE 5
OW B
Lot 198 DP 10396 0.1778
21 .2
15 .2 22 .6
HBH4/1235
24 .2 24 .2
LOT 100 367m²
STAGE 6 .2
HBM1/695
LOT 65 STAGE 5
LOT 99 389m²
4.2
Lot 150 DP 9997 0.1039
307 STAGE 5
AN K
HBA1/716
Lot 159 DP 9997 0.0814
24 .2
LOT 405 2193m²
12
HBJ3/1004
Lot 151 DP 9997 0.0753
.2
LOT 67 388m² LOT 66 388m²
LOT 17 STAGE 1C
.0
16 .0
HBE1/318
Lot 197 DP 9997 0.0687
24
16 .0
MA
HB200/23
Lot 196 DP 9997 0.0703
Lot 158 DP 9997 0.0710
HBM1/696 Bisson Place
LOT 68 388m²
Lot 195 DP 9997 0.0758
4.2
Lot 152 DP 9997 0.0819
24 .2 .2
24
0
HBJ3/948
388m²
HBB3/848
16 .0
Lot 157 DP 9997 0.0786
HBA1/516
HBM1/697
LOT 69
Lot 194 DP 9997 0.0753
AD 1
Lot 153 DP 9997 0.0839
24 .2
RO
Lot 156 DP 9997 0.0690
LOT 18 STAGE 1C
HBF2/1462
16 .0
HBB4/640
HBA3/1263
Lot 193 DP 9997 0.0741
16 .0
Lot 155 DP 9997 0.0672
LOT 19 STAGE 1C
Lot 192 DP 9997 0.0741
UE
HBA1/619
UE
ELD
CE A PL
HBM1/677
AV EN
NOTES 1. This plan has been produced for resource consent purposes. Boundaries and dimensions are subject to resource consent approval and land transfer survey. 2. Easements may be required for cross-boundary services. 3. Current Napier City Council Zoning: Main Residential. NCC Planning Maps: I7, I8 and H8. 4. Proposed Amalgamation Conditions: 4.1. "That Lot 405 & Lot 404 DP (Stage 5 LT#) & Lot 403 DP (Stage 4 LT#) & Lot 402 DP (Stage 3 LT#) & Lot 401 DP (Stage 2 LT#) hereon are to be held in one record of title". 4.2. "That Lot 417 hereon (Legal Access) be held in two undivided one half shares by the owners of Lots 103 & 108 hereon as tenants in common in the said shares and that individual records of title be issued in accordance herewith."
LOT 508 3.0ha
HBA3/48
Lot 12 DP 10375 0.0935
AV EN
ER
Lot 154 DP 9997 0.0789
HBM1/687
N SO S BI
ILL
HBJ4/1500
Lot 191 DP 9997 0.0728
AVE NU E
HBY1/923
SP
HBM1/676
SEF I
CY
SER
HBM1/686
Lot 6 DP 28293 0.0603
HBB3/843
Lot 190 DP 9997 0.0715
15 .2
LAN
HBY1/922
PE R
Lot 189 DP 9997 0.0703 Lot 11 DP 10375 0.1464
VIC E
Lot 22 DP 10192 0.2137
Lot 23 DP 10192 0.0799
XREF's: QuickMap_TE Awa_willowbank; Durham Property_LA BASE_v9_culdesacs; Willowbank Rd_QuickMap CAD FILE: H:\_2018\H20180069 - Durham Property Investments\CAD\H20180069-CONSENT-R3.dwg
Appr. Issued KRC KRC
793437
Lot 354 DP 513468 0.0527
Lot 363 DP 513468 0.0560
Lot 357 DP 513468 0.0584
793445
793439
Lot 358 DP 513468 0.0527
Lot 362 DP 513468 0.0526
16 & 18 WILLOWBANK AVE TE AWA, NAPIER STAGE 6 - SCHEME PLAN Status
FOR APPROVAL
NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES
793444
Datum
793440
Lot 361 DP 513468 0.0526
793436
Lot 359 DP 513468 0.1125 793441
793443
Lot 360 DP 513468
Council Ref.
HB2000
Scale
1:1000
Drawing Number
H20180069-C019
Size
A3 Revision
3
HBW1/1022
DP 26433 0.0498 HBW1/1023
HBW1/1021
LL
STR
EE T
HBV2/873
Lot 8 DP 10375 0.2324
Lot 9 DP 10192 0.1274
HBM1/675
HBM1/678
Lot 186 DP 9997 0.0748
HBM1/672
Appr. Issued KRC KRC
2
23/01/2020 FOR APPROVAL
KRC
MH
3
28/01/2020 FOR APPROVAL
KRC
JK
HBH2/114
Lot 10 DP 10192 0.1224
HBG2/478
Lot 188 DP 9997 0.0718
HBM1/673
HBY1/918
Lot 2 DP 28293 0.0286 Lot 3 DP 28293 HBY1/919 0.0310 Lot 4HBY1/920 DP 28293 0.0319 Lot 5 DP 28293 HBY1/921 0.0276
HBF4/39
HBA1/624
HBH2/141
Lot 204 DP 9997 0.0703
HBD2/756
HBA1/525
Lot 206 DP 9997 0.0687
LOT 61 STAGE 4
HBA3/1372
Lot 207 DP 9997 0.0687
Lot 118 DP 10451 0.0407
LOT 153 STAGE 4
HBA2/1403
HBA3/306
LOT 60 STAGE 3
Lot 208 DP 10451 0.0741
Lot 114 DP 10248 0.0419
HBA3/1092
HBA3/306
LOT 168 STAGE 3
HBK1/626
HBE2/1003
LOT 170 STAGE 3
Lot 96 DP 10451 0.0672 HBF4/40
LOT 178 STAGE 3
402 STAGE 3
HBC4/814
306 STAGE 3
Lot 94 DP 10451 0.0733
0
LOT 184 STAGE 2
LOT 179 STAGE 2 LOT 52 STAGE 3
LOT 181 STAGE 2
15.3
15.9
24 .2
12.8
D1
14.8
16.0
13.0
LOT 187 STAGE 2
17.00 m
Lot 381 DP 513468 0.0483
Lot 382 DP 513468 0.0483
Lot 383 DP 513468 0.0483
795983
795984
795985
795986
795987
Lot 384 DP 516362 0.0483 804715
Lot 385 DP 516362 0.0483 804716
Lot 386 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 387 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 388 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 389 DP 516362 0.0483
804717
804718
804719
804720
LOT 5 STAGE 1A
KAITUNA PLACE
Date
Drawn
LOT 185 STAGE 2
LOT 4 STAGE 1A Lot 370 DP 513468 0.0462
LOT 40 STAGE 2
HBG3/590
LOT 47 STAGE 2
LOT 46 STAGE 2
Lot 372 DP 513468 0.0543
Lot 371 DP 513468 0.0520
795981
LOT 42 STAGE 2
Lot 349 DP 513468 0.0565
LOT 3 STAGE 1A
LOT 44 STAGE 2
793429
LOT 1 STAGE 1A
Lot 346 DP 513468 0.0544 793428
Lot 345 DP 513468 0.0544
Lot 376 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 377 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 378 DP 516362 0.0490
804711
804712
804714
804710
804713
795982
795978
Lot 350 DP 513468 0.0521
Lot 347 DP 513468 0.0544 LOT 43 STAGE 2
Lot 375 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 369 DP 513468 0.0509
793431
793430
LOT 2 STAGE 1A
Lot 374 DP 516362 0.0470
795980
Lot 348 DP 513468 0.0544 LOT 45 STAGE 2
Lot 373 DP 513468 0.0562
Lot 368 DP 513468 0.0469
Lot 367 DP 513468 0.0550
Lot 366 DP 513468 0.0578
794507
794506
Lot 365 DP 513468 0.0914 793447
Date
793432
Lot 364 DP 513468 0.0621
793433
Lot 356 DP 513468 0.0604 793438
793434
Lot 355 DP 513468 0.0527 Lot 353 DP 513468 0.1185 793435
17/12/2018
Designed
Date
Approved
Date
Client
DURHAM PROPERTY INVESTMENTS PROPOSED SUBDIVISION OF LOT 1 & 2 DP 14417 COMPRISED IN RT HBG2/863 & 420376
793446
Lot 352 DP 513468 0.0544
793427
Date
KRC
This document is produced by Development Nous Ltd solely for the benefit of and use by the client in accordance with the terms of engagement. Development Nous Ltd does not and shall not assume any responsibility or liability whatsoever to any third party arising out of any use or reliance by third party on the content of this document.
795977
Lot 351 DP 513468 0.0544
HBB2/1223
All Rights Reserved.
17/12/2018
Checked
LOT 41 STAGE 2
305 STAGE 2
Lot 380 DP 513468 0.0483
LOT 39 STAGE 2
301 STAGE 2
Lot 9 DP 6055 2.1650
16.0
16.0
16.0
9.6
14.2 7.4
10.4
24.2
LOT 38 STAGE 2
795979
378863
Lot 379 DP 513468 0.0500
Fieldwork
LOT 188 STAGE 2
LOT 186 STAGE 2
Lot 3 DP 394762 6.7380
17.8
24.2
LOT 6 STAGE 1A
GG
LOT 182 STAGE 2
HBG2/209
Lot 93 DP 10451 0.0713
15 .4
.2 15 24.2
12 .2
24 .2
RO 13 .2
16 .0
.2
16 .2
24 .2
24
16 .0
AD 1
15 .2
15 .2 8.0
.2 15
LOT 7 STAGE 1A LOT 36 STAGE 2
LOT 183 STAGE 2
LOT 177 STAGE 2
LOT 53 STAGE 3
Lot 95 DP 10451 0.0713
LOT 8 STAGE 1B
LOT 35 STAGE 2
LOT 166 STAGE 2
LOT 163 STAGE 2
LOT 37 STAGE 2
LOT 180 STAGE 3
LOT 175 STAGE 3 LOT 54 STAGE 3
LOT 9 STAGE 1B
LOT 165 STAGE 2
LOT 176 STAGE 3 LOT 174 STAGE 3
LOT 55 STAGE 3
LOT 33 STAGE 5
LOT 167 STAGE 2
LOT 171 STAGE 3
LOT 56 STAGE 3
HBK1/825
LOT 162 STAGE 2
LOT 173 STAGE 3
HBK1/977
Lot 97 DP 10451 0.0672
LOT 143 STAGE 5
LOT 147 STAGE 4
LOT 149 STAGE 4
Superseded
LOT 10 STAGE 1B
LOT 152 STAGE 4
LOT 57 STAGE 3
Lot 98 DP 10451 0.0672
LOT 142 STAGE 5
401 STAGE 2
LOT 150 STAGE 4
LOT 153 STAGE 4
LOT 172 STAGE 3
LOT 169 STAGE 3
LOT 140 STAGE 5
LOT 34 STAGE 5
LOT 58 STAGE 3
Lot 210 DP 10451 0.0728
LOT 11 STAGE 1B LOT 31 STAGE 5
LOT 154 STAGE 4
LOT 59 STAGE 3
Lot 209 DP 10451 0.0741
LOT 12 STAGE 1B
LOT 30 STAGE 5
LOT 154 STAGE 4 LOT 157 STAGE 4
71899
LOT 29 STAGE 5
LOT 144 STAGE 5
LOT 155 STAGE 4
302 STAGE 3
Lot 1 DP 318389 6.1891
LOT 32 STAGE 5
LOT 158 STAGE 4
LOT 152 STAGE 4
LOT 13 STAGE 1B
LOT 115 STAGE 5
LOT 116 STAGE 5
LOT 144 STAGE 4
LOT 15 STAGE 1B
LOT 14 STAGE 1B
LOT 27 388m² 24.2
LOT 137 STAGE 5
403 STAGE 4
LOT 26 388m²
404 STAGE 5
LOT 139 STAGE 5
Y2
LOT 28 STAGE 5
LOT 134 STAGE 5
LOT 136 STAGE 5
ENT R
21.2
24.2
LOT 117 STAGE 5
LOT 133 STAGE 4
LOT 16 STAGE 1C
LOT 25 383m² 24.2
LOT 118 STAGE 6
LOT 132 STAGE 4
LOT 159 STAGE 4
LOT 111 404m²
LOT 119 STAGE 6
LOT 135 STAGE 5
LOT 62 STAGE 4
4.2
3.7
LOT 120 STAGE 5
LOT 131 STAGE 4
LOT 59 STAGE 4
HBA1/801
Lot 205 DP 9997 0.0675
LOT 112 388m²
LOT 24 427m² 21.2
.8
LOT 121 STAGE 5
LOT 130 STAGE 5
21.2
21
LOT 124 STAGE 5
LOT 60 STAGE 4
HBA2/1222
Lot 165 DP 9997 0.0784
LOT 122 STAGE 6 LOT 125 STAGE 5
LOT 61 STAGE 4
Lot 203 DP 9997 0.0718
HBK1/439
.5
LOT 123 STAGE 6 LOT 129 STAGE 5
LOT 62 STAGE 4
LOT 113 363m²
24.2 24.2
LOT 126 STAGE 6
LOT 63 STAGE 5
.1
24.2
LOT 110 STAGE 6
LOT 128 STAGE 5
21
LOT 114 388m²
LOT 109 STAGE 6
LOT 127 STAGE 6
303 STAGE 5
Lot 202 DP 9997 0.0693
Lot 164 DP 9997 0.0725
LOT 108 STAGE 6
STAGE 7
16.0
LOT 65 STAGE 5
HBJ2/292
Lot 166 DP 9997 0.0682
19 .8
LOT 101 STAGE 6 LOT 102 STAGE 6
LOT 64 STAGE 5
HBD3/1295
Lot 163 DP 9997 0.0786
.2
LOT 107 420m²
ROA D
HBW1/356
LOT 100 STAGE 6
LOT 17 STAGE 1C 24.2
3.7
SEN
Lot 201 DP 10396 0.1090
.4
16.0
307 STAGE 5
WI LL
HBE1/551
Lot 162 DP 9997 0.0776
.2
LOT 66 STAGE 6
29
15
ERIK
HBW1/355
HBC4/792
Lot 161 DP 9997 0.0789
.2
15
405 STAGE 6
LOT 87 469m² NA
ROA
Lot 160 DP 9997 0.0786
HBM1/694
.5
LOT 18 STAGE 1C
NB
.0
16.0
Lot 198 DP 10396 0.1778
16
3
29
.2
15 .2 LOT 105 369m² LOT 106 15 .2 369m²
15
LOT 86 421m²
16.0
HBH4/1235
.5
16.5
HBM1/695
.2
AD
15
.5
16.0
Lot 159 DP 9997 0.0814
24
16
RO
.2
LOT 104 370m²
LOT 99 STAGE 6
LOT 67 STAGE 6
OW B
Lot 150 DP 9997 0.1039
Lot 151 DP 9997 0.0753
.2
LOT 103 STAGE 6
AN K
HBA1/716
24
15
16
LOT 88 402m² MA
MB
10.4
15 .2 15 .2 8.0
Lot 197 DP 9997 0.0687
HBJ3/1004
15 .2
.5
HBE1/318
Lot 158 DP 9997 0.0710
HBM1/696 Bisson Place
LOT 97 365m²
LOT 98 388m²
.5
14.1
Lot 152 DP 9997 0.0819
Lot 196 DP 9997 0.0703
.2
.5
LOT 91 402m²
16
4.6
MA
HB200/23
LOT 92 402m²
LOT 19 STAGE 1C
4.2
HBJ3/948
16
24 .2
Lot 157 DP 9997 0.0786
HBA1/516
HBM1/697
LOT 68 STAGE 6
Lot 195 DP 9997 0.0758
.5
LOT 406 5035m²
21
NOTES 1. This plan has been produced for resource consent purposes. Boundaries and dimensions are subject to resource consent approval and land transfer survey. 2. Easements may be required for cross-boundary services. 3. Current Napier City Council Zoning: Main Residential. NCC Planning Maps: I7, I8 and H8. 4. Proposed Amalgamation Conditions: 4.1. "That Lot 406 & Lot 405 DP (Stage 6 LT#) & Lot 404 DP (Stage 5 LT#) & Lot 403 DP (Stage 4 LT#) & Lot 402 DP (Stage 3 LT#) & Lot 401 DP (Stage 2 LT#) hereon are to be held in one record of title". 5. Lot 304 & 308 is to vest in the Napier City Council as local purpose reserve upon deposit.
16
ST AG E6
Lot 153 DP 9997 0.0839
HBB3/848
.2
.2
4.2
HBF2/1462
LOT 69 STAGE 6
24 .2
21
24 .2
LOT 70 375m²
Lot 194 DP 9997 0.0753
24
LOT 96 389m²
417
Lot 156 DP 9997 0.0690
Lot 193 DP 9997 0.0741
LOT 95 388m²
16.0
HBB4/640
LOT 71 369m²
40 .0
HBA3/1263
16 .0
Lot 155 DP 9997 0.0672
4.2
15
UE
Lot 192 DP 9997 0.0741
LOT 304 194m² 2
15
AV EN
24 .2
OA DS
HBA1/619
HBM1/677
4.2 .2
24
LOT 72 369m²
PR IVA TE R
CE A PL
Lot 12 DP 10375 0.0935
UE
ER
Lot 154 DP 9997 0.0789
HBM1/687
N SO S BI
ILL
LOT 308 5255m²
HBA3/48
ELD
SP
Lot 191 DP 9997 0.0728
AV EN
HBY1/923
HBJ4/1500
SEF I
CY
SER
HBM1/686
Lot 6 DP 28293 0.0603
HBM1/676
LOT 509 1.0ha
.2
4.2
PE R
Lot 190 DP 9997 0.0715
24
LOT 73 369m² 2
HBB3/843
Lot 11 DP 10375 0.1464
AVE NU E
HBY1/922
Lot 189 DP 9997 0.0703
E
LAN
VIC E
Lot 22 DP 10192 0.2137
22 6.1
Lot 1 DP 28293 0.0596
22 6.1
Lot 187 DP 9997 0.0705
Lot 24 DP 10192 0.3819
Lot 23 DP 10192 0.0799
XREF's: QuickMap_TE Awa_willowbank; Durham Property_LA BASE_v9_culdesacs; Willowbank Rd_QuickMap CAD FILE: H:\_2018\H20180069 - Durham Property Investments\CAD\H20180069-CONSENT-R3.dwg
Description Rev Date 1 17/12/2018 FOR APPROVAL
40 .0
Pt Section 92 Blk VIII Heretaunga SD 0.0916
NORTH
Lot 1 DP 26433 0.1325
STA
LD
DP 26433 0.0442
FIT ZG ER A
DATE PLOTTED: 1/28/2020 9:59:15 AM BY : GEMMA GUILFORD
PL A
BE
793437
Lot 354 DP 513468 0.0527
Lot 363 DP 513468 0.0560
Lot 357 DP 513468 0.0584
793445
793439
Lot 358 DP 513468 0.0527
Lot 362 DP 513468 0.0526
16 & 38 WILLOWBANK AVE TE AWA, NAPIER STAGE 7 - SCHEME PLAN Status
FOR APPROVAL
NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES
793444
Datum
793440
Lot 361 DP 513468 0.0526
793436
Lot 359 DP 513468 0.1125 793441
793443
Lot 360 DP 513468
Council Ref.
HB2000
Scale
1:1000
Drawing Number
H20180069-C020
Size
A3 Revision
3
EE T
HBV2/873
Description Rev Date 1 17/12/2018 FOR APPROVAL Pt Section 92 Blk VIII Heretaunga SD 0.0916 .1
LOT 77 388m²
Lot 186 DP 9997 0.0748
Lot 157 DP 9997 0.0786
HBA1/516
HBJ3/948
Lot 152 DP 9997 0.0819
HB200/23
HBE1/318
HBM1/695
HBH4/1235
Lot 198 DP 10396 0.1778
Lot 160 DP 9997 0.0786
HBM1/694
HBW1/355
HBC4/792
HBE1/551
Lot 201 DP 10396 0.1090 HBW1/356
307 STAGE 5
HBA1/624
HBH2/141
Lot 203 DP 9997 0.0718
Lot 204 DP 9997 0.0703
Lot 205 DP 9997 0.0675
HBD2/756
LOT 130 STAGE 5
Lot 206 DP 9997 0.0687 HBA3/1372
LOT 153 STAGE 4
LOT 60 STAGE 3
Lot 208 DP 10451 0.0741
Lot 114 DP 10248 0.0419
LOT 136 STAGE 5
.2
24
HBE2/1003
LOT 170 STAGE 3
Lot 96 DP 10451 0.0672
24 .2
HBF4/40
LOT 178 STAGE 3
402 STAGE 3
HBC4/814
306 STAGE 3
24.2
24 .2
24 .2
LOT 184 STAGE 2
LOT 179 STAGE 2 LOT 52 STAGE 3
24 .2
D1 ROA
16.3
16.3
16.3
17 .7
16.3
LOT 7 STAGE 1A LOT 36 STAGE 2
LOT 181 STAGE 2
LOT 6 STAGE 1A
LOT 38 STAGE 2
LOT 187 STAGE 2
Lot 382 DP 513468 0.0483
Lot 383 DP 513468 0.0483
795983
795984
795985
795986
795987
Lot 384 DP 516362 0.0483 804715
Lot 385 DP 516362 0.0483 804716
Lot 386 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 387 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 388 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 389 DP 516362 0.0483
804717
804718
804719
804720
KAITUNA PLACE
Date
Drawn
LOT 185 STAGE 2
LOT 39 STAGE 2 LOT 4 STAGE 1A Lot 370 DP 513468 0.0462
LOT 40 STAGE 2
HBG3/590
LOT 47 STAGE 2
LOT 46 STAGE 2
Lot 372 DP 513468 0.0543
Lot 371 DP 513468 0.0520
795981
LOT 42 STAGE 2
Lot 349 DP 513468 0.0565
LOT 3 STAGE 1A
LOT 44 STAGE 2
793429
LOT 1 STAGE 1A
Lot 346 DP 513468 0.0544 793428
Lot 345 DP 513468 0.0544
Lot 376 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 377 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 378 DP 516362 0.0490
804711
804712
804714
804710
804713
795982
795978
Lot 350 DP 513468 0.0521
Lot 347 DP 513468 0.0544 LOT 43 STAGE 2
Lot 375 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 369 DP 513468 0.0509
793431
793430
LOT 2 STAGE 1A
Lot 374 DP 516362 0.0470
795980
Lot 348 DP 513468 0.0544 LOT 45 STAGE 2
Lot 373 DP 513468 0.0562
Lot 368 DP 513468 0.0469
Lot 367 DP 513468 0.0550
Lot 366 DP 513468 0.0578
794507
794506
Lot 365 DP 513468 0.0914 793447
Date
793432
Lot 364 DP 513468 0.0621
793433
Lot 356 DP 513468 0.0604 793438
793434
Lot 355 DP 513468 0.0527 Lot 353 DP 513468 0.1185 793435
17/12/2018
Designed
Date
Approved
Date
Client
DURHAM PROPERTY INVESTMENTS PROPOSED SUBDIVISION OF LOT 1 & 2 DP 14417 COMPRISED IN RT HBG2/863 & 420376
793446
Lot 352 DP 513468 0.0544
793427
Date
KRC
This document is produced by Development Nous Ltd solely for the benefit of and use by the client in accordance with the terms of engagement. Development Nous Ltd does not and shall not assume any responsibility or liability whatsoever to any third party arising out of any use or reliance by third party on the content of this document.
795977
Lot 351 DP 513468 0.0544
HBB2/1223
All Rights Reserved.
17/12/2018
Checked
LOT 41 STAGE 2
305 STAGE 2
Lot 381 DP 513468 0.0483
GG
LOT 182 STAGE 2
301 STAGE 2
378863
Lot 380 DP 513468 0.0483
LOT 5 STAGE 1A
795979
Lot 3 DP 394762 6.7380
Lot 379 DP 513468 0.0500
Fieldwork
LOT 188 STAGE 2
LOT 186 STAGE 2
Lot 9 DP 6055 2.1650
16.3
24 .2
24 .2
13.0
14.9
16.3
24 .2
LOT 35 STAGE 2
LOT 166 STAGE 2
LOT 163 STAGE 2
LOT 183 STAGE 2
HBG2/209
Lot 93 DP 10451 0.0713
LOT 8 STAGE 1B
LOT 165 STAGE 2
LOT 37 STAGE 2
LOT 180 STAGE 3
LOT 177 STAGE 2
LOT 53 STAGE 3
Lot 95 DP 10451 0.0713
Lot 94 DP 10451 0.0733
24 .2
.2
LOT 149 STAGE 4
LOT 176 STAGE 3
LOT 175 STAGE 3 LOT 54 STAGE 3
LOT 9 STAGE 1B
401 STAGE 2
LOT 150 STAGE 4
LOT 167 STAGE 2
LOT 174 STAGE 3 LOT 55 STAGE 3
LOT 33 STAGE 5
LOT 34 STAGE 5
LOT 153 STAGE 4
Superseded
LOT 143 STAGE 5
LOT 147 STAGE 4
LOT 154 STAGE 4
LOT 162 STAGE 2
LOT 171 STAGE 3
LOT 56 STAGE 3
HBK1/825
LOT 10 STAGE 1B
LOT 144 STAGE 5
LOT 173 STAGE 3
HBK1/977
LOT 142 STAGE 5
LOT 152 STAGE 4
LOT 57 STAGE 3
Lot 98 DP 10451 0.0672
LOT 140 STAGE 5
LOT 32 STAGE 5
LOT 172 STAGE 3
LOT 169 STAGE 3
LOT 11 STAGE 1B LOT 31 STAGE 5
LOT 137 STAGE 5
LOT 58 STAGE 3
Lot 210 DP 10451 0.0728
LOT 12 STAGE 1B
LOT 30 STAGE 5
LOT 154 STAGE 4
LOT 168 STAGE 3
HBK1/626
Lot 97 DP 10451 0.0672
24 .2
9.2 15 .2
LOT 139 STAGE 5
LOT 158 STAGE 4
LOT 157 STAGE 4
71899
LOT 29 STAGE 5
LOT 116 STAGE 5
LOT 59 STAGE 3
Lot 209 DP 10451 0.0741
Lot 1 DP 318389 6.1891
404 STAGE 5
LOT 144 STAGE 4
HBA3/1092
HBA3/306
LOT 13 STAGE 1B
LOT 115 STAGE 5
LOT 134 STAGE 5
LOT 155 STAGE 4
HBA2/1403
HBA3/306
LOT 28 STAGE 5
LOT 117 STAGE 5
403 STAGE 4
LOT 152 STAGE 4
302 STAGE 3
LOT 118 STAGE 6
LOT 120 STAGE 5
LOT 133 STAGE 4
LOT 14 STAGE 1B
LOT 27 STAGE 7 LOT 119 STAGE 6
LOT 132 STAGE 4
LOT 61 STAGE 4
Lot 207 DP 9997 0.0687
Lot 118 DP 10451 0.0407
LOT 111 STAGE 7
LOT 135 STAGE 5
LOT 159 STAGE 4
LOT 15 STAGE 1B
LOT 122 STAGE 6
LOT 121 STAGE 5
LOT 131 STAGE 4
LOT 62 STAGE 4
HBA1/525
LOT 25 STAGE 7
LOT 112 STAGE 7 LOT 26 STAGE 7
LOT 124 STAGE 5
LOT 59 STAGE 4
HBA1/801
Lot 165 DP 9997 0.0784
LOT 114 STAGE 7
LOT 110 STAGE 6
LOT 125 STAGE 5
LOT 60 STAGE 4
HBA2/1222
HBK1/439
LOT 108 STAGE 6
LOT 123 STAGE 6
LOT 61 STAGE 4
LOT 17 STAGE 1C
LOT 16 STAGE 1C
LOT 109 STAGE 6
LOT 129 STAGE 5
LOT 62 STAGE 4
24.2
PALOT 23 396m²
LOT 113 STAGE 7
LOT 126 STAGE 6
LOT 63 STAGE 5
Lot 202 DP 9997 0.0693
Lot 164 DP 9997 0.0725
LOT 101 STAGE 6
LOT 128 STAGE 5
303 STAGE 5
LOT 18 STAGE 1C
LOT 22 PB 396m²
LOT 24 STAGE 7 LOT 107 STAGE 7
LOT 127 STAGE 6
LOT 64 STAGE 5
LOT 19 STAGE 1C
24.2
LOT 86 STAGE 7
LOT 106 STAGE 7
LOT 102 STAGE 6
LOT 65 STAGE 5
HBJ2/292
Lot 166 DP 9997 0.0682
.6
NOTES 1. This plan has been produced for resource consent purposes. Boundaries and dimensions are subject to resource consent approval and land transfer survey. 2. Easements may be required for cross-boundary services. 3. Current Napier City Council Zoning: Main Residential. NCC Planning Maps: I7, I8 and H8. 4. Proposed Amalgamation Conditions: 4.1. "That Lot 407 & Lot 406 DP (Stage 7 LT#) & Lot 405 DP (Stage 6 LT#) & Lot 404 DP (Stage 5 LT#) & Lot 403 DP (Stage 4 LT#) & Lot 402 DP (Stage 3 LT#) & Lot 401 DP (Stage 2 LT#) hereon are to be held in one record of title".
21.3
OALOT 21 391m²
25
LOT 100 STAGE 6
LOT 66 STAGE 6
HBD3/1295
Lot 163 DP 9997 0.0786
LOT 99 STAGE 6
405 STAGE 6
WI LL
Lot 161 DP 9997 0.0789
Lot 162 DP 9997 0.0776
LOT 85 413m²
LOT 87 STAGE 7
LOT 103 STAGE 6
OW B
Lot 150 DP 9997 0.1039
Lot 159 DP 9997 0.0814
.5
LOT 88 STAGE 7
4.3
18 .7
LOT 105 STAGE 7
LOT 67 STAGE 6
AN K
HBA1/716
Lot 151 DP 9997 0.0753
26 .4
LOT 20 OB 567m²
.0 6.8
LOT 104 STAGE 7
LOT 98 STAGE 7
LOT 68 STAGE 6
Lot 197 DP 9997 0.0687
HBJ3/1004
16
406 STAGE 7
HBB3/848
Lot 196 DP 9997 0.0703
Lot 158 DP 9997 0.0710
HBM1/696 Bisson Place
.5
LOT 89 402m²
LOT 97 STAGE 7
Lot 195 DP 9997 0.0758
MA
HBM1/697
17
ROA D
Lot 153 DP 9997 0.0839
16
LOT 90 402m²
.0
LOT 84 412m²
.0
.5
LOT 91 STAGE 7
LOT 69 STAGE 6
JK
17
LOT 83 412m²
.0
17
LOT 82 STAGE 7
LOT 70 STAGE 7
17
D2
16
16 .5
LOT 71 STAGE 7
Lot 194 DP 9997 0.0753
KRC
17 .0
SEN
Lot 156 DP 9997 0.0690
RO A
.5
LOT 96 STAGE 7
HBF2/1462
28/01/2020 FOR APPROVAL
ERIK
HBB4/640
16
LOT 93 402m²
LOT 95 STAGE 7
ST AG E6
Lot 155 DP 9997 0.0672
LOT 94 389m²
16
Lot 193 DP 9997 0.0741
3
.4
417
UE
2428m²
.2
HBA3/1263
UE
HBA1/619
AV EN
.4
21
.5
AV EN
CE A PL
HBM1/677
15
4.2
304 STAGE 7
308 STAGE 7
Lot 192 DP 9997 0.0741
AVE NU E
ER
Lot 154 DP 9997 0.0789
HBM1/687
N SO S BI
ILL
Lot 12 DP 10375 0.0935
STAGE 8LOT 407 QB
LOT 72 STAGE 7
HBA3/48
ELD
SP
SER
HBY1/923
15
17 .0 LOT 81 374m² QA LOT 82 15 .4 412m²
4.6
CY
SEF I
PE R
HBM1/686
MH
.4
.7
.2
HBJ4/1500
KRC
15
15 .4 LOT 79 374m² LOT 80 RA 374m² 15 .4
RB
24
Lot 191 DP 9997 0.0728
23/01/2020 FOR APPROVAL
409m² 11
13
E
LAN
HBY1/922
Lot 6 DP 28293 0.0603
LOT 78
3.1
LOT 73 STAGE 7
HBB3/843
Lot 190 DP 9997 0.0715
HBM1/676
VIC E
Lot 22 DP 10192 0.2137
LOT 74 369m²
HBF4/39
Lot 189 DP 9997 0.0703 Lot 11 DP 10375 0.1464
24 .2
15 .2
Lot 2 DP 28293 0.0286 Lot 3 DP 28293 HBY1/919 0.0310 Lot 4HBY1/920 DP 28293 0.0319 Lot 5 DP 28293 HBY1/921 0.0276
LOT 75 369m² .2
HBY1/918
2
14
16
HBG2/478
Lot 188 DP 9997 0.0718
HBM1/673
15
Lot 1 DP 28293 0.0596
LOT 76 384m² 24 .2
15
Lot 10 DP 10192 0.1224
.6
Appr. Issued KRC KRC
.8
.0
.2
Lot 187 DP 9997 0.0705
Lot 24 DP 10192 0.3819
17
23
6.9
HBM1/672
HBH2/114
Lot 23 DP 10192 0.0799
XREF's: QuickMap_TE Awa_willowbank; Durham Property_LA BASE_v9_culdesacs; Willowbank Rd_QuickMap CAD FILE: H:\_2018\H20180069 - Durham Property Investments\CAD\H20180069-CONSENT-R3.dwg
26
NORTH
HBM1/678
16 .2
Lot 9 DP 10192 0.1274
HBM1/675
6.8
Lot 8 DP 10375 0.2324
.0
HBW1/1021
STR
.8
HBW1/1023
LL
14
HBW1/1022
LD
Lot 1 DP 26433 0.1325
DP 26433 0.0498
FIT ZG ER A
DP 26433 0.0442
STA
4.8
DATE PLOTTED: 1/28/2020 9:59:20 AM BY : GEMMA GUILFORD
PL A
BE
793437
Lot 354 DP 513468 0.0527
Lot 363 DP 513468 0.0560
Lot 357 DP 513468 0.0584
793445
793439
Lot 358 DP 513468 0.0527
Lot 362 DP 513468 0.0526
16 & 38 WILLOWBANK AVE TE AWA, NAPIER STAGE 8 - SCHEME PLAN Status
FOR APPROVAL
NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES
793444
Datum
793440
Lot 361 DP 513468 0.0526
793436
Lot 359 DP 513468 0.1125 793441
793443
Lot 360 DP 513468
Council Ref.
HB2000
Scale
1:1000
Drawing Number
H20180069-C021
Size
A3 Revision
3
APPENDIX B Landscape Design
Shared pathway by NCC
LOT 1 DP 6369
40m wide drainage reserve
13.5m wide Minor Local Roads
MARAENUI 8m wide drainage corridor/ reserve
Private accessways serve lots on western boundary
Additional parking extra 7 bays
Roads terminate at 16m diameter culdesacs 8m wide drainage corridor/ reserve
RV, Boat and Camper Parking 15 bays
WIL
LO
WB AN K
AVE
Secondary Entry 17m wide corridor
8m wide drainage corridor/ reserve 17m wide Mjor Local Road with 1.4m wide pathway to one side of road
ERIK
SEN
ROAD
Main Entry with feature entry walls and signage. 17m wide corridor
LOT 9 DP 6055
Upgraded berm with new kerb and channel, 1.5m wide footpath and street trees
Neighbourhood Reserve/ Park connecting to broader recreational network
LOT 10 DP 6055
LOT PLAN TOTAL LOTS = 182
Layout in accordance with NCC Te Awa Structure Plan 40m wide drainage line to western boundary 0 20 40 60 80 100m
TE AWA
N
Superseded 28/01/2020 Revision K [H20180069]
Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village, Te Awa - landscape concept design
SINGLE DWELLING
DUPLEX DWELLINGS
N
Orange = Living/ Kitchen
Shared pathway by NCC
Pink = Bedrooms/ Bathrooms
LOT 1 DP 6369
40m wide drainage reserve
Blue = Double Garage
13.5m wide Minor Local Roads
WI
DE )
8m wide drainage corridor/ reserve
M
(13
(4. 8
.5M
DE
Private accessways serve lots on western boundary
)
Additional parking extra 7 bays
(13
.5M
Roads terminate at 16m diameter culdesacs 8m wide drainage corridor/ reserve
WI
)
RV, Boat and Camper Parking 14 bays
(4. 8
M
WI
DE )
DE
DE )
Secondary Entry 17m wide corridor
AVE
(4. 8
M
WI
MARAENUI
WI
(13
.5M
WI
DE
WIL
LO
WB AN K
)
(13.5
Single Dwelling
MW
IDE)
8m wide drainage corridor/ reserve
Duplex Dwellings
IDE)
(13.5
IDE)
(13.5
MW
(13.5
IDE)
ERIK
SEN
ROAD
(13.5
MW
MW
(17M
(4.
WIDE
)
8M
WI
DE
)
17m wide Major Local
Main Entry with feature entry walls and signage. 17m wide corridor
MW
IDE)
TE AWA
LOT 9 DP 6055
Upgraded berm with new kerb and channel, 1.5m wide footpath and street trees
Neighbourhood Reserve/ Park connecting to broader recreational network (min. 2000m²)
LOT 10 DP 6055
ARCHITECTURAL OVERLAY TOTAL LOTS = 182 (36 Duplex Units, 126 Single Units)
Layout in accordance with NCC Te Awa Structure Plan 40m wide drainage line to western boundary 0 20 40 60 80 100m
N
Superseded
28/01/2020 Revision K [H20180069]
Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village, Te Awa - landscape concept design
Estate Entry
Superseded 28/01/2020 Revision K [H20180069]
Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village, Te Awa - landscape concept design
ENTR Y
AVE WB AN K LO
ENTR Y
ERIK SEN RO
AD
WIL
INDICATIVE NEIGHBOURHOOD RESERVE/ PARK min. 2000m² N
Not to Scale
Indicative Fencing Diagram LEGEND 1.8m high Butted Paling (or approved equivalent) max. 1.0m high fence or low planted boundary 1.8m high semi-transparent fence for passive surveillance Semi-transparent pedestrian gate with key or swipe access Pedestrian bridge across open swale Planted buffer to soften long fence line and provide further separation from roadway - to be semi transparent to retain visual connection i.e. low shrubs and ground covers with clear trunk trees
Road Corridor Profile 13.5m wide corridor with 1.5m meander
Superseded 28/01/2020 Revision K [H20180069]
Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village, Te Awa - landscape concept design
Indicative cross section - road corridor Not to scale
Indicative cross section - drainage reserve Not to scale
Passive open space
Passive open space Inundation zone (approx. 12m)
P. BOUNDARY
Willowbank Avenue Berm
P. BOUNDARY
40M Wide Drainage Reserve
Rear yard
Max. 1:5 batter
Meandering shared pathway 3.0m wide with potential breakout and seating opportunities
Superseded
Potential bridge crossing points to connect pedestrians from development
Open style fences to rear boundaries interfacing open space
28/01/2020 Revision K [H20180069]
Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village, Te Awa - landscape concept design
PLANTING CHARACTER Indicative only - to be finalised at Detail Design phase
OA D
PARKLAND PALETTE
RA
CT
ENTR PALE Y TTE RO
AD
S
R RO
PARKLAND PALETTE
ENTR Y CH
R RO AD
S
ENTR PALE Y TTE TE
RO
TER
BU
EN R
OAD
PALE T
OR
MINO
MIN
ADS
ARAC
ADS
R FFE BU
R LOC
PR
MINO
MAJO
IVA TE
RO
AL RO
AD
AD
OR
EN R
WIL LO W
MIN
ERIKS
BA
NK
AVE
BU
TE
ER
PALE T
HA
OAD
IVA TE R
TR YC
PR
FFE R
E NU
EN
FFE
ERIKS
R
PARKLAND PALETTE
ERIKSEN ROAD PALETTE - Street trees to Rriksen Road edge to tie into council approved character and tie in with adjacent developments ENTRY PALETTE/ ENTRY CHARACTER - To include specimen trees and a dense understory that creates a specific character for the development with the palette continuing out along roads adjacent entries with understory planting to street trees to be more prevalent along these street (trees in mulch only to other minor streets) MAJOR ROAD - Road to have different tree species for ease of wayfinding. Boulevard to include planted buildouts and understory planting to street trees. MINOR ROADS - Trees in mulch with less understory planting. Species to differ from main circulation to provide sense of place/ wayfinding for residents
BUF
FER
PRIVATE ROADS - Trees in mulch with less understory planting. Species to differ from main circulation to provide sense of place/ wayfinding for residents PARKLAND PALETTE - Larger specimen trees within parklands to tie character to existing drainage lines within the broader community species to be mainly natives with some flowering exotics for seasonal interest. Parkland entering the project site to tie in with specific character of the development through the use of feature trees found in entry palette. BUFFER - Trees and groundcover understory planting to provide separation for residents and buffering from busy road. Mix of native species to be loosely planted to allow for visual permeability along fence line.
Superseded
28/01/2020 Revision K [H20180069]
Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village, Te Awa - landscape concept design
Smaller ornamental trees as feature within garden beds
timber open paling fence to rear boundary for some privacy to outdoor living area - hedge to continue within lot along fence line
LAWN WASHING LINE
Hardy, drought tolerant groundcover species to garden beds
Deciduous trees to northern boundaries to allow sun in winter and shade in summer. Trees to be thoughtfully located to provide to not block light/ sun from neighbouring property
Shared hedge - planted along boundary
PATIO
3m min. building setback
BERM
Duplex units - Typical Landscape Concept Plan N
Low shared hedge to the first 6m of boundary to provide visibility and passive surveillance- planted along boundary 1m min. building setback
North indicative only
28/01/2020 Revision K [H20180069]
Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village, Te Awa - landscape concept design
5m min. vehicle standing bay
Timber screen to bin bay
BIN BAY
1m min. building setback
1m min. building setback
BERM
Hardy, drought tolerant groundcover species to garden beds
LAWN Timber screen to bin bay
Shared hedge - planted along boundary
BIN BAY
5m min. vehicle standing bay
3m min. building setback
Deciduous trees to northern boundaries to allow sun in winter and shade in summer. Trees to be thoughtfully located to provide to not block light/ sun from neighbouring property
Low shared hedge to the first 6m of boundary to provide visibility and passive surveillanceplanted along boundary
Evergreen tree to edge of driveway
PATIO
Hardy, drought tolerant groundcover species to garden beds
WASHING LINE
Single units - Typical Landscape Concept Plan N
timber open paling fence to rear boundary for some privacy to outdoor living area - hedge to continue within lot along fence line
North indicative only
28/01/2020 Revision K [H20180069]
Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village, Te Awa - landscape concept design
PLANTING PALETTE Indicative planting palette only - to be finalised at Detail Design phase
CODE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME Street TREES 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.
ALE exe Alectryon execelsus Titoki COR lae Corynocarpus laevigatus Karaka HED arb Hedycarya arborea Porokaiwhiri HOH ang Hoheria angustifolia Lacebark MET mis Metrosideros ‘Mistral’ Pohutakawa MET MP Metrosideros ‘Maori Princess’ Pohutakawa VIT luc Vitex lucens Puriri
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
SPECIMEN TREES - For Parklands/ Open Space + FEature areas 8. COR aus Cordyline australis Cabbage tree 9. KNI exc Knightia excelsa Rewarewa 10. MAG gra Magnolia grandiflora Magnolia 11. NOT sol Nothofagus solandri Black Beech 12. POD tot Podocarpus totara Totara
ORNAMENTAL TREES - for unit Gardens 13. COR kou Cornus kousa Kousa Dogwood 14. MIC bub Michelia ‘Bubbles’ False Magnolia 15. PRU aco Prunus ‘Acolade’ Flowering Cherry 16. PSE cra Pseudopanax crassifolius Lancewood 17. SOP tet Sophora tetraptera Kowhai
Shrubs - Hedge species 18. COR GG Corokia virgata ‘Geentys Green’ Corokia 19. GRI whe Griselinia littoralis ‘Whenuapai’ Broadleaf 20. MET tah Metrosideros collina ‘Tahiti’ Pohutukawa 21. OLE pan Olearia paniculata Akiraho
Groundcovers 22. APO sim Apodasmia similis Oioi 23. ART cir Arthropodium cirratum Renga Renga 24. AST fra Astelia fragrans Bush Flax 25. CAL sol Calystegia soldanella False Bindweed 26. CAR vir Carex virgata Carex 27. CHI fla Chionochloa flavicans Dwarf Toitoi 28. COP PK Coprosma 'Poor Knights' Coprosma 29. DIA nig Dianella nigra Turutu Blueberry 30. HEB WD Hebe ‘Wiri Dawn’ Dwarf Hebe 31. HEB WM Hebe ‘Wiri Mist’ Dwarf Hebe 32. LIB for Libertia spp. Libertia 33. LOM LW Lomandra cylindrica ‘Lime Wave’ Mat Rush 34. PHO GD Phormium ‘Green Dwarf’ Flax
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
28/01/2020 Revision K [H20180069]
Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village, Te Awa - landscape concept design
APPENDIX C Urban Design Report
Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village Te Awa Urban Design Report 27/02/2020 Revision E [H20180069]
PURPOSE OF REPORT
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The purpose of this report is to provide an Urban Design assessment for a proposed lifestyle village development at 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Te Awa, Napier. The report has been prepared as part of the resource consent application.
The resource consent application is for the greenfield redevelopment of 2 lots of existing agricultural land in the suburb of Te Awa, Napier.
This report has been prepared by Development Nous Pty Ltd for Durham Property Investments (DPI) in accordance with the City of Napier District Plan with specific reference to Appendix 29A the Te Awa Structure Plan Design Outcomes. This report has also been created with reference to the following: •
NZ Urban Design Protocol (Ministry for the Environment – March 2005)
•
NCC Code of Practice for Subdivision and Land Development
•
National Guidelines for Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design in New Zealand (CPTED)
This report initially focuses on the context of the proposal that guides the design response, following on to reviews against Good Practice Urban Design parameters and against the District Plan conditions. The design responds to the following sections of the District Plan: •
Appendix 29A – Te Awa Structure Plan Design Outcomes
•
District Plan Chapter 5 – Main Residential Zone Rules
•
District Plan Map H8 and I7
This report is to be read in conjunction with the Civil Engineering and Servicing reports, Traffic Report and Architectural design package.
