globalwatch-Aug 31st 2012

A Weekly Global Watch Media Publica on (www.globalreport2010.com)

August 31st, 2012

The Global Watch Weekly Report is a publica on of Rema Marke ng (www.remamarke ng.com) and is published every Friday.

For any queries regarding this service please contact us at admin@remamarke ng.com. ŠRema Marke ng 2012. All Rights Reserved.

“The Number one weekly report which provides concrete evidence of a New World Order & One World Government agenda�

www.globalreport2010.com This is a FREE report. Please pass this on to others who you may feel would benefit from this information. Web site owners please feel free to give this away to your site visitors or email lists Not yet on our mailing list? Then visit the web site link below and sign up to ensure you don't miss out on these free weekly reports

www.globalreport2010.com

Welcome to the Global Watch Weekly Report It is one thing associating somebody as being a pawn or an apostle of the New World Order. By this we mean someone who is playing in an instrumental role in part of a bigger picture. For instance I am sure that you would agree with me that Angela Merkel, Prime Minister of Germany, is somehow enjoying this whole debacle within the European Union, because it gives Germany more of an opportunity to forge a new kind of Europe which they have always wanted. Or maybe you would agree with me that Barack Obama’s socialist background has had a significant impact on the policies that he has been rolling out across the United States. Or maybe that Tony Blair's Interfaith Agenda is simply part of a wider ecumenical initiative to seek a common denominator across all religions. I am sure I could list a handful more people who you believe are playing a specific role as part of a gigantic machine operating with a specific end goal. Absolute control of mankind.

However to go beyond this and label someone as the Antichrist takes a lot of guts, considering the fact that history is littered with the dead remains of books and websites which claimed that a specific individual was the Antichrist when they were not. Some people might like the whole idea of reading the latest theories about who is the Antichrist but Bible Prophecy in general has suffered a tremendous amount of reputational damage over the decades, mainly due to failed man-made prophecies and predictions about the return of Christ and also the identity of the Antichrist.

So when theories about the Antichrist being linked to the British Royal Family emerged during the mid 1990s, it was easy to dismiss this as another incoming dead statistic until a specific revolution of thinking began to emerge. Firstly those in the Islamic world who study Hadith (Islamic Eschatology) were raising the profile of their belief that the Dajaal (antichrist) was actually Western Zionism and Freemasonry which they equated as being the tools of Israel, the United States and the United Kingdom. However Muslim researchers whilst believing in an individual Dajaal seemed to place more emphasis on an Antichrist system, which they believed was linked to the British Monarchy, Freemasonry and the Rothschilds.

However there was one man who in the late 1990s did take this to a much more personal level in claiming that the Antichrist was actually an individual within the British Monarchy.

This man was a Christian, not a Muslim and his book which was one of the first major publications of its kind, has since led to thousands of websites and blogs debating whether this belief system is consistent with Bible Prophecy.

You be the judge of what is about to unfold. The question is, do you believe this quite controversial view?, are you against it? or will you take the easy option and sit on the fence?

Welcome to the Pandora’s box of identifying the Antichrist.

www.globalreport2010.com The Global Watch Weekly Report is a publica on of Rema Marke ng (www.remamarke ng.com) and is published every Friday.

For any queries regarding this service please contact us at admin@remamarke ng.com. ŠRema Marke ng 2012. All Rights Reserved.

D

THE ANTICHRIST KING TO COME? THE ANTICHRIST AND A CUP OF TEA In 1998 a book was released called “The Antichrist and a Cup of Tea”. The book authored by Tom Cohen sought to provide evidence that the symbolic description of the Antichrist in the book of Revelation was consistent with the symbolism found with the Royal Family and specifically Prince Charles and his coat of Arms.

and worthy of your earthly worship." Leige is an old English word meaning "Lord". "I am now your Lordman, and worthy of your earthly worship."

Cohen’s views were also at the time given fuel by a number of major public events involving Prince Charles such as that seen in March 2002 when a giant bronze statue of Prince Charles as a winged hero "saving the world" became the centrepiece of a remote Amazonian town in Brazil. The Prince was presented with a model of the sculpture, which shows him with bulging muscles, pinned back ears and only a loin cloth to protect his modesty.

Prince Charles' coat of arms and crest was designed for him by the British College of Heraldry, using a system of guidelines over 500 years old.

