Livestock “The greatest homage we can pay to truth is to use it.”
MARKET
Digest I
www. aaalivestock . com
Volume 52 • No. 3
Crying Uncle by Lee Pitts
fter wasting $142 million over six years and only getting a third of this nation’s ranchers to register their premises, the USDA finally threw in the towel on its mandatory national animal identification program. Or so they say. Pardon us for being a bit skeptical but this is, after all, the same agency that first said it was a voluntary program to aid in disease control and then morphed it into a mandatory program in which health and welfare seemed to be almost an afterthought. Much to his credit, USDA Secretary Vilsack did something his predecessor never did. He admitted that the USDA earned “a failing grade” in trying to implement NAIS. Depending on how much you trust the USDA and the politicians in Washington, DC, Vilsack’s waving of the white flag could either be total capitulation and the death of a mandatory national ID system for livestock, or it could be just another smokescreen. It could be that the meatpackers, and the politicians they have in their pocket, will try to get what they want through even more sinister methods than they used in trying to implement NAIS in the first place. Knowing the USDA like
NEWSPAPER PRIORITY HANDLING
A
by LEE PITTS
Better Off Dead
– JAMES RUSSELL LOWELL MARCH 15, 2010 •
Riding Herd
“The best sermons are lived, not preached.” we do, on this the 100th anniversary of Mark Twain’s death, we are reminded of his words when contemplating the supposed end of NAIS: “The rumors of my death have been greatly exaggerated.”
If It’s Dead, Why Not Bury It? Amidst all the whooping and hollering and back-patting following the alleged end to NAIS, cynics like Doreen Hannes smell a rat. “What about all the people who are in the Premises Database with PIN’s already? They stay in that database,” said the activist for small scale and traditional farming rights. “How about animals that are already identified with the “840” tags for
NAIS? They also stay in the database. What about the “840” tags themselves? Well, the USDA and states will keep using them. Are they going to halt further registrations into the NAIS database? Heck no! They’ll keep registering properties and will also be using a ‘unique location identifier’ for this kinder, gentler NAIS that the States will run for us.” As opponents of NAIS celebrate what they see as a major victory, Hannes asks the nagging question, “If NAIS is dead, why not allow the database to be annihilated?”
Good question. Ever since NAIS was first introduced during the Presidency
of George Bush, the NAIS was sold as a way to track every head of livestock in this country using a 15-digit number. Gadget geeks, technology buffs and bureaucrats wanting to expand their turf, envisioned a world in which all your livestock would be implanted with an electronic chip and their every move would be kept track of in a huge database run by the USDA, that would enable it to immediately track down potentially diseased animals within 48 hours. Cynics suggested it could also do other, more sinister things. It could also serve as an inventory control tool by advocates of captive supply, or by the IRS to nail a rancher in tax court. Of course, the USDA said they’d never allow such abuse, but this comes from the same agency that first U.S. Supreme Court. NAIS forged feelings of fear, loathing and even laughter amongst ranchers who only knew their government as one that can’t even use its own database to keep known-terrorists off airplanes. And the bumbling and fumbling USDA was going to keep track of every cow, horse, pig and sheep in this country? That’s a real leg slapper! Besides, hadn’t the USDA ever heard the old bromide that you never ask a rancher how continued on page two
Environmental Litigation Abuse A Nationwide Problem by KAREN BUDD-FALEN, Attorney, Cheyenne, Wyo.
This is an installment of a multi-part series of articles regarding the attorney fees litigation gravy train perpetrated by the environmental groups using taxpayer dollars. In addition to uncovering more fees paid for environmental litigation, this memorandum exposes the fallacy between “non-profit” and “for-profit” attorney fee requesters. I have joined forces with Western Legacy Alliance (WLA) to continue this research and to find solutions to these astronomical abuses. Western Legacy Alliance can be reached at P.O. Box 162, Moreland, ID 83256, www.westernlegacyalliance.org; e-mail: westernlegacyalliance@ gmail.com; phone: 208/206-7309. The research in this and other stories is open to anyone seeking a solution to this abuse of the system.
t is not only western based environmental groups that have found litigation against the federal government to be a profitable source of funding. Consider that the Friends of the Earth filed 113 district court cases against the federal government in the last approximately ten years and the Environmental Defense Fund filed 67. Even greater is The Wilderness Society with 150 cases, the National Wildlife Federation with 233 cases, the Natural Resources Defense Council with 488 cases and topping the list is the Sierra Club. Between 1989 and 2009, the Sierra Club filed 983 cases against the federal government. All totaled, these five groups have filed 2,034 cases. If you add the “western envi-
I
continued on page four
t is said that the only two sure things in life are death and taxes. To which I would add a third certainty: that the government will use your death as an excuse to increase your taxes. Here’s an installment of “Ask The Tax Man” that might help your heirs keep some of your cash when you keel over. Q: My ungrateful son just informed me that 2010 is a great year to die. How so? A: If you die in 2010 your child will inherit 100 percent of your estate whereas if you wait to die until 2011 the government will grab 55 percent of it. I’d watch my back if I were you. Accidents will happen, you know what I mean? Q: Doesn’t this create an incentive for people to die this year? A: Of course. Thousands of wealthy people on life support will be unplugged this year by their kids, suicide hot lines will heat up, charities will spring up to find a cure for metabolism, and Oprah will do a show on the best ways to off yourself. Q: I’m a 92 year-old female worth in excess of 100 million dollars that my four husbands worked very hard to amass. I would like to leave my spoiled stepkids all my money but I don’t believe in suicide. Isn’t there some way around this ridiculous rule? A: Start living dangerously. Take up skydiving, trade in your Rolls for a murder-cycle, start smoking four packs of cigarettes a day and don’t get a flu shot. In the past I would have suggested committing a crime so bad that you’d end up sharing a prison cell with Dr. Kervorkian, but I think he’s out on bail now. Besides, if your crime wasn’t heinous enough you could just end up doing 500 hours of community service. Q: I love my kids but I worry that all the money in my estate is just too tempting. Are there any precautions I should take? A: Absolutely. Trade in your Chihuahua for a bomb continued on page four
www.LeePittsbooks.com