NASHVILLE AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS 2011-2015
ADOPTED December 15, 2010
Nashville Area Metropolitan Planning Organization 800 Second Avenue South Nashville, Tennessee 37201 Phone: (615) 862‐7204 Fax: (615) 862‐7209 www.NashvilleMPO.org
Funding for this document was provided by the U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration, the Tennessee Department of Transportation, and local government members of the Nashville Area Metropolitan Planning Organization.
Equal Employment Opportunity Employer The Nashville Area Metropolitan Planning Organization does not discriminate on the basis of age, race, sex, color, national origin, religion or disability in access to, or operation of its programs, services, activities or in its hiring or employment practices. ADA and Title VI inquiries should be forwarded to: Josie L. Bass, Nashville Area MPO, 800 Second Avenue South, Nashville, TN 37201, (615) 862‐7150. All employment related inquiries should be forwarded to Metro Human Resources: Delaine Linville at (615)862‐6640.
Table of Contents List of Tables............................................................................................................................................................. ii Acronyms & Definitions .......................................................................................................................................... iii FY 2011-2015 TIP Project Index..............................................................................................................................ix 1.0 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 About the Nashville Area MPO ....................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose of Document ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Metropolitan Planning Requirements ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.4 Statewide Transportation Improvement Program .......................................................................................................... 3 2.0 Program Development ....................................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Guiding Principles, Goals, and Objectives ....................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Programming Policies ...................................................................................................................................................... 6 2.3 Project Prioritization & Selection .................................................................................................................................. 10 2.4 Air Quality Conformity .................................................................................................................................................. 11 2.5 Public & Stakeholder Involvement ................................................................................................................................ 12 3.0 Financial Plan.................................................................................................................................................... 13 3.1 Fiscal Constraint ............................................................................................................................................................ 13 3.2 Revenue Sources ........................................................................................................................................................... 13 3.3 Urban STP Investment Strategy .................................................................................................................................... 17 3.4 Ongoing Maintenance & Operations Costs ................................................................................................................... 20 3.5 Funding Tables .............................................................................................................................................................. 22 4.0 Amendment & Modification Process .............................................................................................................. 26 4.1 Formal Amendments ..................................................................................................................................................... 26 4.2 Administrative Modifications ........................................................................................................................................ 27 4.3 Funding for Roadway Construction ............................................................................................................................... 27 4.4 Transferring (Flexing) Funds among Programs.............................................................................................................. 28 4.5 Projects Identified at the State‐Level ............................................................................................................................ 28 4.6 Funding Sources for New Projects and Cost Increases ................................................................................................. 28 5.0 TIP Projects ....................................................................................................................................................... 30 Appendix A. List of Transit Projects................................................................................................................... A-1 Appendix B. Construction Reserve Project List ............................................................................................... B-1 Appendix C. MPO Project Evaluation & Scoring ............................................................................................... C-1 Appendix D. Air Quality Conformity ................................................................................................................... D-1 Appendix E. Status of FY 2008-2011 Projects ................................................................................................... E-1 Appendix F. Certifications ................................................................................................................................... F-1 Appendix G. Public Comments ........................................................................................................................... G-1
NASHVILLE AREA MPO FY 2011-2015 TIP - ADOPTED DECEMBER 15, 2010
I
List of Tables Table 1. Transportation Funding Programs ......................................................................................................... 14 Table 2. Annual Cost of Maintenance and Operations ....................................................................................... 21 Table 3. FY 2011-2015 TDOT Program Funds ...................................................................................................... 22 Table 4. FY 2011-2015 MPO Funds: FHWA Grant Revenues ............................................................................. 23 Table 5. FY 2011-2015 MPO Funds: FHWA Grant Expenditures........................................................................ 23 Table 6. FY 2011-2015 MPO Funds: FHWA Unprogrammed Revenues ............................................................ 24 Table 7. FY 2011-2015 MPO Funds: FHWA Construction Reserves & Balances ............................................. 24 Table 8. FY 2011-2015 MPO Funds: FTA Grant Revenues ................................................................................. 25 Table 9. FY 2011-2015 MPO Funds: FTA Grant Expenditures ........................................................................... 25 Table 10. FY 2011-2015 MPO Funds: FTA Unprogrammed Revenues .............................................................. 25
NASHVILLE AREA MPO FY 2011-2015 TIP - ADOPTED DECEMBER 15, 2010
II
Acronyms & Definitions Active Transportation: Transportation which requires physical activity as part of the mode. Typically, active transportation refers to walking, bicycling and to transit, as transit trips begin and end with a walking or bicycling trip. ADA ‐ Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990: Federal law that requires public facilities (including transportation services) to be accessible to persons with disabilities including those with mental disabilities, temporary disabilities, and the conditions related to substance abuse. ADT ‐ Average Daily Traffic: The number of vehicles passing a fixed point in a day, averaged over a number of days. The number of count days included in the average varies with the intended use of data. AVL – Automated Vehicle Locator: A device that makes use of the Global Positioning System (GPS) to enable a business or agency to remotely track the location of its vehicle fleet by using the Internet. AVO ‐ Average Vehicle Occupancy: The ratio of person trips to vehicle trips; often used as a criteria in judging the success of trip reduction programs. BRT – Bus Rapid Transit: A high speed bus system operated within an exclusive right‐of‐way. BRT incorporates exclusive transit ways, modern stations, on‐board fare collection, high‐tech vehicles and frequent service. BRT systems can be built incrementally and designed for vehicles ‐ rather than people ‐ transfer from local bus routes to the high speed lines. CAAA ‐ Clean Air Act Amendments: 1990 amendments to the federal Clean Air Act which classify non‐attainment areas and provide for rules dealing with air pollution in such areas; specifically brought transportation decisions into the context of air quality control. CMAQ ‐ Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program: A categorical funding program created under ISTEA, which directs funding to projects that contribute to meeting national air quality standards in non‐attainment areas for ozone and carbon monoxide. CMP ‐ Congestion Management Process (previously known as Congestion Management System): A systematic process required under SAFETEA‐LU for all TMAs that shall address congestion management through the metropolitan planning process that provides for effective management and operation, based on a cooperatively developed and implemented metropolitan‐wide strategy of new and existing transportation facilities eligible for funding under title 23 and chapter 53 of title 49 through the use of travel demand reduction and operational management strategies. The CMP is required under 23 CFR 500.109 and shall include methods to monitor and evaluate the performance of the multi‐modal transportation system, identify causes of congestion, identify and evaluate alternative actions, provide information supporting the implementation of actions, and evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of implementation actions. The CMP is periodically reviewed for efficiency and effectiveness of the implemented strategies, the results of this evaluation shall be provided to decision‐makers to provide guidance on selection of effective strategies for future implementation purposes. Complete Streets – Streets that offer transportation choices that are safe and convenient for all ages and ability levels. These choices may include transit, walking, bicycling and automobile travel. CONST – Construction (phase of a project): The phase of a project after the preliminary environmental and engineering work is completed, where the project is being built and the improvements are prepared for implementation. DOT ‐ Department of Transportation: Agency responsible for transportation at the local, state, or federal level. For title 23 U.S.C. federal‐aid highway actions, this would mean the Federal Highway Administration and for federal‐aid transit actions under title 49 U.S.C, this would mean the Federal Transit Administration. E+C – Existing plus Committed Transportation Network: Also called a No‐Build network, this is a test of how a roadway network, consisting of an existing network plus currently funded future roadway projects, could withstand the demand of projected population and employment growth. EA – Environmental Assessment: The process of identifying, predicting, evaluating and mitigating the biophysical, social, and other relevant effects of development proposals prior to major decisions being taken and commitments made. The
NASHVILLE AREA MPO FY 2011-2015 TIP - ADOPTED DECEMBER 15, 2010
III
purpose of the assessment is to ensure that decision‐makers consider environmental impacts before deciding whether to proceed with new projects EIS ‐ Environmental Impact Statement: A National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) document that explains the purpose and need for a project, presents project alternatives, analyzes the likely impact of each, explains the choice of a preferred alternative, and finally details measures to be taken in order to mitigate the impacts of the preferred alternative. EJ ‐ Environmental Justice: Derived from Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and established by Executive Order, EJ requires federally funded plans and programs to assess their impact, either positive or negative, on traditionally underserved (e.g., low‐income, minority, etc.) communities or segments of the population. The goal of EJ is to ensure public involvement of low income and minority groups in decision making to prevent disproportionately high and adverse impacts on low income and minority groups, and to ensure that these groups receive equal benefits from transportation improvements. EPA – U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: is an agency of the federal government of the United States charged with protecting human health and with safeguarding the natural environment: air, water, and land. Executive Board: A standing committee created for the purpose of serving as spokespersons for the citizens of the metropolitan area and is the designated MPO to prioritize and direct federal transportation funds to local projects. The Board is comprised of elected officials from the cities over 5,000 population and the counties of Nashville‐Davidson, Rutherford, Sumner, Williamson and Wilson in the urbanized area. The Executive Board also has representatives from TDOT, representing the Governor. The Board is responsible for creating policies regarding transportation planning issues. The Executive Board meetings are open to the public and where any member of the public can address the MPO on any transportation issue. FHPP ‐ Federal High Priority Projects: Discretionary projects earmarked by the U.S. Congress as high priorities at the federal level during the Congressional appropriations and re‐authorization process. This amounts to roughly 5% of the total transportation budget. FHWA ‐ Federal Highway Administration: Division of the U.S. Department of Transportation responsible for administrating federal highway transportation programs under title 23 U.S.C. Fiscal Constraint: A requirement, originally of ISTEA, that all plans be financially – constrained, balanced expenditures to reasonably expected sources of funding over the period of the TIP or Long‐Range Transportation Plan. FTA ‐ Federal Transit Administration: Federal entity responsible for transit planning and programs under title 49 U.S.C. Functional Classification: Functional classification is the process by which streets and highways are grouped into classes, or systems, according to the character of service they are intended to provide. Basic to this process is the recognition that individual roads and streets do not serve travel independently in any major way. Rather, most travel involves movement through a network of roads. It becomes necessary then to determine how this travel can be channelized within the network in a logical and efficient manner. Functional classification defines the nature of this channelization process by defining the part that any particular road or street should play in serving the flow of trips through a highway network. FY ‐ Fiscal Year: A federal fiscal or budget year; runs from October 1 through September 30 for the MPO and the federal government. State and local governments operate on a fiscal year beginning July 1 and ending June 30. HIA – Health Impact Assessment: An assessment conducted ideally in the planning phases of a built environment project which estimates any positive or negative impacts that a project may have on environmental or personal health. The assessment makes recommendations for improvements to the project to mitigate negative impacts such as reducing emissions or improving positive impacts such as increasing physical activity. GIS – Geographic Information System: a system for capturing, storing, analyzing and managing data which is spatially referenced to the earth. GIS is a tool that allows users to create interactive queries (user created searches), analyze the spatial information, edit data, maps, and present the results of all these operations. HOV ‐ High Occupancy Vehicle: In Tennessee, vehicles carrying two (2) or more people receive this designation and may travel on freeways, expressways and other large volume roads in lanes designated for high occupancy vehicles. Motorcycles are also authorized to use these lanes.
NASHVILLE AREA MPO FY 2011-2015 TIP - ADOPTED DECEMBER 15, 2010
IV
HUD – United States Department of Housing and Urban Development: Federal agency charged with helping to create strong, sustainable, inclusive communities and quality, affordable homes. IM – Interstate Maintenance: A funding category created by the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA), the IM authorizes funding for activities that include the reconstruction of bridges, interchanges, and over crossings along existing Interstate routes, including the acquisition of right‐of‐way where necessary, but shall not include the construction of new travel lanes other than high occupancy vehicle lanes or auxiliary lanes. IMS ‐ Incident Management System: A systematic process required under SAFETEALU to provide information on accidents and identify causes and improvements to the Transportation system to increase safety of all users. ISTEA ‐ Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991: Federal law which restructured transportation planning and funding by requiring consideration of multimodal solutions, emphasis on the movement of people and goods as opposed to traditional highway investments, flexibility in the use of transportation funds, a greater role of MPOs, and a greater emphasis on public participation. ISTEA preceded TEA‐21 and SAFETEA‐LU. ITE ‐ Institute of Transportation Engineers: An international society of professionals in transportation and traffic engineering; publishes Trip Generation (a manual of trip generation rates by land use type). ITS ‐ Intelligent Transportation System: Use of computer and communications technology to facilitate the flow of information between travelers and system operators to improve mobility and transportation productivity, enhance safety, maximize the use of existing transportation facilities, conserve energy resources and reduce adverse environmental effects; includes concepts such as “freeway management systems,” “automated fare collection” and “transit information kiosks.” Intergovernmental Agreement: Legal instrument describing tasks to be accomplished and/or funds to be paid between government agencies. LOS ‐ Level of Service: A qualitative assessment of a road’s operating condition, generally described using a scale of A (little congestion) to E/F (severe congestion). LRT – Light Rail Transit: a particular class of urban and suburban passenger railway that utilizes equipment and infrastructure that is typically less massive than that used for rapid transit systems, with modern light rail vehicles usually running along the system. LRTP – Long‐Range Transportation Plan: A document resulting from regional or statewide collaboration and consensus on a region or state's transportation system, and serving as the defining vision for the region's or state's transportation systems and services. In metropolitan areas, the plan indicates all of the transportation improvements scheduled for funding over the next 20 years. It is fiscally constrained, i.e., a given program or project can reasonably expect to receive funding within the time allotted for its implementation. MG ‐ Minimum Guarantee: A funding category created in TEA‐21 that guarantees a 90% return of contributions on formula funds to every state. MPO Activities: Are plans, programs and projects related to the MPO process. MPO ‐ Metropolitan Planning Organization: The forum for cooperative transportation decision‐making; required for urbanized areas with populations over 50,000. MTA – Metropolitan Transit Authority: The public transit agency serving Nashville/Davidson County. NEPA – National Environmental Policy Act: Passed in 1970, NEPA requires federal agencies to integrate environmental values into their decision making processes by considering the environmental impacts of their proposed actions and reasonable alternatives to those actions. NHS ‐ National Highway System: Specific major roads to be designated September 30, 1995; the NHS will consist of 155,000 (plus or minus 15%) miles of road and represents one category of roads eligible for federal funds under ISTEA. NOx – Nitrous Oxide: The third largest greenhouse gas, nitrous oxide also attacks ozone in the stratosphere, aggravating the excess amount of UV light striking the earth's surface.
NASHVILLE AREA MPO FY 2011-2015 TIP - ADOPTED DECEMBER 15, 2010
V
Obligated Funds: Funds that have been authorized by and committed to legally by a federal agency to pay for the federal share of the project cost. Officials: Are people who have governmental decision‐making, planning or administrative responsibilities that relate to MPO activities. PE – Preliminary Engineering (phase of project): a process to begin developing the design of the facilities and system, to analyze the function and operation of the system, evaluation cost efficiencies and prepare for the final design of the project. PMS ‐ Pavement Management System: A systematic process utilized by state agencies and MPOs to analyze and summarize pavement information for use in selecting and implementing cost‐effective pavement construction, rehabilitation, and maintenance programs; required for roads in the National Highway System as a part of ISTEA; the extent to which the remaining public roads are included in the process is left to the discretion of state and local officials; criteria found in 23 CFR 500.021‐209. Public: Includes citizens, public agencies, advocacy groups and the private sectors that have an interest in or may be affected by MPO activities. Public Participation: Is an integral part of a planning or major decision‐making process. It provides opportunities for the public to be involved with the MPO in an exchange of data and ideas. Public participation offers an open process in which the rights of the community, to be informed to provide comments to the Government and to receive a response from the Government, are met through a full opportunity to be involved and to express needs and goals. ROW ‐ Right‐of‐Way: Real property that is used for transportation purposes; defines the extent of the corridor that can be used for the road and associated drainage. RTA – Regional Transportation Authority: Nine‐county regional agency that plans and develops regional transit in the Nashville area. RTDM ‐ Regional Travel Demand Model: This is a tool for forecasting impacts of urban developments on travel patterns as well as testing various transportation alternative solutions to traffic patterns. The travel patterns are determined from US Census results and in simple terms tell where residents live and where they go to work or school on a regional wide basis. SAFETEA‐LU ‐ Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users ‐ legislation enacted August 10, 2005, as Public Law 109‐59. SAFETEA‐LU authorizes the Federal surface transportation programs for highways, highway safety, and transit for the 5‐year period 2005‐2009. SAFETEA‐LU was preceded by ISTEA and TEA‐21. School Siting: the process by which a community decides where to locate a new public school. The placement of schools and the zones of populations assigned to attend a school affect transportation patterns in the community as well as the modal types used to make a home to school trip. SIP – State Implementation Plan (for air quality): the regulations and other materials for meeting clean air standards and associated Clean Air Act requirements. SR – State Route: a roadway owned, financed and maintained by a state. SRTS – Safe Routes to School: the name of a national movement and a component of SAFETEA‐LU by which communities provide infrastructure and education to enable and encourage children to walk and bicycle to school. STA – State gas tax fund: Also called motor fuel excise tax, this is a tax charged by the gallon and collected as consumers pay at the pump. The tax goes primarily towards basic operating costs, highway maintenance contracts, resurfacing, bridges, major reconstruction, new construction, consultant contracts, right‐of‐way purchases, and to match federal funds. STIP ‐ State Transportation Improvement Program: A priority list of transportation projects developed by the Tennessee Department of Transportation that is to be carried out within the four (4) year period following its adoption; must include documentation of federal and state funding sources for each project. Transportation projects in the state’s 11 urban areas are determined through Metropolitan Planning Organization process. STP – Surface Transportation Program (L‐STP or U‐STP): A program funded by the National Highway Trust Fund.
NASHVILLE AREA MPO FY 2011-2015 TIP - ADOPTED DECEMBER 15, 2010
VI
L‐STP provides funding to areas of 5,000 to 50,000 in population for improvements on routes functionally classified urban collectors or higher. U‐STP Provides funding to Census designated urbanized areas over 50,000 in population (e.g. MPO areas based on US Census) for improvements on routes functionally classified urban collectors or higher. TCC ‐ Technical Coordinating Committee: A standing committee of most metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs); function is to provide advice on plans or actions of the MPO from planners, engineers and other staff members (not general citizens). TDM – Transportation Demand Management: a method of planning for and implementing transportation improvement in a manner that reduces traffic congestion and pollution by influencing changes in travel behavior. TDEC – Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation: State agency responsible for protecting and improving the quality of Tennessee’s land, air, water and recreation resources. TDOT – Tennessee Department of Transportation: State agency responsible for the planning and implementation of Tennessee’s multimodal transportation system including roads and bridges, aviation, public transit, waterways, and railroads. TOD ‐ Transit Oriented Development: a mixed‐use development that is anchored by a transit station. The transit mode may include bus or rail, and the development may include uses such as housing, office and retail. Transportation Disadvantaged: People who are unable to transport themselves or to purchase transportation due to disability, income status or age. Transportation Enhancements: Specific activities which can be funded with Surface Transportation Program (STP) funds; activities include pedestrian/bicycle facilities, acquisition of scenic easements and scenic historic sites, scenic or historic highway programs, scenic beautification, historic preservation, rehabilitation/operation of historic transportation structures, railway corridor preservation, control/removal of outdoor advertising, archeological planning/research and mitigation of highway runoff water pollution. TEA‐21 ‐ Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century: Federal Legislation that authorized funds for all modes of transportation and guidelines on the use of those funds. Successor to ISTEA, the landmark legislation clarified the role of the MPOs in the local priority setting process. TEA‐21emphasized increased public involvement, simplicity, flexibility, fairness, and higher funding levels for transportation. TEA‐21 preceded SAFETEA‐LU. TIP ‐ Transportation Improvement Program: A priority list of transportation projects developed by a metropolitan planning organization that is to be carried out within the four (4) year period following its adoption; must include documentation of federal and state funding sources for each project and be consistent with adopted MPO long range transportation plans and local government comprehensive plans. TMA ‐ Transportation Management Area: An area designated by the U.S. Department of Transportation given to all urbanized areas with a population over 200,000 (or other area when requested by the Governor and MPO); these areas must comply with special transportation planning requirements regarding congestion management systems, project selection and certification; requirements identified in 23 CFR ‐ 450.300‐33.6. The TMA Group: A local non‐profit organization headquartered in Williamson County responsible for carrying out certain transit services on behalf of the Regional Transportation Authority and the Franklin Transit Authority, and for the administration of the regional Clean Air Partnership of Middle Tennessee, under contract to Williamson County and the Nashville Area MPO. TSM ‐ Transportation Systems Management: Strategies to improve the efficiency of the transportation system through operational improvements such as the use of bus priority or reserved lanes, signalization, access management, turn restrictions, etc. UPWP ‐ Unified Planning Work Program: Developed by Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPOs); identifies all transportation and planning activities anticipated within the next one to two years, including a schedule for the completion of the identified tasks and activities. V/C Ratio Volume over Capacity Ratio: This is a roadway performance measure to show how a highway volume compares with a highway‘s capacity.
NASHVILLE AREA MPO FY 2011-2015 TIP - ADOPTED DECEMBER 15, 2010
VII
VMT ‐ Vehicle Miles Traveled: This is an output of the travel demand model and is a measure of traffic flow over a highway segment. While 1000 vehicles traveling over a mile road and 1 vehicle traveling over 1000 miles are mathematically. VOC – Volatile Organic Compounds: are organic chemical compounds that have high enough vapor pressures under normal conditions to significantly vaporize and enter the atmosphere. Included among these compounds are dry‐cleaning solvents and some constituents of petroleum fuels.
NASHVILLE AREA MPO FY 2011-2015 TIP - ADOPTED DECEMBER 15, 2010
VIII
FY 2011-2015 TIP Project Index
NASHVILLE AREA MPO FY 2011-2015 TIP - ADOPTED DECEMBER 15, 2010
IX
FY 2011-2015 TIP PROJECT INDEX
Davidson Goodlettsville Greenway Interchange Interchange Lighting Interchange Lighting Reconstruct Reconstruct Reconstruct Road Widening Signalization/Signage/Streetscaping
Goodlettsville Bicycle/Pedestrian Plan - Greenway Connectors Vietnam Veterans Pkwy Merge Lane onto Conference Drive I-65 High Mast Lighting Vietnam Veterans Interchange High Mast Lighting Main Street (US41)/Long Hollow Pike (SR174)/Rivergate Pkwy Rivergate Parkway Rivergate Parkway Safety Improvements Dickerson Pike (US-41/31W) Widening/CSX Underpass Improvement Conference Drive Enhancements
2011-16-119 2011-14-028 2011-19-022 2011-19-023 2011-110-141 2011-110-140 2008-14-083 2011-12-021 2011-19-020
Metro Nashville Enhancement Enhancement Enhancement Greenway Interchange Intersection Intersection ITS ITS ITS ITS ITS ITS ITS ITS ITS New Roadway Pedestrian Road Widening Road Widening Signalization/Signage/Streetscaping Wayfinding
21st Avenue Roadscaping in Hillsboro Village Harding Place Sidewalk Enhancement I-40 and Jefferson Street Transportation Enhancement Cumberland River Greenway System - TSU Connector Portion I-40 / McCrory Lane Interchange - Phase 1 Jefferson Street Various intersection improvements (FAU routes) Advanced Traveler Information System - Phase 2 Arterial CCTV Arterial Corridor ITS Communication ATIS Phase 1B - Incident Response ATIS Travelers Information System, ITS Communication & CCTV Signal System Upgrade - Phase 3B Traffic Management Center Traffic Signal Communication Provision and Upgrade Wayfinding Sign Program SR-255 Harding Place Extension (Phase 1) 21st Avenue Area Sidewalks Gateway Boulevard McCrory Lane Widening 3rd Avenue and Union Street Countywide Wayfinding and Traffic Guidance Program
2008-19-062 2011-16-092 2011-16-104 2009-16-029 2008-14-092 2004-005 2008-14-030 2008-17-056 2004-001 2008-17-026 2011-17-064 2008-17-057 2011-17-062 2004-007 2004-008 2004-009 2008-11-027 2002-038 2006-124 2008-12-095 2008-14-059 2008-17-031
FY 2011-2015 TIP PROJECT INDEX:
1 OF 9
FY 2011-2015 TIP PROJECT INDEX Wayfinding
Increased Guidance for Improved Mobility
2004-004
Transit Transit Capital Transit Capital Transit Capital Transit Capital Transit Capital Transit Capital Transit Capital Transit Capital Transit Capital Transit Capital Transit Capital Transit Capital
Project Administration for Grant Programs ACCESSRIDE Buses Bus Purchase and Replacement Bus Stop Improvements and Passenger Amenities Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD), Automatic Vehicle Location (AVL) & Intelligent Transp Enhanced Transit Service along West End Corridor - Capital Farebox Purchase and Replacement Local Bus Service Preventative Mainatenance and Capitalization - MTA MTA - Administration Building Rehabilitation (Nestor) MTA - Administration Building Rehabilitation (Nestor) New Satellite Maintenance and Office Facility (Peterbilt) Service and Support Vehicles and Equipment Transit Signal Prioritization
2008-15-046 2008-15-052 2008-15-054 2011-15-133 2008-17-021 2011-15-117 2011-15-135 2011-15-137 2008-15-049b 2008-15-049 2011-15-148 2008-15-048 2011-15-139
Oak Hill Greenway Battery Lane / Harding Place and Franklin Road Improvements
2011-16-157 2011-14-042
Pilot School Bus Diesel Retrofit - Metro Nashville Public Schools I-65 I-440 I-65/I-24 I-40
2009-19-004 2008-19-001 2011-12-109 2004-066 2009-84-033
ITS-Various ITS-Various ITS-Various
2006-411c 2006-411b 2006-411
MTA
Oak Hill Greenway Intersection TDOT Bus Diesel Retrofit Noise Barrier Wall Road Widening Road Widening Safety
Davidson/Sumner TDOT ITS ITS ITS
FY 2011-2015 TIP PROJECT INDEX:
2 OF 9
FY 2011-2015 TIP PROJECT INDEX
Regional MPO Bike/Ped Bike/Ped Enhancement ITS Transit Transit Transit Transit Transit Capital Transit Capital Transit Capital Transit Capital Transit Capital
Regional Non-Motorized Projects with U-STP Safe Routes to School Bucket Transportation Enhancement Projects Bucket Regional ITS & System Managment Projects with U-STP Job Access and Reverse Commute (JARC) Bucket Regional Ridesharing & TDM Strategies - Program Administration Regional Ridesharing & TDM Strategies - Program Administration Regional Transit Projects with U-STP ADA Service Capitalization Regional Park and Ride Lots Regional Vanpool Program - Vehicle Replacement Regional Vanpool Program - Vehicle Replacement Regional Vanpool Start-Up Program (New Vehicles & Seat Guarantee)
2011-86-6666 2008-86-086 2008-89-087 2011-89-9999 2011-85-147 2008-85-036 2008-85-036b 2011-85-5555 2008-15-051 2011-85-132 2011-85-155b 2011-85-155 2011-85-154
Transit
New Freedom (NF) Funds Bucket
2008-85-093
Transit Capital Transit Capital Transit Capital Transit Capital Transit Capital Transit Operating Transit Operating Transit Operating Transit Operating
Commuter Rail Capitalization and Preventative Maintenance Commuter Rail Capitalization and Preventative Maintenance Commuter Rail Capitalization and Preventative Maintenance Martha Station Construction Media Fare Purchase Bus Seat Guarantee Expansion of Regional Bus Services Express Bus Service from Williamson County SE Corridor Express Bus Service Expansion
2008-85-091b 2008-85-091c 2008-85-091 2009-85-010 2011-85-127 2006-113 2011-85-125 2009-85-012 2009-85-018
Project Cost Overrun Bucket - STP Project Cost Overrun Bucket - STP (>30%) Project Cost Overruns Bucket - IM Project Cost Overruns Bucket - IM (>30%) Project Cost Overruns Bucket - NHS
2008-89-005 2008-89-006 2008-89-009 2008-89-010 2008-89-007
MTA
RTA
TDOT
FY 2011-2015 TIP PROJECT INDEX:
3 OF 9
FY 2011-2015 TIP PROJECT INDEX
Bridge Bridge Bridge Bridge Bridge Interstate Impr. Safety Safety Safety State Route Impr. Williamson Co/TMA Group Education & Outreach Education & Outreach Education & Outreach
Project Cost Overruns Bucket - NHS (>30%) Bridge Bond Bucket Bridge Replacement Bucket (Local) Bridge Replacement Bucket (State) Bridge Replacement Overrun Bucket (Local) Bridge Replacement Overrun Bucket (State) Interstate 3R improvements Freeway Safety Service Patrol Bucket Safety Bucket (Highway Hazard Elimination) Spot Safety Improvement Program State Route 3R Improvements
2008-89-008 2009-88-032 2008-88-002 2008-88-011 2008-89-003 2008-89-004 2008-89-014 2008-89-091 2008-84-013 2008-84-012 2008-89-015
Clean Air Schools Anti-Idling Campaign and School Pooling Program Transportation-Related Air Quality Education Programming Transportation-Related Air Quality Outreach Campaign
2011-69-122 2011-69-123 2011-69-124
Central Business District Sidewalks
2004-010
SR-65/US-431
2010-32-004
SR-76 Sidewalks
2004-022
Hurricane Creek Greenway Chaney Boulevard Sidewalk Fergus Road Chaney Boulevard Widening Jefferson Pike Widening Waldron Rd / Parthenon Pkwy Old Nashville Hwy
AM-006 2008-46-075 223 2011-42-031 2011-42-032 2006-401 99-New-14
Robertson Springfield Pedestrian TDOT Road Widening White House Pedestrian
Rutherford LaVergne Greenway Pedestrian Pedestrian Road Widening Road Widening Road Widening Signalization
FY 2011-2015 TIP PROJECT INDEX:
4 OF 9
FY 2011-2015 TIP PROJECT INDEX Murfreesboro Greenway Greenway ITS ITS New Roadway Rebuild Reconstruct Reconstruct Reconstruct Road Widening Road Widening Road Widening
Stones River Bicycle and Pedestrian Trail (North) Stones River Greenway Extension CCTV and Traffic Signal Interconnect Middle Tennessee Boulevard Cherry Lane Extension with SR-840 Interchange Pitts Lane Brinkley Road Reconstruction Manson/Gresham/Fortress Reconstruction Rucker Lane Reconstruction Bradyville Pike (SR-99) Widening Fortress Boulevard Widening Thompson Lane (SR-266) Widening
2006-201 226 2004-014 203 2011-41-144 2011-410-153 2011-410-151 2011-410-149 2011-410-152 2011-42-143 2011-42-150 2011-42-142
Murfreesboro Public Transit Transit Capital Transit Capital Transit Capital Transit Capital Transit Operating Transit Operating Transit Operating
5307 Urban Capital for Rover Public Transit - Bus Replacement 5307 Urban Capital for Rover Public Transit - Equipment 5307 Urban capital Funding for Rover Public - Station/Operations/Admin/Training Facilit 5309 Earmark for Rover Public Transit - Bus & Bus Facilities 5307 Urban Operating for Rover Public Transit - MCHRA Contract 5307 Urban Operating for Rover Public Transit - Relax & Ride Service 5307 Urban Operating for Rover Public Transit - Service Operations
2011-45-112 2008-45-090 2011-45-114 2011-45-113 2005-007 2005-006 2008-45-089
Stones River Battlefield - Natl Park Service Interior
2006-202
Rutherford Co./Eagleville Greenway
Eagleville Bicycle and Pedestrian Trail
2006-203
Smyrna Greenway Greenway Greenway Interchange Road Widening
Jefferson Springs Greenway Extension Smyrna Greenway Smyrna Greenway 2 Rocky Fork Road Interchange Weakley Lane Widening
2006-304 2011-46-056 2011-46-057 2011-44-058 2011-42-061
NPS New Roadway
FY 2011-2015 TIP PROJECT INDEX:
5 OF 9
FY 2011-2015 TIP PROJECT INDEX
Sumner Gallatin Greenway Intersection Intersection Intersection New Roadway Reconstruct
Town Creek Greenway - Phase 2 Big Station Camp Creek Blvd East Broadway (SR-6) Various intersection improvements East-West Corridor (Albert Gallatin Avenue (SR-174) / Hatten Track Road Extension) Airport Road Relocation
2009-56-027 2009-54-024 99-New-23 2008-54-033 2008-51-032 2011-510-017
Long Hollow Pike Street Lighting Improvements US-41 (Springfield Hwy)/US 31W (Louisville Hwy) Street Lighting Improvements Caldwell Drive/Indian Hills Pedestrian Control Long Hollow Pike Traffic Signal Synchronization Madison Creek/Long Hollow Pike Traffic Signal
2011-59-025 2011-59-027 2011-17-019 2011-57-024 2011-57-026
Hendersonville Intersection New Roadway Road Widening Road Widening Road Widening Signalization
Walton Ferry Road at West Main Street Re-Alignment - Phase 1 Rockland Road/Imperial Boulevard Drakes Creek / Indian Lake Blvd Widening Indian Lake Boulevard New Shackle Island Road (SR-258) - Phase 1 Hendersonville Closed Loop and Signal Upgrade
2002-029 2002-028 99-New-28 2008-52-034 2006-014 99-New-29
Millersville New Roadway
Cartwright Parkway Extension
2004-019
Portland Intersection Intersection
SR-109 @ Kirby Drive SR-109 at Kirby Drive
2004-020 2004-020b
Sumner Co. Greenway
Lower Station Camp Creek Road Streetscape and Pavement Project (Greenway)
2008-56-082
SR-109
2011-51-108
Goodlettsville
Signalization Signalization Signalization
TDOT New Roadway
FY 2011-2015 TIP PROJECT INDEX:
6 OF 9
FY 2011-2015 TIP PROJECT INDEX Road Widening Road Widening
SR-109 SR-109
AM-018 AM-019
Tyree Springs (SR-258) / S Palmers Chapel Intersection Improvements
2011-54-156
I-65/SR-109 Prop/SR-41 SR-41/US-31 W
2006-416 2008-32-018
Brentwood ITS Road Widening Road Widening
Concord Road Signals Concord Road (SR-253) SR-31/Franklin Road Widening
2008-67-035 2006-013 2006-408
Franklin Greenway ITS ITS Road Widening Road Widening Road Widening Road Widening Road Widening Road Widening Road Widening Road Widening Road Widening Road Widening
Franklin Greenway Bicentennial Connection Franklin ITS Infrastructure Franklin Traffic Operations Center Columbia Ave South (SR 6/US 31) Goose Creek Bypass (SR-248) Hillsboro Rd (SR-106/ US-431) Phase II Hillsboro Rd (SR-106/US-431) Phase I Lewisburg Pike (US-431) - Phase 1 Lewisburg Pike (US-431) - Phase 2 Lewisburg Pike (US-431) - Phase 3 McEwen Drive Extension McEwen Drive Phase 3 McEwen Drive Phase 4
2006-024 2009-67-026 2002-032 2011-62-004 2011-62-005 2006-118 2006-117 2011-62-007 2011-62-008 2011-62-009 2011-61-012 2011-62-010 2011-62-011
Franklin Transit Authority Transit Capital Transit Operating Transit Operating
Local Bus Service Preventative Maintenance and Capitalization - Franklin Job Access and Reverse Commute Funds - Franklin Transit Authority New Freedom Funds - Franklin Transit Authority
2011-65-016 2009-65-008 2009-65-007
White House Intersection
Sumner/Robertson TDOT Interchange Road Widening
Williamson
FY 2011-2015 TIP PROJECT INDEX:
7 OF 9
FY 2011-2015 TIP PROJECT INDEX Spring Hill/TDOT Road Widening
SR-247 (Duplex Road)
2004-051
Pilot School Bus Diesel Retrofit - Williamson County Schools Pilot School Bus Retrofit - Franklin Special School District I-65 Interchange SR-840 South SR-840 South I-65 I-65 I-65 Widening SR-253 (Concord Road)
2009-69-006 2009-69-005 2011-64-111 407b 2008-61-094 2010-65-001 2011-62-110 2006-417 2004-058
Timberland Park Visitor Improvements (Phase I) Timberland Park Visitor Improvements (Phase II) SR-106 (Hillsboro Rd)
2011-69-145 2011-69-146 2008-64-037
Lebanon Greenway Greenway Interchange Intersection Intersection ITS ITS Resurfacing Road Widening Road Widening
Cedar City Trail - Phase 5 (Bartons Creek South) Cedar City Trail Phase 3 & 4 Interchange Lighting Maddox-Simpson Parkway (SR-26) SR-24/US 70/West Main Street at Castle Heights Avenue Closed Loop Signal System - US 231 South/South Cumberland Closed Loop Signal System - Highway 70/West Main Street City of Lebanon 3R Improvements Bucket Hartmann Drive, Section 2 SR-26 (Baddour Pkwy)
2011-76-035 2009-76-001 2008-74-061 503 2011-74-034 2011-77-036 2011-77-037 2010-79-005 2008-72-042 2011-72-033
Mt. Juliet Greenway New Roadway
West Division Street Greenway Beckwith Road/Eastern Connector
2008-76-024 2008-71-038
TDOT Bus Diesel Retrofit Bus Diesel Retrofit Interchange New Roadway New Roadway Road Widening Road Widening Road Widening Road Widening Williamson Co. Enhancement Greenway Intersection
Wilson
FY 2011-2015 TIP PROJECT INDEX:
8 OF 9
FY 2011-2015 TIP PROJECT INDEX TDOT Reconstruct Road Widening Road Widening Road Widening
SR-141 I-40 SR-109 SR-141
2010-710-006 2011-72-107 2009-72-035 2011-72-012
FY 2011-2015 TIP PROJECT INDEX:
9 OF 9
1.0 Introduction 1.1 About the Nashville Area MPO Established through federal legislation, Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) exist throughout the United States in all urbanized areas of more than 50,000 people and have the authority to plan, prioritize, and select transportation projects in urban / metropolitan areas for federal funding and to coordinate any major transportation initiative that has significance to the region. The Nashville Area MPO is the federally‐designated transportation planning agency for over 2800 square miles and more than 1.5 million people throughout Davidson, Rutherford, Sumner, Williamson, Wilson and parts of Maury and Robertson counties. Serving as a regional partnership among the U.S. DOT, Tennessee DOT, local elected leadership, local planning and public works directors, the business community, and citizens across the five‐plus county planning area, the MPO leads in the development of the region’s long‐range transportation plan and short‐range Transportation Improvement Program and contributes to ongoing conversations about issues such as land use, economic development, climate change and the environment, safety and security, and health. The Nashville Area MPO is committed to providing leadership to the region in the planning, funding, and development of a regional multi‐modal transportation system ‐‐ one that promotes personal and social economic prosperity while encouraging sustainable growth and development practices to protect and preserve valuable community and natural assets.
