Articles
Psilocybin with psychological support for treatment-resistant depression: an open-label feasibility study Robin L Carhart-Harris, Mark Bolstridge, James Rucker*, Camilla M J Day*, David Erritzoe, Mendel Kaelen, Michael Bloomfield, James A Rickard, Ben Forbes, Amanda Feilding, David Taylor, Steve Pilling, Valerie H Curran, David J Nutt
Summary
Background Psilocybin is a serotonin receptor agonist that occurs naturally in some mushroom species. Recent studies have assessed the therapeutic potential of psilocybin for various conditions, including end-of-life anxiety, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and smoking and alcohol dependence, with promising preliminary results. Here, we aimed to investigate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of psilocybin in patients with unipolar treatment-resistant depression. Methods In this open-label feasibility trial, 12 patients (six men, six women) with moderate-to-severe, unipolar, treatment-resistant major depression received two oral doses of psilocybin (10 mg and 25 mg, 7 days apart) in a supportive setting. There was no control group. Psychological support was provided before, during, and after each session. The primary outcome measure for feasibility was patient-reported intensity of psilocybin’s effects. Patients were monitored for adverse reactions during the dosing sessions and subsequent clinic and remote follow-up. Depressive symptoms were assessed with standard assessments from 1 week to 3 months after treatment, with the 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms (QIDS) serving as the primary efficacy outcome. This trial is registered with ISRCTN, number ISRCTN14426797. Findings Psilocybin’s acute psychedelic effects typically became detectable 30–60 min after dosing, peaked 2–3 h after dosing, and subsided to negligible levels at least 6 h after dosing. Mean self-rated intensity (on a 0–1 scale) was 0·51 (SD 0·36) for the low-dose session and 0·75 (SD 0·27) for the high-dose session. Psilocybin was well tolerated by all of the patients, and no serious or unexpected adverse events occurred. The adverse reactions we noted were transient anxiety during drug onset (all patients), transient confusion or thought disorder (nine patients), mild and transient nausea (four patients), and transient headache (four patients). Relative to baseline, depressive symptoms were markedly reduced 1 week (mean QIDS difference –11·8, 95% CI –9·15 to –14·35, p=0·002, Hedges’ g=3·1) and 3 months (–9·2, 95% CI –5·69 to –12·71, p=0·003, Hedges’ g=2) after high-dose treatment. Marked and sustained improvements in anxiety and anhedonia were also noted. Interpretation This study provides preliminary support for the safety and efficacy of psilocybin for treatment-resistant depression and motivates further trials, with more rigorous designs, to better examine the therapeutic potential of this approach. Funding Medical Research Council. Copyright © Carhart-Harris et al. Open Access article distributed under the terms of CC BY.
Introduction Psilocybin is a naturally occurring plant alkaloid found in the Psilocybe genus of mushrooms. Psilocybe mushrooms have been used for millennia for healing purposes, but were only discovered by modern science in the late 1950s.1,2 Psilocybin is a prodrug of psilocin (4-hydroxy-dimethyltryptamine), a serotonin receptor agonist and classic psychedelic drug whose principal psychoactive effects are mediated by serotonin 2A (5-HT2A) receptor agonism.3 Psilocybin therefore has a novel pharmacology in the context of currently available antidepressant medications, because selective serotoninreuptake inhibitors are not direct 5-HT2A receptor agonists. Enhanced cognitive flexibility,4 associative learning,5 cortical neural plasticity,6 and antidepressant responses
have been reported with 5-HT2A receptor agonism in animals,7 and increased and sustained improvements in wellbeing8 and optimism9 have been observed after psychedelic experiences in human beings. Findings from human imaging studies with psilocybin have supplemented these discoveries, showing changes in brain activity suggestive of antidepressant potential; for example, a range of effective antidepressant treatments have been found to normalise hyperactivity in the medial prefrontal cortex and we found reduced blood flow in this region with intravenous psilocybin.10 Moreover, data obtained from large-scale population studies have recently challenged the view that psychedelics negatively affect mental health,11–13 with one study’s findings showing lower rates of psychological distress and suicidality among people who had used
www.thelancet.com/psychiatry Published online May 17, 2016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30065-7
Lancet Psychiatry 2016 Published Online May 17, 2016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S2215-0366(16)30065-7 See Online/Comment http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S2215-0366(16)30087-6 *Contributed equally Centre for Neuropsychopharmacology, Division of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK (R L Carhart-Harris PhD, M Bolstridge MD, J Rucker MD, C M J Day MD, D Erritzoe MD, M Kaelen BSc, Prof D J Nutt DM); Department of Pharmacy and Pathology, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK (Prof D Taylor PhD); The Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (J Rucker) and Institute of Pharmaceutical Science (Prof B Forbes PhD), King’s College London, London, UK; Department of Psychiatry (M Bloomfield MD), Clinical Psychology and Clinical Effectiveness (Prof S Pilling PhD), and Clinical Psychopharmacology Unit (Prof V H Curran PhD), University College London, London, UK; Barts Health Pharmaceuticals, Barts Health NHS Trust, The Royal London Hospital, London, UK (J A Rickard PhD); and The Beckley Foundation, Beckley Park, Oxford, UK (A Feilding) Correspondence to: Dr Robin L Carhart-Harris, Centre for Neuropsychopharmacology, Division of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, UK r.carhart-harris@imperial.ac.uk
1
Articles
Research in context Evidence before this study We searched PubMed up to Jan 30, 2016, using the terms “psilocybin”, “hallucinogens”, “psychedelics”, and “depression”. We did not find any clinical trials assessing psilocybin as a treatment for depression, but we did find population analyses, review articles, and imaging studies lending support to this approach. We also found one report documenting enduring decreases in depressive symptoms after a single dose of psilocybin in a randomised controlled trial of psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy for end-of-life anxiety, one report on an open-label trial showing rapid decreases in depressive symptoms that endured for up to 21 days after a single dose of ayahuasca, and two early reports or case studies on the effects of lysergic acid diethylamide on “neurotic” and depressive symptoms describing “improvements”, albeit without validated measures of symptom severity.
