URBAN DESIGN
NANASHI
WORK SAMPLE Under-Grad
Nitya Patel
As a design student, I’m musing upon certain fundamental questions of design concerning our day to day lives. I am interested in understanding the gap between the way cities work and how we aspire to design them, I observe the life and the details of people and the way it shapes the city. Or do cities shape people? Hence, on an adventure to find answers to all my speculation from the billions of stories that are waiting to be discovered.
Ahmedabad,Gujarat, India Contact
26 September 1998
Language
DOB
+91 8469393950 nitya.patel.bud17@cept.ac.in English Hindi Gujarati
Education
Completed - 2017 2017 - Present (2022)
Workshops Rammed Earth, Adobe Bricks Hunnarshala, Bhuj, India Relative Study Program Majuli, Assam, India Aldo Van Eyck’s Amsterdam Amsterdam, The Netherlands Evolutionary Computation Workshop Ahmedabad, India Experience Research Assistant (Summer ‘18) CIC Child Friendly Cities, Ahmedabad Interest Parametric Design Sustainable Design Graphic Design Illustrations Speculative Design
Anand Niketan, Shilaj (ISC), Ahmedabad, India CEPT University, Ahmedabad, India
Digital Skills Autocad Rhinoceros Adobe Photoshop Adobe Indesign Adobe Illustrator Grasshopper (+other plug-ins) ArcGIS Manual Skills Drafting Model Making Wood and Metal tools Hobby Reading Traveling Music Movies and Shows
CURRICULUM VITAE
Nitya Patel
CONTENTS 01
from Utopia to Heterotopia
02
Generative Technique for Urban Placemaking
03
Hands-on 1:1 Contruction
04
Relative Study Program
05
Streets and the City
06
Designing Water Infrastructure for Civic Expression
Incremental Migrant housing
1
Porous Neighbourhood
9
Construction and Structure
15
Exploring Majuli Island
17
Activating Riverfront
19
Parasitic Co-existance and Symbiosis
21
It is to breakfree from our longing to be perfect into finding meaning of our being. The portfolio is named ‘Nanashi’ that means something which does not have an identity.The fish personifies myself and the bowl represents the imperfect world that we live it.
Surat 2019
01
from Utopia to Heterotopia
Incremental Migrant housing
The studio aims on understanding the concept of mass housing across space and time. It focuses on analyzing the modular units and the issues of it. By exploring housing structures and cluster formation. The idea is to create an adaptive habitat for the migrant communities associated.
on-site drawing
The migrant community have settled in from rural regions of Maharashtra. They have settled in this neighbourhood of Surat since last 30 years. The community is dominantly Marathi Muslim and have a patriarchal and conservative belief. This was observed in their daily life a well. The aim of this research was to understand and document the selected community and their daily life. This was crutial in order to understand the socio-spatial and the live-work arrangement of the neighbourhood.
1
2
team work
Community settlement
team work
3
Design Development
The aim of this excerise was to take forward the understandings of community and to answer the question why certain things happen and what are the factors that affect them. This would help in design developement of the housing so as to reciprocate to the actual needs of the community. The two concept of open-built relationship and what can be flexible for the community to decide and what should be fixed, which is difficult to manage on their own.
4
Design
Proces
The Project aims at providing an incremental housing to the community living in Nehrunagar Surat. The process of mass housing sounds industrial which lacks a personal touch or the individualistic nature of the present site. It aims at providing half built houses which are affordable and give them an oppurtunity to expand in the prescribed limit as a rule. This wil help the community to expand when their family size increases or the financial stabilty strengthens. 5
ss
Final Model
6
Visualization
The cross sections are an attempt to heterotopia. The aim of this exercise was to understand the urban element and the open spaces. How a particular activity would be supported by just the context.These are crucial in understanding the scale and proportion of the built with respect to open. They try to help visualize the spaces in the housing. The creation of the chowks and multiplicity of the existing sites are kept in mind while making this. The facade extension though not encouraged are bound to happen considering the nature of existing site.
