THE NEW PERSPECTIVE Thursday, March 27, 2003 News
• Volume 26, Issue 10
Features
Major Concert decision, page 2 New housing plans, page 4
•
http://newperspective.cc.edu
Arts & Entertainment
Carroll vs. Carroll, page 8 Spring Break Contest, page 9
WCCX charity concert, page 11 CAB movies, page 12
Sports Milwaukee Mile, page 15 Softball, page 16
The Student Newspaper of Carroll College
Why war, why now? Bush, nation face war with Hussein Greg Rabidoux, Ph.D. Staff Writer
Editor’s Note: The following was provided by Carroll College’s own political expert, Dr. Greg Rabidoux, who offers a chronology of the events that led to the war in Iraq. As “Operation Iraqi Freedom” continues in full force, as casualties on both sides mount, from hostile and friendly fire, two questions loom large over the battlefield. First, “Why was war necessary?” and, “If necessary, why now as opposed to some future date?” Shortly after his 48 hour public “ultimatum” to Saddam Hussein and his sons (leave Iraq or “face the consequences,”) expired, President George W. Bush, acting on military intelligence regarding a “target of opportunity,” gave
the “go ahead” March 19 to the 1980’s. This act of Iraqi initiate military action against aggression came on the heels Iraq. This order, while star- of a protracted and bloody war tling to some for its swiftness between Iraq and Iran where after the 48 hours expired, hundreds of thousands of Iraqi and Iranian was, in fact, a troops and long time comcivilian lives ing. This Bush were lost. Administration, As a direct like that of his consequence father, was well of the invasion aware of the of Kuwait and security threat a its eventual Hussein regime surrendering posed to the to allied forces, U.S. and its disarmament allies. President measures were George H.W. reached and Bush had imposed upon orchestrated an Iraq by the international c o a l i t i o n , Source: www.whitehouse.gov/homeland U n i t e d Nations. The “Operation Desert Storm,” against goal was to ensure Iraq could Hussein to forceably remove not again build weaponry and Iraqi troops out of Kuwait wage war in the future. after Hussein’s troops invaded Despite early compliance, the tiny oil-rich nation back in trouble began to brew quickly.
Students, faculty want to be heard Amanda Bothe News Editor
As whispers of a student vote of no confidence in College President Frank Falcone floated across Carroll College’s campus, the Student Senate geared up by forming an ad hoc committee to further investigate the option of a no confidence vote. The College Leadership Investigative Committee was formed after a 20-1 vote at Sundays night’s Senate meeting. The Senate feels, if all options
and angles are investigated thoroughly and objectively, the vote will hold more credibility. Student Senate President Mick Linse said Senate refuses to rush into anything and make rash decisions; any action or inaction will be well thought out. Linse reiterated, stating, “It will be a last resort … If a vote occurs all options must be exhausted.” Meanwhile, students have been readily showing their lack of support for President Falcone and the Board of Trustees.
March 6 approximately 315 students participated in a sit-in protest questioning “Where is my voice?” The concerned students silently sat outside the president’s office between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m. Throughout the day, any student who wanted to show support, but couldn’t find time to sit-in, could sign their name on a name tag and stick it on a board placed in the front entry to Voorhees Hall. See Students Page 4
Photo by Sarah Lasee
More than 50 students cross campus March 6 on their way to Voorhees Hall to partake in a “sit-in” protesting the administrations’ latest decisions.
Photo by Amy Kant
A Carroll College student watches coverage of the war with Iraq in the Campus Center lobby. As soon as six months after disarmament agreements, evidence that Iraq was violating such agreements and guidelines surfaced. Throughout the
1990’s and the Clinton Administration, concerns were voiced that the Hussein See Conflict Page 3
Trustees speak up Elizabeth Martin Special to the New Perspective
Carroll College students have been in an uproar in recent weeks due to the release of the prioritization recommendations and the Board of Trustees’ denial of tenure to four of the school’s most popular professors. A large group of faculty members cheered on students as they left Voorhees Hall, March 6, after a seven-hour silent sit-in to show their support for the students’ actions. The sentiment of the Board of Trustees regarding student involvement in campus politics, however, has not been as clear. “It’s unfortunate that things got to this point,” said Chairman of the Board Thomas Badciong, a 1962 Carroll graduate. He believes, however, that students “have a right to do whatever they want to do.” Trustee Charmaine Ponkratz, who graduated from Carroll in 1977, said she is saddened when different constituencies of the Carroll campus are at odds with one another, because “when they are working together, (they) do such wonderful things for the students, the community, and society at large.” “I think the students have the right to be upset if we do
something stupid or abrupt,” said President Frank Falcone, who is also a member of the Board, “but I think students are premature in assuming that prioritization recommendations are decisions.” “I think it’s very difficult in all situations to understand all the sides,” agreed Trustee Lynn Delzer, who graduated from Carroll in 1970. “To make judgments, it is important to get a lot of the information.” So far, in the prioritization process, administrators have begun talking with departments, according to Badciong and Falcone. Students will also take part in the decision making process before a final proposal is presented to the Board of Trustees for serious review. “I want the Student Senate to take the lead in developing recommendations on how they feel the student voice should be heard,” said Falcone. The opportunity for student input into the final prioritization project will occur before May 2004. This process is assumed to be difficult but necessary. “Some of the recommendations are going to be the genesis for a debate on campus,” said Ponkratz. “I don’t know how they’re going to end up, but I know that healthy debate and healthy deliberation about See Trustees Page 4