psychedelics within their lifetime than among those who used no psychedelics but an equivalent amount of other drugs.11 In modern trials, psychedelics have been found to reduce anxious,14,15 depressive,15,16 and obsessivecompulsive symptoms,17 as well as addictive behaviours,18,19 often for several months after just one or two exposures. Extensive historical and modern evidence now supports the view that, administered in a controlled environment with appropriate support, psychedelics have a favourable safety profile.20 Depression is a major public health problem; it is a leading contributor to the global burden of disease, affecting hundreds of millions of people worldwide, and costing the USA alone more than US$200 billion each year.21 Antidepressant medications and cognitive behav ioural therapy can be effective for some patients, but around 20% do not respond to any intervention, and many of those who do respond, eventually relapse.22 We aimed to investigate the safety and feasibility of psilocybin in patients with treatment-resistant depression, and to establish an initial impression of its efficacy. We postulated that the treatment would be well tolerated and depressive symptoms would be substantially reduced from baseline at all assessment points, for up to 3 months after treatment.
Methods
Study design and participants This was an open-label feasibility study in patients with treatment-resistant depression; there was no control group. Patients, invest igators, raters, and statisticians were not masked to treatment assignment, and all participants received the study intervention (psilocybin administered in two dosing sessions; an initial safety [low] dose and a subsequent treatment [high] dose). The inclusion criteria were major depression of a moderate to 2
Added value of this research To our knowledge, this is the first investigation of the safety and efficacy of psilocybin as a treatment for major depression. Our findings imply that psilocybin might have value as a treatment option in the management of treatment-resistant depression. Single oral administrations of 10 mg (safety dose) and 25 mg (treatment dose) psilocybin were well tolerated and led to enduring reductions in symptom severity after the two sessions. Implications of all the available evidence The results of this small-scale feasibility study should help to motivate further research into the efficacy of psilocybin with psychological support for major depression. Larger-scale randomised controlled trials are warranted to better examine the potential of psilocybin as a treatment option for this highly prevalent, disabling, costly, and difficult-to-treat disorder. More broadly, the present study should help to catalyse the re-emergence of a promising research area in psychiatry.
severe degree (17+ on the 21-item Hamilton Depression Rating scale [HAM-D]), and no improvement despite two adequate courses of antidepressant treatment of different pharmacological classes lasting at least 6 weeks within the current depressive episode.23 Exclusion criteria were: current or previously diagnosed psychotic disorder; immediate family member with a diagnosed psychotic disorder; medically significant condition rendering unsuitability for the study; history of serious suicide attempts (requiring hospitalisation); history of mania; blood or needle phobia; positive pregnancy test at screening or during the study; and current drug or alcohol dependence. Information about the study’s recruitment was sent to general practitioners via the North West London Clinical Research Network. However, patients were also allowed to self-refer to the study if they were UK residents. In every case, patients initiated contact with the research team (via email, letter, or telephone), were sent a study information sheet, and a subsequent telephone screening was arranged, during which the lead psychiatrist on the trial (MBo) obtained information about the patient’s demographics, medical and psychiatric history, and other key inclusion or exclusion criteria. The patient’s general practitioner or psychiatrist provided written documentation of the patient’s diagnosis and mental health background in every case. This trial received a favourable opinion from the National Research Ethics Service London—West London, was sponsored and approved by Imperial College London’s Joint Research and Compliance Office (JRCO), and was adopted by the National Institute for Health Research Clinical Research Network. The National Institute for Health Research/Wellcome Trust Imperial Clinical Research Facility gave site-specific approval for the study.
www.thelancet.com/psychiatry Published online May 17, 2016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30065-7
Articles
The study was reviewed and approved by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). All participants provided written informed consent. Study and data monitoring was carried out independently by the Imperial Clinical Research Facility and JRCO.
