[FREE PDF sample] Managing and measuring performance in public and nonprofit organizations an integr

Page 1


Managing and

Performance in Public and Nonprofit Organizations

An Integrated Approach 2nd Edition

Visit to download the full and correct content document: https://textbookfull.com/product/managing-and-measuring-performance-in-public-andnonprofit-organizations-an-integrated-approach-2nd-edition-theodore-h-poister/

More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant download maybe you interests ...

Managing Human Behavior in Public and Nonprofit Organizations Robert B. Denhardt

https://textbookfull.com/product/managing-human-behavior-inpublic-and-nonprofit-organizations-robert-b-denhardt/

Cases and Concepts in Comparative Politics An Integrated Approach First Edition Patrick H. O'Neil

https://textbookfull.com/product/cases-and-concepts-incomparative-politics-an-integrated-approach-first-editionpatrick-h-oneil/

Strategic Leadership and Management in Nonprofit Organizations: Theory and Practice 2nd Edition Martha Golensky

https://textbookfull.com/product/strategic-leadership-andmanagement-in-nonprofit-organizations-theory-and-practice-2ndedition-martha-golensky/

Public Policy Analysis: An Integrated Approach William N. Dunn

https://textbookfull.com/product/public-policy-analysis-anintegrated-approach-william-n-dunn/

The new public health 3rd Edition Theodore H Tulchinsky

https://textbookfull.com/product/the-new-public-health-3rdedition-theodore-h-tulchinsky/

Change Management in Nonprofit Organizations: Theory and Practice Kunle Akingbola

https://textbookfull.com/product/change-management-in-nonprofitorganizations-theory-and-practice-kunle-akingbola/

Pilates Conditioning for Athletes An Integrated Approach to Performance and Recovery 1 edition Edition Amy Lademann

https://textbookfull.com/product/pilates-conditioning-forathletes-an-integrated-approach-to-performance-andrecovery-1-edition-edition-amy-lademann/

Conservation and management of tropical rainforests an integrated approach to sustainability 2nd Edition Bruenig

https://textbookfull.com/product/conservation-and-management-oftropical-rainforests-an-integrated-approach-tosustainability-2nd-edition-bruenig/

Managing the Public s Trust in Non profit Organizations 1st Edition Christopher D.B. Burt

https://textbookfull.com/product/managing-the-public-s-trust-innon-profit-organizations-1st-edition-christopher-d-b-burt/

MANAGING AND MEASURING PERFORMANCE IN PUBLIC AND NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS

MANAGING AND MEASURING PERFORMANCE IN PUBLIC AND NONPROFIT

ORGANIZATIONS

An Integrated

Approach

Second edition

Theodore H. Poister

Maria P. Aristigueta

Jeremy L. Hall

Cover design by Wiley Cover image: © iStock.com / aleksandarvelasevic

Copyright © 2015 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved.

Published by Jossey-Bass

A Wiley Brand

One Montgomery Street, Suite 1200, San Francisco, CA 94104-4594—www.josseybass.com

No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, 978-750-8400, fax 978-646-8600, or on the Web at www.copyright.com. Requests to the publisher for permission should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, 201-748-6011, fax 201-748-6008, or online at www.wiley.com/go/permissions.

Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: While the publisher and author have used their best efforts in preparing this book, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this book and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. No warranty may be created or extended by sales representatives or written sales materials. The advice and strategies contained herein may not be suitable for your situation. You should consult with a professional where appropriate. Neither the publisher nor author shall be liable for any loss of profit or any other commercial damages, including but not limited to special, incidental, consequential, or other damages. Readers should be aware that Internet Web sites offered as citations and/or sources for further information may have changed or disappeared between the time this was written and when it is read.

Jossey-Bass books and products are available through most bookstores. To contact Jossey-Bass directly call our Customer Care Department within the U.S. at 800-956-7739, outside the U.S. at 317-572-3986, or fax 317-572-4002.

Wiley publishes in a variety of print and electronic formats and by print-on-demand. Some material included with standard print versions of this book may not be included in e-books or in print-on-demand. If this book refers to media such as a CD or DVD that is not included in the version you purchased, you may download this material at http://booksupport.wiley.com. For more information about Wiley products, visit www.wiley.com.

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

Poister, Theodore H.

[Measuring performance in public and nonprofit organizations]

Managing and measuring performance in public and nonprofit organizations: an integrated approach / Theodore H. Poister, Maria P. Aristigueta, Jeremy L. Hall. – Second edition. pages cm

Revised edition of Poister’s Measuring performance in public and nonprofit organizations. Includes bibliographical references and index.

ISBN 978-1-118-43905-0 (hardback)

1. Organizational effectiveness–Measurement. 2. Organizational effectiveness–Management.

3. Nonprofit organizations. 4. Public administration. 5. Performance–Measurement.

6. Performance–Management I. Aristigueta, Maria Pilar II. Hall, Jeremy L. III. Title. HD58.9.P65 2015

658.4’013–dc23 2014021079

Printed in the United States of America

second edition

HB Printing 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

PART 1: INTRODUCTION TO PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT 1

1 Introduction to Performance Management and Measurement 3

2 Developing Effective Performance Management Systems 35

PART 2: METHODOLOGICAL ELEMENTS OF PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT 51

3 Developing a Performance Framework: Program Logic Models and Performance Measures 53

4 Targeting Results: Clarifying Goals and Objectives 88

5 Defining Performance Indicators 112

6 Reporting Performance Data 155

7 Analyzing Performance Information 175

To my wonderful granddaughters, Susannah Grace and Caroline Elizabeth Tusher Who light up my life and make it all the more worthwhile.—Ted Poister

To my husband, Don Coons, For his unwavering love, patience, and support.—Maria Aristigueta

To my niece, Kadence Olivia Dick, Who brightens each day and always motivates me to perform at my best.—Jeremy L. Hall

PREFACE

This is the second edition of Measuring Performance in Public and Nonprofit Organizations, a sole-authored book published in 2003. Over the intervening ten years, the emphasis on performance management in government has grown tremendously, and in the eyes of both its champions and its critics, it is clear that public and nonprofit organizations are operating in an era of performance. Performance management systems, which set clear goals and objectives and use systematic performance information to manage more effectively in order to achieve them, are ubiquitous in government at all levels in the United States and many other countries, and the adoption of such systems has proliferated rapidly in the nonprofit sector as well.

If the missions and goals of public and nonprofit organizations are worthwhile—if they indeed add public value to the societies and communities they serve—then performance is of paramount importance. And it is important to understand that high levels of performance do not just occur on their own, and there are many barriers to improving performance in most settings. Numerous stakeholders have a vested interest in performance management, including legislative bodies, other elected officials, chief executive officers, managers and employees, agencies in higher levels of government, customers and constituents, and relevant professional organizations. In the nonprofit sector, boards of directors,

administrators, managers, employees, volunteers, customers and clients, advocacy groups, and funding organizations all have a stake in the effective use of performance measures to improve decisions, manage more effectively, and improve performance and accountability.

While the adoption of performance measurement systems has been pervasive in the public and nonprofit sectors, however, they are not always well conceived and constructed, these systems may not be used, and they are often not integrated into management and decision systems effectively. Moreover, the jury is still out regarding the extent to which performance management systems actually make a difference and help contribute to improved program and agency performance. It is not at all surprising, then, that performance management is a dominant topic in the current literature and research in the field of public management as well as in professional graduate education programs preparing students for careers as leaders in the public service.

The purpose of this book is not to promote performance management but rather to help readers understand what performance management systems are and how they function, and to design and implement them effectively. Although the title has been changed from the first edition to emphasize the broader focus on performance management itself rather than performance measurement as the central element of the process and two coauthors have been added, this book still bears a strong connection to the first edition in terms of approach, orientation, and organization. All chapters have been revised and updated extensively to reflect the substantial evolution and expansion of the field over the past ten years, the current context within which performance management is conducted, and newer approaches and practices aimed at making the enterprise more effective.