1.2 Purpose of Document The purpose of this document is to provide information to the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Tennessee Department of Transportation (TDOT), the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC), the public, and other interested parties to indicate that the Nashville Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) has met the requirements of the Safe Accountable Flexible Efficient Transportation Equity Act – A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA‐LU) for the development of a Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). The TIP is consistent with the MPO’s 2035 Regional Transportation Plan and local transportation plans including those of transit operators, and meets the requirements of subsection (h)(2) and (k)(5) of Section 134 of Title 23, USC and 23 CFR Part 450.334 (a). This document provides a TIP that is financially feasible and that depicts the MPO’s regional priorities for the expenditure of federal funds for fiscal years 2011‐2015. Projects within the TIP for federal fiscal years 2011‐ 2014, once approved by the Governor, will become part of Tennessee’s State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). Funding amounts for projects included in federal fiscal year 2015 are shown for illustrative purposes only.
1.3 Metropolitan Planning Requirements Federal law requires all urbanized areas with a population of at least 50,000 to maintain a "3‐C" transportation planning process that is “Continuing, Comprehensive, and Cooperative.” In the Nashville region, the organization responsible for managing this process is the Nashville Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). The MPO is responsible for: •
Monitoring the conditions of the existing transportation network;
•
Identifying existing capacity or safety problems through detailed planning studies to develop candidate transportation improvements; NASHVILLE AREA MPO FY 2011-2015 TIP - ADOPTED DECEMBER 15, 2010
1
•
Forecasting future population and employment growth for the region;
•
Evaluating the effects that future land use plans will have on transportation infrastructure within major growth corridors throughout the region;
•
Developing alternative growth scenarios to evaluate the effects that land use and transportation choices made today will have on the region’s future;
•
Estimating the impact that an expanding transportation system will have on air quality; and
•
Developing a financial plan that identifies the costs and revenues associated with the continued operation and maintenance, and future expansion of the region’s transportation system.
The MPO is comprised of eligible local governments within the counties of Davidson, Rutherford, Sumner, Wilson, and Williamson, the City of Springfield in Robertson County, the City of Spring Hill in Maury County, the Tennessee Department of Transportation, and other transportation‐related agencies such as transit operators and airports.
MPO Planning Area
In order to carry out its responsibilities, the MPO produces three major work products: a Regional Transportation Plan (also known as a long‐range transportation plan), a Transportation Improvement Program, and a Unified Planning Work Program. MPO plans and programs are available to the public and interested parties at the MPO’s website (NashvilleMPO.org), by calling the MPO at (615) 862‐7204, or by visiting the MPO offices at 800 Second Avenue South, Nashville, Tennessee, 37201.
NASHVILLE AREA MPO FY 2011-2015 TIP - ADOPTED DECEMBER 15, 2010
2
Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) The Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) is a long‐range, twenty‐five year multimodal strategy and capital improvement program developed to guide the effective investment of public funds in transportation facilities to help manage congestion, increase regional mobility options, and conform to national air quality standards. The RTP is updated every four or five years and may be amended as a result of changes in anticipated federal, state, and local funding; major investment studies; congestion management systems plans; interstate interchange justification studies; and environmental impact studies. The MPO’s current plan, adopted in December 2010, extends through the year 2035.
Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is a four or five‐year work program that lists all regionally significant and federally funded projects and transportation services in the MPO planning area including highway and street projects, public transit projects, and bicycle/pedestrian enhancement projects. Any project included in the TIP must be consistent with, or be selected from an approved regional transportation plan. Additionally, the TIP must be fiscally constrained by estimated future revenues. As such, the TIP can be amended to account for changes in funding or need.
Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) The Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) is a one or two‐year plan developed to focus work efforts of staff and consultants using planning funds in the upcoming fiscal year. All federally funded planning activities must conform to federal planning requirements and be listed in the UPWP.
1.4 Statewide Transportation Improvement Program While the primary purpose of the Nashville Area MPO is to provide coordinated long and short‐term transportation planning within the greater Nashville region, the Tennessee Department of Transportation (TDOT) performs both long and short‐term planning across the entire state, taking a lead in rural areas, and working with MPOs in urban areas. As part of the federal requirements for transportation planning, TDOT develops a 4‐year short‐term improvement program called the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). To develop the STIP, TDOT works directly with the Rural Planning Organizations (RPOs) and MPOs throughout the state to determine project needs. For urban areas, the state participates in the metropolitan planning process to ensure the inclusion of state projects in the appropriate MPO Transportation Improvement Program. Upon adoption, each project within the Nashville Area MPO’s TIP, within the years 2011‐2014, will become, without exception, a part of the larger STIP. Funding amounts for projects included in federal fiscal year 2015 of the TIP are shown for illustrative purposes only. The STIP is available on the web at www.tdot.state.tn.us/programdev/ or by contacting TDOT at (615) 741‐2848.
NASHVILLE AREA MPO FY 2011-2015 TIP - ADOPTED DECEMBER 15, 2010
3
2.0 Program Development 2.1 Guiding Principles, Goals, and Objectives The FY 2011‐2015 TIP is a five‐year work program of planned transportation improvements that are derived from the MPO’s adopted 2035 Regional Transportation Plan. It is developed by the MPO through a comprehensive, continuing and cooperative effort with the Federal Highway Administration, Federal Transit Administration, Tennessee Department of Transportation, local transit operators, the public, and other interested parties. The development of the MPO’s TIP provides a tremendous opportunity to fund and implement projects from the region’s 2035 plan that are determined to be the most suitable to the region’s current needs. In preparing the work program, significant consideration is given to determine the most appropriate set of short‐term projects that advance the long‐term goals of the region as embodied by a set of guiding principles, regional goals, and major objectives developed through extensive public and stakeholder involvement.
Guiding Principles Guiding principles direct how the Nashville Area MPO ‐‐ working as part of a larger regional context comprised of the interests of local governments, non‐profit organizations, the business community, and public citizens ‐‐ will contribute to overall quality of life for the region. Guiding Principle #1: Livability MPO plans and programs will work to enhance the quality of life in the region by supporting initiatives that increase opportunities for affordable housing, education, jobs, recreation, and civic involvement without increasing the burden on citizens to enjoy their community. Guiding Principle #2: Sustainability MPO plans and programs will strive to support growth and prosperity without sacrificing the health, environment, natural and socio‐cultural resources, or financial stability of this or future generations. Guiding Principle #3: Prosperity MPO plans and programs will contribute to the continued economic well‐being of the greater Nashville area by investing in transportation solutions that increase access to education, jobs, and amenities, reduce the cost of living and doing business, and attract new investment to the region. Guiding Principle #4: Diversity MPO plans and programs will recognize the multitude of needs and the variety of perspectives and backgrounds of the people that live and work in the greater Nashville area by promoting a range of transportation choices that are designed with sensitivity to the desired context.
Regional Goals The regional goals embody a general set of strategies by which the Nashville Area MPO will seek to help the region in its pursuit of quality growth as directed by the overarching guiding principles. Goal # 1:
Maintain and Preserve the Efficiency, Safety, and Security of the Region’s Existing Transportation Infrastructure.
Goal # 2:
Manage Congestion to Keep People and Goods Moving.
NASHVILLE AREA MPO FY 2011-2015 TIP - ADOPTED DECEMBER 15, 2010
4
Goal # 3:
Encourage Quality Growth and Sustainable Land Development Practices.
Goal # 4:
Protect the Region’s Health & Environment.
Goal # 5:
Support the Economic Competitiveness of the Greater Nashville Area.
Goal # 6:
Offer Meaningful Transportation Choices for a Diverse Population including the Aging.
Goal # 7:
Encourage Regional Coordination, Cooperation, & Decision‐Making.
Goal # 8:
Practice Thoughtful, Transparent Financial Stewardship by Ensuring that Transportation Improvements meet Regional Goals.
Major Objectives The major objectives represent specific strategies and actions that the MPO seeks to implement en route to achieving the regional goals of the 2035 Regional Transportation Plan. Objective #1:
Adopt a “fix‐it‐first” mentality in directing transportation funding. Initial focus should always be on the maintenance or improvement of existing facilities.
Objective #2:
Strive for quality over quantity. Build out all elements of priority projects or phases rather than stringing funding out over several incomplete projects or incomplete phases.
Objective #3:
Shift investment strategies towards providing a diversification of modes, rather than solely on strategies focused on roadway capacity.
Objective #4:
Improve marketing and promotion of successful existing transportation services. It is acceptable to use federal transportation funds to do this.
Objective #5:
Provide opportunities and define roles for all types of organizations and/or individuals (public or private) to assist in the implementation of programs and projects.
Objective #6:
Improve the coordination of land use, urban design, transportation, rural and environmental feature preservation, and economic development policies and decisions through incentives and/or policies.
Objective #7:
Encourage the development of context sensitive solutions to ensure that community values are not sacrificed for a mobility improvement.
Objective #8:
Increase efforts to improve the form and function of transportation corridors in order to contribute to the “sense of place.” Such investments can: improve attractiveness to visitors or prospective businesses or residents; compliment existing natural and cultural resources; improve the function of the road for a variety of users; and foster civic pride toward public investments in infrastructure.
Objective #9:
Consider how transportation policies, programs, and investment strategies affect the overall health of people and the environment including air quality, physical activity, biodiversity, and the natural resources.
Objective #10:
Invest in the development of walkable communities that offer citizens the ability to access residences, jobs, retail, recreation, and other community amenities without the need to rely on an automobile.
Objective #11:
Invest in a modern regional mass transit system to maintain the region’s economic competitiveness with other metropolitan regions, and to ensure continued economic
NASHVILLE AREA MPO FY 2011-2015 TIP - ADOPTED DECEMBER 15, 2010
5
prosperity in the face of growing energy costs, environmental concerns, and increasingly expensive automobile traffic. Objective #12:
Work to ensure that Middle Tennessee is given priority consideration in proposed national plans for high‐speed rail. Identify opportunities to coordinate regional mass transit planning efforts with super‐regional and national efforts to invest in rail infrastructure.
Objective #13:
Provide proper guidance to the region for how to bridge the gap between the MPO's "cost‐feasible" plan and the ultimate vision for how transportation will shape the future of the region.
2.2 Programming Policies In order to demonstrate compliance with federal transportation planning requirements, and to ensure that state and local agencies have access to federal transportation funding for roadways, bridges, transit, and facilities for non‐motorized modes, the MPO’s Transportation Improvement Program must include all projects that are funded wholly or in part with federal funds, or are determined to be regionally significant. Though the TIP is developed in its entirety every four or five years, routine maintenance is required to accurately reflect anticipated federal expenditures, and to provide transparency to the public interested in short‐term transportation improvements in the area. The MPO has identified the following policies to provide guidance for the development and maintenance of the regional work program, and to assist in the effective administration of MPO‐managed federal grant funds. Currently, the MPO manages federal grant funding appropriated by the U.S. Congress through the Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration to local government and agencies within the MPO planning area. Specifically, the MPO manages grant funds from the FHWA Surface Transportation Program (STP) and FTA Section 5307 grant programs set‐aside for urbanized areas. From time to time, the MPO may receive a suballocation of revenues from other funding sources (e.g, FHWA Congestion Mitigation Air Quality, Economic Recovery, etc.), for which spending discretion also is provided.
Policy 1. Compliance with Regional Plan For a project to be eligible for the TIP, it first must be included in the adopted regional transportation plan. Large capital projects, roadway capacity, and/or general purpose roadway projects must be individually listed or clearly part of a larger project included in the fiscally‐constrained component of the plan. Certain projects seeking to improve safety, increase multi‐modal opportunities, or enhance the existing transportation system may be programmed in the TIP without individual identification in the regional plan, so long as they are consistent with the established goals and objectives of the plan, are funded with revenue identified by the plan, and are included in the assumptions of the air quality conformity determination (if required).
Policy 2. Compliance with Air Quality Standards Prior to the adoption of a TIP or the approval of any subsequent amendment or modification to the TIP, the MPO shall ensure that the collection of projects comprising the work program conform to applicable air quality standards and/ or meet state and federal air quality regulations or requirements. Such regulations or requirements may necessitate that members of the MPO submit to the MPO detailed information about any project that adds vehicular capacity to the major roadway system ‐‐ whether funded with federal grants or not.
NASHVILLE AREA MPO FY 2011-2015 TIP - ADOPTED DECEMBER 15, 2010
6
Policy 3. Compliance with State Transportation Work Program No TIP project may assume the receipt of state revenues or state‐managed federal grant funds unless those funds are included in the state’s three‐year work program presented annually to the Tennessee General Assembly, or unless otherwise authorized in writing by the Tennessee Commissioner of Transportation. Valid contractual agreements between the State of Tennessee and a local grant recipient may serve as sufficient proof of the State’s commitment.
Policy 4. Fiscal Constraint Limitations The MPO shall not program in the TIP any MPO‐managed federal grant funds for which funding cannot be identified, either as part of unobligated amounts appropriated by Congress in the current or previous federal fiscal years, or as part of the MPO’s adopted financial forecast for the corresponding TIP year(s).
Policy 5. Illustrative Priorities Upon adoption of the TIP and in each year thereafter, the MPO shall endorse or reaffirm its commitment to seeking resources for regional priority projects not funded by grants provided by the TIP. The endorsed list of priorities shall be used to identify next‐in‐line projects to receive additional funding available to the MPO, either through higher‐than‐expected appropriations or new federal grant programs, or from funding that is returned to the MPO general fund from any project not able to use its award. The list also shall be used to communicate the region’s top priorities for other funding opportunities to TDOT, state legislators, the U.S. Congressional delegation, and other interested parties.
Policy 6. Eligibility for MPO-Managed Federal Grant Funds At minimum, any proposed project to improve the safety, capacity, operations, or physical condition of roadways identified on the MPO’s federal‐aid network are eligible for MPO‐managed federal grant funds. In addition, projects that improve safety or multi‐modal opportunities on routes not identified on the federal‐aid system (e.g., sidewalks on local roads, greenways, transit routes, etc.) also are eligible as long as they meet any applicable federal codes and regulations. Certain MPO‐managed federal grant funds may require additional conditions be met in order to be considered eligible (e.g., CMAQ funds require an air quality benefit). In general, MPO‐managed federal grant funds should be awarded to projects that serve locations contained within the geographic area of the associated grant program (e.g., urbanized area Surface Transportation Program funds), but exceptions may be granted in cases where an MPO priority project located outside of the area is shown to have benefit to the region as a whole, and where that project has no other opportunity for funding within the desired implementation schedule.
Policy 7. MPO Commitment to Projects With the adoption of the TIP, or its subsequent amendment, the MPO formally commits to ensuring that MPO‐ managed federal grant funds identified for a project are provided as programmed unless such funding is not available due to changes in law or federal regulations, or if funding is not appropriated at anticipated levels, or is lost to the periodic rescission of unobligated balances. Should MPO‐managed federal grant funding be removed from a project as a result of a decrease in funding levels, that project shall remain a top priority for funding once revenues are identified or restored. Any project programmed in the TIP with MPO‐managed federal grant fund, which continues to meet all eligibility requirements while maintaining the proper support of the project sponsor, shall continue to be a priority for the MPO as the region develops a new TIP. Projects with federal funding already obligated shall automatically have unobligated programmed funds carried forward to the new TIP, along with the appropriate increase in funding to cover inflation (see Policy 11) unless that project is proven to have a fatal flaw, loses
NASHVILLE AREA MPO FY 2011-2015 TIP - ADOPTED DECEMBER 15, 2010
7
support from the project sponsor, or is estimated to cost more than 10% beyond previous cost estimates provided to the MPO (see Policy 12).
Policy 8. Project Sponsor Commitment to Projects Project sponsors hold ultimate responsibility for ensuring that project information contained in the TIP is correct, that it accurately represents the scope of work being performed, and the amount of funding being requested. The sponsor is responsible for providing to the MPO an honest accounting of project details including: costs, implementation schedules, and local matching fund sources, at the time of the application for federal funds and anytime such details change, or at the request of the MPO. For a project funded with MPO‐managed federal funds to remain eligible for those funds, the project’s sponsor must provide proof of stated local matching funds at least 3‐months prior to the beginning of the federal fiscal year for which the funds are programmed for use. Should a sponsor fail to satisfy the requirement, the project may be allowed a one‐year grace period (see Policy 10).
Policy 9. Construction Funding To facilitate the timely delivery of projects and to prevent the lapse of obligation authority provided by Congress to the state and MPO, the construction phase of projects shall not be formally programmed with MPO‐managed federal grant funds until all preliminary engineering (PE) work is completed. This approach assists in the management of federal funds by providing a realistic construction cost estimate and implementation schedule, thus preventing large amounts of funding from being held up on delayed projects. In order to ensure the availability of MPO‐managed federal grant funds for projects ready for construction, the MPO will reserve at least 80% of the amount of funding needed for construction on projects programmed in the TIP (which have not completed PE) as unprogrammed funds. Funding will be programmed on projects in the TIP after the completion of the PE phase on a first‐come, first‐serve basis as funding is made available. In order to be eligible for MPO‐managed federal grant funds for a construction phase, the project sponsor must submit a construction cost estimate at the time of the MPO’s call‐for‐projects associated with the development of a new TIP. If the project is selected for funding, the MPO’s federal share of construction costs will be shown as “illustrative,” until the PE phase has been completed. Should the construction cost estimate identified after the completion of PE exceed the original estimate by 10% or more, the project sponsor must find an alternative source of revenue, make a special request to the MPO Executive Board for additional funding, or compete for the additional funding as part of the MPO’s next call‐for‐ projects. In such competition, priority will be given to viable projects previously programmed in the TIP (see Policy 7).
Policy 10. Dormant or Inactive Projects Project sponsors are given a one‐year grace period to obligate funding on projects beyond the originally programmed year of work. Failure to do so may cause federal funds to be returned to the MPO general fund and re‐programmed to the next highest eligible MPO priority as identified by the MPO’s annual list of priorities (see Policy 5). Project phases which have been obligated, but have not realized any activity within a 12‐month timeframe, may be subject to de‐obligation and grant funds returned to the MPO general fund. Returned funds will be re‐ programmed to the next‐highest eligible MPO priority, as identified by the MPO’s annual list of priorities.
NASHVILLE AREA MPO FY 2011-2015 TIP - ADOPTED DECEMBER 15, 2010
8
Policy 11. Inflation Adjustments Whenever a project is deferred or carried over from one TIP to another, the MPO shall automatically increase the project award by 5% and up to 10%, unless evidence suggests that such adjustment is not necessary. Should evidence show that project cost estimates have increased by more than 10% on a project in a previous TIP, the project sponsor must compete for the additional funding. In such competition, priority will be given to viable projects previously programmed in the TIP (see Policy 7).
Policy 12. Cost Increases/ Cost Over-Runs In cases where a project that is awarded MPO‐managed federal grant funds does not have sufficient funding to fulfill the scope of the project as originally programmed, the project sponsor may be granted the flexibility to shift funding across phases and/or years (pending the availability of funding) to cover increased cost estimates for the affected phase. Should additional funding be required to implement the phase, the project sponsor will be responsible for securing that additional funding from an alternative source of revenue or compete for additional funds at the next available MPO call‐for‐projects. In such competition, priority will be given to viable projects previously programmed in the TIP (see Policy 7). The responsibility for any cost over‐run on a project already under contract shall be determined by the prevailing contractual agreement between TDOT and the project sponsor. Such contractual agreement shall not bind the MPO to pay for cost‐overruns with MPO‐managed federal grant funds. The project sponsor may shift funding across phases and/or years (pending the availability of funding) to cover increased costs, however, should additional funding be required to conduct the programmed phase, the project sponsor will be responsible for securing that additional funding from an alternative source of revenue or compete for additional funds at the next available MPO call‐for‐projects. In such competition, priority will be given to viable projects previously programmed in the TIP (see Policy 7).
Policy 13. Changes in the Scope of Work All changes to the scope of work for projects programmed in the TIP with MPO‐managed federal grant funds must first be approved by the MPO. Projects are evaluated, scored, ranked, and prioritized, and selected based on the benefits and costs of the project as proposed at the time the TIP is developed. Any changes that significantly depart from the original scope may require that project to compete for federal funds during the next MPO call‐for‐projects.
Policy 14. Project Tracking In order to facilitate the implementation of the TIP policies, the MPO will work with TDOT and project sponsors to present to MPO members, at least quarterly, a full accounting of the funds obligated for each project and any changes in the status of those projects.
Policy 15. TIP Amendment Cycles MPO will consider amendments to the TIP on a quarterly basis. The annual schedule of amendment cycles shall be adopted by the MPO prior to the beginning of each federal fiscal year (October 1). Any project sponsor requesting an amendment not deemed to be an emergency must wait for the next amendment cycle or reimburse the MPO for the direct costs incurred to pay for the required public noticing.
NASHVILLE AREA MPO FY 2011-2015 TIP - ADOPTED DECEMBER 15, 2010
9
2.3 Project Prioritization & Selection Projects under consideration for the TIP must first be determined as short‐term priorities of the Regional Transportation Plan. As such, candidate TIP projects are evaluated and prioritized as part of a broader process that looks to address regional transportation needs as far ahead as 25 years into the future. The development of the FY 2011‐2015 work program coincided with the development of the 2035 plan, and as such, projects seeking funding through the TIP were first evaluated for the 2035 plan. To that end, the MPO has developed a priority scoring system to help determine which projects will best facilitate the region’s long term vision. The scoring system is based on both federally‐defined planning factors and locally developed project evaluation factors.
Federal Planning Factors Project prioritization and selection is based, in part, on the eight planning factors identified in the current federal transportation legislation (SAFETEA‐LU), which requires this and other MPOs to focus efforts on the development and implementation of regional strategies that: •
Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, and efficiency;
•
Increase the safety of the transportation system for motorized and non‐motorized users;
•
Increase the security of the transportation system for motorized and non‐motorized users;
•
Increase the accessibility and mobility options available to people and for freight;
•
Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve quality of life, and promote consistency between transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns;
•
Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight;
•
Promote efficient system management and operation; and
•
Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system.
Moreover, since the Nashville urban area has a population greater than 200,000, it is federally designated as a Transportation Management Area (TMA). In a TMA, the planning and programming process also is expected to consider land use implications, strategies to improve transit service, transportation system management, intermodal connectivity, and urban congestion management. Projects to relieve congestion are given particular priority. As such, project prioritization is consistent with the MPO’s Congestion Management Process (CMP) created as an integral part of the 2035 Regional Transportation Plan. In brief, the CMP provides a strategy and mechanism for identifying the appropriate transportation solution for congested roadways.
MPO Project Prioritization & Selection Although the MPO’s project evaluation criteria meet the requirements of the federal planning factors, the MPO developed a comprehensive set of factors that were determined to provide the best approach, given the available data, to evaluate projects for their consistency with the MPO’s guiding principles, regional goals, and major objectives described in section 2.1 of this document. The following factors were considered in evaluating projects for funding: •
Congestion management,
•
Multi‐modal accommodations,
NASHVILLE AREA MPO FY 2011-2015 TIP - ADOPTED DECEMBER 15, 2010
10
•
Freight and goods movement,
•
Safety and security,
•
System preservation,
•
Quality growth and sustainable development,
•
Economic prosperity,
•
Health and environment, and
•
State and local support.
The MPO selection process focused largely on the identification of high‐scoring projects eligible for MPO‐ managed funds including FHWA Surface Transportation Program (STP), FHWA Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ), and FTA Section 5307 Urban Transit grant funds. Projects more appropriately suited for state‐ managed funds were evaluated and scored primarily for the purpose of communicated priorities to the Tennessee Department of Transportation. Those projects with local or state funding commitments or prior federal funding commitments were given priority for funding in the new work program. Appendix C (MPO Project Evaluation and Scoring) of this document includes a comprehensive list of MPO evaluation criteria, project scoring weights, and an example of a project information sheet which was compiled to show relevant data and information for each project being considered for funding.
2.4 Air Quality Conformity Transportation conformity is a mechanism to ensure that federal funding is given to transportation activities that are consistent with the air quality goals of the State Implementation Plans (SIP) for Tennessee. According to the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977 and 1990, transportation plans and programs must be coordinated with, and conform to, local air quality budgets in the local SIP in geographic areas designated by the EPA as non‐ attainment or maintenance for any of the criteria pollutants. The MPO counties of Davidson, Rutherford, Sumner, Williamson and Wilson were designated non‐attainment in 1978 and declared maintenance areas in 1996 for the ozone precursor pollutants of NOx and VOC. In April, 2004, EPA developed new regulations for air quality conformity and established an 8‐hour standard overwriting the existing 1‐hour standard in most areas including Nashville. This 8‐hour standard established a longer period of sustained clean air than the previous standard. On December 29, 2004, the region entered into an Early Action Compact (EAC) in order to defer a non‐ attainment designation long enough to “fast‐track” towards air quality attainment. As of April 15, 2009, the counties of the Nashville Area MPO are considered by the EPA to be in compliance with National Ambient Air Quality Standards and, as such, the MPO is no longer required to demonstrate conformity with established motor vehicle emissions budgets. The region does remain part of Tennessee’s State Implementation Plan, and as such, continues to be eligible to receive Congestion Mitigation Air Quality funding from the Federal Highway Administration, at the discretion of the Tennessee Department of Transportation.
NASHVILLE AREA MPO FY 2011-2015 TIP - ADOPTED DECEMBER 15, 2010
11
2.5 Public & Stakeholder Involvement Public involvement is a critical element of all planning that is done through the Nashville Area MPO. Such involvement ensures that the planning process conforms to the vision, goals, and objectives of the region. The MPO’s SAFETEA‐LU compliant Public Participation Plan (PPP) provides guidelines for how the public and interested stakeholders will be involved in the development of the TIP. Projects included in the TIP went through a lengthy public involvement process as part of the development and adoption of the 2035 Regional Transportation Plan. That process included several workshops and meetings held around the region to provide an opportunity for members of the public and stakeholder groups to help identify transportation problem areas, make suggestions for system improvements, and evaluate proposed projects. Other local, state, and federal agencies involved in natural resources, land use management, environmental protection, conservation, and historic preservation also were given an opportunity to participate. In addition to the opportunity to provide input as part of the formal public review and comment period for the 2035 plan, the public was given twenty‐one days to review and comment on the draft TIP in advance of the adoption hearing held by the MPO Executive Board. During the public review and comment period, copies of the TIP were made available on the MPO’s website and at local branch libraries throughout the MPO region. During that time, MPO staff consulted with interested parties and stakeholders affected by transportation plans and programs. Many of them had indicated an interest in the TIP through a survey conducted during the development of the MPO’s Public Participation Plan. All those parties were provided an opportunity to review and comment on the draft TIP prior to adoption. Comments received through the public involvement were addressed accordingly and provided to the MPO Executive Board prior to adoption (Appendix G).
NASHVILLE AREA MPO FY 2011-2015 TIP - ADOPTED DECEMBER 15, 2010
12
3.0 Financial Plan 3.1 Fiscal Constraint The TIP is required to include a financial plan that demonstrates how the program of projects can be implemented. The detailed financial tables located in Section 3.5 include the estimated amount of available funds, programmed funds, and the remaining funds, by jurisdiction and fund type for each program year. TDOT, local jurisdictions, transit operators, and other agencies with projects in the TIP have indicated that they have the financial resources available to provide the necessary matching funds to complete their projects. The tables show that programmed expenditures are within reasonable balance of expected fund allocations. In accordance with the requirements of SAFETEA‐LU, the TIP is “fiscally constrained.”
Financial Planning Assumptions Accounting for Inflation: Unless otherwise noted, all project costs reported in the TIP are estimated for the expected year of expenditure, meaning that cost estimates include an adjustment to account for the annual inflation of prices. While the MPO assumes the responsibility of estimating the effect of inflation for projects scheduled in the mid‐, and long‐range horizons of the regional plan, the process used to account for inflation on TIP projects was left to the judgment of the sponsoring agency, as short‐term inflationary pressures vary drastically by project type and schedule. Revenue Projections: Revenue projections for TDOT‐managed federal funds (e.g., IM, NHS, STP, etc.) were provided by TDOT and generally equal the programmed expenditures for the same period of time. MPO‐ managed federal funding sources (e.g., urban STP, FTA Section 5307, etc.) are generally assumed to grow at 3 percent per year above the observed 2010 appropriations. Specific assumptions for each MPO‐managed federal grant source follows: •
Nashville‐Davidson UZA FHWA STP – 3 percent annual growth starting in FY 2012.
•
Murfreesboro UZA FHWA STP – 3 percent annual growth starting in FY 2012.
•
Local Urban FHWA STP – TDOT has published a four‐year award cycle for local STP funds for use by urban areas of 5,000 to 50,000 in population. No additional growth beyond TDOT’s estimates for FYs 2010 through 2013 has been assumed. Local STP revenues for FYs 2014 and 2015 are assumed to be the annual average of the allocation for FYs 2010 through 2013.
•
Nashville‐Davidson UZA FTA Section 5307 – 3 percent annual growth starting in FY 2011, with an increase in the base funding amount in FY 2013 to $16 million due to the area’s eligibility for the bonus awarded to areas with commuter rail service and a population of 750,000 or more.
•
Murfreesboro UZA FTA Section 5307 – 3 percent annual growth starting in FY 2011.
•
Nashville‐Davidson UZA FTA Section 5316 – 3 percent annual growth starting in FY 2011.
•
Nashville‐Davidson UZA FTA Section 5317 – 3 percent annual growth starting in FY 2011.
3.2 Revenue Sources SAFETEA‐LU gives greater flexibility for the use of federal transportation funds at the state and local levels. Once used primarily for highway improvements on state and federal roadways, these funds can now be used for a multitude of transportation related activities. Certain funds can now be used for projects such as roadway aesthetics, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, environmental impact mitigation, preservation of historic
NASHVILLE AREA MPO FY 2011-2015 TIP - ADOPTED DECEMBER 15, 2010
13
transportation facilities, transit facilities, and right‐of‐way corridor preservation. In addition, SAFETEA‐LU continues and emphasizes the need for public participation. The following table presents an overview of the various funding sources available to pay for transportation projects and programs.
Table 1. Transportation Funding Programs FUNDING PROGRAMS
DESCRIPTION
PRIMARY FUNDING DECISION
FUNDING RATIO
PRIMARY FUNDING PURPOSE
HIGHWAY & OTHER PROGRAMS BRIDGE REPLACEMENT AND REHABILITATION STATE & LOCAL (BRR or BR)
CONGESTION MITIGATION AND AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (STATE CMAQ) HIGH PRIORITY PROJECTS SET ASIDE OF SAFETEA (HPP) HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (HSIP)
HIGH RISK RURAL ROADS PROGRAM (HRRRP)
INTERSTATE MAINTENANCE (IM)
LOCAL INTERSTATE CONNECTOR (LIC) NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM (NHS)
RAIL-HIGHWAY CROSSING PROGRAM (RHCP) SAFETY SET ASIDE OF STP (SAFETY)
State – Provides funding for on-system bridge replacement, or to rehabilitate aging or substandard bridges based on bridge sufficiency ratings. Local - Provides funding for off-system bridge replacement, or to rehabilitate aging or substandard bridges based on bridge sufficiency ratings. Provides funding for transportation projects in air quality non-attainment or maintenance areas. CMAQ projects are designed to contribute toward meeting the national ambient air quality standards. Provides designated funding for specific projects identified by Congress. A set-aside program with the STP intended to achieve a significant reduction in traffic fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads. HSIP funds may be used to carry out highway safety improvement projects on any public road or publicly owned bicycle or pedestrian pathway or trail. A set-aside program with the STP intended to achieve a significant reduction in traffic fatalities and incapacitating injuries on major or minor collectors, and/or rural local roads. Funds may be used to carry out construction and operational improvements on roadways functionally classified as a rural major or minor collector or a rural local road. Provides funding to rehabilitate, restore, and resurface the Interstate System. Reconstruction is also eligible if it does not add new capacity, with the exception of High-Occupancy-Vehicle (HOV) lanes or auxiliary lanes in non-attainment areas, which can be added. State funding targeted at improving access to an interstate interchange. Provides funding for major roads including the Interstate System, a large percentage of urban and rural principal arterials, the Strategic Defense Highway Network (STRAHNET), and strategic highway connectors. A component of HSIP funds which are intended to improve the safety of the most hazardous public rail-highway crossings. Provides funding for making high hazard improvements on state highways.
