PASSCHENDAELE ANNIVERSARY SUPPLEMENT, NAVY NEWS, OCTOBER 2007
i
‘Nothing so dreadful’ A MEETING IN WASHINGTON
THE WARRIOR OF 1917 JACK, NOT TOMMY
THE FATAL DECISION ONE BATTLE, MANY NAMES At ten minutes past four on the last day of January 1917, Robert Lansing prepared to welcome a visitor. It was coming to the end of the working day in Washington, but Lansing’s guest would ensure the lights on the Capitol burned into the night. Johann Heinrich Graf von Bernstorff removed his trademark bowler hat perched precariously on his head and his long flowing coat and rather limply offered Lansing his hand. Bernstorff was renowned in the US capital as a bon viveur. He loved all the things a gentleman should love: women, cigars, golf, poker. He could hold court for hours on end and, atypically for a Prussian, he welcomed journalists with open arms. And as the German Ambassador to the United States, Johann Heinrich Graf von Bernstorff had a singular task: to keep the country out of the European conflagration. But on this Wednesday afternoon Bernstorff knew his mission had failed. Gone was his customary smile. He glumly handed the US Secretary of State a note: within eight hours Germany’s vaunted U-bootwaffe would unleash a war without limits and restrictions against the world’s merchant trade. The United States would be permitted to send one passenger ship across the Atlantic to Falmouth each week – provided it was painted in red and white stripes and flew a huge red and white checkered flag from every mast. The normally taciturn Lansing looked up from the note. “You know what the result will be.” Bernstoff nodded. “I know it is very serious, very. I deeply regret that it is necessary.” The ambassador bowed and left. Robert Lansing did not know it. Johann Heinrich Graf von Bernstorff did not know it. But the note the German official handed to the American would ensure that British sailors would be locked in a life and death struggle that autumn with the ‘Hun’ in Flanders, the low-lying poplar-studded terrain straddling northern France and Belgium, east of the historic cloth trading town of Ypres. The Germans would call it Ypern or, more usually, Flandernschlacht – Flanders battle. The official historians of the Great War named it the Third Battle of Ypres. The world has come to know it by a single world: Passchendaele.
CHAINS REMOVED TERROR ON THE OCEANS THE U-BOAT PERIL The road to Passchendaele began in the court of Kaiser Wilhelm II in the 300-room castle of Prince Hans von Pless near the great Silesian city of Breslau and the rather more modest Château Beaurepaire, 20 miles south of Boulogne, home to General Sir Douglas Haig. Both sought outright victory: the Kaiser on the high seas, Douglas Haig along the Channel coast. Victory was something Wilhelm II had sought in the summer and autumn of 1914 as his armies smashed through neutral Belgium and Luxembourg into northern France, stalling on the Marne and in the flooded plains of Flanders. He had sought victory too at Verdun in 1916, again to no avail. The mighty dreadnoughts of his Hochseeflotte
● ‘The ground presented the most God-forsaken spectacle I had seen’... A shell crashes into the desolate moonscape east of Ypres, where a British tank has been abandoned in the mud Picture: Naval Historical Branch – High Seas Fleet – had failed to wrest command of the ocean from the Royal Navy at Jutland. There was, perhaps, one last card to play. The Unterseeboot, the U-boat, that “damned un-English weapon” which struck fear into the heart of the enemy. For two years, the U-boats had been on a leash, ordered to obey the very strictest rules of warfare. Unleashed they had brought Germany to the brink of war with the United States – most infamously they dispatched the liner Lusitania – until the shackles were put back in place. Even on a leash, the German submarine was a formidable foe, condemning roughly 180 merchant ships to a watery grave each month – more than 300,000 tons of shipping every four weeks. It was not enough. For all the sinkings, for all the deaths, for all the raw materials sent to the bottom of the Atlantic, the Mediterranean, the North Sea, Britain was still in the war. Her merchant fleet had shrunk by barely one twentieth since the beginning of the war. Unchaining the shackles, argued Admiral Henning von Holtzendorff, Germany’s Chief of the Naval Staff, would ensure the destruction of 600,000 tons of shipping monthly and deal England – Germans rarely referred to Britain – a mortal blow. “Terror will strike into seafarers, into the English people and neutrals, guaranteeing the success of the unrestricted U-boat war,” the admiral declared. “I expect success with certainty within five months at the latest. That success will suffice to make England bow to an acceptable peace.” There were objections. Johann Heinrich Graf von Bernstorff opposed an all-out campaign. So too Germany’s chancellor, Theobald von Bethmann-Hollweg, U-boat warfare had almost made an enemy of the United States once before. Washington would not be so forgiving a second time. The hawks arrogantly dismissed the threat of war with America: not a single ‘doughboy’ would set foot on the European continent.
“They will not come because our U-boats will sink them,” declared Admiral Eduard von Capelle, the State Secretary of the Navy. “From a military viewpoint they mean nothing, nothing, and yet again nothing.” The German volk, too, were in favour of an all out war against Britain’s lifeline; the Reich was being strangled by the Royal Navy’s blockade. Now the British would suffer likewise. “There’s a sigh of relief among the entire German people,” Munich’s Münchner Zeitung commented. “A single word comes out of everyone’s mouth: Finally!” And so at midnight on January 31 1917, the chains were released. “We must attack ferociously, but we must also attack particularly quickly,” Hermann Bauer, the head of the Ubootwaffe, told his men. “So wage war with the greatest energy. No ship which can be sunk after this order should remain afloat.”