The organization of the book is similar to that of the first edition. The two chapters in part 1 introduce the field and provide an overview of the process for developing useful performance management systems. The five chapters in part 2 focus on the methodology of performance measurement in terms of developing performance frameworks, tying measures to goals and objectives, redefining performance measures as operational performance indicators, reporting performance data, and analyzing performances. The chapters in part 3 discuss the development and application of performance management principles in a variety of decision-making venues, including strategic planning and management, performance-informed budgeting, the management of programs and organizations, quality and process improvement, and comparative

performance measurement and benchmarking. In addition, two new chapters have been added to this section, focusing on performance-based contracts and grants management and the stakeholder engagement processes. Part 4 concludes the book with a single summary chapter that discusses the design and implementation of effective performance management systems.

As with the first edition, this book is written with two audiences in mind. Although it is not explicitly designed as a textbook, it works well as a text or supplemental reading for primarily graduate courses in planning, public policy, and program evaluation, in addition to public and nonprofit management that have a performance-based orientation. It is also designed to serve as a resource to provide guidance for managers, professional staff, consultants, and others in designing and implementing effective performance management systems. The response to the first edition over the past ten years seems to indicate that it was useful for both the academic and practitioner communities, and we hope that will be the case with this edition as well.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Many people have contributed directly or indirectly to this book by providing opportunities for me to develop performance management systems, allowing access to existing systems, or serving as mentors by sharing with me their knowledge and experiences regarding the design, implementation, and use of performance measures to manage more effectively. These individuals, many of them long-time friends, include the late Thomas D. Larson, former secretary of transportation in Pennsylvania and former administrator of the Federal Highway Administration; the late Richard H. Harris Jr., director of the Center for Performance Excellence in the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT); Joe Robinson Jr., former director of PennDOT’s Performance Improvement and Metrics Division; David Margolis, director of the Bureau of Fiscal Management at PennDOT; William E. Nichols Jr., general manager of River Valley Transit (RVT) in Williamsport, Pennsylvania; Kevin Kilpatrick, planning and grants administrator at RVT; James Lyle, former director of business process improvement at the Georgia Department of Administrative Services and executive director of Georgia Public Television; Gerald Gillette, former principal operations analyst in the Office of Child Support Enforcement of the Georgia Department of Human Resources; the late Terry Lathrop, former deputy director of the City of Charlotte, North Carolina, Department of Transportation; the late Patrick Manion, former deputy

Acknowledgments

city manager of Phoenix, Arizona; Stuart Berman, former chief of the Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch, Division of STD Prevention of the US Centers for Disease Control; Earl Mahfuz, former treasurer of the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT); Jim Davis, former director of strategic development at GDOT; Amy DeGroff, program evaluation team leader, and Janet Royalty, data manager, at the Division of Cancer Prevention and Control at the Centers for Disease Prevention, and Kristy Joseph, unit manager in the Division of GLobal Health Protection at the Centers for Disease Control; Joey Ridenour, executive director of the Arizona State Board of Nursing; and Lindsey Erickson, project manager at the National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN), and all the members of the CORE Committee at NCSBN. I have enjoyed working with all these people and appreciate all I have learned from them regarding performance management.

In addition, numerous students in the master’s program in public administration at Georgia State University over the years, as well as participants in numerous professional development programs I have conducted for the Evaluators’ Institute in San Francisco, Chicago, Atlanta, Toronto, and Washington, DC, have provided insight regarding problems, challenges, and strategies for success in working with performance measures. I have also enjoyed and benefited from collaborating with good friends John Thomas and David Van Slyke, a colleague and former colleague at Georgia State, respectively, as well as former and current graduate students at Georgia State, including Lauren Edwards, Obed Pasha, Anita Berryman, and Robert Weishan, on a number of performance management–related projects. I wish them all well in their future endeavors in this area.

Finally, I express my sincere appreciation for Maria Aristigueta and Jeremy Hall, who have joined me in writing this second edition. I marvel at their heroic efforts in meeting demanding deadlines, lacking the head start that I had with this project, and, more important, their fresh perspective and differing orientations, exposures, and insights have made many meaningful contributions to this edition. I have enjoyed working with them both, and I look forward to the prospect of further collaboration with them on performance management or related topics in the future.

August 2014

Ted Poister Alpharetta, Georgia

Acknowledgments xv

I am deeply grateful to Ted Poister for the opportunity to collaborate with him on the second edition of this book. He is a wonderful role model for those of us interested in performance and a wealth of knowledge. He is also exemplary in bridging the theory-practice divide so important to the advancement of this field. In addition, Ted Poister and Jeremy Hall are a pleasure to work with.

In the early 1990s, I was fortunate to have Joseph Wholey as a professor and dissertation adviser at the University of Southern California. Because he is firm believer in the use of performance for program improvement and a leader in the field of performance management, I benefited greatly from the chance to work with him. Like Ted, he saw great value in practice and considered it the laboratory for the field.

I am also indebted to my colleagues and staff at the University of Delaware who provide the environment and encouragement for excellence every step of the way. I am particularly grateful to the graduate students in my performance management course who have participated in case studies and contributed to my knowledge of current practices in the field. I have especially benefited from the assistance from Lorelly Solano, Christopher Kelly, and William Morrett.

Finally, I express gratitude to my family for their patience as I spent many weekends and evenings writing to meet the tight deadlines for this book. I am particularly grateful to my husband, Don Coons, for his unwavering love and support and to whom I dedicate my contributions to this book.

August 2014 Maria P. Aristigueta Newark, Delaware

I express my sincere gratitude to a number of individuals who shaped my interest in performance management and have facilitated my work along the way. Of particular note, Ed Jennings (University of Kentucky Martin School) helped me to develop my first analytical framework from the performance perspective. I also extend thanks to Merl Hackbart, also at the Martin School, for providing me with a solid foundation in public budgeting; although I may not use it as often as I would like, that background certainly came in handy on this project. I owe a debt of gratitude to my dean, Marc Holzer, for supporting this endeavor and, more important, allowing me the opportunity to carry my interests in performance management into the classroom. I thank Michael Hail for introducing me

Acknowledgments

to the world of grant management in 1998 and working with me to develop those skills over the fifteen years since then. And I thank my family for their enduring support during many long nights and weekends as this project came together. Most of all, I appreciate Ted Poister for being a supportive voice in the field for those of us who study performance issues and for allowing me the opportunity to join him and Maria Aristigueta on this project.

August 2014

L. Hall Science Hill, Kentucky

PART ONE

INTRODUCTION TO PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT

Performance management—the process of defining, monitoring, and using objective indicators of the performance of organizations and programs to inform management and decision making on a regular basis—is of vital concern to managers in government and the nonprofit sector. The chapters in part 1 discuss the scope and evolution of performance management in these fields and locate it in the context of results-oriented approaches to management. They also convey the variety of purposes that can be served by measurement systems and a sense of why performance management is so important. A crucial point made in part 1 is that performance measurement systems are usually not stand-alone systems. Rather, they are essential to support and strengthen other management and decision-making processes, such as planning, budgeting, the management of organizations and employees, program management, process improvement, grants and contract management, and comparative benchmarking. Thus, it is imperative for system designers to clarify a system’s intended uses at the outset and to tailor the system to serve those needs. These chapters also discuss the limitations of performance management systems, as well as the challenges and difficulties inherent in developing them, and they present a holistic process for designing and implementing effective performance measurement systems.

CHAPTER ONE

INTRODUCTION TO PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT AND MANAGEMENT

Performance management focuses organizations on results through the use of performance information in various decision-making venues. The practice of performance management had its origin in the early twentieth century, and through sporadic and varied implementation efforts, it has appeared in numerous permutations in a variety of settings at the municipal, state, and national levels. In spite of this lengthy history, it has been only since the 1980s that performance management has evolved into a burgeoning field of practice that permeates public and nonprofit administration at all levels and locations around the globe. It has been said that performance is pervasive (Radin, 2006), and that is a fair assessment. This book sets out to provide a clear understanding of the concept and practice of performance management in modern governance, which incorporates the current reality that public goods and services are provided by public, nonprofit, and private organizations and various combinations of these.

