Get Particle physics of brane worlds and extra dimensions 1st edition sreerup raychaudhuri free all

Page 1


Visit to download the full and correct content document: https://textbookfull.com/product/particle-physics-of-brane-worlds-and-extra-dimension s-1st-edition-sreerup-raychaudhuri/

More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant download maybe you interests ...

Concepts of elementary particle physics First Edition

Peskin

https://textbookfull.com/product/concepts-of-elementary-particlephysics-first-edition-peskin/

Particle physics Fourth Edition. Edition Martin

https://textbookfull.com/product/particle-physics-fourth-editionedition-martin/

Particle Physics Brian R. Martin

https://textbookfull.com/product/particle-physics-brian-r-martin/

Foundations of Nuclear and Particle Physics T. W.

Donnelly

https://textbookfull.com/product/foundations-of-nuclear-andparticle-physics-t-w-donnelly/

The

ideas of particle physics 4th Edition James Dodd

https://textbookfull.com/product/the-ideas-of-particlephysics-4th-edition-james-dodd/

Particle Accelerator Physics 4th Edition Helmut Wiedemann

https://textbookfull.com/product/particle-acceleratorphysics-4th-edition-helmut-wiedemann/

Particle physics in the LHC era 1st Edition Barr

https://textbookfull.com/product/particle-physics-in-the-lhcera-1st-edition-barr/

Solar Neutrino Physics The Interplay between Particle Physics and Astronomy Lothar Oberauer

https://textbookfull.com/product/solar-neutrino-physics-theinterplay-between-particle-physics-and-astronomy-lothar-oberauer/

Elementary Particle Physics An Intuitive Introduction 1st Edition Andrew J. Larkoski

https://textbookfull.com/product/elementary-particle-physics-anintuitive-introduction-1st-edition-andrew-j-larkoski/

PARTICLEPHYSICSOFBRANEWORLDS ANDEXTRADIMENSIONS

Thepossibilitythatweliveinahigher-dimensionalworldwithspatialdimensions greaterthanthreestartedwiththeearlyworkofKaluzaandKlein.However, inaddressingexperimentalconstraints,earlymodel-builderswereforcedtocompactifytheseextradimensionstoverytinyscales.Withthedevelopmentof brane-worldscenarios,itbecamepossibletoconsidernovelcompactifications whichallowtheextradimensionstobelargeortoprovideobservableeffectsof thesedimensionsatexperimentallyaccessibleenergyscales.

Thisbookprovidesacomprehensiveaccountoftheserecentdevelopments, keepingthehigh-energyphysicsimplicationsinfocus.Afterahistoricalsurvey oftheideaofextradimensions,thebookdealsindetailwithmodelsoflargeextra dimensions,warpedextradimensionsandothermodelssuchasuniversalextra dimensions.Thetheoreticalandphenomenologicalimplicationsarediscussedin apedagogicalmannerforbothresearchersandgraduatestudents.

SreerupRaychaudhuri isaProfessorofTheoreticalPhysicsattheTata InstituteofFundamentalResearch,Mumbai.Hisbroadresearchinterestsliein theareasofelectroweakphysics,extradimensionsandsupersymmetry,buthe specialisesinthephysicsofhigh-energycollidersandthesearchfornewphysics withsuchmachines.

K.Sridhar isaProfessorofTheoreticalPhysicsattheTataInstituteof FundamentalResearch,Mumbai.Hisresearchinterestsareprimarilyinthe areasofextradimensions,supersymmetry,quantumchromodynamicsandgrand unification.

CAMBRIDGEMONOGRAPHSONMATHEMATICALPHYSICS

GeneralEditors:P.V.Landshoff,D.R.Nelson,S.Weinberg

S.J.Aarseth GravitationalN-BodySimulations:ToolsandAlgorithms†

J.Ambjørn,B.DurhuusandT.Jonsson QuantumGeometry:AStatisticalFieldTheory Approach †

A.M.Anile RelativisticFluidsandMagneto-fluids:WithApplicationsinAstrophysicsand PlasmaPhysics

J.A.deAzcárragaandJ.M.Izquierdo LieGroups,LieAlgebras,CohomologyandSome ApplicationsinPhysics†

O.Babelon,D.BernardandM.Talon IntroductiontoClassicalIntegrableSystems†

F.BastianelliandP.vanNieuwenhuizen PathIntegralsandAnomaliesinCurvedSpace †

D.BaumannandL.McAllister InflationandStringTheory

V.BelinskiandE.Verdaguer GravitationalSolitons†

J.Bernstein KineticTheoryintheExpandingUniverse †

G.F.BertschandR.A.Broglia OscillationsinFiniteQuantumSystems†

N.D.BirrellandP.C.W.Davies QuantumFieldsinCurvedSpace †

K.Bolejko,A.Krasiński,C.HellabyandM-N.Célérier StructuresintheUniversebyExact Methods:Formation,Evolution,Interactions

D.M.Brink Semi-ClassicalMethodsforNucleus-NucleusScattering †

M.Burgess ClassicalCovariantFields†

E.A.CalzettaandB.-L.B.Hu NonequilibriumQuantumFieldTheory

S.Carlip QuantumGravityin2+1Dimensions†

P.CartierandC.DeWitt-Morette FunctionalIntegration:ActionandSymmetries†

J.C.Collins Renormalization:AnIntroductiontoRenormalization,theRenormalizationGroup andtheOperator-ProductExpansion †

P.D.B.Collins AnIntroductiontoReggeTheoryandHighEnergyPhysics†

M.Creutz Quarks,GluonsandLattices†

P.D.D’Eath SupersymmetricQuantumCosmology †

J.DerezińskiandC.Gérard MathematicsofQuantizationandQuantumFields

F.deFeliceandD.Bini ClassicalMeasurementsinCurvedSpace-Times

F.deFeliceandC.J.SClarke RelativityonCurvedManifolds†

B.DeWitt Supermanifolds,2ndedition†

P.G.O.Freund IntroductiontoSupersymmetry †

F.G.Friedlander TheWaveEquationonaCurvedSpace-Time †

J.L.FriedmanandN.Stergioulas RotatingRelativisticStars

Y.FrishmanandJ.Sonnenschein Non-PerturbativeFieldTheory:FromTwoDimensional ConformalFieldTheorytoQCDinFourDimensions

J.A.Fuchs AffineLieAlgebrasandQuantumGroups:AnIntroduction,withApplicationsin ConformalFieldTheory †

J.FuchsandC.Schweigert Symmetries,LieAlgebrasandRepresentations:AGraduateCourse forPhysicists†

Y.FujiiandK.Maeda TheScalar-TensorTheoryofGravitation †

J.A.H.Futterman,F.A.Handler,R.A.Matzner ScatteringfromBlackHoles†

A.S.Galperin,E.A.Ivanov,V.I.OgievetskyandE.S.Sokatchev HarmonicSuperspace † R.GambiniandJ.Pullin Loops,Knots,GaugeTheoriesandQuantumGravity † T.Gannon MoonshinebeyondtheMonster:TheBridgeConnectingAlgebra,ModularFormsand Physics†

M.GöckelerandT.Schücker DifferentialGeometry,GaugeTheories,andGravity † C.Gómez,M.Ruiz-AltabaandG.Sierra QuantumGroupsinTwo-DimensionalPhysics†

M.B.Green,J.H.SchwarzandE.Witten SuperstringTheoryVolume1:Introduction M.B.Green,J.H.SchwarzandE.Witten SuperstringTheoryVolume2:LoopAmplitudes, AnomaliesandPhenomenology

V.N.Gribov TheTheoryofComplexAngularMomenta:GribovLecturesonTheoretical Physics†

J.B.GriffithsandJ.Podolský ExactSpace-TimesinEinstein’sGeneralRelativity †

S.W.HawkingandG.F.R.Ellis TheLargeScaleStructureofSpace-Time † F.IachelloandA.Arima TheInteractingBosonModel †

F.IachelloandP.vanIsacker TheInteractingBoson-FermionModel † C.ItzyksonandJ.M.Drouffe StatisticalFieldTheoryVolume1:FromBrownianMotionto RenormalizationandLatticeGaugeTheory †

C.ItzyksonandJ.M.Drouffe StatisticalFieldTheoryVolume2:StrongCoupling,MonteCarlo Methods,ConformalFieldTheoryandRandomSystems† G.Jaroszkiewicz PrinciplesofDiscreteTimeMechanics

C.V.Johnson D-Branes†

P.S.Joshi GravitationalCollapseandSpacetimeSingularities†

J.I.KapustaandC.Gale Finite-TemperatureFieldTheory:PrinciplesandApplications,2nd edition†

V.E.Korepin,N.M.BogoliubovandA.G.Izergin QuantumInverseScatteringMethodand CorrelationFunctions†

M.LeBellac ThermalFieldTheory †

Y.Makeenko MethodsofContemporaryGaugeTheory †

N.MantonandP.Sutcliffe TopologicalSolitons†

N.H.March LiquidMetals:ConceptsandTheory †

I.MontvayandG.Münster QuantumFieldsonaLattice †

L.O’Raifeartaigh GroupStructureofGaugeTheories†

T.Ortín GravityandStrings,2ndedition

A.M.OzoriodeAlmeida HamiltonianSystems:ChaosandQuantization †

L.ParkerandD.Toms QuantumFieldTheoryinCurvedSpacetime:QuantizedFieldsand Gravity

R.PenroseandW.Rindler SpinorsandSpace-TimeVolume1:Two-SpinorCalculusand RelativisticFields†

