Nicholas Ager - Selected Works 2018 by Nicholas Ager

NICHOLAS GORDON AGER Collected Works 2010-2018

Selected Works 2018 NICHOLAS G AGER

The proceeding projects present my skills, views, and interests to all.

00 RESUME

01 VECTOR INSTITUTE Self-Driving Architecture | University of Toronto 02 DAM | HYPAR-URBAN LIVING Creative Space Simulation | Ryerson University 03 SCHOOL OF RESISTANCE AND RESILIENCE Architecture in Crisis | Ryerson University 04 STUHL Digital Tools | Ryerson University 05 AXIS | DANCE CATHEDRAL Body in Motion | Ryerson University 06 TORONTOâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;STORY Comprehensive Studio | University of Toronto 07 KINETICABIN Glass in Architecture | Ryerson University 07 PROFESSIONAL WORK Turner Fleischer Architects Inc. 08 FORM | INFORMAL Sketches, Thoughts

Selected Works 2018 NICHOLAS G AGER

NICHOLAS G AGER B. Arch. Sci., LEED Green Associate T E A

| 1.519.381.2525 | agernick@gmail.com | 80 John Street, Apt 1809 Toronto, ON, Canada

Adobe Creative Suite CC InDesign CC Photoshop CC Illustrator CC After Effects CC Microsoft Office Suite Word 2016 Powerpoint 2016 Excel 2016 Hand Sketching Autodesk Revit 2016 | Certified Professional AutoCAD 2016 3D Modeling Rhinoceros NURBS Modeling V-Ray Rendering Suite Grasshopper Parametrics Google SketchUp Maxwell Rendering Suite Digital Fabrication Laser Cutting 3D Printing

ACADEMIC EXPERIENCE Master of Architecture | University of Toronto | Toronto, Ontario 09.2016 - PRESENT Bachelor of Architectural Science | Ryerson University | Toronto, Ontario 09.2010 - 04.2014 Ryerson University Option Studio 2013 | Gold Mantis School of Architecture at Soochow University Suzhou, China 04.2013 - 08.2013 St. Patrick’s Catholic High School | Sarnia, Ontario | Graduated June 2010 09.2006 - 06.2010 WORK + VOLUNTEER EXPERIENCE Turner Fleischer Architects Inc. | Intermediate Architectural Technologist | Toronto, Ontario 05.2014 - 07.2016 American Institute of Architecture Students: REvitalization Group | Project Manager | Toronto, Ontario 01.2013 - 04.2014 325 Magazine | Graphics Design Team Member | Toronto, Ontario

04.2013 - 08.2013 Urban Scale Design: Collective Student Works | Section Editor | Toronto, Ontario

09.2012 - 12.2012 Sarnia-Lambton Economic Partnership | Graphics Specialist | Sarnia, Ontario

06.2012 - 08.2012 ACHIEVEMENTS + HONOURS Canadian BIM Council | Certified Professional, Level 2 09.2015 -PRESENT The Stop Night Market | Team 11 Design Team Member 04.2015 -06.2015 325 Magazine Selection | School of Resistance and Resilience 10.2014 Ryerson University End of The Year Exhibition Fourth Year Design Studio Selection | School of Resistance and Resilience Creative Space Simulation Selection | DAM Anti-Urban Dwelling 04.2014 Toronto Design Offsite Festival Exhibitor Toronto 01.2014 Ryerson University Entrance Scholarship 09.2010 Natalie Stellmacker Award | Contributions and Academic Achievement, English Department 09.2010 Ontario Scholar | 93% cumulative average, St. Patrick’s Secondary School 06.2010 Interdisciplinary Study Award | Academic Achievement in IDP Department 09.2009 Honours Student | St. Patrick’s High School, Sarnia 09.2006 - 06.2010

Selected Works 2018 NICHOLAS G AGER

VECTOR INSTITUTE M. Arch III | Option Studio | Fall 2017 New advances in digital technology promise new ways of interacting with each other, new ways of sensing the world, and new ways of extending our abilities. While the application of these new algorithms in architecture has been limited, we can imagine a series of possible future trajectories; new kinds of dynamic and responsive architectures. To explore this potential, an educational and office based program was established for the Vector Institute at the University of Toronto. Taking inspiration from the urban Noli Plan and its reflection of public private spatial flows, a work flow was developed in order to utilize stigemergic agent simulation to not only simulate user movement through space but to create an active relationship between these agents and the structure. By utilizing this self generated design space, designs could be created and explored through standards architecture conventions and explore options which may not be conceived in a traditional design process.

01. View from College Street

6 VS VO

VS VO

VS VF

VO VF

Cohesion Steering Force

Separation Steering Force

Alignment Steering Force

Site as Urban Object

Site as Public Space

01. Rules operating agent simulation

Site as Pathway 02. Building Objectives by swarm compilation

Structural Agents Populate

Structure Repels into Grid

User Agents deflect Structure

Column heights are modified by tributary area of each element

Beam connections are produced from adjacent columns

Floor above is generated. Large spans generate atrium conditions.

03. How is the building generated?

Selected Works 2018 NICHOLAS G AGER 01. Agents Swarm Level

02. Agent Intersection as Public Node

03. Public Nodes Repel Structure

04. Structure to Public/Communal Space

05. Circulation in Public Space

06. Potential Floor Plans

Selected Works 2018 NICHOLAS G AGER

Structure

Proximity to Facade

Project to Plane

Panelization from Project Pattern

Combine Layers

Mass + Facade

01. Generating the Facade

02. West Elevation - Urban Object

03. South Elevation - Urban Object

College Street Atrium

Private Meeting Space

01. Vignettes

02. Transverse Sections - Public Spaces

03. Longitudinal Section - Pathways and Public Space

Communal Atrium

Selected Works 2018 NICHOLAS G AGER

SCHOOL OF RESISTANCE AND RESILIENCE Fourth Year | Architecture in Crisis | Winter 2014 When examining the role of the architect in rebuilding places which have endured traumatic events, like the recent scourge of the school shooting in the United States, a balance must be struck between crafting a place of safety, through minimizing vulnerability, and developing a resilient atmosphere to allow for the healing process to begin. Similarly, the school of the modern age should be a place which is not only resistant to immediate crisis through a variety of safety measures but resilient to the associated long term stresses, where children can feel safe as they grow intellectually, emotionally, and expressively. Through an examination of programmatic arrangement, materiality, and experiences found in traditional school design, a familiarity could be established and these various architectural qualities could be adapted in order to begin to promote physical, emotional, and psychological healing in a place of crisis. A design was developed which strikes a balance between meeting the criteria associated with both safety and recovery in order to create a proposal for a new Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut.

