2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Final Report by North Florida TPO

2040 LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN FINAL REPORT

PATHFORWARD2040.COM

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: INVESTING IN OUR FUTURE T HE P ATH F ORWARD 2040 L ONG R ANGE T RANSPORTATION P LAN PROPOSES NEW STRATEGIES AND PROJECTS TO ACT BOLDLY TO DEFINE THE TRANSPORTATION INVESTMENTS THAT WILL SHAPE OUR COMMUNITY ’ S FUTURE FOR DECADES TO COME . North Florida, like many great regions, began as a hub for commerce and transportation. Our six county region consisting of Baker, Clay, Duval, Nassau, Putnam and St. Johns Counties consists of an area of over 3,900 square miles and 1.4 million citizens. It includes some of our nation’s first ports, cities and roads. Our history as a transportation center shaped our region’s past and will drive our future.

foundation for that process through the year 2040 that will meet the challenges of today’s congestion and tomorrow’s growth. Every five years, the North Florida Transportation Planning Organization (TPO) updates the region’s Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) to guide decision making and investment in our transportation system. Transportation projects must be included in the plan to receive state and federal funding, and all projects in the plan must have the projected cost and funding source identified. The plan is required to have at least a 20Ͳyear horizon and address major road, transit, freight, bike and pedestrian needs. Since the 2035 update was completed in 2009, we’ve experienced changes in our economy that affect how we live, travel and pay for transportation improvements. The LRTP proposes new strategies and projects to act boldly to define the transportation investments that will shape our community’s future for decades to come. However, our needs greatly exceed the anticipated revenues. In today’s dollars we have more than $27 billion of needs versus $7 billion in funding. Considering inflation over the 22Ͳyear plan horizon, those needs increase to $46 billion with only $14.8 billion in revenues available.

Roads, bridges, airports, railroads and seaports deliver the goods we consume each day. About 190 million tons of freight are transported throughout the region by truck, rail, air and water each year. These activities are a major engine driving our economy. But, our future as America’s Logistics Center is in danger because of traffic congestion. Traffic congestion slows the movement of people and goods that makes this region vital and prosperous. Every day we travel to work, to school, for shopping and recreation. By the year 2040, we’ll have nearly 1.9 million residents. Our region will grow by approximately 600,000 people, 265,000 households and 300,000 jobs. This growth in population will significantly increase the demand for safe, reliable and accessible transportation. Not only will we have more demand for transportation, but the mobility needs of our residents are changing too. For many, access to transit and the ability to walk to work or shop may be more important than driving. Transit use is on the rise and our residents have told us they want more access to reliable and efficient public transportation. Our older generation needs more choices for personal mobility that do not rely on automobiles and younger generations are choosing more active lifestyles that include bicycles and walking. Concerns about the environment are also changing the way we travel with more travelers choosing alternative fuels and ridesharing options to reduce their carbon footprint.

To maximize our return on investment, our plan proposes strategies such as express lanes and transportation systems management and operations projects. Other strategic investments such as transit, context sensitive solutions and dedicated revenues for bicycle and pedestrian improvements will provide mode choices to enhance mobility and livability within the region. Investments in our multimodal systems to move freight will be the catalyst for continued economic prosperity to enhance our region’s competitiveness. After an extensive planning and community outreach process, the North Florida TPO adopted the LRTP November 13, 2014.

Building roads, transit and other transportation infrastructure doesn’t happen overnight. It takes years of planning and coordination and this plan forms the

This report summarizes the planning process and the adopted plan.

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

ORGANIZATION OF THIS REPORT This report is organized as follows.

Travel Demand Forecasting

PART ONE: INTRODUCTION This section sets the stage for the plan by describing our region and providing a review of trends and conditions. A summary of the organization of this report is also provided to assist the reader in identifying the key elements of the plan and major components.

A summary of the anticipated growth and future demand for transportation services is provided that is based on the developing a regional travel demand forecasting model used in the planning process.

Freight and Intermodal Systems

PART TWO: PLANNING PROCESS

As part of the development of the LRTP, existing commodity flows and future demand for freight transportation systems were developed. This section provides a summary of that analysis.

Part Two outlines the planning process and is organized as follows:

Goals and Objectives This section summarizes the goals, objectives, performance measures and implementing polices that were adopted as part of the planning process.

Financial Resources A forecast of the financial resources anticipated to be available for use in the plan is summarized in this section. The plan considered federal, state and local resources that are anticipated to be available through the planning horizon of 2040.

Consistency with Federal and State Requirements This section outlines the federal and state metropolitan planning requirements and demonstrates the consistency of the plan with these requirements.

Environmental Considerations This section summarizes the process used to consider the potential environmental consequences of the plan through the Efficient Transportation Decision Making Process established by the FDOT. A summary of the systemwide approach to mitigation of projects is also identified.

Safety and Security This plan builds on the North Florida TPOâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Strategic Safety Plan which was adopted in 2012 and provided a foundation for identifying the needs and priorities for safety investments.

Public Involvement

Congestion Management Process

The public involvement process used as part of the plan and the involvement results are summarized as part of this report. The section also summarizes the actions that were used to engage the underserved and address the federal requirements for Environmental Justice and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act.

The North Florida TPO maintains a Congestion Management Process which identifies trends and conditions for congestion within the area, congested facilities and strategies and tactics for addressing that congestion. This section summarizes the use of the Congestion Management Plan in the planning process.

Plan Alternatives

Completed and Committed Construction

A summary of the plan alternatives considered as part of the planning process is summarized.

As a foundation of the planning process, this plan documents the major projects that were completed since adopting the 2035 LRTP and the projects with commitments to construction within the next five years as part of the Transportation Improvement Program, the Florida Department of Transportationâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s (FDOTâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s) Adopted Work Program and local agency capital improvement plans.

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

PART THREE: ROAD CAPACITY

Referenced Documents

Within Part Three, a summary of the needs and projects adopted as part of the Cost Feasible Plan are summarized. The following plan elements were identified:

To supplement this report more detailed information is provided in the following technical memoranda and appendices provided on a DVD included with this report.

Needs Plan Cost Feasible Plan Ͳ Strategic Intermodal System Funded Projects Ͳ Other Federal and State Funded Projects Ͳ Toll Funded Projects Ͳ Locally and Privately Funded Projects

PART FOUR: MULTIMODAL PROJECTS This section describes the multimodal projects identified in the plan that support providing mobility choices within the region. They include

Transit Capacity Programs Active Transportation 1 Freight and Intermodal Planning Projects 0F0F0F

A. Strategic Safety Plan B. Congestion Management Process and Annual Mobility Report C. Federal and State Revenue Forecast D. Efficient Transportation Decision Making Project Summary E. FDOT Mitigation Plan and St. Johns River Water Management District Permitting Process F. Jacksonville to Atlanta High Speed Rail Corridor G. Jacksonville to Tampa Corridor of the Future H. Project Prioritization Scores I. Regional ITS and TSM&O Master Plan J. AASHTO Report on National Connected Vehicle Field Infrastructure Footprint Analysis K. Needs Plan Project Costs and Purpose and Need Statements L. Cost Feasible Plan Master Project List

PART FIVE: TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT, OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE The management and operations of the transportation system is essential for ensuring we get the most from our investments and can adequately maintain the system consistent with our preservation goals. The following elements are discussed

Safety and Security Transportation Systems Management and Operations Autonomous and Connected Vehicles Operations and Maintenance

Part Six: Plan Summary Part Six provides a summary of the plan addressing measures of effectiveness and demonstrates the balance achieved in the plan from a modal and geographic equity distribution by county.

1 Active Transportation Projects include bicycle and pedestrian projects and mobility enhancements to support transit. iii

Technical Memorandum #1 – Public Involvement Plan Technical Memorandum #2 – Goals and Objectives Technical Memorandum #3 – 2030 and 2040 Socioeconomic Data and Land Use Forecasts Technical Memorandum #4 – Model Validation Report Technical Memorandum #5 – Freight Modeling Technical Memorandum #6 – Financial Resources Technical Memorandum #7 – Existing Plus Committed Projects Technical Memorandum #8 – Needs Plan Technical Memorandum #9 – Context Sensitive Solutions Guidelines Technical Memorandum #10 – Cost Feasible Plan

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

CONTENTS Executive Summary: Investing in Our Future ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ i Organization of this Report ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ ii Contents ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ iv List of Figures ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ v List of Tables ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ viii List of Acronyms ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ x Study Participants ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ xi Part One: Introduction Planning Process Overview ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 1Ͳ1 Regional Overview ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 1Ͳ3 Part Two: Planning Process Goals, Objectives, Performance Measures and Implementing Policies ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ1 Consistency with Federal and State Plans ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ9 Safety and Security ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ21 Congestion Management Process ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ25 Completed and Committed Construction ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ31 Travel Demand Forecasting ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ39 Freight and Intermodal Systems ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ47 Financial Resources ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ65 Environmental Considerations ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ69 Public Involvement ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ75 Plan AlternativesͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ107 Part Three: Road Projects Needs Plan ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 3Ͳ1 Cost Feasible Plan ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 3Ͳ15 Strategic Intermodal Systems Funded Projects ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 3Ͳ33 Other Federally and State Funded Projects ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 3Ͳ37 Toll Funded Projects ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 3Ͳ45 Locally and Privately Funded Projects ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 3Ͳ47 Part Four: Multimodal Projects Transit Capacity Programs ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 4Ͳ1 Active Transportation and Context Sensitive Solutions ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 4Ͳ27 Freight and Intermodal Systems ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 4Ͳ53 Part Five: Systems Management, Operations and Maintenance Transportation Systems Management and Operations ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 5Ͳ1 Autonomous and Connected Vehicles ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 5Ͳ11 Safety and Security ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 5Ͳ13 Operations and Maintence ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 5Ͳ17 Part Six: Plan Summary Measures of Effectiveness ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 6Ͳ1 Balancing the Plan ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 6Ͳ5 iv

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Attachements and Appendices (on DVD) Technical Memorandum #1 – Public Involvement Plan Technical Memorandum #2 – Goals and Objectives Technical Memorandum #3 – 2030 and 2040 Socioeconomic Data and Land Use Forecasts Technical Memorandum #4 – Model Validation Report Technical Memorandum #5 – Freight Modeling Technical Memorandum #6 – Financial Resources Technical Memorandum #7 – Existing Plus Committed Projects Technical Memorandum #8 – Needs Plan Technical Memorandum #9 – Context Sensitive Solutions Guidelines Technical Memorandum #10 – Cost Feasible Plan A. B. C. D. E. F. G. H. I. J. K. L.

Strategic Safety Plan Congestion Management Process and Annual Mobility Report Federal and State Revenue Forecast Efficient Transportation Decision Making Project Summary FDOT Mitigation Plan and St. Johns River Water Management District Permitting Process Jacksonville to Atlanta High Speed Rail Corridor Jacksonville to Tampa Corridor of the Future Project Prioritization Scores Regional ITS and TSM&O Master Plan AASHTO Report on National Connected Vehicle Field Infrastructure Footprint Analysis Needs Plan Project Costs and Purpose and Need Statements Cost Feasible Plan Master Project List

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1Ͳ1. Summary of Major Plan Components and Milestones ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 1Ͳ2 Figure 1Ͳ2. North Florida TPO Region Map ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 1Ͳ4 Figure 1Ͳ3. Strategic Intermodal System Regional ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 1Ͳ5 Figure 1Ͳ4. Strategic Intermodal Sysem Inset Map ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 1Ͳ6 Figure 2Ͳ1. Priroty Safety and Congestion Management Corridors ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ23 Figure 2Ͳ2. Completed and Committed Projects ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ32 Figure 2Ͳ3. Changes in Screenline Volumes from 2010 to 2040 ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ45 Figure 2Ͳ4. Summary of GDP Forecasts ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ52 Figure 2Ͳ5. 2040 Moderate TEU Port Forecast ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ54 Figure 2Ͳ6. 2040 Aggressive TEU Port Forecast – Loaded and Empties ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ55 Figure 2Ͳ7. 2040 Moderate TEU Port Forecast – Loaded and Empties ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ56 Figure 2Ͳ8. 2040 Moderate Forecast of Rail Intermodal ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ58 Figure 2Ͳ9. 2040 Aggressive Forecast of Rail Intermoal ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ59 Figure 2Ͳ10. 2010 Truck Volumes ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ63 Figure 2Ͳ11. 2040 Truck Volumes ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ64 Figure 2Ͳ12. Efficient Transportation Decision Making Planning Process ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ71 Figure 2Ͳ13. St. Johns River Water Management District Wetland Mitigation Banks ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ73 Figure 2Ͳ14. Interactive Priority Map ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ80 Figure 2Ͳ15. Visits and Use of Allocation Game ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ81 Figure 2Ͳ16. Reported Priorities in Asset Allocation Game ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ82 Figure 2Ͳ17. Summary of Budget Allocation ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ83 Figure 2Ͳ18. Summary Brochure ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ86 Figure 2Ͳ19. Example of Future City Physical Model ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ87 Figure 2Ͳ20. Crash Severity Hot Spots ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ92 Figure 2Ͳ21. Congestion Hot Spots ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ93 Figure 2Ͳ22. Comparison of Priorities from Multiple Sources ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ97 Figure 2Ͳ23. Summary of Funding Allocation Compared to Public Priority ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ101 Figure 2Ͳ24. Percent of Need Met by Mode ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ102 Figure 2Ͳ25. 2010 Base Year Deficiencies ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ111 Figure 2Ͳ26. 2040 No Build Deficiencies ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ112 Figure 2Ͳ27. 2040 Needs Plan Trend Scenario Deficiencies ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ113 Figure 2Ͳ28. 2040 Needs Plan Alternate Land Use Scenario Deficiencies ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ114 Figure 3Ͳ1. Regional Road Capacity Needs ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 3Ͳ2 Figure 3Ͳ2. Baker County Road Capacity Needs ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 3Ͳ3 Figure 3Ͳ3. Clay County Road Capacity Needs ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 3Ͳ4 Figure 3Ͳ4. Duval County Road Capacity Needs ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 3Ͳ5 Figure 3Ͳ5. Nassau County Road Capacity Needs ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 3Ͳ6 Figure 3Ͳ6. Putnam County Road Capacity Needs ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 3Ͳ7 Figure 3Ͳ7. St. Johns County Road Capacity Needs ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 3Ͳ8 Figure 3Ͳ8. Roadway Funded Projects ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 3Ͳ28 Figure 3Ͳ9. Clay County Funded Roadway Projects ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 3Ͳ29 Figure 3Ͳ10. Duval County Funded Roadway ProjectsͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 3Ͳ31 Figure 3Ͳ12. St. Johns County Funded Roadway Projects ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 3Ͳ32 Figure 4Ͳ1. Transit Needs BRT, Commuter Rail, Skyway and Streetcar ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 4Ͳ2 Figure 4Ͳ2. Transit Needs Local and Express Bus ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 4Ͳ3 Figure 4Ͳ3. Baker County Transit Needs Commuter Rail ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 4Ͳ4 Figure 4Ͳ4. Baker County Transit Needs Local Bus Service ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 4Ͳ5 vi

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Figure 4Ͳ5. Clay County Transit Project Needs BRT and Commuter Rail ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 4Ͳ6 Figure 4Ͳ6. Clay County Transit Projects Needs Local and Express Bus ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 4Ͳ7 Figure 4Ͳ7. Duval County Transit Project Needs BRT, Commuter Rail, Skyway and Streetcar ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 4Ͳ8 Figure 4Ͳ8. Duval County Transit Project Needs Local and Express Bus Service ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 4Ͳ9 Figure 4Ͳ9. Nassau County Transit Project Needs BRT, Commuter Rail, Skyway and Streetcar ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 4Ͳ10 Figure 4Ͳ10. Nassau County Transit Project Needs Local and Express Bus ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 4Ͳ11 Figure 4Ͳ11. Putnam County Transit Project Needs Commuter Rail ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 4Ͳ12 Figure 4Ͳ12. Putnam County Transit Project Needs Local Bus Service ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 4Ͳ13 Figure 4Ͳ13. St. Johns County Transit Project Needs BRT and Commuter Rail ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 4Ͳ14 Figure 4Ͳ14. St. Johns County Transit Project Needs Local Bus Service ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 4Ͳ15 Figure 4Ͳ15. Cost Feasible Plan Transit BRT, Commuter Rail, Skyway and Streetcar ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 4Ͳ19 Figure 4Ͳ16. Cost Feasible Plan Clay County Transit Projects BRT and Commuter Rail ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 4Ͳ20 Figure 4Ͳ17. Cost Feasible Plan Duval County Transit Projects BRT, Commuter Rail, Skyway and Streetcar ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 4Ͳ21 Figure 4Ͳ18. Cost Feasible Plan Nassau County Transit Projects BRT, Commuter Rail, Skyway and Streetcar ͲͲͲͲͲͲ 4Ͳ22 Figure 4Ͳ19. Cost Feasible Plan St. Johns County Transit Projects BRT and Commuter Rail ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 4Ͳ23 Figure 4Ͳ20. Bicycle and Pedestrian Needs ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 4Ͳ28 Figure 4Ͳ21. Baker County Bicycle and Pedestrian Corridors ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 4Ͳ29 Figure 4Ͳ22. Clay County Florida Greenways and Trails and Priorities ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 4Ͳ30 Figure 4Ͳ23. Duval County Greenways and Trails and Priorities ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 4Ͳ31 Figure 4Ͳ24. Nassau County Greenways and Trails and Priorities ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 4Ͳ32 Figure 4Ͳ25. Putnam Greenways and Trails and Priorities ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 4Ͳ33 Figure 4Ͳ26. St. Johns Greenways and Trails and Priorities ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 4Ͳ34 Figure 4Ͳ27. Candidate Context Sensitive Solutions Corridors ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 4Ͳ40 Figure 4Ͳ28. Freght Needs Projects ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 4Ͳ55 Figure 4Ͳ29. Baker County Freight Needs Projects ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 4Ͳ56 Figure 4Ͳ30. Clay County Freight Needs Projects ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 4Ͳ57 Figure 4Ͳ31. Duval County Freight Needs Projects ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 4Ͳ58 Figure 4Ͳ32. Nassau County Freight Needs Projects ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 4Ͳ59 Figure 4Ͳ33. Putnam County Freight Needs Projects ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 4Ͳ60 Figure 4Ͳ34. St. Johns Freight Needs Projects ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 4Ͳ61 Figure 4Ͳ35. Cost Feasible Plan Freight Projects ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 4Ͳ66 Figure 4Ͳ36. Clay County CFP Freight Projects ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 4Ͳ67 Figure 4Ͳ37. Duval County CFP Freight Projects ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 4Ͳ68 Figure 4Ͳ38. Nassau County CFP Freight Projects ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 4Ͳ69 Figure 4Ͳ39. St. Johns County CFP Freight Projects ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 4Ͳ70 Figure 5Ͳ1. Safety and TSM&O ProjectsͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 5Ͳ2 Figure 5Ͳ2. Clay County Safety and TSM&O Projects ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 5Ͳ3 Figure 5Ͳ3. Duval County Safety and TSM&O Projects ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 5Ͳ4 Figure 5Ͳ4. Nassau Safety and TSM&O Projects ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 5Ͳ5 Figure 5Ͳ5. St. Johns Safety and TSM&O Projects ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 5Ͳ6 Figure 6Ͳ1. 2040 Cost Feasible Plan Deficiencies ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 6Ͳ4

vii

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

LIST OF TABLES Table 1Ͳ1. Population Growth ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 1Ͳ11 Table 1Ͳ2. Employment Growth ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 1Ͳ11 Table 1Ͳ3. Summary of Recent Mobility Trends (average daily values) ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 1Ͳ13 Table 1Ͳ4. Anticipated Changes to Trip Travel Times (2010 to 2040) ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 1Ͳ13 Table 1Ͳ5. Total Tons of Commodities (millions of tons per year) ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 1Ͳ14 Table 2Ͳ1. Enhance Economic Development Objectives and Performance Measures ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ2 Table 2Ͳ2. Livability and Sustainability Objectives and Performance Measures ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ3 Table 2Ͳ3. Safety Objectives and Performance Measures ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ3 Table 2Ͳ4. Mobility and Accessibility Objectives and Performance Measures ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ4 Table 2Ͳ5. System Preservation Objectives and Performance Measures ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ6 Table 2Ͳ6. Traceability Matrix ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ11 Table 2Ͳ7. Federal Planning Requirements ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ12 Table 2Ͳ8. State Planning Requirements ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ18 Table 2Ͳ9. Congested Facilities ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ27 Table 2Ͳ10. Major Projects Under Construction or Completed Since the 2035 Plan was Adopted ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ33 Table 2Ͳ11. Major Road Projects with Construction Funding Committed ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ36 Table 2Ͳ12. Major Bicycle, Pedestrian and Transit Projects with Construction Funding Committed ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ37 Table 2Ͳ13. NERPMͲAB Year 2010 and 2040 Population and Employment Control Totals ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ42 Table 2Ͳ14. Employment in Trend and Alternate Land Use Scenarios ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ43 Table 2Ͳ15. Year 2040 School Enrollment Projects versus Age Group Projections ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ43 Table 2Ͳ16. Total Tons of Commodities (millions per year) ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ48 Table 2Ͳ17. Top Origins and Destinations of Truck Freight Passinng Through North Florida ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ48 Table 2Ͳ18. Top Origins and Destinations of Rail Freight Passing Through North Florida ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ49 Table 2Ͳ19. Summary of TEUs for North Florida Port Facilities (JAXPORT and Port of Fernandina) ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ59 Table 2Ͳ20. Summary of Rail Intermodal Forecasts ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ57 Table 2Ͳ21. Growth Factors for Trucks ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ60 Table 2Ͳ22. Summary of Truck Model Inputs ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ62 Table 2Ͳ23. Federal and State Revenues ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ66 Table 2Ͳ24. Local Revenue ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ67 Table 2Ͳ25. Summary of Funding Programs by Primary DecisionͲMaking Authority ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 2Ͳ68 Table 2Ͳ26. OnͲline Asset Allocation Game ............................................................................................................. 2Ͳ78 Table 2Ͳ27. Interactive Priority Map Legend .......................................................................................................... 2Ͳ79 Table 2Ͳ28. Summary of Priority Strategies OnͲline Allocation Game ..................................................................... 2Ͳ82 Table 2Ͳ29. Budget Allocation from OnͲline Allocation Game ................................................................................. 2Ͳ83 Table 2Ͳ30. Summary of Strategies from OnͲline Allocation Game ......................................................................... 2Ͳ84 Table 2Ͳ31. Summary of Demographic Information from OnͲline Allocation Game ............................................... 2Ͳ85 Table 2Ͳ32. Meeting Summary ................................................................................................................................ 2Ͳ88 Table 2Ͳ33. Summary of Public Meeting Advertisements ....................................................................................... 2Ͳ94 Table 2Ͳ34. Needs Plan Workshops Attendance ...................................................................................................... 2Ͳ95 Table 2Ͳ35. Summary of Needs Plan Public Workshop Allocation Game ................................................................ 2Ͳ95 Table 2Ͳ36. Summary of Needs Plan Public Workshop Comments ......................................................................... 2Ͳ96 Table 2Ͳ37. Summary of Input by Percent Respondents ......................................................................................... 2Ͳ97 Table 2Ͳ38. Summary of Attendance at the Cost Feasible Plan Workshops ............................................................ 2Ͳ98 Table 2Ͳ39. Summary of Comments During Cost Feasible Plan Workshops ............................................................ 2Ͳ99 Table 2Ͳ40. Modal Distribution .............................................................................................................................. 2Ͳ100 Table 2Ͳ41. Organizations Serving Minority and Underserved Populations .......................................................... 2Ͳ103 Table 2Ͳ42. Major Improvements in Minority and Underserved Communities .................................................... 2Ͳ105 Table 2Ͳ43. Summary of Deficiency Analysis ......................................................................................................... 2Ͳ110 Table 2Ͳ44. Summary of Needs Versus Revenue in Present Day Dollars ............................................................... 2Ͳ115 viii

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Table 3Ͳ1. Road Capacity Needs by County ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 3Ͳ9 Table 3Ͳ2. Road Capacity Needs in Ranked Order ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 3Ͳ17 Table 3Ͳ3. Strategic Intermodal System Projects ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 3Ͳ34 Table 3Ͳ4. Other State and Federally Projects ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 3Ͳ38 Table 3Ͳ5. Transportation Management Area Fund Projects ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 3Ͳ42 Table 3Ͳ6. Transportation Regional Incentive Program ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 3Ͳ43 Table 3Ͳ7. Projects Funded with Turnpike/Toll Revenue ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 3Ͳ46 Table 3Ͳ8. Clay County Locally Funded Projects ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 3Ͳ48 Table 3Ͳ9. Duval County Locally Funded Projects (Non LOGT) ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 3Ͳ48 Table 3Ͳ10. Duval County Locally Funded Projects from LOGT ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 3Ͳ49 Table 3Ͳ11. Nassau County Locally Funded Projects ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 3Ͳ50 Table 3Ͳ12. St. Johns County Locally Funded Projects ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 3Ͳ50 Table 4Ͳ1. Transit Needs ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 4Ͳ16 Table 4Ͳ2. Federal and State Transit Capacity Projects Cost Feasible Plan ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 4Ͳ24 Table 4Ͳ3. Summary of Funding Source for Transit ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 4Ͳ25 Table 4Ͳ4. Dedicated Bicycle and Pedestrian Project Needs by County ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 4Ͳ35 Table 4Ͳ5. Candidate Context Sensitive Corridors ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 4Ͳ41 Table 4Ͳ6. Transit Accessibility and Mobility Enhancement Projects ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 4Ͳ42 Table 4Ͳ7. Bicycle and Pedestrian Prioritization ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 4Ͳ45 Table 4Ͳ8. Summary of Anticipated Expenditures for Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 4Ͳ49 Table 4Ͳ9. Candidate Context Sensitive Solution Funded Projects ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 4Ͳ50 Table 4Ͳ10. Duval County LOGT Transit Accessibility and Mobility and Transit Hub Projects ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 4Ͳ51 Table 4Ͳ11. Freight and Intermodal Needs ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 4Ͳ62 Table 4Ͳ12. Freight and Intermodal Funded Projects ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 4Ͳ71 Table 5Ͳ1. TSM&O Needs ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 5Ͳ7 Table 5Ͳ2. Priority Safety Corridors ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 5Ͳ14 Table 5Ͳ3. Summary of Operations and Maintenance Costs ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 5Ͳ18 Table 6Ͳ1. Summary of Measures of EffectivenessͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 6Ͳ2 Table 6Ͳ2. Total Expenditures by Fund for Capacity Programs ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 6Ͳ6 Table 6Ͳ3. Total Revenue and Expenditures for Balancing ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 6Ͳ7 Table 6Ͳ4. Summary of Funds in Proportion to Needs ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 6Ͳ8 Table 6Ͳ5. Geographic Distribition ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 6Ͳ8 Table 6Ͳ6. Modal Distribution ͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲͲ 6Ͳ9

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

LIST OF ACRONYMS CBO CST DSB EST ETAT ENV FDOT FEC FHWA FTA GDP ITS JAXPORT LRTP MAPͲ21 MPO NERPMͲAB OECD PD&E PE QOS ROW TDB TEU TPO TSM&O

Congressional Budget Office Construction Design Build Environmental Screening Tool Environmental Technical Advisory Team Environmental Florida Department of Transportation Florida East Coast Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration Gross Domestic Product Intelligent Transportation Systems Jacksonville Port Authority Long Range Transportation Plan Moving Ahead Progress in the 21st Century Metropolitan Planning Organizations Northeast [Florida] Regional Planning Model Ͳ Activity Based Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Project Development and Environment Preliminary Engineering Quality of Service Right of Way Toronto Dominion Bank TwentyͲfoot Equivalency Units Transportation Planning Organization Transportation Systems Management and Operations

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

STUDY PARTICIPANTS NORTH FLORIDA TPO BOARD CHAIRMAN Nancy SikesͲKline, City of St. Augustine Commission VICE CHAIRMAN Doyle Carter, Jacksonville City Council TREASURER Diane Hutchings, Clay County Commission Brian Reaves, Nassau County Ocean, Highway and Port Authority Charlie Latham, Mayor, City of Jacksonville Beach Alvin Brown, Mayor, City of Jacksonville Reginald Brown, Jacksonville City Council Danny Leeper, Nassau County Commission Rachael Bennett, St. Johns County Commission Ed Fleming, JAXPORT Donna Harper, Jacksonville Transportation Authority Teresa Davlantes, Jacksonville Aviation Authority William Bishop, Jacksonville City Council Doug Conkey, Clay County Commission Carl Youman, St. Augustine/St. Johns Airport Authority EX OFFICIO MEMBERS James Croft, Baker County Chip Laibl, Putnam County Capt. Roy Undersander, U.S. Navy NONͲVOTING ADVISER: Gregory Evans, P.E., FDOT District 2 Secretary

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

NORTH FLORIDA TPO TECHNICAL COORDINATING COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN Jeff Beck, Clay County Engineering Department VICE CHAIRMAN Calvin Burney, City of Jacksonville Planning Neil Shinkre, St. Johns County Public Works Scott Herring, Nassau County Engineering Starling Kramer, Clay County Public Works Alaina Ray, Town of Orange Park Tom Morris, Clay County Utility Authority Phong Nguyen, St. Johns County Planning Steve Lindorff, Jacksonville Beach Planning Rick Carper, Atlantic Beach Public Works David Kaufman, JAXPORT Jim Robinson, City of Jacksonville Public Works Asst. Chief Dale Allen, Jacksonville Sheriffâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s Office Mike Null, Green Cove Springs Planning Department David Buchanan, Town of Hilliard Martha Graham, St. Augustine Public Works Department Gary Larson, City of St. Augustine Beach Mayor Stan Totman, Town of Baldwin Bryan Spell, JEA Systems Planning Joseph Napoli, City of Jacksonville Environmental Quality Division Kevin Harvey, St. Augustine Airport Authority Karen Taulbee, Florida Department of Transportation Vincent Clark, Florida Department of Environmental Protection Todd Lindner, Jacksonville Aviation Authority Ed Lehman, Northeast Florida Regional Council Donald Jacobovitz, Putnam County Barbara Goodman, National Park Service Neil Nance, Jacksonville Transportation Authority Engineering Division Suraya Teeple, Jacksonville Transportation Authority Transit Division Shelby Jack, Town of Hastings Lisa Parlapiano, WorkSource Ron Braddock, Nassau County Ocean Highway and Port Authority Matt Schellhorn, U.S. Navy Peter King, Nassau County Planning Terry Suggs, City of Keystone Heights

xii

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

NORTH FLORIDA TPO CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN Bernie Oâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;Connor, Duval County (at large) VICE CHAIRMAN Frank Riner, Town of Orange Park Richard Darby, Clay County (at large) James M. Lucas, Duval County (Beaches) Richard Berry, Duval County (North Citizens Planning Advisory Committee) Celia Miller, Duval County (Urban Core Citizens Planning Advisory Committee) Lin White, Duval County (at large) Larry Solomon, Duval County (Northwest Citizens Planning Advisory Committee) Lesley Davidson, Duval County (at large) Warren Butler, St. Johns County (at large) Barney Roberts, Duval County (at large) Terry Tillman, City of Baldwin Anita Warming, Duval County (at large) Heather Neville, City of St. Augustine Gene Brisach, Nassau County (at large) Vickie Breedlove, Duval County (at large) Jim Hill, Duval County (Southeast Citizens Planning Advisory Committee) Roger Sharp, Duval County (Arlington/Beaches Citizens Planning Advisory Committee) Martha Moore, Duval County (at large) Ken Amaro, Duval County (at large) Brian Alley, St. Johns County (at large) Bradley Gordon, St. Johns County Melinda Luedtke, Amelia Island Branch Davis, Duval County (at large) Ron Hick, Nassau County (at large) Mike Kloehn, Clay County (at large)

xiii

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

LRTP STEERING COMMITTEE Dale Allen, Jacksonville Sherriff’s Office Jeff Beck, Clay County Public Works Bill Ball, City of Jacksonville Public Works Bill Bishop, Council Member, City of Jacksonville Dan Buckman, Nassau County Public Schools Calvin Burney, City of Jacksonville Planning Vincent Clark, Florida Department of Environmental Protection Enis Davis, MetroJacksonville Dawn Emerick, Health Planning Council of North East Florida Janis Fleet, City of Green Cove Springs Barbara Goodman, National Park Service James Green, Florida Department of Transportation Kimberly Hair, Jacksonville Aviation Authority Scott Herring, Nassau County Planning Don Jacobovitz, Putnam County Public Works Dorren Joyner Howard, Florida Department of Transportation David Kauffman, JAXPORT Peter King, Nassau County Mark Knight, City of St. Augustine Planning Starling Kramer, Clay County Planning Gary Larson , City of Atlantic Beach Ed Lehman, Northeast Florida Regional Planning Council Michelle Leak, Mayo Clinic Todd Linder, Jacksonville Aviation Authority Steve Lindorff, City of Jacksonville Beach Planning Dan Locklear, St. Johns County Public Works Carolyn Morgan, Clay County Planning Joe Napoli, City of Jacksonville Environmental Quality Phong Nguyen, St. Johns County Planning Mike Null, City of Green Cove Springs Bernie O’Conner, Citizen Lisa Parlapiano, Career Source Northeast Florida Ed Preston, Baker County Public Works Alaina Ray, Town of Orange Park Matt Schellhorm, U.S. Navy Brian Spell, JEA Joe Stephenson, Regional Planning Commission David Stubbs, JAXPORT Karen Taulbee, Florida Department of Transportation Suraya Teeple, Jacksonville Transportation Authority Brad Thoburn, Jacksonville Transportation Authority Steve Tocknell, Citizen Kim Weisnburger, U.S. Marine Corps

xiv

PART

ONE

INTRODUCTION

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

INTRODUCTION THE PATH FORWARD 2040 LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN IS COMPREHENSIVE IN ITS NATURE AND WAS DEVELOPED THROUGH A COOPERATIVE PROCESS TO ACHIEVE CONSENSUS ON A VISION FOR OUR REGION’S FUTURE.

PLANNING PROCESS OVERVIEW Federal and state metropolitan planning regulations require the North Florida Transportation Planning Organization (North Florida TPO) to develop a regional transportation plan every five years. This section outlines the process that was followed and is organized to address the following.

The Path Forward 2040 Long Rage Transportation Plan (LRTP) defines the transportation vision for the future of the region, establishes goals and policies that will lead to achieving the vision, and allocates projected revenue to transportation programs and projects that implement those goals and policies. Fundamentally, the LRTP is about making choices for the future of the metropolitan area—choices about local and regional land use, choices about where to allocate limited transportation resources, and

1Ͳ1

choices about the type of future we wish to see for our region and the State of Florida. The LRTP’s 22Ͳ year scope (2019 to 2040) allows the TPO to consider the transportation network’s future from a regional perspective. Existing and proposed transportation facilities (including major roadways, transit, multimodal and intermodal facilities, pedestrian walkways and bicycle facilities, and intermodal connectors) that function as an integrated transportation system are addressed in the plan. The plan emphasizes those facilities that serve important national and regional transportation functions over the life of the transportation plan. The planning process was designed to meet federal planning rules that require the North Florida TPO to maintain a continuing, cooperative, and

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

comprehensive transportation planning process. Our planning process provides opportunities for public engagement and participation.

The major components of the plan include three milestones to adopt:

Goals and Objectives of the Plan Needs Plan Cost Feasible Plan A summary of the planning process and major milestones associated with the plan are shown in Figure 1Ͳ1.

Figure 1Ͳ1. Summary of Major Plan Components and Milestones

1Ͳ2

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Virtually every freight shipment in the state, as well as nearly every visitor and business traveler, will use the Strategic Intermodal System at some point in its journey.”

REGIONAL OVERVIEW North Florida, like many great regions, began as a hub for commerce and transportation. Our six county region consisting of Baker, Clay, Duval, Nassau, Putnam and St. Johns Counties consists of an area of over 3,900 square miles and 1.4 million citizens. It includes some of our nation’s first ports, cities and roads. Our history as a transportation center shaped our region’s past and will drive our future.

The major Strategic Intermodal System highway facilities within our region are shown on Figure 1Ͳ2 and Figure 1Ͳ3 and are summarized below.

IͲ10 IͲ95 IͲ295 and SR 9B US 301/SR 200 US 1 from IͲ295 to the Georgia State Line SR 23 First Coast Expressway (future) Strategic Intermodal System Connectors include

PLANNING BOUNDARIES The metropolitan planning boundaries established by the Federal Highway Administration for the North Florida TPO metropolitan statistical area include Clay, Duval, Nassau and St. Johns Counties. To provide a regional approach, the LRTP addresses these counties and two additional counties: Baker and Putnam. Figure 1Ͳ2 on the next page shows the study area.

As part of the Cost Feasible Plan, only the federal planning boundaries associated with Clay, Duval, Nassau and St. Johns Counties were considered.

The following summarizes the major components of the freight network within North Florida including the Florida Department of Transportation’s (FDOT’s) Strategic Intermodal System. Figure 1Ͳ3 and 1Ͳ4 show the location of the major elements of the multimodal freight network in North Florida.

ROADS Strategic Intermodal System FDOT’s Strategic Intermodal System is: “a statewide system of highͲpriority transportation facilities. It includes the state’s largest and most significant commercial service airports, spaceport, deepͲwater seaports, freight rail terminals, passenger rail and intercity bus terminals, rail corridors, waterways and highways. These facilities are the workhorses of Florida’s transportation system. They carry more than 99 percent of all enplaned commercial air passengers in the state, virtually 100 percent of all waterborne freight tonnage, almost 100 percent of all freight moving on the rail system, and more than 68 percent of all truck traffic and 54 percent of total traffic on the State Highway System. With the exception of some localized commuting, recreational and shopping trips, few trips in Florida are not impacted by the Strategic Intermodal System.

1Ͳ3

Cecil Spaceport (Planned); SR 23 First Coast Expressway to New World Avenue to 6th Street to entrance. Jacksonville Amtrak Station (Currently this facility is planned to be dropped from the Strategic Intermodal System.); IͲ95 to New Kings Road and Martin Luther Jr. King Parkway to Clifford Lane. Jacksonville CSX Intermodal Terminal; IͲ295 to Pritchard Road to Sportsman Club Road to entrance. Jacksonville Florida East Coast (FEC) Railroad Intermodal Terminal (Bowden Yard); IͲ95 to SR 202 J.T. Butler Boulevard to US 1 Philips Highway to entrance. Jacksonville Greyhound (Currently this facility is planned to be dropped from the Strategic Intermodal System.); IͲ95 to Forsyth Street to Pearl Street to Bay Street entrance, exit to Forsyth Street to Broad Street to Adams Street to IͲ95. Jacksonville International Airport; IͲ295 to Duval Road to South International Airport Boulevard to Air Cargo Access Road to cargo entrance. Jacksonville International Airport; IͲ95 to SR 202 Airport Road to passenger terminal. Jacksonville Multimodal Terminal Center (Currently, this center is planned to be added to the Strategic Intermodal System); IͲ95 to Forsyth Street to Lee Street to entrance; exit to Lee Street to Adams Street to IͲ95.

" )

108

115

¬ «

£ ¤

" ) " )

" ) 127

A1A

108

105

107

§ ¨ ¦

£ ¤

¬ « ¬ «

" )

¬ «

A1A

£ ¤ 301

" ) 250

¬ « ¬ «

295

119

" )

A1A

295

§ ¨ ¦

" )

¬ «

§ ¨ ¦

122

105

" )

116

125

¬ «

" )

221

124

" )

£ ¤

§ ¨ ¦

228

¬ « 228

£ ¤

130

£ ¤ ¬ «

" )

250A

¬ « 90

301

¬ « ¬ « 134

202

§ ¨ ¦ 295

£ ¤ 1

" ) 220

" ) 218

¬ «

A1A

¬ « 13

§ ¨ ¦

¬ «

£ ¤ 1

" )

¬ « " ) " " ) ) " ) 208

" )

315

209

£ ¤

" )

¬ «

A1A

13A

214

315

¬ «

« § ¨ ¦¬ ¬ «

207

" )

214

" ) 305

Legend

£ ¤

¬ « 100

" )

County

¬ « 206

¬ «

A1A

315

" ) 204

¬ «

BAKER

CLAY

" )

DUVAL

" ) 310

NASSAU

" )

320 PUTNAM

" )

§ ¨ ¦

" ) STJOHNS" " ) £ ) ¤ Water Bodies" ¬ « ) " ) £ ¤ £ ¤Roadway" System «" ) ) " ¬ ) ¬ « ) 335

" ) 309

" ) 308

301

502

200

316

441

225

318

329

335

¬ «

200A

25A

200A

500

Date: 9/22/2014

Figure - North Florida 732 5HJLRQ 0DS

1-4

10,560 Feet

4.5

9 Miles

! !

! ! ! !

! ! !

! !

! ! !! !

" )

! !

Port of Fernandina

" )

105

§ ¦ ¨

£ ¤

¬ « ¬ «

107

¬ «

A1A

) ¯ í

115

! !

108

A1A

! ! !

127

! !

" )

! !

¬ «

A1A

£ ¤ 301

Y ®

! ! ! ! !

" ) 122

! !

! ! ! !

! !

§ ¦ ¨

295

! !

£ ¤

A1A !

! !

218

¬ «

" )

¬ «

" ) 220

Airports and Spaceports

! !

Jacksonville Naval Complex

¯ ®

202

( ( ¢ ¥ ¥ (¢ ( ¥ ¢ ¢ ¥

Jacksonville FEC Intermodal Terminal

Legend

Emerging SIS Airport

! !

134

301

¬ « ¬ « 23

! !

) ¯ í ¯ ) í

§ ¦ ¨

! !

¬ «

SIS Spaceport

Seaports

! !

¬ «

! ! ! !

! !

13A

! !

! ! !

207

! ! ! ! !

100

! ! !

! !

204

! ! !

SIS Railway Connector

Emerging SIS Waterway

SIS Waterway Connector 320

! !

" ) 310

SIS Waterway

" )

Waterways !

Emerging SIS Railway Corridors

! !

¬ «

" )

309

" ) 308

! ! !

301

" ) 316

200

! !

441

Conservation Lands

200A

25A

225

318

« £ ¤¬ £ ¤Six Counties «" " ) Boundaries" ) ) ¬ ¬ « " ¬ ) « 27

! !

" )

335

" ) £ ¤

Roadway 3System 29 Water Bodies

§ ¦ ¨

Railroad System

335

" )

200A

" ) " )

" )

500

)LJXUH SWUDWHJLF Intermodal System Date: 6/25/2014

" )

¬ «

SIS Railway Corridors

! !

315

Rail

! !

¬ «

" )

206

! !

SIS Higway Connectors

¬ «

A1A

£ ¤

¬ «

Emerging SIS Highway Corridor

305

" )

« § ¦¬ ¨ ¬ « !

¬ «

SIS Highway Corridor

214

Highway

! !

" )

Emerging SIS Passenger Terminal

SIS Passenger Terminal

! !

214

315

A1A ! !

! !

£ ¤

¬ «

208

209

" )

¬ « " ) " " ) ) " )

" )

315

! ! !! !

" )

( ( ( Intermodal Logistics Center ¢ ¥ ¢ ¥ ¥ ¥ (Passenger (¢ (¢ ¥ ¢ ¢ ¥ ¢ ¥ ¢ ¥ Terminals

® X Ã SIS Freight Rail Terminal ¢¢ ¥ ¥XÃ¢ ¥¢ ¥Emerging SIS Freight Rail Terminal

b Æ

£ ¤

Camp Blanding

Freight Rail Terminals

b Æ b Æ

¬ «

Emerging SIS Seaport

SIS Seaport

228

¬ «

£ ¤

SIS Airport

£ ¤ ¬ «

X¢ ® Ã ( ( ¥ ¢ ¥

228

! ! !

" )

¬ «

§ ¦ ¨

! !

b ÆÆ b

! !

£ ¤

130

® Y Y ¯ ®

116

Port of Jacksonville Talleyrand

" )

250A

295

! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Naval Station Mayport Station !

" )

221

124

¬ «

" )

§ ¦ ¨ !

¬ «

! !

Jacksonville NS Intermodal Terminal

125

" )

250

¬ « ¬ «

Jacksonville CSX Intermodal Terminal

" )

) ¯ í !

1!05 Port of Jacksonville Blount Island ! ! ! ! !

119

( ( ¢ ¥ ¢ ¥ § ¦ ¨ ( ( ¥ ¢ ¢ ¥ X ® Ã ( ( (®XÃÆb¢ ( ¥¢ ¢ ¥¢ ¥ ¥ ( ( ¥ ¢ ¢ ¥

" )

Port of Jacksonville Dames Point ! !

295

A1A

¬ «

£ ¤

" ) " ) 108

1-5

10,560 Feet

6 Miles

¯ ®

Cecil Spaceport

228

« ¬ 23

« ¬

134

« ¬

¤ £

! !

¦ ¨ § 295

! !

« ¬

FEC Intermodal Terminal

( ( ( ¢ ¥ ¥ ¢ ¥ X ®¢ Ã ( ( ( ¥ ¢ ¢ ¥ ¢ ¥ (¢ (¢ ( ¥ ¢ ¥ ¥ ( ( ( ¥ ¢ ¢ ¥ ¢ ¥ ( ( ( ¥¢ ¢ ¥¢ ¥

152

! ! ! ! 295

¦ ¨ §

202

« ¬

A1A

« ¬

A1A

« ¬

A1A

Naval Station Mayport Station !

« ¬

A1A

Port of Fernandina

A1A

¤ £ « ¬

116

« ¬

¯ ) í

! ! ! ! ! ! !

! ! ! !

10,560 Feet

1SJWBUF .BSJOF 5FSNJOBMT

6W -RKQV 5LYHU &KDQQHO

,QWHUQDWLRQDO 6KLSSLQJ &KDQQHO

SIS Spaceport

Emerging SIS Airport

SIS Airport

Emerging SIS Seaport

SIS Seaport

Emerging SIS Passenger Terminal

SIS Passenger Terminal

Rail

3.5

7 Miles

Six Counties Boundaries

Conservation Lands

Water Bodies

Roadway System

Railroad System

SIS Waterway Connector

Emerging SIS Waterway

SIS Waterway

Waterways

SIS Railway Connector

Emerging SIS Railway Corridors

SIS Railway Corridors

SIS Higway Connectors

Emerging SIS Highway Corridor

SIS Highway Corridor

Highway

b Æ b Æ

Intermodal Logistics Center

( (¢ ( ¢ ¥ ¢ ¥ ¥ (Passenger ( ( Terminals ¥ ¢ ¢ ¥ ¢ ¥

X ® SIS Freight Rail Terminal Ã ¢¢ ¥ ¥XÃ¢ ¥ Emerging SIS Freight Rail Terminal

Freight Rail Terminals

) ¯ í ¯ ) í

Seaports

® Y Y ¯ ®

Airports and Spaceports

Legend

! ! !

! !

1-6

« ¬

Port of Fernandina

Blount Island Command ! ! Port of Jacksonville Blount ! ! ! !Island

Port of Jacksonville Talleyrand

¯ ) í

Port of Jacksonville

! !

£)LJXUH 6WUDWHJLF Intermodal System ,QVHW 0DS

224

Port of Jacksonville Dames Point !

Jacksonville Multimodal Terminal Center

b Æb Æ

Jacksonville Greyhound

Jacksonville Naval Complex

« ¬

128

« ¬

¦ ¨ §

¤ £

Jacksonville International Airport

Jacksonville Amtrak

NS Intermodal Terminal

CSX Intermodal Terminal

(¢ ( ¢ ¥ ¥ ( ( ¥ ¢ ¢ ¥ ( ( ¥ ¢ ¢ ¥ X ® Ã ( ( ¥ ¢ ¢ ¥ ¤ £ (¢ ( ¥ ( ( ¥ ¢ ¥ ¢ ¥ X b Æ (Ã®¢ ( ¥ ¢ ¢ ¥

104

« ¬

115

« ¬

Y ®

! !

Date: 9/25/2014

301

¤ £

¤§ £ ¦ ¨

301

¤ £

! !

! !!

! ! !

! !

! ! !

! !

! ! !

! !

! ! ! !

! ! !

! !

! ! !

! !

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Naval Air Station Jacksonville; IͲ295 to US 17 Roosevelt Boulevard to entrance. Naval Station Mayport; IͲ295 to US 90 Atlantic Boulevard to SR A1A to entrance. Port of Jacksonville Blount Island; IͲ295 to SR 105 Heckscher Drive to Dave Rawls Boulevard to entrance. Part of Jacksonville Dames Point; IͲ295 to SR 105 Heckscher Drive to New Berlin Road. Port of Jacksonville Dames Point Cruise Ship Terminal; IͲ295 to SR 105 Heckscher Drive to August Drive to entrance. Port of Jacksonville Dames Point Cruise Ship Terminal; IͲ95 to SR 105 Heckscher Drive to August Drive to entrance. Port of Jacksonville; Talleyrand; IͲ95 to US 1 Martin Luther King Jr. Parkway to Phoenix Avenue to 21st Street to North Talleyrand Avenue to 11th Street entrance. Port of Fernandina; IͲ95 to SR A1A to 8th Street to Dade Street to Front Street to entrance.

the Strategic Intermodal System. This terminal serves distribution facilities and shippers in Florida accessing the facility using IͲ95 and IͲ10. Preliminary estimates show this facility generates approximately 300,000 lifts (a lift is the move of one container on or off a rail car) per year which would equate to about 600,000 truck trips per year. The Norfolk Southern intermodal terminal (Simpson Yard), located east of the IͲ295 interchange with Pritchard Road, is included as a hub in the Strategic Intermodal System. This terminal serves distribution facilities and shippers in Florida accessing the facility using IͲ95 and IͲ10. Preliminary estimates show this facility generates approximately 225,000 lifts per year which would equate to about 450,000 truck trips. Norfolk Southern also operates an auto distribution facility with access from Old Kings Road north of Pritchard Road in the project study area. This facility serves the Jacksonville Port Authority (JAXPORT) auto terminal and other commercial shippers of automobile traffic destined for in the southeastern US. This facility is currently not part of the Strategic Intermodal System.