Cohen believed the Coat of Arms mirrored all of the visual and symbolic elements of the Antichrist described in Revelation 13.

“And the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were as the feet of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion: and the dragon gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority.”

Rev 13:2 KJV

During his visit to Tocantins state in central Brazil the Prince was told the full size piece would be erected in a square named in his honor in the main town of Palmas. The inscription on the statute reads “Savior of the World”.

OTHER SUPPORTERS

Additionally, Prince Charles Coat of Arms has another symbol, The Order of the Garter. The Order of the Garter is the parent organization over Free Masonry, world-wide.

Evidence also points to the fact that the national symbol of Wales is a red dragon and that at his coronation, Prince Charles sat on a chair with a large red dragon emblazoned on it. During the ceremony, his mother said, "This dragon gives you your power, your throne and your authority." His response to her was, "I am now your Leige-man,

However it hasn't only been Tom Cohen that has been a staunch supporter of this interpretation. The controversial enigma, Monte Judah of Lion and Lamb Ministries, (not to be confused with the Lamb and Lion Ministries of David Reagan) has also written extensively on identifying Prince Charles as the Antichrist.

It should be noted that Tim Cohen met with Monte Judah in 1987, and subsequently included the same ideas/calculations concerning using gematria in English and Hebrew to identify "Prince Charles of Wales" and his name/title also as equalling 666.

4

D

THE ANTICHRIST KING TO COME? Monte Judah in 2001 wrote an article called “The Prince who is to come” where he stated, "...I have been asked many times if Prince Charles knows who he is.

That is, if he is the antimessiah, does he know that he is. My answer is Yes. I believe that the antimessiah is patiently waiting for his time just as the Messiah waited for His. I believe he is trusting in the promise that was given by his father...Am I afraid of what Prince Charles might do with me identifying him? Nope. I’m small potatoes in this world. I’m just the “him” who did the calculation.

“Let him who has understanding calculate the number of the beast...”

However whilst Monte Judah has been associated with significant controversy regarding his theology and failed end time predictions there are more credible authors who also have given fuel to the idea of Prince Charles being a coming world ruler.

The late Joan Veon in her book “The Sustainable Prince” says “There has been much speculation with regard to when Charles will become king but it would seem he does not need a throne as the environmental agenda via sustainable development, and publicprivate partnerships with the world’s largest and strongest multinational corporations, many of which have cash flows and assets exceeding that of most countries, provide Charles his throne. It appears that he rules behind the scenes, encouraging, expanding, and pushing the agenda of the United Nations, partnering with the World Bank and other global agencies, all of which are advancing world government, a philosophy with which he is not uncomfortable.

After all there have been many kings, popes, and world leaders who have tried to attain it. When one takes a look at the 48 companies on his directorate, 23 of them are part of Business Week’s Global 1000 corporations with a market value of over $1 Trillion. Apart from the manufacturing base he has amassed, travel and tourism is the world’s largest industry and generator of jobs. It provides direct and indirect employment for 200 million people, one in every 9 workers in the world. Its gross domestic product generates more than that of the gross national product (GNP) of the United States in 1995.

It is through public-private partnerships that corporations will replace the rule of a nation’s. When you have a board of appointed people representing government, corporations, the private people sector, and nongovernmental organizations, money rules, not government or the people. What we see in the making is a new form of governance transcending national borders, elected officials, and the will of the people. Little by little, people will be squeezed out and the New World Order will fully emerge.

Lastly, the environment is something all the people of the world share — the air, water, fish and fowl. Whoever controls the environment, controls man. That is the objective and goal. The work

that Prince Charles is spearheading has been gaining momentum.

He is at the heart of what is going on in the world, as it relates to power, control, philosophy, and “forward” thinking at every level of society. Since Prince Charles lives and breathes sustainable development, a better title for him would be the “Sustainable Prince”.

Because of who he is, doors automatically open and people flock to him. His tentacles are very deep, reaching into every area of life, business, and government. He transcends politics, national borders, and religion. He is very powerful by way of position, lineage, inheritance, importance and influence. He is out to remake society and mold it into his image, which is based on Gaia, a usurpation of Genesis 1. This alone will change life for every person on earth, as they will become slaves to the new twenty-first century feudal landlords, where every crust of bread they eat will be measured against what they produce in order to protect resources for future generations. Is all of this the new divine right of kings?”