01. Exterior View of School Entrance

REPROGRAMMING The site of the violence The site is cleared The place is reprogrammed TRANSPLANTING The site of the violence Victims are removed from the site Victims are replanted in a place of control REBUILDING The site of the violence The site is cleared The site is rebuilt with a responsive design

02. Taxonomy of Response - Violence in Places of Learning

REPROGRAM TRANSPLANT REBUILD

Selected Works 2018

Space for Collaboration Space for Repose Visual Connectivity

NICHOLAS G AGER

Natural Exposure Secure Environment

Creating units to address objectives

Units must be combined to address all objectives

Reorient Planes to address multiple objectives

Split planes create public/private relationship in section

Combine units to re-imagine the classroom

01. Designing at the scale of the individual

14 Primary Access Secondary Access Public Program Communal Program Private Program

Site

Site of Incident

Outdoor Space

Primary Access

Public + Communal

Primary Access

Repose for Students

Primary Access

Classrooms

Partitions

Administration

Classrooms

Collaboration Zone

Private Repose

Envelope the Program

02. Arranging Programming

Selected Works 2018 NICHOLAS G AGER 01. Library Space exits onto rear play area

02. Exterior Memorial incorporated in play space

Nature Administration Gymnasium Administration Nature Library Services Repose Collaborate Washroom Repose

07. Ground Floor Plan 1:500

Primary Access Secondary Access Public Program Communal Program Private Program

10. Security - Circulation

03. Classroom connects to elevated communal corridor/work space

04. Collaborative Corridor provides private, communal space

08. Second Floor Plan 1:500

11. Programming - Public / Private

05 Space for Repose located below collaborative corridor

06. Space for Repose located above the collaborative corridor

09. Third Floor Plan 1:500

12. Visual Control between Repose and Collaborative Spaces

Selected Works 2018 NICHOLAS G AGER

01. South-East Elevation 1:500

02. North-East Elevation 1:500

03. South-West Elevation 1:500

04. North-West Elevation 1:500

LIBRARY LIBRARY 05. Section AA 1:400

LIBRARY

Wall Section

04 12

06 12

08 07

01. Roof Membrane 02. Aluminium Clip 03. Steel Brackets 04. Ribbed Metal Sheathing 05. Glass Rail 06. Steel Angle Support 07. Double Paned Glazing 08. Curtain Wall Mullion 09. 300mm Steel I Beam 10. Structural Silicone 11. 400mm Steel I Beam 12. Parklex Wood Veneer 13. 300mm Batt Insulation 14. Vapour Barrier 06. Wall Section

07. Section BB 1:400

09 11 13

1:100

Selected Works 2018 NICHOLAS G AGER

STUHL Fourth Year | Digital Tools | Fall 2013 Collaboration with Nicholas vanNiekerk In the evolving , progressive school system, students are given freedom to explore the world around them and learn in a way that is catered to their unique minds. This means that traditionally rigid learning environments are beginning to open up and allow for children to control their surroundings and experiences. In order to adapt to the these changes and avoid the drawbacks of a static state, Stuhl was conceived. A simple curved geometry allows for children from the ages of 8-12 to sit comfortably at a work station or transform it into a low-lying rocking seat. Cut from a single 4 x 8 foot sheet of plywood using a CNC Router, Stuhl offers an inexpensive, sustainable and attractive dual seating option for children. This project was submitted for potential mass production and future use in the Early Childhood Education Program at Ryerson University and an Architecture Summer Camp run by Professor Vincent Hui.

01. Fullsized prototype, CNC, 4x8â&#x20AC;&#x2122; Sheet of Plywood

01. Conceptualizing

02. Pieces for Assembly

03. Assembly Instructions

04. Transform Instructions

05. Adapt to a childâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s environment

Selected Works 2018 NICHOLAS G AGER

AXIS | DANCE CATHEDRAL Second Year | Design Studio III | Winter 2012 Located on Sherbourne Street across from the popular Phoenix Concert Hall in Toronto, Axis features a large amount of space which has been dedicated to physical performance and dance. This is the result of an emphasis being placed on this venue to act as a “Dance Cathedral” or a gathering place for people who share a passion (dance and music), much like a cathedral or place of worship. These cathedrals placed paramount importance on orientation with the idea of “Westwerk” and rigid cruciform arrangements. Dance itself is a very spiritual act which made it pertinent to explore the notion of orientation in this design to relate to global religions. Axis focuses on orientation and the way people are able to orient themselves around or within the venue through three unique systems: a grid which runs true North, defining the position of the venue itself and a number of interior spaces; the Toronto city grid which sits approximately 17.5 degrees off of North, and a conceptual, compass-like meeting point of lines which were the purest experience of the dance cathedral takes place. The users location expands into the contextual facade openings and creates a a deeply personal connection with the built form.

01. View from Sherbourne Street

01. Emphasis on Orientation in Global Religions

02. Dance focuses on celebrating the body; therefore, the body must orient itself in its surroundings

03. Prevalent geometries incorporated into AXIS Dance Cathedral for orientation

Depth

Projection

Void

Selected Works 2018 NICHOLAS G AGER

Site

01. Defining and Implementing Contextual Facades Projection

Void

02 06

09 01

10 11 15 03

01. Vision Glass 02. Spandrel Glazing 03. Hollow HSS 04. Metal Cap Flashing 05. Roof Deck 06. OWSJ 07. 500mm W-Section 08. Curtain Wall Mullion 09. Batt Insulation 10. Vapour Barrier 11. Drainage Plane 12. Drainage Flashing 13. Concrete on Metal Deck 14. 300mm T-Section 15. Pre-Fabricated Brick Panel 03. Wall Section

1:75

Void

Projection

01. Sherbourne Elevation | 1:750

04. Section AA | 1:500

C A B C D E F G H

Security - Coatcheck Administration - Box Office Foyer Performer Services - Green Room Stage Space Bar Washroom Storage Space

E D

02. Ground Floor Plan | 1:500

A Bar B Private Seating Areas C Ramp to Upper VIP Levels D Loading along Bleecker E Taxi Alley F Open to Below

03. Second Floor Plan | 1:500

Selected Works 2018 NICHOLAS G AGER

DAM | ANTI-URBAN LIVING Fourth Year | Creative Space Simulation | Winter 2014 Drawing on the contradiction of density in an isolated environment, the structure needed to provide basic facilities for four travelers to rest and gather in a place of natural immersion. The geometry for DAM was inspired by the beaver dam; an evolved structure of cast wood, wedged into an intricate chassis for living in the negative space. The DAM is anti-urban yet a compacted human experience. As the occupant lowers their body through the tensile structure, the mind begins to wander to the primal; living in trees, climbing through vines and branches to find a place to live. Through a parametric exploration of the relationship between a line, a face, and a volume, various iterations could be explored and critiqued to develop a practical yet evocative environment for travel between compartments. Ultimately, the DAM will remain a portable, lightweight structure which offers true immersion within the landscape.