Other State Highways and Local Roads

The CSX intermodal terminal (Jacksonville Yard), located just west of IͲ295 at the Pritchard Road interchange, is a major intermodal facility within CSX’s operations and is included as a hub in the Strategic Intermodal System. This terminal serves distribution facilities and shippers in Florida accessing the facility using IͲ95 and IͲ10. Preliminary estimates show this facility generates approximately 300,000 lifts per year which would equate to about 600,000 truck trips. CSX also operates an auto distribution facility in the study area with access from Commonwealth Boulevard to the south. This facility is similar in size and services to the Norfolk Southern facility. This facility is currently not part of the Strategic Intermodal System.

In addition to the Strategic Intermodal System, other state highway system routes and locallyͲmaintained roads of regional significance were addressed in the plan.

RAIL North Florida is located at a key junction for three railroads, CSX, Norfolk Southern and FEC. CSX, headquartered in Jacksonville, maintains the largest rail network in Florida and will soon provide enhanced connectivity to the Dames Point and Blount Island marine terminals with the Intermodal Container Transfer Facility at Dames Point. Norfolk Southern maintains its Florida terminus in northwest Jacksonville and provides direct service to the Talleyrand Marine terminals, other key sites along the St. Johns River, and inland facilities. FEC has its corporate operations center and its northern terminus in Jacksonville including a river bridge crossing in Downtown that facilitates connections to the CSX and Norfolk Southern railroads. Genesee & Wyoming Inc., which operates major short line railroads across the U.S. and in Australia and maintains its operations headquarters in Jacksonville. The following summarizes the Strategic Intermodal System and other major rail intermodal facilities in the study area.

AN INTERMODAL FREIGHT SHIPMENT IS ONE THAT IS MOVED VIA STANDARDIZED REUSABLE SHIPPING BOXES CALLED CONTAINERS. TYPICAL MARINE CONTAINERS ARE

40ͲFT LONG AND TYPICAL TRUCK CONTAINERS ARE 53Ͳ FT LONG. EACH CONTAINER CAN CARRY BETWEEN 20 AND 25 TONS OF FREIGHT.

The Florida East Coast Industries intermodal terminal (Bowden Yard), located west of US 1 Philips Highway near SR 202 J. T. Butler Boulevard, is included as a hub in

THE UNITS OF MEASURE ARE EXPRESSED IN TWENTYͲ FOOT EQUIVALENCY UNITS OR TEUS. 1Ͳ7

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

two 50ͲLT capacity rubber tired gantry cranes, both of which straddle four rail spurs totaling 4,800 linear feet Talleyrand's onͲdock rail facilities are run by Talleyrand Terminal Railroad, Inc., which provides direct switching service for Norfolk Southern and CSX rail lines. The terminal is only 25 minutes from FEC railroad's intermodal ramp, and is conveniently located within minutes of interstates IͲ95 and IͲ10. Talleyrand is equipped with four container cranes, onͲdock rail and 160,000 square feet of transit shed space capable of handling cargo in refrigerated, freezer or ambient conditions. Additionally, a 553,000Ͳsquare foot warehouse stores a variety of cargoes, including rolls of fine and specialty papers.

AMTRAK, the National Railroad Passenger Corporation, operates a passenger intermodal facility on the northwest side of Jacksonville off US 23 SR 15 New Kings Road. This facility serves approximately 30,000 passengers per year. This facility is part of the Strategic Intermodal System. The FDOT Strategic Intermodal System rail connectors include the following:

CSX Eastport Railroad connector to Blount Island and Dames Point Terminals CSX Connector to CSX Intermodal Facility Talleyrand Terminal Railroad CSX Downtown Jacksonville to Port of Fernandina along US 17 Main Street and SR 200 Buccaneer Trail

The U.S. Marine Corps Terminal is located on Blount Island and supports deployments by the US Transportation Command. Shipments include rollͲon/rollͲ off cargo, intermodal and breakͲbulk cargo.

PORTS JAXPORT 2 and its maritime partners handle containerized cargo, automobiles, recreational boats and construction equipment, dry and liquid bulks, breakͲbulk commodities, and oversized and specialty cargoes. 1F1F1F1F

A network of privatelyͲowned maritime facilities also operates in Jacksonville’s harbor, and in Northeast Florida.

Blount Island is a 754Ͳacre terminal and is JAXPORT's largest marine facility. It is one of the largest vehicle import/export centers in the United States. The terminal also handles bulk cargo via rollͲon/rollͲoff, heavy lift, and liquid bulk cargo operations. Blount Island has one 112Ͳ ton whirly crane and eight container cranes (five 50Ͳton cranes, one 45Ͳton crane and two 40Ͳton cranes). The terminal also offers 240,000Ͳsquare feet of transit shed space and a 90,000ͲsquareͲfoot Container Freight Station for crossͲdock efficiency.

The Nassau County Ocean Highway and Port Authority operates the Port of Fernandina, a deepͲwater access with 47Ͳft channel depth and two berths. The port consistently handles over 225 vessels per year. The port’s principal cargoes include breakͲbulk cargo 3 consisting of forest products including Kraft liner board, wood pulp, steel and treated lumber. The principal imports are lumber, wood pulp, hardboard and steel. The containerized commodities moving through the Port include wood pulp, automobile parts, steel products, beer, frozen foods, machinery and consumer goods. 2F2F2F2F

The Dames Point Marine Terminal (TraPac) is located ten nautical miles from the Atlantic Ocean, the Dames Point Marine Terminal is home to the 158Ͳacre TraPac Container Terminal, where vessels from TokyoͲbased MOL and other carriers offer direct containership service between Jacksonville and ports throughout Asia. The TraPac terminal features new port infrastructure, including roadways, terminal buildings, two 1,200Ͳfoot berths and six new Panamax container cranes. This 173Ͳ acre terminal has 4,780 linear feet of berthing space on 40 feet of deepͲwater. A second terminal is planned at Dames Point but a tenant is currently not identified.

AVIATION Jacksonville’s Airport System 4 3F3F

Jacksonville's Airport System encompasses four airports, each of which serves a distinct aviation need. Jacksonville International Airport is the major regional passenger air service provider, featuring nonͲstop flights to dozens of major U.S. cities. Jacksonville Executive at Craig Airport (CRG), centrally located near Jacksonville's suburban business centers, is a general aviation field. Herlong Recreational Airport, on the city's west side, is ideally suited as a general aviation field and prime recreational site for small private planes, hot air balloons, 3 http://www.portoffernandinamaritimeexchange.org/res ources_port.html 4 http://www.flyjacksonville.com/default.aspx?sMP=JAA

The Talleyrand Terminal, located north of Downtown on the west bank of the St. Johns River, is a 173Ͳacre terminal that has 4,780 linear feet of berthing space on 40 feet of deepͲwater. The Talleyrand terminal offers 2 Adapted from http://www.jaxport.com/ 1Ͳ8

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Mandarin, various shopping malls, employment centers and Downtown.

gliders and similar craft. Cecil Field Airport is located approximately 15 miles west of downtown Jacksonville. The newest addition to the Jacksonville airport system, Cecil Airport is an ideal site for aviation maintenance, manufacturing and repair and overhaul operations. 5

Jacksonville Transportation Authority's Interliner service combines two routes into one, providing oneͲseat transportation between two quadrants of town. Residents traveling between two areas no longer change buses (i.e. from Commonwealth Boulevard to SR 152 Baymeadows Road), eliminating the need to transfer or pay two fares. Nine Interliner routes currently serve Jacksonville residents.

3F4F4F

Although a smaller market relative to tonnage handled by other modes of transportation, aviation services are also part of the region’s freight movement. Several passenger airlines and dedicated allͲcargo airlines provide air cargo service at the Jacksonville International Airport. The airport’s air cargo area has more than 200,000 square feet of warehouse space dedicated to air cargo operations and hundreds of acres of onͲairport property suitable for air cargo development. FedEx, UPS, and Airborne all utilize Jacksonville International Airport. It is anticipated that Cecil Airport will help support economic development within the region, serving both aviation and aerospace dependent industries. The airport is adjacent to the Cecil Commerce Center and recently was designated a spaceport and “space territory” by the state of Florida (HB59). As a result, the newly named “Cecil Field Spaceport” is included in Space Florida’s Spaceport Master Plan and the Strategic Intermodal System.

All Jacksonville Transportation Authority buses are equipped with frontͲmounted bike racks. There is no extra charge to transport the bicycle. JTA Connection is a sharedͲride service that provides doorͲtoͲdoor transportation for the disabled, elderly and transportation disadvantaged in Duval County. It is complementary to the fixed route bus service. A private vendor is contracted to provide drivers and operate specially equipped transit vehicles. Jacksonville Transportation Authority Paratransit staff manage the dayͲtoͲday system operations, take reservations and schedule trips. The Jacksonville Transportation Authority is the Community Transportation Coordinator (CTC) for Duval County.

Northeast Florida Regional Airport 6 4F5F5F

The Northeast Florida Regional Airport is located just a few miles from historic downtown St. Augustine and serves as a focal point for the Northeast Florida region. The airport is centered in a gateway market of 4.4 million passengers within a 2Ͳhour drive to the facility.

The Automated Skyway Express is a fully automated stateͲofͲtheͲart transit system operating on an elevated dual guideway, with peripheral parking at several stations. Ten twoͲcar trains whisk patrons to eight stations on both sides of the St. Johns River in the central business district.

TRANSIT

Approximately 3,500 spaces are available to commuters for monthly parking. Nearly 1,000 spaces are located in and around the Skyway Convention Center Station. Another major parking facility is the King's Avenue Transit garage with 1,684, low cost, covered parking spaces, with walkways leading to the Kings Avenue Skyway Station. Another 200 surface spots are available, some for shortͲterm. Limited daily and hourly (meter) parking is available at the Convention Center and King's Avenue Skyway Stations.

Jacksonville Transportation Authority 7 5F6F6F

Another vital component to an integrated transportation network is the bus system. Jacksonville Transportation Authority has 56 routes with vehicles traveling 8.5 million revenue miles each year with approximately 320 bus operators and 110 maintenance employees supporting an active fleet of 180 vehicles. Flyer and express bus routes offer additional opportunities for Jacksonville Transportation Authority to meet the community's needs. Flyers and express buses provide minimal or nonͲstop service and serve popular areas like the Beaches, Arlington, Blanding, Orange Park,

The Skyway hours are Monday through Friday from 6 AM to 9 PM. The Skyway is closed Saturday and Sunday, except for special events. The Skyway is free. Jacksonville Transportation Authority offers the very popular Stadium Shuttle Service that connects thousands of football fans to EverBank Field for Jaguars home games, the FloridaͲGeorgia game and the Gator Bowl.

5 http://www.flyjacksonville.com/content.aspx?id=83 6 http://www.flynf.com/ 7 http://www.jtafla.com/AboutJTA 1Ͳ9

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Fans may park free in several suburban and downtown locations, then shuttle to the stadium starting two hours before kickͲoff and ending one hour following the game. Customers may purchase a discounted season pass or a gameͲday ticket. Prices are reasonable, but vary depending on pickͲup points.

The Riverside Trolley offers weekday, lunchtime trips between the Five Points historic district in Riverside and The Landing in Downtown. The Beaches Trolley runs seven days a week along A1A through the heart of Jacksonville Beach, Neptune Beach and Atlantic Beach. The Jacksonville Transportation Authority served more than 12 million passenger trips in 2012. 8 6F7F7F

Baker County Council on Aging The Baker County Council on Aging is the Community Transportation Coordinator providing transportation to residents of Clay County.

Clay Transit Clay Transit is the Community Transportation Coordinator providing transportation to residents of Clay County. The paratransit services connect to Jacksonville Transportation Authority Service at the Orange Park Mall enabling riders to commute from Middleburg, Fleming Island, Green Cove Springs and Orange Park all the way into Jacksonville or vice versa.

Council on Aging of Nassau County The Council on Aging of Nassau County is the Community Transportation Coordinator providing paratransit services to residents of Nassau County.

Ride Solution Ride Solution is the Community Transportation Coordinator providing paratransit services to residents of Putnam County.

The Sunshine Bus Company St. Johns County Council on Aging, Inc. operates the Sunshine Bus Company in St. Johns County which provides paratransit services to St. Johns County along six routes. More than 237,000 passenger trips were served by The Sunshine Bus Service in 2012. 9 7F8F8F

8 Florida Transit Handbook, 2013. 9 Florida Transit Handbook, 2013. 1Ͳ10

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

in population of 41 percent and an increase of workers of 43 percent.

POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT North Florida is anticipated to grow by approximately 600,000 persons, 265,000 households and nearly 300,000 jobs by the year 2040 representing an increase

The anticipated growth in population and employment by county is summarized in the tables below.

Table 1Ͳ1. Population Growth County 2010 2040

Growth

Percent Compounding Annual Growth Rate Change Nassau 73,314 116,700 43,386 59.2 2.0% Duval 864,278 1,071,600 207,322 24.0 0.8% St. Johns 189,396 377,000 187,604 99.1 3.3% Clay 190,865 315,700 124,835 65.4 2.2% Baker 27,115 39,000 11,885 43.8 1.5% Putnam 74,364 79,400 5,036 6.8 0.2% Totals 1,419,332 1,999,400 580,068 40.9 1.4% Source: Bureau of Economic Business and Research, University of Florida Table 1Ͳ2. Employment Growth County 2010 2040 Growth

Percent Change

Nassau 24,126 40,661 16,535 68.5 Duval 519,142 627,144 108,002 20.8 St. Johns 61,714 186,691 124,977 202.5 Clay 54,454 87,737 33,283 61.1 Baker 7,396 16,775 9,379 126.8 Putnam 25,148 29,218 4,070 16.2 Total 691,980 988,226 296,246 42.8 Note: Growth rate for Putnam County is adjusted to 0.05%. Source: Bureau of Economic Business and Research, University of Florida

1Ͳ11

Compounding Annual Growth Rate 1.74% 0.63% 3.69% 1.59% 2.73% Ͳ0.06% 0.95%

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

To address this growth and maintain the quality of life for the residents of North Florida, investments in transportation infrastructure and services are needed.

Reduced automobile use and increased transit use combined with the opening of 62 additional lane miles of highways between 2008 and 2012 resulted in significant benefits in the quality of travel within the region. Average speeds during the peak periods improved by 2.73 percent from 2008 to 2012 and 0.65 percent from 2011 to 2012. These average speeds resulted in a positive economic impact to the local economy of $280 million per year.

LAND USE Land use is what drives our need to travel and is an important input into the transportation planning process. Land use development decisions are made at the local level but the effects of these decisions can be seen in regional travel patterns. Coordination between local communities is important so that the growth pattern is beneficial for the area as a whole. Extensive coordination with the local agencies within the region occurred to cooperatively develop a land use forecast for the year 2040.

However, vehicle use and travel is anticipated to increase in the region for the next five years as a result of the economic recovery and new growth within the region. The demand for travel is anticipated to return to preͲ recession levels by the year 2018. Investments to meet these demands are needed to remain competitive.

New developments of regional impact are anticipated to be builtͲout by the year 2040. Land use within the region is anticipated to intensify as a result. Vacant parcels within the urban service boundary are anticipated to fill and densities intensify within existing parcels through redevelopment to meet the demand for new households, schools, recreation and employment.

A summary of the recent trends in mobility within the region is provided in Table 1Ͳ3 on the next page. By the year 2040, the traffic volumes are anticipated to increase by oneͲthird within the region as a result of the growth in population and economic activity. Although driving (alone or with other passengers) is still anticipated to account for about 85 percent of all trips within the region, because of the aging population and changes in preferences from the millennial generation who wish to drive less, the percent of trips made by persons walking is anticipated to increase from 8.4 percent to 9.4 percent, a 14 percent change. According to the American Planning Association’s 2014 National Poll, 81 percent of millennials and 77 percent of active boomers say “affordable and convenient alternatives to the car are at least somewhat important in deciding where to live and work.” These changes in travel preferences will require a multimodal approach to addressing our transportation needs in 2040.

PERSONAL MOBILITY From 2008 to 2012, automobile use has declined within the region by 5.7 percent. This decline in vehicle use is believed to be the result of the economic downturn, changing travel patterns associated with an aging population and younger driver’s reduced automobile dependence. The exception to this reduction is the recent increase in the truck miles traveled within the region. Over the last five years, truck traffic declined by 16.4 percent. From 2011 to 2012 truck traffic increased 1.6 reflecting the beginning of the economic recovery. Although transit use in North Florida continues to be less than one percent of all person travel miles, ridership continues to rise with a 1.8 percent annual increase from 2011 to 2012. Since 2008, transit use in the area has increased by 30.8 percent.

Without investments in transportation, travel conditions are anticipated to worsen. By the year 2040, trip times are anticipated to increase by nearly 20 percent as summarized in Table 1Ͳ4.

1Ͳ12

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Table 1Ͳ3. Summary of Recent Mobility Trends (average daily values) Item 2008 2009 2010 Quantity of Travel VehicleͲmiles traveled (daily) in thousands 26,997 26,629 26,310 VehicleͲmiles traveled (peak hour) in thousands 2,161 2,132 2,105 PersonͲmiles traveled (daily) in thousands 44,081 43,507 43,000 PersonͲmiles traveled (peak Hour) in thousands 3,520 3,472 3,432 TruckͲmiles traveled (daily) in thousands 2,249 2,139 1,866 Transit ridership (thousands) 55,640 55,884 63,755 Quality of Travel Average travel speed (peak hour) 51.38 50.92 52.13 Delay (daily) 18,316 14,782 11,740 Travel time reliability (daily) 68.95 69.77 69.41 Percent miles meeting level of service criteria (daily) 99.42 99.72 99.72 on rural facilities System Utilization Percent miles severely congested (peak hour) 5.26 6.49 4.41 Percent travel severely congested (daily) 2.83 4.08 2.52 Percent travel severely congested (peak hour) 0.23 0.34 0.21 Hours severely congested (daily) 0.81 1.10 0.81 Hours severely congested (yearly) 153.94 226.70 105.04 Vehicle per lane miles (peak hour) in hundreds 642.1 633.9 622.8 Passengers per transit revenue mile 5.47 5.91 6.48 Table 1Ͳ4. Anticipated Changes in Trip Travel Times (2010 to 2040) Trip Purpose Increase in Trip Time Work Shopping Social/recreation School trips Personal business

2012

26,081 2,087 42,646 3,403 1,851 72,785

25,474 2,036 41,640 3,323 1,880 72,785

52.03 13,211 69.59 99.45

52.38 12,244 69.26 99.68

5.52 3.75 0.31 0.80 184.41 620.2 7.42

3.64 2.43 0.20 0.80 120.45 604.3 7.67

16.4% 21.7% 25.1% 16.5% 21.7%

which operates major short line railroads across the US and in Australia, maintains its operations headquarters in Jacksonville.

FREIGHT MOBILITY The level of connectivity to the North Florida region is a significant economic advantage for our region. IͲ95 serves as the major highway gateway to Florida’s 19.5 million persons. IͲ10 connects our region along an eastͲ west route to the southwest, western states and Pacific Ocean. A third interstate, IͲ295 serves as a beltway around Jacksonville that connects both of these interstates and provides direct access to major JAXPORT marine terminals at Blount Island and Dames Point and rail intermodal facilities for CSX and Norfolk Southern railroads. IͲ75, the nation’s central spine connecting Florida, southeastern and midͲwestern states is located 60 miles to the west of our region. North Florida provides the rail gateway into Florida. Norfolk Southern and FEC railroads have their Florida termini in North Florida. In addition CSX’s and FEC both maintain their corporate headquarters in North Florida. Genesee & Wyoming Inc.,

These significant assets result in 160 million tons of freight moving through North Florida each year. As our regional, the state and global economy grow, the movement of goods will increase. Growth is anticipated to occur for deliveries to our region, goods exported from our region and shipments that travel through our region each year. Trends that will affect our region include the continued shift of freight to containerized or intermodal movements, growth in the port imports and exports and shipments through North Florida as the gateway to Florida.

1Ͳ13

2011

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Table 1Ͳ5 summarizes the freight flows in the year 2012 in North Florida.

By the year 2040, shipments traveling through North Florida are anticipated to increase 280 percent as a result of economic growth. Investments in our multimodal freight network are needed to meet this demand and maintain our region’s competitiveness in the global economy.

Table 1Ͳ5. Total Tons of Commodities (millions of tons per year) Origin and Destination Truck Internal to area 34.9 Originates in area And is destined to locations within Florida 18.5 And is destined to locations outside Florida 8.0 Is destined for the area And originated from within Florida 7.5 And originated from outside Florida 8.9 Port related 11.7 Through traffic 70.0 Total 159.5 Mix Percent 84%

1Ͳ14

Rail

Total 0.0 0.2 0.6 0.4 11.6 0.6 18.0 31.4 16%

34.9 18.7 8.6 7.9 20.5 12.3 88.0 190.9 100%

Percentage 18% 10% 5% 4% 11% 6% 46% 100%

PART

TWO

PLANNING PROCESS

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

GOALS, OBJECTIVES, PERFORMANCE MEASURES AND IMPLEMENTING POLICIES F ACED WITH ESCALATING DEMANDS FOR TRANSPORTATION INVESTMENT AND LIMITED RESOURCES , ESTABLISHING THE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES WITHIN THE P ATH F ORWARD 2040 LRTP IS AN ESSENTIAL FIRST STEP IN DEFINING THE SUCCESS OF OUR PLAN AND GUIDING DECISION MAKING .

LRTP GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

The goals, objective and performance measures proposed are based on the transportation user’s point of view. The order of the goals and objectives do not indicate the priority.

Through the LRTP, it is North Florida TPO’s vision to promote the regional optimization of mobility consistent with the values of local communities.

Specifically, the goals and objectives are to enhance the following:

Economic Competitiveness Livability Safety Mobility and Accessibility Equity in Decision Making System Preservation

2Ͳ1

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

GOAL 1: INVEST IN PROJECTS THAT ENHANCE ECONOMIC COMPETITIVENESS

Table 2Ͳ2 on the next page summarizes the objectives, performance measures and benchmarks associated with this goal. The targets are to achieve the benchmarks by the year 2040.

Investing in projects that enhance economic competitiveness are primarily those that improve travel time reliability, which is the most important factor for freight operators, enhance access to job and maximize the return on investment. Table 2Ͳ1 summarizes the objectives, performance measures and benchmarks associated with this goal.

GOAL 2: INVEST IN LIVABLE AND SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES There no single definition of what constitutes a “livable” or “sustainable” transportation system. According to the definition endorsed by the Transportation Research Board Sustainable Transportation Indicators Subcommittee, a sustainable transportation system follows: Allows the basic access and development needs of individuals, companies, and society to be met safely and in a manner consistent with human and ecosystem health, and promotes equity within and between successive generations. Is affordable, operates fairly and efficiently, offers a choice of transportation modes, and supports a competitive economy, as well as balanced regional development. Limits air, water, noise emissions, waste and resource use. Limits emissions and waste within the planet’s ability to absorb them, uses renewable resources at or below their rates of generation, and uses nonͲrenewable resources at or below the rates of development of renewable substitutes, while minimizing the impact on the use of land and the generation of noise.

Table 2Ͳ1. Enhance Economic Competitiveness Objectives and Performance Measures Objective Performance Measure Benchmark Improve travel reliability on major Travel time reliability Maintain or improve the freight routes reliability Enhance access to jobs Jobs within ½ mile of a congestion Maintain or improve access to management system facility jobs Maximize the return on investment Benefit: cost ratio Rank benefitͲtoͲcost ratio Return on investment Rank return on investment

2Ͳ2

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Table 2Ͳ2. Livability and Sustainability Objectives and Performance Measures Objective Performance Measure Enhance transit ¼ mile walk accessibility to transit stops accessibility Households within 5 miles of major transit centers or park and ride lots Enhance transit Annual boardings per vehicle revenue mile ridership Annual boardings per vehicle revenue hour Enhance bicycle and Lane mile with bicycle and pedestrian facilities at the quality pedestrian quality of of service standard service Reduce the cost of Transportation costs per capita congestion per capita Costs of congestion Reduce the impacts of Environmental screening and mitigation investments on the natural environment Reduce emissions from Hydrocarbon, nitrous oxides and volatile organic compound automobiles emissions Consistency with land Includes active transportation design principles in context use planning sensitive solutions Supports regional Reduce clearance times for evacuations evacuation needs Table notes

Benchmark 95% of all stops (1) (2) (2) 85% of lane miles

(3) Apply Efficient Decision Making Process to all projects in LRTP. Maintain our attainment status. (4) Include walkability standards in context sensitive solutions Improve clearance times by 15 minutes. (5)

(1) This performance measure will not change significantly from year to year unless major route changes or new transit operations are deployed. (2) Coordination with Jacksonville Transportation Authority is needed to develop the baseline and benchmark data needed. (3) Many exogenous factors influence this performance measure including the price of fuels that are beyond the scope of a LRTP. However, this performance measure will be considered within the LRTP based on policy decisions made during the scenario development. (4) Emissions will be determined using Florida emission factors from the FHWA Moves model. (5) Based on modeling provide by the Northeast Florida Regional Council.

GOAL 3: ENHANCE SAFETY

Investing in projects that enhance safety will lead to reduced crashes and lower crash severity.

Table 2Ͳ3 summarizes the objectives, performance measures and benchmarks associated with this goal.

Table 2Ͳ3. Safety Objectives and Performance Measures Objective Performance Measure Reduce Crashes Number of crashes Crash rate per million vehicle miles Reduce Fatal crashes Number of fatalities Crash rate per million vehicle miles

2Ͳ3

Benchmark Reduce by 0.25% each year Reduce or maintain Reduce by 0.25% each year Reduce or maintain

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

context of each corridor being considered is an essential element to identifying the right mobility solution for any project.

GOAL 4: ENHANCE MOBILITY AND ACCESSIBILITY Enhancing mobility includes addressing the four dimensions of mobility – quantity of travel, quality of travel, system accessibility and system utilization. Several of these measures also support other goals and objectives (such as livability and sustainability).

Table 2Ͳ4 summarizes the objectives, performance measures and benchmarks associated with this goal. The measures associated with the quantity of travel are oriented to how many people use the network. These measures are important, as some operational improvements may increase the throughput of travel at a location, but the quality of travel flow (speeds, delays, etc.) may not change during the peak hour.

Mobility is about more than increasing the volume of persons served and managing congestion. Users want a less stressful commute, but they also want improved reliability of their travel, more choices including transit, walking and bicycling and to ensure we optimize system operations before we invest in new infrastructure. Understanding the tradeͲoffs of these goals in the

Table 2Ͳ4. Mobility and Accessibility Objectives and Performance Measures Goal Mobility Performance Measures Benchmark PersonͲmiles traveled TruckͲmiles traveled VehicleͲmiles traveled Person trips Transit ridership Average speed Delay Average trip time

(2) (2) Optimize the (2) quantity of travel (2) Increase transit ridership Maintain or improve the average travel speed Maintain or reduce the average vehicle delay Maintain or reduce the average trip time Optimize the Maintain or improve the reliability quality if Reliability Achieve 95% reliability (on time arrival) on Strategic travel (1) Intermodal System facilities. Maintain the level of service standard (FDOT standard for Level of service on rural facilities Strategic Intermodal System facilities and local government standards for other facilities) Proximity to major transportation hubs (3) Improve the % miles bicycle accommodations (3) accessibility to mode % miles pedestrian accommodations (3) choices Transit coverage Increase the % of population served with ¼ mile % system heavily congested Maintain or reduce the % of system heavily congested % travel heavily congested Maintain or reduce the % of travel heavily congested Optimize the Vehicles per lane mile Optimize the vehicles per lane mile for a desired LOS utilization of Duration of congestion Maintain or reduce the duration of congestion the system Optimize the transit load factor for a desired quality of Transit load factor service (1) These measures may not apply on corridors not selected for contextͲbased solutions that may intentionally lower the running speed or capacity. (2) Generally, increases in the quantity traveled (throughout) are preferred. However, consistent with livability and sustainability goals, one objective is to reduce the amount of travel needed. Therefore, no benchmarks are proposed, but monitoring is recommended. (3) These performance measures will not change significantly from year to year but will be evaluated in each major update to the LRTP to establish benchmark and monitor performance. 2Ͳ4

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Optimizing the quantity of travel is proposed so that context sensitive solutions and alternatives that result in fewer trips and less use of the transportation network can be considered equitably with projects that add capacity. The quality of travel includes not only speeds and delays but also travel reliability.

1. To avoid, minimize, or mitigate disproportionately high and adverse human health and environmental effects, including social and economic effects, on minority populations and lowͲincome populations. 2. To ensure the full and fair participation by all potentially affected communities in the transportation decisionͲmaking process.

Accessibility refers to the ease of reaching goods, services and other activities. Accessibility analysis is one component of mobility in that it considers the connections to adjacent land uses and the modalities of transportation between desired origins and destinations. By improving accessibility, we can meet the same needs of users by being smarter and enhancing the efficiencies of our investments.

3. To prevent the denial of, reduction in, or significant delay in the receipt of benefits by minority and lowͲincome populations. 11 4F9F10F10F

To address these goals, these three principles are adopted as objectives for this LRTP. The performance measures associated with each objective are less quantifiable than the objectives associated with other goals and are more process oriented. These three factors will be considered as part of the Needs Plan and Cost Feasible Plan and will be implemented using Geographic Information Systems techniques to identify the minority and lowͲincome populations and by designing outreach programs to involve minority and lowͲincome populations.

As transportation providers, understanding the utilization of the system is important in optimizing the transportation network. Measures such as the duration of congestion are used to ensure the services and facilities are allocated appropriately. Together these four dimensions will allow us to evaluate the tradeoffs of alternative transportation investments.

GOAL 5: ENHANCE EQUITY IN DECISION MAKING

GOAL 6: PRESERVE AND MAINTAIN OUR EXISTING SYSTEM

The United States Environmental Protection Agency defines Environmental Justice as follows.

The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and FDOT established formal goals and objectives for systems preservation that are proposed for adoption as part of this LRTP. They include:

Environmental Justice is the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all people regardless of race, color, national origin, or income with respect to the development, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies. EPA has this goal for all communities and persons across this Nation [sic]. It will be achieved when everyone enjoys the same degree of protection from environmental and health hazards and equal access to the decisionͲmaking process to have a healthy environment in which to live, learn, and work. 10

1. 2. 3.

3F8F9F9F

The United States Department of Transportation defines three fundamental Environmental Justice principles for the Federal Highway Administration and the Federal Transit Administration as follows:

Have 95 percent of the Strategic Intermodal System in good or better condition. Have 85 percent of other arterials in good or better condition. Strengthen bridges that are either (1) structurally deficient or (2) posted for weight restriction within six years on FDOT facilities. Replace bridges that require structural repair and are more cost effective to replace within nine years on FDOT facilities. Satisfy FDOT’s off system bridge replacement goals.

2. 1.

"Environmental Justice". US EPA. Retrieved 2012Ͳ03Ͳ29.

2Ͳ5

"Overview of Transportation and Environmental Justice". U.S. Department of Transportation. Retrieved 2010Ͳ01Ͳ22.

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

In addition, the objective of the systems preservation and maintenance goal is to provide a transit fleet that meets Federal Transit Administration’s (FTA’s) requirements for system preservation, vehicle age and maintenance.

Federal and state requirements and policies associated with the LRTP’s goals for “Equity in Decision Making” and “System Preservation” were in place before this plan began and are recommended for direct adoption in the plan. The following are new policies to consider.

Table 2Ͳ5 summarizes the performance measures established for preservation, operations and maintenance.

ECONOMIC COMPETITIVENESS This policy requires each new project included in the 2040 Cost Feasible Plan provide a benefitͲtoͲcost ratio. This policy will ensure that all projects are evaluated using consistent criteria in relationship to the economic goals of the plan and are focused on the greatest economic return and efficient allocation of resources.

LRTP IMPLEMENTING POLICIES INTENT

Not all projects that are included in the Cost Feasible Plan may demonstrate benefitͲtoͲcost ratio of greater than 1.0. The intent of the policy is for this to be one of the factors used to support decisionͲmaking.

Adopting more formal policies as part of the LRTP is a first step toward a stronger regional approach to transportation decision making. Establishing these policies is within the context of the role of the North Florida TPO as a policy board in regional planning. The intent is not for the Board to be involved with or direct design decisions. Engineers are the licensed professionals charged with safe and efficient operation of the transportation system. It is inappropriate, for the Board or elected officials to direct elements of roadway design. However, it is appropriate at the policy level to establish the general framework and policy guidelines for the objectives of the project to be constructed.

LIVABILITY TRANSIT INVESTMENT Incorporating a regional livability policy in the LRTP will guide investment decisions to promote transit and mode choices. The Jacksonville Transportation Authority has defined a vision for future transit investments with the 2040 horizon that may include bus rapid transit, trolleys, commuter rail and other modes. The policy intent is to support these investments. In addition to considering transit alternatives, successful transit investments are dependent on walkable access, pedestrianͲoriented design and transitͲoriented design.

As changes to the LRTP or Transportation Improvement Program are considered for adoption by the North Florida TPO, a policy review of the projects should be performed to ensure the proposed investments reflect the values and intent of the goals and objectives within the LRTP. Policies for economic competitiveness, livability, safety, mobility and accessibility were adopted.

CONTEXT SENSITIVE SOLUTIONS A policy in the LRTP that identifies corridors where investments would be made consistent with complete

Table 2Ͳ5. System Preservation Objectives and Performance Measures Objective Performance Measure Benchmark Maintain roadways FDOT condition rating system 95% of SIS roadways in good or better condition 85% of nonͲSIS roadways in good or better condition Maintain bridges FDOT condition rating system Strengthen bridges that are either (1) structurally deficient or (2) posted for weight restriction within six years on FDOT facilities. Replace bridges that require structural repair that more cost effective to replace within nine years on FDOT facilities. Satisfy FDOT’s off system bridge replacement goals. Maintain transit system FTA system preservation Age of vehicles

2Ͳ6

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

street and context sensitive solutions principles is recommended. With the complete streets and context sensitive solutions concept, we are working to change the paradigm from “moving cars quickly” to “providing safe mobility for all modes”.

Implementing these concepts should reflect the context and character of the surrounding built and natural environments. These transportation investments need to be linked to land use and zoning requirements to ensure a consistent urban character. The livability goals include.

SAFETY As part of the Strategic Safety Plan completed in 2012, several strategic safety corridors and intersections on the stateͲmaintained highway system and local roadways were identified. Many safety projects are smaller in scope and costs and can be implemented in a shorter time than major capacity improvements. Safety projects often result in high benefitͲtoͲcost ratios. This policy leverages the plan to identify safety strategies for implanting and advancing projects.

Maximizing the number of lanes to six general use lanes. Any additional lanes would be bus rapid transit or other managed lanes. Investing in each corridor consistent with an urban character defined through the project or adopted from a prior study such as the Neighborhood Vision projects performed by the City of Jacksonville. For example, on some corridors an urban village could be used which would require wider sidewalks and onͲstreet parking or grand boulevards, or “Grand Boulevard” concepts. Grand Boulevards would require bicycle, pedestrians and transit to be considered with equal consideration to automobile mobility. Requiring land use and zoning regulations to be in place by local governments to encourage redevelopment consistent with the urban design characteristics established for the corridor. Establishing prototype corridor concepts for use within designated corridors or areas. The following actions were performed as part of the developing the LRTP.

TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS The policies associated with transit oriented development context sensitive solutions are key elements of the overall mobility and accessibility approach for this plan. In addition, to ensure we are optimizing the efficiency of the network, a Transportation Systems Management and Operations (TSM&O) policy is proposed. TSM&O alternatives should be considered prior to investing in new capacity. These strategies are highly competitive with capacity projects funding in many settings. Examples of TSM&O approaches include:

Integrated corridor management Arterial traffic management systems Bus rapid transit Ramp metering Hard shoulder running Commercial vehicle information systems The following actions were performed within the LRTP process.

The policy built on work being prepared by local agencies within the region that are developing context sensitive solutions, livable communities and low impact development guidelines. A network of context sensitive solutions corridors was identified where context sensitive solutions are considered a priority. A list of context sensitive solutions guidelines was prepared where specific types of investments are encouraged. The guidelines are provided in Technical Memorandum #9 – Context Sensitive Solutions Guidelines. A conceptual evaluation context sensitive solutions were screened and identified projects that are candidates for more detailed evaluation

A TSM&O network that includes the constrained corridors identified in the plan and the congested corridors identified in the Congestion Management Plan are designated. A list of candidate TSM&O strategies and tactics screened and identified for more detailed evaluation during project development phases. TSM&O improvements were included in the 2040 Needs Plan and the Cost Feasible Plan. This page is intentionally blank. 2Ͳ7

during project development phases were identified. Context sensitive solutions improvements were included in the 2040 Needs Plan and 2040 Cost Feasible Plan.

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

2Í˛8

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

CONSISTENCY WITH FEDERAL AND STATE PLANS T HE P ATH F ORWARD 2040 LRTP CONSIDERS THE REQUIREMENTS OF KEY LEGISLATIVE , STATEWIDE POLICIES , GOALS AND OBJECTIVES AND IS CONSISTENT WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF F EDERAL AND S TATE LEGISLATION . MOVING AHEAD FOR PROGRESS IN THE 21ST CENTURY 12

1F1F

Congress passed the act entitled Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAPͲ21) in 2012 which establishes national performance goals for Federal highway programs and include:

Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan areas, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity and efficiency. Increase the safety and security of the transportation system for motorized and nonͲ motorized users to achieve a significant reduction in

12 Adapted from http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/tpr_and_nepa/tpran dnepa.cfm

2Ͳ9

traffic fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads. Increase the accessibility and mobility of people and freight to achieve a significant reduction in congestion on the National Highway System. Improve the efficiency of the surface transportation system. Improve the national freight network, strengthen the ability of rural communities to access national and international trade markets, and support regional economic development. Enhance the performance of the transportation system while protecting and enhancing the natural environment.

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

As part of MAPͲ21, the following new policies related to metropolitan planning were identified:

LRTPs and Transportation Improvement Programs (TIPs) are required to be developed through a performanceͲbased approach. As part of the performanceͲbased planning approach: o Performance measures that support national goals are required. o Targets are required with monitoring toward attaining the performance measures. o Targets should be established in coordination with other state or public transportation agencies. o Targets are required to be integrated into the continuing planning process. o The performance measures should be included in the LRTP and show the progress that is anticipated to be achieved by planned investments and decision making. System Performance Reports are required that describe the progress made toward achieving the performance targets. o The U.S. Department of Transportation will establish the minimum condition levels for all highways on the Interstate System and bridges on the National Highway System. Within two years of enacting MAPͲ21, each MPO shall include representation by transportation providers, including public transit systems. Table 2Ͳ6 demonstrates how these goals and objectives are consistent with the federal requirements in MAPͲ21. Table 2Ͳ7 outlines the Federal planning requirements as enumerated in CFR 450.322 and provides references to how each of the planning requirements is addressed. The public involvement requirements from Federal and state legislation and policies are discussed in greater detail in the Public Involvement section.

2Ͳ10

Objective

Optimize the quantity of travel

Reduce facilities

Preserve and maintain our existing system

Enhance equity in decision making

Satisfy FDOT’s off system bridge replacement goals

Meet FTA transit system maintenance requirements

Meet the FDOT bridge condition goals

2Ͳ11

9 9 9

Meet the FDOT pavement condition goals

9 9 9

Prevent the denial of benefits to minority and lowͲ income populations

9 9

Protect and enhance the environment

9 9 9 9 9 9

9 9 9 9

Improve the national freight network 9

Ensure fair participation by all affected populations

Avoid disproportionately adverse impacts on minority or lowͲincome populations

Optimize the utilization of the system

9 9 9 9

9 9 9 9 9 9

9 9 9 9 9 9 9

Reduce crashes

Reduce emissions from automobiles

Reduce the impacts of improvements on the natural environment

9 9

Reduce the cost of congestion per capita

9 9 9

9 9 9 9

Improve efficiency

Increase accessibility and mobility

Increase safety and security

Support economic vitality

Enhance bicycle and pedestrian quality of service

Enhance transit ridership

Enhance mobility and Optimize the quality of travel accessibility Improve the accessibility to mode choices

Enhance safety

Invest in livable communities and sustainable communities

Enhance transit accessibility

Invest in projects that Improve travel time reliability on major freight routes enhance economic Enhance access to jobs competitiveness Maximize the return on investment

Goal

Table 2Ͳ6. Traceability Matrix

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Table 2Ͳ7. Federal Planning Requirements Planning Requirement (a) The metropolitan transportation planning process shall include the development of a transportation plan addressing no less than a 20Ͳyear planning horizon as of the effective date. In nonattainment and maintenance areas, the effective date of the transportation plan shall be the date of a conformity determination issued by the FHWA and the FTA. In attainment areas, the effective date of the transportation plan shall be its date of adoption by the MPO. (b) The transportation plan shall include both longͲrange and shortͲrange strategies/actions that lead to the development of an integrated multimodal transportation system to facilitate the safe and efficient movement of people and goods in addressing current and future transportation demand. (c) The MPO shall review and update the transportation plan at least every four years in air quality nonattainment and maintenance areas and at least every five years in attainment areas to confirm the transportation plan's validity and consistency with current and forecasted transportation and land use conditions and trends and to extend the forecast period to at least a 20Ͳyear planning horizon. In addition, the MPO may revise the transportation plan at any time using the procedures in this section without a requirement to extend the horizon year. The transportation plan (and any revisions) shall be approved by the MPO and submitted for information purposes to the Governor. Copies of any updated or revised transportation plans must be provided to the FHWA and the FTA. (d) In metropolitan areas that are in nonattainment for ozone or carbon monoxide, the MPO shall coordinate the development of the metropolitan transportation plan with the process for developing transportation control measures in a State Implementation Plan. (e) The MPO, the State(s), and the public transportation operator(s) shall validate data utilized in preparing other existing modal plans for providing input to the transportation plan. In updating the transportation plan, the MPO shall base the update on the latest available estimates and assumptions for population, land use, travel, employment, congestion, and economic activity. The MPO shall approve transportation plan contents and supporting analyses produced by a transportation plan update.

Action Taken The plan addresses a horizon of 2040. A maintenance plan is not required in this airshed based on Section 185A of the Clean Air Act Amendments and the adopted State Implementation Plan.

ShortͲ and longͲrange strategies were evaluated that included safety and TSM&O strategies.

This is an update to the 2035 LongͲRange Transportation Plan. Not applicable.

Not applicable.

Extensive coordination with all state and local transportation agencies including the Jacksonville Transportation Authority was performed in the development of the plan as outlined in the public involvement section. A travel demand model was prepared as part of the planning process that included information on the population, land use, travel, employment, congestion and economic activity. These data were reviewed and approved by the local agencies and the North Florida TPO.

2Ͳ12

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Table 2Ͳ7. Federal Planning Requirements Planning Requirement Action Taken (f) The metropolitan transportation plan shall, at a minimum, include: (1) The projected transportation demand of persons and A regional travel demand model was developed that goods in the metropolitan planning area over the period of included a freight analysis and forecasts through the year the transportation plan. 2040. (2) Existing and proposed transportation facilities (including A comprehensive evaluation of all regional multimodal major roadways, transit, multimodal and intermodal needs was conducted as part of the planning process. As facilities, pedestrian walkways and bicycle facilities, and documented in this report, an inventory of major roadways, intermodal connectors) that should function as an transit, multimodal and intermodal facilities, pedestrian integrated metropolitan transportation system, giving walkways and bicycle facilities, and intermodal connectors emphasis to those facilities that serve important national was completed and the needs were identified. and regional transportation functions over the period of the transportation plan. In addition, the locally preferred alternative selected from an Transit projects are identified in the plan. Projects where project development has begun and projects with plans to Alternatives Analysis under the FTA's Capital Investment conduct alternatives analysis phases are also identified. Grant program (49 U.S.C. 5309 and 49 CFR part 611) needs to be adopted as part of the metropolitan transportation plan as a condition for funding under 49 U.S.C. 5309. (3) Operational and management strategies to improve the A regional ITS and TSM&O Master Plan was adopted as part performance of existing transportation facilities to relieve of the Needs Plan and funding will be allocated on an vehicular congestion and maximize the safety and mobility annual basis to address needs within the plan. of people and goods. (4) Consideration of the results of the congestion The congestion management process was used to identify management process in Transportation Management Areas needs and alternative strategies to address congestion. that meet the requirements of this subpart, including the identification of singleͲoccupancy vehicle projects that result from a congestion management process in Transportation Management Areas that are nonattainment for ozone or carbon monoxide. (5) Assessment of capital investment and other strategies to Operations and maintenance of the region’s infrastructure preserve the existing and projected future metropolitan was addressed and funding was allocated within this plan. transportation infrastructure and provide for multimodal capacity increases based on regional priorities and needs. The metropolitan transportation plan may consider projects An analysis of the regional congestion management plan and strategies that address areas or corridors where current and process was used to identify system bottlenecks and or projected congestion threatens the efficient functioning of needs. key elements of the metropolitan area's transportation system. (6) Design concept and design scope descriptions of all The purpose and need for each project is summarized for existing and proposed transportation facilities in sufficient projects. Cost estimates were included based on prior detail, regardless of funding source, in nonattainment and studies for most of the projects included in the plan. maintenance areas for conformity determinations under the Where project costs estimates were not available, generic EPA's transportation conformity rule (40 CFR part 93). In all cost estimates were used based on FDOT historical data. These are provided in Appendix K. areas (regardless of air quality designation), all proposed improvements shall be described in sufficient detail to develop cost estimates.

2Ͳ13

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Table 2Ͳ7. Federal Planning Requirements Planning Requirement (7) A discussion of types of potential environmental mitigation activities and potential areas to carry out these activities, including activities that may have the greatest potential to restore and maintain the environmental functions affected by the metropolitan transportation plan. The discussion may focus on policies, programs, or strategies, rather than at the project level. The discussion shall be developed in consultation with Federal, State, and Tribal land management, wildlife, and regulatory agencies. The MPO may establish reasonable timeframes for performing this consultation. (8) Pedestrian walkway and bicycle transportation facilities in accordance with 23 U.S.C. 217(g);

Action Taken A systemwide approach to environmental mitigation activities are identified in the plan. Estimates for mitigation costs were provided for projects as part of the plan. The Efficient Transportation Decision Making Process established by FDOT was used to identify an inventory of issues that may be associated with each corridor. The FDOT has established procedures for addressing all mitigation issues in consultation with agencies as part of the Project Development and Environment (PD&E) process.

(9) Transportation and transit enhancement activities, as appropriate; and (10) A financial plan that demonstrates how the adopted transportation plan can be implemented. (i) For purposes of transportation system operations and maintenance, the financial plan shall contain systemͲlevel estimates of costs and revenue sources that are reasonably expected to be available to adequately operate and maintain FederalͲaid highways (as defined by 23 U.S.C. 101(a)(5)) and public transportation (as defined by title 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53). (ii) For the purpose of developing the metropolitan transportation plan, the MPO, public transportation operator(s), and State shall cooperatively develop estimates of funds that will be available to support metropolitan transportation plan implementation, as required under §450.314(a). All necessary financial resources from public and private sources that are reasonably expected to be made available to carry out the transportation plan shall be identified. (iii) The financial plan shall include recommendations on any additional financing strategies to fund projects and programs included in the metropolitan transportation plan. In the case of new funding sources, strategies for ensuring their availability shall be identified.

Pedestrian and bicycle improvements are addressed in the plan as part of the Active Transportation discussion. Dedicated funding was set aside for bicycle and pedestrian projects. Projects that are candidates for context sensitive solutions and transit accessibility and mobility enhancements are also identified. Transit and transit mobility enhancement improvements are addressed in the plan. A financial plan was prepared and is documented in this plan. SystemͲlevel estimates of operations and maintenance costs were identified for state roads, local roads and transit and are documented in this report.

Federal and state funding program estimates were provided in consultation with FDOT. These revenues are summarized in this report. Through consultation with the Jacksonville Transportation Authority, estimates of local match and operations and maintenance costs for each project were developed for transit.

A financial plan was prepared that included alternative revenue sources. While developing the plan, alternatives for additional financing beyond those that are currently in place were not advanced to the Cost Feasible Plan stage. Toll revenues anticipated to fund the future First Coast Expressway were also estimated. LocallyͲfunded and privatelyͲfunded projects of regional significance were also identified.

2Ͳ14

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Table 2Ͳ7. Federal Planning Requirements Planning Requirement (iv) In developing the financial plan, the MPO shall take into account all projects and strategies proposed for funding under title 23 U.S.C., title 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53 or with other Federal funds; State assistance; local sources; and private participation. Starting December 11, 2007, revenue and cost estimates that support the metropolitan transportation plan must use an inflation rate(s) to reflect “year of expenditure dollars,” based on reasonable financial principles and information, developed cooperatively by the MPO, State(s), and public transportation operator(s). (v) For the outer years of the metropolitan transportation plan (i.e., beyond the first 10 years), the financial plan may reflect aggregate cost ranges/cost bands, as long as the future funding source(s) is reasonably expected to be available to support the projected cost ranges/cost bands. (vi) For nonattainment and maintenance areas, the financial plan shall address the specific financial strategies required to ensure the implementation of traffic control measures in the applicable State Implementation Plan. (vii) For illustrative purposes, the financial plan may (but is not required to) include additional projects that would be included in the adopted transportation plan if additional resources beyond those identified in the financial plan were to become available. (viii) In cases that the FHWA and the FTA find a metropolitan transportation plan to be fiscally constrained and a revenue source is subsequently removed or substantially reduced (i.e., by legislative or administrative actions), the FHWA and the FTA will not withdraw the original determination of fiscal constraint; however, in such cases, the FHWA and the FTA will not act on an updated or amended metropolitan transportation plan that does not reflect the changed revenue situation. (g) The MPO shall consult, as appropriate, with State and local agencies responsible for land use management, natural resources, environmental protection, conservation, and historic preservation concerning the development of the transportation plan. The consultation shall involve (1) Comparison of transportation plans with State conservation plans or maps, if available; or (2) Comparison of transportation plans to inventories of natural or historic resources, if available.