R.PenroseandW.Rindler SpinorsandSpace-TimeVolume2:SpinorandTwistorMethodsin Space-TimeGeometry †

S.Pokorski GaugeFieldTheories,2ndedition†

J.Polchinski StringTheoryVolume1:AnIntroductiontotheBosonicString †

J.Polchinski StringTheoryVolume2:SuperstringTheoryandBeyond †

J.C.Polkinghorne ModelsofHighEnergyProcesses†

V.N.Popov FunctionalIntegralsandCollectiveExcitations†

L.V.ProkhorovandS.V.Shabanov HamiltonianMechanicsofGaugeSystems

A.RecknagelandV.Schiomerus BoundaryConformalFieldTheoryandtheWorldsheet ApproachtoD-Branes

R.J.Rivers PathIntegralMethodsinQuantumFieldTheory †

R.G.Roberts TheStructureoftheProton:DeepInelasticScattering †

C.Rovelli QuantumGravity †

W.C.Saslaw GravitationalPhysicsofStellarandGalacticSystems†

R.N.Sen Causality,MeasurementTheoryandtheDifferentiableStructureofSpace-Time

M.ShifmanandA.Yung SupersymmetricSolitons

H.Stephani,D.Kramer,M.MacCallum,C.HoenselaersandE.Herlt ExactSolutionsof Einstein’sFieldEquations,2ndedition†

J.Stewart AdvancedGeneralRelativity †

J.C.Taylor GaugeTheoriesofWeakInteractions†

T.Thiemann ModernCanonicalQuantumGeneralRelativity †

D.J.Toms TheSchwingerActionPrincipleandEffectiveAction †

A.VilenkinandE.P.S.Shellard CosmicStringsandOtherTopologicalDefects†

R.S.WardandR.O.Wells,Jr TwistorGeometryandFieldTheory †

E.J.Weinberg ClassicalSolutionsinQuantumFieldTheory:SolitonsandInstantonsinHigh EnergyPhysics

J.R.WilsonandG.J.Mathews RelativisticNumericalHydrodynamics† T.Ortín Gravityand Strings

D.BaumannandL.McAllister InflationandStringTheory

† Availableinpaperback

ParticlePhysicsofBraneWorlds andExtraDimensions

SREERUPRAYCHAUDHURI

TataInstituteofFundamentalResearch,Mumbai

K.SRIDHAR

TataInstituteofFundamentalResearch,Mumbai

UniversityPrintingHouse,CambridgeCB28BS,UnitedKingdom CambridgeUniversityPressispartoftheUniversityofCambridge. ItfurtherstheUniversity’smissionbydisseminatingknowledgeinthepursuitof education,learningandresearchatthehighestinternationallevelsofexcellence.

www.cambridge.org

Informationonthistitle: www.cambridge.org/9780521768566

c CambridgeUniversityPress2016

Thispublicationisincopyright.Subjecttostatutoryexception andtotheprovisionsofrelevantcollectivelicensingagreements, noreproductionofanypartmaytakeplacewithoutthewritten permissionofCambridgeUniversityPress.

Firstpublished2016

PrintedintheUnitedKingdombyClays,StIvesplc

AcataloguerecordforthispublicationisavailablefromtheBritishLibrary. LibraryofCongressCataloguinginPublicationdata Names:Raychaudhuri,Sreerup,author.|Sridhar,K.,author. Title:Particlephysicsofbraneworldsandextradimensions/Sreerup Raychaudhuri(TataInstituteofFundamentalResearch,Mumbai),K.Sridhar (TataInstituteofFundamentalResearch,Mumbai).

Description:Cambridge,UnitedKingdom;NewYork,NY:CambridgeUniversity Press,2016.| c 2016|Includesbibliographicalreferencesandindex. Identifiers:LCCN2016011199|ISBN9780521768566(alk.paper) |ISBN052176856X(alk.paper)

Subjects:LCSH:Particles(Nuclearphysics)|Branes.|Stringmodels.| Fourthdimension.

Classification:LCCQC793.2.R392016|DDC539.7/2–dc23

LCrecordavailableat http://lccn.loc.gov/2016011199 ISBN978-0-521-76856-6Hardback CambridgeUniversityPresshasnoresponsibilityforthepersistenceor accuracyofURLsforexternalorthird-partyinternetwebsitesreferredto inthispublication,anddoesnotguaranteethatanycontentonsuch websitesis,orwillremain,accurateorappropriate.

ToGita,IraandOindrila

Preface

Thegodslovewhatismysterious,anddislikewhatisevident.

BrihadaranyakaUpanishad IV.2.2

For49outofthe50centuriesofrecordedhistory,theideaofextradimensionsof spacewastheprovinceofthemystic,thecrankandthetrickster.Forwhatcould bemoreobviousthanthefactthattherearethreedimensions–length,breadth andheight–aseveryschoolchildknows?Takeabrick,forexample,whichis soreassuringlysolid,andseemssouncompromisinglythree-dimensional.Yet, forthelastcenturyorso,modernatomicsciencehasbeentellingusthatthe solidbrickis99.99999999999%emptyspace.Whatremainsissomelittlebitsof matter,flyingaroundeternally,andheldtogetherbyelectromagneticpullsand pushesofincrediblestrength.Thismayseembizarreandunreal,butthat’show itis.

Wehavelearnt,therefore,that‘commonsense’–orrather,theevidenceofour fivesenses–isnotatrustworthyguidetotheworldwhenwetrytoperceiveit atlengthscalesmuchbelowthesizeofanaveragehuman.Oncewearetrained tohaveanopenmindinhisway,thereisnoproblematallinconceivingofmore dimensionsofspace–theyjusthavetobecurledupintotinyloops,orspheresor higherdimensionalcompactobjects.Ifthesizeoftheseisbelowtheresolution ofthehumaneye(oranyinstrumentswhichaidthehumaneye),theseextra dimensionswillbeinvisible,justasatomsandmoleculeswereatthetimethey wereconceivedof.

Mostscientistsencountercurled-updimensionswithoutrealisingit,whenthey studythequantumphysicsofsolids.There,onecansetupawavefunctionofan electroninasolidbyinvokinga‘periodicboundarycondition’,whichisanother wayofsayingthattheco-ordinatesarecurledup.Infact,athree-dimensional solidisactuallytreatedinthetextbooksasa3-torus,whichisacomplicated topologicalobjectthatcannotbedrawnonpaper.Ifwecangetusefuland experimentallyverifiableresultsbyassumingablockofcopper,forexample,to bea3-torus,surelyitisnottoomuchofaflightoffancytoassumethatthe selfsameblockalsohasotherdimensions,similarlycurled-up,whicharetoosmall tobeseen?

Thisfascinatingquestionwasraisedintheearlyhalfofthetwentiethcentury, anditcontinues,afterahundredyears,toexcitethecuriosityoftheresearcher. Duringthisperiod,extradimensionshavecome(andsometimesgone)invarious

guises,firstasaroutetounificationofforces,thenasasupporttostringtheories, laterasasolutiontothegauge-hierarchyproblemandfinallyasanexplanation ofdarkmatter.Assomeonewasheardtoremark,extradimensionshavebeen usedtodoeverythingexceptmakecoffee!

Theauthorsofthisworkknew,therefore,whenundertakingtowriteabook onthissubject,thatitwouldnotbeaneasytask.Forthesubjectofextra dimensions,apartfromhavingalonghistory,hasgrowntodaytospanalmost everybranchoftheoreticalhigh-energyphysics.Someofthedevelopmentsare highlymathematicalwhileothersarepurelyexperimental.Wehave,therefore, triedtocreateaworkwhichreflectstheflavourofourownlabouredjourney throughthissubject.Partofthedevelopmentispedagogic,andpartismore likeamonograph.Wehavedeliberatelychosennottotrytobecomprehensive andcovereverythinginthisarea,for,apartfromtheproblemoffeasibility,this wouldswampthereaderwithanintimidatingamountofinformation.

Thisbookismeantforgraduatestudentsandresearchersinhigh-energy physicswhowishtolearnaboutextradimensionsandtheirimpactonhighenergyphysicsresearchinthelast15yearsorso.Afterabriefwarm-up,where thehistoricaloriginsofextradimensionsarenarrated,weintroducetheearly theoriesofKaluzaandKlein,andtheirimmediatefollowers.Thisisfollowed byreviewsoftheStandardModelofparticlephysics,ofstringtheory,and ofeffectivetheories,whichform,sotosay,thefleshthatclothestheskeletal frameworkofextradimensions.Wethendescribethethreemajorparadigms developedoverthelastdecadeandahalf,viz.large(flat)extradimensions, universal(flat)extradimensionsand,finally,warpedextradimensions.Ineach case,wedescribethetheoreticalmodel,showhowtoobtaintheparticlemasses andinteractionsandthendiscusshowitmaybepossibletoobservethem, bothinterrestrialexperimentsandinastrophysicalobservations,asthecase maybe.