Even the reputable “Cutting Edge Ministries” have also voiced their support for Prince Charles being the Antichrist. In 2002 they produced a series called “Antichrist Series” in which they spent a significant amount of time quoting from Tim Cohen's “Antichrist and a Cup of Tea.” There are many arguments that have been put forward for Prince Charles being the Antichrist and too numerous to cover, but one key argument was based on the fact that in 2004 Prince Charles became Supreme Governor of the Church of England and indicated he would prefer to be "defender of faith” (all religions) rather than the conventional "defender of the faith" (Christian Faith) when he becomes King.

Considering he had already made several strong and disturbing public statements endorsing Islam “as the solution to the spiritual and cultural ills of Britain and the West”, many believed that should he become King, we could end up with a situation where the head of one of the worlds largest and wealthiest Christian denominations could seek to possibly unite the Anglican Church and Islam into a morphed form of social Chrislam.

However an interesting thing happened around 2007 onwards. It became rather noticeable that the “Prince Charles Antichrist fever” was somewhat dissipating and that even some of its staunch supporters were making statements which seemed to suggest that it was not so much Prince Charles that we should be looking at but rather his eldest son, Prince William.

5

D

THE ANTICHRIST KING TO COME?

PRINCE WILLIAM: THE ANTICHRIST KING Rumours had been surfacing about Prince William as far back as the death of his mother Diana amidst controversial circumstances. Grace Powers a researcher and staunch supporter of the “Prince William Antichrist” theory states

Scientific tests on the shroud captures some dermal cells from the shroud, and Goodman clones them and places them in a woman's womb (a Mexican servant named Maria, of course). The result is Christopher Goodman, an exact replica of Jesus Christ. His birth sets off a series of events that are taken right out of the New Testament.

At precisely 9:03pm, on June 21st, 1982, Grail Princess Diana of Wales gave birth to PRINCE WILLIAM ARTHUR PHILIP LOUIS WINDSOR and England was given its future King. He was born during a Solar Eclipse. On the eve of his birth, Druids, Witches, and Satanists from all over the world celebrated at pagan sites throughout Scotland, England, and Wales. The intense celebration carried on far into the night with sexual orgies, sacrifices, black masses, and Satanic worship on this longest day of the year – the summer solstice.

The ancient Druids had already prophesied that some time in the future on June 21st, their Sun King would be born of a Princess. William’s birth was not only accompanied by a Solar Eclipse but by an even rarer Lunar Eclipse and by strange alignments of the stars and planets. As foretold by the eclipses, the name ‘Diana’ was given to the ancient Moon Goddess who gave birth to the Sun Coinciding with William’s birth was the release of the 1982 Hollywood film The Omen III: Final Conflict It is no coincidence that the Illuminati-owned publishing houses and movie studios are releasing timely and influential propaganda to advance their one world government agenda.

However one event which did cause significant interest even for those feeling the “Prince William Antichrist” theory was overstretched, was the picture below taken of Prince William and Prince Harry at a helicopter training session in 2009 at RAF Shrewsbury.

However for the most part, the view of Prince William being the Antichrist was mainly based on conjecture rather than solid biblical exegesis, such as his similar facial structure appearance to the image on the shroud of Turin.

Both Harry and William are wearing badges with their name printed on them - "Harry Wales" and "William Wales". However on William right side is a badge which has an image of a goat with two horns.

Already a publication appeared several years ago called the Christ Clone Trilogy, a science fiction trilogy by the American novelist James BeauSeigneur, presenting a fictionalised version of Christian eschatology. The story begins in 1978, as journalist Decker Hawthorne attaches himself to a large contingent of American scientists who are off to Italy to conduct tests on the Shroud of Turin, long believed to be the burial cloth of Christ, in an effort to establish it's authenticity.

The “Markhor Goat” head is the symbolism used in the RAF patch for Squadron 60 of the Royal Air Force. The Markhor is an indian mountain goat and it's head symbol was approved for the patch by King George VI in December 1937, chosen to commemorate many years of service in North-West India. However what caused a stir was that this specific goat image is similar to that used as a symbol for Satan known as Baphomet.

