Full download Sustainable landscape planning in selected urban regions 1st edition makoto yokohari p

Page 1


Visit to download the full and correct content document: https://textbookfull.com/product/sustainable-landscape-planning-in-selected-urban-re gions-1st-edition-makoto-yokohari/

More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant download maybe you interests ...

Smart and Sustainable Planning for Cities and Regions

Adriano Bisello

https://textbookfull.com/product/smart-and-sustainable-planningfor-cities-and-regions-adriano-bisello/

Engineering Geology for Society and Territory Volume 5

Urban Geology Sustainable Planning and Landscape Exploitation 1st Edition Giorgio Lollino

https://textbookfull.com/product/engineering-geology-for-societyand-territory-volume-5-urban-geology-sustainable-planning-andlandscape-exploitation-1st-edition-giorgio-lollino/

Sustainable Urban Logistics Planning and Evaluation 1st Edition Jesus Gonzalez-Feliu

https://textbookfull.com/product/sustainable-urban-logisticsplanning-and-evaluation-1st-edition-jesus-gonzalez-feliu/

Sustainable Urban Planning Vibrant Neighbourhoods Smart Cities Resilience 1st Edition Bott

https://textbookfull.com/product/sustainable-urban-planningvibrant-neighbourhoods-smart-cities-resilience-1st-edition-bott/

Advances in Human Factors in Architecture Sustainable Urban Planning and Infrastructure Proceedings of the AHFE 2020 Virtual Conference on Human Factors in Architecture Sustainable Urban Planning and Infrastructure 16 20 July 2020 USA Jerzy Charytonowicz

https://textbookfull.com/product/advances-in-human-factors-inarchitecture-sustainable-urban-planning-and-infrastructureproceedings-of-the-ahfe-2020-virtual-conference-on-human-factorsin-architecture-sustainable-urban-planning-and/

GIS in Sustainable Urban Planning and Management (Open Access): A Global Perspective 1st Edition Martin Van Maarseveen (Editor)

https://textbookfull.com/product/gis-in-sustainable-urbanplanning-and-management-open-access-a-global-perspective-1stedition-martin-van-maarseveen-editor/

Landscape-ecological Planning LANDEP László Miklós

https://textbookfull.com/product/landscape-ecological-planninglandep-laszlo-miklos/

Historical Urban Landscape 1st Edition Gábor Sonkoly (Auth.)

https://textbookfull.com/product/historical-urban-landscape-1stedition-gabor-sonkoly-auth/

Urban and Transit Planning: A Culmination of Selected Research Papers from IEREK Conferences on Urban Planning, Architecture and Green Urbanism, Italy and Netherlands (2017) Hocine Bougdah

https://textbookfull.com/product/urban-and-transit-planning-aculmination-of-selected-research-papers-from-ierek-conferenceson-urban-planning-architecture-and-green-urbanism-italy-andnetherlands-2017-hocine-bougdah/

Makoto Yokohari

Akinobu Murakami

Yuji Hara

Kazuaki Tsuchiya Editors

Sustainable Landscape Planning in Selected Urban Regions

ScienceforSustainableSocieties

SeriesEditorialBoard

EditorinChief

KazuhikoTakeuchi,Ph.D.,DirectorandProfessor,IntegratedResearchSystemfor SustainabilityScience,TheUniversityofTokyoInstitutesforAdvancedStudy, Japan;SeniorVisitingProfessor,UnitedNationsUniversityInstituteforthe AdvancedStudyofSustainability,Japan

SeriesAdviser

JoanneM.Kauffman,Ph.D.,Co-editorinChief, HandbookofSustainable Engineering,Springer,2013

ScientificAdvisoryCommittee

SirParthaDasgupta,Ph.D.,FrankRamseyProfessorEmeritusofEconomics, UniversityofCambridge,UK;VolvoEnvironmentPrize,2002;BluePlanet Prize,2015

HiroshiKomiyama,Ph.D.,Chairman,MitsubishiResearchInstitute,Japan; PresidentEmeritus,TheUniversityofTokyo,Japan

SanderVanderLeeuw,Ph.D.,FoundationProfessor,SchoolofHumanEvolution andSocialChangeandSchoolofSustainability,ArizonaStateUniversity,USA

HiroyukiYoshikawa,Dr.Eng.,MemberofJapanAcademy;Chairman,TheJapan PrizeFoundation;PresidentEmeritus,TheUniversityofTokyo,Japan;JapanPrize 1997

TanSriZakriAbdulHamid,Ph.D.,ScienceAdvisertothePrimeMinisterof Malaysia,Malaysia;FoundingChairoftheUNIntergovernmentalScience-Policy PlatformonBiodiversityandEcosystemServices(IPBES);ZayedInternational Prize,2014

EditorialBoard

Jean-LouisArmand,Ph.D.,Professor,Aix-MarseilleUniversite ´ ,France

JamesBuizer,Professor,UniversityofArizona,USA

AnanthaDuraiappah,Ph.D.,Director,UNESCOMahatmaGandhiInstituteof EducationforPeaceandSustainable(MGIEP),India

ThomasElmqvist,Ph.D.,Professor,StockholmResilienceCenterandStockholm University,Sweden

KenFukushi,Ph.D.,Professor,TheUniversityofTokyo,Japan

VincenzoNazo,Ph.D.,Professor,TheSapienzaUniversityofRome,Italy

ObijioforAginam,Ph.D.,Professor,UnitedNationsUniversity,Japan

OsamuSaito,Ph.D.,AcademicProgrammeOfficer,UnitedNationsUniversity,Japan

LeenaSrivastava,Ph.D.,ExecutiveDirector,TheEnergyandResourcesInstitute,India

JeffreySteinfeld,Ph.D.,ProfessorEmeritusofChemistry,MassachusettsInstitute ofTechnology,USA ScopeoftheSeries

Thisseriesaimstoprovidetimelycoverageofresultsofresearchconductedin accordancewiththeprinciplesofsustainabilitysciencetoaddressimpedimentsto achievingsustainablesocieties–thatis,societiesthatarelowcarbonemitters,that liveinharmonywithnature,andthatpromotetherecyclingandre-useofnatural resources.Booksintheseriesalsoaddressinnovativemeansofadvancingsustainabilityscienceitselfinthedevelopmentofbothresearchandeducationmodels.

Theoverallgoaloftheseriesistocontributetothedevelopmentofsustainability scienceandtoitspromotionatresearchinstitutionsworldwide,withaviewto furtheringknowledgeandovercomingthelimitationsoftraditionaldiscipline-based researchtoaddresscomplexproblemsthatafflicthumanityandnowseemintractable.

Bookspublishedinthisserieswillbesolicitedfromscholarsworkingacross academicdisciplinestoaddresschallengestosustainabledevelopmentinallareas ofhumanendeavors.

ThisisanofficialbookseriesoftheIntegratedResearchSystemforSustainability Science(IR3S)oftheUniversityofTokyo.

Moreinformationaboutthisseriesathttp://www.springer.com/series/11884

SustainableLandscape PlanninginSelectedUrban Regions

Editors

DepartmentofUrbanEngineering TheUniversityofTokyo Bunkyo-ku,Tokyo

Japan

YujiHara FacultyofSystemsEngineering WakayamaUniversity Wakayama,Japan

AkinobuMurakami FacultyofEngineering InformationandSystems UniversityofTsukuba Tsukuba,Ibaraki

Japan

KazuakiTsuchiya DepartmentofEcosystemStudies TheUniversityofTokyo Bunkyo-ku,Tokyo Japan

ISSN2197-7348ISSN2197-7356(electronic) ScienceforSustainableSocieties

ISBN978-4-431-56443-0ISBN978-4-431-56445-4(eBook) DOI10.1007/978-4-431-56445-4

LibraryofCongressControlNumber:2016959537

© SpringerJapan2017

Thisworkissubjecttocopyright.AllrightsarereservedbythePublisher,whetherthewholeorpartof thematerialisconcerned,specificallytherightsoftranslation,reprinting,reuseofillustrations, recitation,broadcasting,reproductiononmicrofilmsorinanyotherphysicalway,andtransmission orinformationstorageandretrieval,electronicadaptation,computersoftware,orbysimilaror dissimilarmethodologynowknownorhereafterdeveloped.

Theuseofgeneraldescriptivenames,registerednames,trademarks,servicemarks,etc.inthis publicationdoesnotimply,evenintheabsenceofaspecificstatement,thatsuchnamesareexempt fromtherelevantprotectivelawsandregulationsandthereforefreeforgeneraluse.

Thepublisher,theauthorsandtheeditorsaresafetoassumethattheadviceandinformationinthis bookarebelievedtobetrueandaccurateatthedateofpublication.Neitherthepublishernorthe authorsortheeditorsgiveawarranty,expressorimplied,withrespecttothematerialcontained hereinorforanyerrorsoromissionsthatmayhavebeenmade.

Printedonacid-freepaper

ThisSpringerimprintispublishedbySpringerNature TheregisteredcompanyisSpringerJapanKK

Foreword

Sustainabilityisoneofthemostimportantissueswithwhichmankindisfacedin theearlytwenty-firstcentury.Theimpactonnatureofsingleindividualsmaynot appeartobesevere;however,theimpactofthehumanspeciesasawholeis immenseandcannotbeignored.Weareresponsibleforconsiderabledisturbances totheEarth’senvironment.Sustainabilitycanberegardedasanissueofhowour societyshouldbedesignedgiventhelimitationsintheEarth’scapacitytosustain humanlife.Asiaisaparticularlykeyareainthequestionofsustainabilityasitis hometonearlyhalftheglobalpopulationandrapideconomicgrowthispredictedin theregion.Energy,food,andotherdemandssuchasthosefornaturalresourcesare growingexponentially,anditisanticipatedthattherewillbeanincreaseinsocial andpoliticalconflictsaswellasseverepollutionissues.