01. View of DAM in situ

Looking up the chassis 02. Vignettes

D. Six-Point Chassis

C. Five-Point Chassis

B. Four-Point Chassis

A. Three-Point Chassis

03. Evolving the Beaver Dam

04. Parametric Design Space

All environment use

Interior Space

Selected Works 2018 NICHOLAS G AGER

TORONTO’STORY M. Arch II | Comprehensive Studio | Winter 2017 Collaboration with Jin Park Toronto is a 21st century metropolitan mosaic. Defining moments in the city’s history have led to a collection of distinct neighbourhoods made up of unique individuals who gather, create, and live by their own cultural/philosophical terms. This notion has been integral during the development of Toronto’ Story Museum + Archive. Placing great importance on a piece-to-whole relationship, the project has been conceived as a collection of these cities uniquely scaled and idiosyncratic moments. These “stories” have then been placed into an organizing and protective framework. Just as the “stories” represent and the moments in its history which resulted in the fine grain of the city, this framework is representative of Toronto’s large-scale growth plans. Rising from the shell of a heritage building, as many civic scale residential projects do today, it is meant to be porous and reflect the opportunity for additional stories to be created and added over time. The stories are then freed from the frame and begin to spill out along the site towards Front Street to create a connection to the prominent public space of Rail Deck Park. While the framework allows the site to operate at a civic scale, required of a major institution such as this, the stories begin to reflect the contextual scale of the Draper Street Cottages and create something that is both grand and contextually resonant. 01. View from Front Street

Create an Urban Scale Frame

Collect the City Stories

Expose Story to City at Site Scale

Add Stories over time

02. Concept for a Museum

Selected Works 2018

Draper St

Portland St

NICHOLAS G AGER

Wellington St

Front St

Ground Floor Plan

Fifth Floor Plan

01. Circulation + Program Axonometric

02. Floor Plans 1:2000

Second Floor Plan

Third Floor Plan

Fourth Floor Plan

Sixth Floor Plan

Seventh Floor Plan

Eight Floor Plan

Selected Works 2018 NICHOLAS G AGER

Wellington St

01. West Elevation 1:1000

Wellington St

03. Section AA 1:1000

Night on Wellington 05. Vignettes

Underside of Spill

Large Gallery

Veranda

Front St

Rail Deck Park

Portland St

02. North Elevation 1:1000

Front St

Rail Deck Park

Portland St

04. Section BB 1:1000

Auditorium

Archives

Heritage Facade Interior

Selected Works 2018 NICHOLAS G AGER

Build Framework out of Heritage Facade

Fill Framework with Occupied Trusses

Build Spill on Ground 01. Structural Axonometric

02. Structural Progression

03. Auditorium Wall Section 1:200

Heating Season 04. Environmental Control

Cooling Season

Passive Season

1. Perforated Aluminum Screen 2. 39mm C-Channel Frame 3. 200 x 150HSS 4. 150mm C-Channel Stud 5. Metal Panel Wall 7mm Aluminum Panel 25mm Z-Clip System Air/Moisture Barrier 25mm Gypsum Wallboard 152mm Batt Insulation 150mm C-Channel Stud (Spaced 16â&#x20AC;? OC) 25mm Gypsum Wallboard Optional Interior Perforated Panel Finish 6. C-Channel Panel Clip 7. 160mm Concrete on Metal Deck 8. 152 x 102 x 12.7mm L-Angle 9. 600x16.1 W-Section 10. Return Air Intake Duct 11. Recessed Fluorescent Lighting 12. Perforated Drop Ceiling System 13. Recessed Roller Shade 14. Glazed urtain Wall Sill 15. Triple Glazed Unit 16. Floor Assembly A Interlocked Wood Flooring 106mm Concrete on Metal Deck 17. Floor Assembly B 106mm Polished Concrete on Metal Deck 18. 300 x 150HSS Diagonal Bracing 19. Interlocked Wood Flooring 20. 200mm Poured Concrete on Grade 21. Soil 22. Permeable Concrete Pavers 23. Soil for Planting 24. Drainage Trench/Reveal 25. 235mm Trench Drain 26. Gravel 27. HSS Frame Support 28. Metal Cap Flashing 29. Triple Ply Roof Membrane 30. Aluminum Cant Strip 31. 200mm Rigid Insulation with Air Moisture Barrier

05. Wall Section 1:50

Selected Works 2018 NICHOLAS G AGER

KINETICABIN Fourth Year | Glass in Architecture | Winter 2014 Why should a room only be usable on the floor plane? By acknowledging the potential for the four separate faces of an interior to function as livable space, a meager 20 square metres becomes far more dynamic and livable. This kineticabin is designed to accommodate for summer holiday on Spanish Ship Bay Island in Nova Scotia. By adhering to a limited floor plate . The environment is unforgiving and because of this, the cabin must be simple and compact. To reduce concerns of damage during the winter months, every swatch of space within the cabin must be utilized. In order to deliver a durable and aesthetically pleasing “cabin”, a design was generated around this idea of total versatility. Featuring rotating compartments, all 4 faces of the interior can be programmed and used by the occupants. Necessary amenities are all included in these planes, shifted from view during their unused hours of the day. With such a small footprint, it was clear that creating visual connections to the exterior would be of paramount importance in “opening up” the cabin and making it feeler much larger that its modest footprint suggests.

01. Kineticabin in Situ

Distinct Spaces 02. Conceptual Models

Full-range of Views

Combine to create Cabin

What if each face of the room could be utilized?

Adaptable and Versatile Program

Animate each plane

Glazed exterior to protect from elements

Maximize Floor Area Through Rotation

03. Objectives through concept

Panelized-wood caompartment

Steel Support Rods

Steel Framing

Adjustable Wood Partitions

Vertical Glass Fins Rotating Channels 4 Walled Glass Facade Steel Supports

04. Exploded axonometric

Selected Works 2018 NICHOLAS G AGER 01. 491 College Street, Toronto

PROFESSIONAL WORK Turner Fleischer Architects Inc. | 2014-2016 The following images are a sample set of professional work completed from 2014-2016 as a member of the Site Development Team and the Commercial Realization Team at Turner Fleischer Architects Inc. General responsibilities included the preparation of Site Plans and Elevations for a variety of projects at the Conceptual Phase, Site Plan Approval Phase, and Building Permit Phase. Much of this work was independantly completed. I was also responsible for coordination efforts between Clients, Planners, and Engineers during the Schemtic to Construction Document Phase. 491 College Street, Toronto is a commercial development which repurposes a neglected heritage facade in Downtown Toronto. The building offers retail at grade at two floors of office space above. I was personally responsible for independant preparation of the Design Conceptualization and Site Plan Approval Process drawing set. This included extensive heritage compliance efforts and client collaboration.

02. Ground Floor

02. North Elevation

03. South Elevation

04. South Elevation

04. Third Floor 05. Heritage Mandated Sight Line Compliance

Selected Works 2018 NICHOLAS G AGER 01. Stonegate Common, Calgary Stonegate Common is a mixeduse commercial plaza, including Âą720,000 S.F. of restaurants, banks, and retail located in Calgary, Alberta. I was personally responsible for the preparation of design and site plan approval drawings and for coordination between the client (One Properties) and the consultant team.