with their allocated psychiatrists; fMRI data will be reported elsewhere. This preparatory session involved inviting the patient to talk openly about their personal history (including thoughts on the origins of their depression), a discussion of psilocybin’s psychological effects, and simulation of aspects of the dosing session itself, such as listening to a sample of the session music while wearing eyeshades. The preparatory session typically lasted for 4 h, with lunch and breaks provided. Patients enrolled in the study attended two subsequent dosing sessions that were separated by 7 days. No more than one patient was dosed on any given day. Patients arrived at the research facility (Imperial Clinical Research Facility) at 0900 h, gave a urine sample for drugs of abuse (including amphetamines, benzodiazapines, opiates, and cannabinoids), performed a breathalyser test for alcohol use, and completed interim QIDS, BDI, and STAI-T assessments to ensure no substantial deviation from baseline measures. They were then taken to a dosing room that was pre-decorated (eg, with low lighting). Patients were invited to relax on a ward bed in a supine or reclined position and music was played through high-quality stereo speakers and earphones. The two psychiatrists sat on either side of the bed. Patients were supervised at all times by at least two staff members. Dosing commenced at 1030 h in every case. Patients received a low oral dose of psilocybin 10 mg (two 5 mg capsules) on a first dosing day and a high oral dose of psilocybin 25 mg (five 5 mg capsules) on a second dosing day, separated by 1 week. Blood pressure, heart rate, and observer ratings of the intensity of psilocybin’s acute psychoactive effects (0–4, with 0 signifying no effects and 4 signifying extreme effects8) were measured at baseline (typically 5 min before dosing) and 30, 60, 120, 180, 240, 300, and 360 min after dosing. Subjective ratings of the acute altered state of consciousness using the revised
Procedures Psilocybin was obtained from THC-pharm (Frankfurt, Germany) and formulated into the investigational medicinal product (5 mg psilocybin in size 0 capsules) by Guy’s and St Thomas’ Hospitals’ Pharmacy Manufacturing Unit (London, UK). A Home Office Licence for storage and dispensing of Schedule One drugs was obtained. Screening consisted of written informed consent, a thorough evaluation of the patient’s physical and mental health background, a psychiatric interview (MiniInternational Neuropsychiatric Interview), clinician assessments of depression severity (the 21-item HAM-D and the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS], and Global Assessment of Functioning [GAF]; all assessed by MBo), and additional patient-rated scales (16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms [QIDS], Beck Depression Inventory [BDI—original version], Spielberger’s State-Trait Anxiety Inventory [ form 2, trait version only; STAI-T], and the SnaithHamilton Pleasure Scale [SHAPS]). Patients also received a thorough physical health check, consisting of an electrocardiogram, routine blood tests, blood pressure, heart rate, and physical examination. At the end of screening, eligible patients were given an opportunity to meet with the two clinical psychiatrists who would support them through the remainder of the trial. Eligible patients attended a subsequent visit involving a baseline functional MRI (fMRI) scanning session lasting 60 min, followed by an extensive preparatory session Recruitment
Screening visit and baseline assessment
Enrolment and treatment Baseline fMRI and preparatory session
Follow-up
Time
Interim questionnaires
Telephone screening
Post-treatment fMRI and assessment (interim questionnaires)
Patients contacted for remote assessment
Ongoing support from study psychiatrists if required 1 week
Unspecified time period Remote screening or follow-up Clinic screening or follow-up Psilocybin dosing session Low psilocybin dose
1 week
7 weeks
2 weeks
Each bar represents 1 day 1 week follow-up at research facility High psilocybin dose
3 week follow-up (remotely)
2 week follow-up (remotely)
5 week follow-up (remotely)
3 month follow-up (remotely)
Figure 1: Schedule of study interventions
www.thelancet.com/psychiatry Published online May 17, 2016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30065-7
3
Articles
11 dimension altered states of consciousness questionnaire (11D ASC)24 were completed 6–7 h after dosing. Psychiatrists adopted a non-directive, supportive approach, allowing the patient to experience a mostly uninterrupted inner “journey”. Check-ins (ie, asking the patient how they are feeling) occurred at the same timepoints as the physiological recordings. Tranquilising medications (oral lorazepam and risperidone) were available if necessary. The phenomenology of the acute experience, including accounts of the nature of the therapeutic support provided before, during, and after the experience, and considerations related to the music selection and other aspects of the clinical setting, will be discussed in separate publications. Return transport from the research facility was organised ahead of dosing sessions. Patients were taken to and from the sessions accompanied by a close friend or relative, and had the option of staying overnight in accommodation adjacent to the hospital. Emergency contact details were provided, and patients confirmed their safe return from the research facility. Patients were contacted via telephone 1 day after their low-dose session to check on their wellbeing and monitor for any adverse events. Patients returned to the research facility 1 day after their high-dose session for a posttreatment fMRI scan lasting 60 min. After the fMRI scan, patients completed interim questionnaires (QIDS, STAI-T, and HAM-D), and were invited back to the research facility where they were met by their psychiatrists to discuss their experience the previous day. Patients attended one further study visit to the research facility 1 week after their high-dose session, during which all baseline questionnaires and assessments were repeated
72 individuals expressed an interest in participating in the trial
34 excluded because they did not meet the entry criteria
38 telephone screened
18 attended screening visit
6 excluded because of insufficiently severe depression (HAM-D)
12 recruited to the study and fully compliant with protocol
Figure 2: Trial profile
4
Outcomes The main objective of this study is to optimise the protocol for the administration of oral psilocybin in this patient group, while gaining an initial impression of treatment efficacy. The primary outcome measure to assess feasibility was patient-rated subjective intensity of psilocybin’s effects, which we report on a 0–1 scale. We assessed the safety of the intervention through clinical monitoring during and after dosing sessions, and during 3 months of face-to-face and remote follow-up. We also aimed to assess the preliminary efficacy of psilocybin in patients with treatment-resistant depression; the primary outcome measure for this endpoint was mean change in the severity of self-reported depressive symptoms (with the 16 item QIDS) from baseline to 1 week after the high-dose psilocybin session. The QIDS was chosen as the primary outcome measure due to its brevity, increasingly widespread use, and validity at 1 week intervals.25 We chose to assess the primary efficacy endpoint at 1 week after the high-dose session to allow comparison with previous studies of ketamine infusion for treatment-resistant depression;26 the low-dose session was conceived a priori as a safety session rather than a treatment session. We also assessed change in BDI, STAI-T, and SHAPS between baseline and 1 week and 3 months of follow-up, and change in HAM-D, MADRS, and GAF between baseline and 1 week of follow-up.
