EARTHQUAKE MUSEUM IN CEPHALONIA
NATALIA KOKKALA supervisor ISSAIAS DEMETRIOS advisor GAZETAS GEORGE
Thesis Project
Earthquake Museum in Cephalonia
student NATALIA KOKKALA supervisor ISSAIAS DEMETRIOS advisor GAZETAS GEORGE Professor of Soil Mechanics, School of Civil Engineering, NTUA
National Technical University of Athens School of Architecture Department Ι Architectural Design November 2014
4
Acknowledgements I would like to thank Professor Demetrios Issaias for his guidance and support during our long collaboration Professor George Gazetas for his enthusiastic willingness to offer a different perspective as well as Mr Athanasios Balafas, officer of the Hellenic Fire Service (1st Special Disaster Management Unit -EMAK) Mrs G.Panopoulou, Permanent Scientific Technical Staff at the Institute of Geodynamics, National Observatory of Athens Mr Alkimos Papathanasiou, Structural Engineer Professor Panagiotis Touliatos who contributed, in different ways, to this project
5
TABLE OF CONTENTS
6
1 2 3
ANALYSIS
13
CEPHALONIA- ARGOSTOLI
24
FUNCTIONAL ORGANISATION -BUILDING PROGRAMME
37
4 5
THE BUILDING
45
STRUCTURAL DETAILS
80
6
BIBLIOGRAPHY
91
7
“Returning to Kobe and visiting the site of the earthquake, the first thing that struck me was just how important a responsibility we architects have on the very basic level of providing safety and security for people.� Tadao Ando RIBA Royal Gold Medal Address, 1997
10
Fractures, Arata Isozaki The award-winning japanese pavilion at the Venice Architecture Biennale, 1996 was dedicated to the disastrous 1995 earthquakes
11
1
ANALYSIS
Eurasian
North American Plate Arabian Plate
Carribean Plate Coco Plate Pacific Plate Nazca Plate
South American Plate
African Plate
Scotia Plate Antarctic Plate
Global Seismic Activity data: NASA, USGS
14
Greece is the sixth most seismogenous country in the world, as well as the most seismogenous country in Europe.[1] The creation of an Earthquake Museum, aiming at raising awareness on the various aspects of the natural phenomenon, but, most importantly, educating the public, was found to be a need of utmost importance.
n Plate
Philippine Plate Pacific Plate
Indian- Australian Plate
The country is located on the boundary between the Eurasian and the submerging African plate. Solid lithosphere material is progressively descending towards the earth’s core. Due to unfavourable conditions, soil rock formations fail, causing earthquakes. In other areas, such as the Atlantic Ocean and more specifically the Mid-Oceanic ridge, lithospheric plates are divergent, resulting in hot, fluid matter ascending and solidifying. The earth’s outer crust is therefore constantly engaged in a cycle of genesis and destruction, which is manifested though seismic activity. As societies fail to design cities and buildings that take successfully into account this limitation, millions of lives have been lost and countless disasters have occurred throughout human history.
The main purpose of this project was to create a building dedicated to education, research, and vulnerability reduction, while proposing a spherical view of the phenomenon as an integral part of the region.
15
Hanshin Expressway Earthquake Museum Japan
16
6
1 4
3
2
5
Countries with the greatest seismic activity [data: OASP]
1. Japan
4.Solomon Islands
2. Vanuatu
5. Chile
3. Peru
6. Greece
17
18
Ai Weiwei, Straight, 2013, Venice Art Biennale The artist straightned 150 tons of reinforcement bars of schools that collapsed during the Sichuan earthquake, 2008 19
2
CEPHALONIA ARGOSTOLI
The Museum is designed in Cephalonia, an area characterised by very interesting geological features and that has been deeply marked, throughout history, by seismic events.
The island is at the end of the Hellenic outer non-volcanic arc, at the outskirts of the Aegean microplate.
Offshore the island is located the Cephalonia Transform Fault, one of the most important features of the Hellenic Trench and the Mediterranean Ridge. Through a network of faults, it is connected to the North Anatolia fault, responsible for the most disastrous earthquakes in Turkey, 1999.