02. Iterative Site Plan Process

40 1/A4.0-B

TURN ER FLEISC HER

1' - 4 5/8"

129' - 8 1/2" 1' - 0 5/8"

6' - 0"

20' - 8"

16' - 4"

9' - 4"

10' - 2 7/8"

T URNER FLEISCHER ARCHITECTS INC.

16' - 3 1/8"

9' - 0"

12' - 9 3/8"

24' - 1 1/8"

5' - 0"

   3 5/8"      

1' - 0 5/8"

 1/2"

T/O HIGH PARAPET STEEL

4' - 6"

1' - 0 5/8"

4 A5.3-B

18' - 8"

STRUCTURAL STEEL GIRT. REFER TO STRUC. DWGS.

6' - 2"

1/2"

STRUCTURAL STEEL GIRT. REFER TO STRUCT. DWGS..

5 A7.2-B

4' - 10"

9' - 8"

1' - 6"

10' - 9"

CROSS HATCHING INDICATES EXTENT OF 1/2" FIRE RETARDENT PLYWOOD OR 22 GA. METAL SHEET ON 1/2" CEMENT BOARD FOR EXTERIOR LIGHTS (TYP.)

0 1.0 19

1/2" JOINT FILLER (TYP.) 2" RIGID INSULATION OVER FULL HEIGHT OF WALL BELOW FINISHED EF12a GRADE

1' - 8"

EF2c

3' - 0"

16' - 1"

3' - 0"

6' - 2"

9' - 6"

EF2b

GRADE.

(TYP.)

6' - 4"

(TYP.)

EW-1.2

5 0.0 19

EF12a

EF14 12' - 0"

2" RIGID INSULATION 3' - 0" 4' OVER FULL HEIGHT OF WALL BELOW FINISHED GRADE

A5.3-B

EF5

EF2c

3' - 0"

3 2

2 EF2e A7.2-B

1/2"

EF5

F.F.E. 191.15 0"

TOP OF FINISH FLOOR. REFER TO

REINFORCED CONCRETE 12' - 0" 3' - 0" FOUNDATION AND FOOTING.

15' - 11"

6' - 4"

CONTINUOUS THRU-WALL FLASHING GRADE ELEVATION @ SIDEWALKS TO BE 1-1/2" BELOW TOP OF FINISH FLOOR. REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR FINAL GRADE. REINFORCED CONCRETE FOUNDATION AND FOOTING. REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS

SECTION THROUGH EAST WALL @ BRICK PIER 1/2" = 1'-0"

1/2" JOINT FILLER (TYP.)

EF6

EF8a

EF9

EF2e

EF7a

? EF9

EF2a

40' - 0" PLYWOOD

EF8a

EF2a

EQ EQ

EF12a

3' - 0" 4' - 0" 3' - 0"

EF14 14' - 1"

EF2c

(TYP.)

6' - 4"

EF1b

EF12a

3' - 0" 4' - 0" 3' - 0"

5 1.1 19

EF12a

EF1b 34' - 0"

EF2c

3' - 0" 4' - 0"

EF1b

1' - 6" 15' - 0"

2' - 10"

Sim

BUILDING B - BILLY BISHOP & WIL AVE.

1/2"

TORONTO, ONTARIO

1/2" JOINT FILLER (TYP.)

DRAWN BY

02. Detailed Wall Sections

EF12a

LIGHT FIXTURE C/W 1/2" EXTERIOR GRADE PLYWOOD BACKING (FIRE RATED WHERE APPLICABLE).

CHECKED BY

GH SCALE

1/2" = 1'-0"

DRAWING NO.

SIGNAGE C/W 3/4" EXTERIOR GRADE PLYWOOD FOR SIGNAGE LOCATIONS @ EIFS CONSTRUCTION, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED (FIRE RATED WHERE APPLICABLE).

METAL CANOPY (CLOSED): CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE MANUFACTURER INFORMATION OR SHOP DRAWINGS TO BE APPROVED BY ARCHITECT. C/W 1/2" EXTERIOR GRADE PLYWOOD BACKING (FIRE RATED WHERE APPLICABLE). COLOUR: BLACK

EXTERIOR WALL SECTIONS PROJECT NO.

2" RIGID INSULATION OVER 10.141 FULL HEIGHT OF WALL BELOW PROJECT DATE FINISHED GRADE 2014-10-08

9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 #

2016-07-11 2016-07-06 2016-06-28 2016-06-24 2016-06-20 2016-06-15 2016-06-14 2016-06-06 DATE

ISSUED FOR COORDINATION ISSUED FOR COORDINATION ISSUED FOR COORDINATION ISSUED FOR TENANT REVIEW ISSUED FOR REVIEW ISSUED FOR COORDINATION ISSUED FOR REVIEW ISSUED FOR REVIEW DESCRIPTION

A5.0-B

NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA BY

SPANDREL GLAZING C/W INSULATED BACKPAN, INTERIOR FINISHED WITH STUDS AND GYPSUM WALL BOARD COLOUR: OPACI-COAT-300 3-0770 WARM GRAY

PROJECT

BUILDING B - BILLY BISHOP & WILSON AVE.

EF2b 12' - 9"

2016-07-11 ISSUED FOR COORDINATION 2016-07-06 ISSUED FOR COORDINATION 2016-06-20 ISSUED FOR REVIEW 2016-05-20 ISSUED FOR COORDINATION DATE DESCRIPTION

PROJECT

SIGNAGE:

EXTENT OF 3/4" FIRE-RATED PLYWOOD BACKING FOR MOUNTING OF SIGNAGE AND FIXTURES

5 1.1 19

7 A7.2-B 1/2" 1" 5 1/2"

PREFINISHEDSECTION CAP FLASHING THROUGH EAST WALL PRE-FINISHED METAL CAP FLASHING @BLOCK/GLAZING/CANOPY/BRICK PROFILES4INDICATED ON DRAWINGS 1/2" = 1'-0" COLOUR: VICWEST QC 16161 CAMBRIDGE WHITE

EF11

EF14

V.B.

9 8 5 1 #

DRAWING

H.M. DOORS & FRAMES: PREFINISHED HOLLOW METAL DOORS AND FRAMES. PAINTED TO MATCH ADJACENT MATERIAL

EF10b

EF7a

27' - 6"

7' - 0"

EQ EQ

5 1.1 19

32' - 7 1/2"

EF2e

V.B.