Action Taken The Cost Feasible Plan was developed using year of expenditure dollars and inflation rates provided by FDOT. All values in this report are expressed in the yearͲofͲ expenditure, unless otherwise noted.

Funding bands of 2019Ͳ2020, 2021Ͳ2025, 2026Ͳ2030 and 2031Ͳ2040 were used.

A maintenance plan is not required in this airshed based on Section 185A of the Clean Air Act Amendments and the adopted State Implementation Plan. A needs plan was developed that identifies the illustrative projects that would be included if additional resources were available. Illustrative projects that were not funded for construction but funded for preliminary engineering phases only are also summarized in the plan. Not applicable. This process is address in the plan maintenance phase.

Extensive coordination with agencies was performed as part of the planning process and is summarized in this report.

Conservation areas were identified as part of the planning process and are shown on the plan maps. A comparison was performed through the Efficient Transportation Decision Making Process.

2Ͳ15

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Table 2Ͳ7. Federal Planning Requirements Planning Requirement (h) The metropolitan transportation plan should include a safety element that incorporates or summarizes the priorities, goals, countermeasures, or projects for the MPA contained in the Strategic Highway Safety Plan required under 23 U.S.C. 148, as well as (as appropriate) emergency relief and disaster preparedness plans and strategies and policies that support homeland security (as appropriate) and safeguard the personal security of all motorized and nonͲ motorized users. (i) The MPO shall provide citizens, affected public agencies, representatives of public transportation employees, freight shippers, providers of freight transportation services, private providers of transportation, representatives of users of public transportation, representatives of users of pedestrian walkways and bicycle transportation facilities, representatives of the disabled, and other interested parties with a reasonable opportunity to comment on the transportation plan using the participation plan developed under §450.316(a). (j) The metropolitan transportation plan shall be published or otherwise made readily available by the MPO for public review, including (to the maximum extent practicable) in electronically accessible formats and means, such as the World Wide Web. (k) A State or MPO shall not be required to select any project from the illustrative list of additional projects included in the financial plan under paragraph (f)(10) of this section.

(l) In nonattainment and maintenance areas for transportationͲrelated pollutants, the MPO, as well as the FHWA and the FTA, must make a conformity determination on any updated or amended transportation plan in accordance with the Clean Air Act and the EPA transportation conformity regulations (40 CFR part 93). During a conformity lapse, MPOs can prepare an interim metropolitan transportation plan as a basis for advancing projects that are eligible to proceed under a conformity lapse. An interim metropolitan transportation plan consisting of eligible projects from, or consistent with, the most recent conforming transportation plan and Transportation Improvement Program may proceed immediately without revisiting the requirements of this section, subject to interagency consultation defined in 40 CFR part 93. An interim metropolitan transportation plan containing eligible projects that are not from, or consistent with, the most recent conforming transportation plan and Transportation Improvement Program must meet all the requirements of this section.

Action Taken The region recently adopted a Strategic Safety Plan and the needs identified in the plan are summarized in this plan. Funding will be allocated on an annual basis for selected projects in consultation with FDOT. Emergency relief and disaster preparedness plans were prepared by the Regional Planning Council and considered as part of the plan. Evaluation routes received a priority designation as part of the prioritization process. The North Florida TPO Board, Technical Advisory Board and Citizens Advisory Board were consulted through the plan development. These boards include representatives of all users. A project steering committee was also established which included additional members. The participation of these interest groups is documented in greater detail in Technical Memorandum #1 – Public Involvement and summarized in this report.

A project web site was established for the project and all materials were made available to the public for review. The project web site is http://pathforward2040.com/.

All projects were adopted by the North Florida TPO. Two projects were excluded from consideration in the Cost Feasible Plan based on the potential environmental impacts. These projects are documented in the Environmental Considerations section. A maintenance plan is not required in this airshed based on Section 185A of the Clean Air Act Amendments and the State Implementation Plan.

2Ͳ16

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

FLORIDA TRANSPORTATION PLAN The 2060 Florida Transportation Plan was adopted in 2010 and creates a shared vision for the future of transportation in Florida and the goals, objectives and strategies to achieve this vision over the next 50 years.

Goal: Make transportation decisions to promote responsible environmental stewardship

Goal: Invest in transportation systems to support a prosperous, globally competitive economy

Maximize Florida’s position as a strategic hub for international and domestic trade, visitors and investment by developing, enhancing, and funding Florida’s Strategic Intermodal System. Improve transportation connectivity for people and freight to establish emerging regional employment centers in rural and urban areas. Plan and develop transportation systems to provide adequate connectivity to economically productive rural lands. Invest in transportation capacity improvements to meet future demand for moving people and freight. Be a worldwide leader in developing and implementing innovative transportation technologies and systems.

Goal: Provide a safe and secure transportation system for all users

Goal: Improve mobility and connectivity for people and freight

Goal: Make transportation decisions to support and enhance livable communities

Develop transportation plans and make investments to support the goals of the Florida Transportation Plan and other statewide plans, as well as regional and community visions and plans. Coordinate transportation investments with other public and private decisions to foster livable communities. Coordinate transportation and land use decisions to support livable rural and urban communities.

2Ͳ17

Eliminate fatalities and minimize injuries on the transportation system. Improve the security of Florida’s transportation system. Improve Florida’s ability to use the transportation system to respond to emergencies and security risks.

Plan and develop transportation systems and facilities in a manner which protects and, where feasible, restores the function and character of the natural environment and avoids or minimizes adverse environmental impacts. Plan and develop transportation systems to reduce energy consumption, improve air quality, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

Expand transportation options for residents, visitors and businesses. Reinforce and transform Florida’s Strategic Intermodal System to provide multimodal options for moving people and freight. Develop and operate a statewide high speed and intercity passenger rail system connecting all regions of the state and linking to public transportation systems in rural and urban areas. Expand and integrate regional public transit systems in Florida’s urban areas. Increase the efficiency and reliability of travel for people and freight. Integrate modal infrastructure, technologies, and payment systems to provide seamless connectivity for passenger and freight trips from origin to destination.

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

STATE PLANNING REQUIREMENTS The state planning principles to be considered in the LRTP: preserving the existing transportation infrastructure; enhancing Florida’s economic competitiveness; and improving travel choices to ensure mobility. Table 2Ͳ8. State Planning Requirements Planning Requirement Each MPO must develop a longͲrange transportation plan that addresses at least a 20Ͳyear planning horizon. The plan must include both longͲrange and shortͲrange strategies and must comply with all other state and federal requirements. The prevailing principles to be considered in the longͲ range transportation plan are: preserving the existing transportation infrastructure; enhancing Florida’s economic competitiveness; and improving travel choices to ensure mobility. The longͲrange transportation plan must be consistent, to the maximum extent feasible, with future land use elements and the goals, objectives, and policies of the approved local government comprehensive plans of the units of local government located within the jurisdiction of the MPO Each MPO is encouraged to consider strategies that integrate transportation and land use planning to provide for sustainable development and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The approved longͲrange transportation plan must be considered by local governments while developing the transportation elements in local government comprehensive plans and any amendments thereto. (a) Identify transportation facilities, including, but not limited to major roadways, airports, seaports, spaceports, commuter rail systems, transit systems, and intermodal or multimodal terminals that will function as an integrated metropolitan transportation system. The longͲrange transportation plan must give emphasis to those transportation facilities that serve national, statewide or regional functions. The plan must consider the goals and objectives identified in the Florida Transportation Plan as provided in s. 339.155. If a project is located within the boundaries of more than one MPO, the MPOs must coordinate plans regarding the project in the longͲrange transportation plan.

Table 2Ͳ8 summarizes the state planning requirements and how they addressed in this plan.

Action Taken The plan addresses a 22Ͳyear horizon. LongͲrange and shortͲrange strategies such as TSM&O were considered. The prevailing principles were adopted as part of our goals and objectives. Future land use forecasts were made in consultation with local governments and adopted by the North Florida TPO. Two land use scenarios were developed during the planning process. The North Florida TPO adopted a livability policy as part of the plan and Active Transportation strategies including Context Sensitive Solutions were identified. The approved longͲrange transportation plan was developed through coordination with local governments and is consistent with the local government land use plans and capital improvement programs. A comprehensive evaluation of all regional multimodal needs was conducted as part of the planning process. As documented in this report, an inventory of major roadways, transit, multimodal and intermodal facilities, pedestrian walkways and bicycle facilities, and intermodal connectors. No projects identified in the plan are located in another metropolitan area.

2Ͳ18

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Table 2Ͳ8. State Planning Requirements Planning Requirement Action Taken (b) Include a financial plan that demonstrates how the A financial plan was prepared that included alternative plan can be implemented, indicating resources from revenue sources. While developing the plan, alternatives public and private sources which are reasonably expected for additional financing beyond those that are currently in place were not advanced to the Cost Feasible Plan. Toll to be available to carry out the plan, and recommends revenues anticipated to be available to fund the future any additional financing strategies for needed projects First Coast Expressway were also estimated. and programs. The financial plan may include, for illustrative purposes, additional projects that would be included in the adopted longͲrange transportation plan if reasonable additional resources beyond those identified in the financial plan were available. For the purpose of developing the longͲrange transportation plan, the MPO and the department shall cooperatively develop estimates of funds that will be available to support the plan implementation. Innovative financing techniques may be used to fund needed projects and programs. Such techniques may include the assessment of tolls, the use of value capture financing, or the use of value pricing. (c) Assess capital investment and other measures necessary to: 1. Ensure the preservation of the existing metropolitan Goals and objectives associated with the preservation of transportation system including requirements for the the existing transportation system were included. The operation, resurfacing, restoration, and rehabilitation of anticipated costs for operations and maintenance of the major roadways and requirements for the operation, state and local transportation systems are documented maintenance, modernization and rehabilitation of public in the plan. transportation facilities; and 2. Make the most efficient use of existing TSM&O strategies and a dedicated funding source for transportation facilities to relieve vehicular congestion these projects were identified. and maximize the mobility of people and goods. (d) Indicate, as appropriate, proposed transportation Pedestrian and bicycle improvements are addressed in enhancement activities, including, but not limited to, the plan as part of the Active Transportation discussion. Dedicated funding was set aside for bicycle and pedestrian and bicycle facilities, scenic easements, pedestrian projects. Projects that are candidates for landscaping, historic preservation, mitigation of water context sensitive solutions and transit accessibility and pollution due to highway runoff, and control of outdoor mobility enhancements are also identified. advertising. Not applicable. (e) In addition to the requirements of paragraphs (a)Ͳ (d), in metropolitan areas that are classified as nonattainment areas for ozone or carbon monoxide, the MPO must coordinate the development of the longͲrange transportation plan with the State Implementation Plan developed pursuant to the requirements of the federal Clean Air Act. In the development of its longͲrange transportation plan, The North Florida TPO, Technical Coordinating each MPO must provide the public, affected public Committee and Citizens Advisory Committee were agencies, representatives of transportation agency consulted through the plan development. These boards employees, freight shippers, providers of freight include representations of all users. A project steering transportation services, private providers of committee was also established which included transportation, representatives of users of public transit, additional members. The participation of these interest groups is documented in greater in the section on public and other interested parties with a reasonable involvement. opportunity to comment on the longͲrange transportation plan. The longͲrange transportation plan must be approved by the MPO 2Ͳ19

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

This page is intentionally blank.

2Í˛20

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

SAFETY AND SECURITY T HE SAFETY OF OUR TRAVELING PUBLIC IS THE NUMBER ONE PRIORITY OF THE PLANNING PROCESS . M ORE PEOPLE DIE OF TRAFFIC CRASHES EACH YEAR IN OUR REGION THAN FROM HOMICIDES . negative impact to lives and economic productivity contribute to the region’s economic competitiveness and quality of life.

TRAFFIC CRASHES Traffic crashes unnecessarily claim the lives of residents of North Florida each year. More people die from traffic crashes each year than homicides. From 2005Ͳ2010, 1,288 fatal crashes occurred versus 715 homicides in the fourͲcounty metropolitan area. But it is homicides that make the news headlines. During that same period an additional 81,404 persons were injured in vehicle crashes.

A Strategic Safety Plan was adopted by the North Florida TPO in 2012 and is included in Appendix A. The Strategic Safety Plan identified priority locations (corridors and intersections) that were determined to be of the most significant concern for the safety of the drivers and vulnerable road users (bicyclists and pedestrians). These locations were identified based on the severity of the crashes using the economic cost of the crashes and the total frequency of crashes.

Based on data provided by the Texas Transportation Institute, crashes cause 53 percent of all delays or 7 hours per resident each year in our region in lost economic productivity. The economic costs of traffic crashes in our region exceeded $5 billion annually in medical costs, lost productivity, travel delays, workplace costs, insurance costs, and legal costs. These economic losses are approximately 8 percent of the $60.3 billion gross product of the metropolitan statistical area. The

The 20Ͳhighest ranked locations based on the severity of crashes included segments of, and intersections with, SR 21 Blanding Boulevard, SR 134 103rd Street/Timuquana Road, IͲ295, Ricker Road, Harlow Boulevard, Firestone Road, Old Middleburg Road, Morse Avenue, Rampart Road, SR 228 Normandy Boulevard, Collins Road, CR 220 Doctors Inlet and CR 209 Russell Road. 2Ͳ21

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

When the total frequency of crashes was considered (without weighting the severity of crashes), the following additional priority corridors and intersections were identified: SR 212 Beach Boulevard, SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard, SR 115 Southside Boulevard, SR 202 J. T. Butler Boulevard and SR 109 University Boulevard.

infrastructure interdependencies, as well as information sharing and publicͲprivate partnering. Together these factors aid in the focus and direction of the Regional Domestic Security Task Forces. The Jacksonville Transportation Authority maintains a Transit Safety and Security Plan as part of their operations.

Because of the close relationship of congestion and safety, congestion management priority corridors which will be discussed in the following section are also shown on Figure 2Ͳ1.

These plans were evaluated and coordinated as part of the planning process.

Construction projects are currently planned on many of the highest ranked priority corridors and intersections. Many of these projects include reconstruction, widening, resurfacing, signalization and access management improvements to address the safety needs.

EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS The Northeast Florida Regional Council coordinates the preparation of a Local Mitigation Strategy with each county to reduce and/or eliminate the risks associated with natural and manͲmade hazards. These plans are prepared in accordance with the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000. This Act is a mechanism for collaboration between state and local entities that encourages preͲ disaster planning, recognizes need for mitigation, and designates funding for projects through Federal grant opportunities. The Florida Division of Emergency Management Mitigation Planning Unit assists counties in the update and review process of the local mitigation strategy. They serve as a resource for technical advice, knowledge of funding sources, and general information regarding hazard mitigation. Without an approved local mitigation strategy a county will not be able to apply for many Federal grants. The Local Mitigation Strategy must be updated every five years to remain compliant.

SECURITY Security planning is addressed through seven Regional Domestic Security Task Forces within the State of Florida. Each Regional Domestic Security Task Forces consists of local representatives from disciplines involved in prevention and response. They are each composed of separate SubͲCommittees (with Chairs & CoͲChairs) that include law enforcement, fire/rescue, emergency medical services, emergency management, hospitals, public health, schools and businesses. The Regional Domestic Security Task Forces work together with the Chief of Domestic Security, to prepare for, prevent and respond to terrorist events. The Northeast Florida Regional Council currently has a Florida Division of Law Enforcement and Florida Division of Emergency Management Planner assigned to the region to help push the State strategy.

As part of this plan evacuation routes were reviewed to assess needs. Designated evacuation routes received a priority consideration in developing the Cost Feasible Plan.

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security and its lead agency for disaster readiness and response, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, has implemented new program initiatives that involve a holistic approach to both disaster readiness and response, and combating terrorism, and are therefore supportive of the national concept of “All Hazards Resilience” and the three closely related factors that necessitate development of a holistic, regional approach to allͲhazards resilience that involves engaging the broad stakeholder communityͲ

In the event of a disaster, the Jacksonville Transportation Authority has a management plan to providing emergency evacuation, paratransit transport, moving emergency service personnel and/or civilian relocation via mass transit.

2Ͳ22

Âą

0 1.5 3

Miles

LEGEND

! ?

Safety Plan - Intersections Congestion Management Plan - Facilities Safety Plan - Facilities Other Roads Conservation Areas North Florida TPO Governing Counties Additional Counties Considered for the LRTP Water Bodies

! ?

! ? ! ? ! ? ! ?

! ? ! ? ! ?

! ? ! ? ?! ? ?! ?! ! ? !

! ? ! ? ! ? ! ? ! ? ! ?

! ? ! ?

! ? ?? ! !! ? ! ? ?!

! !? ?

! ?

! ? ! ?

! ? ! ? ! ? ! ? ! ? ! ?

! ?

)LJXUH 3ULRULW\ 6DIHW\ DQG &RQJHVWLRQ 0DQDJHPHQW 6\VWHP &RUULGRUV 2-23

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

This page is intentionally left blank.

2Í˛24

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROCESS A DDRESSING CONGESTION ON OUR ROADWAY SYSTEM IS THE MOST VISIBLE ELEMENT OF THE LRTP. C ONGESTION IN N ORTH F LORIDA COSTS OUR REGION $526 MILLION IN LOST PRODUCTIVITY EACH YEAR . Recurring congestion has staggering social and economic costs. More than $316 million are lost each year by travelers due to the lost time and excess fuel consumption associated with delays. When congestion resulting from crashes is considered, the total costs of congestion are $526 million. This amounts to 13 hours or $400 per year for each of our region’s 1.3 million residents.

Although transit use in North Florida continues to be less than one percent of all person travel miles, transit use continues to rise with a 1.8 percent annual increase from 2011 to 2012. Since 2008, transit use in the area has increased by 30.8 percent. The reduction in automobile use and increase in transit use combined with the opening of 62 additional lane miles of highways between 2008 and 2012 resulted in significant benefits in the quality of travel within the region. Average speeds during the peak periods improved by 2.73 percent from 2008 to 2012 and 0.65 percent from 2011 to 2012. These average speeds resulted in a positive economic impact to the local economy of $280 million per year.

From 2008 to 2012, automobile use declined within the region by 5.7 percent. This decline in vehicle use is the result of the economic downturn, changing travel patterns associated with an aging population and younger drivers’ reduced automobile dependence. The exception to this reduction is the recent increase in the truck miles traveled within the region. Over the last five years, truck traffic declined by 16.4 percent. From 2011 to 2012 truck traffic increased 1.6 reflecting the beginning of the economic recovery.

2Ͳ25

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

However, vehicle use and travel is anticipated to increase in the region for the next five years as a result of the economic recovery and regional growth. The demand for travel is anticipated to return to preͲ recession levels by the year 2018 and improvements to enhance our mobility are needed to meet these needs.

By the year 2040, the traffic volumes will increase by oneͲthird within the region as a result of the growth in population and economic activity. Although driving (alone or with other passengers) is still anticipated to account for about 85 percent of all trips within the region, because of the aging population and changes in preferences from the millennial generation who wish to drive less, the percent of trips made by persons walking is anticipated to increase from 8.4 percent within the region to 9.4 percent, a 14 percent change. According to the American Planning Association’s 2014 National Poll, 81 percent of millennials and 77 percent of active boomers say “affordable and convenient alternatives to the car are at least somewhat important in deciding where to live and work.” These changes in travel preferences will require a multimodal approach to addressing our transportation needs in 2040. Without investments in transportation, travel conditions are anticipated to worsen. By the year 2040, travel times are anticipated to increase by nearly 20 percent. In 2013, the North Florida TPO completed a Congestion Management Plan. The plan developed performance measures and analyzed mobility trends and conditions. The Congestion Management Plan identified congested corridors and recommended strategies and tactics to address these corridors. As part of developing the Congestion Management, corridors that are currently severely congested (operating at level of service E or F) and constrained were identified. These corridors are shown on Figure 2Ͳ1 (in the prior section). Because of the close relationship of congestion and safety, priority safety corridors are also shown on this map. The corridors are summarized in Table 2Ͳ9. An annual mobility report is prepared each year as part of the congestion management process established in the Congestion Management Plan. The Congestion Management Plan and the 2014 Annual Mobility Report is attached as Appendix B.

2Ͳ26

Table 2Ͳ9. Congested Facilities County Name of Name Area Clay Clay County St. Johns St. Johns County Clay Clay County Clay Clay County St. Johns St. Johns County Duval Jacksonville St. Johns St. Johns County Duval Jacksonville Clay Orange Park Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville St. Johns St. Johns County Nassau Nassau County Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville Beach Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville Beach Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville St. Johns St Augustine Duval Jacksonville Clay Middleburg St. Johns St. Johns County Duval Jacksonville Clay Orange Park Duval Jacksonville Duval Neptune Beach Duval Jacksonville Beach Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville College Drive CR 210 Corona Road Suzanne Avenue SR 224 Kingsley Avenue Solana Road St. Johns Bluff Road CR 210 Palm Valley Road SR 202 J. T. Butler Boulevard SR 224 Kingsley Avenue IͲ95 SR 202 J. T. Butler Boulevard Racetrack Road US 17 SR 5 US 1 Philips Highway US 90 Beach Boulevard SR 116 Monument Road SR 109 University Boulevard Loretto Road SR 228 Hart Bridge Expressway 19th Street IͲ295 SR 152 Baymeadows Road Clay County Line SR 207 SR 228 Emerson Expressway CR 218 SR 312 SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard Wells Road IͲ295 Ramp to A1A St. Johns County Line St. Johns Bluff Road US 1 Philips Highway

SR 21 Blanding Boulevard SR A1A SR 21 Blanding Boulevard SR 21 Blanding Boulevard SR A1A SR 212 Atlantic Boulevard SR A1A SR 115 Southside Boulevard US 17 SR 109 University Boulevard IͲ95 SR 13 SR AIA SR 202 J.T. Butler Boulevard SR A1A Third Street SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard IͲ95 SR 13 San Jose Boulevard US 90 Beach Boulevard SR A1A Third Street SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard US 1 SR 5 Philips Highway SR 21 Blanding Boulevard US 1 IͲ95 SR21 Blanding Boulevard US 1 SR 10 US 17 Rail Connector/Pritchard Road SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard SR A1A Third Street IͲ295 SR 152 Baymeadows Road 2Ͳ27

From Location

Facility

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Suzanne Avenue Solana Road SR 224 Kingsley Ave Duval County Line Duval County Line Girvin Road CR 210 Corona Road Beach Boulevard Wells Road US 90 Beach Boulevard Bowden Road Duval County Line CR 107 Blackrock Road IͲ95 19th Street IͲ295 Emerson Expressway IͲ295 Southside Boulevard 34th Street St. Johns Bluff Road SR 202 J. T. Butler Boulevard IͲ295 King Street Atlantic Boulevard Ramps North City Limit Ͳ Palmetto Street SR 207 SR 5 Exit Downtown Duval County Line Old Kings Road West A1A Junction 34th Avenue US 90 Beach Boulevard IͲ95

To Location

Table 2Ͳ9. Congested Facilities County Name of Name Area St. Johns St Augustine St. Johns St Augustine Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville Clay Orange Park Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville St. Johns St Augustine Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville Clay Orange Park Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville St. Johns St. Johns County Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville Duval Neptune Beach

Facility Orange Street SR A1A Bridge of Lions Ocean Street Girvin Road SR 109 University Boulevard IͲ295 Elbow Road IͲ295 SR 115 Southside Boulevard IͲ95 SR 152 Baymeadows Road SR 129 McDuff Avenue Stockton Street Ramps SR 228/US 17 Old St Augustine Road US 1 IͲ10 Arlington Road North Doctors Lake Drive SR 115 Southside Boulevard IͲ295 St. Johns County SR 109 Cesery Boulevard Church Road IͲ95 Lewis Point Road Bowden Road SR 5 Downtown Exit SR 152 Baymeadows Road Belle Rive Boulevard US 90 Beach Boulevard IͲ95 Hodges Boulevard SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard

From Location

May Street SR A1A US 17 Main Street San Pablo Road Haines Street Expressway Kernan Boulevard SR 224 Kingsley Avenue SR 134 103rd Street IͲ295 Old Baymeadows Road US 1 Philips Highway US 17 Roosevelt Boulevard IͲ95 Stockton Street Ramps SR 13 San Jose Boulevard Cordova Street Commonwealth Avenue SR 109 Cesery Boulevard US 17 Arlington Road SR 115 Southside Boulevard Loretto Road SR 109 University Boulevard SR A1A SR 228 Emerson Expressway SR 312 SR 109 University Boulevard IͲ10 Fuller Warren Bridge SR 202 J. T. Butler Boulevard SR 152 Baymeadows Road SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard SR 115 Southside Boulevard San Pablo Parkway Seagate Avenue

To Location

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

San Marco Avenue SR A1A Bridge of Lions Ocean Street SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard SR 115 Mathews Bridge Expressway US 90 Beach Boulevard US 17 SR 21 Blanding Boulevard US 90 Beach Boulevard SR 152 Baymeadows Road IͲ295 IͲ10 IͲ10 IͲ10 IͲ295 King Street IͲ295 SR 115 Arlington Expressway SR 224 Kingsley Avenue SR 115 Arlington Expressway US 1 Philips Highway SR 13 San Jose Boulevard SR 155 Arlington Expressway Mayport Road SR 126 Emerson Street US 1 IͲ95 IͲ95 IͲ95 SR 115 Southside Boulevard SR 115 Southside Boulevard SR 202 J.T. Butler Boulevard US 90 Beach Boulevard SR A1A Third Street 2Ͳ28

Table 2Ͳ9. Congested Facilities County Name of Name Area Duval Jacksonville Beach Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville St. Johns St Augustine Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville Clay Clay County Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville Duval Atlantic Beach Duval Jacksonville Seagate Avenue SR 208 Wilson Boulevard SR 115 Southside Boulevard St Augustine Road SR 15/US 17 Powers Avenue SR 155 Southside Boulevard SR 109 University Boulevard Herlong Road SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard Merrill Road Monument Road US 1 Philips Highway IͲ295 Park Avenue King Street Craven Road SR 111 Edgewood Avenue SR 122 Golfair Avenue SR 115 Southside Boulevard SR 139/US 23 Francis Street IͲ95 SR 202 J. T. Butler Boulevard Luna Ramps SR 134 103rd Street Cassat Avenue Lane Avenue Kindlewood Drive IͲ10 Ricker Road West A1A Junction SR 10A Arlington Expressway

SR A1A Third Street IͲ295 SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard SR 109 University Boulevard IͲ95 SR 109 University Boulevard SR 115 Arlington Expressway SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard SR 228 Normandy Boulevard IͲ295 IͲ295 IͲ295 SR 115 Southside Boulevard SR 228 Normandy Boulevard US 17 Roosevelt Boulevard US 1 Ponce de Leon Boulevard SR 152 Baymeadows Road US 17 Roosevelt Boulevard IͲ95 SR 152 Baymeadows Road IͲ95 8th St. IͲ295 IͲ295 IͲ10 IͲ295 IͲ10 IͲ10 Branan Field Road IͲ95 SR 134 103rd Street SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard SR 109 University Boulevard 2Ͳ29

From Location

Facility

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

US 90 Beach Boulevard SR 228 Normandy Boulevard Monument Road Powers Avenue SR 122 Golfair Avenue US 1 Philips Avenue Regency Mall Entrance SR 115 Southside Boulevard IͲ295 St. Johns Bluff Road Monument Road SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard Belle Rive Boulevard Lane Avenue SR 111 Edgewood Avenue Castillo Drive US 1Philips Highway McDuff Avenue SR 115 Lem Turner Road IͲ295 SR 114 8th Street Perry Street Old St Augustine Road Gate Parkway SR 129 McDuff Avenue SR 208 Wilson Boulevard Luna Ramps Cassat Avenue Duval County Line US 23 Kings Road IͲ295 SR A1A Third Street Arlington Road

To Location

Table 2Ͳ9. Congested Facilities County Name of Name Area Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville Duval Jacksonville

Facility

Biscayne Boulevard SR 114 8th Street Exit to SR 115 Southside Boulevard IͲ95 US 1 Main Street Liberty Street Commonwealth Avenue

From Location

IͲ95 SR 15 20th Street SR 152 Baymeadows Road US 17 Main Street US 23 Union Street US 1 Pritchard Road

To Location

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

SR 104 Dunn Avenue IͲ95 IͲ95 US 90 Union Street US 90 State Street US 90 State Street IͲ295

2Ͳ30

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

COMPLETED AND COMMITTED CONSTRUCTION T O ESTABLISH A BASELINE FOR DETERMINING FUTURE NEEDS , PROJECTS THAT WERE COMPLETED SINCE THE LAST LRTP AND PROJECTS WITH COMMITMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION WITHIN THE NEXT FIVE YEARS WERE IDENTIFIED . An analysis of the progress made in completing the Envision 2035 LRTP was performed to establish the baseline for this Cost Feasible Plan. Major projects completed since the adoption of the 2035 LRTP are shown on Figure 2Ͳ2 and summarized in Table 2Ͳ10.

The projects identified with commitments for construction or capital improvements are part of the Cost Feasible Plan to provide the flexibility to implement projects commensurate with future funding availability. Projects in Baker and Putnam Counties are shown in the list of committed projects based on the regional development of this plan and their inclusion in the travel demand forecasting model for North Florida.

The major projects with commitments for construction are summarized in Figure 2Ͳ2 in Table 2Ͳ11 and Table 2Ͳ 12. The commitments were obtained from the following planning documents and through coordination with our partner agencies.

All values in this plan for revenues and costs are reported in year of expenditure millions of dollars unless otherwise noted.

North Florida TPO’s Transportation Improvement Program for the Fiscal Years 2015Ͳ2019 as Amended 10/27/14 FDOT’s 2015Ͳ2019Ͳ Adopted with Amended dated October 30, 2014 Local government Capital Improvement Programs Jacksonville Transportation Authority’s Transit Development Plan

Technical Memorandum #7 – Existing Plus Committed Projects is included in the attachments to this report.

2Ͳ31

¾¿

3014

¾¿

¾¿ ¿ ¾ ¾

í ì ë é è

¾¿

3018

¿ ¾

¿ ¾ ¾

¾¿

¿ ¾ ¾

¿ ¾ ¾ ¿ ¾ ¾

¿ ¾ ¾

" Ò ) Ê

¿ ¾ ¾

126

105

107

¬ «

A1A

50 30

973

711

38 37

¿ ¾ ¾

§ ¦ ¨

£ ¤

¬ « ¬ «

" )

¿ ¾ ¾

108

115

¿ ¾ ¾

" Ò ) Ê

1 " Ò ) Ê

" )

¿ ¾ ¾

3040

961

£ ¤

¿ ¾ ¾

¿ ¾

3019

" ) " ) 108

¬ «

£ ¤ 301

67 3011

300 1

í ì ë é Wè " Ò ) ¿ ¾ ¿ ¾ ¾

122

§ ¦ ¨

" )

¿ ¾ ¾

¿ ¾

¿ ¾ ¾

¿ ¾

¿ ¾ ¿ ¾ ¾

¿ ¾

§ ¦ ¨

¿ ¾

970

¾¿

295

¿ ¾ ¾ ¿ ¾

¿ ¾ ¾

¬ «

228

¿ ¾

¬ «

3047

10 « 44 " Ò ¬ í ) ì ë é è è 3008 Ê105 í ì ë é 90 " Ò ) £ Ê65 ¤ 3007 W3021 71 966 " Ò ) " Ò " Ò ) ) " Ò Ê ) Ê Ê X Ã 3017 í 3014 ì ë é è í ì ë é è 961 66 " Ò ) Ê 1 53 ¤ " Ò ) Ê£ 3012

¾¿

¿ ¾

301

30 ¿4 ¾ 1

3015 3016

5 50

£ ¤

116

¿ ¾

228

" )

" Ò ) Ê

" )

130

3010

105

§ ¦ ¨

" Ò ) Ê " Ò ) Ê " Ò ) Ê 134 ¬ " Ò í ì ë é è « ) Ê

¬ « ¬ «

3012

¿ ¾

3043 3051

3045

W " Ò )

" Ò ) Ê

¿ ¾

£ ¤

3005

3004

¬ «

A1A

¿ ¾ ¾

" )

221

3009 11 3052

¿ ¾ ¿ ¾ ¿ ¾ ¿ ¾ ¿¾ ¿¾ ¿ ¾ ¿ ¿¾ ¾ ¾ ¿ ¾

¬ «

124

" Ò ) Ê " Ò ) Ê

¿ ¾

125

¿ ¾ ¾

" )

295

¿ ¿ ¾ ¿ ¾ ¾

250

§ ¦)"ÒÊ ¨

1020

¿ ¾

295

119

" )

" Ò ) Ê " Ò ) Ê

¿ ¾ ¿ ¿¾ ¾

" )

A1A 0 304 64 13

¿ ¾ ¾

3020

¿ ¾ ¾

" )

3002 4

¬ « 13

220

218

¿ ¾ ¾

¿ ¾ ¿ ¾ ¿ ¾ ¿ ¾ ¿ ¾ ¿ ¾

50 30

" )

è Intersection Projects í ì ë é " Ò ) Ê Interchange Projects

¬ «

" Ò ) Ê

A1A

§ ¦ ¨ 95

Bus Rapid Transit

46 30

" Ò ) Ê

1027

¬ «

¿ ¾ ¾

Legend

¿ ¾ ¾

3006

¿ ¾

¿ ¾ ¾

127

¿ ¾ ¾

" )

¿ ¾ ¾

¿ ¾

¬ «

3020

£ ¤

¬ «

£ ¤ 1

Types of Projects

" )

Widen to 3 Lanes

¬ « " ) " " ) ) " ) 208

" )

315

Reconstruct 2 Lanes

209

£ ¤

" )

13A

Widen to 4 Lanes

¬ « 207

" ) 3003

214

Reconstruct 6 Lanes

" )

£ ¤

A1A

¬ «

¬ « 100

504

" ) 315

" ) 204

New 3 Lane Road

¬ « 20

422

New 4 Lane Road

422

New 6 Lane Road 55

Express Lanes

" ) 21

" ) 310

Roadway System 320 FEC Project X Ã" ) 75

" )

§ ¦ ¨

200A

¬ «

" ) 309

" ) 308

Water Bodies

" ) £ " ) ¤ Conservation Lands ¬ « " £ ¤ Six ) Counties Boundaries ¬ « " ) 318

502

301

316

£ ¤

206

New 2 Lane Road

« § ¦¬ ¨ ¬ «

305

Context Sensitive Solutions¬ 26 «

329

A1A

214

315

Widen to 5 Lanes

¬ «

Date: 3/13/2015

200

441

)LJXUH &RPPLWWHG 3OXV &RPSOHWHG Projects

10,560 Feet

8 Miles

1022

IͲ295

SR 13 (Buckman Bridge)

at SR 104 Dunn Avenue

Halsema Road IͲ295

Nocatee Parkway

Chaffee Road Broward Road Shinder Drive Nassau Center Court FEC Railroad

IͲ95

Add 4 Express Lanes

Interchange Modification

Add Auxiliary Lanes

Interchange Modification

New Interchange and Remove Existing Interchange Modification

New 2 Lane New Interchange and New 2 Lane Road Add 2 Lane Add Auxiliary Lanes

Overpass

New 2 Lane New 2 Lane New 2 Lane New 2 Lane

New Interchange

Under construction

Under construction Under construction Under construction Complete

Complete Complete Complete Under Construction Under construction Complete Under construction Complete Under construction Under construction Under construction Complete

Complete

Phase

Operations Improvement Operations Improvement 2035 Cost Feasible Plan #6 Operations Improvement 2035 Cost Feasible Plan #7 Operations Improvement 2035 Cost Feasible Plan #5

Committed Project Operations Improvement Committed Project

2035 Cost Feasible Plan #19 Private Privately Funded

Committed Project Committed Project Locally Funded Locally Funded

5F10F12F12F

2035 Cost Feasible Plan Status 13 Committed Project

13 Projects identified in the list of committed projects in the Envision 2035 Cost Feasible Plan are show as “Committed Project”. Projects identified as Operations Improvement were not part of the 2035 Cost Feasible Plan. 2Ͳ33

IͲ295

IͲ10

3051 3052

IͲ10 IͲ10

Valley Ridge Boulevard at 9B Extension

US 1

at 21st Street/ Talleyrand Avenue SR 134 103rd Street Clark Road Old Middleburg Road Gene Lassere Boulevard

Lane Avenue SR 111 Cassat Avenue 3043 at Hammond Boulevard 3042 (Marietta) 62 at SR 208 Wilson Boulevard 3010 at SR 228 Normandy Boulevard 11 IͲ10 Commonwealth Avenue 3009 at Commonwealth Avenue 60 at Pritchard Road

3046 961

3047 1020 3048 711

CR 210 Extension Davis Parkway

CR 210

Alt. US 1 Martin Luther King Jr. Parkway Chaffee Road Clark Road Extension Collins Road Concourse Loop Road

Table 2Ͳ10. Major Projects Under Construction or Completed Since the 2035 Plan Was Adopted Facility ID From To Improvement

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

US 301 SR 200

3020

126

SR 9B

US 17 Park Avenue

SR 23 First Coast Expressway

SR 9B

3050 3006

3007

SR 21 Blanding Boulevard SR 23 First Coast Expressway

SR 21 Blanding Boulevard

SR 202 J. T. Butler Boulevard

SR 200

3011

IͲ95

SR 104 Dunn Avenue

3041

IͲ95

35 3040

IͲ95

Max Leggett Parkway Max Leggett Parkway

IͲ95

Baldwin Bypass South of Baldwin

US 1 SR 5 Philips Highway Wells Road

SR 21 Blanding Boulevard IͲ95

SR 23 Branan Field Road Old Jennings Road Old Jennings Road

Hodges Boulevard

IͲ95

Garden Boulevard

IͲ95 Owens Road

at SR 202 J.T. Butler Boulevard Emerson Street (Overland Bridge) at IͲ295 North

Widen to 4 Lanes

Intersection Improvement

Widen to 6 Lanes

Intersection Improvement

Widen to 4 Lanes New 4 Lane

Interchange Modifications

Bridge Replacement

Interchange Modification

2Ͳ34

Baldwin Bypass North of Baldwin

New 4 Lane Road

Knight Boxx Road Widen to 6 Lanes Oakleaf Plantation Build Frontage Roads Parkway IͲ10 New Limited Access Toll Road US 1 SR 5 Philips New Limited Access Highway Roadway IͲ295 New Limited Access Roadway IͲ295 Add Lanes and Reconstruct

Old Jennings Road

CR 107

Walgreens

Owens Road SR 5 US 1

Fuller Warren Bridge Phase 1

Under construction

Complete

Under construction Under construction Complete

Complete Complete

Complete

Under Construction Complete

Complete Under Construction Complete

Under construction Under construction Complete

Under construction Complete

IͲ295

Interchange Modification

Complete

Collins Road

505

IͲ295

SR 21 Blanding Boulevard at SR 105 Heckscher Drive at Bowden Road

Phase

Table 2Ͳ10. Major Projects Under Construction or Completed Since the 2035 Plan Was Adopted Facility ID From To Improvement

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Operations Improvement 2035 Cost Feasible Plan #12

2035 Cost Feasible Plan #11 Committed Project

Committed Project

Locally Funded Committed Project

Operations Improvement 2035 Cost Feasible Plan #9 Operations Improvement Locally Funded

Operations Improvement 2035 Cost Feasible Plan #22 Operations Improvement 2035 Cost Feasible Plan #21 Privately Funded Privately Funded

Committed Project

5F10F12F12F

2035 Cost Feasible Plan Status 13 Committed Project

301

North of Baldwin

Callahan

Widen to 4 Lanes

2Í˛35

Note: All Cost Feasible Plan project number references are as shown in the plan summary brochure.

US 301 SR 200

Table 2Í˛10. Major Projects Under Construction or Completed Since the 2035 Plan Was Adopted Facility ID From To Improvement

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Under construction

Phase 5F10F12F12F

2035 Cost Feasible Plan Status 13 2035 Cost Feasible Plan #13

Chester Road CR 216 CR 220 Doctors Inlet Road CR 739 Henley Road/ Russell Road Crawford Road Crawford Road Florida East Coast Railway Fort Gates Ferry Road Girvin Road Girvin Road Holloway Road IͲ10 at IͲ95 IͲ10 IͲ295 IͲ295 IͲ95 IͲ95 IͲ95 Kolas Ferry Road Lake Susan Road Old St Augustine Road Parramore Road Extension Pecan Park Road Radio Avenue SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard SR 10 US 90 Beaver Street SR 10 US 90 Beaver Street SR 109 University Boulevard SR 115 Southside Boulevard SR 134 103rd Street SR 152 Baymeadows Road SR 20 SR 200 SR A1A SR 200 SR A1A SR 202 J. T . Butler Boulevard SR 21 Blanding Boulevard SR 21 Blanding Boulevard SR 21 Blanding Boulevard SR 212 Beach Boulevard SR 23 First Coast Expressway SR 23 First Coast Expressway SR 243 JIA North Access Road SR 9B SR 9B

Facility

Table 2Ͳ11. Major Projects with Construction Funds Committed 973 504 50 51 42 43 3021 502 44 45 3003 27 3045 5 3016 13 64 66 3018 55 53 970 3019 40 105 3004 3005 3012 3014 3015 3017 422 38 39 966 32 33 34 3008 18 17 6 126 3002

From SR 200 SR A1A SR 100 CR 209 Russell Road CR 218 CR 121 Old Alabama Trail RAILEX SR 19 SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard Ashley Melisse SR 100 US 17 Roosevelt Boulevard SR 23 First Coast Expressway SR 9B SR 134 103rd Street at IͲ295/SR 9A North at SR 102 Airport Road at Old St. Augustine Road Murrhee Road Alachua County Line Greenland Road / Loretto Road Youngerman Circle SR 243 JIA North Access Road US 17 SR 115 Arlington Expressway CR 121 Brandy Branch Road CR 119 Otis Road Bartram Drive Deercreek Club Road at Firestone Road Freedom Commerce Parkway Alachua County Line Still Quarters Road Rubin Lane SR 115 Southside Boulevard CR 218 Branan Field Road CR 220 Long Bay Road F.O.P. Way Argyle Forest Boulevard Clay County Line SR 102 Airport Road US 1 Philips Highway CR 2209 2Ͳ36

Black Creek Old Jennings Road Allie Murray Road Ryar Road IͲ10 Argyle Forest Boulevar Pecan Park Road IͲ95 Duval County Line

Country Day School Drive SW 56th Avenue Rubin Lane CR 107 Scott Road

Cesery Boulevard

Kings Ferry Road CR 21 IͲ295 Collins Road IͲ95 Minor Road Monument Road

Mount Royal Ave Ashley Melisse Wonderwood Drive Tinsley Road San Marco Avenue US 90 SR 202 J.T. Butler Boulevard Firestone Road Phase 2

Green Pine Road US 17 Knight Boxx Road CR 220 Doctors Inlet Road Old Alabama Trail US 301 SR 200

To Add Lanes and Reconstruct Widen to 4 Lanes Widen to 4 Lanes Widen to 4 Lanes Road Reconstruction Road Reconstruction Rail Capacity Project Road Reconstruction Widen to 5 Lanes Widen to 3 Lanes New Road Construction Interchange Improvement Interchange Improvement Add 4 Express Lanes Interchange Improvement Interchange Ramp (New) Interchange Improvement Interchange Improvement Road Reconstruction Widen to 4 Lanes Widen to 6 Lanes New 2 Lane Road Widen to 4 Lanes New Road Construction Intersection Improvement Add Right Turn Lane(s) Add Right Turn Lane(s) Intersection Improvement Intersection Improvement Intersection Improvement Intersection Improvement Add Lanes and Reconstruct Add Lanes and Reconstruct Add Lanes and Reconstruct Interchange Improvement Add Lanes and Reconstruct Add Lanes and Reconstruct Add Lanes and Reconstruct Intersection Improvement New 4ͲLane Road Construction Widen to 6 Lane Limited Access Toll Road New Road Construction New Road Construction New Road Construction

Improvement

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Nassau Putnam Clay Clay Nassau Nassau Duval Putnam Duval Duval Putnam Duval Duval Duval Duval Duval Duval Duval Nassau Putnam Duval Duval Duval Nassau Duval Duval Duval Duval Duval Duval Duval Putnam Nassau Nassau Duval Clay Clay Clay Duval Clay/Duval Clay/Duval Duval Duval St. Johns

County CST CST CST CST CST CST CAP CST CST CST CST DSB CST CST CST DSB CST CST CST CST CST CST CST CST CST CST CST CST CST CST CST CST CST CST CST CST CST CST CST DSB DSB CST DSB CST

Fund Source Phase FDOT FDOT FDOT Clay FDOT FDOT FDOT FDOT Duval LOGT Duval LOGT FDOT FDOT FDOT FDOT FDOT FDOT FDOT FDOT FDOT FDOT Duval LOGT Duval LOGT FDOT FDOT FDOT FDOT FDOT FDOT FDOT FDOT FDOT FDOT FDOT FDOT FDOT FDOT FDOT FDOT FDOT FDOT FDOT FDOT FDOT FDOT

2018 2016 2015 2018 2015 2015 2015 2015 2018 2018 2015 2016 2018 2015 2017 2017 2018 2018 2017 2017 2018 2018 2016 2016 2017 2018 2018 2019 2017 2017 2018 2019 2016 2018 2018 2019 2017 2019 2018 2015 2015 2018 2015 2015

Fiscal Year

$10.30 $0.78 $0.81 $0.00 $0.29 $3.38 $1.14 $2.25 $5.74 $7.36 $1.26 $118.77 $48.10 $103.35 $6.90 $165.02 $6.60 $0.90 $3.64 $1.91 $0.60 $5.00 $11.83 $0.24 $6.84 $0.40 $0.19 $3.77 $0.52 $2.20 $6.72 $54.35 $0.65 $32.54 $1.83 $9.23 $15.28 $19.77 $5.41 $12.61 $7.21 $17.20 $95.43 $111.37

Amount

From 126 South of SR 9A 54 Horse Landing Road 23 South of Baldwin

Facility

14F19F21F21F

From

3F18F20F20F

14 CAP represents capital improvements. 15 2035 Cost Feasible Plan Project #B 16 2035 Cost Feasible Plan Project #D

Clay CR 218 Mimosa Avenue Pine Avenue Old Fleming Grove Road Duval FEC Railway RAILEX North First Coast Flyer15 Downtown Jacksonville (Duval County) Sherry Drive Atlantic Beach Elementary Southeast First Coast Flyer 16 Downtown Jacksonville (Duval County) SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard Intracoastal Waterway Bridge SR 115 Arlington Expressway Service Roads Timuquan Trail Kingsley Connector Nassau Bailey and Simmons Road Sports Complex Putnam Main Street Junction Road St. Johns Avenue Sports Complex St. Johns River Sea Loop Trail SR 13 Holley Berry Lane SR 207 Armstrong Trail Heads Hastings Trail Heads Total Note: All Cost Feasible Plan project number references are as shown in the plan summary brochure.

County

Table 2Ͳ12. Major Bicycle, Pedestrian and Transit Projects with Construction Funding Committed

SR 9B US 17 SR 15 US 301 SR 200

Facility

Table 2Ͳ11. Major Projects with Construction Funds Committed

SR 21 Blanding Boulevard Raggedy Point Road IͲ295 Avenues Mall Fletcher Avenue End of Existing Trail SR 19 Roberts Road

2Ͳ37

Improvement New Road Construction Widen to 4 Lanes New 4 Lane Roadway Ͳ Baldwin Bypass

Bike Path Trail Sidewalk Rail Capacity Bus Rapid Transit Sidewalk Bus Rapid Transit Sidewalk Sidewalk Bike Path Trail Sidewalk Bike Path Trail Bike Path Trail Bike Path Trail Sidewalk Bike Path Trail Bike Path Trail

Improvement

IͲ95 Boundary Road in San Mateo North of Baldwin

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

12F17F19F19F

CST CST CAP 14 CAP CST CAP CST CST CST CST CST CST CST CST CST CST

2015 2017 2015 2016 2019 2016 2017 2017 2016 2018 2016 2019 2019 2014 2015 2015

First Year

2015 2015 2017

Fiscal Year

FDOT FDOT FDOT Jacksonville Transportation Authority FDOT Jacksonville Transportation Authority FDOT FDOT FDOT FDOT FDOT FDOT FDOT FDOT FDOT FDOT

DSB CST CST

Fund Source Phase FDOT FDOT FDOT

Phase Fund Source

Duval Putnam Duval

County

$0.74 $1.30 $1.14 $33.50 $0.45 $23.80 $1.20 $0.30 $2.00 $1.30 $0.77 $0.75 $0.95 $0.15 $0.32 $0.37 $69.04

Amount

$0.05 $17.65 $37.18

Amount

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

This page is intentionally blank.

2Í˛38

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING P LANNING TO ADDRESS NOT ONLY OUR CURRENT NEEDS BUT THE NEEDS OF THE FUTURE IS INTEGRAL TO THE SUCCESS OF THE PLANNING PROCESS . modeled at higher levels of demographic, spatial and temporal resolution than has been possible with tripͲ based modeling systems. DaySim links activities and trips through tours (trip chains), and links tours through day patterns. This equips the North Florida TPO with the ability to respond to complex questions involving impacts of plans on specific demographic subͲgroups and geographic units, consideration of different values of time for tolling analysis, and shifts in demand by time of day, all the while accounting for the linkages within a tour and across a day. NERPMͲAB also uses parcelͲlevel land use data as an input to create accessibilityͲrelated variables, providing the potential to make better predictions of the impacts of largeͲscale land use changes, such as developments of regional impact.