◆
● ●
On the day the shackles were removed, one in four of the Kaiser’s front-line U-boats was under the command of the Unterseebootsflotille Flandern – the ‘Flanders Flotilla’ – based in the historic Belgian city of Bruges. And Bruges was, in the words of American journalist Lowell Thomas, “the Flanders lair for the German under-sea corsairs – a particularly irksome threat to the Allies, a thorn in the side”, with canals connecting it with Ostend and Zeebrugge. Unleashed, the Flanders Flotilla and the rest of the U-bootwaffe wrought the destruction their masters had hoped for. “There are two things which are going to win or lose this war,” observed Admiral Sir David Beatty, the dashing, headstrong, Commanderin-Chief of the Grand Fleet. “Our armies might advance a mile a day and slay the Hun in thousands, but the real crux lies in whether we blockade the enemy to his knees, or whether he does the same to us.” In the spring of 1917, it was ‘the Hun’ in the ascendancy. The first month of the unrestricted campaign accounted for 291 merchant ships;
in March 355 were sunk; the toll reached its peak in April, 458 vessels lost. But the sinkings continued: in May 357; in June 352. Over five months, more than three million tons of shipping, half of them British fell victim to German submarines. One in four merchantmen setting sail for or from the British Isles would never return. It could not go on like this. No nation, not even the world’s greatest seafaring nation, could withstand such crippling losses indefinitely. “I must call attention to the great and to the growing menace of Germany’s piratical devices,” warned Lord Carnarvon in a speech that bleak spring of 1917. “It is nothing new in essence. It is a development, it is an advance along the road to complete barbarism. The peril is great.” The peril was indeed great. Even before the U-boats began their concerted campaign, First Sea Lord Admiral Sir John Jellicoe had been worried. Britain had too few merchant ships to sustain her. Now, in the spring of 1917, Jellicoe cut a sepulchral figure in the corridors of the Admiralty. As Commander-in-Chief of the Grand Fleet, the grandest fleet indeed which the Empire had ever sent to sea, Jellicoe had been the only man who could “lose the war in an afternoon”. But now he was losing the war, slowly, inexorably. “It is impossible for us to go on with the war if losses like this continue,” he confided in American admiral William Sims. “Is there no solution for the problem?” asked Sims. “Absolutely none that we can see now,” Jellicoe responded forlornly. The admiral’s despondency reached its nadir in Downing Street on Wednesday June 20 1917 at the War Cabinet. The mood of ministers was already depressed. Public morale was sagging: raids by heavy German bombers, Gothas, were pounding the capital. Gothas would not win the war, but that other ‘piratical device’ beloved by the foe, the submarine, might. As the ministers discussed plans
for actions by the Army for 1917 and 1918, Jellicoe interjected. “There is no good discussing plans for next spring – we cannot go on,” the admiral warned; if shipping losses continued at the same rate into the autumn, the Empire would be forced to sue for peace by November. The news, observed the Commander-in-Chief of the Army Douglas Haig, “was a bombshell”. Perhaps he did not intend to, or perhaps he did, but John Jellicoe had played into the hands of Douglas Haig.
SECOND FIDDLE DLE MUTINY IN FRANCE NCE THE FLANDERS OFFENSIVE NSIVE Throughout the winter and nd spring of 1917, Douglas Haig had d played nch. The second fiddle to the French. Scottish general lacked the flair of his Gallic counterpart Nivelle, rudition whose charm, zeal, and erudition persuaded Allied leaderss to unleash the French soldier dier es, against the Chemin des Dames, an imposing ridge north-west est of Reims where he would reap ap ”. “a splendid harvest of glory”. The British role in Nivelle’s le’s grand plan had been little more than a sideshow, a bloody sideshow at that – a diversionary attack at Arras. The Battle of Arras in n April ely be bbeen en and May of 1917 had largely a success; Nivelle’s offensive sive did not merely fail, it almost cost st F France rance the war. Even before the offensive, e, morale in the French Army had been n waning. In its wake, it collapsed. The failure of Nivelle’s ’s attack he poilu, was the final straw for the dier. He the ordinary French soldier. mutinied. Between mid-April and mid-June 1917 54 divisions of thee French Army were rocked by indiscipline. isci c pline. The poilu rolled through the he streets of la Patrie crying: “Vive la paix! Vive la Révolution!” Abovee all, alll, the Frenchman refused to attack. ack. F For or the rest of 1917, the Tommy, my, not Continued on page ii
LIKE his comrades in the Army, the sailor-soldier of the Royal Naval Division wore the standardissue khaki field jacket. Indeed the uniform and kit of Jack was almost identical to Tommy. The Lee Enfield rifle, plus bayonet, was his friend. On his chest was a ‘small box’ respirator – gas mask – in a haversack. In the cold or wet he donned a leather jerkin. He carried a mess tin, water bottle, a tool for digging trenches. And on his head he wore a ‘Brodie helmet’ – also known as the ‘Tommy helmet’ or ‘tin hat’ – with its distinctive wide brim to provide some protection against shrapnel. Proud of their maritime roots, however, the men of the Royal Naval Division maintained the traditions of their seaborne comrades. Officers wore the distinctive rings and curls on their sleeves, not in gold braid but usually in a lighter shade of khaki (they also wore the equivalent Army pips on their shoulders); ranks wore traditional badges on their sleeves, as well as their battalion badge and a colour flash signalling their company. The customs of the division were distinctly naval: the White Ensign flew over its camps. Officers relaxed in ward rooms, ranks in messes; all were fed from the galley, not the field kitchen; the wounded were treated in a sick bay, not the field hospital. Army officers tried to rid the RND of its ‘peculiar’ customs. “But so stubborn was the resisting power which all ranks developed in a perfectly obedient and respectful manner, and so high was their conduct in action, that after six months the essential character of the Division was unchanged,” wrote Churchill.