TheUniversityofTokyo(UT)hasmaintainedtheAllianceforGlobalSustainability(AGS)withMIT,ETH,andChalmersUniversitysince1998inorderto promotesustainabilityscienceinanacademicarena.Tofurtherfacilitatethe developmentofthisresearchfield,UTalsoorganizedanetworkofresearch organizations,suchastheIntegratedResearchSystemforSustainabilityScience (IR3S),whichincludes10Japaneseuniversitiesandoneresearchinstitute,in2005. Atthesametime,theTransdisciplinaryInitiativeforGlobalSustainability(TIGS) wasestablished,inordertopromotetransdisciplinaryresearchactivitieswithin UT.TIGSspecifiesthefollowingfiveresearchareas:(1)energyandglobal warming,(2)environmentalrisk,(3)foodandwater,(4)urban–ruralenvironment, and(5)technologydevelopment.Ofthesefiveresearchareas,webelievethat urban–ruralenvironmentisthekeyissueforsustainabilityinAsia.

ThereareanumberofdevelopingcountriesinAsia,andassuchtheissueof economicdevelopmentshouldnotbeneglected.Ontheotherhand,thereremain manyruralareasinwhichpoorfarmersmaketheirliving.Astherearefewerjob opportunitiesintheseruralareas,thereisatendencyforresidentstheretomigrate tocityregions.Manyoftheworld’smegacitiesarealsolocatedinAsia,andthere aremanyissuesspecificallyassociatedwithmegacities.However,itisnotwithin thecapacityofmegacitiestoovercomesuchissuesbythemselves—asevenifsuch

issuesaresolvedthecitieswillbefacedwithfurtherinfluxesofpeople.These issuesshouldbesolvedincooperationwithsurroundingruralareas.

Primaryindustryisanothermajorissueforfuturesustainablesociety.Asa generalrule,asaneconomydevelops,theretendstobeadecreaseinthenumbers ofpeopleworkinginprimaryindustry.Globaltradingsystemscontributetothe accelerationofthistrend.Large-scalecapitalisticfarmingsystemsoverwhelm smalllocalfarmerssuchthattheycannotearnsufficientamountstosustaintheir livelihoods.Canwedependonimportsoffood?Shouldagriculturebemaintained forfoodsecurity?Willwebeabletoprovidejobstofarmersfromtheserural regionsinthefuture?Thesearejustsomeofthemanymajorissuesthatare associatedwiththequestionoftheroleofprimaryindustryinfuturesustainable society.

IthasbecomeevidenttousthatAsiancityregionshavemanyuniquecharacteristics.Specifically,theseregionsconsistofdifferentseriesofmixedland-use zonescontainingvariouscombinationsof“rural”and“urban”regions.Incontrast, thedistinctionbetweenruralareasandcityareasinEuropeisclear.Webelievethat thisdistinctcharacteristicofAsianregionsisakeyforfuturesustainablesociety— thatis,thekeyconceptforfuturesustainabledevelopmentisintheharmonization betweencitiesandruralareas.Thereisastrongtrendtosingleoutmegacitiesasa discreteproblem.However,themegacityissueshouldbeconsideredalongsidethe villageissue.Harmonizeddevelopmentofcitiesandvillagesisimperativefor sustainabledevelopment.

Todate,wehaveorganizedthreeworkshops.TheFirstInternationalWorkshop onSustainableCityRegionswasheldinBali,February24–25,2009;thesecondin Tainan,February24–25,2010;andthethirdinManila,August14–15,2011.The topicsoftheseworkshopswereasfollows:(1)UrbanRuralSystems:urban–rural socioeconomiclinkage,andlocalandregionalgovernance,(2)CityRegional Forms:landscapeandspatialplanningandsustainabletransportandmobility, (3)WaterManagement:eco-physicalintegrationandpreservation,watershortage, andwaterenvironmentalmanagement,(4)CultureandSettlements:culturalpreservation,lifestyle,andtheformofsettlements,andcommunity-basedinitiative,and (5)ShrinkingCityandUrbanAgriculture.

Thisvolumewaseditedbasedoninterdisciplinaryandinternationaldiscussions duringandaftertheworkshops.Thesearebothhighlyinformativeandcontain manyideasthatpointthewaytowardsfuturesustainability.Itismyhopethatthis bookwillcontributetofuturesustainabledevelopmentinAsiaandelsewhereinthe world.

NationalInstituteforEnvironmentalStudiesAkimasaSumi Tsukuba,Japan

Preface

Today’sextendedurbanregionsoftenmaintainruralfeatureswithintheirboundariesandalsohavestrongsocial,economicandenvironmentallinkageswiththe surroundingruralareas.Consequently,scholarswhostudycities,professionalswho developurbanpoliciesandcitizenswhoadvocateforbetterurbanenvironmentare inevitablyfacingruralissuesincludingfoodproduction,forestryandagricultural watermanagement.Theseintra-andinter-linkagesbetweenurbanandrural systemsproducecomplexinterdependenceswithglobalsustainabilityissues, includingthoseofclimatechange,resourceexploitation,ecosystemdegradation and,ultimately,humanwellbeing.Thespatialpatternsofmixedrural-urbanland usesfurtheraffectenergyuseinvarioussectors;therefore,alsohavesignificant impactonaggregatedGHGemissionsfromanurbanregion.Inaddition,urban encroachmentoverruralareasinvokestransformationsnotonlyinproductionbut alsointhedemandoffoodandothernaturalresources.Rural-urbangradientacross urbanregionhaveastrongimpactonbiodiversityandecosystemfunctioning.

Emergingrural-urbanlandusescanalsobringavarietyofbenefitstohumankind.Distinctiveexampleofthesebenefitscanbeillustratedthroughtheworldwide expansionofurbanagriculture.Forinstances,urbancommunitiesareincreasingly transformingvacantlotsintoproductivefarmingareas.While,atlarge,these activitiescontributetowardsurbanandregionalfoodsecurity,urbandwellerscan alsoobtainfreshfoodfromthesesources.Urbanagriculturallandsarealsocapable ofdeliveringmultipleecosystemservices.Forexample,theyprovidethecooling effectstomitigatetheimpactsofurbanheatislandphenomenon,contributeto stormwaterretentionthroughinfiltration,andsubsequentlyreducetherisksof urbanflooding.Inaddition,organicwastesgeneratedfromurbanactivitiescanbe suitablytransformedtomanureforuseintheseagriculturallandandcangreatly facilitateinwasterecyclinginanurbancontext.

Traditionaldisciplinesthatstudyurbanregions(e.g.urbanplanning,urbaneconomics,urbangeography),however,tentedtoconsideragriculturalandruralissues outsidetheirresearchdomain.Theterm“urban”inherentlystandupontheworldview ofrural-urbandichotomythus“urban”disciplinesinevitablylackappropriate

concepts,languages,toolsandmodelsfordealingwithenvironmentalandsocioeconomicissuesoftoday’sextendedurbanregions.Planningandotherprospective actionsforthesustainabilityofurbanregions,therefore,cannotsolelydependon “urban”approaches;rather,theyneedtointegratebroaderlandscapeperspectives thattakeextendedsocialandecologicalsystemsintoconsideration.Here,wearenot arguingthatlandscapesciencesasanalternativetourbanapproaches,butsuggestthe termlandscapeasacommonlanguagetodescribeanurbanregionequallyfromthe viewofruralandurbansystems.Thetermlandscape,definedas“anarea,as perceivedbypeople,whosecharacteristheresultoftheactionandinteractionof naturaland/orhumanfactors”byEuropeanLandscapeConventionin2000,alsohasa potentialtolinkland,water,food,ecosystem,human,policy,transportation,innovationandotherkeycomponentsofsustainabilityissues,totherealmofurbanregions.

Thisbookprovidesauniquecontributiontothescienceofsustainablesocietiesby challengingthetraditionalconceptofrural-urbandichotomy.Thisvolumeaddresses diverseenvironmental,socialandplanningissuesintoday’surbanregionsfrom interdisciplinaryperspectivesandshowshowtountangle,diagnose,andtransform urbanregionsthroughdistinctivethematiccontributionsacrossavarietyofacademic disciplinesrangingfromenvironmentalengineering,geographytolandscapeecology andurbanplanning.Casestudies,selectedfromacrosstheworld,investigateurban regionsinAsia,EuropeandNorthAmerica,includingSouth-EastAsianregions (Bangkok,Jakarta,andMetroManilaandothers)thatremainrelativelylessstudied. Thesecontributionscollectivelyillustratesharedanddifferentiateddriversofsustainabilitychallengesandprovideinformativeinputstoglobalandlocalsustainabilityinitiatives.Theyalsoprovideinnovativeideastobetterunderstandandmanage thelinkagesbetweenurbanandruralissues,especiallyfortheresearchers,policy plannersandprofessionalsengagedinurbanandregionalplanning.

TheRoadmap

Thisbookhasfourpartsandtheybringinsightsfromvariousacademicfieldsand geographicregions.PartIprovidestheoreticalfundamentalsofsustainablelandscapeplanning.PartIIandIIItogethercomposethescientificbasesofsustainable landscapeplanninginurbanregionsanddealwithintra-andinter-linkages betweenurbanandruralsystems.PartIVintroduceson-siteactivitieswhich implementingnovelideasofsustainablelandscapeplanning.