The site comprises Lot 1 and 2 DP 14417, 13.8ha of land fronting Eriksen Road and Willowbank Avenue. The site is zoned Main Residential under the District Plan and is subject to the Te Awa Structure Plan (Appendix 29A - District Plan). The site lies around 3.7km south of Napier CBD. The redevelopment of this site is to provide Napier with a freehold lifestyle village comprising 181 residential lots. It is proposed that for the most part, all roads will be encapsulated within a gated style development. The site includes a designated stormwater drain (D172) that runs parallel with Willowbank Avenue to the western edge of the site, then dog-legs east towards Eriksen Road and the foreshore, connecting into existing stormwater systems east of the site (refer to NCC District Plan Maps H8 and I7). This designation is required to be a 40m wide drainage corridor which is to be vested to Council (Refer Design Outcome 14 of the Structure Plan). It is proposed that the development will be privatised with internal road reserves to be owned privately. Open space permeating the development edge will be publicly accessible. Detailed design will ensure that each lot has access to private outdoor space for recreation and utility purposes.
View east over site from Kenny Road
View north along Eriksen Road
Appendix 29 of the District Plan contains Council’s Structure Plan for the area. Appendix Plan 29F shows the subject site is Stage 5 of the Te Awa development area and therefore will occur outside of the Structure Plan sequencing (Refer Design Outcome 4). It is believed that this will not directly impact upon longer term infrastructure planning for the area.
In preparing the concept plan consideration has been given to amenity effects, ensuring that the proposal fits comfortably within the location and is a desirable living To assess the urban design aspects of this project a multidisciplinary team have been put together who have environment. Care has been given to the treatment of knowledge of the site and its context. The team includes: the frontage to Willowbank Avenue and Eriksen Road. The internal layout has been developed considering • Civil Engineering: Strata Group Consulting – open space connections, road layout and orientation Russell Nettlingham providing good urban design outcomes.
BACKGROUND
•
Traffic Surveyor: Traffic Solutions Ltd – Ian Constable
•
Architecture: Innovative Architecture – Andrew Young
The applicant has undertaken several developments on a similar basis and is confident that this development will meet the lifestyle needs of the residents. The following summarises the proposed development:
•
Landscape Architecture: Development Nous Gemma Guilford
Total Area:
13.8ha
Reserve area:
2641m² (4 lots)
•
Planning: Development Nous – Matthew Holder and Jason Kaye
40m Designation:
31,249m² (to be vested)
•
Survey: Development Nous - Karl Carew
Road Reserve:
28,352m²
Total House Lots:
181 (excl. 4x reserve lots)
Engineering inputs have been sought and solutions developed that are environmentally responsible, which is encouraged by the Urban Design Protocol as an attribute of successful towns and cities. While it is acknowledged that the team does not include specific urban design expertise it is considered that the design experience across the combination of disciplines identified above, along with the local knowledge base are commensurate with the site context and constraints, and the complexity and nature of the scheme to suitably assess the urban design aspects associated with the site and the site-specific proposal.
View of park along Willowbank Road
Total house Lot area: 75,519m² Average lot size:
417m²
House Type:
36 Duplex Units (159m² floor area)
126 Single Units (158m² floor area)
This equates to 23.9 dwellings per hectare - which exceeds the structure plan minimum of 12 dwellings per hectare. Average lot size is 417m² based on the 75,519m² area of developed lots (excl. reserve/park area and roading). As an average, this complies with the City of Napier District Plan maximum density limit of 1 dwelling per 350m2 (Condition 5.15).
2
View to Marewa Walk from end of Eriksen Road
View east over site from Willowbank Road
27/02/2020 Revision E [H20180069]
Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village, Te Awa - Urban Design Report
EXISTING ROAD HIERARCHY
SITE DESCRIPTION
The surrounding road hierarchy classification are as follows: ERIKSEN ROAD - LOCAL ROAD (70KM)
THE EXISTING SITE The subject site comprises 2 existing lots covering 13.8ha of agricultural land in the suburb of Te Awa, Napier. The street address for the 2 lots are 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue. The site is bound by Willowbank to the west and Eriksen Road on the eastern edge which runs almost parallel with Willowbank Ave. North and south, the site is bound by neighbouring agricultural lots.
Eriksen Road provides the eastern frontage to the site. Currently it is a moderate speed back block road with no road markings and low usage due to existing adjacent land use. It will likely get a lot busier with the current and proposed residential development in the area. The road speed may need to be reduced when the area becomes more populated.
Design Outcome 12 of the Structure Plan proposed the The broader neighbourhood consists of Main Residential following road upgrades to Eriksen Road: Areas to the east, west and north and Rural land to the south west and further south beyond the Te Awa • 10m carriageway with cycle lanes structure plan area. The Napier foreshore is around • Footpaths 500m to the east of the site. Site topography could be generally termed as “flat”. The site varies in level about 500mm over 300m, falling generally from west to east from RL 12.00 to RL 11.00 at its lowest. There is an invert/ low point running along the southern boundary of Lot 2 which sits at RL 11.00 reflecting the proposed stormwater designation. The residential area east of Eriksen Road (Stage 1 and 2 of the Structure Plan) is currently under development providing established precedent for urban design and neighbourhood design outcomes.
EXISTING SITE CONNECTIONS The site is removed from existing centres in terms of walkable neighbourhoods. The closest locality is the Maraenui Shops located on Bledisoe Road which is 2.3km (a 28min walk from the Eriksen Road frontage) to the west of the site. The Onekawa New World and shopping precinct would be the next closest without going into the CBD itself. Onekawa, Maadi Road is 4.1km (52min walk) and Pak n Save, Raffles Street Napier is 4.8km (58min walk) from the site. The structure plan proposes a small Suburban Commercial node which is to be located in Stage 3 of the Structure Plan Development. This would provide a smaller shopping precinct, but major shopping would require further travel (refer Design Outcome 2).
•
Car parking/ landscaped berm areas
•
Single lane roundabouts at all major intersections (to assist in reducing traffic speeds)
Currently the northern end of Eriksen Road is a deadend not connecting back onto Willowbank Avenue. Design Outcome 12 of the Structure Plan does describe future provision for a single lane round about on to Willowbank/ Chambers Street at this intersection, however this is not a part of the subject site works interface. WILLOWBANK AVENUE - COLLECTOR ROAD (100KM) Willowbank Ave runs along the western edge of the site. This is a high speed 2 lane collector road connecting the suburbs of Meeanee, Te Awa and Napier South. The proposed development does not interface with Willowbank Avenue. Entry into the development is from Eriksen Road. The designated drainage reserve is to run the length of the site along the Willowbank Avenue boundary. This 40m wide reserve will provide separation of the proposed subdivision from this major road. Fencing and buffer planting is being provided to the development edge of the reserve. (Refer Design Outcome 8-11 and 14).
Understanding the proposed demographic of the subject development, the travel distance to local centres would not be a deemed a hindrance to the future residents.
EXISTING VEGETATION
The site has great potential to provide pedestrian and bicycle connection to broader recreation networks such as shared pathways along Marine Parade, and the Marewa Walk just north of the site. Connection to these networks would add value to the lifestyle of residents in the area.
Vegetation to the site is minimal, located mainly to fence lines and within gardens beds surrounding the existing residence on the northern most corner of Lot 1. There is potential to retain significant mature trees along the site boundaries and within the drainage designation if minimal earthworks are being undertaken and they do not impede proposed building footprints. Tree retention is to be investigated further at detail design.
3
27/02/2020 Revision E [H20180069]
Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village, Te Awa - Urban Design Report
SITE CONTEXT
SUBJECT SITE
NEIGHBOURHOOD CONTEXT PLAN + open space network - Google maps
Marewa walk
D
D
WIL Existing 2.8km walk to Maraenui shops - time reduces with proposed park/ reserve walkway
KEN
NY
ROA
Proposed Reserve
LO
Maraenui Park
SUBJECT SITE
SEN
WB AN KA VE
NU E
Foreshore reserve shared path
ERIK
E
BL
E
LO
S DI
A RO
Serpentine Drain
RO
AD
NEIGHBOURHOOD CONTEXT PLAN + open space network [NOT TO SCALE]
4
27/02/2020 Revision E [H20180069]
Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village, Te Awa - Urban Design Report
EXISTING SITE IMAGERY - SUBJECT SITE
View to Ranges from Eriksen Road - looking west
View of southern lot boundary (Lot 2) from Eriksen Road - looking west
View to Lot 2 from Eriksen Road - looking west
Existing shed etc on Lot 2 - view from Eriksen Road looking west
View to boundary between Lot 1 and 2 from Eriksen Road - looking west
View to existing dwelling and trees on northern boundary of Lot 1 from Eriksen Road - north west
View south to existing trees on northern boundary of Lot 1 from northern dogleg of Eriksen Road
Cyclists heading towards Napier - view south along Eriksen Road
View of existing residence from Willowbank Avenue looking south east
View of existing residence from Willowbank Ave looking south east
Existing lot 2 access from Willowbank Avenue - looking east
Existing vegetation along boundary on Willowbank Ave looking south east
5
27/02/2020 Revision E [H20180069]
Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village, Te Awa - Urban Design Report
EXISTING SITE IMAGERY - EXISTING DEVELOPMENT
Eriksen Road looking north - new subdivision to the east - subject site to the left
Suburb east of Eriksen Road - looking towards the foreshore
Suburb east of Eriksen Road - looking towards the foreshore
Suburb east of Eriksen Road - looking towards the foreshore
6
27/02/2020 Revision E [H20180069]
Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village, Te Awa - Urban Design Report
THE PROPOSAL
BUILT FORM
Private DEVELOPMENT
that are orientated generally in a north-south direction. The main streets follow the block layout which is orientated in a northeast-southwest direction – parallel with lot boundaries and following the direction of both Eriksen Road and Willowbank Avenue.
area will remain dry for the bulk of the time providing an open space area with dual capacity to function as a drainage reserve and parkland, providing recreational area for residents and the broader community. This area of land is to be vested to Council.
Internal east-west cross block local roads are provided to create a range of walkable urban blocks within the development.
The drainage reserve has potential to incorporate elements such as pathways, bench seats, rubbish bins and pedestrian lighting creating a public area for walking, cycling and passive recreation.
The Urban Design and Architecture team has worked With the proposed subdivision being a gated style together to create a plan that provides the best built form development, it is important to discuss the provision of and urban design layout for the site. fencing with relation to road frontages and connection to the visual and physical broader community, as well as The proposal is for the development of 2 lots of existing Architectural design has been based on 400m² lots CPTED and urban design principles. agricultural land covering 13.8ha of agricultural land in providing two building types, double garage duplex and the suburb of Te Awa, Napier freehold lifestyle village double garage single dwellings with design flexibility for The following fencing typologies are proposed: comprising approximately 181 residential lots. the footprint to be flipped and orientated to allow for the • 1.8m high butted paling fence - Minimal provision best lot aspect and solar gain. In accordance with the Te Awa Structure Plan the of paling fencing has been provided to the development is a low to moderate density subdivision Built form has been located to allow best living northern most boundary, abutting potential future providing 23.9 dwellings per hectare - which exceeds conditions for the future owners. development area, and highly trafficked areas such the structure plan minimum of 12 dwellings per hectare. as the main entry road and the northern entry/exit OPEN SPACE road and parking area. This fencing is being used Average lot size is 417m² based on the 75,519m² area for privacy and noise/ traffic disturbance mitigation. of developed lots (excl. reserve/park area and roading). The proposal incorporates a 40m wide designated stormwater drainage corridor (D172) which runs along As an average, this complies with the City of Napier • max. 1.2 high fence or low planted boundary -This the western edge of the subject site, following the District Plan maximum density limit of 1 dwelling per fence type is being provided to the Eriksen Road Willowbank Avenue alignment, to dogleg east at the 350m2 (Condition 5.15). frontage to provide active frontage to the broader southern boundary of the site. The drainage corridor community and passive surveillance both to and SITE LAYOUT connects through to Eriksen Road and the 4.4ha from dwellings fronting this road. The proposed site plan shows a comprehensive freehold Serpentine Pond that lies north of Waimakariri Drive, • 1.8m high semi-transparent fence for passive lifestyle village subdivision. The scheme proposes larger further discharging at the Marine Parade Foreshore surveillance - Semi-transparent fencing will be lots to the Eriksen Road frontage (19 x 600-700m²) with Reserve. provided to lots fronting open space to allow more densely designed lots internally (162 x lifestyle lots The site drainage reserve comprises an area of for passive surveillance and provide a pleasant averaging 417m²). 31,249m². The reserve will be profiled to form an open outlook for owners. This also provides a mown grass lined channel to a maximum grade of 1:3. ROAD LAYOUT AND DESIGN development that does not “turn its back” on the The channel will only contain water during major rain broader community. The proposed road layout provides internal local streets events with water draining quickly after the event. The
The 40m wide stormwater/ drainage designation located along the Willowbank Ave. boundary of the site has provided the development with an active interface with the broader neighbourhood. Larger lots (600-700m²) have been located fronting Eriksen Road to reflect the existing urban grain located within the Te Awa/ South Napier area including new development opposite the site. The Eriksen Road interface will provide road profiles and pedestrian connection in accordance to Council standard and design outcomes noted in the Structure Plan and noted previously in this report. With demand in the area, the subdivision proposes to provide Napier with a freehold lifestyle village. It is proposed that for the most part, all internal roads will be encapsulated within a gated style development. Road profiles internally are as follows: •
17.0m wide corridor (NCC Major Local Road) – 8.0m wide road is to meander 1.5m along centerline, to act as a traffic calming device and to provide landscaped buildouts and provide added amenity within long runs of roadway
•
13.5m wide corridor (NCC Minor Local Road) – 6.0m wide road is to meander 1.5m along centerline, to act as a traffic calming device. Roads to terminate at 16.0m diameter culdesac heads.
•
•
Minimum pedestrian 1.4m wide footpaths to 1 side of every road
•
Pedestrian connection to shared pathways within designated drainage reserve
•
7
13.5m wide corridor (NCC Minor Local Road) - 4.8m wide private accessway’s to lots on the western side of the development. No through roads.
Landscaped berm areas including street trees
•
Planted buffer to soften long fence lines and provide further separation from roadway - this planting is to be visually permeable to retain visual connection between the development, open space and roadways. Planting is to be low shrubs and groundcovers with clear trunked trees to allow visibility below crown.
Lots that back onto the reserve will have a great outlook onto open space, and concurrently, residents will provide passive surveillance for a safer community, fostering a local sense of ownership over the reserve. Smaller areas of open space are proposed within the subdivision. The structure plan indicates an area of open space to be provided to the central southern boundary of the site connecting to the drainage designation. The proposed area provided in this location in the scheme plan is located between proposed lots 47 and 48 where there is provision of 2059m² lot to be used as parkland/ open space. A pathway connection, seating and landscaping will be provided within this lot for residents of the lifestyle development. This park will be gated along the internal boundary to allow the residential village to remain secure. Further to this 3 x 194m² lots have been incorporated into the scheme located at the end of east west running cross block roads to allow for stormwater connection to the designated corridor. These are located at the western end of proposed roads 3,5 and 7 – Refer to plan.
INDICATIVE FENCING DIAGRAM Not to Scale LEGEND 1.8m high Butted Paling (or approved equivalent) max. 1.0m high fence or low planted boundary 1.8m high semi-transparent fence for passive surveillance Semi-transparent pedestrian gate with key or swipe access Pedestrian bridge across open swale Planted buffer to soften long fence line and provide further separation from roadway - to be semi transparent to retain visual connection i.e. low shrubs and ground covers with clear trunk trees
27/02/2020 Revision E [H20180069]
Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village, Te Awa - Urban Design Report
8
27/02/2020 Revision E [H20180069]
Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village, Te Awa - Urban Design Report
9
27/02/2020 Revision E [H20180069]
Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village, Te Awa - Urban Design Report
BOUNDARY 16.00m
LIVING
4.0 x 5.7 m
GARAGE 5.8 x 5.8 m
KITCHEN 2.8 x 3.6 m
BOUNDARY 25.00m
DINING
3.4 x 4.7 m
BED 2
3.0 x 3.3 m
BED 3/STUDY 3.0 x 3.4 m
BATH
3.0 x 1.8 m
OUTDOOR LIVING
W/R
3.0 x 1.6 m
7.0 x 11.7 m
BED 1
4.1 x 3.5 m
Proposed Architecture
ENSUITE 3.0 x 1.8 m
Floor Plan - 158m²
Not to Scale
0
2
6
4
1:100
10m
1:100 BOUNDARY 16.00m
BOUNDARY 16.00m
BOUNDARY 16.00m
BOUNDARY 16.00m
LIVING
4.0 x 5.7 m
LIVING
OUTDOOR LIVING
GARAGE
LIVING
5.1 x 4.6 m
OPTION Sliding Door
DINING
3.4 x 3.7 m
BED 3/STUDY
KITCHEN
3.0 x 3.0 m
SCULLERY
2.8 x 4.2 m
2.4 x 1.7 m
OPTION Sliding Door
DINING
3.4 x 3.7 m
BED 3/STUDY
KITCHEN
SCULLERY
3.0 x 3.0 m
2.8 x 4.2 m
2.4 x 1.7 m
KITCHEN
OPTION Sliding Door
BED 2
3.0 x 3.4 m
2.8 x 3.6 m
DINING
BOUNDARY 25.00m
BOUNDARY 25.00m
BED 2
3.0 x 3.4 m
6.0 x 4.0 m
BOUNDARY 25.00m
6.0 x 4.0 m
OPTION Sliding Door
5.8 x 5.8 m
OUTDOOR LIVING
5.1 x 4.6 m
3.4 x 4.7 m
BED 2
3.0 x 3.3 m
LAUNDRY BATHROOM 3.0 x 1.7 m
LAUNDRY
STORE
STORE
1.8 x 1.1 m
1.8 x 1.1 m
BED 3/STUDY
BATHROOM
3.0 x 3.4 m
3.0 x 1.7 m
BATH
3.0 x 1.8 m
W/R
1.8 x 2.3 m
ENTRY
1.7 x 2.1 m
GARAGE 5.8 x 5.8 m
GARAGE 5.8 x 5.8 m
ENTRY
1.7 x 2.1 m
W/R
1.8 x 2.3 m
ENSUITE
ENSUITE
3.0 x 1.7 m
OUTDOOR LIVING
3.0 x 1.7 m
W/R
3.0 x 1.6 m
7.0 x 11.7 m
BED 1
4.1 x 3.5 m
BED 1
4.1 x 3.2 m
4.1 x 3.2 m
PARKING
2x Off-street carparks
BOUNDARY 16.00m
Floor Plan - 159m²
:100
Floor Plan - 158m²
PARKING
1:100
2x Off-street carparks
Project
Date
Drawing
c Copyright
ERIKSEN ROAD DEVELOPMENT [Concept] Floor Plan Andrew: 022 658 6211
10
7/09/2018
Page
Geoff: 027 630 8352
ENSUITE 3.0 x 1.8 m
BED 1
Email: info@innovativearch.co.nz
04
Job No.
1834
Rev
innovative architecture ltd
27/02/2020 Revision E [H20180069]
Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village, Te Awa - Urban Design Report
BOUNDARY 16.00m
Choice
URBAN DESIGN ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
“Quality urban design fosters diversity and offers people choice in the urban form of our towns and cities, and choice in densities, building types, transport options, and activities. Flexible and adaptable design provides for unforeseen uses, and creates resilient and robust towns and cities.”
URBAN DESIGN PROTOCOL
•
The New Zealand Urban Design Protocol provides a platform to make New Zealand towns and cities more successful through quality urban design. The Urban Design Protocol identifies seven essential design qualities that are collectively called the “Seven C’s”. They are:
•
There is demand in region for retirement lifestyle developments as proposed. The development area is a sufficient size to service the community in this manner.
•
The housing product proposed and size of lot fits with the demographic of potential buyers. Investigation was undertaken into providing a larger mix of housing products including smaller single garage dwellings. The applicant has undertaken several developments on a similar basis but it was deemed that this a mix of sizes and types was not in demand for this demographic and is confident that this development will meet the lifestyle needs of the residents.
Context, Character, Choice, Connections, Creativity, Custodianship, and Collaboration An assessment of the proposal against the Seven C’s has been undertaken as follows:
Context “Quality urban design sees buildings, places and spaces not as isolated elements but as part of the whole town or city.” •
The site is located adjacent to an existing fully urbanised area on the southern edge of Napier. This area includes a number of residential subdivisions of a similar urban design character to the proposed including currently under construction subdivisions to the east of Eriksen Road. This project aims to seamlessly integrate into the existing local character by tying in streetscape character, planting species and applying similar architectural typologies, particularly on edges interfacing existing residential areas. The development will blend seamlessly into the wider area, fitting neatly into the urban fringe.
•
•
•
11
The area is zoned appropriate for this type of development. Neighbouring lots consist of residential areas to the north and east with newer development areas directly opposite the site on the east of Eriksen Road through to the Foreshore. Older suburbs such as Maraenui lie to the west beyond Willowbank Avenue. Neighbouring suburbs are of varying age and design. The proposed development will integrate with the character of the more modern subdivisions to the east, using similar landscape and public realm treatments and building materials. The rural and agricultural plains extending to the west and south of the site also provide a character common in the area, with the urban fringe overlapping the rural countryside. The proposed planting palettes for the development will help to integrate and tie the site in to its broader context. Palettes are to include vegetation that is appropriate to the area and in keeping with the both the eastern coastal character while respecting the existing rural/ agricultural character. The character of the proposed drainage designation along Willowbank Ave will provide a continuation of the existing open space network within the area such as the Marewa Walk starting at Geddis Ave and Te Awa Park, the linear open space following along the western edge of Chambers Street. This designation will incorporate meandering pathways and open swale drain with large specimen trees and an expanse of grassed open space providing clear continuation of the existing open space network.
The compact living solution proposed is consistent with other developments of this nature.
•
Restricted vehicle access to the Willowbank Avenue boundary means a creative solution is required for rear lot boundaries. This will ensure that the visually amenity of the road is maintained so a rear wall or a “back of estate” aesthetic does not develop. Boundary fences will be required to have a percentage of transparency maintaining an attractive open aesthetic.
•
The drainage designation has potential to provide the community with a vibrant, inviting open space area. A simple and thoughtful design is to be provided at the detail design phase to incorporate simple parkland elements and landscape embellishment that creates a great passive recreation space.
Custodianship “Quality urban design reduces the environmental impacts of our towns and cities through environmentally sustainable and responsive design solutions. Custodianship recognises the lifetime costs of buildings and infrastructure and aims to hand on places to the next generation in as good or better condition.” •
This subject site is appropriate for the type of development proposed and the development is of a quality consistent with other similar successful developments undertaken by the applicant.
•
Sustainable engineering solutions have been sought to ensure that any negative effects on the site and surrounding area are minimised.
•
Road widths are kept to a minimum reducing runoff, managing speed and providing a pedestrian friendly environment.
•
The lots backing onto the drainage reserve will provide residents with a sense of stewardship, sense of place and will provide opportunity for passive surveillance for a safer community.
•
As the proposed custodianship of site will be via a body corporate the site will be maintained to a consistent and high standard. Landscaping will be included within the streetscape and each unit by the applicant to ensure that each lot is provided with landscaping, giving a cohesive appearance to the whole development. Consistency in landscape design provides ease of maintenance and a tidy and comfortable living environment for future residents.
Connections “Good connections enhance choice, support social cohesion, makes place lively and safe, and facilitate contact among people. Quality urban design recognises how all networks – streets, railways, walking and cycling routes, services, infrastructure, and communication networks – connect and support healthy neighbourhoods, towns and cities.” •
Character “Quality urban design reflects and enhances the distinctive character and culture of the urban environment, and recognises that character is evolving and dynamic not static. It ensures that new buildings and spaces are unique, are appropriate to their location and compliment their historic identity, adding value to our towns and cities by increasing tourism, investment and community pride.”
The scale of Napier is such that there is considerable diversity in the type and scale of residential types in the area. The introduction of this development will contribute positively to the choices available around the fringes of the city.
•
The proposed streetscape layouts aim to connect cohesively to the broader network linking with the established neighbouring developments creating great walkable communities. Concept layouts have been explored to create a neighbourhood that provides maximum dwellings with street frontage limiting rear block and shared access.
•
Internal access for both pedestrians and vehicles around the site will be straight forward, safe and attractive. There are plenty of options for pedestrian activity with pedestrian flows not compromised by vehicle movements.
•
The 40m wide drainage designation proposed allows pedestrian and cycle connections to and from the site, connecting to the broader recreational and green space networks. Accessible pathways and picnic nodes should be provided encompassing all levels of ability.
•
Vehicle circulation is simple and easily navigated with no dead-ends or culdesacs. The road corridor has been kept to a minimum within the site to provide a slow speed environment with permeable edges and meandering roads to provide added amenity and interest.
•
The introduction of home zone style speed control devices at strategic locations is considered important. This will identify crossing points which link to areas of open space within the development. Pedestrian access throughout the site is considered important along with a strong desire to provide linkages to the wider area. Connections will be emphasised by appropriate hard and soft landscape embellishment.
Collaboration “Towns and cities are designed incrementally as we make decisions on individual projects. Quality urban design requires good communication and coordinated action from all decision makers: central government, local government, professionals, transport operators, developers and users. To improve our urban design capability we need integrated training, adequately funded research and shared examples of best practice.” •
The Urban Design Report provides overarching design guidelines for the implementation of the future detail design as well as reference to statutory documents.
•
This is a project in which a multidisciplinary team has been employed to ensure that appropriate consideration is given to the range of issues that will impact on the development of the site ensuring a credible solution for the site and wider area.
•
A collaborative approach between disciplines for the planning, detail design and construction of the site is important to incorporate and acknowledge the contributions of different disciplines and perspectives creating a better long-term outcome.
•
Close consultation with council also helps to provide outcomes that are appropriate in all levels of development and meet the needs of the community.
Creativity “Quality urban design encourages creative and innovative approaches. Creativity adds richness and diversity, and turns a functional place into a memorable place. Creativity facilitates new ways of thinking, adding willingness to think through problems afresh, to experiment and rewrite rules, to harness new technology, and to visualise new futures. Creative urban design supports a dynamic urban cultural life and fosters string urban identities.”
27/02/2020 Revision E [H20180069]
Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village, Te Awa - Urban Design Report
PLANNING AND POLICY CONSIDERATIONS
Design Outcome 5:
Design Outcome 8:
Out of sequence development will be discouraged by:
Subdivision design shall seek to activate the street frontage through the orientation of dwellings to face the street and overlook public open space (where applicable) to enable passive surveillance and improved street amenity outcomes.
- Requiring out of sequence development to be a Discretionary activity
The site is located in the Main Residential Zone with specific reference to the Te Awa Structure Plan. The proposed residential lifestyle proposal is zone appropriate. The proposal is assessed against criteria from: •
Appendix 29A – Te Awa Structure Plan Design Outcomes
•
District Plan Chapter 5 – Main Residential Zone Rules
Appendix 29A – Te Awa Structure Plan Design Outcomes Design Outcomes of the Structure Plan not applicable to the Urban Design aspect of this application have been excluded from the following design responses – this report is to be read in conjunction with the Civil Engineering and Servicing reports.
Design Outcome 1: Development will generally be of a low to moderate density. Subdivision and density requirements for permitted activities will be those applied in the Main Residential zone provided a minimum of 12 dwellings per hectare (net of roads and reserves) is generally achieved and the maximum density does not exceed 1 dwelling per 350m². Plan. The following summarises the proposed development:
- Requiring developers to fund the full cost of infrastructure
13.8ha
Reserve area:
2641m² (4 lots)
40m Designation:
31,249m² (to be vested)
Road Reserve:
28352m²
Total House Lots:
181 (excl. 4x reserve lots)
417m²
House Type:
36 Duplex Units (159m² floor area)
126 Single Units (158m² floor area)
This equates to 123.9 dwellings per hectare - which iexceeds the structure plan minimum of 12 dwellings per hectare. Average lot size is 417m² based on the 75,519m² area of developed lots (excl. reserve/park area and roading). As an average, this complies with the City of Napier District Plan maximum density limit of 1 dwelling per 350m2 (Condition 5.15).
Design Outcome 4: “Orderly and cost efficient staging will be achieved through the progressive construction of infrastructure in cells illustrated on the Structure Plan Map –Staging (Appendix 29F).” Appendix 29 of the District Plan contains the indicative Structure Plan for the area. Appendix Plan 29F shows the subject site is Stage 5 of the Te Awa development area and therefore will occur outside of the Structure Plan sequencing (Refer Design Outcome 4). It is believed that this will not directly impact upon longer term infrastructure planning for the area.
12
•
The Eriksen Road interface will provide road profiles and pedestrian connection in accordance to Council standard and design outcomes noted in the Structure Plan and noted previously in this report.
As per Outcome 4.
URBAN AMENITY DESIGN OUTCOMES Design Outcome 7: Local streets shall be orientated north-south where possible. Urban blocks shall be designed within the range of 60 to 100m to 90 by 170m. The collector street network providing the structure of the transport network shall intersect via single lane roundabouts. The use of on-street traffic calming using cycle lanes and on-street car parking and berm design, together with future provision for public transport infrastructure on collector streets, shall be considered fundamental design elements of the street cross section. The proposed road layout provides internal local streets that are orientated generally in a north-south direction. The main streets follow the block layout which is orientated in a northeast-southwest direction – parallel with lot boundaries and following the direction of both Eriksen Road and Willowbank Avenue. Internal east-west cross block local roads are provided to create a range of walkable urban blocks within the development.
•
17.0m wide corridor (NCC Major Local Road) – 8.0m wide road is to meander 1.5m along centerline, to act as a traffic calming device and to provide landscaped buildouts and provide added amenity within long runs of roadway
•
13.5m wide corridor (NCC Minor Local Road) – 6.0m wide road is to meander 1.5m along centerline, to act as a traffic calming device. Roads to terminate at 16.0m diameter culdesac heads.
•
13.5m wide corridor (NCC Minor Local Road) - 4.8m wide private accessway’s to lots on the western side of the development. No through roads.
•
Minimum pedestrian 1.4m wide footpaths to 1 side of every road
•
Pedestrian connection to shared pathways within designated drainage reserve
Total house Lot area: 75,519m² Average lot size:
The 40m wide stormwater/ drainage designation located along the Willowbank Ave. boundary of the site has provided the development with one active interface with the broader neighbourhood, being Eriksen Road. Larger lots (600-700 m²) have been located fronting Eriksen to reflect the existing urban grain located within the Te Awa/ South Napier area including new development opposite the site.
- Requiring out of sequence developments to provide at their own cost an internal buffer from surrounding rural landuse activities
With demand in the area, the subdivision proposes to provide Napier with a freehold lifestyle village. It is proposed that for the most part, all internal roads will be encapsulated within a gated style development. Road profiles internally are as follows:
Total Area:
•
•
Landscaped berm areas including street trees
Design Outcome 9: Provide for the consistent landscaping treatment of streets and reserves (including the Serpentine Pond environments and open drainage channels) that contribute to urban amenity and landscape values and retains and enhances vistas through the Te Awa Development area. •
Landscaping to streetscapes will be provided to meet council standard and will include street tree planting where services allow (predominantly to northern berms) and street planting in prominent locations such as entries and in buildouts and traffic calming devices.
Design Outcome 10: A consistent generously landscaped buffer strip of 3m will be provided along the western extent of the Te Awa Development area (fronting Willowbank Avenue) in accordance with the Te Awa Structure Plan Map (the 3m buffer is indicatively shown on the western boundary of the Te Awa Development area to the north and south of the open drain channel). This Design Outcome requires that 75% of the buffer setback is densely planted at the time of development with specimens that will reach 3-5m at maturity. •
A planted buffer will be incorporated along the drainage designation running along Willowbank Avenue providing separation from roadway and to soften the long fence line.
•
This planting is to be visually permeable to retain visual connection between the development, open space and roadways. Planting is to be low shrubs and groundcovers with clear trunked trees to allow visibility below crown. Trees will be installed in large container sizes to meet the mature height parameters.
Design Outcome 11: Off road pedestrian and cycle linkages (indicatively shown on the Te Awa Structure Plan Map) which link open spaces to each other, to the street network and the Serpentine stormwater pond shall be wide, open and safe and connect to one another. •
An allowance for a 2.5m wide shared pathway has been shown in the design within the 40m wide drainage designation connecting the broader recreation networks.
•
All other pathways proposed with the development are minimum 1.4m wide provided to one side of every road. These pathways are however not accessible to the public as they will be within the internal gated lifestyle village.
•
A pedestrian pathway is proposed to the Eriksen Road frontage which will match existing connecting the existing pedestrian network
27/02/2020 Revision E [H20180069]
Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village, Te Awa - Urban Design Report
Design Outcome 12: Road upgrading shall proceed in conjunction with staging of development within the Te Awa Development area. The road upgrading is shown indicatively on the Te Awa Structure Plan Map. The following works are required: •
riksen Road, 10m carriageway with cycle lanes, E footpaths, car park / landscape berm areas, pedestrian footpaths and verge. Eriksen Road will be designed and upgraded with single lane roundabouts at all major intersections (see below) with 120° deflection designed into the roundabout design to assist in reducing traffic speeds along this length of road.
•
treet design shall provide for consistent S landscaping treatment that contributes to urban amenity and landscape.
•
Eriksen Road will be upgraded as noted above. No roundabouts are proposed in the design.
•
This project aims to seamlessly integrate into the existing local character by tying in streetscape character, planting species and applying similar architectural typologies and built form, particularly on edges interfacing existing residential areas. The development will blend seamlessly into the wider area, fitting neatly into the urban fringe.
District Plan - Chapter 5 Main Residential Zone - Rules Refer to Assessment of Environmental Effects (AEE)
Design Outcome 13: No additional collector streets are necessary within the Te Awa Development area. Internal streets shall generally comply with Napier City Council standards and design for local streets, except where Council may wish to promote with a developer innovative and attractive solutions that enhance residential amenity, safety and sense of place. Therefore, Council will look favourably on alternative subdivision concepts that achieve safe, pedestrian and cycle friendly streets and discourage through traffic. Road profiles within the development site are as follows: •
17.0m wide corridor (NCC Major Local Road) – 8.0m wide road is to meander 1.5m along centerline, to act as a traffic calming device and to provide landscaped buildouts and provide added amenity within long runs of roadway
•
13.5m wide corridor (NCC Minor Local Road) – 6.0m wide road is to meander 1.5m along centerline, to act as a traffic calming device. Roads to terminate at 16.0m diameter culdesac heads.
•
13.5m wide corridor (NCC Minor Local Road) - 4.8m wide private accessway’s to lots on the western side of the development. No through roads.
•
Minimum pedestrian 1.4m wide footpaths to 1 side of every road
•
Pedestrian connection to shared pathways within designated drainage reserve
•
Landscaped berm areas including street trees
13
27/02/2020 Revision E [H20180069]
Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village, Te Awa - Urban Design Report
APPENDIX D Transport Assessment
Traffic Solutions Ltd
PROPOSED LIFESTYLE VILLAGE 16 AND 38 WILLOWBANK AVENUE, NAPIER
Traffic Impact Assessment
Date:
Issue B: 15 January 2020
Client:
Durham Property Limited c/- Development Nous Limited P O Box 385 Hastings 4156
File: 951ITA.docx
82 Hindmarsh Drive, Taupo 3330 Ph: 021 315 882 â&#x20AC;¢ Email: ian@tsol.co.nz
2
1.
INTRODUCTION
This report assesses the traffic effects of a proposed new lifestyle village to be located at 16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue in Napier. The site is located between Willowbank Avenue and Eriksen Road as indicated on Figure 1: Figure 1: Site Location
SITE
The site has frontage to both roads. Although it has a Willowbank Avenue address, it will only be accessible by motor vehicle off Eriksen Road. Matters that this report addresses include: •
A description of the proposal;
•
A description of the surrounding transport network;
•
Assessment of the amount of traffic that the development will generate and its effect on the road network;
•
Site access;
•
On-site parking provisions;
•
The layout of the internal roading and parking within the site.
3
2.
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
The proposed development is shown on the Landscape Concept Plan scheme plan prepared by Development Nous Limited (Revision J dated 15/01/2020). The site shares common boundaries with Eriksen Road on its eastern side and Willowbank Avenue on its western side. It is presently undeveloped. The development will contain 182 lots. Each of the lots will contain one dwelling except Lot 24, which will be used as a parking area. Therefore the development will have capacity for 181 dwellings. The proposed dwellings within the development will be targeted as housing for residents aged 55 years and above. These residents will be independent, and mobile. The development will be served by two vehicle crossings and three pedestrian footpaths off Eriksen Road. Additional pedestrian connections will also be available to an adjacent reserve along the southern and western site boundaries to Willowbank Road. A public footpath will also be provided along the length of the adjacent reserve. The development will be gated. There will be no direct vehicle access to Willowbank Avenue. A network of internal roadways and footpaths will provide access to and between the various parts of the development. As part of the development, Eriksen Road will be kerbed and channelled along its western side adjacent to the site frontage, and a new public footpath will be provided. Each dwelling will have a double garage attached. In addition, 21 parking spaces will also be provided for residents and their visitors to park, and for other vehicles such as boats or camper vans. There will also be room for parking on the driveway aprons in front of each garage for visitor or residentsâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; use. Parking for 745 vehicles will be provided in total.
3.
DISTRICT PLAN REQUIREMENTS
3.1
Zone
The site is located in the Main Residential zone in the operative Napier City District Plan.
3.2
Te Awa Structure Plan
The site is within the Te Awa Structure Plan area. Design outcomes listed in the Structure Plan that are relevant to transport follow. The design outcomes relevant to this particular development are highlighted in bold. Design Outcome 11: Off road pedestrian and cycle linkages (indicatively shown on the Te Awa Structure Plan Map) which link open spaces to each other, to the street network and the Serpentine stormwater pond shall be wide, open and safe and connect to one another.
4
Design Outcome 12: Road upgrading shall proceed in conjunction with staging of development within the Te Awa Development area. The road upgrading is shown indicatively on the Te Awa Structure Plan Map. The following works are required: Off Site Non Local
•
The following intersections will be upgraded: -
Riverbend / Latham Street intersection shall be upgraded to a single lane roundabout.
-
State Highway 2 / Kennedy Road intersection shall be upgraded to incorporate intersection control (improvements to signals).
Off Site Local
•
•
•
The following intersections shall be upgraded: -
State Highway 2 / Awatoto Road. - State Highway 2 / Te Awa Avenue / McGrath Street.
-
State Highway 2 / Marine Parade.
The following local collector streets shall be upgraded or constructed to Napier City Council standards and design and in general accordance with the Main Street and Local Street typical cross sections (see the Te Awa Structure Plan – Transportation report) to serve as the primary connections through the Te Awa Development area: -
Kenny Road, 10m carriageway with cycle lanes, footpaths, car park / landscaped berm areas, pedestrian footpaths and verge.
-
Eriksen Road, 10m carriageway with cycle lanes, footpaths, car park / landscape berm areas, pedestrian footpaths and verge. Eriksen Road will be designed and upgraded with single lane roundabouts at all major intersections (see below) with 120o deflection designed into the roundabout design to assist in reducing traffic speeds along this length of road.
-
Three (no. 3) additional cross link roads (linking Eriksen Road to Willowbank Avenue and Te Awa Avenue), 10m carriageway with cycle lanes, footpaths, car park / landscape berm areas, pedestrian footpaths and verge.
-
Three (no. 3) priority intersections shall be provided to Te Awa Avenue.
-
One (no. 1) priority intersection shall be provided to Willowbank Avenue.
Single lane roundabouts shall be provided at the following intersections: -
Eriksen Road / Kenny Road.
-
Along Eriksen Road at all junctions with cross link roads – three (no. 3) intersections.
-
Willowbank Avenue / Kenny Road.
-
Willowbank Avenue / Eriksen Road.
-
Street design shall provide for consistent landscaping treatment that contributes to urban amenity and landscape.
5
Design Outcome 13: No additional collector streets are necessary within the Te Awa Development area. Internal streets shall generally comply with Napier City Council standards and design for local streets, except where Council may wish to promote with a developer innovative and attractive solutions that enhance residential amenity, safety and sense of place. Therefore Council will look favourably on alternative subdivision concepts that achieve safe, pedestrian and cycle friendly streets and discourage through traffic.
3.3
Road Classifications
Roads in the immediate site vicinity are classified in the Council’s road hierarchy as follows: • • •
3.4
Willowbank Avenue Eriksen Road Hurunui Drive
collector local local
Parking Space Requirement
The District Plan parking requirement of the proposed development is assessed as follows: •
Dwelling units
181 units @ 2 spaces per unit
362 spaces
With 745 on-site spaces proposed, the development will exceed the requirement by a significant margin.
3.5
Cycle Parking Requirement
Rule 61.14B requires 1 cycle park per 5 carpark spaces. Cycles can be stored in the garages of each dwelling. The requirement is met.
3.6
Vehicle Access Requirements
The District Plan refers to the Napier City Code of Practice for vehicle crossing requirements. Drawing F2.7 in The Code of Practice requires vehicle crossings in residential zones to be no more than 6m wide at the site boundary. Two crossings will be provided. The northern crossing will be 6m wide in accordance with the Code. The southern crossing will have an overall 12.5m width, which does not comply with the Code, but will be specifically designed as a main gateway entry. This access assessed in more detail later in this report.
4.
TRANSPORT ENVIRONMENT
4.1
Existing Road Geometrics
North of Hurunui Drive, Eriksen Road is a rural unkerbed road with 6.4m width between seal edges. The road is two-laned. There are no paint markings or parking controls. There are also no footpaths or cycle facilities. South of Hurunui Drive the road is 8.4m wide between a kerb on the eastern side and the seal edge on the western side. The eastern side was recently kerbed and channelled,
6
and a footpath provided, as part of residential land development on the eastern side of the road. Eriksen Road has a straight and level alignment, with clear visibility along it. There is a slight curve in the horizontal alignment near the northern site boundary. There are two speed thresholds adjacent to the site. These consist of kerbed side islands and paint hatching, which effectively reduce the roadway width through the thresholds to one-lane flow at a time. Hurunui Drive is a newly constructed residential road that intersects with Eriksen Road directly opposite the site and connects to Te Awa Avenue at its eastern end. The road is 9m wide between kerbs. It has a straight and level alignment. The intersection at Eriksen Road has a “Give Way” control. Willowbank Avenue is a high speed rural road. It is 10.5m wide between seal edges, including sealed shoulders. It has a straight and level alignment with clear visibility along it. The northern end of Eriksen Road intersects with Willowbank Avenue some distance north of the site. The intersection is presently barriered off, so Eriksen Road is effectively a cul-de-sac. Design Outcome 12 in the Te Awa Structure Plan indicates that Eriksen Road will be realigned at its northern end to intersect with Willowbank Avenue directly opposite Geddis Avenue, and a roundabout control installed at the intersection at some future time.
4.2
Proposed Eriksen Road Upgrade
The development plans show that a new kerb and channel will be installed along the western side of Eriksen Road adjacent to the site. The roadway width between the proposed kerb and the existing kerb where it is already installed on the eastern side will be 10m, as specified in Design Outcome 12 in the Structure Plan. A footpath will also be provided along the western side adjacent to the site as indicated, for general public use.
4.3
Passenger Transport Services
There are no bus services on Eriksen Road or Willowbank Avenue. The nearest available service routes are: •
Route 11 – Napier to Havelock North via Te Awa Avenue. Frequency of service 2 buses each way in the weekday morning commuter peak and 2 buses each way in the evening commuter peak only.
•
Route 14 – Napier, Maraenui and Onekawa loop via Geddis Avenue. Frequency of service half hourly in commuter peaks, hourly at other times, 4 buses on a Saturday and no services Sunday.
Bus stops are located on Te Awa Avenue about 600m walk from the site, and on Geddis Avenue just west of its intersection with Willowbank Avenue, about 450m walk from the site. Available bus services in the site vicinity are sparse.
7
4.4
Traffic Volumes
Traffic count data shows that Eriksen Road south of Kenny Road carries 400 vehicles per day. Existing traffic flows north of Kenny Road, close to the site, are lower, probably no more than 200 vehicles per day, although this will increase with development in the surrounding area. Willowbank Avenue presently carries about 4,000 vehicles per day. There is a considerable amount of unused capacity on both roads.
4.5
Traffic Safety
During the 5-year period 2015 to 2019 the New Zealand Transport Agency recorded 3 accidents on Eriksen Road north of Kenny Road. Both of these accidents involved lost control vehicles. Speed, alcohol and unfamiliarity with the vehicle were contributing factors. During the same period, 4 accidents were recorded at the cross-intersection of Kenny Road with Eriksen Road. All of these involved collisions at 90-degrees. The proposed roundabout at this intersection referred to in Design Outcome 12 in the Te Awa Structure Plan should address this existing traffic safety issue. No existing traffic safety issues of direct relevance to the proposed development are evident in the accident statistics.
5.
TRAFFIC GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION
5.1
Trip Generation
The following sources have been used to assess the traffic generation of the proposed development: •
New Zealand Trips and Database Bureau (NZTPDB);
•
RTA Guide to Traffic Generating Developments (Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales) - October 2002;
•
ITE Trip Generation 7th Edition (Institute of Transportation Engineers, USA);
•
Surveys of traffic flows and at other residential subdivisions and retirement villages, carried out by Traffic Solutions Limited.
The sources above indicate that retirement villages typically generate traffic flows up to 3 vehicle trips per day per dwelling, and peak hourly flows of approximately 0.3 vehicle trips per hour (tph) per dwelling. Surveys also show that normal residential subdivisions generate about 9 vehicle trips per day per dwelling, and peak hourly flows of about 0.9 tph per dwelling. While this particular development will be targeted to seniors, it will not be a retirement village. Therefore I expect the development will generate traffic at a ratio somewhere between that of a normal residential subdivision and a retirement village. It is anticipated that about 30% of residents will still be of working age, and on that basis I consider that the development will generate traffic flows at ratios of about 5 vehicle trips per day per
8
dwelling, and 0.5 tph per dwelling in a peak hour. These ratios equate to actual flows of about 900 vehicle trips per day and a peak hourly flow of about 90 tph.
5.2
Trip Distribution
While Eriksen Road remains disconnected from Willowbank Avenue at its northern end, traffic flows the development will generate towards the north will need to hook around via Eriksen Road south and Kenny Road, or use Hurunui Drive and Te Awa Avenue. Figure 2 shows how I consider generated traffic will be distributed on the network immediately adjoining the site, under this scenario. Figure 2: Distribution of Generated Traffic â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Eriksen Road Disconnected
Figure 3 shows how I predict generated traffic will be distributed on the network immediately adjoining the site, if Eriksen Road is reconnected to Willowbank Avenue at its northern end in accordance with the Structure Plan.
9
Figure 3: Distribution of Generated Traffic â&#x20AC;&#x201C; Eriksen Road Reconnected
In Figures 2 and 3 I have assumed that 50% of traffic is entering traffic and 50% is exiting traffic. This will not necessarily be the case, however the flows do provide an indication of the magnitude of additional traffic that will likely use each approach road. Regardless of whether Eriksen Road is eventually reconnected to Willowbank Avenue or not, Figures 2 and 3 show that the traffic that will be generated on any one part of the transport network will be low, and well within available capacity.
