Download full Arctic convoys 1942: the luftwaffe cuts russia's lifeline 1st edition mark lardas eboo

Page 1


Arctic Convoys 1942: The Luftwaffe cuts Russia's lifeline 1st Edition Mark Lardas

Visit to download the full and correct content document: https://textbookfull.com/product/arctic-convoys-1942-the-luftwaffe-cuts-russias-lifeline -1st-edition-mark-lardas/

More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant download maybe you interests ...

Arctic Convoys 1942 The Luftwaffe Cuts Russia s Lifeline 1st Edition Mark Lardas & Adam Tooby

https://textbookfull.com/product/arctic-convoys-1942-theluftwaffe-cuts-russia-s-lifeline-1st-edition-mark-lardas-adamtooby/

Battle of the Atlantic 1942–45: The Climax of World War II’s Greatest Naval Campaign 1st Edition Mark Lardas

https://textbookfull.com/product/battle-of-theatlantic-1942-45-the-climax-of-world-war-iis-greatest-navalcampaign-1st-edition-mark-lardas/

Truk 1944–45: The Destruction of Japan's Central Pacific Bastion 1st Edition Mark Lardas

https://textbookfull.com/product/truk-1944-45-the-destruction-ofjapans-central-pacific-bastion-1st-edition-mark-lardas/

Rabaul 1943-44: Reducing Japan's Great Island Fortress 1st Edition Mark Lardas

https://textbookfull.com/product/rabaul-1943-44-reducing-japansgreat-island-fortress-1st-edition-mark-lardas/

Japan 1944–45: LeMay’s B-29 Strategic Bombing Campaign 1st Edition Mark Lardas

https://textbookfull.com/product/japan-1944-45-lemays-b-29strategic-bombing-campaign-1st-edition-mark-lardas/

The Kamikaze Campaign 1944 45 Imperial Japan s Last Throw of the Dice 1st Edition Mark Lardas

https://textbookfull.com/product/the-kamikazecampaign-1944-45-imperial-japan-s-last-throw-of-the-dice-1stedition-mark-lardas/

Battle of the Atlantic 1939-41: RAF Coastal Command's hardest fight against the U-boats 1st Edition Mark Lardas

https://textbookfull.com/product/battle-of-theatlantic-1939-41-raf-coastal-commands-hardest-fight-against-theu-boats-1st-edition-mark-lardas/

Guadalcanal 1942-43: Japan's Bid to Knock Out Henderson Field and the Cactus Air Force 1st Edition Mark Stille

https://textbookfull.com/product/guadalcanal-1942-43-japans-bidto-knock-out-henderson-field-and-the-cactus-air-force-1stedition-mark-stille/

The Russia Anxiety: And How History Can Resolve It Mark B. Smith

https://textbookfull.com/product/the-russia-anxiety-and-howhistory-can-resolve-it-mark-b-smith/

Author’sdedication:

TothememoryofLtC(ret)WilliamBrendanWelsh,USArmySpecial Forces.Iknewhimas“BossMongo”onamessageboard,asgooda friendshipasIhaveeverhadwithsomeoneImetonlyvirtually.Headmired mywriting,whileIadmiredhismanyaccomplishments.Weweregoingto meetupsomedaybutnevergotthechance.Youleftustoosoon,Boss.

A I R C A M P A I G N

CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION

CHRONOLOGY

ATTACKER’S CAPABILITIES

DEFENDER’S CAPABILITIES

CAMPAIGN OBJECTIVES

THE CAMPAIGN

AFTERMATH AND ANALYSIS

FURTHER READING

INTRODUCTION

ByFebruary1942theAllieshadbeenrunningconvoystoRussiaviathe Arcticrouteforsixmonths.Losseshadbeenlightthroughtotheendofthat monthandbythen97shipshadbeensenttoMurmanskandArkhangelsk, withanother61returned.In158sailingsonlyoneshiphadbeensunk(a secondwastorpedoed,buttowedsafelytoport).

Thiswasnottosaythevoyagewaseasy.Thethreatofenemyactionwas everpresent,evenifithadnotposedaseriousdangerduring1941.GermanoccupiedNorwayandGerman-alliedFinlandofferednearbybasesfrom whichthe Kriegsmarine (theGermannavy)andLuftwaffecouldlaunch attacks,whichthereforerequiredaheavyescortforRussianconvoys.

Norwasenemyactiontheonlythreat.Arcticconditionsmadethejourney perilousatalltimes,withicedamageanever-presentthreatthatincreased duringthewintermonths,andArcticstormsanotherdanger.Amangoing overboardintheArcticOceanorsurroundingwatershadonlyminutestolive beforesuccumbingtohypothermia.

YettheArcticconvoyswerevital.SovietRussiawasGermany’sbiggest opponent,andiftheSovietUnionsurrenderedAnglo-Americanchancesof defeatingGermanyshrankdramatically.TheSovietshadtobekeptinthe

The fear of losses due to a potential attack on Convoy PQ-17 by Tirpitz led to massive losses of independently sailing merchantmen to Luftwaffe aircraft and U-boats One victim is shown being sunk here (USNHHC)

war.MuchoftheSovietindustrialbeltwasoverrunbyGermany,andwhileit wasrelocatingwarproductioneastoftheUrals,Russiafacedcritical shortagesofweapons,ammunition,andallthehardwarerequiredformodern war.

TheWesternAllieshadallthematerielinplenty,butthechallengelayin gettingittotheSovietUnion.Threesupplyrouteswereavailable.Oneran fromtheNorthAmericanPacificCoasttoVladivostokandfromtheretothe battlefieldthroughtheTrans-SiberianRailroad.Asecondwounditsway fromBritainorNorthAmericaaroundAfricaintothePersianGulf,across IranandacrosstheCaucusesorCaspianSea.Boththeserouteswerelongand slow,andtheIranianroutewasjustopeningas1942began.

TheshortestandfastestrouteranbyseaacrosstheArcticOceanto RussianArcticports,butitwasalsothemostperilous.Providinganadequate escortforArcticconvoysstrainedAlliednavalresourcesrequiringdestroyers andantisubmarinecrafttoprotectAtlanticconvoysfromU-boats.Protection wasalsoneededtopreventattacksbyFocke-WulfCondors.Arcticconvoys passedwithineasyrangeofKriegsmarinesurfaceshipsandLuftwaffe mediumbombers,socruisersandbattleshipswererequiredasprotection fromthesurfaceships,andantiaircraftships(includingantiaircraftcruisers) wereusedtoguardagainstairattack.