MODEL FRAMEWORK The Northeast Regional Planning Model: ActivityͲBased (NERPMͲAB) is the region travel demand forecasting model was used in developing this plan. The model was used for forecasting future transportation demand and transportation systems analysis. The modeling process and socioͲeconomic data forecasting process are discussed in greater detail in the following

Technical Memorandum #3 – Socio Economic Data Forecasts Technical Memorandum #4 – Model Validation and Calibration Technical Memorandum #5 – Freight Modeling

DaySim is a personͲday activity and travel simulator, which is the only activityͲbased component of the NERPMͲAB model. DaySim accounts for all travel by residents of the region. The simulation occurs at the person level, so the primary outputs of DaySim relate to

NERPMͲAB represents a paradigm shift towards a more disaggregate modeling approach in which the activityͲ travel patterns of individual households and persons are 2Ͳ39

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

personal travel for work, school, social/recreational, and other nonͲwork purposes. The truck and freight model includes all trips made for transportation of goods and services and includes a Jacksonville area Port Model. The external trips model includes both internalͲexternal (trips made by region residents to points outside the region), externalͲinternal (trips made by residents from outside the region to points within the region), and through trips. All of the mode components use the traffic analysis zone system and are adapted from previous NERPM tripͲbased models. Trips from all the subͲmodels are aggregated and factored to create trip tables, which are then assigned to the highway and transit networks.

The model components were integrated into a single package within the Citilabs® Cube travel demand modeling system, using the Cube Catalog graphic user interface.

MARKET SEGMENTATION The NERPMͲAB modeling system covers regional landͲ based travel, segmented by four primary markets:

Resident travel internal to the modeling region. NonͲresident/visitor travel internal to the modeling region. Resident and nonͲresident/visitor travel involving trips passing through the region, but with at least one end outside the region. Commercial vehicle travel internal to the modeling region. The DaySim model covers all household resident travel within the region for the following market segments.

MODEL COMPONENTS NERPMͲAB is composed of many different model components. The following activities were performed:

Develop a synthetic population of residents living in households and group quarters. Develop employment by industry group. Develop a parcelͲbased land use database. Specify parameters for activityͲbased residential demand models, covering travel within the region. Develop calibration target values for activityͲbased model components, using National Household Transportation Survey data, US Census American Community Survey, and the Census Transportation Planning Package. Incorporate updated trip tables representing nonͲ resident travel and resident travel with external trip ends (externalͲexternal, externalͲinternal, internalͲ external). Incorporate updated truckͲtrip generation and distribution models from the Florida statewide model and from port facilities. Incorporate special generators for Jacksonville International Airport and for the tourism district of St. Augustine. Incorporate and development of updated highway network files, requiring recoding of some link attributes and intersection turning penalties. Incorporate updated transit route files. Develop new highway assignment procedures and skimming methods for four time periods (AM peak, midday, PM peak, and evening offͲpeak), as well as summaries for fullͲday analysis. Incorporate updated traffic count data. Develop new speedͲfeedback procedures and closure criteria.

Permanent residents living in households. Permanent residents living in group quarters. Seasonal residents living part of the year in the region, who are permanent residents of a different region. DaySim does not model visitors to the region, such as tourists, business travelers and nonͲresidents visiting family and friends. Nor does DaySim model travel by persons who live external to the modeling area, but who may commute in and out of the region for work or school, or who come to the region for shopping, recreation or other personal business. However, adjustments were made to the model to account for these travel patterns. Common special generators, such as hospitals, shopping malls and military installations are covered by the resident travel models listed above. Two special generators were retained in NERPMͲAB: (1) Jacksonville International Airport (15,000 daily trip ends, derived from airline enplanements); and (2) St. Augustine’s historic center (2,288 daily trip ends, derived from hotel and motel rooms). Both of these special generators represent concentrations of intense visitor traffic, which are not covered by DaySim. DaySim assumes that a portion of the jobs within the region will be filled by workers who live outside the region. To accommodate this market, externalͲinternal 2Ͳ40

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

work trips are fixed for workplace destinations, thereby reducing the availability of those jobs for workers living within the region. The usual workplace location choice is affected by DaySim’s shadowͲpricing mechanism, which compares the total employment within each zone to the number of workplace locations predicted for each zone and adjusts the attractiveness of that zone through a series of iterations to balance job supply with worker demand. TrialͲandͲerror revealed that a tenͲiteration approach to shadowͲpricing for employment yielded the best results.

The DaySim model calibration components consisted of

The calibration process met or exceeds all of the calibration standards established under the Florida Standard Urban Transportation Modeling guidelines and showed a significant improvement over the prior tripͲ based models.

MODEL YEARS The following model scenarios were developed as part of the planning process.

2010 Base Year 2030 Interim Year Cost Feasible Plan 2040 Existing Plus Committed 2040 Needs Plan 2040 Cost Feasible Plan

The model calibration process results are documented in greater detail in Technical Memorandum #4 – Model Validation and Calibration.

TIME OF DAY

Consistency with the model design of DaySim necessitated the development of separate highway network assignment and skimming processes for four timeͲperiods of the day:

AM peak (6:00Ͳ8:59) Midday off peak (9:00Ͳ3:59) PM peak (4:00Ͳ6:59) Evening off peak (7:00 Ͳ5:59) These four timeͲperiodͲbased assignments are run individually, producing a loaded network for each period. At the end of the process, a new script is then run to combine all four time periods into a single daily assignment output, representing a 24Ͳhour travel period.

MODEL CALIBRATION Model calibration is the process of applying the estimated models, comparing the results to observed values, and adjusting either the model specification or the alternative specific constants. The process is complicated by the fact that the various model components in DaySim are not isolated. 2Ͳ41

Usual location choice models Usual school location subͲmodel Auto ownership Day pattern models MainͲpattern model Exact number of tours model Number and purpose of workͲbased subͲtours model Number and purpose of intermediate stops NonͲmandatory tour destination choice Tour mode choice TimeͲofͲday choice model

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

FUTURE LAND USE ALTERNATIVES

As part of preparing the NERPMͲAB, the development of land use scenarios and forecasting of land use within the region at a parcel level was required.

Population forecasts were based on the Bureau of Economic and Business Research medium scenario and were used as control totals at the countyͲlevel.

During the development of the base year model households, population in group quarters, school enrollment and employment by market sector were assigned to individual parcels for the six county region. As part of this process vacant and underdeveloped parcels were identified. According to the 2010 Census, 13 percent or 82,272 of the housing units within the six county region are vacant.

Table 2Ͳ13 summarizes the population forecasts that were provided by the University of Florida Bureau of Economic and Business Research and used as the control totals within the modeling process. An alternate land use scenario was also prepared in cooperation with the local governments that changed employment but not household, school or group quarter land uses. Table 2Ͳ14 summarizes the change in employment by market sector. Table 2Ͳ15 summarizes school enrollment.

Table 2Ͳ13. NERPMͲAB Year 2010 and 2040 Population and Employment Control Totals County Year 2010 Year 2040 Population Year 2010 Year 2040 Workers Population living Population living Growth Rate NERPMͲAB Estimated Growth Rate in Households in Households 2010 Ͳ2040 Total Workers Workers* 2010 Ͳ2040 Nassau 72,771 116,159 60% 24,126 39,586 64% Duval 844,293 1,050,684 24% 519,142 636,596 23% St. Johns 186,598 374,207 101% 61,714 155,227 152% Clay 189,614 314,010 66% 54,454 88,958 64% Baker 24,771 36,657 48% 7,396 13,860 87% Putnam 72,957 77,991 7% 25,148 28,051 21% Total 1,391,004 1,969,708 42% 691,980 962,278 39% * Average between BEA 10 year growth rate (2000Ͳ2010) and NERPMͲAB growth rate of population year 2040.

2Ͳ42

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Table 2Ͳ14. Employment in Trend and Alternate Land Use Scenarios Employment Sectors

Year 2010

Year 2040 Trend

Alternate

Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting

551 633

541

Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction

276 315

271

Construction

39,403 45,140

38,677

Manufacturing

39,670 45,455

38,939

Transportation and Warehousing

24,412 27,982

23,962

104,312 119,525

102,390

376 433

369

Wholesale Trade

20,322 23,285

19,947

Retail Trade

61,371 70,362

60,240

Accommodation and Food Services

38,919 44,615

38,202

Industrial Ͳ Subtotal Utilities

Commercial Ͳ Subtotal

120,988 138,695

118,758

Information

13,882 17,836

17,848

Finance and Insurance

41,546 53,425

53,416

Real Estate and Rental and Leasing

11,509 14,766

14,797

Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services

28,713 37,481

36,916

5,425 6,914

6,975

Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services

35,270 45,319

45,347

Educational Services

27,718 35,652

35,637

Health Care and Social Assistance

57,340 73,825

73,722

5,009 6,418

6,440

Other Services (except Public Administration)

21,486 27,617

27,625

Public Administration

45,944 59,123

59,070

Service ͲSubtotal

293,842 378,376

377,792

Total

519,142 636,596

584,940

Management of Companies and Enterprises

Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation

Table 2Ͳ15. Year 2040 School Enrollment Projections versus Age Group Projections County Total Kindergarten thru 8th 9th Grade thru 12th University and Grade Grade College Nassau 13,389 5,584 1,805 20,779 Duval 141,606 52,601 114,890 309,092 St. Johns 49,317 24,151 10,875 84,343 Clay 40,947 21,095 8,057 70,100 Baker 5,576 2,037 0 7,614 Putnam 9,757 3,339 9,014 22,108 Total 260,592 108,807 144,641 514,036

2Ͳ43

NERPMͲAB Age Groups 5 thru 14 15 thru 17 Years Years 14,998 4,579 142,620 47,325 55,763 19,913 45,562 15,982 5,876 1,692 9,931 2,885 274,750 92,376

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

The future land use maps and approved developments received from the local governments were used to allocate households and employment to the parcel level. The growth was allocated to the vacant and underutilized parcels before new development was considered consistent with the data provided by the local agencies.

REASONABLENESS CHECKS FOR FUTURE YEAR MODEL ASSIGNMENTS As part of the development of the model, reasonableness tests were performed for the model calibration criteria previously discussed. Changes to screenline, cutline and cordon volumes are shown Figure 2Ͳ3. Across the region, these volumes exhibit remarkably proportional growth. That is, locations that carried larger volumes in 2010 seem to grow proportionally in 2040.

Reasonableness checks on the projections on parcel data included evaluation of the number of housing units associated with the residential developments and reviews of aerial photography to ensure that the projections can actually geographically fit within the parcels and traffic analysis zones. Several of the local government requested a reduction in the vacancy rate, assuming it was higher than usual due to the economic downturn. The characteristics of land uses needed for applying DaySim was performed at the parcel level by the Population Generator (PopGen) program. This program synthesizes the population to the characteristics identified in the Census and PUMS data sources and allocates it to a household/parcel and individual level.

Traffic volumes on the Strategic Intermodal System, and particularly the IͲ95 corridor, are forecast to grow faster than in many other corridors without investments in new services or capacity. St. Johns County is expected to grow faster than the other counties in the 2040 scenario and significant growth in traffic volumes along the IͲ95 corridor south of Jacksonville is anticipated. Growth resulting from the East Nassau Community Planning Area also resulted in proportionally higher growth along the IͲ95 corridor than other major screenline and corridor locations.

Extensive coordination occurred with the local governments as part of this process and concurrence of the land use projections and allocations was achieved.

DEFICIENCY ANALYSIS A deficiency analysis using the NERPMͲAB is discussed in the section titled Plan Alternatives

2Ͳ44

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Figure 2-3 - Changes in Screenline Volumes from 2010 to 2040 Source: RSG

2Í˛45

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

This page is intentionally blank.

2Í˛46

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

FREIGHT AND INTERMODAL SYSTEMS F REIGHT AND I NTERMODAL S YSTEMS ARE MAJOR DRIVERS OF OUR ECONOMIC GROWTH AND INVESTMENTS ARE NEEDED FOR US TO BE COMPETITIVE IN THE FUTURE . marine terminals at Blount Island and Dames Point and rail intermodal facilities for CSX and Norfolk Southern railroads. IͲ75, the nation’s central spine connecting Florida, southeastern and midͲwestern states is located 60 miles to the west of our region. North Florida also provides the rail gateway into Florida. Norfolk Southern and FEC railroads have their Florida termini in North Florida. CSX’s and FEC both maintain their corporate headquarters in North Florida. Genesee & Wyoming Inc., which operates major short –line railroads across the US and in Australia, maintains its operations headquarters in Jacksonville.

OVERVIEW This section summarizes the analysis of the demand for freight and intermodal systems within the region. The intermodal system was previously discussed in Part One of this report. The needs that resulted from this forecast of future demand are discussed in Part Three. Additional detail is provided in Technical Memorandum #5 – Freight Modeling.

CURRENT SITUATION

The level of connectivity to the North Florida region is a significant economic advantage for our region. IͲ95 serves as the major highway gateway to Florida’s 19.5 million persons. IͲ10 connects our region along an eastͲ west route to the southwest, western states, and Pacific Ocean. A third interstate, IͲ295 serves as a beltway around Jacksonville that connects both of these interstates and provides direct access to major JAXPORT

2Ͳ47

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

CURRENT FREIGHT MOVEMENTS

North Florida is the origin or destination of freight moving over roadways and railways in Florida and the Southeast U.S.

The total shipments that originate in, are destined for, or travel through North Florida are summarized in Table 2Ͳ 16. This data is based on the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Freight Analysis Framework data.

The top origins and destinations for truck or rail shipments are summarized in Table 2Ͳ17 and Table 2Ͳ18.

Table 2Ͳ16. Total Tons of Commodities (millions of tons per year) Origin and Destination Truck Internal to area

34.9

Rail

Total

0.0

Originates in area

Percentage

34.9

18%

and is destined for locations within Florida and is destined for locations outside Florida Is destined for the area And originated from within Florida And originated from outside Florida Port related

18.5 8.0

0.2 0.6

7.5 8.9 11.7

Through traffic Total Mix Percentage

0.4 11.6 0.6

18.7 8.6 7.9 20.5 12.3

10% 5% 4% 11% 6%

70.0

18.0

88.0

46%

159.5

31.4

190.9

100%

84%

16%

100%

Source: Freight Analysis 2012 data.

Table 2Ͳ17. Top and Origins and Destinations of Truck Freight Passing through North Florida Through Origins Through Destinations Locations Tonnage Mix Locations Florida Locations Polk County 10% MiamiͲDade County MiamiͲDade County 8% Polk County Hillsborough County 7% Hillsborough County Palm Beach County 4% Orange County Broward County 4% Orange County 2% Out of State Savannah, GA 13% New York, NY New York, NY 5% Baltimore, MD Baltimore, MD 4% Boston, MA Charleston, WV 2% Philadelphia, PA Savannah, GA Other Origins 39% Total 100% Total 2Ͳ48

Tonnage Mix 14% 5% 4% 3%

12% 5% 4% 4% 3% 47% 100%

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Table 2Ͳ18. Top Origins and Destinations of Rail Freight Passing through North Florida Through Origins Through Destinations Locations Tonnage Mix Locations Florida Locations Polk County 7% Polk County Hillsborough County 5% Orange County Manatee County 3% Hillsborough County MiamiͲDade County 3% MiamiͲDade County Martin County

Out of State

Charleston, WV Lexington, KY Chicago, IL Atlanta, GA Birmingham, AL Macon, GA

8% 8% 7% 6% 5% 3%

Other Origins Total

3% 3% 3%

Broward County

New York, NY

35%

100%

2Ͳ49

Alachua County Sumter County Brevard County

45%

Tonnage Mix 13% 11% 11% 10% 5%

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

About 4.7 million tons of cargo exported from the U.S. passesthrough the region each year. Of these, 59 percent of the freight originated in one of the top ten markets summarized in Table 2Ͳ14 or Table 2Ͳ15.

TRUCKING About 84 percent of all freight moved within the region is moved on trucks. North Florida has a large internal truck market (both the origins and the destinations are within North Florida). North Florida roadways handle 159.5 million tons of freight each year.

The container market is 47 percent of the shipments. The balance is split between bulk and breakͲbulk cargo. About 9.3 million tons of international cargo imported to the US pass through North Florida. Domestic waterborne cargo is handled at public and private terminals in North Florida and 62 percent of the tonnage is petroleum and petroleum products.

Freight originating in North Florida that is moved by truck is split between breakͲbulk, bulk and containerized commodities. About 43 percent of the freight destined for North Florida is bulk cargo with the balance split between breakͲbulk and bulk cargo.

RAIL

A significant amount of cargo shipped by truck in our region is not from or destined for North Florida travels but is shipped to destinations in central Florida and southeast Florida. About 61 percent of the through freight traveling through North Florida is breakͲbulk cargo 29 percent is bulk and 10 percent is in a container.

Most of the rail cargo shipped in North Florida originated outside of Florida and is consumed within North Florida.

AIR CARGO In 2012, air cargo operators moved more than 0.75 million tons of air cargo through Jacksonville International Airport. The typical commodities shipped by air are high value and time sensitive. An emerging market for air cargo is Asia. The largest growth in air cargo is anticipated to be exports of Florida citrus, Vidalia onions, peaches and fish from the Caribbean. Flowers from Columbia are the largest import good. Air cargo delivered on underutilized aircraft flying to Asia represents the greatest recent growth in air cargo.

PORTS About 12.3 million tons of freight are handled each year by the ports in North Florida. The cargo includes freight that is originating in or destined for the sixͲcounty region and cargo that uses the port but originates or is destined for another location in the US. International shipments account for 71 percent of cargo handled by North Florida ports. Over 74 percent of the imports are from the Caribbean or South America. Of these international shipments, 55 percent is destined for distribution and consumption in North Florida.

Cargo exported through North Florida ports totals 4.9 million tons. About 75 percent of the market is to the Caribbean. North Florida is the largest origin for international shipments that travel through our ports with an 11 percent market share. Of the exports that move through North Florida ports, 80 percent are containerized. More than 70 percent of the freight originating in North Florida is exported using ports in North Florida. This means 30 percent of the freight is exported through a port outside of North Florida. For example, some of the goods produced in North Florida are driven to the Port of Savannah and exported for consumption in other markets.

2Ͳ50

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

FUTURE FREIGHT DEMAND INTRODUCTION Freight forecasts were used in the development of the truck model in the NERPMͲAB and to identify potential needs for freight and intermodal infrastructure to support economic development. The modeling update and future needs are discussed later in this report.

FORECASTING METHODOLOGY Historically, the demand for freight shipments and the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and Gross State Product (GSP) the equivalent considering only the economic productivity in Florida) are highly correlated. Therefore, the first step in developing a forecast for the regional freight movements was to forecast the anticipated growth in GDP and GSP for Florida. The based forecasts are appropriate for estimating the total movement of commodities that include trips that are shipped by rail and port intermodal. Figure 2Ͳ4 shows the basis of the forecast used in continuous annual growth rates. In the figure, the acronyms used are for the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and Toronto Dominion Bank (TDB). The historical growth is shown as HIS growth. The average of the forecasted growth rates shown on the dashed line show the basis of the forecasts provided in this report.

2Ͳ51

2Í˛52

Figure 2-4. Summary of GDP Forecasts

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

GDP forecasts were used as basis for freight forecasts.

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

PORT INTERMODAL The forecast of intermodal rail originating and destined for JAXPORT and Port of Fernandina Facilities is based on published historical 20Ͳft Equivalency Units (TEU) and rail intermodal market analysis.

Two levels of forecasts were prepared: a moderate and a more aggressive forecast. The moderate split uses a growth factor of 1.25 times the GDP growth in freight movements. The aggressive forecast uses a factor of 1.75 times GDP. The more aggressive forecast anticipates a greater shift of freight movements moving by intermodal rail than by truck movements today.

Conservative estimate: Assumes that today 10 percent of the total TEU imports and exports are shipped via rail. This rate is increased by 0.4 percent annually. High estimate: Assumes that today 20 percent of total TEU imports and exports are shipped via rail. This rate is also increased by 0.4 percent annually. The percent of TEUs shipped via rail ranges from 8 percent to 18 percent for the conservative estimate, or 16 percent to 26 percent for the high estimate. Two TEU forecasts for “loaded containers” were developed for the Jacksonville and Fernandina ports.

In addition to the loaded TEUs that are imported and exported – empty TEUs are also moved Ͳ primarily to the Jacksonville Ports. Many of the TEU’s are from the Jacksonville area, but many also travel from locations beyond North Florida to our ports.

Table 2Ͳ19 shows a summary of historical data as reported by the American Association of Port Authorities (AAPA) and the moderate and aggressive forecasts for loaded commodities in TEUs.

These historical data were used to estimate the number of imported, exported and empty containers traveling through the ports in North Florida. Figures 2Ͳ5 thru 2Ͳ9 on the following pages summarize the forecasts.

For the areas outside the Jacksonville area, two forecast splits were developed for both the moderate forecast and the aggressive forecast.

Table 2Ͳ19. Summary of TEUs for North Florida Port Facilities (JAXPORT and Port of Fernandina) TEUs 2009 2010 2011 Import TEUs 139,653 162,645 174,174 Export TEUs 376,044 436,172 444,526 Total loaded TEU's 515,697 598,817 618,700 Empty TEUs* 262,532 291,176 303,151 Empties as percent of Total Loaded 51% 49% 49% Average % past 4 years * Empties are not defined as imported or exported

2Ͳ53

2012 192,830 425,393 618,223 319,455 52% 50%

TEUs per year

500,000

1,000,000

1,500,000

2,000,000

2,500,000

3,000,000

2003

2006

2009

2015

2018

2021

2024

2020, 848,872

2Ͳ54

2027

2030, 1,628,602

Figure 2-5. Moderate TEU Port Forecast

2012

2013, 618,500

2020, 927,670

Vickerman Moderate Forecast (Loaded TEUs Moderate Forecast (Loaded TEUs only) only) Vickerman Aggressive Forecast (Loaded TEUs Aggressive Forecast (Loaded TEUs only) only)

Actual (AAPA Loaded TEUs)

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

2030

2033

2036

2039

2030, 1,272,981

1,903,555

2,847,947

500,000

1,000,000

1,500,000

2,000,000

2,500,000

3,000,000

3,500,000

4,000,000

4,500,000

2003

2006

2012

2015

2018

2021

2024

2020, 1,391,506

2027

2Ͳ55

Figure 2-6. Aggressive TEU Port Forecast – Loaded and Empties

2009

Total TEUs (Loaded + Empties)

Empties

Exports

Imports

Aggressive Forecast

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

2030

2033

2036

2030, 2,442,902

2040, 4,271,920

2039

500,000

1,000,000

1,500,000

2,000,000

2,500,000

3,000,000

3,500,000

4,000,000

4,500,000

2003

2006

2012

2015

2018

2021

2020, 1,273,308

2024

2027

2030

2030, 1,909,471

Figure 2-7. Summary of 2040 Moderate TEU Port Forecast – Loaded and Empties 2Ͳ56

2009

2013, 927,750

Total TEUs (Loaded + Empties)

Empties

Exports

Imports

Moderate Forecast

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

2033

2036

2040, 2,855,333

2039

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

RAIL

RAIL INTERMODAL

The mix of the forecasted TEUs that travel via rail, both to and from North Florida, as well as to and from areas outside North Florida, is based on U.S. Department of Transportation’s Freight Analysis Framework published data. The assumptions with the moderate and aggressive forecasts vary.

Aggressive forecast: Assumes that today 20 percent of total TEU imports and exports are shipped via rail. This rate is also increased by 0.4 percent annually.

The percent of TEUs shipped via rail ranges from 8 percent to 18 percent for the conservative estimate, or 16 percent to 26 percent for the high estimate.

Moderate forecast: Assumes that today 10 percent of the total TEU imports and exports are shipped via rail. This rate is increased by 0.4 percent annually

Table 2Ͳ20 summarizes the rail intermodal forecasts. Figures 2Ͳ10 and 2Ͳ11 show this information graphically.

Table 2Ͳ20. Summary of Rail Intermodal Forecasts

2040 2013 Rail Intermodal TEUs Incremental TEUs shipped via rail TEUs shipped outside the metro area TEUs shipped within the metro area Total TEUs

68,245 70,975 7,653

2Ͳ57

Moderate or Conservative 212,484 450,497 65,716 728,697

Aggressive 317,902 673,952 98,318 1,090,172

100,000

200,000

300,000

400,000

500,000

600,000

700,000

800,000

2025, 21,344

2025, 171,226

2025, 112,649

2040, 65,716

2040, 450,467

2040, 212,484

2Ͳ58

Figure 2-8. 2040 Moderate Forecast of Rail Intermodal

2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2019 2021 2023 2025 2027 2029 2031 2033 2035 2037 2039

2013, 7,653

2013, 70,975

2013, 68,245

TEUs shipped within the Jacksonville Metro area

TEUs shipped outside the Metro area Ͳ Conservative Range

Incremental TEU's shipped via Rail (Conservative Rate vs. High Rate)

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

200,000

400,000

600,000

800,000

1,000,000

1,200,000

2025, 25,204

2025, 202,191

2025, 133,020

2040, 98,318

2040, 673,952

2040, 317,902

2Ͳ59

Figure 2-9. 2040 Aggressive Forecast of Rail Intermodal

2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2019 2021 2023 2025 2027 2029 2031 2033 2035 2037 2039

2013, 7,653

2013, 70,975

2013, 68,245

TEUs shipped within the Jacksonville Metro area

TEUs shipped outside the Metro area Ͳ Conservative Range

Incremental TEU's shipped via Rail (Conservative Rate vs. High Rate)

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

RAIL CARLOAD Similar to the rail intermodal growth forecast, rail carload movements are also anticipated to grow. This growth will be less than the increase of rail intermodal because of the anticipated shift between carload and intermodal and the consumption orientation of the carload shipments within these areas. This growth is anticipated to be 2.0 percent to 2.2 percent per year or a growth factor of 2.7.

After establishing the base year truck flows, growth rates were forecast using growth rates based on the following assumptions.

TRUCK INTERMODAL FORECASTS

GROWTH RATES

TRUCK TRIPS AND VOLUMES

Where gross domestic product is highly correlated to the overall growth in commodity movements, population growth also serves as a reasonable basis for estimating the growth of the internalͲinternal truck trips. For external truck trips that remain in Florida the forested population growth in Florida was used. Both growth factors were based on the University of Florida’s Bureau of Economic and Business Research medium growth forecasts. These growth factors are summarized in Table 2Ͳ21.

Using the port and rail intermodal forecasts and existing truck counts at the entrances to the major intermodal facilities, a worksheet model was prepared to estimate the truck movements between each of the major intermodal facilities within the region. To build a truck trip table between each of the regional intermodal facilities, the following steps were performed.

Using the market and information developed through the cargo and logistics demand forecast, the ratio of truck movements between intermodal facilities was estimated. External truck volumes were identified at the major external nodes within the NERPMͲAB.

The existing truck volumes at the entrances to the intermodal facilities were estimated based on the FDOT Traffic Online database.

Table 2Ͳ21. Growth Factors for Trucks Internal growth factor based on population growth External growth factor based on population growth in Florida

2Ͳ60

Growth Factor (GF) 1.36 1.37

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

An anticipated shift in truck to rail intermodal traffic based on industry trends is anticipated to occur. With this shift, a growth factor of 3.08 was used to reflect the change in rail intermodal demand versus truck trip growth. This shift explaining the basis for the growth rate is discussed in greater detail in the rail intermodal forecasting section.

The statewide freight data is obtained from the statewide freight model, while the freight data associated with the ports within the NERPMͲAB area was obtained by conducting a study of the commodity flows at the Jacksonville and Fernandina ports. In the NERPMͲ AB, the data associated with the ports is located in the JAXPORT input file.

In addition, two major shifts in truck movements associated with intermodal shipments were assumed:

The JAXPORT file distributes trips to the ports and the intermodal facilities. Trips associated with the intermodal facilities are generated by the port but also by the statewide freight model. The model distributes the trips from these two sources based on percentages. These percentages are placed in the JAXPORT file. One input percentage is associated with each of the intermodal facilities, while the other percentage results in the model calculating how many of the port trips go to the intermodal facilities. This percentage represents the distribution of truck freight volumes (port and statewide) among the different intermodal facilities. The total number of freight trips associated with the different intermodal facilities in 2010 and 2040 were shown in Table 2Ͳ22 on the next page.

The opening of an intermodal container transfer facility near Blount Island requires trucks to leave the port gate by truck. These containers are then shifted to the rail network for shortͲhaul movement to the CSX Intermodal Facility or longͲhaul movement by rail. The delivery of containers to the intermodal container transfer facility by truck is anticipated to be small with most of the regional portͲrelated container shipments being delivered to the CSX Intermodal Facility. Neither the FEC nor Norfolk Southern railroads are anticipated to use the Intermodal Container Transfer Facility. The second Dames Point intermodal terminal is anticipated to be open by the year 2040 and operating near capacity similar to the existing intermodal terminal.

These data were converted to percentages to distribute the freight truck trips tables which are then added to all the other trip tables by the model and assigned to the highway network. The resulting truck volumes are shown on Figure 2Ͳ10 and 2Ͳ11.

Table 2Ͳ19 summarizes the anticipated intermodalͲ related truck movements in the year 2040.

AIR CARGO Florida Trade and Logistic Study (2011) and 2013Ͳ2043 Florida and Metro Forecast published by the University of Central Florida anticipate that air cargo within the region will increase by 45 percent between now and the year 2040. This forecast will largely be driven by population growth within the region. Air cargo accounts for less than 1 percent by volume shipped in the region, but may be as high as 4 percent of the total value of goods.

TRUCK MODEL IN THE NERPMͲAB In addition to forecasting the overall goods movement and intermodal shipments which were of particular concern within the region, the truck component of the NERPMͲAB was updated. These updates were based on data from the freight and intermodal demand forecasts, statewide freight model and the truck model in the NERPMͲAB. In the NERPMͲAB there are three types of freight data sources, (1) the statewide freight data on the interstate system, (2) the freight destined to the Jacksonville and Fernandina ports within our study area and (3) the truck trips that are related to distribution of goods and services within our study area. The third group is calculated by the model based on residential and employment input data.

2Ͳ61

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Table 2Ͳ22. Summary of Truck Model Inputs Port Terminal Blount Island Dames Point Dames Point 2 Total Trucks bound to an intermodal facility at CSX, Norfolk Southern or FEC.

2Ͳ62

2040 761 305 305 1,371

" )

108

115

¬ «

£ ¤

" ) " )

" ) 127

A1A

108

¬ «

105

107

§ ¦ ¨

£ ¤

¬ « ¬ «

" )

¬ «

A1A

® q

£ ¤ 301

¬ «

" )

A1A

122

§ ¦ ¨

" ) " ) 250

105

§ ¦ ¨ 295

" ) 125

¬ «

" )

221

124

" )

116

¬ « 10

£ ¤ 90

§ ¦ ¨

228

¬ « 228

£ ¤

130

£ ¤ ¬ «

" )

250A

¬ « ¬ «

295

119

301

¬ « ¬ «

202

134

§ ¦ ¨ 295

£ ¤ 1

" )

" ) 218

¬ «

A1A

¬ « 13

220

§ ¦ ¨

¬ «

® nq ¤

£ ¤ 1

" )

Legend

209

£ ¤

" )

13A

¬ « 207

" ) 214

" )

« § ¦¬ ¨ ¬ « 5

A1A

305

£ ¤

Year 2010 Base Year

¬ « 100

" ) 315

Total Average Daily Truck Volume

¬ « 206

¬ «

" )

® q

204

¬ « 20

< 500 501 - 1,000

" )

1,001 - 2,000

" ) 310

2,001 - 3,000 > 3,001 320

" )

§ ¦ ¨

¬ «

200A

" ) 309

Railroad System

335

318

329

301

200

316

335

441

225

500

" ) 308

" )Roadway ) £ " )System " ¤ ¬ « " ) " )Water Bodies £ ¤ £ ¤ «" Conservation Lands " ) " ) ) ¬ ¬ « " ¬ « ) Six Counties Boundaries " ) ¬ «" ) ¬ «

200A

25A

225A

200

326

326 326

)LJXUH 2010 Truck VolumeV Date: 7/11/2014

2-63

¬ «

A1A

214

315

® Airport q ¤ Amtrak Station n ¤ Passenger Rail Station n

¤ n

" ) " " ) ) " )

" )

315

¬ «

208

10,560 Feet

6 Miles

" )

108

115

¬ «

£ ¤

" ) " )

" ) 127

A1A

108

¬ «

105

107

§ ¦ ¨

£ ¤

¬ « ¬ «

" )

¬ «

A1A

® q

£ ¤ 301

¬ «

" )

A1A

122

§ ¦ ¨

" ) " ) 250

105

§ ¦ ¨ 295

" ) 125

¬ «

" )

221

124

" )

116

¬ « 10

£ ¤ 90

§ ¦ ¨

228

¬ « 228

£ ¤

130

£ ¤ ¬ «

" )

250A

¬ « ¬ «

295

119

301

¬ « ¬ «

202

134

§ ¦ ¨ 295

£ ¤ 1

" )

" ) 218

¬ «

A1A

¬ « 13

220

§ ¦ ¨

¬ «

® nq ¤

£ ¤ 1

" )

Legend

209

£ ¤

" )

13A

¬ « 207

" ) 214

" )

« § ¦¬ ¨ ¬ « 5

A1A

305

£ ¤

Year 2040 No Build

¬ « 100

" ) 315

Total Average Daily Truck Volume

¬ « 206

¬ «

" )

® q

204

¬ « 20

< 500 501 - 1,000

" )

1,001 - 2,000

" ) 310

2,001 - 3,000 > 3,001 320

" )

§ ¦ ¨

¬ «

200A

Railroad System

" )Roadway ) £ " )System " ¤ ¬ « " ) " )Water Bodies £ ¤ £ ¤ «" Conservation Lands " ) " ) ) ¬ ¬ « " ¬ « ) Six Counties Boundaries " ) ¬ «" ) ¬ « 335

" ) 308

301

200

316

441

225

500

309

318

329

335

" )

200A

25A

225A

200

326

326 326

Date: 7/11/2014

)LJXUH 2040 Truck VolumeV 2-64

¬ «

A1A

214

315

® Airport q ¤ Amtrak Station n ¤ Passenger Rail Station n

¤ n

" ) " " ) ) " )

" )

315

¬ «

208

10,560 Feet

6 Miles

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

FINANCIAL RESOURCES P UTTING OUR INFRASTRUCTURE TO WORK REQUIRES FINANCIAL RESOURCES TO BUILD , OPERATE AND MAINTAIN BOTH EXISTING AND FUTURE FACILITIES . Revenues were forecast through the year 2040. These revenues will come from federal, state and local revenue sources that are currently authorized. No new sources of revenue were considered. Within the Path Forward LRTP, only the revenues consistent with the federal planning boundaries for Clay, Duval, Nassau and St. Johns Counties were considered. All revenues shown in this report are in year of expenditure values. Alternative sources of revenue were considered and include

Table 2Ͳ23 and Table 2Ͳ24 summarize the estimated revenues. Operations and maintenance revenues are discussed in a later section of this report. Not all revenues estimated for the plan were used to fund projects within the Cost Feasible Plan. In Table 2Ͳ24 the total revenues estimated during the planning process for local governments are shown. However, during the Cost Feasible Plan development, local agencies used more conservative estimates of revenue in identifying their locallyͲfunded projects. The forecasts prepared as part of the planning process are shown to provide consistency. Table 2Ͳ25 summarizes the funding programs identified in the plan based on the agency with the primary decisionͲmaking authority using the adjusted local revenues and summarizes the allocation by mode in the Cost Feasible Plan. Additional detail on the forecasting methodology is provided in Technical Memorandum #6 – Financial Resources and the federal and state revenue forecasts are provided in Appendix C.

Extension of existing taxes that are scheduled to retire within the horizon of the plan. Authorizing new taxes to maximize the potential for revenue within the legislative authority of each county. Alternative taxes such as vehicle miles traveled taxes. Additional toll revenues beyond facilities currently planned as toll roads. 2Ͳ65

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Table 2Ͳ23. Federal and State Revenue Fund Program Strategic Intermodal System 17 Other State Highways 18 Turnpike/Tolls 19 Transportation Management Area Transportation Regional Incentive Program 20 Transportation Alternatives (TALU) 21 Transportation Alternatives (TALT) 22 State and Federal Transit 23 Federal Transit Administration Passenger Ferry Grant 24 Strategic Intermodal System Multimodal 25 Federal Seaport Grant 26 Total 2F2F

23F23F

24F24F

25F25F

26F26F

27F27F

28F28F

2019Ͳ2020 $39.82 $122.33 $0.00 $28.80 $0.70 $2.80 $3.78 $63.07

29F29F

30F30F

31F31F

$338.65 $311.00 $1,376.45

2021Ͳ2025 $508.26 $273.13 $1,951.22 $77.44 $5.40 $7.10 $9.38 $174.11 $6.62 $220.42 $3,719.80

2026Ͳ2030 2031Ͳ2040 $874.16 $2,635.50 $284.40 $709.21 $0.00 $0.00 $83.98 $126.18 $5.39 $10.80 $7.10 $14.20 $9.38 $18.76 $171.98 $350.84 $313.60 $2,923.24 $2,026.49 $7,420.68

Total $4,057.74 $1,389.08 $1,951.22 $316.40 $22.29 $31.20 $41.30 $760.00 $6.62 $3,795.90 $311.00 $14,543.42

17 The revenue estimate provided by FDOT of $3,880.96 million does not include Preliminary Engineering (PE) phases. This total includes Preliminary Engineering (PE) phases as programmed in the Cost Feasible Plan. 18 The revenue estimate provided by FDOT of $1,162.50 million does not include Preliminary Engineering (PE) phases. This total includes PE phases as programmed in the Cost Feasible Plan. 19 The revenue estimate was provided by FDOT. 20 These funds are distributed by FDOT on a districtwide basis. The total shown is a districtwide total. 21 These funds may only be used in the North Florida Transportation Management Area. 22 These funds are distributed by FDOT on a districtwide basis. The total shown is a districtwide total. 23 The funds include $680.10 million of federal and state capacity funding for the North Florida TPO estimated by FDOT plus $79.90 of New Starts funding. The federal and state capacity funds are distributed on a statewide priority basis. The New Starts funding is allocated by the Federal Transit Administration on a competitive basis. A total of $760.30 million of New Start funds was estimated on a statewide basis by FDOT. These programs are not shown in the FDOT Adopted Work Program. 24 A Passenger Ferry Program Grant was authorized for capacity improvements but is not obligated. 25 These funds are distributed by FDOT on a statewide basis. The funds were estimated by extrapolating the current statewide funding through the horizon of the plan and developing a reasonable estimate of the statewide funding that would be allocated to North Florida. This estimate includes $186.50 million of state funds to match the federal authorization for St. Johns River Dredging. 26 Authorization was approved in the 2014 Water Resources and Reform Development Act but is not obligated. In additional to $311.00 million shown, $186.50 million is anticipated to come from local sources and $186.50 million from the Strategic Intermodal System Multimodal programs. 2Ͳ66

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Table 2Ͳ24. Local Revenue 27 32F32F

Type

Source

Clay County

Constitutional Gas Tax County Fuel Tax NinthͲCent Gas Tax 1st Local Option Gas Tax

Local Infrastructure Surtax 28 Clay County Total Duval Constitutional Gas Tax County Fuel Tax 1st Local Option Gas Tax Extension 29 NinthͲCent Fuel Tax (Diesel Only) Local Infrastructure Surtax 30 Subtotal for NonͲTransit 31 Charter Transit Surtax Total Duval County Nassau Constitutional Gas Tax County Fuel Tax 1st Local Option Gas Tax NinthͲCent Gas Tax Total Nassau County St. Johns Constitutional Gas Tax County Fuel Tax 1st Local Option Gas Tax 32 19F24F3F3F

Years 2019Ͳ2020

Years 2021Ͳ2025

Years 2026Ͳ2030

Years 2031Ͳ2040

22ͲYear Total

$4.94 $2.18 $2.20 $13.16

$10.47 $4.61 $4.67 $28.04

$11.06 $4.87 $4.96 $29.73

$24.02 $10.59 $10.83 $64.98

$50.49 $22.25 $22.66 $135.91

$44.58 $67.04 $22.09 $9.74 $255.23

$47.79 $46.88 $20.66 $362.31

$50.62 $49.51 $21.82

$110.42 $107.54 $47.40 $0.00

$44.58 $275.87 $226.02 $99.62 $617.55

$2.80

$6.20

$6.82

$15.72

$31.54

$235.10

$551.73

$647.40

$524.96 $235.10 $760.05 $2.96 $1.31 $6.38 $1.07 $11.71 $6.16 $2.72 $19.41

$987.78 $551.73 $1,539.51 $6.28 $2.77 $13.67 $2.28 $25.00 $13.06 $5.76 $41.51

$725.55 $647.40 $1,372.95 $6.63 $2.92 $14.56 $2.43 $26.54 $13.79 $6.08 $44.17

$170.66 $1,651.08 $1,834.18 $14.41 $6.35 $32.05 $5.35 $58.16 $29.96 $13.20 $61.73

$2,408.95 $3,085.31 $5,506.70 $30.28 $13.35 $66.66 $11.13 $121.41 $62.97 $27.76 $166.82

$0.59

$1.30

$1.43

$3.29

$6.61

$28.86 $867.66

$61.62 $1,673.92

$65.47 $1,515.58

$108.18 $2,110.94

$264.13 $6,155.67

20F25F34F34F

21F26F35F35F

2F27F36F36F

23F28F37F37F

NinthͲCent Fuel Tax (Diesel Only) Total St. Johns County Total Local Funds 33 24F29F38F38F

$1,434.23

27 Not all revenues estimated for the plan were used to fund projects within the Cost Feasible Plan. The local agencies used more conservative estimates of revenue when providing their list of locallyͲfunded projects. These forecasts are shown to provide consistency with the forecasts prepared as part of this planning process. 28 The Local Infrastructure Surtax is set to expire in 2019 in Clay County. 29 The existing 1st Local Option Gas Tax expires in Duval County in 2036 and no funds are anticipated to be available for new capacity projects. The extension of the 1st Local Option Gas Tax was adopted by Local Ordinance 2013Ͳ820 and bonds will be issued making these revenues available in early years for capacity projects. 30 The Local Infrastructure Surtax is set to expire in Duval County in 2030. 31 Significant portions of these funds are anticipated to be allocated to debt service and maintenance and operations activities. 32 The 1st Local Option Gas expires in St. John’s County in 2036. 33 All local revenue available for capacity projects were estimated at 25 percent of the revenue forecasts with 75 percent being dedicated to operations and maintenance with the exception of Duval County where a greater portion of these revenues are dedicated to debt service and operations and maintenance. 2Ͳ67

$6.62 $2,397.16

$253.33 $6.62

$253.33 $253.33

$0.00

$760.00 $760.00

$1,377.21 $1,377.21

Transit

$302.93

$102.47 $1.98 $7.97 $124.27

$178.66 $11.84 $43.03

$0.00 $91.66 $13.44 $31.20 $41.30 $1.06

$0.00 $34.21

$0.00

$59.44

$34.21

$0.00

Bicycle and TSM&O Pedestrian34

34 These expenditures are based on 5% of road capacity projects and dedicated revenues for bicycle and pedestrian projects. 2Ͳ68

Table 2Ͳ25. Summary of Funding Programs by Primary DecisionͲMaking Authority Primary DecisionͲ Program Roads Making Authority FDOT Strategic Intermodal System $4,057.74 FDOT Turnpike/Tolls $1,951.22 FDOT SIS Multimodal FDOT Subtotal $7,306.37 North Florida TPO Other State Highways $1,297.42 North Florida TPO Transportation Management Area $268.75 North Florida TPO Transportation Alternatives (TALU) North Florida TPO Transportation Alternatives (TALT) North Florida TPO Transportation Regional Incentive Program (TRIP) $21.23 North Florida TPO State and Federal Transit North Florida TPO Subtotal $1,587.40 Local Clay County $236.88 Local Duval County Road Capacity $860.64 Local JAXPORT Local Transit Local Match Local Duval County Subtotal $860.64 Local Nassau County $39.64 Local St. Johns County $159.41 Subtotal Local $1,296.58 Federal Grants FTA Passenger Ferry Grant Federal Grants Federal Seaport Grant Federal Grants $0.00 Grand Total $8,892.93

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

$311.00 $311.00 $2,503.60

$186.50

$0.00 $186.50

$0.00

$2,006.10 $2,006.10

Freight $4,057.74 $1,951.22 $3,383.31 $9,392.27 $1,389.08 $316.40 $31.20 $41.30 $22.29 $760.00 $2.560.27 $248.73 $963.11 $186.50 $253.33 $1,402.95 $41.63 $167.38 $1,860.68 $6.62 $311.00 $317.62 $14,130.82

Total

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS L EVERAGING RESOURCES TO ENGAGE ENVIRONMENTAL STAKEHOLDERS EARLY IN THE PLANNING PROCESS RESULTED IN THE EFFECTIVE SCREENING OF PROJECTS AND AN UNDERSTANDING OF THE POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES OF MAJOR PROJECTS .

INTRODUCTION

FDOT Adopted the Efficient Transportation Decision Making Process to assist agencies in streamlining the environmental review of projects. The following is FDOT’s summary of the process.

was developed by using a methodology of rapid software prototyping, frequent user feedback and flexible architecture designed to adapt to the Efficient Transportation Decision Making Process. This resulted in an internetͲaccessible interactive database and mapping application which integrates: a geoͲrelational database of Efficient Transportation Decision Making Process, over 550 environmental resource geographic information systems data layers, an automated and standardized geographic information systemsͲbased environmental screening analysis application, and numerous tools for data entry, review, and reporting.

Florida’s Efficient Transportation Decision Making Process was developed in response to the Congress' "Environmental Streamlining" initiative, accomplishes major transportation project planning with early and continuous agency participation, efficient online electronically managed environmental review and meaningful dispute resolution mechanisms. Efficient Transportation Decision Making Process is carried out through the use of the Environmental Screening Tool (EST). EST

2Ͳ69

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

protecting and enhancing the natural environment," as established for federal transportation programs in Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAPͲ21).

It is used throughout the Efficient Transportation Decision Makin Process to:

Integrate data from multiple sources into an easy to use, standard format. Analyze the effects of proposed projects on the human and natural environment. Communicate information effectively among Environmental Technical Advisory Team (ETAT) representatives and to the public. Store and report results of the ETAT review effectively and efficiently. Maintain project records, including commitments and responses, throughout the project life cycle. Stakeholders involved in the Efficient Transportation Decision Making Process generally include Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs)/Transportation Planning Organizations (TPOs), county and municipal governments, federal and state agencies, Native American tribes, and the public. To facilitate intergovernmental interaction, each FDOT District has an Environmental Technical Advisory Team (ETAT). The ETAT includes representatives from MPOs/TPOs, state and federal agencies, and participating Native American Tribes. ETAT members and the public have the opportunity to provide input to the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) regarding a project's potential effects on the natural, physical, cultural, and community environment throughout the Planning phase of project delivery. These comments help to determine the feasibility of a proposed project; focus the issues to be addressed during the PD&E phase; allow for early identification of potential avoidance, minimization, and mitigation opportunities; and create products that may be used in the PD&E phase to promote efficiency and consistency during project development.

The Efficient Transportation Decision Making Process is composed of two project screening events: Planning and Programming. During the Planning Screen, comments received from the ETAT members and the public help FDOT and MPOs/TPOs to prioritize proposed transportation projects for their inclusion in their Cost Feasible Long Range Transportation Plans (LRTPs). During the Programming Screen, qualifying projects are reviewed when being considered for funding in the FDOT FiveͲYear Work Program or MPO Transportation Improvement Program, or if already funded, before advancing to the PD&E Phase. Coordination with the ETAT members is facilitated through the Environmental Screening Tool (EST), an InternetͲaccessible interactive database and mapping application. The EST brings together resource and project data from multiple sources into one consistent format. It provides quick, standardized Geographic Information System analyses, identifying potential natural, physical, cultural, and community resources present in the project area. The EST also allows the ETAT members to comment on the potential effects of the proposed project. Project information is made available to the public through the Efficient Transportation Decision Making Public Access Site (https://etdmpub.flaͲ etat.org/est/).

SUMMARY OF EFFICIENT TRANSPORTATION DECISION MAKING PLANNING SCREEN RESULTS

The Efficient Transportation Decision Making Process links land use, transportation, and environmental resource planning initiatives through early interactive agency involvement. It also connects the Planning and PD&E phases by carrying forward planning products, previous analyses and decisions supporting future transportation decisions in subsequent phases of project development. Furthermore, the Efficient Transportation Decision Making Process provides a planning framework to support the national goal of Environmental Sustainability, which seeks "to enhance the performance of the transportation system while

As part of the Efficient Transportation Decision Making Process, each of the projects identified in the Needs Plan were submitted through the planning screen. This process is shown in Figure 2Ͳ12. A report of the data provided through the planning screen is provided in Appendix D.

2Ͳ70

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Figure 2-12. Efficient Transportation Decision Making Planning Process

2Í˛71

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Based on the potential environmental impacts of projects, two projects identified as priority projects were not included in the Cost Feasible Plan as a result of the identification of potential fatal flaws during the environmental screening process and potential controversy.

the use of mitigation banks established pursuant to this part… As part of the program, on an annual basis, projects that are anticipated to be constructed in the first three years of the Tentative Work Program are submitted with a description of the habitats and wetland impacts and a mitigation plan describing which mitigation bank shall be used. A funding plan for the mitigation and the commitments for the funding of mitigation in partnership with the water management district are required. The water management district is then responsible for ensuring that the mitigation requirements are met in accordance with the plan.

SR 313 from US 1 to International Golf Parkway, Wells Road Extension from SR 21 Blanding Boulevard to Argyle Forest Boulevard.

Public comments are summarized in Technical Memorandum #1 – Public Involvement.

