Livestock “The greatest homage we can pay to truth is to use it.”
MARKET
Digest R
www. aaalivestock . com
Volume 52 • No. 6
Chumps or Change? by Lee Pitts ho is the most important person in animal agriculture today? No, it’s not the CEO of one of the Big Three packers, the President of NCBA, R-CALF, Texas Cattle Feeders or the Farm Bureau. It’s not a purebred breeder, editor, auctioneer or cattle feeder. We’d suggest that the most powerful person in animal ag today doesn’t breed bulls, feed cattle or make vaccines. No, the most powerful man when it comes to the cattle business was not born to the ranch, but in an orphanage, of all places. His adoptive parents were a real-estate agent/insurance salesman and a homemaker. He was educated in the law, not animal husbandry and we seriously doubt if he knows how to pull a calf, preg check a cow or throw a houlihan, yet his actions over the next two, or possibly six years, will likely determine what the cow business will look like for decades. The most powerful person in the cow business today is the 30th Secretary of the USDA, Tom Vilsack. Although previous people in his position had plenty of power, the timing wasn’t such as it is today, and due to a confluence of events, he will have the opportunity to change our business in a variety of ways that perhaps no other Ag Secretary in
W
NEWSPAPER PRIORITY HANDLING
by LEE PITTS
Dressing For Failure
– JAMES RUSSELL LOWELL JUNE 15, 2010 •
Riding Herd
“Sometimes you get, and sometimes you get got.” recent memory has had. President Obama’s election had two primary planks: change and hope. The question is . . . will Obama’s Ag Secretary be an agent for positive change, or is he just making chumps out of us who are holding onto tiny slivers of hope?
Our Vanishing Breed It’s probably safe to say that the majority of ranchers, and most of you reading this paper, did not vote for Barrack Obama for President. Neither did this reporter. Nor do I like what I’ve seen so far. But, as much as it pains me to admit this, (and I
never thought I would) the USDA has been a bit of a bright spot compared to its unheralded past. I’d given it up for a lost cause, a massive bureaucracy with a revolving door of industry insiders who, when it came to the cow business, got their marching orders from Big Business and the NCBA. Thus far, it’s safe to say, Tom Vilsack marches to the beat of his own drummer. Don’t judge the man by the actions of his boss and don’t label him a liberal Democrat and give up on him. When Vilsack was elected to the first of two terms as the Governor of Iowa,
he was the first Democrat elected to that office in more than 30 years. When the mayor of Mt. Pleasant, Iowa, was murdered by an irate idiot, Vilsack was elected to take his place, which laid the political base to be elected to the state senate, and then Governor. When he was sworn into office as the Secretary of Ag in January of last year legislators on both sides of the aisles had complimentary things to say, and for apparent good reason. Whatever your party affiliation, say this about Tom Vilsack: he seems to have his heart in the right place. Like those before him, Vilsack speaks of big ideas: increasing broadband service to rural areas, renewable energy, regional food systems, forest restoration, private land conservation, ecosystem market incentives, and on and on. Blah, blah, blah. Talk is cheap, especially in Washington, D.C. No, what gives us a glimmer of hope is that Vilsack actually speaks about our vanishing breed. For the first time in years we have an Ag Secretary who seems to be worried about truly endangered species: farmers and continued on page two
It’s not about saving species— IT’S ABOUT SPENDING TAXPAYER MONEY AND MAKING SOME GROUPS WEALTHY by KAREN BUDD-FALEN, Attorney, Cheyenne, Wyo.
ere is some disappointing data regarding Endangered Species Act (ESA) and its cost to the American public. ESA process and litigation are NOT about saving species, it is about spending American taxpayer money. In an economic time where American jobs are scarce, private property rights are being taken and the federal deficit is trillions of dollars, certainly the federal government can find a better way to spend American taxpayer dollars than lining the pockets of radical environmental groups and their “pro bono” (i.e. allegedly free) attorneys and spending money on a program that by the federal government’s data is a complete failure. The ESA was signed into law in 1978 with the best of intentions. However, over the years it has become the battle cry to eliminate private
H
property rights and property use, shut down agriculture and other industries and fund radical environmental group and their attorneys. There is not a single state within the United States that does not have listed, threatened or endangered species. It would not be so bad if the original intent of the ESA was followed and species were listed, then recovered, then removed from the list—but that is not what is happening. As of May 17, 2010, there are a total of 1,374 species listed as threatened or endangered. This list includes everything, even bugs, worms, plants, snakes, spiders, bogs, moss, mice, rats and other species. According to a 2009 report by Greenwire citing the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (FWS), the average cost of listing a single species is $85,000 and the average cost of designating critical habitat is $515,000 per species. continued on page four
ecently someone sent me an anonymous letter along with an article titled “How To Dress for Success.” I have no idea who sent me the story as it could have been anyone who has ever seen me. I’ll admit I don’t know how to dress for success but if you ever want to emulate someone who dresses for failure, well then, I’m your guy. The article talked about midriffs, French cuffs, arm holes (I think you should have at least two), how to talk to your tailor and single breasted versus double breasted jackets. I don’t know about you but all this talk about breasts in men’s suits makes me a little uncomfortable . . . but not as uncomfortable as the thought of some guy with pins in his mouth measuring my inseam. According to the advice article, the cuffs on your jacket should come to the middle of your hands with your arms hanging loose. Listen, I get most of my jackets for free from livestock auction markets and vaccine makers and I can’t be that picky. The article also placed a great deal of emphasis on lapels and “vents” in your jacket. I have no idea what these vents are but it said that they “can slim your body and allow a suit to stretch, reducing unsightly lumps and bumps.” In that case, I definitely think you should have some. And if these vents also allow bad body odors to escape I recommend having more vents in your jacket than you do in your house. Most ranchers I know should probably have narrow lapels on their Carhartt jackets because I read that they make a person look slimmer and more successful. On a related matter, if you want your jacket to show how successful you are the back of it should stop at the top of your rear end, which is good because it might take several yards of expensive cloth to actually go around and over it. To impress people try not continued on page twelve
www.LeePittsbooks.com