22
Apulian Aegean 45mm/y
Anatolian 25mm/y
African 10mm/y
100km
Mediterrean- Main Geological Attributes of Greece
Fault- plate or microplate boundary Volcanic Arc
Trench
Outer non-volcanic arc 23
3 2 1
5km
Cephalonia strike-slip fault and 2014 Seismic Events Epicentres
24
1
5,8 ML, 26/1/2014, depth 21km
2
5,1 ML, 26/1/2014, depth 17km
3
5,7 ML, 3/2/2014, depth 10km
At the beginning of this year (2014) on January 26th and February 3rd, two seismic events of significant magnitude occurred in Cephalonia, seriously damaging infrastructure, but thankfully causing no human losses. During these seisms the highest peak ground acceleration ever recorded in Greece manifested: 0,8g as opposed to the 0,36g acceleration indicated by the Greek Antiseismic Regulation of 2000 (EAK 2000).[2] What became clear by both seismic events (26/1 and 3/2) was that the population had not received appropriate training and was therefore unprepared to protect themselves during and after the earthquake. In fact, this was one of the main conclusions drawn in the interdisciplinary report published by GEER (Geotechnical Engineering Extreme Events Reconnaissance Association), EERI (Earthquake Engineering Research Institute) and ATC (Applied Technology Council). The report was prepared by a number of scientific teams of various disciplines, coming from Greek and foreign educational institutions, organisations and companies. The need to create such a Museum in Cephalonia was strongly outlined, taking into consideration that its inhabitants will always have to co-exist with the geological phenomenon.
25
1469 Μ: 7,2 ΜS: ΙΧ
1638 Μ: 6,4 ΜS: VIII
1714 Μ: 6,4 ΜS: VIII
1767 Μ: 7,2 ΜS: X
1741 Μ: 7,2 ΜS: ΙΧ
1636 Μ: 7,2 ΜS: ΙΧ 1658 Μ: 7,0 ΜS: ΙΧ
26
1759 Μ: 6,3 ΚΜ: VIII
1766 Μ: 7,0 ΜS: ΙΧ
1915 Μ: 6,7 ΜS: ΙΧ
1867 Μ: 7,4 ΚΜ: X
1972 Μ: 6,3 ΜS: VII
1915 Μ: 6,6 ΜS: IX
1862 Μ: 6,5 ΜS: ΙΧ
1983 Μ: 7,0 ΜS: VI
1912 Μ: 6,8 ΜS: Χ
1953 Μ: 7,2 ΜS: X+
* M: Richter scale magnitude ΜS: Mercalli Scale magnitude
That particular need is also emphasised considering that, since the 17th century, 16 seismic events of magnitude greater than 6R have been recorded. These events were also classified as highly disastrous in the Mercalli scale, which quantifies the damages induced.
27
The Mercalli Scale I. Not felt Not felt except by a very few under especially favorable conditions.
disaster caused by the 1953 Cephalonia Earthquake
II. Weak Felt only by a few persons at rest, especially on upper floors of buildings. III. Weak Felt quite noticeably by persons indoors, especially on upper floors of buildings. Many people do not recognize it as an earthquake. Standing motor cars may rock slightly. Vibrations similar to the passing of a truck. Duration estimated. IV. Light Felt indoors by many, outdoors by few during the day. At night, some awakened. Dishes, windows, doors disturbed; walls make cracking sound. Sensation like heavy truck striking building. Standing motor cars rocked noticeably. V. Moderate Felt by nearly everyone; many awakened. Some dishes, windows broken. Unstable objects overturned. Pendulum clocks may stop. VI. Strong Felt by all, many frightened. Some heavy furniture moved; a few instances of fallen plaster. Damage slight. VII. Very Strong Damage negligible in buildings of good design and construction; slight to moderate in well-built ordinary structures; considerable damage in poorly built or badly designed structures; some chimneys broken. VIII. Severe Damage slight in specially designed structures; considerable damage in ordinary substantial buildings with partial collapse. Damage great in poorly built structures. Fall of chimneys, factory stacks, columns, monuments, walls. Heavy furniture overturned. IX. Violent Damage considerable in specially designed structures; well-designed frame structures thrown out of plumb. Damage great in substantial buildings, with partial collapse. Buildings shifted off foundations. X. Extreme Some well-built wooden structures destroyed; most masonry and frame structures destroyed with foundations. Rails bent. XI. Extreme Few, if any (masonry), structures remain standing. Bridges destroyed. Broad fissures in ground. Underground pipe lines completely out of service. Earth slumps and land slips in soft ground. Rails bent greatly. XII. Extreme Damage total. Waves seen on ground surfaces. Lines of sight and level distorted. Objects thrown upward into the air. 28
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Mercalli_intensity_scale
29
National Road secondary road network paved padestrian road free space industrial area selected lot
30
Argostoli, the largest city and capital of the prefecture, was selected to locate the Museum. Owing to the presence of an international airport, a great number of local and international flights land every year in Cephalonia, especially during the summer (international arrivals: 2013-198.033 / 2012168.496/ 2011- 148.858 visitors). Moreover, an increasing number of visitors are visiting the island every year, due to Argostoli port being a quite popular cruise ship stopover (2013: 115 stops-140.739 passengers / 2012: 105 stops- 130.552 passengers). Creating such an edifice would be most beneficial to the community on multiple levels. The building could function as a point of interest and reference to the city, attracting visitors and scientists on a local and international level. Thus, a small Research Centre, as part of the Geodynamic Institute, was added to the building programme. The objective was to create a building that would combine informing, educating and researching. A building that would function around the clock, producing knowledge. Intending to fully grasp the various aspects of the phenomenon and its consequences on cities and societies, research expanded to the fields of civic protection and disaster management. The aim was to design a building that would function, not only as a training and educational facility, but also as a safe gathering point after a disastrous event. That would actively participate in reducing social vulnerability, as well as in the postdisaster emergency period.