6.
SITE ACCESS
6.1
Vehicle Access
The site will be accessed via two new vehicle crossings. The southern crossing will be the grand entry and some effort will be made to make it attractive. The northern access may also likely be well used by future residents, particularly if Eriksen Road is reconnected to Willowbank Avenue at its northern end, albeit it will be less conspicuous. The northern access will be 6m wide at the site frontage boundary. Such width will cater for simultaneous two-way vehicle flow, and service and emergency vehicles adequately. The southern access will have an overall 12.5m width. This will consist of separate entry and exit carriageways each 4m wide with a kerbed median separating them. The overall width exceeds the 6m maximum permitted in the Councilâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Code of Practice, however, the entry and exit carriageways considered separately will be within the requirement. Such a
10
width is suitable for cars to enter and exit the site simultaneously and is wide enough to accommodate larger vehicles such as emergency vehicles and service vehicles. The separation between the entry and exit lanes will provide a median shelter for any passing pedestrians, thus mitigating any adverse effects of the overall wider crossing. The northern access will not be located near any road intersections. The southern access will be located 35m north of the intersection at Hurunui Drive. Such a separation is considered to be sufficient to avoid conflicts occurring between vehicles turning at the access and vehicles turning at the intersection. I consider there will be no adverse traffic effects arising from the location of either access. Both accesses will be gated for security. The gate across the northern access will be located 6m inside the site boundary, which will provide enough room for an entering car to wait entirely within the site for the gate to open without overhanging into the road reserve. The gate at the southern access will be 12m inside the boundary, which will enable two cars or one service vehicle to wait within the site for it to open. I consider that the gate arrangement can be accommodated satisfactorily at the accesses. Available sight distances from both vehicle crossings are as follows: •
Northern access:
220m northwards, 300m+ southwards
•
Southern access:
300m northwards, 300m+ southwards
The NZTA publication RTS 6 “Guidelines for Visibility at Driveways” recommends at least 40m of sight distance at property accesses on local roads operating at 50 km/h. For a higher operating speed of 100 km/h, which will become less likely with increasing urbanisation of the neighbourhood, the recommendation is 160m. The available sight distances will exceed both recommendations, even at the higher operating speed. I consider that visibility is adequate to enable both accesses to operate safely.
6.2
Pedestrian Access
Two pedestrian footpaths will be provided into the site adjacent to the main southern vehicle access, and one footpath will be located into the site adjacent to the northern vehicle access. These will all connect to the new public footpath to be provided along Eriksen Road. It will also be possible to walk between the site and the reserve along the southern and western site boundaries, through various reserves. These links will provide access to a proposed new public footpath along the full length of the reserve. In my opinion, the proposed footpath accesses will provide safe and convenient routes on and off the site for pedestrians, separate from motor traffic.
7.
SITE LAYOUT
The individual lots will be accessed from the internal driveway network. Road 1 as identified on the landscape concept plan will be 8m wide between kerbs. All other internal roads will be 6m wide between kerbs. These widths will easily accommodate two-way vehicle flow, and emergency and other larger vehicles that may access the site from time to time.
11
Most of the internal driveways will be cul-de-sacs and will carry very little traffic. Each culde-sac will include a 16m diameter turning head, which is easily sufficient to accommodate turning cars. Three cross-intersections are proposed within the site. Uncontrolled cross-intersections can be notorious for creating conflicts between vehicles manoeuvring through them, and often drivers are uncertain who has priority. To improve traffic management at the cross intersections within this development it is proposed to install roundabout controls. The central islands will be small and mountable so that larger vehicles can drive over them if necessary. In my opinion, these roundabouts will provide effective traffic control, and I support their use. Each of the dwellings will have a double garage attached for residentsâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; use. Driveway aprons in front of each garage will also accommodate additional parked vehicles such as for visitors. Some limited parking could also be accommodated along the internal roads if desired, without unduly obstructing vehicle movement. Some parking will also be provided within the site for additional residentsâ&#x20AC;&#x2122; vehicles and their visitors, and other vehicles such as boat trailers or camper vans. These spaces will be provided along the northern driveway entry and is a separate carpark area on Lot 24 immediately adjacent. Parking spaces will be oriented at 90-degrees to the driveway aisles. All of these spaces will be at least 7m long and 3.1m wide, and available manoeuvring widths will be at least 6.9m. The parking areas will be over-sized compared to the dimension requirements specified in Appendix 23 in the District Plan. Vehicle tracking shows that the carpark areas will accommodate vehicles of 6.4m length. Internal footpaths will be provided through the site, along one side of every internal driveway. Pedestrians will also be able to walk around the site easily and safely, separate from motor traffic.
8.
CONCLUSIONS
The amount of traffic that the proposed development will generate onto the road network will be low, too low to have a significant effect on the network capacity or traffic safety. That part of Eriksen Road immediately adjacent to the site will be widened and kerbed and channelled, and a footpath provided, along its western side to an urban standard. The work will be carried out in to satisfy the relevant design outcomes in the Te Awa Structure Plan. The proposed vehicle crossings will have adequate sight lines to enable them to operate safely. The accesses will both be remote enough from any road intersections that conflicts with turning vehicles will not occur. Separate footpath accesses will be provided into the site for pedestrians all around the site, which will enable pedestrians to access the site conveniently and safely. The proposal will exceed the District Plan parking requirement by a significant margin. I consider that there will be an adequate supply of on-site parking to accommodate expected demands. Adverse off-site parking effects are unlikely to occur. The proposed on-site parking will comply with the dimension requirements specified in the District Plan. I consider that the parking spaces shown on the plans will be accessible by the types of vehicles they are intended for.
12
Taking into consideration all of the above, I consider that the traffic and parking effects of the proposed development will be less than minor, and that resource consent could be granted from a traffic engineering perspective.
Ian Constable Traffic Engineer
APPENDIX E Land Development Engineering Services Report
LAND DEVELOPMENT REPORT
REV B
DURHAM PROPERTIES LTD
16-38 WILLOWBANK AVE NAPIER
Superseded 308 Queen Street E, Hastings 4122 | PO Box 758, Hastings | +64 6 876 7646 | admin@sgl.nz |www.stratagroup.net.nz
J4345
DURHAM PROPERTIES LTD Te Awa Development Document Prepared for and on behalf of Strata Group Consulting Engineers Ltd by:
Daniel Joblin Civil Engineer
Document Reviewed By Russell Nettlingham Civil Engineer/Principal
Strata Group Consulting Engineers Ltd P.O Box 758 Hastings 4156 New Zealand Telephone Email Website
+ 64 6 8767646 dan@sgl.nz www.stratagroup.net.nz
Document Control Project Name
Durham Property Ltd 138 Eriksen Road, Napier
Project Ref
J4345
Version Revision B
Date
Status Issued for Resource Consent
Version
Extent of Revision
Prepared DJ / RN
This report caters specifically for the requirements for this project and this client. No warranty is intended or implied for use by any third party and no responsibility is undertaken to any third party for any material contained herein.
Superseded
308 Queen Street E, Hastings 4122 | PO Box 758, Hastings | +64 6 876 7646 | admin@sgl.nz |www.stratagroup.net.nz
Table of Contents 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 4 2. Design Considerations ........................................................................................................................ 5 2.1
Topographical Information ...................................................................................................... 5
2.2
Staging .................................................................................................................................... 5
3. Preliminary Road Design .................................................................................................................... 7 3.1
Existing Roads ........................................................................................................................ 7
3.2
Proposed Roads ..................................................................................................................... 7
4. Earthworks .......................................................................................................................................... 8 5. Stormwater .......................................................................................................................................... 9 6. Wastewater ....................................................................................................................................... 10 7. Water Supply ..................................................................................................................................... 11 8. Utility Services ................................................................................................................................... 12 9. Summary ........................................................................................................................................... 13 Appendix A. Drawings ........................................................................................................................... 14
Superseded 308 Queen Street E, Hastings 4122 | PO Box 758, Hastings | +64 6 876 7646 | admin@sgl.nz |www.stratagroup.net.nz
1. Introduction Strata Group Consulting Engineers Ltd has been engaged by Durham Property Ltd (the Applicant) to investigate the civil engineering aspects of the proposed subdivision at 16-38 Willowbank Ave. This report forms an engineering assessment for the proposal and includes investigation into the following aspects: • • • • • •
Preliminary Roading design Earthworks Stormwater collection and disposal Wastewater disposal Water supply Utilities
The purpose of the investigations summarised in this report is to accompany an application to be made to the Napier City Council for a residential subdivision. The legal description for the site is Lot 1 DP14417 4.5526Ha and Lot 2 DP14417 9.2648Ha. The proposed subdivision consists of: • • • •
19 Residential allotments fronting Eriksen Road 167 Lifestyle Units 2,010m of private accessway A drainage reserve and service corridors
Figure 1: Location Map
Superseded 308 Queen Street E, Hastings 4122 | PO Box 758, Hastings | +64 6 876 7646 | admin@sgl.nz |www.stratagroup.net.nz
2. Design Considerations To complete the engineering assessment of the proposed subdivision it was first necessary to obtain the following: • • • 2.1
Sufficient topographical information regarding the site, including suitably detailed contour data and aerial imagery. Information regarding any protected areas, easements or areas of significance within the site which may have an impact on the layout Sufficient information with regards to existing services within & surrounding the site Topographical Information
A current aerial photograph was captured by drone and a detailed topo survey undertaken Surveying the Bay for the proposed development site and existing services. The subdivision scheme plan was prepared by Development Nous. 2.2
Staging
The development would be undertaken in stages commencing from Eriksen Road with the road frontage residential lots. The development would progress from there in groups of approximately 20 lots. The first stage involves connection to the underground services. Roading is available at the site boundary. The water supply connection can also be made to existing services in Ericksen Road. The stormwater would require NCC to install the proposed box culvert under Eriksen Road to the Cowshed Drain on the western side. A gravity sewer connection is available in Ericksen Road adjacent to the residential lots which provides services without having to install a pump station. Beyond the road frontage lots, the staging would commence from the main entrance to the lifestyle village and the extents that can be serviced by the first pump station. There are two sewer pump stations proposed within the development area. The first pump station could be connected to the existing 100mm diameter pumping at the front of the development, however we have proposed that the connection be made further to the south where the pump main increases in size from 100mm to 150mm. This connection is some 250m south of the development and would be undertaken at the developer’s expense as provided for in the structure plan. Refer to the proposed staging plan on the following page.
Superseded 308 Queen Street E, Hastings 4122 | PO Box 758, Hastings | +64 6 876 7646 | admin@sgl.nz |www.stratagroup.net.nz
Figure 2: Proposed Development Staging
Superseded 308 Queen Street E, Hastings 4122 | PO Box 758, Hastings | +64 6 876 7646 | admin@sgl.nz |www.stratagroup.net.nz
3. Preliminary Road Design 3.1
Existing Roads
The existing roads consist of Eriksen Road and Willowbank Road. There is no access onto Willowbank Road from the proposed development. Eriksen Road is partially formed to service the residential development on the Eastern side. A similar upgrade and widening on the western side is required to service the proposed development. 3.2
Proposed Roads
The 19 Lots fronting Eriksen Road would have access directly from the upgraded road. The remainder of the development would be serviced with two entry points onto Eriksen Road. Within the development the roading network is constructed in a 13.5m wide road reserve. The carriageway width is 6m with asphalt surfacing and kerb and channel both sides. A single 1.4m wide concrete foot path on one side provides safe pedestrian linkages to the open space areas and walkway network. The roading philosophy is one of connectivity for both pedestrians and vehicles. Cul-de-sac streets and rear sections have been avoided where possible. The narrow roads are designed to encourage a slow speed environment and pedestrians to have a number of route selections to gain access to the open space and wider walkway network. The road design and formations are generally in accordance with the Code of Practice and District Plan requirements for minor roads. Final pavement design will be based on design traffic volumes and subgrade CBR strengths as determined by the geotechnical engineer.
Photograph 1: Existing Eriksen Road formation (to be replicated)
Superseded 308 Queen Street E, Hastings 4122 | PO Box 758, Hastings | +64 6 876 7646 | admin@sgl.nz |www.stratagroup.net.nz
4. Earthworks The majority of the existing site contour is above the modeled flood level of RL 11.28m for the Te Awa area (Beca three waters report), however the lower lying areas would require imported structural fill of up to 0.6m to mitigate potential flood risks. It is expected river silt will be used as bulk fill which is common practice for the Te Awa and Parklands development areas. Land to the East of the proposed site has been lifted with imported material during previous construction. It is intended to match into these existing levels and shape lots to fall toward roads and accessways. The structure plan drainage swale along the Western and Southern boundaries will provide fill material for raising the land and will minimise the volume of imported material. It is proposed to batter back into adjacent land at the northern boundary. Land owner approval for the batter has been sought and an agreement reached. Topsoil will be stripped and stockpiled prior to bulk filling and placed back on lots before grassing. Approximately 40,000 m3 of topsoil will be stripped to stockpile. Excess topsoil would be removed from site on completion of the bulk earthworks. A site-specific earthworks and silt management plan will be submitted to Napier City Council for approval prior to earthworks commencing on site. Preliminary earthworks volumes are as follows: • • • •
Strip top soil to stockpile 40,000m³ Cut open drainage channel 33,000m³ Fill low lying land 26,000m³ Import river silt 7,000m³
Superseded 308 Queen Street E, Hastings 4122 | PO Box 758, Hastings | +64 6 876 7646 | admin@sgl.nz |www.stratagroup.net.nz
5. Stormwater The proposed stormwater system has been designed to convey the development catchment through a piped network to the proposed structure plan swale drain along Western and Southern boundaries. This connects into Te Awa structure plan attenuation pond via the upgraded Cowshed drain swale. The swale drains are located within the 40m wide designation area and would be constructed to the profile determined in the Beca report and the structure plan. This is a similar profile to the Cowshed Drain re-construction on the Western side of Eriksen Road. Refer Photograph 2 below.
Photograph 2: Cowshed Drain West of Eriksen Road
The piped network has four discharge points into the swale drain. Three of these are into the Willowbank Road drain and one into the Cowshed Drain. The Eriksen Road allotments are serviced with a 375mm diameter pipe that would discharge into the proposed box culvert under Eriksen Road. The pipes range in size from 300mm to 450mm diameter and the length of each run has been controlled by the outlet invert level to avoid a “bubble-up” system into the open drain network. Stormwater design parameters have been taken from NCC CoP 2015; I1.9. Coefficients have been set at 0.55 for all allotments except lots 12-19 of Stage 1 where owing to the potential for higher site coverage (up to 56%) a higher coefficient of 0.65 (‘Town house development’ from NZBC E1/VM1) has been adopted. Roads and reserves have been assigned coefficients of 0.85 and 0.30 respectively. The pipe network has been designed to allow for both a 10% and combined 10/2% AEP events. Rainfall data has been taken from HIRDS V3 with a 2.1 degree increase for expected 2090 climate change. Stormwater calculations will be submitted with detailed design at the Engineering approval phase.
Superseded 308 Queen Street E, Hastings 4122 | PO Box 758, Hastings | +64 6 876 7646 | admin@sgl.nz |www.stratagroup.net.nz
6. Wastewater Wastewater services can be provided to the site through the existing gravity and pumping mains in Ericksen Road. The gravity connection is on the eastern side of Eriksen Road and is at adequate depth to extend it along the full length of the road frontage allotments. The remainder of the development would be serviced with two pump stations located beside the swale drain for ease of access. These pump stations are positioned to keep the gravity pipe and chamber depths to a minimum for safety in design considerations. A 100mm sewer pumping main in Ericksen Road could be used to provide a connection for the first pump station, however when the second pump station comes on line, it is likely that the connection point would need to be extended to where it enlarges to a 150mm pumping main some 250m south of the development site. Appropriate easements in gross are proposed to cater for council assets laid in private land. The wastewater demand is as follows: Pump Station 1 • • • •
Allotments serviced: 97 Units Land area: 97 x 400m2 = 3.88 Ha Peak wet weather flow (PWWF): 3.88 x 0.3 Litres/sec/Ha = 1.16 Litres/sec Storage: 5.6m3
Pump Station 2 • • • •
Allotments serviced: 67 Units Land area: 67 x 400m2 = 2.68 Ha Peak wet weather flow (PWWF): 2.68 x 0.3 Litres/sec/Ha = 0.8 Litres/sec Storage: 3.8m3
Gravity to Existing Eriksen Road Network • • •
Allotments serviced: 19 Lots Land area: 19 x 700m2 = 1.33 Ha Peak wet weather flow (PWWF): 1.33 x 0.3 Litres/sec/Ha = 0.4 Litres/sec
The total PWWF for the development is 2.36 Litres/sec.
Superseded 308 Queen Street E, Hastings 4122 | PO Box 758, Hastings | +64 6 876 7646 | admin@sgl.nz |www.stratagroup.net.nz
7. Water Supply A water supply for the development can be fed from the 200mm diameter main in Ericksen Road. This main currently terminates at the Hurunui Drive intersection, but we understand that NCC are intending to extend the main along Ericksen Drive. The extended Council main would provide two connection points to the development as shown on the proposed water layout plan, Appendix A. Within the development, a principal DN150 main would run along one side of the road with a looped 63mm rider main running back along the opposite side. A series of appropriately sized feeder branches will be run up each accessway to serve the required Lots. The site also has a 100mm and a 75mm bore for irrigation and domestic water supply as per Figure 3 below. It is proposed that the bore will be professionally plugged and removed below ground level.
Figure 3: Existing Water Bores
The water demand for the development is as follows: • • • • • • •
Residential dwellings: 19 houses x 3.5 people per dwelling = 67 people Lifestyle village: 164 units x 1.25 people per unit = 205 people Total occupancy = 272 people Average daily demand per person: 250 Litres/person/day Average daily demand: 250 L/p/d x 272 people = 68 m3/day Peaking Factor 5 Peak daily demand: 3.93 Litres/sec
Superseded 308 Queen Street E, Hastings 4122 | PO Box 758, Hastings | +64 6 876 7646 | admin@sgl.nz |www.stratagroup.net.nz
8. Utility Services Power and telecommunications have been laid through to the proposed development site as part of the Eriksen Road and Hurunui Road residential development. It is intended to extend these services through the development. Provisional width for laying utilities will be allowed for within the proposed road corridor in accordance with NCC code. The existing overhead power lines in Eriksen Road would remain in place. Undergrounding would be undertaken in the future by Unison as part of their seismic upgrade programme. Power-Co have been approached to service the site for Gas. It is expected this service will run with others in the proposed trenches.
Superseded 308 Queen Street E, Hastings 4122 | PO Box 758, Hastings | +64 6 876 7646 | admin@sgl.nz |www.stratagroup.net.nz
9. Summary From our assessment of the site, engineering servicing for the proposed development can be achieved to an acceptable standard as follows: •
Earthworks will be required to bring the proposed land above the modeled 2% AEP flood level for the Te Awa development area of RL 11.28 (300mm freeboard is required above the flood level for building platforms – RL 11.58). Approximately 6,000m³ of imported structural fill is proposed.
•
All proposed roading for the development can be constructed in accordance with the NCC Engineering Code of Practice.
•
Conveyance of onsite stormwater up to 2% AEP event can be provided for via a piped network discharging into the Te Awa stormwater system which includes the proposed Willowbank Avenue and Cowshed Drain open channels
•
Potable water can be supplied via the DN200 Eriksen Road trunk main and proposed extension.
•
A gravity sewer network can service the Eriksen Road frontage lots
•
Two sewer pump stations within the lifestyle village would collect and pump to the common main in Eriksen Road.
•
Utility services can be provided to all sites.
All final designs and calculations for engineering approval will comply with NCC code of practice and district plan rules and regulations. Preliminary desktop and site investigations have not revealed any significant engineering issues for the proposed development.
Superseded 308 Queen Street E, Hastings 4122 | PO Box 758, Hastings | +64 6 876 7646 | admin@sgl.nz |www.stratagroup.net.nz
Appendix A. Drawings
Superseded 308 Queen Street E, Hastings 4122 | PO Box 758, Hastings | +64 6 876 7646 | admin@sgl.nz |www.stratagroup.net.nz
LOT 1 DP 6396 GENERAL NOTES:
· BOUNDARY INFORMATION/DATA SHOWN IN THIS DRAWING HAS BEEN SOURCED FROM QUICKMAP. STRATA GROUP CONSULTING ENGINEERS TAKE NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ACCURACY OF THIS INFORMATION/DATA.
LOT 2 DP 6396
· COORDINATE DATUM: NZGD 2000 HB CIRCUIT HEIGHT
DATUM IS LOCAL AUTHORITY DATUM 1972 (MSL = 10.00m) ORIGIN OF HEIGHTS: BP 68 SO 9387.
· DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING. ANY ADDITIONAL DIMENSIONS SHOULD CONTACTS BELOW.
BE
REQUESTED
FROM
THE
· ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN METRES UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE.
LOT 1 DP 14417
· AERIAL IMAGE IS SOURCED FROM LINZ IS INDICATIVE ONLY.
AV
E
LOT 3 DP 394762
ERIK
SEN
ROA D
WI
LL
OW
BA
NK
LOT 1 DP 318389
LOT 2 DP 14417 HURUNUI DRIVE
LOT 9 DP 6055
Superseded
LOT 10 DP 6055 SAFETY IN DESIGN
ALL REASONABLY PRACTICABLE STEPS HAVE BEEN TAKEN TO ENSURE SAFETY IN DESIGN HAS BEEN CONSIDERED WITHIN STRATA GROUP'S SCOPE OF WORK FOR THIS DESIGN IN ACCORDANCE WITH IPENZ PRACTICE NOTE 07 "DESIGN FOR SAFETY IN BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES (JULY 2006)". IT REMAINS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER AND/OR OPERATOR TO ENSURE APPROPRIATE PRACTICES ARE IN PLACE TO PROTECT THE SAFETY OF THE WORKERS AND THE PUBLIC IN THE OPERATION OF THE FACILITY.
CLIENT:
2
FOR NOTIFICATION
-
-
1
-
-
-
REV
REASON FOR ISSUE
DATE
BY
PATH:J:\DUR - DURHAM PROPERTIES\J4345 - TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)\2 - DWGS\XREF'S\J4345 - BASE SERVICES PLAN 2020.DWG DATE:7/2/2018
THE CONTRACTOR IS TO BE AWARE OF ALL INSPECTIONS TO BE MADE BY THE ENGINEER AS A REQUIREMENT OF THE PRODUCER STATEMENT PS4 CONSTRUCTION REVIEW DOCUMENTATION. THE ENGINEER WILL REQUIRE 24 HOURS PRIOR NOTIFICATION FOR ALL INSPECTIONS.
DURHAM PROPERTY LTD
P 06 876 7646 F 06 876 7645 www.stratagroup.net.nz Structural
Fire
PO BOX 758 Business HQ 1/308 Queen Street East Hastings, New Zealand Civil Project Management
PROJECT:
TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)
TITLE:
SITE LOCATION PLAN
DJ EM CHECKED DJ DATE OCT 18
DESIGNED DRAWN
PROJECT NO.: This drawing and its contents are the property of Strata Group Consulting Engineers Ltd. Any unauthorized employment or reproduction in full or part is forbidden.
0
250
500
750
Full Size 1:12500 ; Half Size 1:25000 Scale (m)
J4345
SHEET:
C001
REVISION:
2
LOT 1 DP 6396 GENERAL NOTES: LOT 77
· BOUNDARY INFORMATION/DATA SHOWN IN THIS DRAWING HAS BEEN SOURCED FROM QUICKMAP. STRATA GROUP CONSULTING ENGINEERS TAKE NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ACCURACY OF THIS INFORMATION/DATA.
LOT 79 LOT 75
· COORDINATE DATUM: NZGD 2000 HB CIRCUIT HEIGHT
8m WIDE DRAINAGE CORRIDOR/ RESERVE
DATUM IS LOCAL AUTHORITY DATUM 1972 (MSL = 10.00m) ORIGIN OF HEIGHTS: BP 68 SO 9387.
· DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING. ANY ADDITIONAL
LOT 82
LOT 73
THE
LOT 72
· ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN METRES UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE.
THE
LOT 83 LOT 84
RO A
D2
LOT 93
LOT 96
LOT 20 LOT 89 LOT 85
LOT 92
LOT 71
LOT 19
LOT 21
LOT 91
STAGE 7
LOT 70
13
.5m
LOT 104
PR IV
LOT 98
LOT 68
STAGE 6
E AV
AD
NK
OA D PR IV
AT ER
LOT 28
.5m 13
LOT 136
LOT 140
PR .5m
13
.5m
LOT 158
LOT 160
RO AD
LOT 155
302
LOT 11
LOT 31
LOT 142
LOT 56
LOT 10
LOT 143 LOT 141
6
LOT 33
LOT 9
LOT 144
LOT 154
LOT 161
LOT 34 LOT 8
LOT 157 LOT 153
mR
LOT 152
13.5
m RO
LOT 147
AD 7
LOT 177 LOT 178
LOT 169
.5m
LOT 48
RO
AD
9
LOT 306
LOT 172
LOT 175
LOT 176
LOT 182
LOT 38
STAGE 2 LOT 181
LOT 39
LOT 179
LOT 40
LOT 180
LOT 4
LOT 3
LOT 41 LOT 46
LOT 42
LOT 45
HURUNUI DRIVE
LOT 5
STAGE 1a
301
LOT 47
LOT 6
LOT 37
LOT 171 13
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ENTRANCE
ROA
LOT 174
AD
LOT 36
MAIN
LOT 173
LOT 168
LOT 49
E RO
LOT 7
LOT 170 LOT 165
LOT 50
RAN C
LOT 35
D (1 )
LOT 167
LOT 51
ENT
LOT 148
LOT 164 LOT 52
AIN
LOT 146
LOT 151
LOT 166
LOT 53
17.0 mM
LOT 145
17.0 m
.5m
LOT 149
13.5
LOT 162
PR IV
AT ER
OA D
LOT 55
13
LOT 150
OAD 8
LOT 156
LOT 163
STAGE 1b
LOT 32 LOT 138
13
LOT 57
LOT 139
OA
AD RO TE IVA
8m WIDE DRAINAGE CORRIDOR/ RESERVE
LOT 137
LOT 159
LOT 30
STAGE 5 D8
LL WI
STAGE 4
LOT 58
LOT 116
LOT 132 LOT 133
LOT 12
LOT 117
LOT 134
LOT 1 DP 318389
LOT 29
LOT 120
RO A
LOT 135
LOT 59
LOT 115
D5
LOT 131
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ENTRANCE
LOT 13
LOT 118
13.5 mR
BA OW
LOT 61
D2
LOT 119
LOT 121 13 .5m
ROA
LOT 14
LOT 27
4
LOT 124 LOT 130
NCE
LOT 26
LOT 114
RO
TRA
LOT 15
17.0
LOT 122 LOT 125
LOT 62
LOT 54
13 .5m
m EN
LOT 25
(1)
17
LOT 126
LOT 129
LOT 63
LOT 113
LOT 110
LOT 123
303
LOT 60
STAGE 3
LOT 109
PR
LOT 128
17.0
LOT 112
LO T4
RO AD
LOT 127
13 .5m
LOT 64
LOT 111
LOT 108
LOT 102
IVA TE
LOT 65
LOT 17
LOT 16
LOT 107
LOT 101
LOT 307
LOT 23
LOT 24
LOT 100
LOT 66
STAGE 1c
LOT 87
3
LOT 106
LOT 103
8m WIDE DRAINAGE CORRIDOR/ RESERVE
AD
LOT 105 LOT 99
LOT 67
RO
LOT 18
LOT 22
ROA D
LOT 3 DP 394762
LOT 69
LOT 86
SEN
· PROPOSED CONTOUR INTERVALS ARE AT 0.10m.
LOT 88
LOT 97
ERIK
ONLY.
AIN ROA D
· AERIAL IMAGE IS SOURCED FROM LINZ IS INDICATIVE
RO AD
ON
AT E
SHOWN
.5m
UNDERGROUND SERVICES DRAWINGS ARE INDICATIVE ONLY.
LOT 95
13
· ALL
13 .5m
LOT 90
304
LOT 308
LOT 94
mM
FROM
STAGE 8
D
REQUESTED
LOT 81
LOT 74
1 IVA 3.5m TE RO A
BE
LOT 80
PR
DIMENSIONS SHOULD CONTACTS BELOW.
LOT 2 DP 6396
LOT 78
LOT 76
LOT 2
LOT 44
POCKET PARK/ RESERVE CONNECTING TO BROADER RECREATIONAL NETWORK
LOT 43
LOT 1
LOT 305
LOT 9 DP 6055
Superseded
LOT 10 DP 6055 SAFETY IN DESIGN
ALL REASONABLY PRACTICABLE STEPS HAVE BEEN TAKEN TO ENSURE SAFETY IN DESIGN HAS BEEN CONSIDERED WITHIN STRATA GROUP'S SCOPE OF WORK FOR THIS DESIGN IN ACCORDANCE WITH IPENZ PRACTICE NOTE 07 "DESIGN FOR SAFETY IN BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES (JULY 2006)". IT REMAINS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER AND/OR OPERATOR TO ENSURE APPROPRIATE PRACTICES ARE IN PLACE TO PROTECT THE SAFETY OF THE WORKERS AND THE PUBLIC IN THE OPERATION OF THE FACILITY.
CLIENT:
5 4 3 2
FOR NOTIFICATION - STAGING AMENDED
200124
-
FOR NOTIFICATION - INTERSECTION OFF ENTRANCE200115 2
-
FOR NOTIFICATION - ROAD LABELS ADDED FOR NOTIFICATION
200114
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
REV
REASON FOR ISSUE
DATE
BY
PATH:J:\DUR - DURHAM PROPERTIES\J4345 - TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)\2 - DWGS\XREF'S\J4345 - BASE SERVICES PLAN 2020.DWG DATE:7/2/2018
THE CONTRACTOR IS TO BE AWARE OF ALL INSPECTIONS TO BE MADE BY THE ENGINEER AS A REQUIREMENT OF THE PRODUCER STATEMENT PS4 CONSTRUCTION REVIEW DOCUMENTATION. THE ENGINEER WILL REQUIRE 24 HOURS PRIOR NOTIFICATION FOR ALL INSPECTIONS.
DURHAM PROPERTY LTD
P 06 876 7646 F 06 876 7645 www.stratagroup.net.nz Structural
Fire
PO BOX 758 Business HQ 1/308 Queen Street East Hastings, New Zealand Civil Project Management
PROJECT:
TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)
TITLE:
PROPOSED SITE PLAN
DJ EM CHECKED DJ DATE OCT 18
DESIGNED DRAWN
PROJECT NO.: This drawing and its contents are the property of Strata Group Consulting Engineers Ltd. Any unauthorized employment or reproduction in full or part is forbidden.
0
250
500
750
Full Size 1:12500 ; Half Size 1:25000 Scale (m)
J4345
SHEET:
C002
REVISION:
5
LOT 1 DP 6396 GENERAL NOTES:
· BOUNDARY INFORMATION/DATA SHOWN IN THIS DRAWING HAS BEEN SOURCED FROM QUICKMAP. STRATA GROUP CONSULTING ENGINEERS TAKE NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ACCURACY OF THIS INFORMATION/DATA.
LOT 2 DP 6396
· COORDINATE DATUM: NZGD 2000 HB CIRCUIT HEIGHT
.00
12
DATUM IS LOCAL AUTHORITY DATUM 1972 (MSL = 10.00m) ORIGIN OF HEIGHTS: BP 68 SO 9387.
· DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING. ANY ADDITIONAL DIMENSIONS SHOULD CONTACTS BELOW.
BE
REQUESTED
FROM
THE
.90
11
· ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN METRES UNLESS SHOWN · ALL
11
UNDERGROUND SERVICES DRAWINGS ARE INDICATIVE ONLY.
SHOWN
ON
0
.8
OTHERWISE.
THE
0 .7 11
LOT 1 DP 14417
· AERIAL IMAGE IS SOURCED FROM LINZ IS INDICATIVE ONLY.
· EXISTING CONTOUR INTERVALS ARE AT 0.10m.
.9 11
.50
11 .30
.40 11
11
0 12.0
LOT 1 DP 318389
ROA D
.40
20
LOT 2 DP 14417 11.40
11.50
11.6
0
0 11.7
.80 11
.90 11
.00 12
ERIK
SEN
. 11
11.00
11
.30
11
11
.50
WI
LL
OW
BA
NK
AV
11 .6
0
E
11
.7
0
SECONDARY OVERLAND ARROW
11.50
11.70
11.80
PRIMARY OVERLAND FLOW ARROW
0
LOT 3 DP 394762
OVERLAND FLOW:
0
.6
11
HURUNUI DRIVE
1.30
1
0
50
11.4
.4
0
11.50
11.
11
LOT 9 DP 6055
Superseded
LOT 10 DP 6055 SAFETY IN DESIGN
ALL REASONABLY PRACTICABLE STEPS HAVE BEEN TAKEN TO ENSURE SAFETY IN DESIGN HAS BEEN CONSIDERED WITHIN STRATA GROUP'S SCOPE OF WORK FOR THIS DESIGN IN ACCORDANCE WITH IPENZ PRACTICE NOTE 07 "DESIGN FOR SAFETY IN BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES (JULY 2006)". IT REMAINS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER AND/OR OPERATOR TO ENSURE APPROPRIATE PRACTICES ARE IN PLACE TO PROTECT THE SAFETY OF THE WORKERS AND THE PUBLIC IN THE OPERATION OF THE FACILITY.
CLIENT:
2
FOR NOTIFICATION
-
-
1
-
-
-
REV
REASON FOR ISSUE
DATE
BY
PATH:J:\DUR - DURHAM PROPERTIES\J4345 - TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)\2 - DWGS\XREF'S\J4345 - BASE SERVICES PLAN 2020.DWG DATE:7/2/2018
THE CONTRACTOR IS TO BE AWARE OF ALL INSPECTIONS TO BE MADE BY THE ENGINEER AS A REQUIREMENT OF THE PRODUCER STATEMENT PS4 CONSTRUCTION REVIEW DOCUMENTATION. THE ENGINEER WILL REQUIRE 24 HOURS PRIOR NOTIFICATION FOR ALL INSPECTIONS.
DURHAM PROPERTY LTD
P 06 876 7646 F 06 876 7645 www.stratagroup.net.nz Structural
Fire
PO BOX 758 Business HQ 1/308 Queen Street East Hastings, New Zealand Civil Project Management
PROJECT:
TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)
TITLE:
EXISTING CONTOUR & OVERLAND FLOW PLAN
DJ EM CHECKED DJ DATE OCT 18
DESIGNED DRAWN
PROJECT NO.: This drawing and its contents are the property of Strata Group Consulting Engineers Ltd. Any unauthorized employment or reproduction in full or part is forbidden.
0
250
500
750
Full Size 1:12500 ; Half Size 1:25000 Scale (m)
J4345
SHEET:
C003
REVISION:
2
LOT 1 DP 6396 GENERAL NOTES: LOT 77
· BOUNDARY INFORMATION/DATA SHOWN IN THIS DRAWING HAS BEEN SOURCED FROM QUICKMAP. STRATA GROUP CONSULTING ENGINEERS TAKE NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ACCURACY OF THIS INFORMATION/DATA.
LOT 79 LOT 75
8m WIDE DRAINAGE CORRIDOR/ RESERVE
DATUM IS LOCAL AUTHORITY DATUM 1972 (MSL = 10.00m) ORIGIN OF HEIGHTS: BP 68 SO 9387.
· DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING. ANY ADDITIONAL
LOT 73
THE
LOT 72
· ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN METRES UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE.
THE
LOT 20
LOT 96
LOT 89 LOT 85
LOT 92
LOT 71
LOT 19
LOT 21
LOT 91 LOT 70
.5m
LOT 104
LOT 98
PR IV
LOT 68
LOT 99
LOT 67
8m WIDE DRAINAGE CORRIDOR/ RESERVE
E AV
m EN
LOT 125
D4
NK
OA D AT ER
LOT 114
PR IV .5m 13
D5
LOT 12
LOT 117 LOT 116
LOT 30 LOT 11
LOT 136
IVA
TE
LOT 31
LOT 139
OA
AD RO
LOT 137
LOT 159
LOT 140
PR .5m
13
.5m
LOT 158
RO AD
LOT 155
302
LOT 142
LOT 143 LOT 141
6
LOT 33
LOT 56
LOT 9
LOT 144
LOT 154
LOT 161
LOT 10
LOT 32 LOT 138
LOT 160
LOT 34 LOT 8
LOT 157 LOT 153
mR
LOT 152
m RO
LOT 147
AD 7
LOT 173
LOT 168
MAIN
LOT 170 LOT 165
LOT 174
LOT 37
LOT 178
LOT 182
LOT 38
LOT 171
LOT 49
13
.5m
LOT 48
RO
AD
9
LOT 172
LOT 175
LOT 176
LOT 4
LOT 179 LOT 40
301
LOT 3
LOT 41 LOT 46
HURUNUI DRIVE
LOT 5
LOT 39
LOT 181
LOT 180
LOT 47
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ENTRANCE
LOT 6
LOT 177
LOT 169
LOT 50
OAD
LOT 36
D (1
13.5
CE R
LOT 7 )
LOT 167
LOT 51
RAN
LOT 148
LOT 164 LOT 52
ENT
LOT 35
LOT 146
LOT 151
LOT 166
LOT 53
mM AIN
ROA
LOT 163
17.0
LOT 145
17.0 m
.5m
LOT 149
13.5
LOT 162
PR IV
AT ER
OA D
LOT 55
13
LOT 150
OAD 8
LOT 156
LOT 1 DP 318389
LOT 13
LOT 132
13
LOT 57
LOT 14
LOT 29
LOT 120 RO A
LOT 134
LOT 59
LOT 58
LOT 115
13.5 mR
LL WI
LOT 130
LOT 133
8m WIDE DRAINAGE CORRIDOR/ RESERVE
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ENTRANCE
LOT 27
LOT 28
LOT 135
LOT 60
D2
LOT 26
LOT 118
LOT 121
LOT 131
ROA
LOT 119
D8
BA OW
LOT 61
NCE
LOT 15
17.0
RO A
LOT 113
LOT 110
LOT 124
13 .5m
TRA
LOT 25
(1)
17
LOT 109
LOT 122
LOT 129
LOT 63
LOT 62
LOT 54
17.0
LOT 112
LO T4 13 .5m
LOT 126 LOT 123
303
LOT 16 LOT 111
LOT 108
PR
IVA TE
LOT 127 LOT 128
LOT 17
LOT 24 LOT 107
LOT 102
13 .5m
LOT 64
LOT 23
LOT 106
LOT 101 LOT 66
LOT 65
LOT 87
3
LOT 100
RO AD
SECONDARY
AD
LOT 105 LOT 103
PRIMARY
RO
ROA D
OVERLAND FLOW:
13
LOT 18
LOT 22
SEN
LOT 3 DP 394762
LOT 69
LOT 86
ERIK
· PROPOSED CONTOUR INTERVALS ARE AT 0.10m.
LOT 88
LOT 97 RO AD
ONLY.
AIN ROA D
· AERIAL IMAGE IS SOURCED FROM LINZ IS INDICATIVE
AT E
ON
.5m
SHOWN
LOT 84
RO A
D2
LOT 93 LOT 90
13
UNDERGROUND SERVICES DRAWINGS ARE INDICATIVE ONLY.
LOT 83 13 .5m
LOT 95
304
· ALL
LOT 94
mM
FROM
LOT 82 PR IV A TE
REQUESTED
LOT 81
LOT 74
13 .5m
BE
LOT 80
RO AD
· COORDINATE DATUM: NZGD 2000 HB CIRCUIT HEIGHT
DIMENSIONS SHOULD CONTACTS BELOW.
LOT 2 DP 6396
LOT 78
LOT 76
LOT 42
LOT 45
LOT 2
LOT 44
POCKET PARK/ RESERVE CONNECTING TO BROADER RECREATIONAL NETWORK
LOT 43
LOT 1
LOT 9 DP 6055
Superseded
LOT 10 DP 6055 SAFETY IN DESIGN
ALL REASONABLY PRACTICABLE STEPS HAVE BEEN TAKEN TO ENSURE SAFETY IN DESIGN HAS BEEN CONSIDERED WITHIN STRATA GROUP'S SCOPE OF WORK FOR THIS DESIGN IN ACCORDANCE WITH IPENZ PRACTICE NOTE 07 "DESIGN FOR SAFETY IN BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES (JULY 2006)". IT REMAINS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER AND/OR OPERATOR TO ENSURE APPROPRIATE PRACTICES ARE IN PLACE TO PROTECT THE SAFETY OF THE WORKERS AND THE PUBLIC IN THE OPERATION OF THE FACILITY.
CLIENT:
4 3 2
FOR NOTIFICATION - INTERSECTION OFF ENTRANCE200115 2 FOR NOTIFICATION - ROAD LABELS ADDED FOR NOTIFICATION
-
200114
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
REV
REASON FOR ISSUE
DATE
BY
PATH:J:\DUR - DURHAM PROPERTIES\J4345 - TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)\2 - DWGS\XREF'S\J4345 - BASE SERVICES PLAN 2020.DWG DATE:7/2/2018
THE CONTRACTOR IS TO BE AWARE OF ALL INSPECTIONS TO BE MADE BY THE ENGINEER AS A REQUIREMENT OF THE PRODUCER STATEMENT PS4 CONSTRUCTION REVIEW DOCUMENTATION. THE ENGINEER WILL REQUIRE 24 HOURS PRIOR NOTIFICATION FOR ALL INSPECTIONS.
DURHAM PROPERTY LTD
P 06 876 7646 F 06 876 7645 www.stratagroup.net.nz Structural
Fire
PO BOX 758 Business HQ 1/308 Queen Street East Hastings, New Zealand Civil Project Management
PROJECT:
TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)
TITLE:
PROPOSED CONTOUR & OVERLAND FLOW PLAN
DJ EM CHECKED DJ DATE OCT 18
DESIGNED DRAWN
PROJECT NO.: This drawing and its contents are the property of Strata Group Consulting Engineers Ltd. Any unauthorized employment or reproduction in full or part is forbidden.
0
250
500
750
Full Size 1:12500 ; Half Size 1:25000 Scale (m)
J4345
SHEET:
C004
REVISION:
4
LOT 1 DP 6396 EARTHWORKS NOTES:
0.0 0
· CUT AND FILL INDICATES EG UNDERCUT (TOPSOIL
LOT 2 DP 6396
· DO NOT SCALE FROM DRAWING, IF EXTRA INFORMATION IS REQUIRED, PLEASE CONTACT CONSULTING ENGINEERS.
0.00
3
STRATA
GROUP
0.0
0
CT ION
· ALL VOLUMES HAVE BEEN CALCULATED IN SOLID ON FIXED DESIGN DEPTHS. VOLUMES EXCLUDE POSSIBLE UNDER-CUT OF SOFT SPOTS, UNDERGROUND FEATURES AND CONTAMINATED MATERIALS.
50 .00
SE
STRIP) TO FINISHED SURFACE PRIOR TO TOPSOIL FILL.
CUT/FILL TABLE
0.0
0
Number Minimum Level Maximum Level Colour
50.0
50.
00
10
.00
0
100
LOT 3 DP 394762
.00
0.0
150
0
100.
0.0
4
0
150. 00
E 0
00
AV
00
-0.70
-0.60
4
-0.60
-0.20
5
-0.20
-0.10
6
-0.10
0.10
7
0.10
0.30
8
0.30
1.80
ROA
250 .00
SEN
.44 300.
ERIK
297
.00
5
3
D
200 35 0
00
40 0.0 0
50.
00
0.0
0
ION
-0.70
DESIGN SURFACE IMPORTED TOPSOIL - 22,268m³ FILL
00
CT
-1.50
.00
0
2
IMPORTED HARDFILL FROM TOPSOIL UNDERCUT TO TOP OFF OF DESIGN FILL SURFACE LEVELS - 26,481m³ FILL
200. 150 .00
0.0
-1.50
EXISTING GROUND TO TOPSOIL UNDERCUT (300mm DEPTH) - 41,466m³ CUT
LOT 1 DP 318389
0 100 .00
OW LL WI
30
-2.30
CUT AND FILL VOLUMES:
0.0
BA
50.
NK
25
250.
SE
267 .04
20
250
TIO N
.00
SE C
.00
200
00
.00
15
1
350.
00
HURUNUI DRIVE
49
.00
150
.00
100
.00
45 0.0 0
2.8
400.
00
.55
LOT 9 DP 6055
00
343
450.
300
.00
SE
250
CT IO
.00
N1
200
4
476.
SEC
TION
2
86
Superseded
LOT 10 DP 6055 SAFETY IN DESIGN
ALL REASONABLY PRACTICABLE STEPS HAVE BEEN TAKEN TO ENSURE SAFETY IN DESIGN HAS BEEN CONSIDERED WITHIN STRATA GROUP'S SCOPE OF WORK FOR THIS DESIGN IN ACCORDANCE WITH IPENZ PRACTICE NOTE 07 "DESIGN FOR SAFETY IN BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES (JULY 2006)". IT REMAINS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER AND/OR OPERATOR TO ENSURE APPROPRIATE PRACTICES ARE IN PLACE TO PROTECT THE SAFETY OF THE WORKERS AND THE PUBLIC IN THE OPERATION OF THE FACILITY.
CLIENT:
2
FOR NOTIFICATION
-
-
1
-
-
-
REV
REASON FOR ISSUE
DATE
BY
PATH:J:\DUR - DURHAM PROPERTIES\J4345 - TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)\2 - DWGS\XREF'S\J4345 - BASE SERVICES PLAN 2020.DWG DATE:7/2/2018
THE CONTRACTOR IS TO BE AWARE OF ALL INSPECTIONS TO BE MADE BY THE ENGINEER AS A REQUIREMENT OF THE PRODUCER STATEMENT PS4 CONSTRUCTION REVIEW DOCUMENTATION. THE ENGINEER WILL REQUIRE 24 HOURS PRIOR NOTIFICATION FOR ALL INSPECTIONS.
DURHAM PROPERTY LTD
P 06 876 7646 F 06 876 7645 www.stratagroup.net.nz Structural
Fire
PO BOX 758 Business HQ 1/308 Queen Street East Hastings, New Zealand Civil Project Management
PROJECT:
TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)
TITLE:
EARTHWORKS PLAN
DJ EM CHECKED DJ DATE OCT 18
DESIGNED DRAWN
PROJECT NO.: This drawing and its contents are the property of Strata Group Consulting Engineers Ltd. Any unauthorized employment or reproduction in full or part is forbidden.