The scope of performance management is wide. It has become a central part of governance and decision making at all levels of government— domestic and international—and has begun to permeate nonprofit practice as well. Carolyn Heinrich (2007) refers to the rise of performance management as follows: “The rise of the development of performance management systems and practices has been nothing short of meteoric; both nationally and locally, performance management

is now a goal or function of most governmental and nongovernmental organizations, and in many countries, legislation and cabinet-level entities have been created to support it” (256).

To extend our understanding, we first situate performance management within the broader field of public management, the implementation side of the public policy process. It is carried out by public servants in local, state, and federal governments in the United States and other governments around the globe. Public management encompasses the work of the bureaucracy, and as such it has increased in size and scope over time. The Progressive movement of the 1920s heralded an era of professional government based on rational principles. One manifestation of that shift was the development of the federal civil service system. The social, economic, and environmental policy programs of the 1960s expanded the scope of public management again. Now government has given way to the broader concept of governance, which takes into account the fact that public goods and services are increasingly delivered by third parties, including private sector firms, other levels of government, and nonprofit organizations (Frederickson & Frederickson, 2006).

Throughout these periods, there have been numerous reform efforts grounded in rationality—attempts to make government decisions and administration less political, and less subjective, through the use of objective decision strategies. Deborah Stone (1997) referred to this as the government rationality movement. But each rationality-based approach could also be viewed as reform oriented, intended to better hold bureaucrats accountable. Program evaluation, zero-based budgeting, strategic planning, and, of course, performance measurement all offer examples of such rationality-oriented reform strategies, though this is only a partial list. As Dubnick and Frederickson (2011) observed, there has been undue emphasis on implementing new reform strategies without sufficient attention to their potential problems. Romzek (2000) tells us that new reform strategies always introduce new accountability requirements that are added to, rather than replace, the old ones. Moynihan (2008) reflects on the relative ease associated with adopting performance measurement symbolically without the substantive commitment necessary to bring about the expected results. Adding a new layer of accountability expectations on top of existing systems without consideration for the integration of the new systems with the old creates myriad complex and confusing accountability expectations for those charged with implementing them. As one such reform strategy, performance measurement has at times fallen victim to the same pressures as other reform efforts.

In recent years, we have begun to develop a better understanding of what is necessary for performance measurement to generate the results it has promised. We distinguish between performance measurement and performance management in the literature and in practice. Performance measurement refers to the collection of data on key performance indicators; it is a relatively simple exercise, though practice has shown it to be difficult for governments with low technical capacity and stakeholder support (Berman & Wang, 2000) and difficult to implement under conditions of goal multiplicity or confusion (Koppell, 2005). Performance management refers to a strategic daily use of performance information by managers to correct problems before they manifest in performance deficiencies. Moynihan (2008), in a seminal investigation into performance measurement efforts at the state level, introduced the performance management doctrine, which offers three salient indicators of the sophistication of a performance measurement effort that characterize a shift from simple performance measurement to performance management: movement away from output measures toward outcome measures, the use of performance information in decision making, and the devolution of discretion to street level managers in exchange for responsibility for agency performance.

The challenge of performance management is thus to demonstrate outcomes resulting from the resources that the program, agency, or organization has consumed to appropriate managers, stakeholders, clients, and citizens. Performance management also strives to improve performance over time by using performance information to identify and correct deficiencies in the production process. The exact users of performance information vary from setting to setting, and so will their information needs, as we will see throughout the book. This implies that performance management systems need to be custom designed according to the purposes they serve. Over time, performance measurement has become further integrated into decision making, with data collected at various points suited to providing meaningful reports to support these purposes at the appropriate times. Poister (2010) advocates for three overlapping transitions: from strategic planning to strategic management, from performance measurement to performance management, and from using such tools independently toward better integration of strategic management and performance management.

As we explore the mechanics of performance management in detail, a number of questions from public management practice and research help to structure our understanding of performance management:

• How does performance management fit within understood accountability frameworks?

• How extensively has performance management been implemented at various levels of government?

• What factors explain when and where performance management is adopted?

• Under what conditions is performance management effective?

• What is the relationship between capacity and performance, and what forms of organizational capacity are necessary to implement performance management effectively?

• What special conditions affect the use of performance management in networked or intergovernmental settings where authority is shared and goal ambiguity exists?

And, of course, the most important question in this field of study is this:

• Does performance management actually improve performance?

Public Management, Performance Management, and Accountability

This chapter introduces the concept of performance management and situates it within the broader field of public management. In the balance of this chapter, we review the history of the development of performance management from its origins to the present. We discuss the current state of performance management in both government and nonprofit sectors and the characteristics that have come to be associated with effective performance management in those settings. We explore the limitations of performance management; present a brief assessment of the major questions that currently motivate research in the field; and conclude the chapter with a quick synopsis of the significant applications of performance management in practice, such as budgeting and grant and contract management.

Performance Measurement and Performance Management Defined

Performance measurement has been defined by several notable scholars. Hatry (2006) considers performance measurement to consist of “regular measurement of the results (outcomes) and efficiency of services or programs” (2006, 3). Poister defined it as the “process of defining,

monitoring, and using objective indicators of the performance of organizations and programs on a regular basis” (2008, 1). We adopt the following definition of performance measurement in this book: performance measurement is the systematic, orderly collection of quantitative data along a set of key indicators of organizational (or program) performance. The advancement to performance management requires expanding our definition to the following: performance management is the collection and purposive use of quantitative performance information to support management decisions that advance the accomplishment of organizational (or program) strategic goals.

The performance management framework organizes institutional thinking strategically toward key performance goals and strives to orient decision making toward greater use of performance information to stimulate improvement. This is an ongoing cycle of key organizational management processes, all of which interact in meaningful ways with performance measurement. Our conceptual framework is based on ongoing interplay among performance measurement and reporting, strategic planning and other types of planning, budgeting, ongoing management, and performance measurement and reporting, as shown in figure 1.1.

FIGURE 1.1 THE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK

• Engaging Stakeholders

• Clarifying Mission, Vision, and Strategy

• Setting Goals and Objectives

• Planning Programs, Projects, and Service Delivery Systems Planning

Budgeting

• Analyzing Efficiency and CostEffectiveness Measures

• Comparing Alternative Investments

• Allocating Resources

Performance Measurement and Reporting

Evaluation Management

• Analyzing Performance and Identifying Performance Issues

• Undertaking In-Depth Program

Evaluations, Quality Improvement

Efforts, Management and Budget

Analyses, Evidence-Based Research, and Policy Analyses as Needed

• Managing People, Organizations, and Programs for Results

• Promoting Performance through Networks

• Developing a Performance Culture

Performance measurement and reporting is the central element in the performance management model and is the unique feature that defines it as a performance-based approach to managing. Key sets of measures of agency and program performance are observed at periodic intervals and reported to appropriate managers or other decision makers in order to inform the planning, budgeting, management, and evaluation functions from a performance perspective. In addition, these other functions influence the performance measurement process, and thus the linkages between performance measurement and these other functions are all bidirectional.

At a strategic level, planning engages and solicits feedback from stakeholders, clarifies an agency’s mission and vision, establishes strategic goals and objectives, and develops strategic initiatives. Within the framework of strategy that is developed, or even in its absence, other efforts develop plans for programs, projects, service delivery systems, and organizational processes. In a performance management framework, all of these planning activities are informed by data produced by ongoing performance measurement processes that provide information regarding current performance trends and current levels. In turn, the planning activities often identify performance measures needed to monitor goal attainment and the kinds of results that plans are designed to produce, and these measures are likely to become part of ongoing performance measurement processes.