7
8
Ahmedbabad 2018
02
Generative Techniques for Urban Placemaking
Porous Neighbourhood
The studio aims at challenging students to deal with the multiple layers of a city system. The relationship between these layers of network, land-use, open-space, built-density and morphology is multi-directional. Hence, With the advent of computational techniques to design, a possibility to link the analysis and design. The tools of use Rhinoceros + Grasshopper along with analogue and digital analytical tools for analysing environmental data.
Block A
Block B
Block C
FSI <1
Block D
1 - 1.5 1.5 - 2 2 - 2.5 > 2.5
Block E
The site is a green belt undergoing development near Jivraj Park, Ahmedabad. Basic analysis was conducted to understand the site by quantification of data. Largely the FSI used is from 1 to 1.5. It is not very dense in terms of built and population both. The type in the northern side is mainly bangalows and as we move southwards it shifts to low rise apartments. The new development which is proposed is mainly high rise aparments in the surroundings. team work 9
Urban Block Study
400 m.sq
420m.sq 75 (300 pph)
1080 m.sq
1000 m.sq
190 (700 pph)
1500 m.sq
1000 m.sq
750 m.sq
190 (700 pph)
750 m.sq
420 m.sq
400 m.sq
125 (500 pph)
3 6 0 m.sq
900 m.sq
800 m.sq
1000 m.sq
700 m.sq
10
Attractors and time scale Psuedocode
One open space
Select closest pointsto 32
For streets - Edges closest point of the op space
T1 - Parks, Vendors, Juice stalls/ Shops, Educational institution (12 hours)
0
3
6
9
12
15
18
21
24
12hrs
T1
15hrs
17hrs
T2
17hrs
12hrs
T3
17hrs
T4
10hrs
Attractors (activities) were identified according to the time they functioned for. This resulted into 3 types of time scales. Combinations of these activities can be made such that time scale of the place becomes larger and hence, more people out on streets for longer duration. This makes the spaces active for more time period so it is safe and attracts people in some outdoor activities. team work
11
Removing if the unit s is less than 9 m.sq.
T2- Religious institutes (17 hours)
T3 - Utility stores, Bus stops/ depot (14 hours)
Non Uniform scaling to maximum in x and y dire
To create a netwo such that it resul
- 27
to pen
size
o 1.3m ection.
Fitness Criteria
Two open space
Three to five open space
A. Maximizing the area of Public Space To provide open spaces which is also a network and are connected which can be used for daily travel and promote walking and use of Public Transport. B. Maximizing Volume To accomodate more people and increasing density.
Select closest points- 12 to 16
Total area range- 600750 m.sq
C. Minimizing Sunlight on open spaces. To increase Climatic Comfort in the summer months which lasts more than half of the year. Shaded Open spaces are used more than unshadeded.
D. Maximize distance between Open Spaces To have number of small open spaces in the block so that it is used more effienctly. For streets - Short walk between two open spaces
For streets - Edges to 2 closest point of the open space
E. Maximize Sky view factor. Direct Sunlight can heat up open and semi open spaces so, to provide comforatable public spaces and walking corridors which are thermally comfortable.
Strategies Removing if the unit size is less than 9 m.sq.
Removing if the unit size is less than 10 m.sq.
Different sizes of Open spaces Range of area given as a variable. To have different scales of Public spaces.
Staggering (non uniform scaling) To have semi private spaces, corridors and small staggered pockets. Merging surfaces of each floors to remove overlaps.
Extruding 3m per floor, if area < 20m.sq then heights 6m max or else 15m.
Variable Heights To have terraces as shared spaces at multiple levels
Short walk (closest point) To connect the open spaces with each other and streets so minimise distance.
ork of active open spaces with supporting amenities and activities lts into pedestrian friendly neighbourhood.