Themostexposedpartofthevoyagewasmadewithoutaircover.The nearestCoastalCommandairfieldstotheArcticrunwereinIcelandandthe

The Nazi invasion of the Soviet Union in June 1941 brought the Soviets into the war as a British ally. Keeping the Soviets fighting was a British priority, leading to the institution of Arctic convoys to bring munitions to Russia. (AC)

Shetlands,butland-basedaircraftstationedtherelackedtherangetoreach convoysnorthandeastofNorway’sNarvikharbour.TheSovietairforces mighthaveprovidedaircoverontheeasternendoftherun,buttheSoviets werereluctanttooperateaircraftoveropenwaterandneededthelimited aircrafttheyhadtoprotecttheirownportsandcities.Aircraftcarrierswould havebeenwelcome,but,inJanuary1942,theRoyalNavy’sfleetcarriers weretoovaluabletoriskonconvoyescortduty.Furthermore,theRoyal NavyhadlostitsonlycommissionedescortcarrierinDecember1941andno morewouldbeavailableuntilthelasthalfof1942.

Despitethat,throughtotheendofFebruary1942,Arcticconvoys successfullyreachedtheirdestinationswithminimallosses.ButinMarchthat begantochange,owingtotwoBritishCommandoraidstheprevious December.HitlertooktheraidsonVågsoyIslandandtheLofotenIslands, whichtookplaceon26and27December1941,asprecursorstoaBritish invasionofNorway,andorderedwarplanes,U-boatsandwarshipstoprotect thecountry.

AmajorpurposeoftheraidswastodrawGermanforcesawayfromareas wheretheAlliesintendedtofight,butitsucceededtoowell.Germanground forcessenttoNorwaywereeffectivelyremovedfromfightingtheatres elsewhere,butGermanairandseaforcescouldnowreachwellbeyondthe Norwegiancoastline,threateningtheAlliedconvoys.NeitherAdmiralErich RaederoftheKriegsmarinenorReichsmarschallHermannGöringofthe LuftwaffewantedtheirforcesinScandinaviastandingidle,andtheArctic convoysprovedirresistible.

AtfirsttheAlliedlossesremainedlow.DespitetheRoyalNavy’sconcerns overwhatKriegsmarinesurfaceforcesmightdotoconvoys,thatfearwent largelyunrealizedoverthefirstninemonthsoftheArcticrun.Losseswere mainlyduetoU-boatsandthehazardsofthesea,butthentheLuftwaffe joinedthefight.DuringMarchandApril,theLuftwaffe’scontributionwas minor,butbyMay,andnowcarryingtorpedoesaswellasbombs,Luftwaffe bomberssankhalftheAlliedshipslostduringConvoyPQ-15.Havingfound theirstride,theLuftwaffebecamethetruemenacetoAlliedshipping,and theirabilitytofindconvoysgrewwiththelengtheningArcticsummerdays. SodidtheperilfacedbymerchantmenontheArcticrun.Thoughthe Alliednavalcommandersobsessedoverthethreatposedbythesurfaceships oftheKriegsmarine,atwar’sendthenumberofAlliedshipssunkbythese warshipscouldbecountedonthefingersofonehand.Meanwhile,however,

U-boatsandLuftwaffebomberswererippingArcticconvoysapart.InJuly 1942,followinganill-adviseddispersalofConvoyPQ-17amassacreensued inwhich24ofthe38merchantshipsintheconvoyweresunk.Threewere lostbeforetheconvoydispersed;21afterwards.Ofthattotal,sevenwere sunkbyLuftwaffeaircraftandninecrippledbybombersallowingthemtobe finishedoffbyU-boats.

TheAlliestriedeverythingtheycouldtocounterthethreatposedbythe Luftwaffe.Theyaddedantiaircraftshipstotheconvoys,sentRAFunitsto MurmanskandtheKolaPeninsulatoattempttoclosetheLuftwaffe’sbases throughbombing,putHurricanefightersonmerchantshipsequippedwith catapults(thisallowedaone-shotattackbytheHurricane,whichhadtoditch afterwards),andfinally,theycommittedoneoftheirscarceescortcarriersto anArcticconvoy.

TheclimaxcameinSeptember1942,withconvoyPQ-18.TheLuftwaffe threweverythingitcouldattheconvoy,andtheAlliesretaliatedinkind.A bloodyfightensued,attheendofwhichtheconvoyremainedtogetherbut30 percentoftheshipssentweresunk–overthree-quartersofthelosseswere duetoairattack.

TheLuftwaffelost15to20percentoftheaircraftitcommittedtothe battle,buttheAlliesthrewinthetowelandsuspendedArcticconvoysailing untilDecember,relyingonthelongArcticnighttoshieldthemfromthe Luftwaffe.TheyneveragainattemptedanArcticconvoyduringthesummer monthsofJunethroughAugust,duetotheperceivedthreatofLuftwaffe aircraft.However,theLuftwaffe’stideebbedasquicklyasitrose.In NovembertheAllieslandedinNorthAfricainOperation Torch,andto counterthisandanewBritishoffensiveinnortheastAfrica,theLuftwaffe’s bombersharassingArcticconvoyswereredeployedtotheMediterranean.

TheArcticconvoyscontinuedtofacethetwinperilsoftheKriegsmarine’s U-boatsandsurfacewarshipsbutmostoftheaircraftremainingintheArctic Circleweremaritimereconnaissance.TheArcticrunremainedhazardous, butnotnearlyashazardousaswhentheLuftwaffewaspresentinforce.From December1943whenconvoysresumeduntilMay1945whenthewarended, aircraftsankonlyoneshipsailinginanArcticconvoy,andsankonlyone moreduringanairraidonaRussianport.

The1942Arcticconvoybattlesprovedtobethelastsuccessfulair campaignoftheLuftwaffe.Eventhere,successwastenuous.Germansuccess dependedheavilyonAlliedreluctancetoriskmerchantconvoystothethreat

ofGermanairattack–athreatthatexistedlargelywithintheimaginationof Alliedplanners.Regardless,theresultconstrictedsuppliessentbytheArctic routefortherestofthewar.

Thiscampaignwashard-foughtbybothsides,andthemarginofvictory narrowasbothadversariesstrovetomeettheirgoalsinoneofthemost inhospitableplacesintheglobe.TheArcticwasanareahostiletoshipsand evenmoreunforgivingtoaircraft–theenvironmentasmuchafoetoeach sideastheenemytheywerefighting.Themenofbothsideswhichfought thiscampaignwerecourageousandresolute,andallweretestedtothelimits ofhumanendurance.Thisbooktellstheirstory.