Notsuprisingly,thisbookhasbeenalongtimeinthemaking.Duringthis period,andbefore,wehavebeenhelpedinvariouswaysbysomanypeoplethat itisadifficulttasktorememberallthosewhosenamesweneedtoincludeamong ourlistofacknowledgements.

Primarythanksgotoallourcollaborators,BenAllanach,GautamBhattacharyya,BiplobBhattacherjee,PrasantaKumarDas,AmitChakraborty, AnindyaDatta,SukantaDatta,DilipKumarGhosh,RohiniM.Godbole,MonoranjanGuchait,AmbreeshK.Gupta,AbhishekIyer,ParthaKonar,Anirban Kundu,SmaragdaLola,UmaMahanta,FarvahNazilaMahmoudi,Ushoshi Maitra,NamrataManglani,PrakashMathews,NabaK.Mondal,Biswarup Mukhopadhyaya,AyonPatra,PoulosePoulose,SantoshKumarRai,V.Ravindran,DhruvRinge,SophieRenner,TousikSamui,SaswatiSarkar,JordanP. Skitrall,W.L.vanNeervenandSudhirVempati.

RobertoContino,DileepJatkarandGautamMandaldidaverycarefulreading ofportionsofthemanuscriptandhelpeduswiththeircommentsandadvice.

ThanksarealsoduetoAbhishekIyerandRajanPawarforhelpinmakingsome ofthefigures.

WewouldliketothanktheHindustanBookAgency,NewDelhiforpermission toreproducematerialwhichformspartofChapter 6.

Wearereallygratefultoourfamiliesforputtingupwithoddhoursand abstractedbehaviourforyearsonend.

WewouldliketothankSimonCapelinandhisteamatCambridgeUniversity Pressforalltheencouragementandexemplarypatiencetheyhaveshownus duringthelonggestationperiodofthisbook.

Finally,totheprospectivereadersofthisworkweextendthanksinadvance. Everytimeareadergainssomethingbyreadingthisbook,onelittlebitofour effortswillhavebeenworthwhile.

Dimensionaldreams

1.1Space:ahistoricalview

Ofalltheaspectsofthephysicalworld,themysteriesregardingthenatureof spaceandtimearethemostrecondite.Questionsrelatedtothenatureofspace andtimehaveengagedphilosophers,mathematiciansandphysicistsalikeacross historiesandcultures.Itappearsthateveninancientculturessomethinkers concernedthemselveswiththesequestionsbutitwasprobablywiththeGreeks thatanattemptatasystematic,physicalunderstandingofspaceandtimeis discerned.ThisisnotsurprisinggiventhattheGreekinterestinbothgeometry andmechanicswasmotivatedbyphysicalratherthanmetaphysicalconsiderations.ThefamousantinomiesofZenotellusthatevenpre-Socraticphilosophers haddevotedmuchthoughttotheunderstandingofspace,timeandmotion. ButsomewhereintheperiodbetweenZenoandAristotle,earliermeditationson theseissuescrystallisedandwereputdownmoreconcretely.

BetweentheGreekatomistsandAristotle,then,wehavebeenprovidedtwo enduringconceptionsofspacewhicharebroadenoughtoaccomodatethewhole gamutofideasaboutspacethathaveemergedoverthecenturies.ForAristotle, spacedidnothaveanexistenceindependentofthematerialworldbutrather wasarelationalpropertyofmaterialbodies.Independentofmatter,spacehad noexistence:therewasnoconceptionofavacuum.Anystatementaboutspace thatismadeisreallyastatementaboutarelationbetweendifferentmaterial entities.IncontrasttoAristotle,andinfactprecedinghim,thereexistedanother conceptionofspaceduetotheatomists,prominentamongwhomwereLeucippus andDemocritus.Theatoms,whichwereunchangingandeternal,gaverisetothe varietyandthechangeperceivedinthephenomenalworldbycomingtogetherin differentwaysastheymovedaboutinthevoid.Thevoidoremptyspacehadan existenceindependentoftheatomsthatmovedinthemandwasasfundamental astheatoms.Thesetwoviews,relationalism(ofAristotle)andsubstantivalism (oftheatomists),havebeenparadigmaticfortheoriesofspacethathavebeen

developedforovertwomillenia.Whileforthesubstantivalists,geometryhasa significanceofitsown,fortherelationalistsitissomethingthatcanonlybe inferredfromthepropertiesofmaterialbodies.Acomprehensivediscussionof thedifferentphilosophicalconceptionsofspaceandthehistoricalevolutionof theseideasiscontainedinRef.[1].

ItwasAristotle’srelationalismthatdominateduntilthetimeofNewtonwhen substantivalismmadeacomeback.Inhis Principia,Newtontookcaretodistinguishbetweenabsoluteandrelativemotion,whichhedistinguishedastrueand apparentmotion.Intryingtoavoidtheconclusionabouttherelativityofall motion,Newtondistinguishedthenotionofrelativespacesfromthatofabsolutespace.Insteadofacceptingthefactthatallinertialframeswereequivalent, i.e.relatedtoeachotherbyaGalileantransformationandthatallmotionwas relative,Newtonstucktotheideaofoneabsolutespaceidentifiedasthefixed, immovablecentreoftheworld.

Newton’sideaofabsolutespacewascriticisedbyLeibniz,HuygensandBerkeley.ButitwasonlyinthelatterhalfofthenineteenthcenturythatErnstMach mountedasystematiccritiqueofNewton’sideas.Machwaswillingtoaccept onlyinertialsystemsandarguedthatabsolutespacewasametaphysicalentity andhadtobeeliminatedfrommechanics.Inthemeantime,however,electromagneticfieldtheoryhadbeendevelopedbyMaxwellandthepredictionof electromagneticradiationwasverifiedbyHertz.Thisimmediatelybroughtup thequestionoftheexistenceofamediuminwhichthesewavescouldpropagate. Ifitcouldbedemonstratedthatsuchamedium,calledether,existedthenit wouldverymuchbetheabsoluteframewithrespecttowhichthemotionofall bodiescouldbemeasured.Theearth’smotionthroughtheethermeantthatthe speedoflightmeasuredinthedirectionandagainstthedirectionoftheearth’s motionwouldbedifferent.TheMichelson-Morleyexperimentsetouttodetect suchadifferenceinthespeedoflightsoastoestablishtheexistenceofether. ThefamousnullresultoftheexperimentledtotheformulationofEinstein’s specialrelativitythough,forawhile,Lorentzpersistedwithasubstantivalinterpretationoftheexperimentalresults.Apartfromtheothergreatchangesthat thisnewtheorywrought,thespecialtheoryalsomadearadicalchangeinthe conceptionofspace.Thenotionofabsolutespacewaseliminatedsoitwasanew formofrelationalism.But,moreimportantly,throughitscritiqueofthenotion ofsimultaneityofphysicalevents,specialrelativityalsoemphasisedhowitwas notpossibletothinkofspaceandtimeindependentlyandbroughtinthenew notionofaspacetimecontinuum.Thiswastrulyanewextensionofthenotion ofspacebyappendingtimetoitasafourthdimension,throughtheintroductionoftheMinkowskimetric.1 Wehavealludedtothiswell-knownfactabout

1 Theideaoftreatingtimeasthefourthdimensionwasfirstmentionedbyd’Alembertinan Encyclopédie articlethathepublishedin1751[2]andlateralsobyLagrangein Mécanique Analytique [3].

relativitytoemphasiseahistoricalpoint:thatspurredbyempiricalinformation comingfromtheMichelson-Morleyexperimentrevisionsofnotionsofspaceand timewerebeingcarriedoutdemonstratingfortheveryfirsttimethat,inspite oftheabstrusenessofthenotionsofspaceandtime,thesewereamenabletoan experimentalstudymuchlikeotherphysicalphenomena.

Itislikelythatthisfreedominexploringspaceandtimeonparwithother physicalphenomenawaswhatprovidedthepsycho-socioimpetustodevelop theGeneralTheoryofRelativity.Spacehadalreadybeenliberatedfromthe fettersofEuclideanismthroughtheworkofnineteenth-centurymathematicians likeGauss,Lobachevskiand,mostofall,Riemann.Itwaspossiblenowtomove outoftheflatlandofEuclideangeometryandexplorethecurvedspacesofnonEuclideangeometries.WhatwasremarkableaboutEinstein’sGeneralTheory wasthatherelatedthecurvatureofspacetimetothelocaldistributionofmatter andenergyandinbringingtogetherdynamicsandgeometryhe,onceandfor all,establishedthatthestudyofthenatureofspaceandtimewasanempirical discoursetobesettledbycomparingtheories,howeverfanciful,withhardfacts ofexperiment–geometrywasnotan apriori category.

1.2Anextradimension

Oneofthepropertiesofspacethatattractedconsiderableattentionwasits dimensionality.Whyisspacethree-dimensional?Asalways,thereweretwodifferentapproachestakeninaddressingthisquestion.Oneapproachwastosomehow deducethreeastheonlypossiblevalueforthedimensionalityofspace.While manyoftheseattemptsseemtobeonlyofhistoricalinterestandlackanyscientificmeritsomeoftheseargumentsarestillcompelling.Onesuchargument, advancedbyKant,2 wasthattheinverse-squarelawofgravitationwouldmaterialiseonlyinathree-dimensionalworldandtheintroductionofextradimensions wouldmodifyNewton’slawofgravitation.Ofcourse,theargumentrestedonthe assumptionoftheabsolutevalidityofthelawofgravitationatalllengthscales. Infact,itisamusingtonotethatmodern-daysearchesforextradimensions lookforpreciselysuchdeviationsfromtheinverse-squarelawatshortdistances. Ehrenfest[5]andseveralothers3 alsoarguedthatonlyfor d =3arestableplanetaryorbitspossible,thoughstrictlyspeakingthestabilityargumentsdonotrule out d< 3.