6

D

THE ANTICHRIST KING TO COME? Baphomet is a pagan deity revived in the 19th century as a figure of Satanism and is another name for the satanic "Goat of Mendes:" the god of the witches. The symbol has an ancestry that can be traced from ancient Sumer & ancient Egypt through to France in the Middle Ages & on to its global use today in witchcraft and on the logos & shields of the Jesuit universities.

Tim Cohen also states "The state of Charles' and Diana's marriage was one of the prime reasons the Queen clearly indicated she intended to continue as Monarch until her death...[If there was a formal separation or divorce], Charles would find it all but impossible to take the religious vows at his coronation as King and head of the Church...If those events did indeed unfold, then the Throne would pass directly to Prince William..."

There is also a quote attributed to the CNN on March 6th 1996

Eliphas Levi says in his book, Transcendental Magic, its Doctrine and Ritual that: "A reversed pentagram, with two points projecting upwards, is a symbol of evil and attracts sinister forces because it overturns the proper order of things and demonstrates the triumph of matter over spirit. It is the GOAT of lust attacking the heavens with its HORNS, a sign execrated by initiates."

Twelve year old Prince William of Great Britain was one of the first human recipients to be implanted with a high frequency microchip in his right hand. Thus, if he were ever lost or kidnapped, a radiowave with a specific frequency could be targeted to his implanted microchip, the signal would then be routed through a satellite to a special computer screen at Scotland Yard whereby William's movements could be tracked and followed and thereby located anywhere in the world.

Many proponents of the “Prince William Antichrist” theory use Revelation 17:8 as evidence of their claim. According to them, Prince William is a reincarnation of King Arthur. He is the king that was, is not and yet is.

Grace Power provides additional ammunition for propelling William as the coming “World King”.

According to reports by the BBC and the Guardian (UK), Princess Diana stated to her lawyers in October 1995 that the Queen (now 82) would abdicate. Maggie Rae, Diana’s former divorce lawyer said that Diana predicted the succession to the throne would skip a generation and that her son, Prince William, would be made king.

Diana confided in Rae “several times” that she had reason to believe William would be picked over Charles. The Princess achieved “goddess” status and won the hearts, minds, adoration and sympathy of the world when she reportedly died in the arms of a Muslim man.

As the look-alike “perfect” son of a goddess, Prince William is the most eligible candidate for the role of leader of the New World Order when he emerges in 2015 with a global “peace plan”.

No public figure is immune to bad publicity except one – Prince William. The Rothschild controlled Associated Press have protected their “demi-god” from all criticism, scandal and tabloid attacks on his character by enforcing a “hands off” policy and by tightening the choke chain on journalists. To keep their jobs, journalists must portray William as the responsible, handsome, self-effacing heir to the throne. By contrast, William’s carrot-topped, pot-smoking, boozing brother Harry is portrayed as the bad Prince who parties too hard and has been caught wearing a Nazi uniform.

London’s Daily Mirror reports that a majority of Britons want Prince William as their next British monarch instead of Prince Charles. According to opinion polls, over 75% want to retain the monarchy and 81 per cent feel that Queen Elizabeth II should consider stepping down soon. Former BBC royal correspondent Jennie Bond commented that Prince Charles seems to have a real image problem caused by the breakdown of his marriage to Diana.

In an article entitled "William: The Once and Future King," It states that William was trained by Diana to be a new kind of King, A modern Arthur who will lead his people back to greatness. What is so ironic is what is said in her own words. In Diana's words she said...

"I believe Wills can rebuild Camelot and I will be his Merlin. We will return to the chilvary, pageantry and glory of King Arthurs court. Willaim will re-make the Monarchy by showing love, leadership and compassion."

Excerpt from "Diana: Life of a Legend" Published

by Globe International Inc.

7

D

THE ANTICHRIST KING TO COME? Princess Diana was known as the champion of the people, those who were downtrodden and outcast.

Yet whilst Prince Harry is seen as a ruffian who very recently endured the embarrassment of a

ADDITIONAL JUSTIFICATION Some final points which are used to support the “Prince William Antichrist” theory include an incident which took place during the royal wedding of Prince William and Katie Middleton in 2011. The Bishop of London’s speech at the royal wedding had internet forums buzzing with speculation on whether or not Prince William is the Antichrist.