STRATEGIC OVERVIEW

CHRONOLOGY

1941

22June GermanyattackstheSovietUnion.

12July Anglo-SovietAgreementsigned,obligating BritaintosupplytheSovietUnionwith munitions.

21–31August ConvoyDervishsailstoArkhangelsk,Russia, fromHvalfjörður,Iceland,beginningArctic convoystoandfromRussia.

28September ThePQ–QPconvoyseriesopenswiththe sailingofConvoyQP-1toScapaFlow.

10December UnitedStatesdeclareswaronGermanyand Italy.

26–27December VågsoyIslandandtheLofotenIslandsraided byBritishcommandos.

29December Hitlerdecidesthecommandoraidspresagea BritishinvasionofNorway,ordering Wehrmacht,KriegsmarineandLuftwaffe reinforcementssenttothearea.

1942

2January The5,135grt Waziristan becomesthefirst Arcticconvoyshiplost.

17January HMS Matabele sunkby U-454,thefirstBritish warshiplostontheArcticrun.

24January

March

First Kampfgeschwader (KG)30aircraftarrive atBanakandBardufoss.

KG26beginstransferringtwoGruppesto BardufossandBanak.

December 1941 raids on Vågsoy Island (shown here) and the Lofoten Islands convinced Hitler the British planned an invasion of Norway. His orders led to reinforcement of Luftflotte 5 in Norway, making bombers available to attack Arctic convoys. (AC)

11April

14April

3May

LuftwaffeJu88sbombConvoyQP-10, sinking7,161grtcargoship Empire Cowper.It isthefirstshipsunkinconvoybyLuftwaffe aircraft.

LuftwaffedivebomberssinkBritishsteamship Lancaster Castle (5,172grt)inportafterits arrivalatMurmanskinPQ-12.

SixHe111bombersofKG26makethefirst LuftwaffetorpedobomberattackofWorld

21–30May

June

26June

27June

4July

7July

25July

2September

13September

14–18September

WarII.Theyhitthreeships,sinkingtwoand damagingathird.

ConvoyPQ-16sailsfromReykjavíkto Murmansk.ConstantlyattackedbyLuftwaffe aircraft,itlosessixshipstoaircraftwiththree damaged.

FinalLuftwaffereinforcementsarrivein Norway.

ConvoyQP-13leavesArkhangelsk.Despite beingspottedbyLuftwaffereconnaissance,it islargelyignoredduetotheGermans concentratingonConvoyPQ-17.

ConvoyPQ-17departsReykjavík.

ConvoyPQ-17ordereddispersed.

ConvoyQP-13arrivesatReykjavíkafter losingfiveshipstoafriendlyminefield.These aretheonlycasualtiessufferedbyQP-13.

FinalfivesurvivingshipsfromPQ-17arrivein Arkhangelsk.

ConvoyPQ-18departsLochEwe,Scotlandfor Murmansk.

FirstLuftwaffeattackonPQ-18,includingthe war’sfirst‘GoldeneZange’attack.

Luftwaffemakesheavyattacksdailyon ConvoyPQ-18.

22September PQ-19iscancelled.

26September

29October–3 November

8November

8–12November

PQ-18arrivesatArkhangelsk,afterlosingten oftheconvoy’s40cargoshipstoairattacks andtwotoU-boats.

Operation FB,individualsailingbyunescorted merchantmen,replacesescortedArctic convoys.

AnAnglo-AmericanarmyinvadesFrench NorthAfricaasOperation Torch begins.

Luftwaffeunitsbegintransferringfrom NorwayandFinlandtotheMediterranean.

17November PQ–QPseriesterminateswiththesailingof QP-15fromKolaInleton17Novemberandits arrivalatLochEweon30November.

15December

BritishresumeArcticconvoys,withanew convoycode.ConvoyJW-51Adeparts

Two ships destined to play important roles in PQ-17 were the ASW trawler Ayrshire and the Hog Islander Troubadour Ayrshire is shown in this photo taken from Troubadour’s deck The M-3 tank in the foreground is part of Troubadour’s deck cargo (USNHHC)

The real danger on the Arctic run came from the foe the Allies were least able to fight in 1942: Luftwaffe aircraft A lack of air cover and inadequate antiaircraft defences enabled the Luftwaffe to attack convoys with relative impunity during this year (AC) 31December

2March 12KG30Ju88sattackRA-53,thefirst LuftwaffeattackonanArcticconvoyatsea sincePQ-18,butsinknoships.

26December BattleofNorthCape, Scharnhorst sunk attemptingtoattackJW-55B.

1944

September KG26beginstransferringbacktoNorway.

1945

7February KG26sendsa48aircraftstrikeagainstJW-63, itsfirstsincereturningtoNorway.Itfailsto findtheconvoy.

10February 32KG26torpedobombersattackJW-63. Theyscorenohits,andlosefiveaircraft.

23February LibertyShip Henry Bacon becomesthelast shipsunkinanArcticconvoybyLuftwaffe aircraft,andthefirsttobesunkatseasincethe resumptionofconvoysinDecember1943.Itis thelastshiplostontheArcticrun.

7May GermanysurrenderstotheUnitedNations.

30May FinalArcticconvoy,RA-53,arrivesatClyde.

ATTACKER’SCAPABILITIES

TheLuftwaffe’smaritimestrikeforce Aircraft

TheLuftwaffewasinitiallyconceivedasabomberforcetosupport Wehrmachtoperations;maritimepatrolandstrikewaslargelyaddedafter WorldWarIIbeganbut,bythebeginningof1942,theLuftwaffehadgained proficiencyinboth.

ThemostsignificantaircraftusedinthiscampaignweretheLuftwaffe’s mainmediumbombers,theHeinkel111andtheJu88.Theseaircraftwere usedmostfrequentlytoattackAlliedconvoys.Theyweresupplementedby pre-warLuftwaffemaritimepatrolaircraft,suchastheHeinkelHe115and theBlohm&VossBV138,aswellasthewartime-developedFocke-Wulf 200.Thesewereusedprimarilyforreconnaissance,althoughtheHe115did occasionallyattackconvoys,especiallyafterbeingadaptedtoatorpedobomberrole.