Theotherwaytoaddresstheissueofdimensionalitywastoaskifthereisa possibilitythatthereisanextradimension–afourthdimension,orpossibly, evenmoredimensions.ThefirstsuchattemptseemstohavebeenmadebyHenry

2 Kantpublishedthisina1746manuscriptentitled ThoughtsontheTrueEstimationof LivingForces,atranslationofwhichbyJ.B.EdwardsandM.Schönfeldappearsina volumeofKant’swritingsonnaturalscience[4].

3 SeeRef.[6]foracompletelistofthesepapersandforthedetailsofthearguments.

More,aneo-PlatonistphilosopherfromCambridgewhowasacontemporaryof Newton.Infact,Newton’sviewsofabsolutespaceseemtobeverystronglyinfluencedbyMore’sideas.ForMore,likeNewton,theabsolutecharacterofspace wasamanifestationoftheomniscienceofGod.Ifthatweresothenspacewould notbejustthearenaforphysicalphenomenabutforthespiritualandpsychical aswell.ItwastodothisthatMorethoughtofafourthdimension:ageometricaldimensioninwhichspiritualprocessestookplace[7].Morecalledthisnew dimension spissitude fromtheLatinwordforthickness.More’sspissitudedid notattracttoomanyfollowersbuthedidhaveadedicatedfringefollowingall thewaydowntothenineteenthandtwentiethcenturies.Thenineteenth-century astronomerfromLeipzig,J.F.K.Zöllner,tookMore’sideasveryseriouslyand performedseveralexperimentstoestablishtheexistenceofspissitude.Supernaturalphenomena,likethesuddenappearanceordisappearanceofobjectsand severalothermiraclesweremadebyZöllnerthesubjectofthisstudy[8].Aslate astheearlytwentiethcentury,HenryMore’sideasseemedtohavehadcurrency forheseemedtohaveconsiderablyinfluencedthePortuguesepoet,Fernando Pessoa.

Throughoutthenineteenthcentury,interestintheideaofafourthdimensionpersisted.AtthesametimeasZöllnerdabbledinhisexperimentswith thesupernatural,hiscolleagueinLeipzig,themathematicianAugustMöbius, demonstratedhowitispossibletouseafour-dimensionalrotationtoturna three-dimensionalobjectintoitsmirrorimage[9].In1852,theSwissmathematicianLudwigSchläflidiscovered[10]thesixfour-dimensionalanaloguesofthe fivethree-dimensionalplatonicsolids,nowknownaspolytopes.Schläfli’sresults wereduplicatedbyStringhamin1880[11]butinhiswork,Stringhamprovided illustrationsofprojectionsonaplaneofthefour-dimensionalpolytopes.This workbecameverywell-knownandhisdepictionofthefour-dimensionalcube, alsocalledthetesseractbecamepartofthepopularimaginationandservedas aninspirationforseveralworksofartandliterature.Muchofthepopularityof thetesseractwasduetothewritingsofCharlesHintonwhosebook TheFourth Dimension [12]becameimmenselypopularandhadamongitslargefollowing eventheeminentAmericanphilosopher,WilliamJames.

Again,itwasnotuntiltheadventofrelativitythattheideaofextradimensions cameintophysicsproper.Infact,asstatedearlier,Minkowski’srealisationofa geometricalinterpretationoftheLorentztransformationsinafour-dimensional spacetimewasalreadyastepinthedirection.ButMinkowskihadasimpler taskbecausehedidnotinventafourthdimensionbutsimplyreinterpretedtime (or ict)asadimensionandinthishewasalreadyhelpedbythefactthatthe phenomenaofelectricityandmagnetism,nowsystematisedinMaxwell’stheory ofelectromagnetism,showedinvariancewithrespecttoLorentztransformations andnottheGalileantransformations.Soitwas,inasense,empiricalexigenciesthatmadethewayforMinkowski’srealisation.Theproblemoftheorising aboutadimensionbeyondthesefourdimensionsofspacetimewasaltogether

different.Notonlywastherewasnoempiricalsupportforsuchatheorybutif oneweretogobycommon-senseexperiencethenthereappearedtobenowayone couldaccommodateanymoredimensions(spatialortemporal).Withtheadvent ofGeneralRelativity,however,cametherealisationoftheintimaterelationof geometryanddynamics.Ifthegravitationalinteractionweretobeunderstoodas themanifestationoffour-dimensionalgeometrythenisitpossibletoarriveatan unifiedunderstandingofgravitationandelectromagnetismbybringinginafifth dimension?ThiswasthequestionthatpromptedbothNordström,asearlyas 1914(ayearbeforeEinstein’sGeneralTheory!)[13],andKaluza[14],in1919,to considerfive-dimensionalspacetimes.Nordströmwasconsideringascalartheory ofgravitywhileKaluza,benefittingfromEinstein’sformulationoftheGeneral Theory,workedoutatensortheory.Inordertosidesteptheissueofthenonobservabilityofthefifthdimension,bothNordströmandKaluzaassumedthatall derivativesofthefieldswithrespecttothefifth-dimensionalco-ordinatevanish, i.e.thefieldsdonotdependonthefifthdimension.Thisconditionisknownas the‘cylinder’condition.4 Kaluzathenassumedafive-dimensionaltensortheory ofgravitybutintheabsenceofanymatter.Thefive-dimensionalmetric GMN decomposesintoafour-dimensionalpart gμν ,avectorpotential Aμ andascalar φ,i.e.Kaluzaidentifiedthefour-dimensionalpartofthefive-dimensionalmetric astheusualfour-dimensionalmetric,whichisrelatedtogravitation,andidentifiedthevector G4μ astheelectromagneticpotential Aμ .Thescalarfieldwasa bitofanembarrassmenttoKaluzaandheignoreditbysettingitequaltounity butifincludeditgivesrisetoaBrans-Dicke-typescalar.Itwasnotedmuchlater [16]thatthecondition φ =1leadstotheunphysicalcondition Fμν F μν =0.

TheassumptioninKaluza’stheoryofhavingnodependenceofphysicalquantitiesonthefifthdimensionwasbothdrasticandunpalatable.Itwasafterthe adventofquantummechanicsthatKleincameupwiththesuggestion[17]that onecouldtreatthisdimensiononparwiththeotherdimensionsbutcompactify ittoverysmallsizes,i.e.byassigningacirculartopology S 1 toitandmaking theradiusofthiscircleverytiny.Fieldsonthecirclethennaturallyadmittedof aFourierexpansionintomodeslabelledby n andthen,assuggestedinthenew quantummechanics,eachmodecouldbeassignedamomentum |n|/R,with R beingtheradiusofcompactification.Thediminutivenessof R thenmakesthe momentumassociatedwithallmodes n> 0verylarge,puttingthembeyond thereachofobservationwithonlythezeromode(n =0)(whichisindependent ofthefifthdimensionalco-ordinate)observable.Thusbyintroducingasmall

4 ThehistoryoftheearlyperiodofKaluza-Kleintheorieshasbeenstudiedindetail[15]. Einstein,towhomKaluzacommunicatedhispaperin1919,reactedsayingthattheidea wasnewtohim.ButhewascertainlyawareofNordström’sworkwhohadworkedouthis scalargravitationtheoryinaseriesofpapers,whichwasconsideredtheonlycompetitorto Einstein’stensortheory,stilltobetestedatthattime.Itappearsfromthehistorical evidencethatwhileEinsteinwasawareofNordström’sworkonthescalartheoryhehad notappreciatedthatitwasalsoatheoryina‘five-dimensionalcylinderworld’.

compactificationradiusKleincouldreproducethecylinderconditionsofKaluza. TheemergenceofelectromagnetisminKaluza’stheoryisalsonotasurpriseanymorebecausecompactificationon S 1 inducesessentiallya U (1)gauge-invariance inthetheory(thesymmetrygroupcorrespondingto S 1 ).Thisisaveryimportant observationandallowsthepassagetothecasewherethereismorethanjustone extradimension.Infact,relatedtothe U (1)invarianceofthefive-dimensional theory,isthequantisationofcharge,i.e.theKaluza-Kleinfieldshaveelectric chargequantisedintermsofthemodenumber, n.Itistemptingthentothink ofthe n =1modeasthephysicalelectronandidentifythephysicalcharge oftheelectronwiththequantisedchargeoftheKaluza-Kleintheory,thereby explainingthemysteriousfactofchargequantisation.Theproblemisthatthis argumentworksonlyformodeshigherthan n =0andwehavealreadyseen thatthehighermodeshavemassesproportionaltoaverylargescale.Thisinternalcontradictioninthefive-dimensionaltheorywasthereasonforthelossof interestinitthoughitwaslaterrealisedthatitispossibletocircumventthese problemsinatheorywithmorethanoneextradimension.Theotherreason,and probablymoreimportantfromahistoricalpointofview,forthelossofinterest inKaluza-Kleintheorywasthediscoveryofnuclearforces.Therealisationthat, otherthanelectromagnetismandgravitation,thereweretwootherfundamentalinteractionsinnaturewasamajorsetbacktotheKaluza-Kleinprogramme. Atthatstageinthehistoryofphysics,itwasmoreimportanttoarriveatan understandingoftheseforcesthanworryaboutunification.Itwasalongand tortuousjourneythatthesubjecthadtogothroughbeforethediscoveryofthe StandardModelasthetheoryofstrong,weakandelectromagneticinteractions wasmade.