6' - 4"

9' - 6"

EQ EQ

5' - 0"

EW1.1B

AWNING: CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE MANUFACTURER INFORMATION OR SHOP DRAWINGS TO BE APPROVED BY ARCHITECT. C/W 1/2" EXTERIOR GRADE PLYWOOD BACKING (FIRE RATED WHERE APPLICABLE). COLOUR: FIRESIST 82008 BLACK

PLYWOOD

32' - 0"

PLYWOOD

5 1.1 19

1' - 4 5/8"

EF2a

EXTENT OF RETAIL B2.1

GLAZED DOORS & WINDOWS: TEMPERED FRITTED LOW E GLAZING IN CLEAR ANODIZED THERMALLY F.F.E. 191.15 BROKEN ALUMINUM FRAMES 0" (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)

MOULDING: PREFABRICATED CROWN MOULDING PROFILES INDICATED ON DRAWINGS COLOUR: DRYVIT 101 SUPER WHITE

1' - 6"

EF8a

3) BIRD FRIENDLY MEASURES LIMITED USE OF CLEAR GLAZING AND A COMBINATION OF SPANDREL, ADDITIONAL MULLIONS, ARCHITECTURAL PIERS AND CANOPIES, ARE PROPOSED.

WRAP G.W.B. AROUND STEEL TO FINISH

CLAY BRICK (COURSING) BRAMPTON BRICK CONTEMPORARY SERIES COLOUR: ROYAL GRAY SIZE: PREMIER PLUS

2" RIGID INSULATION OVER FULL HEIGHT OF WALL BELOW EF7a DECORATIVE FINISHED GRADE

37' - 6"

EXTENT OF M&E ROOM ROOF SCUPPER. REFER TO DETAIL 4 / A7.1-B .

? EF9

EF2c

21' - 7"

(TYP.)

7' - 0"

.57 GRADE 90 ELEVATION @ 1SIDEWALKS TO BE 1-1/2" BELOW CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR FINAL EF14 EF1b

2) ALL ROOF TOP UNIT SIZES AND LOCATIONS ARE PRELIMINARY ; TO BE CONFIRMED BY MECHANICAL CONSULTANT ON BP PHASE.

STRUCTURAL STEEL GIRT. REFER TO STRUCT. DWGS..

DARK CLAY BRICK EF2c BRAMPTON BRICK CONTEMPORARY SERIES STRUCTURAL STEEL GIRT.COLOUR: ROYAL GRAY REFER TO STRUC. DWGS. SIZE: PREMIER PLUS 3 1/8" (H) X 3 1/2" (D) X 10 1/8" (W) Sim

F-1

1/2" JOINT FILLER (TYP.)

CONTINUOUS THRU-WALL FLASHING

REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS

PLYWOOD

19' - 6"

6' - 4"

(TYP.) 0 1.0 19

(TYP.)

2' - 8"

EF7a

1' - 10"

7' - 0"

3 5/8" 1/2" 1" 3 1/2"

EW-1.1B

SECTION THROUGH EAST WALL @ BLOCK/GLAZING/CANOPY/BRICK/BRICK PROJECTION 2 1/2" = 1'-0"

EXTENT OF RETAIL B6

EF5

SOUTH ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0"

1/2"

8" 0 1.0 19

REINFORCED CONCRETE FOUNDATION AND FOOTING. 36' -REFER 0" TO STRUCTURAL DWGS

9' - 2"

I was personally responsible for independant preparation of the Building Permit drawing set and coordination with the consutant team.

F.F.E. 191.15 0"

EQ EQ

V.B. 8"

1' - 1 3/4"

GRADE ELEVATION @ SIDEWALKS TO BE 1-1/2" BELOW TOP OF FINISH FLOOR. REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR FINAL GRADE.

4' - 10"

4' - 6" 6" 3' - 0"

9' - 6"

U/S CANOPY 9' - 6"

29' - 0"

T/O FLOOR 2 14' - 6" T/O HIGH GLAZING 14' - 0"

LIGHT CLAY BRICK U/S CANOPY 9' - 6"CONTEMPORARY SERIES BRAMPTON BRICK COLOUR: GRAY SMOOTH SIZE: PREMIER PLUS 3 1/8" (H) X 3 1/2" (D) X 10 1/8" (W)

123' - 10 1/2" 28' - 8 1/2"

Shops at Wilson Station is a commercial plaza which repurposes an underutilized site with a focus on enhancing the streetscape through urban design.

T/O STEEL 1 17' - 6"

EF2c

REFER TO STRUC. DWG.

CONTINUOUS THRU-WALL FLASHING

REFER TO STRUC. DWGS.

2' - 0"

F.F.E. 191.15 0"

6' - 4"

(TYP.)

6' - 4"

1/2"

EF14

EF12a 3' - 0"

EQ Sim EQ

7 A7.2-B 1/2" 1" 5 1/2"

F-1

1/2" 1" 5 1/2"

01. Shops at Wilson Station, Toronto

T/O STEEL 2 24' - 6"

EF7a

NOTE: 1) ALL ROOF TOP UNITS TO BE SCREENED WITH ROOF PARAPETS

1/2"

EF2b MEDIUM CLAY BRICK STRUCTURAL STEEL GIRT.BRAMPTON BRICK CONTEMPORARY SERIES REFER TO STRUC. DWGS.COLOUR: CHARCOAL SMOOTH SIZE: PREMIER PLUS 3 1/8" (H) X 3 1/2" (D) X 10 1/8" (W)

EQ EQ

Sim

EW-1.1

EW-1.1B

REFER TO STRUC. DWG.

4' - 6"

4 A7.2-B

SECTION THROUGH EAST WALL @ BLOCK/BRICK/BRICK PROJECTION 1 1/2" = 1'-0"

T/O HIGH PARAPET STEEL

EF2e

PLYWOOD

8' - 0" EQ EQ 1/2"

NORTH ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0"

29' - 0"

EF9 ? 5' - 0"

8' - 10"

7' - 0"

9' - 6" 1/2" 1" 3 1/2"

(TYP.)

EF2b

EF1b 12' - 2"

CONCRETE BLOCK BASE RICHVALE YORK CAMBRIDGE SERIES COLOUR: DIAMOND BLACK-3 FINISH: STIPPLED

EF2a

24' - 0"

6' - 4"

EF2c

T/O LOW PARAPET 26' - 4"

EF14

V.B.

4' - 0"

EF1b STEEL TO FINISH

EF8a

EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE

6' - 1"

EXTENT OF RETAIL B3 WRAP G.W.B. AROUND

PLYWOOD

10 1/2"

2' - 4" 6' - 1 1/2" 3' - 3 1/2"

EF7a

EF2e

EQ EQ

9' - 6"

ROOF SCUPPER. U/S CANOPY REFER TO DETAIL 4 / A7.1-B . 9' - 6"

1/2" 1" 3 1/2"

This drawing, as an instrument of service, is provided by and is the property of Turner Fleisher Architects Inc. The contractor must verify and accept responsibility for all dimensions and conditions on site and must notify Turner Fleischer Architects Inc. of any variations from the supplied information. This drawing is not to be scaled. The architect is not responsible for the accuracy of survey, structural, mechanical, electrical, etc., information shown on this drawing. Refer to the appropriate consultant's drawings before proceeding with the work. Construction must conform to all applicable codes and requirements of authorities having jurisdiction. The contractor working from drawings not specifically marked 'For Construction' must assume full responsibility and bear costs for any corrections or damages resulting from his work.