Budgeting concerns the allocation of resources to fund programmatic activities and organizational processes. These decisions tend to be based on a mix of policy preferences, idealism, tradition, and political realities, but in a performance management mode, they are also informed, perhaps even influenced, by performance information relating resources to be expended to the results expected to be produced. Thus, performanceoriented budgeting is more likely to take efficiency and cost-effectiveness measures into account in comparing alternative investment packages and allocating resources with an eye toward the amount of products or services to be delivered or the results or outcomes to be produced. Budget decisions along these lines also influence the kinds of indicators that are emphasized in performance measurement systems.

The management component of figure 1.1 focuses on the implementation and management of strategies, programs, projects, services, and new initiatives on an ongoing basis. In a performance context, this emphasizes managing, motivating, and incentivizing people, organization units, and programs with an eye toward achieving desired results. This approach

to management is also more likely to emphasize the development and maintenance of performance-oriented organization cultures and, where appropriate, promote performance orientations and approaches through extended networks on which producing desired results depends. Such management approaches may suggest additional kinds of performance indicators regarding employee productivity, quality, organization climate, or customer service, for example, to be monitored on a regular basis.

Finally, the evaluation component of the model focuses principally on analyzing the performance data being reported, identifying performance issues, and assessing their implications for improving performance. However, at times other types of evaluative effort are required. Sometimes assessments based on the performance data and other information suggest the need to undertake more in-depth evaluative activity, such as formal program evaluations, quality or process improvement studies, management and budget analyses, policy analyses, or evidence-based research. While the information generated by the more routine performance measurement and reporting processes certainly feeds into and informs program evaluations and these other more in-depth evaluative efforts, the latter may well suggest additions to or revisions in the indicators monitored through the ongoing performance measurement process.

Although the performance management model shown in figure 1.1 constitutes a conceptual cycle of activities and decision making, it is not intended to represent steps in a process that follow one another in regular cycles over time. Rather, as a report by the National Performance Management Advisory Commission (2010) points out, the processes included in the model operate on different time lines with planning on a long-term basis (perhaps two to five or more years), budgeting focusing on one or two years, ongoing management operating on a day-to-day basis, and many evaluation efforts undertaken sporadically. And performance measurement and reporting processes typically focus on regular weekly, monthly, quarterly, or annual intervals. Nevertheless, while it can be messy, performance management can be held together by the measurement and reporting function at the center of the model, coupled with a disciplined approach to aligning plans, budgets, management practices, and evaluation activities around common goals and objectives and their accompanying performance measures.

When the adoption of performance measurement and management is substantive and not simply symbolic, the purpose of these practices is rather straightforward. Performance measurement strives to document the level of performance achieved during a specified period of time using

measures (and indicators) selected to reflect the purposes of the performance measurement effort. In other words, performance measurement might track inputs, activity levels, outputs, or outcomes; it might use measures of efficiency, effectiveness, equity, cost-effectiveness, or customer satisfaction, for example; and it might be collected to inform internal audiences such as employees or managers or external audiences that include political principals and stakeholder groups. The purpose of performance measurement determines the set of measures and indicators selected, as well as the timing of data collection, the methods of analysis to be used, and the reporting formats and frequencies. Performance management is the strategic use of this performance information in management decision making to maximize key organizational goals through a variety of decision-making areas, including management, budgeting, personnel, contracts, and quality and process improvement. Through informed decisions about common management functions, including staffing and budgeting, for example, performance management allows managers to right the course as deviations are detected that may jeopardize expected performance levels. A good performance management system relies on the collection of valid, reliable, and timely performance information; direction of that information to appropriate users at appropriate times with appropriate discretion to act; and the use of that information to make changes, minor or major, using the tools at their disposal.

The most common goals of performance measurement and management are to reduce costs (increase efficiency), increase effectiveness (or cost-effectiveness), maintain equity, and deliver high-quality products that are met with high levels of customer satisfaction. At a deeper level, the purposes may include accountability to citizens, justifying increased resources, and political and popular support, among others. Deeper still, the goal may be to remain competitive with benchmark cities, attract residents and businesses, and portray the image of a progressive community with a high quality of life.

The first edition of this book referred primarily to performance measurement, because that was the state of the art at that time. Now the field has evolved into a more sophisticated, more strategic approach to management, making the term performance management more applicable. Moynihan (2008) describes what he calls the performance management doctrine, which has three primary components that distinguish it from simple performance measurement. Let’s begin there: performance measurement is

the quantitative tracking of agency or program performance, usually accompanied by a reporting effort to either internal users or to the public. Moynihan (2008) indicates that performance management must evolve from this point of origin by (1) shifting from a focus on outputs—the direct results of agency activities—toward a focus on outcomes—the end result of the agency’s actions on its goals; (2) developing a culture where performance information is used to inform agency decision making, not simply collected in a separate process; and (3) devolving decision-making discretion to frontline managers in exchange for responsibility for outcomes. To summarize, performance management refers to the integration of performance information with other management processes, including human resources, budgeting, and general management.

Performance information is useful to determine what an organization has done with the resources it has been given in a particular period of time, linking it closely with the responsiveness dimension of accountability. Over time our ability to measure and track performance has improved and become increasingly sophisticated. We examine the details of these improvements later in the book, but this refers generally to the exercise of metrics that consider outcomes and impacts rather than inputs and outputs, and engage in comparison and analysis against past performance and peers.

While most of the early literature on performance measurement was largely descriptive or conceptual (Altman, 1979; Hatry, 1980; Poister, 1982, 1983), a number of more recent books and articles examine the performance movement in depth. These writers can be generally organized into three groups: the proponents (such as Wholey & Hatry, 1992; Behn, 2003), the pragmatists (such as Moynihan, 2008; Frederickson & Frederickson, 2006), and the skeptics (Radin, 2006, for example). A limited number of studies examine the effectiveness of performance measurement or management efforts on actual performance levels. This more recent literature has mixed findings, as we discuss in chapter 15.

Public Management and Performance Management

Public management refers broadly to the management of public organizations to achieve public purposes. The field of practice and study has shifted over time with prominent changes in public bureaucratic institutions through the establishment of a series of new traditions of public management, including strategic planning, performance management,

Another random document with no related content on Scribd:

performed according to custom shortly after birth, unless possibly it had been prearranged for Liloa’s act of recognition ↑

To use Kaili, the inherited war god of his father Liloa, as a fish deity, by Umi, seems an unusually degrading act ↑

The appearance of a rainbow was held to indicate a person of high rank in its vicinity, and to be identified by a black pig was conclusive evidence beyond dispute Even Kalakaua is said to have resorted to this means for identifying royal remains when he endeavored to locate the bones of certain ancient aliis ↑

A Hawaiian Cardinal Wolsey ↑

To test for royal care of the usually favored priestly order ↑

An insight is given here of the ancient custom of entertaining distinguished guests. ↑

Illustrative of the solicitous expression “Ola na iwi, ” bones are preserved ↑

The Hawaiian umu, or imu, oven, was made on the ground as required, by heated stones forming a mound over the various articles of food placed on a leaf-lined base of hot rocks and covered in like manner, over all which a mantle of earth was thrown to keep in the heat and steam ↑

A customary greeting on the meeting of long-separated friends or relatives ↑

Meaning, the die is cast, his doom is sealed ↑

Waning days of the moon, twenty-first to twenty-sixth; Kane followed, the twenty-seventh, then Lono; nights of special temple services ↑

E kauila ko akua implies a temple ceremony in which the principal god is readorned with feathers; in this case Hakau’s deity ↑

The twenty-third of the lunar month ↑

Realizing the trap into which he was led, a surprise so complete that he was unnerved for any resistance, or self-protection ↑

The flat-head ideal of beauty with Hawaiians had reference to a head broad and straight at the base, not flat on the top as might be supposed ↑

Ooki pahupu; lit cut asunder, is here used with a sense of injustice which calls for retaliation, or retribution ↑