31
This specific lot at the outskirts of the Argostoli urban area was selected for a variety of reasons. First, due to its advantageous location. Being adjacent to one of the most important circulation nodes, where two of the main highways of the island intersect, it is most readily accessible. Furthermore, it is directly connected to the waterfront promenade, which connects the northern part of the town to the inner part of Koutavos bay, as can be seen on the map. The Museum can be an intermediate stop for bypassing pedestrians. The intent was also to design and mark the entrance of the city, by creating a new landmark and point of reference for the locals. Another factor which led to selecting this specific area was the particular beauty of the landscape. Koutavos area is protected, with rich flora and fauna. Moreover, nearby Cape Drapano is a recognised natural reserve.
32
Argostoli has very few free spaces inside the urban fabric, despite being a small coastal city. After every seismic event it is imperative that the inhabitants gather at an open space. The Museum outdoor space could potentially be used for this cause, and could also serve as a temporary camping site. Its prominent location combined with the specific features of the building designed mark a safe meeting and gathering point, during the post-disaster confusion and disorientation.
up: the selected lot. On the right can be seen the entrance to Argostoli, and on the left the Argostoli- Poros National Road down: view from the lot towards Koutavos bay
33
34
35
3
FUNCTIONAL ORGANISATION BUILDING PROGRAMME
The functional diagram of the Museum-Research Centre is the result of an integrated view of the phenomenon along with the civil protection issues pertaining to it. What became clear during the project was that earthquakes are not inherently disastrous, and that a disaster could more accurately be described as “[…] when the manifestation of a dangerous event or phenomenon coexists with fragility and vulnerability conditions in the society and the society’s ability to mitigate the potential consequences and to recover from them is proved to be insufficient”.[3] Disaster can further be defined as “[…] a significant perturbation of communal or social functions connected with extensive losses and severe impact (human, material, economical or environmental) that surpass the society’s ability to respond by using only its own resources”.[4] Taking the above into consideration, the necessity to systematically inform and train the general population, in order to mitigate disaster, emerges even more pressingly. The building designed in this project aspires to play this role. It aims, through longterm, planned effort, to reduce Cephalonia’s population vulnerability. Aside from training the community, it is of utmost importance to train local engineers as well. Collaboration between engineers and urban search and rescue (USAR) teams is considered to be most necessary by international protocols. It is the engineer’s duty to effectively advise and to rapidly take decisions regarding structure safety or potential reinforcement. His or her role is quintessential to the safety of rescue team members as well as trapped victims. Only by receiving appropriate training can he/ she evaluate the state of the debris, and to accordingly advise rescue teams, in a very tight and pressing timeframe. The Museum has the infrastructure to accommodate such training programmes. Similarly, disaster doctors have to work under extremely unfavourable conditions, requiring previous training in order to increase their effectiveness.[5]
38
Functional Diagram
research programmes data collection
Research Centre
Educational Facility
community training
disaster doctor training
library and database
Museum disaster engineer training
scientific conferences
exhibition
Lebbeus Woods had written that man often blames the earthquake tectonic phenomenon for the destruction of buildings and cities and life loss, while in fact, it is man that is responsible for the disaster, since he defied the limitations of seismogenous areas. He considers this fact to be a denial of modern man to realise and acknowledge his impotence towards a geological phenomenon he cannot master, and that is completely against the dominant, rational view of the world. [6] Only through systematic education and preparation can this perception transform, shielding the community towards a phenomenon it will always have to co-exist with.