The Ju 88 was Nazi Germany’s most versatile aircraft, deployed in almost every role except transport It was an important tool in the Luftwaffe’s campaign against Arctic convoys, serving as a bomber, torpedo bomber and reconnaissance aircraft (AC)

Luftwaffesingle-andmulti-enginefightersplayedminorrolesinthis campaign,asdidsingle-enginestrikeandreconnaissanceaircraft.Limited AlliedaircraftpresencewithArcticconvoysduring1942gavefighterslike theMesserschmittBf109andBf110,ortheFocke-Wulf190,littlescopefor action.TheseaircraftprotectedGermanbasesinScandinaviafromAllied bombersorescortedbombingraidsagainstnorthernRussianports.Similarly, thelimitedrangeoftheAradoAr196meantitsreconnaissancerolewas betterservedbymulti-enginepatrolaircraft.OnlytheJunkersJu87sawuse, andthatlargelyagainstshipsinRussianportsorclosetotheScandinavian coast.

TheaircraftmostinvolvedininterdictingtheAllies’Arcticconvoysto Russiawere:

JunkersJu88:TheJu88wastheLuftwaffe’smostversatileaircraft, servingasabomber,divebomber,torpedobomber,reconnaissanceaircraft, nightfighterandheavyfighterduringWorldWarII.Withtwin-engines,it hadacrewoffourasabomber.Itslengthwas14.36m(47.1ft),itswingspan 20.08m(65.9ft).Ithada470km/h(290mph)topspeed,a370km/h(230mph) cruisingspeed,a1,790km(1,110miles)operationalrangeandaservice ceilingof8,200m(26,900ft).Asabomberitcouldcarryupto1,400kg (3,100lb)ofbombsinternallyandupto3,000kg(6,600lb)externally.Itcould bemodifiedtocarrytwotorpedoes.IthadfiveMG817.92mmmachine guns,threeinflexiblesinglemountsfiringfromthenoseandventral positionsforeandaft,andadorsalflexibletwinmountattheaftcockpit.

TheGermanscalledtheJu88 Mädchen für Alles (MaidofallWork)dueto itsflexibility.Ithadbeenstrengthenedandmodifiedpre-wartoserveasa heavydivebomber.Othermodelswerealsomodifiedtoserveas reconnaissanceaircraft,radar-equippednightfighters(withupward-firing Schrage-Musik 20mmcannon)andasheavyfighterswithuptosix20mm forward-firingcannoninthenose.AgainstArcticconvoys,theJu88was primarilyusedforreconnaissance,andasabomber,bothadivebomberand torpedobomber.

HeinkelHe111:TheHe111twin-enginebomberwasGermany’smain mediumbomberthroughmostofWorldWarII.Itslengthwas16.4m(53.8ft) witha22.6m(74.15ft)wingspan.Ithada440km/h(270mph)topspeed,a cruisingspeedwithafullbombloadof300km/h(190mph),a2,300km (1,400miles)rangeanda6,500m(21,300ft)serviceceiling.Itcouldcarryup to2,000kg(4,400lb)ofbombsinternally,or3,600kg(7,900lb)ortwo

torpedoesonexternalracks.(Itcouldnotcarrybombsinternallywith externalracksattached.)FordefensivearmamentitcarriedsixorsevenMG 15orMG817.92mm(.30cal)machinegunsandoneMG15113mm machineguninsingle-mounthand-heldpositions.

Itfirstflewin1935,disguisedasacivilianairliner,thoughmilitary versionsappearedin1936.Althoughitwasupgradedthroughoutproduction, by1942itwasobsolete,butdespitethis,productioncontinueduntil1944. Equippedwithtorpedoesorbombs,itservedsatisfactorilyagainstconvoys withoutaircover.ItwasprimarilyusedasatorpedobomberagainstArctic convoys.

HeinkelHe115:Thetwin-engineHe115wasafloatplanemaritimepatrol aircraft.Itwasfrequentlyusedforreconnaissance,butalsousedasatorpedo bomberandaminelayingaircraft.Ithadacrewofthree,was17.3m(56.75ft) longwithawingspanof22.28m(73.08ft).Ithadacombatrangeof2,100km (1,300miles),aserviceceilingof5,200m(17,100ft),amaximumspeedof 327km/h(203mph),acruisingspeedof280km/h(174mph)andamaximum enduranceof18hours.Itcouldcarryupto1,250kg(2,750lb)ofbombs,one torpedoorone920kg(2,000lb)seamine.ItwasarmedwithoneflexibleMG 17andoneMG157.93mmmachineguns,innoseanddorsalmounts.

TheHe115wasorderedin1935,andfirstflewin1937,entering operationalservicein1939.By1941,138hadbeenbuilt,withproduction restartingin1943.ConsideredthebestfloatplaneofWorldWarII,theHe 115wasatorpedobomberandreconnaissanceaircraftintheArctic.

Blohm&VossBV138:TheBlohm&VossBV138 Seedrache (Sea Dragon)wasatri-motorflyingboatusedforlong-rangemaritimepatrol.It was19.85m(65.08ft)long,witha26.94m(88.4ft)wingspan.Ithada 285km/h(177mph)topspeed,a235km/h(146mph)cruisingspeed,an operationalrangeof1,220km(760miles)at195km/h(121mph),arelatively shortsix-hourenduranceanda5,000m(16,400ft)serviceceiling.Ithadasixmancrewandcarriedadefensivearmamentoftwo20mmMG151cannon individuallymountedinpowernoseandtailturrets,andasingle13mmMG 131machineguninanopenringmountbehindthecentreengine.Primarilya reconnaissanceaircraft,itcouldcarryuptosix50kg(110lb)bombsunderthe wings.

Firstflownin1937,itbecameoperationalin1940,and297werebuilt between1938and1943.Ithadanoddappearancewithashortfuselage,two enginesmountedmid-winginnacellesformingtwinboomsholdingthe

horizontalandverticalstabilizers,andthecentreenginemountedabovethe fuselageinastreamlinedfairing.Itssideprofilegaveittheappearanceofa shoe,givingrisetothenickname Der Fliegende Holzschuh (Flyingclog)a playonthename Der Fliegende Hollander (TheFlyingDutchman).