Statistical analysis 20 excluded because they did not meet the entry criteria
See Online for appendix
and an opportunity was provided for further psychological debriefing (the 1 week follow-up visit). Assessments of HAM-D, MADRS, and GAF were again done by MBo. Subsequent assessments of clinical progress were done via email 2, 3, and 5 weeks after the high-dose session; we assessed only QIDS during subsequent follow-up, so as not to overload the patient. Final follow-up was done remotely at 3 months after the high-dose session, and included QIDS, BDI, STAI-T, and SHAPS. Patients were made aware that they could contact the study psychiatrists at any time if their depression deteriorated. Figure 1 summarises the screening, intervention, and follow-up procedures in this study.
In this feasibility study, we did not perform a formal power calculation. We planned to recruit 12 patients to provide an initial impression of the tolerability and efficacy of this novel treatment approach. A subsequent protocol amendment (Oct 6, 2015) increased the recruitment to 20 patients to provide statistical power for fMRI imaging. Here, we report findings for the 12 patients initially enrolled; outcome and fMRI data for all 20 patients will be reported separately. Due to the small population, two-tailed Wilcoxon signed ranks tests were performed for non-parametric data. Two-tailed t tests were also performed and the relevant t values are provided in the appendix. We provide 95% CIs around the mean differences. We calculated
www.thelancet.com/psychiatry Published online May 17, 2016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30065-7
Articles
Sex
Age, Ethnic years origin
Employment Estimated status illness duration, years
Baseline scores
BDI
HAM-D
Past unsuccessful medications*
Past psychotherapy
Education
Weekly alcohol intake, units
Previous psilocybin use (time since last use)
STAI-T
1
Female
43
Black Employed Caribbean
30
36
19
72
SSRI (two), SNRI (two), NDRI, NSSRI, MAOI
None
Postgraduate
1
None
2
Male
40
Hispanic
Unemployed
25
33
28
76
SSRI (two), SNRI, NDRI, NSSRI, Na+ channel blocker (two), ketamine infusion, TCA
Cognitive narrative therapy
Postgraduate
0
None
3
Male
37
White
Employed
17
22
18
63
SSRI (two), SNRI
Cognitive behavioural therapy, group therapy
Postgraduate
0
None
4
Female
30
White
Studying
10
26
18
67
NDRI, NSSRI
Cognitive behavioural therapy
Postgraduate
0
One use (6 months)
5
Male
34
White
Unemployed
12
38
25
71
SSRI (three), TCA
Cognitive and mindfulness behavioural therapy
Undergraduate
0
None
6
Female
57
White
Unemployed
29
39
23
78
SSRI (four), SNRI, SARI
Counselling
Secondary education
2
Two uses (45 years)
7
Male
52
White
Unemployed
27
33
22
57
TCA, SARI
Counselling, mindfulness
Secondary education
0
Three uses (30 years)
8
Female
37
White
Employed
17
39
17
71
SSRI (two), TCA
Counselling
Undergraduate
2
None
9
Male
37
White
Unemployed
15
32
26
71
SSRI (three), SNRI
Counselling, cognitive behavioural therapy
Postgraduate
6
None
10
Female
36
Black Unemployed Caribbean
8
47
28
75
SSRI (two), NSSRI
Counselling
Undergraduate
11
Female
64
White
Employed
15
24
17
72
SSRI (four), SNRI Cognitive behavioural (two), NDRI, MAOI, therapy Na⁺ channel blocker, SARI, DRI
12
Male
45
White
Employed
8
35
17
68
SSRI, TCA
Cognitive behavioural therapy
18
Three uses (14 years)
Postgraduate
1
Three uses (48 years)
Undergraduate
0
None
BDI=Beck Depression Inventory. HAMD-D=Hamilton Depression Rating scale. STAI-T=State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. SSRI=selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitor. SNRI=serotonin–noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor. NDRI=noradrenaline–dopamine-reuptake inhibitor. NSSRI=noradrenaline and specific serotonin-reuptake inhibitor. MAOI=monoamine oxidase inhibitor. TCA=tricyclic antidepressant. SARI=serotonin antagonist and reuptake inhibitor. DRI=dopamine-reuptake inhibitor. *One medication from each class, unless otherwise stated.
Table 1: Baseline and demographic characteristics, by patient
effect sizes using the Hedges’ g formula, which is more appropriate for small sample sizes. Hedges’ g values are very similar to Cohen’s d values for dependent data. This trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN14426797. The registration was initiated on March 30, 2015, and finalised on July 7, 2015 (delay caused by administrative issues); recruitment started on April 21, 2015, after initiation of public registration.
Role of the funding source The study funder had no role in the design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, or writing of the report. The corresponding author had full access to all of the data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.