39
The Exhibition
the geological phenomenon
earthquake and Greece
earthquake and Cephalonia
mythical views of the phenomenon
India: elephants on a turtle shell support the firmament
40
according to the Japanese, catfish Namazu is responsible for the earth shaking
historic equipment
earthquake recording instrument creathe by Chinese Mathematician and Astronomer Chang Heng, 132 AD seismometre, Italy 1751
seismoscope containing mercury, 19th century portable seismograph, 1917
existing Earthquake Museums
shake table
shake table drawings, 1923
training- preparedness
41
1. Reception 114 m2 Visitor Reception Area, Wardrobe / Tickets, Information/ Giftshop
2. Permanent exhibitions
725 m2
3. Educational exhibits Shake table / educational programmes
500 m2
MUSEUM
4. Library
120 m2
5. Museum Administration staff offices /
205 m2
secretariat- accountant / director›s office - meeting room / archive-storage / kitchenette / WC
6. Cafe- Restaurant Kitchen / storage room / WC
170 m2
7. Auxiliary spaces
Total
42
1834 m2
1. Research Centre Laboratories
21 m2
• Earthquake Analysis Lab [Mw magnitude calculation] • Phasmatic Analysis Lab [seismic moment calculation] • Tsunami Centre [connected to National Tsunami Warning Centres across Europe - responsible for warning Mediterranean countries in case of tsunami]
2. Reseacher Offices 14 m2 PhD researchers, scientists working in research programmes
RESEARCH CENTRE
3. Amphitheatre- Conference Room
4. Director΄s Office
135 m2
23 m2
5. Reception- Secretariat
30 m2
6. Guest Room
23 m2
7. IT Room 30 m2
8. Kitchen 20 m2
9. WC 13 m2
Total
288 m2
43
4
THE BUILDING
46 Shibboleth, Doris Salcedo, Tate Modern 2007
«Are there new design concepts that might be especially appropriate to building in the earth’s seismically active zones?»
Lebbeus Woods Taking On Risk: Nine experimental scenarios
47
48
Having completed a general research on earthquake as a geological phenomenon, as a disaster, as a geotechnical engineering issue, research focused on how earthquake can be addressed by the architect engineer. That is, more specifically, what are the characteristics of the efficient antiseismic architectural design, and whether there is a related design theory or typology. An effort was made to track applied examples, where the aim to design a seismic resistant building was an integral part of the architectural creation and the morphological expression, greatly defining it since the outset of the design process. It was discovered that “earthquake architecture” as a tendency has begun to gradually emerge at an international level. The term describes architecture that is inextricably linked with the building’s antiseismic behaviour in all respects: synthetically, morphologically, structurally. The term implies that architecture is expressing earthquake resistance or action through building design. That can be achieved by either exposing and accentuating the seismic resisting structure and its technology, or by symbolically referring to the phenomenon. The Te Papa Museum in New Zealand is mentioned as an example of the second category, where a wall parallel to a significant nearby fault is placed diagonally through the building, dominating space. [7] It is also worth mentioning that quite recently an exhibition exploring architectural design in seismically active areas, under the title ” Considering the Quake: Seismic Design on the Edge” was presented, first in Toronto’s Design Exchange and then in the AIA New York Chapter.
49
50
Understanding the topography of Argostoli bay was of great importance from the early stages of the design process, in the framework of certain reflections of a broader scope: how will this architectural intervention be placed in this specific topography? What will be its relationship with the landscape and the city? One of the main intentions was to maintain the direction of the Cephalonia fault, by incorporating the concept of horizontal slip into the design. Those parallel, sliding lines are the two main walls, combined with a linear water element. The visitor begins his journey by entering the fault, leaving the city behind and plunging into the building. Amongst the first thoughts regarding the design was for those linear components to form the connection, the itinerary between an upsurge and an absence of matter, a submersion, the earthquake being a manifestation of the constant redistribution, the never-ending creation and destruction of the earth’s crust. Some other geological features of the region give direction to the remaining building volumes, producing a non-rectangular, rather triangulated plan. After extensive experimentation, and with direct reference to the landscape of Koutavos, an equilateral triangle was selected to house the largest part of the exhibitions spaces, on one side, and the Research Centre, on the other. The most “wordly� functions, that is the research centre, the amphitheatre and the Museum administration offices, were placed toward the city, while the museum and educational spaces were placed toward Mount Ainos and the landscape. As the Research Centre ought to function during both day and night, appropriate facilities, including rest areas, were included in the building programme.