ThechaptersinPartIcontributetountangletheinterrelatedconceptsofurban regions,rural-urbanlinkages,sustainabilityandlandscapeplanning.Trendsin

contemporaryurbanizationandtheoriesofsustainabilityareintroducedforreaders invariousbackgrounds(YokohariandKhew,Chap. 1;McGee,Chap. 2;Takeuchi etal.,Chap. 3).YokohariandKnew(Chap. 1)traceurbanizationhistoryinmodern Japanandproposeaplanningframeworkforintegraterural-urbanlanduses. McGee(Chap. 2)provideskeyideasforstimulatingdiscussionsonthemain challengesforurbanpolicyandresearchintheAsianregion.Takeuchietal. (Chap. 3)introducestheir“urban–ruralfusion”conceptbyusingtheexamplesof localfoodproductionandorganicmaterialrecyclinginAsianurbanregions.Harata (Chap.4)andKidokoro(Chap. 5)explainevolvingtheoriesinurbanplanningfor sustainabilitybyusingtheexamplesoftransportation(Harata,Chap 4)andinnovation(Kidokoro,Chap 5)cases.

PartIIDiagnosingUrbanRegions:SocialandEnvironmental ConsequencesofUrbanization

Thispartprovidescasestudiesonurbanizationandenvironmentalandsocioeconomicimpacts.StudysitesinthispartincludeIndonesia(Murakamietal., Chap. 6;IrhamandSudirman,Chap. 8),thePhillipines(Bravo,Chap. 9),Thailand (ThaitakooandMcGrath,Chap. 10)andVietnam(NgaandFukushi,Chap. 11). Environmentalissuesmentionedinthispartincludecultivatedlandloss(Irhamand Sudirman,Chap. 8;Bravo,Chap. 9),flooding(ThaitakooandMcGrath,Chap. 10; NgaandFukushi,Chap. 11),urbanheatisland(Murakamietal.,Chap. 6)and renewableenergy(SoniandSalokhe,Chap. 11).Murakamietal.(Chap. 6)introducestherelationshipsbetweenthecharacteristicsofurbanizationinSouth-East Asiaandvariousenvironmentalissuesandservesasanintroductorychapterforthis part.SoniandSalokhe(Chap. 7)broadlyexplainaboutchallengesinurbanand peri-urbanagricultureinAsiancountries.Followingfourchapters(Irhamand Sudirman,Chap. 8;Bravo,Chap. 9;ThaitakooandMcGrath,Chap. 10;Ngaand Fukushi,Chap. 11)illustratein-depthinvestigationintocrucialenvironmentaland socio-economicissuesineachregion.

PartIIIDiagnosingUrbanRegions:Rural-UrbanLinkages andSustainabilityChallenges

WhilePartIIfocusesonenvironmentalandsocio-economicissueswithinurban regions,PartIIIlooksbeyondurbanregionsandextendourunderstandingsonhow urbanregionshavestrongsocial,economic,andenvironmentallinkageswiththe surroundingruralareas.Fourchaptersinthispartillustratecutting-edgechallenges instudyingrural-urbanlinkagesandtheirconsequences.Firsttwochapterstellhow rural-urbanlinkagesoffood(HaraandTsuchiya,Chap. 12)andwater(Mouriand

Oki,Chap. 13)affectGHGemissions.Followingtwochaptersdealwithurban contaminationissuesandexplainhowthecontaminationwillaffectnotonlypeople inurbanregionsbutalsosurroundingruralandnaturalenvironmentsandpeople therein(Rauch,Chap. 14,Parikesitetal.,Chap 15).

PartIVTransformingUrbanRegions:TowardRegional Sustainability

Thispartaddressesplanningactivitiesincurrentpractice.Theintentistoshowhow plannersandotherregionalactorsrespondtothegrowinginterestsinrural-urban linkagesmentionedinPartI,IIandIII.Gruehn(Chap. 18)andPotteiger(Chap. 17) explainEuropeanandNorthAmericanexperiencesinsustainabilityinitiativesin post-industrializedsocieties.BothGuzuman(Chap. 16)andPalijonetal.(Chap. 19) illustrategrowingurbanagriculturalactivitiesinMetroManila,thePhilippines. Sudjono(Chap. 20)andPeng(Chap. 21)provideinsightsintowatermanagementin today’sextendedurbanregions.

Bunkyo-ku,Tokyo,JapanMakotoYokohari Tsukuba,Ibaraki,JapanAkinobuMurakami Wakayama,JapanYujiHara Bunkyo-ku,Tokyo,JapanKazuakiTsuchiya

Acknowledgment

WethankTheAllianceforGlobalSustainability(AGS),aswellasIntegrated ResearchSystemforSustainabilityScience(IR3S),Trans-disciplinaryInitiative forGlobalSustainability(TIGS),andGlobalCenterofExcellenceforSustainable UrbanRegenerationattheUniversityofTokyofortheirsupportinorganizing “InternationalWorkshoponSustainableCity-Region”,whichopeneduptheopportunityofinterdisciplinarydiscussionstowardsthisvolume.Wealsoexpressour deepappreciationstotheAsahiGlassFoundation(researchgrantNo.2007–74and 2010–72)fortheirfinancialsupportsonorganizingourresearchactivitiesandthe workshop.

Contents

PartIUntanglingUrbanRegions:TheoreticalFrameworksfor SustainableLandscapePlanning

1LandscapePlanningforResilientCitiesinAsia:Lessonsfrom IntegratedRural–UrbanLandUseinJapan ..................3

MakotoYokohariandYuTingJoanneKhew

2TheSustainabilityofExtendedUrbanSpacesinAsiainthe Twenty-FirstCentury:PolicyandResearchChallenges .........17 TerryG.McGee

3EstablishingASustainableCommunityThroughUrbanandRural Fusion ...............................................27

KazuhikoTakeuchi,KojiHarashina,andYujiHara

4SustainableUrbanStructureandTransportPolicyinthe MetropolitanRegion ....................................39

NoboruHarata

5CreationofCollaborativeNetworksattheCity-RegionalLevel:Two InnovativeCasesinJapan ................................49 TetsuoKidokoro

PartIIDiagnosingUrbanRegions:SocialandEnvironmental ConsequencesofUrbanization

6FeaturesofUrbanizationandChangesintheThermalEnvironment inJakarta,Indonesia ...................................61

AkinobuMurakami,ShinjiKurihara,KojiHarashina, andAlindaM.Zain

7StrategicAnalysisofUrbanandPeri-urbanAgricultureinAsia: Issues,PotentialandChallenges ...........................73 PeeyushSoniandVilasM.Salokhe

8FarmlandConversionandtheSustainableCity:TheCaseof Yogyakarta,Indonesia ..................................85 IrhamandSenthotSudirman

9UrbanizationinthePhilippinesandItsInfluenceonAgriculture ....97 MaridethR.Bravo

10TheLandscapeofBangkok’sAgriculturalFringeandCityRegion Sustainability:AnEcologicalandCulturalCo-evolution ........111 DanaiThaitakooandBrianMcGrath

11InfectiousRiskAssessmentwithExposuretoPathogensin Floodwater—ACaseStudyofManila’sVulnerabilitytoClimate Change ..............................................123 TranThiVietNgaandKensukeFukushi

PartIIIDiagnosingUrbanRegions:Rural-UrbanLinkagesand SustainabilityChallenges

12FeedingUrbanRegions:EstimatingtheEnergyConsumptionof DomesticVegetableSuppliesforOsaka,Japan ................141 YujiHaraandKazuakiTsuchiya

13Catchment-ScaleWaterManagementofWastewaterTreatmentin anUrbanSewerageSystemwithCO2 EmissionAssessment ......151 GoroMouriandTaikanOki

14DispersionofContaminantsinUrbanRegionsandBeyond ......165 SebastienRauch

15Urban–RuralInterrelationsinWaterResourceManagement: ProblemsandFactorsAffectingtheSustainabilityoftheDrinking WaterSupplyintheCityofBandung,Indonesia ..............171 Parikesit,TeguhHusodo,SatoruOkubo,TotokHerwanto,I.Badri, RimboGunawan,ErriNoviarMegantara,DendiMuhammad, andKazuhikoTakeuchi

PartIVTransformingUrbanRegions:TowardRegionalSustainability

16UrbanAgricultureinthePhilippines:Initiatives,Practices, Significance,andThreats ................................187 ConstancioC.DeGuzman

17Scaling-Up:AnOverviewofUrbanAgriculture inNorthAmerica ......................................199 PotteigerMatthew

18RegionalPlanningandProjectsintheRuhrRegion(Germany) ....215 DietwaldGruehn

19BiowasteReuseThroughComposting:TheResponseofBarangay HolySpiritinQuezonCity,Philippines,toSolid-Waste Management ..........................................227 ArmandoPalijon,YujiHara,AkinobuMurakami, ConstancioDeGuzman,andMakotoYokohari

20AConceptofIntegratedGroundwaterManagementforSustaining IndonesianCitiesUsingtheSystemInterrelationshipModel .....237 PrianaSudjonoandFitriPrabarani

21InformalCollaborativeNetwork:ACaseStudyofMeinung, Taiwan ..............................................249 Li-PeiPeng

Erratumto:BiowasteReuseThroughComposting:TheResponse ofBarangayHolySpiritinQuezonCity,Philippines,toSolid-Waste Management .............................................E1

LandscapePlanningforResilientCities inAsia:LessonsfromIntegratedRural–UrbanLandUseinJapan

Abstract Ruralandurbanlandscapecomponentshavetraditionallymaintaineda clearseparationinthemorphologyofEuropeancities.Incontrast,thehistorical landscapeofEdoJapanconsistsofmixedruralandurbanlanduses,dueinparttoa periodofrelativepeacethatrenderedcontainedandfortifiedcitiesredundant. DespiteEuropeanandJapanesecitieshavingverydifferenthistoricaldriversof theirresultanturbanforms,modernlandscapeplanningdiscoursesinbothregions haveshiftedtowardacommonaimforaclearrural–urbanseparation.However, prevailingsocioeconomicfactors(associatedmainlywithfarmers’ rights)thathave sustainedthemixedurban–ruralpatternofJapaneselandscapesresultedinapartial uptakeofthemodernlandscapeplanningmorphology.Insteadoflabelingthe resultant“chaotic”urban–ruralmixcharacteristicofmodernJapaneselandscapes asa“failure,”onecouldinsteaddrawlessonsforabetterfuture.Theinitial motivatorforseparatingtheruralfromtheurbanlandscapeinmodernlandscape planningwastolimitchaoticurbanexpansion.However,therehasbeenincreasing recognitionthatcitiesoftodayhavetoberesilienttonewchallenges,suchasthe increasedinstancesofextremeevents.Thischaptermakesthecasethatacitywith anintegratedrural–urbanlandscapeisidealforincreasingurbanresilienceto naturaldisasters.ThehistoricalJapaneselandscapecould,ironically,functionas anurban-planningmodelthatensuresthefunctionalconnectivityneededforfood securityandsimultaneouslyensurestheprovisionofadequate,accessiblegreen spaces.