0
250
500
750
Full Size 1:12500 ; Half Size 1:25000 Scale (m)
J4345
SHEET:
C005
REVISION:
2
EXISTING GROUND LEVEL
PROPOSED FINISHED LEVEL
EXISTING GROUND TOPSOIL UNDERCUT
PROPOSED FINISHED TOPSOIL UNDERCUT
LOT 1 DP6396 LOT 9 DP6055
11.10 11.27 11.60 11.64 474.70 480
492.84
-0.54 -0.39
-1.82 11.59 460
9.77
-0.25 11.57 440
11.32
0.01 11.56 11.54 420
11.43
0.05 11.53 11.53 400 401.66
-0.13
11.58 11.58 0.04 0.04 11.54 380
11.58
11.58 0.03 11.55 360
11.57 11.56 337.06 340
11.58
11.57 320
0.02
0.01 11.58 0.01 11.58
11.58 300
11.58 0.00
11.61 280
11.58 -0.03
11.63 267.64
11.58 11.58 -0.07 -0.06 11.65
11.70 240
260
11.75 220
11.58 -0.12
11.78 11.78 200 203.62
11.58 -0.17
11.76 180
11.58 -0.20
11.75 160
11.58 -0.18
11.73 140
11.58 -0.17
11.72 129.91
11.58 -0.15
11.76 120
11.58 -0.18
11.84 100
11.58 -0.26
11.91 80
11.58 -0.33 11.94 72.40
11.58 -0.38 11.96 60
11.58 -0.39
-0.41 11.58 11.99
CHAINAGE
40
0.00
EXISTING LEVELS
-0.39
CUT/FILL DEPTHS
12.01
DESIGN LEVELS
20
11.62
SCALE: 1:500H, 1:25V DATUM: 8.00
SECTION 1 LONG SECTION
EXISTING GROUND LEVEL
PROPOSED FINISHED LEVEL
EXISTING GROUND TOPSOIL UNDERCUT
PROPOSED FINISHED TOPSOIL UNDERCUT
LOT 1 DP6396 LOT 9 DP6055
-1.25
11.38
11.42
11.40
11.43
11.45
11.48 11.49
380
388.58
400
420
440
460 465.58
476.86
-0.87
11.30 360
0.05
10.23
0.11 11.54
11.21 340
10.58
0.18
11.16 333.37
11.49
0.28
11.14 320
11.58
0.37
11.11 300
0.21 11.58 0.20 11.58
11.58 0.44
11.08 280
0.47
11.58
11.58 0.47
11.11 11.09 260 262.97
0.39
11.58
0.51 11.58 0.50 11.58
11.19 240
11.58
11.28 220
11.58
0.20 11.38 11.34 200 205.85
0.30 11.58 0.31 11.58
0.09 11.49 180
11.58
-0.03 11.61 160
11.58
-0.11 11.58 -0.13 11.58 11.70 11.71 138.97 140
11.58
-0.08 11.66 120
11.58
-0.03 11.61 100
11.58
0.01 11.58 11.57 80
0.02 0.05
11.58 11.58 11.56 11.56 53.82 60
11.58 -0.02 11.60
CHAINAGE
40
11.63 0.00
EXISTING LEVELS
-0.04
CUT/FILL DEPTHS
11.67
DESIGN LEVELS
20
SCALE: 1:500H, 1:25V DATUM: 8.00
SECTION 2 LONG SECTION FILL
Superseded SAFETY IN DESIGN
ALL REASONABLY PRACTICABLE STEPS HAVE BEEN TAKEN TO ENSURE SAFETY IN DESIGN HAS BEEN CONSIDERED WITHIN STRATA GROUP'S SCOPE OF WORK FOR THIS DESIGN IN ACCORDANCE WITH IPENZ PRACTICE NOTE 07 "DESIGN FOR SAFETY IN BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES (JULY 2006)". IT REMAINS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER AND/OR OPERATOR TO ENSURE APPROPRIATE PRACTICES ARE IN PLACE TO PROTECT THE SAFETY OF THE WORKERS AND THE PUBLIC IN THE OPERATION OF THE FACILITY.
CLIENT:
2
FOR NOTIFICATION
-
-
1
-
-
-
REV
REASON FOR ISSUE
DATE
BY
PATH:J:\DUR - DURHAM PROPERTIES\J4345 - TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)\2 - DWGS\XREF'S\J4345 - BASE SERVICES PLAN 2020.DWG DATE:7/2/2018
THE CONTRACTOR IS TO BE AWARE OF ALL INSPECTIONS TO BE MADE BY THE ENGINEER AS A REQUIREMENT OF THE PRODUCER STATEMENT PS4 CONSTRUCTION REVIEW DOCUMENTATION. THE ENGINEER WILL REQUIRE 24 HOURS PRIOR NOTIFICATION FOR ALL INSPECTIONS.
DURHAM PROPERTY LTD
P 06 876 7646 F 06 876 7645 www.stratagroup.net.nz Structural
Fire
PO BOX 758 Business HQ 1/308 Queen Street East Hastings, New Zealand Civil Project Management
PROJECT:
TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)
CUT
TITLE:
EARTHWORKS SECTIONS
DJ EM CHECKED DJ DATE OCT 18
DESIGNED DRAWN
PROJECT NO.: This drawing and its contents are the property of Strata Group Consulting Engineers Ltd. Any unauthorized employment or reproduction in full or part is forbidden.
0
5
10
20
30
Full Size 1:500 ; Half Size 1:1000 Scale (m)
J4345
SHEET:
C006
REVISION:
2
EXISTING GROUND LEVEL
PROPOSED FINISHED LEVEL
EXISTING GROUND TOPSOIL UNDERCUT
PROPOSED FINISHED TOPSOIL UNDERCUT
WILLOWBANK AVE ERIKSEN ROAD
11.58 11.58 0.25 0.25
11.31
11.33
240
260
267.04
11.58 0.27 11.29 227.86
11.60 0.23 11.37 220
11.58 0.02 11.56 200
11.58 11.58 -0.02 -0.03
-0.08 11.66 160
11.59 11.60
-0.18 11.76 140
174.93 180
-0.21 11.58 11.79 120
11.58
-0.22 11.80 11.79 100 105.29
CHAINAGE
11.58
-0.26 11.84 80
0.00
EXISTING LEVELS
11.58
-0.24 11.87 60
CUT/FILL DEPTHS
11.58
11.66 -0.23 11.89 51.94
DESIGN LEVELS
11.63
11.21 -0.67 11.88 40
10.27 -1.60 11.87 20
SCALE: 1:500H, 1:25V DATUM: 9.00
SECTION 3 LONG SECTION PROPOSED FINISHED LEVEL PROPOSED FINISHED TOPSOIL UNDERCUT
EXISTING GROUND LEVEL EXISTING GROUND TOPSOIL UNDERCUT
WILLOWBANK AVE ERIKSEN ROAD
0.51 11.63 11.12 11.11 278.22 280
11.58
0.46 11.17 260
0.54
11.63
297.44
0.39 11.62 0.41 11.63 11.23 240
11.58 0.29 11.29 220
11.58 0.25 11.33 11.33
11.58 0.22
198.30 200
11.58 0.19 11.39
11.58 0.14 11.44 160
180
11.58 0.07 11.51 140
11.58 0.02 11.56 127.28
11.58 0.00 11.58 120
11.58 -0.05 11.63 100
11.58 -0.12 11.70 80
11.59 -0.22 11.82 11.81 58.54 60
-0.31 11.53
11.06 -0.80 11.86
CHAINAGE
40
10.39 0.00
EXISTING LEVELS
-1.55
CUT/FILL DEPTHS
11.94
DESIGN LEVELS
20
SCALE: 1:500H, 1:25V DATUM: 9.00
SECTION 4 LONG SECTION PROPOSED FINISHED LEVEL PROPOSED FINISHED TOPSOIL UNDERCUT EXISTING GROUND LEVEL EXISTING GROUND TOPSOIL UNDERCUT
WILLOWBANK AVE
ERIKSEN ROAD
ALL REASONABLY PRACTICABLE STEPS HAVE BEEN TAKEN TO ENSURE SAFETY IN DESIGN HAS BEEN CONSIDERED WITHIN STRATA GROUP'S SCOPE OF WORK FOR THIS DESIGN IN ACCORDANCE WITH IPENZ PRACTICE NOTE 07 "DESIGN FOR SAFETY IN BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES (JULY 2006)". IT REMAINS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER AND/OR OPERATOR TO ENSURE APPROPRIATE PRACTICES ARE IN PLACE TO PROTECT THE SAFETY OF THE WORKERS AND THE PUBLIC IN THE OPERATION OF THE FACILITY.
2
FOR NOTIFICATION
11.73
0.20 0.20
0.17
0.14
0.18 11.58 0.21 11.62
11.75
0.23
0.34
0.29
11.35 11.35
11.35
11.38
11.41
11.44 11.44
11.40
11.42
11.44
11.45
180 183.57
200
220
240
260 260.40
280
300
320
331.30
11.71
11.58
0.23
11.36 160
-
-
1
-
-
-
REV
REASON FOR ISSUE
DATE
BY
PATH:J:\DUR - DURHAM PROPERTIES\J4345 - TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)\2 - DWGS\XREF'S\J4345 - BASE SERVICES PLAN 2020.DWG DATE:7/2/2018
DURHAM PROPERTY LTD
P 06 876 7646 F 06 876 7645 www.stratagroup.net.nz Structural
Fire
PO BOX 758 Business HQ 1/308 Queen Street East Hastings, New Zealand Civil Project Management
0.45
11.58 11.58
0.22
11.36 140
CLIENT:
THE CONTRACTOR IS TO BE AWARE OF ALL INSPECTIONS TO BE MADE BY THE ENGINEER AS A REQUIREMENT OF THE PRODUCER STATEMENT PS4 CONSTRUCTION REVIEW DOCUMENTATION. THE ENGINEER WILL REQUIRE 24 HOURS PRIOR NOTIFICATION FOR ALL INSPECTIONS.
340 343.55
FILL
CUT
Superseded
SECTION 5 LONG SECTION SAFETY IN DESIGN
11.58
11.58
0.22
11.39 11.38 115.75 120
11.58
0.20
11.46 100
11.58
0.12
11.54 80
11.58
0.04
11.65 60
0.21 11.58
-0.08
11.70 53.66
11.58
-0.35
11.83 40
11.58
-0.96
12.02 0.00
CHAINAGE
11.58
11.37
-1.68
EXISTING LEVELS
DESIGN LEVELS
11.56
10.87
CUT/FILL DEPTHS
20
10.34
SCALE: 1:500H, 1:25V DATUM: 9.00
PROJECT:
TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)
TITLE:
EARTHWORKS SECTIONS
DJ EM CHECKED DJ DATE OCT 18
DESIGNED DRAWN
PROJECT NO.: This drawing and its contents are the property of Strata Group Consulting Engineers Ltd. Any unauthorized employment or reproduction in full or part is forbidden.
0
5
10
20
30
Full Size 1:500 ; Half Size 1:1000 Scale (m)
J4345
SHEET:
C007
REVISION:
2
LOT 77 LOT 78
LOT 76
LOT 79 LOT 75
LOT 80 LOT 81
LOT 74
STORMWATER OUTLET 1
LOT 82 LOT 94
LOT 73
LOT 95
LOT 72
LEGEND:
LOT 84
LOT 93
LOT 20
LOT 90
304
EXISTING STORMWATER
LOT 83
LOT 96
LOT 89 LOT 85
LOT 92
LOT 71
LOT 19
LOT 21
LOT 91 LOT 70
LOT 69
LOT 103
LOT 101 LOT 66
VE
LOT 112
LOT 128
KA
LOT 25
LOT 109
LOT 15
LOT 113
LOT 110
LOT 26
LOT 126 LOT 114
LOT 123 LOT 125
LOT 119
LOT 28
LOT 124 LOT 62
WI LL
LOT 61
LOT 115
LOT 12
LOT 117
LOT 134
LOT 116
LOT 135
LOT 60
LOT 29
LOT 120
LOT 131
LOT 30
LOT 132
LOT 11
LOT 133
LOT 136
LOT 59
LOT 58
LOT 31
LOT 139
LOT 140
LOT 143 LOT 141
LOT 158
LOT 160
LOT 154
LOT 161 LOT 56
LOT 33
LOT 9
LOT 144
LOT 155
302
LOT 34 LOT 8
LOT 157 LOT 156
LOT 150
LOT 153
LOT 149
LOT 55 LOT 162
LOT 35
LOT 146
LOT 151
LOT 166
LOT 53
LOT 148 LOT 167
LOT 164
LOT 7 LOT 36
LOT 147 LOT 170
LOT 165
LOT 173
LOT 168
LOT 51
LOT 145
LOT 152
LOT 54
LOT 52
LOT 10
LOT 32 LOT 138
LOT 57
LOT 142
LOT 137
LOT 159
LOT 163
LOT 13
LOT 118
LOT 121
LOT 130
LOT 14
LOT 27
LOT 122
LOT 129
LOT 63
OW BA N
LO T4
LOT 127
LOT 64
STORMWATER OUTLET 3
LOT 174
LOT 177 LOT 178
LOT 182
LOT 38
LOT 171
LOT 49
LOT 172
LOT 48
DR
LOT 175
LOT 176
LOT 40 LOT 3
LOT 41 LOT 46
HURUNUI DRIVE
LOT 4
LOT 179
301
LOT 47
LOT 5
LOT 39
LOT 181
LOT 180
AIN
LOT 6
LOT 37
LOT 169
LOT 50
EN
LOT 111
LOT 108
LOT 102
303
LOT 16
LOT 107
LOT 100
LOT 65
OP
LOT 24
LOT 106
17
STORMWATER OUTLET 2
LOT 99
LOT 67
OP
PROPOSED WATER
LOT 17
LOT 105
LOT 68
EN
SEWER PUMP STATION 1
LOT 23
D
EXISTING WATER
LOT 87
LOT 104
LOT 98
LOT 18
LOT 22
ROA
DR AIN
PROPOSED SEWER
LOT 86
SEN
EXISTING SEWER
LOT 88
LOT 97
ERIK
PROPOSED STORMWATER
LOT 42
LOT 45
LOT 2
EXISTING Ø375 SEWER MAIN EXISTING Ø550 WATER MAIN
LOT 44 LOT 43
LOT 1
STORMWATER OUTLET 4
SEWER PUMP STATION 2 BOX CULVERTS BY NCC
NEW PUMP LINE
EXISTING Ø100 SEWER MAIN
Superseded
CONNECT NEW PUMP LINE INTO EXISTING
SAFETY IN DESIGN
ALL REASONABLY PRACTICABLE STEPS HAVE BEEN TAKEN TO ENSURE SAFETY IN DESIGN HAS BEEN CONSIDERED WITHIN STRATA GROUP'S SCOPE OF WORK FOR THIS DESIGN IN ACCORDANCE WITH IPENZ PRACTICE NOTE 07 "DESIGN FOR SAFETY IN BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES (JULY 2006)". IT REMAINS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER AND/OR OPERATOR TO ENSURE APPROPRIATE PRACTICES ARE IN PLACE TO PROTECT THE SAFETY OF THE WORKERS AND THE PUBLIC IN THE OPERATION OF THE FACILITY.
CLIENT:
4
FOR NOTIFICATION - INTERSECTION OFF ENTRANCE200115 2
-
3
FOR NOTIFICATION
200114
-
2
FOR NOTIFICATION
-
-
1
-
-
-
REV
REASON FOR ISSUE
DATE
BY
PATH:J:\DUR - DURHAM PROPERTIES\J4345 - TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)\2 - DWGS\XREF'S\J4345 - BASE SERVICES PLAN 2020.DWG DATE:7/2/2018
THE CONTRACTOR IS TO BE AWARE OF ALL INSPECTIONS TO BE MADE BY THE ENGINEER AS A REQUIREMENT OF THE PRODUCER STATEMENT PS4 CONSTRUCTION REVIEW DOCUMENTATION. THE ENGINEER WILL REQUIRE 24 HOURS PRIOR NOTIFICATION FOR ALL INSPECTIONS.
DURHAM PROPERTY LTD
P 06 876 7646 F 06 876 7645 www.stratagroup.net.nz Structural
Fire
PO BOX 758 Business HQ 1/308 Queen Street East Hastings, New Zealand Civil Project Management
PROJECT:
TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)
TITLE:
SERVICES OVERVIEW
DJ EM CHECKED DJ DATE OCT 18
DESIGNED DRAWN
PROJECT NO.: This drawing and its contents are the property of Strata Group Consulting Engineers Ltd. Any unauthorized employment or reproduction in full or part is forbidden.
0
200
400
600
800
Full Size 1:15000 ; Half Size 1:30000 Scale (m)
J4345
SHEET:
C008
REVISION:
4
WILL
OWB
STORMWATER OUTLET 3
ANK
AVE LEGEND
CATCHMENT BOUNDARY
DRAI
N STORMWATER OUTLET 2
ATE R
OAD
m CO
OAD
PIPE
RETE
PRIV
OAD
13.5m
CONC
375mm
RETE
ATE R
ATE R
OAD
RETE PIPE
PE TE PI
375mm
3
13.5m
ROAD
2
13.5m
13.5m
ROAD
ROAD
4
375mm CONCRETE PIPE
CONC
RETE
375mm
13.5m RO
PIPE
CONC
m CO NCRE
8
375m
13.5m ROAD
AD 5
13.5m ROAD 6
13.5m ROAD 7
13.5m ROAD 8
375mm CONCRETE PIPE
375mm CONCRETE PIPE
EXISTING OPEN DRAIN
PRIV
375mm
TE PIPE
ATE R
13.5m
CONC
CONC R 375mm
9 ROAD
ONCRE
PRIV
PIPE
ETE P
IPE
375m
13.5m
13.5m
450mm C
STORMWATER OUTLET 4
PRIV
TE PI PE
13.5m
m CO
OPEN
ATE R OAD
NCRE
PRIV
NCRE TE PI PE
13.5m
STORMWATER OUTLET 1
450m
OAD
39.98
ATE R
NCRE TE PI PE
PRIV
450m m CO
DRAI N
13.5m
450m mC
EXIST ING O
PEN D
ONCR
RAIN
ET E P
IPE
OPEN
375mm CONCRETE PIPE
300mm CONCRETE PIPE 300mm CONCRETE PIPE
17.0m MAIN ROAD 1
17.0m MAIN ROAD 1
17.0m ENTRANCE ROAD 2
17.0m MAIN ENTRANCE ROAD
17.0m MAIN ROAD 1
40m
BOX CULVERTS BY NCC
375mm CONCRETE PIPE
375mm CONCRETE PIPE
ERIKSEN ROAD
Superseded
EXISTING DN600 CULVERT
SAFETY IN DESIGN
ALL REASONABLY PRACTICABLE STEPS HAVE BEEN TAKEN TO ENSURE SAFETY IN DESIGN HAS BEEN CONSIDERED WITHIN STRATA GROUP'S SCOPE OF WORK FOR THIS DESIGN IN ACCORDANCE WITH IPENZ PRACTICE NOTE 07 "DESIGN FOR SAFETY IN BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES (JULY 2006)". IT REMAINS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER AND/OR OPERATOR TO ENSURE APPROPRIATE PRACTICES ARE IN PLACE TO PROTECT THE SAFETY OF THE WORKERS AND THE PUBLIC IN THE OPERATION OF THE FACILITY.
CLIENT:
4 3 2
FOR NOTIFICATION - INTERSECTION OFF ENTRANCE200115 2 FOR NOTIFICATION - ROAD LABELS ADDED FOR NOTIFICATION
-
200114
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
REV
REASON FOR ISSUE
DATE
BY
PATH:J:\DUR - DURHAM PROPERTIES\J4345 - TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)\2 - DWGS\XREF'S\J4345 - BASE SERVICES PLAN 2020.DWG DATE:7/2/2018
THE CONTRACTOR IS TO BE AWARE OF ALL INSPECTIONS TO BE MADE BY THE ENGINEER AS A REQUIREMENT OF THE PRODUCER STATEMENT PS4 CONSTRUCTION REVIEW DOCUMENTATION. THE ENGINEER WILL REQUIRE 24 HOURS PRIOR NOTIFICATION FOR ALL INSPECTIONS.
DURHAM PROPERTY LTD
P 06 876 7646 F 06 876 7645 www.stratagroup.net.nz Structural
Fire
PO BOX 758 Business HQ 1/308 Queen Street East Hastings, New Zealand Civil Project Management
PROJECT:
TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)
TITLE:
PROPOSED STORMWATER LAYOUT
DJ EM CHECKED DJ DATE OCT 18
DESIGNED DRAWN
PROJECT NO.: This drawing and its contents are the property of Strata Group Consulting Engineers Ltd. Any unauthorized employment or reproduction in full or part is forbidden.
0
7.5
15
30
45
Full Size 1:750 ; Half Size 1:1500 Scale (m)
J4345
SHEET:
C009
REVISION:
4
WILL OW
BANK
AVE LEGEND: PROPOSED GRAVITY SEWER PIPE
SEWE
R PU
MPIN G LIN
PROPOSED SEWER PUMP PIPE
OPEN
DRAI N
E
EXISTING SEWER PIPE
PUMP STATION
PRIV
ATE R
OAD
DRAI
N
13.5m
OPEN
13.5m
PRIV
ATE R
OAD
PRIV
ATE R
OAD
uPVC
13.5m
150m
m uPV
PRIV
ATE R
C
OAD
ROAD
6
150mm
13.5m
uPVC
PRIV
ATE R
OAD
150mm
150mm
uPVC
13.5m
13.5m
PRIV
ATE R
OAD
150mm
uPVC
13.5m
ROAD
9
13.5m
AD 5
8
3 ROAD
150m
13.5m
150mm uPVC
SEWER PUMPING LINE
13.5m ROAD 6
ROAD
4
m uPV
C
150m
13.5m
m uPV
C
ROAD
2
13.5m
150m m
13.5m ROAD
13.5m ROAD 8
13.5m RO
13.5m ROAD 7
uPVC
PUMP STATION
150mm uPVC
150mm uPVC
17.0m MAIN ROAD 1
17.0m MAIN ROAD 1
17.0m ENTRANCE ROAD 2
17.0m MAIN ENTRANCE ROAD
17.0m MAIN ROAD 1
SEWER PUMPING LINE
150mm uPVC
150mm uPVC
ERIKSEN ROAD
CONNECT INTO EXISTING GRAVITY SYSTEM
EXISTING DN275 SEWER PUMPING MAIN
Superseded SAFETY IN DESIGN
ALL REASONABLY PRACTICABLE STEPS HAVE BEEN TAKEN TO ENSURE SAFETY IN DESIGN HAS BEEN CONSIDERED WITHIN STRATA GROUP'S SCOPE OF WORK FOR THIS DESIGN IN ACCORDANCE WITH IPENZ PRACTICE NOTE 07 "DESIGN FOR SAFETY IN BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES (JULY 2006)". IT REMAINS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER AND/OR OPERATOR TO ENSURE APPROPRIATE PRACTICES ARE IN PLACE TO PROTECT THE SAFETY OF THE WORKERS AND THE PUBLIC IN THE OPERATION OF THE FACILITY.
CLIENT:
4 3 2
FOR NOTIFICATION - INTERSECTION OFF ENTRANCE200115 2 FOR NOTIFICATION - ROAD LABELS ADDED FOR NOTIFICATION
-
200114
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
REV
REASON FOR ISSUE
DATE
BY
PATH:J:\DUR - DURHAM PROPERTIES\J4345 - TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)\2 - DWGS\XREF'S\J4345 - BASE SERVICES PLAN 2020.DWG DATE:7/2/2018
THE CONTRACTOR IS TO BE AWARE OF ALL INSPECTIONS TO BE MADE BY THE ENGINEER AS A REQUIREMENT OF THE PRODUCER STATEMENT PS4 CONSTRUCTION REVIEW DOCUMENTATION. THE ENGINEER WILL REQUIRE 24 HOURS PRIOR NOTIFICATION FOR ALL INSPECTIONS.
DURHAM PROPERTY LTD
P 06 876 7646 F 06 876 7645 www.stratagroup.net.nz Structural
Fire
PO BOX 758 Business HQ 1/308 Queen Street East Hastings, New Zealand Civil Project Management
PROJECT:
TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)
TITLE:
PROPOSED SEWER LAYOUT
DJ EM CHECKED DJ DATE OCT 18
DESIGNED DRAWN
PROJECT NO.: This drawing and its contents are the property of Strata Group Consulting Engineers Ltd. Any unauthorized employment or reproduction in full or part is forbidden.
0
7.5
15
30
45
Full Size 1:750 ; Half Size 1:1500 Scale (m)
J4345
SHEET:
C010
REVISION:
4
LEGEND:
WILL OW
PROPOSED WATER MAIN
BANK
PROPOSED RIDER MAIN EXISTING WATER MAIN
OPEN
PRIV
ATE R
OAD
DRAI N
100mm mPVC PN12
N
13.5m
AVE
DRAI
13.5m
PRIV
ATE R
OAD
OPEN
13.5m
PRIV
ATE R
OAD
13.5m
PRIV
ATE R
OAD
100mm mPVC PN12 13.5m
PRIV
63mm PE
ATE R
OAD
100mm mPVC PN12
13.5m
PRIV
ATE R
OAD
13.5m
ROAD
9
63mm PE
ROAD
63mm PE ROAD
ROAD
3
100mm mPVC PN12
2
8
13.5m
AD 5
13.5m ROAD
13.5m RO
13.5m ROAD 8
4
100mm mPVC PN12
13.5m ROAD 6
13.5m
63mm PE
13.5m
13.5m ROAD 7
100mm mPVC PN12
63mm PE
100mm mPVC PN12
63mm PE
17.0m MAIN ROAD 1
17.0m MAIN ROAD 1
100mm mPVC PN12
17.0m ENTRANCE ROAD 2
17.0m MAIN ENTRANCE ROAD
17.0m MAIN ROAD 1
150mm mPVC PN12
100mm mPVC PN12
150mm mPVC PN12
63mm PE
63mm PE
63mm PE
ERIKSEN ROAD EXISTING Ø550 MAIN CONNECT INTO EXISTING Ø200 BY NCC
EXISTING Ø200
PROPOSED DN200 WATERMAIN
SAFETY IN DESIGN
ALL REASONABLY PRACTICABLE STEPS HAVE BEEN TAKEN TO ENSURE SAFETY IN DESIGN HAS BEEN CONSIDERED WITHIN STRATA GROUP'S SCOPE OF WORK FOR THIS DESIGN IN ACCORDANCE WITH IPENZ PRACTICE NOTE 07 "DESIGN FOR SAFETY IN BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES (JULY 2006)". IT REMAINS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER AND/OR OPERATOR TO ENSURE APPROPRIATE PRACTICES ARE IN PLACE TO PROTECT THE SAFETY OF THE WORKERS AND THE PUBLIC IN THE OPERATION OF THE FACILITY.
CLIENT:
4
FOR NOTIFICATION - INTERSECTION OFF ENTRANCE 2
3
FOR NOTIFICATION - ROAD LABELS ADDED
2
FOR NOTIFICATION
200114
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
REV
REASON FOR ISSUE
DATE
BY
PATH:J:\DUR - DURHAM PROPERTIES\J4345 - TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)\2 - DWGS\XREF'S\J4345 - BASE SERVICES PLAN 2020.DWG DATE:7/2/2018
THE CONTRACTOR IS TO BE AWARE OF ALL INSPECTIONS TO BE MADE BY THE ENGINEER AS A REQUIREMENT OF THE PRODUCER STATEMENT PS4 CONSTRUCTION REVIEW DOCUMENTATION. THE ENGINEER WILL REQUIRE 24 HOURS PRIOR NOTIFICATION FOR ALL INSPECTIONS.
DURHAM PROPERTY LTD
P 06 876 7646 F 06 876 7645 www.stratagroup.net.nz Structural
Fire
PO BOX 758 Business HQ 1/308 Queen Street East Hastings, New Zealand Civil Project Management
Superseded PROJECT:
TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)
PROPOSED DN200 WATERMAIN TITLE:
PROPOSED WATER LAYOUT
DJ EM CHECKED DJ DATE OCT 18
DESIGNED DRAWN
PROJECT NO.: This drawing and its contents are the property of Strata Group Consulting Engineers Ltd. Any unauthorized employment or reproduction in full or part is forbidden.
0
7.5
15
30
45
Full Size 1:750 ; Half Size 1:1500 Scale (m)
J4345
SHEET:
C011
REVISION:
4
13.5
BERM (Varies) 1.4 NEW FOOTPATH
0.7
3.0
3.0
KERB AND CHANNEL
4% min
2%
1.8
4%
STORMWATER KERB CONNECTION REFER TO NCC COP DETAIL M3.15 4% min
KERB AND CHANNEL
3%
3%
BOUNDARY
BOUNDARY
VARIES
BERM (Varies)
6.0m FORMED WIDTH
TREE PIT SUBSOIL DRAIN
SUBSOIL DRAIN
TREE PIT STORMWATER PIPE POWER
GAS
TELECOM
DN150 SN16 uPVC
DN100 PN9 uPVC / NEW DN63 SDR13.6 PE
TELECOM
GAS
POWER
13.5m TYPICAL CROSS SECTION NORTHERN ROAD
17.0m
BERM (Varies) 1.4 NEW FOOTPATH
3.3
0.7
3.3
KERB AND CHANNEL
4% min
2%
4%
STORMWATER KERB CONNECTION REFER TO NCC COP DETAIL M3.15
KERB AND CHANNEL
3%
4% min
3%
BOUNDARY
VARIES BOUNDARY
BERM (Varies)
6.6m FORMED WIDTH
1.8
SUBSOIL DRAIN
SUBSOIL DRAIN TREE PIT
TREE PIT POWER
GAS
TELECOM
DN150 SN16 uPVC
DN100 PN9 uPVC WATER MAIN
TELECOM
GAS
POWER
STORMWATER PIPE
17.0m TYPICAL CROSS SECTION MAIN ROAD
BOUNDARY
2.5 CAR PARKING
4.8 m FORMED WIDTH
1.4m NEW FOOTPATH
SERVICE BERM (Varies)
FLUSH NIB
DISH CHANNEL
3%
3%
3%
0.55m BERM
2.5 CAR PARKING
BOUNDARY
13.5
1.8 SUBSOIL DRAIN
SUBSOIL DRAIN
STORMWATER PIPE
3 2
FOR NOTIFICATION - TYPICAL SECTIONS ADDED FOR NOTIFICATION
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
REV
REASON FOR ISSUE
DATE
BY
PATH:J:\DUR - DURHAM PROPERTIES\J4345 - TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)\2 - DWGS\XREF'S\J4345 - BASE SERVICES PLAN 2020.DWG DATE:7/2/2018
THE CONTRACTOR IS TO BE AWARE OF ALL INSPECTIONS TO BE MADE BY THE ENGINEER AS A REQUIREMENT OF THE PRODUCER STATEMENT PS4 CONSTRUCTION REVIEW DOCUMENTATION. THE ENGINEER WILL REQUIRE 24 HOURS PRIOR NOTIFICATION FOR ALL INSPECTIONS.
DURHAM PROPERTY LTD
P 06 876 7646 F 06 876 7645 www.stratagroup.net.nz Structural
Fire
PO BOX 758 Business HQ 1/308 Queen Street East Hastings, New Zealand Civil Project Management
PROJECT:
TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)
POWER
ALL REASONABLY PRACTICABLE STEPS HAVE BEEN TAKEN TO ENSURE SAFETY IN DESIGN HAS BEEN CONSIDERED WITHIN STRATA GROUP'S SCOPE OF WORK FOR THIS DESIGN IN ACCORDANCE WITH IPENZ PRACTICE NOTE 07 "DESIGN FOR SAFETY IN BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES (JULY 2006)". IT REMAINS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER AND/OR OPERATOR TO ENSURE APPROPRIATE PRACTICES ARE IN PLACE TO PROTECT THE SAFETY OF THE WORKERS AND THE PUBLIC IN THE OPERATION OF THE FACILITY.
CLIENT:
GAS
SAFETY IN DESIGN
TELECOM
DN150 SN16 uPVC
DN100 PN9 uPVC WATER MAIN
TELECOM
GAS
POWER
13.5m TYPICAL CROSS SECTION PRIVATE ROAD
NOTE: CAR PARKING LOCATIONS AS INDICATED ON SCHEME PLAN ONLY
Superseded TITLE:
TYPICAL ROAD CROSS SECTION
DJ EM CHECKED DJ DATE OCT 18
DESIGNED DRAWN
PROJECT NO.: This drawing and its contents are the property of Strata Group Consulting Engineers Ltd. Any unauthorized employment or reproduction in full or part is forbidden.
NTS
J4345
SHEET:
C012
REVISION:
3
Revised Plan Set Residential Subdivision and Development
16 and 38 Willowbank Avenue, Napier (Our Ref H20180069) Prepared for Durham Property Investments Limited April 2020
Jason Kaye From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments:
Jason Kaye Tuesday, April 21, 2020 12:01 PM Rebecca Sutton Paul O'Shaughnessy; Matthew Holder RE: Te Awa Subdivision. Durham Properties Ltd H20180069-CONSENT-R3.pdf; H20180069_Te Awa_Scheme v3_rev L 200420.pdf; J4345 Engineering Report REV C.pdf; J4345-CVL-RESOURCE CONSENT SET_5_complied.pdf
Dear Rebecca, In response to your email of 26/03/20, please find attached a revised set of staged scheme plans, landscape details and engineering services report that supersede previous application details. The following comments provide response to the specific matters raised in your email (in the order raised in your mail). Swale Area in Landscape Plan The swale area on the landscape plan had not been updated from the previous layout. The 41m2 difference that you noted has now been added to the annotated 3.1ha area of the swale within the attached amended landscape document. Balance Lot Area The difference that you have identified for the stage 7 balance lot area is a result of the rounding of this area. The rounding of the balance lot area is standard practice for the presentation of large lots on scheme plans, but we appreciate your concerns over this matter and the balance lot rounding on the attached set of scheme plans has been amended to address your comments. Amended Strata Staging Plan The amended Strata Engineering Report and associated engineering plans are attached. Overhead Power Lines Having reviewed the overhead power lines matter, it seems logical that these are replaced with underground lines at the time of Stage 1 road widening, as envisaged by the Te Awa Structure Plan. This position supersedes any previous statement in this respect. Signage Thank you for the offer of incorporating signage into the current application. The signage will be limited to the village name (not yet determined). Simple wall wash lighting is proposed to illuminate the entrance signage in association with feature lighting, which is likely to be in the form of traditional lanterns mounted on the entrance wall. Separation of Stage 1 The revised scheme plan set has removed the staged scheme plans for Stages 1A, 1B and 1C following Councilâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s invitation to submit the Stage 1 development as a standalone application. The Stage 1 development is retained on the application plans for information only and is no longer part of this application.
Kind regards, Jason Kaye Development Nous Limited 1
Staged Scheme Plans
FIT ZG ER AL DP LA
HBV2/873
Description Rev Date 1 17/12/2018 FOR APPROVAL
40 .0
Pt Section 92 Blk VIII Heretaunga SD 0.0916
24.2
24 .2
24.2
16.3 23.6
16.7
16.3
C014 )
19.4
GE 1 C 20.0
16.3 20.0
16.3 20.0
17.8
(SHE ET
19.5
16.3
ROA D1 16.3
14.8
STA 17.0
13.0
14.9 15.9
12.8
16.0
16.0
m 17.00 17.0
20.0
13.0
20.0
20.0
16.0
20.0
20.0
)
C013
(SHE ET
20.0
20.0
D
ROA
SEN
20.0
17.0
ERIK
17.0
16.0
20.0
Lot 383 DP 513468 0.0483
795986
795987
20.0
16.0
22.4
804716
Lot 386 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 387 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 388 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 389 DP 516362 0.0483
804717
804718
804719
804720
22.4
012)
Lot 373 DP 513468 0.0562
Lot 374 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 375 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 376 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 377 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 378 DP 516362 0.0490
804711
804712
804714
804710
804713
795982
20.0
Lot 369 DP 513468 0.0509 795978
Lot 368 DP 513468 0.0469
Lot 367 DP 513468 0.0550
Lot 366 DP 513468 0.0578
794507
794506
Lot 365 DP 513468 0.0914 793447
20.0
Lot 364 DP 513468 0.0621
Lot 356 DP 513468 0.0604
22.5
Lot 345 DP 513468 0.0544
0
793438
793434
Lot 355 DP 513468 0.0527
793427
40.0
Lot 353 DP 513468 0.1185 793435
Date
KRC
17/12/2017
Designed
Date
Approved
Date
Client
DURHAM PROPERTY INVESTMENTS PROPOSED SUBDIVISION OF LOT 1 & 2 DP 14417 COMPRISED IN RT HBG2/863 & 420376
793446
0.0544
169.
HBB2/1223
17/12/2017
This document is produced by Development Nous Ltd solely for the benefit of and use by the client in accordance with the terms of engagement. Development Nous Ltd does not and shall not assume any responsibility or liability whatsoever to any third party arising out of any use or reliance by third party on the content of this document.
795977
22.5
16.8
Lot 9 DP 6055 2.1650
All Rights Reserved.
Date
GG
16.7
378863
Date
Drawn
(SHE
21.8
STA
16.0
20.0
16.0
804715
Lot 385 DP 516362 0.0483
Checked
20.0
16.4
3.6 5.8
Lot 384 DP 516362 0.0483
Fieldwork
ET C
GE 1 A
16.0 21.8
16.0
16.0
7.8
Lot 382 DP 513468 0.0483
KAITUNA PLACE
16.0
16.0
16.6
12.9
24.2
0 5.3
24.2
71899
16.0
20.0
16.0
17.7
20.0
14.7
16.0
ROA D1
16.0
16.0
12.9
24.2
16.6
24.2
15.9
24.2
Lot 1 DP 318389 6.1891
20.0
16.0
16.0
20.0
16.0
13.0
11.8
12.9
16.6
12.9
20.0
GE 1 B
STA
20.0
16.0
20.0
16.0
16.0
16.0
16.0
12.0
14.8
21.8 14.9
15.9
24.2
16.6
24.2
15.9
15.9
24.2
24.2
24.2
24.2
40
5.1
Lot 3 DP 394762 6.7380
LOT 15 625m² 31.5
16.0
12.4
D1
17.0
ROA
17.6
15.0
14.9 14.9
21.8
24.2
24.2
24.2 24.2
24.2
24.2
14.4 14.4
24.2
.0
HBG3/590
28.5
16.0
16.0 16.0
21.7
14.9
18.8
4.0
21.2
4.2
25.8
10.0 10.0
23 .2 23 .2
.2
24
Lot 93 DP 10451 0.0713
16.0
16.0
4.7
4.7
.7
20
.0
24
20.1
ROA
21.2
D8
ROA
12.1
.2
25
.2
23
.2
STAGE 3
HBG2/209
.2
24
.7
9.6
16.0
ROA D1
16.0
.6
.6
12.6
D8
15.2
13.0
13.8
16.2
16 .1 16 .1
24 .3
.2
24
STAGE 2
24
HBC4/814
Lot 94 DP 10451 0.0733
LOT 26 388m²
22
.5
15
.0
15
.2
24
.8
15
.3 16 .3
16
7.9 7.9
8.1 8.1
.2
24
15 24 .9 .2
.6
16
.2
24
15 .9
.2
24
Lot 95 DP 10451 0.0713
24.2
22
.6
22
.2
22
24
.2
15
.2
24
.2
24
.9
15
.9
12
.6
16
RO
.9
12
.2
21
HBF4/40
17
.2
24
.6
.2
15
.0
16
.2
STAGE 5
4.2
Lot 96 DP 10451 0.0672
LOT 25 383m²
22
12
.0
16
15 .9 24 .2
.6
16
.9
12
8.0
15 .2
15 .2
10
AD
.2
15
.2
12
3.8
.0
28
HBK1/825
24 .2
.2 24
.3 15
24 .2
10.4 10.4 7.4
14.2 16.0 16.0
24.2 24.2
4.2
RY 2
21.2
15
.0
.2
.9
12
.6
16
.6
15
8.0
.2
15
.2
.2
15
.0
97
.2
15
4.2
HBK1/977
Lot 97 DP 10451 0.0672
32.0
4.2
HBE2/1003
Lot 98 DP 10451 0.0672
.2 24
.2 24
24 .2
24.2
344m²
15
.0 13 7
HBK1/626
Lot 210 DP 10451 0.0728
XREF's: QuickMap_TE Awa_willowbank; Durham Property_LA BASE_v9_culdesacs; Willowbank Rd_QuickMap CAD FILE: H:\_2018\H20180069 - Durham Property Investments\CAD\H20180069-CONSENT-R3.dwg
15.6 23.7
.7
LOT 16 625m²
21.2
4.2
Lot 209 DP 10451 0.0741
.2
.1
23
19
31.5
LOT 24 427m²
ENT
4.2
4.2
HBA3/1092
HBA3/306
LOT 114 388m² 24.2
4.2
Lot 208 DP 10451 0.0741
Lot 114 DP 10248 0.0419
4.2
HBA2/1403
HBA3/306
21 .1
LOT 112 388m²
31.5
LOT 17 630m²
24.2
STAGE 7 (SHEET C020) 21.2
20
4
15
.2
8.0
.2
.4
16
AD
RO
.0
.0
16
.6
15
HBA3/1372
Lot 207 DP 9997 0.0687
Lot 118 DP 10451 0.0407
NORTH 24 .2
.2
24.2 .0
24 .2
m²
LOT 109 14 .6 374m² LOT 110 LB 13 397m² .2 LA
LOT 18 613m²
24.2
PALOT 23 396m²
3.7
LOT 113 363m²
31.5
LOT 22 PB 396m²
16.0
15
15
.0
16
STAGE 4
16
HBA1/525
Lot 206 DP 9997 0.0687
.4
16.5
.7
.5
12
16
Lot 205 DP 9997 0.0675
HBD2/756
31 .0
.3
NB
.0
NOTES 1. This plan has been produced for resource consent purposes. Boundaries and dimensions are subject to resource consent approval and land transfer survey. 2. Easements may be required for cross-boundary services. 3. Current Napier City Council Zoning: Main Residential. NCC Planning Maps: I7, I8 and H8. 4. All private shared lots are to be held by a Residents Society. 5. This plan is to be read in conjunction with the proposed stage plans C012 - C021.