TDOT
80% Federal, 20% Non-Federal
Bridge Reconstruction and Bridge Replacement
TDOT
Eligible for 100% Federal
PE, ROW, Construction, Operations, Capital, and Promotional Activities.
CONGRESS
80% Federal, 20% Non-Federal
As described in Law
TDOT
90% Federal, 10% Non-Federal
Construction, Operational Improvements, and Educational Activities
TDOT
90% Federal, 10% Non-Federal
Construction and Operational Improvements
TDOT
90% Federal, 10% Non-Federal
Reconstruction
TDOT
50% State, 50% Local 80% Federal, 20%Non-Federal
Construction
TDOT
90% Federal, 10% Non-Federal
TDOT
80% Federal, 20% Non-Federal
Construction and Operational Improvements Construction
TDOT
NASHVILLE AREA MPO FY 2011-2015 TIP - ADOPTED DECEMBER 15, 2010
Construction
14
FUNDING PROGRAMS STATE (STA)
STATE INDUSTRIAL ACCESS PROGRAM (SIA)
STATE - SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (S-STP)
DESCRIPTION This program provides 100% state funding for various projects on the State Route System. This program provides funding to improve access to new or expanding industrial facilities.
Provides funding for roads functionally classified as rural major collector and above. Funds may be utilized on projects in Rural Areas, Urbanized Areas, Small Urban Areas, Enhancement, Safety, and RailHighway Crossings.
PRIMARY FUNDING DECISION TDOT
FUNDING RATIO
PRIMARY FUNDING PURPOSE
100% State
PE, ROW, Construction
TDOT
Up to 100% State
PE, ROW, Construction
TDOT
80% Federal, 20% Non-Federal
PE, ROW, Construction
ENHANCEMENT PROGRAMS RECREATIONAL TRAILS PROGRAM (RTP)
Provides funding for the creation, rehabilitation, and maintenance of multi-use recreational trails.
TDEC
80% Federal, 20% Non-Federal
Construction and Promotional Activities
TRANSPORTATION & COMMUNITY & SYSTEM PRESERVATION (TCSP)
This program provides funding for planning grants, implementation grants, and research to investigate and address the relationship between transportation and community and system preservation.
FHWA
100% Federal
Planning and Construction
TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT SET ASIDE OF THE STP (TE or ENH)
Provides funding for 12 exclusive activities such as pedestrian facilities, rehabilitation, and restoration of historic transportation related structures, and environmental mitigation to address water pollution due to highway runoff. Provides funding to infrastructure and educational programs for bicycle and pedestrian safety at elementary and middle schools.
TDOT
80% Federal, 20% Non-Federal
Construction and Promotional Activities
TDOT
100% Federal
70-90% Engineering, Construction 10-30% Education
SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL (SRTS)
TRANSIT PROGRAMS FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION (FTA-5303) – PLANNING GRANTS FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION (FTA-5307)
FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION (FTA-5309)
FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION (FTA-5310)
This program provides funds to Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO) to support the costs of transit planning and research studies. Section 5307 is a formula grant program for urbanized areas providing capital, operating, and planning assistance for mass transportation.
MPO/Transit Agencies
80% Federal, 20% Non-Federal
Planning
MPO/Transit Agencies
80% Federal, 20% Non-Federal (Capital)
Capital, Operating, Planning
Provides funding for the establishment of new rail or busway projects (new starts), the improvement and maintenance of existing rail and other fixed guideway systems that are more than seven years old, and the upgrading of bus systems. This program provides transit capital assistance, through the state, to private non-profit organizations and public bodies that provide specialized transportation services to elderly and/or disabled persons. Annually eligible applicants apply to OPT for funding to acquire equipment to provide specialized transportation need of elderly and/or disabled persons.
CONGRESS/ FTA
TDOT
50% Federal, 50% Non-Federal (Operating) 80% Federal, 20% Non-Federal
80% Federal, 20% Non-Federal
NASHVILLE AREA MPO FY 2011-2015 TIP - ADOPTED DECEMBER 15, 2010
Capital Investments
Capital Investments
15
FUNDING PROGRAMS
DESCRIPTION
JOB ACCESS/REVERSE COMMUTE (JARC-5316)
A Job Access project is one that provides new or expanded transportation service designed to fill gaps that exist for welfare recipients and other low-income individuals to and from jobs and other employmentrelated services. Reverse Commute projects facilitate the provision of new or expanded public mass transportation services for the general public from urban, suburban, and rural areas to suburban work sites. Encourages services and facility improvements to address the transportation needs of persons with disabilities that go beyond those required by the Americans with Disabilities Act. This program enhances access of people in nonurbanized areas to health care, shopping, education, employment, public services and recreation; assists in the maintenance, development, improvement and use of public transportation in rural and small-urban areas.
NEW FREEDOM (5317)
RURAL TRANSIT (5311)
PRIMARY FUNDING DECISION MPO/Transit Agencies
50% FTA, 50% Other-Federal
Operating
MPO/Transit Agencies
60% FTA, 40% Federal or Other
Capital , Operating; 10% eligible for Planning, Administration and Technical Assistance Capital, Administrative Assistance
TDOT
FUNDING RATIO
80% Federal, 20% Non-Federal 50% Federal, 50% Non-Federal
PRIMARY FUNDING PURPOSE
Operating
MPO RELATED PROGRAMS CONGESTION MITIGATION AND AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CMAQ) LOCAL-SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (L-STP) URBANIZED AREAS SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (U-STP)
Provides funding for transportation projects in air quality non-attainment or maintenance areas. CMAQ projects are designed to contribute toward meeting the national ambient air quality standards. Provides funding to areas of 5,000 to 50,000 in population for improvements on routes functionally classified urban collectors or higher. Provides funding to Census designated urbanized areas over 50,000 in population (e.g. MPO areas based on US Census) for improvements on routes functionally classified urban collectors or higher.
MPO
Eligible for a 100% Federal
Education, Outreach, Transit Programs, Construction
MPO
80% Federal, 20% Non-Federal
Construction
MPO
80% Federal, 20% Non-Federal
Construction
MPO
80% Federal, 20% Non-Federal
Planning
MPO/Transit Agencies
80% Federal, 20% Non-Federal
Planning
TDOT/ MPO
80% Federal, 20% State
Planning
PLANNING PROGRAMS FHWA SECTION 112 “PL” – MPO PLANNING
FTA 5303 METROPOLITAN PLANNING
FHWA SECTION 5313(B) “SPR” – STATE PLANNING & RESEARCH
This program provides funds to Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO) to support the costs of preparing long range transportation plans and financially feasible Transportation Improvement Plans and conducting inter-modal transportation planning and technical studies. This program provides funds to Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO) to support the costs of preparing long range transportation plans and financially feasible Transportation Improvement Plans and conducting inter-modal transportation planning and technical studies. Through this program, funding is available to each state for the purposes of technical studies and assistance, demonstrations, planning, management training and cooperative research activities.
NASHVILLE AREA MPO FY 2011-2015 TIP - ADOPTED DECEMBER 15, 2010
16
3.3 Urban STP Investment Strategy Shaped by extensive input from regional leadership, the MPO has established a new direction for future investments made with MPO‐managed grant funds received through the Federal Highway Administration Surface Transportation Program. The new strategy aligns the region’s transportation investments with stated goals and objectives, particularly those related to diversifying the set of transportation options available to those living, working, and doing business in the Nashville area. The MPO’s new strategy calls for a minimum level of investment of future revenues appropriated to the MPO through the Surface Transportation Program (STP) on projects in each of the following target areas, assuming such projects exist for consideration. Should there be no candidates in one of the three categories, funding may be awarded to roadway improvement projects that best meet overall regional goals and objectives. 1. 15 % to encourage the development of active transportation choices and walkable communities. 2. 10% to support other regional investments in public transportation and mass transit. 3. 5% to improve the efficiency of the transportation system through innovative management and operations upgrades. Of the remaining amount (roughly 70%), roadway improvement projects that best meet overall goals and objectives for a safe, efficient, multi‐modal transportation system will compete for the remainder of funding. Historically, more than 90 cents of every dollar awarded to MPO projects with STP revenues has been used to pay for roadway capacity projects. This new direction provides an opportunity to provide “complete streets” throughout the region. Currently, the MPO receives Urban or Local STP on behalf of the Nashville‐Davidson Urbanized Area, Murfreesboro Urbanized Area, and the Urban Areas of Lebanon, Fairview, Portland, Spring Hill, and White House. While specific revenues and expenditures for each of the region’s STP accounts has been identified for the period of this TIP, those accounts for the 2025 and 2035 planning horizons of the 2035 Regional Transportation Plan have been combined into one, single pot of urban STP revenue as the MPO assumes these individual funding allocations will be collapsed in the future as the geographies of the census‐defined areas are merged due to urban growth. The following presents the anticipated levels of funding for each category of investment available over the three planning horizons of the 2035 regional plan, beginning with the FY 2011‐ 2015 Transportation Improvement Program. Please note that the new investment strategy applies only to funding available after the MPO fulfills its commitment to existing TIP projects. U‐STP Investment Strategy – Revenue Distribution by Horizon Year Category
Target
Multi‐Modal Roadway Capacity & Safety Active Transportation Enhancements Public Transportation/ Mass Transit System Management & Operations TOTAL URBAN STP
70% 15% 10% 5% 100%
2011‐2015* $11,448000 $2,500,000 $1,650,000 $825,000 $16,423,000*
2016‐2025
2026‐2035
$ 168,919,239 $ 36,196,980 $ 24,131,320 $ 12,065,660 $ 241,313,199
$ 227,013,332 $ 48,645,714 $ 32,430,476 $ 16,215,238 $ 324,304,760
*FY 11-15 revenues available after prior commitments are funded.
The following provides an overview of the primary objective of and method of administration for each of the investment categories.
NASHVILLE AREA MPO FY 2011-2015 TIP - ADOPTED DECEMBER 15, 2010
17
Active Transportation and Walkable Communities Objective:
The MPO will program at least 15% of its future allocation of Urbanized Area Surface Transportation Program funding to projects that proactively address goals for walkable communities and increased active transportation choices to respond to mounting challenges related to energy costs, health and environmental concerns, and the efficient use of land resources. Investments in the non‐motorized modes will help increase accessibility to transit, provide safe and reliable transportation choices for trips of short distances, promote physical activity, and encourage infill and redevelopment of existing centers and corridors that may already have reached or be nearing the expected capacity on the supporting roadway infrastructure.
Eligibility:
Any project that meets the federal requirements of the Surface Transportation Program that improves or expands infrastructure to accommodate non‐motorized modes of transportation shall be eligible including sidewalks, bicycle lanes, shared lanes, transit stop amenities, bicyclist and pedestrian amenities, pedestrian crossings, intersection upgrades, greenways, etc. Funding may be used to implement a stand‐alone project or supplement an existing project to ensure the inclusion of non‐motorized modes (e.g., adding sidewalks to a road widening project). Highest priority will be given to the projects that address needs identified by the MPO’s recently completed regional bicycle and pedestrian study. Further details about application process and project scoring will be developed in coordination with the MPO’s Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee and TCC.
Process:
Urban Surface Transportation Program funds will be programmed to be used explicitly for the purposes of improving walking and bicycling opportunities and safety throughout the area. Within 6‐months of the adoption of the multi‐year Transportation Improvement Program, the MPO will announce a call for projects to solicit project ideas. Candidate projects will be scored, ranked, and prioritized by MPO staff working alongside the MPO’s BPAC. Grant awards will be made to the selected projects after endorsement by the TCC and adoption by the Executive Board. Projects that are selected for funding will be amended into the TIP. All TIP policies related to local matching requirements, construction funding availability, and project tracking will apply.
Public Transportation and Mass Transit Objective:
To enhance the revenue already made available by grant programs through the Federal Transit Administration for transit projects, The MPO will program at least 10% of its future allocation of Federal Highway Administration Urbanized Area Surface Transportation Program funding to projects that proactively address goals for increased public transportation service and the expansion of a safe and convenient regional mass transit system. Investments in transit infrastructure will 1) assist the region in expanding the capacity of the transportation system, particularly in areas with constrained corridors; 2) ensure that citizens and visitors without access to a personal automobile, either by choice or circumstance, have reliable transportation to access the local economy, educational and employment opportunities, and medical services; 3) address mounting challenges related to energy costs, health and environmental concerns, and the efficient use of land resources; and 4) stimulate economic development opportunities that keep the region competitive with a changing national and global economy.
Eligibility:
Any project that meets the federal requirements of the Surface Transportation Program that improves or expands infrastructure to accommodate existing or future transit service or promotes or implements various other transportation demand management strategies such as
NASHVILLE AREA MPO FY 2011-2015 TIP - ADOPTED DECEMBER 15, 2010
18
ridesharing, telecommuting, etc. shall be eligible. Funding may be used to conduct transit alternatives analyses for regionally significant transit projects, implement a stand‐alone transit project, or supplement an existing project to ensure the inclusion of the appropriate transit accommodations. Highest priority will be given to the projects that help implement the regional vision for mass transit as identified by the MPO’s 2035 Regional Transportation Plan. Further details about application process and project scoring will be developed in coordination with the MPO’s transit working group and the TCC. Process:
Urban Surface Transportation Program funds will be programmed to be used explicitly for the purposes of improving transit and transportation demand management opportunities throughout the area. Within 6‐months of the adoption of the multi‐year Transportation Improvement Program, the MPO will announce a call for projects to solicit project ideas. Candidate projects will be scored, ranked, and prioritized by MPO staff working alongside the MPO’s transit working group. Grant awards will be made to the selected projects after endorsement by the TCC and adoption by the Executive Board. Projects that are selected for funding will be amended into the TIP. All TIP policies related to local matching requirements, construction funding availability, and project tracking will apply.
System Management and Operations Objective:
The MPO will program at least 5% of its future allocation of Urbanized Area Surface Transportation Program funding to projects that improve the management or operations of the existing transportation system including roadways, transit, and non‐motorized modes of transportation.
Eligibility:
Any project that meets the federal requirements of the Surface Transportation Program that improves or the region’s ability to effectively manage and operate a multi‐modal transportation system through the use of technology, signage, lighting, or incident management strategies shall be eligible. Funding may be used to implement a stand‐alone project or supplement an existing project. Highest priority will be given to the projects that address needs identified by the MPO’s ITS master plan and any other MPO plan or study that addresses system management and operations needs. Further details about application process and project scoring will be developed in coordination with the TCC.
Process:
Urban Surface Transportation Program funds will be programmed to be used explicitly for the purposes of improving system efficiency through projects that use technology or intelligent transportation systems, signage, lighting, or incident management strategies. Within 6‐months of the adoption of the multi‐year Transportation Improvement Program, the MPO will announce a call for projects to solicit project ideas. Candidate projects will be scored, ranked, and prioritized by MPO staff working alongside the MPO’s TCC and ITS working group. Grant awards will be made to the selected projects after endorsement by the TCC and adoption by the Executive Board. Projects that are selected for funding will be amended into the TIP. All TIP policies related to local matching requirements, construction funding availability, and project tracking will apply.
Multi-Modal Roadway Capacity and Safety Objective:
The MPO will program approximately 70% of its future allocation of Urbanized Area Surface Transportation Program funding to projects that expand the multi‐modal capacity of the regional roadway system in order to manage congestion, accommodate a growing population, and to address goals for increased safety and security.
NASHVILLE AREA MPO FY 2011-2015 TIP - ADOPTED DECEMBER 15, 2010
19
Eligibility:
Any project that meets the federal requirements of the Surface Transportation Program that improves or expands a specific roadway, intersection, or interchange to increase multi‐modal capacity or roadway safety shall be eligible including roadway widening, new roadways, roadway reconstruction and realignment, ITS upgrades, multi‐modal upgrades, intersection and interchange improvements, bridge repair and replacement, etc. Highest priority will be given to the projects that address the MPO’s primary project evaluation criteria including 1) system preservation and enhancement, 2) quality growth, sustainable development, and economic prosperity, 3) multi‐modal options, 4) congestion management, 5) safety and security, 6) freight and goods movement, 7) health and environment, 8) project history and prior commitment.
Process:
Urban Surface Transportation Program funds will be programmed on general roadway projects with the adoption of the multi‐year Transportation Improvement Program. Prior to the adoption of a new TIP, the MPO will announce a call for projects to solicit project ideas. Candidate projects will be scored, ranked, and prioritized by MPO staff working alongside the MPO’s TCC. Grant awards will be made to the selected projects after endorsement by the TCC and adoption by the Executive Board. All TIP policies related to local matching requirements, construction funding availability, and project tracking will apply.
3.4 Ongoing Maintenance & Operations Costs In addition to the growth and improvements of the transportation network, the MPO and its members must also ensure the maintenance and efficient operation of the existing roadway and public transit infrastructure. Maintenance activities are those that occur primarily in reaction to situations that have an immediate or imminent adverse impact on the safety or availability of transportation facilities such as pavement resurfacing and markings, bridge repair, guardrail and sign replacement and traffic signal maintenance. Operations may include more routine items such as painting and right of way maintenance. While these activities are not funded through or scheduled in the TIP, they are included here for information purposes. The varied and complex systems used to maintain the regional transportation network are difficult to quantify and present. Each jurisdiction and agency has unique methods of accounting for these activities. They may also have varying goals and priorities they are seeking to achieve. In order to provide a clearer picture of the efforts undertaken, the MPO will act as a reporting agency for these activities through the TIP. Table 2 presents the estimated costs incurred by each MPO jurisdictions involved in the operations and maintenance of transportation infrastructure. Each MPO member is responsible for ensuring that the local share of operations and maintenance activities is provided for through the local budget process.
NASHVILLE AREA MPO FY 2011-2015 TIP - ADOPTED DECEMBER 15, 2010
20
Table 2. Annual Cost of Maintenance and Operations Jurisdiction/ Agency Roadway System Metro Nashville-Davidson County Rutherford County La Vergne Smyrna Murfreesboro Sumner County Hendersonville Gallatin Goodlettsville Millersville White House Williamson County Brentwood Fairview Franklin Wilson County Mt. Juliet Lebanon Springfield Spring Hill Portland Public Transit System Regional Transportation Authority Nashville MTA Franklin Transit Authority Murfreesboro Rover
Annual Costs* $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
96,677,001 48,344,375 9,788,880 892,588 1,137,412 4,115,018 3,203,956 790,578 610,020 553,914 294,809 982,356 10,868,720 1,780,993 277,365 1,493,936 6,601,735 387,638 1,198,618 2,056,522 249,925 1,047,643 49,916,553 7,000,946 40,804,000 1,106,809 1,004,799
*Estimates based on recent local annual budgets.
NASHVILLE AREA MPO FY 2011-2015 TIP - ADOPTED DECEMBER 15, 2010
21
3.5 Funding Tables Table 3. FY 2011-2015 TDOT Program Funds Funding Program Total Amount Programmed BRR-L (Bridge Replacement & Rehabilitation - Local) BRR-S (Bridge Replacement & Rehabilitation - State) DEMO (Section 115) ENH (Enhancement Grants) HPP (High Priority Projects) HSIP (Highway Safety Improvement Program) IM (Interstate Maintenance) ITS (Intelligent Transportation Systems) NHS (National Highway System) PLHD (Public Lands Highways) S-CMAQ (State Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality) STP (State Surface Transportation Program) STP-S (STP Safety Set Asdie) State (inlcudes matching amounts for federal funds)
FY 2011
FY 2012
FY 2013
FY 2014
FY 2015**
TOTAL
$
200,993,462
$
74,123,328
$
72,943,112
$
17,669,179
n/a
$
$
408,000
$
408,000
$
408,000
$
408,000
n/a
$
1,632,000
$
3,240,000
$
3,240,000
$
3,240,000
$
3,240,000
n/a
$
12,960,000
$
354,172
$
n/a
$
354,172
$
5,306,875
$
2,563,438
$
2,000,000
$
$
18,731,062
$
640,430
$
504,000
$
$
6,570,000
$
1,800,000
$
1,800,000
$
$
65,403,000
$
31,005,000
$
47,002,500
$
-
2,000,000
n/a
$
11,870,313
n/a
$
19,875,492
1,800,000
n/a
$
11,970,000
1,305,000
n/a
$
144,715,500
n/a
$
1,891,073
n/a
$
7,784,000
-
1,891,073
$ $
$
4,023,107
$
-
$
-
$
-
n/a
$
4,023,107
$
568,802
$
-
$
-
$
-
n/a
$
568,802
$
26,667,142
37,809,270
$
62,446,229
$ $ $
4,513,168 29,153,292
800,000
$
-
5,384,000
$
-
$
$
800,000
$
-
$
$
-
$
365,729,081
$
$
3,200,480
$
$
266,400
$
$
13,721,732
$
800,000
3,428,480 4,687,699
n/a
$
n/a
$
266,400
n/a
$
110,008,952
*Funds are only programmed if corresponding revenue is anticipated by TDOT, **No funds programmed in FY 2015 for TDOT.
NASHVILLE AREA MPO FY 2011-2015 TIP - ADOPTED DECEMBER 15, 2010
22
Table 4. FY 2011-2015 MPO Funds: FHWA Grant Revenues Opening Balance*
Grant Program Total Revenue STP Nash-Davidson UZA STP Murfreesboro UZA STP Lebanon** STP Spring Hill** STP Fairview** STP Portland** STP White House** CMAQ
FY 2011 Allocation
FY 2012 Allocation
FY 2013 Allocation
FY 2014 Allocation
FY 2015 Allocation
Total Revenue
$
77,766,914
$
27,867,677
$
21,408,764
$
22,349,297
$
21,602,189
$
20,586,805
$
191,581,646
$
63,059,849
$
14,972,607
$
15,421,785
$
15,884,439
$
16,360,972
$
16,851,801
$
142,551,453
$
10,302,617
$
2,310,829
$
2,380,154
$
2,451,558
$
2,525,105
$
2,600,858
$
22,571,122
$
1,389,339
$
$
347,335
$
357,755
$
2,094,429
$
1,313,746
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
328,437
$
338,290
$
1,980,472
$
486,114
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
121,529
$
125,174
$
732,817
$
612,637
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
153,159
$
157,754
$
923,550
$
602,612
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
150,653
$
155,173
$
908,438
$
1,615,000
$
$
19,819,366
$
-
$
-
$
10,584,241
$
-
$
3,606,825
-
$
4,013,300
-
*Opening balance includes unobligated funds from prior years. **STP allocated by TDOT in four-year cycles.
Table 5. FY 2011-2015 MPO Funds: FHWA Grant Expenditures Grant Program Total Amount Programmed STP Nash-Davidson UZA STP Murfreesboro UZA STP Lebanon STP Spring Hill STP Fairview STP Portland STP White House CMAQ
FY 2011
FY 2012
FY 2013
$
90,726,134
$
11,284,659
$
$
69,248,055
$
4,678,584
$
7,988,320
$
2,868,000
$
894,454
$
131,250
$
$
1,135,966
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
-
$
$ $
272,486
$
602,612
$
$
10,584,241
$
3,606,825
FY 2014
10,433,300
$
$
660,000
$
5,760,000
$
FY 2015
TOTAL
5,491,000
$
1,500,000
$
500,000
$
1,500,000
$
2,720,000
$
-
$
656,000
-
$
-
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
602,612
$
-
$
19,819,366
4,013,300
$
1,615,000
$
119,435,093
$
76,586,639
-
$
19,336,320
$
-
$
1,681,704
$
-
$
1,135,966
NASHVILLE AREA MPO FY 2011-2015 TIP - ADOPTED DECEMBER 15, 2010
272,486
23
Table 6. FY 2011-2015 MPO Funds: FHWA Unprogrammed Revenues Grant Program
FY 2011
Remaining Balance* STP Nash-Davidson UZA STP Murfreesboro UZA STP Lebanon STP Spring Hill STP Fairview STP Portland STP White House CMAQ
FY 2012
FY 2013
FY 2014
FY 2015
$
14,908,457
$
25,032,562
$
36,948,559
$
53,059,749
$
72,146,553
$
8,784,401
$
19,527,602
$
34,752,041
$
50,613,013
$
65,964,814
$
4,625,126
$
4,137,280
$
828,838
$
633,944
$
3,234,802
$
494,885
$
363,635
$
363,635
$
54,970
$
412,725
$
177,780
$
177,780
$
177,780
$
506,217
$
844,506
$
486,114
$
486,114
$
486,114
$
607,643
$
732,817
$
340,151
$
340,151
$
340,151
$
493,310
$
651,064
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
150,653
$
305,826
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
* Annual cumulative balance.
Table 7. FY 2011-2015 MPO Funds: FHWA Construction Reserves & Balances Grant Program
FY 2011 to FY 2015
STP Nash-Davidson UZA Unprogrammed Funds STP Nash-Davidson UZA Construction Reserve STP Nash-Davidson UZA Remaining Balance
$
65,964,814
$
65,486,922
$
477,892
STP Murfreesboro UZA Unprogrammed Funds STP Murfreesboro UZA Construction Reserve STP Murfreesboro UZA Remaining Balance
$
3,234,802
$
2,000,000
$
1,234,802
NASHVILLE AREA MPO FY 2011-2015 TIP - ADOPTED DECEMBER 15, 2010
24
Table 8. FY 2011-2015 MPO Funds: FTA Grant Revenues Opening Balance*
Grant Program Total Revenue 5307 Nash-Davidson UZA 5307 Murfreesboro UZA 5316 Nash-Davidson UZA 5317 Nash-Davidson UZA
$ $
4,917,973 -
FY 2011 Allocation
FY 2012 Allocation
FY 2013 Allocation
FY 2014 Allocation
FY 2015 Allocation
Total Revenue
$
14,402,535
$
14,868,994
$
18,888,335
$
19,457,185
$
20,040,901
$
92,575,922
$
11,683,802
$
12,034,316
$
16,000,000
$
16,480,000
$
16,974,400
$
73,172,518
$
4,000,000
$
2,006,160
$
2,066,345
$
2,128,335
$
2,192,185
$
2,257,951
$
14,650,975
$
539,887
$
440,113
$
455,000
$
470,000
$
485,000
$
499,550
$
2,889,550
$
378,086
$
272,461
$
313,333
$
290,000
$
300,000
$
309,000
$
1,862,880
*Opening balance includes unobligated funds from prior years.
Table 9. FY 2011-2015 MPO Funds: FTA Grant Expenditures Grant Program Total Amount Programmed 5307 Nash-Davidson UZA 5307 Murfreesboro UZA 5316 Nash-Davidson UZA 5317 Nash-Davidson UZA
FY 2011
FY 2012
FY 2013
FY 2014
FY 2015
TOTAL
$
18,272,407
$
13,683,220
$
15,724,643
$
16,873,850
$
3,450,000
$
68,004,120
$
11,676,110
$
11,393,162
$
13,397,265
$
14,474,451
$
3,450,000
$
54,390,988
$
4,965,750
$
1,521,725
$
1,567,378
$
1,614,399
$
$
9,669,252
$
980,000
$
455,000
$
470,000
$
485,000
$
2,390,000
$
650,547
$
313,333
$
290,000
$
300,000
$
1,553,880
-
Table 10. FY 2011-2015 MPO Funds: FTA Unprogrammed Revenues Grant Program Remaining Balance 5307 Nash-Davidson UZA 5307 Murfreesboro UZA 5316 Nash-Davidson UZA 5317 Nash-Davidson UZA
FY 2011
FY 2012
FY 2013
FY 2014
FY 2015
$
10,703
$
1,196,477
$
4,360,169
$
6,943,504
$
7,151,809
$
7,692
$
648,846
$
3,251,581
$
5,257,130
$
5,414,844
$
3,011
$
547,631
$
1,108,588
$
1,686,374
$
1,736,965
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
NASHVILLE AREA MPO FY 2011-2015 TIP - ADOPTED DECEMBER 15, 2010
25
4.0 Amendment & Modification Process 4.1 Formal Amendments Changes to an approved TIP are documented by either an amendment or an administrative modification. Amendments are intended to document major changes to the TIP and require state review and federal approval. The following list contains some typical examples of changes requiring an amendment to the TIP. A TIP amendment which requires MPO Executive Board approval: •
Adding a new project to a TIP, regardless if the project has been in a previous TIP or not.
•
Deleting a programmed project from the period of the TIP.
•
Adding new, unprogrammed funds regardless of the source. The term “unprogrammed funds” means any remaining portion of allocated funds that have not been identified for use in a particular project or any additional funds not currently identified in the TIP.
•
Increasing the cost of any phase of any project listed in the current TIP by more than 30 %.
•
Changing a project description/scope or introducing any other change that is inconsistent with the NEPA documentation or will alter the NEPA determination. Examples include: changing the number of through lanes, adding or deleting non‐motorized facilities, changing mode (FTA rolling stock or facility type), changing capital category (FTA), and changing project termini/length.
•
Changing a project description/scope or introducing any other change that alters the approved Air Quality conformity finding.
•
Moving a project from year to year within a TIP period if the move crosses an Air Quality Horizon year.
Major amendments to the Transportation Improvement Program such as those mentioned above are required to follow a public input process. All TIP Amendments shall follow the procedures outlined below: 1. The Technical Coordinating Committee shall review and endorse the Transportation Improvement Program Amendment for consideration by the Executive Board. The Executive Board shall then review, amend if necessary and concur with the Transportation Improvement Program for public review and comment. 2. After concurrence by the Executive Board of the Transportation Improvement Program, the MPO shall publish the Transportation Improvement Program Amendment and place copies in public libraries in the region. These copies must be distributed to the libraries a minimum of twenty‐one (21) days prior to final consideration and adoption by the Executive Board. 3. A notice stating that the Executive Board has endorsed a Transportation Improvement Program Amendment for public review and comment shall be placed in the notice newspapers listed in the Public Participation Plan of the MPO. The notice shall specify the dates, times and location of forthcoming public hearings. Similar press releases shall be furnished to all news organizations registered with the Transportation Planning Coordinator. Special efforts shall be made to provide information on the Transportation Improvement Program to media and organizations serving the low‐income and minority populations in the region. This notice and press release shall be published/mailed a minimum of
NASHVILLE AREA MPO FY 2011-2015 TIP - ADOPTED DECEMBER 15, 2010
26
twenty‐one (21) days prior to the meeting at which the Transportation Improvement Program Amendment will be considered by the Executive Board. 4. A public hearing shall be held by the Technical Coordinating Committee following the Executive Board’s endorsement of the Transportation Improvement Program Amendment. Comments received at this public hearing shall be provided to the Executive Board prior to the final public hearing. 5. A final public hearing shall be held by the Executive Board prior to voting on the Transportation Improvement Program Amendment. 6. At the public meetings the MPO Director shall report to the Board all comments received in writing prior to the meetings. 7. The public shall be afforded the opportunity for comment at the public meetings. The Executive Board may establish reasonable time limits for each presentation, considering the time constraints of the meeting and complexity of the issue. 8. At the time of adoption of the amendment by the Executive Board, the MPO Director/staff shall request that TDOT include the amendment into the STIP.
4.2 Administrative Modifications Administrative modifications can be used to document minor changes to the TIP. The following is a list of some typical changes to projects requiring a modification to the TIP. All administrative modifications as described below will NOT require MPO Executive Board approval and will be handled by MPO staff. The following are examples of changes that can be accomplished through the administrative modification process: •
Adding a prior phase to a programmed project.
•
Moving funds between programmed projects without exceeding 30% of any affected phase.
•
Moving a project from year to year within a TIP period provided that, in air quality non‐attainment and maintenance areas, the move does not cross an Air Quality Horizon year.
•
Changing a project description/scope if the change does not necessitate revising the NEPA documentation or will not alter the NEPA determination or in air quality non‐attainment and maintenance areas, the change does not require a new Air Quality conformity finding.
•
Once the Administrative Modification need has been identified, MPO staff will perform the TIP modification and request that TDOT include the modification into the STIP.
4.3 Funding for Roadway Construction MPO TIP Policy #9, detailed in Section 2.2 of this document, establishes that construction funding will be made available to MPO‐managed roadway improvement projects after the completion of the preliminary engineering phase. The intent of the policy is to facilitate the timely delivery of projects and to prevent the lapse of obligation authority provided by Congress to the state and MPO. This approach assists in the management of federal funds by providing a realistic construction cost estimate and implementation schedule, thus preventing large amounts of funding from being held up on delayed projects. In order to ensure the availability of MPO‐managed federal grant funds for projects ready for construction, the MPO will hold at least 80% of the amount of funding needed for construction on projects programmed in the TIP
NASHVILLE AREA MPO FY 2011-2015 TIP - ADOPTED DECEMBER 15, 2010
27
(which have not completed PE) as unprogrammed, reserve funds. Funding will be programmed on projects in the TIP after the completion of the PE phase on a first come, first serve basis as funding is available. In order to be eligible for MPO‐managed federal grant funds for a construction phase, the project sponsor must submit a construction cost estimate at the time of the MPO’s call‐for‐projects associated with the development of a new TIP. If the project is selected for funding, the MPO’s federal share of the construction costs will be shown as “illustrative” until the PE phase has been completed. Should the construction cost estimate identified after the completion of PE exceed the original estimate by 10% or more, the project sponsor must find an alternative source of revenue, make a special request to the MPO Executive Board for the additional funding, or compete for the additional funding as part of the MPO’s next call‐ for‐projects. In such competition, priority will be given to viable projects previously programmed in the TIP, per Policy 7. Appendix B includes a list of projects that have met the programming requirements for construction funds held in reserve.
4.4 Transferring (Flexing) Funds among Programs SAFETEA‐LU provides considerable flexibility in the use of FHWA and FTA funds for either highway or transit projects. All of these transportation acts permitted the transfer of funds from FHWA to FTA and vice versa. Funds transferred to or from FHWA or FTA can only be used for purposes that would have been eligible in the original funding category from which the funds were transferred. Throughout the TIP, several projects include a note indicating that funds may be “flexed.” This notation is shown to allow the flexing of funds as described above when projects get underway. In most cases, funds are flexed in order to make them more readily accessible to the implementing agency.
4.5 Projects Identified at the State-Level Any regionally significant project located within the boundary of the MPO and funded with federal, state, local, or private transportation funds must be included in the TIP regardless of who controls the funding. Before the preparation of a new TIP/STIP, the Nashville Area MPO will submit to TDOT a list of their priorities for proposed projects on State‐controlled facilities located within the planning boundary which are to be developed with federal funds allotted for state‐wide use. When the proposed state annual work program is finalized, TDOT will provide the MPO with a list of all such projects, located within the MPO boundary, that have been included in the proposed state annual work program. So that these projects may proceed, TDOT will request that the MPO include these projects in their TIP in the same manner as MPO‐initiated projects. Similarly during the period of the TIP, changes may be necessary to some of the state‐wide funded projects which have been included in the TIP. When this occurs, TDOT will inform the MPO of the needed change and request that the MPO take the appropriate action to amend or adjust the TIP as required.