The applicable mitigation banks for this region are shown on Figure 2Ͳ13. Credits for impacts based on the Uniform Mitigation Assessment Method may be purchased from local agencies as well.

SYSTEM APPROACH TO MITIGATION The mitigation of environmental impacts are addressed in the FDOT Project Development and Environment Manual which implements the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and related legislation for projects that may use federal funds or require a federal action. These procedures also apply to major projects where state revenues are used.

The mitigation of other environmental impacts, such as archeological and historic resources and noise are addressed in the FDOT Project Development and Environment Manual. Specific project level mitigation requirements are determined through the Environmental Resource Permit process administered by the St. Johns River Water Management District.

FDOT maintains a wetland mitigation plan with the St. Johns River Water Management District that is conducted on an annual basis for projects in the FDOT’s Adopted Work Program. The requirements to be address in the Mitigation Plan are outlined in F.S. 373.41337 Mitigation Requirements for Specified Transportation Projects.

The FDOT Mitigation Plan and St. Johns River Water Management District permitting process are provided in Appendix E.

The Legislature recognized in the establishment of this program that “environmental mitigation for the impact of transportation projects proposed by the Department of Transportation or a transportation authority can be more effectively achieved by regional, longͲrange mitigation planning rather than on a projectͲbyͲproject basis. It is the intent of the Legislature that mitigation to offset the adverse effects of these transportation projects be funded by the Department of Transportation and be carried out by the water management districts, including

AIR QUALITY The Jacksonville urban area airshed is designated as a maintenance area in accordance with Section 185A of the Clean Air Act Amendments. As such the LRTP may proceed revisiting the conformity determination requirements in accordance with the State Implementation Plan.

2Ͳ72

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Figure 2-13. St. Johns River Water Management District Wetland Mitigation Banks

2Í˛73

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

This page is intentionally blank.

2Í˛74

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT T HE INFORMATION GATHERED EARLY IN THE PLANNING PROCESS THROUGH PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT IS ESSENTIAL TO THE SUCCESS OF THE LRTP. W HEN COMBINED WITH PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DATA , IT SETS THE DIRECTION FOR THE PLAN ' S DEVELOPMENT . I T WILL TELL THE N ORTH F LORIDA TPO WHAT THE RESIDENTS OF N ORTH F LORIDA CONSIDER IMPORTANT AND PLAYS A SIGNIFICANT ROLE IN ESTABLISHING THE TRANSPORTATION GOALS . The public involvement activities carried out as part of this plan were conducted to inform and solicit ideas from the public about transportation needs, alternatives and priorities. The program elements are described further in the following sections.

The Path Forward 2040 Public Involvement Plan contained a structured process to inform the public and interested parties and solicited input in identifying transportation needs and prioritizing projects. Multiple methods were used to engage and solicit input from the public as part of the planning process.

2Í˛75

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS SURVEY A survey was conducted online, by landline telephone and by mobile phone among residents of Baker, Clay, Duval, Nassau, Putnam, and St. Johns counties to identify opinions on transportation issues and needs. A total of 759 respondents participated in the survey. The key findings are listed below:

Of the respondents who work outside the home, 92 percent traveled to their jobs by private car, while three percent rode the bus, two percent participated in a car pool, and the remainder went by bicycle (one percent), airplane (one percent), walking (0.5 percent), or were always on the road, such professional truckers (one percent). About seven percent of the commuters said that the traffic on their primary road to work was “always backed up far below the speed limit,” and 21 percent said their road was “usually below the speed limit unless there’s bad weather or an accident.” Interstate 10 was most often cited as “always backed up,” by 25 percent of the people who used it. The mean commuting time to work was 24 minutes, and the median commute was 20 minutes. These findings were unchanged from the 2008 transportation survey. About 86 percent of the commuters reported that their current commuting time was acceptable to them, while 14 percent found it “unacceptable.” 97 percent said they would be willing to accept a commute up to 30 minutes to work. About 17 percent of the respondents reported that they had used public transit in North Florida during the past year. Public transit use was highest among respondents age 18 to 24, at 36 percent, and also among those with household incomes under $25,000, at 28 percent. Among those who used public transportation, 61 percent used the bus, 27 percent used a trolley, 26 percent used the Skyway, and 23 percent used a van or shuttle service. Most residents of North Florida have used public transit in another city: 67 percent said they had used public transit while traveling in another city. In this case, the rate of usage increased with household income, rising from a low of 43 percent among those with household incomes below $25,000 to 81 percent among those with household incomes of $150,000 and over. Those who had used public transit in another city had most often used a bus (68 percent), subway (62

ELECTRONIC MEDIA The public information campaign used multiple forms of electronic media to inform and solicit public input.

Interactive project web site Asset allocation game Social media Community forum engagement

2Ͳ76

percent), commuter rail (35 percent) or light rail (28 percent). The “need for better mass transit” was identified by 22 percent of the respondents as the most important transportation issue in North Florida. Fifteen percent specifically mentioned the need for an expanded bus system, while 13 percent called for an expanded road system and 12 percent mentioned the need to alleviate traffic congestion in general. Only one of eight ideas for transportation was deemed a “high priority” by a majority of the respondents. “Providing smoothͲflowing traffic on local highways” is a high priority for 72 percent of the respondents, 47 percent placed a high priority of “Providing convenient public transit alternatives,” and 37 percent placed a high priority on “Promoting the use of alternative fuels and vehicles.” Of the respondents, 28 percent felt that public transit services in North Florida are adequate, while 52 percent said they are not adequate and 20 percent were “not sure.” Those who said public transit is not adequate were invited to suggest what the region should do to improve it. 36 percent called for “more buses” or “more bus routes.” 18 percent suggested using light rail, and 13 percent proposed expanding all of the public transit options for greater accessibility. Public opinion was divided on the best longͲterm solution to reducing traffic in their area. “Improving public transit,” was supported by 37 percent. About 26 percent favored “developing communities where people don’t have to drive so much” and 24 percent advocated “building new roads.”

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

PROJECT WEB SITE

The pathforward2040.com website included:

The following summarizes the geographic clusters of comments:

Home page with news, events and social media feed, overview video and link to asset allocation game Plan development overview with news and frequently asked questions Project lists, maps and documents Public involvement opportunities including the asset allocation game, online survey and social media Project team contact information From September 2013 to December 2014 the site had 4,527 users, 5,586 sessions and 9,652 pageͲviews. The most popular page was “Get Involved” which detailed public involvement opportunities including a survey, asset allocation game, meetings and events. The second most popular page was “Resources” which included project lists, maps and study documents.

Table 2Ͳ28 summarizes the priority strategies and rankings of the participants. Figure 2Ͳ16 summarize the reported priorities. Similar to other sources of input, transit and bicycle and pedestrian improvements were the highest ranked priorities followed by maintaining our roadways and improving traffic flow.

ASSET ALLOCATION GAME

In Table 2Ͳ29 and Figure 2Ͳ17, when the budget was allocated, enhancing safety and widening roadways were budgeted higher than transit or bicycles and pedestrians.

The Path Forward 2040 website included a link to an “asset allocation game” where visitors could provide input. There were five screens that are summarized in Table 2Ͳ26 which summarizes the game. The project resulted in 1,400 visitors and 257 persons provided data. 35

A total of 1,714 data points were input on the strategies recommended within each priority area. More males than females responded. The household income was distributed to higher income brackets than exist within the region with a weighted average of $82,500 versus a median wage for the region of $42,400. Ten responders were in the low income bracket with a household income of less than $10,000 per year.

25F30F40F40F

Figure 2Ͳ14 is a map of the locations where users identified priority locations. Table 2Ͳ27 is a legend for the map indicating the priority of the map input by color. The input received from users peaked around placements in MetroJacksonville.com an online community forum on transportation. Figure 2Ͳ15 summarizes the number of visitors who use of the allocation game by period.

Table 2Ͳ30 summarizes the strategies recommended in the onͲline allocation game. Table 2Ͳ31 is a summary of the demographics of the participants.

35 Map Data on Google Drive https://www.google.com/fusiontables/DataSource?docid=1m6 MDLQVmM8JACZ1J9n4hYH32Irs_v2IeͲTSFvo2O Map on Google Maps https://www.google.com/fusiontables/embedviz?q=select+col2 +from+1m6MDLQVmM8JACZ1J9n4hYH32Irs_v2IeͲ TSFvo2O&viz=MAP&h=false&lat=30.256694798509937&lng=Ͳ 81.79939270020623&t=1&z=9&l=col2&y=2&tmplt=2&hml=TW O_COL_LAT_LNG

2Ͳ77

In the urban core, transit was identified as the highest priority in the comments (29 comments). This is the consistent with comments received through other sources (public perception survey, public meetings, etc.) The next highest comment was related to freight and portͲrelated investments (8 comments).

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Table 2Ͳ26. OnͲline Asset Allocation Game Screen Screen 1 – Welcome The first screen provides a brief introduction to the project.

Screen Image

Screen 2 – Priority Ranking The second screen asked visitors to prioritize a list of priorities by moving their top three priorities. Ten preset priorities were provided with an option to suggest another priority. Invest in ports Enhance safety Expand transit Serve elderly or disabled Serve trucking Alternative fuel infrastructure Maintain roads and bridges Enhance traffic flow Serve bicycles and pedestrians Widen roads The opportunity to comment about the priorities was also provided and a link to an interactive map provided for users to identify specific locations where projects are needed. Figure 2Ͳ17 and Table 2Ͳ24 shows the locations where project priorities were located and the level of priority. Screen 3 – Budget Allocation The third screen asked visitors to allocate budget amounts in ten categories. Each category contained existing budget amounts that reflect federal and state limitations of the flexibility of funding programs within the plan. For example, the Strategic Intermodal Systems road capacity funding category investments are selected by the state and provided to the North Florida TPO for concurrency. The visitors’ task was to allocate the portion of the budget that was not already allocated.

2Ͳ78

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Table 2Ͳ26. OnͲline Asset Allocation Game Screen 4 – Additional Questions The fourth screen asked visitors to provide more detailed input on the type of alternative strategies the respondent would recommend in each of the ten priority areas. This was accomplished by having visitors rank a set of alternatives for each category. Users could also add comments within each priority area describing each alternative.

Screen 5 – Stay Involved The last screen was used to gather demographic data about visitors and provide additional project information for those who wished to provide information.

Table 2Ͳ27. Interactive Priority Map Legend Priority Alternative Fuel Infrastructure Enhance Safety Expand Transit Invest in Ports Maintain Roads/Bridges Serve Bikes and Pedestrians Serve Elderly/Disabled Widen Roads

Icon Color Green Purple White Turquoise Grey Blue Red Yellow

2Ͳ79

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Figure 2-14. Interactive Priority Map

2Í˛80

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Figure 2-15. Visits and Use of Asset Allocation Game

2Í˛81

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Table 2Ͳ28. Summary of Priority Strategies OnͲline Allocation Game Ranking Priority Alternative Fuel Infrastructure Enhance Safety Expand Transit Invest in Ports Maintain Roads/Bridges Serve Bikes and Pedestrians Serve Elderly/Disabled Serve Trucking Traffic Flow Widen Roads

Average Rank

Times Ranked 27 47 108 38 64 99 19 5 55 20

Figure 2-16. Reported Priorities in Asset Allocation Game

2Ͳ82

2.15 2.04 1.74 2.13 2.17 1.99 2.37 2.20 1.96 1.60

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Table 2Ͳ29. Budget Allocation from OnͲline Allocation Game Budget Item Enhance Safety Widen Roads Expand Transit Serve Bikes & Pedestrians Serve Elderly/Disabled Maintain Roads & Bridges Invest in Ports Serve Trucking Traffic Flow Alternative Fuel Infrastructure

Dollars Allocated

Figure 2-17. Summary of Budget Allocation

2Ͳ83

Average Dollars 399 166 1024 847 217 548 287 44 412 187

2.79 1.15 7.11 5.88 1.52 3.81 1.99 0.31 2.86 1.30

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Table 2Ͳ30. Summary of Strategies from OnͲline Allocation Game Strategy Alternative Fuels I would not invest in alternative fuels Incentives for alternative fuel purchases Incentives for compressed natural gas stations Incentives for electronic vehicle stations Enhance Safety Access management (reducing driveways and closing medians) Improving traffic signals (removing "permitted left turn phases, etc.) Intersection improvements (adding turn lanes, etc.) Expand Transit Commuter rail Enhancing bus service Expanding bus services Trolley services Invest in Ports I would not invest in ports Improve rail access to ports Improve water access to ports (dredging) Serve Bicyclists and Pedestrians Construct bicycle lanes Construct paths separate from the roadway Construct sidewalks Traffic Flow Road rangers Roadway message signs Traffic signal coordination Widen Roads Build new roads Construct or improve intersections and interchanges Widen existing roadways Widen roadways with express lanes Total

2Ͳ84

Inputs 224 26 72 53 73 233 68 64 101 306 97 68 70 71 214 23 81 44 66 263 78 103 82 209 51 55 103 263 49 96 58 1,712

Relative Rank 1.81 2.19 1.71 1.92 1.68 1.69 1.93 2.13 1.26 2.09 1.62 2.10 2.54 2.28 1.76 2.26 1.63 2.30 1.39 1.77 1.90 1.55 1.91 2.18 1.93 1.84 2.03 2.82 1.52 2.13 2.07 1.84

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Table 2Ͳ31. Summary of Demographic Information from OnͲline Allocation Game Survey item Gender Female Male Household Income Less than $25,000 $25,000 but less than $50,000 $50,000 but less than $100,000 $100,000 but less than $150,000 $150,000 and over Residents in Household 1 2 3 4 5 More than 5 Number of Drivers in Household 1 2 3 4 5 Number of Vehicles in Household 1 2 3 4 5 Work Trip Travel Modes Bike Bus Drive Mix of modes Commute Durations Less than 10 minutes Between 10 and 30 minutes Between 30 and 60 minutes More than 1 hour

2Ͳ85

Number of Responses 117 43 74 105 10 16 44 25 10 106 21 47 15 18 4 1 109 22 70 11 5 1 107 25 60 14 7 1 106 3 2 86 15 101 24 54 20 3

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

SOCIAL MEDIA

NEWSLETTERS

The North Florida TPO’s Facebook page and Twitter account were used to post study updates, meetings, events and information. The public involvement team posted 72 tweets and 100 Facebook statuses updates generating 7,110 impressions. Facebook advertising was used to generate traffic to the asset allocation game December 2013 to February 2014 resulting in 136,967 impressions and 651 clicks to the site.

Newsletters announcing meetings and study updates were distributed to the contact list at the beginning of the study, prior to each round of public meetings.

OVERVIEW BROCHURE An overview brochure was created to introduce the LRTP update process and participation opportunities. The complete brochure was distributed at meetings and events throughout the course of the project.

Two Pinterest boards were developed to encourage input – “What’s Your Vision?” and “Transportation Flashback.” Sixty pins were placed generating over 8,000 impressions per month. The most popular pin, “More bike paths, please!” showed the Cherry Creek bike path in Denver and was reͲpinned over 50 times.

COMMUNITY FORUM

The Metrojacksonville.com online news publication and community forum was used to share articles about the update, promote discussion and obtain comments. Each round of public meetings was promoted on the site through editorial articles and banner advertising that linked to the pathforward2040.com site.

OVERVIEW VIDEO An overview video was created to explain the LRTP process. The video was posted on the website and used for presentations, meetings and workshops. The video can be viewed at www.pathforward2040.com.

CALENDAR A public involvement calendar was developed to schedule and document presentations, group meetings, public workshops and outreach events throughout the study.

CONTACT LIST A contact list of stakeholders was developed to include elected officials, agency partners, transportationͲrelated organizations, business and civic groups, neighborhood associations, environmental groups, organizations serving the elderly, disabled, minority and lowͲincome populations, meeting attendees and interested parties who sign up via the website.

Figure 2-18. Summary Brochure

2Ͳ86

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW YOUTH OUTREACH

VISUALIZATION TECHNIQUES Visualization techniques are required to communicate the planning process to the public. The visualization techniques employed included:

As part of the 2014 National Engineer’s Week Future City Competition, 120 students in elementary, middle and high school throughout North Florida imagined their “city of the future”. The competition engages teams of students, educators and mentors to prepare vision statements, write research essays, use the SimCity™ software, build scale models with recycled materials, and present their ideas for cities of the future in the year 2050.

Participating schools included

Clay County Ͳ Argyle Elementary Duval County Ͳ Lee High School Duval County Ͳ Westview KͲ8 Nassau County Ͳ Yulee Middle School St. Johns County Ͳ Florida School for the Deaf and Blind Individuals from transportation agencies and consulting firms volunteered as mentors.

Allocation games – onͲline and interactive meeting games were used to engage the public in the virtual or physical allocation of resources. Interactive map for needs – as part of the onͲ line allocation game, participants could locate specific project needs and add comments explaining their needs. Temperature charts – as part of the Needs Plan public workshops temperature charts were used to explain intensity and extent of congestion and safety challenges. Maps, charts and graphs – presentations were used as part of the public workshops to explain the purpose, intent and process used in the development of the plan. Video – a project video was prepared explaining the context and planning process used.

AGENCY MEETINGS

The result of the program was education on the role of transportation in regional development. The participants identified a wide range of future technologies for transit that included trains, hyperloops, gondola and bus rapid transit. Livability was also emphasized as part of several models. Figure 2Ͳ19 is an example of the one of the physical models developed by Yulee Middle School.

A total of 109 community small group, steering committee, North Florida TPO Board or committees, or community organization briefings were conducted during the planning process. Table 2Ͳ32 summarizes these meetings by organization and if the meeting was a technical meeting or citizens meeting, and if the meeting engaged or invited minorities, underserved populations or businesses.

STEERING COMMITTEE The Steering Committee was formed with representatives from the TPO Technical Coordinating Committee, Citizens Advisory Committee, Board, agencies, environmental, business and community groups. The members of the Steering Committee are shown in the forward to this report and included representatives from:

Figure 2-19. Example Future City Physical Model

2Ͳ87

Career Source Citizens Community forum (Metro Jacksonville) Elected officials Florida Department of Environmental Protection FDOT Health Planning Council of Northeast Florida Jacksonville Aviation Authority

22ͲFebͲ13 26ͲJunͲ13 9ͲJulͲ13 10ͲJulͲ13 11ͲJulͲ13 13ͲJulͲ13 15ͲJulͲ13 16ͲJulͲ13 16ͲJulͲ13 18ͲJulͲ13 22ͲJulͲ13 22ͲJulͲ13 23ͲJulͲ13 30ͲJulͲ13 31ͲJulͲ13 31ͲJulͲ13 2ͲAugͲ13 5ͲAugͲ13 6ͲAugͲ13 9ͲAugͲ13 9ͲAugͲ13 9ͲAugͲ13 12ͲAugͲ13 12ͲAugͲ13 13ͲAugͲ13 16ͲAugͲ13 16ͲAugͲ13 16ͲAugͲ13 25ͲAugͲ13 28ͲAugͲ13 5ͲSepͲ13 5ͲSepͲ13 9ͲSepͲ13 24ͲSepͲ13 1ͲOctͲ13 6ͲDecͲ13 17ͲDecͲ13 10ͲJanͲ14 14ͲJanͲ14 14ͲJanͲ14

Event

2Ͳ88

Agency Kickoff Meeting Steering Committee Meeting #1 Travel Demand Model Government Staff Discussion Ͳ Baker County Travel Demand Model Government Staff Discussion – Town of Orange Park Travel Demand Model Government Staff Discussion Ͳ Clay County Travel Demand Model Government Staff Discussion Ͳ Nassau County Travel Demand Model Government Staff Discussion – City of St. Augustine Travel Demand Model Government Staff Discussion Ͳ Fernandina Beach Travel Demand Model Government Staff Discussion Ͳ St. Johns County Travel Demand Model Government Staff Discussion Ͳ Putnam County Travel Demand Model Government Staff Discussion – City of Hastings Travel Demand Model Government Staff Discussion Ͳ Town of Marineland Travel Demand Model Government Staff Discussion Ͳ Green Cove Springs Jax2035 Bicycle and Pedestrian Committee of the Florida Bicycle Association Travel Demand Model Government Staff Discussion Ͳ Callahan City Hall Travel Demand Model Government Staff Discussion – City of Jacksonville Travel Demand Model Government Staff Discussion Ͳ Town of MacClenny Travel Demand Model Government Staff Discussion Ͳ Town of Penney Farms Travel Demand Model Government Staff Discussion Ͳ St. Augustine Beach Travel Demand Model Government Staff Discussion Ͳ Atlantic Beach Travel Demand Model Government Staff Discussion Ͳ Jacksonville Beach Travel Demand Model Government Staff Discussion Ͳ Neptune Beach Travel Demand Model Government Staff Discussion Ͳ Town of Pomona Park Travel Demand Model Government Staff Discussion Ͳ Town of Welaka Jax2035 Bicycle and Pedestrian Committee of the Florida Bicycle Association Travel Demand Model Government Staff Discussion Ͳ Crescent City Travel Demand Model Government Staff Discussion Ͳ Interlachen Travel Demand Model Government Staff Discussion – City of Palatka Travel Demand Model Government Staff Discussion Ͳ Town of Penney Farms Travel Demand Model Government Staff Discussion – City of Yulee Travel Demand Model Government Staff Discussion Ͳ Baldwin Travel Demand Model Government Staff Discussion Ͳ Keystone Heights Travel Demand Model Government Staff Discussion Ͳ Town of Glen St. Mary Jax2035 Bicycle and Pedestrian Committee of the Florida Bicycle Association Jax2035 Bicycle and Pedestrian Committee of the Florida Bicycle Association Regional Transportation Commission Jax2035 Bicycle and Pedestrian Committee of the Florida Bicycle Association Data Forecasts and Needs Teleconference Ͳ Putnam County Data Forecasts and Needs Teleconference Ͳ Clay County Data Forecasts and Needs Teleconference Ͳ Nassau County

Table 2Ͳ32. Meeting Summary Date Region Region Baker Clay Clay Nassau St. Johns Nassau St. Johns Putnam St. Johns St. Johns Clay Regional Nassau Duval Baker Clay St. Johns Duval Duval Duval Putnam Putnam Regional Putnam Putnam Putnam Clay Nassau Duval Clay Baker Regional Regional Region Regional Putnam Clay Nassau

County

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Citizen

z z z z z z z

Technical z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z

Minority or Underserved z z z

Business

14ͲJanͲ14 16ͲJanͲ14 26ͲFebͲ14 26ͲFebͲ14 1ͲMarͲ14 12ͲMarͲ14 13ͲMarͲ14 24ͲMarͲ14 27ͲMarͲ14 2ͲAprͲ14 2ͲAprͲ14 3ͲAprͲ14 10ͲAprͲ14 14ͲAprͲ14 14ͲAprͲ14 14ͲAprͲ14 15ͲAprͲ14 17ͲAprͲ14 22ͲAprͲ14 22ͲAprͲ14 22ͲAprͲ14 23ͲAprͲ14 23ͲAprͲ14 24ͲAprͲ14 28ͲAprͲ14 4ͲMayͲ14 6ͲMayͲ14 7ͲMayͲ14 7ͲMayͲ14 7ͲMayͲ14 10ͲMayͲ14 12ͲMayͲ14 15ͲMayͲ14 28ͲMayͲ14 4ͲJunͲ14 4ͲJunͲ14 5ͲJunͲ14 12ͲJunͲ14 12ͲJunͲ14

Event

2Ͳ89

Data Forecasts and Needs Teleconference Ͳ St. Johns County Regional Transportation Commission Amelia IslandͲFernandina BeachͲYulee Chamber Government Affairs Committee Regional Transportation Commission Northwest Jacksonville Sherriff ShAdCo Safety Fair City of Jacksonville North Citizens Planning Advisory Committee North Florida TPO Board Briefing Emmanuel United Methodist Church ͲPalatka Steering Committee Meeting #2 North Florida TPO Citizens Advisory Committee Briefing North Florida TPO Technical Coordinating Committee Briefing Regional Transportation Commission North Florida TPO Board Briefing City of Jacksonville TEU Committee Briefing St. Augustine City Commission West Augustine Community Redevelopment Association Needs Plan Public Workshop – St. Augustine City Commission Chambers Needs Plan Public Workshop – Clay County ThrasherͲHorne Center Baker County Commission Briefing Clay County Commission Briefing Needs Plan Public Workshop – Baker County Commission Chambers Nassau County Commission Briefing Needs Plan Public Workshop – Nassau County Commission Chambers Needs Plan Public Workshop – Duval County Florida State College Deerwood Needs Plan Public Workshop – Putnam County Commission Chambers Trinity United Methodist Church Ͳ Fernandina Shrimp Festival St. Johns County Commission Briefing Steering Committee Meeting #3 North Florida TPO Citizens Advisory Committee Briefing North Florida TPO Technical Coordinating Committee Briefing National Train Day Healthy Baker Ͳ Baker County Health Department Springfield Community Meeting with Congresswoman Brown Regional Transportation Commission North Florida TPO Citizens Advisory Committee Briefing North Florida TPO Technical Coordinating Committee Briefing Rotary Club of Arlington Lincolnville Neighborhood Association City of Jacksonville Northwest Citizens Planning Advisory Committee

Table 2Ͳ32. Meeting Summary Date St. Johns Region Nassau Region Duval Duval Region Putnam Region Region Region Region Region Duval St. Johns St. Johns St. Johns Clay Baker Clay Baker Nassau Nassau Duval Putnam Nassau St. Johns Region Region Region Duval Baker Duval Region Region Region Duval St. Johns Duval

County

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

z z

z z z z z

z z z z z z z z z z z z z z

z z z z z z z z z

z z z z z z z z z z

z z z z z z z z

Minority or Underserved z z z z z z z

Citizen

Technical

z z

z z z z z z z z

Business

18ͲJunͲ14 18ͲJunͲ14 26ͲJunͲ14 6ͲAugͲ14 6ͲAugͲ14 6ͲAugͲ14 14ͲAugͲ14 27ͲAugͲ14 11ͲSepͲ14 16ͲSepͲ14 16ͲSepͲ14 17ͲSepͲ14 18ͲSepͲ14 22ͲSepͲ14 23ͲSepͲ14 24ͲSepͲ14 1ͲOctͲ14 1ͲOctͲ14 1ͲOctͲ14 4ͲOctͲ14 9ͲOctͲ14 14ͲOctͲ14 22ͲOctͲ14 28ͲOctͲ14 5ͲNovͲ14 5ͲNovͲ14 13ͲNovͲ14 13ͲNovͲ14 17ͲNovͲ14 3ͲDecͲ14

Event

2Ͳ90

River Region Human Services Community Review Panel Southpoint Rotary Steering Committee Meeting #4 Steering Committee Meeting #5 North Florida TPO Citizens Advisory Committee Briefing North Florida TPO Technical Coordinating Committee Briefing North Florida TPO Board Briefing Southside Businessmen's Club North Florida TPO Board Briefing Associated Builders and Contractors Women's Council Cost Feasible Plan Public Workshop Ͳ Jacksonville Main Library Cost Feasible Plan Public Workshop Ͳ Fleming Island High School Cost Feasible Plan Public Workshop Ͳ American Beach Community Center Cost Feasible Plan Public Workshop Ͳ Bartram Trail Library Cost Feasible Plan Public Workshop Ͳ Jacksonville Beach City Hall Regional Transportation Commission Steering Committee Meeting #6 North Florida TPO Citizens Advisory Committee Briefing North Florida TPO Technical Coordinating Committee Briefing Clay Soul Food Festival North Florida TPO Board Briefing Logistics Advisory Group Regional Transportation Commission Cost Feasible Plan Public Workshop – North Florida TPO Board Room North Florida TPO Citizens Advisory Committee Briefing North Florida TPO Technical Coordinating Committee Briefing Public Hearing – North Florida TPO Board Room North Florida TPO Board Briefing Lakeshore Area Preservation Society Regional Transportation Commission

Table 2Ͳ32. Meeting Summary Date Duval Duval Region Region Region Region Region Duval Region Duval Duval Clay Nassau St. Johns Duval Region Region Region Region Clay Region Region Region Duval Region Region Region Region Duval Region

County

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z

z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z

Citizen

Technical

Minority or Underserved z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z

Business

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Jacksonville Sherriff’s Office Jacksonville Transportation Authority JAXPORT Local governments Mayo Clinic (healthcare) National Park Service Regional Planning Commission Regional Transportation Commission U.S. Marine Corps U.S. Navy WorkSource The steering committee met six times Ͳ in June of 2013, and March, May, June, August and October of 2014.

In 2013, the Florida Legislature established a Regional Transportation Commission for the six county region of Baker, Clay, Duval, Nassau, Putnam and St. Johns Counties. The commission is charged with developing a regional multimodal corridors plan and identifying funding to support deployments of regional nature. As part of the planning process, briefings were provided throughout the planning process in December of 2013, January, February, March, April, May, September and October of 2014. At the December 3, 2014 meeting, the commission endorsed of the plan.

TECHNICAL COORDINATING COMMITTEE

NEEDS PLAN PUBLIC WORKSHOPS

The members of the Technical Coordinating Committee are summarized in the Forward of this report and include representatives from:

MEETING FORMAT

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION

Six Needs Plan public workshops were conducted in April 2014. One workshop was conducted in each of the six counties participating in the Needs Plan. A presentation was provided during the workshops that provided:

FDOT Jacksonville Aviation Authority Jacksonville Sherriff Office JAXPORT Local governments National Park Service Ocean Highway and Port Authority Regional Planning Commission Regional Transportation Commission St. Augustine Airport Authority U.S. Navy Utilities (JEA and Clay County) WorkSource Briefings and workshops were provided to the Technical Coordinating Committee in April, May, June, August, October and November of 2014. These meetings are publically noticed in accordance with the North Florida TPO policies.

Overview of the planning process Goals and objectives Summary of trends and conditions related to population growth Increases in congestion Growth in transit ridership Crashes Maps were used to provide visualizations of the hot spots for congestion and safety Opportunities for public input through the web page and allocation game, comment cards during the workshop and contact information for the North Florida TPO Examples of the visualization techniques used are shown in Figure 2Ͳ20 for safety hot spots and Figure 2Ͳ21 for congestion hot spots.

CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE

Table 2Ͳ33 summarizes the public notifications for the Needs Plan and Cost Feasible Plan public workshops and the Cost Feasible Plan Public Hearing.

The members of the Citizens Advisory Committee are summarized in the Forward of this report. Briefings and workshops were provided to the Citizens Advisory Committee in April, May, June, August, October and November of 2014. These meetings are publically noticed in accordance with the North Florida TPO policies.

PARTICIPATION A summary of the attendees at each of the Needs Plan public workshops are summarized in Table 2Ͳ34.

2Ͳ91

J I 115A

T S

J I 121A

4 Miles

LEGEND

108

£ ¤

J I

£ ¤

J I

115

I J J I

J I

105

J I I J J I J I J I

200A

108

J I

105B

A1A

0019

105

105A

200A

115

Cold Spot

0016

J I J I

Hot Spot Analysis Scale

T T S S T S

107

North Florida TPO Boundary

105A

0012

Neutral

105A

107

£ ¤

Hot Spot

105

015A

105

T S

J I 121

£ ¤

J I

A1A

J I T S

108

105

107A

J I

T SS T T S

200

I J J I

T S A

T S

5 11

J T I S 110

102

J I 110

T IS J 24

T S A1A

110

T S 104

J I 106

J I 163

J I

T S 10

115A

119

J I

117

T S

J I

101

A1A

113

109A

T S S T

J I

T S

T S 109

115

£ ¤

T S

90A

10A

T S

£ ¤

J I

90A

£ ¤

T S

I J J I

T S

101A

228

J I 212

126

211

J I

211

213

200

T S

217

1 21

128

295

£ ¤

T S

§ ¦ ¨

J I

228

213

115C

228

T S

129

J I

T S

115 A

T S

103

§ ¦ ¨ 10

T S

200

T S

£ ¤

T S

21B

111

T S S T

J I

T T S S

J I

114

T S 116

113

J I

139

103

T S

£ ¤ S T

119

7 11

21D

T S

J I S T T S

T S

202

301

£ ¤

134

T S T S

115

116

T S

152

J I

J I 210A

J I I J T I J JS I

J I 203

1179

J I

1162

224 1187

217

J I

1177

J I 1181

209

JI I J

220A

J I

220A

13B

J I

220

A1A

220B

T S

J I

1189

J I

J I 15A

220

J I

J I I J 209

J I

209B

739

21A

210

J I 739B

T S 16

315

T S

J I

218

£ ¤

16A

T S

16A

J I

209

T S

J I

315

215

T S

J I

13A

T S

J I

15A

J I I J

§ ¦ ¨

226

209

208

I J J I J S I JTJ JI I I J I J I J I I J S T J I I J J I I J J I 1333

J I

1332

1335

A1A

1351

1365

J I

1340

T S 17

£ ¤

J I

315C

J S I T 219

100

J I

309D

J I

J I 305

)LJXUH &rash Severity +RW 6SRWV

315

2-92

1363

A1A

J I

214

312

T S

J I

352

J I

A1A

13A

J I

1353

T S

J I 214

315

1339

1354

13A

1359

J I

T S

1337

¤ £

J I

115A

J I 121A

T S

J I

¤ £

J I

108

115

J I I J J I J I J JI I J I 105A

£ ¤

0012

J I

105

Peak Hour Delay

Cold Spot

105B

105

T S

0019

105A

I J J I

T S

107

Neutral

A1A

T S

200

4 Miles

108

200A

115

North Florida TPO Boundary

0016

200A

LEGEND

T S

107

J I

107A

J I

105

T S

¤ £

J I S T

108

015A

Hot Spot

105

T S

¤ £

J JI I 121

T S

5 11

J T I S 110

102

J I 110

T IS J 24

200

A1A

T S

110

T S 104

J I

301

£ ¤

106

J I

J I 163

J I

T S 10

115A

119

J I

T S

117

§ ¦ ¨

T S 22

200

T S

217

101

A1A

113

109

228

T S

10A

1 21

128

T S

£ ¤

T S

T I S J

295

T S

J I

90A

129

T S

103

213

115C

J I

109A

116

T S

90A

J I

J I J I

T S

228

T S

J I

£ ¤

§ ¦ ¨

111

228

115A

139

T S

T S S T

£ ¤

200

J I

T S

21B

T S

£ ¤

103

T S

115

139

£ ¤

J I I J

T S

113

J I 119

T S

T S S T

7 11

21D

T S

J I

S T T S

101A

228

J I 212

126

211

J I

211

213

T S

202

301

£ ¤

134

T S

115

J I

T S

J S I T

T S

152

116

228

J I 210A

J I I J T S J J I I

J I 203

£ ¤

1179

J I

1162 224

217

1177

1187

J I 1181

JI I J

220A

J I 13B

T S

J I

220

1189

J I

J I 15A

220

J I I J 209

209B

739

21A

J I

J I 210

J I

T S

J I 218

A1A

220B 220A

T S

J I

739B

16A

T S 1

£ ¤

T S

315

16A

J I

209

J I

T S

J I

315

215

225

T S

J I

13A

T S

J I

15A

J I

I J T S J J I I T S J I JI I J JI I J J I I JS T

226

1333

J I 208

1365

214

315

1353

312

J I

J JI I J I 5A

T S

1351

209

T S

J I

A1A

1339

1338

13A

1337

T S

§ ¦ ¨

J I

1332 A A1

1335

1359

1342

I J J I 312

A1A

1363

13A

J I 352

J I 315C

J I

214

305

209

J I 309D

I J J I 214

A1A

T S

219

100

J I

T S

209

J I

207A

315

J I 309C

J I

216

J I 1447

T S

)LJXUH Congestion Hot-Spots J I 21

J I 20A

2-93

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Table 2Ͳ33. Summary of Public Meeting Advertisements Needs Plan Workshops

Dates

Targeted Minority or Underserved

Needs Plan Workshops: 22ͲAprͲ14, 23ͲAprͲ14, 23ͲAprͲ14, 24ͲAprͲ14, 28ͲAprͲ14 Florida TimesͲUnion

8ͲAprͲ14

St. Augustine Record

8ͲAprͲ14

Baker County Press

10ͲAprͲ14

Clay Today

10ͲAprͲ14

Florida Star

12ͲAprͲ14

Eco Latino

14ͲAprͲ14

Fernandina News Leader

16ͲAprͲ14

Palatka Daily News

22ͲAprͲ14

Radio WJBT 93.3 The Beat (Urban Contemporary) WQIK FM 99.9 (Country) WSOL V1015 FM (Urban Adult Contemporary) WJGH Jack FM (Classic Hits) WNWW Kiss FM (Pop Contemporary) WFXJ Sports Radio AM 930 (Sports) Metrojacksonville.com banner

7ͲAprͲ14 through 23ͲAprͲ14

13ͲAprͲ14 through 28ͲAprͲ14

Cost Feasible Plan Workshops 18ͲSepͲ14, 2ͲSepͲ14, 17ͲSepͲ14, 23ͲSepͲ14, 16ͲSepͲ14 Florida TimesͲUnion

9ͲSepͲ14 and 16ͲSepͲ14

St. Augustine Record

9ͲSepͲ14

Creekline (Northwest St. Johns County) Southside Newsline (zip code 32256) Beaches Leader

Delivered 8ͲSepͲ14 through 11ͲSepͲ14 Delivered 1ͲSepͲ14 through 4ͲSepͲ14 11ͲSepͲ14

Ponte Vedra Beach Leader

11ͲSepͲ14

Fernandina NewsͲLeader

12ͲSepͲ14

Clay Today

11ͲSepͲ14

Florida Star

13ͲSepͲ14

Eco Latino web banner

1ͲSepͲ14 through 30ͲSepͲ14

Metrojacksonville.com banner

4ͲSepͲ14 through 23ͲSepͲ14

Radio Ͳ WJCT First Coast Connect

10ͲSepͲ14

Television – First Cost Connect

8ͲSepͲ14 through 22ͲSepͲ14

Cost Feasible Plan Workshop 28ͲOctͲ14 Florida TimesͲUnion

23ͲOctͲ14

Public Hearing 13ͲNovͲ14 Florida TimesͲUnion

24ͲCotͲ14 and 25ͲOctͲ14

2Ͳ94

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Table 2Ͳ34. Needs Plan Workshops Attendance Location Baker County – Commission Chambers Clay County Ͳ ThrasherͲHorne Center Duval County Ͳ FSCJ Deerwood Nassau County – Commission Chambers Putnam County – Commission Chambers St. Johns County Ͳ St. Augustine City Commission Chambers Total Average Per Meeting

Attendance 15 20 8 9 9 43 104 17.3

During the workshops an allocation game was conducted using tokens for participants to determine how they would invest their resources similar to the interactive project web site. Stations focusing on five categories – bicycle and pedestrian, road capacity, safety and TSM&O, transit and freight were provided. Each station included a map and list of potential projects needed, reference brochures pertaining to previous studies and a tube for that category. As attendees arrived, they were given a handout explaining the workshop and a pouch of ten tokens to place in tubes at each of the five stations based on their preferences.

Table 2Ͳ35 provides a summary of the results of the allocation game that was conducted during the meetings. This table is colored so that the areas that received the greatest interest are coded green and the least are coded brown. During the public meetings and based on followͲup correspondence (such as emails and phone calls), 155 comments were provided. Table 2Ͳ36 summarizes the comments by topic.

Table 2Ͳ35. Summary of Needs Plan Public Workshop Allocation Game Baker Clay Duval Nassau Putnam St. Johns Overall

Transit

Bicycles and Pedestrians

21% 25% 27% 26% 16% 40% 30%

Road Capacity

10% 24% 36% 23% 14% 31% 25%

41% 26% 17% 9% 38% 15% 23%

Freight 20% 11% 8% 15% 30% 6% 12%

Safety and TSM&O

Participants 36

7% 14% 13% 26% 3% 8% 10%

36 The exact number of participants is not known since not all participants fully allocated ten tokens. The values are estimated by rounding to the next highest factor of ten. For example, if 183 tokens were used, 19 participants were assumed. 2Ͳ95

26F31F41F41F

15 19 8 6 8 43 99

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Table 2Í˛36. Summary of Needs Plan Public Workshop Comments Topic Transit Bicycle and Pedestrian Road Freight Safety Miscellaneous TSM&O Context sensitive solutions Need for additional funding Land use and transportation coordination Grand Total Attendees from Baker, Clay and Putnam counties favored road capacity projects as their top priority.

Percent 69 29 22 12 12 3 3 2 2 1 155

45% 19% 14% 8% 8% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 100%

Following the Needs Plan workshops, the North Florida TPO received correspondence objecting to the construction of the SR 313 in the vicinity of Twelve Mile Swamp. Because of the environmental fatal flaws and potential for public controversy associated with this project it was removed from the Needs Plan. CR 2209 from SR 16 to SR 9B was also removed from the Needs Plan based over environmental concerns.

Duval County attendees selected bicycle and pedestrian projects as their top priority, followed by transit. St. Johns and Nassau participants prioritized transit first, followed by bicycle and pedestrian projects. Nassau participants also felt equally strong about safety and TSM&O projects.

2Í˛96

Number

Overall, there was a significant increase in support for transit and bicycle and pedestrian projects from previous LRTP updates with the meeting participants.

Clay County participants were closely divided among road, transit and bicycle and pedestrian projects.

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

COMPARISON OF PRIORITIES When these results of the telephone survey, onͲline allocation game and the public meeting allocation game were considered, the results are shown in Figure 2Ͳ22 and Table 2Ͳ37.

Similar to the public meeting participants, the telephone survey respondents had transit as the highest priority. Road capacity was the second priority with a much higher priority than the public meeting attendees. The telephone survey responders rated bicycle and pedestrian improvements as much lower priorities.

450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 Transit

Bicycles and Pedestrians

Road Capacity

Freight

Safety and TSM&O

Telephone Survey

290

195

OnͲline Allocation Game

108

139

Public Workshops

Figure 22. Comparison of Priorities from Multiple Sources

Table 2Ͳ37. Summary of Input by Percent of Respondents

Transit

Bicycles and Pedestrians

Road Freight Capacity

Public Workshop OnͲline Allocation Game

30% 25%

25% 23%

23% 32%

12% 10%

Safety and TSM&O 10% 11%

Telephone Survey All Respondents

67% 39%

2% 12%

45% 33%

0% 5%

15% 11%

Note: The telephone survey does not total 100 percent because respondents could comment on multiple categories.

2Ͳ97

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

The onͲline allocation game had a much high allocation to road capacity than the workshop participants. Transit was the second highest priority.

The meeting locations within each county were shifted to reach new geographic and demographic areas. Television advertising was used instead of radio for the second round of meetings, but public relations effort included participation with agency partners on public radio public affairs programming.

As shown in the summary in input provided in Table 2Ͳ34, 39 percent of respondents prioritized transit improvements and 33 percent of respondents prioritized road improvements. Bicycle and pedestrian improvements compared similarly with safety and TSM&O improvements at 12 percent and 11 percent respectively. Freight investments received the lowest priority.

PARTICIPATION A summary of the attendees at each of the Cost Feasible Plan workshops is summarized in Table 2Ͳ38 and the comments by priority area are summarized in Table 2Ͳ39. Duval County attendees commented that a majority of funding was committed to Strategic Intermodal System projects versus other desired projects focusing on transit, bicycle and pedestrian improvements.

COST FEASIBLE PLAN WORKSHOPS MEETING FORMAT

Clay County attendees wanted more investment in roadway infrastructure as part of the Strategic Intermodal System. Additional outreach targeting Clay County minority communities showed a desire for more transit.

Five Cost Feasible Plan Public Workshops were held September 16Ͳ22 in Clay, Duval, Nassau and St. Johns counties and October 28, 2014 in Duval County. The meetings were advertised via newsletters, website posting, social media and radio public affairs programming. Notifications also included general circulation, local and minority publications, web and television advertising. The notifications are summarized in Table 2Ͳ33. Attendees viewed maps and lists of proposed projects. The consultant gave a PowerPoint presentation explaining the funding and project selection process.

St. Johns County attendees had concerns about the SR 23 First Coast Expressway and Shands Bridge. Nassau County residents focused on the need for bicycle, pedestrian and safety improvements.

Table 2Ͳ38. Summary of Attendance at the Cost Feasible Plan Workshops Location St. Johns County Ͳ Bartram Trail Library Duval County Ͳ Jacksonville Main Library Duval County Ͳ Jacksonville Beach Clay County Ͳ Fleming Island H.S. Teach Center Nassau County American Beach Community Center Duval County Ͳ North Florida TPO Board Room Total Average Per Meeting 2Ͳ98

Attendance 16 28 6 11 32 1 94 15.6

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Table 2Ͳ39. Summary of Comments During Cost Feasible Plan Workshops Topic Bicycle and Pedestrian Transit Road Funding Environment Grand Total

Comments 39 23 18 12 1 90

USE OF PUBLIC INPUT IN THE PLANNING PROCESS During the planning process extensive agency and community outreach was conducted. During both the Needs Plan and Cost Feasible Plan meetings, significant interest in improving transit and enhanced services for bicycles and pedestrian improvements were provided. During the prioritization funds, significant consideration to advance funding for transit and bicycle and pedestrian improvements were made. Table 2Ͳ40 on the next page shows the allocation of the total funding in the plan to various components based on the primary decisionͲmaking authority. With the various funding categories, limitations exist as to how the funding can be used. The FDOT has the primary decisionͲmaking authority for other programs with concurrency of the North Florida TPO for 70 percent of the revenue estimated in the plan. The North Florida TPO has primary decisionͲmaking authority with the concurrency of FHWA for 11 percent of the revenue and local government funded projects represent 18 percent of the plan.

2Ͳ99

Percent 43% 26% 20% 13% 1% 100%

$0.00 $8,892.93

$860.64 $39.64 $159.41 $1,296.58

$1,587.40 $236.88 $860.64

$21.23

$6,008.96 $1,297.42 $268.75

$4,057.74 $1,951.22

Roads

$6.62 $2,397.16

$253.33 $6.62

$253.33 $253.33

$0.00

$760.00 $760.00

$1,377.21 $1,377.21

Transit

$302.93

$102.47 $1.98 $7.97 $124.27

$178.66 $11.84 $43.03

$0.00 $91.66 $13.44 $31.20 $41.30 $1.06

$0.00 $34.21

$0.00

$59.44

$34.21

$0.00

Bicycle and TSM&O Pedestrian37

$311.00 $311.00 $2,503.60

$186.50

$0.00 $186.50

$0.00

$2,006.10 $2,006.10

Freight

37 These expenditures are based on 5% of road capacity projects on arterials and dedicated revenues for bicycle and pedestrian projects. 2Ͳ100

Table 4Ͳ20. Modal Distribution Primary DecisionͲ Program Making Authority FDOT Strategic Intermodal System FDOT Turnpike/Tolls FDOT SIS Multimodal FDOT Subtotal North Florida TPO Other State Highways North Florida TPO Transportation Management Area North Florida TPO Transportation Alternatives (TALU) North Florida TPO Transportation Alternatives (TALT) North Florida TPO Transportation Regional Incentive Program (TRIP) North Florida TPO State and Federal Transit North Florida TPO Subtotal Local Clay County Local Duval County Road Capacity Local JAXPORT Local Transit Local Match Local Duval County Subtotal Local Nassau County Local St. Johns County Subtotal Local Federal Grants FTA Passenger Ferry Grant Federal Grants Federal Seaport Grant Federal Grants Grand Total

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

$4,057.74 $1,951.22 $3,383.31 $9,392.27 $1,389.08 $316.40 $31.20 $41.30 $22.29 $760.00 $2.560.27 $248.73 $963.11 $186.50 $253.33 $1,402.95 $41.63 $167.38 $1,860.68 $6.62 $311.00 $317.62 $14,130.82

Total

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Within the context of these funding program limitations, Figure 2Ͳ23 summarizes the proportion of funding allocated by mode in relation to the priorities provided through public input.

After coordination with local agencies and deliberations of the plan alternatives, the North Florida TPO believes the plan makes an appropriate allocation of resources considering the public input and the proportion of the needs identified through the planning process.

This chart shows that a greater proportion of the total funding is dedicated to road projects than other modes of investment. However, a much smaller percentage of the total needs for roadways (26 percent) are met than with any other mode as shown in Figure 2Ͳ24.

Additional detail on the needs and prioritization of projects is identified in Part Three of this report.

70%

63%

60% 50% 40%

39% 33%

30% 18%

17%

20%

12%

10%

11% 5%

0% Road

Transit

TSM&O Allocation

Bicycles and Pedestrians

Freight

Public Perception

Figure 2-23. Summary of Funding Allocation Compared to Public Priority 70%

65% 58%

60% 50%

38%

40% 30%

26%

20% 10%

0% Road

Transit

TSM&O

Bicycle and Pedestrian

Freight

Percent Figure 2-24. Percent of Need Met by Mode 2Ͳ101

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Strategies and Efforts

PUBLIC HEARING

As part of the planning process, extensive efforts were made to engage minority and underserved populations through a demographic analysis, targeted outreach, using web sites with interactive opportunities to provide information on needs and priorities, social media, telephone surveys and outreach to organizations and elected officials. The process and performance measures deployed are summarized in the following sections.

The plan was adopted by the North Florida TPO Board as part of the November 13, 2014 regularly scheduled board meeting. A unanimous vote was recorded to approve the plan.

ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE AND TITLE VI

Identification of Minority and Underserved Populations

Executive Order 12898, signed by President Clinton in February 1994, directed all Federal agencies to make environmental justice a key part of its mission by identifying and addressing the impacts of programs, policies, and activities on both minority and lowͲincome populations.

The locations of minority and underserved population communities were identified using 2010 Census data by census tract. Areas with minority or underserved populations of 50 percent or more were identified as communities for special consideration. The following communities were identified.

In 1999, the U.S. Department of Transportation issued a memorandum to all federallyͲfunded transportation agencies, including state DOTs and MPO, and required such agencies to comply with Title VI and environmental justice. Noting that issues of Title VI and environmental justice were raised by concerned citizens primarily during project development phases of projects, the U.S. Department of Transportation urged that compliance be evaluated as early as possible, specifically, in the planning stages of the transportation process.