32 .1
LOT 19 634m²
24.2
LOT 87 469m² NA
4.2
HBA1/801
Lot 165 DP 9997 0.0784
19 .8
LOT 108 446m²
16
T4
.6
22
.6
21.3
OALOT 21 391m²
LOT 86 421m²
29
.1
LO
AD
27
15.2
239 17
15
22
.6
RO
5.2 LOT 126 344m² LOT 123
S
.0
PR
.0
16
.0
Lot 204 DP 9997 0.0703
HBK1/439
.5
24.2
.3
.0
15
.3
12 .2
0 .7
14
23
LOT 129 354m² 2
TE
IVA
.0
16
.0
.0
16
64
HBA2/1222
4.2
Lot 164 DP 9997 0.0725
HBA1/624
16
4.5
Lot 203 DP 9997 0.0718
.6
29
15 .4
15 .2 24.2
15 .0 16
.0
.0
16
HBH2/141
HBJ2/292
Lot 166 DP 9997 0.0682
AD 3
15 .2 LOT 105 369m² 15 .2 LOT 106 15 .2 LOT 103 31.9 369m² LOT 107 488m² 15 .2 31 420m² .9
4.2
14
4.2
16
Lot 202 DP 9997 0.0693
Lot 163 DP 9997 0.0786
25
4.7
HBD3/1295
MB
LOT 85 413m²
16 .5 .5
.2
.2
1
LOT 128 347m²
16
4.3
.7
14.1
12.2 16
16.0
16 .0
LOT 104 370m²
15 .2
15.2
.0
RO 15
6.8
LOT 88 402m² MA
.5
.2
.4
.0
18
LOT 89 402m²
LOT 91 402m²
16
15
.0
23 .5
24 .2
16.2
LOT 406 5035m²
26
LOT 20 OB 567m²
17
16 .5
.5 .5
.5
.0
LOT 84 412m²
.0
.5
16
LOT 92 402m²
.0
17
16
16
17
LOT 83 412m²
17
2
16
16 .5 16 .5
.2
13
LOT 127 355m²
AD
LOT 90 402m²
16
.2
15
21 .2
RO .5
16
.0 16
.2
24 .2
.0
.2
.2
LOT 100 367m²
JK
.8
6.9 13
.2
15 .2
0
15 .2
13
8.0 15 .2
S RO
AD
15 .5
TE IVA
16 .0
PR
6.8
9.2 15 .2
15 .2
15 .2 15 .2 8.0
15 .2
21
LOT 97 365m²
24
12 16
24
16
LOT 93 402m²
.2
HBW1/356
LOT 95 388m²
LOT 96 389m²
.2
LOT 98 388m²
16
Lot 201 DP 10396 0.1090
.0
16 .0 8.0
WI LL
HBE1/551
Lot 162 DP 9997 0.0776
.2
STAGE 6
4.2
Lot 161 DP 9997 0.0789
24
21
24 .2 24 .2
KRC
17 .0
.8 LOT 111 24.2 LOT 14 404m² LOT 27 15 LOT 122 .4 21 .8 629m² 4.2 15 .2 388m² 358m² 15 LOT 125 JB .7 .4 3 16 24.2 LOT 63 0.5 .1 LOT 119 31.5 348m² LOT 124 24.2 15 .7 JA 388m² 15 323m² LOT 118 .4 LOT 28 15 HB 348m² 24 15 LOT 13 .4 .2 .4 2 2 4. 1.5 360m² 388m² 15.4 5 HA 21 C 629m² LOT 121 .2 LOT 62 15 .4 19 LOT 115 .6 LOT 130 24.2 388m² 356m² LOT 120 19 .6 31.5 448m² LOT 29 365m² 24 16 373m² .2 .0 19 .5 25.0 LOT 117 24 388m² IB .2 LOT 12 4.1 LOT 61 406m² 14.0 RO LOT 131 IA 388m² LOT 134 629m² 19 24.2 AD LOT 116 .5 22.0 5 24 388m² LOT 30 433m² .2 LOT 135 436m² 31.5 24 12.4 .2 388m² LOT 404 LOT 60 19 362m² .5 4.2 LOT 132 40 388m² 5374m² LOT 11 .0 13.3 4.4 24 24.2 .6 364m² 40 24 LOT 133 .0 .2 16.9 629m² 21 LOT 136 LOT 31 .2 LOT 139 LOT 59 473m² (SHEET C018) 21 387m² 388m² .2 LOT 140 31.5 394m² 388m² 19 26 LOT 142 .5 .6 4.2 391m² 24.2 24 (SHEET C017) .2 LOT 10 18.2 20 360m² .5 LOT 137 LOT 32 LOT 403 17.0 24 .2 LOT 58 629m² LOT 159 17.0 25 435m² 3207m² 388m² .7 18.1 388m² 15 375m² LOT 138 .2 LOT 143 31.5 24 24.2 9 23 .2 3. 361m² LOT 141 387m² .5 15 .2 24.2 LOT 57 LOT 158 LOT 33 396m² LOT 160 GB LOT 9 RO 15.9 A 378m² D 369m² GA 388m² 392m² 24 6 18 24 LOT 144 .2 629m² .4 LOT 155 .2 18.1 15 24.2 23 .2 LOT 302 356m² .5 16 LOT 154 372m² .0 21.2 31.5 194m² LOT 34 LOT 161 24 .2 .2 4 15 377m² .2 15.1 4.2 LOT 157 16 383m² 370m² .0 LOT 56 LOT 8 20 25 .5 18.9 21.2 .1 388m² 369m² 625m² LOT 156 LOT 401 LOT 150 LOT 153 21.2 24 .2 28.4 EB 16 5768m² 384m² .0 LOT 149 415m² 436m² 4.2 LOT 145 LOT 55 4.2 20 EA .5 27 458m² 369m² .0 381m² 16 18.1 .0 18 4.2 LOT 162 .1 21.2 24.2 24 LOT 152 .2 18.9 17 370m² RO 18.9 .1 456m² LOT 35 LOT 54 AD 24 28.5 LOT 146 LOT 151 .1 23 .5 7 369m² 424m² 16 LOT 148 LOT 166 404m² .5 LOT 163 3.2 4.2 436m² 24 LOT 7 24.2 .2 24 459m² .2 416m² 392m² Lot 2 FB LOT 53 625m² 16 .1 LOT 167 15.1 LOT 36 FA DP 14417 365m² 23 15 .5 LOT 147 15 .4 7.5 .4 18.9 410m² 21 31.5 387m² 1.7 9.2648 .2 LOT 164 381m² 9.1 1.7 LOT 170 24.2 4.2 Lot 381 Lot 379 13 Lot 380 420376 21.2 LOT 165 16.5 13 .7 371m² DP 513468 DP 513468 DP 513468 .7 LOT 6 4.2 0.0483 477m² 0.0500 2.8 0.0483 20 4.2 LOT 173 13 .5 16.4 374m² LOT 37 LOT 52 .0 629m² 795985 795983 795984 LOT 168 LOT 174 15 21 .4 16.4 405m² .6 387m² 472m² DB LOT 177 1 1 R 6 5 LOT 51 366m² .0 400m² .4 24.2 31.5 OA 9.0 21(SHEET LOT 169 C015) .2 16 D9 DA 16.5 .0 5.0 388m² 400m² LOT 178 LOT 182 15 16 359m² LOT 171 14.6 LOT 50 .0 LOT 38 16.5 LOT 5 LOT 402 .5 400m² 16 15.4 .0 381m² CB 388m² 16.5 387m² 4108m² 364m² 705m² 15 16 .3 LOT 49 15.4 24.2 .0 LOT 172 24.2 16.5 16 CA .0 15.4 388m² 385m² LOT 175 16 31.5 .6 LOT 48 LOT 181 LOT 39 374m² LOT 176 BB 16 .0 LOT 306 388m² 17.3 403m² 387m² LOT 4 11 BA 374m² LOT 179 B Lot 372 2.0 45 .6 24.2 9938m² DP 513468 15.4 373m² 24.2 16 0.0543 AB .0 686m² Lot 370 Lot 371 15.4 DP 513468 AA LOT 40 DP 513468 795981 LOT 180 0.0462 0.0520 15.4 387m² 381m² 31.5 ROA 795979 795980 D 36.7 LOT 301 9 21.2 24.2 (SHEET C016) 4.2 Lot 349 LOT 3 2059m² DP 513468 15.9 48 LOT 41 0.0565 .0 629m² 12 0.0 16.0 793431 Lot 348 387m² DP 513468 16.0 LOT 47 24.2 31.5 0.0544 11.1 39.6 1 388m² LOT 46 793430 Lot 350 LOT 45 LOT 42 LOT 2 DP 513468 388m² 0.0521 16.0 LOT 44 6.7 387m² 629m² Lot 347 388m² 793432 DP 513468 16.0 21 .2 411m² 0.0544 A 31 .5 16.0 793429 Lot 351 LOT 43 53 .0 DP 513468 165.0 17.5 0.0544 475m² LOT 1 Lot 346 793433 28.5 DP 513468 710m² 0.0544 LOT 305 793428 Lot 352 35 8712m² .0 DP 513468 24 .2
LOT 303 194m² 2
.0
HBC4/792
LOT 94 389m²
16 LOT 101 .0 370m² LOT 102 KB 16 366m² .0 4.2 (SHEET C019) KA 20 .5
.2
24 .2
LOT 64 378m² 2
16
HBW1/355
15 .6
OW BA NK
Lot 198 DP 10396 0.1778
Lot 160 DP 9997 0.0786
HBM1/694
24
LOT 65 388m²
.4
2428m²
.2
HBG2/863
LOT 99 389m²
28/01/2020 FOR APPROVAL
4.2
HBH4/1235
HBM1/695
LOT 307 7344m²
15
21
4.2
Lot 150 DP 9997 0.1039
15 .2
16 .0 16 .0
HBA1/716
Lot 159 DP 9997 0.0814
Lot 151 DP 9997 0.0753
16 .0
18
3.6
HBJ3/1004
LOT 66 388m²
16
Lot 197 DP 9997 0.0687
LOT 405 2193m²
.2
Bisson Place
LOT 67 388m² 24 .2
RO AD 1
HBE1/318
24 .2
12
MA
HB200/23
Lot 196 DP 9997 0.0703
Lot 158 DP 9997 0.0710
HBM1/696
LOT 68 388m²
64 .0
Lot 195 DP 9997 0.0758
3
.4
4.6
Lot 152 DP 9997 0.0819
15 .5
UE HBB3/848
24 24 .2 .2
STAGE 8 QB (SHEET C021) LOT 407
Lot 1 DP 14417 4.5526
24
MH
15
17 .0 LOT 81 374m² QA LOT 82 15 .4 412m²
4.2
HBJ3/948
HBM1/697
388m²
.0
HBA1/516
24 .2
LOT 69
16
Lot 157 DP 9997 0.0786
HBF2/1462
Lot 194 DP 9997 0.0753
KRC
.4
11 .7
4.2
LOT 70 375m²
16 .0
Lot 156 DP 9997 0.0690
24 .2
Lot 193 DP 9997 0.0741
.6
HBB4/640
Lot 153 DP 9997 0.0839
NU E
LOT 71 369m²
.0
40 .0
15
Lot 155 DP 9997 0.0672
4.2
40
HBA3/1263
E
HBA1/619
24 .2
LOT 304 194m² 2
4.2
N SO S BI
A PL
CE
Lot 192 DP 9997 0.0741
AV EN U
HBM1/687
HBM1/677
VE
LOT 308 5255m²
HBA3/48
Lot 12 DP 10375 0.0935
LOT 72 369m²
HBJ4/1500
Lot 191 DP 9997 0.0728
AVE N
Lot 154 DP 9997 0.0789
HBM1/676
4.2 24 .2
23/01/2020 FOR APPROVAL
15
15 .4 LOT 79 374m² LOT 80 RA 374m² 15 .4
RB
4.6
Lot 23 DP 10192 0.0799
Lot 190 DP 9997 0.0715
ELD
HBY1/923
LOT 73 369m² 2
HBB3/843
Lot 11 DP 10375 0.1464
2
409m²
4.2
24 .2
4.2
PE RC YS PIL LER A
HBM1/686
Lot 189 DP 9997 0.0703
SEF I
HBY1/922
Lot 6 DP 28293 0.0603
LOT 74 369m²
HBF4/39
SER VIC EL AN E
Lot 22 DP 10192 0.2137
24 .2
16 .0
Lot 2 DP 28293 0.0286 Lot 3 DP 28293 HBY1/919 0.0310 Lot 4HBY1/920 DP 28293 0.0319 Lot 5 DP 28293 HBY1/921 0.0276
LOT 75 369m²
LOT 78
3.1
.3
HBY1/918
Appr. Issued KRC KRC
14
16 .0
HBG2/478
Lot 188 DP 9997 0.0718
HBM1/673
LOT 76 384m² 24 .2
22 6.1
Lot 1 DP 28293 0.0596
.6
.0
22 6.1 15 .2
Lot 187 DP 9997 0.0705 Lot 10 DP 10192 0.1224
17
23
HBH2/114
Lot 24 DP 10192 0.3819
.1
LOT 77 388m²
Lot 186 DP 9997 0.0748
HBM1/672
26
14 .8
HBM1/678
24
Lot 9 DP 10192 0.1274
HBM1/675
RO AD 1
Lot 8 DP 10375 0.2324
16.0
HBW1/1021
EE T
.6
HBW1/1023
STR
22
HBW1/1022
DP 26433 0.0498
4.8
DATE PLOTTED: 1/28/2020 9:58:21 AM BY : GEMMA GUILFORD
DP 26433 0.0442
Lot 1 DP 26433 0.1325
BE S TA LL
793437
Lot 354 DP 513468 0.0527
Lot 363 DP 513468 0.0560
Lot 357 DP 513468 0.0584
793445
793439
Lot 358 DP 513468 0.0527
Lot 362 DP 513468 0.0526
16 & 38 WILLOWBANK AVE TE AWA, NAPIER OVERALL SCHEME PLAN Status
FOR APPROVAL
NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES
793444
Datum
793440
Lot 361 DP 513468 0.0526
793436
Lot 359 DP 513468 0.1125 793441
793443
Lot 360 DP 513468
Council Ref.
HB2000
Scale
1:1000
Drawing Number
H20180069-C011
Size
A3 Revision
3
HBW1/1023
HBW1/1021
STA LL STR
EE T
HBV2/873
Description Rev Date 1 17/12/2018 FOR APPROVAL Pt Section 92 Blk VIII Heretaunga SD 0.0916
Lot 8 DP 10375 0.2324
Lot 9 DP 10192 0.1274
HBM1/675
HBM1/678
NORTH
DP 26433 0.0498
FIT ZG E
HBW1/1022
LD P
DP 26433 0.0442
Lot 1 DP 26433 0.1325
RA
DATE PLOTTED: 1/28/2020 9:58:45 AM BY : GEMMA GUILFORD
LA
BE
Lot 186 DP 9997 0.0748
HBM1/672
Appr. Issued KRC KRC
2
23/01/2020 FOR APPROVAL
KRC
MH
3
28/01/2020 FOR APPROVAL
KRC
JK
HBH2/114
Lot 187 DP 9997 0.0705
Lot 24 DP 10192 0.3819
Lot 10 DP 10192 0.1224
Lot 1 DP 28293 0.0596
HBG2/478
Lot 188 DP 9997 0.0718
HBM1/673
HBY1/918
Lot 155 DP 9997 0.0672 HBB4/640
Lot 156 DP 9997 0.0690
Lot 153 DP 9997 0.0839
AN E
Lot 157 DP 9997 0.0786
HBA1/516
HBJ3/948
HBM1/697
Lot 152 DP 9997 0.0819
LOT 18 STAGE 1C
HBF2/1462
Lot 194 DP 9997 0.0753
LOT 17 STAGE 1C
HBB3/848
Lot 195 DP 9997 0.0758 HB200/23
Lot 196 DP 9997 0.0703 HBE1/318
Lot 158 DP 9997 0.0710
HBM1/696 Bisson Place
HBA3/1263
Lot 193 DP 9997 0.0741
E
ON
HBA1/619
MA
SS BI
P
CE A L
HBM1/677
AV EN UE
LOT 19 STAGE 1C
Lot 192 DP 9997 0.0741
Lot 197 DP 9997 0.0687
HBJ3/1004
HBM1/695
HBH4/1235
Lot 198 DP 10396 0.1778
Lot 160 DP 9997 0.0786
HBM1/694
HBW1/355
HBC4/792
HBE1/551
LOT 14 STAGE 1B
WI LL
Lot 161 DP 9997 0.0789 Lot 201 DP 10396 0.1090
Lot 162 DP 9997 0.0776
LOT 15 STAGE 1B
OW BA
Lot 150 DP 9997 0.1039
Lot 159 DP 9997 0.0814
NK
HBA1/716
Lot 151 DP 9997 0.0753
LOT 16 STAGE 1C
NU
Lot 154 DP 9997 0.0789
HBM1/687
NOTES 1. This plan has been produced for resource consent purposes. Boundaries and dimensions are subject to resource consent approval and land transfer survey. 2. Easements may be required for cross-boundary services. 3. Current Napier City Council Zoning: Main Residential. NCC Planning Maps: I7, I8 and H8. 4. Proposed Amalgamation Conditions: 4.1. "That Lot 401 hereon is to be held in one record of title". 5. Lots 301 & 305 are to vest in the Napier City Council as local purpose reserve upon deposit.
HBA3/48
Lot 12 DP 10375 0.0935
AV E
Lot 23 DP 10192 0.0799
HBJ4/1500
Lot 191 DP 9997 0.0728
UE
HBY1/923
HBM1/676
VEN
HBM1/686
Lot 190 DP 9997 0.0715
DA
Lot 6 DP 28293 0.0603
HBB3/843
Lot 11 DP 10375 0.1464
IEL
HBY1/922
PE RC YS PIL LER
Lot 189 DP 9997 0.0703
SEF
Lot 22 DP 10192 0.2137
HBF4/39
SER VIC EL
Lot 2 DP 28293 0.0286 Lot 3 DP 28293 HBY1/919 0.0310 Lot 4HBY1/920 DP 28293 0.0319 Lot 5 DP 28293 HBY1/921 0.0276
HBW1/356
LOT 13 STAGE 1B Lot 1 DP 318389 6.1891
HBD3/1295
71899
Lot 202 DP 9997 0.0693
Lot 163 DP 9997 0.0786
LOT 12 STAGE 1B
HBH2/141
HBJ2/292
Lot 166 DP 9997 0.0682
Lot 203 DP 9997 0.0718
Lot 164 DP 9997 0.0725
HBA1/624
LOT 11 STAGE 1B
HBA2/1222
Lot 204 DP 9997 0.0703
HBK1/439
HBA1/801
Lot 165 DP 9997 0.0784
LOT 504 9.9ha
Lot 205 DP 9997 0.0675
HBD2/756
LOT 10 STAGE 1B
Lot 206 DP 9997 0.0687
LOT 9 STAGE 1B
HBA3/1372
EN R O
Lot 207 DP 9997 0.0687
Lot 118 DP 10451 0.0407
HBA2/1403
LOT 8 STAGE 1B
Lot 208 DP 10451 0.0741
16.0
21.2
388m² 16.0
17.5
16.0
16.0
Lot 370 DP 513468 0.0462 795979
795987
Lot 372 DP 513468 0.0543
Lot 371 DP 513468 0.0520
804715
804716
Lot 386 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 387 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 388 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 389 DP 516362 0.0483
804717
804718
804719
804720
Date
Drawn
795981
Lot 373 DP 513468 0.0562
Lot 374 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 375 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 376 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 377 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 378 DP 516362 0.0490
804711
804712
804714
804710
804713
795982
795980
Lot 349 DP 513468 0.0565
LOT 3 STAGE 1A Lot 348 DP 513468 0.0544
6.7
LOT 42 387m²
28.5
795978
Lot 350 DP 513468 0.0521
Lot 347 DP 513468 0.0544
21.2
LOT 43 475m²
793429
LOT 1 STAGE 1A
Lot 346 DP 513468 0.0544 793428
Lot 345 DP 513468 0.0544
169.
0
Lot 368 DP 513468 0.0469
Lot 367 DP 513468 0.0550
Lot 366 DP 513468 0.0578
794507
794506
Lot 365 DP 513468 0.0914 793447
793432
Lot 364 DP 513468 0.0621
Date
17/12/2018 Date
KRC
22/08/2017
Designed
Date
Approved
Date
793433
Lot 356 DP 513468 0.0604 793438
793434
Lot 355 DP 513468 0.0527 Lot 353 DP 513468 0.1185 793435
Client
DURHAM PROPERTY INVESTMENTS PROPOSED SUBDIVISION OF LOT 1 & 2 DP 14417 COMPRISED IN RT HBG2/863 & 420376
793446
Lot 352 DP 513468 0.0544
793427
All Rights Reserved. This document is produced by Development Nous Ltd solely for the benefit of and use by the client in accordance with the terms of engagement. Development Nous Ltd does not and shall not assume any responsibility or liability whatsoever to any third party arising out of any use or reliance by third party on the content of this document.
795977
Lot 351 DP 513468 0.0544
HBB2/1223
40.0
Lot 369 DP 513468 0.0509
793431
793430
LOT 2 STAGE 1A
LOT 305 8712m² Lot 9 DP 6055 2.1650
795986
LOT 4 STAGE 1A
7.8
16.7 165.0
378863
5.1 0
LOT 44 411m²
16.0
53 .0
1
3.6 5.8
24.2
24.2
11.1
LOT 45
795985
Lot 385 DP 516362 0.0483
KAITUNA PLACE
24.2
24.2
24.2
40
16.0
A
LOT 41 387m²
16.0
5.3
LOT 47 388m² LOT 46 388m²
795984
Lot 384 DP 516362 0.0483
24.2
16.0
39.6
Lot 3 DP 394762 6.7380
LOT 40 387m²
4.2
.0
795983
LOT 5 STAGE 1A
16.0
9
15.9
.0
HBG3/590
36.7
16.0
48
LOT 180 381m²
15.4
Lot 383 DP 513468 0.0483
Checked
24.2
16.8
LOT 301 2059m²
Lot 93 DP 10451 0.0713
ROA D
Lot 382 DP 513468 0.0483
GG
LOT 39 387m²
24.2
15.9
HBG2/209
16.0
16.6
24.2
45 .6
16.0
24.2
24.2
24.2
14.4
HBC4/814
Lot 94 DP 10451 0.0733
Lot 381 DP 513468 0.0483
24.2
24.2
LOT 181 403m²
Lot 380 DP 513468 0.0483
Fieldwork
LOT 38 387m²
12.9
15.4 LOT 172 16.5 15.4 385m² LOT 175 LOT 176 374m² BB LOT 179 17.3 BA 374m² 15.4 373m² AB 15.4 AA
381m²
16.6
24.2
16.5
LOT 37 387m²
Lot 379 DP 513468 0.0500
24.2
21.2
LOT 182
24.2
Lot 95 DP 10451 0.0713
400m²
12.9
HBF4/40
LOT 178 24.2
10.0
15.4
15.9
24.2
400m²
14.6
4.2
Lot 96 DP 10451 0.0672
STAGE 2
16.4
LOT 6 STAGE 1A
16.0
16.4
16.0
4.2
LOT 177
17.7
24.2
21.2
HBK1/825
16.0
LOT 36 387m²
16.0
18.9
HBK1/977
Lot 97 DP 10451 0.0672
LOT 7 STAGE 1A
24.2
D1
LOT 147 381m²
21.2
LOT 35 424m²
16.6
24.2
15.9
15.1
4.2
ROA
FB
4.2
LOT 148 459m² FA
24.2
24.2
436m²
HBE2/1003
Lot 98 DP 10451 0.0672
16.6
21.2
Lot 210 DP 10451 0.0728
LOT 146 404m²
14.7
24.2 18.9
LOT 151
16.0
18.1
HBK1/626
12.9
15.9
LOT 145 381m²
4.2
Lot 209 DP 10451 0.0741
ERIK S
21.2
HBA3/1092
HBA3/306
LOT 401 5768m²
12.9
Lot 114 DP 10248 0.0419
16.4
HBA3/306
XREF's: QuickMap_TE Awa_willowbank; Durham Property_LA BASE_v9_culdesacs; Willowbank Rd_QuickMap CAD FILE: H:\_2018\H20180069 - Durham Property Investments\CAD\H20180069-CONSENT-R3.dwg
AD
HBA1/525
793437
Lot 354 DP 513468 0.0527
Lot 363 DP 513468 0.0560
Lot 357 DP 513468 0.0584
793445
793439
Lot 358 DP 513468 0.0527
Lot 362 DP 513468 0.0526
16 & 38 WILLOWBANK AVE TE AWA, NAPIER STAGE 2 - SCHEME PLAN Status
FOR APPROVAL
NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES
793444
Datum
793440
Lot 361 DP 513468 0.0526
793436
Lot 359 DP 513468 0.1125 793441
793443
Lot 360 DP 513468
Council Ref.
HB2000
Scale
1:1000
Drawing Number
H20180069-C015
Size
A3 Revision
3
HBW1/1023
HBW1/1021
STA LL STR
EE T
HBV2/873
Description Rev Date 1 17/12/2018 FOR APPROVAL Pt Section 92 Blk VIII Heretaunga SD 0.0916
Lot 8 DP 10375 0.2324
Lot 9 DP 10192 0.1274
HBM1/675
HBM1/678
NORTH
DP 26433 0.0498
FIT ZG E
HBW1/1022
LD P
DP 26433 0.0442
Lot 1 DP 26433 0.1325
RA
DATE PLOTTED: 1/28/2020 9:58:51 AM BY : GEMMA GUILFORD
LA
BE
Lot 186 DP 9997 0.0748
HBM1/672
Appr. Issued KRC KRC
2
23/01/2020 FOR APPROVAL
KRC
MH
3
28/01/2020 FOR APPROVAL
KRC
JK
HBH2/114
Lot 187 DP 9997 0.0705
Lot 24 DP 10192 0.3819
Lot 10 DP 10192 0.1224
Lot 1 DP 28293 0.0596
HBG2/478
Lot 188 DP 9997 0.0718
HBM1/673
HBY1/918
Lot 155 DP 9997 0.0672 HBB4/640
Lot 156 DP 9997 0.0690
Lot 153 DP 9997 0.0839
AN E
Lot 157 DP 9997 0.0786
HBA1/516
HBJ3/948
HBM1/697
Lot 152 DP 9997 0.0819
LOT 18 STAGE 1C
HBF2/1462
Lot 194 DP 9997 0.0753
LOT 17 STAGE 1C
HBB3/848
Lot 195 DP 9997 0.0758 HB200/23
Lot 196 DP 9997 0.0703 HBE1/318
Lot 158 DP 9997 0.0710
HBM1/696 Bisson Place
HBA3/1263
Lot 193 DP 9997 0.0741
E
ON
HBA1/619
MA
SS BI
P
CE A L
HBM1/677
AV EN UE
LOT 19 STAGE 1C
Lot 192 DP 9997 0.0741
Lot 197 DP 9997 0.0687
HBJ3/1004
HBM1/695
HBH4/1235
Lot 198 DP 10396 0.1778
Lot 160 DP 9997 0.0786
HBM1/694
HBW1/355
HBC4/792
HBE1/551
LOT 505 7.4ha
LOT 14 STAGE 1B
WI LL
Lot 161 DP 9997 0.0789 Lot 201 DP 10396 0.1090
Lot 162 DP 9997 0.0776
LOT 15 STAGE 1B
OW BA
Lot 150 DP 9997 0.1039
Lot 159 DP 9997 0.0814
NK
HBA1/716
Lot 151 DP 9997 0.0753
LOT 16 STAGE 1C
NU
Lot 154 DP 9997 0.0789
HBM1/687
NOTES 1. This plan has been produced for resource consent purposes. Boundaries and dimensions are subject to resource consent approval and land transfer survey. 2. Easements may be required for cross-boundary services. 3. Current Napier City Council Zoning: Main Residential. NCC Planning Maps: I7, I8 and H8. 4. Proposed Amalgamation Conditions: 4.1. "That Lot & 402 & 401 DP (Stage 2 LT#) hereon are to be held in one record of title". 5. Lots 302 & 306 are to vest in the Napier City Council as local purpose reserve upon deposit.
HBA3/48
Lot 12 DP 10375 0.0935
AV E
Lot 23 DP 10192 0.0799
HBJ4/1500
Lot 191 DP 9997 0.0728
UE
HBY1/923
HBM1/676
VEN
HBM1/686
Lot 190 DP 9997 0.0715
DA
Lot 6 DP 28293 0.0603
HBB3/843
Lot 11 DP 10375 0.1464
IEL
HBY1/922
PE RC YS PIL LER
Lot 189 DP 9997 0.0703
SEF
Lot 22 DP 10192 0.2137
HBF4/39
SER VIC EL
Lot 2 DP 28293 0.0286 Lot 3 DP 28293 HBY1/919 0.0310 Lot 4HBY1/920 DP 28293 0.0319 Lot 5 DP 28293 HBY1/921 0.0276
HBW1/356
LOT 13 STAGE 1B Lot 1 DP 318389 6.1891
HBD3/1295
71899
Lot 202 DP 9997 0.0693
Lot 163 DP 9997 0.0786
LOT 12 STAGE 1B
HBH2/141
HBJ2/292
Lot 203 DP 9997 0.0718
Lot 164 DP 9997 0.0725
LOT 11 STAGE 1B
HBA2/1222
Lot 204 DP 9997 0.0703
HBK1/439
40 .0
HBA1/801
8.1
LOT 162 STAGE 2
16 .5
.2
1.7
Lot 379 DP 513468 0.0500
Lot 380 DP 513468 0.0483
Lot 381 DP 513468 0.0483
Lot 382 DP 513468 0.0483
Lot 383 DP 513468 0.0483
795983
795984
795985
795986
795987
10.0
23 .2 23 .2
LOT 38 STAGE 2
LOT 5 STAGE 1A
14.4
.2
24
12
HBG3/590
Lot 389 DP 516362 0.0483
804717
804719
804720
Lot 370 DP 513468 0.0462
LOT 40 STAGE 2
795979
0.0
LOT 45 STAGE 2
LOT 42 STAGE 2
795981
Lot 346 DP 513468 0.0544 793428
Lot 345 DP 513468 0.0544
Lot 374 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 375 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 376 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 377 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 378 DP 516362 0.0490
804711
804712
804714
804710
804713
795982
795978
Lot 350 DP 513468 0.0521
Lot 347 DP 513468 0.0544 793429
Lot 373 DP 513468 0.0562
Lot 369 DP 513468 0.0509
793431
793430
LOT 2 STAGE 1A
LOT 1 STAGE 1A 305 STAGE 2
Drawn
795980
Lot 349 DP 513468 0.0565
LOT 43 STAGE 2
378863
Lot 371 DP 513468 0.0520
Lot 348 DP 513468 0.0544
LOT 44 STAGE 2 Lot 3 DP 394762 6.7380
Lot 372 DP 513468 0.0543
LOT 3 STAGE 1A
LOT 41 STAGE 2
LOT 46 STAGE 2
Date
Lot 368 DP 513468 0.0469
Lot 367 DP 513468 0.0550
Lot 366 DP 513468 0.0578
794507
794506
Lot 365 DP 513468 0.0914 793447
Date
793432
Lot 364 DP 513468 0.0621
793433
Lot 356 DP 513468 0.0604 793438
793434
Lot 355 DP 513468 0.0527 Lot 353 DP 513468 0.1185 793435
17/12/2018
Designed
Date
Approved
Date
Client
DURHAM PROPERTY INVESTMENTS PROPOSED SUBDIVISION OF LOT 1 & 2 DP 14417 COMPRISED IN RT HBG2/863 & 420376
793446
Lot 352 DP 513468 0.0544
793427
Date
KRC
This document is produced by Development Nous Ltd solely for the benefit of and use by the client in accordance with the terms of engagement. Development Nous Ltd does not and shall not assume any responsibility or liability whatsoever to any third party arising out of any use or reliance by third party on the content of this document.
795977
Lot 351 DP 513468 0.0544
HBB2/1223
All Rights Reserved.
17/12/2018
Checked LOT 4 STAGE 1A
LOT 186 STAGE 2
LOT 47 STAGE 2
Lot 9 DP 6055 2.1650
Lot 388 DP 516362 0.0483
804718
LOT 39 STAGE 2
301 STAGE 2
Lot 93 DP 10451 0.0713
Lot 387 DP 516362 0.0483
GG
LOT 187 STAGE 2
6.0
STAGE 3
HBG2/209
804716
Lot 386 DP 516362 0.0483
KAITUNA PLACE
.2
HBC4/814
Lot 94 DP 10451 0.0733
804715
Lot 385 DP 516362 0.0483
Fieldwork
LOT 188 STAGE 2
24
Lot 95 DP 10451 0.0713
Lot 384 DP 516362 0.0483
24.2
24.2
LOT 6 STAGE 1A
LOT 37 STAGE 2
25.8
.2
23
.2
24
HBF4/40
AD
.2
24
.2
21
Lot 96 DP 10451 0.0672
LOT 36 STAGE 2
LOT 167 STAGE 2
7.5
.2
3.8
.0
28
HBK1/825
LOT 7 STAGE 1A
16 .1
LOT 167 410m²
25
16
15 15 .4 .4
24
4.2
20 .5
4.2
LOT 35 STAGE 2
LOT 166 STAGE 2
LOT 163 STAGE 2
ERIK S
.1
16
RO AD 7
17 .1
LOT 166 416m²
.6
LOT 164 371m²
LOT 165 STAGE 2
24 .3
LOT 163 392m²
401 STAGE 2
9.1 1.7 LOT 170 13 LOT 165 16.5 13 .7 .7 477m² LOT 173 2.8 13 374m² LOT 52 .0 LOT 168 LOT 174 15 21 .4 405m² .6 472m² DB LOT 183 16 15 RO LOT 51 366m² .0 400m² .4 STAGE 2 AD LOT 169 9.0 16 DA 16.5 LOT 184 .0 5.0 9 388m² STAGE 2 15 16 359m² LOT 171 LOT 50 .5 .0 16.5 LOT 402 16 .0 CB 388m² 4108m² 364m² 15 16 .3 LOT 49 .0 LOT 179 16 CA STAGE 2 .0 LOT 181 388m² 16 STAGE 2 .6 LOT 48 LOT 182 16 STAGE 2 .0 LOT 185 LOT 306 388m² 11 B STAGE 2 2.0 9938m² 1
4.2
HBK1/977
Lot 97 DP 10451 0.0672
EN R O
.6 .2
.2
24
EB
16 .0
15 24 .9 .2
23 .5
.6 16
LOT 162 370m²
23 .5
.9 .2 12
21 .2
24 .9
.0
.9 12
.2 15
0 D1
.2 15
LOT 53 365m²
16
.9 12
8.0
16 .5
RO A
HBE2/1003
Lot 98 DP 10451 0.0672
LOT 8 STAGE 1B
16 .0
LOT 156 384m² EA
20
12
15
.2
24 .2
LOT 157 388m²
15 .2
.2
LOT 54 369m²
97 .0
Lot 210 DP 10451 0.0728
16 .0
LOT 161 370m²
4.2
24 .2
15
HBK1/626
23 .5
20 .5
24 .2
15
.0
.6
.6 15
8.0 .2 15
4.2
LOT 55 369m² .2
Lot 209 DP 10451 0.0741
13 7
HBA3/1092
HBA3/306
XREF's: QuickMap_TE Awa_willowbank; Durham Property_LA BASE_v9_culdesacs; Willowbank Rd_QuickMap CAD FILE: H:\_2018\H20180069 - Durham Property Investments\CAD\H20180069-CONSENT-R3.dwg
LOT 302 194m² 2 LOT 56 369m²
Lot 208 DP 10451 0.0741
Lot 114 DP 10248 0.0419
24 .2
LOT 9 STAGE 1B
LOT 160 392m²
4.2
HBA2/1403
HBA3/306
24 .2
23 .5
16
15
LOT 57 378m²
HBA3/1372
Lot 207 DP 9997 0.0687
.0
24 .2
.6
Lot 206 DP 9997 0.0687
Lot 118 DP 10451 0.0407
LOT 10 STAGE 1B
24 .2
LOT 58 388m²
HBA1/525
16
HBD2/756
15
Lot 205 DP 9997 0.0675
15 .9
Lot 165 DP 9997 0.0784
.0
HBA1/624
16
Lot 166 DP 9997 0.0682
793437
Lot 354 DP 513468 0.0527
Lot 363 DP 513468 0.0560
Lot 357 DP 513468 0.0584
793445
793439
Lot 358 DP 513468 0.0527
Lot 362 DP 513468 0.0526
16 & 38 WILLOWBANK AVE TE AWA, NAPIER STAGE 3 - SCHEME PLAN Status
FOR APPROVAL
NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES
793444
Datum
793440
Lot 361 DP 513468 0.0526
793436
Lot 359 DP 513468 0.1125 793441
793443
Lot 360 DP 513468
Council Ref.
HB2000
Scale
1:1000
Drawing Number
H20180069-C016
Size
A3 Revision
3
HBW1/1023
HBW1/1021
STA LL STR
EE T
HBV2/873
Description Rev Date 1 17/12/2018 FOR APPROVAL Pt Section 92 Blk VIII Heretaunga SD 0.0916
Lot 8 DP 10375 0.2324
Lot 9 DP 10192 0.1274
HBM1/675
HBM1/678
NORTH
DP 26433 0.0498
FIT ZG E
HBW1/1022
LD P
DP 26433 0.0442
Lot 1 DP 26433 0.1325
RA
DATE PLOTTED: 1/28/2020 9:58:59 AM BY : GEMMA GUILFORD
LA
BE
Lot 186 DP 9997 0.0748
HBM1/672
2
23/01/2020 FOR APPROVAL
KRC
MH
3
28/01/2020 FOR APPROVAL
KRC
JK
HBH2/114
Lot 187 DP 9997 0.0705
Lot 24 DP 10192 0.3819
Lot 10 DP 10192 0.1224
Lot 1 DP 28293 0.0596
HBG2/478
Lot 188 DP 9997 0.0718
HBM1/673
HBY1/918
HBB4/640
Lot 156 DP 9997 0.0690
Lot 153 DP 9997 0.0839
AN E
Lot 157 DP 9997 0.0786
HBA1/516
HBJ3/948
HBM1/697
Lot 152 DP 9997 0.0819
LOT 18 STAGE 1C
HBF2/1462
Lot 194 DP 9997 0.0753
LOT 17 STAGE 1C
HBB3/848
Lot 195 DP 9997 0.0758 HB200/23
Lot 196 DP 9997 0.0703 HBE1/318
Lot 158 DP 9997 0.0710
Lot 197 DP 9997 0.0687
HBJ3/1004
.0
.0 16 .2
.2 15
.2 24
HBE2/1003
LOT 57 STAGE 3 LOT 170 STAGE 3
402 STAGE 3
HBC4/814
306 STAGE 3
Lot 94 DP 10451 0.0733
LOT 178 STAGE 3
LOT 7 STAGE 1A LOT 36 STAGE 2
13.8
21.2
LOT 181 STAGE 2
LOT 38 STAGE 2
LOT 187 STAGE 2
Lot 383 DP 513468 0.0483
795983
795984
795985
795986
795987
Lot 384 DP 516362 0.0483 804715
Lot 385 DP 516362 0.0483 804716
Lot 386 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 387 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 388 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 389 DP 516362 0.0483
804717
804718
804719
804720
KAITUNA PLACE
Date
Drawn
LOT 185 STAGE 2
LOT 4 STAGE 1A Lot 370 DP 513468 0.0462
LOT 40 STAGE 2
HBG3/590
LOT 47 STAGE 2
LOT 46 STAGE 2
Lot 372 DP 513468 0.0543
Lot 371 DP 513468 0.0520
795981
LOT 42 STAGE 2
Lot 349 DP 513468 0.0565
LOT 3 STAGE 1A
LOT 44 STAGE 2
793429
LOT 1 STAGE 1A
Lot 346 DP 513468 0.0544 793428
Lot 345 DP 513468 0.0544
Lot 376 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 377 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 378 DP 516362 0.0490
804711
804712
804714
804710
804713
795982
795978
Lot 350 DP 513468 0.0521
Lot 347 DP 513468 0.0544 LOT 43 STAGE 2
Lot 375 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 369 DP 513468 0.0509
793431
793430
LOT 2 STAGE 1A
Lot 374 DP 516362 0.0470
795980
Lot 348 DP 513468 0.0544 LOT 45 STAGE 2
Lot 373 DP 513468 0.0562
Lot 368 DP 513468 0.0469
Lot 367 DP 513468 0.0550
Lot 366 DP 513468 0.0578
794507
794506
Lot 365 DP 513468 0.0914 793447
Date
793432
Lot 364 DP 513468 0.0621
793433
Lot 356 DP 513468 0.0604 793438
793434
Lot 355 DP 513468 0.0527 Lot 353 DP 513468 0.1185 793435
17/12/2018
Designed
Date
Approved
Date
Client
DURHAM PROPERTY INVESTMENTS PROPOSED SUBDIVISION OF LOT 1 & 2 DP 14417 COMPRISED IN RT HBG2/863 & 420376
793446
Lot 352 DP 513468 0.0544
793427
Date
KRC
This document is produced by Development Nous Ltd solely for the benefit of and use by the client in accordance with the terms of engagement. Development Nous Ltd does not and shall not assume any responsibility or liability whatsoever to any third party arising out of any use or reliance by third party on the content of this document.
795977
Lot 351 DP 513468 0.0544
HBB2/1223
All Rights Reserved.
17/12/2018
Checked
LOT 41 STAGE 2
Lot 9 DP 6055 2.1650
Lot 382 DP 513468 0.0483
LOT 39 STAGE 2
301 STAGE 2
305 STAGE 2
Lot 381 DP 513468 0.0483
LOT 5 STAGE 1A
795979
378863
Lot 380 DP 513468 0.0483
Fieldwork
LOT 188 STAGE 2
LOT 186 STAGE 2
Lot 3 DP 394762 6.7380
Lot 379 DP 513468 0.0500
GG
LOT 182 STAGE 2
HBG2/209
Lot 93 DP 10451 0.0713
LOT 6 STAGE 1A
LOT 183 STAGE 2 LOT 184 STAGE 2
LOT 179 STAGE 2
ERIK S
LOT 35 STAGE 2
LOT 166 STAGE 2
LOT 163 STAGE 2
LOT 37 STAGE 2
LOT 180 STAGE 3
LOT 177 STAGE 2
LOT 52 STAGE 3
AD
21.8
24.2
24.2
LOT 165 STAGE 2
18.9
LOT 176 STAGE 3
LOT 53 STAGE 3
Lot 95 DP 10451 0.0713
LOT 149 458m²
18.1
LOT 162 STAGE 2
LOT 175 STAGE 3 LOT 54 STAGE 3
HBF4/40
436m²
401 STAGE 2
LOT 167 STAGE 2
LOT 174 STAGE 3 LOT 55 STAGE 3
Lot 96 DP 10451 0.0672
LOT 150
3.2 4.2
LOT 171 STAGE 3
LOT 56 STAGE 3
HBK1/825
LOT 8 STAGE 1B
15.1
LOT 173 STAGE 3
HBK1/977
Lot 97 DP 10451 0.0672
8.1
4.1
LOT 172 STAGE 3
LOT 169 STAGE 3
Lot 98 DP 10451 0.0672
27 .0
LOT 152 456m² 2
LOT 58 STAGE 3
Lot 210 DP 10451 0.0728
4.2
12.1
HBK1/626
LOT 9 STAGE 1B
EN R O
.3 16 .3
LOT 168 STAGE 3
LOT 141 396m² GA
18.9
LOT 153 415m²
16 .1
LOT 59 STAGE 3
6
ROA
HBA3/1092
Lot 209 DP 10451 0.0741
387m² GB 15.9
LOT 154 377m² 25 .1
LOT 157 STAGE 4
LOT 138
18.1
7.9
15 .2
LOT 154 STAGE 4
7.9
16
.2
LOT 153 STAGE 4
LOT 60 STAGE 3
18 .4
18.1
21.8
18.8 24
LOT 155 372m²
AD
D8
15 .9 24 .2
.2
RO
4.0
15 .2
LOT 158 369m²
16.2
PR .9
17.0
15 .2
15
HBA2/1403
HBA3/306
LOT 10 STAGE 1B
LOT 403 3207m²
LOT 159 375m²
LOT 152 STAGE 4
302 STAGE 3
Lot 208 DP 10451 0.0741
Lot 114 DP 10248 0.0419
473m²
20 .5
4.2
Lot 207 DP 9997 0.0687
HBA3/306
.0
LOT 61 STAGE 4
HBA3/1372
Lot 118 DP 10451 0.0407
16 16
Lot 206 DP 9997 0.0687
LOT 11 STAGE 1B
LOT 133
19 .5
4.2
LOT 62 STAGE 4
HBA1/525
19 .5
STAGE 4 12
HBD2/756
388m² 24 .2
21 .2
.0
16
Lot 205 DP 9997 0.0675
LOT 131
LOT 132 364m²
.2
LOT 59 388m²
HBA1/801
Lot 165 DP 9997 0.0784
24
.0
Lot 204 DP 9997 0.0703
LOT 12 STAGE 1B
24 .2
24
.0 16
LOT 60 388m²
HBA2/1222
HBK1/439
24 .2
4.2
HBA1/624
16
HBH2/141
71899
16
16
LOT 61 388m²
Lot 203 DP 9997 0.0718
Lot 164 DP 9997 0.0725
24 .2
.0
Lot 202 DP 9997 0.0693
HBJ2/292
Lot 166 DP 9997 0.0682
Lot 1 DP 318389 6.1891 .0
HBD3/1295
Lot 163 DP 9997 0.0786
LOT 13 STAGE 1B
24 .2
LOT 62 388m²
16
HBW1/356
AD S
Lot 201 DP 10396 0.1090
RO
HBE1/551
Lot 162 DP 9997 0.0776
LOT 14 STAGE 1B
WI LL
Lot 161 DP 9997 0.0789
.2
HBW1/355
HBC4/792
12
Lot 160 DP 9997 0.0786
HBM1/694
LOT 15 STAGE 1B
.0
Lot 198 DP 10396 0.1778
.0
HBH4/1235
16
HBM1/695
6.4ha
OW BA
Lot 150 DP 9997 0.1039
Lot 159 DP 9997 0.0814
LOT 506
NK
HBA1/716
Lot 151 DP 9997 0.0753
LOT 16 STAGE 1C
IVA TE
HBM1/696 Bisson Place
HBA3/1263
Lot 193 DP 9997 0.0741
E
Lot 155 DP 9997 0.0672
LOT 19 STAGE 1C
Lot 192 DP 9997 0.0741
AV E
ON
HBA1/619
HBM1/677
AV EN UE
MA
SS BI
P
CE A L
NOTES 1. This plan has been produced for resource consent purposes. Boundaries and dimensions are subject to resource consent approval and land transfer survey. 2. Easements may be required for cross-boundary services. 3. Current Napier City Council Zoning: Main Residential. NCC Planning Maps: I7, I8 and H8. 4. Proposed Amalgamation Conditions: 4.1. "That Lot 403 & Lot 402 DP (Stage 3 LT#) & Lot 401 DP (Stage 2 LT#) hereon are to be held in one record of title".
HBA3/48
Lot 12 DP 10375 0.0935
NU
Lot 154 DP 9997 0.0789
HBM1/687
HBJ4/1500
Lot 191 DP 9997 0.0728
UE
Lot 23 DP 10192 0.0799
HBM1/676
VEN
HBM1/686
Lot 190 DP 9997 0.0715
DA
Lot 6 DP 28293 0.0603
HBB3/843
Lot 11 DP 10375 0.1464
IEL
HBY1/922
PE RC YS PIL LER
Lot 189 DP 9997 0.0703
SEF
Lot 22 DP 10192 0.2137
HBF4/39
SER VIC EL
Lot 2 DP 28293 0.0286 Lot 3 DP 28293 HBY1/919 0.0310 Lot 4HBY1/920 DP 28293 0.0319 Lot 5 DP 28293 HBY1/921 0.0276
HBY1/923
XREF's: QuickMap_TE Awa_willowbank; Durham Property_LA BASE_v9_culdesacs; Willowbank Rd_QuickMap CAD FILE: H:\_2018\H20180069 - Durham Property Investments\CAD\H20180069-CONSENT-R3.dwg
Appr. Issued KRC KRC
793437
Lot 354 DP 513468 0.0527
Lot 363 DP 513468 0.0560
Lot 357 DP 513468 0.0584
793445
793439
Lot 358 DP 513468 0.0527
Lot 362 DP 513468 0.0526
16 & 38 WILLOWBANK AVE TE AWA, NAPIER STAGE 4 - SCHEME PLAN Status
FOR APPROVAL
NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES
793444
Datum
793440
Lot 361 DP 513468 0.0526
793436
Lot 359 DP 513468 0.1125 793441
793443
Lot 360 DP 513468
Council Ref.
HB2000
Scale
1:1000
Drawing Number
H20180069-C017
Size
A3 Revision
3
HBW1/1023
HBW1/1021
STA LL STR
EE T
HBV2/873
Description Rev Date 1 17/12/2018 FOR APPROVAL Pt Section 92 Blk VIII Heretaunga SD 0.0916
Lot 8 DP 10375 0.2324
Lot 9 DP 10192 0.1274
HBM1/675
HBM1/678
NORTH
DP 26433 0.0498
FIT ZG E
HBW1/1022
LD P
DP 26433 0.0442
Lot 1 DP 26433 0.1325
RA
DATE PLOTTED: 1/28/2020 9:59:05 AM BY : GEMMA GUILFORD
LA
BE
Lot 186 DP 9997 0.0748
HBM1/672
2
23/01/2020 FOR APPROVAL
KRC
MH
3
28/01/2020 FOR APPROVAL
KRC
JK
HBH2/114
Lot 187 DP 9997 0.0705
Lot 24 DP 10192 0.3819
Lot 10 DP 10192 0.1224
Lot 1 DP 28293 0.0596
HBG2/478
Lot 188 DP 9997 0.0718
HBM1/673
HBY1/918
AN E
.7
.6 22
LOT 170 STAGE 3
Lot 96 DP 10451 0.0672 HBF4/40
HBC4/814
306 STAGE 3
Lot 94 DP 10451 0.0733
16.0
16.0
D1
16.0
16.0
12.4
16.0
16.0
AD
LOT 9 STAGE 1B
EN R O
16.0
16.0
16.0
17.6
16.0
16.0 24.2
LOT 34 383m²
16.0
11.8
16.0
14.8
24.2
LOT 33 388m²
LOT 8 STAGE 1B
401 STAGE 2 LOT 149 STAGE 4
LOT 165 STAGE 2
ERIK S
LOT 150 STAGE 4
LOT 153 STAGE 4
LOT 178 STAGE 3
LOT 35 STAGE 2
LOT 166 STAGE 2
LOT 163 STAGE 2
LOT 7 STAGE 1A LOT 36 STAGE 2
LOT 184 STAGE 2
LOT 179 STAGE 2
LOT 181 STAGE 2
LOT 38 STAGE 2
LOT 187 STAGE 2
Lot 383 DP 513468 0.0483
795983
795984
795985
795986
795987
Lot 384 DP 516362 0.0483 804715
Lot 385 DP 516362 0.0483 804716
Lot 386 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 387 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 388 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 389 DP 516362 0.0483
804717
804718
804719
804720
KAITUNA PLACE
Date
Drawn
LOT 185 STAGE 2
LOT 39 STAGE 2 LOT 4 STAGE 1A Lot 370 DP 513468 0.0462
LOT 40 STAGE 2
HBG3/590
LOT 47 STAGE 2
LOT 46 STAGE 2
Lot 372 DP 513468 0.0543
Lot 371 DP 513468 0.0520
795981
LOT 42 STAGE 2
Lot 349 DP 513468 0.0565
LOT 3 STAGE 1A
LOT 44 STAGE 2
793429
LOT 1 STAGE 1A
Lot 346 DP 513468 0.0544 793428
Lot 345 DP 513468 0.0544
Lot 376 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 377 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 378 DP 516362 0.0490
804711
804712
804714
804710
804713
795982
795978
Lot 350 DP 513468 0.0521
Lot 347 DP 513468 0.0544 LOT 43 STAGE 2
Lot 375 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 369 DP 513468 0.0509
793431
793430
LOT 2 STAGE 1A
Lot 374 DP 516362 0.0470
795980
Lot 348 DP 513468 0.0544 LOT 45 STAGE 2
Lot 373 DP 513468 0.0562
Lot 368 DP 513468 0.0469
Lot 367 DP 513468 0.0550
Lot 366 DP 513468 0.0578
794507
794506
Lot 365 DP 513468 0.0914 793447
Date
793432
Lot 364 DP 513468 0.0621
793433
Lot 356 DP 513468 0.0604 793438
793434
Lot 355 DP 513468 0.0527 Lot 353 DP 513468 0.1185 793435
17/12/2018
Designed
Date
Approved
Date
Client
DURHAM PROPERTY INVESTMENTS PROPOSED SUBDIVISION OF LOT 1 & 2 DP 14417 COMPRISED IN RT HBG2/863 & 420376
793446
Lot 352 DP 513468 0.0544
793427
Date
KRC
This document is produced by Development Nous Ltd solely for the benefit of and use by the client in accordance with the terms of engagement. Development Nous Ltd does not and shall not assume any responsibility or liability whatsoever to any third party arising out of any use or reliance by third party on the content of this document.
