THE NEWS RECORD
132 YEARS IN PRINT VOL. CXXXI ISSUE XLI
MONDAY | APRIL 2 | 2012
MADONNA A WIN FOR RECLAIMS THRONE SENIOR SENDOFF entertainment | 4
sports | 6
Redistricting to combine police forces LANCE LAMBERT | SENIOR REPORTER The University of Cincinnati community might fall under a singular protection, as a proposed reorganization would combine the UC East and Main campuses into one Cincinnati Police District. Currently, UC’s East Campus and Main Campus are divided into Districts 4 and 5, making it hard to unite an effort against crime. Cincinnati Police Department (CPD) Capt. Paul Humphries told the UC Board of Trustees on March 27 that redistricting UC into one district was possible. The new possible districting would add to ongoing efforts between UC Police
Division (UCPD), and CPD. Redistricting would come hand-in-hand with advanced surveillance and partnered patrols. Its planned for the university to work with the CPD to add more cameras around the campus, said Michael Cureton, UC police chief. “We are planning on utilizing our relations with the CPD with the partner car,” Cureton said. “UC police officers and CPD will patrol the south and west borders of the campus.” UCPD is tentatively planning to increase the number of officers in 2012, along with more building security and more police on bicycles to increase visibility, Cureton said.
“One of our UC police officers [rides along] with CPD and goes on patrol with District 5 in the Clifton area around 8 p.m. to 1 a.m.,” Cureton said. Though UC is situated across two districts, utilizing the CPD is essential, Cureton said. “Since [arriving as police chief] at UC, crime patterns in local communities around UC are discussed in weekly meetings with the Cincinnati Police Department,” Cureton said. Students should expect to not only to see more bicycle patrols, but also officers on foot on campus, Cureton said. SEE POLICE | 2
FILE ART | THE NEWS RECORD
POWER IN UNITY UC’s East and Main Campuses might see a unified police force as districts 4 and 5 become one district.
FILE ART | THE NEWS RECORD
EXTENT OF FREEDOM The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) named the University of Cincinnati one of the 12 worst colleges for free speech and demonstrations, such as the anti-Senate Bill 5 protest in February 2011 (below). FILE ART | THE NEWS RECORD
MONTHS TO GO The opening of the former IGA on Ludlow Avenue has been delayed until summer.
Goessling’s to open in summer NATALYA DAOUD | STAFF REPORTER
Keller’s IGA on Ludlow Avenue has been closed for a little more than one year now — and its reopening has been delayed due to funding issues. The store’s new owner says the store will return to Clifton consumers sometime this summer new and improved. The grocery store closed Jan. 6, 2011, due to its previous owners, John Vierling and Charles Dugger, owing more than $220,000 in back taxes to the state. Though Steve Goessling, the new owner, originally planned for the store to reopen in September 2011, its reopening has been delayed for seven months. “The initial goal would be to have this open by Sept. 1, [2011],” Goessling said in May 2011. “But as I hear more and more of the clamor in the neighborhood for the need for [the store to open], we are trying to come up with a way to open up in phases.” What delayed the project the most was financing and working out details of the project, said Marilyn Hyland, spokeswoman for Goessling’s establishment. “That is a question of timing and where the economy really is; getting them to be able to do potential work for locations,” Hyland said. Goessling has done a $2 million debt-rehab project. It will be LEED [Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design] certified, Hyland said. The store’s rehabilitation encompasses remodeling and replacing the basics — from new flooring to roofing, Hyland said. “Steve Goesling is dedicated to bringing an upscale, really exciting grocery store to Clifton,” Hyland said. “It will be called Goessling’s SEE GOESSLING’S | 2
3 4 5 6
Entertainment College Living Classifieds Sports
MONDAY
TNR SPECIAL REPORT
FREE SPEECH UNDER ‘FIRE’ UC named one of worst first amendment universities JAMES SPRAGUE | CHIEF REPORTER In the midst of a federal civil rights lawsuit alleging First Amendment violations by the University of Cincinnati, the school received another black eye last week when it was named one of the nation’s worst colleges for free speech. The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) — a nonprofit educational foundation that promotes individual rights and due process at colleges and universities throughout the United States — named UC to its 2012 list of “The 12 Worst Colleges for Free Speech” March 27. The list — which includes such schools as Harvard University, Yale University, Syracuse University and Michigan State University — was for institutions “severely violating the speech rights of students, faculty members, or both,” according to a statement accompanying FIRE’s list. UC was the only Ohio college or university named among the 12 schools and was pinpointed by FIRE based primarily on the university’s “Free Speech Area” policy, which FIRE labeled “shockingly restrictive.” “These colleges and universities have deeply violated the principles that are supposed to animate higher education,” said Greg Lukianoff, president of FIRE. “Sunlight is one of the best disinfectants, and the public needs to know which schools to watch out for.” The distinction is the latest in what has become a growing issue at UC, which finds itself embroiled as the defendant in a federal civil rights lawsuit filed in February by the UC chapter of Young Americans for Liberty (YAL) with the cooperation of FIRE and Ohio’s 1851 Center for Constitutional Law. The lawsuit was brought against the university after a request was denied for YAL to gather signatures and speak to students throughout campus regarding support of a “right to work” ballot initiative. The group was instead placed in the campus “Free Speech Area” located in the northwest corner of McMicken Commons. The lawsuit alleges First Amendment violations on the part of UC and asks for an immediate injunction against the
72° 54°
TUE
WED
THU
FRI
FILE ART | THE NEWS RECORD
82° 52°
66° 44°
60° 36°
62° 41°
STUDENTS SPEAK UP An anti-abortion protester sit near a sign on McMicken Commons. UC Young Americans for Liberty voiced their opinions most recently.
