Drug-Induced Homicide Defense Toolkit, by Health in Justice Action Lab

Page 107

Drug Induced Homicide Defense Toolkit

crimes through judicial decisions rather than legislation.320 The result was to vacate the defendant's conviction for involuntary manslaughter. Of course, the most sensible approach would be to avoid the convoluted arguments about what sorts of behaviors count as "reckless" and to instead make the drug supply safer by regulating it. G. Better approaches to the overdose crisis Prosecutors are under intense pressure to demonstrate that they are “doing something” about the overdose crisis. There are much more effective approaches to solving the crisis than these counterproductive DIH enforcement efforts, and they are far more cost-effective. Numerous cost-benefit analyses have found that treatment outperforms punitive measures; it reduces demand.321 Yet only around one in ten people with substance use disorder receive any type of appropriate evidence-based treatment, 322

320

Commonwealth v. Carrillo, S131 N.E.3d 812 (Mass. 2019). See also Section III.A.2.

321

For example, a 1997 study found that treatment was 15 times more effective at reducing drug-related violent crimes than incarceration; and a 2006 study found that Wisconsin could reduce prison expenditures by $3 to $4 per additional dollar spent on treatment. See Przybylsk, Correctional and Sentencing Reform for Drug Offenders at 29-32 (describing studies). 322

See Marc R. Larochelle et al., Medication for Opioid Use Disorder After Nonfatal Opioid Overdose and Association With Mortality: A Cohort Study, 169 Annals Internal Med. 137 (2018), http://annals.org/aim/article-abstract/2684924/medication-opioid-use-disorder-after-nonfatal-opioid-overdo se-association-mortality#. See also U.S. Surgeon General, Facing Addiction in America: The Surgeon General’s Report on Alcohol, Drugs, and Health (2016), https://addiction.surgeongeneral.gov/sites/default/files/surgeon-generals-report.pdf.

Version Date July 2021 – Check https://ssrn.com/abstract=3265510 for most current edition

105


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

D. Secondary sources

26min
pages 120-144

c. Illinois

1min
page 119

b. Wisconsin

1min
page 118

a. Pennsylvania

3min
pages 116-117

VIII. FINALTHOUGHTS: HUMANIZING THE DEFENDANTAND USING PERSON-AFFIRMING LANGUAGE

4min
pages 110-113

F. The questionable strict liability approach

4min
pages 104-106

G. Better approaches to the overdose crisis

3min
pages 107-109

E. DIH prosecutions do not reduce drug use or drug crime

7min
pages 99-103

treatment

1min
page 98

C. Jail and prison actually increases the risk of overdose and death D. DIH prosecutions hinder law enforcement efforts to connect users with

6min
pages 94-97

B. DIH enforcement actually reduces help-seeking, thereby increasing the risk that people will die from overdose

10min
pages 87-93

A. DIH statutes purport to target major traffickers, but prosecutions target co-users and small-scale sellers

5min
pages 83-86

3. Apps

2min
pages 80-81

1. Contents and metadata

2min
pages 75-76

E. Cell phone searches and Carpenter

1min
page 74

2. Location tracking

4min
pages 77-79

B. Denial of MOUD to inmates may violate the ADA or Rehabilitation Act

2min
pages 71-72

V. SENTENCING AND MITIGATION

2min
pages 67-68

acquisition requirement

1min
page 60

D. Arguing for a broad application of the joint-user rule based on distinguishing users from sellers

3min
pages 65-66

B. Application to drug-induced homicide prosecutions

4min
pages 53-55

b. Query determination of manner of death as accident or homicide for evidence of bias

8min
pages 45-50

a. The constructive possession doctrine

3min
pages 61-63

1. Decisions requiring physical presence

1min
page 57

C. Analyzing the simultaneous acquisition requirement

1min
page 56

2. Decisions not requiring physical presence

3min
pages 58-59

ii. Toxicology as a tool

3min
pages 42-44

2. Proximate causation and foreseeability

3min
pages 26-27

3. Intervening cause limitation

2min
pages 28-29

3. Consider the state official’s expertise

6min
pages 34-37

pathologist/medical examiner

1min
page 31

B. Challenging the scientific evidence

1min
page 30

“but-for” testimony

2min
pages 32-33

1. But-for causation

10min
pages 18-25

i. Autopsy as a tool

2min
pages 40-41
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.