A sign to assemble together about the canoe for the capture therefrom of a victim for the altar ↑

The fabulous fish-hook of Maui wherewith he sought to draw the islands together ↑

This friend was Umi’s backer in his surfing contest with Paiea off Laupahoehoe ↑

An unusual procedure, likely of modern interpolation ↑

A not uncommon wager in those days ↑

The channel between the islands of Maui and Hawaii ↑

Malukoi, a season of special temple observance to procure ohia trees for the heiau ↑

Hawaiian rank was held to descend through the mother, not the father, hence the obscure unrecognized rank of Akahiakuleana was the ground for considering Umi as of low birth ↑

An unusual term to apply to Hilo, which has reference to its northerly section ↑

Or companions, Omaokamau, Koi and Piimaiwaa ↑

It is unusual to find a successive family name in early history ↑

In this and following union of close relation is shown the solicitude for the preservation of unalloyed royal blue blood, according to their then standards ↑

Wiliwili, Erythrina monosperma, a light white wood forming the ornament or tongue of the necklace. As this has been known generally of ivory, from sperm whale’s teeth, with variations in shell and in bone, the name palaoa is confusedly applied to all alike as an ivory-tongued necklace This account would imply that palaoa was the name of the peculiar curve-tongued ornament itself, not ivory, the material of which it was formed, though its general use and reference as niho palaoa ivory tooth is responsible therefor ↑

Each of these named games were usually for indulgences in lascivious conduct ↑

Kanoa heiau was located at Puueo, on the northerly bank of the Wailuku river, Hilo; destroyed in recent years ↑

The kaakaua were a class of chiefs consulted by the king in times of difficulty The term implies councilors of war ↑

A variety or species of small fish, Anchovia purpurea ↑

Poupou, rendered here “chubby”, applied as a nickname, hardly agrees with the earlier statement of Umi’s excellent physique, which in one place won him two wives to the one each of his companions ↑

Or grandmothers possessing supernatural powers ↑

“Battle of the god” and “sea of the god,” in the sense of overwhelming ↑

Its account is given in following paper, Kihapiilani ↑

Ahua-a-Umi; collection or memorial of Umi These ruins lie on the great plateau of Hawaii about equally distant from Mauna Loa, Kea and Hualalai, the principal structure being the temple of Kaili, said to have been erected by Umi Three northern pyramids forming the front are also credited to him to represent the districts of the island he then governed, other districts as conquered being obliged each to build similar pyramids on the side of the temple [Wilkes U S Ex Exped 1845, vol IV, p 100 ] Alexander says: “Umi built a remarkable temple, now known as Ahua-a-Umi, which he is said to have occupied as his headquarters. Around this heiau he caused six pyramids of stone fifteen or twenty feet high to be erected, one by each district of the island, besides one for himself ” ↑

Ala is the flint kind of black basalt rock, used for the adze and other native implements ↑

A customary service committed only to one’s most trusted friend Tradition asserts that Umi in his solicitude on this subject said to Koi: “There is no place, nor is there any possible way to conceal my bones You must disappear from my presence I am going to take back all the lands which I have given you around Hawaii, and they will think you in disgrace You will then withdraw to another island, and as soon as you hear of my death, or that I am dangerously ill, return secretly to take away my body ” [Trans from Jules Remy ] ↑

49

It is said that no hardship was considered too great to comply with the trust imposed on a faithful friend for the secret interment of their remains, reduced to a prepared bundle of bones ↑ This indicates its place of concealment as high up in the cliffs ↑

[Contents] K.

K.

CHAPTER I.

T P F:

C M C.

We will here learn of the brothers of Piikea. The first-born of the family was Piilani,1 a boy; the one following after him was Piikea whom we have already been introduced to as the wife of Umi. Following her was Kihapiilani, another boy; and the last of the family was Kalanipiilani, also a boy, who died young. Piilani was the heir to the kingdom of Maui, while his

MOKUNA I.

N O P: M M A.

Maanei e hoomaopopo ai kakou i ko Piikea mau hoahanau; o ka mua o Piilani, he kane ia, o kona muli o Piikea (nona keia olelo ana); o Kihapiilani kona muli iho, he kane, o Kalaniapiilani kona muli iho he kane no, ua make mua nae ia. A o Piilani, ka hooilina aina o Maui, a o kona mau pokii malalo mai ona, oia o Piikea a me Kihapiilani; pela no ka Piilani kauoha ia lakou, aka,

younger brother and sister, Kihapiilani and Piikea, were placed under him. This was the expressed will of Piilani to them, but Piilani disregarded the words of their father

When Piilani came to the throne of all Maui he made his residence at Kauiki in Hana, and there he took his brother to live with him. While living together Piilani did not care for his brother according to the instructions of their father before his death. It was customary with Piilani while eating, or sitting in company, to care more for the others than his brother Kihapiilani. Every time his brother was around he would show a marked degree of hatred towards him, and he evinced his displeasure in many ways.

One day while Piilani was eating with his companions, all strangers, enjoying the good things placed before them, Kihapiilani, although present at the table, was not served with any of the good things; but, in front of him was placed a small calabash containing some small

aole i malama o Piilani ia olelo a ko lakou makuakane.

Ia Piilani e noho ana i ka aina o Maui a puni, noho pu iho la ia me kona kaikaina me Kihapiilani ma Kauiki, ma Hana. Ma keia noho ana, aole malama o Piilani i kona pokii, e like me ke kauoha a ko lakou makuakane, mamua ae o ka wa make. He mea mau ia Piilani, i ka wa ai a me ka wa noho, o ka poe e kana mea oluolu loa, a o kona pokii o Kihapiilani, he mea pono ole i kona manao, a he mea oluolu ole ia ia.

I kekahi la, e ai ana o Piilani me kona mau hoa ai, he poe e wale no, aia i mua o lakou ka ai a me ka ia; a o Kihapiilani hoi kona pokii, aole ana ia e ai ana; aka, aia i mua o kona alo, he ipu ohua, na Piilani; lalau aku la ia elua ohua a ai iho la. Ma keia ai ana a Kihapiilani, ike mai la o

fish. This dish belonged to Piilani. Seeing that this was all there was to be had within reach, he reached into the dish and took out two small fish and ate them. While doing this he was seen by Piilani. Piilani then reached for the dish and held it up in his hand, then asked of Kihapiilani: “Who ate of the fish in this dish?” Kihapiilani replied: “I did, because there was nothing else for me to eat.” Piilani then threw the dish with the fish in it, brine and all, at the forehead of his brother, breaking the dish into pieces and spattering the fish and brine into the eyes of Kihapiilani which blinded him for a while.

Because of this ill treatment by his elder brother, showing no love or respect for him, Kihapiilani got up and secretly ran away to Kalaniwai, a place in Makawao. While there he met a woman belonging to the place and they were united and lived as husband and wife. The people of the place, however, did not know that this was Kihapiilani, the chief, but took

Piilani; lalau mai la ia i ka ipukai ohua a paa i ka lima, ninau mai la o Piilani: “Nawai la i ai iho nei i ka ipukai ohua?” I aku o Kihapiilani: “Na’u no, no ka mea aole a’u ia.” Ia wa kiola o Piilani i ka ipukai ohua, me ke kai o loko a pa i ka lae o Kihapiilani, naha ae la ka ipukai ohua, a paumaele ka maka i ke kai o ka ohua, a wewela loa iho la.