The He 111 was the Luftwaffe’s main medium bomber when World War II began. One Gruppe, KG 26, converted to carrying aerial torpedoes. These aircraft saw extensive service in the Arctic, proving a hazard to Allied shipping. (AC)

Focke-WulfFw200:TheFw200Condorwasavery-long-rangemaritime patrolaircraft.Ithada360km/h(223mph)topspeed,a335km/h(208mph) cruisingspeed,aserviceceilingof6,000m(20,000ft),a3,560km(2,210 mile)rangeanda14hourendurance.Itswingspanwas32.85m(107.77ft) anditslength23.45m(77ft).ItwasarmedwithanMG15120mmcannonin theforwardventralgondola,anMG13113mmmachineguninahand-held aftdorsalmountandfourMG157.9mmmachinegunsindividuallymounted inapowertopturret,andflexiblebeamandaftventralmountings.Ithada maximumbombloadof5,400kg(4,620lb)onwingmountsor1,000kg (2,200lb)internally,butgenerallycarriedlessforgreaterrange.Ithadacrew offivetoseven.

Originallyanairliner,itwasconvertedtomilitaryusebyattachingabomb baybeneaththefuselageandaddingmachinegunsandcannonforantishippingandair-to-airdefence.TheCondorwasstructurallyweakand virtuallyhelplessagainstfighters(orevenAlliedpatrolbombers),but becametheterroroftheAtlanticin1940byoperatingagainstlargely unarmedmerchantmensailingindividually.By1942itsreignasanattack

aircraftwasover,thoughitremainedasuperbmaritimepatrolaircraftdueto itsenduranceandlongrange,andwassousedonArcticconvoys.

JunkersJu87:Atwoplace,single-enginedivebomber,theJunkersJu87 Stuka(shortfor Sturzkampfflugzeug ‘divebomber’)wasadivebomber developedasanarmygroundsupportaircraft,thoughitprovedeffective againstmaritimetargetsduringthewar’sopeningmonths.Ithada383km/h (238mph)topspeed,a209km/h(130mph)cruisingspeed,an8,200m (26,900ft)operationalceilinganda595.5km(370mile)rangewhencarrying bombs.Itwasarmedwithtwofixedforward-firingMG177.92mmandone flexiblerear-mountedMG157.29mmmachinegun.Itcarriedacentremounted250kg(550lb)bombandfourwing-mounted50kg(110lb)bombs.

TheJu87wasWorldWarII’siconicLuftwaffeaircraft.Alow-wingmetal monoplane,withinvertedgull-wingsandfixedlandinggearinfaired housings,itlookedlikeapredatoryhawk.Anaccuratedivebomber,itwas deadlyagainstunarmedopponents,butitwasalsoslow,hadlimited manoeuvrabilityandweakdefensivearmament,makingitvulnerableto fighters.Itsshortrangelimiteditsusefulnessinmaritimeroles,butitdid attackArcticconvoysclosetoGerman-heldshores.

Facilitiesandinfrastructure

TheGermansfacedtwoobstaclesinconductinganaerialoffensiveagainst Arcticconvoys:possessingadequatefacilitiesfromwhichtomountthe offensiveandthendevelopingtheinfrastructuretosupportandsupplythose facilities.

ThepathtoRussiathroughtheArcticcrossedoneoftheworld’smost hostileenvironments–evenduringsummermonthsitwascoldand inhospitable.ThelandsborderingArcticwaterswereafrozendesertmostof theyear,andplainsuponwhichairfieldscouldbebuiltfrequentlybecame bogsduringthebriefArcticsummer.

ThepopulationofFinnmark,thenNorway’snorthernmostcounty,was sparseatthebeginningofWorldWarII.Therewerefewcommunities,and thosethatdidexisthadpopulationsnumberingonlyinthehundreds–for example,thepopulationofVadsø,theregion’sadministrativecentre,was under2,000in1940.Littleexistinginfrastructurecouldsupportairfieldsand navalports,andconditionsinNorthernFinlandwerelittlebetter.Northern LaplandwasjustassparselypopulatedasFinnmark,withitslargesttown,the portcityofPetsamo,aboutaslargeasVadsø.

As1942began,theLuftwaffehadaseriesofairfieldsandseaplanebases throughoutNorwayandFinland–acombinationofbaseswhichexistedprior tothe1940WinterWarbetweenFinlandandtheSovietUnionandthe1940 occupationofNorway,andthosebuiltfortheLuftwaffeafteroccupation.

Additionally,SolaAirfieldatStavangerandVærnesAirfieldinTrondheim supportedLuftwaffeactivitiesagainstArcticconvoysbyprovidingbasesfor long-rangemaritimereconnaissanceaircraft.

ThemostimportantnorthernairfieldsincludedKirkenes,Banak, BardufossandBodöinFinnmark,andPetsamoinLapland.Banak,Bodöand BardufosswereexistingNorwegianairfieldstakenoverbyGermanyafter conquest,andsimilarly,Petsamowasoneofsixpre-warairfieldsinLapland.

Themajorseaplanestationsandanchorageswhichwereusedinthis campaignincludedAlta-SeeandTromsø,thoughtherewerealsoseaplane facilitiesassociatedwithBodö,Kirkenes,StavangerandTrondheim.

Noneoftheseairfields,exceptStavanger,werewelldevelopedpriorto WorldWarII.Stavangerhadaconcreterunway,buttherestwereunpaved, withBanak,BardufossandBodöhavingbeenbuiltinthelate1930sbythe NorwegianstoprotectFinnmarkfromapotentialSovietinvasion.Theyhad eithergravelorturfrunwaysin1940,asdidtheairfieldsaroundTrondheim. Petsamo,alongwiththeotherfiveLaplandairfields,werelittlemorethan clearedfieldswithafewsmallbuildingsorshedsforsupport.

Luftwaffe aircraft operated under primitive conditions out of Finnmark airfields. The airfields had gravel or wood-plank runways and maintenance facilities were crude. Fuelling and servicing had to be done outdoors in a harsh climate. (AC)

GERMAN AND ALLIED AIRFIELDS

BetweenthestartoftheGermanoccupationandtheinvasionofRussiain June1941,theGermansextensivelyimprovedtheirairfieldsinNorway.At first,airfieldsinsouthernandcentralNorway,includingTrondheim,were improvedtosupporttheBattleofBritain;however,astheGermansprepared toinvadeRussia,theyalsoupgradedairfieldsinFinnmark.TheLuftwaffe improvedFinnishairfieldsafterFinlanddeclaredwarontheSovietUnionin June1941,andbyJanuary1942thesewereabletosupportabroadrangeof Luftwaffeaircraft,evenmulti-engineaircraft.