795977
Lot 351 DP 513468 0.0544
HBB2/1223
All Rights Reserved.
17/12/2018
Checked
LOT 41 STAGE 2
Lot 9 DP 6055 2.1650
Lot 382 DP 513468 0.0483
GG
LOT 182 STAGE 2
301 STAGE 2
305 STAGE 2
Lot 381 DP 513468 0.0483
LOT 5 STAGE 1A
795979
378863
Lot 380 DP 513468 0.0483
Fieldwork
LOT 188 STAGE 2
LOT 186 STAGE 2
Lot 3 DP 394762 6.7380
Lot 379 DP 513468 0.0500
LOT 183 STAGE 2
LOT 177 STAGE 2
LOT 52 STAGE 3
LOT 6 STAGE 1A
LOT 37 STAGE 2
LOT 180 STAGE 3
HBG2/209
Lot 93 DP 10451 0.0713
ROA
17.0
12.0
15.0
14.9
14.9
LOT 144 356m²
LOT 32 388m²
LOT 176 STAGE 3
LOT 53 STAGE 3
Lot 95 DP 10451 0.0713
24.2
4.2
LOT 175 STAGE 3 402 STAGE 3
LOT 143 361m²
LOT 147 STAGE 4
LOT 10 STAGE 1B
24.2
LOT 167 STAGE 2
LOT 174 STAGE 3
LOT 54 STAGE 3
14.9
LOT 144 STAGE 4
LOT 162 STAGE 2
LOT 171 STAGE 3
LOT 55 STAGE 3
24.2
17.0
LOT 11 STAGE 1B
24.2
LOT 31 388m²
21.2
LOT 142 360m²
21.2
LOT 172 STAGE 3
LOT 56 STAGE 3
HBK1/825
LOT 140 391m²
18.2
LOT 173 STAGE 3
HBK1/977
14.9
20.1
15.2
D8 ROA
13.0
LOT 139 394m²
71899
LOT 12 STAGE 1B
24.2
LOT 30 388m²
4.2
STAGE 5
16.9
LOT 29 388m²
LOT 152 STAGE 4
LOT 57 STAGE 3
Lot 97 DP 10451 0.0672
12.4
4.2
HBE2/1003
Lot 98 DP 10451 0.0672
21.7
.0 24
12.6
13.3
LOT 154 STAGE 4
LOT 58 STAGE 3 LOT 169 STAGE 3
LOT 404 5374m²
Lot 1 DP 318389 6.1891
24.2
21.2
LOT 168 STAGE 3
Lot 210 DP 10451 0.0728
LOT 116 436m²
22.0
4.4
LOT 59 STAGE 3
HBK1/626
25.0
LOT 13 STAGE 1B
16.0
.6
22
14.0
LOT 117 406m² IA
LOT 115 448m²
LOT 154 STAGE 4 LOT 157 STAGE 4
Lot 209 DP 10451 0.0741
.6
13.0
LOT 153 STAGE 4
LOT 60 STAGE 3
HBA3/1092
HBA3/306
4.7
22
.6
15
.0 15
.8
LOT 155 STAGE 4
HBA2/1403
19
D5
LOT 158 STAGE 4
LOT 152 STAGE 4
302 STAGE 3
Lot 208 DP 10451 0.0741
Lot 114 DP 10248 0.0419
LOT 120 373m² IB
3.9
Lot 207 DP 9997 0.0687
HBA3/306
24 .6
LOT 136 387m²
LOT 137 25 435m² .7
403 STAGE 4
LOT 159 STAGE 4
LOT 61 STAGE 4
HBA3/1372
Lot 118 DP 10451 0.0407
4.1
RO A
19 .5
LOT 135 362m²
26 .6
15
Lot 206 DP 9997 0.0687
.7 14
.2 12
LOT 133 STAGE 4
LOT 62 STAGE 4
HBA1/525
.0
.55
4.2
HBD2/756
356m² 16
LOT 134 433m²
LOT 132 STAGE 4
LOT 59 STAGE 4
Lot 205 DP 9997 0.0675
.4
19 .5
15
LOT 60 STAGE 4
40 .0
HBA1/801
Lot 165 DP 9997 0.0784
.0
LOT 131 STAGE 4
.0 64
HBA2/1222
Lot 204 DP 9997 0.0703
HBK1/439
LOT 130 365m²
4.5
HBA1/624
15
22
HBH2/141
Lot 164 DP 9997 0.0725
21 .2
.2
LOT 61 STAGE 4
Lot 203 DP 9997 0.0718
24.2
LOT 28 388m²
21
15.4
4.7
LOT 62 STAGE 4
Lot 202 DP 9997 0.0693
LOT 14 STAGE 1B
.4
15 LOT 125 .4 348m² LOT 124 15 .4 HB 15 348m² .4 HA LOT 121
.5
C
HBJ2/292
Lot 166 DP 9997 0.0682
16
4.2
HBD3/1295
Lot 163 DP 9997 0.0786
0.5
15
.2
LOT 63 388m²
23 .5
LOT 129 354m² 2
15
HBW1/356
4.2
LOT 303 194m² 2 4.2
LOT 128 347m²
.2
Lot 201 DP 10396 0.1090
LOT 64 378m² 2
14
15 .6
WI LL
HBE1/551
Lot 162 DP 9997 0.0776
24 .2
LOT 15 STAGE 1B
4.2
Lot 161 DP 9997 0.0789
24 .2
.2
HBW1/355
HBC4/792
24 .2
LOT 65 388m²
16
Lot 160 DP 9997 0.0786
HBM1/694
8.0
Lot 198 DP 10396 0.1778
.0
HBH4/1235
16
HBM1/695
OW BA
Lot 150 DP 9997 0.1039
LOT 307 7344m²
NK
HBA1/716
Lot 159 DP 9997 0.0814
.6
Lot 197 DP 9997 0.0687
HBJ3/1004
Lot 151 DP 9997 0.0753
LOT 16 STAGE 1C
15
HBE1/318
Lot 158 DP 9997 0.0710
HBM1/696 Bisson Place
64 .0
HB200/23
Lot 196 DP 9997 0.0703
12
HBJ3/948
Lot 152 DP 9997 0.0819
16 .0
Lot 157 DP 9997 0.0786
HBA1/516
HBM1/697
LOT 17 STAGE 1C
HBB3/848
Lot 195 DP 9997 0.0758
8.0
Lot 153 DP 9997 0.0839
LOT 18 STAGE 1C
Lot 194 DP 9997 0.0753
.0
Lot 156 DP 9997 0.0690
LOT 507 4.0ha
HBF2/1462
E
HBB4/640
40 .0
NU
Lot 155 DP 9997 0.0672
HBA3/1263
Lot 193 DP 9997 0.0741
3.6
ON
HBA1/619
MA
SS BI
P
CE A L
HBM1/677
AV EN UE
LOT 19 STAGE 1C
Lot 192 DP 9997 0.0741
AV E
HBM1/687
NOTES 1. This plan has been produced for resource consent purposes. Boundaries and dimensions are subject to resource consent approval and land transfer survey. 2. Easements may be required for cross-boundary services. 3. Current Napier City Council Zoning: Main Residential. NCC Planning Maps: I7, I8 and H8. 4. Proposed Amalgamation Conditions: 4.1. "That Lot 404 Lot 403 DP (Stage 4 LT#) & Lot 402 DP (Stage 3 LT#) & Lot 401 DP (Stage 2 LT#) hereon are to be held in one record of title". 5. Lots 303 & 307 is to vest in the Napier City Council as local purpose reserve upon deposit.
HBA3/48
Lot 12 DP 10375 0.0935
18
Lot 154 DP 9997 0.0789
HBJ4/1500
Lot 191 DP 9997 0.0728
UE
Lot 23 DP 10192 0.0799
HBM1/676
VEN
HBM1/686
Lot 190 DP 9997 0.0715
DA
Lot 6 DP 28293 0.0603
HBB3/843
Lot 11 DP 10375 0.1464
IEL
HBY1/922
PE RC YS PIL LER
Lot 189 DP 9997 0.0703
SEF
Lot 22 DP 10192 0.2137
HBF4/39
SER VIC EL
Lot 2 DP 28293 0.0286 Lot 3 DP 28293 HBY1/919 0.0310 Lot 4HBY1/920 DP 28293 0.0319 Lot 5 DP 28293 HBY1/921 0.0276
HBY1/923
XREF's: QuickMap_TE Awa_willowbank; Durham Property_LA BASE_v9_culdesacs; Willowbank Rd_QuickMap CAD FILE: H:\_2018\H20180069 - Durham Property Investments\CAD\H20180069-CONSENT-R3.dwg
Appr. Issued KRC KRC
793437
Lot 354 DP 513468 0.0527
Lot 363 DP 513468 0.0560
Lot 357 DP 513468 0.0584
793445
793439
Lot 358 DP 513468 0.0527
Lot 362 DP 513468 0.0526
16 & 38 WILLOWBANK AVE TE AWA, NAPIER STAGE 5 - SCHEME PLAN Status
FOR APPROVAL
NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES
793444
Datum
793440
Lot 361 DP 513468 0.0526
793436
Lot 359 DP 513468 0.1125 793441
793443
Lot 360 DP 513468
Council Ref.
HB2000
Scale
1:1000
Drawing Number
H20180069-C018
Size
A3 Revision
3
HBW1/1023
HBW1/1021
STA LL STR
EE T
HBV2/873
Description Rev Date 1 17/12/2018 FOR APPROVAL Pt Section 92 Blk VIII Heretaunga SD 0.0916
Lot 8 DP 10375 0.2324
Lot 9 DP 10192 0.1274
HBM1/675
HBM1/678
NORTH
DP 26433 0.0498
FIT ZG E
HBW1/1022
LD P
DP 26433 0.0442
Lot 1 DP 26433 0.1325
RA
DATE PLOTTED: 4/14/2020 9:01:56 AM BY : SIMON JONES
LA
BE
Lot 186 DP 9997 0.0748
HBM1/672
HBH2/114
Lot 10 DP 10192 0.1224
Lot 1 DP 28293 0.0596
UE VEN
16 .0
Lot 207 DP 9997 0.0687
16 .0
15 .0
.0
LOT 153 STAGE 4
LOT 170 STAGE 3
402 STAGE 3
15.6
.3 15
m²
239 17 .1
20
.1
23.7
.6
.6
4.7
22
LOT 140 STAGE 5
LOT 142 STAGE 5
LOT 33 STAGE 5
LOT 154 STAGE 4
LOT 34 STAGE 5
LOT 9 STAGE 1B
LOT 8 STAGE 1B
401 STAGE 2
LOT 150 STAGE 4
LOT 153 STAGE 4
LOT 149 STAGE 4
LOT 165 STAGE 2
LOT 35 STAGE 2
LOT 166 STAGE 2
LOT 163 STAGE 2
LOT 7 STAGE 1A LOT 36 STAGE 2
LOT 176 STAGE 3 LOT 178 STAGE 3
LOT 184 STAGE 2
LOT 179 STAGE 2
LOT 181 STAGE 2
LOT 182 STAGE 2
LOT 38 STAGE 2
LOT 187 STAGE 2
Lot 383 DP 513468 0.0483
795983
795984
795985
795986
795987
Lot 384 DP 516362 0.0483 804715
Lot 385 DP 516362 0.0483 804716
Lot 386 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 387 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 388 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 389 DP 516362 0.0483
804717
804718
804719
804720
LOT 185 STAGE 2
HURUNUI DRIVE
LOT 4 STAGE 1A Lot 370 DP 513468 0.0462
LOT 40 STAGE 2
HBG3/590
LOT 47 STAGE 2
LOT 46 STAGE 2
Lot 372 DP 513468 0.0543
Lot 371 DP 513468 0.0520
Drawn
795981
LOT 42 STAGE 2
Lot 349 DP 513468 0.0565
LOT 3 STAGE 1A
LOT 44 STAGE 2
793429
LOT 1 STAGE 1A
Lot 346 DP 513468 0.0544 793428
Lot 345 DP 513468 0.0544
Lot 375 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 376 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 377 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 378 DP 516362 0.0490
804711
804712
804714
804710
804713
795982
795978
Lot 350 DP 513468 0.0521
Lot 347 DP 513468 0.0544 LOT 43 STAGE 2
Lot 374 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 369 DP 513468 0.0509
793431
793430
LOT 2 STAGE 1A
Lot 373 DP 513468 0.0562
793432
Lot 351 DP 513468 0.0544
17/12/2018
KAITU 793438
793434
Lot 355 DP 513468 0.0527 Lot 353 DP 513468 0.1185 793435
NA PL A
Lot 356 DP 513468 0.0604
Lot 352 DP 513468 0.0544
793427
Lot 367 DP 513468 0.0550
Lot 366 DP 513468 0.0578
794507
794506
Lot 365 DP 513468 0.0914 793447
Date
KRC
17/12/2018
Designed
Date
Approved
Date
This document is produced by Development Nous Ltd solely for the benefit of and use by the client in accordance with the terms of engagement. Development Nous Ltd does not and shall not assume any responsibility or liability whatsoever to any third party arising out of any use or reliance by third party on the content of this document.
Client
DURHAM PROPERTY INVESTMENTS
795977
793433
HBB2/1223
Lot 368 DP 513468 0.0469
All Rights Reserved.
Date
GG
795980
Lot 348 DP 513468 0.0544 LOT 45 STAGE 2
Date
Checked
LOT 41 STAGE 2
Lot 9 DP 6055 2.1650
Lot 382 DP 513468 0.0483
LOT 39 STAGE 2
301 STAGE 2
305 STAGE 2
Lot 381 DP 513468 0.0483
LOT 5 STAGE 1A
795979
378863
Lot 380 DP 513468 0.0483
Fieldwork
LOT 188 STAGE 2
LOT 186 STAGE 2
Lot 3 DP 394762 6.7380
Lot 379 DP 513468 0.0500
LOT 183 STAGE 2
LOT 177 STAGE 2
LOT 52 STAGE 3
LOT 6 STAGE 1A
LOT 37 STAGE 2
LOT 180 STAGE 3
HBG2/209
Lot 93 DP 10451 0.0713
LOT 10 STAGE 1B
LOT 143 STAGE 5
LOT 147 STAGE 4
LOT 167 STAGE 2
LOT 53 STAGE 3
306 STAGE 3
LOT 11 STAGE 1B LOT 31 STAGE 5
LOT 144 STAGE 5
LOT 175 STAGE 3 LOT 54 STAGE 3
LOT 12 STAGE 1B
LOT 30 STAGE 5
LOT 32 STAGE 5
LOT 162 STAGE 2
LOT 174 STAGE 3 LOT 55 STAGE 3
71899
LOT 29 STAGE 5
LOT 154 STAGE 4
LOT 171 STAGE 3
LOT 56 STAGE 3
HBC4/814
LO T4
.3
15 .6
LOT 139 STAGE 5
LOT 173 STAGE 3
HBK1/977
Lot 1 DP 318389 6.1891
LOT 115 STAGE 5
LOT 152 STAGE 4
LOT 57 STAGE 3
Lot 94 DP 10451 0.0733
.6
LOT 13 STAGE 1B
404 STAGE 5
LOT 136 STAGE 5
LOT 172 STAGE 3
LOT 169 STAGE 3
Lot 95 DP 10451 0.0713
LOT 28 STAGE 5
LOT 116 STAGE 5
LOT 58 STAGE 3
HBF4/40
LOT 14 STAGE 1B
LOT 137 STAGE 5
LOT 155 STAGE 4
HBK1/626
19
LOT 158 STAGE 4
LOT 168 STAGE 3
Lot 96 DP 10451 0.0672
.7
.8
LOT 134 STAGE 5
LOT 59 STAGE 3
HBK1/825
19
15
LOT 144 STAGE 4
HBA3/1092
Lot 97 DP 10451 0.0672
LOT 15 STAGE 1B
LOT 117 STAGE 5
LOT 157 STAGE 4
HBE2/1003
31 .0
.3
LOT 120 STAGE 5
403 STAGE 4
LOT 152 STAGE 4
LOT 60 STAGE 3
Lot 98 DP 10451 0.0672
16
15 LOT 122 .4 358m² JB 16 .1 LOT 119 15 .7 JA 323m² LOT 118 15 .4 360m²
LOT 132 STAGE 4
LOT 159 STAGE 4
HBA2/1403
Lot 210 DP 10451 0.0728
.6
23
15 .2 22 .6
22
.2
.2
16 .0
16
.3 12 .0 16
.0 16
12 .2
15
LOT 133 STAGE 4
302 STAGE 3
Lot 209 DP 10451 0.0741
D4
LOT 135 STAGE 5
LOT 61 STAGE 4
HBA3/1372
XREF's: QuickMap_TE Awa_willowbank; Durham Property_LA BASE_v9_culdesacs; Willowbank Rd_QuickMap CAD FILE: \\dnlfs01\Projects\_2018\H20180069 - Durham Property Investments\CAD\H20180069-CONSENT-R5.dwg
JK
AD
Lot 206 DP 9997 0.0687
HBA3/306
KRC
EN R O
HBA1/525
Lot 114 DP 10248 0.0419
344m²
27
LOT 108 446m²
LOT 109 14 .6 374m² LOT 110 LB 13 397m² .2 LA
LOT 121 STAGE 5
LOT 131 STAGE 4
LOT 62 STAGE 4
Lot 208 DP 10451 0.0741
.2
LOT 130 STAGE 5
LOT 59 STAGE 4
HBA1/801
Lot 205 DP 9997 0.0675
HBA3/306
14/04/2020 FOR APPROVAL
ERIK S
Lot 204 DP 9997 0.0703
Lot 118 DP 10451 0.0407
RO A
15 .2
LOT 124 STAGE 5
LOT 60 STAGE 4
HBA2/1222
HBD2/756
15 .2
LOT 125 STAGE 5
LOT 61 STAGE 4
HBH2/141
Lot 165 DP 9997 0.0784
4.2
15
LOT 62 STAGE 4
Lot 203 DP 9997 0.0718
HBK1/439
.0
LOT 129 STAGE 5
HBJ2/292
HBA1/624
13
LOT 126 344m² LOT 123
LOT 63 STAGE 5
Lot 202 DP 9997 0.0693
Lot 164 DP 9997 0.0725
.5
LOT 128 STAGE 5
303 STAGE 5
HBD3/1295
Lot 163 DP 9997 0.0786
16 LOT 101 .0 370m² LOT 102 KB 16 366m² .0 KA
20
23 .5
LOT 16 STAGE 1C
.9
4.2
LOT 127 355m²
31 .9
31
16.0
HBW1/356
.0
.7
Lot 201 DP 10396 0.1090
21 .2
LOT 103 488m²
16
20
HBE1/551
Lot 162 DP 9997 0.0776
24 .2 24 .2
LOT 100 367m²
STAGE 6
LOT 64 STAGE 5
WI LL
Lot 161 DP 9997 0.0789
LOT 405 2193m²
LOT 99 389m²
22
HBW1/355
HBC4/792
16 .0
16 .0
Lot 198 DP 10396 0.1778
Lot 160 DP 9997 0.0786
LOT 65 STAGE 5
OW BA
HBH4/1235
307 STAGE 5
LOT 17 STAGE 1C
4.2
HBM1/695
24 .2
LOT 66 388m²
NK
HBA1/716
Lot 159 DP 9997 0.0814
LOT 67 388m²
10
HBE1/318
24 .2
.0
HB200/23
Lot 197 DP 9997 0.0687
HBJ3/1004
Lot 151 DP 9997 0.0753
24 24 .2 .2
LOT 68 388m²
Lot 195 DP 9997 0.0758
Lot 196 DP 9997 0.0703
Lot 158 DP 9997 0.0710
HBM1/696 Bisson Place
388m²
HBB3/848
MA
Lot 152 DP 9997 0.0819
LOT 69
Lot 194 DP 9997 0.0753
RO AD
HBJ3/948
24 .2
15
AN E
Lot 157 DP 9997 0.0786
HBA1/516
LOT 18 STAGE 1C
HBF2/1462
16
Lot 156 DP 9997 0.0690
HBA3/1263
Lot 193 DP 9997 0.0741
16 .0
HBB4/640
HBM1/677
LOT 19 STAGE 1C
Lot 192 DP 9997 0.0741
E
Lot 155 DP 9997 0.0672
Lot 153 DP 9997 0.0839
Lot 166 DP 9997 0.0682
3
NOTES 1. This plan has been produced for resource consent purposes. Boundaries and dimensions are subject to resource consent approval and land transfer survey. 2. Easements may be required for cross-boundary services. 3. Current Napier City Council Zoning: Main Residential. NCC Planning Maps: I7, I8 and H8. 4. Proposed Amalgamation Conditions: 4.1. "That Lot 405 & Lot 404 DP (Stage 5 LT#) & Lot 403 DP (Stage 4 LT#) & Lot 402 DP (Stage 3 LT#) & Lot 401 DP (Stage 2 LT#) hereon are to be held in one record of title". 4.2. "That Lot 417 hereon (Legal Access) be held in two undivided one half shares by the owners of Lots 103 & 108 hereon as tenants in common in the said shares and that individual records of title be issued in accordance herewith."
LOT 508 3.0680ha
HBA3/48
Lot 12 DP 10375 0.0935
NU
HBA1/619
HBM1/694
JK
HBJ4/1500
Lot 191 DP 9997 0.0728
DA
Lot 154 DP 9997 0.0789
HBM1/676
AV EN UE
HBM1/697
Lot 150 DP 9997 0.1039
KRC
HBB3/843
AV E
ON
28/01/2020 FOR APPROVAL
Lot 190 DP 9997 0.0715
4.2
SS BI
P
3
HBG2/478
Lot 11 DP 10375 0.1464
IEL
HBY1/923
CE A L
MH
Lot 189 DP 9997 0.0703
SEF
Lot 6 DP 28293 0.0603
HBM1/687
KRC
HBF4/39
SER VIC EL
HBY1/922
PE RC YS PIL LER
Lot 23 DP 10192 0.0799
23/01/2020 FOR APPROVAL
Lot 188 DP 9997 0.0718
HBM1/673
HBY1/918
Lot 2 DP 28293 0.0286 Lot 3 DP 28293 HBY1/919 0.0310 Lot 4HBY1/920 DP 28293 0.0319 Lot 5 DP 28293 HBY1/921 0.0276
HBM1/686
2
Lot 187 DP 9997 0.0705
Lot 24 DP 10192 0.3819
Lot 22 DP 10192 0.2137
Appr. Issued KRC KRC
793437
Lot 354 DP 513468 0.0527
Lot 364 DP 513468 0.0621
CE
Lot 363 DP 513468 0.0560
Lot 357 DP 513468 0.0584
793445
793439
Lot 358 DP 513468 0.0527
PROPOSED SUBDIVISION OF LOT 1 & 2 DP 14417 COMPRISED IN RT HBG2/863 & 420376
793446
Lot 362 DP 513468 0.0526
16 & 18 WILLOWBANK AVE TE AWA, NAPIER STAGE 6 - SCHEME PLAN Status
FOR APPROVAL
NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES
793444
Datum
793440
Lot 361 DP 513468 0.0526
793436
Lot 359 DP 513468 0.1125 793441
793443
Lot 360 DP 513468
Council Ref.
HB2000
Scale
1:1000
Drawing Number
H20180069-C019
Size
A3 Revision
4
HBW1/1023
HBW1/1021
STA LL STR
EE T
HBV2/873 40
Lot 8 DP 10375 0.2324
Lot 9 DP 10192 0.1274
HBM1/675
HBM1/678
Lot 186 DP 9997 0.0748
HBM1/672
HBH2/114
HBW1/356
HBA2/1222
HBD2/756
Lot 206 DP 9997 0.0687 HBA3/1372
LOT 153 STAGE 4
LOT 60 STAGE 3
Lot 208 DP 10451 0.0741
Lot 114 DP 10248 0.0419
HBE2/1003
LOT 170 STAGE 3
14/04/2020 FOR APPROVAL
KRC
JK
Lot 96 DP 10451 0.0672 HBF4/40
HBC4/814
306 STAGE 3
Lot 94 DP 10451 0.0733
.0 16
12.8
14.8
LOT 178 STAGE 3
LOT 33 STAGE 5
LOT 9 STAGE 1B
LOT 8 STAGE 1B
LOT 165 STAGE 2
LOT 35 STAGE 2
LOT 166 STAGE 2
LOT 7 STAGE 1A LOT 36 STAGE 2
LOT 184 STAGE 2
LOT 181 STAGE 2
LOT 182 STAGE 2
LOT 38 STAGE 2
LOT 187 STAGE 2
Lot 383 DP 513468 0.0483
795983
795984
795985
795986
795987
Lot 384 DP 516362 0.0483 804715
Lot 385 DP 516362 0.0483 804716
Lot 386 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 387 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 388 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 389 DP 516362 0.0483
804717
804718
804719
804720
LOT 185 STAGE 2
HURUNUI DRIVE
LOT 4 STAGE 1A Lot 370 DP 513468 0.0462
LOT 40 STAGE 2
HBG3/590
LOT 47 STAGE 2
LOT 46 STAGE 2
Lot 372 DP 513468 0.0543
Lot 371 DP 513468 0.0520
Drawn
795981
LOT 42 STAGE 2
Lot 349 DP 513468 0.0565
LOT 3 STAGE 1A
LOT 44 STAGE 2
793429
LOT 1 STAGE 1A
Lot 346 DP 513468 0.0544 793428
Lot 345 DP 513468 0.0544
Lot 375 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 376 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 377 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 378 DP 516362 0.0490
804711
804712
804714
804710
804713
795982
795978
Lot 350 DP 513468 0.0521
Lot 347 DP 513468 0.0544 LOT 43 STAGE 2
Lot 374 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 369 DP 513468 0.0509
793431
793430
LOT 2 STAGE 1A
Lot 373 DP 513468 0.0562
793432
Lot 351 DP 513468 0.0544
17/12/2018
KAITU 793438
793434
Lot 355 DP 513468 0.0527 Lot 353 DP 513468 0.1185 793435
NA PL A
Lot 356 DP 513468 0.0604
Lot 352 DP 513468 0.0544
793427
Lot 367 DP 513468 0.0550
Lot 366 DP 513468 0.0578
794507
794506
Lot 365 DP 513468 0.0914 793447
Date
KRC
17/12/2018
Designed
Date
Approved
Date
This document is produced by Development Nous Ltd solely for the benefit of and use by the client in accordance with the terms of engagement. Development Nous Ltd does not and shall not assume any responsibility or liability whatsoever to any third party arising out of any use or reliance by third party on the content of this document.
Client
DURHAM PROPERTY INVESTMENTS
795977
793433
HBB2/1223
Lot 368 DP 513468 0.0469
All Rights Reserved.
Date
GG
795980
Lot 348 DP 513468 0.0544 LOT 45 STAGE 2
Date
Checked
LOT 41 STAGE 2
Lot 9 DP 6055 2.1650
Lot 382 DP 513468 0.0483
LOT 39 STAGE 2
301 STAGE 2
305 STAGE 2
Lot 381 DP 513468 0.0483
LOT 5 STAGE 1A
795979
378863
Lot 380 DP 513468 0.0483
Fieldwork
LOT 188 STAGE 2
LOT 186 STAGE 2
Lot 3 DP 394762 6.7380
Lot 379 DP 513468 0.0500
LOT 183 STAGE 2
LOT 177 STAGE 2 LOT 179 STAGE 2
LOT 6 STAGE 1A
LOT 37 STAGE 2
LOT 180 STAGE 3
m
LOT 143 STAGE 5
LOT 147 STAGE 4
LOT 149 STAGE 4
LOT 163 STAGE 2
17.00
16.0
LOT 10 STAGE 1B
401 STAGE 2
LOT 150 STAGE 4
17.8
16.0
13.0
D1 ROA
16.0
10.4
7.4
LOT 142 STAGE 5
LOT 176 STAGE 3
LOT 52 STAGE 3
16.0
10.4
24.2
16.0
9.6
16.0
24 .2
15.9
24 .2
15 .4
.2
16
LOT 140 STAGE 5
LOT 34 STAGE 5
HBG2/209
Lot 93 DP 10451 0.0713
15.3
24 .2
.2
24 .2
24
16 .0 .2 15 24.2
24.2
14.2
.2 12 16
.0
LOT 11 STAGE 1B LOT 31 STAGE 5
LOT 167 STAGE 2
LOT 53 STAGE 3
Lot 95 DP 10451 0.0713
LOT 30 STAGE 5
LOT 154 STAGE 4
LOT 175 STAGE 3 402 STAGE 3
LOT 12 STAGE 1B
LOT 144 STAGE 5
LOT 162 STAGE 2
LOT 174 STAGE 3
LOT 54 STAGE 3
71899
LOT 29 STAGE 5
LOT 154 STAGE 4
LOT 171 STAGE 3
LOT 55 STAGE 3
LOT 13 STAGE 1B Lot 1 DP 318389 6.1891
LOT 32 STAGE 5
LOT 153 STAGE 4
LOT 15 STAGE 1B
LOT 115 STAGE 5
LOT 137 STAGE 5
LOT 172 STAGE 3
LOT 56 STAGE 3
HBK1/825
D1 0 RO A 13
.2
15 .2
8.0 15 .2
LOT 139 STAGE 5
LOT 173 STAGE 3
HBK1/977
Lot 97 DP 10451 0.0672
24.2
LOT 28 STAGE 5
404 STAGE 5
LOT 136 STAGE 5
RY 2
LOT 14 STAGE 1B
LOT 27 388m²
LOT 152 STAGE 4
LOT 57 STAGE 3
Lot 98 DP 10451 0.0672
24.2
LOT 116 STAGE 5
LOT 58 STAGE 3 LOT 169 STAGE 3
21.2
LOT 26 388m²
3.7
LOT 134 STAGE 5
LOT 158 STAGE 4
LOT 168 STAGE 3
Lot 210 DP 10451 0.0728
LOT 111 404m²
LOT 16 STAGE 1C
LOT 25 383m² 24.2
LOT 118 STAGE 6
LOT 59 STAGE 3
HBK1/626
LOT 112 388m²
ENT
4.2
LOT 117 STAGE 5
LOT 157 STAGE 4
Lot 209 DP 10451 0.0741
LOT 114 388m²
LOT 119 STAGE 6
LOT 144 STAGE 4
HBA3/1092
HBA3/306
21.2
LOT 24 427m² 21.2
.8
LOT 120 STAGE 5
LOT 155 STAGE 4
302 STAGE 3
LOT 113 363m²
21
LOT 121 STAGE 5
403 STAGE 4
LOT 152 STAGE 4
21 .1
24.2 24.2
LOT 132 STAGE 4
LOT 159 STAGE 4
STAGE 7
24.2
LOT 122 STAGE 6
LOT 133 STAGE 4
HBA2/1403
HBA3/306
.2
LOT 108 STAGE 6
LOT 17 STAGE 1C 24.2
3.7
LOT 107 420m²
LOT 110 STAGE 6
LOT 135 STAGE 5
LOT 61 STAGE 4
Lot 207 DP 9997 0.0687
Lot 118 DP 10451 0.0407
.4
LOT 126 STAGE 6
LOT 124 STAGE 5
LOT 131 STAGE 4
LOT 62 STAGE 4
LOT 87 469m² NA 29
LOT 109 STAGE 6
LOT 130 STAGE 5
LOT 18 STAGE 1C
NB
.0
15
19 .8
LOT 125 STAGE 5
LOT 59 STAGE 4
HBA1/525
.2
LOT 123 STAGE 6
LOT 60 STAGE 4
HBA1/801
15
LOT 129 STAGE 5
LOT 61 STAGE 4
Lot 205 DP 9997 0.0675
.5
15 .2 LOT 105 369m² LOT 106 15 .2 369m²
LOT 101 STAGE 6
LOT 128 STAGE 5
LOT 62 STAGE 4
HBH2/141
Lot 165 DP 9997 0.0784
16
LOT 100 STAGE 6
LOT 63 STAGE 5
Lot 204 DP 9997 0.0703
.2
LOT 86 421m² 29
.2
LOT 127 STAGE 6
303 STAGE 5
Lot 203 DP 9997 0.0718
HBK1/439
AD 3
15
.5
16.0
LOT 65 STAGE 5
HBJ2/292
HBA1/624
24
LOT 104 370m²
LOT 102 STAGE 6
LOT 64 STAGE 5
Lot 202 DP 9997 0.0693
Lot 164 DP 9997 0.0725
4
AD
Lot 201 DP 10396 0.1090
.5
.2
16.0
307 STAGE 5
HBD3/1295
Lot 166 DP 9997 0.0682
JK
EN R O
HBE1/551
Lot 162 DP 9997 0.0776
.2
LOT 98 388m²
LOT 66 STAGE 6
WI LL
Lot 161 DP 9997 0.0789
Lot 163 DP 9997 0.0786
KRC
ERIK S
HBW1/355
HBC4/792
24
16
RO
15
16
LOT 88 402m² MA
MB
16.0
Lot 160 DP 9997 0.0786
HBM1/694
LOT 97 365m²
.5
LOT 91 402m²
.5
16.5
Lot 198 DP 10396 0.1778
LOT 92 402m²
16
14.1
HBH4/1235
.2
LOT 19 STAGE 1C
16
15 .2
405 STAGE 6
NK
HBM1/695
.5
LOT 406 5035m²
21
LOT 103 STAGE 6
OW BA
Lot 150 DP 9997 0.1039
Lot 159 DP 9997 0.0814
28/01/2020 FOR APPROVAL
NOTES 1. This plan has been produced for resource consent purposes. Boundaries and dimensions are subject to resource consent approval and land transfer survey. 2. Easements may be required for cross-boundary services. 3. Current Napier City Council Zoning: Main Residential. NCC Planning Maps: I7, I8 and H8. 4. Proposed Amalgamation Conditions: 4.1. "That Lot 406 & Lot 405 DP (Stage 6 LT#) & Lot 404 DP (Stage 5 LT#) & Lot 403 DP (Stage 4 LT#) & Lot 402 DP (Stage 3 LT#) & Lot 401 DP (Stage 2 LT#) hereon are to be held in one record of title". 5. Lot 304 & 308 is to vest in the Napier City Council as local purpose reserve upon deposit.
16
.2
LOT 99 STAGE 6
LOT 67 STAGE 6
.2
6
HBE1/318
24 .2
ST AG E
HB200/23
15 .2
15 .2 15 .2 8.0
LOT 68 STAGE 6
Lot 195 DP 9997 0.0758
HBA1/716
Lot 151 DP 9997 0.0753
15 .2
15 .5
LOT 69 STAGE 6
Lot 194 DP 9997 0.0753
OA DS
UE HBF2/1462
Lot 197 DP 9997 0.0687
HBJ3/1004
4.2
LOT 70 375m²
Lot 196 DP 9997 0.0703
Lot 158 DP 9997 0.0710
HBM1/696 Bisson Place
Lot 193 DP 9997 0.0741
21
24 .2
HBB3/848
MA
Lot 152 DP 9997 0.0819
.0
24
LOT 96 389m²
4.2
HBJ3/948
LOT 71 369m²
40
HBA3/1263
15 .5
AN E
Lot 157 DP 9997 0.0786
HBA1/516
HBM1/697
LOT 304 194m² 2 4.2
LOT 95 388m²
41 7
Lot 153 DP 9997 0.0839
24 .2
16.0
Lot 156 DP 9997 0.0690
4.2 .2
24
LOT 72 369m²
PR IVA TE R
HBB4/640
HBM1/677
AV EN UE
Lot 192 DP 9997 0.0741
E
Lot 155 DP 9997 0.0672
Lot 12 DP 10375 0.0935
AV E
ON
HBA1/619
3
LOT 509 1.0470ha
4.6
SS BI
P
CE A L
LOT 308 5255m²
HBA3/48
NU
Lot 154 DP 9997 0.0789
HBM1/687
Lot 191 DP 9997 0.0728
VEN
Lot 23 DP 10192 0.0799
HBJ4/1500
DA
HBY1/923
HBM1/676
IEL
Lot 6 DP 28293 0.0603
Lot 190 DP 9997 0.0715
24 .2
LOT 73 369m² 2
HBB3/843
Lot 11 DP 10375 0.1464
4.2
PE RC YS PIL LER
Lot 189 DP 9997 0.0703
SEF
HBY1/922
MH
HBF4/39
SER VIC EL
Lot 22 DP 10192 0.2137
KRC
HBG2/478
Lot 188 DP 9997 0.0718
HBM1/673
HBY1/918
Lot 2 DP 28293 0.0286 Lot 3 DP 28293 HBY1/919 0.0310 Lot 4HBY1/920 DP 28293 0.0319 Lot 5 DP 28293 HBY1/921 0.0276
23/01/2020 FOR APPROVAL
22 6.1
Lot 1 DP 28293 0.0596
2
22
Lot 10 DP 10192 0.1224
Appr. Issued KRC KRC
6.1
Lot 187 DP 9997 0.0705
Lot 24 DP 10192 0.3819
HBM1/686
XREF's: QuickMap_TE Awa_willowbank; Durham Property_LA BASE_v9_culdesacs; Willowbank Rd_QuickMap CAD FILE: \\dnlfs01\Projects\_2018\H20180069 - Durham Property Investments\CAD\H20180069-CONSENT-R5.dwg
Description Rev Date 1 17/12/2018 FOR APPROVAL
.0
Pt Section 92 Blk VIII Heretaunga SD 0.0916
NORTH
DP 26433 0.0498
FIT ZG E
HBW1/1022
LD P
DP 26433 0.0442
Lot 1 DP 26433 0.1325
RA
DATE PLOTTED: 4/14/2020 9:01:41 AM BY : SIMON JONES
LA
BE
793437
Lot 354 DP 513468 0.0527
Lot 364 DP 513468 0.0621
CE
Lot 363 DP 513468 0.0560
Lot 357 DP 513468 0.0584
793445
793439
Lot 358 DP 513468 0.0527
PROPOSED SUBDIVISION OF LOT 1 & 2 DP 14417 COMPRISED IN RT HBG2/863 & 420376
793446
Lot 362 DP 513468 0.0526
16 & 38 WILLOWBANK AVE TE AWA, NAPIER STAGE 7 - SCHEME PLAN Status
FOR APPROVAL
NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES
793444
Datum
793440
Lot 361 DP 513468 0.0526
793436
Lot 359 DP 513468 0.1125 793441
793443
Lot 360 DP 513468
Council Ref.
HB2000
Scale
1:1000
Drawing Number
H20180069-C020
Size
A3 Revision
4
LD P
EE T
Description Rev Date 1 17/12/2018 FOR APPROVAL Pt Section 92 Blk VIII Heretaunga SD 0.0916
HBH4/1235
Lot 198 DP 10396 0.1778 HBW1/355
HBC4/792
HBE1/551
Lot 201 DP 10396 0.1090 HBW1/356
LOT 65 STAGE 5
HBH2/141
Lot 203 DP 9997 0.0718
Lot 164 DP 9997 0.0725
HBA1/624
Lot 204 DP 9997 0.0703
Lot 205 DP 9997 0.0675
HBD2/756
HBA1/525
Lot 206 DP 9997 0.0687 HBA3/1372
LOT 153 STAGE 4
LOT 60 STAGE 3
Lot 208 DP 10451 0.0741
Lot 114 DP 10248 0.0419
LOT 136 STAGE 5
NORTH
.8 14
.2
24
.2
24
LOT 139 STAGE 5
LOT 168 STAGE 3
HBE2/1003
LOT 170 STAGE 3
Lot 96 DP 10451 0.0672
LOT 149 STAGE 4
HBF4/40
402 STAGE 3
LOT 178 STAGE 3
HBC4/814
306 STAGE 3
Lot 94 DP 10451 0.0733
24 .2
24.2
.2 24
24 .2
LOT 184 STAGE 2
LOT 179 STAGE 2 LOT 52 STAGE 3
LOT 181 STAGE 2
.2
13.0
1
16.3
16.3
24 .2
17
.7
ROA D
16.3
16.3
24
16.3
LOT 6 STAGE 1A
LOT 38 STAGE 2
LOT 187 STAGE 2
Lot 382 DP 513468 0.0483
Lot 383 DP 513468 0.0483
795983
795984
795985
795986
795987
Lot 384 DP 516362 0.0483 804715
Lot 385 DP 516362 0.0483 804716
Lot 386 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 387 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 388 DP 516362 0.0483
Lot 389 DP 516362 0.0483
804717
804718
804719
804720
KAITUNA PLACE
Date
Drawn
LOT 185 STAGE 2
LOT 39 STAGE 2 LOT 4 STAGE 1A Lot 370 DP 513468 0.0462
LOT 40 STAGE 2
HBG3/590
LOT 47 STAGE 2
LOT 46 STAGE 2
Lot 372 DP 513468 0.0543
Lot 371 DP 513468 0.0520
795981
LOT 42 STAGE 2
Lot 349 DP 513468 0.0565
LOT 3 STAGE 1A
LOT 44 STAGE 2
793429
LOT 1 STAGE 1A
Lot 346 DP 513468 0.0544 793428
Lot 345 DP 513468 0.0544
Lot 376 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 377 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 378 DP 516362 0.0490
804711
804712
804714
804710
804713
795982
795978
Lot 350 DP 513468 0.0521
Lot 347 DP 513468 0.0544 LOT 43 STAGE 2
Lot 375 DP 516362 0.0470
Lot 369 DP 513468 0.0509
793431
793430
LOT 2 STAGE 1A
Lot 374 DP 516362 0.0470
795980
Lot 348 DP 513468 0.0544 LOT 45 STAGE 2
Lot 373 DP 513468 0.0562
Lot 368 DP 513468 0.0469
Lot 367 DP 513468 0.0550
Lot 366 DP 513468 0.0578
794507
794506
Lot 365 DP 513468 0.0914 793447
Date
793432
Lot 364 DP 513468 0.0621
793433
Lot 356 DP 513468 0.0604 793438
793434
Lot 355 DP 513468 0.0527 Lot 353 DP 513468 0.1185 793435
17/12/2018
Designed
Date
Approved
Date
Client
DURHAM PROPERTY INVESTMENTS PROPOSED SUBDIVISION OF LOT 1 & 2 DP 14417 COMPRISED IN RT HBG2/863 & 420376
793446
Lot 352 DP 513468 0.0544
793427
Date
KRC
This document is produced by Development Nous Ltd solely for the benefit of and use by the client in accordance with the terms of engagement. Development Nous Ltd does not and shall not assume any responsibility or liability whatsoever to any third party arising out of any use or reliance by third party on the content of this document.
795977
Lot 351 DP 513468 0.0544
HBB2/1223
All Rights Reserved.
