NATIONAL CATHOLIC
REPORTER
www.NCRonline.org NCRonline.org
THE INDEPENDENT NEWS SOURCE
FEBRUARY 4, 2011
Vol.27-April 47, No. 89,| $2.95 March 2015
An ‘expansive classroom’ on the Bible By SOLI SALGADO
Half of the U.S. population says they have read Scripture in the past year, and nearly 10 percent say they read it daily, according to a 2014 study by the Center for the Study of Religion and American Culture. Yet only 44 percent of those who read it said they sought help in understanding or interpreting it. To tackle these problematic numbers, the Society of Biblical Literature founded Bible Odyssey, a website for scholars to contribute context and analysis of biblical passages, places, people and themes, all with “news magazine readability.” “The Bible is particularly susceptible to misinformation, bad information, or even hurtful interpretation,” said John Kutsko, the society’s executive director. “[Those numbers] highlight the urgent need to provide good, credible background. We can’t understand Shakespeare and Elizabethan English without notes. The same goes for the Bible.” Bible Odyssey, intended for high school students and older, provides a nonsectarian, academic approach to biblical text, using a variety of interpretations through objective readings. The site — BibleOdyssey. com — does not address spiritual, theological or religious questions except through historical examples, and in doing so, Kutsko said, could still inform persons who use the Bible for spiritual reflection. While “bible study” and “study of the Bible,” suggest two very differ-
—CNS/Michael Alexander
ent approaches, he said they should be complementary. “If you’re using the Bible for personal study, you might ask what harm is there for literal reading or reading without context,” Kutsko said. “But what if you’re asking yourself, what does the Bible mean for me as a member of community, of democracy? What’s my attitude toward personal wealth, or social issues like immigration, civil rights, women’s rights, science? It’s hard to make a fine distinction between personal understanding of the Bible and one that has consequences for living in the modern world. A deeper understanding of the Bible’s background helps us know how we can and can’t use it, which is just as important.” One attribute important in develop-
ing the site was making clear the variety of interpretations and approaches a passage or theme may have, to “showcase debate rather than a right answer,” Kutsko said. The society hopes that the respect and openness among scholars on the site will present an example of civil discourse. “In many ways, the Bible intentionally embeds diverse views and voices, and that may be a message in itself; the text doesn’t strive to be black or white,” Kutsko said. He noted that the Catholic church has a long-standing tradition in understanding the difference between “Bible literacy” and “interpretive literacy,” placing a high value on not what the Bible says, but what the
National Catholic Reporter provides independent news about the church through its biweekly newspaper and website. For more information, visit NCRonline.org.