However,eventheseimprovementsweremorerudimentarythanseen elsewhereinEurope.Banak’stwomainrunwayshadwooden-plank surfacing,asdidPetsamo,andKirkeneshadonlydirtandgravel-surfaced runwaysthroughoutitsexistence.Trondheim,BardufossandBodögained concreterunwaysbetween1940andthemiddleof1942,althoughBodö’s runwayswerepartlywoodandpartlyconcrete,whileitstaxiwayswere

wooden.Allhadbuildingspermittingmaintenanceandrudimentaryrepairof aircraft,aswellasfuellingandammunitionstoragefacilities,andaircraft dispersalareas.

Tromsø,apre-warNorwegianNavalAirServiceStation,wasthe Luftwaffe’smainseaplanestationinnorthernNorway.Ithad30mooring buoys,jettiesforfuelandammunition,andalargedoublehangarwith attachedworkshopandconcreteapron.Alta-Seewasprimarilyaseaplane anchoragewithbasicfuelandammunitioncapabilities,butnomaintenance facilities,andBodö-Seewasarefuellingstop.In1942,Kirkenes’sseaplane facilitieswerejustananchorage,whereasTrondheimandStavangerhad extensiveseaplanefacilitiesusedmainlybylong-rangereconnaissance seaplanesinvolvedwithArcticconvoys.

TheLuftwaffe’sinfrastructuresupportingtheirforcesinFinnmarkand Laplandwereasadhocandimprovisedastheirairfieldsandfacilities.One problemfacedbyforcesinthefarnorth,AxisandAlliesalike,wasthatit wasattheendofalongsupplyline.Everythingexceptdrinkingwater, includingrations,armsandmateriel,hadtobeshippedtherebysea.No railroadsrantoFinnmarkorLapland,androadswerepoorinsummerand impassableinwinter.

Tromsø was the Luftwaffe’s main seaplane station in northern Norway. It had pre-war mooring buoys and maintenance jetties, but Arctic conditions made it difficult to operate from. A BV 138 is being towed ashore, and an He 115 can be seen in the background. (USNHHC)

Narvik was northern Norway’s most important harbour, serving as the point from which Swedish iron ore was shipped to Germany It served as a Kriegsmarine anchorage, although it lacked repair facilities to make it a full naval port (AC)

AlthoughNorway’swestandnorthcoastremainedice-freeduringthe winter,logisticswerecomplicatedbytherelativelysmallmerchantmarine availabletotheAxisinScandinavia.Furthermore,theLuftwaffewasnotthe onlyorganizationrequiringuseofGermany’ssealiftcapabilities–multiple demandsfellonit.TheWehrmachtwaspursuingalandoffensivetocapture MurmanskandtheKolaPeninsulain1941and1942,andsothe KriegsmarinemaintainedalargenavalpresenceinNorway.Itkeptitsmajor surfaceunitsinTrondheimandthenorthernportsin1942and1943,andthe 13thU-boatFlotillaoperatedoutofTrondheimduringthisperiod. Furthermore,Narvikwasanice-freeportfromwhichSwedishironorewent toGermanyandwasananchorage(alongwithAltenFjord)forKriegsmarine warshipsattackingtheArcticconvoys.

Additionally,theGermanmerchantmarinedidnotgrowtomeetdemands forgreatershipping,butinsteadshrankasthehazardsoftheseatookatoll. Furthermore,toprotectAlliedArcticconvoys,theRoyalNavymaintained heavysubmarinepatrolsoffNorwegiancoastalwaterswhosemaintargets weremajorKriegsmarinewarships(especiallythebattleship Tirpitz),butfew submarinecommandersignoredmerchanttargetswhenencountered.

TheLuftwaffecouldonlymaintainamaximumof300–400aircraftinthe Arctic.Thatlimitwasmitigatedbytwofactors:theabilitytostageaircraft

fromsouthernScandinaviaandthenumberofaircraftavailabletothe Luftwaffe.

Staginginvolvedoperatingaircraftoutofairfieldsinsouthernorcentral NorwaytosupportactionsintheArctic.Aircraftwouldbemaintained, servicedandarmedinairfieldssuchasStavanger’sSolaorTrondheim,and flowntoairfieldsinFinnmarkwheretheyrefuelledtoattacktheconvoy. ReturningtotheFinnmarkairfieldstheymightberearmedandrefuelledfor anotherattackorflownbacktosouthernbasesforservicing,dependingupon whetherthiswasneeded.

Theperiodduringwhichaconvoycouldbeattackedbyaircraftwasbrief–rarelymorethanaweek.Stagingminimizedthetimeaircraftspentinthefar north,reducingthelogisticaldemandsattheFinnmarkairbases.

Additionally,very-long-rangepatrolaircraft,suchastheHe115orFw200 couldoperateeffectivelyoutofStavanger,BergenorTrondheim.

TherealreasonlogisticallimitationneverconstrainedLuftwaffeArctic operationswasthattheLuftwaffelackedtheaircrafttocommitenoughto strainlogisticlimits.ByJanuary1942theLuftwaffehadtomaintaina presencesupportingairactivitiesinRussia,theMediterranean,Franceand Germany,and200–250multi-engineaircraftwereasmuchascouldbe committedinNorwayandLapland.EveninLapland,mostoftheLuftwaffe’s effortwenttowardssupportingGermangroundoffensives.Germanycould getenoughammunition,fuelandsuppliestosupporttheiraircraftsimply becausetheyhadrelativelyfewaircrafttosupport.

Weaponsandtactics

Luftwaffebombersusedbombsandtorpedoesoffensivelytoattackandsink shipsinAlliedArcticconvoys,buttheyalsodeployedavarietyofcannon andmachinegunstodefendtheiraircraftand,lessoften,tostrafeshipping. WhiletheLuftwaffehadawidevarietyofspecialistbombs,thosemost frequentlyusedagainstAlliedmerchantshipsandwarshipswere50kgand 250kghighexplosivebombs.

ThemostcommonbombusedwasonethatallLuftwaffebomberscould carry,theSC250(Sprengbombe Cylindrisch 250 –thenumberindicatedits weightinkilograms).Totalweightwas250kg(550lb),130kg(290lb)of whichwastheexplosivefilling(typicallyTNT,AmatolorTrialen–Trialen wastheexplosivemostoftenemployedagainstshipping).Theoutershell wasmadeofcast,tubeorforgedsteel.GradeIbombs,intendedtopenetrate,

hadthenoseandmainbodyforgedfromasinglepieceofsteel,whereas GradeIIandIIIbombsconsistedofthreesteelsections–nosecone,body andaftcone–weldedtogether.Allhadafour-finnedtailattachedafterthe bombwasfilled.AsingleSC250,properlyplaced,couldsinkatypical merchantman.