Keywords Integratedurban–rurallandscape•Landscapeplanning•Europe• Japan•Landscapeform•Urbanresilience•Urbanagriculture•Food-security• Disasterplanning•Historicalperspective

M.Yokohari(*)

DepartmentofUrbanEngineering,TheUniversityofTokyo,Bunkyo-ku,Tokyo,Japan e-mail: myoko@k.u-tokyo.ac.jp

Y.T.J.Khew

GraduatePrograminSustainabilityScience,TheUniversityofTokyo,Tokyo,Japan

© SpringerJapan2017

M.Yokoharietal.(eds.), SustainableLandscapePlanninginSelectedUrban Regions,ScienceforSustainableSocieties,DOI10.1007/978-4-431-56445-4_1

4M.YokohariandY.T.J.Khew

Permanenthumansettlementsappearedasearlyas700BC(Antrop 2004).Cities andtheirassociatedeconopoliticalsystemswereformedasanindirectresultof successfulagriculturalmovementsthatallowedhumanstoexpandtheirdaily activitiesbeyondtherealmofhuntingandgathering(Pacione 2001;Antrop 2004).Theurbanizinglandscapehaslongbeenoneofthefundamentalcharacteristicsofmodernmaneversincehelearnedtoshaperurallandtomanagefood production.

Althoughaconsensusonasingulardefinitiontodescribethecomponentsthat constitutealandscapehasnotbeenreached,asatestimonytotheimportanceof urbanspaces,landscapedefinitionshavealwaysincludedanthropogenicimpacts. AccordingtotheEuropeanLandscapeConvention(2000),thelandscapeisdefined as“anarea,asperceivedbypeople,whosecharacteristheresultoftheactionand interactionofnaturaland/orhumanfactors”(CouncilofEurope 2000).This definitionpaintsthe“landscape”asabroadareathathasbeenmodifiedbyhumans, andalsoincludestheculturalandenvironmentalimpactsoftheresultantmodifications.Alandscapecanthusenclosebothurbanandassociatedruralareasthat havebeenshapedinaccordancewiththeprevalentsocialdiscoursescharacteristic tospecifichistoricalperiodsandgeographicallocations.

Thisopeningchapteraimstopresentandcontrastthemorphologyofruraland urbanlandscapesintwodistinctportionsoftheglobe:EuropeandJapaninthe Asia-Pacificregion.Indoingso,itexplorestheimportanthistoricaldrivingforces thathaveresultedinalandscapewithaclearurban–ruraldistinctioninEuropeand amixedurban–agriculturallandscapeinJapan.

Despitestartingoutwithdifferenthistoricallandscapetemplates,modernlandscapeplanningdiscoursesinthetworegionshavetendedtoshifttowardanaimfor aclearrural–urbanseparation,resultinginJapaneselandscapestryingtoconformto thetraditionalEuropeanlandscapemorphology(YokohariandAmati 2005).Motivatedbytheneedtoaddressthesocialandenvironmentalproblemsofurban sprawl,thiswasoftenenactedthroughthecreationofgreenbeltsandspecial urbanizationpromotionareastogeographicallypartitionurbanfromruralareas (YokohariandAmati 2005).However,themixedurban–ruralpatterninJapanwas firmlyentrenchedinthehistoricalevolutionofthelandscape’scharacter,contributingtoaneventual,partialsuccessofthismodularformoflandscapeplanning.On thesurface,thismayseemtobeafailureintermsofachievingthegoalssetoutby themodernlandscapeplanningmovement.Althoughthemotivationofachievinga clearurban–ruralseparationwasanobleattemptatcreatingorderlyurbanlandscapes,thischapteraimstomakethecasethatitspartial“failure”inJapan’scase hasvaluablelessonsforabetterfuture.

Insofarasthelandscaperemainsintertwinedwithprevalentsocialneeds,planningcitiesisnolongerjustanissueofcreatinganorganizedandcontainedurban form.Sincethe1990s,buzzwordsencompassing(butnotrestrictedto)thedescriptors“sustainable,”“resilient,”“ecological,”and“greencities”havegainedgreat officialrecognitionaroundtheglobe(Satterthwaite 1997).Citiesoftodayhaveto bedesignedwiththepromotionofurbanresilienceinmind.Addressingissuessuch asenergyefficiency,properwastedisposal,andadequategreen-spaceprovision

havethusbeenattheforefrontofcityplanninginthetwenty-firstcentury (Satterthwaite 1997;Burtonetal. 2013).

Unfortunately,oneofthemainmotivatorspoweringthischangeistheincreased instancesofextremeevents.Consequently,plannersandpolicymakershave realizedthatdesigninglandscapesthatpromotesocioeconomicresilienceagainst disastershasbecomeapressingissue(Burtonetal. 2013).Alongtheselines,this chapterclosesbyproposinganalternativelandscapepatternforresiliencebuilding, inspiredbythehistoricalpatternofintegratedrural–urbanlanduseintheJapanese landscapefabric.Thechapterputsforwardtheargumentthatsuchalandscape designwouldaddresstwomajorconcernsofresilientcityplanningespeciallyinthe faceofdisasters:(1)ensuringfoodsecurityforurbanites;and(2)providingadequategreenspacesthatcancontributetohumanandenvironmentalwell-being.

1.1HistoricalUrbanandRegionalPlanninginEurope andJapan

SinceurbanizationsweptfromSoutheasternEuropetotherestofthecontinent around700BC,landscapepatternshavehistoricallymaintainedaclearruraland urbanseparationintermsofbothformandfunction(Antrop 2004).ThemorphologyofatypicallatemedievalEuropeancity(sixteenthcentury)canbefoundto containadenseurbancore,whichisseparatedfromthesurroundingruralareaby castlewallsand/ormoats(Spirn 1984;Antrop 2004).

Theformofacityoftenbetraysitsfunctionandthefortificationssurrounding medievalurbanareasarenoexception.Thesebeartestimonytotumultuousperiods whenknightsandlesserlordsoftenfoughteachotherforhumanandnatural resources.Whilethenobilityhadthefortunetobeholedupwithinthesafetyof thecitywalls,thelogisticaldifficultyinbuildingwallsaroundproductivelandhad resultedinfarmersbeinglefttoconductsmall-scaleagriculturefurtherawayinthe surroundinglands(Pinker 2011).Thisseparatedlandintozoneswithdistincturban, agricultural,andruralfunctions.Farmlandswerescatteredthroughoutthecountrysideandconnectedtorelativelydistantcitiesmainlythroughwaterwaysorthrough horse-drawncarriages(Antrop 2004).

Incomparison,themorphologyofurbanareasinJapandoesnotexhibittheclear rural–urbanseparationcharacteristicoflatemedievalcitiesinEurope.Japanese citiesofthattime(forexample,theancientcapitalsofNaraandKyoto,aswellas theKofubasininYamanishi),wereinsteadcharacterizedbymixedurban–agriculturallanduse(Yokoharietal. 2010).Thislandscapeformwasalsoprevalentinthe capitalcityofJapanduringthesixteenthtothenineteenthcenturies—EdoCity. Edowasestablishedin1603byIeyasuTokugawaandforabout250years,there wasrelativepeaceinthecountryofJapanundertheTokugawashogunategovernment(YokohariandAmati 2005).Itisarguablethatthisperiodofrelativepeace allowedthecontinuedexistenceofintegratedurban–rurallandusesystems.

Fig.1.1 LandusemapofEdoCityinthemid-nineteenthcentury.About40%ofthelandwas dedicatedtoagriculturaluse(Fujiietal. 2002)

Stabilityhasalwaysbeenaproductofpeace.Inaperiodthatsawthegrowthofa nationalculture,commercialandmateriallinkagesbetweenagriculturalandurban areasalsoflourished(Guth 1996),withoutfearofdisruptionbydangerousraids.

Bythemid-nineteenthcentury,upto40%oflandwithinEdoCitywasdedicated topaddyfields,cropfields,andteaorchards(Fig. 1.1)(Fujiietal. 2002).Theorigin ofhavingagriculturallandasan“urban”fixturecouldhavebeenaresultof Japanesecitiesadoptingagridsystem,whichoriginatedfromChina,whereby agriculturallandwasfeaturedaspartofanurbangrid.Inthistimeofrelative peace,feudallordsunconsciouslyperpetuatedthismixedlandusebyrentingout vacantlandwithintheirEdoestatestocitizenfarmerswhiletheytraveledbackto otherpropertieslocatedelsewhereinJapan(Watanabe 1983).