12
Phenotypes B A
C
E D
Population : 196 Open space per person : 5 m.sq
B A
C
E D
Population : 179 Open space per person : 7 m.sq
B A
C
E D
Population : 207 Open space per person : 5 m.sq
low density
medium density
high density
13
B A
C
E D
Population : 205 Open space per person : 5 m.sq
B A
C
E D
Population : 184 Open space per person : 6 m.sq
B A
C
E D
Population : 217 Open space per person : 5 m.sq
14
Ahmedbabad 2018
03
Hands-On 1:1 Construction
Construction and Structure
The course aimed to build a composite structure consisting of five different materials, brick, concrete, bamboo, wood and metal. The batch of 40 students were divided to focus on one material to makex the finished product. The idea was to understand the contruction process not only from foundation to roof but also material procurement, managing finances, etc.
team work
15
16
Assam, 2017
04
Relative Study Program
Exploring Majuli Island
Majuli Island on the river Bhramaputra in Assam has been one of the undiscovered places by the masses. It is a beautiful rural island with bamboo contruction. The social and the cultural lifestyle is very different from the rest of India. Unfortunately, the island might disappear. Hence, to document and understand the rich layers of Assamese lifestyle and settlement, the project was taken up.
Samuguri Satra
Garmur Villa
Satras are religious communities in the larger umbrella of HIndu Assamese culture. It is a structure with open space around it and the community living by the side of it. Garmur Village is a small settlement which consists of bamboo huts in the farms and brick houses along it. People eat what they grow. The small activities take place in the backyard of the houses. The people are very welcoming which shows their faith in humans.
17
Garmur Village
age
0 2
18
7
14
team work
Pune, 2018
05
Street and the City
Activating Riverfront
The Studio aims at understanding how cities are formed by the Urban Fabric which is resultant of streets. This is to undertsand how streets formulate the city and what role does it play on citizenâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s life. These are public infrastructure which is used by all. They are a space of expression which should cater to the needs of people. Hence, the focus was on to understand the larger nework and street as public space.
The frontage and the open land in the city of Pune is neglected. Not only the river is polluted by sewage but the ecology of the surrounding area is so disturbed that it is inhabitable. This makes it difficult to commute from end to end and across. Street Design is not for the Vehicles but for the people, who use it for thier daily activities. It is a democratic public space which is used by all. Streets should cater to the people and pedestrians and also sustainble for the environment. Hence, through tactical urbanism and space making, a cohesive nework which integrates commute and recreation.w
19
20
Ahmedabad, 2020
06
Designing Water Infrastructure for Civic Expression
Campus Mapping and Speculation
The studio investigates the many natures and scales of water and develop an approach to documentation, representation and design techniques to render visible a new collective imagination around water. The idea is has evolved throughout the years and so has the infrastrcuture on campus. Physically there to demonstrate a speculative design using infrastructure as a medium of civic expression and CEPT more importantly has been change in surface materials. Looking through the lens of flow of water, it is unimaginable that how much the cycle here i.e. natural seepage was disrupted. And the way these materials are public life. used donot benefit the natural factors and the ecology. Hence, the term parasatic co-existence How to read model?
Parasitic Co-existance (mapping)
Different materials are mapped here according to porosity and unit of water falling on it. The comparison between two models show the change in materiality and porosity over the years. brick pav
brick
Soil grass
soil
conc
brick pav
brick
Grass
brick
brick pav
grass grass
conc
Concrete conc
Building
Pavementconc
brick
brickconc pav brick brick pav
grass
grass soil
Non Porous
soil soil
2
soil
1
-1 -2
Porous
change in material difference
2 unit (B+A)
1 unit (A)
G1 G2
Key
G3
G4
G5
G6 G7
G8 G9 G10
G11
G12 G13
G14
G15
CEPT has evolved throughout the years and so has the infrastrcuture on campus. Physically there has been change in surface materials. Looking through the lens of flow of water, it is unimaginable that how much the cycle here i.e. natural seepage was disrupted. And the way these materials are used donot benefit the natural factors and the ecology. Hence, the term parasatic co-existence. Different materials are mapped here according to porosity and unit of water falling on it. The comparison between two models show the change in materiality and porosity over the years. 21
This comparison helps us understand that how materials distrupt the flow of water and it may not look very evident but even in this scale the change is drastic. Not much thought is given when such infrastructure is added, but they are toxic as water contaminates while trying to reach back to the ground. At the scale of urbanization it is unfathomable.
Nitya Patel
Speculation
22
Nitya Patel +91 8469393950 nitya.patel.bud17@cept.ac.in