TheSC50wasalsousedagainstshipping,althoughtheywouldmore likelybeusedagainststragglersorcrippledvessels,sailingindependently.It held16.4kg(36lb)ofexplosive,andwasgenerallyfilledwithTNT,Amatol orTrialen.Anti-shipSC50swerefittedwithanti-ricochetadapterstoprevent themfrombouncingofftargets.IttypicallytookmultiplehitsfromSC50sto sinkallbutthesmallestseagoingvessels.

In1942theLuftwaffe’sprimaryaerialtorpedowasthe45cmdiameterF5b torpedo.Itcarrieda180–250kg(397–551lb)Hexanitewarhead,capableof sinkinganAlliedmerchantmanwithonehit.Itcouldtravel2,000m(6,500ft) ata40-knotsettingor6,000m(19,500ft)at24knots.Itusedhydrogen peroxideastheoxidantandDecalin(decahydronaphthalene)fuel.Total weightwas725–812kg(1,598–1,790lb),anditsoveralllengthwas4.804–5.160m(15.75ft–16.96ft)–thewarheadfittedaccountedfordifferencesin lengthandweight.Thistorpedohadawoodentailattachedtostabilizeflight whileintheairwhichbrokeoffoncethetorpedoenteredthewater.The torpedohadtobedroppedatspeedslessthan250km/h(155mph)andfrom nohigherthan40m(131ft).

DIE GOLDENE ZANGE (THE GOLDEN COMB)

KEY

1 Torpedo bombers appear.

2 Torpedo bombers release torpedoes.

3 Torpedo bombers depart. (Note: the two positions”3” show the location of the torpedoes (right) and aircraft (left) at the same time).

The Golden Comb used a line of torpedo bombers flying line abreast at 50m intervals, and simultaneously releasing torpedoes With 46 bombers, this sent 92 torpedoes in a line over a nautical mile long racing towards a convoy. This 3D view shows what the Germans hoped would happen – that the convoy moved forwards without evading the torpedoes. In reality, the convoy commodore ordered a hard left turn. Only the right two columns failed to turn and six of the eight ships hit were in those columns.

LuftwaffeaircraftinvolvedinthiscampaignwerearmedwithMG15,MG 17,MG81andMG131machineguns,andMG151/20cannon.TheMG15, MG17andMG81wereall7.92mmmachinegunsfiringriflecalibrebullets. TheMG131wasa13mmmachinegun,andtheMG151a20mm autocannon.

TheMG15andMG17werethesamebasicgundevelopedfromtheMG 30,anair-cooled,recoil-operatedweaponfiringastandard7.92x57mm Mausercartridgewhichfiredan11.7–12.7gbullet.TheMG15wasdesigned forahand-heldflexiblemountwhiletheMG17wasusedinfixed mountings.TheMG15hadashorterbarrel,lowermuzzlevelocityandrate offire20percentlowerthantheMG17.TheMG15hada75-rounddrum, whiletheMG17useda1,000-roundbelt.

TheMG81wastheaviationversionoftheMG34,anupgradedMG30.It wasalsoa7.92mmgunfiringthestandard7.92x57mmMausercartridge.It hadahigherrateoffirethantheMG17,wasbelt-fedandreplacedtheMG 15forflexiblemountings.

TheMG131wasdevelopedbyRheinmetallin1938,enteringservicein 1940.Itwasalightweight13mmgun,weighing16.6kg(37lb),andcouldbe usedfixedoronflexiblemountings.Itfireda38.5ground,air-cooledand recoil-operated.Theroundwasnotjustheavierthanthatofthe7.92mm,but italsofiredanHEI(high-explosive,incendiary)round,similartothatfired by20mmcannon.

TheMG151/20wasanupgradeoftheoriginal15mmMG151autocannon designedforuseonLuftwaffefighterspre-war.Combatexperienceshoweda largerexplosiveshellperformedbetter,despitealowermuzzlevelocitythan the15mmversion.TheMG151/20enteredproductionin1941.Although intendedasafixedweapononfighters,itwasusedonflexiblemountingson theFw200andBV138.Itfiredarmour-piercingandhigh-explosiverounds, whichweighedbetween94gand117g(3.3–4.1oz).

By1942theLuftwaffehaddevelopedanti-shippingtacticsthrough experiencegainedintheNorthSea,MediterraneanSea,AtlanticOceanand EnglishChannel.Thepreferredweaponagainstwarshipsandmerchant vesselswerebombs,andwhilelevelbombingwasused,divebombing provedmoreeffectiveandwaspreferred,especiallyagainstwell-defended targets,likewarships.TheLuftwaffeintroducedaerialtorpedoesin1942,and werestilldevelopingtorpedodoctrineatthattime.

The SC 250 (Sprengbombe Cylindrisch 250) was the bomb most-commonly used by the Luftwaffe during their Arctic campaign. It weighed 250kg (550lb) of which 130kg (290lb) was explosive (NMAF)

WithArcticconvoys,thepreferredtargetsweremerchantships,andhigher prioritywasgiventoinboundshipsladenwithmunitionsandsuppliesforthe Soviets.TheLuftwaffehoweverdidnotavoidwarshipsorignoreoutbound QPconvoys–theyattackedandsankthesemanytimesin1942.The favouredtarget,ladenorinballast,wasasolitarymerchantman,acrippleora

Another random document with no related content on Scribd:

Kissat täyttivät kaikki paikat, niitä oli tuoleilla ja sängyssä ja ikkunalla ja vaikka missä, ja ne olivat syödä naiseläjän perikatoon. Naisihmisen täytyi näin ollen pyytää, että jos herrasväki olisi hyvä ja lähtisi sinne mistä on tullutkin. Naiseläjä avasi vielä ovenkin ja sanoi, että siitä on uloskäynti, hyvästi nyt ja kiitoksia, käynnistä!

Mutta kissat eivät lähteneet ajamallakaan, sillä niistä oli hyvä niinkuin nyt oli, ja ne sähisivät ja sylkivät ja uhkasivat kynsiä emäntänsä hyvän omaksi, jos hän uskaltaisi ryhtyä joihinkin väkivaltaisuuksiin.