ThedistinctlandscapemorphologiesoflatemedievalEuropeanandEdo-era Japaneselandscapesresultedintwonoticeablecontrastsintermsofthestatusof agriculturalproductsandthestatusofsanitationwithinthecity.Whilehavinga morefunctionalroleinEuropeancitiesofold,agricultureinEdoCitywasaccorded anarguablymorerespectedposition—eventothepointofhavingitsown“brand image”(Yokoharietal. 2010).Today,vegetablesfoundinaJapanesesupermarket carrynamesthattelloftheareatheywerefamouslygrowninduringtheEdoera (JATokyo 1992)—forexample,Yanaka-shouga(avarietyofgingergrowninwhat

ispresentlythecentralnortheastpartofTokyo)andNerima-daikon(atypeof radishgrowninwhatispresentlythenorthwestofTokyo).

SanitationwithinthecityofEdoJapanwasmaintainedatanacceptablelevelby havingagricultureincloseproximitytourbandwellings.FarmersinEdoCitywere abletoestablishawaste-cyclingsystemwherenightsoilwascollectedand transportedeasilytonearbyfarmland,whereitwasusedasfertilizer(Kingand Bruce 1911;YokohariandAmati 2005).Inturn,producefromthefarmlandwas easilytransportedtolocalmarketsforconsumptionbythecitydwellers.This systemefficientlyconnectedruralandurbanlandgeographicallyandfunctionally, andallowedabout1millionpeopletoresideinrelativecomfortinEdoCityasof 1721(Gordon 2003),makingthecityoneofthelargestintheworldatthattime.Itis alsointerestingtonotethatthepopulationdensityinsomeareasofEdoCity exceededthatofmoderndayTokyobyfivetosixtimes(Yokoharietal. 2010).

Incontrast,thiswasteandfoodrecyclingsystemdidnotexistinmedieval Europe,wherefarmlandwasscatteredovervaryingdistancesbeyondthecity wall.Anunfortunaterepercussionwasthegrimsanitaryconditionsfacedbythe urbanpopulaceascitystreetsstartedrunningfoulwithhumanwaste(Kingand Bruce 1911).Manyofthedeathsresultingfromillnessesanddiseasesprevalentin medievalEuropeancitieswereattributedtothelackofproperwastedisposal(King andBruce 1911;Pinker 2011).Unfortunately,thisproblemcontinuedevenintothe IndustrialAge,whenhumanwastewasstillrecordedasbeingquitecasuallyflung outofwindowsasameansofdisposal(Pinker 2011).

Asmentionedearlier,oneofthemaindrivingforcesinthecreationofalivable citywasaclimateofstabilityandpeace.Establishmentofasoundcentralgovernmentsystem,coupledwiththeestablishmentofmutuallybeneficialcommercial linkagesthatmaderaidsbecomeazero-sumgame,occurredslowlythroughoutand aftertheMiddleAges(Pinker 2011).Thecivilizingprocessnegatedthenecessityof walledcitiesandgaveintellectualspaceforprominentthinkersthroughoutEurope topondersolutionstothepoorsanitationandovercrowdingissuespresentin premoderncities.Asasilverlining,theseunfortunateurbanconditionsthusgave risetoideasthatweretolaterformthebackboneofmodernlandscapeplanningin Europeandtherestoftheworld.

1.2TrendsCoalesce:Rural–UrbanLandUseSeparation inModernLandscapePlanning

The“gardencity”conceptasproposedbyEbenezerHowardin1898wasoneofthe mostfamousideastoconceptualizeamoderncitywherepeoplewouldlivein harmonywithnature.Howarddesignedthegardencitytobeanurbancoreinthe middleofsixradialboulevards,whichheldalternatingblocksofresidentialestates, industrialland,andagriculture.Hebelievedthatthisgroupingofdifferentmosaics oflandfunctionswouldsolvetheproblemof“crowded,unhealthycities”(Howard

1902).Howard’sconceptwaseventuallysuccessfullyimplementedinmanycitiesin EuropeandinNorthAmerica.SomeexamplesofactualizedcitieswereLetchworth GardenCity,ParmainCleveland,andBaldwinHillsVillageinLosAngeles(Horley 1998).

Althoughthegardencitywasdesignedtosolvetheproblemsinherentin Europeanmedievalandindustrialcities,Howard’svisionwasstillinherently derivedfromthelandscapeandhistoryinhiscontext.Althoughhisvisiondid contributegreatlytomakingmodernWesterncitiesverylivable,hisunderstanding ofthemedievalcity’sstructurecontributedtothegardencitystilldelineatingurban andruralfunctions(Yokoharietal. 2010).Inessence,theurbancoreinthegarden citywasstillclearlyseparatedfromtherurallanduses,whichwereconfinedto outerlayersoftheradialboulevards.

Thisclearseparationofruralandurbanlandhasbeensucceededinotherlater landscapeplanningmovementsinEurope.Theimplementationofgreenbelts aroundurbanareas,suchastheGreenbeltoftheGreaterLondonPlan(1944)by PatrickAbercrombie,isanothernotableexamplewherebytheuncontrolledexpansionofurbanareaswascontrolledfromspillingoverintothesurroundingcountryside(YokohariandAmati 2005).

TheGreenbeltandHoward’searliergardencityconceptcombinedanother importantfeatureofmodernEuropeanlandscapeplanning:zoning.Inanutshell, zoningaimstorealizeajuxtapositionofhomogenouslandunitsthatspecializeina singlefunction(orafewfunctions),whilestillkeepingadistinctrural–urban boundary(Fig. 1.2)(Yokoharietal. 2000).Forexample,landdedicatedtoindustry andhousingwouldberepresentedasdistinctunitswithintheurbanfabric,while landdesignatedforusessuchasforestryandfarmingwouldalsobeassignedto distinctunitswithintheruralportionofthelandscape.

Fig.1.2 Diagrammatic representationofthezoning conceptinmodernWestern landscapeplanning. Functionallydistinctland unitsarejuxtaposedwithin thebroadcategoryofurban andruralareas

Onitsown,goodzoningpracticecancontributesignificantlytopopulation redistributionandthuscontributedpositivelytoalleviatingthephenomenonof overcrowdingthatplaguedEuropeanmedievalandindustrialcities.However,in ordertoaddressotherproblemsarisingfromthelackofmaterialflowbetweenrural andurbanlandmosaics,zoningcanonlyworkinconjunctionwitharobust transportandroadinfrastructurenetwork.Thisisbecauseeachspecializedland unitisnotself-sufficientonitsown(Yokoharietal. 2000).Forexample,urban residentiallandunitsrequirefoodfromtheagriculturallandunitswithinrural mosaics.Likewise,materialrequiredforbuildingandindustrymaycomefrom timberplantationsintherurallandscape.Thisconceptextendsalsototheflowof peoplefromruraland/orperi-urbanresidentiallandmosaicstourbancommercial areaswherethemaineconomicactivityofthecitytakesplace.

WhilezoningasmodernlandscapeplanninghaditsrootsinEuropeandthe West,itsooninfluencedplanningthroughouttheworld.Greenbeltsstartedto featureprominentlyinlandscapeplanninginAsiancitiessuchasSeoul(Yokohari andAmati 2005)andTokyo(Ishida 1992).

Improvementsinmoderntransportationsystemsandtheefficiencyofchemical fertilizersmeantthatJapancouldalsoadoptazoningsystemastherewasno absolutenecessitytoplaceagriculturallandsclosetourbanareas(Yokohari etal. 2010).Asaresult,Japaneseplannersreadilyacceptedtheideaofzoning. Thismanifestedmostprominentlyinthe1968CityPlanningandZoningAct.

Underthisact,Japaneseplannersdrewupdesignatedurbanizationpromotion areas,especiallyinthe23wardsofTokyo,wherehistoricallyexistingfarmlandwas supposedtobeconvertedentirelytourbanuse(YokohariandAmati 2005). AlthoughthedensityofurbanareasdidincreaseincentralTokyo,aswellasin itssurroundingsuburbs(theouterlimitsofthe23wardsofTokyo),thehistorical integratedurban–rurallandusepatternpersistedthroughoutnearly40yearsofthe act’simplementation.Asaresult,typicallanduseinJapanesecitiessuchasTokyo consistedofoverlappingpatchesoflandwithdenseurbanuseandruralagricultural (and,insomecases,secondaryplantationforest)patches(Fig. 1.3).

Thereasonsforthepersistenceoffarmlandinurbanareasarenumerousand complex.Afewarelistedhere:

1.ScholarslikeFukutake(1967)speculatedthatfarmerstendtoresistsellingtheir farmlandespeciallyinperi-urbanareasdespiteitbeingripefordevelopment, duetoaculturethatdiscouragesthesaleoffamily-ownedlandassets.

2.Evenwhenthe1968CityPlanningandZoningActwasactive,landdevelopmentregulationsexistedthatallowedfarmerstosubdivideandsellpartsoftheir farmlandaturbanprices,butwithnorequirementtoprovideurbanservices (Hanayami 1988;Mori 1998).

3.Persistenceoffarmlandinurbanareaswere,toacertainextent,testimonytothe bargainingpoweroftheFarmersLobbyovertheLiberalDemocraticPartyof Japananditsassociatedurbanpolicy.Farmersweresuccessfulinlobbyingfor attractivetaxreductionsonfarmlandinurbanareas,makingiteconomicto maintaintheirfarmlandatareducedprice(Sorensen 1999).

Fig.1.3 Diagrammatic representationofthe landscapewithoverlapping urbanandrurallanduseina typicalJapanesecityafter the1968CityPlanningand ZoningAct

Today,asmuchas3%ofthelandinSetagaya,asuburbofTokyo,isdedicatedto agriculture(YokohariandAmati 2005).Ifonetakesatripinthedirectionaway fromcentralTokyo,inabout20km,perhapstheonlydifferenceinlandscape morphologyonewouldnoticeisthethinningoutofurbandevelopmentandthe slightincreaseinlandareadedicatedtoagricultureandopengreen-spaceuse. However,ifoneweretotakeasimilartripawayfromacentralEuropeancity— forexample,London—thelandscapeislikelytoexhibitatransitionfrombuiltareas tolandwithalmostcompletelyagriculturalandruraluse.

