THE NEW PERSPECTIVE Thursday, May 1, 2003
News Waukesha water, page 3 Dr. Gary Stevens, page 5
• Volume 26, Issue 12 Features
Road trips, page 9 Spring Fling, pages 10-11
•
http://newperspective.cc.edu
Arts & Entertainment Emerson Drive, page 14 Anger Management, page 15
Sports Carroll in Final Four?, page 19 Miller Park, page 20
The Student Newspaper of Carroll College
Committee resigns sixth year, the committee does a final evaluation of the proSpecial to The New Perspective fessor and makes a recomDuring the first week of mendation to Vice President March, every member of the for Academic Affairs, presentTenure and Promotion ly Dr. Lynne Bernier. The Committee (TPC) submitted Vice President then makes a letters of resignation to the recommendation to the Faculty Executive Committee President of the college, cur(FEC). Former members of rently Dr. Frank Falcone, who the TPC were reluctant to makes a recommendation to give specifics as to their rea- the Board of Trustees. The sons for resigning, but former Board makes the final decichair of the TPC, Robert sion on whether tenure will be Black, assured that it was not granted or not. For the meant to be a Related Coverage rest of this political act. semester, Rather, it was “an act of Timeline of events, pages 4-5 there are still eight profesconscience” Towell named new religion sors who need that was chair, page 4 biennial made individreviews. After ually for the the resignation of the comfive members. The TPC consisted of five mittee in early March, there Carroll College professors: Dr. was a call for volunteer memRobert Black of the bers, but an insufficient numDepartment of Modern ber of faculty members Languages, Dr. Mary Hauser offered. There is no plan yet as of the Department of to what may happen if there Education, Dr. Lori Kelly of are not enough members the Department of English, elected to the committee. The president of the David Simpson of the Department of Psychology, FEC, Dr. Peter Settle of the of and Dr. Linda Thompson of Department seemed the Department of Communication, Mathematics. These five sympathetic in regard to the members are responsible for resignation of the Tenure and evaluating fellow faculty Promotion Committee. “I members who are on the understand them. I just wish they weren’t in a position that tenure track. The TPC evaluates tenure compelled them to do that,” track professors biennially at two, four and six years. In the See Committee Page 5
Karen Windau
Photo by Andrew Farrell
Emerson Drive Lead singer, Brad Mates, brings the sound of country music to Shattuck Auditorium during Spring Fling.
Photo by Andrew Farrell
Sign of the times Concerns about the faculty and administration issues continue as picketers demonstrate April 22 along South East Avenue in front of President Frank Falcone’s home.
Tenure denial decisions appealed Jessica A. Bauer Staff Writer
"Devastated," "shock" and "disbelief" are just a few of the words used by four faculty members who were denied tenure earlier this year. Dr. Penny Johnson of the Department of Computer Science, Dr. Charlene McMahon of the Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, and Dr. Joel Heim and Dr. Nelia Beth Scovill of the Department of Religion and Philosophy were denied tenure this year after being recommended by the Tenure and Promotion Committee. Two other professors, Dr. Kevin McMahon and Dr. Joseph Piatt of the Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry were the only professors who were granted tenure this year. The Board of Trustees made the final tenure decision. The professors all received letters through certified mail announcing their rejection of tenure. Heim, whose wife, Scovill, was not home when he received the letters, opened his own letter first and then hers, thinking that if he had not received tenure then she had. "After the release of the
prioritization report, we were sure that only one of us would receive tenure," Heim said, so they were surprised both were denied. Professors are granted tenure after serving at the college for a specified number of years, usually five or six. Tenure allows professors to enjoy more academic freedom and ensures a life position at the college. When a professor is denied tenure, they have one more "terminal year" to teach while looking for another job. According to Scovill, two criteria must be met in order for a professor to receive tenure. There must be an instructional need of the program and potential of the candidate to the college. Recommendations for tenure are decided by the Tenure and Promotion Committee based on these two criteria, in addition to student reviews. All six teachers met the second criteria and believe they also meet the first, whereas the college determined they did not. However, the four professors feel that the decisions were based on the institutional need of the college rather than the instructional need of the programs. According to the tenure documents of the school, this is not a valid criterion on
which to base the decision. Scovill relates the situation to a class syllabus, in which everything you will be graded on is spelled out at the beginning of the semester. Later, at the end of the semester, the teacher would say they forgot one of the criteria for grading and the students fail the class because of this criterion they never knew they were expected to complete. However, Scovill feels that they do meet this additional criterion of the instructional need even though they were not aware of it in the beginning. During a meeting with Vice President for Academic Affairs Dr. Lynne Bernier, each of the four teachers was allowed to ask questions and be told the reason for denial of tenure. As Bernier read from a prepared statement, McMahon recorded what was said: "The Board denied tenure because it did not believe it would be wise to commit to a tenured faculty member in this field, in the department of chemistry, given current and projected program and enrollment trends." The statement for Scovill was virtually identical, only See Tenure Page 4