1.3Non-abeliangeneralisations

TheStandardModelisagaugefieldtheorybasedonthegaugegroup SU (3) × SU (2) × U (1).Ofcourse,thisunderstandingcameafterafull40yearsofresearch inwhichtimenotonlythephenomenologicaldetailsoftheStandardModelwere understoodbuttheimportanceofgaugetheoriesasanimportantclassofrelativisticfieldtheorieswasfullyappreciatedanditsdynamicsunderstoodatthe quantumlevel.Thisclassoftheoriesincludesnotonlytheabelian U (1)theory ofwhichelectromagnetismisanexamplebutalsonon-abeliangaugetheories neededtounderstandthelargersymmetriesofstrongandweakinteractions. Inretrospect,itisironicalthatthefirstexplicitnon-abeliangaugetheory(or Yang-Millstheory,asitisnowcalled)waswrittendowninthe1930sbyKleinin anattempttogobeyondthefive-dimensionalKaluza-Kleintheory.Kleinconsidered[18]thecompactificationoftwoextradimensionsonasphere S 2 .The isometrygroupofthespherebeing SU (2),theresultingtheorywasan SU (2) gaugetheoryinsteadofelectromagnetism.Whilethisresultdidnotimpactthe developmentofnon-abeliangaugetheories,whichfollowedacompletelydifferent

historicalcourse,itwasanimportantmathematicalresultandshowedtheway ofgeneralisingKaluza-Kleintheorytoincludelargergaugegroupsbyconsideringcompactmanifoldsofhigherdimensionwithlargerisometrygroups.The particularlyattractivefeatureofthisisthegroupofisometriesgeneratedbythe Killingvectorsofthecompactifiedspacemanifestasthenon-abelianYang-Mills symmetriesinfour-dimensionalspace.

Thoughtherewereearlierattempts,itwaswiththeworkofChoandFreund [19]thatthecompletederivationofthefour-dimensionalgravitationalandYangMillstheoryfromahigherdimensionaltheorywaspresented.Theproblemwith theveryattractiveideaofobtainingYang-Millstheoriesasisometriesofthe higherdimensionalspaceisthatitnecessarilygaveonlycurvedspacesolutions forfourdimensionsandaflat-spacesolutionwasruledout.Muchoftheeffort thatfollowed,pioneeredbytheworkofCremmerandScherk,[20]wastotryto achievewhatwascalledaspontaneouscompactificationoftheextradimensions byincludingadditionalgaugeandscalarfields.SolvingthefullEinsteinequations inthepresenceoftheseadditionalfieldsyieldedclassicalsolutionsinwhichthe four-dimensionalspacewasMinkowski.

1.4Higher-dimensionalsupergravity

Oneofthemostremarkablediscoveriesinhigh-energyphysicsinthe1970swas thatofanewsymmetry–supersymmetry.Thegeneratorsofthissymmetryare fermionicandobeyagradedLiealgebraofanti-commutators.Theproductof twosuchgeneratorsisproportionaltomomentum,i.e.thegeneratoroftranslationsinspacetime,whichmakesitclearthatsupersymmetryisanewsymmetry ofspacetime.Becausethegeneratorsofsupersymmetryarefermionic,theyrelate fermionstobosonsmakingtherebyafundamentalconnectionbetweenmatter andforce.Moreover,itisasymmetrythatmaywellberealisedintheworldof high-energyparticles,albeitnotasanexactbutasabrokensymmetryforeven whenitisnotexactithelpsamelioratetheproblemofseverefine-tuningthat oneencountersintheStandardModelintryingtocomputequantumcorrectionstothemassoftheHiggsparticle.Itisremarkablethatsinceaproductof supersymmetrytransformationsgivesrisetoaspacetimetranslation,byelevatingsupersymmetrytothestatusofalocalsymmetryonecangeneratelocal–i.e.spacetime-dependent–translationsorgeneralco-ordinatetransformations. Sogravityisanecessarycomponentoflocalsupersymmetrictheoriesotherwise knownassupergravitytheories.

Thesimplest N =1versionofsupersymmetryinvolvesonlyonesetofgeneratorsbutitispossibletomakeextendedversionsofsupersymmetry.Noting thatthesupersymmetrygeneratorschangethehelicityofaparticlebyhalfand thatbecauseoftheiranti-commutingpropertyrepeatedapplicationofthesame generatoronagivenparticlestatewillyieldzeroitiseasytoseethatwith N setsofsupersymmetrygeneratorsthemaximalchangeinthehelicityofa

particlestatecanbe N/2.If,followingtheinformedprejudiceinthesubject, onethendemandsthattherebenospinsgreaterthan2inthetheory,then itimpliesthat N ≤ 8.Itispossibletoviewtheseextendedsupersymmetries as N =1theoriesinhigherdimensionsandbycountingdegreesoffreedomof particlesinthesuper-multipletsitcanbeseenthatthemaximal N =8theory infourspacetimedimensionscanbeviewedasan N =1theoryin11spacetimedimensions.Thisiswhatspurredinterestinsupergravitytheoriesinhigher dimensions.

Ifmaximalsupergravitytheoriesexistin11dimensions,itwasshownby Witten[21]thatifonehopedtoderivetheStandardModelasisometriesof acompactmanifold,thentheminimumdimensionalityofthecompactmanifold is7–againa11-dimensionalspacetime!Thisledtothewidespreadbeliefinthe 1980sthat11-dimensionalsupergravitywastheultimatetheorybecauseitheld promisefortheunificationofallforcesincludinggravity.FreudandRubinthen showed[22]thatin11-dimensionalsupergravity,thegraviton(asecond-rank tensor gMN with44componentsin11dimensions)andthefermionicsuperpartner,thegravitino(aMajoranafermionwith128components),couldnot formacompletesupermultiplet.Inordertomatchthebosonicandfermionic degreesoffreedomitwasnecessarytointroduceamasslessantisymmetrictensorpotentialwiththreeindices.Analogoustothecaseofelectrodynamics,this potentialgivesrisetogauge-invariantfieldstrengthswithfourindices.Ifthe fieldstrengthoritsdualistohavenon-vanishingvacuumexpectationvalue onthe d -dimensionalspacetimethenFreundandRubinshowedthateither d or11 d mustequalthenumberofindicesofthefield,i.e.either d =4or d =7.Thisargumenthasbeenspeltoutinsomedetailherebecauseitisa beautifuldemonstrationofhowsupersymmetrypredictsthedimensionalityof spacetime.Awada,DuffandPope[23]studiedthisfurtherbyanalysingthe isometrygroupof S 7 viz. SO (8),andrelatingitto N =8supersymmetryin fourdimensions.

Inspiteoftheearlyenthusiasm,11-dimensionalsupergravityfailedtodeliver duetoseveralproblemswhichwereencountered.Oneseriousproblemwas thenon-renormalisabilityofsupergravitytheories.Further,itwasshownby Witten[21]thatnocompactificationofan11-dimensionaltheoryusinga compactseven-dimensionalmanifoldcanyieldchiralfermionssocrucialfor constructingtheStandardModel.NoneoftheattemptstotrytoevadeWitten’sargumentandgenerateachiralfermionspectrumwassatisfactoryand the11-dimensionalmodelhadtobeeventuallyabandoned.Witten’sobservation,however,didnotapplytocompactmanifoldsofevendimensionalityso attentionnowturnedtosupergravitytheoriesintendimensionswherechiralfermionscouldbegenerated.However,itispossibletoviewthistheory asthezero-slopelimitofastringtheoryandwiththeremarkabledevelopmentsthatweretakingplaceinstringtheory,thedramamovedtoanother stage.

1.5Superstrings

Stringtheorywasoriginallyproposedasatheoryofstronginteractionsinthe 1960satatimewhenQuantumChromodynamicswasnotyetformulated.At thatjunctureinthehistoryofparticlephysics,aconsiderableamountofhadronscatteringdatawereavailablebutafundamentalfield-theoreticdescriptionwas lacking.Theapparentfailureoffieldtheoryindescribingstronginteractions ledtothesuggestionthatstronginteractionsshouldbeunderstoodinterms of S -matrixtheorywheretheattemptwouldbetoderivethedynamicsof stronginteractionsfromthepropertiesofthe S -matrix,suchasanalyticity, unitarityandcrossingsymmetry.Venezianoproposedaformofthescattering amplitudewhichsatisfiedtheserequirementsanddisplayedthedesiredasymptoticbehaviourandduality.Thebreakthroughinunderstandingtheunderlying dynamicsofthedualmodelcamewiththerealisationthatthismodelcould beobtainedfromarelativisticstringinthatthespectrumofhadronicstates couldbedeterminedfromthatofastring.Inspiteofitsinitialsuccessthis stringpictureofthestronginteractionsranintoproblemsbecauseofthepersistentappearanceofamassless,spin-2hadroninthespectrumofstatesofa closedstringwhichhadnoanalogueinthehadronicspectrumandeventually thestringmodelofhadronicphysicshadtobeabandoned.