4.6 Funding Sources for New Projects and Cost Increases Federal Law requires that the TIP be financially constrained to the amount of funds that have been projected to be available by year, over the length of the approved TIP. This means that the cost of projects identified for each year cannot exceed the amount of funds expected to be available for that year. Some examples of funding sources for new projects that are amended into the TIP include but are not limited to, one or more of the following:
NASHVILLE AREA MPO FY 2011-2015 TIP - ADOPTED DECEMBER 15, 2010
28
1. Funds from new appropriations or allocations of federal funds that were not available when the TIP was developed. 2. Funds included in the projected revenue for the appropriate TIP year, but left unprogrammed when the TIP was developed. 3. Funds coming from the deletion or deferral of another individual project appearing in the appropriate year of the TIP. 4. Funds coming from reductions to the cost estimates for another project or projects appearing in the appropriate year of the TIP. •
Cost increases on projects appearing in the current TIP can be financed by funds from any of the four (4) sources described previously. Acquiring funds by reducing the cost estimates for another project(s) as described above in the number 4 option can generally be accomplished by an administrative modification, as can the acquisition of funds from the deferral of another project in a few circumstances. All other actions described above would require an amendment.
•
Cost increases on projects appearing only in a previous TIP can also be financed by funds from any of the four (4) sources described above. A TIP amendment, however, would be required to accomplish any of the actions described above since the project needing additional funds must be amended back into the current TIP in the same manner as a new project.
MPO TIP Policy #12, detailed in Section 2.2 of this document, establishes that in cases where a project that is awarded MPO‐managed federal grant funds does not have sufficient funding to fulfill the scope of the project as originally programmed, the project sponsor may be granted the flexibility to shift funding across phases and/or years (pending the availability of funding) to cover increased cost estimates for the affected phase. Should additional funding be required to implement the phase, the project sponsor will be responsible for securing that additional funding from an alternative source of revenue or compete for additional funds at the next available MPO call‐for‐projects. In such competition, priority will be given to viable projects previously programmed in the TIP (see Policy 7). The responsibility for any cost over‐run on a project already under contract shall be determined by the prevailing contractual agreement between TDOT and the project sponsor. Such contractual agreement shall not bind the MPO to pay for cost‐overruns with MPO‐managed federal grant funds. The project sponsor may shift funding across phases and/or years (pending the availability of funding) to cover increased costs, however, should additional funding be required to conduct the programmed phase, the project sponsor will be responsible for securing that additional funding from an alternative source of revenue or compete for additional funds at the next available MPO call‐for‐projects. In such competition, priority will be given to viable projects previously programmed in the TIP (see Policy 7).
NASHVILLE AREA MPO FY 2011-2015 TIP - ADOPTED DECEMBER 15, 2010
29
5.0 TIP Projects
NASHVILLE AREA MPO FY 2011-2015 TIP - ADOPTED DECEMBER 15, 2010
30
FY 2011-2015 Transportation Improvement Program ID# 2002-028
LRTP 1052-177 Lead Agency
ID# 2002-029
Total $4,312,500.00
2011
PE-D
LOCAL
$14,375.00
2011
ROW/UTILITIES
U-STP
$4,702,085.00
$3,761,668.00
$940,417.00
2012
CONST
U-RSV
$2,875,000.00
$2,300,000.00
$575,000.00
LRTP 1052-180
Type Intersection
Hendersonville
Federal $3,450,000.00
Total $12,565,325
County Sumner Funding U-STP
Total $4,075,117.00
Federal $3,260,094.00
2012
CONST
U-STP
$2,329,668.00
$1,863,734.00
Type Pedestrian
Metro Nashville
LRTP 1017-192 Year 2011
Funding U-STP
Phase CONST Type ITS
Federal $264,000.00
Local $66,000.00
Route 21st Avenue Area Sidewalks Total $280,734.00
Total $708,750 Federal $208,734.00
State
County Davidson Funding U-STP
Type Wayfinding
Metro Nashville
Local
Total $1,378,125.00
Total $1,381,875 Federal $1,102,500.00
State
Local $275,625.00
Route Increased Guidance for Improved Mobility County Davidson
Total $600,000
Year 2011
Phase CONST
Funding U-STP
Total $441,000.00
Federal $352,800.00
2011
PE-D
U-STP
$110,250.00
$88,200.00
FY 2011-2015 TIP PROJECTS: Tuesday, December 21, 2010
State
Route Arterial CCTV
Metro Nashville
LRTP 1017-193 Lead Agency
Total $330,000.00
Total $1,397,135
County Davidson Funding ENH
Phase CONST
Local $815,023.00 $465,934.00
County Williamson
Phase CONST
Lead Agency
State
Route Franklin Traffic Operations Center
Franklin
LRTP 1016-188 Year 2011
Type ITS
Local $862,500.00
Route Walton Ferry Road at West Main Street Re-Alignment - Phase 1
Phase ROW
LRTP 1067-144
State
$14,375.00
Year 2011
Lead Agency
ID# 2004-004
Total $12,624,690
Funding U-RSV
Year 2011
ID# 2004-001
County Sumner
Phase CONST
Lead Agency
ID# 2002-038
Hendersonville
Route Rockland Road/Imperial Boulevard
Year 2011
Lead Agency
ID# 2002-032
Type New Roadway
State
Local $88,200.00 $22,050.00 Page 1 of 40
FY 2011-2015 Transportation Improvement Program ID# 2004-005
LRTP 1014-260 Lead Agency
ID# 2004-007
Total $250,000.00
Federal
2012
ROW
U-STP
$159,862.00
$127,890.00
$31,973.00
2013
CONST
U-RSV
$991,148.00
$792,918.00
$198,230.00
LRTP 1017-194
Type ITS
State
Local $250,000.00
Route Traffic Management Center
Metro Nashville
County Davidson
Total $1,120,000
Year 2011
Phase CONST
Funding U-STP
Total $463,050.00
Federal $370,440.00
2011
PE-D
U-STP
$210,500.00
$168,400.00
$42,100.00
2011
PE-N
U-STP
$10,000.00
$8,000.00
$2,000.00
LRTP 1017-195
Type ITS
Metro Nashville
County Davidson Funding U-RSV
Total $1,067,062.50
Federal $853,650.00
2011
PE-D
U-STP
$5,000.00
$4,000.00
Year 2011
Type Pedestrian
Springfield
LRTP 1047-279 Lead Agency
Type ITS
Federal $542,845.00
State
Local $135,711.25
Route Central Business District Sidewalks Total $151,975.00
Total $1,601,424 Federal $121,580.00
State
Local $30,395.00
Route CCTV and Traffic Signal Interconnect
Murfreesboro
FY 2011-2015 TIP PROJECTS: Tuesday, December 21, 2010
Total $678,556.25
Total $1,725,250
County Robertson Funding U-STP
Phase CONST
Local $213,412.50 $1,000.00
County Davidson Funding U-STP
Phase CONST
State
Route Wayfinding Sign Program
Metro Nashville
LRTP 1036-278 Lead Agency Year 2011
Type ITS
Phase CONST
Local $92,610.00
Total $1,700,000
Phase CONST
LRTP 1017-196
State
Route Traffic Signal Communication Provision and Upgrade
Year 2011
Year 2011
ID# 2004-014
Total $1,402,010
Funding LOCAL
Lead Agency
ID# 2004-010
County Davidson
Phase PE-D
Lead Agency
ID# 2004-009
Metro Nashville
Route Jefferson Street
Year 2011
Lead Agency
ID# 2004-008
Type Intersection
County Rutherford Funding M-STP
Total $241,000.00
Total $1,241,000 Federal $192,800.00
State
Local $48,200.00 Page 2 of 40
FY 2011-2015 Transportation Improvement Program ID# 2004-019
LRTP 1051-268 Lead Agency Year 2011
ID# 2004-020
LRTP 1054-280
Funding U-STP Type Intersection
Portland
Total $202,650.00
Total $208,900 Federal $162,120.00
State
Local $40,530.00
Route SR-109 @ Kirby Drive County Sumner
Total $665,845
Funding L-STP
Total $65,477.00
Federal $52,382.00
2011
PE-D
L-STP
$106,317.00
$85,054.00
$21,263.00
2011
PE-N
L-STP
$11,813.00
$9,450.00
$2,363.00
2011
ROW
L-STP
$157,000.00
$125,600.00
$31,400.00
LRTP 1054-280
Type Intersection
Portland
Phase CONST
LRTP 1036-274 Lead Agency
State
County Sumner Funding U-STP
Type Pedestrian
White House
Total $325,238.00
Total $665,845 Federal $260,190.00
State
County Robertson
Total $765,811
Funding L-STP
Total $331,370.00
Federal $265,096.00
State $66,274.00
2011
CONST
U-RSV
$247,441.00
$197,953.00
$49,488.00
2011
PE-D
L-STP
$187,000.00
$149,600.00
$6,000.00
Type Road Widening
Spring Hill/TDOT Funding L-STP
Total $851,975.00
Federal $681,580.00
2011
PE-N
L-STP
$567,983.00
$454,386.00
Year
Type Road Widening
TDOT
Phase
FY 2011-2015 TIP PROJECTS: Tuesday, December 21, 2010
State
Local $170,395.00 $113,597.00
Route SR-253 (Concord Road) County Williamson
Funding
$31,400.00
Total $16,000,000
Phase PE-D
LRTP 1062-346
Local
Route SR-247 (Duplex Road) County Williamson
Year 2011
Lead Agency
Local $65,048.00
Route SR-76 Sidewalks
Phase CONST
LRTP 1062-170
Local $13,095.00
Route SR-109 at Kirby Drive
Year 2011
Lead Agency
ID# 2004-058
County Sumner
Phase CONST
Year 2011
ID# 2004-051
Route Cartwright Parkway Extension
Year 2011
Lead Agency
ID# 2004-022
Millersville
Phase CONST
Lead Agency
ID# 2004-020b
Type New Roadway
Total
Total $20,500,000 Federal
State
Local Page 3 of 40
FY 2011-2015 Transportation Improvement Program 2011 ID# 2004-066
ROW/UTILITIES
LRTP 1012-229 Lead Agency Year 2012
ID# 2005-006
ID# 2005-007
LRTP 1045-332
$3,120,000.00
$780,000.00
Route I-65/I-24 County Davidson
Funding IM Type Transit Operatin
Murfreesboro Public Transit
Total $33,000,000.00
Total $40,000,000 Federal $29,700,000.00
State $3,300,000.00
Local
Route 5307 Urban Operating for Rover Public Transit - Relax & Ride Service Total $1,943,689
County Rutherford
Phase OPERATIONS
Funding 5307
Total $792,076.00
Federal $396,038.00
State $198,019.00
Local $198,019.00
2012
OPERATIONS
5307
$376,993.00
$188,497.00
$94,248.00
$94,248.00
2013
OPERATIONS
5307
$383,803.00
$191,902.00
$95,951.00
$95,951.00
2014
OPERATIONS
5307
$390,817.00
$195,409.00
$97,704.00
$97,704.00
LRTP 1045-333
Type Transit Operatin
Murfreesboro Public Transit
Route 5307 Urban Operating for Rover Public Transit - MCHRA Contract County Rutherford
Total $647,766
Year 2011
Phase OPERATIONS
Funding 5307
Total $309,532.00
Federal $154,766.00
State $77,383.00
Local $77,383.00
2012
OPERATIONS
5307
$109,429.00
$54,714.00
$27,357.00
$27,357.00
2013
OPERATIONS
5307
$112,712.00
$56,356.00
$28,178.00
$28,178.00
2014
OPERATIONS
5307
$116,093.00
$58,047.00
$29,023.00
$29,023.00
LRTP 1062-159 Lead Agency Year 2011
ID# 2006-014
$3,900,000.00
Year 2011
Lead Agency
ID# 2006-013
Type Road Widening
TDOT
Phase CONST
Lead Agency
STP
Type Road Widening
Brentwood
Phase PE-D
Route Concord Road (SR-253) County Williamson
Funding LOCAL
Total $90,000.00
Total $4,790,000 Federal
State
Local $90,000.00
2011
ROW
LOCAL
$300,000.00
2011
UTILITIES
U-STP
$1,000,000.00
$800,000.00
$200,000.00
2012
CONST
U-RSV
$3,250,000.00
$2,600,000.00
$650,000.00
LRTP 1052-176 Lead Agency Year
Type Road Widening
Hendersonville
Phase
FY 2011-2015 TIP PROJECTS: Tuesday, December 21, 2010
$300,000.00
Route New Shackle Island Road (SR-258) - Phase 1 County Sumner
Funding
Total
Total $4,964,644 Federal
State
Local Page 4 of 40
FY 2011-2015 Transportation Improvement Program
ID# 2006-024
2011
CONST
U-RSV
$3,244,500.00
$2,595,600.00
$648,900.00
2011
PE-D
U-STP
$175,000.00
$140,000.00
$35,000.00
2011
ROW/UTILITIES
U-STP
$555,530.00
$444,424.00
$11,106.00
LRTP 1066-302 Lead Agency
ID# 2006-113
Phase CONST
Funding U-STP
Total $787,500.00
2011
CONST
LOCAL
$360,000.00
LRTP 1085-325
Type Transit Operatin
RTA
Federal $630,000.00
State
Local $157,500.00 $360,000.00
Route Bus Seat Guarantee County Regional
Total $750,000
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Funding CMAQ
Total $250,000.00
Federal $200,000.00
2012
IMPLEMENTATION
CMAQ
$250,000.00
$200,000.00
$50,000.00
2013
IMPLEMENTATION
CMAQ
$250,000.00
$200,000.00
$50,000.00
LRTP 1062-137 Year 2011
Type Road Widening
Franklin
State
Funding LOCAL
LRTP 1062-137
Type Road Widening
Franklin
Local $50,000.00
Route Hillsboro Rd (SR-106/US-431) Phase I County Williamson
Phase PE-D
Lead Agency
ID# 2006-124
Total $1,147,500
Year 2011
Lead Agency
ID# 2006-118
Route Franklin Greenway Bicentennial Connection County Williamson
Year 2011
Lead Agency
ID# 2006-117
Type Greenway
Franklin
Total $130,000.00
Total $4,380,000 Federal
State
Local $130,000.00
Route Hillsboro Rd (SR-106/ US-431) Phase II County Williamson
Total $25,000,000
Year 2011
Phase PE-D
Funding LOCAL
Total $3,000,000.00
2011
ROW
LOCAL
$3,000,000.00
$3,000,000.00
2012
CONST
LOCAL
$19,000,000.00
$19,000,000.00
LRTP 1011-182 Lead Agency
Type Road Widening
Metro Nashville
Federal
Local $3,000,000.00
Route Gateway Boulevard County Davidson
Total $47,000,000
Year 2011
Phase CONST
Funding U-STP
Total $32,500,000.00
Federal $26,000,000.00
2011
ROW
U-STP
$7,257,725.00
$5,806,180.00
FY 2011-2015 TIP PROJECTS: Tuesday, December 21, 2010
State
State
Local $6,500,000.00 $1,451,545.00 Page 5 of 40
FY 2011-2015 Transportation Improvement Program ID# 2006-201
LRTP 1046-298 Lead Agency Year 2011
ID# 2006-202
Phase PE-D
LRTP 1046-296 Lead Agency Year 2011
ID# 2006-203
Total $400,500.00
Total $4,325,500 Federal $320,400.00
State
Route Stones River Battlefield - Natl Park Service Interior County Rutherford
Funding PLHD
Type Greenway
Rutherford Co./Eagleville
Local $80,100.00
Total $4,023,107.00
Total $4,023,107 Federal $4,023,107.00
State
Local
Route Eagleville Bicycle and Pedestrian Trail County Rutherford
Total $200,000
Year 2011
Phase PE-D
Funding HPP
Total $28,462.00
Federal $22,770.00
2011
PE-N
HPP
$1,000.00
$800.00
$200.00
2012
CONST
HPP
$170,538.00
$136,430.00
$34,108.00
LRTP 1046-295
Type Greenway
Lead Agency
ID# 2006-401
Type New Roadway
NPS
LRTP 1046-297
Route Stones River Bicycle and Pedestrian Trail (North) County Rutherford
Funding HPP-TN146
Phase PE, ROW, CONST
Lead Agency
ID# 2006-304
Type Greenway
Murfreesboro
Smyrna
State
Local $5,692.00
Route Jefferson Springs Greenway Extension County Rutherford
Total $2,588,084
Year 2011
Phase CONST
Funding HPP
Total $1,328,084.00
Federal $1,062,467.00
2011
CONST
ENH
$400,000.00
$320,000.00
$80,000.00
2012
CONST
HPP
$630,000.00
$504,000.00
$126,000.00
2013
CONST
HPP
$630,000.00
$504,000.00
$126,000.00
LRTP 1042-271 Lead Agency
Type Road Widening
LaVergne
Local $265,617.00
Route Waldron Rd / Parthenon Pkwy County Rutherford
Total $11,303,600
Year 2011
Phase CONST
Funding LOCAL
Total $2,803,600.00
Federal
2011
CONST
M-STP
$2,500,000.00
$2,000,000.00
2011
CONST
LIC
$5,000,000.00
FY 2011-2015 TIP PROJECTS: Tuesday, December 21, 2010
State
State
Local $2,803,600.00 $500,000.00
$5,000,000.00
Page 6 of 40
FY 2011-2015 Transportation Improvement Program ID# 2006-408
LRTP 1062-160 Lead Agency
ID# 2006-411
Total $15,300,000
Funding LOCAL
Total $1,200,000.00
Federal
2015
ROW
U-STP
$2,400,000.00
$1,000,000.00
LRTP 1087-281
Type ITS
State
Route ITS-Various
TDOT
Total $7,500,000
County Davidson/Sumner
Phase OPERATIONS
Funding IM
Total $800,000.00
Federal $720,000.00
State $80,000.00
2011
UTILITIES
IM
$200,000.00
$180,000.00
$20,000.00
2012
OPERATIONS
IM
$800,000.00
$720,000.00
$80,000.00
2012
UTILITIES
IM
$200,000.00
$180,000.00
$20,000.00
LRTP 1087-281
Type ITS
County Davidson/Sumner
Total $7,500,000
Year 2013
Phase MAINTENANCE
Funding IM
Total $3,500,000.00
Federal $3,150,000.00
State $350,000.00
2013
OPERATIONS
IM
$800,000.00
$720,000.00
$80,000.00
2013
UTILITIES
IM
$200,000.00
$180,000.00
$20,000.00
2014
UTILITIES
IM
$200,000.00
$180,000.00
$20,000.00
Year 2014
Type ITS
LRTP 1053-240 Lead Agency
County Davidson/Sumner Funding IM Type Interchange
TDOT
Total $800,000.00
Total $7,500,000 Federal $720,000.00
State $80,000.00
Local
Route I-65/SR-109 Prop/SR-41 County Sumner/Robertson
Total $28,500,000
Year 2011
Phase PE-D
Funding HPP
Total $30,000.00
Federal $24,000.00
State $6,000.00
2011
PE-D
STP
$21,000.00
$16,800.00
$4,200.00
2011
PE-N
HPP
$25,000.00
$20,000.00
$5,000.00
FY 2011-2015 TIP PROJECTS: Tuesday, December 21, 2010
Local
Route ITS-Various
TDOT
Phase OPERATIONS
Local
Route ITS-Various
TDOT
LRTP 1087-281
Local $1,200,000.00 $1,400,000.00
Year 2011
Lead Agency
ID# 2006-416
County Williamson
Phase ROW
Lead Agency
ID# 2006-411c
Brentwood
Route SR-31/Franklin Road Widening
Year 2014
Lead Agency
ID# 2006-411b
Type Road Widening
Local
Page 7 of 40
FY 2011-2015 Transportation Improvement Program ID# 2006-417
LRTP 1062-113 Lead Agency
ID# 2008-11-027
Total $8,875,000
Funding HPP
Total $3,122,654.00
Federal $2,498,123.00
State $624,531.00
2011
ROW
IM
$5,500,000.00
$4,950,000.00
$550,000.00
LRTP 1011-230
Type New Roadway
Metro Nashville
Local
Route SR-255 Harding Place Extension (Phase 1) Total $11,370,000
County Davidson
Year 2011
Phase PE-D
Funding U-STP
Total $1,270,000.00
Federal $1,016,000.00
2011
PE-N
U-STP
$100,000.00
$80,000.00
$20,000.00
2012
UTILITIES
U-STP
$1,500,000.00
$1,200,000.00
$300,000.00
2013
CONST
U-RSV
$8,500,000.00
$6,800,000.00
$1,700,000.00
LRTP 1012-157 Year 2014
Type Road Widening
Metro Nashville
Phase CONST
LRTP 1014-266 Lead Agency
ID# 2008-14-059
County Williamson
Phase ROW
Lead Agency
ID# 2008-14-030
TDOT
Route I-65 Widening
Year 2011
Lead Agency
ID# 2008-12-095
Type Road Widening
State
Route McCrory Lane Widening County Davidson
Funding LOCAL Type Intersection
Metro Nashville
Local $254,000.00
Total $3,000,000.00
Total $3,000,000 Federal
State
Local $3,000,000.00
Route Various intersection improvements (FAU routes) County Davidson
Total $8,000,000
Year 2011
Phase CONST
Funding U-RSV
Total $5,000,000.00
Federal $4,000,000.00
2011
PE-D
U-STP
$856,250.00
$685,000.00
$171,250.00
2011
PE-N
U-STP
$50,000.00
$40,000.00
$10,000.00
2011
ROW
U-STP
$1,406,250.00
$1,125,000.00
$281,250.00
LRTP 1014-265 Lead Agency Year 2011
State
Local $1,000,000.00
Type Signalization/Sig Route 3rd Avenue and Union Street
Metro Nashville
Phase CONST
FY 2011-2015 TIP PROJECTS: Tuesday, December 21, 2010
County Davidson Funding HPP
Total $6,957,707.00
Total $6,957,707 Federal $5,566,166.00
State
Local $1,391,541.00
Page 8 of 40
FY 2011-2015 Transportation Improvement Program ID# 2008-14-083
LRTP 1012-108 Lead Agency
ID# 2008-14-092
Funding LOCAL
Total $32,000.00
2012
PE-N
LOCAL
$5,000.00
2013
CONST
STP-S
$333,000.00
LRTP 1014-221
Type Interchange
Metro Nashville
Federal
State
Funding LOCAL
Total $538,290.00
2013
CONST
LIC
$8,200,000.00
Type Transit
MTA
Local $32,000.00 $5,000.00
$266,400.00
$66,000.00
County Davidson
Phase PE-D
LRTP 1015-310
Total $370,000
Route I-40 / McCrory Lane Interchange - Phase 1
Year 2011
Total $8,733,290 Federal
State
Local $538,290.00
$4,000,000.00
$4,200,000.00
Route Project Administration for Grant Programs County Davidson
Total $500,000
Year 2011
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Funding 5307
Total $125,000.00
Federal $100,000.00
State $12,500.00
Local $12,500.00
2012
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$125,000.00
$100,000.00
$12,500.00
$12,500.00
2013
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$125,000.00
$100,000.00
$12,500.00
$12,500.00
2014
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$125,000.00
$100,000.00
$12,500.00
$12,500.00
LRTP 1015-311 Lead Agency
ID# 2008-15-049
County Davidson
Phase PE-D
Lead Agency
ID# 2008-15-048
Goodlettsville
Route Rivergate Parkway Safety Improvements
Year 2012
Lead Agency
ID# 2008-15-046
Type Reconstruct
Type Transit Capital
MTA
Route Service and Support Vehicles and Equipment County Davidson
Total $3,125,000
Year 2012
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Funding 5307
Total $125,000.00
Federal $100,000.00
State $12,500.00
Local $12,500.00
2013
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$875,000.00
$700,000.00
$87,500.00
$87,500.00
2014
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$875,000.00
$700,000.00
$87,500.00
$87,500.00
LRTP 1015-313 Lead Agency
Type Transit Capital
MTA
Route MTA - Administration Building Rehabilitation (Nestor) County Davidson
Total $7,215,151
Year 2011
Phase CONST
Funding LOCAL
Total $1,500,000.00
Federal
State
Local $1,500,000.00
2011
CONST
5307
$1,250,000.00
$1,000,000.00
$125,000.00
$125,000.00
FY 2011-2015 TIP PROJECTS: Tuesday, December 21, 2010
Page 9 of 40
FY 2011-2015 Transportation Improvement Program
ID# 2008-15-049b
2012
CONST
5307
$312,500.00
$250,000.00
$31,250.00
$31,250.00
2013
CONST
5307
$312,500.00
$250,000.00
$31,250.00
$31,250.00
LRTP 1015-313 Lead Agency Year 2014
ID# 2008-15-051
LRTP 1085-327
Funding 5307 Type Transit Capital
MPO
Total $312,500.00
Total $7,215,151 Federal $250,000.00
State $31,250.00
Local $31,250.00
Route ADA Service Capitalization County Regional
Total $6,720,000
Year 2011
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Funding 5307
Total $1,460,475.00
Federal $1,168,380.00
State $146,047.50
Local $146,047.50
2012
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$1,504,290.00
$1,203,432.00
$150,429.00
$150,429.00
2013
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$1,549,418.75
$1,239,535.00
$154,941.88
$154,941.88
2014
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$1,595,901.25
$1,276,721.00
$159,590.13
$159,590.13
LRTP 1015-316 Lead Agency
ID# 2008-15-054
Route MTA - Administration Building Rehabilitation (Nestor) County Davidson
Phase CONST
Lead Agency
ID# 2008-15-052
Type Transit Capital
MTA
Type Transit Capital
MTA
Route ACCESSRIDE Buses County Davidson
Total $6,800,000
Year 2011
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Funding LOCAL
Total $1,700,000.00
2012
IMPLEMENTATION
LOCAL
$1,700,000.00
$1,700,000.00
2013
IMPLEMENTATION
LOCAL
$1,700,000.00
$1,700,000.00
2014
IMPLEMENTATION
LOCAL
$1,700,000.00
$1,700,000.00
LRTP 1015-317 Lead Agency
Type Transit Capital
MTA
Federal
State
Local $1,700,000.00
Route Bus Purchase and Replacement County Davidson
Total $43,200,000
Year 2011
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Funding LOCAL
Total $10,800,000.00
2012
IMPLEMENTATION
LOCAL
$10,800,000.00
$10,800,000.00
2013
IMPLEMENTATION
LOCAL
$10,800,000.00
$10,800,000.00
2014
IMPLEMENTATION
LOCAL
$10,800,000.00
$10,800,000.00
FY 2011-2015 TIP PROJECTS: Tuesday, December 21, 2010
Federal
State
Local $10,800,000.00
Page 10 of 40
FY 2011-2015 Transportation Improvement Program ID# 2008-17-021
LRTP 1015-312 Lead Agency
ID# 2008-17-026
Total $400,000.00
Federal $320,000.00
State $40,000.00
Local $40,000.00
2013
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$1,000,000.00
$800,000.00
$100,000.00
$100,000.00
2014
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$1,000,000.00
$800,000.00
$100,000.00
$100,000.00
LRTP 1017-197
Type ITS
Route Arterial Corridor ITS Communication
Metro Nashville
County Davidson
Total $4,000,000
Year 2011
Phase PE-D
Funding U-STP
Total $1,000,000.00
Federal $800,000.00
2012
CONST
U-RSV
$3,000,000.00
$2,400,000.00
LRTP 1017-198
Type Wayfinding
Metro Nashville
Phase CONST
LRTP 1017-199 Lead Agency
Funding U-STP Type ITS
Total $1,500,000.00
Total $2,000,000 Federal $1,200,000.00
County Davidson Total $2,258,800.00
Federal $1,807,040.00
2011
PE-D
HPP
$554,000.00
$443,400.00
Type ITS
State
Local $451,760.00 $110,600.00
Route ATIS Travelers Information System, ITS Communication & CCTV
Metro Nashville
County Davidson
Total $2,363,842
Year 2011
Phase CONST
Funding ITS
Total $1,891,074.00
Federal $1,512,859.00
2011
PE-D
ITS
$472,768.00
$378,214.00
Year 2011
Local $300,000.00
Total $3,468,738
Funding HPP
LRTP 1019-282
State
Route Advanced Traveler Information System - Phase 2
Phase CONST
Lead Agency
Local $200,000.00 $600,000.00
County Davidson
Metro Nashville
LRTP 1017-200
State
Route Countywide Wayfinding and Traffic Guidance Program
Year 2011
Lead Agency
ID# 2008-19-001
Total $7,000,000
Funding 5307
Year 2011
ID# 2008-17-057
County Davidson
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Lead Agency
ID# 2008-17-056
MTA
Route Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD), Automatic Vehicle Location (AVL) & Int
Year 2012
Lead Agency
ID# 2008-17-031
Type Transit Capital
State
Local $378,215.00 $94,553.00
Type Noise Barrier Wa Route I-65
TDOT
Phase CONST
FY 2011-2015 TIP PROJECTS: Tuesday, December 21, 2010
County Davidson Funding NHS
Total $1,530,000.00
Total $1,830,000 Federal $1,224,000.00
State $306,000.00
Local
Page 11 of 40
FY 2011-2015 Transportation Improvement Program ID# 2008-19-062
LRTP 1016-187 Lead Agency Year 2011
ID# 2008-32-018
LRTP 1082-241
Type Road Widening
LRTP 1045-334
Federal $122,837.00
State
Route SR-41/US-31 W County Sumner/Robertson
Funding STP Type Transit Operatin
Murfreesboro Public Transit
Local $30,709.00
Total $1,900,000.00
Federal $1,520,000.00
Total $1,900,000 State $380,000.00
Local
Route 5307 Urban Operating for Rover Public Transit - Service Operations County Rutherford
Total $6,416,414
Phase OPERATIONS
Funding 5307
Total $3,202,761.00
Federal $1,601,381.00
State $800,690.00
Local $800,690.00
2012
OPERATIONS
5307
$1,035,303.00
$517,651.00
$258,826.00
$258,826.00
2013
OPERATIONS
5307
$1,070,862.00
$535,431.00
$267,715.00
$267,715.00
2014
OPERATIONS
5307
$1,107,488.00
$553,744.00
$276,872.00
$276,872.00
LRTP 1045-335
Type Transit Capital
Murfreesboro Public Transit
Route 5307 Urban Capital for Rover Public Transit - Equipment County Rutherford
Total $3,808,471
Year 2011
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Funding 5307
Total $1,819,861.00
Federal $1,455,888.80
State $181,986.10
Local $181,986.10
2013
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$979,611.00
$783,689.00
$97,961.00
$97,961.00
2014
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$1,008,999.00
$807,199.00
$100,900.00
$100,900.00
LRTP 1046-269 Lead Agency Year 2012
ID# 2008-51-032
Total $153,546.00
Total $155,954
Year 2011
Lead Agency
ID# 2008-46-075
TDOT
Phase ROW
Lead Agency
Route 21st Avenue Roadscaping in Hillsboro Village County Davidson
Funding ENH
Year 2012
ID# 2008-45-090
Metro Nashville
Phase CONST
Lead Agency
ID# 2008-45-089
Type Enhancement
Phase CONST
LRTP 1052-120 Lead Agency Year 2011
Type Pedestrian
LaVergne Funding ENH Type New Roadway
Gallatin
Phase PE-D
FY 2011-2015 TIP PROJECTS: Tuesday, December 21, 2010
Route Chaney Boulevard Sidewalk County Rutherford Total $154,000.00
Total $154,000 Federal $123,200.00
State
Route East-West Corridor (Albert Gallatin Avenue (SR-174) / Hatten Track Road County Sumner
Funding U-STP
Local $30,800.00
Total $810,750.00
Total $22,000,000 Federal $648,600.00
State
Local $162,150.00 Page 12 of 40
FY 2011-2015 Transportation Improvement Program
ID# 2008-52-034
2011
ROW
U-STP
$1,100,000.00
$880,000.00
$220,000.00
2012
CONST
U-RSV
$9,476,751.00
$7,581,401.00
$1,895,350.00
2013
CONST
U-RSV
$10,125,000.00
$8,100,000.00
$2,025,000.00
LRTP 1054-263 Lead Agency Year 2011
ID# 2008-54-033
Phase CONST
LRTP 1054-275 Lead Agency
Funding U-STP Type Intersection
Gallatin
Total $5,775,000.00
Federal $4,620,000.00
Total $341,000
2011
CONST
U-RSV
$191,000.00
$183,000.00
2011
PE-D
U-STP
$30,000.00
$30,000.00
2011
ROW
U-STP
$20,000.00
$20,000.00
Type Greenway
Sumner Co.
Local $1,155,000.00
Route Various intersection improvements Federal $100,000.00
LRTP 1056-299
State
County Sumner Total $100,000.00
State
Local $7,400.00
Route Lower Station Camp Creek Road Streetscape and Pavement Project (Gre County Sumner
Total $2,500,000
Year 2011
Phase CONST
Funding CMAQ
Total $125,000.00
Federal $100,000.00
2011
CONST
HPP-TN239
$304,810.00
$243,848.00
$60,962.00
2011
CONST
HPP-TN239
$125,000.00
$100,000.00
$25,000.00
LRTP 1061-226 Lead Agency Year 2012
ID# 2008-64-037
Total $6,450,830
Funding H-STP
Lead Agency
ID# 2008-61-094
Route Indian Lake Boulevard County Sumner
Phase CONST
Year 2011
ID# 2008-56-082
Type Road Widening
Hendersonville
Type New Roadway
TDOT
Lead Agency
Funding STA Type Intersection
Williamson Co.