51
52
53
54
55
On the ends of the building circulation axis are placed a Tower, in the lagoon, and an overflowing water Tank, encased in the ground. These two elements complete the visitor’s itinerary. The exact location of the tower was selected with regards to the topography, to the neighbouring mountain peaks, as well as the existing sculpture by the nearby Debosset bridge, a small obelisk in the bay. Furthermore, a project undertaken by Elia Zenghelis in 1985 was taken into consideration. The architect was suggesting a network of interventions along the inner coastline of the bay that was also expanding to Koutavos lagoon. [8] The tower position was selected for another important reason: defining a safe gathering point after a disastrous event. Water, aside from its symbolic role, constitutes the primary visitor-flow organising element. It allows visitors to enter specific spaces, directing them, through a predefined course, to the end of the “fault�, where a light well, combined with the sound of the cascading water, are stimulating curiosity while marking the entrance of the Museum. Having entered the building, visitors find themselves in a space that, while being strictly defined, seems intertwined with a circulation network they cannot fully perceive. They cannot see the provenance and destination of those moving along the other wall, entering and exiting through its openings, creating a somewhat theatrical space. At the same time, circulation paths are predetermined, leaving no confusion or disorientation possibility. A lightweight metallic structure, following the rectangular walls grid, is placed in the triangle, as a means of combining the two systems: rectangular and triangular. A small platform, reminiscent of scaffolding, is placed upon it, allowing visitors to wander at a higher level, while maintaining visual contact with all exhibition spaces. The rest of the structure is of reinforced concrete. Perimetrical robust walls shield the building against seismic forces. The triangular plan of the above-ground part of the building has high seismic resistance and is non-deformable. The rectangular parts of the building, being incorporated into the relief, behave much more favourably they would if able to freely oscillate under the effect of the seismic force.
56
δεξαµενή-βύθιση
υδάτινη γραµµή
πορεία µουσείου
µεταλλική κατασκευή
πύργος-έξαρση
κάναβος 4,5x4,5m
57
58
Light is introduced in most spaces through the roofs, creating a potent impression of what is “up” and what is “down”. The building is in direct relation with the topography, seems to emerge from it. It penetrates the landscape, both the mountain and the sea, with references to the violent tectonic phenomenon, the earthquake.
Through this strictly defined itinerary in landscape and space, the aim is for the visitor to acquire a new perspective on the earthquake phenomenon. To understand its multiple aspects, to reflect upon its relationship with man and locus, and to ultimately conquer the knowledge and dexterities that will enable him to harmoniously co-exist with it. Combined with the Research Centre, the Earthquake Museum aspires to become an internationally renowned reference point for Cephalonia and Argostoli, a knowledgeproducing centre in the service of the community.
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
D
C
EXHIBITION AREA
CAFERESTAURANT
+0.00
Α
A Β RESEARCH CENTRE
D
GROUND FLOOR PLAN 68
AMPHITHEATRE
+2.60
TICKETS LIBRARY
C
Α
WC MUSEUM ADMINISTRATION Β
69
D
C
KITCHEN EXHIBITION AREA
Α
-4.50
Β
RESEARCH CENTRE
D
-4.50 PLAN 70
LIBRARY
GIFTSHOP
C
WC
AMPHITHEATRE
Α
MUSEUM ADMINISTRATION Β
71
TOP VIEW 72
73
SECTION AA
SECTION BB 74
75
SECTION CC
SECTION DD 76
NORTH-EAST ELEVATION 77
SOUTH-EAST ELEVATION
NORTH-WEST ELEVATION 78
79
5
STRUCTURAL DETAILS
80
81
Material Samples
exposed concrete
82
steel
corrugated steel
mosaic floor
water
83
84
85
86
87
Image Sources
PAGE 10 http://biginjapan.com.au/ PAGES 18-19 http://artobserved.com/2013/06/ao-on-sitevenice-ai-weiwei-dual-exhibition-s-a-c-r-e-dat-the-church-of-saint-antonin-and-straightat-zuecca-project-space-on-the-island-of-giudecca/
PAGE 46 http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/ Category:Shibboleth
all other images were taken or produced by the author
88
Notes
[1] OASP website [2] ITSAK report “Strong Ground Motion of the February 3, 2014 (M6.0) Cephalonia Earthquake: Effects on Soil and Built Environment in Combination with the January 26, 2014 (M6.1) Event” [3] M.Dandoulaki, Civil Protection and Local Government (Πολιτική Προστασία και Αυτοδιοίκηση), p.4, ΕΕΤΑA [4] UN/ISDR 2009, M.Dandoulaki, Civil Protection and Local Government (Πολιτική Προστασία και Αυτοδιοίκηση), p.5, ΕΕΤΑΑ [5] APPENDIX D’ to the Special Order 116 - Memorandum of Intervention Actions in Collapsed Buildings, p.9 Fire Service Headquarters, Athens 2010 (ΠΑΡΑΡΤΗΜΑ Δ΄στην Εγκύκλιο Διαταγή 116 Α.Π.Μνημόνιο ενεργειών για επέμβαση σε κτίριο που έχει υποστεί κατάρρευση, Αρχηγείο Πυροσβεστικού Σώματος, Αθήνα 2010 )
[6] Earthquake! A Post-Biblical View (abstract) http://www.lebbeuswoods.net/EARTHQUAKEtext. pdf [7] A.W.Charleson, Seismic Design for Architects, p.259 [8]L’Architecture d’Aujourd’hui, “OMA” No 238 Avril 1985, p.64-70
89
90
6
BIBLIOGRAPHY
91
Books Designing for Earthquakes- A Manual for Architects, FEMA 454 Risk Management Series, December 2006 Αντωνάτος Σ.Γ.