Addressing the royal couple Richard John Carew Chartres, who is the Bishop of London, quoted St Catherine of Siena whose festival day coincided with the royal wedding. He said “Be who God meant you to be and you will set the world on fire.”

This has internet chat forums on overdrive although what he meant by this statement was never clarified. national publication display of him playing “naked” games in his hotel room, Prince William seems to be the exact opposite. One who is seen as gentle and measured and a man of the people.

Is this why pictures appeared of Prince William on May 31st, 2004 in the Associated Press holding a baby lamb with cloven hind hooves. What is the significance of this photograph? Is it a mock imitation of Jesus Christ?

Another reputable author Tracy Twyman also supports the idea of Prince William being a coming Antichrist. She says, “Born on the Summer Solstice during a solar eclipse, Prince William is a living embodiment of the dying and reborn solar king of the ancient world. This is the primordial archetype of kingship, the “Lord of the Earth,” upon which all monarchs throughout history have modeled themselves. Through his descent from the Spencer family, William carries a more illustrious predigree than any other monarch to sit on the throne of England. His bloodline can be traced back to the biblical House of David, and possibly Jesus himself, as well to the historical figure remembered as Satan. His marriage to Kate Middleton has been patterned on the ancient pagan May Day rituals of king sacrifice and sex magic. His bride has been quite consciously chosen to be modeled as a new Diana, a living incarnation of that "virgin queen" goddess referred to in St. John's Revelation as the Whore of Babylon. Learn why Prince William could in fact be that final King of the World prophesied in the Bible.”

We have already made reference to the Shroud of Turnin but Dr. Joye Pugh author of the book Eden Knowledge of Good & Evil takes it one step further.

She actually believes that Prince William was cloned from the Shroud of Turin. She says, Those who believe William has a future role to play point out that that the Antichrist will appear as a lamb but whose power will derive from the Dragon.

This photograph is believed to be a hidden occutlic symbolic gesture to demonstrate that behind the handsome and charming smile is a benevolent evil which will deceive the world at the appointed time.

“The Shroud of Turin is a legitimate artifact from Jesus' crucifixion and has been used, by modern science, for nefarious purposes. The Shroud is real…...Carbon dating of this artifact may have been a conspiracy to conceal its legitimacy. Evidence found in the Book of Revelation suggests that the Antichrist is a demonic clone. Clones do not have a soul which makes them the perfect vehicle for demonic influence.”

Joye's believes that Princess Diana was used by the Royal Family as a "sacrificial lamb" to usher in the Antichrist - Prince William. She believes 8

D

THE ANTICHRIST KING TO COME? the Shroud of Turin will eventually be proven legitimate and Prince William's DNA will match Christ's supposed DNA taken from the shroud. She believes when it is revealed that Prince William shares the same DNA as Christ (cloned), the public will embrace him as the Messiah.

BRITISH ISRAELISM INFLUENCE One of the key factors which contributes largely to the British Monarchy’s belief that they are descendants of King David and thus a continuation of Gods theocracy on earth is a belief which has caused major controversy throughout the years.

The theology behind the royal family mirrors the Christian cultic view known a British Israelism. In this belief system which was actually the theology taught by the Worldwide Church of God, 'British Israel' is interpreted as being the literal descendants of the lost ten tribed house of Israel who are supposedly found today in the British Commonwealth of Nations, the United States of America, and certain areas of north-western Europe, particularly Denmark, Sweden, Norway and Holland. As a result of this, many of the themes

published his book in 1794 “A Revealed Knowledge of the Prophecies and Times.” Brothers was, as one source puts it, "a Canadian madman". He became troubled by visions, and said that the British parliament was the 'beast' of Revelation.

Brothers believed he was a descendant of King David, and that only he had the right to be king of England. Unfortunately for him, King George III disagreed.

The Cambridge Biographical Encyclopaedia (1994) says: “Brothers, Richard (1757-1824) British religious fanatic and exnaval officer, born in Newfoundland, Canada. He announced himself in 1793 as the 'nephew of the Almighty', apostle of a new religion, the Anglo-Israelites. In 1795, for prophesying the destruction of the monarchy, he was sent to Newcastle and subsequently to an asylum from 1795-1806. Despite this, and the failure of his prophecy that Jerusalem would be restored to the Hebrews in 1798, his movement flourished. By the end of the nineteenth century, there were said to number two million adherents of British-Israelism, most of them Church of England members.”