Total $10,400,000.00
Total $82,660,000 Federal
State $10,400,000.00
Local
Route SR-106 (Hillsboro Rd) County Williamson
Total $650,000
Year 2013
Phase PE-D
Funding U-STP
Total $105,000.00
Federal $84,000.00
2013
PE-N
U-STP
$45,000.00
$36,000.00
FY 2011-2015 TIP PROJECTS: Tuesday, December 21, 2010
Local $25,000.00
Route SR-840 South County Williamson
Phase PAVE
LRTP 1064-252
State
State
Local $21,000.00 $9,000.00 Page 13 of 40
FY 2011-2015 Transportation Improvement Program ID# 2008-67-035
LRTP 1067-161 Lead Agency
Federal $40,000.00
2011
CONST
U-RSV
$210,000.00
$210,000.00
2011
PE-D
U-STP
$14,000.00
$14,000.00
2011
PE-N
U-STP
$1,000.00
$1,000.00
LRTP 1072-132
Type New Roadway
Mt. Juliet
State
Local $10,000.00
Route Beckwith Road/Eastern Connector Total $18,330,000
County Wilson Total $200,000.00
Federal $160,000.00
State
Local $40,000.00
Phase PE-D
Funding U-STP
2011
ROW
U-STP
$6,500,000.00
$5,200,000.00
$1,300,000.00
2012
CONST
U-RSV
$9,462,800.00
$7,570,240.00
$1,892,560.00
2013
CONST
U-RSV
$2,167,200.00
$1,733,760.00
$433,440.00
LRTP 1072-112 Lead Agency Year 2015
Type Road Widening
Lebanon
Phase CONST
LRTP 1074-347 Lead Agency
ID# 2008-76-024
Total $250,000
Total $50,000.00
Year 2011
ID# 2008-74-061
County Williamson Funding U-RSV
Lead Agency
ID# 2008-72-042
Route Concord Road Signals
Phase CONST
Year 2011
ID# 2008-71-038
Type ITS
Brentwood
Route Hartmann Drive, Section 2 County Wilson
Funding LOCAL Type Interchange
Lebanon
Total $6,000,000.00
Total $6,000,000 Federal
County Wilson
Total $328,125
Phase CONST
Funding L-STP
Total $153,562.50
Federal $122,850.00
2012
PE-D
L-STP
$10,500.00
$8,400.00
Lead Agency Year 2011
Type Greenway
Mt. Juliet
Phase CONST
FY 2011-2015 TIP PROJECTS: Tuesday, December 21, 2010
State
Local $30,713.00 $2,100.00
Route West Division Street Greenway County Wilson
Funding CMAQ
Local $6,000,000.00
Route Interchange Lighting
Year 2012
LRTP 1076-303
State
Total $646,551.00
Total $1,473,615 Federal $517,241.00
State
Local $129,310.00
Page 14 of 40
FY 2011-2015 Transportation Improvement Program ID# 2008-84-012
LRTP 1089-902 Lead Agency
ID# 2008-84-013
County Regional
Total $400,000
Funding STP
Total $100,000.00
Federal $80,000.00
State $20,000.00
2012
CONST
STP
$100,000.00
$80,000.00
$20,000.00
2013
CONST
STP
$100,000.00
$80,000.00
$20,000.00
2014
CONST
STP
$100,000.00
$80,000.00
$20,000.00
LRTP 1089-902
Type Safety
TDOT
Total $8,000,000
County Regional
Phase PE, ROW, CONST
Funding HSIP
Total $2,000,000.00
Federal $1,800,000.00
State $200,000.00
2012
PE, ROW, CONST
HSIP
$2,000,000.00
$1,800,000.00
$200,000.00
2013
PE, ROW, CONST
HSIP
$2,000,000.00
$1,800,000.00
$200,000.00
2014
PE, ROW, CONST
HSIP
$2,000,000.00
$1,800,000.00
$200,000.00
LRTP 1085-331
Type Transit
MPO
County Regional
Total $3,783,700
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Funding CMAQ
Total $625,000.00
Federal $625,000.00
2012
IMPLEMENTATION
CMAQ
$775,000.00
$775,000.00
2012
IMPLEMENTATION
U-STP
$833,700.00
$666,960.00
2013
IMPLEMENTATION
CMAQ
$775,000.00
$775,000.00
Year 2014
MPO
Lead Agency
State
Funding CMAQ
Type Transit Capital
RTA
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Route Regional Ridesharing & TDM Strategies - Program Administration
FY 2011-2015 TIP PROJECTS: Tuesday, December 21, 2010
Total $775,000.00
Total $3,783,700 Federal $775,000.00
State
Local
Route Commuter Rail Capitalization and Preventative Maintenance County Regional
Funding 5307
Local
$166,740.00
County Regional
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
LRTP 1085-320 Year 2011
Type Transit
Local
Route Regional Ridesharing & TDM Strategies - Program Administration
Year 2011
LRTP 1085-331
Local
Route Safety Bucket (Highway Hazard Elimination)
Year 2011
Lead Agency
ID# 2008-85-091
TDOT
Phase CONST
Lead Agency
ID# 2008-85-036b
Route Spot Safety Improvement Program
Year 2011
Lead Agency
ID# 2008-85-036
Type Safety
Total $1,750,000.00
Total $18,750,000 Federal $1,400,000.00
State $175,000.00
Local $175,000.00 Page 15 of 40
FY 2011-2015 Transportation Improvement Program
ID# 2008-85-091b
2011
IMPLEMENTATION
U-STP
$625,000.00
$500,000.00
$125,000.00
2012
IMPLEMENTATION
U-STP
$625,000.00
$500,000.00
$125,000.00
2012
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$2,812,500.00
$2,250,000.00
LRTP 1085-320 Lead Agency
ID# 2008-85-091c
Route Commuter Rail Capitalization and Preventative Maintenance Total $18,750,000
County Regional
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Funding 5307
Total $3,125,000.00
Federal $2,500,000.00
2013
IMPLEMENTATION
U-STP
$625,000.00
$500,000.00
$125,000.00
2014
IMPLEMENTATION
U-STP
$625,000.00
$500,000.00
$125,000.00
2014
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$3,437,500.00
$2,750,000.00
LRTP 1085-320
Type Transit Capital
RTA
State $312,500.00
$343,750.00
Local $312,500.00
$373,750.00
Route Commuter Rail Capitalization and Preventative Maintenance County Regional
Total $18,750,000
Year 2015
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Funding U-STP
Total $625,000.00
Federal $500,000.00
State
Local $125,000.00
2015
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$3,750,000.00
$3,000,000.00
$375,000.00
$375,000.00
LRTP 1085-505 Lead Agency
ID# 2008-86-086
$281,250.00
Year 2013
Lead Agency
ID# 2008-85-093
Type Transit Capital
RTA
$281,250.00
Type Transit
MTA
Route New Freedom (NF) Funds Bucket County Regional
Total $1,850,000
Year 2011
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Funding 5317
Total $743,750.00
Federal $595,000.00
State $74,375.00
Local $74,375.00
2012
IMPLEMENTATION
5317
$356,250.00
$285,000.00
$35,625.00
$35,625.00
2013
IMPLEMENTATION
5317
$362,500.00
$290,000.00
$36,250.00
$36,250.00
2014
IMPLEMENTATION
5317
$375,000.00
$300,000.00
$37,500.00
$37,500.00
LRTP 1086-603 Lead Agency
Type Bike/Ped
MPO
Route Safe Routes to School Bucket County Regional
Total $3,400,000
Year 2011
Phase PE, ROW, CONST
Funding SRTS
Total $850,000.00
Federal $850,000.00
2012
PE, ROW, CONST
SRTS
$850,000.00
$850,000.00
2013
PE, ROW, CONST
SRTS
$850,000.00
$850,000.00
2014
PE, ROW, CONST
SRTS
$850,000.00
$850,000.00
FY 2011-2015 TIP PROJECTS: Tuesday, December 21, 2010
State
Local
Page 16 of 40
FY 2011-2015 Transportation Improvement Program ID# 2008-88-002
LRTP 1088-801 Lead Agency
ID# 2008-88-011
TDOT
County Regional
Total $2,000,000
Phase PE, ROW, CONST
Funding BRR-L
Total $500,000.00
Federal $400,000.00
2012
PE, ROW, CONST
BRR-L
$500,000.00
$400,000.00
$100,000.00
2013
PE, ROW, CONST
BRR-L
$500,000.00
$400,000.00
$100,000.00
2014
PE, ROW, CONST
BRR-L
$500,000.00
$400,000.00
$100,000.00
LRTP 1088-801
Type Bridge
State
TDOT
Total $16,000,000
County Regional
Phase PE, ROW, CONST
Funding BRR-S
Total $4,000,000.00
Federal $3,200,000.00
State $800,000.00
2012
PE, ROW, CONST
BRR-S
$4,000,000.00
$3,200,000.00
$800,000.00
2013
PE, ROW, CONST
BRR-S
$4,000,000.00
$3,200,000.00
$800,000.00
2014
PE, ROW, CONST
BRR-S
$4,000,000.00
$3,200,000.00
$800,000.00
LRTP 1088-801
Local $100,000.00
Route Bridge Replacement Bucket (State)
Year 2011
Lead Agency
ID# 2008-89-004
Route Bridge Replacement Bucket (Local)
Year 2011
Lead Agency
ID# 2008-89-003
Type Bridge
Type Bridge
Local
Route Bridge Replacement Overrun Bucket (Local)
TDOT
County Regional
Total $40,000
Year 2011
Phase PE, ROW, CONST
Funding BRR-L
Total $10,000.00
Federal $8,000.00
2012
PE, ROW, CONST
BRR-L
$10,000.00
$8,000.00
$2,000.00
2013
PE, ROW, CONST
BRR-L
$10,000.00
$8,000.00
$2,000.00
2014
PE, ROW, CONST
BRR-L
$10,000.00
$8,000.00
$2,000.00
LRTP 1088-801 Lead Agency
Type Bridge
State
Route Bridge Replacement Overrun Bucket (State)
TDOT
County Regional
Total $200,000
Year 2011
Phase PE, ROW, CONST
Funding BRR-S
Total $50,000.00
Federal $40,000.00
State $10,000.00
2012
PE, ROW, CONST
BRR-S
$50,000.00
$40,000.00
$10,000.00
2013
PE, ROW, CONST
BRR-S
$50,000.00
$40,000.00
$10,000.00
2014
PE, ROW, CONST
BRR-S
$50,000.00
$40,000.00
$10,000.00
FY 2011-2015 TIP PROJECTS: Tuesday, December 21, 2010
Local $2,000.00
Local
Page 17 of 40
FY 2011-2015 Transportation Improvement Program ID# 2008-89-005
LRTP Consistent Lead Agency
ID# 2008-89-006
TDOT
County Regional
Total $2,000,000
Phase PE, ROW, CONST
Funding STP
Total $500,000.00
Federal $400,000.00
State $100,000.00
2012
PE, ROW, CONST
STP
$500,000.00
$400,000.00
$100,000.00
2013
PE, ROW, CONST
STP
$500,000.00
$400,000.00
$100,000.00
2014
PE, ROW, CONST
STP
$500,000.00
$400,000.00
$100,000.00
LRTP Consistent
Type
TDOT
Total $2,000,000
County Regional
Phase PE, ROW, CONST
Funding STP
Total $500,000.00
Federal $400,000.00
State $100,000.00
2012
PE, ROW, CONST
STP
$500,000.00
$400,000.00
$100,000.00
2013
PE, ROW, CONST
STP
$500,000.00
$400,000.00
$100,000.00
2014
PE, ROW, CONST
STP
$500,000.00
$400,000.00
$100,000.00
LRTP Consistent
Type
County Regional
Total $2,000,000
Year 2011
Phase PE, ROW, CONST
Funding NHS
Total $500,000.00
Federal $400,000.00
State $100,000.00
2012
PE, ROW, CONST
NHS
$500,000.00
$400,000.00
$100,000.00
2013
PE, ROW, CONST
NHS
$500,000.00
$400,000.00
$100,000.00
2014
PE, ROW, CONST
NHS
$500,000.00
$400,000.00
$100,000.00
Lead Agency
Type
Local
Route Project Cost Overruns Bucket - NHS (>30%)
TDOT
County Regional
Total $2,000,000
Year 2011
Phase PE, ROW, CONST
Funding NHS
Total $500,000.00
Federal $400,000.00
State $100,000.00
2012
PE, ROW, CONST
NHS
$500,000.00
$400,000.00
$100,000.00
2013
PE, ROW, CONST
NHS
$500,000.00
$400,000.00
$100,000.00
2014
PE, ROW, CONST
NHS
$500,000.00
$400,000.00
$100,000.00
FY 2011-2015 TIP PROJECTS: Tuesday, December 21, 2010
Local
Route Project Cost Overruns Bucket - NHS
TDOT
LRTP Consistent
Local
Route Project Cost Overrun Bucket - STP (>30%)
Year 2011
Lead Agency
ID# 2008-89-008
Route Project Cost Overrun Bucket - STP
Year 2011
Lead Agency
ID# 2008-89-007
Type
Local
Page 18 of 40
FY 2011-2015 Transportation Improvement Program ID# 2008-89-009
LRTP Consistent Lead Agency
ID# 2008-89-010
TDOT
County Regional
Total $800,000
Phase PE, ROW, CONST
Funding IM
Total $200,000.00
Federal $180,000.00
State $20,000.00
2012
PE, ROW, CONST
IM
$200,000.00
$180,000.00
$20,000.00
2013
PE, ROW, CONST
IM
$200,000.00
$180,000.00
$20,000.00
2014
PE, ROW, CONST
IM
$200,000.00
$180,000.00
$20,000.00
LRTP Consistent
Type
TDOT
Total $800,000
County Regional
Phase PE, ROW, CONST
Funding IM
Total $200,000.00
Federal $180,000.00
State $20,000.00
2012
PE, ROW, CONST
IM
$200,000.00
$180,000.00
$20,000.00
2013
PE, ROW, CONST
IM
$200,000.00
$180,000.00
$20,000.00
2014
PE, ROW, CONST
IM
$200,000.00
$180,000.00
$20,000.00
LRTP 1089-904
Type Interstate Impr.
TDOT
County Regional
Total $200,000
Phase CONST
Funding IM
Total $50,000.00
Federal $45,000.00
State $5,000.00
2012
CONST
IM
$50,000.00
$45,000.00
$5,000.00
2013
CONST
IM
$50,000.00
$45,000.00
$5,000.00
2014
CONST
IM
$50,000.00
$45,000.00
$5,000.00
Lead Agency
Local
Route Interstate 3R improvements
Year 2011
LRTP 1089-903
Local
Route Project Cost Overruns Bucket - IM (>30%)
Year 2011
Lead Agency
ID# 2008-89-015
Route Project Cost Overruns Bucket - IM
Year 2011
Lead Agency
ID# 2008-89-014
Type
Local
Type State Route Impr Route State Route 3R Improvements
TDOT
County Regional
Total $200,000
Year 2011
Phase CONST
Funding STP
Total $50,000.00
Federal $40,000.00
State $10,000.00
2012
CONST
STP
$50,000.00
$40,000.00
$10,000.00
2013
CONST
STP
$50,000.00
$40,000.00
$10,000.00
2014
CONST
STP
$50,000.00
$40,000.00
$10,000.00
FY 2011-2015 TIP PROJECTS: Tuesday, December 21, 2010
Local
Page 19 of 40
FY 2011-2015 Transportation Improvement Program ID# 2008-89-087
LRTP 1086-602 Lead Agency
ID# 2008-89-091
Total $0
Funding ENH-B
Total $2,500,000.00
Federal $2,000,000.00
2012
PE, ROW, CONST
ENH-B
$2,500,000.00
$2,000,000.00
$500,000.00
2013
PE, ROW, CONST
ENH-B
$2,500,000.00
$2,000,000.00
$500,000.00
2014
PE, ROW, CONST
ENH-B
$2,500,000.00
$2,000,000.00
$500,000.00
LRTP 1089-902
Type Safety
State
TDOT
Total $11,090,588
County Regional
Phase OPERATIONS
Funding STP
Total $2,512,928.00
Federal $2,010,342.00
State $502,586.00
2012
OPERATIONS
STP
$2,591,460.00
$2,073,168.00
$518,292.00
2013
OPERATIONS
STP
$2,850,600.00
$2,280,480.00
$570,120.00
2014
OPERATIONS
STP
$3,135,600.00
$2,508,480.00
$627,120.00
LRTP 1016-291
Local $500,000.00
Route Freeway Safety Service Patrol Bucket
Year 2011
Type Greenway
Metro Nashville
Local
Route Cumberland River Greenway System - TSU Connector Portion County Davidson
Total $500,000
Year 2013
Phase PE-D
Funding U-STP
Total $45,000.00
Federal $36,000.00
2013
PE-N
U-STP
$5,000.00
$4,000.00
$1,000.00
2014
CONST
U-RSV
$450,000.00
$360,000.00
$90,000.00
LRTP 1015-318 Lead Agency Year 2011
ID# 2009-54-024
County Regional
Phase PE, ROW, CONST
Lead Agency
ID# 2009-19-004
MPO
Route Transportation Enhancement Projects Bucket
Year 2011
Lead Agency
ID# 2009-16-029
Type Enhancement
TDOT
Lead Agency
Funding S-CMAQ
Type Intersection
Gallatin
Phase CONST
FY 2011-2015 TIP PROJECTS: Tuesday, December 21, 2010
Total $250,000.00
Total $250,000 Federal $200,000.00
State $50,000.00
Local
Route Big Station Camp Creek Blvd County Sumner
Funding LIC
Local $9,000.00
Route Pilot School Bus Diesel Retrofit - Metro Nashville Public Schools County Davidson
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
LRTP 1052-115 Year 2011
Type Bus Diesel Retro
State
Total $4,000,000.00
Total $5,000,000 Federal
State $2,000,000.00
Local $2,000,000.00
Page 20 of 40
FY 2011-2015 Transportation Improvement Program ID# 2009-56-027
LRTP 1056-300 Lead Agency Year 2011
ID# 2009-65-007
LRTP 1065-343
Type Transit Operatin
Franklin Transit Authority
Total $33,750.00
Federal $27,000.00
State
Local $6,750.00
Route New Freedom Funds - Franklin Transit Authority County Williamson
Total $167,764
Total $111,097.00
Federal $55,547.00
State $27,775.00
Local $27,775.00
2012
IMPLEMENTATION
5317
$56,667.00
$28,333.00
$14,167.00
$14,167.00
LRTP 1085-504
Type Transit Operatin
Franklin Transit Authority
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
LRTP 1067-145
Funding 5316
Type ITS
Route Job Access and Reverse Commute Funds - Franklin Transit Authority County Williamson Total $60,000.00
Total $60,000 Federal $30,000.00
County Williamson Funding U-RSV
Total $2,000,000.00
Federal $1,600,000.00
2011
PE-D
U-STP
$500,000.00
$400,000.00
Year 2011
LRTP 1065-342 Lead Agency Year 2011
Lead Agency
State
Funding S-CMAQ
Type Bus Diesel Retro
TDOT
Route Pilot School Bus Retrofit - Franklin Special School District Total $212,002.00
Total $212,002 Federal $169,602.00
State $42,400.00
County Williamson Total $249,000.00
Type Road Widening
Route SR-109
TDOT
FY 2011-2015 TIP PROJECTS: Tuesday, December 21, 2010
Total $249,000 Federal $199,200.00
State $49,800.00
Federal
State
County Wilson Funding
Local
Route Pilot School Bus Diesel Retrofit - Williamson County Schools
Funding S-CMAQ
Phase
Local $400,000.00 $100,000.00
County Williamson
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
LRTP 1072-348 Year
Type Bus Diesel Retro
TDOT
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Local $15,000.00
Total $7,225,000
Phase CONST
LRTP 1065-341
State $15,000.00
Route Franklin ITS Infrastructure
Franklin
Year 2011
Lead Agency
ID# 2009-72-035
Funding U-STP
Total $5,370,766
Funding 5317
Lead Agency
ID# 2009-69-006
County Sumner
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Year 2011
ID# 2009-69-005
Route Town Creek Greenway - Phase 2
Year 2011
Lead Agency
ID# 2009-67-026
Gallatin
Phase CONST
Lead Agency
ID# 2009-65-008
Type Greenway
Total
Local
Total $80,000,000 Local Page 21 of 40
FY 2011-2015 Transportation Improvement Program 2011 ID# 2009-76-001
PE-D
LRTP 1076-304 Lead Agency
ID# 2009-84-033
Route Cedar City Trail Phase 3 & 4 Total $783,366
Total $138,000.00
Federal $110,400.00
2011
CONST
ENH
$307,866.00
$246,293.00
LRTP 1014-238
Year 2011
Type Safety Funding IM Type Transit Capital
RTA
Lead Agency
Total $170,000.00
Total $1,000,000 Federal $153,000.00
State $17,000.00
Funding U-STP Type Transit Operatin
RTA
Local
Route Martha Station Construction County Regional
Phase CONST
Local $27,600.00 $61,573.00
County Davidson
Phase PE-D
LRTP 1085-322
State
Route I-40
TDOT
LRTP 1085-321
$240,000.00
County Wilson Funding L-STP
Lead Agency
ID# 2009-85-018
$960,000.00
Phase CONST
Year 2011
ID# 2009-85-012
Type Greenway
Lebanon
$1,200,000.00
Year 2011
Lead Agency
ID# 2009-85-010
NHS
Total $875,000.00
Total $1,472,985 Federal $700,000.00
State
Local $175,000.00
Route Express Bus Service from Williamson County County Regional
Total $1,100,000
Year 2012
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Funding CMAQ
Total $300,000.00
Federal $240,000.00
2013
IMPLEMENTATION
CMAQ
$300,000.00
$240,000.00
$60,000.00
2014
IMPLEMENTATION
CMAQ
$300,000.00
$240,000.00
$60,000.00
LRTP 1085-319 Lead Agency
Type Transit Operatin
RTA
State
Local $60,000.00
Route SE Corridor Express Bus Service Expansion County Regional
Total $1,397,840
Year 2011
Phase OPERATIONS
Funding 5307
Total $349,460.00
Federal $177,730.00
State $85,865.00
Local $85,865.00
2012
OPERATIONS
5307
$349,460.00
$177,730.00
$85,865.00
$85,865.00
2013
OPERATIONS
5307
$349,460.00
$177,730.00
$85,865.00
$85,865.00
2014
OPERATIONS
5307
$349,460.00
$177,730.00
$85,865.00
$85,865.00
FY 2011-2015 TIP PROJECTS: Tuesday, December 21, 2010
Page 22 of 40
FY 2011-2015 Transportation Improvement Program ID# 2009-88-032
LRTP 1088-801 Lead Agency
ID# 2010-32-004
Total $30,300,000
Total $30,100,000.00
2012
PE, ROW, CONST
BRBD
$100,000.00
$100,000.00
2013
PE, ROW, CONST
BRBD
$100,000.00
$100,000.00
LRTP 1032-109
Funding STP Type Road Widening
TDOT Funding IM Type Reconstruct
TDOT
LRTP 1072-284
Funding STP Type Resurfacing
Lebanon
Local
Route SR-65/US-431 Total $2,150,000.00
Total $15,950,000 Federal $1,720,000.00
State $430,000.00
Local
Route I-65 Total $53,150,000.00
Total $53,932,250 Federal $47,835,000.00
State $5,315,000.00
Local
Route SR-141 County Wilson
Phase CONST
Lead Agency
State $30,100,000.00
County Williamson
Phase CONST
LRTP 1072-237
Federal
County Robertson
Phase ROW (ADD)
Lead Agency Year 2011
Type Road Widening
TDOT
LRTP 1062-113 Year 2011
ID# 2011-110-140
County Regional Funding BRBD
Lead Agency
ID# 2010-79-005
TDOT
Phase PE, ROW, CONST
Year 2011
ID# 2010-710-006
Route Bridge Bond Bucket
Year 2011
Lead Agency
ID# 2010-65-001
Type Bridge
Total $17,000,000.00
Total $21,888,925 Federal $13,600,000.00
State $3,400,000.00
Local
Route City of Lebanon 3R Improvements Bucket County Wilson
Total $814,170
Year 2011
Phase CONST
Funding L-STP
Total $774,170.00
2011
PE-D
LOCAL
$35,137.00
$35,137.00
2011
PE-N
LOCAL
$4,863.00
$4,863.00
LRTP 1012-102 Lead Agency
Type Reconstruct
Goodlettsville
State
Local $154,834.00
Route Rivergate Parkway County Davidson
Year 2012
Phase PE-D
Funding LOCAL
Total $970,000.00
2012
PE-N
LOCAL
$30,000.00
FY 2011-2015 TIP PROJECTS: Tuesday, December 21, 2010
Federal $619,336.00
Total $10,000,000 Federal
State
Local $970,000.00 $30,000.00 Page 23 of 40
FY 2011-2015 Transportation Improvement Program ID# 2011-110-141
LRTP 1012-203 Lead Agency
ID# 2011-12-021
Funding LOCAL
Total $1,090,000.00
2012
PE-N
LOCAL
$30,000.00
LRTP 1018-202
Type Road Widening
Goodlettsville
Federal
State
Funding LOCAL
Total $270,000.00
2013
PE-N
LOCAL
$30,000.00
Type Road Widening
TDOT
Total $3,000,000 Federal
State
Route I-440 County Davidson
Total $10,800,000
Phase CONST
Funding IM
Total $9,300,000.00
Federal $8,370,000.00
State $930,000.00
2011
UTILITIES
IM
$100,000.00
$90,000.00
$10,000.00
Type Interchange
Goodlettsville
County Davidson
Phase PE-D
Funding LOCAL
Total $35,000.00
2013
PE-N
LOCAL
$5,000.00
LRTP 1014-259
Type Intersection
Oak Hill
Local
Route Vietnam Veterans Pkwy Merge Lane onto Conference Drive
Year 2013
Lead Agency
Local $270,000.00 $30,000.00
Year 2011
LRTP 1014-106
Local $1,090,000.00 $30,000.00
County Davidson
Phase PE-D
LRTP 1012-239
Total $11,200,000
Route Dickerson Pike (US-41/31W) Widening/CSX Underpass Improvement
Year 2013
Lead Agency
ID# 2011-14-042
County Davidson
Phase PE-D
Lead Agency
ID# 2011-14-028
Goodlettsville
Route Main Street (US41)/Long Hollow Pike (SR174)/Rivergate Pkwy
Year 2012
Lead Agency
ID# 2011-12-109
Type Reconstruct
Total $400,000 Federal
State
Local $35,000.00 $5,000.00
Route Battery Lane / Harding Place and Franklin Road Improvements County Davidson
Total $1,810,000
Year 2011
Phase PE-D
Funding U-STP
Total $84,000.00
Federal $67,200.00
2011
PE-N
U-STP
$126,000.00
$100,800.00
$25,200.00
2011
ROW
U-STP
$78,000.00
$62,400.00
$15,600.00
2012
CONST
U-RSV
$1,522,000.00
$1,217,600.00
$304,400.00
FY 2011-2015 TIP PROJECTS: Tuesday, December 21, 2010
State
Local $16,800.00
Page 24 of 40
FY 2011-2015 Transportation Improvement Program ID# 2011-15-117
LRTP 1015-315 Lead Agency
ID# 2011-15-133
County Davidson
Total $6,000,000
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Funding CMAQ
Total $2,500,000.00
Federal $2,000,000.00
2012
IMPLEMENTATION
CMAQ
$1,500,000.00
$1,200,000.00
$300,000.00
2013
IMPLEMENTATION
CMAQ
$1,500,000.00
$1,200,000.00
$300,000.00
LRTP 1015-307
Type Transit Capital
MTA
State
Local $500,000.00
Route Bus Stop Improvements and Passenger Amenities County Davidson
Total $1,250,000
Year 2011
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Funding 5307
Total $250,000.00
Federal $200,000.00
State $25,000.00
Local $25,000.00
2012
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$250,000.00
$200,000.00
$25,000.00
$25,000.00
2013
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$250,000.00
$200,000.00
$25,000.00
$25,000.00
2014
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$250,000.00
$200,000.00
$25,000.00
$25,000.00
LRTP 1015-306 Lead Agency
ID# 2011-15-137
MTA
Route Enhanced Transit Service along West End Corridor - Capital
Year 2011
Lead Agency
ID# 2011-15-135
Type Transit Capital
Type Transit Capital
MTA
Route Farebox Purchase and Replacement County Davidson
Total $400,000
Year 2011
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Funding 5307
Total $100,000.00
Federal $80,000.00
State $10,000.00
Local $10,000.00
2012
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$100,000.00
$80,000.00
$10,000.00
$10,000.00
2013
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$100,000.00
$80,000.00
$10,000.00
$10,000.00
2014
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$100,000.00
$80,000.00
$10,000.00
$10,000.00
LRTP 1015-309 Lead Agency
Type Transit Capital
MTA
Route Local Bus Service Preventative Mainatenance and Capitalization - MTA County Davidson
Total $35,000,000
Year 2011
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Funding 5307
Total $6,812,500.00
Federal $5,450,000.00
State $681,250.00
Local $681,250.00
2012
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$7,000,000.00
$5,600,000.00
$700,000.00
$700,000.00
2013
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$7,781,250.00
$6,225,000.00
$778,125.00
$778,125.00
2014
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$8,750,000.00
$7,000,000.00
$875,000.00
$875,000.00
FY 2011-2015 TIP PROJECTS: Tuesday, December 21, 2010
Page 25 of 40
FY 2011-2015 Transportation Improvement Program ID# 2011-15-139
LRTP 1015-314 Lead Agency
ID# 2011-15-148
Total $500,000.00
Federal $400,000.00
2014
IMPLEMENTATION
CMAQ
$500,000.00
$400,000.00
LRTP 1015-308
Type Transit Capital
MTA
LRTP 1016-190
State
Funding 5307
Type Enhancement
Metro Nashville
Local $100,000.00 $100,000.00
Route New Satellite Maintenance and Office Facility (Peterbilt) Total $20,000,000
County Davidson
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Total $1,250,000.00
Federal $1,000,000.00
State $125,000.00
Local $125,000.00
Route Harding Place Sidewalk Enhancement County Davidson
Total $1,561,216
Year 2011
Phase CONST
Funding LOCAL
Total $183,591.00
Federal
2011
CONST
ENH
$1,119,461.00
$880,449.00
2011
PE-D
LOCAL
$145,530.00
$145,530.00
2011
ROW
LOCAL
$112,634.00
$112,634.00
LRTP 1016-189 Lead Agency Year 2011
Type Enhancement
Metro Nashville
Phase CONST
LRTP 1086-107 Lead Agency
ID# 2011-16-157
Total $1,000,000
Funding CMAQ
Lead Agency
ID# 2011-16-119
County Davidson
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Year 2011
ID# 2011-16-104
MTA
Route Transit Signal Prioritization
Year 2013
Lead Agency
ID# 2011-16-092
Type Transit Capital
Type Greenway
Goodlettsville
Total $792,000.00
Total $792,000 Federal $633,600.00
Total $3,000,000
Total $220,000.00
Federal $220,000.00
2011
PE-N
CMAQ
$30,000.00
$30,000.00
2011
ROW & CONST
CMAQ
$2,750,000.00
$2,750,000.00
Type Greenway
Oak Hill
Phase
FY 2011-2015 TIP PROJECTS: Tuesday, December 21, 2010
State
Local
Route Oak Hill Greenway County Davidson
Funding
Local $158,400.00
Route Goodlettsville Bicycle/Pedestrian Plan - Greenway Connectors
Funding CMAQ
Year
State
County Davidson
Phase PE-D
LRTP 1016-349
$239,012.00
County Davidson Funding ENH
Local $183,591.00
Route I-40 and Jefferson Street Transportation Enhancement
Year 2011
Lead Agency
State
Total
Total $291,044 Federal
State
Local Page 26 of 40
FY 2011-2015 Transportation Improvement Program 2011 ID# 2011-17-019
CONST
LRTP 1057-248 Lead Agency
ID# 2011-17-062
Total $70,000 Federal $63,000.00
2011
PE-D
CMAQ
$6,000.00
$6,000.00
2011
PE-N
CMAQ
$1,000.00
$1,000.00
Type ITS
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Lead Agency
Funding CMAQ
Total $1,100,000.00
Total $1,640,000.00
Goodlettsville
Total $65,000.00
2013
PE-N
LOCAL
$5,000.00
Goodlettsville
Local
Total $700,000 Federal
State
Local $65,000.00 $5,000.00
County Davidson
Phase PE-D
Funding LOCAL
Total $74,500.00
2012
PE-N
LOCAL
$500.00
Year 2012
State
Type Interchange Ligh Route I-65 High Mast Lighting
Year 2012
Lead Agency
Total $1,640,000 Federal $1,640,000.00
County Davidson Funding LOCAL
LRTP 1014-249
Local $500,000.00
Type Signalization/Sig Route Conference Drive Enhancements
Phase PE-D
Lead Agency
State
County Davidson Funding CMAQ
Year 2013
LRTP 1084-250
Federal $600,000.00
Route ATIS Phase 1B - Incident Response
Metro Nashville
LRTP 1016-103
Local
Total $1,100,000
County Davidson
Type ITS
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
State
Route Signal System Upgrade - Phase 3B
Metro Nashville
LRTP 1017-191 Year 2011
ID# 2011-19-023
Route Caldwell Drive/Indian Hills Pedestrian Control Total $63,000.00
LRTP 1017-195
$58,209.00
County Sumner Funding CMAQ
Lead Agency
ID# 2011-19-022
$232,835.00
Phase CONST
Year 2011
ID# 2011-19-020
Type Signalization
Goodlettsville
$291,044.00
Year 2011
Lead Agency
ID# 2011-17-064
HPP
Total $750,000 Federal
State
Local $74,500.00 $500.00
Type Interchange Ligh Route Vietnam Veterans Interchange High Mast Lighting
Goodlettsville
Phase PE-D
FY 2011-2015 TIP PROJECTS: Tuesday, December 21, 2010
County Davidson Funding LOCAL
Total $34,500.00
Total $350,000 Federal
State
Local $34,500.00 Page 27 of 40
FY 2011-2015 Transportation Improvement Program 2012 ID# 2011-410-149
PE-N
LRTP 1042-285 Lead Agency
ID# 2011-410-151
Route Manson/Gresham/Fortress Reconstruction County Rutherford
Total $7,052,000
Funding LOCAL
Total $6,400,000.00
2011
PE-D
LOCAL
$552,000.00
$552,000.00
2011
ROW
LOCAL
$100,000.00
$100,000.00
LRTP 1042-286
Type Reconstruct
Murfreesboro
State
Funding LOCAL
Total $7,300,000.00
2011
PE-D
LOCAL
$547,500.00
Type Reconstruct
Murfreesboro
Local $6,400,000.00
Route Brinkley Road Reconstruction
Phase CONST
LRTP 1042-287
Federal
Total $7,847,500
County Rutherford
Year 2011
Federal
State
Local $7,300,000.00 $547,500.00
Route Rucker Lane Reconstruction County Rutherford
Total $5,125,355
Year 2011
Phase PE-D
Funding LOCAL
Total $318,513.00
2012
ROW
LOCAL
$560,000.00
$560,000.00
2013
CONST
LOCAL
$4,246,842.00
$4,246,842.00
LRTP 1042-288 Lead Agency
ID# 2011-41-144
$500.00
Phase CONST
Lead Agency
ID# 2011-410-153
Type Reconstruct
Murfreesboro
$500.00
Year 2011
Lead Agency
ID# 2011-410-152
LOCAL
Type Rebuild
Murfreesboro
Federal
State
Local $318,513.00
Route Pitts Lane County Rutherford
Total $1,298,493
Year 2011
Phase CONST
Funding LOCAL
Total $950,390.00
2011
PE-D
LOCAL
$174,000.00
$174,000.00
2011
ROW
LOCAL
$174,103.00
$174,103.00
LRTP 1041-129 Lead Agency
Type New Roadway
Murfreesboro
Federal
Local $950,390.00
Route Cherry Lane Extension with SR-840 Interchange County Rutherford
Total $29,915,000
Year 2011
Phase PE-D
Funding M-STP
Total $2,415,000.00
Federal $1,932,000.00
2014
ROW
M-STP
$3,400,000.00
$2,720,000.00
FY 2011-2015 TIP PROJECTS: Tuesday, December 21, 2010
State
State
Local $483,000.00 $680,000.00 Page 28 of 40
FY 2011-2015 Transportation Improvement Program ID# 2011-42-031
LRTP 1042-121 Lead Agency
ID# 2011-42-032
Total $4,750,000
Funding M-STP
Total $125,000.00
Federal $100,000.00
2012
PE-N
M-STP
$125,000.00
$100,000.00
LRTP 1042-122
Type Road Widening
LaVergne
Total $5,750,000
Funding M-STP
Total $375,000.00
Federal $300,000.00
2012
PE-N
M-STP
$375,000.00
$300,000.00
Type Road Widening
Smyrna
Local $25,000.00 $25,000.00
County Rutherford
Phase PE-D
LRTP 1042-167
State
Route Jefferson Pike Widening
Year 2012
State
Local $75,000.00 $75,000.00
Route Weakley Lane Widening County Rutherford
Total $5,800,000
Year 2011
Phase PE-D
Funding LOCAL
Total $90,000.00
2011
PE-N
LOCAL
$60,000.00
2012
ROW
M-STP
$1,000,000.00
$800,000.00
$200,000.00
2015
CONST
M-RSV
$4,650,000.00
$2,000,000.00
$2,650,000.00
LRTP 1042-127 Lead Agency
ID# 2011-42-143
County Rutherford
Phase PE-D
Lead Agency
ID# 2011-42-142
Route Chaney Boulevard Widening
Year 2012
Lead Agency
ID# 2011-42-061
Type Road Widening
LaVergne
Type Road Widening
Murfreesboro
Federal
Route Thompson Lane (SR-266) Widening County Rutherford
Total $34,713,000
Phase PE-D
Funding M-STP
Total $2,500,000.00
Federal $2,000,000.00
2013
ROW
M-STP
$5,700,000.00
$4,560,000.00
Lead Agency
Type Road Widening
Murfreesboro
State
Local $500,000.00 $1,140,000.00
Route Bradyville Pike (SR-99) Widening County Rutherford
Total $7,378,400
Year 2011
Phase PE-D
Funding M-STP
Total $554,400.00
Federal $443,520.00
2012
ROW
M-STP
$1,280,000.00
$1,024,000.00
FY 2011-2015 TIP PROJECTS: Tuesday, December 21, 2010
Local $90,000.00 $60,000.00
Year 2011
LRTP 1042-131
State
State
Local $110,880.00 $256,000.00
Page 29 of 40
FY 2011-2015 Transportation Improvement Program ID# 2011-42-150
LRTP 1042-289 Lead Agency
ID# 2011-44-058
Funding LOCAL
Total $2,218,994.00
2011
PE-D
LOCAL
$176,230.00
LRTP 1043-261 Smyrna
Federal
State
Local $2,218,994.00 $176,230.00
Route Rocky Fork Road Interchange Total $10,500,000
County Rutherford
Phase PE-D
Funding M-STP
Total $350,000.00
Federal $280,000.00
2011
PE-N
M-STP
$150,000.00
$120,000.00
$30,000.00
2013
ROW
M-STP
$1,500,000.00
$1,200,000.00
$300,000.00
LRTP 1045-336
Murfreesboro Public Transit
LRTP 1045-337 Year 2011
Murfreesboro Public Transit
LRTP 1045-338
Funding 5309
Type Transit Capital
Murfreesboro Public Transit
Phase CONST
LRTP 1046-292 Lead Agency
Funding 5307
Type Transit Capital
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Lead Agency Year 2011
Type Transit Capital
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Lead Agency
ID# 2011-46-056