Αργοστόλι, Η χαμένη πόλη/ Δράση καθ’οδόν 1853-1953, Κεφαλλονιά, 2005 Γασπαρινάτος Σ.Γ.,
Σελίδες Επτανησιακής Ιστορίας¸ Αθήνα, 2011 Γκαζέτας Γ.
Εδαφομηχανική και Σεισμική Μηχανική: Ιστορικά Περιστατικά, εκδόσεις Συμεών, Αθήνα, 1996 Charleson A.
Seismic Design for Architects- Outwitting the Quake, Architectural Press, Oxford 2008 Δανδουλάκη Μιράντα
Πολιτική Προστασία και Αυτοδιοίκηση, έκδοση ΕΕΤΑΑ Δεμπόνος Α.-Δ.
Το χρονικό του σεισμού του 1953, Αργοστόλι, 1976 Dal Co Francesco and Mazzariol Giuseppe
Carlo Scarpa : the complete works, Electa/Rizzoli, New York, 1985 Garcia B.
Earthquake Architecture, Loft Publications S.L., New York, 2000 Κοσμετάτου Ε.
Αναφορά στους Δρόμους της Κεφαλλονιάς, Κοργιαλένειος Βιβλιοθήκη, Κεφαλλονιά, 1991 Levy Matthys and Salvadori Mario
Why the Earth Quakes: The Story of Earthquakes and Volcanoes, W. W. Norton & Company , New York, 1997 Livada-Duca Evi
Kefallonia: The Castle of Saint George¸ODYSSEIA of Kefallonia and Ithaki, Argostoli, 2000 Μαρινάτος Σπυρίδων
Κεφαλληνία- Ιστορικός και Αρχαιολογικός Περίπατος, Εκδόσεις Τ.Ε.Τ. Κεφαλληνίας, Αργοστόλι, 1962 Ματθαίος Σ.
Κεφαλληνία- Δι’ένα καλλίτερον μέλλον, Αθήναι, 1978 McGuigan David Mark
URBAN SEARCH AND RESCUE AND THE ROLE OF THE ENGINEER- A report submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Engineering, University of Canterbury 2002 Μοσχόπουλος Γ.& Μαραβέγια Κ.,
Αργοστόλι Σεισμοί 1953- Το Τέλος και η Αρχή μιας Πόλης, Κοργιαλένειο Ίδρυμα Naeim Farzad, Kelly James M.,
Design of seismic isolated structures : from theory to practice, Wiley &Sons, New York, 1999 Napier C.J.
Memoir on The Roads of Cephalonia, Ridgway, London, 1825 Yeats Robert S., Sieh Kerry and Allen Clarence R.,
The geology of earthquakes Oxford University Press, 1997 92
Παπαζάχοs Β., Καρακαίσης Γ.,
Εισαγωγή στη σεισμολογία, εκδόσεις Ζήτη, Θεσσαλονίκη, 2005
Παπαζάχος Β., Παπαζάχου Κ.,
Οι σεισμοί της Ελλάδας, εκδόσεις Ζήτη, Θεσσαλονίκη, 2003 Petris T.N.
Cephalonia, Michalis Toubis Publishing House, Athens, 1985
Τσιτσέλη Κ.
Ο θάνατος μιας πόλης, ΑΓΡΑ, Αθήνα, 2000
Φωκά-Κοσμετάτου Κ.Π.
Κεφαλληνία- Το εισόδημα αυτής ενόψει της Ανασυγκροτήσεως, Τύπος Σπυροπούλου, Αθήναι, 1949 Πουλάκη-Κατεβάτη Δ.
Προσεισμική Κεφαλλονιά, Εικών, Αθήνα, 2009
Σβορώνου Α.