ItwasScherkandSchwarz[24]whoresurrectedtheideaofstringsbysuggestingareinterpretationofstringtheorynotasatheoryofhadronsbutas atheoryofallinteractions,whichnaturallyincorporatesgravity.Thedreaded spin-2masslessexcitationofclosed-stringtheorywastobeunderstoodasagraviton,instead.ThescaleofstringdynamicswasalsoelevatedtoPlanckscalefrom typicalhadronicscalessothatthecorrectionstoclassicalgravitycomingfrom stringtheorywouldbeatappropriateshort-distancescales.

WewillbespellingoutstringtheoryingreaterdetailinChapter 4,soherewe willemphasisethemainpointsofcontactwithKaluza-Kleintheories.Theaction foraclassicalrelativisticstring,whichiseitheropenorclosed,canbederived fromtherequirementthatitbeproportionaltotheareaofthetwo-dimensional surfacesweptoutbythestring.Onecanthenproceedtoquantisethissystem usingstandardtechniquesusingsomeconvenientgauge.Itturnsoutthatquantisationleadstoananomalycalledtheconformalanomalymakingthetheory inconsistent.Therealsoappearnegative-normstatesinthestringspectrum. Boththeseproblemsturnouttohavethesamesolution:thesedisappearifthe spacetimedimensionalityis26.Afurtherconditionalsorestrictsthemassspectrumofthetheory.Butwhatisimportantisthefactthathigherdimensionality ofspacetimeinstringtheoryisnotan apriori assumptionbutitemergesnaturallyfromconsistencyrequirementsofthequantumtheoryofstrings.Justasthe Kaluza-Kleinideaemergesnaturallyfromstringtheorysodoestheideaofunificationoffundamentalinteractions:thequantisationoftheopenandclosedstring proceedsalongsimilarlinesexceptthattheopenstringhasaspin-1massless

modeandtheclosedstringhasaspin-2masslessmode,suggestingapossible pathtotheunificationofYang-Millstheoryandgravitation.

Thequantisationdescribedaboveisforthebosonicstring.Ifwewantto bringfermionsintothepictureitisdonebysupersymmetrisingtheactionand bringinginMajoranafermionsassuperpartnerstothebosonicco-ordinates.The quantisationproceedsasbeforebuttheconsistencyconditiontogetridofthe conformalanomalyyields d =10,ratherthan d =26.

Compactificationoftheextradimensionstoobtainconsistentandrealistic four-dimensionaltheorieshasbeenaproblemthathasreceivedconsiderable attention.Compactificationonmanifoldsof SU (3)holonomy,i.e.Calabi-Yau manifolds,provideslow-energyphysicswith N =1supersymmetrybutchiral fermionscontinuetoremainaprobleminsuchmodels.Compactificationon orbifoldsmayholdthekeytogettingchiralfermions.Inspiteofseveralpromising attemptsinthesedirections,itisfairtosaythatnoneofthesearecloseto providingarealisticmodelofparticlephysicsatlowenergies.

Itwasfromaratherunexpectedvantagepointthatthenewonslaughton higherdimensionswaslaunchedabouttenyearsago.Muchofthiswasdue,at leastinspirit,tonewdevelopmentsthattookplaceinstringtheoryinthemid1990s.Thesenewdevelopmentsweremainlyintheunderstandingofstringtheory atstrongcouplingandtheprogresswasduetothediscoveryofaseriesofdualities instringtheorywhichallowedstrong-couplingandweak-couplingtheoriestobe relatedtoeachother.Theseeventuallyledtoproposalswherethecomplete setofdualsforallknownstringtheories(withsufficientsupersymmetry)was detailed.Ontheonehand,thedualitiesinstringtheoryarelikestrong/weakcouplingdualitiesbut,ontheotherhand,itisalsointimatelyconnectedto electric–magneticduality.Inthelattercase,whileatweak(electric)coupling, electricchargesappearaselementaryquantabutmagneticmonopolesappearas extendedobjects(solitons),inthestrongcouplingtherolesgetreversedandthe basicquantaturnouttobemagnetic.Instringtheory,similarly,dualitygives risetonewsolitonicsolutionscalledbranes.Wewilldiscussthisinmoredetail inChapter 3 butthebranesturnouttoactlikethefamiliardomainwallsinfield theoryandserveassurfacesonwhichgaugeandmatterfieldscanbelocalised.

Arkani-Hamed,DimopoulosandDvali[25]consideredatheorywith D 4 extradimensionswhichhastheStandardModelparticlesconfinedtoa3-brane (whichisessentiallya3+1dimensionalsurface)andonlythegravitonsarefree topropagateinthefull D dimensions.Asusual,theextra D 4dimensionshave tobecompactifiedtoobtainthe3+1dimensionaltheory.But,sincetheseextra dimensionsareonly‘seen’bygravity,theseneednotbecompactifiedtolength scaleswhichareoftheorderof M 1 P butitcanbearrangedthat n ofthese extradimensionsarecompactifiedtoacommonscale R whichisrelativelylarge, whiletheremainingdimensionsarecompactifiedtomuchsmallerlengthscales whichareoftheorderoftheinversePlanckscale.Dependingonthenumber oflargeextradimensions,themagnitudeof R couldvaryfromamillimetre

toafermi.Moreimportantly,theeffectivetheoryexistsatascaleofaTeV, whichhelpshandlethehierarchyproblemwhileprovidingveryexcitingand novelphenomenologyatexperimentallyaccessibleenergies.

Theproblemwiththeabovemodeloflargeextradimensionsisthatitintroducesanotherhierarchy:betweenthemagnitudeofthelargeextradimension andthePlancklength.Itwastoaddressthisproblemthatamodelwithasmall fifthdimensionbutwithawarpedfive-dimensionalgeometrywasputforthby RandallandSundrum[26].Themodelhastwobraneslocatedatthefixedpoints oftheorbifoldonwhichthefifthdimensioniscompactified.Awarpedmetricis thenovelfeatureofthismodel.Thewarpfactorisanexponentialfactorinvolving thefifthdimensionandtheradiusofcompactificationandthisfactormultiplies thefour-dimensionalMinkowskipartofthemetric.Thewarpfactorgenerates MP MEW ∼ 1015 byanexponentoforder30andsolvesthehierarchyproblem.For thismechanismtowork,onewillhavetoensurethatthecompactificationradius isstabilisedagainstquantumfluctuationsandthiscanbedonebyintroducing abulkscalarfieldwhichgeneratesapotentialthatallowsforthestabilisation andtheassociatedmodulusfield,theradion(whichdescribesthefluctuations ofthemagnitudeoftheradius),acquiresamassoftheorderofaTeV.The phenomenologyofthismodelisquitedistinctfromthatofthemodeloflarge extradimensionsbecauseofthediscretespectrumofgravitonresonancesthat resulthere.Themassiveradionalsooffersaverydistinctivetestofthismodel.

TheworkofArkani-Hamed,DimopolosandDvaliandthatofRandalland Sundrumopenedupthefloodgatesfornewworkonmodelsofextradimensions. Inthelasttenyears,severalmodelshavebeenproposedandtheirconsequences havebeenworkedoutingreatdetailforbothparticlephysicsandcosmology. Severalattemptshavealsobeenmadetointerpretandexplainthesemodelsin termsofahigh-energystring-theoreticdescription.Asstatedinourpreface,we willfocusontheparticlephysicsaspectsofthisvigorousfieldofendeavourand attempttogiveacoherentaccountofitinthechapterstofollow.

TheStandardModelandbeyond

2.1ThestructureoftheStandardModel

Inthischapter,weprovidearapidsurveyoftheStandardModelofthestrong andelectroweakinteractions.Weassumethatthereaderwillhavemorethan anacquaintancewiththeStandardModel,giventhatthisbookaddressesa high-energyphysicsreadership.However,thischapterisnecessarynotjustto establishconventionsandnotationsbut,morepertinently,tohighlightthose aspectsoftheStandardModelthatweneedtofocuson.Thecontentsofthis chapterarecoveredinmuchgreaterdetailinmanystandardtextbooksand reviews.Wewilllisthereafewofthesereferences.Thefoundationsofthesubject werelaidoutinRefs.[27, 28, 29].Verygoodexpositionsofthefield-theoretic foundationsoftheStandardModelmaybefoundinRefs.[30, 31, 32, 33]and relatedphenomenologicalissuesmaybefoundinRefs.[34, 35].

HavingdiscussedthekeyaspectsoftheStandardModel,wewillthendiscuss thereasonsthatwehavetobelievethattheStandardModelwillbesubsumed intoalargertheoryathigherenergies,despitetheremarkablesuccessthatithas hadinexplainingextantempiricalinformation.Someofthecandidatetheories whichgobeyondtheStandardModelandmayreplaceitathighenergieswill thenbediscussed.

2.2QuantumElectrodynamics

Westartwiththeprototypegaugetheory,QuantumElectrodynamics(QED), whoseLagrangiandescribestheinteractionoftheelectromagneticfield Aμ with anelementaryfermion, ψ (liketheelectron,forexample)ofcharge e andmass m,givenby

Another random document with no related content on Scribd:

the meat, and gave some of it to her husband; he kicked it away. She gave him some wûdjûk (weed like mustard), to eat; he tasted of it, spat it out, and threw the rest in the fire.