Type Interchange
Total $2,395,224
Year 2011
Year 2012
ID# 2011-45-114
County Rutherford
Phase CONST
Lead Agency
ID# 2011-45-113
Murfreesboro
Route Fortress Boulevard Widening
Year 2011
Lead Agency
ID# 2011-45-112
Type Road Widening
Funding 5307 Type Greenway
Smyrna
State
Route 5307 Urban Capital for Rover Public Transit - Bus Replacement County Rutherford Total $951,078.00
Total $951,078 Federal $760,863.00
State $95,108.00
Local $95,108.00
Route 5309 Earmark for Rover Public Transit - Bus & Bus Facilities County Rutherford Total $86,766.00
Total $86,766 Federal $69,413.00
State $8,677.00
Local $8,677.00
Route 5307 Urban capital Funding for Rover Public - Station/Operations/Admin/ County Rutherford Total $1,697,095.00
Total $1,697,095 Federal $1,357,676.00
State $169,709.50
Local $169,709.50
Route Smyrna Greenway County Rutherford Total $90,000.00
Total $700,000 Federal $72,000.00
State
Local $18,000.00
Year 2012
Phase PE-D
2012
PE-N
HPP-TN100
$10,000.00
$8,000.00
$2,000.00
2013
ROW
HPP-TN100
$100,000.00
$80,000.00
$20,000.00
FY 2011-2015 TIP PROJECTS: Tuesday, December 21, 2010
Funding HPP-TN100
Local $70,000.00
Page 30 of 40
FY 2011-2015 Transportation Improvement Program 2014 ID# 2011-46-057
CONST
LRTP 1046-293 Lead Agency
ID# 2011-510-017
$100,000.00
Route Smyrna Greenway 2 County Rutherford
Total $756,000
Funding HPP-TN100
Total $90,000.00
Federal $72,000.00
2012
PE-N
HPP-TN100
$10,000.00
$8,000.00
$2,000.00
2013
ROW
HPP-TN100
$100,000.00
$80,000.00
$20,000.00
2014
CONST
HPP-TN100
$556,000.00
$444,800.00
$111,200.00
LRTP 1052-273
Type Reconstruct
Gallatin
LRTP 1051-222
State
Funding HPP-TN281 Type New Roadway
TDOT
Total $1,500,000.00
Total $4,198,526 Federal $1,500,000.00
State
County Sumner
Total $46,000,000
Phase PE-D
Funding NHS
Total $2,000,000.00
Federal $1,600,000.00
State $400,000.00
2011
PE-N
NHS
$1,000,000.00
$800,000.00
$200,000.00
Lead Agency
Type Intersection
White House
County Sumner
Phase CONST
Funding L-STP
Total $260,000.00
2011
CONST
SAFETY
$90,000.00
Lead Agency
Type Signalization
Goodlettsville
Total $350,000 Federal $187,916.00
State
Local $72,048.00
$90,000.00
Route Long Hollow Pike Traffic Signal Synchronization County Sumner
Total $300,000
Year 2011
Phase CONST
Funding CMAQ
Total $270,000.00
Federal $270,000.00
2011
PE-D
CMAQ
$29,000.00
$29,000.00
2011
PE-N
CMAQ
$1,000.00
$1,000.00
FY 2011-2015 TIP PROJECTS: Tuesday, December 21, 2010
Local
Route Tyree Springs (SR-258) / S Palmers Chapel Intersection Improvements
Year 2011
LRTP 1017-267
Local
Route SR-109
Year 2011
LRTP 1054-255
Local $18,000.00
Route Airport Road Relocation County Sumner
Phase CONST
Lead Agency
ID# 2011-57-024
$400,000.00
Phase PE-D
Year 2011
ID# 2011-54-156
Type Greenway
Smyrna
$500,000.00
Year 2012
Lead Agency
ID# 2011-51-108
HPP-TN100
State
Local
Page 31 of 40
FY 2011-2015 Transportation Improvement Program ID# 2011-57-026
LRTP 1057-247 Lead Agency
ID# 2011-59-025
Total $120,000
Funding CMAQ
Total $84,000.00
Federal $84,000.00
2011
PE-D
CMAQ
$35,000.00
$35,000.00
2011
PE-N
CMAQ
$1,000.00
$1,000.00
LRTP 1086-105
Type
Goodlettsville
County Sumner
Phase PE-D
Funding LOCAL
Total $12,000.00
2012
PE-N
LOCAL
$500.00
LRTP 1056-104
Type
Phase PE-D
Funding LOCAL
Total $6,500.00
2012
PE-N
LOCAL
$500.00
Type Road Widening
Franklin
Federal
State
Local $12,000.00 $500.00
Total $70,000 Federal
State
Funding LOCAL
LRTP 1062-135
Type Road Widening
Franklin
Local $6,500.00 $500.00
Route McEwen Drive Extension County Williamson
Phase CONST
Lead Agency
Total $125,000
County Sumner
Year 2012
Year 2011
Local
Route US-41 (Springfield Hwy)/US 31W (Louisville Hwy) Street Lighting Improv
Goodlettsville
LRTP 1061-201
State
Route Long Hollow Pike Street Lighting Improvements
Year 2012
Lead Agency
ID# 2011-62-004
County Sumner
Phase CONST
Lead Agency
ID# 2011-61-012
Goodlettsville
Route Madison Creek/Long Hollow Pike Traffic Signal
Year 2011
Lead Agency
ID# 2011-59-027
Type Signalization
Total $12,500,000.00
Total $12,500,000 Federal
State
Local $12,500,000.00
Route Columbia Ave South (SR 6/US 31) County Williamson
Total $20,000,000
Year 2012
Phase PE-D
Funding LOCAL
Total $900,000.00
2012
PE-N
LOCAL
$100,000.00
$100,000.00
2013
ROW
LOCAL
$4,000,000.00
$4,000,000.00
2015
CONST
U-RSV
$12,500,000.00
FY 2011-2015 TIP PROJECTS: Tuesday, December 21, 2010
Federal
$10,000,000.00
State
Local $900,000.00
$2,500,000.00
Page 32 of 40
FY 2011-2015 Transportation Improvement Program ID# 2011-62-005
LRTP 1062-136 Lead Agency
ID# 2011-62-007
Total $9,550,000
Funding LOCAL
Total $945,000.00
2011
PE-N
LOCAL
$105,000.00
$105,000.00
2013
ROW
LOCAL
$1,000,000.00
$1,000,000.00
2014
CONST
LOCAL
$7,500,000.00
$7,500,000.00
LRTP 1062-138
Type Road Widening
Franklin
Federal
State
Local $945,000.00
Route Lewisburg Pike (US-431) - Phase 1 Total $12,800,000
County Williamson
Year 2012
Phase PE-D
Funding LOCAL
Total $1,170,000.00
2012
PE-N
LOCAL
$130,000.00
$130,000.00
2013
ROW
LOCAL
$1,500,000.00
$1,500,000.00
LRTP 1062-138
Type Road Widening
Franklin
State
County Williamson
Phase PE-D
Funding LOCAL
Total $900,000.00
2013
PE-N
LOCAL
$100,000.00
LRTP 1062-138
Federal
Type Road Widening
Franklin
Local $1,170,000.00
Route Lewisburg Pike (US-431) - Phase 2
Year 2013
Lead Agency
ID# 2011-62-010
County Williamson
Phase PE-D
Lead Agency
ID# 2011-62-009
Franklin
Route Goose Creek Bypass (SR-248)
Year 2011
Lead Agency
ID# 2011-62-008
Type Road Widening
Total $3,000,000 Federal
State
Local $900,000.00 $100,000.00
Route Lewisburg Pike (US-431) - Phase 3 County Williamson
Total $8,000,000
Year 2011
Phase PE-D
Funding LOCAL
Total $585,000.00
2011
PE-N
LOCAL
$65,000.00
$65,000.00
2012
ROW
LOCAL
$2,000,000.00
$2,000,000.00
2013
CONST
LOCAL
$5,360,000.00
$5,360,000.00
LRTP 1062-141 Lead Agency Year 2011
Type Road Widening
Franklin
Phase CONST
FY 2011-2015 TIP PROJECTS: Tuesday, December 21, 2010
Federal
State
Route McEwen Drive Phase 3 County Williamson
Funding LIC
Local $585,000.00
Total $3,976,000.00
Total $15,000,000 Federal
State $3,976,000.00
Local
Page 33 of 40
FY 2011-2015 Transportation Improvement Program 2011 ID# 2011-62-011
CONST
LRTP 1062-142 Lead Agency Year 2011
ID# 2011-62-110
LRTP 1062-113
Type Road Widening
Lead Agency Year 2013
Route McEwen Drive Phase 4 Total $17,500,000.00
Total $17,500,000 Federal
State
Federal $17,797,500.00
State $1,977,500.00
Route I-65 Total $19,775,000.00
Total $20,671,500
Type Transit Capital
Franklin Transit Authority
Local
Route I-65 Interchange County Williamson
Funding IM
Local $17,500,000.00
Total $27,500,000.00
Total $27,924,700 Federal $24,750,000.00
State $2,750,000.00
Local
Route Local Bus Service Preventative Maintenance and Capitalization - Frankli County Williamson
Total $2,792,000
Year 2011
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Funding 5307
Total $500,000.00
Federal $400,000.00
State $50,000.00
Local $50,000.00
2012
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$515,000.00
$412,000.00
$51,500.00
$51,500.00
2013
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$531,250.00
$425,000.00
$53,125.00
$53,125.00
2014
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$550,000.00
$440,000.00
$55,000.00
$55,000.00
LRTP 1089-345 Lead Agency
ID# 2011-69-123
Type Interchange
TDOT
LRTP 1065-340
$11,024,000.00
County Williamson Funding IM
Phase CONST
Lead Agency
ID# 2011-69-122
TDOT
Phase CONST
LRTP 1062-113
$11,024,000.00
County Williamson Funding LOCAL
Year 2013
ID# 2011-65-016
Type Road Widening
Franklin
Phase CONST
Lead Agency
ID# 2011-64-111
LOCAL
Type Education & Out
Williamson Co/TMA Group
Route Clean Air Schools Anti-Idling Campaign and School Pooling Program County Regional
Total $398,025
Year 2011
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Funding CMAQ
Total $159,000.00
Federal $159,000.00
2012
IMPLEMENTATION
CMAQ
$117,025.00
$117,025.00
2013
IMPLEMENTATION
CMAQ
$122,000.00
$122,000.00
LRTP 1089-345 Lead Agency Year
Type Education & Out
Williamson Co/TMA Group
Phase
FY 2011-2015 TIP PROJECTS: Tuesday, December 21, 2010
Funding
State
Local
Route Transportation-Related Air Quality Education Programming County Regional Total
Total $225,000 Federal
State
Local Page 34 of 40
FY 2011-2015 Transportation Improvement Program
ID# 2011-69-124
2011
IMPLEMENTATION
CMAQ
$75,000.00
$75,000.00
2012
IMPLEMENTATION
CMAQ
$75,000.00
$75,000.00
2013
IMPLEMENTATION
CMAQ
$75,000.00
$75,000.00
LRTP 1089-345 Lead Agency
ID# 2011-69-145
Funding CMAQ
Total $130,000.00
Federal $130,000.00
2012
IMPLEMENTATION
CMAQ
$133,300.00
$133,300.00
2013
IMPLEMENTATION
CMAQ
$134,800.00
$134,800.00
LRTP 1066-301
LRTP 1066-301 Year 2011
Lead Agency
Type Greenway Funding NSBP Type Road Widening
TDOT
Total $249,950.00
Total $249,950 Federal $199,960.00
LRTP 1072-111
Type Road Widening
Lebanon
Total $95,855.00
Total $95,855 Federal $76,684.00
State
Federal $3,680,000.00
State $920,000.00
Total $4,600,000.00
Total $12,600,000
County Wilson
Total $10,620,000
Total $492,000.00
Federal $393,600.00
2014
PE-N
L-STP
$328,000.00
$262,400.00
Year
TDOT
Phase
FY 2011-2015 TIP PROJECTS: Tuesday, December 21, 2010
State
Local $98,400.00 $65,600.00
Route I-40 County Wilson
Funding
Local
Route SR-26 (Baddour Pkwy)
Funding L-STP
Lead Agency
Local $19,171.00
Route SR-141
Phase PE-D
Type Road Widening
Local $49,990.00
Route Timberland Park Visitor Improvements (Phase II)
Year 2014
LRTP 1072-214
State
County Wilson Funding STP
Local
Route Timberland Park Visitor Improvements (Phase I)
County Williamson
Phase ROW
Lead Agency
ID# 2011-72-107
Funding NSBP
Phase CONST
State
County Williamson
Williamson Co.
LRTP 1072-237, 10 Year 2011
Type Enhancement
Williamson Co.
Phase CONST
Lead Agency
ID# 2011-72-033
Total $428,100
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Year 2011
ID# 2011-72-012
Route Transportation-Related Air Quality Outreach Campaign County Regional
Year 2011
Lead Agency
ID# 2011-69-146
Type Education & Out
Williamson Co/TMA Group
Total
Total $48,416,000 Federal
State
Local Page 35 of 40
FY 2011-2015 Transportation Improvement Program
ID# 2011-74-034
2011
PE-D
IM
$2,000,000.00
$1,800,000.00
$200,000.00
2011
PE-N
IM
$1,000,000.00
$900,000.00
$100,000.00
LRTP 1074-251 Lead Agency
ID# 2011-76-035
Phase PE-D
Funding LOCAL
Total $20,000.00
2014
ROW
LOCAL
$100,000.00
LRTP 1076-305
Federal
State
$100,000.00
Route Cedar City Trail - Phase 5 (Bartons Creek South) Total $830,898
County Wilson Total $74,703.00
Federal $59,762.00
State
Local $14,941.00
2011
PE-N
L-STP
$897.00
$718.00
$179.00
2011
ROW
L-STP
$205,000.00
$164,000.00
$41,000.00
2012
CONST
ENH
$550,298.00
$440,238.00
$110,060.00
LRTP 1077-101
Type ITS
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Lead Agency
County Wilson Funding CMAQ
Type ITS
LRTP 1085-323
Total $67,500.00
Total $67,500 Federal $67,500.00
State
Local
Route Closed Loop Signal System - Highway 70/West Main Street
Lebanon
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Lead Agency
Route Closed Loop Signal System - US 231 South/South Cumberland
Lebanon
LRTP 1077-101 Year 2011
Funding ENH
Local $20,000.00
Phase PE-D
Year 2011
ID# 2011-85-125
Type Greenway
Lebanon
Total $620,000
Year 2011
Lead Agency
ID# 2011-77-037
Route SR-24/US 70/West Main Street at Castle Heights Avenue County Wilson
Year 2014
Lead Agency
ID# 2011-77-036
Type Intersection
Lebanon
County Wilson Funding CMAQ
Type Transit Operatin
RTA
Total $114,000.00
Total $114,000 Federal $114,000.00
State
Local
Route Expansion of Regional Bus Services County Regional
Total $1,000,000
Year 2011
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Funding CMAQ
Total $250,000.00
Federal $200,000.00
2012
IMPLEMENTATION
CMAQ
$250,000.00
$200,000.00
$50,000.00
2013
IMPLEMENTATION
CMAQ
$250,000.00
$200,000.00
$50,000.00
2014
IMPLEMENTATION
CMAQ
$250,000.00
$200,000.00
$50,000.00
FY 2011-2015 TIP PROJECTS: Tuesday, December 21, 2010
State
Local $50,000.00
Page 36 of 40
FY 2011-2015 Transportation Improvement Program ID# 2011-85-127
LRTP 1085-328 Lead Agency
ID# 2011-85-132
County Regional
Total $250,000
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Funding 5307
Total $62,500.00
Federal $50,000.00
State $6,250.00
Local $6,250.00
2012
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$62,500.00
$50,000.00
$6,250.00
$6,250.00
2013
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$62,500.00
$50,000.00
$6,250.00
$6,250.00
2014
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$62,500.00
$50,000.00
$6,250.00
$6,250.00
LRTP 1085-329
Type Transit Capital
MPO
Route Regional Park and Ride Lots Total $1,000,000
County Regional
Year 2011
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Funding 5307
Total $250,000.00
Federal $200,000.00
State $25,000.00
Local $25,000.00
2012
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$250,000.00
$200,000.00
$25,000.00
$25,000.00
2013
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$250,000.00
$200,000.00
$25,000.00
$25,000.00
2014
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$250,000.00
$200,000.00
$25,000.00
$25,000.00
LRTP 1085-504 Lead Agency
ID# 2011-85-154
Route Media Fare Purchase
Year 2011
Lead Agency
ID# 2011-85-147
Type Transit Capital
RTA
Type Transit
MPO
Route Job Access and Reverse Commute (JARC) Bucket County Regional
Total $3,700,000
Year 2011
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Funding 5316
Total $1,187,500.00
Federal $950,000.00
State $118,750.00
Local $118,750.00
2012
IMPLEMENTATION
5316
$568,750.00
$455,000.00
$56,875.00
$56,875.00
2013
IMPLEMENTATION
5316
$587,500.00
$470,000.00
$58,750.00
$58,750.00
2014
IMPLEMENTATION
5316
$606,250.00
$485,000.00
$60,625.00
$60,625.00
LRTP 1085-326 Lead Agency
Type Transit Capital
MPO
Route Regional Vanpool Start-Up Program (New Vehicles & Seat Guarantee) County Regional
Total $1,999,500
Year 2011
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Funding CMAQ
Total $666,500.00
Federal $666,500.00
2012
IMPLEMENTATION
CMAQ
$666,500.00
$666,500.00
2013
IMPLEMENTATION
CMAQ
$666,500.00
$666,500.00
FY 2011-2015 TIP PROJECTS: Tuesday, December 21, 2010
State
Local
Page 37 of 40
FY 2011-2015 Transportation Improvement Program ID# 2011-85-155
LRTP 1085-330 Lead Agency
ID# 2011-85-155b
Total $562,500.00
Federal $450,000.00
State $56,250.00
Local $56,250.00
2012
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$562,500.00
$450,000.00
$56,250.00
$56,250.00
2013
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$562,500.00
$450,000.00
$56,250.00
$56,250.00
2014
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$562,500.00
$450,000.00
$56,250.00
$56,250.00
LRTP 1085-330
MPO
Year 2011
Total $562,500.00
Federal $450,000.00
State $56,250.00
Funding U-STP
Type ITS
Total $2,062,500.00
Total $2,062,500 Federal $1,650,000.00
State
Local $412,500.00
Route Regional Non-Motorized Projects with U-STP Total $3,125,000.00
Total $3,125,000 Federal $2,500,000.00
State
Local $625,000.00
Route Regional ITS & System Managment Projects with U-STP County Regional Funding U-STP
Type ITS
Total $1,031,250.00
Total $1,031,250 Federal $825,000.00
State
Local $206,250.00
Route Middle Tennessee Boulevard
Murfreesboro
Phase CONST
Local $56,250.00
Route Regional Transit Projects with U-STP
County Regional
MPO
LRTP 1047-290 Year 2011
Type Bike/Ped
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Lead Agency
Funding U-STP
MPO
LRTP 1087-701
Total $2,200,000
County Regional
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Lead Agency
Funding 5307
Type Transit
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Lead Agency
Route Regional Vanpool Program - Vehicle Replacement County Regional
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
LRTP 1086-601 Year 2011
Type Transit Capital
MPO
LRTP 1085-501 Year 2011
ID# 203
Total $2,200,000
Funding 5307
Lead Agency
ID# 2011-89-9999
County Regional
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Year 2015
ID# 2011-86-6666
MPO
Route Regional Vanpool Program - Vehicle Replacement
Year 2011
Lead Agency
ID# 2011-85-5555
Type Transit Capital
County Rutherford Funding DEMO
Total $442,715.00
Total $9,578,569 Federal $354,172.00
State
Local $88,543.00
2011
CONST
HPP
$6,279,286.00
$5,023,429.00
$1,255,857.00
2011
CONST
M-STP
$1,150,000.00
$920,000.00
$230,000.00
FY 2011-2015 TIP PROJECTS: Tuesday, December 21, 2010
Page 38 of 40
FY 2011-2015 Transportation Improvement Program ID# 223
LRTP 1046-270 Lead Agency Year 2011
ID# 226
LRTP 1046-298
Funding ENH Type Greenway
Murfreesboro
Total $154,000.00
Total $154,000 Federal $123,200.00
State
Local $30,800.00
Route Stones River Greenway Extension County Rutherford
Total $10,951,764
Funding HPP-TN034
Total $7,348,415.00
Federal $5,878,732.00
2011
CONST
ENH
$750,000.00
$600,000.00
$150,000.00
2011
CONST
HPP-TN034
$750,000.00
$600,000.00
$150,000.00
2011
ROW
HPP-TN034
$2,853,349.00
$2,282,679.00
$570,670.00
LRTP 1061-225 TDOT
LRTP 1074-277 Year 2011
Type New Roadway Funding STA Type Intersection
Lebanon
Phase CONST
LRTP 1044-272 Lead Agency
Total $10,800,000.00
Total $83,440,000 Federal
Type Signalization
LaVergne
Total $5,300,000.00
Total $8,800,000 Federal $4,770,000.00
State $530,000.00
Local
Route Old Nashville Hwy County Rutherford
Total $894,339
Funding M-STP
Total $100,000.00
Federal $100,000.00
2012
CONST
M-STP
$305,000.00
$244,000.00
LRTP 1052-276
Type Intersection
Gallatin
Local
Route Maddox-Simpson Parkway (SR-26)
Phase CONST
State
Local $61,000.00
Route East Broadway (SR-6) County Sumner
Total $2,170,836
Year 2011
Phase CONST
Funding U-RSV
Total $126,000.00
Federal $100,800.00
2011
PE-D
U-STP
$59,000.00
$59,000.00
FY 2011-2015 TIP PROJECTS: Tuesday, December 21, 2010
State $10,800,000.00
County Wilson Funding HSIP
Local $1,469,683.00
Route SR-840 South
Year 2011
Lead Agency
State
County Williamson
Phase PAVE
Lead Agency
ID# 99-New-23
County Rutherford
Phase CONST
Year 2012
ID# 99-New-14
Route Fergus Road
Year 2011
Lead Agency
ID# 503
LaVergne
Phase CONST
Lead Agency
ID# 407b
Type Pedestrian
State $25,200.00
Local
Page 39 of 40
FY 2011-2015 Transportation Improvement Program 2011 ID# 99-New-28
ROW
LRTP 1052-174 Lead Agency
ID# 99-New-29
Route Drakes Creek / Indian Lake Blvd Widening County Sumner
Total $1,400,000
Funding U-STP
Total $70,000.00
Federal $56,000.00
2012
PE-N
U-STP
$30,000.00
$24,000.00
$6,000.00
2012
ROW/UTILITIES
U-STP
$300,000.00
$240,000.00
$60,000.00
2013
CONST
U-RSV
$1,000,000.00
$800,000.00
$200,000.00
LRTP 1057-178
Type Signalization
Hendersonville
Phase CONST
LRTP 1046-294 Lead Agency
Funding U-STP Type Greenway
LaVergne
Total $966,614.00
Type Road Widening
Route SR-109
TDOT
State
Funding HPP
LRTP 1051-233
Type Road Widening
TDOT
Phase CONST (ADD)
Federal $112,000.00
State
FY 2011-2015 TIP PROJECTS: Tuesday, December 21, 2010
Total $2,107,730.00
Federal $1,686,184.00
State $421,546.00
Local $45,000.00
Total $9,300,000 Local
Route SR-109 County Sumner
Funding STP
Local
Total $147,000
County Sumner
Phase ROW
Year 2011
Federal $966,614.00
County Rutherford
LRTP 1052-223
Lead Agency
Total $1,607,874
Route Hurricane Creek Greenway Total $147,000.00
Year 2011
Local $14,000.00
Route Hendersonville Closed Loop and Signal Upgrade
Funding ENH
Lead Agency
State
County Sumner
Phase CONST
Year 2011
ID# AM-019
$583,000.00
Phase PE-D
Year 2011
ID# AM-018
Type Road Widening
Hendersonville
$583,000.00
Year 2012
Lead Agency
ID# AM-006
U-STP
Total $2,000,000.00
Total $36,073,000 Federal $1,600,000.00
State $400,000.00
Local
Page 40 of 40
Appendix A. List of Transit Projects
NASHVILLE AREA MPO FY 2011-2015 TIP - ADOPTED DECEMBER 15, 2010
A-1
FY 2011-2015 TIP: TRANSIT PROJECTS ID# 2008-15-046
LRTP 1015-310 Lead Agency
ID# 2008-15-048
Total $500,000
Funding 5307
Total $125,000.00
Federal $100,000.00
State $12,500.00
Local $12,500.00
2012
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$125,000.00
$100,000.00
$12,500.00
$12,500.00
2013
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$125,000.00
$100,000.00
$12,500.00
$12,500.00
2014
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$125,000.00
$100,000.00
$12,500.00
$12,500.00
LRTP 1015-311
Type Transit Capital
MTA
Route Service and Support Vehicles and Equipment Total $3,125,000
County Davidson
Year 2012
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Funding 5307
Total $125,000.00
Federal $100,000.00
State $12,500.00
Local $12,500.00
2013
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$875,000.00
$700,000.00
$87,500.00
$87,500.00
2014
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$875,000.00
$700,000.00
$87,500.00
$87,500.00
LRTP 1015-313
Type Transit Capital
MTA
Route MTA - Administration Building Rehabilitation (Nestor) County Davidson
Total $7,215,151
Year 2011
Phase CONST
Funding LOCAL
Total $1,500,000.00
Federal
State
Local $1,500,000.00
2011
CONST
5307
$1,250,000.00
$1,000,000.00
$125,000.00
$125,000.00
2012
CONST
5307
$312,500.00
$250,000.00
$31,250.00
$31,250.00
2013
CONST
5307
$312,500.00
$250,000.00
$31,250.00
$31,250.00
LRTP 1015-313 Lead Agency Year 2014
ID# 2008-15-051
County Davidson
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Lead Agency
ID# 2008-15-049b
MTA
Route Project Administration for Grant Programs
Year 2011
Lead Agency
ID# 2008-15-049
Type Transit
Type Transit Capital
MTA
County Davidson
Phase CONST
LRTP 1085-327 Lead Agency
Route MTA - Administration Building Rehabilitation (Nestor)
Funding 5307 Type Transit Capital
MPO
Total $312,500.00
Total $7,215,151 Federal $250,000.00
State $31,250.00
Local $31,250.00
Route ADA Service Capitalization County Regional
Total $6,720,000
Year 2011
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Funding 5307
Total $1,460,475.00
Federal $1,168,380.00
State $146,047.50
Local $146,047.50
2012
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$1,504,290.00
$1,203,432.00
$150,429.00
$150,429.00
FY 2011-2015 TIP TRANSIT PROJECTS: Tuesday, December 21, 2010
Page 1 of 8
FY 2011-2015 TIP: TRANSIT PROJECTS
ID# 2008-15-052
2013
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$1,549,418.75
$1,239,535.00
$154,941.88
$154,941.88
2014
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$1,595,901.25
$1,276,721.00
$159,590.13
$159,590.13
LRTP 1015-316 Lead Agency
ID# 2008-15-054
Total $6,800,000
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Funding LOCAL
Total $1,700,000.00
2012
IMPLEMENTATION
LOCAL
$1,700,000.00
$1,700,000.00
2013
IMPLEMENTATION
LOCAL
$1,700,000.00
$1,700,000.00
2014
IMPLEMENTATION
LOCAL
$1,700,000.00
$1,700,000.00
LRTP 1015-317
Type Transit Capital
MTA
Federal
State
Local $1,700,000.00
Route Bus Purchase and Replacement County Davidson
Total $43,200,000
Year 2011
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Funding LOCAL
Total $10,800,000.00
2012
IMPLEMENTATION
LOCAL
$10,800,000.00
$10,800,000.00
2013
IMPLEMENTATION
LOCAL
$10,800,000.00
$10,800,000.00
2014
IMPLEMENTATION
LOCAL
$10,800,000.00
$10,800,000.00
LRTP 1015-312 Lead Agency
ID# 2008-45-090
Route ACCESSRIDE Buses County Davidson
Year 2011
Lead Agency
ID# 2008-17-021
Type Transit Capital
MTA
Type Transit Capital
MTA
Federal
State
Local $10,800,000.00
Route Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD), Automatic Vehicle Location (AVL) & Int County Davidson
Total $7,000,000
Year 2012
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Funding 5307
Total $400,000.00
Federal $320,000.00
State $40,000.00
Local $40,000.00
2013
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$1,000,000.00
$800,000.00
$100,000.00
$100,000.00
2014
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$1,000,000.00
$800,000.00
$100,000.00
$100,000.00
LRTP 1045-335 Lead Agency
Type Transit Capital
Murfreesboro Public Transit
Route 5307 Urban Capital for Rover Public Transit - Equipment County Rutherford
Total $3,808,471
Year 2011
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Funding 5307
Total $1,819,861.00
Federal $1,455,888.80
State $181,986.10
Local $181,986.10
2013
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$979,611.00
$783,689.00
$97,961.00
$97,961.00
2014
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$1,008,999.00
$807,199.00
$100,900.00
$100,900.00
FY 2011-2015 TIP TRANSIT PROJECTS: Tuesday, December 21, 2010
Page 2 of 8
FY 2011-2015 TIP: TRANSIT PROJECTS ID# 2008-85-036
LRTP 1085-331 Lead Agency
ID# 2008-85-036b
Total $3,783,700
Funding CMAQ
Total $625,000.00
Federal $625,000.00
2012
IMPLEMENTATION
CMAQ
$775,000.00
$775,000.00
2012
IMPLEMENTATION
U-STP
$833,700.00
$666,960.00
2013
IMPLEMENTATION
CMAQ
$775,000.00
$775,000.00
LRTP 1085-331
Type Transit
MPO
LRTP 1085-320
Funding CMAQ
Type Transit Capital
RTA
Total $3,783,700
Total $775,000.00
Federal $775,000.00
State
Total $18,750,000
Funding 5307
Total $1,750,000.00
Federal $1,400,000.00
2011
IMPLEMENTATION
U-STP
$625,000.00
$500,000.00
2012
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$2,812,500.00
$2,250,000.00
2012
IMPLEMENTATION
U-STP
$625,000.00
$500,000.00
RTA
Local
Route Commuter Rail Capitalization and Preventative Maintenance
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Lead Agency
$166,740.00
County Regional
Type Transit Capital
Local
Route Regional Ridesharing & TDM Strategies - Program Administration
Year 2011
LRTP 1085-320
State
County Regional
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Lead Agency
ID# 2008-85-091c
County Regional
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Year 2014
ID# 2008-85-091b
MPO
Route Regional Ridesharing & TDM Strategies - Program Administration
Year 2011
Lead Agency
ID# 2008-85-091
Type Transit
State $175,000.00
Local $175,000.00 $125,000.00
$281,250.00
$281,250.00 $125,000.00
Route Commuter Rail Capitalization and Preventative Maintenance County Regional
Total $18,750,000
Year 2013
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Funding U-STP
Total $625,000.00
Federal $500,000.00
State
Local $125,000.00
2013
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$3,125,000.00
$2,500,000.00
$312,500.00
$312,500.00
2014
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$3,437,500.00
$2,750,000.00
$343,750.00
$373,750.00
2014
IMPLEMENTATION
U-STP
$625,000.00
$500,000.00
LRTP 1085-320 Lead Agency Year 2015
Type Transit Capital
RTA
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
$125,000.00
Route Commuter Rail Capitalization and Preventative Maintenance County Regional
Funding 5307
FY 2011-2015 TIP TRANSIT PROJECTS: Tuesday, December 21, 2010
Total $3,750,000.00
Total $18,750,000 Federal $3,000,000.00
State $375,000.00
Local $375,000.00 Page 3 of 8
FY 2011-2015 TIP: TRANSIT PROJECTS 2015 ID# 2008-85-093
IMPLEMENTATION
LRTP 1085-505 Lead Agency
ID# 2009-85-010
$125,000.00
Route New Freedom (NF) Funds Bucket County Regional
Total $1,850,000
Funding 5317
Total $743,750.00
Federal $595,000.00
State $74,375.00
Local $74,375.00
2012
IMPLEMENTATION
5317
$356,250.00
$285,000.00
$35,625.00
$35,625.00
2013
IMPLEMENTATION
5317
$362,500.00
$290,000.00
$36,250.00
$36,250.00
2014
IMPLEMENTATION
5317
$375,000.00
$300,000.00
$37,500.00
$37,500.00
LRTP 1085-321
Type Transit Capital
RTA
LRTP 1015-315
Route Martha Station Construction County Regional
Phase CONST
Lead Agency
Funding U-STP Type Transit Capital
MTA
Total $875,000.00
Total $1,472,985 Federal $700,000.00
State
Local $175,000.00
Route Enhanced Transit Service along West End Corridor - Capital County Davidson
Total $6,000,000
Year 2011
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Funding CMAQ
Total $2,500,000.00
Federal $2,000,000.00
2012
IMPLEMENTATION
CMAQ
$1,500,000.00
$1,200,000.00
$300,000.00
2013
IMPLEMENTATION
CMAQ
$1,500,000.00
$1,200,000.00
$300,000.00
LRTP 1015-307 Lead Agency
ID# 2011-15-135
$500,000.00
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Year 2011
ID# 2011-15-133
Type Transit
MTA
$625,000.00
Year 2011
Lead Agency
ID# 2011-15-117
U-STP
Type Transit Capital
MTA
State
Local $500,000.00
Route Bus Stop Improvements and Passenger Amenities County Davidson
Total $1,250,000
Year 2011
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Funding 5307
Total $250,000.00
Federal $200,000.00
State $25,000.00
Local $25,000.00
2012
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$250,000.00
$200,000.00
$25,000.00
$25,000.00
2013
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$250,000.00
$200,000.00
$25,000.00
$25,000.00
2014
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$250,000.00
$200,000.00
$25,000.00
$25,000.00
LRTP 1015-306 Lead Agency Year 2011
Type Transit Capital
MTA
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Route Farebox Purchase and Replacement County Davidson
Funding 5307
FY 2011-2015 TIP TRANSIT PROJECTS: Tuesday, December 21, 2010
Total $100,000.00
Total $400,000 Federal $80,000.00
State $10,000.00
Local $10,000.00 Page 4 of 8
FY 2011-2015 TIP: TRANSIT PROJECTS
ID# 2011-15-137
2012
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$100,000.00
$80,000.00
$10,000.00
$10,000.00
2013
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$100,000.00
$80,000.00
$10,000.00
$10,000.00
2014
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$100,000.00
$80,000.00
$10,000.00
$10,000.00
LRTP 1015-309 Lead Agency
ID# 2011-15-139
Funding 5307
Total $6,812,500.00
Federal $5,450,000.00
State $681,250.00
Local $681,250.00
2012
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$7,000,000.00
$5,600,000.00
$700,000.00
$700,000.00
2013
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$7,781,250.00
$6,225,000.00
$778,125.00
$778,125.00
2014
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$8,750,000.00
$7,000,000.00
$875,000.00
$875,000.00
LRTP 1015-314
Type Transit Capital
MTA
Route Transit Signal Prioritization County Davidson
Total $1,000,000
Year 2013
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Funding CMAQ
Total $500,000.00
Federal $400,000.00
2014
IMPLEMENTATION
CMAQ
$500,000.00
$400,000.00
LRTP 1015-308 Year 2011
LRTP 1045-336 Year 2012
Funding 5307
Type Transit Capital
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Lead Agency
State
Funding 5307
Type Transit Capital
Murfreesboro Public Transit
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Funding 5309
FY 2011-2015 TIP TRANSIT PROJECTS: Tuesday, December 21, 2010
Local $100,000.00 $100,000.00
Route New Satellite Maintenance and Office Facility (Peterbilt) County Davidson
Murfreesboro Public Transit
LRTP 1045-337 Year 2011
Type Transit Capital
MTA
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Lead Agency
ID# 2011-45-113
Total $35,000,000
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Lead Agency
ID# 2011-45-112
Route Local Bus Service Preventative Mainatenance and Capitalization - MTA County Davidson
Year 2011
Lead Agency
ID# 2011-15-148
Type Transit Capital
MTA
Total $1,250,000.00
Total $20,000,000 Federal $1,000,000.00
State $125,000.00
Local $125,000.00
Route 5307 Urban Capital for Rover Public Transit - Bus Replacement County Rutherford Total $951,078.00
Total $951,078 Federal $760,863.00
State $95,108.00
Local $95,108.00