Οικοδομική κατασκευή προσεισμικής Κεφαλλονιάς, Ίδρυμα Φωκά-Κοσμετάτου, Αργοστόλι, 2005 ΟΤΟΜΕ (Ομάς Τεχνικών και Οικονομικών Μελετών)
Νομός Κεφαλληνίας/ χωροταξική μελέτη-αναγνωριστική μελέτη, Υπουργείο Συντονισμού, Αθήνα, 1982
Legal Documents- Laws Αρχηγείο Πυροσβεστικού Σώματος
ΠΑΡΑΡΤΗΜΑ Δ΄στην Εγκύκλιο Διαταγή 116 Α.Π..- Μνημόνιο ενεργειών για επέμβαση σε κτίριο που έχει υποστεί κατάρρευση, Ελληνική Δημοκρατία- Υπουργείο Προστασίας του Πολίτη, Αθήνα 2010 Γενική Γραμματεία Πολιτικής Προστασίας, Δ/νση Σχεδιασμού και Αντιμετώπισης Έκτακτων Αναγκών Σχεδιασμός και δράσεις Πολιτικής Προστασίας για την αντιμετώπιση κινδύνων από την
εκδήλωση σεισμικών φαινομένων, Ελληνική Δημοκρατία- Υπουργείο Προστασίας του Πολίτη, Αθήνα 2012
Ελληνική Δημοκρατία
«ΞΕΝΟΚΡΑΤΗΣ»- Γενικό Σχέδιο Πολιτικής Προστασίας, Εφημερίς της Κυβερνήσεως, ΦΕΚ 423Β-2003
Magazine L’Architecture d’Aujourd’hui, “OMA” No 238 Avril 1985
93
Articles - Publications
American Institute of Architects
Buildings at Risk: Seismic Design Basics for Practicing Architects http://www.aia.org/aiaucmp/groups/aia/documents/pdf/aiap016810.pdf Ardekani Amirreza and Hosseini Mahmood
Urban and Architectural Approaches to Design against Tsunami http://www.iitk.ac.in/nicee/wcee/article/WCEE2012_5730.pdf Arnold Christopher
Building Configuration:The Architecture Of Seismic Design http://www.nzsee.org.nz/db/Bulletin/Archive/17(2)0083.pdf
Architectural Aspects of Seismic Resistant Design http://www.iitk.ac.in/nicee/wcee/article/11_2003.PDF Bachmann Hugo
Seismic Conceptual Design of Buildings – Basic principles for engineers, architects, building owners, and authorities http://www.preventionweb.net/files/687_10092.pdf Charleson Andrew W.
Seismic Design Within Architectural Education
http://www.nzsee.org.nz/db/Bulletin/Archive/30(1)0046.pdf Charleson Andrew W. &Taylor Mark
Earthquake Architecture Explorations
http://www.iitk.ac.in/nicee/wcee/article/13_596.pdf GEER-EERI-ATC
Earthquake Reconnaissance January 26th/ February 2nd 2014, Cephalonia, Greece Events Version 1: 6 June 2014
http://www.geerassociation.org/GEER_Post%20EQ%20Reports/Cephalonia_Greece_2014/GEER-EERI-ATC_CephaloniaGREECE_v1.pdf Goodno B.J., Pinelli P.-J. and Craig J.I.
Optimal Design Approach for Passive Damping Using Architectural Cladding http://www.iitk.ac.in/nicee/wcee/article/11_1453.PDF Gokhale B.A.
Architectural Heritage and Seismic Design with Reference to Indian Temple Architecture http://www.iitk.ac.in/nicee/wcee/article/13_2819.pdf
González Herrera Raúl Gómez Soberón and Consuelo Influence of Plan Irregularity of Buildings
http://www.iitk.ac.in/nicee/wcee/article/14_05-01-0224.PDF Guisasola Adriana
Base Isolation in Architecture
http://www.iitk.ac.in/nicee/wcee/article/14_S08-008.PDF The Structure’s Architecture
http://www.iitk.ac.in/nicee/wcee/article/14_S08-009.PDF Architecture and Seismic Protection
http://inderc.blogspot.gr/2012/05/adriana-guisasola-due-to-complexity-of.html Masayoshi Nakai
Unique Architectural Forms Enabled by Base-Isolation
http://www.iitk.ac.in/nicee/wcee/article/14_S05-01-014.PDF Mezzi M. & Mariani V.
Innovative Use of the Stone in Seismic Resistant Architecture 94
http://www.iitk.ac.in/nicee/wcee/article/14_S08-015.PDF Murao O.
Case Study of Architecture and Urban Design on the Disaster Life Cycle in Japan http://www.iitk.ac.in/nicee/wcee/article/14_S08-032.PDF
Slak T. & Kilar V.
Simplified Ranking System for Recognition and Evaluation of Earthquake Architecture http://www.curee.org/architecture/docs/S08-002.pdf New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering
Architectural Design for Earthquake
http://www.nzsee.org.nz/db/PUBS/ADE2007.pdf
Reitherman Robert
The Earthquake Architecture Website
http://www.iitk.ac.in/nicee/wcee/article/14_05-06-0185.PDF
The Expression of Seismic Design
http://www.curee.org/image_gallery/calendar/essays/2005-CUREE_excerpt.pdf
Rodríguez V.L. and Giuliani G.