A2.0-B

BRICK SOLDIER COURSE. REFER TO ELEVATIONS.

T/O HIGH GLAZING 14' - 0"

Sim

12' - 11 1/2"

DRAWING NO.

BRICK SOLDIER COURSE. REFER TO ELEVATIONS.

3' - 2 1/2"

STRUCTURAL STEEL GIRT. REFER TO STRUC. DWGS.

1/2" 1" 3 1/2" BRICK SOLDIER COURSE. A5.2-B REFER TO ELEVATIONS.

9' - 2"

N EW1.1

10 1/2"

T URNER FLEISCHER ARCHITECTS INC. 6

A7.2-B           

1/8" = 1'-0"

BRICK SOLDIER COURSE. REFER TO ELEVATIONS.

TURN ER FLEISC HER

GH SCALE

6 A7.2-B

A7.2-B

36' - 0"

V.B.

F.F.E. 191.15 0"

? EF9

F.F.E. 191.15 0"

4' - 6" 1' - 8" 9' - 6"

11"

123' - 10 1/2" 15' - 11"

1' - 7 1/8"

29' - 1 1/8" 6

CHECKED BY

7' - 8"

3' - 0"

26' - 4"

D 21' - 7"

EF2a

PROJECT DATE BRICK SOLDIER2014-10-08 COURSE. REFER TO ELEVATIONS. DRAWN BY

2' - 10"

R-1

10.141

4' - 6"

A5.2-B T/O HIGH GLAZING 14' - 0"

3 A7.2-B

GROUND FLOOR PLAN

5' - 0"

2 A7.1-B

STRUCTURAL STEEL GIRT. REFER TO STRUCT. DWGS..

1' - 8"

10 1/2"

Sim

3 A5.2-B

EW1.1A PROJECT NO.

T/O STEEL 2 24' - 6"

PLYWOOD

5' - 4 1/2"

1' - 10"2' - 8" 7' - 0"

U/S CANOPY 9' - 6"

4' - 6" 6" 3' - 0"

29' - 0"

T/O STEEL 1 17' - 6" T/O FLOOR 2 14' - 6" T/O HIGH GLAZING 14' - 0"

EF8a

T/O LOW PARAPET 26' - 4"

R-1

10' - 6"

3' - 0"

6' - 1 1/2"

6' - 1 1/2" 10 1/2" 3' - 2 1/2" 29' - 0"

7" 24' - 6" 10' - 9" 2' - 0"

EW-1.2A

1" 1 1/2"

1/2" 6 1/2"

DRAWING

3 A7.2-B 3 1/8"

1/2" 3/4" 1 3/4"

1' - 10"

Sim

3 5/8" 1/2" 1" 3 1/2"

EW-1.1

EF7a

BUILDING B - BILLY BISHOP & WILSON AVE. 11"

8' - 10"

6' - 10 3/8"

EW-1.1

1/2"

EXTENT OF RETAIL B1

T/O HIGH PARAPET STEEL 29' - 0" T/O LOW PARAPET 26' - 4" T/O STEEL 2 24' - 6"

PROJECT

1 A7.1-B

T/O STEEL 2 24' - 6"

Sim

5 A5.3-B

1/2" 3/4" 1 3/4"

BLOCK/GLAZING/CANOPY/BR PROJECTION 2 1/2" = 1'-0"

This drawing, as an instrument of service, is provided by and is the property of Turner Fleisher Arc contractor must verify and accept responsibility for all dimensions and conditions on site and mus Fleischer Architects Inc. of any variations from the supplied information. This drawing is not to be architect is not responsible for the accuracy of survey, structural, mechanical, electrical, etc., infor on this drawing. Refer to the appropriate consultant's drawings before proceeding with the work. must conform to all applicable codes and requirements of authorities having jurisdiction. The cont from drawings not specifically marked 'For Construction' must assume full responsibility and bear corrections or damages resulting from his work.

6' - 4"

10 1/2"

12' - 9"

22' - 3"

4' - 0" 3' - 0" 14' - 4" 11 1/4" 3' - 0" 5' - 3 3/4"

V.B. 3' - 0" 32' - 5"

8 A7.2-B

3 1/2" 1' - 6"

ENTRANCE

2 4 A5.3-B A5.1-B STEEL PLATE TO SUPPORT BRICK. REFER TO

1 A7.2-B

24' - 6"

R-1

FROST SLAB. REFER TO DETAIL 3 / A5.3-B & 4 / A5.3-B . V.B.

21' - 9 3/8"

3x 1/2" 1" 3 1/2"

TURN ER FLEISC HE

TORONTO, ONTARIO 1/2"

009

3 A7.2-B

NA NA 1/2" JOINT FILLER (TYP.) NA NA 2" RIGID INSULATION NA OVER FULL HEIGHT OF NA WALL BELOW FINISHED NA GRADE NA BY

STRUCTURAL STEEL GIRT. REFER TO STRUCT. DWGS..

11"

1' - 6"

14' - 8 3/4"

6 22' - 3" A7.2-B

29' - 0"

5 A5.3-B

1/2" 1" 1 1/2"

29' - 0"

3' - 0"

3' - 2 1/2"

10 1/2"

3/A4.0-B 6' - 11 1/8" 6' - 4"

CONTINUOUS THRU-WALL FLASHING

15' - 3"

Sim

T/O HIGH PARAPET STEEL 29' - 0"

STRUC. DWGS. G.C. TO PAINT STEEL PLATE COLOUR TO MATCH BRICK.

BRICK SOLDIER COURSE. REFER TO ELEVATIONS. A5.2-B

4 A5.3-B

T/O STEEL 2 24' - 6"

129' - 8 1/2"

22' - 3"

ENTRANCE

Sim

5 A5.3-B

8' - 11"

BRICK SOLDIER COURSE. REFER TO ELEVATIONS.

3 5/8" 1/2" 1" 3 1/2"

3' - 3 1/2"

R-1

F.F.E. 191.15 0" 2016-07-11 ISSUED FOR COORDINATION CONTINUOUS9 THRU-WALL FLASHING 8 2016-07-06 ISSUED FOR COORDINATION 7 2016-06-28 ISSUED FOR COORDINATION GRADE ELEVATION @ SIDEWALKS TO 6 2016-06-24 ISSUED FOR TENANT REVIEW BE 1-1/2" BELOW TOP OF FINISH 5 TO2016-06-20 ISSUED FOR REVIEW FLOOR. REFER CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR FINAL GRADE. 4 2016-06-15 ISSUED FOR COORDINATION 2 2016-06-06 ISSUED FOR REVIEW REINFORCED CONCRETE FOUNDATION 1 REFER 2016-05-20 ISSUED FOR COORDINATION AND FOOTING. TO STRUCTURAL # DATE DESCRIPTION DWGS

SECTION THROUGH EAST WALL @ BLOCK/BRICK/BRICK PROJECTION 1 1/2" = 1'-0"

1' - 4 5/8" 3 5/8" 1/2" 1" 3 1/2"

1 A7.1-B

EW-1.2 EW-1.1B

EW-1.2A

ENTRANCE

5' - 0"

3 1/2" 4"

Sim

1 A7.3-B

F-1

T URNER FLEISCHER ARCHITECTS INC.