Theapparent“disorganization”inherentinJapaneselandscapeshasbeenseen bymanyasafailureintermsofmodernurban-planningacts,suchasthe1968City PlanningandZoningAct.Thepresent-dayJapaneselandscapehasbeendescribed as“chaotic”anddisorderly(Sorensen 1999)andhasevenbeencomparedtoa malignantformofagriculturalcancer(Fukutake 1967,p21).

ShouldthecaseofmodernJapaneselandscapeplanningbeconsidereda“textbookexample”offailedpolicyimplementation?Thischapteraimstoputforward theideathatsuchurbanformscouldinsteadbebeneficialinunderlyingtheurbanplanningdiscourseofthetwenty-firstcentury.

1.3IntegratedRuralandUrbanLandUsesintheCity: TheWayForwardforResilientAsianCities

Sincethe1980s,whenenvironmentalconcernswereaprominentpartoftheglobal agenda,thefocusofthelandscapeplanningdiscourseoftodayhaschangedfrom creatinganorganizedurbanformtooneofplanningresilientandsustainablecities

(Satterthwaite 1997).Citiesoftodayhavetotackleissuesthatenablethemaximizationofhumancomfortwhileminimizingenvironmentalimpact(Satterthwaite 1997).

Notably,withtheadventofclimatechange,instancesofextremeeventshave increased(MunichReinsurance 2015).InthewakeofdisasterssuchasHurricane Katrina(NewOrleans)in2005andthe2011floodsandtsunamiinThailandand Japan,respectively,thereisapressingneedtodevelopcitiesthatcanaddressthe issueofensuringfoodsecurityandecosystemserviceprovisionintermsofprovidingeffectiveurbangreenspaces.Bothfunctionscontributetothemitigationof disasterimpacts,whilethelatterisalsotiedtoclimate-changealleviationfunctions thatreducetheinstancesofdisastersbeforetheyoccur.

Inparticular,Asiancountriesarethemostinneedofcitiesthatareresilientto climatechangeanditsassociateddisasterimpacts.Arecentsurveyconductedby theMunichReinsurancecompanyrevealedAsiatobethecontinentwiththehighest numberofnaturaldisaster–relatedcausalitiesfromatimespanof1980to2014 (MunichReinsurance 2015).Notablerecentdisastershaveincludedthedevastating TyphoonHaiyan,whichhitthePhilippinesinNovember2013,resultingintheloss ofabout6300lives(NationalDisasterRiskReductionandManagementCouncil 2014).FloodshavealsooccurredinincreasedmagnitudeinThailand.Asevere flood,whichoccurredin2011,resultedin890fatalitiesandinundationin66outof 75provinces(AonBenfield 2011).

Furthermore,18%ofthetotalnumberofdisastersoccurringinAsiancountries wereattributedtoseismichazards,ascomparedwith8%inNorthAmericaand Europe(MunichReinsurance 2015).InJapanitself,majorearthquakeshaverocked thecountrysincethelargestdisasterinthecountry’shistory(TheGreatKanto Earthquake)in1923,whichkillednearly60,000people.Otherinstancesofearthquakesincludethe1995Kobeearthquake(6000causalities)andtherecentMarch 2011TohokuEarthquakeandTsunami,where20,000fatalitieswerereported.

Therefore,aresilientAsiancitywouldideallyhavetocontributetothereduction ofclimate-relateddisastersandensurefoodsecuritywithinthecityinthecaseof geologicaldisasterswhenthetransportsystemscharacteristicofthezoningsystem haveceasedtofunction.Plannersshouldideallykeeptheconceptofdisaster resilienceattheforefrontwhendesigningurbanandregionalareasinAsia.

Thiscouldmeanthattheresultantcitywoulddeviateinmorphologyfromthe conventionalzoningconceptbirthedintheWestinviewofthehigheroverall disasterriskandhigherseismichazardriskpresentinAsiaascomparedwithcities inNorthAmericaandEurope.Afterall,thezoningsystemreliesheavilyonurban transportnetworksinordertosustaintheinterunitfunctionalrelationshipsbetween componentsoftheruralandurbanlandscape.Havingsuchatransportsystem spreadovergreatgeographicaldistancesinAsianlandscapescouldmakethecity morevulnerabletofunctionaldisruptionsinthecaseofnaturaldisasters.

EspeciallyintheAsiancontext,lookingbackattheapparent“failure”of Japanesecitiestoconformtoastrictrural–urbanzonationmay,infact,provide answersastohowtoplanthecityofthefuture.Acitywithintegratedagricultural/ productivelandwithintheurbanfabrichasbeenrecognizedasonethatisableto

offerurbandwellersanoptionforfoodsecurity,shouldcontactwithsurrounding ruralagriculturallandbecutoffsuddenly(Burtonetal. 2013).Havingacity plannedwithmultiplepatchesofagriculturelandwithintheurbanfabricprovides much-neededredundancy,whichwouldcomeinhandyintheeventofadisaster.

Theconceptofredundancywasfirstintroducedinecology(Holling 1973)andis positivelycorrelatedwithsystemresilience.Themoreredundantasystemis,the moreitisabletoabsorbdisturbanceswithoutsustainingsignificantchangetoits originalfunction(BrandandJax 2007).Theclassicillustrationofredundancy utilizesanecologicalfoodwebwhereanincreaseinredundancycanbedemonstratedthroughincreasingthenumberofflows(connectionsbetweenspecies)per node(anygivenspecies)(Costanzaetal. 1995).Alowlevelofredundancy,and accordinglylowresilience,canberepresentedinasimpleone-predator,one-preyfoodchainmodel(Costanzaetal. 1995).Afoodwebsystemrepresentsanincrease inredundancyandresilienceduetotheincreasednumberofflowsfromasingle nodeatahighertropicleveltonodesatalowertropiclevel.Uponapplicationto agricultureinanurbanlandscapemodel,moreresilientcitieswouldhaveagreater numberofproductiveagriculturallandpatches,whichwouldprovideurban dwellerswithafoodsourcethatisindependentoflong-distancetransportchains.

Aquestionthatonemightaskwouldthenbe:canagriculturewithintheurban fabricreallyprovideenoughfoodtosustainanurbanpopulation?Takingalookat thecaseofTokyo,withitshistoricallyintegratedlandscape,900haofland(about 1.5%ofthelandareainthe23wardsofTokyo)hasbeencontinuouslyfarmedby 6500professionalfarmers(YokohariandAmati 2005).Thissmallamountofland hasmanagedtoproduce0.3%ofthevegetablesand0.2%oftheflowersand ornamentaltreesproducedinthewholeofJapan(YokohariandAmati 2005).This seemslikeasmallpercentagewhenspreadoutovertheentiretyofthecountry. However,shouldalltheresourcesberequiredinjustthecityofTokyointheevent ofanemergency,thenetvolumeofagriculturalproducecouldarguablybesufficienttosustaintheurbanpopulationatleasttillmajorlong-distancetransport networksarereestablished.

Furthermore,urbanagricultureisaviablesolutionforfoodsecurityworldwide andnotonlyinTokyo(Burtonetal 2013)asareaswherecitiesdevelophistorically coincidewithareaswithfertileagriculturalsoil(DeelstraandGirardetUndated). StudiesbySmitetal.(1996)andHodgsonetal.(2011)haveestimatedthaturban agriculturecanprovideanestimated15–20%oftheglobalfoodsupplyatits currentproductivelevels.

Agricultureinurbanareasisrequiredbeyondtherealmofaddressingthe problemsoffoodsecurity.Earlier,wementionedtheneedforresilientcitiesto provideadequateecosystemservicesinordertomitigatetheimpactsofclimate changeandcontributetothereductionofextremeweatherevents.Itisinthisrealm thatagriculturalgreenspacesintegratedwithintheurbanfabriccanalsoprove effective.

Beneficialecosystemservicesattributabletourbanagriculturehavebeenwidely studied(seeDeelstraandGirardet,Undated;Linetal. 2015 forexamples).Areas withagriculturehelptocombatheatislandeffectsbyreducingambient

temperaturesintheirimmediatesurroundingsbyasmuchastwodegreesCelsius (Yokoharietal. 1997).Whensownwithnativecrops(thisagainbringstomind cropsthatwerecharacteristicallygrowninspecificareasofEdoCityinfeudal Japan),agriculturehasbeenabletocontributepositivelytobiodiversityconservationwithinurbanconfines.This,inturn,haspositivespillovereffectscharacteristic ofarobustecosystem:stormwaterrunofftreatmentandpollutioncontrol,pest control,andtheprovisionofpollinationservices(Daily 1997;Linetal. 2015).

Thepositiveeffectsofurbanagriculturehaveevenpermeatedthetraditional zoningsystemintheWest,where600communitygardenshavebeenregisteredin NewYorkCityaloneunderthenongovernmentalorganizationcalledtheGreen Thumb.Muchpopularandacademicliteraturehasalsobeenwrittentoencourage thepopularizationofthisformofagriculture,laudingitasasolutionforthe alleviationofclimatechangeandfoodsecurityprovision(Burtonetal 2013;Lin etal. 2015).