No keia hana ino aloha ole a kona kaikuaana ia ia, hele aku la ia me ka mahuka, a noho ma Kalaniwai ma Makawao. I ko Kihapiilani noho ana ma laila, moe iho la ia ma laila i ka wahine, aole nae lakou i ike o Kihapiilani keia, he ’lii, aka, i ko lakou manao, he kanaka kuaaina loa. Nolaila, olelo na makuahunowai o Kihapiilani, i ka palaualelo, i ka moe wale iho no

him to be a man from the country. While living with his wife’s parents he was often spoken of as a lazy fellow, spending his time sleeping instead of going out to work. When Kihapiilani heard his wife’s parents speak of him [238]as being a lazy fellow, he got up and went down to get potato stalks in the lowlands of Kaluaama at Haiku. Upon his arrival at this place, an old man by the name of Kukuiokaaulani saw him and recognized him as of high rank; so he said to his companion, another old man: “Say, that man that is coming down is either a chief or a priest.” After a while he again remarked: “It must be a chief. If there was but one rainbow, then it would be a priest;2 but since there are two it must surely be a chief.” The two finally decided that the person was a chief, for the fact of the disappearance of Kihapiilani was well known. The two old men then waited for the approach of the stranger. As soon as he came up to them they greeted him, saying: “Our salutation to the chief.”

i ka hale, aole hana. A lohe o Kihapiilani i ka olelo a kona mau makuahunowai, ala ae la ia a iho i ka ako lau uala, ma Kaluaama ma Haiku. [239]A hiki o Kihapiilani i kai, ike mai la kekahi elemakule o Kukuiokaaulani ka inoa, olelo aku la ia i kekahi elemakule e aku: “E! he ’lii paha keia e iho mai nei, he kahuna paha?” I aku o Kukuiokaaulani: “He ’lii. Ina hookahi anuenue, alaila, he kahuna; aka, ina elua, he ’lii.” Ma keia noonoo o laua, ua holo ia laua, he ’lii, a ua lohe ia no hoi ka nalowale ana o Kihapiilani.

Kihapiilani then admonished them, saying: “Be quiet. Since you two have recognized me you must not reveal my identity.”

After this Kihapiilani continued on his way until he came to Kaluaama, where a large patch of sweet potatoes was growing. Kihapiilani then proceeded to pick a quantity of stalks, taking and breaking them from the vines, leaving the hills bare. While he was thus busily picking stalks the owner of the patch arrived, and upon seeing what Kihapiilani was doing he came up to him and began beating him with a stick, but Kihapiilani paid no attention to his beating but kept on picking stalks. After he had picked a quantity sufficient for his purpose he tied them into a large pack, placed the pack on to his back and started for the uplands of Kalaniwai.

When Kihapiilani arrived at the place where the old men were living they asked him: “What is your name?” Kihapiilani replied: “My name is Kihapiilani.” When the old men heard this it

Noho iho la laua a hiki mai la o Kihapiilani, aloha aku la laua: “Aloha ke ’lii.” Hamau aku la o Kihapiilani: “Hamau ko olua mau waha; he nani ia, ua ike iho la olua ia’u, e huna olua ia’u, mai hoike olua.” A pau ka halawai ana me na elemakule, iho aku la keia a hiki i Kaluaama, malaila ka lau uala e ulu ana, ako iho la o Kihapiilani. Ma keia ako ana a Kihapiilani, lalau iho la ia i ka lau o ka pue uala, a pua ae la a paa, apahu ae la, me ke koe ole o kekahi lau uala, no ka pue.

Ia ia e ako ana, hiki mai la ka mea nana ka mala uala, a ike iho la ia, kumakena, hahau mai la ia ia Kihapiilani i ka laau, aole nae ona eueu ae. Hana iho la o Kihapiilani i kana lau uala a

confirmed their guess of the morning. The old men then asked him again: “What is the object of the chief’s journey to these parts?” Kihapiilani replied: “I am seeking for someone to kill my brother Piilani. That is the object of my search.” Kihapiilani then related the incident of the insult which caused Kihapiilani to seek revenge. When the old men heard this they said: “Your older brother is as good as dead; he shall not live. Go to that house whose door is opened toward Waikapu; there you will find our sister, Pao by name. Upon your arrival at the place she will direct you what to do next, then you will gain your object and your older brother will be at your mercy.” Kihapiilani agreed to follow out the advice of the old men and said: “I will go along home and plant my potato stalks: after that has been done, then I will carry out your instructions.”

haawe, hoi aku la i uka o Kalaniwai. A hiki o Kihapiilani i kahi o na wahi elemakule, ninau mai la na elemakule: “Owai kou inoa?” “O Kihapiilani ko’u inoa.” A lohe na elemakule, hoomaopopo iho la laua, ua like loa me ka laua mea i kukakuka ai mamua ae. Ninau hou laua: “Heaha ka huakai nui a ke ’lii o ka hele ana mai?” Wahi a Kihapiilani: “He makaia no kuu kaikuaana no Piilani, o ia ka’u e imi nei.” Hai aku la ke ’lii o Kihapiilani i ka hana a kona kaikuaana.

A lohe na elemakule, i aku la laua ia Kihapiilani: “Ua make ko kaikuaana, aole e ola; aia ka mea e make ai, o keia hale e hamama mai la ka puka i Waikapu. Aia i laila ke kaikuahine o maua, o Pao ka inoa; a hiki oe i laila, nana oe e hai mai i ka mea pono e hana ai, alaila, o ka make ka hoi ia.”

Ma keia mau olelo a na elemakule, ua holo ia i ko ke ’lii manao. I aku la ia i na elemakule: “E hoi au e kanu i kuu lau uala a pau i ke kanu,

We will here set forth the chant composed in honor of Piikea and her brothers.

Kukaipaoa,3 the lofty one is a chief,

A chief of the heavens, a cloud

Of the great heaven is Kumakomako,4

A chief of the rocky cliffs of Kahuku, They are the solid5 chiefs belonging to Lonokaeho.

It was the brow of Lono that was anointed with the milk of the coconut,

That was dedicated with the black6 pig of Kane, The black pig of Lono.

O Lono, here is your royal offspring,

Your leaf, your shoot, your offshoot, your bud, [240]

Your sacred chief, Kihapiilani; Your chiefly offspring who stands in the light.

alaila, hooko au i keia mau olelo a pau loa.” Maanei kakou e ike ai i ka haku ana o ka inoa o Piikea, a me kona mau kaikunane.

Eia ua mele la i haku ia no keia mau alii.

Kukaipaoa ka lani, he ’lii, He ’lii ao lani, he ao-e; He ia mau lani Kumakomako, He lani no Kahuku, pali pohaku, He mau lani pohaku no Lonokaeho.

No Lono ka lae poni ia i ka wai niu,

I haua i ka puaa hiwa a Kane, I ka puaa hiwa a Lono.

E Lono e! eia ko maka lani, Ko lau, ko muo, ko ao, ko liko; [241]

Ko alii kapu o Kihapiilani.

Ko maka e ku ana i ka malama, Malama ia ka lau kapu o Keaka, Ka lau oheohe o Keakamahana, I kupu a kapalulu ka pua, Ka pua oloolo o Hemahema, o Kaikilani;

Nana ia lau oloolo no Kanaloa, No ka ilio hulu pano i ka maka,

Protect thou the sacred bud of Keaka,

The thrifty sprout of Keakamahana

That grew and flowered,

The drooping flower of Hemahema, and Kaikilani,

To whom belonged the drooping leaves of Kanaloa,

Like the black-haired dog7 in whose eye

Blackness dwells in the pupil, With striped marks on the forehead,

Marks of the kikakapu,8

The sacred fish with the bitter gall.

Bitter is the chiefess Keaka,9 Who grew and developed through Keakealani.10

By them was the sacred law broken,

Broken by the product of the great chiefs.

Here is a great district chief standing here; Kauhi is great; it is the foundation of the isles. Keaka is great for she has produced eight.

The seas of her lands are noised on the shoals,11

I noho ka eleele i loko o ka onohi;

He kakau kiko onio i ka lae, Ke kiko o ke ki-kakapu, O ka ia kapu hilia au awahia.