Route 5309 Earmark for Rover Public Transit - Bus & Bus Facilities County Rutherford Total $86,766.00
Total $86,766 Federal $69,413.00
State $8,677.00
Local $8,677.00
Page 5 of 8
FY 2011-2015 TIP: TRANSIT PROJECTS ID# 2011-45-114
LRTP 1045-338 Lead Agency Year 2011
ID# 2011-65-016
LRTP 1065-340
Type Transit Capital
Franklin Transit Authority
County Rutherford Total $1,697,095.00
Total $1,697,095 Federal $1,357,676.00
State $169,709.50
Local $169,709.50
Route Local Bus Service Preventative Maintenance and Capitalization - Frankli County Williamson
Total $2,792,000
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Funding 5307
Total $500,000.00
Federal $400,000.00
State $50,000.00
Local $50,000.00
2012
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$515,000.00
$412,000.00
$51,500.00
$51,500.00
2013
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$531,250.00
$425,000.00
$53,125.00
$53,125.00
2014
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$550,000.00
$440,000.00
$55,000.00
$55,000.00
LRTP 1089-345
Type Education & Out
Williamson Co/TMA Group
Route Clean Air Schools Anti-Idling Campaign and School Pooling Program County Regional
Total $398,025
Year 2011
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Funding CMAQ
Total $159,000.00
Federal $159,000.00
2012
IMPLEMENTATION
CMAQ
$117,025.00
$117,025.00
2013
IMPLEMENTATION
CMAQ
$122,000.00
$122,000.00
LRTP 1089-345 Lead Agency
ID# 2011-69-124
Funding 5307
Route 5307 Urban capital Funding for Rover Public - Station/Operations/Admin/
Year 2011
Lead Agency
ID# 2011-69-123
Murfreesboro Public Transit
Phase CONST
Lead Agency
ID# 2011-69-122
Type Transit Capital
Type Education & Out
Williamson Co/TMA Group
County Regional
Total $225,000
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Funding CMAQ
Total $75,000.00
Federal $75,000.00
2012
IMPLEMENTATION
CMAQ
$75,000.00
$75,000.00
2013
IMPLEMENTATION
CMAQ
$75,000.00
$75,000.00
Lead Agency
Type Education & Out
Williamson Co/TMA Group
State
Local
Route Transportation-Related Air Quality Outreach Campaign County Regional
Total $428,100
Year 2011
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Funding CMAQ
Total $130,000.00
Federal $130,000.00
2012
IMPLEMENTATION
CMAQ
$133,300.00
$133,300.00
2013
IMPLEMENTATION
CMAQ
$134,800.00
$134,800.00
FY 2011-2015 TIP TRANSIT PROJECTS: Tuesday, December 21, 2010
Local
Route Transportation-Related Air Quality Education Programming
Year 2011
LRTP 1089-345
State
State
Local
Page 6 of 8
FY 2011-2015 TIP: TRANSIT PROJECTS ID# 2011-85-127
LRTP 1085-328 Lead Agency
ID# 2011-85-132
County Regional
Total $250,000
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Funding 5307
Total $62,500.00
Federal $50,000.00
State $6,250.00
Local $6,250.00
2012
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$62,500.00
$50,000.00
$6,250.00
$6,250.00
2013
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$62,500.00
$50,000.00
$6,250.00
$6,250.00
2014
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$62,500.00
$50,000.00
$6,250.00
$6,250.00
LRTP 1085-329
Type Transit Capital
MPO
Route Regional Park and Ride Lots Total $1,000,000
County Regional
Year 2011
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Funding 5307
Total $250,000.00
Federal $200,000.00
State $25,000.00
Local $25,000.00
2012
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$250,000.00
$200,000.00
$25,000.00
$25,000.00
2013
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$250,000.00
$200,000.00
$25,000.00
$25,000.00
2014
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$250,000.00
$200,000.00
$25,000.00
$25,000.00
LRTP 1085-504 Lead Agency
ID# 2011-85-154
RTA
Route Media Fare Purchase
Year 2011
Lead Agency
ID# 2011-85-147
Type Transit Capital
Type Transit
MPO
Route Job Access and Reverse Commute (JARC) Bucket County Regional
Total $3,700,000
Year 2011
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Funding 5316
Total $1,187,500.00
Federal $950,000.00
State $118,750.00
Local $118,750.00
2012
IMPLEMENTATION
5316
$568,750.00
$455,000.00
$56,875.00
$56,875.00
2013
IMPLEMENTATION
5316
$587,500.00
$470,000.00
$58,750.00
$58,750.00
2014
IMPLEMENTATION
5316
$606,250.00
$485,000.00
$60,625.00
$60,625.00
LRTP 1085-326 Lead Agency
Type Transit Capital
MPO
Route Regional Vanpool Start-Up Program (New Vehicles & Seat Guarantee) County Regional
Total $1,999,500
Year 2011
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Funding CMAQ
Total $666,500.00
Federal $666,500.00
2012
IMPLEMENTATION
CMAQ
$666,500.00
$666,500.00
2013
IMPLEMENTATION
CMAQ
$666,500.00
$666,500.00
FY 2011-2015 TIP TRANSIT PROJECTS: Tuesday, December 21, 2010
State
Local
Page 7 of 8
FY 2011-2015 TIP: TRANSIT PROJECTS ID# 2011-85-155
LRTP 1085-330 Lead Agency
ID# 2011-85-155b
MPO
Route Regional Vanpool Program - Vehicle Replacement County Regional
Total $2,200,000
Year 2011
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Funding 5307
Total $562,500.00
Federal $450,000.00
State $56,250.00
Local $56,250.00
2012
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$562,500.00
$450,000.00
$56,250.00
$56,250.00
2013
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$562,500.00
$450,000.00
$56,250.00
$56,250.00
2014
IMPLEMENTATION
5307
$562,500.00
$450,000.00
$56,250.00
$56,250.00
LRTP 1085-330 Lead Agency Year 2015
ID# 2011-85-5555
Type Transit Capital
MPO
Lead Agency
Route Regional Vanpool Program - Vehicle Replacement Total $2,200,000
County Regional
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
LRTP 1085-501 Year 2011
Type Transit Capital Funding 5307
Type Transit
MPO
Phase IMPLEMENTATION
Total $562,500.00
Federal $450,000.00
State $56,250.00
Route Regional Transit Projects with U-STP County Regional
Funding U-STP
FY 2011-2015 TIP TRANSIT PROJECTS: Tuesday, December 21, 2010
Local $56,250.00
Total $2,062,500.00
Total $2,062,500 Federal $1,650,000.00
State
Local $412,500.00
Page 8 of 8
Appendix B. Construction Reserve Project List
NASHVILLE AREA MPO FY 2011-2015 TIP - ADOPTED DECEMBER 15, 2010
B-1
FY 2011-2015 CONSTRUCTION RESERVE
Davidson Metro Nashville 2004-008 2008-14-030 2008-17-026 2004-005 2008-11-027 2009-16-029
Traffic Signal Communication Provision and Upgrade Various intersection improvements (FAU routes) Arterial Corridor ITS Communication Jefferson Street SR-255 Harding Place Extension (Phase 1) Cumberland River Greenway System - TSU Connector Portion
2011 2011 2012 2013 2013 2014
$853,650.00 $4,000,000.00 $2,400,000.00 $792,918.00 $6,800,000.00 $360,000.00
Battery Lane / Harding Place and Franklin Road Improvements
2012
$1,217,600.00
SR-76 Sidewalks
2011
$197,953.00
2011-42-061
Weakley Lane Widening
2015
$2,000,000.00
2008-54-033 99-New-23 2008-51-032 2008-51-032
Various intersection improvements East Broadway (SR-6) East-West Corridor (Albert Gallatin Avenue (SR-174) / Hatten Track Road Extension) East-West Corridor (Albert Gallatin Avenue (SR-174) / Hatten Track Road Extension)
2011 2011 2012 2013
$183,000.00 $100,800.00 $7,581,401.00 $8,100,000.00
Rockland Road/Imperial Boulevard New Shackle Island Road (SR-258) - Phase 1 Rockland Road/Imperial Boulevard Drakes Creek / Indian Lake Blvd Widening
2011 2011 2012 2013
$3,450,000.00 $2,595,600.00 $2,300,000.00 $800,000.00
Oak Hill 2011-14-042
Robertson White House 2004-022
Rutherford Smyrna
Sumner Gallatin
Hendersonville 2002-028 2006-014 2002-028 99-New-28
Williamson Brentwood FY 2011-2015 TIP CONSTRUCTION RESERVE:
1 OF 2
FY 2011-2015 CONSTRUCTION RESERVE 2008-67-035 2008-67-035 2006-013
Concord Road Signals Concord Road Signals Concord Road (SR-253)
2011 2011 2012
$210,000.00 $40,000.00 $2,600,000.00
2009-67-026 2011-62-004
Franklin ITS Infrastructure Columbia Ave South (SR 6/US 31)
2011 2015
$1,600,000.00 $10,000,000.00
2008-71-038 2008-71-038
Beckwith Road/Eastern Connector Beckwith Road/Eastern Connector
2012 2013
$7,570,240.00 $1,733,760.00
Franklin
Wilson Mt. Juliet
FY 2011-2015 TIP CONSTRUCTION RESERVE:
2 OF 2
Appendix C. MPO Project Evaluation & Scoring
NASHVILLE AREA MPO FY 2011-2015 TIP - ADOPTED DECEMBER 15, 2010
C-1
Nashville Area MPO 2035 Regional Plan Ͳ Project Evaluation Factors ENDORSED BY EXECUTIVE BOARD, MARCH 17, 2010 Factors in Evaluating Projects for the 2035 Regional Transportation Plan 1. Congestion Management a. What are the root causes of congestion in the vicinity of the project location (e.g., traffic volume, physical design, crashes, regulations, behavioral, freight, etc.)? b. Given the land uses, urban design and community goals for the project vicinity, what level of congestion is appropriate for the project and vicinity (i.e. some commercial centers/Downtowns need greater congestion for visibility/economic development)? c. How well does the project address those causes? d. How could the project be scoped to include congestion management solutions to optimize its benefit? 2. MultiͲModal Choices a. How well does the project introduce, support, or reinforce multiple transportation choices for people to access residences, jobs, schools, food, entertainment, etc? b. How can the project be scoped to incorporate facilities for and/or connections to nonͲmotorized modes and transit? 3. Freight & Goods Movement a. How well does the project support or harm the movement of freight and goods through the region? b. How can the project be scoped to incorporate facilities that aid in the safe and efficient movement of freight? c. How can the project be scoped to balance the movement of freight and goods with other community goals? 4. Safety & Security a. How well does the project address safety concerns for all users? b. Is the project in a highͲcrash corridor? c. How can the project be scoped to increase safety of all users? d. How well does the project address security concerns? e. Does the project aid/ harm important evacuation routes? f.
How can the project be scoped to features that help secure citizens and regional resources?
5. System Preservation a. How well does the project make use of limited financial resources to ensure the continued productivity of the existing transportation system? b. How can the project be scoped to include features the make the facility more efficient (e.g., ITS, design, materials, etc.) Printed on 5/5/2010
Page 1 of 2
6. Quality Growth/ Sustainable Land Development a. How well does the project encourage infill/ redevelopment? b. Do area plans call for mixedͲused, higher density development? If so, how does the project complement these plans? c. Is the project encouraging growth in areas where growth is planned or desired? d. Conversely, is the project encouraging growth in areas where additional growth is not planned or desired? e. Does the project enhance or contribute to the form and function quality of the surrounding community? 7. Economic Prosperity a. How well does the project support or stimulate the local/ regional economy? b. How well does the project support freight movements? c. To what degree does the implementation of the project create jobs? d. How well does the facility connect people with opportunities to engage in economic activity? e. To what degree does the project aid in the region's economic competitiveness with other metro areas of the nation? f.
Is the project supported by business leaders?
8. Health & Environment a. Does the project aid/ harm in the preservation of the region's natural or socioͲcultural resources (e.g., open space, animal habitat, historic structures, places of worship, community centers, etc.)? b. How can the project be scoped to mitigate the negative impacts to valuable resources? c. How well does the project support efforts to reduce dependency on fossil fuels, particularly foreign oil? d. How well does the project support efforts to improve air and water quality? e. Does the project include facilities that provide opportunities for active transportation/ physical activity? f.
Does the project aid/ harm the advancement of social justice and equal opportunity to destinations throughout the region?
g. How can the project be scoped to mitigate any negative impacts to predominately lowͲincome or minority communities or persons with a disability? 9. Local Support/ Consistency with Plans a. Is the project consistent with local, state, or other regional plans for growth and preservation (economic development, land use, natural features preservation, etc.)? b. Has the project been endorsed locally through the adoption of official instruments such as, but not limited to, a local major thoroughfare plan, transportation element of a comprehensive plan, or by resolution of the local governing body? c. If on a stateͲroute, is the project endorsed or supported by TDOT? Printed on 5/5/2010
Page 2 of 2
Nashville Area Metropolitan Planning Organization 2035 Regional Transportation Plan | Project Scoring Key Draft Implementation of Project Evaluation Criteria Endorsed by MPO Executive Board on March 17, 2010
EVALUATION CRITERIA TOTAL POSSIBLE POINTS SYSTEM PRESERVATION & ENHANCEMENT Project Improves Existing Route Project Improves an Intersection 2008 AADT Index to Average per Functional Class Project Upgrades Route to Context Sensitive/ Prescribed Design Standards Project Addresses Major Maintenance (e.g., bridge repair, general aging, etc.) Project Integrates ITS Technology, Signalization, Wayfinding Project Integrates MultiͲModal Upgrades
QUALITY GROWTH, SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, & ECONOMIC PROSPERITY Project Improves Accessibility and/or Connectivity to Existing Residential Population Project Improves Accessibility and/or Connectivity to Existing Jobs Project Located ENTIRELY within Urban Growth Boundary Project Located PARTIALLY within Urban Growth Boundary Project Located ENTIRELY within Existing or Planned MixedͲUse or Employment Centers Project Located PARTIALLY within Existing or Planned MixedͲUse or Employment Centers Project Incorporates Streetscaping/ Enhancements Project Corrects Poor Storm water Flow/ Drainage (Curb and Gutter) Project Contributes to Grid Development/ Roadway Network Connectivity Project Located In High Growth Areas
MULTIͲMODAL OPTIONS Route Includes Existing Transit Service Project Includes Transit Capacity (e.g., dedicated lanes, signal priority, HOV) Project Includes Sidewalk Improvements (up to 7 depending on BPAC priority) Project Includes Bicycle Facility Improvements (up to 7 depending on BPAC priority) Project Includes MultiͲModal Treatments (e.g., xͲwalks, pullouts, shelters, etc)
CONGESTION MANAGEMENT Project Addresses Corridor Congestion MPO Base Year Congestion (2008) MPO ShortͲTerm Congestion (2015) MPO MidͲTerm Congestion (2025) MPO LongͲTerm Congestion (2035) Congestion as Identified by Other Study or Observation
Project Incorporates Congestion Management Strategies (MULTIPLIER:) Geometrical Improvement Improvements to Access Management ITS/ Signalization Improvement Improvements to Turning Movements Improves Parallel Facility/ Contributes to Alternative Routing Provides Additional NonͲMotorized Mode Capacity Transit Capacity Signage/ Wayfinding
SAFETY & SECURITY Project Addresses Location with High Level of Crashes Project has Fatal Crashes Project Improves Modal Conflict (e.g., traffic signals, grade separation, dedicated lanes) Local High Crash Corridor Designation State High Crash Corridor Designation Project Located on Known Evacuation Route Project Located on the Strategic Highway Network (STRANET) Project Located on the National Highway System (NHS) Primary Purpose of Project to Improve Safety
PRINTED ON 8/9/2010
POINTS 100 15 Up to 15* 3 Value *# Strategies X 3 for Existing Route 15 Density/100 Density/1000 2 1 2 1 2 2 1 RES+EMP/10 15 3 Up to 6 Up to 7 Up to 7 Up to 4 10 5 4 3 2 3 2
ANY X2
10 Crashes/10th Mile/20 2 3 1 1 1 1 1 7 PAGE 1 OF 2
EVALUATION CRITERIA Secondary Purpose of Project to Improve Safety
FREIGHT & GOODS MOVEMENT Project Improves a Designated Truck Route Project Improves High Volume Heavy Truck Route Project Improves High Volume Commercial Truck Route Project Design Accomodates Freight Flows Route Serves Major Shipping/ Distribution Center Route Serves Intermodal Center (e.g., rail yard, port, etc.) Project Addresses Existing Freight/ Passenger Conflict Project Provides Separation in Freight/ Passenger Movements (e.g., grade separation) Project Impedes Efficient Delivery of Goods
HEALTH & ENVIRONMENT Project Located in Health Impact Area Project Provides Alt Transportation Choices for Traditionally Underserved Groups Project Provide MultiͲModal Options Near Schools Project Overlaps Environmental Conflict Areas Project Overlaps Environmental Challenge Areas
PROJECT HISTORY Project Located within the Federal Aid Urban Boundary Project Located on a Federal Aid Route TDOT Support TOP Local Priority Programmed in Current LRTP Programmed in Current TIP
PRINTED ON 8/9/2010
POINTS 5 10 4 Index Index 1 1 1 1 1 Ͳ2 10 2 #Options X #Groups #Options X #Schools Ͳ2 Ͳ2 15 1 1 2 3 5 10
PAGE 2 OF 2
Appendix D. Air Quality Conformity As of April 15, 2009, the counties of the Nashville Area MPO are considered in compliance with National Ambient Air Quality Standards and no longer are required to demonstrate conformity with established motor vehicle emissions budgets. The region does remain part of the Tennessee’s State Implementation Plan, and as such, continues to be eligible to receive Congestion Mitigation Air Quality funding from the Federal Highway Administration, at the discretion of the Tennessee Department of Transportation.
NASHVILLE AREA MPO FY 2011-2015 TIP – ADOPTED DECEMBER 15, 2010
D-1
Appendix E. Status of FY 2008-2011 Projects
NASHVILLE AREA MPO FY 2011-2015 TIP – ADOPTED DECEMBER 15, 2010
E-1
FY 2008-2011 PROJECT STATUS REPORT County Davidson
Lead Agency CHTFI
08-11 TIP 2008-15-067
Improvement Type Transit Operating
Route/Description Children's Health Transportation Fund Initiative (Vanderbilt Hospital) Rivergate Parkway Safety Improvements Dickerson Pike Streetscape
Termini / Intersecting Road Davidson County
Davidson Davidson
Goodlettsville MDHA
2008-14-083 2008-19-085
Reconstruct Enhancement
Davidson
MDHA
2006-125
Greenway
Davidson
MDHA
2006-125b
Greenway
Davidson Davidson Davidson
Metro Nashville Metro Nashville Metro Nashville
065 2003-002 001
Greenway Pedestrian Road Widening
Davidson Davidson Davidson
Metro Nashville Metro Nashville Metro Nashville
Enhancement Greenway Intersection
Davidson
Metro Nashville
Road Widening
West Trinity Lane
Davidson
Metro Nashville
Intersection
Davidson
Metro Nashville
2008-19-077 2006-409 Completed Project 8 In Previous TIP (055) In Previous TIP (056) 020
Nashville Gateway Bridge south along Cumberland Rolling Mill Hill Greenway Extension, Hermitage Ave Reconstruction & Pedestrian River Connections Rolling Mill Hill Greenway Extension, Nashville Gateway Bridge south along Cumberland Hermitage Ave Reconstruction & Pedestrian River Connections Stones River Greenway Percy Priest Lake to Cumberland River Cumberland River Pedestrian Bridge Briley Parkway and Two Rivers Parkway Gateway Boulevard/Franklin St Corridor Phase 1st Avenue to 4th Avenue 2 Amqui Train Station Depot Madison Cumberland River Greenway System Downtown to Metro Center Granny White Pike Old Hickory Boulevard (SR-254)
Davidson Davidson
Metro Nashville Metro Nashville
Davidson
11-15 TIP No
Moss Trail; Old Two Mile Pike Yes Douglas Avenue, Cleveland Street and Grace Street No
Project Status Completed Programmed Underway
No
Underway
No
Underway
No No No
Completed Completed Completed
No Yes Yes
Completed Completed Completed
Buena Vista Pike to Whites Creek Pike (SR-431)
Yes
Completed
Elm Hill Pike
Spence Lane to Massman Drive
Yes
Completed
Intersection
Andrew Jackson Parkway
No
Dropped
2006-123 2008-16-078
Pedestrian Enhancement
No No
Dropped Dropped
Metro Nashville
99-New-36
Intersection
Pedestrian Bridge to Emergency Center Demonbreun Street Streetscape Improvements Hobson Pike (SR-171)
Intersection of Chandler Road/ Old Lebanon Dirt Road Vanderbilt Medical Center 1st Avenue South to 8th Avenue South
Davidson Davidson
Metro Nashville Metro Nashville
2004-037a 2008-17-026
Education & Outreach ITS
Davidson Davidson
Metro Nashville Metro Nashville
2008-14-059 057
Ozone Action Program Arterial corridors compliant with ITS Communication and Implementation Plans Signalization/Signage/Streets3rd Avenue and Union Street Bridge Central Pike (SR-265)
Davidson
Metro Nashville
057b
Bridge
Central Pike (SR-265)
Davidson Davidson
Metro Nashville Metro Nashville
060 063
ITS ITS
Downtown Traffic Guidance ATIS - Phase 1
Davidson Davidson
Metro Nashville Metro Nashville
2002-038 2004-004
Pedestrian Wayfinding
21st Avenue Area Sidewalks Increased Guidance for Improved Mobility
Davidson
Metro Nashville
2004-005
Intersection
Jefferson Street
Davidson
Metro Nashville
2004-006
ITS
Multi-Modal Traffic Signal Enhancement
Davidson
Metro Nashville
2004-008
ITS
Davidson
Metro Nashville
2008-17-020
ITS
Traffic Signal Communication Provision and Upgrade ITS Communication Device Deployment
Various Intersections to include: Pin Hook, Hamilton No Church, Smith Springs Blvd, Couchville, and Granny Wright Regionwide No Central Business District to county line Yes 3rd Avenue North and Union Street Lebanon Rd (SR-24) to just East of Nashville and Eastern Railroad Lebanon Rd (SR-24) to just East of Nashville and Eastern Railroad Downtown Nashville Various intersections along Charlotte, James Robertson and West End 21st Avenue High volume corridors (e.g. West End), tourist areas, major intersections 8th Ave N., 10th Ave N., 12th Ave N., 21st Ave. North, 28th Ave N. Lafayette St @ 2nd Ave, 4th Ave &th Ave; Gallatin Ave @ Cahal/Carolyn; Gallatin Pk @ Trinity, Litton & Hart/Greenfield Countywide Countywide - Arterial corridors compliant with ITS Communication and Implementation Plans
Dropped
Completed Programmed
Yes No
Reprogrammed/Resubmitted Underway
No
Underway
No Yes
Underway Underway
Yes Yes
Underway Underway
Yes
Underway
Yes
Underway
Yes
Underway
No
Underway
PROJECT STATUS 1 OF 9
FY 2008-2011 PROJECT STATUS REPORT County Davidson
Lead Agency Metro Nashville
08-11 TIP 2009-16-028
Improvement Type Bike/Ped
Route/Description Sidewalk Maintenance
Termini / Intersecting Road West End Avenue between I-440 and White Bridge Road targeted for I-440 and Christopher Pl - Carden Avenue Metro Center Levee at Clarksville Highway to Clifton Avenue Various congested corridors including: Gallatin PK, Conference Dr, Old Hickory Blvd, Rivergate Pkwy,Nolensville Pk, Harding Pl, Mboro Pk, Bell Rd, Lebanon Pk, 21st Ave & others. Downtown Nashville 4th Ave to 8th Ave 4th Avenue to 8th Avenue
11-15 TIP No
Project Status Underway
Davidson
Metro Nashville
2009-16-029
Greenway
Davidson
Metro Nashville
2009-17-023
Signalization
Cumberland River Greenway System - TSU Connector Portion Traffic Signal Optimization
No
Underway
No
Underway
Davidson Davidson Davidson
Metro Nashville Metro Nashville Metro Nashville
2004-009 2006-124 2006-124b
Wayfinding Road Widening Road Widening
Davidson Davidson Davidson
Metro Nashville Metro Nashville Metro Nashville
2008-11-027 2008-12-095 2008-14-030
New Roadway Road Widening Intersection
Davidson Davidson
Metro Nashville Metro Nashville
2008-14-092 2008-17-031
Interchange Wayfinding
Davidson
Metro Nashville
2008-17-056
ITS
Davidson
Metro Nashville
2008-17-057
ITS
Davidson
Metro Nashville
2008-19-062
Enhancement
Davidson
Metro Nashville/TDOT
2004-001
ITS
Davidson Davidson
Metro Nashville/TDOT MNAA
2004-007 2009-19-003
ITS Intermodal/Parking
Davidson Davidson Davidson Davidson
MTA MTA MTA MTA
2006-406 066a 066b 2008-15-049
Transit Capital Transit Capital Transit Capital Transit Capital
Wayfinding Sign Program Gateway Boulevard Shelby Avenue Continuation (Gateway Boulevard) SR-255 Harding Place Extension (Phase I) Murfreesboro Road to Couchville Pike McCrory Lane Widening I-40 to south of EB ramps Various intersection improvements (state Countywide routes) I-40 / McCrory Lane Interchange - Phase 1 I-40 at McCrory Lane Arterial corridors compliant with ITS Central Business District to county line Communication and Implementation Plans and Wayfinding Plan (under development) Advanced Traveler Information System Phase 2 ATIS Travelers Information System, ITS Countywide Communication & CCTV 21st Avenue Roadscaping in Hillsboro Village 21st Avenue from Hillsboro Village to St. Bernard Park Entrance Arterial CCTV Charlotte Pike, Lebanon Pike; Elm Hill Pike & Donelson Pike Traffic Management Center Davidson County TMC & TDOT TMC Consolidated Rental Car Facility at Nashville Nashville International Airport grounds International Airport Farebox Replacement Countywide Central Station - Downtown Transit Center Central Business District Central Station - Downtown Transit Center Central Business District MTA - Administration Building Rehabilitation 130 Nestor Street
Yes Yes Yes
Underway Underway Underway
Yes Yes Yes
Underway Underway Underway
Yes Yes
Underway Underway
Yes
Underway
Yes
Underway
Yes
Underway
Yes
Underway
Yes No
Underway Underway
No No No Yes
Combined/Resubmitted Completed Completed Programmed
Davidson
MTA
2008-15-049b
Transit Capital
MTA- Administration Building Rehabilitation
130 Nestor Street
Yes
Programmed
Davidson Davidson
MTA MTA
2008-15-051 2008-17-021
Transit Operating ITS
Davidson
MTA
2008-17-021b
ITS
Davidson
MTA
2008-15-025
Transit Capital
Davidson
MTA
2008-15-028
Transit Operating
Davidson Davidson Davidson Davidson
MTA MTA MTA MTA
2008-15-044 2008-15-045 2008-15-050 2008-15-053
Transit Capital Transit Operating Transit Capital Transit Capital
ADA Service capitalization Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD), Automatic Vehicle Location (AVL) & Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD), Automatic Vehicle Location (AVL) & Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) Central Station Downtown Transit Center Support Equipment Service Expansion and limited BRT implementation - Murfreesboro Rd MTA Equipment Preventative Maintenance Bus Purchase Transit Facility at Lipscomb University
MTA Service Area Regionwide
Yes Yes
Programmed Underway
Regionwide
Yes
Underway
Central Business District - MCC will be located on Charlotte Ave between 4th and 5th Streets Murfreesboro Road within Davidson County
No
Completed
No
MTA Administrative Building - 130 Nestor Street 130 Nestor Street MTA service area Granny White Pike
No No No No
PROJECT STATUS 2 OF 9
FY 2008-2011 PROJECT STATUS REPORT County Davidson Davidson Davidson Davidson Davidson Davidson Davidson Davidson Davidson Davidson Davidson Davidson Davidson Davidson Davidson
Lead Agency MTA MTA MTA MTA MTA MTA MTA MTA MTA MTA MTA Oak Hill Park Center TDOT TDOT
08-11 TIP 2009-15-011 2009-15-014 2008-15-040 2008-15-040b 2008-15-046 2008-15-047 2008-15-048 2008-15-052 2008-15-052b 2008-15-054 2008-15-054b 2008-19-055 2008-15-071 2006-002 2002-041
Improvement Type Transit Capital Transit Capital Transit Capital Transit Capital Transit Operating Transit Transit Capital Transit Capital Transit Capital Transit Capital Transit Capital Noise Barrier Wall Transit Capital Noise Barrier Wall ITS
Route/Description Bus Rapid Transit Infrastructure Bus Rapid Transit Vehicles Passenger stop facility improvements Passenger stop facility improvements Project Administration Security and Surveillance Service and Support Vehicles ACCESSRIDE Buses ACCESSRIDE Buses Transit Buses Transit Buses Noise barrier wall on I-65 Vehicle Purchase I-40 ITS - Various Interstates (Phase 1)
Davidson Davidson
TDOT TDOT
2003-004 2006-001
Road Widening ITS
I-40/I-24 ITS - Various Interstates (Phase 2)
Davidson
TDOT
2008-17-063
ITS
ITS - Various
Davidson
TDOT
2009-19-002
Safety
I-440
Davidson
TDOT
2006-411a
ITS
Davidson
TDOT
2006-411b
ITS
Davidson
TDOT
2008-19-001
Noise Barrier Wall
Davidson
TDOT
2009-19-004
Bus Diesel Retrofit
Davidson Davidson Davidson
TDOT TDOT TDOT
2008-89-080 2001-002 2006-412
Locomotive Diesel Retrofit Interchange Interchange
ITS-Various Interstates and Controlled Access Various interstates Facilities (Phase 3) ITS-Various Interstates and Controlled Access Various interstates Facilities (Phase 3) I-65 Near SR-45 (Old Hickory Blvd) to north of SR-386 (Vietnam Veterans Blvd) 2 locations Pilot School Bus Diesel Retrofit - Metro Countywide Nashville Publis Schools Pilot Locomotive Diesel Retrofit - CSXT CSXT Rail line I-65 SR-12 (8th Ave.) interchange I-40 Briley Parkway/Robertson Avenue (Phase 2 CNST)
Davidson Davidson Davidson/Wils on Davidson/Wils on Regional Regional
TDOT TDOT RTA
2004-066 2009-84-033 2008-85-091
Road Widening Interchange Transit Operating
I-65/I-24 I-40 Music City Star Commuter Rail Line
RTA
2008-85-091b
Transit Operating
Metro Health & MPO MPO
2004-037b 2009-89-020
Education & Outreach Resurfacing
Regional Regional Regional
MPO MPO MPO
2010-89-002 2008-86-086 2008-89-087
Planning Bike/Ped Enhancement
Regional Regional Regional Regional Regional
MPO MPO MPO MPO MTA
2008-0na1 2008-0na2 2008-cmaq1 2008-cmaq2 2006-402
Transit Operating
11-15 TIP No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No
Programmed Completed Completed Pending Review
No No
Pending Review Pending Review
No
Pending Review
No
Pending Review
Yes
Programmed
Yes
Programmed
Yes
Programmed
Yes
Programmed
Yes No No
Programmed Underway Underway
Trinity Lane to Dickerson Road I-40 East to I-440 South Downtown Nashville to Downtown Lebanon
Yes Yes No
Underway Underway Reprogrammed/Resubmitted
Music City Star Commuter Rail Line
Downtown Nashville to Downtown Lebanon
No
Reprogrammed/Resubmitted
Ozone Action Program 3R Improvements Bucket for 2009 ARRA Projects Metropolitan Planning Activities Safe Routes to School Bucket Transportation Enhancement Projects Bucket
Regionwide Regional
No No
Completed Completed
Regional Regional Regional
No Yes Yes
Pending Review Programmed Programmed
Nashville U-STP Nashville U-STP CMAQ Overrun Bucket CMAQ Contingency Bucket Nashville Urbanized Area
No No No No Yes
Dropped Dropped Dropped Dropped Programmed
Project Cost Overrun Bucket Project Contingency Overrun Bucket Project Cost Overrun Bucket Project Contingency Overrun Bucket Job Access and Reverse Commute (JARC) Bucket
Termini / Intersecting Road Davidson County (Gallatin Pike) Davidson County (Gallatin Pike) MTA service area MTA service area 130 Nestor Street - Administration Building 130 Nestor and Downtown operations MTA service area MTA Service Area MTA Service Area MTA Service Area MTA Service Area Near intersection of I-65 and Harding Place Countywide I-40 eastbound between I-65 and I-24 Interstates including I-24, I-40, I-65 and I-440; Vietnam Veterans Fesslers Lane to Green Street Interstates including I-24, I-40, I-65 and I-440; Vietnam Veterans Interstates including I-24, I-40, I-65 and I-440; Vietnam Veterans Hillsboro Road on ramp and Murphy Road on ramp
Project Status
PROJECT STATUS 3 OF 9