FROST SLAB. REFER TO DETAIL 3 / A5.3-B & 4 / A5.3-B

1/2" 1" 1 1/2"

1/2"

          SECTION THROUGH EAST WA

4' - 6"

1/2" 1"

3' - 0"

STRUCTURAL STEEL GIRT. REFER TO STRUCT. DWGS.

008

007

15' - 0"

20' - 2 3/8"

FLOOR PLAN 1/8" = 1'-0"

Sim

4 A7.2-B

EXIT

1' - 7 1/8"

T/O HIGH PARAPET STEEL 29' - 0"

3' - 2 1/2"

6' - 4"

Sim

3 A7.2-B

STEEL PLATE TO SUPPORT BRICK. REFER TO A5.1-B A5.1-B STRUC. DWGS. G.C. TO PAINT STEEL PLATE COLOUR TO MATCH BRICK.

47' - 8"

4 A5.3-B

1/2"

1/2" 1" 5 1/2"

EW-1.1B

F.F.E. 191.15 0"

EW-1.1

ABOVE

EW-1.1 EW-1.2A 1" 3 1/2"

1" 1 1/2"

1 EW-1.1B A7.3-B

ABOVE

EW-1.2A 1/2"

1 A7.1-B

6' - 1 1/2"

3 1/2" 4' - 6"

19' - 11 3/4"

11"

1' - 4 5/8"

ABOVE 3 5/8"

ABOVE

3 5/8" 1/2" 1" 3 1/2"

A5.3-B

1/2" 1" 3 1/2"

F-1

ABOVE

1/2" EW-1.1

FROST SLAB. REFER TO DETAIL 3 / A5.3-B & 4 / A5.3-B . V.B.

T/O STEEL 2 24'4 - 6" 4 A5.1-B

2" 2"

EW-1.2

EW-1.2A

6' - 1 1/2"

1' - 7 1/8"

4' - 9 1/2"

11" 1' - 7 1/8"

ENTRANCE

5 A5.3-B

F-1

STRUCTURAL STEEL GIRT. REFER TO STRUCT. DWGS..

006

PROPOSED RESTAURANT B7 A&W RESTAURANT (±1,505 S.F.) (±140 S.M.) FFE=191.15

EW-1.1A

3 5/8" 1/2"

ABOVE 1" 3 1/2" EW-1.2A

EW-1.1B

1' - 0 5/8"

V.B.

ABOVE

T/O HIGH PARAPET STEEL 29' - 0"

Sim

1' - 4 5/8"

ABOVE EW-1.2A

EW-1.1

EW-1.1B EW-1.1 EW-1.2A

F-1

ABOVE

5' - 0"

6' - 1"

EXIT

010

29' - 0"

12' - 0"

12' - 11 1/2" 9' - 8"

4' - 6" 3' - 0"

ABOVE

U/S CANOPY 9' - 6"

Sim

4 A7.0-B

SMOOTH & LEVEL CONCRETE FLOOR READY TO RECEIVE TENANT FINISHES FOR ALL UNITS

ABOVE

EW-1.2 EW-1.2A

PROPOSED RETAIL B6 TBD (±1,079 S.F.) (±100 S.M.) FFE=191.15

EW-1.1

4 / A7.0-B

F-1

3' - 0"

PROPOSED RETAIL B5 NAIL GALLERY (±1,104 S.F.) (±103 S.M.) FFE=191.15

RWL TIGHT TO BACK OF COLUMN. TYP. REFER TO DETAIL

48' - 10 1/2"

3' - 0"

EW-1.1B EW-1.1 EW-1.1

4 A5.3-B

011

P-1

2' - 10"

A5.2-B

ABOVE

P-1

4' - 6"

ABOVE

Sim

29' - 1 1/8"

2 HR F.R.

PROPOSED RETAIL B4 SNUGGLE BUGZ (±2,865 S.F.) (±266 S.M.) FFE=191.15

21' - 9 3/8"

2 HR F.R.

FROST SLAB. REFER TO DETAIL 3 / A5.3-B & 4 / A5.3-B

005

2 HR F.R.

3' - 7" 3' - 0"

EXIT

4 A5.3-B

8' - 5"

20' - 2"

A5.2-B

M&E ROOM (±226 S.F.) (±21 S.M.) FFE=190.85

2 HR F.R. 22' - 3"

T/O HIGH GLAZING 14' - 0"

C1 4 A5.3-B

11' - 8 1/8"

10 A7.3-B

2 HR F.R.

TENANT ELECTRICAL PANEL. REFER TO ELECTRICAL DWGS. LOCATION TO BE CONFIRMED BY TENANT

Sim

1 A7.2-B

EXIT

012 2 HR F.R.

17' - 5"

P-1A

56' - 7"

1/2"

BRICK SOLDIER COURSE. REFER TO ELEVATIONS.

REFER TO STRUC. DWG.

ROUGH IN FOR UNIVERSAL PUBLIC WASHROOM

P-1

2/A4.1-B

16' - 3 1/8"

TENANT ELECTRICAL PANEL. REFER TO ELECTRICAL DWGS. LOCATION TO BE CONFIRMED BY TENANT

15' - 11"

V.B.

EW-1.2 EW-1.2A

4' - 0"

10' - 2 7/8"

ROUGH IN FOR SINGLE PUBLIC WASHROOM

ABOVE

7' - 4 1/2"

013

2 HR F.R.

EW-1.1B EW-1.1 EW-1.2A

Sim

10 A7.3-B

1' - 9"

ABOVE

1/2" 1" 3 1/2"

BRICK SOLDIER COURSE. REFER TO ELEVATIONS.

CONTINUOUS THRU-WALL FLASHING

18' - 8 3/4"

21' - 8 5/8" SMOOTH & LEVEL CONCRETE FLOOR READY TO RECEIVE TENANT FINISHES FOR ALL UNITS

P-1A 2 HR F.R.