She said: “The people were kind to me to-day; they gave me the fawn and asked me to come to-morrow,” and she began to pound seed and get ready to go. [119]

The next day when the woman and her brother-in-law were starting off, Gáhga said: “I know what kind of stuff you are feeding me! I know you are making sport of me. You don’t fool me. You can do what you like; I don’t care for you any longer, but I will make you feel sorry.” They didn’t answer, didn’t say a word to him.

That day Gáhga’s sister came to see her little nephew. Gáhga said: “I want you to get me a straw plate.”

“Why do you want a straw plate?” asked his sister.

“Get it for me, I want it.”

She wouldn’t get him the plate till he told her what he was going to do with it, and he wouldn’t tell. She was afraid of him; she knew he was mad about something.

After a while old man Kāhkaas came; he was kin of Gáhga. Gáhga asked him for the plate and he gave it to him, and said: “Your brother is stealing your wife. All the people at the deer hunt say so. But you must keep quiet; you mustn’t get mad. You are old and blind; your brother is young, and your wife is nice-looking.”

Gáhga screamed, he was so mad. He called his sister and said: “Lead me to the hunt!”

She was so scared that she had to do as he told her. He took the straw plate, and the three started. When they got to the place, his sister said: “Sit down here, away from the snares; then you will be safe.”

“No,” said Gáhga, “I am going where my wife is.”

“Don’t be a fool,” said his sister. “She doesn’t want you; she has another man.”

Gáhga took the plate from under his arm, and sat down on it.

About midnight his sister asked: “What are you doing? Why don’t you lie down and go to sleep? Why are you sitting on that plate and keeping awake all night?”

“Keep still and let me alone,” said Gáhga. “Stay here by me; I am going to punish those people.” Then he got up and began to dance on the plate and to call out: “Ho! ho! ho!”

Right away rain came down, but Gáhga didn’t get wet. [120]He kept shaking himself and calling: “Ho! ho! ho!” Each time that he called, it rained harder. There was deep water everywhere, but the plate was dry and the ground around it was dry. The people got as wet as though they had been swimming.

Gáhga’s sister said: “You shouldn’t get mad and act in this way; you will kill everybody.”

He didn’t listen to what she said; he called, “Ho! ho! ho!” and danced faster and faster. The people were almost drowned; the water was up to their arms. Still Gáhga kept shaking himself and dancing and calling: “Ho! ho! ho!”

When the people saw that Gáhga and his sister were dry, they said to his brother: “You have done this. You have made Gáhga mad. You have taken your brother’s wife,” and they threatened to kill him.

He said: “I don’t want her. I am going to die; I am freezing.”

The people caught hold of the woman, dragged her along in the water, and threw her down in front of her husband. He stopped dancing, and right away it stopped raining.

The people said: “You shouldn’t be mad at us. We didn’t do this. We don’t want to die; we want to go home. You should feel sorry for us and dry up the water.”

Gáhga was sorry for them. He danced on the plate, but he didn’t call: “Ho! ho! ho!” The water began to go away, and soon the ground was as dry as it had been before the rain, and every one went home except Gáhga and his wife and his brother.

Gáhga sat on his plate; he wouldn’t get up or he wouldn’t speak. His wife got mad. She pushed him, and asked: “Why don’t you get ready to go home?” He didn’t answer: then she took hold of his arm, jerked him up, threw him on top of the load of meat on her back, and went home.

His brother went off on the mountains; he was afraid of Gáhga, and afraid of the people; for they hated him, and the woman didn’t care for him any longer.

Gáhga was so jealous and cross that he drove his wife away. His sister took the little boy, and Gáhga stayed alone. Maybe [121]he is dead and maybe he is living. Doctors who have him for their medicine can make rain whenever they want to. It is a good

medicine. When any one has it, they can look through a man’s body just as we look through a window. [122]

[Contents]

OLD MAN LULUS-DEWIEAS OR EARTHQUAKE

OLD MAN

CHARACTER

LulusDewieas A Sweet Root; Dewieas means a Great Eater, a Glutton

Old man Lulus-Dewieas and his son and daughter-in-law lived in the country where the lava beds are now. They ate a great deal of sweet lulus; it was the old man’s medicine. Always when the son went to hunt for deer, he told his wife to take good care of his father, and be sure to give him food before she ate herself, or gave any food to the children. If she didn’t, she would bring misfortune on herself and the children. The woman remembered what her husband said, and she always gave the old man food first; he was glad and fed his grandchildren.

One day, early in winter, the son said to his wife: “There is plenty of game now. I want to kill a good many deer before deep snow comes. While I am gone, you mustn’t forget to feed my father before any one else.” The old man was white as snow; he was very old and was almost blind.

The next morning, when the young man was starting off, he said: “I had a bad dream last night. I don’t want to go, but the children are always crying for fat meat. I dreamed that I came home and found only a deep hole where our house is now. You must keep the

children away from their grandfather. Don’t let them bother him; he might get mad. As long as you treat him well, he won’t harm them.”

When the young man got to the top of the mountain, he looked back; he could see his house, but somehow he felt lonesome and scared. He kept listening, as if he expected to hear something. It was the first time that he had felt that way. He found a deer and drove it on to a hill, and shot at it. [123]Right where it stood, it disappeared. Then he knew that something was going to happen to him. He said: “This is the first time I have lost a deer after shooting it.” When he got tired of looking for the deer, he sat down to rest.

After her husband was gone, the young woman got a heavy stone and began to pound seeds. While she was pounding, she made up her mind to find out what her father-in-law would do if she put the seed away without giving him any. When the seed was fine enough, she put up the mortar without saying a word. When the old man saw her do that, he crept out and sat down on the south side of the house. As he sat there, he began to swell up. He took black paint and painted himself in stripes. Right away he began to turn and turn, and to throw up dirt. His hair grew as red as fire, and when the hole he made was large enough, he sank into it.

When the little girl saw her grandfather going down in the ground she screamed: “Oh, grandfather, come back!”

The woman heard the child cry, and she ran out to see what the matter was. When she saw what had happened, she called: “Oh, father, come back. I’ll give you lots of seeds to eat! Come back!”

But the old man had gone too far, and was too mad; the house, the woman, and the children all sank into the hole.

The old man went on, boring as he went. Everywhere he broke and threw out the earth. Once in a while he raised himself up a little. At such places the earth would be level for a short distance, then it would sink down in a deep hole and leave a wide opening in the ground.

The son heard a terrible roar and he knew that his wife had made his father mad. People living a long way off heard the roar. They knew what kind of an old man that was; they stayed in their houses and fastened up their doors. As the old man traveled, he kept calling his own name: “Lulus-Dewieas, Lulus-Dewieas!” When the young man came to where his house had been, he found only a wide gap in the earth. He followed the sound of his father’s traveling and called to him; but the old man didn’t hear him.

He traveled under the ground till he got beyond Mount [124]Shasta and came to where there was water. He stopped there, but stayed under ground. The son stood above the place and spoke to his father.

The old man said: “You must not feel badly; my spirit belongs to this earth. You must go away from me; you must not try to follow me. I shall live forever under the earth.”

Lulus-Dewieas could hardly speak when he said this. The son left him, and ever after wandered around in the world. He felt sorry and lonesome. [125]

[Contents]

Máidikdak

MÁIDIKDAK’S DAUGHTERS

CHARACTERS

Snowbird

Wus Fox

Máidikdak and her two daughters lived in the south. The old woman knew that five chiefs lived in the north, with their father, who was a chief, too. She wanted her daughters to marry those five brothers, so she made them ready for the road. To one daughter she gave a basket of food; to the other beads, nice shells, and porcupine quills.

When the girls were ready to start, she said: “If you see a man coming from the east, you will know he is Wus. Don’t stop to talk to him. He is a powerful man; he can do any thing he likes. If he gets mad, he will turn you into an animal or a bird. Don’t go on the west side of the lake. Follow the trail on the east side.”

When the girls came to the lake, the west side looked nicer, the trail was brighter. The elder sister wanted to follow it, but the younger sister said: “Our mother told us not to go on that side.”

The elder sister said: “You can follow the other trail if you want to. I am going on this trail; it is nicer.”

The younger girl didn’t want to be alone, so she went with her sister. When they passed Wus’ house she was frightened. She said: “I feel as if somebody were looking at me.”

“I feel that way too,” said the elder sister. Presently they saw a young man coming toward them.

“What nice girls those are,” thought Wus. When he came up to them, the younger sister said to the elder: “Don’t stop. Go right on. This is the man our mother told us about. Don’t speak to him.” [126]

But the elder girl stopped. Wus made her stop. The younger went on a little way, then she turned back; she was afraid to go on alone.

“Where are you going?” asked Wus.

“To the chief’s house,” said the elder sister.

“What chief is there out this way? I am the only chief here. I am the chief of this world.”

“You are not the chief we are going to. That chief never travels around. Our mother told us there was a bad man on this side of the lake. His name is Wus; he doesn’t smell good.”

“I know that man,” said Wus. “He is not bad. He has power and can do anything he wants to.”