17/12/2018
Checked
LOT 41 STAGE 2
305 STAGE 2
Lot 381 DP 513468 0.0483
GG
LOT 182 STAGE 2
301 STAGE 2
378863
Lot 380 DP 513468 0.0483
LOT 5 STAGE 1A
795979
Lot 3 DP 394762 6.7380
Lot 379 DP 513468 0.0500
Fieldwork
LOT 188 STAGE 2
LOT 186 STAGE 2
Lot 9 DP 6055 2.1650
16.3
.2 24
24
LOT 7 STAGE 1A LOT 36 STAGE 2
LOT 183 STAGE 2
HBG2/209
Lot 93 DP 10451 0.0713
24 .2
.2 16
LOT 35 STAGE 2
LOT 166 STAGE 2
LOT 163 STAGE 2
LOT 37 STAGE 2
LOT 180 STAGE 3
LOT 177 STAGE 2
LOT 53 STAGE 3
Lot 95 DP 10451 0.0713
LOT 8 STAGE 1B
LOT 165 STAGE 2
LOT 176 STAGE 3
LOT 175 STAGE 3 LOT 54 STAGE 3
LOT 9 STAGE 1B
401 STAGE 2
LOT 150 STAGE 4
LOT 153 STAGE 4
LOT 167 STAGE 2
LOT 174 STAGE 3 LOT 55 STAGE 3
LOT 33 STAGE 5
LOT 34 STAGE 5
LOT 162 STAGE 2
LOT 171 STAGE 3
LOT 56 STAGE 3
HBK1/825
LOT 10 STAGE 1B
LOT 143 STAGE 5
LOT 147 STAGE 4
LOT 154 STAGE 4
LOT 173 STAGE 3
HBK1/977
Lot 97 DP 10451 0.0672
LOT 142 STAGE 5
LOT 152 STAGE 4
LOT 57 STAGE 3
Lot 98 DP 10451 0.0672
LOT 140 STAGE 5
LOT 144 STAGE 5
LOT 172 STAGE 3
LOT 169 STAGE 3
LOT 11 STAGE 1B LOT 31 STAGE 5
LOT 32 STAGE 5
LOT 58 STAGE 3
Lot 210 DP 10451 0.0728
LOT 30 STAGE 5
LOT 137 STAGE 5
LOT 59 STAGE 3
Lot 209 DP 10451 0.0741 HBK1/626
XREF's: QuickMap_TE Awa_willowbank; Durham Property_LA BASE_v9_culdesacs; Willowbank Rd_QuickMap CAD FILE: H:\_2018\H20180069 - Durham Property Investments\CAD\H20180069-CONSENT-R3.dwg
LOT 116 STAGE 5
LOT 154 STAGE 4 LOT 157 STAGE 4
71899
LOT 12 STAGE 1B
404 STAGE 5
LOT 158 STAGE 4
HBA3/1092
HBA3/306
Lot 1 DP 318389 6.1891 LOT 29 STAGE 5
LOT 134 STAGE 5
LOT 155 STAGE 4
HBA2/1403
HBA3/306
LOT 13 STAGE 1B
LOT 115 STAGE 5 LOT 117 STAGE 5
LOT 144 STAGE 4
LOT 152 STAGE 4
LOT 28 STAGE 5
LOT 120 STAGE 5
403 STAGE 4
LOT 159 STAGE 4
302 STAGE 3
LOT 118 STAGE 6 LOT 121 STAGE 5
LOT 133 STAGE 4
LOT 14 STAGE 1B
LOT 27 STAGE 7 LOT 119 STAGE 6
LOT 132 STAGE 4
LOT 61 STAGE 4
Lot 207 DP 9997 0.0687
Lot 118 DP 10451 0.0407
LOT 111 STAGE 7
LOT 135 STAGE 5
LOT 62 STAGE 4
LOT 15 STAGE 1B
LOT 122 STAGE 6
LOT 130 STAGE 5
LOT 59 STAGE 4
HBA1/801
Lot 165 DP 9997 0.0784
LOT 25 STAGE 7
LOT 112 STAGE 7 LOT 26 STAGE 7
LOT 124 STAGE 5
LOT 60 STAGE 4
HBA2/1222
HBK1/439
LOT 16 STAGE 1C
LOT 114 STAGE 7
LOT 110 STAGE 6
LOT 125 STAGE 5
LOT 131 STAGE 4
LOT 17 STAGE 1C
LOT 108 STAGE 6
LOT 123 STAGE 6
LOT 61 STAGE 4
24.2
PALOT 23 396m²
LOT 113 STAGE 7
LOT 126 STAGE 6
LOT 63 STAGE 5
Lot 202 DP 9997 0.0693
LOT 18 STAGE 1C
LOT 22 PB 396m²
LOT 24 STAGE 7
LOT 109 STAGE 6
LOT 129 STAGE 5
HBJ2/292
Lot 166 DP 9997 0.0682
LOT 101 STAGE 6
LOT 128 STAGE 5
LOT 62 STAGE 4
LOT 19 STAGE 1C
24.2
LOT 86 STAGE 7
LOT 107 STAGE 7
LOT 127 STAGE 6
303 STAGE 5
NOTES 1. This plan has been produced for resource consent purposes. Boundaries and dimensions are subject to resource consent approval and land transfer survey. 2. Easements may be required for cross-boundary services. 3. Current Napier City Council Zoning: Main Residential. NCC Planning Maps: I7, I8 and H8. 4. Proposed Amalgamation Conditions: 4.1. "That Lot 407 & Lot 406 DP (Stage 7 LT#) & Lot 405 DP (Stage 6 LT#) & Lot 404 DP (Stage 5 LT#) & Lot 403 DP (Stage 4 LT#) & Lot 402 DP (Stage 3 LT#) & Lot 401 DP (Stage 2 LT#) hereon are to be held in one record of title".
21.3
OALOT 21 391m²
.6
LOT 106 STAGE 7
LOT 102 STAGE 6
LOT 64 STAGE 5
HBD3/1295
Lot 163 DP 9997 0.0786
LOT 85 413m² 25
LOT 100 STAGE 6
LOT 66 STAGE 6
307 STAGE 5
4.3
.7
LOT 87 STAGE 7
LOT 99 STAGE 6
405 STAGE 6
WI LL
Lot 161 DP 9997 0.0789
Lot 162 DP 9997 0.0776
6.9
.2
HBE1/318
Lot 160 DP 9997 0.0786
HBM1/694
.5
LOT 88 STAGE 7
LOT 103 STAGE 6
NK
HBM1/695
6.8
18
LOT 89 402m²
16
.4
.0
LOT 105 STAGE 7
LOT 67 STAGE 6
OW BA
Lot 150 DP 9997 0.1039
Lot 159 DP 9997 0.0814
LOT 90 402m²
26
LOT 20 OB 567m²
17
16 .5
14.9
UE HB200/23
.0
LOT 84 412m²
.0
.5
LOT 104 STAGE 7
LOT 98 STAGE 7
LOT 68 STAGE 6
HBA1/716
Lot 151 DP 9997 0.0753
.0
16
406 STAGE 7
HBB3/848
Lot 197 DP 9997 0.0687
HBJ3/1004
LOT 93 402m²
17
LOT 83 412m²
17
2
LOT 97 STAGE 7
Lot 195 DP 9997 0.0758
JK
17 .0
17
LOT 82 STAGE 7
LOT 70 STAGE 7
Lot 196 DP 9997 0.0703
Lot 158 DP 9997 0.0710
HBM1/696 Bisson Place
AD
16 .5
LOT 69 STAGE 6
KRC
AD
Lot 152 DP 9997 0.0819
RO .5
LOT 91 STAGE 7
Lot 194 DP 9997 0.0753
28/01/2020 FOR APPROVAL
EN R O
HBJ3/948
13
AN E
Lot 157 DP 9997 0.0786
HBA1/516
HBM1/697
16
LOT 96 STAGE 7
HBF2/1462
3
ERIK S
Lot 153 DP 9997 0.0839
LOT 95 STAGE 7
6
Lot 156 DP 9997 0.0690
LOT 94 389m²
ST AG E
HBB4/640
2428m²
.2
41 7
Lot 155 DP 9997 0.0672
.4
21
LOT 71 STAGE 7
E
ON
HBA1/619
MA
SS BI
P
CE A L
15
4.2
HBA3/1263
AV E
HBM1/687
AV EN UE
MH
.4
16
Lot 193 DP 9997 0.0741
KRC
15
17 .0 LOT 81 374m² QA LOT 82 15 .4 412m²
.5
NU
Lot 154 DP 9997 0.0789
HBM1/677
STAGE 8LOT 407 QB
304 STAGE 7
308 STAGE 7
Lot 192 DP 9997 0.0741
VEN
Lot 23 DP 10192 0.0799
Lot 12 DP 10375 0.0935
.7
LOT 72 STAGE 7
HBA3/48
DA
HBY1/923
23/01/2020 FOR APPROVAL
.4
11
.2
HBJ4/1500
2
15
15 .4 LOT 79 374m² LOT 80 RA 374m² 15 .4
RB
24
Lot 191 DP 9997 0.0728
Appr. Issued KRC KRC
409m²
4.6
PE RC YS PIL LER
HBM1/686
HBM1/676
IEL
HBY1/922
Lot 6 DP 28293 0.0603
LOT 78
3.1
LOT 73 STAGE 7
HBB3/843
Lot 190 DP 9997 0.0715
SEF
Lot 22 DP 10192 0.2137
Lot 189 DP 9997 0.0703 Lot 11 DP 10375 0.1464
24 .2
LOT 74 369m²
HBF4/39
SER VIC EL
Lot 2 DP 28293 0.0286 Lot 3 DP 28293 HBY1/919 0.0310 Lot 4HBY1/920 DP 28293 0.0319 Lot 5 DP 28293 HBY1/921 0.0276
LOT 75 369m² 15 .2
HBY1/918
LOT 76 384m² 24 .2
.2
HBG2/478
Lot 188 DP 9997 0.0718
HBM1/673
.6
.0
15 .2
Lot 187 DP 9997 0.0705 Lot 10 DP 10192 0.1224
17
23
HBH2/114
Lot 1 DP 28293 0.0596
.1
LOT 77 388m²
Lot 186 DP 9997 0.0748
HBM1/672
Lot 24 DP 10192 0.3819
26
14 .8
HBM1/678
6.8
Lot 9 DP 10192 0.1274
HBM1/675
9.2
Lot 8 DP 10375 0.2324
15 .2
HBW1/1021
HBV2/873
16 .0
HBW1/1023
15 .2
DP 26433 0.0498
FIT ZG E
HBW1/1022
RA
DP 26433 0.0442
Lot 1 DP 26433 0.1325
STA LL STR
4.8
DATE PLOTTED: 1/28/2020 9:59:20 AM BY : GEMMA GUILFORD
LA
BE
793437
Lot 354 DP 513468 0.0527
Lot 363 DP 513468 0.0560
Lot 357 DP 513468 0.0584
793445
793439
Lot 358 DP 513468 0.0527
Lot 362 DP 513468 0.0526
16 & 38 WILLOWBANK AVE TE AWA, NAPIER STAGE 8 - SCHEME PLAN Status
FOR APPROVAL
NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES
793444
Datum
793440
Lot 361 DP 513468 0.0526
793436
Lot 359 DP 513468 0.1125 793441
793443
Lot 360 DP 513468
Council Ref.
HB2000
Scale
1:1000
Drawing Number
H20180069-C021
Size
A3 Revision
3
Landscape Design
Shared pathway by NCC
LOT 1 DP 6369
40m wide drainage reserve
13.5m wide Minor Local Roads
MARAENUI 8m wide drainage corridor/ reserve
Private accessways serve lots on western boundary
Additional parking extra 7 bays
Roads terminate at 16m diameter culdesacs 8m wide drainage corridor/ reserve
RV, Boat and Camper Parking 15 bays
WIL
LO
WB AN K
AVE
Secondary Entry 17m wide corridor
8m wide drainage corridor/ reserve 17m wide Mjor Local Road with 1.4m wide pathway to one side of road
ERIK
SEN
ROAD
Main Entry with feature entry walls and signage. 17m wide corridor
LOT 9 DP 6055
Upgraded berm with new kerb and channel, 1.5m wide footpath and street trees
Neighbourhood Reserve/ Park connecting to broader recreational network
LOT 10 DP 6055
LOT PLAN TOTAL LOTS = 182
Layout in accordance with NCC Te Awa Structure Plan 40m wide drainage line to western boundary 0 20 40 60 80 100m
TE AWA
N
20/04/2020 Revision L [H20180069]
Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village, Te Awa - landscape concept design
SINGLE DWELLING
DUPLEX DWELLINGS
N
Orange = Living/ Kitchen
Shared pathway by NCC
Pink = Bedrooms/ Bathrooms
LOT 1 DP 6369
40m wide drainage reserve
Blue = Double Garage
13.5m wide Minor Local Roads
WI
DE )
8m wide drainage corridor/ reserve
M
(13
(4. 8
.5M
DE
Private accessways serve lots on western boundary
)
Additional parking extra 7 bays
(13
.5M
Roads terminate at 16m diameter culdesacs 8m wide drainage corridor/ reserve
WI
)
RV, Boat and Camper Parking 14 bays
(4. 8
M
WI
DE )
DE
DE )
Secondary Entry 17m wide corridor
AVE
(4. 8
M
WI
MARAENUI
WI
(13
.5M
WI
DE
WIL
LO
WB AN K
)
(13.5
Single Dwelling
MW
IDE)
8m wide drainage corridor/ reserve
Duplex Dwellings
IDE)
(13.5
IDE)
(13.5
MW
(13.5
IDE)
ERIK
SEN
ROAD
(13.5
MW
MW
(17M
(4.
WIDE
)
8M
WI
DE
)
17m wide Major Local
Main Entry with feature entry walls and signage. 17m wide corridor
MW
IDE)
TE AWA
LOT 9 DP 6055
Upgraded berm with new kerb and channel, 1.5m wide footpath and street trees
Neighbourhood Reserve/ Park connecting to broader recreational network (min. 2000m²)
ARCHITECTURAL OVERLAY
LOT 10 DP 6055
TOTAL LOTS = 182 (36 Duplex Units, 126 Single Units)
Layout in accordance with NCC Te Awa Structure Plan 40m wide drainage line to western boundary 0 20 40 60 80 100m
N
20/04/2020 Revision L [H20180069]
Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village, Te Awa - landscape concept design
INDICATIVE SIGNAGE
Signage content, detail, finish and appearance to be resolved by condition of consent at detail design
Estate Entry - Indicative Precedent Imagery
Indicative Lighting
20/04/2020 Revision L [H20180069]
Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village, Te Awa - landscape concept design
ENTR Y
AVE WB AN K LO
ENTR Y
ERIK SEN RO
AD
WIL
INDICATIVE NEIGHBOURHOOD RESERVE/ PARK min. 2000m² N
Not to Scale
Indicative Fencing Diagram LEGEND 1.8m high Butted Paling (or approved equivalent) max. 1.0m high fence or low planted boundary 1.8m high semi-transparent fence for passive surveillance Semi-transparent pedestrian gate with key or swipe access Pedestrian bridge across open swale Planted buffer to soften long fence line and provide further separation from roadway - to be semi transparent to retain visual connection i.e. low shrubs and ground covers with clear trunk trees
Road Corridor Profile 13.5m wide corridor with 1.5m meander 20/04/2020 Revision L [H20180069]
Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village, Te Awa - landscape concept design
Indicative cross section - road corridor Not to scale
Indicative cross section - drainage reserve Not to scale
Passive open space
Passive open space Inundation zone (approx. 12m)
P. BOUNDARY
Willowbank Avenue Berm
P. BOUNDARY
40M Wide Drainage Reserve
Rear yard
Max. 1:5 batter
Meandering shared pathway 3.0m wide with potential breakout and seating opportunities
Potential bridge crossing points to connect pedestrians from development
Open style fences to rear boundaries interfacing open space
20/04/2020 Revision L [H20180069]
Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village, Te Awa - landscape concept design
PLANTING CHARACTER Indicative only - to be finalised at Detail Design phase
OA D
PARKLAND PALETTE
RA
CT
ENTR PALE Y TTE RO
AD
S
R RO
PARKLAND PALETTE
ENTR Y CH
R RO AD
S
ENTR PALE Y TTE TE
RO
TER
BU
EN R
OAD
PALE T
OR
MINO
MIN
ADS
ARAC
ADS
R FFE BU
R LOC
PR
MINO
MAJO
IVA TE
RO
AL RO
AD
AD
OR
EN R
WIL LO W
MIN
ERIKS
BA
NK
AVE
BU
TE
ER
FFE
ERIKS
R
PARKLAND PALETTE
ERIKSEN ROAD PALETTE - Street trees to Rriksen Road edge to tie into council approved character and tie in with adjacent developments ENTRY PALETTE/ ENTRY CHARACTER - To include specimen trees and a dense understory that creates a specific character for the development with the palette continuing out along roads adjacent entries with understory planting to street trees to be more prevalent along these street (trees in mulch only to other minor streets) MAJOR ROAD - Road to have different tree species for ease of wayfinding. Boulevard to include planted buildouts and understory planting to street trees. MINOR ROADS - Trees in mulch with less understory planting. Species to differ from main circulation to provide sense of place/ wayfinding for residents
PALE T
HA
OAD
IVA TE R
TR YC
PR
FFE R
E NU
EN
BUF
FER
PRIVATE ROADS - Trees in mulch with less understory planting. Species to differ from main circulation to provide sense of place/ wayfinding for residents PARKLAND PALETTE - Larger specimen trees within parklands to tie character to existing drainage lines within the broader community species to be mainly natives with some flowering exotics for seasonal interest. Parkland entering the project site to tie in with specific character of the development through the use of feature trees found in entry palette. BUFFER - Trees and groundcover understory planting to provide separation for residents and buffering from busy road. Mix of native species to be loosely planted to allow for visual permeability along fence line. 20/04/2020 Revision L [H20180069]
Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village, Te Awa - landscape concept design
Smaller ornamental trees as feature within garden beds
timber open paling fence to rear boundary for some privacy to outdoor living area - hedge to continue within lot along fence line
LAWN WASHING LINE
Hardy, drought tolerant groundcover species to garden beds
Deciduous trees to northern boundaries to allow sun in winter and shade in summer. Trees to be thoughtfully located to provide to not block light/ sun from neighbouring property
Shared hedge - planted along boundary
PATIO
3m min. building setback
BERM
Duplex units - Typical Landscape Concept Plan N
Low shared hedge to the first 6m of boundary to provide visibility and passive surveillance- planted along boundary 1m min. building setback
North indicative only
20/04/2020 Revision L [H20180069]
Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village, Te Awa - landscape concept design
5m min. vehicle standing bay
Timber screen to bin bay
BIN BAY
1m min. building setback
1m min. building setback
BERM
Hardy, drought tolerant groundcover species to garden beds
LAWN Timber screen to bin bay
Shared hedge - planted along boundary
BIN BAY
5m min. vehicle standing bay
3m min. building setback
Deciduous trees to northern boundaries to allow sun in winter and shade in summer. Trees to be thoughtfully located to provide to not block light/ sun from neighbouring property
Low shared hedge to the first 6m of boundary to provide visibility and passive surveillanceplanted along boundary
Evergreen tree to edge of driveway
PATIO
Hardy, drought tolerant groundcover species to garden beds
WASHING LINE
Single units - Typical Landscape Concept Plan N
timber open paling fence to rear boundary for some privacy to outdoor living area - hedge to continue within lot along fence line
North indicative only
20/04/2020 Revision L [H20180069]
Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village, Te Awa - landscape concept design
PLANTING PALETTE Indicative planting palette only - to be finalised at Detail Design phase
CODE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME Street TREES 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.
ALE exe Alectryon execelsus Titoki COR lae Corynocarpus laevigatus Karaka HED arb Hedycarya arborea Porokaiwhiri HOH ang Hoheria angustifolia Lacebark MET mis Metrosideros ‘Mistral’ Pohutakawa MET MP Metrosideros ‘Maori Princess’ Pohutakawa VIT luc Vitex lucens Puriri
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
SPECIMEN TREES - For Parklands/ Open Space + FEature areas 8. COR aus Cordyline australis Cabbage tree 9. KNI exc Knightia excelsa Rewarewa 10. MAG gra Magnolia grandiflora Magnolia 11. NOT sol Nothofagus solandri Black Beech 12. POD tot Podocarpus totara Totara
ORNAMENTAL TREES - for unit Gardens 13. COR kou Cornus kousa Kousa Dogwood 14. MIC bub Michelia ‘Bubbles’ False Magnolia 15. PRU aco Prunus ‘Acolade’ Flowering Cherry 16. PSE cra Pseudopanax crassifolius Lancewood 17. SOP tet Sophora tetraptera Kowhai
Shrubs - Hedge species 18. COR GG Corokia virgata ‘Geentys Green’ Corokia 19. GRI whe Griselinia littoralis ‘Whenuapai’ Broadleaf 20. MET tah Metrosideros collina ‘Tahiti’ Pohutukawa 21. OLE pan Olearia paniculata Akiraho
Groundcovers 22. APO sim Apodasmia similis Oioi 23. ART cir Arthropodium cirratum Renga Renga 24. AST fra Astelia fragrans Bush Flax 25. CAL sol Calystegia soldanella False Bindweed 26. CAR vir Carex virgata Carex 27. CHI fla Chionochloa flavicans Dwarf Toitoi 28. COP PK Coprosma 'Poor Knights' Coprosma 29. DIA nig Dianella nigra Turutu Blueberry 30. HEB WD Hebe ‘Wiri Dawn’ Dwarf Hebe 31. HEB WM Hebe ‘Wiri Mist’ Dwarf Hebe 32. LIB for Libertia spp. Libertia 33. LOM LW Lomandra cylindrica ‘Lime Wave’ Mat Rush 34. PHO GD Phormium ‘Green Dwarf’ Flax
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
20/04/2020 Revision L [H20180069]
Eriksen Road Lifestyle Village, Te Awa - landscape concept design
Land Development Report
LAND DEVELOPMENT REPORT
REV C
DURHAM PROPERTIES LTD
16-38 WILLOWBANK AVE NAPIER
308 Queen Street E, Hastings 4122 | PO Box 758, Hastings | +64 6 876 7646 | admin@sgl.nz |www.stratagroup.net.nz
J4345
DURHAM PROPERTIES LTD Te Awa Development Document Prepared for and on behalf of Strata Group Consulting Engineers Ltd by:
Daniel Joblin Civil Engineer
Document Reviewed By Russell Nettlingham Civil Engineer/Principal
Strata Group Consulting Engineers Ltd P.O Box 758 Hastings 4156 New Zealand Telephone Email Website
+ 64 6 8767646 dan@sgl.nz www.stratagroup.net.nz
Document Control Project Name
Durham Property Ltd 138 Eriksen Road, Napier
Project Ref
J4345
Version Revision B
Date
Version
Extent of Revision
Status Issued for Resource Consent
Prepared DJ / RN
This report caters specifically for the requirements for this project and this client. No warranty is intended or implied for use by any third party and no responsibility is undertaken to any third party for any material contained herein.
308 Queen Street E, Hastings 4122 | PO Box 758, Hastings | +64 6 876 7646 | admin@sgl.nz |www.stratagroup.net.nz
Table of Contents 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 4 2. Design Considerations ........................................................................................................................ 5 2.1
Topographical Information ...................................................................................................... 5
2.2
Staging .................................................................................................................................... 5
3. Preliminary Road Design .................................................................................................................... 7 3.1
Existing Roads ........................................................................................................................ 7
3.2
Proposed Roads ..................................................................................................................... 7
4. Earthworks .......................................................................................................................................... 8 5. Stormwater .......................................................................................................................................... 9 6. Wastewater ....................................................................................................................................... 10 7. Water Supply ..................................................................................................................................... 11 8. Utility Services ................................................................................................................................... 12 9. Summary ........................................................................................................................................... 13 Appendix A. Drawings ........................................................................................................................... 14
308 Queen Street E, Hastings 4122 | PO Box 758, Hastings | +64 6 876 7646 | admin@sgl.nz |www.stratagroup.net.nz
1. Introduction Strata Group Consulting Engineers Ltd has been engaged by Durham Property Ltd (the Applicant) to investigate the civil engineering aspects of the proposed subdivision at 16-38 Willowbank Ave. This report forms an engineering assessment for the proposal and includes investigation into the following aspects: • • • • • •
Preliminary Roading design Earthworks Stormwater collection and disposal Wastewater disposal Water supply Utilities
The purpose of the investigations summarised in this report is to accompany an application to be made to the Napier City Council for a residential subdivision. The legal description for the site is Lot 1 DP14417 4.5526Ha and Lot 2 DP14417 9.2648Ha. The proposed subdivision consists of: • • • •
19 Residential allotments fronting Eriksen Road 167 Lifestyle Units 2,010m of private accessway A drainage reserve and service corridors
Figure 1: Location Map
308 Queen Street E, Hastings 4122 | PO Box 758, Hastings | +64 6 876 7646 | admin@sgl.nz |www.stratagroup.net.nz
2. Design Considerations To complete the engineering assessment of the proposed subdivision it was first necessary to obtain the following: • • • 2.1
Sufficient topographical information regarding the site, including suitably detailed contour data and aerial imagery. Information regarding any protected areas, easements or areas of significance within the site which may have an impact on the layout Sufficient information with regards to existing services within & surrounding the site Topographical Information
A current aerial photograph was captured by drone and a detailed topo survey undertaken Surveying the Bay for the proposed development site and existing services. The subdivision scheme plan was prepared by Development Nous. 2.2
Staging
The development would be undertaken in stages commencing from Eriksen Road with the road frontage residential lots. The development would progress from there in groups of approximately 20 lots. The first stage involves connection to the underground services. Roading is available at the site boundary. The water supply connection can also be made to existing services in Ericksen Road. The stormwater would require NCC to install the proposed box culvert under Eriksen Road to the Cowshed Drain on the western side. A gravity sewer connection is available in Ericksen Road adjacent to the residential lots which provides services without having to install a pump station. Beyond the road frontage lots, the staging would commence from the main entrance to the lifestyle village and the extents that can be serviced by the first pump station. There are two sewer pump stations proposed within the development area. The first pump station could be connected to the existing 100mm diameter pumping at the front of the development, however we have proposed that the connection be made further to the south where the pump main increases in size from 100mm to 150mm. This connection is some 250m south of the development and would be undertaken at the developer’s expense as provided for in the structure plan. Refer to the proposed staging plan on the following page.
308 Queen Street E, Hastings 4122 | PO Box 758, Hastings | +64 6 876 7646 | admin@sgl.nz |www.stratagroup.net.nz
Figure 2: Proposed Development Staging
308 Queen Street E, Hastings 4122 | PO Box 758, Hastings | +64 6 876 7646 | admin@sgl.nz |www.stratagroup.net.nz
3. Preliminary Road Design 3.1
Existing Roads
The existing roads consist of Eriksen Road and Willowbank Road. There is no access onto Willowbank Road from the proposed development. Eriksen Road is partially formed to service the residential development on the Eastern side. A similar upgrade and widening on the western side is required to service the proposed development. 3.2
Proposed Roads
The 19 Lots fronting Eriksen Road would have access directly from the upgraded road. The remainder of the development would be serviced with two entry points onto Eriksen Road. Within the development the roading network is constructed in a 13.5m wide road reserve. The carriageway width is 6m with asphalt surfacing and kerb and channel both sides. A single 1.4m wide concrete foot path on one side provides safe pedestrian linkages to the open space areas and walkway network. The roading philosophy is one of connectivity for both pedestrians and vehicles. The narrow roads are designed to encourage a slow speed environment and pedestrians to have a number of route selections to gain access to the open space and wider walkway network. The road design and formations are generally in accordance with the Code of Practice and District Plan requirements for minor roads. Final pavement design will be based on design traffic volumes and subgrade CBR strengths as determined by the geotechnical engineer.
Photograph 1: Existing Eriksen Road formation (to be replicated)
308 Queen Street E, Hastings 4122 | PO Box 758, Hastings | +64 6 876 7646 | admin@sgl.nz |www.stratagroup.net.nz
4. Earthworks The majority of the existing site contour is above the modeled flood level of RL 11.28m for the Te Awa area (Beca three waters report), however the lower lying areas would require imported structural fill of up to 0.6m to mitigate potential flood risks. It is expected river silt will be used as bulk fill which is common practice for the Te Awa and Parklands development areas. Land to the East of the proposed site has been lifted with imported material during previous construction. It is intended to match into these existing levels and shape lots to fall toward roads and accessways. The structure plan drainage swale along the Western and Southern boundaries will provide fill material for raising the land and will minimise the volume of imported material. It is proposed to batter back into adjacent land at the northern boundary. Land owner approval for the batter has been sought and an agreement reached. Topsoil will be stripped and stockpiled prior to bulk filling and placed back on lots before grassing. Approximately 40,000 m3 of topsoil will be stripped to stockpile. Excess topsoil would be removed from site on completion of the bulk earthworks. A site-specific earthworks and silt management plan will be submitted to Napier City Council for approval prior to earthworks commencing on site. Preliminary earthworks volumes are as follows: • • • •
Strip top soil to stockpile 40,000m³ Cut open drainage channel 33,000m³ Fill low lying land 26,000m³ Import river silt 7,000m³
308 Queen Street E, Hastings 4122 | PO Box 758, Hastings | +64 6 876 7646 | admin@sgl.nz |www.stratagroup.net.nz
5. Stormwater The proposed stormwater system has been designed to convey the development catchment through a piped network to the proposed structure plan swale drain along Western and Southern boundaries. This connects into Te Awa structure plan attenuation pond via the upgraded Cowshed drain swale. The swale drains are located within the 40m wide designation area and would be constructed to the profile determined in the Beca report and the structure plan. This is a similar profile to the Cowshed Drain re-construction on the Western side of Eriksen Road. Refer Photograph 2 below.
Photograph 2: Cowshed Drain West of Eriksen Road
The piped network has four discharge points into the swale drain. Three of these are into the Willowbank Road drain and one into the Cowshed Drain. The Eriksen Road allotments are serviced with a 375mm diameter pipe that would discharge into the proposed box culvert under Eriksen Road. The pipes range in size from 300mm to 450mm diameter and the length of each run has been controlled by the outlet invert level to avoid a “bubble-up” system into the open drain network. Stormwater design parameters have been taken from NCC CoP 2015; I1.9. Coefficients have been set at 0.55 for all allotments except lots 12-19 of Stage 1 where owing to the potential for higher site coverage (up to 56%) a higher coefficient of 0.65 (‘Town house development’ from NZBC E1/VM1) has been adopted. Roads and reserves have been assigned coefficients of 0.85 and 0.30 respectively. The pipe network has been designed to allow for both a 10% and combined 10/2% AEP events. Rainfall data has been taken from HIRDS V3 with a 2.1 degree increase for expected 2090 climate change. Stormwater calculations will be submitted with detailed design at the Engineering approval phase.
308 Queen Street E, Hastings 4122 | PO Box 758, Hastings | +64 6 876 7646 | admin@sgl.nz |www.stratagroup.net.nz
6. Wastewater Wastewater services can be provided to the site through the existing gravity and pumping mains in Ericksen Road. The gravity connection is on the eastern side of Eriksen Road and is at adequate depth to extend it along the full length of the road frontage allotments. The remainder of the development would be serviced with two pump stations located beside the swale drain for ease of access. These pump stations are positioned to keep the gravity pipe and chamber depths to a minimum for safety in design considerations. A 100mm sewer pumping main in Ericksen Road could be used to provide a connection for the first pump station, however when the second pump station comes on line, it is likely that the connection point would need to be extended to where it enlarges to a 150mm pumping main some 250m south of the development site. Appropriate easements in gross are proposed to cater for council assets laid in private land. The wastewater demand is as follows: Pump Station 1 • • • •
Allotments serviced: 97 Units Land area: 97 x 400m2 = 3.88 Ha Peak wet weather flow (PWWF): 3.88 x 0.3 Litres/sec/Ha = 1.16 Litres/sec Storage: 5.6m3
Pump Station 2 • • • •
Allotments serviced: 67 Units Land area: 67 x 400m2 = 2.68 Ha Peak wet weather flow (PWWF): 2.68 x 0.3 Litres/sec/Ha = 0.8 Litres/sec Storage: 3.8m3
Gravity to Existing Eriksen Road Network • • •
Allotments serviced: 19 Lots Land area: 19 x 700m2 = 1.33 Ha Peak wet weather flow (PWWF): 1.33 x 0.3 Litres/sec/Ha = 0.4 Litres/sec
The total PWWF for the development is 2.36 Litres/sec.
308 Queen Street E, Hastings 4122 | PO Box 758, Hastings | +64 6 876 7646 | admin@sgl.nz |www.stratagroup.net.nz
7. Water Supply A water supply for the development can be fed from the 200mm diameter main in Ericksen Road. This main currently terminates at the Hurunui Drive intersection, but we understand that NCC are intending to extend the main along Ericksen Drive. The extended Council main would provide two connection points to the development as shown on the proposed water layout plan, Appendix A. Within the development, a principal DN150 main would run along one side of the road with a looped 63mm rider main running back along the opposite side. A series of appropriately sized feeder branches will be run up each accessway to serve the required Lots. The site also has a 100mm and a 75mm bore for irrigation and domestic water supply as per Figure 3 below. It is proposed that the bore will be professionally plugged and removed below ground level.
Figure 3: Existing Water Bores
The water demand for the development is as follows: • • • • • • •
Residential dwellings: 19 houses x 3.5 people per dwelling = 67 people Lifestyle village: 164 units x 1.25 people per unit = 205 people Total occupancy = 272 people Average daily demand per person: 250 Litres/person/day Average daily demand: 250 L/p/d x 272 people = 68 m3/day Peaking Factor 5 Peak daily demand: 3.93 Litres/sec
308 Queen Street E, Hastings 4122 | PO Box 758, Hastings | +64 6 876 7646 | admin@sgl.nz |www.stratagroup.net.nz
8. Utility Services Power and telecommunications have been laid through to the proposed development site as part of the Eriksen Road and Hurunui Road residential development. It is intended to extend these services through the development. Provisional width for laying utilities will be allowed for within the proposed road corridor in accordance with NCC code. The existing overhead power lines in Eriksen Road would remain in place. Undergrounding would be undertaken in the future by Unison as part of their seismic upgrade programme. Power-Co have been approached to service the site for Gas. It is expected this service will run with others in the proposed trenches.
308 Queen Street E, Hastings 4122 | PO Box 758, Hastings | +64 6 876 7646 | admin@sgl.nz |www.stratagroup.net.nz
9. Summary From our assessment of the site, engineering servicing for the proposed development can be achieved to an acceptable standard as follows: •
Earthworks will be required to bring the proposed land above the modeled 2% AEP flood level for the Te Awa development area of RL 11.28 (300mm freeboard is required above the flood level for building platforms – RL 11.58). Approximately 6,000m³ of imported structural fill is proposed.
•
All proposed roading for the development can be constructed in accordance with the NCC Engineering Code of Practice.
•
Conveyance of onsite stormwater up to 2% AEP event can be provided for via a piped network discharging into the Te Awa stormwater system which includes the proposed Willowbank Avenue and Cowshed Drain open channels
•
Potable water can be supplied via the DN200 Eriksen Road trunk main and proposed extension.
•
A gravity sewer network can service the Eriksen Road frontage lots
•
Two sewer pump stations within the lifestyle village would collect and pump to the common main in Eriksen Road.
•
Utility services can be provided to all sites.
All final designs and calculations for engineering approval will comply with NCC code of practice and district plan rules and regulations. Preliminary desktop and site investigations have not revealed any significant engineering issues for the proposed development.
308 Queen Street E, Hastings 4122 | PO Box 758, Hastings | +64 6 876 7646 | admin@sgl.nz |www.stratagroup.net.nz
Appendix A. Drawings
308 Queen Street E, Hastings 4122 | PO Box 758, Hastings | +64 6 876 7646 | admin@sgl.nz |www.stratagroup.net.nz
LOT 1 DP 6396 GENERAL NOTES:
· BOUNDARY INFORMATION/DATA SHOWN IN THIS DRAWING HAS BEEN SOURCED FROM QUICKMAP. STRATA GROUP CONSULTING ENGINEERS TAKE NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ACCURACY OF THIS INFORMATION/DATA.
LOT 2 DP 6396
· COORDINATE DATUM: NZGD 2000 HB CIRCUIT HEIGHT
DATUM IS LOCAL AUTHORITY DATUM 1972 (MSL = 10.00m) ORIGIN OF HEIGHTS: BP 68 SO 9387.
· DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING. ANY ADDITIONAL DIMENSIONS SHOULD CONTACTS BELOW.
BE
REQUESTED
FROM
THE
· ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN METRES UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE.
LOT 1 DP 14417
· AERIAL IMAGE IS SOURCED FROM LINZ IS INDICATIVE ONLY.
AV
E
LOT 3 DP 394762
ERIK
SEN
ROA D
WI
LL
OW
BA
NK
LOT 1 DP 318389
LOT 2 DP 14417 HURUNUI DRIVE
LOT 9 DP 6055
LOT 10 DP 6055 SAFETY IN DESIGN
ALL REASONABLY PRACTICABLE STEPS HAVE BEEN TAKEN TO ENSURE SAFETY IN DESIGN HAS BEEN CONSIDERED WITHIN STRATA GROUP'S SCOPE OF WORK FOR THIS DESIGN IN ACCORDANCE WITH IPENZ PRACTICE NOTE 07 "DESIGN FOR SAFETY IN BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES (JULY 2006)". IT REMAINS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER AND/OR OPERATOR TO ENSURE APPROPRIATE PRACTICES ARE IN PLACE TO PROTECT THE SAFETY OF THE WORKERS AND THE PUBLIC IN THE OPERATION OF THE FACILITY.
CLIENT:
2
FOR NOTIFICATION
-
-
1
-
-
-
REV
REASON FOR ISSUE
DATE
BY
PATH:J:\DUR - DURHAM PROPERTIES\J4345 - TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)\2 - DWGS\XREF'S\J4345 - BASE SERVICES PLAN 2020.DWG DATE:7/2/2018
THE CONTRACTOR IS TO BE AWARE OF ALL INSPECTIONS TO BE MADE BY THE ENGINEER AS A REQUIREMENT OF THE PRODUCER STATEMENT PS4 CONSTRUCTION REVIEW DOCUMENTATION. THE ENGINEER WILL REQUIRE 24 HOURS PRIOR NOTIFICATION FOR ALL INSPECTIONS.
DURHAM PROPERTY LTD
P 06 876 7646 F 06 876 7645 www.stratagroup.net.nz Structural
Fire
PO BOX 758 Business HQ 1/308 Queen Street East Hastings, New Zealand Civil Project Management
PROJECT:
TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)
TITLE:
SITE LOCATION PLAN
DJ EM CHECKED DJ DATE OCT 18
DESIGNED DRAWN
PROJECT NO.: This drawing and its contents are the property of Strata Group Consulting Engineers Ltd. Any unauthorized employment or reproduction in full or part is forbidden.
0
250
500
750
Full Size 1:12500 ; Half Size 1:25000 Scale (m)
J4345
SHEET:
C001
REVISION:
2
LOT 1 DP 6396 GENERAL NOTES: LOT 77
· BOUNDARY INFORMATION/DATA SHOWN IN THIS DRAWING HAS BEEN SOURCED FROM QUICKMAP. STRATA GROUP CONSULTING ENGINEERS TAKE NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ACCURACY OF THIS INFORMATION/DATA.
LOT 79 LOT 75
· COORDINATE DATUM: NZGD 2000 HB CIRCUIT HEIGHT
8m WIDE DRAINAGE CORRIDOR/ RESERVE
DATUM IS LOCAL AUTHORITY DATUM 1972 (MSL = 10.00m) ORIGIN OF HEIGHTS: BP 68 SO 9387.
· DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING. ANY ADDITIONAL
LOT 82
LOT 73
THE
LOT 72
· ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN METRES UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE.
THE
LOT 83 LOT 84
RO A
D2
LOT 93
LOT 96
LOT 20 LOT 89 LOT 85
LOT 92
LOT 71
LOT 19
LOT 21
LOT 91
STAGE 7
LOT 70
13
.5m
LOT 104
PR IV
LOT 98
LOT 68
STAGE 6
E AV
AD
NK
OA D PR IV
AT ER
LOT 28
.5m 13
LOT 136
LOT 140
PR .5m
13
.5m
LOT 158
LOT 160
RO AD
LOT 155
302
LOT 11
LOT 31
LOT 142
LOT 56
LOT 10
LOT 143 LOT 141
6
LOT 33
LOT 9
LOT 144
LOT 154
LOT 161
LOT 34 LOT 8
LOT 157 LOT 153
mR
LOT 152
13.5
m RO
LOT 147
AD 7
LOT 177 LOT 178
LOT 169
.5m
LOT 48
RO
AD
9
LOT 306
LOT 172
LOT 175
LOT 176
LOT 182
LOT 38
STAGE 2 LOT 181
LOT 39
LOT 179
LOT 40
LOT 180
LOT 4
LOT 3
LOT 41 LOT 46
LOT 42
LOT 45
HURUNUI DRIVE
LOT 5
STAGE 1a
301
LOT 47
LOT 6
LOT 37
LOT 171 13
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ENTRANCE
ROA
LOT 174
AD
LOT 36
MAIN
LOT 173
LOT 168
LOT 49
E RO
LOT 7
LOT 170 LOT 165
LOT 50
RAN C
LOT 35
D (1 )
LOT 167
LOT 51
ENT
LOT 148
LOT 164 LOT 52
AIN
LOT 146
LOT 151
LOT 166
LOT 53
17.0 mM
LOT 145
17.0 m
.5m
LOT 149
13.5
LOT 162
PR IV
AT ER
OA D
LOT 55
13
LOT 150
OAD 8
LOT 156
LOT 163
STAGE 1b
LOT 32 LOT 138
13
LOT 57
LOT 139
OA
AD RO TE IVA
8m WIDE DRAINAGE CORRIDOR/ RESERVE
LOT 137
LOT 159
LOT 30
STAGE 5 D8
LL WI
STAGE 4
LOT 58
LOT 116
LOT 132 LOT 133
LOT 12
LOT 117
LOT 134
LOT 1 DP 318389
LOT 29
LOT 120
RO A
LOT 135
LOT 59
LOT 115
D5
LOT 131
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ENTRANCE
LOT 13
LOT 118
13.5 mR
BA OW
LOT 61
D2
LOT 119
LOT 121 13 .5m
ROA
LOT 14
LOT 27
4
LOT 124 LOT 130
NCE
LOT 26
LOT 111
RO
TRA
LOT 15
17.0
LOT 122 LOT 125
LOT 62
LOT 54
13 .5m
m EN
LOT 25
(1)
17
LOT 126
LOT 129
LOT 63
LOT 112
LOT 110
LOT 123
303
LOT 60
STAGE 3
LOT 109
PR
LOT 128
17.0
LOT 114
LO T4
RO AD
LOT 127
13 .5m
LOT 64
LOT 113
LOT 108
LOT 102
IVA TE
LOT 65
LOT 17
LOT 16
LOT 107
LOT 101
LOT 307
LOT 23
LOT 24
LOT 100
LOT 66
STAGE 1c
LOT 87
3
LOT 106
LOT 103
8m WIDE DRAINAGE CORRIDOR/ RESERVE
AD
LOT 105 LOT 99
LOT 67
RO
LOT 18
LOT 22
ROA D
LOT 3 DP 394762
LOT 69
LOT 86
SEN
· PROPOSED CONTOUR INTERVALS ARE AT 0.10m.
LOT 88
LOT 97
ERIK
ONLY.
AIN ROA D
· AERIAL IMAGE IS SOURCED FROM LINZ IS INDICATIVE
RO AD
ON
AT E
SHOWN
.5m
UNDERGROUND SERVICES DRAWINGS ARE INDICATIVE ONLY.
LOT 95
13
· ALL
13 .5m
LOT 90
304
LOT 308
LOT 94
mM
FROM
STAGE 8
D
REQUESTED
LOT 81
LOT 74
1 IVA 3.5m TE RO A
BE
LOT 80
PR
DIMENSIONS SHOULD CONTACTS BELOW.
LOT 2 DP 6396
LOT 78
LOT 76
LOT 2
LOT 44
POCKET PARK/ RESERVE CONNECTING TO BROADER RECREATIONAL NETWORK
LOT 43
LOT 1
LOT 305
LOT 9 DP 6055
LOT 10 DP 6055 SAFETY IN DESIGN
ALL REASONABLY PRACTICABLE STEPS HAVE BEEN TAKEN TO ENSURE SAFETY IN DESIGN HAS BEEN CONSIDERED WITHIN STRATA GROUP'S SCOPE OF WORK FOR THIS DESIGN IN ACCORDANCE WITH IPENZ PRACTICE NOTE 07 "DESIGN FOR SAFETY IN BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES (JULY 2006)". IT REMAINS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER AND/OR OPERATOR TO ENSURE APPROPRIATE PRACTICES ARE IN PLACE TO PROTECT THE SAFETY OF THE WORKERS AND THE PUBLIC IN THE OPERATION OF THE FACILITY.
CLIENT:
6 5 4 3 2
FOR NOTIFICATION - STAGE 7 LOT NUMBERING RE-ARRANGED 200330 FOR NOTIFICATION - STAGING AMENDED
-
200124
-
FOR NOTIFICATION - INTERSECTION OFF ENTRANCE200115 2
-
FOR NOTIFICATION - ROAD LABELS ADDED FOR NOTIFICATION
200114
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
REV
REASON FOR ISSUE
DATE
BY
PATH:J:\DUR - DURHAM PROPERTIES\J4345 - TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)\2 - DWGS\XREF'S\J4345 - BASE SERVICES PLAN 2020.DWG DATE:7/2/2018
THE CONTRACTOR IS TO BE AWARE OF ALL INSPECTIONS TO BE MADE BY THE ENGINEER AS A REQUIREMENT OF THE PRODUCER STATEMENT PS4 CONSTRUCTION REVIEW DOCUMENTATION. THE ENGINEER WILL REQUIRE 24 HOURS PRIOR NOTIFICATION FOR ALL INSPECTIONS.
DURHAM PROPERTY LTD
P 06 876 7646 F 06 876 7645 www.stratagroup.net.nz Structural
Fire
PO BOX 758 Business HQ 1/308 Queen Street East Hastings, New Zealand Civil Project Management
PROJECT:
TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)
TITLE:
PROPOSED SITE PLAN
DJ EM CHECKED DJ DATE OCT 18
DESIGNED DRAWN
PROJECT NO.: This drawing and its contents are the property of Strata Group Consulting Engineers Ltd. Any unauthorized employment or reproduction in full or part is forbidden.
0
250
500
750
Full Size 1:12500 ; Half Size 1:25000 Scale (m)
J4345
SHEET:
C002
REVISION:
6
LOT 1 DP 6396 GENERAL NOTES:
· BOUNDARY INFORMATION/DATA SHOWN IN THIS DRAWING HAS BEEN SOURCED FROM QUICKMAP. STRATA GROUP CONSULTING ENGINEERS TAKE NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ACCURACY OF THIS INFORMATION/DATA.
LOT 2 DP 6396
· COORDINATE DATUM: NZGD 2000 HB CIRCUIT HEIGHT
.00
12
DATUM IS LOCAL AUTHORITY DATUM 1972 (MSL = 10.00m) ORIGIN OF HEIGHTS: BP 68 SO 9387.
· DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING. ANY ADDITIONAL DIMENSIONS SHOULD CONTACTS BELOW.
BE
REQUESTED
FROM
THE
.90
11
· ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN METRES UNLESS SHOWN · ALL
11
UNDERGROUND SERVICES DRAWINGS ARE INDICATIVE ONLY.
SHOWN
ON
0
.8
OTHERWISE.
THE
0 .7 11
LOT 1 DP 14417
· AERIAL IMAGE IS SOURCED FROM LINZ IS INDICATIVE ONLY.
· EXISTING CONTOUR INTERVALS ARE AT 0.10m.
.9 11
.50
11 .30
.40 11
11
0 12.0
LOT 1 DP 318389
ROA D
.40
20
LOT 2 DP 14417 11.40
11.50
11.6
0
0 11.7
.80 11
.90 11
.00 12
ERIK
SEN
. 11
11.00
11
.30
11
11
.50
WI
LL
OW
BA
NK
AV
11 .6
0
E
11
.7
0
SECONDARY OVERLAND ARROW
11.50
11.70
11.80
PRIMARY OVERLAND FLOW ARROW
0
LOT 3 DP 394762
OVERLAND FLOW:
0
.6
11
HURUNUI DRIVE
1.30
1
0
50
11.4
.4
0
11.50
11.