A wahia i lani Keaka wahine, I kupu a mala o Keakealani kane,

Ia laua hai ka haka o ke kapu. Hakahaka i ka momona o na ’lii nui,

He ’lii ku moku aimoku nui hoi nei,

He nui hoi o Kauhi, he hono ko na moku,

He nui hoi Keaka, he awalu i waho,

He kai papa nene ko na aina, He ulu papa kai holo papa no Kahiki,

Hiki o Keawe, ke kupu kia aumoku,

Ka hua hookahi a ka ao i ka lani, Na Kalani, Kalanikauleleiwi.

No Keaka keia lani, na Keawe, Na kela eke hului o Piilani.

I noho o Keawe i o Piilani la, Ahu kooka o na ’lii nui,

He ’lii, he mau alii ka ike ana aku,

He mau lani haele wale iho no; Hele hehi i ka lihi o ka la.

I ka malama hanau o Ikiiki,

As rolling waves from the shoals of Kahiki.

Keawe the great commander has arrived,

The only offspring of the cloud in the heaven

By the chiefess

Kalanikauleleiwi.12

This is Keaka’s chiefly one, by Keawe.

That attraction was Piilani,

For Keawe dwelt at Piilani’s,

The gathering place of great chiefs.

A chief, several chiefs were seen;

They are the chiefs who go idly by,

Walking about until the close of the day.

In the month born of Ikiiki.13

The heaven above is panting [for breath],

The rain for the month is far removed,

Far driven away is the rain.

The earth is suffering as one in travail.

The mountain trembles, the flood gushes with violence; It is indeed stormy for the lands are overturned and floating, The breast of the isle is floating

Ua Ikiiki ka lani i luna,

Ua ui-a ia ka malama,

Ka pili o hoehu ka ua,

Ke iloli nei ka honua,

Naku ka mauna waikahe ino,

Ino ua kahuli lewa na aina,

Ua lawe ka houpo o ka moku,

Ke au o mahele o Kuala,

O Kanaiki o ka moku,

O ka uuina i wawau e,

O na ’lii o ka nuu pule,

O kanaka o ka hale hiwa,

O loko o mana ka moo,

O ka Hina kii o Haloa,

O Kalani oi-oia i apa,

Ke paha ala i kona makemake ia,

A hiki mai ka olelo hoi ana, Ko aupuni la, nana ia,

No Ikiiki, no Kaaona ke ’lii, No Hanaia, no Hinaiaeleele, Nolaila o Piikea, wahine a Umi, Ka Laielohelohe hiapo ia,

A Piilani no i hanau mai.

Hanau o Lonopii, he kane, Hanau o Kihapiilani, he kane,

A Piilani no i hanau ai,

O Kihapiilani, Kalanilonaakea,

Ili kea, malo kea, Malailena a Kihapiilani,

O ua ha ia o Laielohelohe,

Ia lakou ke kae o ke kapu, Ia Kalamaku a Kauhiholua,

On the dividing current of Kuala.

Of Kanaiki of the isle,

For the sound of crackling is heard,

It is the chiefs on the place of prayer,

They are the people of the sacred house

Within the confines of mana,14 the lizard.15

One belonging to Hina, taken by Haloa.

Excellent Kalani, he is being delayed.

Boasting of his being a great favorite

When the word came to him

To take charge of his kingdom, For the chief was of the month of Ikiiki, of Kaaona;

Of Hanaia, of Hinaiaeleele.

Thence came Piikea the wife of Umi,

She was the first-born of Laielohelohe,

Given birth through Piilani. Lonopii16 was born, a male.

Kihapiilani was born, a male, Given birth through Piilani, Kihapiilani, Kalanilonaakea.

[Of] light17 skin [and] white loin cloth.

Kihapiilani shall see bitterness.

Na Kauhiholua, na Lupeikalani,

Na Nalu e hilo i ke aho a Makalii,

Ke aho kaakolu ia i kela ka loa,

Ka maawe lau huna ia o ke ’lii,

I heia i Miloa e Hanauane, [243] Hanau mai o Kuhihewa.

He muli o Kaihikapu a Kuhihewa,

O Kaihikapu ili manoa, Ili pepee, pepee i ke kapu,

Ka ili pee ku-e o ke ’lii o Mano,

No Mano ili oi, ili kalakala,

Ke kalakala o ka lau ea pu,

Ke kalakala o ka ia ili ee,

Ka ili e, o Mano, lae pohaku,

Ka ulu a Mano, a Mano no,

He mau puha ia na Mano,

Na laua o Nohoamakalii,

Noho o Mano, moe ia

Pulanaieie, Kalanipiilani kana keiki, He niu kaukahi na Manookalanipo.

He mau lani olu iho no ka maka, I luna wale nei-e lili nei la.

Lili ka ua i ka Makalii, Puehu i ke kula o Kailo, Lulana i Hauoa Keawe, Kakaulua i ke ala wela, Hiki loa i o olua ka lai ua malie, Ua luhea ka iki o Puna,

O Puna maka inaina, Ke kahu hoi o Kahinanalo,

There were four from Laielohelohe;18

They possessed the border19 of the tabu

Of Kalamaku, of Kauhiholua, Of Kauhiholua, of Lupeikalani. It was Nalu that spun the fishline of Makalii,20

The fish-line of three strands which excels in length.

The chief is like a hidden strand Which was caught at Miloa by Hanauane. [242] Kuhihewa21 was then born. Kaihikapu22 of Kuhihewa was the younger, Kaihikapu with the thick skin, Crackled skin23 crackled by the kapus.

The thick, ugly skin of the chief Mano,24

Mano, of the sharp skin, the rough skin,

Like the roughness of the pumpkin leaf

Like the roughness of the roughskinned fish,

The peculiar skin of Mano, he of the hard forehead.25

The seed of Mano, belonging to Mano

Is the loin product of Mano. Together with Nohoamakalii,26

Moku o Ohikihokolio, Ho a e ia no kuu lani, No ka ohiki; kau ka oli e, Ke ’lii loa la malama ia.

Mano lived and cohabited with Pulanaieie;27

Kalanipiilani28 was his child

The only offspring29 of Manookalanipo.30

The eyes are like two kindly chiefs

Who are haughty in their lofty position.

The light showers of the summer

Were scattered31 on the plain of Kailo.

Calmness is seen at Hauoa of Keawe,

Gathering on the heated road. The calm and clearness have reached you two.

Drooping is the diminutive of Puna,

Puna of the angry eyes,

The guardian of Kahinanalo

The isle of Ohikihokolio, Previously secured for my chief; For the sand crab;32 let joy prevail,

The long-lived chief, watch over him.

[A word is here necessary in reference to the composition of this mele. The history of the kings of Maui is mentioned in this chant and the composition of

[Olelo hoakaka: maloko o keia mele i haku ia, ua komo no ka moolelo o ko Maui mau alii, a ua pili no hoi ka haku ana i na ’lii o Maui.]

it was made solely for the Maui kings.]

We will now continue with the story of Kihapiilani.

At the close of the conversation between the old men and Kihapiilani, he continued on his way to the uplands of Kalaniwai, where he began planting his potato stalks. For some time Kihapiilani devoted his whole time to the cultivation of his fields, until his season of want was finally passed, for he felt bitterly the shame and insult shown him by his wife’s parents when he was called a lazy fellow. When the potatoes were at last matured he turned them over to his wife and her parents.

Ma keia kakau ana, e olelo hou ia ka olelo maanei no Kihapiilani. A pau ka olelo a na elemakule ia Kihapiilani, hoi aku la ia a hiki mauka o Kalaniwai, kanu iho la i kana mala uala. Pela o Kihapiilani i hoomanawanui iho ai i ka mahiai, a hala ke kau o ka pilikia, no ka mea, he hilahila kona i na makuahunowai i ke amuamu ia ia i ka palaualelo. A oo ka uala, haawi aku la ia i ka wahine, a me na makuahunowai.

CHAPTER II.

R K.

MOKUNA II.

N K.

We will now see how Kihapiilani Maanei e maopopo ai ko

made the search for the one to avenge the insult given him by his unkind brother, Piilani.