1. 2. 3. 4.

Throughout the LRTP study process, the provisions of environmental justice, as defined by the Federal Highway Administration, were followed to ensure consistency with environmental justice and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. North Florida TPO staff and consultants made every effort to include all affected parties from varying socioͲ economic groups to ensure that their input was considered in the planning process. The planning process was also conducted in compliance with the following related legislation

Regional maps showing the results of this analysis are provided in Technical Memorandum #1 – Public Involvement. No significant populations of American Indian or Native Hawaiian were identified through the mapping.

23 CFR 450.316, providing interested parties with reasonable opportunities to be involved in the metropolitan transportation planning process. Chapter 286, Florida Statutes (Florida Sunshine Law) requiring public access to governmental meetings at the state and local level and requires meetings of boards and commissions to be open to the public, adequately noticed, and recorded via minutes.

Outreach Efforts and Analysis of Needs Multiple strategies were implemented as part of the public involvement process to engage the underserved and minority populations as summarized in the prior section. The organizations solicited for participation in the planning process related to minority and underserved populations are summarized in Table 2Ͳ38.

2Ͳ102

Low income households making less than $25,000 per year. Populations greater than 65 years old. Black: a person having origins in any of the black racial groups of Africa. Hispanic or Latino: a person of Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, Central or South American, or other Spanish culture or origin, regardless of race. Asian American: a person having origins in any of the original peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia or the Indian subcontinent. American Indian and Alaskan Native: a person having origins in any of the original people of North America, South America (including Central America), and who maintains cultural identification through tribal affiliation or community recognition. Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander: a person having origins in any of the original peoples of Hawaii, Guam, Samoa or other Pacific Islands.

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Table 2Ͳ41. Organizations Serving Minority and Underserved Populations Organization Low Income 100 Black Men Ability Housing Adult Services Division Asian American Chamber of Commerce Baker County Health Department z Better Living Community Association z Career Source of Northeast Florida z City of Jacksonville Citizen’s Planning Advisory Committees z Clara White Mission z Clay County Council on Aging z Clay Soul Food Festival Destined for a Change z Duval County Council on Aging Edwards Waters College (Historically Black University) Emmanuel United Methodist Church z Habitat for Humanity z Health Planning Council of North Florida Jacksonville Housing Authority z Knots for Kids z Mayo Clinic Nassau Council on Aging National Council for Negro Women Northeast Florida Community Action Agency z Northeast Florida Healthy Start Coalition z Northeast Florida Veterans Council z Palatka Housing Authority z Springfield Community Meeting z St. Augustine Council on Aging Summer Haven United Way of Northeast Florida z West St. Augustine Community Redevelopment Authority z Work Source z

2Ͳ103

Elderly z z

Black z

Hispanic

z z

z z z z z z z

z z

z z z

Asian z

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Analysis of Investments Related to Minority and Underserved Populations The public input received from minority and underserved populations related primarily to the need for more mass transit and active transportation improvements. Significant investments are identified in the Cost Feasible Plan to address these needs and a predominant amount of that investment is occurring in areas where minority and the underserved populations exist. Nearly $2.4 billion of transit investments and $303 million in active transportation investments were adopted. The investments in the Cost Feasible Plan are discussed in greater detail in Part Three.

Equity Considerations Analysis of the investments in transit and highway investments was performed relative to the predominant locations of minority and underserved populations. Table 2Ͳ39 on the next page summarizes these areas, the targeted group and the major projects within that area that are funded.

Language Translation According to the U. S. Census 2013 American Community Survey oneͲyear estimate, only two percent of the households in Clay, Duval and St. Johns counties are deemed “Limited English Speaking Households” with the largest concentration being Spanish speaking households at .8 percent. The public involvement materials were produced in English but translation capability into Spanish or Braille for the visually impaired was available as requested. There were no requests. The public involvement team will continue to monitor demographic trends and anecdotal experience within the TPO service area for language translation as needed.

2Ͳ104

z z

West St. Augustine (west of US 1 Ponce de Leon Boulevard)

Middleburg and Penny Farms

East Arlington (east of IͲ295 and north of SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard)

Westside Jacksonville and Argyle (area along the IͲ295 corridor between US 17 Roosevelt Boulevard and IͲ10)

Arlington and San Souci (north of SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard and east of IͲ 295)

Urban Core (downtown and areas along US 90 Beaver Street east of IͲ295)

2Ͳ105

Table 2Ͳ42. Major Improvements in Minority and Underserved Communities Low Organization Elderly Black Income

Hispanic

Enhanced bus service Bus rapid transit Transit mobility and accessibility improvements IͲ295 express lanes Ricker Road widening SR 21 Blanding Boulevard widening Enhanced bus service Bus rapid transit Transit mobility and accessibility improvements IͲ295 express lanes SR 115 Southside intersection improvements and context sensitive solutions Enhanced bus service Bus rapid transit Transit mobility and accessibility improvements IͲ295 express lanes Kernan Boulevard widening SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard intersection improvements Commuter rail SR 207 widening from IͲ95 to South Holmes Boulevard Bus rapid transit SR 21 Blanding Boulevard from SR 16 to CR 215

Enhanced bus service Bus rapid transit Commuter rail Streetcar Skyway enhancements Transit mobility and accessibility improvements US 90 Beaver Street widening

Major Projects

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

SUMMARY

The public involvement process used in developing the plan provided significant input into the needs to be addressed, concerns with specific projects that would result in community impacts and the strategies used in the LRTP. Multiple outreach and data gather activities were used to engage the public as part of the process:

Public perceptions telephone survey Interactive project web site OnͲline asset allocation game Social media Community forum engagement Overview video Contact list Newsletters Overview brochure Youth outreach Visualization techniques Agency meetings Public workshops Public hearing

A significant effort was made to engage minority and underserved populations in accordance with the requirements of Executive Order 12898 and Title VI of the Civil Rights. Strategies and tactics used to engage minorities and underserved included identifying the population locations, target outreach to organizations serving these populations, scheduling public workshops in areas with clusters of these populations. Analysis of the investments related to these populations was performed to ensure the investments resulted in equity and the projects implemented would not result in disproportionate impacts.

The stakeholders involved represented a wide range of community organizations and populations.

Future decisionͲmakers (middle and high school students) were engaged through the Transportation Tomorrow program which resulted in 120 student participants. Users of public transportation were engaged through the telephone survey and public workshops. Representatives of public transportation employees were engaged as part of our steering

2Ͳ106

committee and the North Florida TPO’s committees and boards. Freight shippers and freight transportation providers were solicited for participation as part of the outreach process. A presentation was made to the Jacksonville Chamber of Commerce’s Logistics and Advisory Group which involved approximately 40 representatives of beneficial cargo operators, overͲtheͲroad truckers, shipping companies and railroads, third party logistics providers, etc. In addition to attending the Jacksonville Chamber of Commerce’s Logistics and Advisory Group meetings, Norfolk Southern and CSX participated in one steering committee. JAXPORT, the Nassau County Ocean Highway Port Authority, Jacksonville Aviation Authority and St. Augustine Airport also participated through the North Florida TPO Board and committees. The Jacksonville Transportation Authority participated in the agency meetings and the Sunshine Bus Company participated through their involvement in the Regional Transportation Commission. Military freight transportation providers were represented by the U.S Navy Air Station Jacksonville on the steering committee and the North Florida TPO Board. Representatives of pedestrian and bicyclist organizations participated such as the North Florida Bicycle Club and the Bicycle and Pedestrian Coordinator for the City of Jacksonville participated in steering committee and public workshops. Significant discussion and focus on investments in active transportation solutions were adopted as part of the plan. Representatives of the disabled participated through the North Florida TPO Board and committees. Several members of the disabled community attended the Needs Plan and Cost Feasible Plan meetings in the urban core. Neighborhood associations and community groups were solicited through our contact list mailings. Business and professional groups were engaged through presentations to local community organizations such as rotary clubs, the Jacksonville Chamber and public workshops. Elected officials and agency representatives were engaged through the North Florida TPO Board and committees, community planning

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

groups and briefings to commissions on the planning process.

Jacksonville Transportation Authority plans to implement transit mobility and enhancement projects that will serve many of these areas to provide greater mobility and access to transit.

A total of 109 community meetings, public workshops and the public hearing were conducted as part of the project.

The result of the public involvement process reflected the needs of the community balanced with the regional needs identified in the planning process.

The size of the contact database increased by 53 percent from 653 to 1,000 contacts compared to the 2035 LRTP. The contact database included geographically and demographically diverse organizations. Meeting advertising increased from seven to eight print publications. Radio spots increased and television advertising was used for the first time.

Facebook advertising was again used to drive traffic resulting in 651 clicks and 136,967 impressions. Facebook and Twitter posts were used in LRTP outreach for the first time with 72 tweets and 100 Facebook updates generating 7,110 impressions. Finally, 60 pins on Pinterest generated over 83,864 impressions in ten months. In comparison to the 2035 LRTP, meeting attendance improved with an average of 15 per meeting to 16 per meeting. The number of comments submitted increased over 500 percent from 83 for the 2035 LRTP to 500 for this update. The major themes of the public involvement process were that transit should be a major priority for future investments within the region. Depending on the type of participation (through the allocation game onÍ˛line, the allocation game in workshops or comments received during the meetings or in correspondence), road investment and investment in bicycles and pedestrians also remain a high priority. These priorities were reflected in developing of the Cost Feasible Plan by allocating funding through which the North Florida TPO has the primary decisionÍ˛making authority. When the allocation funds to the types of improvements were analyzed, bicycles and pedestrians are funded with a significantly higher percent of the needs identified than for road capacity projects. The results of the planning process resulted in fair and equitable distribution by mode. An analysis of the investments for major projects in minority or underserved populations was also performed and the major investments in these areas consisted of transit improvements for enhanced bus service, bus rapid transit, commuter rail and streetcars. In addition, the 2Í˛107

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

This page is intentionally blank.

2Í˛108

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

PLAN ALTERNATIVES C ONSIDERING A RANGE OF ALTERNATIVES IS NEEDED TO MEET THE DIVERSE MOBILITY NEEDS OF STAKEHOLDERS WITHIN OUR REGION IS AN IMPORTANT PART OF THE PLANNING PROCESS . Because of the level of visioning and planning that occurred within these studies, the known needs greatly exceeded the resources anticipated to be available. Building on the community consensus that was achieved, the development of the Needs Plan began with a review and confirmation of these studies. The following sources were used to define the needs.

INTRODUCTION This section summarizes the process used to develop the Needs Plan and Cost Feasible Plan. The illustrative projects and interͲregional projects considered in the planning process are also discussed.

NEEDS PLAN The Needs Plan included a six county area consisting of Baker, Clay, Duval, Nassau, Putnam and St. Johns counties. The Needs Plan is not a prioritized list of projects, nor is it constrained by financial resources.

The Needs Plan leveraged prior studies developed by local governments. Maintaining the public consensus continuity of these efforts was essential to the credibility of the planning process.

2Ͳ109

FDOT’s Strategic Intermodal Systems Needs Plan and Cost Feasible Plan (includes 1st Five Years and 2nd Five Years) FDOT’s Adopted Work Program North Florida TPO Transportation Improvement Program 2035 Envision Long Range Transportation Plan North Florida TPO Strategic Safety Plan North Florida TPO ITS Master Plan North Florida TPO Congestion Management Plan

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

North Florida TPO Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan First Coast Regional Greenways and Trails Plan North Florida TPO Freight, Logistics and Intermodal Planning Framework Plan City of Jacksonville Mobility Plan Local Government Comprehensive Plans Committed Development Projects Provided by Local Governments Coordination with local governments and stakeholders on additional needs

When alternate land use scenarios in the Needs Plan were evaluated, the amount of travel within the network increases. This growth in trips occurs primarily on portions of the network that are less congested (demand to capacity ratio of less than 0.8). There was a reduction in the vehicleͲmiles traveled in the severely congested segments of the network with the alternate land use scenario in the Needs Plan.

DEFICIENCY ANALYSIS

Appendix I includes a matrix that summarizes the purpose and need for the project.

Future mobility deficiencies were identified through an evaluation of anticipated levels of congestion using the NERPMͲAB as the primary analysis tool. The congestion assessment was performed using the existing plus committed model scenario in the year 2040 which represents a No Build Scenario. This approach considers only the projects that are committed for construction within the Transportation Improvement Program and FDOT Adopted Work Program.

LAND USE ALTERNATIVES As discussed in greater detail in the section on travel demand forecasting, two alternative land use scenarios were developed. Although the consensus of the participating agencies was to use the trendͲbased scenario, performance measures for both alternatives were developed.

Congestion was assessed through the ratio of roadway volume to roadway capacity, known as the demandͲtoͲ capacity ratio. Table 2Ͳ43 summarizes the systemwide deficiencies in the Base Year model scenario and the 2040 No Build model scenario (existing plus committed). The congested links (greater than 0.8) are shown for the Base Year on Figure 2Ͳ25, the No Build on Figure 2Ͳ26, the Needs Plan Trend Land Use Scenario on Figure 2Ͳ27 and the Needs Plan Alternate Land Use Scenario on Figure 2Ͳ28.

Because of the NERPMͲAB’s model framework, the model is much more sensitive to changes in the network and the impacts on tripͲmaking. As more capacity is added to the network, persons are more willing to make longer trips when the travel times do not significantly change. As shown in Table 2Ͳ43, the number of vehicleͲ miles traveled is greater when the Needs Plan is modeled than in the No Build or Build model scenarios as a result of the increased capacity of the network.

Table 2Ͳ43. Summary of Deficiency Analysis Millions of Vehicle Miles Traveled by Demand to Capacity Ratio Model Scenario

Base Year (2010) Future Year No Build (2040) Trend Land Use Scenario Needs Plan Trend Land Use Scenario Needs Plan Alternate Land Use Scenario Cost Feasible Plan Trend Land Use Scenario

Less than 0.8 (uncongested)

Between 0.8 and 0.9 Greater than 0.9 (Moderately congested) (Severely congested) 20.4

4.3

12.7

37.4

31.3

6.2

19.4

56.9

22.6

4.9

30.7

58.2

24.8

4.9

30.5

60.2

19.4

4.7

34.0

58.1

2Ͳ110

Total

" )

108

115

¬ «

£ ¤

" ) " )

" ) 127

A1A

108

¬ «

105

107

§ ¦ ¨

£ ¤

¬ « ¬ «

" )

¬ «

A1A

£ ¤ 301

" ) " )

¬ « ¬ «

295

119

250

A1A

295

§ ¦ ¨

" )

¬ «

§ ¦ ¨

122

105

" )

116

125

¬ «

" )

221

124

¬ « 10

£ ¤ 90

§ ¦ ¨

" ) 228

" )

¬ « 228

£ ¤

130

£ ¤ ¬ «

301

¬ « ¬ «

202

134

§ ¦ ¨ 295

£ ¤

Legend

V/C Ratio

" )

< 0.80

218

0.81 - 0.89

§ ¦ ¨

¬ «

> 0.90

¬ «

A1A

¬ «

220

Roadway System

¬ «

Water Bodies

¬ «

Conservation Lands

£ ¤ 1

Six Counties Boundaries

" )

¬ « " ) " " ) ) " )

209

£ ¤

" )

¬ «

208

" )

315

A1A

13A

214

315

¬ «

« § ¦¬ ¨ ¬ «

207

" )

214

A1A

" ) 305

£ ¤

¬ « 206

¬ « 26

¬ « 100

" ) 315

" ) 204

¬ « 20

" ) 21

" ) 320

§ ¦ ¨ 75

" ) 310

" )

¬ «

200A

" ) 309

" ) 308

)LJXUH 2010 Base Year 'HILFLHQFLHV Date: 1/28/2015

2-111

10,560 Feet

3.5

7 Miles

" )

108

115

¬ «

£ ¤

" ) " )

" ) 127

A1A

108

¬ «

105

107

§ ¦ ¨

£ ¤

¬ « ¬ «

" )

¬ «

A1A

£ ¤ 301

" ) " )

¬ « ¬ «

295

119

250

A1A

295

§ ¦ ¨

" )

¬ «

§ ¦ ¨

122

105

" )

116

125

¬ «

" )

221

124

¬ « 10

£ ¤ 90

§ ¦ ¨

" ) 228

" )

¬ « 228

£ ¤

130

£ ¤ ¬ «

301

¬ « ¬ «

202

134

§ ¦ ¨ 295

£ ¤

Legend

V/C Ratio

" )

< 0.80

218

0.81 - 0.89

§ ¦ ¨

¬ «

> 0.90

¬ «

A1A

¬ «

220

Roadway System

¬ «

Water Bodies

¬ «

Conservation Lands

£ ¤ 1

Six Counties Boundaries

" )

¬ « " ) " " ) ) " )

209

£ ¤

" )

¬ «

208

" )

315

A1A

13A

214

315

¬ «

« § ¦¬ ¨ ¬ «

207

" )

214

A1A

" ) 305

£ ¤

¬ « 206

¬ « 26

¬ « 100

" ) 315

" ) 204

¬ « 20

" ) 21

" ) 320

§ ¦ ¨ 75

" ) 310

" )

¬ «

200A

" ) 309

" ) 308

)LJXUH 2040 No Build 'HILFLHQFLHV Date: 1/28/2015

2-112

10,560 Feet

3.5

7 Miles

" )

108

115

¬ «

£ ¤

" ) " )

" ) 127

A1A

108

¬ «

105

107

§ ¦ ¨

£ ¤

¬ « ¬ «

" )

¬ «

A1A

£ ¤ 301

" ) " )

¬ « ¬ «

295

119

250

A1A

295

§ ¦ ¨

" )

¬ «

§ ¦ ¨

122

105

" )

116

125

¬ «

" )

221

124

¬ « 10

£ ¤ 90

§ ¦ ¨

" ) 228

" )

¬ « 228

£ ¤

130

£ ¤ ¬ «

301

¬ « ¬ «

202

134

§ ¦ ¨ 295

£ ¤

Legend

V/C RATIO

" )

< 0.8

218

0.81 - 0.89

§ ¦ ¨

¬ «

>0.9

¬ «

A1A

¬ «

220

Roadway System

¬ «

Water Bodies

¬ «

Conservation Lands

£ ¤ 1

Six Counties Boundaries

" )

¬ « " ) " " ) ) " )

209

£ ¤

" )

¬ «

208

" )

315

A1A

13A

214

315

¬ «

« § ¦¬ ¨ ¬ «

207

" )

214

A1A

" ) 305

£ ¤

¬ « 206

¬ « 26

¬ « 100

" ) 315

" ) 204

¬ « 20

" ) 21

" ) 320

§ ¦ ¨ 75

" ) 310

" )

¬ «

200A

" ) 309

" ) 308

)LJXUH 2040 Needs Plan 7UHQG 6FHQDULR 'HILFLHQFLHV Date: 2/9/2015

2-113

10,560 Feet

3.5

7 Miles

" )

108

115

Â¬ Â«

Â£ Â¤

" ) " )

" ) 127

A1A

108

Â¬ Â«

105

107

Â§ Â¦ Â¨

Â£ Â¤

Â¬ Â« Â¬ Â«

" )

Â¬ Â«

A1A

Â£ Â¤ 301

" ) " )

Â¬ Â« Â¬ Â«

295

119

250

A1A

295

Â§ Â¦ Â¨

" )

Â¬ Â«

Â§ Â¦ Â¨

122

105

" )

116

125

Â¬ Â«

" )

221

124

Â¬ Â« 10

Â£ Â¤ 90

Â§ Â¦ Â¨

" ) 228

" )

Â¬ Â« 228

Â£ Â¤

130

Â£ Â¤ Â¬ Â«

301

Â¬ Â« Â¬ Â«

202

134

Â§ Â¦ Â¨ 295

Â£ Â¤

Legend

V/C Ratio

" )

< 0.80

218

0.81 - 0.89

Â§ Â¦ Â¨

Â¬ Â«

> 0.90

Â¬ Â«

A1A

Â¬ Â«

220

Roadway System

Â¬ Â«

Water Bodies

Â¬ Â«

Conservation Lands

Â£ Â¤ 1

Six Counties Boundaries

" )

Â¬ Â« " ) " " ) ) " )

209

Â£ Â¤

" )

Â¬ Â«

208

" )

315

A1A

13A

214

315

Â¬ Â«

Â« Â§ Â¦Â¬ Â¨ Â¬ Â«

207

" )

214

A1A

" ) 305

Â£ Â¤

Â¬ Â« 206

Â¬ Â« 26

Â¬ Â« 100

" ) 315

" ) 204

Â¬ Â« 20

" ) 21

" ) 320

Â§ Â¦ Â¨ 75

" ) 310

" )

Â¬ Â«

200A

" ) 309

" ) 308

)LJXUH 2040 Needs 3ODQ $OWHUQDWH /DQG 8VH 6FHQDULR 'HILFLHQFLHV Date: 2/6/2015

2-114

Â¯

10,560 Feet

3.5

7 Miles

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

community were conducted. These workshops are documented in the public involvement section. Several iterations of the Needs Plan were also presented to the steering committee, North Florida TPO Board and committees during March, April and May of 2014 for refinement of alternatives and consensus building. The Needs Plan includes road capacity projects, multimodal projects (transit, active transportation and freight) and operations strategies.

Within the Needs Plan project cost estimates were prepared based on today’s buying power for projects. In the future inflation is anticipated to occur that will increase the nominal costs of the projects. Since as part of the Needs Plan, the year of expenditure for each project is not known and to compare projects on consistent basis, the following summary of the Needs Plan is reported in “presentͲday costs”. In today’s dollars we have more than $27 billion of needs versus $7 billion in funding. Forecasting that over the 22Ͳ year plan horizon, those needs increase to $46 billion with only $14.8 billion in revenues available. Table 2Ͳ44 summarizes the Needs Plan in present day dollars.

The Needs Plan was adopted by the North Florida TPO Board on June 12, 2014. Technical Memorandum #8 – Needs Plan is attached to this report. The projects in the Needs Plan are presented in Part Three of this report.

Four iterations of the Needs Plan were prepared with the stakeholder agencies during the planning process. Public comments were considered as part of the process and a series of public workshops throughout the Table 2Ͳ44. Summary of Needs Versus Revenue in Present Day Costs

Need (millions) $19,503 $306 $417 $273 $20,499 $2,448 $3,824 $6,272 $26,771

Type Roadway Capacity Bicycle and Pedestrian TSM&O Context Sensitive Solutions Subtotal Highways Transit Freight Subtotal Multimodal TOTAL

2Ͳ115

Estimated Revenue (millions) $5,537 $135 $38 $59 $5,769 $624 $1,839 $2,463 $8,232

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

For the purposes of this plan reasonable estimates for all potential funding programs were developed. However, the revenue estimated for the Strategic Intermodal System Multimodal funding program and the state New Start transit capacity programs are allocated on a statewide basis and there is no “guarantee” these projects will be funded. The Strategic Intermodal System Multimodal program revenue estimates used were based on a proportion of the programͲlevel revenue based on population share. The New Starts funding program is allocated on a competitive basis and projects that are eligible for New Start funding and feasible were included in the Cost Feasible Plan.

COST FEASIBLE PLAN Following the identification of needs, the Cost Feasible Plan was prepared for the federal planning boundaries only – Clay, Duval, Nassau and St. Johns Counties. The projects selected from the Needs Plan were identified using the prioritization system developed using the performance measures established with the goals and objectives. The prioritization systems and decisionͲmaking process used for the selection of projects is documented in Part Three of this report. Quantitative performance measures and prioritization systems were developed for road capacity and bicycle and pedestrian projects. More qualitative methods were used for other components of the plan.

In addition, the following projects received high rankings during the prioritization of the Needs Plan, but are so costly that if included they would have consumed all of the funding available in the programs they are eligible. These projects included.

Priority projects were identified and revenues allocated from various funding sources until the plan was balanced (project costs equaled revenues). The process of prioritization and selection of the projects for inclusion in the Cost Feasible Plan is discussed in greater detail in Part Three.

Project # 79, SR 115 Mathews Bridge over the St. Johns River. The construction cost was estimated to be $1.1 billion. Project #413, IͲ95 from IͲ10 to SR 104 Dunn Avenue Express Lanes. The project was not included in the Strategic Intermodal System program and if funded in the Other Road Capacity program, it would have consumed more than oneͲhalf of the available funding. The project was estimated cost $374 million in construction. Project #74, SR 115 Lem Turner Road from IͲ295 to US 1 Kings Road, Widen to 4 Lanes. The estimated construction cost is $88 million. Two projects ranked favorably but insufficient information on the scope of the work was available to include construction, right of way or environmental phases.

Extensive coordination with the steering committee and TPO Board and committees occurred. Multiple versions of the plan were presented in the August, September and October TPO Board and committee meetings for review and comment. Public workshops were conducted in September of 2014 and a public hearing occurred on October 28, 2014. The Cost Feasible Plan was adopted by the North Florida TPO Board in November 13, 2014 with a unanimous vote of approval. Technical Memorandum #10 – Cost Feasible Plan is attached to this report.

ILLUSTRATIVE PROJECTS

Illustrative projects are included as defined by FHWA

The financial plan may include, for illustrative purposes, additional projects what would be included in the adopted/approved transportation plan/program if reasonable additional resources beyond those identified in the financial plan were available" [see 23 U.S.C. 135(e)(4), 23 U.S.C. 135(f)(2)(E), 23 U.S.C. 134(g)(2)(B), and 23 U.S.C. 134(h)(2)(B)(iv), respectively].

These projects were included in the Cost Feasible Plan for preliminary engineering phases only so that if additional funding were available, subsequent phases could be advanced.

2Ͳ116

Project #100, SR 115 Arlington Expressway from SR 109 University Boulevard to SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard. Project #967, SR 115 Southside Boulevard at SR 152 Baymeadows Road Underpass.

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

determines that highͲspeed rail is feasible in the AtlantaͲ MaconͲJacksonville Corridor. It is further recommended that a Tier 1 NEPA Document and Service Development Plan be pursued for highͲspeed rail service within the corridor. This analysis should continue to address a range of technology alternatives including the Hybrid High Performance implementation approach.

INTERͲREGIONAL PROJECTS As part of the development of the plan, the following key interͲregional projects that will connect North Florida to other metropolitan regions were identified.

Jacksonville to Atlanta high speed rail Miami to Jacksonville intercity passenger rail Tampa Bay to Northeast Florida: Florida’s Future Corridors

A copy of the executive summary of the Georgia Department of Transportation study is provided in Appendix F.

No funding was allocated to these projects as part of the plan but they are longͲterm needs that will be addressed through intraͲstate or interͲstate cooperation. The following provides a brief overview of these projects.

MIAMI TO JACKSONVILLE HIGH SPEED RAIL All Aboard Florida, an intercity passenger rail program being developed by the owner of the FEC railroad, Fortress Investment Group, will be a privately owned, operated and maintained passenger rail service to connect South Florida and Orlando that is anticipated to open service in 2016. As part of their longͲterm plan, Jacksonville to Miami service is proposed in the future. However, no timetable has been set.

JACKSONVILLE TO ATLANTA HIGH SPEED RAIL In 1998, the U.S. Department of Transportation 38 designated the Jacksonville to Atlanta as a component of the Southeast High Speed Rail network. According to the report Ground Transportation for America prepared by U.S. Department of Transportation the Southeast High Speed Rail network was given a "specialized analysis" and "afforded exceptional treatment" because of its extraordinary potential for commercial success. 27F32F42F42F

TAMPA BAY TO NORTHEAST FLORIDA: FLORIDA’S FUTURE CORRIDOR New connections between Tampa Bay and Jacksonville, two large regions that are not well connected today are needed to enhance intrastate commerce and personal mobility. In 2013, FDOT completed highͲlevel evaluations of Future Corridors. A possible new connection between the Suncoast Parkway in Tampa and IͲ75 in the Gainesville or Ocala area and enhanced connectivity between Gainesville and Ocala and the Jacksonville area were evaluated. However, no commitments for advancing study or implementation of these projects has been made. Additional information is provided in Appendix G.

In 2012, the Georgia Department of Transportation and U.S. Department of Transportation completed a feasibility study for the potential of high speed rail consistent with the Southeast High Speed Rail Network program. The total costs of implementing service ranged from $5 billion to $15 billion if shared rail use or exclusive rail was constructed. The following summarizes the recommendations of the study. HighͲspeed rail service in the AtlantaͲMaconͲJacksonville Corridor presents an opportunity to provide needed transportation solutions and promote economic development. While highͲspeed rail is not the only transportation solution, this study gives evidence that passenger highͲspeed rail will provide added mobility and transportation choices to consumers. HighͲspeed rail can provide more efficient and costͲeffective means to consumers, providing added connectivity to major cities such as Atlanta and Birmingham through commercial centers and national / international destinations.

This study illustrates that although the initial investment in highͲspeed rail is significant, the mobility and economic opportunities offered by this new more are significant. Based on the analysis findings, this study 38 http://www.sehsr.org/reports/time2act/actchapter4.htm 2Ͳ117

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

This page is intentionally blank

2Í˛118

PART

THREE

ROAD PROJECTS

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

NEEDS PLAN R OADS ARE THE MOST VISIBLE AND PRODUCTIVE COMPONENT OF OUR TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE . N EW ROADS AND ADDITIONAL CAPACITY ARE NEEDED TO MEET OUR REGION ’ S NEEDS .

OVERVIEW The need to provide safe, convenient and effective mobility for all persons was identified throughout our region. Major projects identified for funding within this program include new roads, the widening and reconstruction of corridors, intersection improvements and interchange modifications.

Our plan addresses context sensitive solutions by identifying corridors that are candidates for more walkable, rideͲable and livable communities. Roads don’t just serve automobiles. All road projects on arterials will include new sidewalks and bicycle lanes. Roads provide buses with access to more persons and allow them to offer better quality of service through more reliable travel times and reduced congestion.

Revenues are also dedicated to constructing standalone bicycle and pedestrian projects and deployment of TSM&O projects within these road capacity funding categories.

Figures 3Ͳ1 through 3Ͳ7 summarize the project needs that were identified. Table 3Ͳ1 summarizes the road capacity needs identified in the six county region.

These projects are discussed in later sections.

3Ͳ1

" )

9 70

108

115

Ò " ) Ê

969

) è " í ì ë Ò Ò " " § ¨ ¦éëìíè ) ÊÊé è A¬ í ì ë é «1A í ì ë é è

£ ¤

105

107

427

3 70

981

501

413

956

431 98

101

1023 1023 11 9

410

971

414

84 9

82 9

¬ «

826 816

" )

315

209

" )

Northern Outer Beltway Corridor

907

420

850

423

818 965

® q

400

315

A1A

Ò " ) Ê

400

¬ «

" )

Six Counties Boundaries

50 5

100

¬ « 206

420

138

130

" )

£ ¤

451

¬ «

1008

« § ¨ ¦¬ ¬ «

207

305

Conservation Lands

1007

115

¬ «

" )

Water Bodies

n A¬ ¤ 1A í« ì ë é è í ì ë é è

809

214

Roadway System

110

13A

315

45 0

814

Future Corridor TBD

£ ¤ 17

906

First Coast Expressway

¬ «

208

832

" )

Operational Improvements

£ ¤

83 6

" ) " " ) ) " )

839

Ò " ) Ê q ¤® n

823

81 2

11 3

133 31

909

841

820

Express Lanes

840

1 13

Ò " ) Ê

1013

802

803

106

847

846

811

Ò " ) Ê Ò " ) Ê

844

5 80

418

114

842

845

2 13

25 41 26

819

810

904

¬ «

A1A

Ò" " ) Ò Ò " ) Ê Ê Ê) Ò " ) Ê Ò " ) Ê § ¨ ¦ Ò " ) Ê ) Ò " Ê 827

834

¬ «

104

411

944

934

123

425

424

91 2

902

" )

903

¬ «

220

Ò " ) Ê

New 4 Lane Road

128

Ò " ) Ê

1012 905

¬ «

New 6 Lane Road

£ ¤ 34

1027

New 3 Lane Road

1 15

218

80 0

848

" )

New 2 Lane Road

119

1011

Ò " ) Ê

1022

911

1026

721

962 49

Context Sensitive Solutions

964 16

202

1036

295

Widen to 6 Lanes

§ ¨ ¦

4 43

957

913

960

716

£ ¤ ¬ «

960

416

í) ì ë é è Ò " Ê

0 97

Widen to 5 Lanes

960

121

134

714

Ò " ) Ê è í ì ë Ò " ) Ê é í ì ë é è Ò " ) Ê

10 2

715

103

957

301

¬ « ¬ « 23

715

968

3 43

228

957

¬ «

è í ì ë é í ì ë é è

3 43

100

153

415

152

116

Ò " ) Ê è «è í ì ë é íè ì ë é íè ì ë é í ¬ ì ë é

432

£ ¤

¬ « ¬ « è í ì ë é

951

" )

432

935

401

431

" )

406

228

Widen to 4 Lanes 130

Ò " ) Ê

6 406

§ ¨ ¦

405

404

A1A

295

419

Ò " ) Ê

410

£ ¤ 90

" )

Reconstruct 2 Lanes

¬ «

§ ¨ ¦ 105

221

959

295

119

¬ «

407

§ ¨ ¦

" )

500

95 4

Ò " ) Ê Ò " ) Ê

408

145 940

A1A

® q

£ ¤

¬ «

1005 92

301

124

453 Widen to 3 Lanes 453

939

701

127

1006

" ) ® Airport q ¤ Amtrak Station n Rail Station ¤ Passenger" n 122 ) í Intersection Projects ì ë é è Projects Ò " 250 ) Ê Interchanges " ) 125 " ) Lanes

710

1017

706

" )

Ò " ) Ê

705

707

£ ¤

708

A1A

704

994

" ) " )

Legend ¬

250A

108

¬ « ¬ «

984

Ò " Ê " ) )

138

204

¬ « 20

422

3 50

8 42 9 42

" ) £ ¤ 200

316

225

500

721

200A

25A

225A

502

441

425

308

« £ ¤¬ £ ¤ «" " ) ) " ) ¬ ¬ « " ¬ « ) " )

" )

335

" )

05 4301

404

453

430

309

425

329

" )

403

720

318

453

500

" )

335

¬ «

200A

" ) " )

310

" )

§ ¨ ¦

200

424

" ) 320

" )

2 45

" )

326

)LJXUH RHJLRQDO 5oad &DSDFLW\ 1HHGV Date: 11/4/2014

3-2

10,560 Feet

8 Miles

Legend è í ì ë é Ò " ) Ê

Intersection Projects Interchanges Projects

Lanes Reconstruct 2 Lanes Widen to 3 Lanes Widen to 4 Lanes Widen to 5 Lanes Widen to 6 Lanes Context Sensitive Solutions New 2 Lane Road New 3 Lane Road New 4 Lane Road New 6 Lane Road Express Lanes Operational Improvements

" ) 108

Northern Outer Beltway Corridor

¬ « 2

Future Corridor TBD

" )

127

Roadway2 System Water Bodies Conservation Lands

Six Counties Boundaries

" ) 121

" ) 122

£ ¤ 301

" )

125

119

" ) 127

" ) 119

" ) " )

" )

23D

250

23C

" )

¬ «

123

500

121

" ) £ ¤ ¤ £

229

121

" )

139B

124

§ ¦ ¨

720

123

404

" )

§ ¦ ¨

250A

" ) 23A

453

" )

¬ « 228

453

405

" )

403 403

402

" )

£ ¤

217

301

125

" )

425

130

721

" ) " ¬ « ) ) " £ ¤ " ) " ) 228

" )

228

229

217

" )

301

231

217

424

218

1026

)LJXUH Baker County Road &DSDFLW\ 1HHGV Date: 11/4/2014

406

405

228

£ ¤

" )

301

3-3

10,560 Feet

1.5

3 Miles

406

í ì ë é è

970

936

957 16

932

101

1015

425

431

Ò " ) ÊÊ Ò " )

431

910

¬ «

217

§ ¦ ¨

295

1022

¬ «

1022

224

964

1179

913

£ ¤ " ) 301

" )

91 2

" )

" ) 220A

Ò " ) Ê

" )

1189

1011

900

2 10

" ) " )

901

911

902

424

209

13B

220

" )

914

Ò " ) Ê

" )

915

739

721

904

" )

133

220

1027

218

15A

903

" )

905

1012

" )

739B

209

¬ «

" ) ¬ «

Ò " ) Ê

909

215

84 9

¬ « 15

803

Ò " ) Ê

" ) 1013

¬ «

" )

Ò " ) Ê

¬ «

106

16A

114

315

841

0 82 908

£ ¤ 17

¬ « 230

" ) 226

" ) 315

906

" ) 209

907

" ) 315

Legend

è í ì ë é Ò " ) Ê

" ) 352

45 0

¬ « 21

Intersection Projects Interchanges Projects

Lanes

" )

Reconstruct 2 Lanes

" )

214

209 to 3 Lanes Widen Widen to 4 Lanes

" )

Widen to 5 Lanes

214

" )

Widen to 6 Lanes

315

Context Sensitive Solutions

¬ « ¬ «

New 2 Lane Road

451

" ) 309D

" ) 209

New 3 Lane Road New 4 Lane Road New 6 Lane Road Express Lanes

505

Operational Improvements First Coast Expressway 965

Future Corridor TBD Roadway System Water Bodies Conservation Lands 422

423

Six Counties Boundaries

)LJXUH Clay County Road &DSDFLW\ 1HHGV Date: 11/4/2014

3-4

10,560 Feet

1.5

3 Miles

404

500

405

424

£ ¤§ ¦ ¨ 406

228

¬ «

972

971

035 41 103

820

932

Ò " ) Ê 432

¬ «

970

930

9 40

940

í ì ë é è

224

¬ «

957

£ ¤

964

Ò " ) Ê

16 57

295

§ ¦ ¨

419

Ò " ) Ê

§ ¦ ¨

2 10

421

40 7

Ò " ) Ê

Ò " ) Ê £ ¤

407

Ò " ) Ê

1005

952

¬ « 13

153

Ò " ) Ê

416

Ò " ) Ê

415

954

948

1022

100

129

1022

295

í ì ë é è

Ò " ) Ê

3-5

819

828

§ ¦ ¨ 827

119

£ ¤

962

152

¬ «

966

967

119

Ò " ) Ê

947

960

è í ì ë é í ì ë é è í ì ë é è Ò " ) Ê

960

968

946

945

§ ¦ ¨

960

949

710

418

)LJXUH Duval County Road &DSDFLW\ 1HHGV

910

957

£ ¤

432

1019

104

¬ «

115

¬ «

¬ « ¤ í £ ì ë é è í ì ë é è 128

£ ¤

939

® q

1033

Ò " ) Ê

1011

134

¬ «

935

454

1 94

431

936

¬ «

820

401

£ ¤

3 43

8 41

200

425

40 8 9

¬ «

406

301

£ ¤

Ò " ) Ê

102 6

721

301

£ ¤

403

123 123

701

í ì ë é è

Date: 11/4/2014

405

720

402

911

708

410 934

414

1038 413

70 7

97 953

956

2 1

4 43

91 3

4 43

91 2

431 98

944

101 5 101 901

411 411

0 41

3 43

902

951

41 4

950 103

900

1024

90 3

104

1017

1023

83 82 121 1023

74 963

¬ « 116

¬ «

A1A

716 714 715

¬ «

A1A

706

705

844

Ò " ) Ê Ò " ) Ê

202

¬ «

£ ¤

845

¬ « è í ì ë é íè ì ë é íè ì ë é

833

1036

1006

102

121

10 2

¬ «

A1A

152

í ì ë é è

¬ «

A1A

¬ «

A1A

826

706

128

2 13

5 82

80 0

10,560 Feet

Lanes

® q í ì ë é è Ò " ) Ê

6 Miles

Six Counties Boundaries

Conservation Lands

Water Bodies

Roadway System

Future Corridor TBD

Northern Outer Beltway Corridor

First Coast Expressway

Operational Improvements

Express Lanes

New 6 Lane Road

New 4 Lane Road

New 3 Lane Road

New 2 Lane Road

Context Sensitive Solutions

Widen to 6 Lanes

Widen to 5 Lanes

Widen to 4 Lanes

Widen to 3 Lanes

Reconstruct 2 Lanes

Interchanges Projects

Intersection Projects

Airport

Legend

10 0

975

982

427

127

" )

¬ «

985

123

" )

500

228

¬ «

" )

405

¬ «

720

402

403

119

406

972

§ ¦ ¨ 10

Ò " ) Ê

£ ¤ 23 708

401

¬ «

1016

9 40

957

2 11

432

¬ « £ ¤¬ «

115

¬ « 104

¬ «

" ) )LJXUH

« è í ì ë é " )¬

213

228

208

454

Ò " ) Ê ¬ « 432

§ ¦ ¨ 295

1 94

940

939

® q

1033

414

Ò " ) Ê

§ ¦ ¨

415

109

3-6

í ì ë é è

707

982

1003

427

153

100

416

¬ « Ò " ) Ê 109

948

" ) 200A

115

947

960

968

è í ì ë é í ì ë é è ¬ « í ì ë é è

960

í ì ë é è

945

949

710

501

987

¬ «

" ) 107

997

1001

981

107

" ) í ì ë é è

501

See Inset

979

í ì ë é è Ò " " ) ) ÊÒ Ê 984

£ ¤ Ò " ) Ê ¬ « Ò " ¬ «) Ê

419

40 7

959

Ò " ) Ê

407

Ò " ) Ê

421

1005

952

998

í ì ë é è

981

Nassau County Road &DSDFLW\ 1HHGV

¬ «

820

200

721

301

£ ¤

Ò " ) Ê £ ¤

969

3 43

¬ «

£ ¤

108

" )

115

" )

301

£ ¤

951

950

453

125

" )

121

) " )"

" )

115

" )

108

" )

963

23C

23D

" ) " )

SR 200 Projects Inset

986

í ì ë é è

121

Date: 11/4/2014

í ì ë é è

707

501

996

981

987

123

Ò " Ò " ) Ê) Ê

701

1003

425

979

944

í ì ë é è

40 8

411 411

97 6

984

121

971

1006

410

714 715 716

A1A

105

A1A

152

10,560 Feet

212

10 2

¬ «

A1A

í ì ë é è

¬ «

A1A

« ¤¬ ¬ « £

í ì ë é íè ì ë é íè ì ë é è

116

¬ «

A1A

105

¬ « ¬ «

108

" )

¬ « ¬ « ¬ «

706

705

703

105

« ¬ « ¬ A1A

105A

" )

1 15

410

954

70 9

413

1017

70 7

6 97 956

9 99

7 97

983 41 4

953

994 994

104

995

704

9 70 706

7 Miles

Six Counties Boundaries

Conservation Lands

Water Bodies

Roadway System

Future Corridor TBD

Northern Outer Beltway Corridor

First Coast Expressway

Operational Improvements

Express Lanes

New 6 Lane Road

New 4 Lane Road

New 3 Lane Road

New 2 Lane Road

Context Sensitive Solutions

Widen to 6 Lanes

Widen to 5 Lanes

Widen to 4 Lanes

Widen to 3 Lanes

Reconstruct 2 Lanes

Interchanges Projects

Intersection Projects

Airport

3.5

Lanes

® q í ì ë é è Ò " ) Ê

Legend

" ) 226

" ) 315

906

" )

13A

" ) 209

907

" ) 315

¬ « 21

" ) 352

" )

315C

45 0

" ) 214

" )

214

309D

" )

¬ «

219

100

¬ « 26

¬ «

45 1

" )

505

207A

" ) 216

965

" )

¬ «

309C

100

" )

¬ « 20

310

¬ «

423

" ) 315

422

£ ¤ 17

" ) 20A

" )

8 42

309B

3 50

¬ «

" )

¬ « 15

429

" )

Legend

2 45

è í ì ë é Ò " ) Ê

310

Intersection Projects Interchanges Projects

" )

Lanes

308B

430

" )

Reconstruct 2 Lanes

309

Widen to 3 Lanes Widen to 4 Lanes

" )

Widen to 5 Lanes

308

Widen to 6 Lanes Context Sensitive Solutions

" )

New 2 Lane Road

309

New 3 Lane Road New 4 Lane Road New 6 Lane Road Express Lanes Operational Improvements Roadway System Water Bodies Conservation Lands

" ) 314

Six Counties Boundaries

)LJXUH Putnam County 5RDG &DSDFLW\ 1HHGV Date: 11/4/2014

3-7

10,560 Feet

1.5

3 Miles

1023

967

4 43

1029

809

103 1

962

« " ) ¬ A1A

210A

11 9

§ ¦ ¨

295

102

§ ¦ ¨

1023

202

128

115

103

Ò " ) ÊÊ

4 43

¬ « Ò " ) Ê

¬ «

966

937

938

16 964

121

3 43

í ì ë é è

è í ì ë é Ò " ) Ê 103

960

1036

Ò " ) Ê

1025

1022

1024

295

119

1022

80 0

í ì ë é è

1008

825

721

St. Augustine

826

8 41

" ) 13B

828

827

851

833

Ò " ) Ê

844

Ò " ) Ê

845

834

848

5 80

843

Ò " Ê " ))

846

210

810

Ò " ) Ê 807

2 13

84 9

¬ « 13

Ò " ) Ê

847

Ò " ) Ê 811

Ò " ) Ê

840

418

802

841 803

10 3

Ò " ) Ê

9 81

842

1 13

¬ «

0 82

¬ «

823

Ò " ) Ê

" )

812

908

82 9

106

13A

839

5 81

£ ¤

835

816

" )

® q

¤ n

815

83 6

¬ « 16

832

" )

n ¤ í ì ë é è

110

208

¬ « A1A

1007

103

813

821

" )

1029

809

1025

§ ¦ ¨

906

Legend ® Airport q ¤ Amtrak Station n ¤ Passenger Rail Station n í Intersection Projects ì ë é è Ò " ) Ê Interchanges Projects

See Inset

13A

¬ «

115

83 0

" )

103 1

è í ì ë é

1008

312

214

11 3

907

814

Lanes

801

Reconstruct 2 Lanes

" )

Widen to 3 Lanes

13A

Widen to 4 Lanes

£ ¤

420

¬ «

Widen to 5 Lanes

" )

£ ¤ New 2 Lane Road ¬ «Road New 3 Lane

" )

Context Sensitive Solutions 17

A1A

130

420

09 Widen to 6 2Lanes

¬ «

207

305

850

¬ «

Ò " ) Ê

138

206

New 4 Lane Road 818

400

" )

New 6209 Lane Road Express Lanes

" )

207A Operational Improvements 505

First Coast Expressway

" ) 13

Roadway System 451

® q

¬ « " ) ¬ «Bodies Water 19

965

Future Corridor TBD

" )

100 1447

" ) 2016

Conservation Lands

204

¬ «

Ò " ) Ê

138

100

" )

310 Six Counties Boundaries

)LJXUH St. John's County 5RDG &DSDFLW\ 1HHGV Date: 11/4/2014

3-8

10,560 Feet

1.5

3 Miles

Table 3Ͳ1. Road Capacity Needs by County County Map ID Facility Baker 453 IͲ10 Baker 404* IͲ10 Baker 405* IͲ10 Baker 720 IͲ10/US 90 Parallel Reliever Baker/Clay/Duval 721 Future Corridor Initiative Baker/Duval 91 Outer Loop Facility Clay 900 Baxley Road Clay 13 Cheswick Oak Avenue Extension Clay 902 College Drive Clay 14 College Drive Extension Clay 905 CR 209 Russell Road Clay 906 CR 209 South Clay 24 CR 218 Clay 909 CR 218 Clay 1026 CR 218 Clay 1027 CR 218 Clay 25 CR 218 Extension Clay 26 CR 218 Extension Clay 33 CR 220 Doctors Inlet Road Clay 34 CR 220 Doctors Inlet Road Clay 31 CR 315 Clay 32 CR 315 Clay 904 CR 739B Sandridge Road Clay 907 Decoy Road Clay 46 Governors Park Road Clay 901 Knight Boxx Road Clay 915 Lake Asbury East West 1 Clay 914 Lake Asbury North South Road 3 Clay 911 Long Bay Road Extension North Clay 913 Oakleaf Village Parkway Extension Clay 450 SR 100 Clay 106 SR 16 Clay 908 SR 16 Clay 114 SR 21 Blanding Boulevard Clay 903 Town Center Boulevard Clay 912 Tynes Road Clay 133 US 17 Clay 1037 US 17 Clay 424 US 301 SR 200 Clay 910 Wells Road Duval 2 Alta Drive / Yellow Bluff Road Duval 1 Alta Drive Realignment Duval 936 Argyle Forest Boulevard Duval 1006 Blount Island Boulevard Extension Duval 939 Braddock Parkway Duval 1016 Cahoon Road Duval 972 Cecil Field Connector Duval 971 Chaffee Road Duval 1020 Clark Road Extension Duval 932 Collins Road Duval 16 Collins Road From Baker/Columbia County Line W of CR 125 W of SR 121 South MacClenny Tampa Bay SR 228 Normandy Boulevard CR 220 Doctors Inlet Road Oakleaf Plantation Parkway CR 220 Doctors Inlet Road SR 21 Blanding Boulevard CR 739 Henley Road Decoy Road SR 21 Blanding Boulevard SR 16 US 301 Cosmos Avenue CR 739 Henley Road SR 23 First Coast Expressway SR 21 Blanding Boulevard College Drive SR 16 CR 315B CR 739 Henley Road US 17 US 17 CR 220 Doctors Inlet Road NS3 CR 739B Sandridge Road Old Jennings Road Oakleaf Plantation Parkway Clay/Bradford County Line CR 218 US 17 SR 16 US 17 Pipit Place CR 315 Governor Street Clay/Bradford County Line Aquarius Concourse IͲ295 SR 105 Zoo Parkway SR 23 First Coast Expressway Spoil Island SR 115 Lem Turner Road Lenox Avenue Commerce Center SR 228 Normandy Boulevard Broward Road Old Middleburg Road S at US 17 Roosevelt Boulevard 3Ͳ9