“We are not going to stop here,” said the elder sister. “We are going to the chief who lives in the north, and has five sons.”

“Go on, if you want to,” said Wus.

When the girls started, Wus watched them till they went out of sight; he was saying things in his mind. As they traveled, they became old women, with humps on their backs; their bodies shriveled up, there was no flesh on their bones, they could scarcely move; their hair turned white, and their teeth fell out. Their beautiful clothes turned to dirty straw; their strings of beads were twisted bark; their baskets

looked old and broken and the roots in them turned to moldy skins; the shells and porcupine quills were bits of bark.

The younger sister said: “We didn’t go the way our mother told us to. That man was Wus; he has done this. If we had gone on the east side of the lake, we shouldn’t have met him. We should have done as our mother told us; she is old, and she knows more than we do.”

After a long time, they got to the chief’s house. The five brothers were out hunting. The chief didn’t know what to give the women to eat; he thought they were too old to eat roasted liver (old people’s food). When he gave them some, they pushed it away. They lay down to sleep, and while they were sleeping the five brothers came. They knew Máidikdak’s daughters and knew who had made them old. [127]

The youngest brother asked: “Did you give these women anything to eat?”

“I gave them liver,” said the old man, “but they couldn’t eat it; they haven’t any teeth.”

The young man was glad they had come; he sat down and watched them. About midnight they turned to beautiful girls. In the morning, when they woke up, they were old women again.

The chief said to himself: “What kind of a man is my son? Why does he stay by those dirty old women?”

The young women heard his thoughts and they felt badly. At last they crawled up and went out to wash in the river. The elder sister said: “If we swim, maybe it will make us young again.”

They took off their dirty, ragged clothes and old torn moccasins and began to swim. Right away they turned to beautiful girls; their long

hair floated on the top of the water. As they swam, they talked and laughed, for they were glad to be young again. They made sport of their father-in-law, and said: “That big chief thought we were old women; he fed us liver!”

The young man heard this and said to his father: “You fed those girls dirty liver. Did you think they were old women?”

The girls kept diving down in the water and coming up, and soon they began to change. They became green-headed ducks, and floated off toward home. The young man felt badly; he didn’t want them to go.

Old Máidikdak heard them coming, and when they were near the house, she said: “My daughters, you didn’t do as I told you. I told you about that bad man. If I hadn’t this would be my fault; now it is yours.” She tried to catch them, but couldn’t. At last she went under the water and caught hold of their legs. She pulled off their feathers and they were girls again.

The next morning the young man said to his father: “I am going to carry my wives’ clothes and beads and porcupine quills to their mother.” [128]

When he got to Máidikdak’s house the two sisters were off gathering wood. The old woman saw him sitting on top of the house and she asked: “Who are you?”

“I am one of the five brothers who live in the north.”

“Are you the youngest?”

“Yes, I have brought back your shells and porcupine quills. Wus changed your daughters to ducks.”

“Come in, son-in-law, my daughters have gone for wood.”

The young man was glad. When the girls came, he said: “I have left my father and brothers. I will live here now.” Ningádaniak.1 [129]

The edge or rim; meaning the end of the story. ↑

[Contents]

WUS KUMUSH AND TSMUK

CHARACTERS

Nátcaktcókaskĭt

Tsmuk Darkness

Wuswelékgăs Wus’ Old Woman

Old man Tsmuk and his wife had three sons and one daughter. The daughter was always thinking about Wus and singing about him.

Wus heard her, but he didn’t know how to get to her, for everywhere around Tsmuk’s place it was dark. He tried in all directions, but couldn’t get there. He listened to the girl’s song. At last he thought: “I can do anything I want to; I am Wus. I will make a place where that girl will come, and I can see her.” He burned over ground and made it ready for ges.1 Then he thought of ges, and it grew there right away.

One day, when the three sons of old man Tsmuk were starting off to hunt deer, they asked their sister: “What will you eat while we are gone?”

“I have nothing to eat,” said the girl.

“Not far from here,” said the brothers, “there is ges growing; you can dig that.” And they told her where the place was.

Wus saw her digging roots and singing, and he thought: “How can I get near her without frightening her?” He turned himself into an old woman, put his bow and arrows and quiver into a basket, tied bark

around his legs and head, just as an old woman does, and went to the girl. He talked like a woman, spoke kindly, asked her who she was, and where her home was.

The girl was tired; she complained because she had to come so far for roots.

“Are you very far from home?” asked Wus. [130]

“I have to camp one night on the way back,” said the girl. When she started for home, Wus hurried the sun down, made night come quickly, then he said: “Let us sit down and sing songs.”

While they were singing, Wus wished her to sleep. She went to sleep right away. Then he built a brush house over her; he worked all night, and in the morning the house was finished. When the girl woke up, she was in a bright, many-colored house, and she wondered where she was. When she remembered, and looked around for the old woman, she saw a handsome young man; his clothes were covered with beads.

The next day Tsmuk’s daughter had a child. It was like any child, except that it had fox ears. The mother cried.

“Why do you cry?” asked Wus. “Are you sorry to be here? For a long time I have listened to you. When I have been out hunting, I have heard you singing about me. If you don’t like me, why did you sing that song?”

“I am not crying about you, I am crying about my baby; I think my father or brothers will kill it.”

“They will not kill the baby. I have power; I can do anything; I am Wus,” said the young man.

Wus pushed the sun and made it go down quickly. As soon as the woman was asleep, he fixed the baby’s ears, made them like the ears of a person. He did this by thinking hard and wishing them to be that way.

Old Tsmuk and his wife were looking for their daughter. They knew that Wus had been trying to find her and they thought he had caught her. They called to her, and listened for her song, but didn’t hear it.

Tsmuk’s daughter wanted to go home; she wanted to see her father and mother. Wus knew her thoughts, and he asked: “Why do you think of such things? What I wish for will be. To-morrow you will go home.”

The next morning Wus wrapped up the baby and tied it on a board. The child was bright and beautiful. It looked like a rainbow.

Old man Tsmuk sent his youngest son to hunt for his sister. When the young man saw her coming, he didn’t know her, she [131]was so beautiful; she was different from what she had been before. He ran into the house, and said: “There is a beautiful woman coming.” When the second brother saw her, he said: “That is our sister.” The woman was alone, except for the baby on her back. When she went into the house, her father asked: “What man have you found? If Wus is your husband, you can’t stay here!”

Wus was a long way off, but he heard what the old man said and he was angry. He thought: “I will find out if old Tsmuk is mad at his daughter.” Then he wished the baby to turn to a little fox. When the young woman took the baby off her back, it was like a baby fox. It was covered with hair.

“That child smells like a fox!” cried the old man. He snatched it and threw it out of the house. The mother screamed. Wus heard her, and

said: “Now I will torment Tsmuk.” That moment Wus’ wife was an old woman. Her youngest brother was so frightened that he lay down and cried. The baby was crying itself to death, but the mother couldn’t do anything; she was bent over and helpless, too old to go out of the house.

Wus thought: “Bring in that child!” That minute the young man got up, went out, and brought in the baby and put it by its mother. He said to his sister: “Lie down, and I will cover you up.”

Wus thought: “My brother-in-law is going to like me,” and he was glad. He gave his own feelings to the young man.

The brother watched his sister, and after a while he saw that she was getting younger; then he said: “Go to the river and swim. Maybe you will be young again. I don’t care if you are old, I love you just the same; but I am sorry for the baby.” He kept the child covered, and it went to sleep. He went to sleep himself, and slept till the middle of the night, then he woke up, but he slept again, and when he woke up the second time it was almost morning. He looked at the baby; it was like a person. He didn’t go to sleep again; he was afraid to; he thought if he did the child would turn into a fox.

“Do you know what Wus can do?” asked his sister. “He [132]can do anything. He can make people old in a minute; he can turn them to anything; he can move a house or tear it down by wishing. When I saw Wus, he looked as I do; he was a woman and carried a basket on his back. While I was asleep, he turned to a man and built a house. The house is so bright and has so many colors that it hurts my eyes to look at it. If anything happens to Wus’ child, I think we shall die. When it was thrown out, I got old; now that it is in the house, I am growing young again.”

“What are you talking about?” asked Tsmuk. “Old Wus is listening to everything. He listens while he catches mice to eat.”

When the brother and sister started to go to Wus’ house, they didn’t tell their father where they were going. Soon they heard Wus blowing on reeds, making music. It was nice and it sounded far off. They followed the music till they came to the house. The brother stood outside; he was afraid to go in.

Wus said to the woman: “Why do you let your brother stand outside? Tell him to come and sit here by me.”

When the young man went into the house, he couldn’t see, it glittered so; the light was so bright that it hurt his eyes; he had to hold his head down. Wus said: “I know that you like me,” and he called the young man brother-in-law. “Take off your clothes and put on these I give you; then you can look around.”

The sister asked: “When do you want to go back to our father and mother?”

“In two days I will go,” said the brother.

“Will you take blankets and beads with you?”

“No,” said the young man, “I shall come back; I don’t like to stay there.”

Wus wanted to go to Tsmuk’s house. His brother-in-law said: “I will show you the way; you will get there if I am with you.”

They all started; when near the house the young man went ahead. Old Tsmuk spoke cross to him; asked: “Have you been in Wus’ house?” and he called Wus bad names. [133]

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.