In 1859, John Taylor of London expanded the theory into the field of Pyramidology. In the book “The Great Pyramid, Why Was It Built and Who Built It?” John Taylor tried to show how Israelites built the Pyramid of Cheops, and how British Inches and measurements could be found in its design.

However it was in 1950 that this doctrine went into overdrive when it was promoted by Herbert W. Armstrong who founded the World Wide Church of God and Plain Truth Magazine and became the theological champion of this belief system.

found within the Commonwealth ideology are founded on historical principles with ancient Israel.

“Israel has become "a nation and a company of nations" (Genesis 35:11) - the U.S.A. (a nation), and the British Commonwealth (a company of nations). The people to be reigned over by David's throne were to be descendants of the tribes of Israel, who migrated from Palestine through Europe to the "appointed place" (2 Samuel 7:10), identified as the (British) "Isles" (Isaiah 41:1). “

British-Israelism was first hinted at by the British Member of Parliament, John Sadler, in his “Rights of the Kingdom” in 1649. But the movement began in the eighteenth century after the self-styled 'Nephew of the Almighty', Richard Brothers,

After Armstrong died, his successor Joseph Tkach rejected as heresy most of Armstrong's doctrines in 1998. This brought about a great split in the church that produced countless little splinter churches each following a different combination of Armstrong's theology.

THE ISRAELITE SYMBOLISM Earlier we referenced Prince Charles Coat of Arms in association with the symbology of Revelation 13 with Tim Cohen believing this was evidence that Prince Charles would be the Antichrist. However additional examination of the British Coat of Arms also shows a strong link to the national emblems of ancient Israel further affirming the Monarchies belief that Great Britain is a modern day representation of ancient Israel.

9

D

THE ANTICHRIST KING TO COME? The crowns surmounting the helmet and on the lion and unicorn symbolize Kingship. Abraham and Sarah were promised that their descendants would be kings (Genesis 17:5-6). This was to be Israel's high calling -- to be a nation of kings ruling as God's instruments of blessing.

The official coronation anthem for a British monarch is called “Zadok the Priest” (after the priests of Israel, who anointed their monarchs). It was written by Handel in 1727, as commissioned

by King George I as one of his last acts.

It is therefore a belief within some quarters that a British led Anglo-Empire uniting the world in 'peace' will bring forth a Merovingian Arthurian “Davidic” like leader to the forefront.

For instance in the official “British Coat of Arms” as seen above the lion and the unicorn supporting the shield are both identifications of the Israel nation.

Speaking of Israel, the Bible says, ". . . he hath as it were the strength of a UNICORN ... he couched, he lay down as a LION, and as a GREAT LION who shall stir him up?" (Numbers 24:8-9).

In the beginnings of the Bible story we read how Israel, whose former name was Jacob, obtained the God-given birth right of an everlasting national covenant.

Adherents believe that William, predicted to be the next king of England, will be crowned in 2015 at the age of 33 where he will undergo the same sacred ceremonies as his predecessors.

Like his predecessors, he will be anointed with oil from Israel just before being crowned. The anointing takes place under a canopy that is lowered over the monarch’s head so that the public cannot see the actual moment of anointing.

Under the shield is a motto, "Dieu et mon droit" meaning "God And My Right", referring to this birthright.

The other motto around the shield, "Honi soit qui mal y pense" means "Shame on Him Who Thinks Evil of It.” This was God's covenant promise to Israel, when He declared, "I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee" (Genesis 12). The shield is symbolic of God's assurance to David, King of Israel, that his house and kingdom would be established forever (II Samuel 7).

The two quadrants (first and third) containing the lions passants represent England, whilst the second quadrant, containing the lion rampant, represents Scotland. The Harp, displayed in the fourth quadrant of the shield, is associated with David (as recorded in I Samuel 16:23) and represents Ireland.

Interestingly, for many years, the Westminster Abbey "Cosmati Pavement" mosaic, constructed in the 13th century has been hiding under a carpet for 150 years. Work has begun on restoring it - for what some to believe will be the next and final coronation. The Cosmati Pavement represents the exact center of the cosmos, and the end of time.