To CR 125 W of SR 121 Baker/Nassau County Line East Baldwin Northeast Florida SR 228 Normandy Boulevard SR 21 Blanding Boulevard Savannah Glen Boulevard SR 21 Blanding Boulevard Challenger Drive (Branan Field Road ) US 17 US 17 CR 739 Henley Road CR 739 Henley Road Cosmos Avenue Pine Tree Lane SR 23 First Coast Expressway CR 315 Knight Boxx Road US 17 CR 315B US 17 CR 209 Russell Road CR 209 South SR 16 SR 21 Blanding Boulevard CR 209 Russell Road CR 209 Russell Road Long Bay Road Oakleaf Village Parkway Clay/Putnam County Line SR 15A Oakridge Avenue Shands Bridge CR 215 Blanding Boulevard CR 220 Doctors Inlet Road Oakleaf Plantation Parkway Town Center Boulevard Haven Avenue Duval/Clay County Line SR 21 Blanding Boulevard New Berlin Road (north ) North of New Berlin Road (south) Old Middleburg Road JAXPORT Pecan Park Road US 90 Beaver Street SR 23 First Coast Expressway Crystal Springs Road Clark Road Shindler Drive

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Improvement Type Add 4 Express Lanes Add 4 Express Lanes Add 4 Express Lanes Future Corridor Future Corridor Future Corridor Widen to 4 Lanes New 4 Lane Road Widen to 6 Lanes New 4 Lane Road Widen to 4 Lanes Reconstruct 2 Lanes Widen to 4 Lanes Widen to 4 Lanes Widen to 4 Lanes Widen to 4 Lanes New 4 Lane Road New 4 Lane Road Widen to 4 Lanes Widen to 6 Lanes Widen to 4 Lanes Widen to 4 Lanes Widen to 4 Lanes Reconstruct 2 Lanes New 4 Lane Road Widen to 6 Lanes New 2 Lane Road New 2 Lane Road New 2 Lane Road New 2 Lane Road Widen to 4 Lanes Widen to 4 Lanes Widen to 4 Lanes Widen to 4 Lanes Widen to 4 Lanes New 2 Lane Road Widen to 6 Lanes Widen to 4 Lanes Widen to 6 Lanes Reconstruct and New 2 Lane Road Widen to 4 Lanes New 4 Lane Road Widen to 6 Lanes New 2 Lane Bridge New 2 Lane Road Reconstruct 2 Lanes New 2 Lane Road Widen to 5 Lanes New 3 Lane Road Widen to 4 Lanes New Interchange

Table 3Ͳ1. Road Capacity Needs by County County Map ID Facility Duval 16B Collins Road Realignment Duval 1036 Davis / 9B Parcel Duval 942 Duval Station Road Duval 37*** Eastport Road Duval 1021 Florida Boulevard Duval 43 Gator Bowl Boulevard Duval 943 Harlow Boulevard Duval 43B SR 228 Hart Expressway Ramps Duval 49 Hartley Road Duval 963 Harts Road Duval 401 IͲ10 Duval 406 IͲ10 Duval 432 IͲ10 Duval 454 IͲ10 Duval 403* IͲ10 Duval 119 IͲ295 Duval 407 IͲ295 Duval 408 IͲ295 Duval 409 IͲ295 Duval 410 IͲ295 Duval 411 IͲ295 Duval 431 IͲ295 Duval 964 IͲ295 Duval 1022 IͲ295 Duval 1023 IͲ295 Duval 121 IͲ295 Duval 68 IͲ95 Duval 413 IͲ95 Duval 414 IͲ95 Duval 419 IͲ95 Duval 433 IͲ95 Duval 434 IͲ95 Duval 962 IͲ95 Duval 418A IͲ95 Duval 944 Jones Road Duval 73 Kernan Boulevard Duval 945 Merrill Road Duval 946 Monument Road Duval 947 Monument Road Duval 1033 National Cemetery Road Duval 948 New Berlin Road Duval 949 New Berlin Road Duval 1034 New World Avenue Duval 1035 New World Avenue Duval 85 Norfolk Southern Railroad Overpass Duval 951 Old Kings Road Duval 1015 Old Middleburg Road Duval 90 Old St. Augustine Road Duval 1010 Old St. Augustine Road Duval 952 Pecan Park Road Duval 92 Pecan Park Road From Pine Verde SR 9B US 17/SR 5 Main Street SR 105 Heckscher Drive Penman Road Liberty Street SR 134 103rd Street Liberty Street SR 13 San Jose Boulevard SR 104 Dunn Avenue SR 23 First Coast Expressway US 301 IͲ295 at IͲ295 Nassau/Duval County Line SR 9B IͲ95 North North of Trout River US 1 New Kings Road SR 134 103rd Street IͲ10 US 17 Roosevelt Boulevard US 17 at Roosevelt Boulevard IͲ95 South SR 202 J. T. Butler Boulevard SR 113 Southside Connector at SR 102 Airport Road SR 104 Dunn Avenue North of Fuller Warren Bridge at US 1/SR 15 Martin Luther King Jr. SR 202 J. T. Butler Boulevard IͲ295 SR 115 at Southside Boulevard Duval/St. Johns County Line US 90 Beaver Street SR 202 J. T. Butler Boulevard Hartsfield Road Tredinick Parkway IͲ295 Lannie Road Pulaski Road Yellow Bluff Road SR 23 First Coast Expressway SR 23 First Coast Expressway West 12th Street SR 111 Edgewood Avenue Argyle Forest Boulevard Bartram Park Boulevard at Greenland Road Braddock Boulevard IͲ95 3Ͳ10

JIA North Access Road US 17 Main Street

IͲ295 Pritchard Road Glen Kernan Parkway SR 113 Southside Connector IͲ295 Lee Road Arnold Road Yellow Bluff Road Cedar Point Road Chaffee Road Chaffee Road US 23 New Kings Road Plummer Road SR 134 103rd Street US 1/SR 5 Phillips Highway

SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard SR 202 J. T. Butler Boulevard

SR 102 Airport Road SR 104 Dunn Avenue

SR 13 San Jose Boulevard SR 9B SR 202 J. T. Butler Boulevard

US 301 IͲ295 SR 105 Dames Point Bridge/Heckscher Drive IͲ95 North of Trout River IͲ10 US 1 South of New Kings Road SR 134 103rd Street

To US 17 Roosevelt Boulevard SR 152 Baymeadows Road Starratt Road Pulaski Road SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard Hart / SR 115 Mathews Bridge Lane Avenue Hart / SR 115 Mathews Bridge Old St. Augustine Road IͲ295 IͲ295 SR 23 First Coast Expressway IͲ95

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Improvement Type New 4 Lane Road, Two Overpass and New Interchange Widen to 4 Lanes Widen to 4 Lanes Widen to 3 Lanes Widen to 3 Lanes Widen to 6 Lanes and Remove Ramps Widen to 3 Lanes Remove Ramps Widen to 3 Lanes Widen to 4 Lanes Add 4 Express Lanes Add 4 Express Lanes Add 4 Express Lanes Modify Interchange Add 4 Express Lanes Add 4 Express Lanes Add 4 Express Lanes Add 4 Express Lanes Add 4 Express Lanes Add 4 Express Lanes Add 4 Express Lanes Add 4 Express Lanes Modify Interchange Add 2 Express Lanes Add 2 Express Lanes Add 4 Express Lanes Modify Interchange Add 4 Express Lanes Add 4 Express Lanes Modify Interchange Add 4 Express Lanes Add 4 Express Lanes Modify Interchange Add 4 Express Lanes Intersection Improvements Widen to 6 Lanes Widen to 6 Lanes Widen to 6 Lanes Widen to 6 Lanes New 2 Lane Road Widen to 4 Lanes Widen to 4 Lanes New 2 Lane Road Widen to 4 Lanes New 3 Lane Road / Bridge Intersection Improvements Widen to 4 Lanes Widen to 6 Lanes and Overpass Intersection Improvements / Add 1 Lane Widen to 4 Lanes Widen to 4 Lanes

Table 3Ͳ1. Road Capacity Needs by County County Map ID Facility Duval 953*** Pulaski Road Duval 97 Pulaski Road / Starratt Road Duval 935 Ramona Boulevard Duval 98 Rampart / Firestone Road Duval 1038 Ranch Road Duval 934 Ricker Road Duval 99 Salisbury Road Extension Duval 101 Shindler Drive Duval 714 SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard Duval 715 SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard Duval 716 SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard Duval 152 SR 101 Mayport Road Duval 152B SR 101 Mayport Road Duval 421 SR 102 Airport Road Duval 940 SR 104 Dunn Avenue Duval 941 SR 104 Dunn Avenue Duval 100 SR 115 Arlington Expressway Duval 153 SR 115 Arlington Expressway * Duval 102 SR 115 Southside Boulevard Duval 103 SR 115 Southside Boulevard Duval 104 SR 115 Southside Boulevard Duval 960 SR 115 Southside Boulevard Duval 966 SR 115 Southside Boulevard Duval 967 SR 115 Southside Boulevard Duval 968 SR 115 Southside Boulevard Duval 937 SR 152 Baymeadows Road Duval 938 SR 152 Baymeadows Road Duval 9 SR 21 Blanding Boulevard Duval 957A SR 21 Blanding Boulevard Duval 957B SR 21 Blanding Boulevard Duval 957C SR 21 Blanding Boulevard Duval 47 SR 228 Hart Bridge Duval 86 SR 228 Normandy Boulevard Duval 87 SR 228 Normandy Boulevard Duval 701 SR 243 JIA North Access Road Duval 18 SR 9B Duval 1024 SR 9B Duval 151 SR A1A Duval 954 Starratt Road Duval 129 Touchton Road Duval 955 Trout River Boulevard Duval 6 US 90 Beaver Street Duval 82 US 1 SR 15 New Kings Road Duval 83 US 1 SR 15 New Kings Road Duval 950 US 1 SR 15 New Kings Road Duval 93 US 1 SR 5 Philips Highway Duval 94 US 1 SR 5 Philips Highway Duval 95 US 1 SR 5 Philips Highway Duval 96 US 1 SR 5 Philips Highway Duval 1017 US 17 Main Street Duval 959 US 17 Main Street From Eastport Road IͲ295 Hammond Boulevard Collins Road Tradeport Road Morse Avenue SR 152 Baymeadows Boulevard Collins Road at Girvin Road at Hodges Boulevard at San Pablo Boulevard at SR 116 Wonderwood Drive SR 116 Wonderwood Drive Airport Entrance US 1/SR 15 New Kings Road Old Kings Road SR 109 University Boulevard at SR 109 University Boulevard US 1 SR 5 Philips Highway SR 202 J. T. Butler Boulevard US 90 Beach Boulevard Hogan Road at SR 202 J. T. Butler Boulevard at SR 152 Baymeadows Road at SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard IͲ95 US 1 /SR 5 Philips Highway IͲ295 at Collins Road at SR 134 103rd Street at Cedar Hills Boulevard SR 228 Hart Expressway Ͳ Downtown US 301 SR 23 First Coast Expressway SR 102 Airport Road US 1 SR 5 Philips Highway US 1 SR 5 Philips Highway SR 116 Wonderwood Drive Duval Station Road Belfort Road Old Kings Road SR 23 First Coast Expressway Soutel Drive IͲ295 SR 111 Edgewood Avenue Nocatee Parkway / Race Track Road SR 9B IͲ95 at the Avenues SR 202 J. T. Butler Boulevard New Berlin Road at Eastport Road 3Ͳ11

SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard Bell Road (Equestrian Park ) SR 111 Cassat Avenue Pecan Park Road IͲ295 IͲ295 Naval Station Mayport North Gate Yellow Bluff Road SR 115 Southside Boulevard US 23 New Kings Road Cahoon Road IͲ295 Old Kings Road Soutel Drive SR 9B IͲ295 SR 202 J. T. Butler Boulevard SR 126 Emerson Street Pecan Park Road

SR 115 Southside Boulevard IͲ95 Wilson Boulevard

IͲ95 Ramps US 90 Beach Boulevard SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard Gate Parkway

Mayport Main Gate IͲ95 IͲ295 US 23 New Kings Road SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard

To IͲ295 Duval Station Road Cahoon Road South SR 134 103rd Street SR 102 North of Airport Road Old Middleburg Road Belfort Road SR 134 103rd Street

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Improvement Type Widen to 4 Lanes Widen to 4 Lanes Widen to 5 Lanes Widen to 4 Lanes Widen to 4 Lanes Widen to 3 Lanes New 3 Lane Road Widen to 3 Lanes Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Add 2 Northbound Lanes Widen to 6 Lanes Widen to 4 Lanes Intersection Improvements Widen to 6 Lanes* Modify Interchange Widen to 6 Lanes* Widen to 6 Lanes* Widen to 6 Lanes* Intersection Improvements Modify Interchange Underpass Intersection Improvements Widen to 6 Lanes Widen to 6 Lanes* Widen to 6 Lanes Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements New 6 Lane Bridge Widen to 4 Lanes Widen to 6 Lanes Widen to 4 Lanes Widen to 6 Lanes Add 2 Auxiliary Lanes Widen to 4 Lanes* Widen to 4 Lanes Widen to 4 Lanes Widen to 4 Lanes Widen to 4 Lanes Widen to 6 Lanes Widen to 6 Lanes Intersection Improvements Widen to 6 Lanes Widen to 6 Lanes* Widen to 6 Lanes* Widen to 6 Lanes Widen to 4 Lanes New Interchange

Table 3Ͳ1. Road Capacity Needs by County County Map ID Facility Duval 123 US 301 SR 200 Duval 425 US 301 SR 201 Duval 7 US 90 Beaver Street Duval 79 US 90 SR 115 Mathews Bridge Duval 956 Yellow Bluff Road Duval/Clay 57 IͲ295 Duval/Nassau 88 Northern Outer Beltway Duval/Nassau 74 SR 115 Lem Turner Road Duval/Nassau 78 US 17 Main Street Nassau 988 Abaco Island Drive Extension Nassau 704 Amelia Island Parkway Nassau 980 ArrigoͲParliament Reconnection Nassau 1001 BarnwellͲ0' Neil Scott Connector Nassau 1002 Brady PointͲClements Connector Nassau 976 Cardinal Street North Extension Nassau 975 Cardinal Street South Extension Nassau 995 Christian Way Extension Nassau 996 Commodore Point Drive Extension Nassau 501 Concourse Loop Road Nassau 705 CR 105A Buccaneer Trail Nassau 993 Crosby Avenue Extension Nassau 991 Dove Road Extension {west} Nassau 974 east Dove Road Extension Nassau 36 East Nassau Connector Nassau 969 East Nassau Connector Nassau 986 Flora ParkeͲWalͲMart Connector Nassau 985 Gene Lassere Boulevard Extension Nassau 977 Goodbread Road Reconstruction Nassau 1000 Hamilton Street Extension Nassau 989 Harper Chapel Extension Nassau 402* IͲ10 Nassau 710 Lofton Creek Crossing Nassau 982 Macaw Avenue Extension Nassau 990 MentoriaͲWilliam Burgess Connector Nassau 987 Pages Dairy Road East Extension Nassau 983 Pages Dairy Road South Extension Nassau 1003 SR 200 Overpass Nassau 998 SR 200 William Burgess Connector Nassau 992 SR 200 Yulee Backage Roads Nassau 427 SR 200 SR A1A Nassau 703 SR 200 SR A1A Nassau 979 SR 200A Pages Dairy Road Nassau 706 SR A1A Nassau 707 US 17 Nassau 709 US 17 Nassau 984 US 17 Pages Dairy Connector w/roundabout Nassau 994 US 17 Powerline Corridor Nassau 999 US 17 Yulee Backage Roads Nassau 708 US 301 SR 200 Nassau 981 Various SR 200 Intersections Modifications Nassau 997 Woodbridge Parkway Extension From US 90 Duval/Clay County Line Cahoon Road US 1 Martin Luther King Jr. Jr. Parkway Starratt Road SR 13 San Jose Boulevard IͲ10 IͲ295 Pecan Park Road Abaco Island Drive South 14th Street Arrigo Boulevard Barnwell Road Brady Point Road Cardinal Avenue Spring Meadow Avenue Christian Way Commodore Point Drive License Road South Fletcher Avenue US 17 SR 5 Harper Chapel Road Extension Harper Chapel Road IͲ95 at IͲ95 Flora Parke Boulevard Gene Lassere Boulevard US 17 SR 5 Goodbread Circle Harper Chapel Road Baker/Nassau County Line Hendricks Road Cardinal Street William Burgess Boulevard Chester Road SR 200 SR A1A at US 17 SR 5 and Railroad Tracks William Burgess Boulevard Cardinal Street North Extension at US 17 Amelia Island Parkway at Felmor Road South Fletcher Avenue Nassau/Duval County Line SR 200 SR A1A US 17 SR 5 Vegas Boulevard US 17 SR 5 US 1 at S Kings Road Woodbrigde Parkway 3Ͳ12

Clements Road

Amelia Island Parkway Harts Road Georgia State Line SR 200A Pages Dairy Road Radio Avenue North of Koen Lane

Sadler Road

SR 200 SR A1A Old Yulee Road

Dove Road Extension Nassau/Duval County Line Avant Road US 17 SR 5 Harper Chapel Road Blackrock Road Sowell Road

WalͲMart Supercenter SR 200A Pages Dairy Road Hamilton Street

To Duval/Nassau County Line IͲ10 McDuff Avenue SR 109 University Boulevard New Berlin Road (north) W of US 17 Roosevelt Boulevard IͲ95 US 1 / Callahan S Kings Road SR 200 / SR A1A Zion Court CR 105A Buccaneer Trail Parliament Drive O'Neil Scott Road Clements Road SR 200 SR AIA Yulee Backage Roads William Burgess Boulevard Hampton Club Way Blackrock Road Amelia Concourse Canopy Drive Pinewood Drive Mentoria Road William Burgess Boulevard Chester Road

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Improvement Type Widen to 4 Lanes Widen to 6 Lanes Widen to 4 Lanes New 6 Lane Bridge and Transit Widen to 4 Lanes Add 4 Express Lanes on Bridge Future Corridor Widen to 4 Lanes Widen to 4 Lanes New 2 Lane Road Widen to 4 Lanes* New 2 Lane Road New 2 Lane Road New 2 Lane Road New 2 Lane Road New 2 Lane Road New 2 Lane Road New 2 Lane Road New 2 Lane Road Turn Lane Improvements* New 2 Lane Road New 2 Lane Road New 2 Lane Road New 4 Lane Road New Interchange New 2 Lane Road New 2 Lane Road and Roundabout New 2 Lane Road New 2 Lane Road New 2 Lane Road Add 4 Express Lanes New 2 Lane Bridge New 2 Lane Road New 2 Lane Road New 2 Lane Road New 2 Lane Road Overpass New 2 Lane Road New 2 Lane Road Intersection Improvements Widen to 6 Lanes Roundabout Projects Turn Lane Improvements* Intersection Improvements Widen to 4 Lanes New 2 Lane Road and Roundabout New 2 Lane Road New 2 Lane Road Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements New 2 Lane Road

Table 3Ͳ1. Road Capacity Needs by County County Map ID Facility Putnam 503 Buffalo Road Putnam 505 Comfort Road Putnam 451 SR 100 Putnam 965 SR 19 Connector Putnam 422 SR 20 Putnam 423 SR 20 Putnam 428 US 17 SR 15 Putnam 429 US 17 SR 15 Putnam 430 US 17 SR 15 Putnam 452 US 17 SR 15 St John's 801 Brinkhoff Road St John's 803 CR 16A St John's 802 CR 16A Extension St John's 805 CR 210 St John's 807 CR 210 St John's 849 CR 210 W St John's 809 CR 214 St John's 810 CR 2209 St John's 811 CR 2209 St John's 812 CR 2209 St John's 813 CR 2209 St John's 814 CR 2209 St John's 815 CR 2209 St John's 816 CR 2209 St John's 843 CR 2209 St John's 818 CR 305 St John's 850 CR 305 St John's 1025 Dixie Highway / Pellicer Lane St John's 819 Durbin Parkway St John's 844 Durbin Parkway St John's 821 Holmes Boulevard St John's 138 IͲ95 St John's 400 IͲ95 St John's 420 IͲ95 St John's 846 IͲ95 St John's 418B IͲ95 St John's 823 International Golf Parkway St John's 825 Mickler Road St John's 826 Palm Valley Road St John's 827 Race Track Road St John's 828 Race Track Road St John's 851 Race Track Road Connector St John's 110 SR 16 St John's 835 SR 16 St John's 836 SR 16 St John's 829 SR 16 Connector St John's 113 SR 207 St John's 830 SR 207 St John's 115 SR 312 St John's 832 SR 313 St John's 839 SR 313 3Ͳ13

From Buffalo Road west Port Road Clay/Putnam County Line SR 19 Putnam/Alachua County Line SW 56th Avenue West of Dunn Creek Bridge CR 309 Satsuma Putnam/Volusia County Line Pomona Park/Feagle Avenue SR 207 SR 16 Connector CR 16A IͲ95 Greenbriar Road Longleaf Pine Parkway Holmes Boulevard SR 23 First Coast Expressway SR 16 Connector International Golf Parkway CR 214 SR 207/CR 305 SR 16 CR 208 at CR 210 CR 204 SR 206 SR 207 9B Extension at US 1/SR 5 Dixie Highway CR 214 at US 1/SR 5 Ponce De Leon Boulevard and at SR 206 St. Johns /Flagler County Line SR 206 at CR 210 International Golf Parkway IͲ95 Palm Valley Road Intracoastal Waterway St. Johns Parkway Bartram Park Boulevard Durbin Parkway / 9B Extension IͲ95 South Francis Road CR 208 Outlet Mall SR 16/CR 16A IͲ95 Holmes Boulevard US 1/SR 5 Dixie Highway SR 16 at US 1/SR 5 Dixie Highway St. Johns /Duval County Line Turn/Bend SR A1A Mickler Road Bartram Park Boulevard Bartram Springs Race Track Road SR 313 International Golf Parkway South Francis Road CR 2209 South Holmes Boulevard SR 312 SR A1A US 1 Dixie Highway

SR 206 International Golf Parkway

Four Mile Road

SR 206 SR 207 CR 214 West of King Street Nocatee Parkway

To Buffalo east US 17 US 17 SR 5 Putnam County Boulevard SW 56th Avenue CR 315 Interlachen Horse Landing Road West of Dunn Creek Bridge Pomona Park/Feagle Avenue CR 309 Satsuma Wildwood Drive SR 13 Leo Maguire Parkway near US 1 Cimarrone Road Greenbriar Road US 1 CR 210 SR 23 First Coast Expressway SR 16 Connector CR 208 CR 214 International Golf Parkway SR 16

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Improvement Type New 2 Lane Bridge Widen to 4 Lanes Widen to 4 Lanes New 4 lane road / bridge Widen to 4 Lanes Widen to 4 Lanes Widen to 4 Lanes Widen to 4 Lanes Widen to 4 Lanes Widen to 4 Lanes New 2 Lane Road Widen to 4 Lanes New 2 Lane Road Widen to 6 Lanes Widen to 4 Lanes Widen to 4 Lanes Widen to 3 Lanes* New 6 Lane Road New 6 Lane Road New 6 Lane Road New 4 Lane Road New 4 Lane Road New 4 Lane Road New 4 Lane Road New Interchange New 2 Lane Road Widen to 4 Lanes Reconstruct 2 Lanes and Widen to add Sidewalks and Bike Lanes New 4 Lane Road Modify Interchange Widen to 6 Lanes Modify Interchange Add 4 Express Lanes Add 4 Express Lanes Modify Interchange Add 4 Express Lanes Widen to 4 Lanes* Widen to 4 Lanes Widen to 4 Lanes Widen to 4 Lanes Widen to 4 Lanes New 2 Lane Road Widen to 6 Lanes Widen to 4 Lanes Widen to 4 Lanes New 4 Lane Road Widen to 6 Lanes Widen to 6 Lanes Widen to 6 Lanes New 4 Lane Road New Interchange

A, B Projects must be done together to provide logical termini. *Project identified as potential context sensitive solutions improvements. **Projects must be done together to provide logical termini.

Table 3Ͳ1. Road Capacity Needs by County County Map ID Facility St John's 833 SR 9B Extension St John's 842 SR 9B Extension St John's 128 SR A1A St John's 1008 SR A1A St John's 800 SR A1A St John's 1031 SR A1A Anastasia Boulevard St John's 848 St. Johns Parkway St John's 845 US 1 SR 5 St John's 130 US 1 SR 5 Dixie Highway St John's 131 US 1 SR 5 Dixie Highway St John's 132 US 1 SR 5 Dixie Highway St John's 1029 US 1B King Street St John's 1030 US 1B San Marco Avenue St John's 834 Veterans Parkway Private Projects Baker 500 Northern Cross Town Corridor Putnam 502 Connector Road From St. Johns Parkway at Durbin Parkway Solana Road at Red Cox/Coquina Road Mickler Road Casanova Road CR 2209 at CR 210 SR 206 SR 313 International Golf Parkway US 1 Ponce de Leon Boulevard Bridge of Lions Greenbriar Road CR 125 US 17

3Ͳ14

SR 121 Distribution Center

Lewis Point Road International Golf Parkway Race Track Road Avenida Menendez SR 16 Longleaf Pine Parkway

Palm Valley Road Bridge of Lions 9B Extension

SR 202 J. T. Butler Boulevard

To Race Track Road

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

New 2 Lane Road New 2 Lane Road

Improvement Type Widen to 6 Lanes New Interchange Widen to 6 Lanes* Intersection Improvements Widen to 4 Lanes context sensitive solutions Widen to 6 Lanes Modify Interchange Widen to 6 Lanes Widen to 6 Lanes Widen to 6 Lanes Context sensitive solutions Context sensitive solutions New 4 Lane Road

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

COST FEASIBLE PLAN OVERVIEW P ROVIDING A PLAN THAT HAS A REASONABLE EXPECTATION OF THE FUNDING AVAILABLE THROUGH

THE PLAN HORIZON WILL ALLOW AGENCIES TO PROGRAM AND ADVANCE PROJECTS CONSISTENT WITH THE REGION ’ S NEEDS AND PRIORITIES . Economic competitiveness

OVERVIEW

The Cost Feasible Plan was prepared for the federal planning boundaries only – Clay, Duval, Nassau and St. Johns Counties and the projects are summarized in sections that follow by the funding programs previously identified in Part Two. A prioritization system using the performance measures established with the goals and objectives was used to rank projects priorities for inclusion in the Cost Feasible Plan. The projects in the plan are summarized by funding source.

Livable and sustainable communities

PRIORITIZATION PROCESS The candidate projects for funding in the Cost Feasible Plan were identified using a prioritization system to rank projects according to the following criteria. 3Ͳ15

Access to jobs within ¼ mile Benefit to cost ratio Safety crash cost reduction benefits Travel time saving benefits Emissions reduction benefits

Population within ¼ mile that would benefit from a bus transit route or ½ mile for commuter rail Transit ridership per day Inclusion of bicycle and pedestrian amenities Number of environmental features identified that during the Efficient Transportation Decision Making Process planning screen

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Project identified on an evacuation route established by the Northeast Florida Regional Council

The ranks were then summed for each goal category and ranked based on the low score being the best. The prioritization scores for each project are summarized in Table 3Ͳ2. A summary of the performance measures and ranked scores for each project is provided in Appendix H.

Safety

Project identified as a priority safety corridor in the Strategic Safety Plan

After the initial ranking of the projects, strategic priority decisions were used to determine if the project should be funded. For example, two projects that received a high rank were identified as having potential environmental fatal flaws and were removed.

Mobility

PersonͲmiles traveled PersonͲdelay DemandͲtoͲcapacity ratio These criteria were drawn from the performance measures adopted in the goals and objectives. Not all measures were used in the prioritization system since methodologies to forecast the measure are not available within the context of the travel demand forecasting model (such as reliability). Other measures are more qualitative and were considered in a strategic way (such as compatibility with adjacent land uses).

SR 313 from US 1 to International Golf Parkway Wells Road Extension from SR 21 Blanding Boulevard to Argyle Forest Boulevard Following the prioritization of the projects, the projects were reviewed strategically to evaluate:

Because there are many different units involved in measuring these prioritization criteria, each of the performance measure data was normalized using the statistical measure of a ZͲscore. The ZͲscore calculates the difference a value is from the mean of a normal distribution relative to the standard deviation of the data. This provides a ranking of the project in scale that can be more easily compared to other measures. For example, a project may provide access to 10,000 jobs. A score of 1.1 (or 10 percent of one standard deviation greater than the mean) is assigned. Converting all the measures to the ZͲscore allows each measure of effectiveness to be compared on a relative basis. Measures such as the benefit to cost ratio or demand to capacity ratio which are based on a ratio were not normalized.

COST FEASIBLE PLAN Following the maps, sections are provided that summarize the road capacity projects by funding source:

Strategic Intermodal System Funded Projects Other State and Federally Funded Projects Toll Funded Projects Local and Privately Funded Project

In the following tables, the phases of each project are identified as

Since there are a different number of measures within each goal category, once the measures were normalized, the total score within each of the goals was summarized and ranked. For example, the score for access to jobs and the benefit to cost ratio for economic competitiveness were added and then the score within that goal category was ranked.

3Ͳ16

System connectivity and linkages Logical termini Size and scale of the project Geographic equity

Preliminary Engineering (PE) Right of Way (ROW) Environmental (ENV) Capital Improvements (CAP) Construction (CST) Operations (OPS)

Nassau

Duval

705 LR

16 LR

714 SR

101 LR

9 SR

454 SR

95 SR

418B SR

416 SR

414 SR

957A SR

Duval

103 SR

Duval

419 SR

715 SR

Nassau

706 SR

Clay

Duval

966 SR

106 SR

Duval

415 SR

St John's

Nassau

427 SR

823 LR

Duval

967 SR

St John's

835 SR

809 LR

Duval

964 SR

St John's

807 LR

1029 SR

Clay

910 LR

Name

SR 21 Blanding Boulevard

IͲ95

SR 5 US 1 Philips Highway

IͲ10

SR 21 Blanding Boulevard

Shindler Drive

SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard

Collins Road

CR 105A Buccaneer Trail

SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard

SR 16

International Golf Parkway

CR 214

US 1 B King Street

SR 115 Southside Boulevard

IͲ95

SR A1A

SR 115 Southside Boulevard

IͲ95

SR A1A SR 200

SR 115 Southside Boulevard

SR 16

IͲ295

CR 210

Wells Road

Table 3Ͳ2. Road Capacity Needs in Ranked Order Map State or County Id Local Road

at Collins Road

3Ͳ17

SR 104 Dunn Avenue

at SR 109 University Boulevard and Bowden Road North of IͲ95 Fuller Warren Bridge

St. Johns /Duval County Line

SR 202 J. T. Butler Boulevard

SR 208 Wilson Boulevard

SR 134 103rd Street

Canopy Drive

SR 15A Oakridge Avenue

Turn/Bend

Holmes Boulevard

Granada Street

International Golf Parkway

IͲ95 at the Avenues

at IͲ295

IͲ295

Collins Road

at Girvin Road

at US 17 Roosevelt Boulevard

South Fletcher Avenue

at Hodges Boulevard

CR 218

IͲ95

US 1

Palmer Street

US 90 Beach Boulevard

SR 202 J. T. Butler Boulevard

Amelia Island Parkway

South Fletcher Avenue

South Francis Road

Greenbriar Road

SR 21 Blanding Boulevard

at US 1 SR 5 Martin Luther King Jr. Parkway

at SR 202 J. T. Butler Boulevard

at SR 126 Emerson Street

at US 17

at SR 152 Baymeadows Road

International Golf Parkway

at US 17 Roosevelt Boulevard

Cimarrone Road

Aquarius Concourse

From

Improvement Type

Intersection Improvements

Add 4 Express Lanes

Modify Interchange

Add 4 Express Lanes

Widen to 6 Lanes

Modify Interchange

Widen to 6 Lanes

Widen to 3 Lanes

Intersection Improvements

New Interchange

Turn Lane Improvements

Intersection Improvements

Widen to 4 Lanes

Widen to 3 Lanes

Context Sensitive Solutions

Widen to 6 Lanes

Modify Interchange

Turn Lane Improvements

Modify Interchange

Intersection Improvements

Underpass

Widen to 4 Lanes

Modify Interchange

Widen to 4 Lanes

Reconstruct and New 2 Lane Road

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

0.36 0.75 1.13 0.49 0.99 0.02

3.34 3.60 2.09 0.40 2.94 1.10

0.60

0.41

3.65

3.25

0.49

4.73

Ͳ0.06

0.33

3.85

1.86

1.02

3.18

0.54

0.34

0.79

0.46 5.58

0.38

5.55

5.07

0.43

2.36

0.85

0.41

3.37

4.52

0.40

6.31

1.25

0.35

6.24

0.44

0.48

6.96

4.22

0.17

3.79

2.15

1.01

6.68

Economic Livability Score Score 18.90 0.18

0.67

1.77

3.45

3.70

0.90

2.97

1.93

1.04

1.70

0.35

0.25

1.68

1.88

0.31

0.71

0.98

1.14

4.09

0.31

4.77

3.95

1.16

1.89

1.31

5.03

2.27

Mobility Score 0.44

0.00

1.00

0.00

1.00

0.00

1.00

0.00

1.00

0.00

Safety Score 0.00

4.52

4.56

4.78

4.83

4.87

5.15

5.40

5.47

5.86

6.07

6.23

6.24

6.35

6.61

6.68

7.24

7.57

7.73

7.87

8.48

8.76

8.99

9.96

Total Score 19.52

Rank Total Score 1

Duval

St John's

94 SR

433 SR

113 SR

Duval

Clay

Duval

Clay

Duval

St John's

957C SR

1015 LR

957B SR

1028 LR

951 LR

34 LR

1026 LR

432 SR

115 SR

1007 SR

805 LR

Duval

941 SR

St John's

Duval

936 LR

1008 SR

St John's

828 LR

Duval

68 SR

90 LR

Clay

908 SR

Duval

St John's

803 LR

418A SR

Duval

930 LR

Clay

Duval

16B LR

1027 LR

St John's

1030 SR

Name

CR 210

US 1 Ponce De Leon Boulevard

SR 312

IͲ10

Turn/Bend

at San Carlos Avenue / US 1 B San Marco Avenue / May Street IͲ95

SR A1A

IͲ95

3Ͳ18

Cosmos Avenue

US 17

Plummer Road

SR 21 Blanding Boulevard

Argyle Forest Boulevard

US 23 New Kings Road

SR 23 First Coast Expressway

Bartram Springs

US 1 SR 5 Philips Highway

IͲ295

Pine Tree Lane

South Holmes Boulevard

US 1 SR 5 Dixie Highway

IͲ295

US 301

College Drive

SR 220 SR 220 Doctors Inlet Road

CR 218

SR 11 Edgewood Avenue

Pine Tree Lane

at SR 134 103rd Street

SR 134 103rd Street

at Cedar Hills Boulevard

at Red Cox/Coquina Road

Old Kings Road

Old Middleburg Road

Bartram Park Boulevard

Duval/St. Johns County Line

Cosmos Avenue

IͲ95

SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard

IͲ295

Shands Bridge

SR 13

Rampart Road

US 17 Roosevelt Boulevard

US 1 Ponce de Leon Boulevard

Improvement Type

Widen to 6 Lanes

Intersection Improvements

Widen to 6 Lanes

Add 4 Express Lanes

Widen to 4 Lanes

Widen to 6 Lanes

Intersection Improvements

Widen to 4 Lanes

Intersection Improvements

Widen to 4 Lanes

Intersection Improvements

Widen to 6 Lanes

Widen to 4 Lanes

Widen to 6 Lanes and Overpass

Add 4 Express Lanes

Widen to 4 Lanes

Widen to 6 Lanes

Add 4 Express Lanes

Widen to 6 Lanes

Modify Interchange

Widen to 4 Lanes

New 4 Lane Road, Two Overpass and New Interchange

Context Sensitive Solutions

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

SR 202 J. T. Butler Boulevard

SR 9B

at SR 102 Airport Road

US 17

SR 16 Connector

Shindler Drive

Pine Verde

West Castillo Drive

From

Old Kings Road

CR 218

SR 21 Blanding Boulevard

Old Middleburg Road

SR 21 Blanding Boulevard

SR A1A

SR 104 Dunn Avenue

Argyle Forest Boulevard

Racetrack Road

Old St. Augustine Road

IͲ95

CR 218

SR 207

IͲ95

SR 5 US 1 Philips Highway

IͲ95

SR 16

CR 16A

Collins Road

Collins Road Realignment

US 1 B San Marco Avenue

Table 3Ͳ2. Road Capacity Needs in Ranked Order Map State or County Id Local Road

1.27 0.50 0.37 0.65 0.16 0.51 0.31 0.02 0.48 0.31 0.40 0.59 0.61 0.56 0.50 0.57 0.25 2.54

2.15 2.34 0.67 2.65 1.70 1.99 2.85 1.11 2.85 2.49 2.30 2.75 2.67 2.63 1.79 2.56 2.93 0.94

0.78

1.66

1.81

0.64

0.49

1.49

2.24

0.50 Ͳ0.06

1.31

0.75

0.66

2.68

1.51

0.41

3.65

Economic Livability Score Score 3.18 0.64

0.74

0.32

0.95

1.85

1.66

1.26

0.07

0.43

0.50

1.36

0.51

0.43

0.46

1.11

1.05

0.54

2.77

0.74

1.41

2.06

0.72

2.16

1.45

0.97

1.06

0.35

Mobility Score 0.59

0.00

1.00

0.00

Safety Score 0.00

3.19

3.20

3.24

3.29

3.47

3.52

3.54

3.61

3.63

3.64

3.70

3.71

3.80

3.81

3.85

3.86

3.90

3.91

3.92

4.03

4.20

4.29

4.39

4.40

4.41

Total Score 4.41

Rank Total Score 28

Duval

Clay

Duval

St John's

934 LR

905 LR

15 LR

129 LR

18 SR

100 SR

846 LR

St John's

845 LR

Duval

153 SR

98 LR

Duval

431 SR

Duval

946 LR

102 SR

St John's

130 SR

Duval

Clay

133 SR

93 SR

Duval

Clay

33 LR

945 LR

Clay

114 SR

Duval

968 SR

716 SR

Duval

121 SR

Nassau

Duval

151 SR

981 SR

Duval

943 LR

St John's

Duval

73 LR

830 SR

Duval

434 SR

Name

CR 210

SR 115 Arlington Expressway

SR 9B

Touchton Road

Collins Road

CR 209 Russell Road

Ricker Road

Rampart / Firestone Road

SR 115 Southside Boulevard

US 1 SR 5 Philips Highway

CR 210

SR 115 Arlington Expressway

IͲ295

Monument Road

US 1 SR 5 Dixie Highway

US 17

Merrill Road

at IͲ95

SR 109 University Boulevard

US 1 SR 5 Philips Highway

Belfort Road

SR 21 Blanding Boulevard

CR 739 Henley Road

Morse Avenue

Collins Road

US 1 SR 5 Philips Highway

Nocatee Parkway / Racetrack Road

at US 1 SR 5 Dixie Highway

at SR 109 University Boulevard

US 17 Roosevelt Boulevard

IͲ295

SR 206

Town Center Boulevard

Hartsfield Road

at San Pablo Boulevard

SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard

Holmes Boulevard

Various SR 200 Intersections Modifications

SR 21 Blanding Boulevard

SR 16

at SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard

SR 202 J. T. Butler Boulevard

SR 116 Wonderwood Drive

SR 134 103rd Street

3Ͳ19

SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard

IͲ295

SR 115 Southside Boulevard

Pine Verde

US 17

Old Middleburg Road

SR 134 103rd Street

IͲ95 Ramps

SR 9B

SR 134 103rd Street

Tredinick Parkway

Lewis Point Road

CR 315

SR 113 Southside Connector

SR 312

Knight Boxx Road

CR 215 Blanding Boulevard

SR 113 Southside Connector

Naval Station Mayport Gate

Lane Avenue

Glen Kernan Parkway

SR 202 J. T. Butler Boulevard

Improvement Type

Modify Interchange

Widen to 6 Lanes

Widen to 4 Lanes

Widen to 3 Lanes

Widen to 4 Lanes

Widen to 6 Lanes

Modify Interchange

Add 4 Express Lanes

Widen to 6 Lanes

Intersection Improvements

Widen to 6 Lanes

Widen to 4 Lanes

Intersection Improvements

Add 4 Express Lanes

Widen to 4 Lanes

Widen to 3 Lanes

Widen to 6 Lanes

Add 4 Express Lanes

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

SR 202 J. T. Butler Boulevard

IͲ295

From

SR 207

SR 220 Doctors Inlet Road

SR 21 Blanding Boulevard

SR 115 Southside Boulevard

IͲ295

SR A1A

Harlow Boulevard

Kernan Boulevard

IͲ95

Table 3Ͳ2. Road Capacity Needs in Ranked Order Map State or County Id Local Road

0.42 0.28 0.43 0.37 0.49 0.39 0.60 0.47 0.49 0.78 0.61 0.31 0.39 0.18 0.49 0.42

1.03 0.73 0.61 0.24 0.46 1.11 1.61 1.37 1.31 0.38 0.61 0.74 1.11 1.42 0.46

0.35

0.72

1.32

0.69

1.43

0.62

0.86

1.16

0.75

0.37

1.04

0.54

0.51

0.92

0.64

0.73

2.12

1.02

0.21

2.62

1.64

0.30

2.04

Economic Livability Score Score 0.89 0.14

1.59

0.59

1.23

0.43

0.64

0.56

0.48

0.71

0.50

0.87

1.74

1.87

1.62

0.45

0.38

1.03

0.41

1.29

0.60

0.91

0.87

0.99

1.60

1.65

0.29

0.32

0.81

Mobility Score 2.13

0.00

1.00

0.00

1.00

0.00

1.00

0.00

1.00

0.00

Safety Score 0.00

2.47

2.51

2.52

2.55

2.56

2.57

2.58

2.59

2.60

2.69

2.77

2.78

2.85

2.87

2.97

2.99

3.00

3.08

3.14

3.15

Total Score 3.16

Rank Total Score 55

Duval

Baker

Duval

Clay

Duval

Clay

Duval

St John's

43B LR

99 LR

405 SR

413 SR

96 SR

26 LR

408 SR

901 LR

406 SR

410 SR

848 LR

Duval

Clay

St John's

Duval

47 SR

900 LR

128 SR

411 SR

St John's

79 SR

800 SR

Duval

104 SR

92 LR

Duval

Duval/Clay

57 SR

937 SR

St John's

Duval

1009 LR

132 SR

Duval

960 SR

St John's

Duval

43 LR

420 SR

Duval

87 SR

Name

IͲ295

SR A1A

Baxley Road

SR 228 Hart Expressway Bridge

SR 115 Mathews Bridge

SR A1A

Pecan Park Road

St. Johns Parkway

IͲ295

IͲ10

Knight Boxx Road

IͲ295

CR 218 Extension

US 1 SR 5 Philips Highway

IͲ95

IͲ10

Solana Road

SR 220 Doctors Inlet Road

SR 228 Hart Expressway

US 1Martin Luther King Jr. Parkway

Mickler Road

IͲ95

CR 2209

SR 134 103rd Street

US 301

SR 220 Doctors Inlet Road

North of Trout River

SR 23 First Coast Expressway

SR 202 J. T. Butler Boulevard

SR 104 Dunn Avenue

West of SR 121

Belfort Road

Liberty Street

SR 228 Hart Expressway Ramps

Salisbury Road Extension

US 90 Beach Boulevard

IͲ95

SR 13 San Jose Boulevard

International Golf Parkway

SR 206

US 90 Beach Boulevard

Hogan Road

Liberty Street

Add 4 Express Lanes

South of New Kings Road (US 1) 3Ͳ20

Widen to 6 Lanes

Widen to 4 Lanes

New 6 Lane Bridge

New 6 Lane Bridge (+Transit)

Widen to 4 Lanes

Widen to 6 Lanes

Add 4 Express Lanes

Widen to 6 Lanes

Add 4 Express Lanes

New 4 Lane Road

Widen to 6 Lanes

Add 4 Express Lanes

New 3 Lane Road

Remove Ramps

Widen to 6 Lanes

SR 202 J. T. Butler Boulevard

SR 21 Blanding Boulevard

SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard

SR 109 University Boulevard

Palm Valley Road

US 17 Main Street

9B Extension

IͲ10

SR 23 First Coast Expressway

SR 21 Blanding Boulevard

IͲ95

CR 315

SR 126 Emerson Street

SR 102 Airport Road

Baker/Nassau County Line

SR 115 Baymeadows Road

Hart / SR 115 Mathews Bridge

SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard

Widen to 6 Lanes

Add 4 Express Lanes on Bridge

West of US 17 Roosevelt Boulevard SR 115 Southside Boulevard

Widen to 6 Lanes

Add 4 Express Lanes

Widen to 3 Lanes

Intersection Improvements

Widen to 6 Lanes and Remove Ramps

Widen to 6 Lanes

Improvement Type

Racetrack Road

International Golf Parkway

SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard

Gate Parkway

Hart / SR 115 Mathews Bridge

SR 111 Cassat Avenue

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

SR 23 First Coast Expressway

From

SR 115 Southside Boulevard

SR 152 Baymeadows Road

IͲ295

US 1 SR 5 Dixie Highway

IͲ95

San Pablo Road

SR 115 Southside Boulevard

Gator Bowl Boulevard

SR 228 Normandy Boulevard

Table 3Ͳ2. Road Capacity Needs in Ranked Order Map State or County Id Local Road

0.35 0.52 1.65 0.37 0.31 0.29 0.13 0.37 0.24 0.58 0.73 0.38 0.36 1.34

0.91 1.34 0.32 0.16 0.34 0.05 0.36 0.66 0.46 0.97 0.40 0.14 1.29 0.18

0.04

0.18

0.38

0.74

0.34

0.69

0.74

0.36

0.74

0.81

1.80

0.27

0.03

1.31 0.40

1.11 Ͳ0.06

0.66

0.64

0.85 0.77

0.36

1.89

Economic Livability Score Score 1.05 0.72

1.15

0.49

0.37

0.52

0.92

0.51

0.37

1.08

1.62

0.78

0.48

0.68

0.25

0.36

0.99

0.73

0.27

0.17

0.85

0.79

1.68

1.04

1.79

0.52

0.92

0.17

Mobility Score 0.68

0.00

1.00

0.00

1.00

0.00

1.00

0.00

1.00

0.00

Safety Score 0.00

1.93

2.02

2.04

2.05

2.06

2.07

2.10

2.11

2.13

2.21

2.22

2.25

2.29

2.30

2.33

2.34

2.36

2.38

2.39

2.40

2.41

2.42

Total Score 2.46

109

108

107

106

105

104

103

102

101

100

Rank Total Score 83

Duval

St John's

Clay

Duval

Clay

938 SR

836 SR

424 SR

25 LR

7 SR

24 LR

Duval

Putnam

Clay

401 SR

953 LR

451 SR

911 LR

Baker

Nassau

Clay

453 SR

703 SR

909 LR

Duval/Nassau

Nassau

709 SR

74 SR

Duval

St John's

1031 SR

950 SR

St John's

Duval

1024 SR

831 SR

Duval

1022 SR

St John's

Nassau

992 SR

138 SR

Duval

947 LR

St John's

Nassau

979 SR

849 LR

Duval

1023 SR

Clay/Putnam County Line

Eastport Road

SR 23 First Coast Expressway

SR A1A SR 200

Soutel Drive

Casanova Road

SR 207

Phillips Highway (US 1)

CR 218

SR A1A SR 200

IͲ10

SR 115 Lem Turner Road

SR 16

Amelia Island Parkway

Baker/Columbia County Line

IͲ295

3Ͳ21

CR 739 Henley Road

Sadler Road

CR 125

US 1 Kings Road Callahan

Long Bay Road

US 17 SR 5

IͲ295

Georgia State Line

SR 11 Edgewood Avenue

Bridge of Lions

SR 16

IͲ295

Buckman Bridge

at Ponce De Leon Boulevard (US 1/SR 5) and at SR 206 IͲ95

Longleaf Pine Parkway

Henley Road (CR 739)

McDuff Avenue

SR 23 First Coast Expressway

Duval/Clay County Line

CR 208 Outlet Mall

IͲ95

Old Yulee Road

IͲ295

Greenbriar Road

SR 21 Blanding Boulevard

Cahoon Road

Henley Road (CR 739)

Clay/Bradford County Line

South Francis Road

Philips Highway (US 1 /SR 5)

Cardinal Street North Extension

Lee Road

at Felmor Road

SR 9B

SR A1A SR 200

Improvement Type

Widen to 4 Lanes

Widen to 6 Lanes

Add 4 Express Lanes

Widen to 4 Lanes

New 2 Lane Road

Widen to 4 Lanes

Add 4 Express Lanes

Widen to 4 Lanes

Intersection Improvements

Context Sensitive Solutions

New 6 Lane Road

Add 2 Auxiliary Lanes

Add 2 Express Lanes

Modify Interchange

Widen to 4 Lanes

New 4 Lane Road

Widen to 6 Lanes

Widen to 4 Lanes

Widen to 6 Lanes

New 2 Lane Road

Widen to 6 Lanes

Roundabout Projects

Add 2 Express Lanes

New 2 Lane Road

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

SR 202 J. T. Butler Boulevard

William Burgess Boulevard

From

Long Bay Road Extension North Old Jennings Road

SR 100

Pulaski Road

IͲ10

US 17

US 1 SR 15 New Kings Road

SR A1A Anastasia Boulevard

SR 313

SR 9B

IͲ295

IͲ95

CR 210 West

CR 218

US 90 Beaver Street

CR 218 Extension

US 301 SR 200

SR 16

SR 152 Baymeadows Road

SR 200 Yulee Backage Roads

Monument Road

SR 200A Pages Dairy Road

IͲ295

Table 3Ͳ2. Road Capacity Needs in Ranked Order Map State or County Name Id Local Road SR 200 William Burgess 998 SR Nassau Connector