Thisisahearteningtrend,thoughslightlyironic,ascitiesofthefuturemaybegin tolookonceagainlikecitiesofthepast.EvenintheWest,perhapsanewstandard ofacceptanceistobefoundin“chaotic”citieswherebyruralandurbanlanduses worktogethertoachievefunctionalandmorphologicalintegration.However,there hastobeagreaterunderstandingoftheinteractionbetweenfunctionalurban–rural integration,aswellasitssideeffectofurbansprawl,inorderfortheintegratedland usemodeltoworkoptimally.Perhaps,thereisspacetoconsiderthecitystructureof EdoinfeudalJapanasastartingpointinunderstandingthatintegratedlanduse modelsarenecessaryforresilientcitiesoftoday.Thecitymodelcanthenserveasa springboardtolaunchfurtherdiscussionabouthowmuchrural–urbanintegrationis necessaryinaspecificregion,givenitsdisasterriskprofileandurbansprawl potential.Initstotality,flexibilityisstronglyencouragedinplanningforresilient citiesandthereisaneedtorecognizethatinachangingworld,thereisveryseldom a“onesizefitsall”solution.Plannersmustalwaysbemindfuloftheircontextand itsinherentqualitieswhiletakingaforward-lookingstancewhenadoptingtheideas oftomorrow.

References

Antrop,M.(2004).LandscapechangeandtheurbanizationprocessinEurope. Landscapeand UrbanPlanning,67,9–26. AonBenfield.(2011).2011Thailandfloodseventrecapreport:ImpactForecasting–March2012. Accessedonlineat: http://thoughtleadership.aonbenfield.com/Documents/20120314_impact_ forecasting_thailand_flood_event_recap.pdf.Accessed6Aug2015. Brand,F.S.,&Jax,K.(2007).Focusingthemeaning(s)ofresilience:Resilienceasadescriptive conceptandaboundaryobject. EcologyandSociety12(1),23.Availableat: http://www. ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art23/.Accessed12Jan2014. Burton,P.,Lyons,K.,Richards,C.,Amati,M.,Rose,N.,DesFours,L.,Pires,V.,&Barclay, R.(2013). Urbanfoodsecurity,urbanresilienceandclimatechange.GoldCoast:National ClimateChangeAdaptationResearchFacility.

Costanza,R.,Kemp,M.,&Boynton,W.(1995).Scaleandbiodiversityinestuarineecosystems.In C.Perrings,K.G.Maler,C.Folke,C.S.Holling,&B.O.Jansson(Eds.), Biodiversityloss: Economicandecologicalissues (pp.84–125).Cambridge:CambridgeUniversityPress. CouncilofEurope.(2000). Europeanlandscapeconvention.Florence. Daily,G.(1997). Nature’sservices:Societaldependenceonnaturalecosystems.Washington,DC: IslandPress.

Deelstra,T.,&Girardet,H.(Undated).Urbanagricultureandsustainablecities.ThematicPaper 2.PortlandStateUniversity.Accessedonlineat: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/down load?doi¼10.1.1.168.4991&rep¼rep1&type¼pdf.Accessed7Aug2015.

Fujii,M.,Yokohari,M.,&Watanabe,T.(2002).Identificationofthedistributionpatternof farmlandsinEdo(inJapanesewithEnglishabstract). CityPlanningReviewSpecialIssue, 37,931–936.

Fukutake,T.(1967). Japaneseruralsociety.Ithaca:CornellUniversityPress. Gordon,A.(2003). AmodernhistoryofJapanfromTokugawaTimestothepresent.NewYork: OxfordUniversityPress. Guth,C.(1996). ArtofEdoJapan:Theartistandthecity,1615–1868.NewYork:HarryN.Abrams. Hanayami,Y.(1988). Japaneseagricultureundersiege.NewYork:St.Martin’sPress. Hodgson,K.,Campbell,M.C.,&Bailkey,M.(2011). Urbanagriculture:Growinghealthy, sustainableplaces.Washington,DC:AmericanPlanningAssociation. Holling,C.S.(1973).Resilienceandstabilityofecologicalsystems. AnnualReviewofEcologyand Systematics,4,1–23. Horley,R.(1998). ThebestkeptsecretsofParma,“TheGardenCity”.Parma:ParmaHistorical Society. Howard,E.(1902). Gardencitiesofto-morrow (2nded.).London:S.Sonnenschein&Co. Ishida,Y.(Ed.).(1992). IncompletecityplanofTokyo(inJapanese).Tokyo:Chikuma-shobo. King,F.H.,&Bruce,J.P.(1911). Farmersoffortycenturies.Madison:Mrs.F.H.King.Accessed onlineat https://archive.org/details/cu31924073872685.Accessed5Aug2015.

Lin,B.B.,Philpott,S.M.,&Ha,S.(2015).Thefutureofurbanagricultureandbiodiversityecosystemservices:Challengesandnextsteps. BasicandAppliedEcology,16,189–201. Mori,H.(1998).Landconversionattheurbanfringe:AcomparativestudyofJapan,Britainand theNetherlands. UrbanStudies,35,1541–1558.

MunichReinsurance.(2015). TopicsGeo:Naturalcatastrophes2014.Accessedonlineat, https:// www.munichre.com/us/property-casualty/publications-expertise/topics-publications/topics-geonat-cat-2014/index.html.Accessed5Aug2015.

NationalDisasterRiskReductionandManagementCouncil.RepublicofPhilippines.(2014). Updatesretheeffectsoftyphoon“Yolanda”(Haiyan).Accessedonlineat: https://web.archive. org/web/20141006091212/http://www.ndrrmc.gov.ph/attachments/article/1177/Update%20Effects %20TY%20YOLANDA%2017%20April%202014.pdf.Accessed6Aug2015.

Pacione,M.(2001).Modelsofurbanlandusestructureincitiesinthedevelopedworld. Geography, 86,97–119.

Pinker,S.(2011). Thebetterangelsofournature:Ahistoryofviolenceandhumanity.London: PeuguinGroup.

Satterthwaite,D.(1997).Sustainablecitiesorcitiesthatcontributetosustainabledevelopment? UrbanStudies,34(10),1667–1691.

Smit,J.,Nasr,J.,&Ratta,A.(1996). Urbanagriculture:Foodjobsandsustainablecities. NewYork:UnitedNationsDevelopmentProgramme(UNDP).

Sorensen,A.(1999).Landreadjustment,urbanplanningandurbansprawlintheTokyoMetropolitanArea. UrbanStudies,36(13),2333–2360.

Spirn,A.W.(1984). Thegranitegarden.Boston:Basic. Tokyo,J.A.(1992). VegetablesandflowersfromEdoandTokyo (EdoTokyoYukarinoYasaito Hana).TokyoChuo:JapanAgriculturalCooperatives.

Watanabe,Z.(1983). Betweencitiesandthecountry(ToshitoNousonnoAida).Tokyo:Ronso-sha (inJapanese).

Yokohari,M.,&Amati,M.(2005).Natureinthecity,cityinthenature:Casestudiesofthe restorationofurbannatureinTokyo,JapanandToronto,Canada. LandscapeandEcological Engineering,1,53–59.

Yokohari,M.,Brown,R.D.,Kato,Y.,&Moriyama,H.(1997).Effectsofpaddyfieldsonsummer airandsurfacetemperatureinurbanfringeareasofJapan. LandscapeandUrbanPlanning, 38(1/2),1–11.

Yokohari,M.,Takeuchi,K.,Watanabe,T.,&Yokota,S.(2000).Beyondgreenbeltsandzoning: AnewplanningconceptfortheenvironmentofAsianmega-cities. LandscapeandUrban Planning,47(3–4),159–171.

Yokohari,M.,Amati,M.,Bolthouse,J.,&Kurita,H.(2010).Restoringagriculturallandscapesin shrinkingcities:Re-inventingtraditionalconceptsinJapaneselandscapeplanning.InJ.Primdahl &S.Swaffield(Eds.), Globalisationandagriculturallandscapes:Changepatternsand policytrendsindevelopedcountries.Cambridge:CambridgeUniversityPress.

Another random document with no related content on Scribd:

FROM PITTSBURGH TO ALTOONA

BEFORE THE FLIGHT IN BOSTON A. E. AND G. P. P.

Navigator: The map won’t do us any good just now.

The Woman: What’s a map for, then? I’ll bet if I had a map I could tell where I was. * * *

(Twelve Hundred Miles Out.)

The Woman: Why do we have to keep flying in this awful fog? It’s perfectly terrible!

Pilot: There’s no way of avoiding it.

The Woman: That’s a perfectly silly thing to say. When you sail right into a fog and stay in it for hours I should think you’d admit you’d made a mistake and not drive calmly on, pretending it was necessary.

Pilot: We’ve flown way up in the air to get out of it and we’ve flown close to the ocean to escape it, but it’s no use.

The Woman: I’ll bet if you’d turn a sharp right you’d get out of it in no time. I told you to take a sharp right five hours ago.

Pilot: We can’t take any sharp right turns and reach Europe, my dear.

The Woman: How do you know without trying?

(Fifteen Hundred Miles Out.)

The Woman: Well, I just know we’re lost and it’s all your fault.

Navigator: Please have a heart. Everything’ll come out okay if you have patience.

The Woman: I’ve had patience for hours, and for all I know may be right back where I started. If you don’t know exactly where you are why don’t you STOP AND ASK SOMEBODY?

(Over South Wales.)

The Woman: Look! It’s land! What place is it?

Pilot: The British Isles.

The Woman: Isn’t it just splendid? Here we are across the Atlantic in no time just as we had planned. And you boys were so NERVOUS AND UNCERTAIN ABOUT IT ALL THE WAY OVER!

H. I. Phillips added that to the gaiety of aviation, in the Sun Dial of the “New York Sun.” By the way, at the N. A. A. luncheon at the Boston reception I was introduced as the most famous b. s. d. in the world.