11
LOT 9 DP 6055
LOT 10 DP 6055 SAFETY IN DESIGN
ALL REASONABLY PRACTICABLE STEPS HAVE BEEN TAKEN TO ENSURE SAFETY IN DESIGN HAS BEEN CONSIDERED WITHIN STRATA GROUP'S SCOPE OF WORK FOR THIS DESIGN IN ACCORDANCE WITH IPENZ PRACTICE NOTE 07 "DESIGN FOR SAFETY IN BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES (JULY 2006)". IT REMAINS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER AND/OR OPERATOR TO ENSURE APPROPRIATE PRACTICES ARE IN PLACE TO PROTECT THE SAFETY OF THE WORKERS AND THE PUBLIC IN THE OPERATION OF THE FACILITY.
CLIENT:
2
FOR NOTIFICATION
-
-
1
-
-
-
REV
REASON FOR ISSUE
DATE
BY
PATH:J:\DUR - DURHAM PROPERTIES\J4345 - TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)\2 - DWGS\XREF'S\J4345 - BASE SERVICES PLAN 2020.DWG DATE:7/2/2018
THE CONTRACTOR IS TO BE AWARE OF ALL INSPECTIONS TO BE MADE BY THE ENGINEER AS A REQUIREMENT OF THE PRODUCER STATEMENT PS4 CONSTRUCTION REVIEW DOCUMENTATION. THE ENGINEER WILL REQUIRE 24 HOURS PRIOR NOTIFICATION FOR ALL INSPECTIONS.
DURHAM PROPERTY LTD
P 06 876 7646 F 06 876 7645 www.stratagroup.net.nz Structural
Fire
PO BOX 758 Business HQ 1/308 Queen Street East Hastings, New Zealand Civil Project Management
PROJECT:
TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)
TITLE:
EXISTING CONTOUR & OVERLAND FLOW PLAN
DJ EM CHECKED DJ DATE OCT 18
DESIGNED DRAWN
PROJECT NO.: This drawing and its contents are the property of Strata Group Consulting Engineers Ltd. Any unauthorized employment or reproduction in full or part is forbidden.
0
250
500
750
Full Size 1:12500 ; Half Size 1:25000 Scale (m)
J4345
SHEET:
C003
REVISION:
2
LOT 1 DP 6396 GENERAL NOTES: LOT 77
· BOUNDARY INFORMATION/DATA SHOWN IN THIS DRAWING HAS BEEN SOURCED FROM QUICKMAP. STRATA GROUP CONSULTING ENGINEERS TAKE NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ACCURACY OF THIS INFORMATION/DATA.
LOT 79 LOT 75
8m WIDE DRAINAGE CORRIDOR/ RESERVE
DATUM IS LOCAL AUTHORITY DATUM 1972 (MSL = 10.00m) ORIGIN OF HEIGHTS: BP 68 SO 9387.
· DO NOT SCALE FROM THIS DRAWING. ANY ADDITIONAL
LOT 73
THE
LOT 72
· ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN METRES UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE.
THE
LOT 20
LOT 96
LOT 89 LOT 85
LOT 92
LOT 71
LOT 19
LOT 21
LOT 91 LOT 70
.5m
LOT 104
LOT 98
PR IV
OVERLAND FLOW:
13
LOT 68
LOT 99
LOT 67
8m WIDE DRAINAGE CORRIDOR/ RESERVE
E AV
LOT 123
LOT 109
LOT 125
D4
NK
OA D AT ER
LOT 111
PR IV .5m 13
D5
LOT 12
LOT 117 LOT 116
LOT 30 LOT 11
LOT 136
IVA
TE
LOT 31
LOT 139
OA
AD RO
LOT 137
LOT 159
LOT 140
PR .5m
13
.5m
LOT 158
RO AD
LOT 155
302
LOT 142
LOT 143 LOT 141
6
LOT 33
LOT 56
LOT 9
LOT 144
LOT 154
LOT 161
LOT 10
LOT 32 LOT 138
LOT 160
LOT 34 LOT 8
LOT 157 LOT 153
mR
LOT 152
m RO
LOT 147
AD 7
LOT 173
LOT 168
MAIN
LOT 170 LOT 165
LOT 174
LOT 37
LOT 178
LOT 182
LOT 38
LOT 171
LOT 49
13
.5m
LOT 48
RO
AD
9
LOT 306
LOT 172
LOT 175
LOT 176
LOT 4
LOT 179 LOT 40
301
LOT 3
LOT 41 LOT 46
HURUNUI DRIVE
LOT 5
LOT 39
LOT 181
LOT 180
LOT 47
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ENTRANCE
LOT 6
LOT 177
LOT 169
LOT 50
OAD
LOT 36
D (1
13.5
CE R
LOT 7 )
LOT 167
LOT 51
RAN
LOT 148
LOT 164 LOT 52
ENT
LOT 35
LOT 146
LOT 151
LOT 166
LOT 53
mM AIN
ROA
LOT 163
17.0
LOT 145
17.0 m
.5m
LOT 149
13.5
LOT 162
PR IV
AT ER
OA D
LOT 55
13
LOT 150
OAD 8
LOT 156
LOT 1 DP 318389
LOT 13
LOT 132
13
LOT 57
LOT 14
LOT 29
LOT 120 RO A
LOT 134
LOT 59
LOT 58
LOT 115
13.5 mR
LL WI
LOT 130
LOT 133
8m WIDE DRAINAGE CORRIDOR/ RESERVE
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ENTRANCE
LOT 27
LOT 28
LOT 135
LOT 60
D2
LOT 26
LOT 118
LOT 121
LOT 131
ROA
LOT 119
D8
BA OW
LOT 61
NCE
LOT 25
17.0
RO A
LOT 112
LOT 110
LOT 124
13 .5m
TRA
LOT 15
LOT 122
LOT 129
LOT 63
LOT 62
LOT 54
m EN
(1)
17 13 .5m
LOT 126
17.0
LOT 114
PR
LOT 128
303
LOT 16 LOT 113
LOT 108
LO T4
LOT 127
13 .5m
LOT 64
LOT 17
LOT 24 LOT 107
LOT 102 RO AD
LOT 65
LOT 23
LOT 106
LOT 101 LOT 66 LOT 307
LOT 87
3
LOT 100
IVA TE
SECONDARY
AD
LOT 105 LOT 103
PRIMARY
RO
LOT 18
LOT 22
ROA D
LOT 3 DP 394762
LOT 69
LOT 86
SEN
· PROPOSED CONTOUR INTERVALS ARE AT 0.10m.
LOT 88
LOT 97
ERIK
ONLY.
AIN ROA D
· AERIAL IMAGE IS SOURCED FROM LINZ IS INDICATIVE
RO AD
ON
AT E
SHOWN
.5m
UNDERGROUND SERVICES DRAWINGS ARE INDICATIVE ONLY.
LOT 84
RO A
D2
LOT 93 LOT 90
13
· ALL
LOT 83 13 .5m
LOT 95
304
LOT 308
LOT 94
mM
FROM
LOT 82 PR IV A TE
REQUESTED
LOT 81
LOT 74
13 .5m
BE
LOT 80
RO AD
· COORDINATE DATUM: NZGD 2000 HB CIRCUIT HEIGHT
DIMENSIONS SHOULD CONTACTS BELOW.
LOT 2 DP 6396
LOT 78
LOT 76
LOT 42
LOT 45
LOT 2
LOT 44
POCKET PARK/ RESERVE CONNECTING TO BROADER RECREATIONAL NETWORK
LOT 43
LOT 1
LOT 305
LOT 9 DP 6055
LOT 10 DP 6055 SAFETY IN DESIGN
ALL REASONABLY PRACTICABLE STEPS HAVE BEEN TAKEN TO ENSURE SAFETY IN DESIGN HAS BEEN CONSIDERED WITHIN STRATA GROUP'S SCOPE OF WORK FOR THIS DESIGN IN ACCORDANCE WITH IPENZ PRACTICE NOTE 07 "DESIGN FOR SAFETY IN BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES (JULY 2006)". IT REMAINS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER AND/OR OPERATOR TO ENSURE APPROPRIATE PRACTICES ARE IN PLACE TO PROTECT THE SAFETY OF THE WORKERS AND THE PUBLIC IN THE OPERATION OF THE FACILITY.
CLIENT:
5
FOR NOTIFICATION - STAGE 7 LOT NUMBERING RE-ARRANGED 200330
-
4
FOR NOTIFICATION - INTERSECTION OFF ENTRANCE200115 2
-
3 2
FOR NOTIFICATION - ROAD LABELS ADDED FOR NOTIFICATION
200114
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
REV
REASON FOR ISSUE
DATE
BY
PATH:J:\DUR - DURHAM PROPERTIES\J4345 - TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)\2 - DWGS\XREF'S\J4345 - BASE SERVICES PLAN 2020.DWG DATE:7/2/2018
THE CONTRACTOR IS TO BE AWARE OF ALL INSPECTIONS TO BE MADE BY THE ENGINEER AS A REQUIREMENT OF THE PRODUCER STATEMENT PS4 CONSTRUCTION REVIEW DOCUMENTATION. THE ENGINEER WILL REQUIRE 24 HOURS PRIOR NOTIFICATION FOR ALL INSPECTIONS.
DURHAM PROPERTY LTD
P 06 876 7646 F 06 876 7645 www.stratagroup.net.nz Structural
Fire
PO BOX 758 Business HQ 1/308 Queen Street East Hastings, New Zealand Civil Project Management
PROJECT:
TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)
TITLE:
PROPOSED CONTOUR & OVERLAND FLOW PLAN
DJ EM CHECKED DJ DATE OCT 18
DESIGNED DRAWN
PROJECT NO.: This drawing and its contents are the property of Strata Group Consulting Engineers Ltd. Any unauthorized employment or reproduction in full or part is forbidden.
0
250
500
750
Full Size 1:12500 ; Half Size 1:25000 Scale (m)
J4345
SHEET:
C004
REVISION:
5
LOT 1 DP 6396 EARTHWORKS NOTES:
0.0 0
· CUT AND FILL INDICATES EG UNDERCUT (TOPSOIL
LOT 2 DP 6396
· DO NOT SCALE FROM DRAWING, IF EXTRA INFORMATION IS REQUIRED, PLEASE CONTACT CONSULTING ENGINEERS.
0.00
3
STRATA
GROUP
0.0
0
CT ION
· ALL VOLUMES HAVE BEEN CALCULATED IN SOLID ON FIXED DESIGN DEPTHS. VOLUMES EXCLUDE POSSIBLE UNDER-CUT OF SOFT SPOTS, UNDERGROUND FEATURES AND CONTAMINATED MATERIALS.
50 .00
SE
STRIP) TO FINISHED SURFACE PRIOR TO TOPSOIL FILL.
CUT/FILL TABLE
0.0
0
Number Minimum Level Maximum Level Colour
50.0
50.
00
10
.00
0
100
LOT 3 DP 394762
.00
0.0
150
0
100.
0.0
4
0
150. 00
E 0
00
AV
00
-0.70
-0.60
4
-0.60
-0.20
5
-0.20
-0.10
6
-0.10
0.10
7
0.10
0.30
8
0.30
1.80
ROA
250 .00
SEN
.44 300.
ERIK
297
.00
5
3
D
200 35 0
00
40 0.0 0
50.
00
0.0
0
ION
-0.70
DESIGN SURFACE IMPORTED TOPSOIL - 22,268m³ FILL
00
CT
-1.50
.00
0
2
IMPORTED HARDFILL FROM TOPSOIL UNDERCUT TO TOP OFF OF DESIGN FILL SURFACE LEVELS - 26,481m³ FILL
200. 150 .00
0.0
-1.50
EXISTING GROUND TO TOPSOIL UNDERCUT (300mm DEPTH) - 41,466m³ CUT
LOT 1 DP 318389
0 100 .00
OW LL WI
30
-2.30
CUT AND FILL VOLUMES:
0.0
BA
50.
NK
25
250.
SE
267 .04
20
250
TIO N
.00
SE C
.00
200
00
.00
15
1
350.
00
HURUNUI DRIVE
49
.00
150
.00
100
.00
45 0.0 0
2.8
400.
00
.55
LOT 9 DP 6055
00
343
450.
300
.00
SE
250
CT IO
.00
N1
200
4
476.
SEC
TION
2
86
LOT 10 DP 6055 SAFETY IN DESIGN
ALL REASONABLY PRACTICABLE STEPS HAVE BEEN TAKEN TO ENSURE SAFETY IN DESIGN HAS BEEN CONSIDERED WITHIN STRATA GROUP'S SCOPE OF WORK FOR THIS DESIGN IN ACCORDANCE WITH IPENZ PRACTICE NOTE 07 "DESIGN FOR SAFETY IN BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES (JULY 2006)". IT REMAINS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER AND/OR OPERATOR TO ENSURE APPROPRIATE PRACTICES ARE IN PLACE TO PROTECT THE SAFETY OF THE WORKERS AND THE PUBLIC IN THE OPERATION OF THE FACILITY.
CLIENT:
2
FOR NOTIFICATION
-
-
1
-
-
-
REV
REASON FOR ISSUE
DATE
BY
PATH:J:\DUR - DURHAM PROPERTIES\J4345 - TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)\2 - DWGS\XREF'S\J4345 - BASE SERVICES PLAN 2020.DWG DATE:7/2/2018
THE CONTRACTOR IS TO BE AWARE OF ALL INSPECTIONS TO BE MADE BY THE ENGINEER AS A REQUIREMENT OF THE PRODUCER STATEMENT PS4 CONSTRUCTION REVIEW DOCUMENTATION. THE ENGINEER WILL REQUIRE 24 HOURS PRIOR NOTIFICATION FOR ALL INSPECTIONS.
DURHAM PROPERTY LTD
P 06 876 7646 F 06 876 7645 www.stratagroup.net.nz Structural
Fire
PO BOX 758 Business HQ 1/308 Queen Street East Hastings, New Zealand Civil Project Management
PROJECT:
TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)
TITLE:
EARTHWORKS PLAN
DJ EM CHECKED DJ DATE OCT 18
DESIGNED DRAWN
PROJECT NO.: This drawing and its contents are the property of Strata Group Consulting Engineers Ltd. Any unauthorized employment or reproduction in full or part is forbidden.
0
250
500
750
Full Size 1:12500 ; Half Size 1:25000 Scale (m)
J4345
SHEET:
C005
REVISION:
2
EXISTING GROUND LEVEL
PROPOSED FINISHED LEVEL
EXISTING GROUND TOPSOIL UNDERCUT
PROPOSED FINISHED TOPSOIL UNDERCUT
LOT 1 DP6396 LOT 9 DP6055
11.10 11.27 11.60 11.64 474.70 480
492.84
-0.54 -0.39
-1.82 11.59 460
9.77
-0.25 11.57 440
11.32
0.01 11.56 11.54 420
11.43
0.05 11.53 11.53 400 401.66
-0.13
11.58 11.58 0.04 0.04 11.54 380
11.58
11.58 0.03 11.55 360
11.57 11.56 337.06 340
11.58
11.57 320
0.02
0.01 11.58 0.01 11.58
11.58 300
11.58 0.00
11.61 280
11.58 -0.03
11.63 267.64
11.58 11.58 -0.07 -0.06 11.65
11.70 240
260
11.75 220
11.58 -0.12
11.78 11.78 200 203.62
11.58 -0.17
11.76 180
11.58 -0.20
11.75 160
11.58 -0.18
11.73 140
11.58 -0.17
11.72 129.91
11.58 -0.15
11.76 120
11.58 -0.18
11.84 100
11.58 -0.26
11.91 80
11.58 -0.33 11.94 72.40
11.58 -0.38 11.96 60
11.58 -0.39
-0.41 11.58 11.99
CHAINAGE
40
0.00
EXISTING LEVELS
-0.39
CUT/FILL DEPTHS
12.01
DESIGN LEVELS
20
11.62
SCALE: 1:500H, 1:25V DATUM: 8.00
SECTION 1 LONG SECTION
EXISTING GROUND LEVEL
PROPOSED FINISHED LEVEL
EXISTING GROUND TOPSOIL UNDERCUT
PROPOSED FINISHED TOPSOIL UNDERCUT
LOT 1 DP6396 LOT 9 DP6055
-1.25
11.38
11.42
11.40
11.43
11.45
11.48 11.49
380
388.58
400
420
440
460 465.58
476.86
-0.87
11.30 360
0.05
10.23
0.11 11.54
11.21 340
10.58
0.18
11.16 333.37
11.49
0.28
11.14 320
11.58
0.37
11.11 300
0.21 11.58 0.20 11.58
11.58 0.44
11.08 280
0.47
11.58
11.58 0.47
11.11 11.09 260 262.97
0.39
11.58
0.51 11.58 0.50 11.58
11.19 240
11.58
11.28 220
11.58
0.20 11.38 11.34 200 205.85
0.30 11.58 0.31 11.58
0.09 11.49 180
11.58
-0.03 11.61 160
11.58
-0.11 11.58 -0.13 11.58 11.70 11.71 138.97 140
11.58
-0.08 11.66 120
11.58
-0.03 11.61 100
11.58
0.01 11.58 11.57 80
0.02 0.05
11.58 11.58 11.56 11.56 53.82 60
11.58 -0.02 11.60
CHAINAGE
40
11.63 0.00
EXISTING LEVELS
-0.04
CUT/FILL DEPTHS
11.67
DESIGN LEVELS
20
SCALE: 1:500H, 1:25V DATUM: 8.00
SECTION 2 LONG SECTION FILL
CUT
SAFETY IN DESIGN
ALL REASONABLY PRACTICABLE STEPS HAVE BEEN TAKEN TO ENSURE SAFETY IN DESIGN HAS BEEN CONSIDERED WITHIN STRATA GROUP'S SCOPE OF WORK FOR THIS DESIGN IN ACCORDANCE WITH IPENZ PRACTICE NOTE 07 "DESIGN FOR SAFETY IN BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES (JULY 2006)". IT REMAINS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER AND/OR OPERATOR TO ENSURE APPROPRIATE PRACTICES ARE IN PLACE TO PROTECT THE SAFETY OF THE WORKERS AND THE PUBLIC IN THE OPERATION OF THE FACILITY.
CLIENT:
2
FOR NOTIFICATION
-
-
1
-
-
-
REV
REASON FOR ISSUE
DATE
BY
PATH:J:\DUR - DURHAM PROPERTIES\J4345 - TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)\2 - DWGS\XREF'S\J4345 - BASE SERVICES PLAN 2020.DWG DATE:7/2/2018
THE CONTRACTOR IS TO BE AWARE OF ALL INSPECTIONS TO BE MADE BY THE ENGINEER AS A REQUIREMENT OF THE PRODUCER STATEMENT PS4 CONSTRUCTION REVIEW DOCUMENTATION. THE ENGINEER WILL REQUIRE 24 HOURS PRIOR NOTIFICATION FOR ALL INSPECTIONS.
DURHAM PROPERTY LTD
P 06 876 7646 F 06 876 7645 www.stratagroup.net.nz Structural
Fire
PO BOX 758 Business HQ 1/308 Queen Street East Hastings, New Zealand Civil Project Management
PROJECT:
TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)
TITLE:
EARTHWORKS SECTIONS
DJ EM CHECKED DJ DATE OCT 18
DESIGNED DRAWN
PROJECT NO.: This drawing and its contents are the property of Strata Group Consulting Engineers Ltd. Any unauthorized employment or reproduction in full or part is forbidden.
0
5
10
20
30
Full Size 1:500 ; Half Size 1:1000 Scale (m)
J4345
SHEET:
C006
REVISION:
2
EXISTING GROUND LEVEL
PROPOSED FINISHED LEVEL
EXISTING GROUND TOPSOIL UNDERCUT
PROPOSED FINISHED TOPSOIL UNDERCUT
WILLOWBANK AVE ERIKSEN ROAD
11.58 11.58 0.25 0.25
11.31
11.33
240
260
267.04
11.58 0.27 11.29 227.86
11.60 0.23 11.37 220
11.58 0.02 11.56 200
11.58 11.58 -0.02 -0.03
-0.08 11.66 160
11.59 11.60
-0.18 11.76 140
174.93 180
-0.21 11.58 11.79 120
11.58
-0.22 11.80 11.79 100 105.29
CHAINAGE
11.58
-0.26 11.84 80
0.00
EXISTING LEVELS
11.58
-0.24 11.87 60
CUT/FILL DEPTHS
11.58
11.66 -0.23 11.89 51.94
DESIGN LEVELS
11.63
11.21 -0.67 11.88 40
10.27 -1.60 11.87 20
SCALE: 1:500H, 1:25V DATUM: 9.00
SECTION 3 LONG SECTION PROPOSED FINISHED LEVEL PROPOSED FINISHED TOPSOIL UNDERCUT
EXISTING GROUND LEVEL EXISTING GROUND TOPSOIL UNDERCUT
WILLOWBANK AVE ERIKSEN ROAD
0.51 11.63 11.12 11.11 278.22 280
11.58
0.46 11.17 260
0.54
11.63
297.44
0.39 11.62 0.41 11.63 11.23 240
11.58 0.29 11.29 220
11.58 0.25 11.33 11.33
11.58 0.22
198.30 200
11.58 0.19 11.39
11.58 0.14 11.44 160
180
11.58 0.07 11.51 140
11.58 0.02 11.56 127.28
11.58 0.00 11.58 120
11.58 -0.05 11.63 100
11.58 -0.12 11.70 80
11.59 -0.22 11.82 11.81 58.54 60
-0.31 11.53
11.06 -0.80 11.86
CHAINAGE
40
10.39 0.00
EXISTING LEVELS
-1.55
CUT/FILL DEPTHS
11.94
DESIGN LEVELS
20
SCALE: 1:500H, 1:25V DATUM: 9.00
SECTION 4 LONG SECTION PROPOSED FINISHED LEVEL PROPOSED FINISHED TOPSOIL UNDERCUT EXISTING GROUND LEVEL EXISTING GROUND TOPSOIL UNDERCUT
WILLOWBANK AVE
ERIKSEN ROAD
11.73
0.20 0.20
0.17
0.14
0.18 11.58 0.21 11.62
11.75
0.23
0.34
0.29
11.35 11.35
11.35
11.38
11.41
11.44 11.44
11.40
11.42
11.44
11.45
180 183.57
200
220
240
260 260.40
280
300
320
331.30
11.71
11.58
0.23
11.36 160
0.45
11.58 11.58
0.22
11.36 140
FILL
340 343.55
11.58
11.58
0.22
11.39 11.38 115.75 120
11.58
0.20
11.46 100
11.58
0.12
11.54 80
11.58
0.04
11.65 60
0.21 11.58
-0.08
11.70 53.66
11.58
-0.35
11.83 40
11.58
-0.96
12.02 0.00
CHAINAGE
11.58
11.37
-1.68
EXISTING LEVELS
DESIGN LEVELS
11.56
10.87
CUT/FILL DEPTHS
20
10.34
SCALE: 1:500H, 1:25V DATUM: 9.00
CUT
SECTION 5 LONG SECTION SAFETY IN DESIGN
ALL REASONABLY PRACTICABLE STEPS HAVE BEEN TAKEN TO ENSURE SAFETY IN DESIGN HAS BEEN CONSIDERED WITHIN STRATA GROUP'S SCOPE OF WORK FOR THIS DESIGN IN ACCORDANCE WITH IPENZ PRACTICE NOTE 07 "DESIGN FOR SAFETY IN BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES (JULY 2006)". IT REMAINS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER AND/OR OPERATOR TO ENSURE APPROPRIATE PRACTICES ARE IN PLACE TO PROTECT THE SAFETY OF THE WORKERS AND THE PUBLIC IN THE OPERATION OF THE FACILITY.
CLIENT:
2
FOR NOTIFICATION
-
-
1
-
-
-
REV
REASON FOR ISSUE
DATE
BY
PATH:J:\DUR - DURHAM PROPERTIES\J4345 - TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)\2 - DWGS\XREF'S\J4345 - BASE SERVICES PLAN 2020.DWG DATE:7/2/2018
THE CONTRACTOR IS TO BE AWARE OF ALL INSPECTIONS TO BE MADE BY THE ENGINEER AS A REQUIREMENT OF THE PRODUCER STATEMENT PS4 CONSTRUCTION REVIEW DOCUMENTATION. THE ENGINEER WILL REQUIRE 24 HOURS PRIOR NOTIFICATION FOR ALL INSPECTIONS.
DURHAM PROPERTY LTD
P 06 876 7646 F 06 876 7645 www.stratagroup.net.nz Structural
Fire
PO BOX 758 Business HQ 1/308 Queen Street East Hastings, New Zealand Civil Project Management
PROJECT:
TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)
TITLE:
EARTHWORKS SECTIONS
DJ EM CHECKED DJ DATE OCT 18
DESIGNED DRAWN
PROJECT NO.: This drawing and its contents are the property of Strata Group Consulting Engineers Ltd. Any unauthorized employment or reproduction in full or part is forbidden.
0
5
10
20
30
Full Size 1:500 ; Half Size 1:1000 Scale (m)
J4345
SHEET:
C007
REVISION:
2
LOT 77 LOT 78
LOT 76
LOT 79 LOT 75
LOT 80 LOT 81
LOT 74
STORMWATER OUTLET 1
LOT 82 LOT 94
LOT 73
LOT 95
LOT 72
LEGEND: EXISTING STORMWATER
LOT 84
LOT 93
LOT 20
LOT 90
304
LOT 308
LOT 83
LOT 96
LOT 89 LOT 85
LOT 92
LOT 71
LOT 19
LOT 21
LOT 91 LOT 70
LOT 69
LOT 103
LOT 101 LOT 66
VE
LOT 65
LOT 127 LOT 128
LOT 64
KA
LOT 114
LOT 111
LOT 62
LOT 119
LOT 28
WI LL
LOT 61
LOT 115
LOT 29
LOT 120
LOT 131
LOT 12
LOT 117
LOT 134
LOT 116
LOT 135
LOT 30
LOT 132
LOT 11 LOT 136
LOT 59
LOT 58
LOT 31
LOT 139
LOT 140
LOT 143 LOT 141
LOT 158
LOT 160
LOT 154
LOT 161 LOT 56
LOT 33
LOT 9
LOT 144
LOT 155
302
LOT 34 LOT 8
LOT 157 LOT 156
LOT 150
LOT 153
LOT 149
LOT 55 LOT 162
LOT 35
LOT 146
LOT 151
LOT 166
LOT 53
LOT 148 LOT 167
LOT 164
LOT 7 LOT 36
LOT 147 LOT 170
LOT 165
LOT 173
LOT 168
LOT 51
LOT 145
LOT 152
LOT 54
LOT 52
LOT 10
LOT 32 LOT 138
LOT 57
LOT 142
LOT 137
LOT 159
LOT 163
LOT 13
LOT 118
LOT 121
LOT 130
LOT 14
LOT 27
LOT 122 LOT 125
LOT 133
LOT 174
LOT 177 LOT 178
LOT 182
LOT 38
LOT 171
LOT 49
LOT 172
LOT 48 LOT 306
LOT 175
LOT 176
LOT 40 LOT 3
LOT 41 LOT 46
HURUNUI DRIVE
LOT 4
LOT 179
301
LOT 47
LOT 5
LOT 39
LOT 181
LOT 180
AIN
LOT 6
LOT 37
LOT 169
LOT 50
DR
LOT 26
LOT 123
LOT 60
EN
LOT 15
LOT 112
LOT 110
LOT 124
STORMWATER OUTLET 3
OP
LOT 25
LOT 109
LOT 126
LOT 129
LOT 63
OW BA N
LOT 108
LOT 102
303
LOT 113
D
LOT 307
LOT 16
LOT 107
LOT 100
17
SEWER PUMP STATION 1
LOT 17
LOT 24
LOT 106
LO T4
STORMWATER OUTLET 2
LOT 99
LOT 67
OP
PROPOSED WATER
LOT 23
LOT 105
LOT 68
EN
EXISTING WATER
LOT 87
LOT 104
LOT 98
LOT 18
LOT 22
ROA
DR AIN
PROPOSED SEWER
LOT 86
SEN
EXISTING SEWER
LOT 88
LOT 97
ERIK
PROPOSED STORMWATER
LOT 42
LOT 45
LOT 2
EXISTING Ø375 SEWER MAIN EXISTING Ø550 WATER MAIN
LOT 44 LOT 43
LOT 1
LOT 305
STORMWATER OUTLET 4
SEWER PUMP STATION 2 BOX CULVERTS BY NCC
NEW PUMP LINE
EXISTING Ø100 SEWER MAIN
CONNECT NEW PUMP LINE INTO EXISTING
SAFETY IN DESIGN
ALL REASONABLY PRACTICABLE STEPS HAVE BEEN TAKEN TO ENSURE SAFETY IN DESIGN HAS BEEN CONSIDERED WITHIN STRATA GROUP'S SCOPE OF WORK FOR THIS DESIGN IN ACCORDANCE WITH IPENZ PRACTICE NOTE 07 "DESIGN FOR SAFETY IN BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES (JULY 2006)". IT REMAINS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER AND/OR OPERATOR TO ENSURE APPROPRIATE PRACTICES ARE IN PLACE TO PROTECT THE SAFETY OF THE WORKERS AND THE PUBLIC IN THE OPERATION OF THE FACILITY.
CLIENT:
5
FOR NOTIFICATION - STAGE 7 LOT NUMBERING RE-ARRANGED 200330
-
4
FOR NOTIFICATION - INTERSECTION OFF ENTRANCE200115 2
-
3
FOR NOTIFICATION
200114
-
2
FOR NOTIFICATION
-
-
1
-
-
-
REV
REASON FOR ISSUE
DATE
BY
PATH:J:\DUR - DURHAM PROPERTIES\J4345 - TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)\2 - DWGS\XREF'S\J4345 - BASE SERVICES PLAN 2020.DWG DATE:7/2/2018
THE CONTRACTOR IS TO BE AWARE OF ALL INSPECTIONS TO BE MADE BY THE ENGINEER AS A REQUIREMENT OF THE PRODUCER STATEMENT PS4 CONSTRUCTION REVIEW DOCUMENTATION. THE ENGINEER WILL REQUIRE 24 HOURS PRIOR NOTIFICATION FOR ALL INSPECTIONS.
DURHAM PROPERTY LTD
P 06 876 7646 F 06 876 7645 www.stratagroup.net.nz Structural
Fire
PO BOX 758 Business HQ 1/308 Queen Street East Hastings, New Zealand Civil Project Management
PROJECT:
TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)
TITLE:
SERVICES OVERVIEW
DJ EM CHECKED DJ DATE OCT 18
DESIGNED DRAWN
PROJECT NO.: This drawing and its contents are the property of Strata Group Consulting Engineers Ltd. Any unauthorized employment or reproduction in full or part is forbidden.
0
200
400
600
800
Full Size 1:15000 ; Half Size 1:30000 Scale (m)
J4345
SHEET:
C008
REVISION:
5
WILL
OWB
STORMWATER OUTLET 3
ANK
AVE LEGEND
CATCHMENT BOUNDARY
DRAI
N STORMWATER OUTLET 2
ATE R
OAD
m CO
OAD
PIPE
RETE
PRIV
OAD
13.5m
CONC
375mm
RETE
ATE R
ATE R
OAD
RETE PIPE
PE TE PI
375mm
3
13.5m
ROAD
2
13.5m
13.5m
ROAD
ROAD
4
375mm CONCRETE PIPE
CONC
RETE
375mm
13.5m RO
PIPE
CONC
m CO NCRE
8
375m
13.5m ROAD
AD 5
13.5m ROAD 6
13.5m ROAD 7
13.5m ROAD 8
375mm CONCRETE PIPE
375mm CONCRETE PIPE
EXISTING OPEN DRAIN
PRIV
375mm
TE PIPE
ATE R
13.5m
CONC
CONC R 375mm
9 ROAD
ONCRE
PRIV
PIPE
ETE P
IPE
375m
13.5m
13.5m
450mm C
STORMWATER OUTLET 4
PRIV
TE PI PE
13.5m
m CO
OPEN
ATE R OAD
NCRE
PRIV
NCRE TE PI PE
13.5m
STORMWATER OUTLET 1
450m
OAD
39.98
ATE R
NCRE TE PI PE
PRIV
450m m CO
DRAI N
13.5m
450m mC
EXIST ING O
PEN D
ONCR
RAIN
ET E P
IPE
OPEN
375mm CONCRETE PIPE
300mm CONCRETE PIPE 300mm CONCRETE PIPE
17.0m MAIN ROAD 1
17.0m MAIN ROAD 1
17.0m ENTRANCE ROAD 2
17.0m MAIN ENTRANCE ROAD
17.0m MAIN ROAD 1
40m
BOX CULVERTS BY NCC
375mm CONCRETE PIPE
375mm CONCRETE PIPE
ERIKSEN ROAD
EXISTING DN600 CULVERT
SAFETY IN DESIGN
ALL REASONABLY PRACTICABLE STEPS HAVE BEEN TAKEN TO ENSURE SAFETY IN DESIGN HAS BEEN CONSIDERED WITHIN STRATA GROUP'S SCOPE OF WORK FOR THIS DESIGN IN ACCORDANCE WITH IPENZ PRACTICE NOTE 07 "DESIGN FOR SAFETY IN BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES (JULY 2006)". IT REMAINS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER AND/OR OPERATOR TO ENSURE APPROPRIATE PRACTICES ARE IN PLACE TO PROTECT THE SAFETY OF THE WORKERS AND THE PUBLIC IN THE OPERATION OF THE FACILITY.
CLIENT:
4 3 2
FOR NOTIFICATION - INTERSECTION OFF ENTRANCE200115 2 FOR NOTIFICATION - ROAD LABELS ADDED FOR NOTIFICATION
-
200114
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
REV
REASON FOR ISSUE
DATE
BY
PATH:J:\DUR - DURHAM PROPERTIES\J4345 - TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)\2 - DWGS\XREF'S\J4345 - BASE SERVICES PLAN 2020.DWG DATE:7/2/2018
THE CONTRACTOR IS TO BE AWARE OF ALL INSPECTIONS TO BE MADE BY THE ENGINEER AS A REQUIREMENT OF THE PRODUCER STATEMENT PS4 CONSTRUCTION REVIEW DOCUMENTATION. THE ENGINEER WILL REQUIRE 24 HOURS PRIOR NOTIFICATION FOR ALL INSPECTIONS.
DURHAM PROPERTY LTD
P 06 876 7646 F 06 876 7645 www.stratagroup.net.nz Structural
Fire
PO BOX 758 Business HQ 1/308 Queen Street East Hastings, New Zealand Civil Project Management
PROJECT:
TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)
TITLE:
PROPOSED STORMWATER LAYOUT
DJ EM CHECKED DJ DATE OCT 18
DESIGNED DRAWN
PROJECT NO.: This drawing and its contents are the property of Strata Group Consulting Engineers Ltd. Any unauthorized employment or reproduction in full or part is forbidden.
0
7.5
15
30
45
Full Size 1:750 ; Half Size 1:1500 Scale (m)
J4345
SHEET:
C009
REVISION:
4
WILL OW
BANK
AVE LEGEND: PROPOSED GRAVITY SEWER PIPE
SEWE
R PU
MPIN G LIN
PROPOSED SEWER PUMP PIPE
OPEN
DRAI N
E
EXISTING SEWER PIPE
PUMP STATION
PRIV
ATE R
OAD
DRAI
N
13.5m
OPEN
13.5m
PRIV
ATE R
OAD
PRIV
ATE R
OAD
uPVC
13.5m
150m
m uPV
PRIV
ATE R
C
OAD
ROAD
6
150mm
13.5m
uPVC
PRIV
ATE R
OAD
150mm
150mm
uPVC
13.5m
13.5m
PRIV
ATE R
OAD
150mm
uPVC
13.5m
ROAD
9
13.5m
AD 5
8
3 ROAD
150m
13.5m
150mm uPVC
SEWER PUMPING LINE
13.5m ROAD 6
ROAD
4
m uPV
C
150m
13.5m
m uPV
C
ROAD
2
13.5m
150m m
13.5m ROAD
13.5m ROAD 8
13.5m RO
13.5m ROAD 7
uPVC
PUMP STATION
150mm uPVC
150mm uPVC
17.0m MAIN ROAD 1
17.0m MAIN ROAD 1
17.0m ENTRANCE ROAD 2
17.0m MAIN ENTRANCE ROAD
17.0m MAIN ROAD 1
SEWER PUMPING LINE
150mm uPVC
ERIKSEN ROAD
CONNECT INTO EXISTING GRAVITY SYSTEM
EXISTING DN275 SEWER PUMPING MAIN
SAFETY IN DESIGN
ALL REASONABLY PRACTICABLE STEPS HAVE BEEN TAKEN TO ENSURE SAFETY IN DESIGN HAS BEEN CONSIDERED WITHIN STRATA GROUP'S SCOPE OF WORK FOR THIS DESIGN IN ACCORDANCE WITH IPENZ PRACTICE NOTE 07 "DESIGN FOR SAFETY IN BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES (JULY 2006)". IT REMAINS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER AND/OR OPERATOR TO ENSURE APPROPRIATE PRACTICES ARE IN PLACE TO PROTECT THE SAFETY OF THE WORKERS AND THE PUBLIC IN THE OPERATION OF THE FACILITY.
CLIENT:
4 3 2
FOR NOTIFICATION - INTERSECTION OFF ENTRANCE200115 2 FOR NOTIFICATION - ROAD LABELS ADDED FOR NOTIFICATION
-
200114
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
REV
REASON FOR ISSUE
DATE
BY
PATH:J:\DUR - DURHAM PROPERTIES\J4345 - TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)\2 - DWGS\XREF'S\J4345 - BASE SERVICES PLAN 2020.DWG DATE:7/2/2018
THE CONTRACTOR IS TO BE AWARE OF ALL INSPECTIONS TO BE MADE BY THE ENGINEER AS A REQUIREMENT OF THE PRODUCER STATEMENT PS4 CONSTRUCTION REVIEW DOCUMENTATION. THE ENGINEER WILL REQUIRE 24 HOURS PRIOR NOTIFICATION FOR ALL INSPECTIONS.
150mm uPVC
DURHAM PROPERTY LTD
P 06 876 7646 F 06 876 7645 www.stratagroup.net.nz Structural
Fire
PO BOX 758 Business HQ 1/308 Queen Street East Hastings, New Zealand Civil Project Management
PROJECT:
TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)
TITLE:
PROPOSED SEWER LAYOUT
DJ EM CHECKED DJ DATE OCT 18
DESIGNED DRAWN
PROJECT NO.: This drawing and its contents are the property of Strata Group Consulting Engineers Ltd. Any unauthorized employment or reproduction in full or part is forbidden.
0
7.5
15
30
45
Full Size 1:750 ; Half Size 1:1500 Scale (m)
J4345
SHEET:
C010
REVISION:
4
LEGEND:
WILL OW
PROPOSED WATER MAIN
BANK
PROPOSED RIDER MAIN EXISTING WATER MAIN
OPEN
PRIV
ATE R
OAD
DRAI N
100mm mPVC PN12
N
13.5m
AVE
DRAI
13.5m
PRIV
ATE R
OAD
OPEN
13.5m
PRIV
ATE R
OAD
13.5m
PRIV
ATE R
OAD
100mm mPVC PN12 13.5m
PRIV
63mm PE
ATE R
OAD
100mm mPVC PN12
13.5m
PRIV
ATE R
OAD
13.5m
ROAD
9
63mm PE
ROAD
63mm PE ROAD
ROAD
3
100mm mPVC PN12
2
8
13.5m
AD 5
13.5m ROAD
13.5m RO
13.5m ROAD 8
4
100mm mPVC PN12
13.5m ROAD 6
13.5m
63mm PE
13.5m
13.5m ROAD 7
100mm mPVC PN12
63mm PE
100mm mPVC PN12
63mm PE
17.0m MAIN ROAD 1
17.0m MAIN ROAD 1
100mm mPVC PN12
17.0m ENTRANCE ROAD 2
17.0m MAIN ENTRANCE ROAD
17.0m MAIN ROAD 1
150mm mPVC PN12
100mm mPVC PN12
150mm mPVC PN12
63mm PE
63mm PE
63mm PE
ERIKSEN ROAD EXISTING Ø550 MAIN CONNECT INTO EXISTING Ø200 BY NCC
EXISTING Ø200
PROPOSED DN200 WATERMAIN
SAFETY IN DESIGN
ALL REASONABLY PRACTICABLE STEPS HAVE BEEN TAKEN TO ENSURE SAFETY IN DESIGN HAS BEEN CONSIDERED WITHIN STRATA GROUP'S SCOPE OF WORK FOR THIS DESIGN IN ACCORDANCE WITH IPENZ PRACTICE NOTE 07 "DESIGN FOR SAFETY IN BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES (JULY 2006)". IT REMAINS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER AND/OR OPERATOR TO ENSURE APPROPRIATE PRACTICES ARE IN PLACE TO PROTECT THE SAFETY OF THE WORKERS AND THE PUBLIC IN THE OPERATION OF THE FACILITY.
CLIENT:
4
FOR NOTIFICATION - INTERSECTION OFF ENTRANCE 2
3
FOR NOTIFICATION - ROAD LABELS ADDED
2
FOR NOTIFICATION
200114
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
REV
REASON FOR ISSUE
DATE
BY
PATH:J:\DUR - DURHAM PROPERTIES\J4345 - TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)\2 - DWGS\XREF'S\J4345 - BASE SERVICES PLAN 2020.DWG DATE:7/2/2018
THE CONTRACTOR IS TO BE AWARE OF ALL INSPECTIONS TO BE MADE BY THE ENGINEER AS A REQUIREMENT OF THE PRODUCER STATEMENT PS4 CONSTRUCTION REVIEW DOCUMENTATION. THE ENGINEER WILL REQUIRE 24 HOURS PRIOR NOTIFICATION FOR ALL INSPECTIONS.
DURHAM PROPERTY LTD
P 06 876 7646 F 06 876 7645 www.stratagroup.net.nz Structural
Fire
PO BOX 758 Business HQ 1/308 Queen Street East Hastings, New Zealand Civil Project Management
PROPOSED DN200 WATERMAIN PROJECT:
TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)
TITLE:
PROPOSED WATER LAYOUT
DJ EM CHECKED DJ DATE OCT 18
DESIGNED DRAWN
PROJECT NO.: This drawing and its contents are the property of Strata Group Consulting Engineers Ltd. Any unauthorized employment or reproduction in full or part is forbidden.
0
7.5
15
30
45
Full Size 1:750 ; Half Size 1:1500 Scale (m)
J4345
SHEET:
C011
REVISION:
4
13.5
BERM (Varies) 1.4 NEW FOOTPATH
0.7
3.0
3.0
KERB AND CHANNEL
4% min
2%
1.8
4%
STORMWATER KERB CONNECTION REFER TO NCC COP DETAIL M3.15 4% min
KERB AND CHANNEL
3%
3%
BOUNDARY
BOUNDARY
VARIES
BERM (Varies)
6.0m FORMED WIDTH
TREE PIT SUBSOIL DRAIN
SUBSOIL DRAIN
TREE PIT STORMWATER PIPE POWER
GAS
TELECOM
DN150 SN16 uPVC
DN100 PN9 uPVC / NEW DN63 SDR13.6 PE
TELECOM
GAS
POWER
13.5m TYPICAL CROSS SECTION NORTHERN ROAD
17.0m
BERM (Varies) 1.4 NEW FOOTPATH
3.3
0.7
3.3
KERB AND CHANNEL
4% min
2%
4%
STORMWATER KERB CONNECTION REFER TO NCC COP DETAIL M3.15
KERB AND CHANNEL
3%
4% min
3%
BOUNDARY
VARIES BOUNDARY
BERM (Varies)
6.6m FORMED WIDTH
1.8
SUBSOIL DRAIN
SUBSOIL DRAIN TREE PIT
TREE PIT POWER
GAS
TELECOM
DN150 SN16 uPVC
DN100 PN9 uPVC WATER MAIN
TELECOM
GAS
POWER
STORMWATER PIPE
17.0m TYPICAL CROSS SECTION MAIN ROAD
BOUNDARY
2.5 CAR PARKING
4.8 m FORMED WIDTH
1.4m NEW FOOTPATH
SERVICE BERM (Varies)
FLUSH NIB
DISH CHANNEL
3%
3%
3%
0.55m BERM
2.5 CAR PARKING
BOUNDARY
13.5
1.8 SUBSOIL DRAIN
SUBSOIL DRAIN
STORMWATER PIPE
3 2
FOR NOTIFICATION - TYPICAL SECTIONS ADDED FOR NOTIFICATION
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
REV
REASON FOR ISSUE
DATE
BY
PATH:J:\DUR - DURHAM PROPERTIES\J4345 - TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)\2 - DWGS\XREF'S\J4345 - BASE SERVICES PLAN 2020.DWG DATE:7/2/2018
THE CONTRACTOR IS TO BE AWARE OF ALL INSPECTIONS TO BE MADE BY THE ENGINEER AS A REQUIREMENT OF THE PRODUCER STATEMENT PS4 CONSTRUCTION REVIEW DOCUMENTATION. THE ENGINEER WILL REQUIRE 24 HOURS PRIOR NOTIFICATION FOR ALL INSPECTIONS.
DURHAM PROPERTY LTD
P 06 876 7646 F 06 876 7645 www.stratagroup.net.nz Structural
Fire
PO BOX 758 Business HQ 1/308 Queen Street East Hastings, New Zealand Civil Project Management
PROJECT:
TE AWA SUBDIVISION (WILLOWBANK AVE)
POWER
ALL REASONABLY PRACTICABLE STEPS HAVE BEEN TAKEN TO ENSURE SAFETY IN DESIGN HAS BEEN CONSIDERED WITHIN STRATA GROUP'S SCOPE OF WORK FOR THIS DESIGN IN ACCORDANCE WITH IPENZ PRACTICE NOTE 07 "DESIGN FOR SAFETY IN BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES (JULY 2006)". IT REMAINS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER AND/OR OPERATOR TO ENSURE APPROPRIATE PRACTICES ARE IN PLACE TO PROTECT THE SAFETY OF THE WORKERS AND THE PUBLIC IN THE OPERATION OF THE FACILITY.
CLIENT:
GAS
SAFETY IN DESIGN
TELECOM
DN150 SN16 uPVC
DN100 PN9 uPVC WATER MAIN
TELECOM
GAS
POWER
13.5m TYPICAL CROSS SECTION PRIVATE ROAD
NOTE: CAR PARKING LOCATIONS AS INDICATED ON SCHEME PLAN ONLY
TITLE:
TYPICAL ROAD CROSS SECTION
DJ EM CHECKED DJ DATE OCT 18
DESIGNED DRAWN
PROJECT NO.: This drawing and its contents are the property of Strata Group Consulting Engineers Ltd. Any unauthorized employment or reproduction in full or part is forbidden.
NTS
J4345
SHEET:
C012
REVISION:
3