After Kihapiilani had spoken to his wife relative to the field of potatoes, he said to her: “My wife, I am going away and shall leave you. I have labored patiently in the cultivation and care of these fields until they are ripened. You will eat the fruit of our labor.” The wife replied: “Are you going away for good, then, and are you not coming back again?” The husband replied: “Yes, I am not coming back for [244]a summer and a winter. If you have husband-regard, remain husbandless until my return.” When the wife heard this she held Kihapiilani back and refused to allow him to go. Because of this stubbornness on his wife’s part he told her everything concerning himself in order to overcome her opposition, so he said: “My wife, I am now going to reveal certain things to you which you must not repeat, and I also urge upon you not to reveal my name. I am Kihapiilani; I am going in search

Kihapiilani imi ana i makaia nona, e paio ai me kona kaikuaana lokoino, me Piilani.

Mahope o ka Kihapiilani olelo i ka wahine no ka mala uala, olelo aku la ia i kana wahine, penei: “E kuu wahine, e hele ana wau, haalele au ia oe, he nani ia, ua mahi iho la au i ka ai a oo, nau no e ai ka luhi o kaua.” I mai ka wahine: “O kou hele no keia hele loa, aole oe e hoi mai ana?” Ae aku la ke kane: “Ae, aole au e hoi mai, a kau, a hooilo; ina he manao kane kou, e noho kane ole oe a hoi mai au.” Ma keia mau olelo a Kihapiilani, aua loa iho la kana wahine, me ka ae ole e hele. No ka ikaika loa o ka aua o ka wahine, nolaila, hai aku la o Kihapiilani i mea e pau ai kona aua ana. Olelo aku la ia: “E kuu wahine, ke hai aku nei au ia oe, mai olelo iki oe [245]ia’u, a mai hai no hoi oe i kuu inoa; o Kihapiilani au, e hele ana au e imi i hoamakaia no kuu kaikuaana no Lonoapii” (oia o Piilani). Ma keia mau olelo a Kihapiilani, maopopo i ka wahine he ’lii keia kane ana, he ’lii nui; alaila, pau kona manao ana i ka

of some one who will kill my brother Lonoapii (Piilani).” When the wife heard this she then knew that her husband was Kihapiilani, the great chief; and she also knew that it was beyond her to withhold him from going, so she consented for him to go on his way.

As soon as he was allowed to go, Kihapiilani started for Waikapu where the prophetess by the name of Pao was living. While Kihapiilani was yet on the road, on his way to meet her, she predicted to those around her, saying: “There is a chief on the way here in search for some one to help him in his revenge.”

noho, ae aku la ia e hele o Kihapiilani.

When Kihapiilani arrived in the presence of Pao, a rainbow appeared at the same time. Pao then said: “My lord is swift of foot.” She then greeted Kihapiilani. Kihapiilani returned the greeting. After the greetings had been exchanged, Pao invited Kihapiilani to come in, and then she asked him: “What brings my lord here on this hot

Ma keia hookuu ana o ka wahine ia Kihapiilani e hele, hele aku la ia a hiki ma Waikapu, malaila kela wahine kaula, o Pao kona inoa. Ia Kihapiilani ma ke alanui, e hele aku ana e halawai me Pao, wanana mua oia i kana olelo ike, i mua o kona poe, penei: “He ’lii keia e hele mai nei i ke alanui, e imi i hoa makaia nona.”

A hiki o Kihapiilani i mua o Pao, ku iho la ke anuenue ia wa hookahi. Pane mai la o Pao: “Mama kuu haku.”

Aloha aku la o Pao, aloha mai la o Kihapiilani, a pau ke aloha, hookipa aku la o Pao ia Kihapiilani. Mahope o ka hookipa ana, ninau mai la o Pao: “Heaha ka huakai a kuu haku o

day?” The chief replied: “I have come in search of someone who will cause the death of my brother Piilani, for he has treated me shamefully.” Pao then replied: “There in the lowlands of Kalepolepo lives the one who will assist you in killing your enemy. You go down till you reach Kalepolepo and look for a man whose face is covered over with filth. He is the one.” At the close of the directions of Pao, Kihapiilani proceeded on his way to Kalepolepo, where in time he found the man described to him and he went up to meet him. As he was approaching the man, the man saw him and said: “What is the object of the chief’s journey that has brought him here?” The chief, Kihapiilani, then said: “I have come to your presence by the direction of the prophetess Pao, for she told me that you have the means of fulfilling my desire, that is, something that will aid me in killing my brother Piilani, the one who has shamelessly abused me.”

ka hiki ana mai o ka la?” I aku ke ’lii: “I hele mai nei au e imi i mea e make ai kuu kaikuaana o Piilani, ua hana ino ia’u.” Alaila, olelo aku o Pao: “Aia ka mea e make ai ko hoapaio i kai o Kalepolepo. E iho oe a hiki i Kalepolepo, nana aku oe i ke kanaka paapu o na maka i ka haueka, oia no.” A pau ka olelo ana a Pao, iho aku la o Kihapiilani a hiki i kai o Kalepolepo, e noho ana ua kanaka ala i laila. Hele aku la o Kihapiilani a ku ana i ke alo.

Ninau mai la ua kanaka ala: “Heaha ka huakai a ke ’lii o ka hiki ana mai?” I aku ke ’lii o

Kihapiilani: “Ua hele mai nei au i mua ou ma ke kuhikuhi a ke kaula wahine a Pao, aia ia oe ka mea e pono ai ka’u mea e hana aku ai. Oia hoi, o ka mea e ku ai ka makaia i kuu kaikuaana ia Piilani, ka mea nana i hana mai ia’u i ka pono ole.”

When the man of learning heard A lohe ua kanaka akamai la i na

the words of Kihapiilani, he ordered his canoe men to prepare the canoe for a trip to Hawaii. When the preparation was complete, Kihapiilani boarded the canoe and they set sail for Hawaii, to meet his sister Piikea and his brother-in-law Umi. That same evening they landed at Waipio. As soon as they landed, Kihapiilani proceeded to the house where Piikea was living and entered it. When his sister saw him, she sprang on him and wept. At the end of their weeping Piikea asked: “How are you getting along with your brother?”

Kihapiilani answered his sister, saying: “We do not get along at all; my brother ill-treats me; he gets angry, abuses me, and has no love for me. That is why I have come to you, to tell you of these things.” When Piikea heard this, she cried in a loud voice, recounting their life in their early days while living with their parents and of their childhood wanderings here and there, carefree and happy. While Piikea was wailing, Umi, who was in another house, heard it and he

olelo a Kihapiilani, kena ae la ia i na hoewaa, e hoomakaukau i na waa, a holo i Hawaii. A makaukau na waa, ee aku la o Kihapiilani, a holo aku la i Hawaii, i kona kaikuahine o Piikea a me kona kaikoeke o Umi; a ahiahi, pae aku la lakou ma Waipio. Ma keia pae ana, hele aku la o Kihapiilani a ma ka hale o Piikea e noho ana, kipa aku la ia, a ike mai la kona kaikuahine, lele mai la uwe, a pau ko laua uwe ana, ninau mai la o Piikea: “Pehea ko olua noho ana me kou kaikuaana?” I aku o Kihapiilani i kona kaikuahine: “Aole pono o ko maua noho ana, he hana ino kuu kaikuaana ia’u, he huhu, he aloha ole; nolaila ko’u hele mai i ou nei, e hai aku ia oe, i ko maua noho ana.” A lohe o Piikea i keia mau olelo, uwe helu aku la ia ma ko laua noho pu ana me na makua, kahi i hele ai ma o a maanei. Ma keia uwe ana a Piikea, lohe aku la o Umi, haohao iho la ia i ka ike ole ia o ke kumu o ka uwe ana, a mahope, lohe o kona kaikoeke o Kihapiilani. O Piikea hoi, puka ae la ia a [247]waho o ka hale, uwe ae la me ka leo nui loa, haalele i

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.