Naisihmisen täytyi nyt kääntyä miesväen puoleen apua pyytämään, ja lopuksi tuli eräs iso miehenrumilas ja sanoi, että kyllä hän kissat sortteeraa, mikäpäs siinä. Ja hän ryhtyi heti asianomaisiin toimenpiteisiin ja passitti kissan toisensa perästä niinsanotuille autuaammille metsästysmaille. Mutta kun hän oli lopettanut viiden kissan maallisen vaelluksen, niin valtasi kauhu ne kuusi, jotka vielä olivat jäljellä, ja ne huusivat toisilleen, että tappaa se tuo hurjimus meidätkin, jollei nyt lähdetä muille markkinoille. Ja kissat livistivät niin että häntä suorana.

Mikä on liikaa, se on liikaa. Ja niinkuin sanottu, helsinkiläisten kommunistien vierailunäytäntö Hämeenlinnassa viime lauantaina oli ollut Hämeenlinnan työläisistäkin liian paksua.

Jo kesällä kerrottiin lehdissä, että Tampereelle oli Helsingistä saapunut sakki suomalaisia ryssiä, nimittäin helsinkiläisiä kommunisteja, joilla oli yllään housujen päälle vedetty punainen paita, paidan päällä nahkaremmi, jalassa pussihousut ja saappaat, lakissa bolshevikkiryssien kokardi ja hihassa jonkinlainen punainen tähti. On epäämätön todistus suomalaisesta pitkämielisyydestä, että tällainen hävettävä ja suomalaista työläistä häpäisevä roskajoukko

sai selkäsaunatta esiintyä kirkkaalla päivällä, aiheuttamatta yleisön taholta muuta kuin ivaa ja hyvin ansaittua halveksimista.

* * * * *

Viime lauantaina vietti Hämeenlinnan muurarien ammattiosasto 25-vuotisjuhlaansa. Mielialaa kohottamaan oli Helsingistä taas sinnekin saapunut ylläkuvatunlaisia suomalaiskommunistisia punapaitapolsuja, ja paikkakunnan työväenlehti kertoo häpeän punan nousseen monen rehellisen työmiehen poskille moisen iljettävän näyn nähdessään.

Seuraavana päivänä, sunnuntaina, saivat Hämeenlinnan työläiset kuitenkin vielä enemmän hävetä äkkijyrkkiä helsinkiläisiä vieraitaan, kun nämä ajelivat autoilla kaupungilla ja puistolanmäessä arvoisien hengenheimolaistensa luona vierailuilla, ja pöhnäpäissään esiintyivät julkisilla paikoilla tavalla, jota ei tässä voi selostaa. Riittää maininta, että sikäläinen työväenlehti leimaa asian suureksi häpeäksi ja todistaa, ettei kommunistiparatiisin edustajain rähjääminen »lainkaan poikennut Helsingin hulikaanien menettelyistä».

— »Ja niitä tuotiin oikein Helsingistä saakka Hämeenlinnaan nähtäväksi, niinkuin ei niitä täällä olisi», huomauttaa lehti harmistuneena.

On hyvä, että työväen kunnollisten ja valistuneitten ainesten silmät aukenevat näkemään kommunististen maailmanparantajain todellisen olemuksen oikeassa karvassaan ja loistossaan.

Enemmän vain sellaisia vierailuja, toverit kommunistit! Ne ovat Suomen kansalle niin terveellisiä että oikein!

***

END OF

THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK KOMMUNISTIJA BOLSHEVIKKIPAKINOITA ***

Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will be renamed.

Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG™ concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you charge for an eBook, except by following the terms of the trademark license, including paying royalties for use of the Project Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the trademark license is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and research. Project Gutenberg eBooks may be modified and printed and given away—you may do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks not protected by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark license, especially commercial redistribution.

START: FULL LICENSE

THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE

PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK

To protect the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting the free distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work (or any other work associated in any way with the phrase “Project Gutenberg”), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project Gutenberg™ License available with this file or online at www.gutenberg.org/license.

Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works

1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg™ electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property (trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in your possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project Gutenberg™ electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.

1.B. “Project Gutenberg” is a registered trademark. It may only be used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg™ electronic works even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project Gutenberg™ electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg™ electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.

1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation (“the Foundation” or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the United States and you are located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg™ works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg™ name associated with the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg™ License when you share it without charge with others.

1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any country other than the United States.

1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:

1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg™ License must appear prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg™ work (any work on which the phrase “Project Gutenberg” appears, or with which the phrase “Project Gutenberg” is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, copied or distributed:

This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you will have to check the laws of the country where you are located before using this eBook.

1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase “Project Gutenberg” associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg™ trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is posted with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked to the Project Gutenberg™ License for all works posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.

1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg™ License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg™.

1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project Gutenberg™ License.

1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg™ work in a format other than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other format used in the official version posted on the official Project Gutenberg™ website (www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg™ License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.

1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg™ works unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing access to or distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works provided that:

• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the method you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark, but he has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation.”

• You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg™

License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg™ works.

• You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of receipt of the work.

• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.

1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg™ electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the manager of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark. Contact the Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below

1.F.

1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project Gutenberg™ collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain “Defects,” such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by your equipment.

1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY,

DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES

- Except for the “Right of Replacement or Refund” described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark, and any other party

distributing a Project Gutenberg™ electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.

1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further opportunities to fix the problem.

1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.

1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted

by the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.

1.F.6.

INDEMNITY

- You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone providing copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg™ work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg™ work, and (c) any Defect you cause.

Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg™

Project Gutenberg™ is synonymous with the free distribution of electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from people in all walks of life.

Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg™’s goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg™ collection will remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure and permanent future for Project Gutenberg™ and future generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org.

Section 3. Information about the Project

Gutenberg

Literary Archive Foundation

The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-profit 501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal Revenue Service. The Foundation’s EIN or federal tax identification number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state’s laws.

The Foundation’s business office is located at 809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up to date contact information can be found at the Foundation’s website and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact

Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation

Project Gutenberg™ depends upon and cannot survive without widespread public support and donations to carry out its mission of increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be freely distributed in machine-readable form accessible by the widest array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations ($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt status with the IRS.

The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations where we have not received written confirmation of

compliance. To SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate.

While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who approach us with offers to donate.

International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.

Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate.

Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg™ electronic works

Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg™ concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and distributed Project Gutenberg™ eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.

Project Gutenberg™ eBooks are often created from several printed editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.

Most people start at our website which has the main PG search facility: www.gutenberg.org.

This website includes information about Project Gutenberg™, including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary

Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.