The mosaic was created in 1268 by the command of King Henry III, but it has not been seen at the coronation for over 150 years A Latin inscription around the perimeter of the work states: “The spherical globe here shows the archetypal macrocosm.”

10

D

THE ANTICHRIST KING TO COME? THE VERDICT ON THE PRINCE WILLIAM ANTICHRIST THEORY One of the things we need to understand is that the Coat of Arms for Prince Charles (Charles COA) is distinct from the Coat of Arms of that for Prince William (William COA). We came across numerous websites which were incorrectly referencing Prince William using the Charles COA. There are some very

distinct differences as we see below which then highlights other key questions that must be asked.

For instance at the base of Charles COA is the heraldic symbol of Wales, the red dragon.

Opposite the red dragon is Charles' badge as the heir-apparent to the British throne. The badge consists of three ostrich feathers surrounded by a crown with the motto Ich Dien underneath both the badge and the dragon. The meaning of Ich Dien is "I serve" in Welsh. In old Welsh, Eich Dyn, as some believe the motto is a corruption of, is "Your man." Reading the motto and symbols from right to left, the following message is believed by Cohen to possibly convey the following.

Ich, the Black Prince, Dien the Red Dragon (I, the Black Prince, serve the Red Dragon)

These lower symbols (badge and dragon) applies to Charles COA but is missing from William COA. However Tim Cohen and others will argue that despite this being missing Prince Williams Coat of Arms still has the presence of a red dragon in the right upper quadrant of the shield inferring that Prince William is still under the influence of the red dragon and still has the Lion and Unicorn in his COA which are interpreted as the following based on Cohen's interpretations of Charles COA. This beast on the left-hand side of Charles' coat of arms has the head and mouth of a lion, the body of a leopard, and the feet of a bear.

Typically in heraldry, lions have only three claws per foot while bears will have four or five. This lion has four claws and thus resembles those of a bear. Traditionally in heraldry, the lion has represented England, however Prince Charles' heraldic representation is totally unique in history even differing from that of his mother's, Queen Elizabeth, whose lion has the typical three claws per foot.

11

D

THE ANTICHRIST KING TO COME? (Rev 13:2 KJV) And the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were as the feet of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion: and the dragon gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority.

Note the design around the lion's neck. This image is called the "eldest-son label" and has been described by Tim Cohen (The AntiChrist and a Cup of Tea, pg. 124) as "three parallel horns which are, in a manner of speaking, 'plucked out by the roots' (i.e., turned upside down)." The eldest-son label is a "distinctive mark" of all succeeding Princes of Wales. Other members of the British royal family have labels that have more than three descending "horns." There are a total of five eldest-son labels on the coat of arms: on the left-side lion, the head lion, the unicorn, the red dragon, and at the top of the center shield where 10 lions are depicted.

To the right of the head of the coat of arms is a representation of a unicorn. "In heraldry, this unicorn represents not only Scotland, but also a counterfeit Christ" (Cohen, pg 184). Symbolically, the unicorn in the past has represented Alexander the Great (Dan 8:5, goat with one horn) and Antiochus Epiphanes, a type of anti-Christ (Dan 8:9, "a little horn"). Mythologically, the unicorn probably originated in ancient Babylon and today is a symbol adopted by New Agers to represent "a great world leader" whom they expect to bring world peace to earth.

Interestingly, in "Christian" symbolism, the unicorn has also represented the Virgin Mary.

In heraldry, and even historical representations, the unicorn's eyes are round and black, i.e., no visible eye-whites. (Queen Elizabeth's heraldic unicorn is depicted as thus.) Charles' design has the eyes shaped more like those of a human with noticeable eye-whites, (although not easily recognized in this particular copy.)

Some believe that the same description above could also be applied to William’s COA since the bulk of the imagery in Charles COA is the same as William’s COA, however there are some other significant differences.

One subtle difference is the introduction in William’s COA of an unusual small red scallop shell that appears four times, in the centre of a three-pointed label which adorns the shield, the necks of the lion and the unicorn. The red scallop shells had been incorporated in Lady Diana’s Arms since the 16th century.

This design reflected Prince William's own wishes, in incorporating the Spencer symbol.