Results Enrolment started on May 1, 2015, and finished on Aug 25, 2015. 72 people were initially considered for the study,
most of whom self-referred after hearing about this trial through public outreach work (eg, public presentations by the investigators and media reports). 38 were considered appropriate for a telephone screen, from which 18 were invited for a formal screening visit, and 12 were ultimately recruited for the trial (figure 2), of whom ten were selfreferrals. Patients’ demographic and clinical characteristics are shown in table 1. Nine of the 12 patients met criteria for severe or very severe depression at baseline (BDI score ≥30), with the remaining three patients meet ing criteria for moderate depression (BDI score 19 to <30). 11 patients had received some form of psychotherapy before participation in the study. The acute effects of psilocybin were well tolerated by all of the patients and no serious or unexpected adverse events occurred. Mean self-rated intensity of psilocybin experience was 0·51 (SD 0·36) for the lowdose session and 0·75 (0·27) for the high-dose session (difference 0·24 [95% CI 0·06–0·41], Z –2·4, p=0·019).
www.thelancet.com/psychiatry Published online May 17, 2016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30065-7
5
Articles
Severity
Timing or onset
Duration
Transient anxiety
Mild
Onset of both sessions
60 min
Transient headache
Mild
Day after high-dose session
One day only
Transient confusion
Mild (core drug effect)
Peak of both sessions
60–120 min
Mild
Anticipatory anxiety only (both sessions)
30 min
Transient anxiety
Mild
Anticipatory anxiety only (both sessions)
30 min
Transient confusion
Mild (core drug effect)
Peak of both sessions
60–180 min
Transient anxiety
Mild (low dose), moderate (high dose)
Onset of both sessions and peak of high dose
60 min (low dose), 120 min (high dose)
Transient nausea
Moderate
Onset phase of high-dose session
Arose and subsided within 60 min
Transient confusion
Mild (core drug effect)
Peak of both sessions
60–180 min
Transient paranoia
Mild
Peak of high-dose session
Arose and subsided within 30 min
Transient anxiety
Moderate (low dose), severe (high dose)
Onset of both sessions and peak of high dose
60 min (low dose), 150 min (high dose)
Transient headache
Mild
Day after high-dose session
One day only
Transient confusion
Mild (core drug effect)
Peak of both sessions
60–120 min
Mild
Anticipatory anxiety only (both sessions)
30 min
Transient anxiety
Mild
Anticipatory anxiety only (both sessions)
30 min
Transient confusion
Mild (core drug effect)
Peak of both sessions
60–180 min
Mild or negligible
Anticipatory anxiety only (both sessions)
30 min
Transient anxiety
Mild (low dose), moderate (high dose)
Onset of low-dose and high-dose session
60 min (low dose), 150 min (high dose)
Transient headache
Mild
Day after high-dose session
One day only
Transient confusion
Mild (core drug effect)
Peak of both sessions
60–180 min
Transient anxiety
Mild
Onset of both sessions
60 min
Transient nausea
Mild
Onset and peak of low-dose session
Subsided after 90 min
Transient headache
Mild or moderate
Day after high-dose session
2 days
Transient confusion
Mild (core drug effect)
Peak of both sessions
60–180 min
Transient anxiety
Moderate (both sessions)
Onset phase and peak of both sessions
150 min (both sessions)
Transient nausea
Mild (high dose)
Onset phase of high-dose session
Arose and subsided within 60 min
Transient confusion
Mild (core drug effect)
Peak of both sessions
60–180 min
Transient paranoia
Mild
Peak of low-dose session
Arose and subsided within 60 min
Transient anxiety
Mild
Anticipatory anxiety only (both sessions)
30 min
Transient confusion
Mild (core drug effect)
Peak of both sessions
60–180 min
Patient 1
Patient 2 Transient anxiety Patient 3
Patient 4
Patient 5
Patient 6 Transient anxiety Patient 7
Patient 8 Transient anxiety Patient 9
Patient 10
Patient 11
Patient 12
Table 2: Adverse events by patient
No patients required tranquilising medications (oral lorazepam and risperidone) during the dosing sessions. Psilocybin’s acute psychedelic effects typically became detectable between 30 min and 60 min after dosing, peaked between 2 h and 3 h after dosing, and subsided to negligible levels at which the patient could be assessed for discharge at least 6 h after dosing (appendix). Self-rated experiences on the 11D-ASC questionnaire from the two sessions are 6
shown in the appendix. Results from interim patient questionnaires (QIDS, BDI, and STAI-T), done immediately before the low-dose session to monitor for substantial changes since enrolment, did not differ from baseline (data not shown). Interim questionnaires done the day after the high-dose session showed some reduction in depressive symptoms (data for HAM-D in appendix; data for QIDS and STAI-T not shown).
www.thelancet.com/psychiatry Published online May 17, 2016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30065-7
Table 3: Clinical ratings at baseline and follow-up
Follow-up refers to the period starting after the second (high-dose) administration of psilocybin. Clinician-administered ratings (HAM-D, MADRS, and GAF) were completed only at baseline and 1 week after the high-dose session. QIDS=Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms. BDI=Beck Depression Inventory. STAI-T=State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. SHAPS=Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale. HAM-D=Hamilton Depression Rating scale. MADRS=Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale. GAF=Global Assessment of Functioning. *Compared with baseline.