A5.2-B

13' - 2 5/8"

21' - 9 3/8"

3' - 5" 3' - 0"

26' - 6" LATERALLY SUPPORTED

P-1

CORRIDOR (±163 S.F.) (±15 S.M.) FFE=190.85

21' - 7"

F-1

2 HR F.R.

21' - 7"

6' - 5"

123' - 10 1/2"

3' - 0" 5' - 11 3/8" 15' - 11"

52' - 4"

ABOVE

2 HR F.R.

TENANT ELECTRICAL PANEL. REFER TO ELECTRICAL DWGS. LOCATION TO BE CONFIRMED BY TENANT

SMOOTH & LEVEL CONCRETE FLOOR READY TO RECEIVE TENANT FINISHES FOR ALL UNITS

ABOVE

2 A8.0-B

3' - 0"

75' - 0" 8' - 3 3/8"

F-1

004

16' - 1"

1/A4.1-B

ABOVE

R-1

6 A7.2-B

2 A5.3-B

LINE OF FLOOR ABOVE

FROST SLAB. REFER TO DETAIL 3 / A5.3-B & 4 / A5.3-B

EXIT

PROPOSED RETAIL B3 1 CLASSIC CREATIONS JEWELERS A8.0-B GROUND FLOOR (±3,834 S.F.) (±356 S.M.) FFE=191.15 FROST SLAB. REFER TO DETAIL 3 / A5.3-B & 4 / A5.3-B SECOND FLOOR (±1,904 S.F.) EW-1.2A EW-1.1 EW-1.3 EW-1.1B (±177 S.M.)

P-1A

RWL TIGHT TO BACK OF COLUMN. TYP. REFER TO DETAIL Sim 4 A7.0-B

4 A5.3-B

1/2" 1"

T/O STEEL 2 24' - 6"

A5.3-B

2 1/2" 3' - 0"

EW-1.1B EW-3 EW-1.1 EW-1.1

EW-1.2A ABOVE

50' - 10 5/8"

PROPOSED RETAIL B2 TBD (±1,544 S.F.) (±143 S.M.) FFE=191.15

P-1

EW-1.1 ABOVE

EW-1.2A ABOVE

9' - 2"

PROPOSED RETAIL B1 CARTERS OSHKOSH CLOTHING (±4,227 S.F.) (±393 S.M.) FFE=191.15

EW-1.1 ABOVE

24' - 6"

ABOVE

26' - 6"

2 HR F.R.

ABOVE

2 HR F.R.

4' - 6" 3' - 0" 15' - 3"

15' - 4 1/4"

ABOVE

EW-1.2A

EW-1.1A ABOVE

STEEL PLATE TO SUPPORT BRICK. REFER TO STRUC. DWGS. G.C. TO PAINT STEEL PLATE COLOUR TO MATCH BRICK.

EW-1.1B

V.B.

EW-1.1 ABOVE

52' - 4"

4997 EW-1.1B

27' - 6"

V.B.

TENANT ELECTRICAL PANEL. REFER TO ELECTRICAL DWGS. LOCATION TO BE CONFIRMED BY TENANT

A5.2-B

Sim

1 A7.3-B

EW-1.2

123' - 10 1/2"

EW-1.B

3 5/8" 1/2" 1" 3 1/2"

EW-1.2A

15' - 3"

12' - 2"

1 A7.3-B

T/O HIGH PARAPET STEEL 29' - 0"

3 A7.2-B

T/O STEEL 2 24' - 6"

EW-1.1BEW-1.1A

EW-1.2

EW-1.2 Sim

4' - 0"

001

contractor must verify and accept responsibility for all dimensions and conditions on site and must notify Turner Fleischer Architects Inc. of any variations from the supplied information. This drawing is not to be scaled. The architect is not responsible for the accuracy of survey, structural, mechanical, electrical, etc., information shown on this drawing. Refer to the appropriate consultant's drawings before proceeding with the work. Construction must conform to all applicable codes and requirements of authorities having jurisdiction. The contractor working

STRUCTURALfrom STEEL GIRT. drawings not specifically marked 'For Construction' must assume full responsibility and bear costs for any corrections or damages resulting from his work. REFER TO STRUCT. DWGS..

ENTRANCE

002

2" CANOPY DRAIN REFER TO MECH DWGS. (MAKE SURE RWL CLEARS STEEL)

29' - 0"

3' - 0" 4' - 5 3/4"

3' - 3 1/2"

A5.0-B

35' - 0"

FROST SLAB. REFER TO DETAIL 3 / A5.3-B & 4 / A5.3-B .

F-1

3' - 0"

19' - 10"

ENTRANCE

4' - 6"

1' - 9"

003

3' - 0"

8' -15' 6 3/4" - 11"

24' - 10"

FROST SLAB. REFER TO DETAIL 3 / A5.3-B & 4 / A5.3-B .

ABOVE

22' - 3"

3' - 0"

1' - 0 5/8"

4' - 0"

ENTRANCE

4' - 6"

6' - 2"

3' - 0"

4' - 10" 4' - 0"

36' - 0"

28' - 8 1/2"

3' - 0"

3 1/2"

2 A5.0-B

BOLLARDS 4' - 6"

3' - 2 1/2"

Sim

5 A5.3-B

29' - 0"

4 A5.3-B

8' - 10"

3 A5.0-B

REFER TO STRUC. DWGS.

4 A5.0-B

Sim

4' - 9 1/2"

5 A5.3-B

4 A5.3-B

3 1/2"

V.B.

Sim

5 A5.3-B

REFER TO STRUC. DWG.

4 A5.3-B

1"  1/2" 1 3 1/2" A7.1-B 2" 1" This drawing, as an instrument of service, is2" provided by and is8" the property1of1/2" Turner Fleisher Architects Inc. The

TORONTO, ONTARIO

4' - 0" DRAWING

ELEVATIONS PROJECT NO.

10.141 PROJECT DATE

2014-10-08 DRAWN BY

Author CHECKED BY

Checker SCALE

Selected Works 2018 NICHOLAS G AGER

FORM | INFORMAL China Option Studio + Personal

Form is a core principle of architecture. The relationship between an object, the space it inhabits, and the resulting human experience have been at the centre of the discipline since its inception. During my 40-day excursion through mainland China, I was drawn to the stark departure from Western architectural traditions which the Ancient Chinese explored; gone were the rigid, rectilinear forms of Medieval Europe or even ancient Mediterranean culture. Sweeping forms and intricate woodwork incorporated into structure were prevalent from the pagoda of Wutushan to the various pavilions surround the Temple of Heaven in Beijing. This formal language piqued my interest and I saw it reflected in my personal interest in two-dimensional drawings which exude dynamicism.

â&#x20AC;&#x153;The strength of the ancient buildings was incredibly apparent yet the elegance was not lost.â&#x20AC;?

In my personal time, I find myself fascinated by the work of graphic novelists and comic book artists. Depictions of beings performing unbelievable feats of strength, speed, and agility inspired me. Moreover, I see a strong connection between the medium of two-dimensional illustration and the static built world. Emotive architecture has the formal ability to transmit the same strength and power as a drawing while maintaining an elegance and conveyance of emotion. This led to my own attempts at capturing this excitement and movement in two-dimensions from an early age. In my own design works, I attempt to express emotion, experience, strength, and elegance through two-dimensional representation.

T E A

| 1.519.381.2525 | agernick@gmail.com | 80 John Street, Apt 1809 Toronto, ON, Canada