Another significance difference noted is that Charles COA features a garter (a strap used to hold up stockings and which surrounds the shield in Charles COA) bearing the motto "Honi soit qui mal y pense" (which means "Shame on him who thinks ill of it") in gold letters. This garter is a symbol of The Order of the Garter which was founded by Edward III in 1348 and is the oldest British Order of Chivalry. It is composed of a maximum of Knights and Sovereigns appointed by the Queen. Of interest is a subsection within the order called “Stranger Knights and Ladies” which includes the heads of monarchy in Luxembourg, Denmark, Sweden, Spain, Netherlands, Japan and Norway lending credence to the idea of a black nobility formed predominantly from the houses of Europe.

Surprisingly this symbol is missing from Williams COA despite the fact that William is a royal Knight Companion of the Garter. Why? A final difference worth noting is how Cohen takes the same Beast in Revelation 13 and tries to explain how the ten heads of this beast relates to Charles COA. Pictured is another lion with the eldest-son label around its neck standing on top of a crown and a "gold helm." The helm is made up of seven curved bars or "horns." These seven horns, along with the three horns from the eldest-son label make a total of 10 horns in the head region of the coat of arms.

What seems a slightly overstretched attempt by Cohen to find the 10 horns in Prince Charles Coat of Arms is nevertheless of interest because this aspect of Charles COA is actually missing from Williams COA. Since 10 heads or 10 horns is a common theme in Daniel and Revelation representing an end times Antichrist Beast it again raises questions as to why such a significant aspect of the deciphering be missing from Williams COA if he is supposed to be the Antichrist and not Prince Charles.

12

D

THE ANTICHRIST KING TO COME? If the symbols of heraldry are supposed to be modern day deciphering's of the imagery in Revelation 13 it would be interesting for Tim Cohen and his supporters to provide some explanation as to why specific symbols seen in Charles COA are missing from William COA. The reason we are placing so much emphasis on the Coat of Arms is because many of the other arguments used to justify Prince William being the Antichrist have very little biblical basis so we place focus on the Coat of Arms since this was very basis that Tim Cohen used to justify Charles being the Antichrist from a biblical position more than any of his other arguments.

Prince Harry has the same Coat of Arms (image to the left) as William except that in Harrys COA, the red scallop shell symbols appears in all three strands of the three-pointed labels (lions and unicorn) rather than just the central point of the label as in William’s COA. Does this mean that Harry could be the Antichrist should William unexpectedly die since Harry’s COA is pretty much the same as Williams COA? How much emphasis should really be given to the Coat of Arms? How far do we take this? Is it possible that if Kate bears a son for William that the son could be the Antichrist if another 30 years goes by?

When the argument for Prince Charles was first presented in 1998 by Cohen it was unique, yet somehow there is a feeling that the Coat of Arms and heraldry deciphering position has somehow lost its potency when one tries to apply it to William. Charles COA was unique whereas Williams COA is not unique. This is why some researchers such as Tim Mchyde continue to believe that it is Prince Charles who will be the Antichrist and not his son William.

So without the uniqueness of heraldry to support a case for Prince William being the Antichrist, what else is out there from a biblical perspective? Not much we have to admit. There are other views floating around as already seen about the similarity of Williams face to that of the Shroud of Turn or him holding a lamb in his hand, the baphomet symbol on his air force jacket, his masonic hand symbol, his birth at the same time of the release of the Omen III and his inclusion as a Knight of the Garter.

Some of these observations are not without coincidence and clearly show that William is somewhat part of a royalty network which bears all the marks of one heavily involved with freemasonry, a dark side of Zionism and the construction of a one world government. And yes we are in agreement that there could possibly be a future world leader of Merovingian descent from a house of Europe. However, can we today really stretch that much further to conclusively concur that Prince William may not only be an Apostle of the New World Order but that he is the very prophesied Antichrist himself?

After seeing the dead bones of books from authors who thought that Javier Solana, King Juan Carlos of Spain, Otto Von Hapsburg, Tony Blair, Bill Clinton, George Bush Jr, Barack Obama, Herman Van Rompuy, Prince Hassan of Jordan, Henry Kissinger, Saddam Hussein, Mikhail Gorbachev, Vladimir Putin, Pope John Paul ll, Pope Ratzinger, Prince Charles of Wales and others were the Antichrist, are we again being guilty of trying to identify someone whose full revelation to the world may not come until he sits in the very temple of God declaring that he is God (II Thessalonians 2:3-4)? You be the judge.

13