2·4
0·003 ·· 0·002 ·· 0·003 ·· 0·002 0·002 ·· 0·004 0·002 ·· 0·002 0·002 ·· 0·003 0·003 0·002
3·1
0·002 ·· p value*
0·002
3 ··
·· 2·7
–3·1 ··
·· 2·4
–3·0 ··
·· 1·3
–3·1 –3·1
1·9 ··
·· –2·9
1·4 2·7
–3·1 ··
·· 2·0
–3·1 –3·1
3·2 ··
·· –3·0
2·0 2·7 3·2
–2·9
www.thelancet.com/psychiatry Published online May 17, 2016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30065-7
3·2 ·· Hedges’ g*
–3·1 –3·1 ·· Z
–3·06
·· –23·3 (–17·1 to –29·5) ·· –14·0 (–9·6 to –18·4) ·· –4·7 (–3·29 to –6·11) –6·1 (–4·46 to –7·74) ·· –15·3 (–7·77 to –22·83) –29·5 (–22·03 to –36·97) ·· –18·5 (–11·8 to –25·2) –25·0 (–20·1 to –29·9) ·· –9·2 (–5·69 to –12·71) –11·0 (–7·7 to –14·2) –11·8 –12·9 (–9·15 to (–10·64 –14·35) to –15·16) ·· Difference versus baseline (95% CI)
–12·8 (–9·9 to –15·6)
77·7 (13·0) 50·3 (9·2) 9·7 (9·8) 31·0 (5·0) 7·4 (6·9) 21·4 (4·5) 2·8 (3·7) 7·5 1·4 (3·7) (2·7)
3 months SHAPS
3 months
54·8 (14·5) 40·6 (14·2) 70·1 (5·8) 15·2 (11·0) 8·7 (8·4) 33·7 (7·1) 10·0 (6·0) 8·2 (5·4) 6·4 (5·1) 7·4 (4·9)
6·3 (4·6) 19·2 (2·0) Mean (SD)
GAF
1 week
In this open-label, single-arm pilot study, we sought to examine the feasibility of administering psilocybin to patients with treatment-resistant depression as a prelude to a larger randomised controlled trial. Our results support
Base line
MADRS
Discussion
STAI-T
The most common adverse events were transient anxiety (mostly mild) during drug onset (n=12), transient confusion or thought disorder (n=9), mild and transient nausea (n=4), and transient headache (n=4; table 2). These adverse events were expected psycho logical effects of psilocybin. Subacute headache typically presented 1 day after the psilocybin session, and subsided after 1–2 days. Paranoia presented in only one patient, but this was mild and transient. No prolonged psychotic symptoms were observed in any of the patients. One patient contacted the study psychiatrists during the 3 months of follow-up due to deterioration of their depression, and was referred to their general practitioner. QIDS depression scores were significantly reduced from baseline to 1 week and 3 months post-treatment, with the maximum effect at 2 weeks (figure 3, table 3). BDI and clinician-administered ratings confirmed these results (figure 4, table 3). All patients showed some reduction in depression severity at 1 week that was sustained in the majority for 3 months (appendix). According to standard criteria for determining remission (eg, a score of ≤9 on the BDI), eight (67%) of the 12 patients achieved complete remission at 1 week and seven patients (58%) continued to meet criteria for response (50% reduction in BDI score relative to baseline) at 3 months, with five of these (42%) still in complete remission (figure 4, table 3). STAI-T anxiety scores were also significantly reduced at 1 week and 3 months post-treatment, as were SHAPS anhedonia scores for 1 week and 3 months post-treatment (table 3).
3 months
Figure 3: Mean depression severity (QIDS) over time Depression severity determined by self-rated 16-item QIDS. QIDS scores of 16–20 are considered to reflect severe depression, scores of 11–15 are considered moderate depression, scores of 6–10 are considered mild depression, and scores of 5 and less are considered absent depression. All post-treatment assessments were obtained after the high-dose session (ie, 1 week post-treatment refers to 1 week after the high-dose session). Hedges’ g values versus baseline are shown. QIDS=Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms.
HAM-D
3 months
Base 1 week line
5 weeks
BDI
3 weeks
3 weeks 5 weeks 3 months
2 weeks
2 weeks
1 week
1 week
Baseline
Base line
0
Base 1 week line
5
Base 1 week line
10
Hedges’ g 2·0 p=0·003
Base 1 week line
Hedges’ g Hedges’ g 2·7 Hedges’ g Hedges’ g 3·1 3·2 p=0·003 3·2 p=0·002 p=0·002 p=0·002
15
QIDS
QIDS score
20
Base 1 week line
25
27·3 (18·0 to 36·6)
Articles
7
Articles
50
P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 P9 P10 P11 P12
40 Severe depression (≥30)
33·7 (7·1)
BDI score
30
Mild or moderate depression (>9 to >30)
20
10
15·2 (11) g=2
8·7 (8·4) g=3·2 No depression (≤9)
0 Baseline
1 week
3 months
High dose
Figure 4: Depression severity (BDI) over time, by patient Figure shows depression severity (BDI) over time plotted for each of the 12 patients. Mean values (SD) are shown as well as the relevant effect sizes (Hedges’ g) versus baseline. BDI=Beck Depression Inventory.