Seismic-Resistant Architecture on an Urban Scale (A Morphological Answer) http://www.iitk.ac.in/nicee/wcee/article/1868.pdf
Seismic Resisting Architecture on Building Scale http://www.iitk.ac.in/nicee/wcee/article/11_1067.PDF
Sever M. and Yankelevsky D.
Seismic Architecture As An Essential Component Of The Structural Integrity Of Apartment Buildings In Israel http://www.iitk.ac.in/nicee/wcee/article/14_S08-043.PDF
Seyedinnoor S.P. and Hosseini M.
Using Combination of Suspension and Isolation as an Innovative Aseismic Technique to Achieve High Seismic Performance http://www.iitk.ac.in/nicee/wcee/article/WCEE2012_4935.pdf
Woods Lebbeus
Earthquake! A Post-Biblical View (περίληψη)
http://www.lebbeuswoods.net/EARTHQUAKEtext.pdf Taking On Risk: Nine experimental scenarios http://www.lebbeuswoods.net/CARNEGIE.pdf
Yaoxian Ye
Urban Earthquake Disaster Mitigation
http://www.iitk.ac.in/nicee/wcee/article/8_vol5_557.pdf
Zuei-Ho Tsai
Earthquake and Architecture in Taiwan
http://www.iitk.ac.in/nicee/wcee/article/vol3_V-114.pdf
Websites
AIA New York, Exhibitions, Considering the Quake: Seismic Design on the Edge http://cfa.aiany.org/index.php?section=exhibitions&expid=271 95
ARUP (seismic engineering brochure)
http://www.arup.com/~/media/Files/PDF/Publications/Brochure/ATR_Seismic%20engineering_Oct08_final.ashx California Academy of Sciences-The Earthquake Exhibit https://www.calacademy.org/academy/exhibits/earthquake/ Consortium of Universities for Research in Earthquake Engineering (CUREE) http://www.curee.org/architecture/bibliographies.html Earthquake Museums in Japan
http://readytokyo.blogspot.gr/2011/10/earthquake-museums-in-japan.html Η Καθημερινή, «Τα 159 ρήγματα σε όλη την Ελλάδα», 25.11.2001 http://news.kathimerini.gr/4dcgi/_w_articles_ell_2_25/11/2001_9019 Isozaki Japan Pavilion Biennale 1996 (πληροφορίες)
http://biginjapan.com.au/2011/10/all-became-substance-future-ruins-part-two/ http://biginjapan.com.au/tag/time/
http://www.kmaa.jp/works/venice/venice_en.html Μουσείο Σεισμού και Σεισμολογίας Kandilli, Τουρκία
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kandilli_Earthquake_Museum Μουσείο Σεισμού Ikebukuro, Ιαπωνία http://www.sunnypages.jp/travel_guide/tokyo_leisure/one_day_experience/Ikebukuro+E arthquake+Museum/1848 http://www.tfd.metro.tokyo.jp/hp-ikbskan/index.html Hanshin Expressway Museum
http://www.hanshin-exp.co.jp/english/img/aboutsus/earthquake/museum/leaflet.pdf http://www.hanshin-exp.co.jp/english/aboutus/earthquake/museum.html Kobe Earthquake Museum
http://www.hyogo-tourism.jp/english/column/2004_12.html New Madrid Earthquake Museum
http://www.roadsideamerica.com/tip/15580 Paper Tube Housing by Shigeru Ban, Design4Disaster
http://www.design4disaster.org/2011/02/12/paper-tube-housing-by-shigeru-ban/ και http://myweb.wit.edu/kiml1/590fall05/web-content/chris.pdf Tadao Ando’s Royal Gold Medal Address
https://www.concretecentre.com/PDF/cq_184.PDF Taiwan 921 Earthquake Museum
http://www.921emt.edu.tw/e_content/exhibitions/exhibitions02_02.aspx http://eng.taiwan.net.tw/m1.aspx?sNo=0002112&id=A12-00013 http://www.flickr.com/photos/elliecasson/4971759640/
The Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake Museum in Kobe, Japan http://museumchick.com/2011/01/hanshin-awaji-earthquake-museum-kobe-japan.html Wenchuan Earthquake Museum
http://www.chinahighlights.com/chengdu/attraction/wenchuan-earthquake-museum.htm
96
97
National Technical University of Athens School of Architecture Department Ι Architectural Design November 2014