FY 2008-2011 PROJECT STATUS REPORT County Regional Regional
Lead Agency MTA RTA
08-11 TIP 2008-85-093 2009-85-017
Improvement Type Transit Operating Transit Capital
Regional Regional Regional
RTA RTA RTA
2004-049 2009-85-010 2009-85-012
Transit Operating Transit Capital Transit Capital
Regional
RTA
2009-85-018
Transit Operating
Route/Description New Freedom Funds Bucket Hybrid Over-the Road Coaches for SE Corridor Express Bus Service/Bus Wrap Extension of Bus Service Martha Station Construction Express Bus Service from Williamson Co./Franklin SE Corridor Express Bus Service Expansion
Regional Regional Regional Regional Regional Regional Regional Regional Regional Regional
RTA RTA RTA RTA RTA RTA RTA RTA RTA RTA
2002-010 021 2006-019 2008-85-069 2006-009 2006-017 2006-112 2006-113 2009-85-019 2006-303
Transit Operating Transit Operating Transit Capital Transit Capital Transit Capital Transit Operating Transit Operating Transit Operating Transit Capital Transit Operating
Job Access/Reverse Commute (JARC) Ridesharing Program Vanpool vehicle purchase Vanpool Vehicle Purchase Music City Star Commuter Rail Ridesharing Vanpool Seat Guarantee Bus Seat Guarantee Regional Vanpool Expansion Downtown Bus Circulator
Regional
TDOT
2008-84-013b
Safety
Safety Bucket (Highway Hazard Elimination)
Regional Regional Regional Regional Regional Regional Regional Regional
TDOT TDOT TDOT TDOT TDOT TDOT TDOT TDOT
2008-88-002b 2008-88-011b 2008-89-014b 2008-89-015b 2008-89-081 2008-89-091 2008-84-012 2008-84-013
Bridge Bridge Interstate Impr. State Route Impr. Locomotive Diesel Retrofit Safety Safety Safety
Bridge Replacement Bridge Replacement Interstate 3R Improvements State Route 3R Improvements Pilot Locomotive Diesel Retrofit - NERR Freeway Safety Service Patrol Bucket Spot Safety Improvement Program Safety Bucket (Highway Hazard Elimination)
Regional Regional Regional Regional Regional Regional Regional Regional Regional Regional Regional Regional Regional Regional Regional Regional
TDOT TDOT TDOT TDOT TDOT TDOT TDOT TDOT TDOT TDOT TDOT TDOT TDOT TDOT TMA Group TMA Group
2008-88-002 2008-88-011 2008-89-003 2008-89-004 2008-89-005 2008-89-006 2008-89-007 2008-89-008 2008-89-009 2008-89-010 2008-89-014 2008-89-015 2009-88-032 2010-89-003 2008-85-070 2008-85-036
Bridge Bridge
Transit Capital Transit Operating
Bridge Replacement Bridge Replacement Project Cost Overrun Bucket Project Cost Overrun Bucket Project Cost Overrun Bucket Project Cost Overrun Bucket Project Cost Overruns Bucket Project Cost Overruns Bucket Project Cost Overruns Bucket Project Cost Overrun Bucket Interstate 3R improvements State Route 3R Improvements Bridge Bond Bucket S-CMAQ Funding Bucket Vanpool Vehicle Purchase TDM Strategies
Regional Regional Robertson Robertson
TMA Group TMA Group Springfield Springfield
2006-016 2006-122 2004-061 In Previous TIP (2004-011)
Transit Operating ITS Greenway Bridge
Transportation Demand Management ITS, Safety & Traveler Information System Springfield Greenway North Main Street Bridge
Interstate Impr. State Route Impr. Bridge
Termini / Intersecting Road Nashville Urbanized Area Davidson County and Rutherford County
11-15 TIP Yes No
Project Status Programmed Completed
Downtown Nashville to Lebanon Music City Star line @ Martha Williamson County & Davidson County
No Yes Yes
Dropped Programmed Programmed
Davidson County and Rutherford County
Yes
Programmed
Regionwide Region wide 5 county area Regional Regionwide Downtown Nashville to the City of Lebanon Regional Regional Regional Regional Riverfront station in Downtown Nashville and circulate throughout the downtown area
No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Reprogrammed/Resubmitted Reprogrammed/Resubmitted Reprogrammed/Resubmitted Reprogrammed/Resubmitted Reprogrammed/Resubmitted Reprogrammed/Resubmitted Reprogrammed/Resubmitted Reprogrammed/Resubmitted Reprogrammed/Resubmitted Underway
Yes
Combined/Resubmitted
Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes
Combined/Resubmitted Combined/Resubmitted Combined/Resubmitted Combined/Resubmitted Completed Programmed Programmed Programmed
Urbanized Area Urbanized Area
NERR Rail line MPO Area
Urbanized Area Urbanized Area BRR-L Overrun Bucket BRR-S Overrun Bucket State STP Overrun Bucket State STP Overrun Bucket NHS Overrun Bucket NHS Overrun Bucket IM Overrun Bucket IM Overrun Bucket
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Regional Yes Regional No Regionwide No Nashville, Gallatin, Hendersonville, Lebanon, Smyrna Yes and Murfreesboro Regional No Regional Yes Main St at 9th Avenue to Bransford Community No Sulphur Fork Creek No
Programmed Programmed Programmed Programmed Programmed Programmed Programmed Programmed Programmed Programmed Programmed Programmed Programmed Reprogrammed Dropped Programmed Underway Underway Deferred Underway
PROJECT STATUS 4 OF 9
FY 2008-2011 PROJECT STATUS REPORT County Robertson
Lead Agency Springfield
08-11 TIP 2004-010
Improvement Type Pedestrian
Route/Description Central Business District Sidewalks
Termini / Intersecting Road 5th Avenue; Memorial Blvd to Willow and Locust to Springfield Middle School From Walling Road to SR-11/US-431 (Memorial Blvd) East of Raymond Hirsch Pkwy to west of SR-41/US31 Proposed SR-109 relocation and new interchange at I-65 and the proposed relocated SR-109
11-15 TIP Yes
Project Status Underway
Robertson
TDOT
2010-32-004
Road Widening
SR-65/US-431
Yes
Underway
Robertson
White House
2004-022
Pedestrian
SR-76
Yes
Programmed
Robertson/Su TDOT mner
2006-416
Interchange
I-65
Yes
Programmed
Robertson/Su mner Rutherford Rutherford Rutherford Rutherford Rutherford Rutherford
TDOT
2008-32-018
Road Widening
SR-41/US-31 W
South of SR-109 to Kentucky State Line
No
Underway
LaVergne LaVergne LaVergne LaVergne LaVergne LaVergne
2002-033 2004-013 2006-401 2006-401b 2008-46-076 2008-46-075
Intersection Intersection Road Widening Road Widening Greenway Pedestrian
Murfreesboro Road (SR-1) Murfreesboro Road (SR-41/US-70) Waldron Rd / Parthenon Pkwy Waldron Rd / Parthenon Pkwy La Vergne Bicycle and Pedestrian Trail Chaney Boulevard Sidewalk
No No No No No Yes
Completed Completed Underway Underway Underway Underway
223 99-New-14 AM-006 2004-074 2006-407
Pedestrian Signalization Greenway Enhancement Signage
Fergus Road Old Nashville Hwy Hurricane Creek Greenway Rutherford County Visitor's Center Rutherford County Wayfinding Sign Program
La Vergne City Hall Floyd Mayfield Lane Industrial Blvd to Murfreesboro Rd (SR-1) Industrial Blvd to Murfreesboro Rd (SR-1) City of La Vergne From Chaney Blvd. to intersection of Old Nashville Highway Gale Lane to Bill Stewart Blvd Stones River Road SR-41 I-24 and Medical Ctr Parkway Rutherford County
Rutherford Rutherford Rutherford Rutherford Rutherford
LaVergne LaVergne LaVergne Murfreesboro Murfreesboro
Yes Yes Yes No No
Underway Underway Underway Completed Completed
Rutherford Rutherford
Murfreesboro Murfreesboro
2007-003 2008-46-041
Transit Operating Greenway
Service Operations - Murfreesboro Transit Lytle Creek Greenway
No No
Completed Completed
Rutherford Rutherford Rutherford Rutherford
Murfreesboro Murfreesboro Murfreesboro Murfreesboro
2008-46-066 2004-014 2004-057 2008-45-089
Greenway ITS Interchange Lighting Transit Operating
No Yes No Yes
Completed Completed Completed Programmed
Rutherford Rutherford Rutherford
Murfreesboro Murfreesboro Murfreesboro
2005-007 2007-001 2007-002
Transit Operating Transit Capital Transit Capital
Stones River Trail CCTV and Traffic Signal Interconnect US-41/70 (Northwest Broad) Service Operations - Murfreesboro Public Transportation Murfreesboro Urban Area Transit Service Bus Purchase - MurfreesboroTransit Passenger Amenities - Murfreesboro Transit
City of Murfreesboro Stones River Greenway to Cannonsburg/Public Square Lytle Creek Greenway to Thompson Lane SR-96W, US-231N (SR-10), SR-99S SR-840 City of Murfreesboro Murfreesboro Urban Area City of Murfreesboro City of Murfreesboro
No No Yes
Reprogrammed/Resubmitted Reprogrammed/Resubmitted Reprogrammed/Resubmitted
Rutherford
Murfreesboro
2008-45-088
Transit Capital
City of Murfreesboro
Yes
Reprogrammed/Resubmitted
Rutherford
Murfreesboro
2008-45-090
Transit Capital
City of Murfreesboro
Yes
Reprogrammed/Resubmitted
Rutherford Rutherford Rutherford
Murfreesboro Murfreesboro Murfreesboro
2004-056 203a 2006-201
Road Widening ITS Greenway
Old Fort Parkway to SW Loop Rd Greenland Drive to Main Street Various
No No Yes
Underway Underway Underway
Rutherford Rutherford
Murfreesboro Murfreesboro
2006-403 202
Transit Capital Intersection
Station Design & Construction - Murfreesboro Public Transportation Office and Operations Support Equipment Murfreesboro Public Transportation SR-99 (New Salem Highway) Middle Tennessee Boulevard Stones River Bicycle and Pedestrian Trail (North) Murfreesboro Transit Equipment Broad Street (SR-1)
Yes Yes
Underway Underway
Rutherford Rutherford
Murfreesboro Murfreesboro
203 226
ITS Greenway
Middle Tennessee Blvd Stones River Greenway Extension
City of Murfreesboro Old Fort Parkway (SR96), Memorial Boulevard (SR10) - separated Greenland Drive to Main Street Barfield-Crescent Road to north of Old Fort Parkway
Yes Yes
Underway Underway
Rutherford
Murfreesboro
232
Greenway
Gateway Trail
Yes
Underway
Rutherford
Murfreesboro
2008-0mu1
Stones River Greenway N. to General Bragg Trailhead Murfreesboro Urbanized Area (Includes LaVergne and Smyrna)
No
Dropped
Project Cost Overrun Bucket
PROJECT STATUS 5 OF 9
FY 2008-2011 PROJECT STATUS REPORT County Rutherford
Lead Agency Murfreesboro
08-11 TIP 2008-0mu2
Improvement Type
Route/Description Project Contigency Overrun Bucket
Rutherford
NPS
2006-202
New Roadway
Rutherford
RTA
2009-45-016
Transit Capital
Rutherford
Rutherford Co./Eagleville 2006-203
Greenway
Stones River Battlefield - Natl Park Service Interior Regional Vanpool Expansion in Rutherford County Eagleville Bicycle and Pedestrian Trail
Rutherford Rutherford Rutherford Rutherford Rutherford
Smyrna Smyrna Smyrna/La Vergne TDOT TDOT
2004-072 2006-304 225 2006-415 2006-120
Enhancement Greenway Greenway Road Widening Reconstruct
Downtown Depot Jefferson Springs Greenway Extension Stones River Greenway SR-266 / Jefferson Pike SR-99
Rutherford Rutherford Sumner Sumner
TDOT TDOT Gallatin Gallatin
2008-42-017 2008-49-016 2004-071 2008-54-084
Road Widening Noise Barrier Wall Pedestrian Interchange
Sumner
Gallatin
2008-56-022
Pedestrian
Sumner
Gallatin
2008-56-079
Enhancement
Sumner Sumner Sumner
Gallatin Gallatin Gallatin
2009-54-024 2009-56-027 2008-51-032
Intersection Greenway New Roadway
Sumner Sumner Sumner Sumner
2008-54-033 2008-54-033b 99-New-23 2008-55-072
Intersection Intersection Intersection Transit Capital
Sumner
Gallatin Gallatin Gallatin Habilitation & Training Services, Inc. Hendersonville
SR-99 I-24 Downtown Streetscape Project Interchange Modification at US 31-E and SR 109 Volunteer State Community College Pedestrian Tunnel Downtown Gallatin Streetscape Improvements - Phase II Big Station Camp Creek Blvd Town Creek Greenway - Phase 1 & 2 East-West Corridor (Albert Gallatin Avenue (SR-174) / Hatten Track Road Extension) Various intersection improvements Various Intersection Improvements East Broadway (SR-6) Vehicle Purchase
2002-030a
Greenway
Sumner
Hendersonville
2002-030b
Greenway
Sumner
Hendersonville
2009-59-022
Reconstruct
Hendersonville Bike/Ped Trail Phase 2, Project 1 Hendersonville Bike/Ped Trail - Phase 2, Project 2 West Main Street Reconstruction
Sumner Sumner
Hendersonville Hendersonville
2002-028 2002-029
New Roadway Intersection
Rockland Road/Imperial Boulevard Walton Ferry/Old Shackle Island
Sumner
Hendersonville
2006-014
Road Widening
New Shackle Island Road (SR-258)
Sumner Sumner
Hendersonville Hendersonville/TDOT
2008-52-034 99-New-28
Road Widening New Roadway
Indian Lake Boulevard Indian Lake Boulevard
Sumner
Hendersonville/TDOT
99-New-29
Signalization
Closed Loop and Signal Upgrade - CCTV
Sumner
Millersville
2004-019
New Roadway
Cartwright Parkway Extension
Sumner Sumner Sumner
Portland Portland Portland
2004-020 2008-0po1 2008-0po2
Intersection
SR-109 Project Cost Overrun Bucket Project Contingency Overrun Bucket
Termini / Intersecting Road Murfreesboro Urbanized Area (Includes LaVergne and Smyrna) Stones River Battlefield
11-15 TIP No
Project Status Dropped
Yes
Underway
Rutherford County
No
Reprogrammed/Resubmitted
Downtown Area
Yes
Programmed
Front Street and Washington Street Sharp Springs Natural Area to Jefferson Springs Smyrna to LaVergne SR-102 (Nissan Blvd) to SR-840 SR-16 (US-41A) in Eagleville to West of SR-269 (Concord Rd) Cason Lane to SR-96 (Old Fort Pkwy) East of SR-96 to Stones River Downtown Square
No Yes No No No
Dropped Underway Deferred Pending Review Underway
No No No No
Underway Underway Completed Completed
Under Nashville Pike (SR-6/US-31E)
No
Dropped
Downtown Gallatin
Yes
Programmed
Cages Bend Road From Triple Creek Park to Smith Street From SR-174/N. Water Avenue intersection to new interchange onto SR-109. SR-6/SR-25 and SR-6/Locust Street SR-6/SR-25 and SR-6/Locust Street North Water Ave (SR-109) Countywide
Yes Yes Yes
Underway Underway Underway
Yes Yes Yes No
Underway Underway Underway Completed
No
Underway
No
Underway
No
Underway
Yes Yes
Underway Underway
Yes
Underway
Yes Yes
Underway Programmed
Yes
Underway
Yes
Programmed
Yes No No
Programmed Dropped Dropped
Drakes Creek to Wessington Elementary School/Vietnam Veterans Boulevard Memorial Park to Nannie Berry Elementary, Ellis Middle and Hendersonville High School From Davidson County line to New Shackle Island Rd/SR-258 Center Point Road to Imperial Boulevard Luna Lane to Main St. (Walton Ferry) & Main to New Shackle (Old Shackle) Iris Drive north to SR-386 (Vietnam Veterans Blvd) State Route 386 Intersection Existing Indian Lake Boulevard (SR-6/US-31E) to Vietnam Veterans Boulevard (SR-386) Main Street(SR-6); New Shackle Island Road (SR258); Freehill Road Williamson Road to North Cartwright SR-41 to US31W Kirby Drive Portland L-STP Portland L-STP
PROJECT STATUS 6 OF 9
FY 2008-2011 PROJECT STATUS REPORT County Sumner
Lead Agency Portland/TDOT
08-11 TIP 314
Improvement Type Pedestrian
Route/Description SR-52
Termini / Intersecting Road 11-15 TIP SR-109 to South Russell Street; College Street from No Searcy Lane to Morningside Drive; and Searcy Lane from College Street to SR-52 Lower Station Camp Creek Road Streetscape Big Station Camp Blvd. Yes and Pavement Project (Greenway)
Sumner
Sumner Co.
2008-56-082
Greenway
Sumner
Sumner Co.
2008-56-082b
Greenway
Lower Station Camp Creek Road Streetscape Big Station Camp Blvd. and Pavement Project (Greenway)
Sumner
TDOT
AM-018
Road Widening
Sumner Sumner Sumner Sumner Sumner Sumner Williamson
TDOT TDOT TDOT White House White House White House Brentwood
2002-018 2009-52-010 AM-019 2009-57-025 2008-0wh1 2008-0wh2 2004-023
Road Widening Road Widening Road Widening ITS
Williamson Williamson Williamson Williamson Williamson Williamson Williamson
Brentwood Brentwood Brentwood Brentwood Brentwood Brentwood Franklin
Williamson
Project Status Pending Review
Programmed
Yes
Programmed
SR-109
North of Cumberland River Bridge to SR-109 Bypass Yes
Programmed
ITS
SR-109 SR-109 SR-109 Signal Upgrade to Fiber Optics Project Cost Overrun Bucket Project Contingency Overrun Bucket Signal Interconnect
No No Yes No No No No
Underway Underway Underway Programmed Dropped Dropped Completed
2008-62-039 2006-408 2008-67-035 2004-058a 2004-058b 2006-013 2006-103
Road Widening Road Widening ITS Road Widening Road Widening Road Widening New Roadway
Split Log Road SR-31/Franklin Road Widening Concord Road Signals SR-253 (Concord Road) SR-253 Concord Road (SR-253) McEwen Drive
No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No
Completed Programmed Programmed Underway Underway Underway Combined/Resubmitted
Franklin
2006-104
New Roadway
McEwen Drive Extension (Phase 1)
South of SR-76 to SR-52 South of Hollis Chapel Road to South of SR-76 SR-109 bypass to south of Hollis Chapel Rd Hwy 76 and Hwy 31 within city limits White House L-STP White House L-STP Northern Brentwood including Maryland Way; Old Hickory Blvd. In Davidson County Wilson Pike east to Ragsdale Road SR-253/Concord Road to SR-441/Moores Lane Wilson Pike to Sunset Road Edmonson Pike to SR-11 (Nolensville Rd) Edmonson Pike to to Sunset Road Jones Parkway east to Arrowhead Drive Cool Springs Boulevard easterly to Wilson Pike (SR252) McEwen Drive from Cool Springs Blvd at the present locations of McEwen Dr easterly to Mallory Ln
No
Completed
Williamson
Franklin
2006-111
New Roadway
Carothers Parkway Extension (Phase 1)
No
Completed
Williamson Williamson
Franklin Franklin
2009-64-021 2004-025
Safety Greenway
SR-96 & Royal Oaks Blvd Intersection Franklin Greenway & Harpeth River Walk
Williamson Williamson Williamson Williamson Williamson
Franklin Franklin Franklin Franklin Franklin
2006-025 2006-118 2006-117 2006-024 2006-114
Greenway Road Widening Road Widening Greenway Road Widening
Harpeth River Walk / Franklin Linear Park Hillsboro Rd (SR-106/US-431) Phase II Hillsboro Rd (SR-106/US-431) Phase I Riverbend Greenway Lewisburg Pike (US431/SR106) Phase 1
Williamson
Franklin
2002-032
ITS
Franklin Traffic Operations Center
Williamson Williamson
Franklin 2009-67-026 Franklin Transit Authority 2006-405
ITS Transit Operating
Franklin ITS Infrastructure Job Access and Reverse Commute (JARC)
Williamson
Franklin Transit Authority 2009-65-013
Transit Capital
Williamson
Franklin Transit Authority 2006-011
Transit Capital
Williamson
Franklin Transit Authority 2004-064
Transit Capital
Franklin Transit Authority ITS Equipment and Installation Franklin Transit Authority Maintenance and Storage Facility Transit Capital & Planning
Williamson
Franklin Transit Authority 2009-65-007
Transit Operating
New Freedom Funds - Franklin Transit Authority
Existing Carothers Pkwy Terminus to existing McEwen Drive Royal Oaks Blvd Fieldstone Park/Hillsboro Road to Mack Hatcher Parkway Harpeth River and Spencer Creek New Hwy 96 to just north of Del Rio Pike Del Rio Pike to Mack Hatcher Parkway (SR-397) 5th Avenue and North Margin St. South of Goose Creek Bypass to North of Old Peytonsville Rd Cool Springs, Hillsboro Road, Mack Hatcher, Murfreesboro Road Various corridors citywide Williamson County
No No
Completed Deferred
No Yes Yes No No
Dropped Programmed Programmed Programmed Reprogrammed/Resubmitted
Yes
Underway
Yes No
Underway Completed
City of Franklin
No
Completed
City of Franklin
No
Dropped
City of Franklin
No
Underway
City of Franklin
Yes
Underway
PROJECT STATUS 7 OF 9
FY 2008-2011 PROJECT STATUS REPORT County Williamson
Lead Agency 08-11 TIP Franklin Transit Authority 2009-65-008
Williamson Williamson Williamson Williamson
Spring Hill Spring Hill Spring Hill/TDOT TDOT
2008-0sh1 2008-0sh2 2004-051 2008-61-094
Road Widening New Roadway
Williamson
TDOT
2009-69-005
Bus Diesel Retrofit
Williamson
TDOT
2009-69-006
Bus Diesel Retrofit
Williamson
TDOT
407b
New Roadway
Pilot School Bus Retrofit - Franklin Special School District Pilot School Bus Diesel Retrofit - Williamson County Schools SR-840 South
Williamson Williamson Williamson
TDOT TDOT TDOT
2004-058a 2004-058b 2006-418
Road Widening Road Widening New Roadway
SR-253 (Concord Road) SR-253 SR-397
Williamson Williamson
TDOT TDOT
2009-61-034 407
New Roadway New Roadway
SR-397 / Mack Hatcher Parkway SR-840 South
Williamson
TDOT
407c
New Roadway
SR-840 South
Williamson
TDOT
426
New Roadway
SR-840 South
Williamson
TDOT
AM-020b
Road Widening
SR-397
Williamson
TDOT
2006-417
Road Widening
I-65
Williamson Williamson Williamson Williamson Williamson Williamson Williamson Williamson
TDOT TMA Group TMA Group TMA Group Waves, inc. Williamson Co. Williamson Co. Williamson Co./TDOT
2010-65-001 2002-031 2006-018 2009-65-009 2008-65-073 2006-015 2008-64-037 2004-069
Road Widening TDM/Rideshare Transit Operating Transit Capital Transit Capital Intersection Intersection Enhancement
I-65 Ridesharing/Clean Air Partnership Vanpool fleet management Vehicle Purchase Vehicle Purchase SR-96 SR-106 (Hillsboro Rd) Hillsboro Road Stone Wall
2008-65-023
Transit Operating
2006-021
Williamson
Williamson Co/TMA Group Williamson Williamson Co/TMA Group Williamson/M Spring Hill aury Williamson/M Spring Hill aury Wilson Lebanon Wilson Lebanon Wilson Lebanon Wilson Lebanon Wilson Lebanon
Improvement Type Transit Operating
Route/Description Job Access and Reverse Commute Funds Franklin Transit Authority Project Cost Overrun Bucket Project Contingency Overrun Bucket SR-247 (Duplex Road) SR-840 South
Termini / Intersecting Road City of Franklin
11-15 TIP Yes
Project Status Underway
Spring Hill L-STP Spring Hill L-STP SR-6 (US-31, Main Street) to near I-65 From west of Carters Creek Pike (SR-246) to west of Columbia Pike (SR-6) City of Franklin
No No Yes Yes
Underway Programmed
Yes
Programmed
Countywide
Yes
Programmed
West Leipers Creek Road (SR-46) to west of Carters Creek Pike (SR-246) Edmonson Pike to SR-11 (Nolensville Rd) Edmonson Pike to to Sunset Road Mack Hatcher Pkwy West, from SR-6 (US-31) South of Franklin to SR-106 (US-431) North of Franklin
Yes
Programmed
No No No
Underway Underway Underway
South of SR-96 to East of SR-106 No West of Bending Chestnut Road to east of No Thompson Station Road East of Pinewood Road (SR-46) to west of Leipers No Creek Road Southeast of SR-100 to west of Bending Chestnut Rd No
Underway Underway
No
Underway
Yes
Underway
Yes No No No No No Yes No
Underway Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Programmed Completed
Vanpool Startup Program
SR-96 east of Franklin to SR-6 (US-31) north of Franklin South of SR-840 to SR-96 including interchange at SR-248 (Peytonsville Rd) North of SR-248 to North of SR-96 Countywide Regional City of Franklin Countywide SR-46 (Old Hillsboro Road) SR-46 (Old Hillsboro Rd) East and west of the intersection with Berry's Chapel Road (502' in length) Regionwide
No
Reprogrammed/Resubmitted
Transit Capital
Vanpool Vehicle Purchase
Regional
No
Underway
2008-64-068
Signalization
US Hwy 31/Main Street Signalization
No
Completed
2008-64-043
Intersection
US Hwy 31/Main Street
From Stephen P. Yokich Pkwy (South) to Buckner Road (North) SR-24/Duplex Road
No
Pending Review
2008-74-060 2008-74-061 2008-74-065 2008-72-042 2009-76-001
Interchange Interchange RR Crossing Road Widening Greenway
I-40 Interchange Lighting Interchange Lighting Railroad Crossing Hartmann Drive, Section 2 Cedar City Trail Phase 3 & 4
No Yes No Yes Yes
Completed Deferred Dropped Underway Underway
I-40 at S. Hartmann Drive I-40 at SR-109 SR-24 (West Main Street) From Coles Ferry to Canal Street N side of Sinking Creek from Castle Heights to N Greenwood to Maple (Phase 3) Hill to Castle Heights; Castle Heights from Hill to Main (Phase 4)
Underway Underway
PROJECT STATUS 8 OF 9
FY 2008-2011 PROJECT STATUS REPORT County Wilson Wilson Wilson Wilson Wilson
Lead Agency Lebanon Lebanon Lebanon Lebanon Mt. Juliet
08-11 TIP 2010-79-005 503 2008-0le1 2008-0le2 2004-070
Improvement Type Resurfacing Intersection
Pedestrian
Route/Description City of Lebanon 3R Improvements Bucket Maddox-Simpson Parkway (SR-26) Project Cost Overrun Bucket Project Contingency Overrun Bucket Charlie Daniels Parkway Sidewalks
Wilson Wilson
Mt. Juliet Mt. Juliet
2004-059 99-New-32
Interchange Road Widening
I-40 Old Lebanon Dirt Road (FAU 4450)
Wilson
Mt. Juliet
2008-71-038
New Roadway
Beckwith Road
Wilson
Mt. Juliet
2008-76-024
Greenway
West Division Street Greenway
Wilson Wilson Wilson
Prospect, Inc. TDOT TDOT
2008-75-074 2004-043 2004-067
Transit Capital Interchange Interchange
Vehicle Purchase I-40 I-40
Wilson Wilson
TDOT TDOT
2004-068b 2002-023
Road Widening Road Widening
SR-171 / Mt. Juliet Road SR-109
Wilson Wilson
TDOT TDOT
2004-068a 2006-121
Road Widening Road Widening
SR-171 / Mt. Juliet Road SR-141
Wilson Wilson
TDOT TDOT
2008-78-064 AM-022
Bridge Reconstruct
Linwood Road (Route 1067) SR-141
Wilson
TDOT
AM-022a
Reconstruct
SR-141
Wilson Wilson
TDOT TDOT
2009-72-035 2010-710-006
Road Widening Reconstruct
SR-109 SR-141
Termini / Intersecting Road 11-15 TIP Various Locations within the City of Lebanon Yes SR-26/US-70 (Sparta Pike) Yes Lebanon L-STP No Lebanon L-STP No Beginning at Mt. Juliet Road/SR-171 and continuing No approximately 1400 feet to the east Central Pike No Davidson County Line/Wilson County Line to No Jackson Trail Beckwith Road interchange to Benders Ferry Road & Yes Highway 70 North Greenhill Road (West) to Music City Star Yes station (East) Countywide No Interchange at Beckwith Road No SR-171/Mt. Juliet Road, including Providence Place No
Project Status Underway Underway Dropped Dropped Completed
Providence Place to Adams Lane Division Street (north of I-40) to south of SR-24 (US70) Division Street to SR-24 (Lebanon Road) 0.2 miles south of Spring Creek to north of Lovers Lane I-40 .2 mile south of Spring Creek to Trousdale Co. line
No No
Completed Underway
No No
Underway Underway
No No
Underway Underway
0.2 miles south of Spring Creek to north of No Tomlinson Rd Near SR-24 (US-70) to Cumberland River Yes From North of Tomlinson Road to Trousdale County Yes line
Deferred Deferred Underway Underway Completed Completed Completed
Underway Underway Underway
PROJECT STATUS 9 OF 9
Appendix F. Certifications MPO Self Certifications and Federal Certifications 23CFR 450.334
(a)
The MPO and state shall certify the metropolitan planning process every 4 years is in accordance with:
X
(1) 23 USC 134, 49 USC 5303 (Highways and Transit)
X
(2) In non-attainment and maintenance areas, sections 174 and 176 (c) and (d) of the Clean Air Act, as amended 942 U.S.C. 7504, 7506 (c) and (d) and 40 CFR part 93
X
(3) Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2000d-1) and 49 CFR part 21
X
(4) 49 U.S.C. 5332, prohibiting discrimination, on the basis of race, creed, national origin, sex or age in employment or business opportunity
X
(5) Section 1101 (b) of the SAFETEA-LU (Pub. L 109-59) and 49 CFR part 26 regarding the involvement of disadvantaged business enterprises in USDOT funded projects
X
(6) 23 CFR part 230, regarding the implementation of an equal employment opportunity program on Federal and Federal-aid highway construction contracts
X
(7) Provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12101 et. Seq.
X
(8) The Older Americans Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 6101), prohibiting discrimination on the basis of age in programs or activities receiving Federal financial assistance
X
(9) Section 324 of title 23 U.S.C. regarding the prohibition of discrimination based on gender
X
(10) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794) and 49 CFR part 27 regarding discrimination against individuals with disabilities
NASHVILLE AREA MPO FY 2011-2015 TIP – ADOPTED DECEMBER 15, 2010
F-1
Appendix G. Public Comments Summary of Public Comments Draft 2035 Regional Transportation Plan and FYs 2011‐2015 Transportation Improvement Program The full text of each comment is available by request at contact@nashvillempo.org or (615) 862‐7204. Comment #1: Jamie Melton (Franklin, TN) Nature of comments: Requested that Old Hillsboro Road, Pinewood Road, Southall Road, and Boyd Mille Pike be designated as bike routes in Williamson County. Comment #2: Bell Newton (Nashville, TN) Nature of comments: Expressed opposition to the proposed Bosley Springs Connector road in the Harding Town Center area of Davidson County Comment #3: Bill C. Duncan (Gallatin, TN) Nature of comments: Expressed three concerns. The first is with an unfunded project which would connect Hatten Track Road (planned) to Green Lea Blvd. He feels this road is unnecessary. The second is ID# 1052‐116, which he feels should be widened to 5 lanes instead of 3). The third is with respect to the amount of funding being spent on transportation over the next 25 years given the economic recession. He expressed a concern that too much taxes for transportation improvements could add to the long‐term deficit. Comment #4: Susan Wilkins and Evelyn Mitchell on behalf of other unnamed users of the Music City Star East Corridor Commuter Rail Service. Nature of comments: Expressed desire for new shuttle service to connect to St. Thomas, Baptist, Centennial to Riverfront Station and new bus service to connect residents to the Lebanon, Martha, and Mt. Juliet stations. Expressed desire to see increased train service throughout the day, dedicated bus lanes to for downtown service from Riverfront, and increased information to passengers via text alerts/ electronic signs. Comment #5: Richard Daigle (Gallatin, TN) Nature of comments: Would like to see increased service along the 92X (Gallatin Express). Expressed interest in having more funding for transit made available. Comment #6: Gilbert Smith (Nashville, TN) Nature of comments: Expressed a desire to see solutions that help keep local traffic off the interstates. Pointed out that people drive to Nashville for reasons other than “to work” (e.g., entertainment).
NASHVILLE AREA MPO FY 2011-2015 TIP - ADOPTED DECEMBER 15, 2010
G-1
Comment #7: Dave Bordenkircher (Nashville, TN) Nature of comments: Expressed opposition to the widening of any interstates in the Nashville Area MPO area. Comment #8: Kenya Stevens (Nashville, TN) Nature of comments: Expressed a desire to continued improvements to the efficiency and appearance/ cleanliness of the Nashville MTA. Expressed an appreciation for regional planning efforts. Comment #9: Ben Freeland (Nashville, TN) Nature of comments: Expressed an interest in seeing Hickory Hollow included in the S.E. Corridor plan. Comment #10: Christine Coldiron (Nashville, TN) Nature of comments: Expressed a desire to see a walking and bicycling facility over/ under or through the 37th Avenue South bridge. Comment #11: Joseph Reed, Jr. (Hermitage, TN) Nature of comments: Expressed an opinion that a regional transportation system is “badly” needed in middle Tennessee area and that a monorail system would be a convenient way to get around while keeping protecting the environment. Comment #12: Kathy Webber (Franklin, TN) Nature of comments: Expressed a concern that bridges be properly improved and maintained due to the potential of a major disaster (e.g., earthquake along the New Madrid fault). Old bridges could collapse and hinder rescue and recovery efforts. Comment #13: Ed Cole (Nashville, TN) on behalf of the Transit Alliance of Middle Tennessee Nature of comments: Expressed support for the advancement of mass transit in Middle Tennessee as part of an overall comprehensive transportation plan. Comment #13: Jay Everett (Wilson County, TN) Nature of comments: Expressed support for the MPO’s recent planning efforts and commended the Board for the inclusion of a bold new vision for mass transit.
NASHVILLE AREA MPO FY 2011-2015 TIP - ADOPTED DECEMBER 15, 2010
G-2