the view that, done with appropriate safeguards (eg, careful screening and adequate therapeutic support), psilocybin can be safely administered to this patient group. Because this was a small-scale feasibility study with an open-label design, strong inferences cannot be made about the treatment’s therapeutic efficacy. However, the data do suggest that further research is warranted. The response rate to psilocybin was 67% (n=8) at 1 week after treatment (HAM-D and BDI), and seven of these eight patients also met criteria for remission. Moreover, 58% (n=7) of the patients maintained their response for 3 months, and 42% (n=5) remained in remission. It is also worth noting that psilocybin has a favourable toxicity profile and is not associated with compulsive drug-seeking behaviours in animals or human beings. The side-effects that we noted were minor, and expected in light of previous studies of psilocybin.27 Spontaneous recovery in refractory depression is rare, and many of the patients in the present study reported having depression for much of their adult lives (mean estimated illness duration 17·8 years [SD 8]). Key questions for future research therefore should address why the therapeutic effect observed in the present study is so large, and if it can be replicated when tighter experimental controls are introduced. Because the treatment in our study consisted of not just two psilocybin administrations but also psychological support before, during, and after these sessions, as well as a positive therapeutic environment for the sessions, the relative effects of these factors need to be determined, which can only be done by conducting further trials with appropriate control conditions. A logical next step would be to carry out a placebocontrolled randomised trial in which the level of therapist contact is consistent between conditions. This would 8
enable any between-group differences in clinical outcomes to be attributed to psilocybin rather than the psychological support provided. However, a positive interaction between these variables seems likely, and inert placebo-based blinds are known to be ineffective in studies involving conspicuous experimental inter ventions, because patients can easily discern whether they are in the active condition or not. Use of an active placebo for the control condition might therefore be worth considering. Additionally, randomised comparative efficacy trials (eg, with an optional crossover component) incorporating another treatment for refractory depression (eg, ketamine infusion) could also be explored. The magnitude and persistence of the antidepressant effects observed here are not incongruent with what has been observed previously with psilocybin in chronic psychiatric conditions. For example, 80% of long-term heavy tobacco smokers demonstrated abstinence from smoking 6 months after two treatment sessions with psilocybin.18 Alcohol-dependent patients demonstrated significantly reduced drinking behaviours over 8 months after one or two psilocybin sessions.19 Significantly decreased anxiety and depression scores were observed 3 and 6 months after a single dose of psilocybin in patients with anxiety related to end-stage cancer,15 and improvements in wellbeing lasting for more than 1 year were observed in healthy individuals given a single dose of psilocybin.8 Rapid and enduring decreases in depressive symptoms were also recently found in a small-scale feasibility trial involving the psychedelic brew, ayahuasca.16 It is important to consider the limitations of this pilot study; for example, although all patients showed some clinical improvements for at least 3 weeks after treatment, and no serious or unexpected adverse reactions were observed, enduring improvements beyond 3 weeks were not observed universally, and five of the 12 patients showed a degree of relapse at 3 months. One should be cautious of the potential for inflated effect sizes in early trials, particularly when the sample size is small. That all patients showed some improvement in their depressive symptoms for up to 3 weeks after treatment could be suggestive of an expectancy bias. It may also be relevant that most patients in this trial were self-referring and, thus, actively sought this treatment. Psychedelics are known to promote suggestibility,28 which might have further enhanced positive outcomes. Future double-blind randomised controlled trials could address the role of expectancy and suggestibility by measuring and controlling these variables. For example, patients could be asked about their pre-treatment expectations, suggestions could be controlled between conditions, and outcomes from self-referred patients could be compared with those from patients referred via clinicians. From a more pragmatic perspective, if expectancy or suggestibility are found to be influential in the context of psychedelic therapy, they could be treated as exploitable components of the treatment model rather than confounding variables.
www.thelancet.com/psychiatry Published online May 17, 2016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30065-7
Articles
Serotonergic antidepressants have been found to downregulate the primary receptor target of psilocybin (the 5-HT2A receptor) and attenuated subjective responses to psychedelics have previously been reported in individuals chronically medicated with serotonergic antidepressants.29 Thus, patients may be required to withdraw from concurrent antidepressant medication before receiving psilocybin and this should only ever be done with care. In conclusion, we sought to assess the safety and tolerability of psilocybin plus psychological support in patients with unipolar treatment-resistant depression. Our findings support the feasibility of this approach and the magnitude and duration of the post-treatment reductions in symptom severity motivate further controlled research. Psilocybin has a novel pharma cological action in comparison with currently available treatments for depression (ie, 5-HT2A receptor agonism) and thus could constitute a useful addition to available therapies for the treatment of depression.
8
Contributors RLC-H and DJN designed the study and RLC-H wrote the report. RLC-H coordinated the study, and collected and analysed the data. MBo was the lead psychiatrist on the trial. MBo, JR, CMJD, DE, and MBl provided psychological support for the patients. All authors critically revised the report or contributed important intellectual content.
16
Declaration of interests DT has received research funding and lecture honoraria from Servier, and lecture honoraria from Lundbeck. The other authors declare no competing interests. Acknowledgments This study was funded by an MRC clinical development scheme grant (MR/J00460X/1). MK was supported by the Beckley Foundation and this work was carried out as part of the Beckley/Imperial Research Collaboration. The research was carried out at the NIHR/Wellcome Trust Imperial Clinical Research Facility. We would like to thank Robert Sullivan (Meridian West London, London, UK) for provision of high-quality audio equipment for the dosing sessions. References 1 Hofmann A, Frey A, Ott H, Petr Zilka T, Troxler F. Elucidation of the structure and the synthesis of psilocybin. Experientia 1958; 14: 397–99. 2 Hofmann A, Heim R, Brack A, Kobel H. Psilocybin, a psychotropic substance from the Mexican mushroom Psilicybe mexicana Heim. Experientia 1958; 14: 107–09. 3 Halberstadt AL, Geyer MA. Multiple receptors contribute to the behavioral effects of indoleamine hallucinogens. Neuropharmacology 2011; 61: 364–81. 4 Boulougouris V, Glennon JC, Robbins TW. Dissociable effects of selective 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptor antagonists on serial spatial reversal learning in rats. Neuropsychopharmacology 2008; 33: 2007–19. 5 Harvey JA. Role of the serotonin 5-HT(2A) receptor in learning. Learn Mem 2003; 10: 355–62. 6 Vaidya VA, Marek GJ, Aghajanian GK, Duman RS. 5-HT2A receptor-mediated regulation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor mRNA in the hippocampus and the neocortex. J Neurosci 1997; 17 (8): 2785–95. 7 Buchborn T, Schroder H, Hollt V, Grecksch G. Repeated lysergic acid diethylamide in an animal model of depression: normalisation of learning behaviour and hippocampal serotonin 5-HT2 signalling. J Psychopharmacol 2014; 28: 545–52.