One of the largest organizations connected with the Friendship flight was the I-knew-all-about-it-beforehand-club. Most of them contrived to get into the papers pretty promptly. Some charter members recorded that they turned down tempting offers to pilot the ship, actuated by an exuberant loyalty to Uncle Sam.

Here, in conclusion of this hodge-podge are three more extracts from the press, random examples of what men do and say.

The first is from the “English Review,” evidence that the world is far from any universal air-mindedness:

T L A F

The Atlantic has been flown again, and no one will grudge Miss Earhart her triumph. The achievement has, however, produced the usual crop of inspired paragraphs on the future of aviation, and the usual failure to face the fact that air transport is the most unreliable and the most expensive form of transport available. No amount of Atlantic flights will alter these facts, because they happen, as things are, to be inherent in the nature of men and things. Absurd parallels are drawn between people who talk sense about the air today, and people who preferred stage-coaches to railways. The only parallel would be, of course, between such people and any who insist today in flying to Paris by balloon instead of by aeroplane. Everyone wants to see better, safer and cheaper aeroplanes. If the Air League can offer us a service which will take us to Paris in half-an-hour for half-a-crown, I would even guarantee that Neon would be the first season-ticket holder. But all this has nothing to do with the essential fact that not a single aeroplane would be flying commercially today without the Government subsidy, for the simple reason that by comparison with other forms of transport air transport is uneconomic. To talk vaguely of the great developments which will occur in the future is no answer, unless you can show that the defects of air

transport are technical defects which can be overcome by mechanical means. A few of them, of course, are, but the overwhelming defects are due to the nature of the air itself. It is very unfortunate, but we fail to see how it can be helped.

After all, the “Review” may be right; but somehow its viewpoint is reminiscent of certain comment when the Wrights were experimenting at Kitty Hawk. Also of the mathematical deductions which proved beyond doubt that flight in a heavier than air machine was impossible.

TWO CHARACTERISTIC PAGES FROM THE TRANS-ATLANTIC LOG BOOK. THE DIFFICULTY OF WRITING IN THE DARK IS EXEMPLIFIED BY THE PENMANSHIP OF THE SECOND PAGE

BOSTON, 1928

To balance the pessimism here is an editorial from this morning’s “New York Times”—current commentary upon characteristic news of the day:

Steamship and Plane

In the world of commerce a gain of fifteen hours in the receipt of letters from Europe may have important consequences. The experiment of the French Line was to be only a beginning in speeding Atlantic mails. It is yet

planned to launch planes when steamships are 800 miles from the port of destination. With a following wind the amphibian plane piloted by Commander Demougeot flew at the rate of 130 miles an hour and made the distance of over 400 miles to Quarantine in three hours and seventeen minutes. In such weather as prevailed it could have been catapulted from the Ile de France with no more hazard when she was 800 miles away, or about one-fourth of the distance between Havre and New York.

Ten years ago the experiment of hurrying mail to shore in a plane from a surface ship 400 miles out at sea would not have been attempted. So great has been the improvement in airplane design that what the Ile de France has done will soon become the regular order. It is not wildly speculative to think of dispatching a plane after a liner on a well-traveled route in these days of excellent radio communication. It would be well to use for that purpose amphibian or seaplanes carrying fuel enough to take them all the way across the Atlantic if necessary.

It is conceivable that ocean flight between Europe and the United States will be the sequel to a ship-and-plane system of mail delivery, the distances covered by the plane becoming longer and longer until the steamship can be dispensed with altogether.

And last, just an item of news, gleaned from “Time”:

Broker’s Amphibian

Between his summer home on Buzzard’s Bay, Mass., and his brokerage offices in Manhattan, Richard F. Hoyt commutes at 100 miles an hour. He uses a Loening amphibian biplane, sits lazily in a cabin finished in dark brown broadcloth and saddle leather, with built-in lockers containing pigskin picnic cases. Pilot Robert E. Ellis occupies a forward cockpit, exposed to the breezes. But occasionally Broker Hoyt wishes to pilot himself. When this happens he pulls a folding seat out of the cabin

ceiling, reveals a sliding hatch. Broker Hoyt mounts to the seat, opens the hatch, inserts a removable joystick in a socket between his feet. Rudder pedals are already installed in front of the folding seat. He has thus created a rear cockpit, with a full set of controls. Broker Hoyt becomes Pilot Hoyt.

With such excerpts, from the newspapers and the magazines of every day, one could go on endlessly, for aviation is woven ever closer into the warp of the world’s news. Ours is the commencement of a flying age, and I am happy to have popped into existence at a period so interesting.

WILMER STULTZ—P

Born April 11, 1900.

He enlisted in 1917 for duration of the war Joined the 634th Aero Squadron at San Antonio, Texas, and later served at Middletown, Pa. Discharged March, 1919.

On August 4, 1919, married Mildred Potts, of Middletown.

December 2, 1919, Stultz joined the Navy, being stationed at Hampton Roads, Virginia, until July, 1920. Then he went to Pensacola, Florida, to the flight school, where he received training with seaplanes, in the ground school, and in navigation, aerology, meteorology, radio, etc. Thereafter he returned to Hampton Roads until December 2, 1922, securing his discharge.

In February, 1923, Stultz took a position with Curtiss Export Company, being sent to Rio de Janeiro to oversee the setting up of forty F5L and other types of planes. He also instructed Brazilians in flying. That autumn he returned to New York, working with the Curtiss Company at Curtiss Field. Later for the Fokker Company he tested the “Josephine Ford” used by Commander Byrd.

Among those for whom he flew subsequently were Al Pack, President of the Hubbard Steel Foundries, for the Gates Flying Circus, and the Reynolds Airways.

In August Stultz joined Mrs. Grayson, testing her plane “The Dawn.” From Old Orchard, Maine, in October he made three take-off attempts with Mrs. Grayson. A flight of about 500 miles was terminated by engine trouble. Lacking confidence in the “Dawn’s” equipment, he severed his connection with Mrs. Grayson.

In November, 1927, Stultz took a position with Arrow Airways, Paterson, N. J., which he left to make flights with Charles Levine to Havana, etc.

Thereafter he became associated with the Friendship flight.

Born March 4, 1901, San Antonio, Texas.

Gordon enlisted in the Army Air Service at Ellington Field, Houston, Texas, July 15, 1919.

Later he was transferred to the 20th Bombing Squadron and went to Kelly Field, San Antonio, Texas, where he had six months in the aircraft motor school. Rejoining his organization in New York, he was assigned as mechanic to two tri-motored Caproni and one Handley Page plane. In May, 1921, he was with the Handley Page bombers during operations against obsolete battleships off the Virginia Capes.

Subsequently Gordon became Chief Mechanic at the proving grounds, Aberdeen, Maryland. Then until 1926 he served with bombers at Mitchel Field, where he was throughout the International Air Races. In May, 1926, after seven years and nine days in the service, he received his honorable discharge as Staff Sergeant.

Gordon next was with the Philadelphia Rapid Transit Air Service, operating Fokker tri-motors between Philadelphia, Washington, and Norfolk.

In June, 1927, R. J. Reynolds bought the ships. Gordon was working on a tri-motor at Monroe, Louisiana, when Stultz, telephoning from New York, asked him if he would like to join up on the Friendship project. The next day he met Stultz in Detroit and joined the Friendship.

On July 20, 1928, married Ann Bruce of Brookline, Mass.

Transcriber’s Notes

In the HTML version of this text, original page numbers are enclosed in square brackets and presented in the right margin.

Footnotes have been renumbered and moved to after the paragraph

Images have been moved to be outside of text paragraphs. Their location may not match the page given in the table of contents.

Misspelled words have been corrected Obsolete and alternative spellings have been left unchanged (e g avigator, avigation) Spelling and hyphenation have otherwise not been standardised Grammar has not been corrected

Punctuation has been silently corrected.

“Edit Distance” in Corrections table below refers to the Levenshtein Distance

*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 20 HRS., 40 MIN ***

Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will be renamed.

Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG™ concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you charge for an eBook, except by following the terms of the trademark license, including paying royalties for use of the Project Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the trademark license is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and research. Project Gutenberg eBooks may be modified and printed and given away—you may do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks not protected by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark license, especially commercial redistribution.

START: FULL LICENSE

THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE

PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK

To protect the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting the free distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work (or any other work associated in any way with the phrase “Project Gutenberg”), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project Gutenberg™ License available with this file or online at www.gutenberg.org/license.

Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works

1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg™ electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property (trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in your possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project Gutenberg™ electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.

1.B. “Project Gutenberg” is a registered trademark. It may only be used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg™ electronic works even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project Gutenberg™ electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg™ electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.

1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation (“the Foundation” or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the United States and you are located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg™ works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg™ name associated with the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg™ License when you share it without charge with others.

1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any country other than the United States.

1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:

1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg™ License must appear prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg™ work (any work on which the phrase “Project Gutenberg” appears, or with which the phrase “Project

Gutenberg” is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, copied or distributed:

This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you will have to check the laws of the country where you are located before using this eBook.

1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase “Project Gutenberg” associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg™ trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is posted with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked to the Project Gutenberg™ License for all works posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.

1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg™ License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg™.

1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project Gutenberg™ License.

1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg™ work in a format other than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other format used in the official version posted on the official Project Gutenberg™ website (www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg™ License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.

1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg™ works unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing access to or distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works provided that:

• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the method you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark, but he has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information

about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation.”

• You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg™ License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg™ works.

• You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of receipt of the work.

• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.

1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg™ electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the manager of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark. Contact the Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.

1.F.

1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project Gutenberg™ collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain “Defects,” such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other

medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by your equipment.

1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGESExcept for the “Right of Replacement or Refund” described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark, and any other party distributing a Project Gutenberg™ electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH

1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.

1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further opportunities to fix the problem.

1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.