“
university’s free speech policy. A temporary violators being charged with trespassing, compromise was reached in March between however, which has drawn the most heat. UC and YAL, allowing the group to petition In 2007, FIRE called it “truly shameful” in throughout most open outdoor spaces on the fact that the policy “threatens students campus without having to reregister with with criminal prosecution UC’s scheduling office, and a merely for exercising their I would ask hearing regarding the lawsuit constitutionally protected is slated for May 30. anyone to visit rights outside of the paltry Legal action FIRE area it has designated for this campus on previously participated in free speech.” any given day and resulted in the elimination Part of the current lawsuit walk by almost of similar free speech areas filed by YAL against UC at West Virginia University, any point in the alleges that if any members of Texas Tech University and the the student group were found campus, and University of North Carolina “walking around campus they’re going to at Greensboro. gathering signatures, campus see free speech The list isn’t the first time, security would be alerted.” however, UC has been in activities going on. Multiple attempts by the crosshairs of FIRE. The The News Record to contact GREG HAND organization criticized the Daniel Cummins, director UC SPOKESMAN university’s free speech policy of Judicial Affairs at UC, to by naming it “Speech Code of learn the number of students the Month” in December 2007 and also wrote a — if any — who have been disciplined for letter to former UC President Nancy Zimpher violating the university’s free speech policy in December 2008 regarding the policy, calling were unsuccessful. it “imperative that Cincinnati immediately A News Record analysis of the UC Police revise its illegal and immoral ‘Free Speech Division daily call logs shows that since Area’ policy” and offering guidelines for how September 2011 — the beginning of the UC could revise the regulation. 2011-12 academic year — there have been UC’s free speech policy details the 20 citations for trespassing on UC’s Main procedures and regulations that have incurred Campus and one trespass warning given. the wrath of FIRE. UC Police Chief Michael Cureton declined to comment on whether any of those citations POLICY OUTLINES FREEDOMS Found on pages 14 and 15 of UC’s “Use by the UCPD were given to individuals for violating the policy, due to the current lawsuit of Facilities Policy Manual” is the policy pending against the university. that has garnered UC the recent spate of “This issue of free speech is currently in negative attention. litigation,” Cureton said. “There is likely to be The university’s “Free Speech Area” is a settlement that moves all parties forward. It detailed on page 14 as being “the northwest would be premature for me to comment until section of McMicken Commons immediately east of McMicken Hall on the West Campus the court has ruled.” ... Individuals or groups wanting to use these areas must schedule the activity in the Campus Scheduling Office. Anyone violating this policy might be charged with trespassing. No more than one musical or speaking activity is permitted at the same time.” The area described in the policy constitutes approximately 0.1 percent of UC’s 137-acre Main Campus, one of many areas of criticism by FIRE. Among other points of contention with UC’s policy are the specific times and places allowing the use of amplification, such as megaphones; the amount of time required for notification of a demonstration,picket or rally — 10 days; and such activities being confined to the campus Free Speech Area. The policy also forbids the disruption of classes or administrative functions on campus due to rallies or demonstrations and access to campus buildings for those activities. Such an occurrence took place in February 2011, when dozens of UC students and faculty, equipped with signs and chanting slogans, marched to the office of UC President Greg Williams to deliver a letter condemning Ohio Senate Bill 5 — the now-defeated bill which proposed collective bargaining reform. It is the portion of the policy regarding
NEWSRECORDNEWS@GMAIL.COM | 513.556.5908
”
UC DENIES INJUSTICE
Despite the recent wave of criticism, the idea that UC is a repressive campus violating the right to free speech is incredulous, said Greg Hand, UC spokesman. “I would ask anyone to visit this campus on any given day and walk by almost any point in the campus, and they’re going to see free speech activities going on,” Hand said. “Every single bulletin board, any space that holds a folding table both outside and inside Tangeman [University Center], you have free speech activities going on.” Hand even cites personal experiences at UC as examples of the university being both open and committed to open dialogue on campus. “I’ve been witness to semi truck-sized posters of aborted fetuses in the middle of McMicken Commons, seen Michael Moore speaking and been asked for signatures on petitions from every point of the political spectrum,” Hand said. While Hand was unsure when the policy for a “free speech zone” on UC’s campus was instituted — it was last updated in August 2008 — the idea for it originated in the SEE SPEECH | 2