9 10 11
12 13 14 15
17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26
27 28 29
Griffiths R, Richards W, Johnson M, McCann U, Jesse R. Mystical-type experiences occasioned by psilocybin mediate the attribution of personal meaning and spiritual significance 14 months later. J Psychopharmacol 2008; 22: 621–32. Carhart-Harris RL, Kaelen M, Bolstridge M, et al. The paradoxical psychological effects of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD). Psychol Med 2016; 46: 1379–90. Carhart-Harris RL, Erritzoe D, Williams T, et al. Neural correlates of the psychedelic state as determined by fMRI studies with psilocybin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012; 109: 2138–43. Hendricks PS, Thorne CB, Clark CB, Coombs DW, Johnson MW. Classic psychedelic use is associated with reduced psychological distress and suicidality in the United States adult population. J Psychopharmacol 2015; 29: 280–88. Krebs TS, Johansen PO. Psychedelics and mental health: a population study. PLoS One 2013; 8: e63972. Bouso JC, Gonzalez D, Fondevila S, et al. Personality, psychopathology, life attitudes and neuropsychological performance among ritual users of Ayahuasca: a longitudinal study. PLoS One 2012; 7: e42421. Gasser P, Holstein D, Michel Y, et al. Safety and efficacy of lysergic acid diethylamide-assisted psychotherapy for anxiety associated with life-threatening diseases. J Nerv Ment Dis 2014; 202: 513–20. Grob CS, Danforth AL, Chopra GS, et al. Pilot study of psilocybin treatment for anxiety in patients with advanced-stage cancer. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2011; 68: 71–78. Osorio Fde L, Sanches RF, Macedo LR, et al. Antidepressant effects of a single dose of ayahuasca in patients with recurrent depression: a preliminary report. Rev Bras Psiquiatr 2015; 37: 13–20. Moreno FA, Wiegand CB, Taitano EK, Delgado PL. Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of psilocybin in 9 patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 2006; 67: 1735–40. Johnson MW, Garcia-Romeu A, Cosimano MP, Griffiths RR. Pilot study of the 5-HT2AR agonist psilocybin in the treatment of tobacco addiction. J Psychopharmacol 2014; 28: 983–92. Bogenschutz MP, Forcehimes AA, Pommy JA, Wilcox CE, Barbosa P, Strassman RJ. Psilocybin-assisted treatment for alcohol dependence: a proof-of-concept study. J Psychopharmacol 2015; 29: 289–99. Johnson M, Richards W, Griffiths R. Human hallucinogen research: guidelines for safety. J Psychopharmacol 2008; 22: 603–20. Greenberg PE, Fournier AA, Sisitsky T, Pike CT, Kessler RC. The economic burden of adults with major depressive disorder in the United States (2005 and 2010). J Clin Psychiatry 2015; 76: 155–62. Gaynes BN. Identifying difficult-to-treat depression: differential diagnosis, subtypes, and comorbidities. J Clin Psychiatry 2009; 70 (suppl 6): 10–15. Sackeim HA. The definition and meaning of treatment-resistant depression. J Clin Psychiatry 2001; 62 (suppl 16): 10–17. Studerus E, Gamma A, Vollenweider FX. Psychometric evaluation of the altered states of consciousness rating scale (OAV). PLoS One 2010; 5: e12412. Rush AJ, Trivedi MH, Ibrahim HM, et al. The 16-Item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS), clinician rating (QIDS-C), and self-report (QIDS-SR): a psychometric evaluation in patients with chronic major depression. Biol Psychiatry 2003; 54: 573–83. Ibrahim L, DiazGranados N, Franco-Chaves J, et al. Course of improvement in depressive symptoms to a single intravenous infusion of ketamine vs add-on riluzole: results from a 4-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Neuropsychopharmacol 2012; 37: 1526–33. Johnson MW, Sewell RA, Griffiths RR. Psilocybin dose-dependently causes delayed, transient headaches in healthy volunteers. Drug Alcohol Depend 2012; 123: 132–40. Carhart-Harris RL, Kaelen M, Whalley MG, Bolstridge M, Feilding A, Nutt DJ. LSD enhances suggestibility in healthy volunteers. Psychopharmacology 2015; 232: 785–94. Bonson KR, Buckholtz JW, Murphy DL. Chronic administration of serotonergic antidepressants attenuates the subjective effects of LSD in humans. Neuropsychopharmacology 1996; 14: 425–36.
www.thelancet.com/psychiatry Published online May 17, 2016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30065-7
9