0.46 0.36 0.45 0.02 0.18 0.12 0.17 0.79 0.12 0.47 0.58

0.99 0.30 1.33 0.91 0.04 0.26 0.01 0.75 0.39

0.49

0.78

0.94

0.74

0.40

0.76

0.53

0.93

0.88

0.51

0.00

0.03

0.38

0.08

0.18

0.37

0.73

0.51

0.89

0.53

0.18

0.63

0.46

0.70

0.67

0.55

0.18

0.45

0.49

0.35

0.87

Economic Livability Score Score 0.64 0.29

0.54

0.30

0.39

0.48

0.35

0.54

0.09

1.30

0.18

0.32

0.43

0.77

0.99

0.52

0.69

0.45

0.61

0.30

0.26

0.33

0.70

0.40

0.00

0.45

0.21

0.63

0.00

1.00

0.00

1.00

0.00

1.00

0.00

1.00

0.00

1.00

0.00

Mobility Safety Score Score 0.00 1.00

1.51

1.52

1.53

1.56

1.60

1.61

1.62

1.65

1.67

1.70

1.73

1.75

1.76

1.78

1.79

1.80

1.81

1.82

1.84

1.85

Total Score 1.92

136

135

134

133

132

131

130

129

128

127

126

125

124

123

122

121

120

119

118

117

116

115

114

113

112

111

Rank Total Score 110

St John's

Clay

Nassau

Duval

Nassau

Clay

Duval

Clay

Duval

Putnam

Duval

Clay

Duval

Nassau

St John's

902 LR

904 LR

704 LR

49 LR

969 LR

912 LR

407 SR

450 SR

31 LR

914 LR

1017 SR

152 SR

44 LR

152B SR

505 LR

933 LR

907 LR

421 SR

402 SR

400 SR

Clay

819 LR

32 LR

St John's

Duval/Nassau

78 SR

811 LR

Duval

St John's

826 LR

82 SR

St John's

110 SR

Name

IͲ95

IͲ10

SR 102 Airport Road

Decoy Road

Kernan Boulevard

Comfort Road

SR 101 Mayport Road

Girvin Road

SR 101 Mayport Road

St. Johns /Flagler County Line

Baker County Line

Airport Entrance

US 17

SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard

Port Road

SR 116 Wonderwood Drive

SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard

at SR 116 Wonderwood Drive

IͲ295

CR 209 Russell Road

Lake Asbury North South Road 3

US 17 Main Street

SR 16

Clay/Bradford County Line

IͲ95 North

Pipit Place

at IͲ95

SR 13 San Jose Boulevard

South 14th Street

CR 739 Henley Road

SR 220 Doctors Inlet Road

9B Extension

CR 315B

SR 206

3Ͳ22

Duval County Line

IͲ95

CR 209 South

SR 116 McCormick Road

US 17

Mayport Main Gate

Ashley Melisse

Pecan Park Road

CR 739B Sandbridge Road

CR 315B

Clay/Putnam County Line

Dames Point Bridge

Oakleaf Plantation Parkway

Old St. Augustine Road

CR 105A Buccaneer Trail

CR 209 Russell Road

SR 21 Blanding Boulevard

Nocatee Parkway

US 17

SR 16 Connector

SR 200 / SR A1A

IͲ295

Mickler Road

SR 313

Improvement Type

Add 4 Express Lanes

Widen to 6 Lanes

Reconstruct 2 Lanes

Widen to 6 Lanes

Widen to 4 Lanes

Add 2 Northbound Lanes

Widen to 5 Lanes

Intersection Improvements

Widen to 4 Lanes

New 2 Lane Road

Widen to 4 Lanes

Add 4 Express Lanes

New 2 Lane Road

New Interchange

Widen to 3 Lanes

Widen to 4 Lanes

Widen to 6 Lanes

New 4 Lane Road

Widen to 4 Lanes

New 6 Lane Road

Widen to 4 Lanes

Widen to 6 Lanes

Widen to 4 Lanes

Widen to 6 Lanes

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

SR 23 First Coast Expressway

Pecan Park Road

SR 11 Edgewood Avenue

Intracoastal Waterway

IͲ95

From

CR 315

SR 100

IͲ295

Tynes Road

East Nassau Connector

Hartley Road

Amelia Island Parkway

CR 739B Sandridge Road

College Drive

Durbin Parkway

CR 315

CR 2209

US 17 Main Street

US 1 SR 15 New Kings Road

Palm Valley Road

SR 16

Table 3Ͳ2. Road Capacity Needs in Ranked Order Map State or County Id Local Road

0.18 0.16 0.33 0.28

0.00 0.82 0.13 0.21

0.23

0.54

0.31

0.37

0.48

0.23

0.16

0.26

0.45

0.17

0.00

0.38

0.15

0.65

0.34

0.75

0.29

0.45

0.56

0.37

0.63

0.44

0.48

0.31

0.50

0.58

0.17

0.00

0.49

0.31

0.61

0.54

0.18

0.00

0.32

0.45

0.43

0.17

0.33

0.52

0.00

0.42

0.59

Economic Livability Score Score 0.56 0.35

0.69

0.73

0.23

0.03

0.44

0.00

0.31

0.30

0.31

0.43

0.13

0.53

0.48

0.91

0.17

0.81

0.25

0.36

0.32

0.60

0.25

0.52

0.29

0.59

0.63

0.49

Mobility Score 0.59

0.00

1.00

0.00

1.00

0.00

1.00

0.00

1.00

0.00

1.00

0.00

1.00

0.00

Safety Score 0.00

1.19

1.20

1.23

1.24

1.25

1.28

1.29

1.30

1.33

1.34

1.35

1.37

1.39

1.41

1.42

1.44

1.47

1.48

1.50

Total Score 1.50

163

162

161

160

159

158

157

156

155

154

153

152

151

150

149

148

147

146

145

144

143

142

141

140

139

138

Rank Total Score 137

St John's

Duval

St John's

Duval

Nassau

Putnam

Nassau

St John's

Nassau

Duval

Nassau

St John's

Duval

Baker

Duval

St John's

Duval

935 LR

802 LR

962 SR

989 LR

429 SR

977 LR

994 SR

1003 SR

827 LR

990 LR

409 SR

976 LR

131 SR

944 LR

403 SR

959 SR

404 SR

955 LR

6 SR

948 LR

844 LR

821 LR

119 SR

963 LR

Duval

833 SR

1021 LR

Harts Road

IͲ295

Holmes Boulevard

Durbin Parkway

New Berlin Road

Beaver Street (US 90)

Trout River Boulevard

IͲ10

US 17 Main Street

IͲ10

Jones Road

SR 104 Dunn Avenue

IͲ95

CR 214

at US 1 SR 5 Dixie Highway

Pulaski Road

SR 23 First Coast Expressway

Old Kings Road

W of CR 125

at Eastport Road

Nassau/Duval County Line

Pritchard Road

SR 313

Cardinal Avenue

Cardinal Street North Extension

US 1 SR 5 Dixie Highway

US 1 New Kings Road

William Burgess Boulevard

MentoriaͲWilliam Burgess Connector

IͲ295

St. Johns Parkway

IͲ295

SR 9B

3Ͳ23

Four Mile Road

Yellow Bluff Road

Cahoon Road

US 23 New Kings Road

W of SR 121

US 301

US 90 Beaver Street

International Golf Parkway

SR 200 Yulee Backage Roads

North of Trout River

Harper Chapel Road

Bartram Park Boulevard

Radio Avenue

Hamilton Street

West of Dunn Creek Bridge

Dove Road Extension

Leo Maguire Parkway

Cahoon Road South

St. Johns Parkway

SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard

Blackrock Road

Improvement Type

Widen to 4 Lanes

Add 4 Express Lanes

Widen to 6 Lanes

Modify Interchange

Widen to 4 Lanes

Add 4 Express Lanes

New Interchange

Add 4 Express Lanes

Intersection Improvements

Widen to 6 Lanes

New 2 Lane Road

Add 4 Express Lanes

New 2 Lane Road

Widen to 4 Lanes

Overpass

New 2 Lane Road

Widen to 4 Lanes

New 2 Lane Road

Modify Interchange

New 2 Lane Road

Widen to 5 Lanes

Widen to 6 Lanes

Widen to 3 Lanes

New 2 Lane Road

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

at US 17 SR 5 and Railroad Tracks

Racetrack Road

SR 200 Overpass

Vegas Boulevard

US 17 SR 5

Goodbread Road Reconstruction

US 17 Powerline Corridor

CR 309 (Satsuma)

Harper Chapel Road

at IͲ95

CR 16A

Hammond Boulevard

Racetrack Road

Penman Road

Commodore Point Drive

From

US 17 SR 15

Harper Chapel Extension

SR 115 Southside Boulevard

CR 16A Extension

Ramona Boulevard

SR 9B Extension

Florida Boulevard

Table 3Ͳ2. Road Capacity Needs in Ranked Order Map State or County Name Id Local Road Commodore Point Drive 996 LR Nassau Extension

0.44 0.45 0.61 0.33 0.36 0.36 0.21 0.45 0.53 0.55 0.20 0.35 0.55

0.31 0.34 0.10 0.11 0.05 0.57 0.28 0.16 0.07 0.68 0.11 0.16

0.35

0.09 0.64

0.37

0.31 0.72

0.35

0.48

0.33

0.19

0.41

0.72

0.05

0.46

0.30

0.05

0.75

0.28

0.06

0.34

0.60

0.17

0.33

0.29

0.94

0.41

0.30

Economic Livability Score Score 0.00 0.17

0.22

0.48

0.07

0.34

0.27

0.24

0.20

0.58

0.55

0.61

0.10

0.30

0.00

0.65

0.00

0.60

0.71

0.00

0.32

0.00

0.39

0.12

0.22

0.54

0.46

0.00

1.00

0.00

Mobility Safety Score Score 0.00 1.00

0.93

0.94

0.95

0.96

0.97

0.98

1.02

1.04

1.06

1.08

1.09

1.10

1.11

1.12

1.13

1.14

1.15

1.16

1.17

Total Score 1.17

190

189

188

187

186

185

184

183

182

181

180

179

178

177

176

175

174

173

172

171

170

169

168

167

166

165

Rank Total Score 164

Duval

Clay

932 LR

949 LR

913 LR

Nassau

707 SR

Clay

Duval

37 LR

13 LR

Duval

1019 LR

Duval

83 SR

St John's

Putnam

452 SR

1025 LR

Putnam

965 SR

Putnam

Duval

971 LR

428 SR

Putnam

503 LR

St John's

Duval

942 LR

810 LR

Duval

97 LR

701 SR

Duval

940 SR

St John's

Duval

85 LR

825 LR

Clay

St John's

14 LR

843 LR

Duval

St John's

851 LR

1016 LR

Nassau

Duval

973 LR

2 LR

Name

Yellow Bluff Road Oakleaf Plantation Parkway

New Berlin Road

Oakleaf Village Parkway Extension

Old Middleburg Road S

Oakleaf Village Parkway Extension

Cheswick Oak Avenue Extension

Collins Road

Nassau/Duval County Line

SR 105 Heckscher Drive

Melson Avenue

West of CR 214 King Street

West of Dunn Creek Bridge

CR 210

IͲ295

Pomona Park/Feagle Avenue

SR 19

SR 228 Normandy Boulevard

Buffalo Road west

US 17 SR 5 Main Street

SR 102 Airport Road

Palm Valley Road

IͲ295

US 17

Eastport Road

McDuff Avenue / 5th Street

Dixie Highway / Pellicer Lane

US 17 SR 15

CR 2209

US 1 SR 15 New Kings Road

US 17 SR 15

SR 19 Connector

Chaffee Road

Buffalo Road

Duval Station Road

SR 243 JIA Access Road

Mickler Road

Pulaski Road / Starratt Road

US 1 SR 15 New Kings Road

West 12th Street

SR 104 Dunn Avenue

SR 21 Blanding Boulevard

College Drive Extension

at CR 210

Lenox Avenue

3Ͳ24

Oakleaf Village Parkway

Cedar Point Road

Shindler Drive

Cheswick Oak Avenue

Harts Road

Pulaski Road

Huron Street

SR 207

Horse Landing Road

SR 23 First Coast Expressway

Old Kings Road

CR 309 (Satsuma)

Putnam County Boulevard

Crystal Springs Road

Buffalo east

Starratt Road

Pecan Park Road

SR A1A

Duval Station Road

IͲ295

US 23 New Kings Road

Cheswick Oak Avenue

US 90 Beaver Street

Racetrack Road

Green Pine Road

New Berlin Road (north)

Improvement Type

New 2 Lane Road

Widen to 4 Lanes

New 4 Lane Road

Intersection Improvements

Widen to 3 Lanes

Resurface 2 Lanes

Widen to 4 Lanes

New 6 Lane Road

Widen to 6 Lanes

Widen to 4 Lanes

New 4 lane road / bridge

Widen to 5 Lanes

New 2 Lane Bridge

Widen to 4 Lanes

New 3 Lane Road / Bridge

New 4 Lane Road

New Interchange

Reconstruct 2 Lanes

New 2 Lane Road

Widen to 4 Lanes

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Durbin Parkway / 9B Extension

SR A1A SR 200

IͲ295

From

Norfolk Southern Railroad Overpass

CR 2209

Cahoon Road

Racetrack Road Connector

Chester Road

Alta Drive / Yellow Bluff Road

Table 3Ͳ2. Road Capacity Needs in Ranked Order Map State or County Id Local Road

0.18 0.27 0.27 0.19 0.43 0.38 0.23 0.35 0.35

0.22 0.13 0.14 0.14 0.09 0.26 0.18 0.25 0.11

0.01

0.17

0.34

0.25

0.15

0.06

0.18

0.00

0.35

0.31

0.35

0.04

0.40

0.22

0.20

0.26

0.25

0.00

0.48

0.19

0.20

0.14

0.40

0.06

0.18

0.38

0.27

0.14

0.17

0.05

0.07

0.50

0.16

Economic Livability Score Score 0.20 0.41

0.44

0.22

0.24

0.44

0.18

0.05

0.23

0.02

0.15

0.35

0.27

0.30

0.32

0.53

0.06

0.13

0.25

0.13

0.27

0.39

0.51

0.61

0.44

0.64

0.22

Mobility Score 0.29

0.00

Safety Score 0.00

0.62

0.63

0.64

0.65

0.66

0.67

0.68

0.69

0.70

0.72

0.75

0.76

0.81

0.83

0.85

0.86

0.88

Total Score 0.90

217

216

215

214

213

212

211

210

209

208

207

206

205

204

203

202

201

200

199

198

197

196

195

194

193

192

Rank Total Score 191

Duval

123 SR

3 LR

1020 LR

Duval

St John's

801 LR

815 LR

Nassau

983 LR

St John's

Nassau

974 LR

850 LR

Nassau

999 SR

Nassau

Duval

425 SR

982 LR

Putnam

422 SR

Clay

Duval

954 LR

906 LR

St John's

812 LR

St John's

Nassau

708 SR

834 LR

Duval

970 LR

Nassau

Putnam

430 SR

991 LR

Putnam

423 SR

Nassau

Duval

86 SR

993 LR

Duval

956 LR

St John's

829 SR

Duval

St John's

832 SR

45 LR

Clay

903 LR

Name

Clark Road Extension

CR 2209

CR 305

Macaw Avenue Extension

CR 209 South

Veterans Parkway

Dove Road Extension {west}

Crosby Avenue Extension

Alta Drive

US 301 SR 200

Broward Road

International Golf Parkway

SR 206

Cardinal Street

Decoy Road

Greenbriar Road

Harper Chapel Road Extension

US 17 SR 5

New Berlin Road (south)

US 90

SR 207

SR A1A SR 200

Pages Dairy Road South Extension

Brinkhoff Road

Harper Chapel Road

US 17 SR 5

Duval/Clay County Line

Putnam/Alachua County Line

Duval Station Road

SR 16 Connector

at S Kings Road (US 1)

Youngerman Circle

Clark Road

SR 16

SR 207

US 17 SR 5

US 17

3Ͳ25

Longleaf Pine Parkway

Mentoria Road

Pinewood Drive

IͲ295

Duval/Nassau County Line

Wildwood Drive

Sowell Road

William Burgess Boulevard

North of Koen Lane

IͲ10

SW 56th Avenue

Yellow Bluff Road

International Golf Parkway

Collins Road

Pomona Park/Feagle Avenue

CR 315 (Interlachen)

Bell Road (Equestrian Park)

New Berlin Road (north)

Wonderwood Drive

SR 16/CR 16A

US 1 Dixie Highway

SR 220 Doctors Inlet Road

Improvement Type

New 3 Lane Road

New 4 Lane Road

Widen to 4 Lanes

New 2 Lane Road

Reconstruct 2 Lanes

New 4 Lane Road

New 2 Lane Road

Widen to 4 Lanes

New 2 Lane Road

Widen to 6 Lanes

Widen to 4 Lanes

New 6 Lane Road

Intersection Improvements

New 2 Lane Road

Widen to 4 Lanes

Widen to 3 Lanes

New 4 Lane Road

Widen to 4 Lanes

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Putnam/Volusia County Line

SW 56th Avenue

US 301

Starratt Road

Ashley Melisse

CR 2209

SR 16

US 17

From

Dove Road Extension (east)

SR 200 Yulee Backage Roads

US 301 SR 200

SR 20

Starratt Road

CR 2209

US 301 SR 200

Parramore Road Extension

US 17 SR 15

SR 20

SR 228 Normandy Boulevard

Yellow Bluff Road

Girvin Road

SR 16 Connector

SR 313

Town Center Boulevard

Table 3Ͳ2. Road Capacity Needs in Ranked Order Map State or County Id Local Road

0.27 0.23 0.18 0.00 0.23

0.04 0.13 0.07 0.00 0.03

0.30

0.15

0.17

0.46

0.00

0.29

0.12

0.08

0.02

0.17

0.05

0.10

0.28

0.10

0.20

0.18

0.22

0.21

0.34

0.02

0.18

0.24

0.09

0.24

Ͳ0.08

0.34

0.21

0.28

0.03

0.16

0.26

0.08

0.24

0.37

0.09

0.00

0.26

0.14

0.26

0.33

0.00

0.19

0.32

0.06

Economic Livability Score Score 0.24 0.27

0.05

0.34

0.10

0.00

0.07

0.21

0.00

0.02

0.04

0.21

0.00

0.28

0.26

0.11

0.09

0.14

0.18

0.25

0.22

0.18

0.09

0.17

0.24

0.20

Mobility Score 0.08

0.00

Safety Score 0.00

0.31

0.34

0.35

0.36

0.37

0.39

0.40

0.41

0.44

0.45

0.46

0.48

0.49

0.50

0.51

0.52

0.53

0.55

0.57

0.58

Total Score 0.58

245

244

243

242

241

240

239

238

237

236

235

234

233

232

231

230

229

228

227

226

225

224

223

222

221

220

219

Rank Total Score 218

Duval

Nassau

St John's

952 LR

995 LR

816 LR

818 LR

Nassau

St John's

710 LR

814 LR

Nassau

Baker

Nassau

Clay

Nassau

St John's

Nassau

984 LR

980 LR

1001 LR

720 LR

987 LR

501 LR

915 LR

986 LR

997 LR

839 SR

1000 LR

1002 LR

Duval

Nassau

985 LR

1 LR

975 LR

Clay

Nassau

988 LR

46 LR

St John's

813 LR

Duval

1010 LR

1032 SR

Duval

939 LR

Name

Goodbread Circle Brady Point Road

Brady PointͲClements Connector

at US 1 SR 5 Dixie Highway

Woodbrigde Parkway

Flora Parke Boulevard

NS3

Hamilton Street Extension

SR 313

Flora ParkeͲWalͲMart Connector Woodbridge Parkway Extension

Lake Asbury East West 1

License Road

Chester Road

Pages Dairy Road East Extension

Concourse Loop Road

South MacClenny

3Ͳ26

Clements Road

Walmart Supercenter

CR 209 Russell Road

Amelia Concourse

Blackrock Road

East Baldwin

O'Neil Scott Road

Parliament Drive

Arrigo Boulevard Barnwell Road

SR 200A Pages Dairy Road

US 17 SR 5

New 2 Lane Road

New Interchange

New 2 Lane Road

Future Corridor

New 2 Lane Road

New 2 Lane Road and Roundabout

New 4 Lane Road

North of New Berlin Road (south) SR 200A Pages Dairy Road

New 2 Lane Road

New 4 Lane Road

New 2 Lane Bridge

New 2 Lane Road

New 4 Lane Road

Widen to 4 Lanes

New 4 Lane Road

New 2 Lane Road

Widen to 4 Lanes

Intersection Improvements / Add 1 Lane

New 2 Lane Road

Improvement Type

William Burgess Boulevard

SR 16

SR 207 CR 305

Avant Road

Zion Court

Gene Lassere Boulevard

IͲ10/US 90 Parallel Reliever

Gene Lassere Boulevard Extension US 17 Pages Dairy Connector w/roundabout ArrigoͲParliament Reconnection BarnwellͲ0' Neil Scott Connector

SR 105 Zoo Parkway

Spring Meadow Avenue

Cardinal Street South Extension

Alta Drive Realignment

US 17

CR 214

Hendricks Road

Abaco Island Drive

CR 214

Baldwin Bypass North of Baldwin

Baldwin Bypass South of Baldwin CR 208

CR 204

CR 208

Hampton Club Way

JIA North Access Road

Pecan Park Road

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

SR 206

SR 16

Christian Way

Braddock Boulevard

at Greenland Road

SR 115 Lem Turner Road

From

Governors Park Road

CR 2209

Lofton Creek Crossing

Abaco Island Drive Extension

CR 2209

US 301 SR 200

CR 305

CR 2209

Christian Way Extension

Pecan Park Road

Old St. Augustine Road

Braddock Parkway

Table 3Ͳ2. Road Capacity Needs in Ranked Order Map State or County Id Local Road

0.22 0.17 0.19

0.01 0.05 0.01

0.17 0.17

0.01 0.00

0.17

0.00

0.18

0.17 0.00

0.00

0.17

0.02

0.18

0.02

0.00

0.19

0.01

0.19

0.20

0.00

0.18

0.18 0.02

0.01

0.20

0.19

0.02

0.17

0.00

0.04

0.17

0.00

0.01

0.18

0.07

0.19

0.01

0.04

0.20

0.08

Economic Livability Score Score 0.00 0.17

0.00

0.01

0.00

0.01

0.00

0.03

0.00

0.03

0.01

0.00

0.06

0.00

0.07

0.08

0.00

0.07

0.00

Mobility Score 0.12

0.00

Safety Score 0.00

0.17

0.18

0.19

0.20

0.21

0.22

0.23

0.24

0.25

0.27

Total Score 0.30

272

271

270

269

268

267

266

265

264

263

262

261

260

259

258

257

256

255

254

253

252

251

250

249

248

247

Rank Total Score 246

Spoil Island

Blount Island Boulevard Extension

1006 LR

Nassau

Baker/Duval

Duval/Nassau

36 LR

91 LR

88 LR

Duval

Tampa Bay

Baker/Clay/Duval Future Corridor Initiative

Northern Outer Beltway

Outer Loop Facility

East Nassau Connector

IͲ10

SR 228 Normandy Boulevard

IͲ95

3Ͳ27

SR 228 Normandy Boulevard

Chester Road

JAXPORT

Northeast Florida

Commerce Center

Improvement Type

Future Corridor

New 4 Lane Road

New 2 Lane Bridge

Future Corridor

New 2 Lane Road

New Interchange

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

SR 23 First Coast Expressway

721 LR

Cecil Field Connector

Duval

From at Durbin Parkway

972 LR

SR 9B Extension

St John's

Name

842 SR

Table 3Ͳ2. Road Capacity Needs in Ranked Order Map State or County Id Local Road

0.17 0.02 Ͳ0.17 Ͳ0.30

0.00 0.04 0.03

0.17

0.00 0.00

0.17

0.00

Economic Livability Score Score 0.00 0.17

0.03

0.04

0.01

0.00

Mobility Score 0.00

0.00

Safety Score 0.00

Ͳ0.25

Ͳ0.09

0.03

0.17

Total Score 0.17

279

278

277

273

Rank Total Score 273

Legend ÂŽ q Â¤ n Â¤ n Ă ĂŹ ĂŤ ĂŠ Ă¨ Ă&#x2019; " ) Ă&#x160; Ă&#x2019; " ) Ă&#x160;

Airport Amtrak Station

" )

Passenger Rail Station

108

115

Intersection Projects

FCE Interchange Projects

ÂŤ Lanes ÂŹ 2

" ) " )

" ) 127

Ă ĂŹ ĂŤ ĂŠ Ă¨

ÂŹ ÂŤ

A1A

ÂŹ ÂŤ

A1A

ÂŽ q

ÂŁ Â¤

Reconstruct 2 Lanes

Ă&#x2019; " ) Ă&#x160; Ă&#x2019; " ) Ă&#x160;

301

Widen to 3 1Lanes 22

" )

Widen to 4 Lanes

" )

Ă ĂŹ ĂŤ ĂŠ Ă¨

ÂŁ Â¤

Ă ĂŹ ĂŤ ĂŠ Ă¨

108

Ă&#x2019; " ) Ă&#x160;

105

107

Â§ Â¨ ÂŚĂ¨ĂŠĂŤĂŹĂ

ÂŁ Â¤

Interchange Projects

ÂŹ ÂŤ ÂŹ ÂŤ

" )

Â§ Â¨ ÂŚ

" )

ÂŹ ÂŤ

Â§ Â¨ ÂŚ

A1A

295

ÂŹ ÂŤ ÂŹ ÂŤ

295

119

105

Widen 250 to 5 Lanes

" )

Ă&#x2019; " ) Ă&#x160;

125

Widen to 6 Lanes

ÂŹ ÂŤ

" )

221

124 Road New 2 Lane

ÂŁ Â¤

New 3 Lane Road

" )

" ) New 4 Lane Road " )

228

250A

ÂŹ ÂŤ 228

ÂŁ Â¤

130

ÂŹ ÂŤĂŠ Ă ĂŹ ĂŤ ĂŠ ĂĂ¨ ĂŹ ĂŤ ĂŠ Ă¨Ă¨ Ă ĂŹ ĂŤ ÂŁ Â¤ Ă ĂŹ ĂŤ ĂŠ Ă¨ Ă ĂŹ ĂŤ ĂŠ Ă¨ ÂŹ ÂŤ Ă&#x2019; " ) Ă&#x160; Ă ĂŹ ĂŤ ĂŠ Ă¨

Ă&#x2019; " ) Ă&#x160;

Â§ Â¨ ÂŚ

116

301

Ă¨ Ă ĂŹ ĂŤ ĂŠ Ă ĂŹ ĂŤ ĂŠ Ă¨

ÂŹ ÂŤ ÂŹ ÂŤ 134

202

Ă) ĂŹ ĂŤ ĂŠ Ă¨ Ă&#x2019; " Ă&#x160;

New 6 Lane Road

Ă&#x2019; " ) Ă&#x160;

Â§ Â¨ ÂŚ 295

ÂŁ Â¤

Context Sensitive Solution

Operational Improvements

" ) 218

Express Lanes

" )

Ă&#x2019; " ) Ă&#x160;

220

Ă&#x2019; " ) Ă&#x160; Ă&#x2019; " ) Ă&#x160; Â§ Â¨ ÂŚ"Ă&#x2019;Ă&#x160; Ă&#x2019; " ) Ă&#x160; )

Ă&#x2019; " ) Ă&#x160;

ÂŹ ÂŤ

St John's River Ferry

First Coast Expressway

ÂŹ ÂŤ

A1A

ÂŹ ÂŤ 13

Ă&#x2019; " ) Ă&#x160; Ă&#x2019; " ) Ă&#x160;

ÂŹ ÂŤ 16

Roadway System

Ă&#x2019; " ) Ă&#x160;

ÂŹ ÂŤ

ÂŽ nq Â¤

ÂŁ Â¤ 1

Water Bodies

" )

208

209

Conservation Lands

ÂŁ Â¤

" )

Six Counties Boundaries

ÂŹ ÂŤ " ) " " ) ) " )

" )

315

Â¤ n

ÂŹ ÂŤ

A1A

Ă ĂŹ ĂŤ ĂŠ Ă¨

13A

214

315

ÂŹ ÂŤ

ÂŤ Â§ Â¨ ÂŚÂŹ ÂŹ ÂŤ

207

" )

214

" )

A1A

305

ÂŹ ÂŤ 2

ÂŁ Â¤

127

ÂŹ ÂŤ 100

" ) 315

) " 125

ÂŹ ÂŤ Â¤ ÂŁ Â§ ÂŚ Â¨

) "

221

124

) "

250A

) "

" )

Â§ Â¨ ÂŚ

) " 130

310

" ) 225

Date: 11/3/2014

ÂŹ ÂŤ 19

" ) 309

" ) 308

301

" )

335

ÂŁ " )Â¤

318

316

" )

" ) ÂŁ Â¤

329

ÂŁ Â¤ ÂŹ ÂŤ

200A 30

" )

335

" )

228

320

" ) " )

204

) "

250

" )

ÂŽ q

ÂŹ ÂŤ

122

) "

ÂŹ ÂŤ 206

ÂŹ ÂŤ

) "

ÂŤ ÂŁ Â¤ÂŹ ÂŤ" ) " ) ÂŹ

502

200

441

25A

200A

Projects ID's shown on County Maps

)LJXUH Roadway )XQGHG Projects 3-28

ÂŻ

10,560 Feet

4.5

9 Miles

í ì ë é è

957 16

1015

932

Ò " ) ÊÒ " ) Ê

431

" )

§ ¦ ¨ 295

49 49

1179

£ ¤ " ) 301

964

¬ «

217

¬ «

1022

224

" ) 209

" )

" ) " )

" )

1189

220A

Ò " ) Ê

1011

13B

220

2 10 6

" ) 15A

" )

Ò " ) Ê

220

1027

218

1012

" ) 739

" )

739B

209

¬ « 13

" ) ¬ «

Ò " ) Ê

215

¬ « 15

" )

10 3

Ò " ) Ê

114

315

" )

1013

¬ «

Ò " ) Ê

¬ «

106

16A

841

908

£ ¤ 17

820

¬ « 230

" ) 226

" ) 315

" ) 209

" ) 315

Legend

è í ì ë é Ò " ) Ê Ò " ) Ê

" ) 352

¬ « 21

" )

Intersection Projects Interchange Projects FCE Interchange Projects

Lanes

214

" )

209 Reconstruct 2 Lanes Widen to 3 Lanes

" ) 214

Widen to 4 Lanes

" )

Widen to 5 Lanes

315

Widen to 6 Lanes

¬ « ¬ «

New 2 Lane Road

" )

" ) 209

309D

New 3 Lane Road New 4 Lane Road New 6 Lane Road Context Sensitive Solution Operational Improvements Express Lanes First Coast Expressway Roadway System Water Bodies Conservation Lands Six Counties Boundaries

)LJXUH Clay County )XQGHG Roadway Projects Date: 11/3/2014

3-29

10,560 Feet

1.5

3 Miles

406

228

¬ «

972 4 103

820

Ò " ) Ê

£ ¤

964

16 57

295

419

§ ¦ ¨

Ò " ) Ê

¬ « 13

40 7

1022

100

949

960

Ò " ) Ê

827

§ ¦ ¨ 95

£ ¤ 1

¬ « 962

152

966

960

è í ì ë é í ì ë é è í ì ë é è Ò " ) Ê

103

í ì ë é è

968

§ ¦ ¨ 295

4 43

2 10

70 7

828

3-30

Ò " ) Ê

202

¬ «

£ ¤ 90

845

¬ «

A1A

2331

¬ «

A1A

716 714 715

¬ «

A1A

706

705

¬ « è í ì ë é íè ì ë é íè ì ë é

116

¬ «

)LJXUH Duval County )XQGHG Roadway Projects

¬ «

Ò " ) ÊÊ Ò " )

§ ¦ ¨ 95

953

3 43

8 41

431

224

957

701

1020

Ò " ) Ê £ ¤

1017

959

948

¬ «

í ì ë é è

930

957

£ ¤

104

¬ «

¬ « ¤ í £ ì ë é è í ì ë é è

£ ¤ 1

40 8

128

9 40

940

Ò " ) Ê

967

1011

932

1016

Ò " ) Ê

454 432

955

410

¬ «

¬ « 134

935

1 94

115

¬ «

® q

701

1024

Date: 11/3/2014

301

£ ¤

403

10 971

1033

¬ «

402

£ ¤§ ¦ ¨

£ ¤

301

411

£ ¤

101 5 101

í ì ë é è

934

2 1

708

414

707

121

820

103

í ì ë é è

102

74 1 15

1023

706

10 2

¬ «

A1A

¬ «

A1A

80 0

10,560 Feet

Lanes

® q í ì ë é è Ò " ) Ê Ò " ) Ê

6 Miles

Six Counties Boundaries

Conservation Lands

Water Bodies

Roadway System

First Coast Expressway

St John's River Ferry

Express Lanes

Operational Improvements

Context Sensitive Solution

New 6 Lane Road

New 4 Lane Road

New 3 Lane Road

New 2 Lane Road

Widen to 6 Lanes

Widen to 5 Lanes

Widen to 4 Lanes

Widen to 3 Lanes

Reconstruct 2 Lanes

FCE Interchange Projects

Interchange Projects

Intersection Projects

Airport

Legend

" )

125

" )

23C

" ) " )

23D

228

¬ «

402

121

403

119

¬ «

) " )"

" )

£ ¤

108

" )

406

301

£ ¤

115

972

" )

301

820

¬ «

í ì ë é è

708

£ ¤

¬ «

" )

228

Ò " ) Ê ¬ «

454

432

295

211

¬ « £¬ ¤ «

40 8

í ì ë é è

9 40

940

§ ¦ ¨

955

1 94

115

¬ «

® q

1033

104

¬ «

Ò " ) Ê

£ ¤ ¬ «

419

Ò " ) Ê

981

£ ¤ í ì ë é è

§ ¦ ¨

701

1020

701

¬ «

109

¬ «

8 94

959

707

40 7

100

í ì ë é è

Ò " ) Ê

427

115

960

í ì ë é è

3-31

960

968

107

¬ «

" )

981

107

" ) í ì ë é è

501

è í ì ë é í ì ë é è ¬ «

949

200A

" )

)LJXUH Nassau County )XQGHG Roadway Projects

§ ¦ ¨

£ ¤

1016

£ ¤

1017

3 43

Date: 11/3/2014

127

" )

¬ «

115

" )

70 7

108

411

" )

971

953

74 414

705

703

714 715 716

A1A

105

¬ « ¬ « ¬ « A1A

A1A

105

¬ « ¬ «

108

" )

212

10 2

¬ «

A1A

¬ «

A1A

« ¬ ¤¬ « £

í ì ë é íè ì ë é íè ì ë é è

116

¬ «

A1A

105A

" ) 105

« ¬ « ¬

704

706

410

1 15

121

10,560 Feet

3.5

7 Miles

Six Counties Boundaries

Conservation Lands

Water Bodies

Roadway System

First Coast Expressway

Express Lanes

Operational Improvements

Context Sensitive Solution

New 6 Lane Road

New 4 Lane Road

New 3 Lane Road

New 2 Lane Road

Widen to 6 Lanes

Widen to 5 Lanes

Widen to 4 Lanes

Widen to 3 Lanes

Reconstruct 2 Lanes

Lanes

Legend ® Airport q í Intersection Projects ì ë é è Ò " ) Ê Interchange Projects Ò " ) Ê FCE Interchange Projects

Ò " ) Ê

¬ « 202

966

¬ « 115

§ ¦ ¨

967

295

962

« " ) ¬ A1A

210A

102

Ò " ) ÊÒ " ) Ê

964

1023

4 43

Ò " ) Ê

49 49

§ ¦ ¨ 295

80 0

1024

1022

8 41

" ) 13B

828

827

8 41

" )

Ò " ) Ê

845

846

810

210

Ò " ) Ê

¬ « 13

10 3

841

847

Ò " ) Ê

840

811

Ò " ) Ê

8 41

¬ «

0 82

¬ «

" )

812

908

106

13A

835

® q

¤ n

815

£ ¤ 1

816

" ) 13

¬ « 16

832

Legend ® q ¤ n ¤ n í ì ë é è Ò " ) Ê Ò " ) Ê

¬ «

¤ n

" ) 208

103

Airport

A1A

813

Amtrak Station

1029

1025

§ ¦ ¨ 95

Passenger Rail Station

" )

í ì ë é è

13A

Intersection Projects

115

" )

Interchange Projects

1008

¬ « 312

214

11 3

FCE Interchange Projects

Lanes Reconstruct 2 Lanes Widen to 3 Lanes

" ) 13A

Widen to 4 Lanes Widen to 5 Lanes

£ ¤

¬ «

207

Widen to 6 Lanes

A1A

" ) 209

New 2 Lane Road

£ ¤ New 4 Lane ¬ «Road

" )

305

New 3 Lane Road 15

¬ « 206

New 6 Lane Road Context Sensitive Solution

" )

818

209

Operational Improvements Express Lanes

" )

207A

First Coast Expressway

" ) 13

Roadway System

® q

¬ « ) Lands ¬ «" Conservation Water19Bodies

" )

100 1447

" ) 2016

Six Counties Boundaries

" )

Date: 11/3/2014

204

¬ « 100

)LJXUH St. John's County )XQGHG Roadway Projects 3-32

10,560 Feet

1.5

3 Miles

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

STRATEGIC INTERMODAL SYSTEM FUNDED PROJECTS S OPHISTICATED TOLLING SYSTEMS ARE COMING TO N ORTH F LORIDA TO OFFER MOTORISTS COMPETITIVE TRAVEL CHOICES . The success of express lanes in South Florida will be brought to North Florida to enhance travel times, improve system reliability and ensure we get the most from our transportation system. To address escalating congestion within our Interstate System highways and other expressways, lanes will be constructed that will allow travelers to pay a small fee to receive a higher operating speed and greater reliability. The tolls will be collected using SunPass® transponders.

In other regions, once commuters experience the reliable and congestionͲfree ride, they want to use the express lanes as much as possible. In addition to the express lane projects on the Interstate System, two auxiliary lanes will be added on SR 9B from US 1 Phillips Highway to IͲ295. The following table summarizes the Cost Feasible Plan projects.

3Ͳ33

Duval Nassau Duval

IͲ10 IͲ10 Total IͲ295

From

28F3F43F43F

30F35F45F45F

29F34F4F4F

403 Nassau/Duval County Line 406 US 301 432 IͲ295 402 41 Baker/Nassau County Line 1022 IͲ95 South 57 SR 13 San Jose Boulevard 431 US 17 Roosevelt Boulevard 410 SR 134 103rd Street

39 40

ID US 301 SR 23 First Coast Expressway IͲ95 Nassau/Duval County Line SR 13 San Jose Boulevard (Buckman Bridge) W of US 17 Roosevelt Boulevard (Buckman Bridge) SR 134 103rd Street IͲ10

To Add 4 Express Lanes Add 4 Express Lanes Add 4 Express Lanes Add 4 Express Lanes Add 2 Express Lanes Add 4 Express Lanes on Bridge Add 4 Express Lanes Add 4 Express Lanes

Improvement Type Design ROW ENV CST Total ENV CST Total Design PDE ROW CST Total Design ROW ENV CST Total CST Total Design PDE ROW ENV CST Total Design PDE ROW CST Total Design PDE ROW CST Total

Phase

3Ͳ34

39 Improvements on IͲ10 in Baker County shown in the FDOT District 2 Strategic Intermodal System Plan are not listed. The construction to SR 228 in Baker County is necessary to provide logical limits. 40 Projects 402 and 403 will be constructed together. 41 Projects 402 and 403 will be constructed together.

County

Facility

Table 3Ͳ3. Strategic Intermodal System Projects

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Years 2019Ͳ2020 $3.10 $3.10 $3.10 $1.00 $1.00

Years 2021Ͳ2025 $4.65 $4.65 $0.30 $0.30 $4.96 $6.40 $0.98 $7.38 $15.11 $0.98 $16.09

Years 2026Ͳ2030 $3.80 $153.07 $156.87 $3.09 $3.09 $1.10 $1.10 $161.06 $33.21 $3.00 $228.69 $264.90 $81.51 $117.65 $199.15

Years 2031Ͳ2040 $1.00 $97.58 $98.58 $7.90 $12.52 $709.10 $729.52 $1.00 $6.15 $7.15 $835.25 $9.85 $1.48 $17.00 $75.00 $103.33

22ͲYear Total $3.10 $4.65 $1.00 $97.58 $106.34 $3.80 $153.07 $156.87 $7.90 $3.09 $12.52 $709.10 $732.60 $0.30 $1.10 $1.00 $6.15 $8.55 $1,004.37 $1.00 $1.00 $6.40 $0.98 $33.21 $3.00 $228.69 $272.27 $9.85 $1.48 $17.00 $75.00 $103.33 $15.11 $0.98 $81.51 $117.65 $215.24

Duval Duval

IͲ295 IͲ295 Total IͲ95

31F36F46F46F

From

411 IͲ10 409 South of US 1 New Kings Road 408 North of Trout River 407 IͲ95 North Interchange 121 SR 113 Southside Connector 1023 SR 202 J. T. Butler Boulevard 964 at US 17 Roosevelt Boulevard to Wells Road 418 42 Duval/St. Johns County Line 434 IͲ295

42 Project 48 is divided into the portion in Duval and St. Johns County.

County

Facility

Table 3Ͳ3. Strategic Intermodal System Projects

IͲ295 SR 202 J. T. Butler Boulevard

3Ͳ35

South of US 1 New Kings Road North of Trout River IͲ95 North Interchange Dames Point Bridge/ SR 105 Heckscher Drive SR 202 J. T. Butler Boulevard SR 9B

To Add 4 Express Lanes Add 4 Express Lanes Add 4 Express Lanes Add 4 Express Lanes Add 4 Express Lanes Add 2 Express Lanes Modify Interchange Add 4 Express Lanes Add 4 Express Lanes

Improvement Type

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Design PDE ROW CST Total Design PDE ROW CST Total Design PDE ROW CST Total ENV CST Total Design ROW ENV CST Total CST Total Design ROW CST Total ROW ENV CST Total Design ROW ENV CST Total

Phase

Years 2019Ͳ2020 $11.86 $11.86 $1.00 $1.00 $13.86 $21.86 $21.86

Years 2021Ͳ2025 $29.46 $3.00 $185.86 $218.32 $3.93 $6.18 $34.55 $44.66 $286.45 $4.28 $59.24 $63.52

Years 2026Ͳ2030 $4.93 $0.54 $5.47 $2.70 $0.42 $3.12 $1.16 $1.16 $3.23 $3.23 $477.01 $44.87 $28.17 $73.04

Years 2031Ͳ2040 $22.56 $101.29 $123.86 $6.86 $44.65 $51.51 $7.42 $31.92 $131.32 $170.66 $238.78 $238.78 $688.13 $3.00 $615.63 $618.63

22ͲYear Total $4.93 $0.54 $22.56 $101.29 $129.32 $2.70 $0.42 $6.86 $44.65 $54.63 $7.42 $1.16 $31.92 $131.32 $171.81 $3.23 $238.78 $242.00 $11.86 $29.46 $3.00 $185.86 $230.18 $1.00 $1.00 $3.93 $6.18 $34.55 $44.66 $1,465.46 $21.86 $4.28 $59.24 $85.37 $44.87 $28.17 $3.00 $615.63 $691.67

Duval St. Johns Duval

IͲ95 IͲ95 Total SR 9B SR 9B Total Grand Total

32F37F47F47F

From

433 SR 202 J. T. Butler Boulevard 419 at US 1 SR 15 Martin Luther King Jr. 68 at SR 102 Airport Road Ͳ Phase 2 418 43 International Golf Parkway 1024 SR 5 US 1 Phillips Highway

43 Project 418 is divided into the portion in Duval and St. Johns County.

County

Facility

Table 3Ͳ3. Strategic Intermodal System Projects

SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard St. Johns /Duval County Line IͲ295

3Ͳ36

Add 4 Express Lanes Modify Interchange Modify Interchange Add 4 Express Lanes Add 2 Auxiliary Lanes

Improvement Type

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Design ROW ENV CST Total Design PDE ROW CST Total Design CST Total CST Total Total CST Total

Phase

Years 2019Ͳ2020 $21.86 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $39.82

Years 2021Ͳ2025 $5.24 $0.66 $5.90 $0.75 $7.50 $8.25 $139.18 $139.18 $216.85 $508.26

Years 2026Ͳ2030 $43.12 $35.22 $78.34 $7.70 $77.00 $84.70 $236.08 $874.16

Years 2031Ͳ2040 $1.00 $492.50 $493.50 $1,112.13 $2,635.50

22ͲYear Total $43.12 $35.22 $1.00 $492.50 $571.84 $5.24 $0.66 $7.70 $77.00 $90.60 $0.75 $7.50 $8.25 $139.18 $139.18 $1,586.91 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $4,057.74

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

OTHER FEDERALLY AND STATE FUNDED PROJECTS T HE OTHER FEDERAL AND STATE ROADWAYS PROVIDE IMPORTANT CONNECTIONS BETWEEN LAND USES , SERVE LOCAL TRIPS , CARRY BUSES , ACCOMMODATE BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIANS AND PROVIDE ACCESS TO S TRATEGIC I NTERMODAL S YSTEM ROADS . The need to provide safe, convenient and effective mobility for all persons was identified throughout our region. Major projects identified for funding within this program includes constructing new roads, widening and reconstructing corridors, improving intersections and modifying interchanges. The following tables summarize the Cost Feasible Plan for road capacity projects that are not part of the Strategic Intermodal System.

Roads don’t just serve automobiles. All road projects on arterials will include new sidewalks and bicycle lanes where practical. Roads provide buses with access to more persons and allow them to offer better quality of service through more reliable travel times and reduced congestion. These multimodal elements are discussed in Part Four of this report. Operational issues are discussed in Part Five.

3Ͳ37

County Duval Duval Duval Duval Duval Clay

Map Id From 454 at IͲ295 41450 North of Fuller Warren Bridge 941 Old Kings Road 10045 SR 109 University Boulevard 103 SR 202 J. T. Butler Boulevard 966 at SR 202 J. T. Butler Boulevard 96750 SR 152 Baymeadows Road 106 CR 218 908 US 17

SR 15A Oakridge Avenue Shands Bridge

SR 104 Dunn Avenue US 23 New Kings Road SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard US 90 Beach Boulevard

Phase PE ROW CST Total PE Total PE ROW ENV CST Total PE Total PE ROW ENV CST Total PE ROW ENV CST Total PE Total PE ROW ENV CST Total PE ROW ENV CST Total

Improvement Type Modify Interchange Add 4 Express Lanes Intersection Improvements Widen to 6 Lanes Widen to 6 Lanes Modify Interchange Underpass Widen to 4 Lanes Widen to 4 Lanes

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

44 Where projects are identified as candidates for context sensitive solutions, the estimates are based on the improvement type shown. 45 Project is included for PE phases only so that preliminary engineering can be prepared to determine the detailed scope and costs for this project. 3Ͳ38

Facility IͲ10 IͲ95 SR 104 Dunn Avenue SR 115 Arlington Expressway SR 115 Southside Boulevard SR 16

Table 3Ͳ4. Other State and Federal Highway Capacity Projects44 Years 2021Ͳ2025

Years 2019Ͳ2020

Years 2026Ͳ2030 $0.80 $0.80 $0.16 $3.82 $5.57 $17.49 $4.37 $4.37 $60.36 $86.59 $12.08 $3.02 $3.02 $54.38 $72.50

Years 2031Ͳ2040 $26.07 $119.32 $122.25 $267.64 $100.00 $100.00 $20.00 $20.00 $1.02 $1.02 $0.20 $17.05 $19.29 $1.02 $1.02 $0.20 $55.62 $57.86 $12.99 $12.99 $23.43 $23.43

22ͲYear Total $26.07 $119.32 $122.25 $267.64 $100.00 $100.00 $0.80 $0.80 $0.16 $3.82 $5.57 $20.00 $20.00 $1.02 $1.02 $0.20 $17.05 $19.29 $1.02 $1.02 $0.20 $55.62 $57.86 $12.99 $12.99 $17.49 $4.37 $4.37 $83.78 $110.02 $12.08 $3.02 $3.02 $54.38 $72.50

Facility SR 16 SR 200 SR 207 SR 21 Blanding Boulevard SR 243 JIA North Access Road SR 312 SR 313 SR A1A

County St. Johns Nassau St. Johns Clay Duval St. Johns St. Johns Nassau

Map Id From 835 International Golf Parkway 981 IͲ95 113 IͲ95 114 SR 16 701 SR 102 Airport Road 115 US 1/SR 5 Dixie Highway 831 SR 207 832 SR 16 706 South Fletcher Avenue

Table 3Ͳ4. Other State and Federal Highway Capacity Projects44

3Ͳ39

To South Francis Road Fernandina South Holmes Boulevard CR 215 Blanding Boulevard Pecan Park Road SR A1A SR 16 US 1 Dixie Highway Amelia Island Parkway

Improvement Type Widen to 4 Lanes Intersection Improvements Widen to 6 Lanes Widen to 4 Lanes Widen to 4 Lanes Widen to 6 Lanes New 6 Lane Road New 4 Lane Road Turn Lane Improvements

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Phase PE ROW ENV CST Total PE ROW ENV CST Total PE ROW ENV CST Total CST Total CST Total PE ROW ENV CST Total ROW ENV CST Total PE ROW ENV CST Total PE ROW ENV CST Total

Years 2019Ͳ2020 $0.61 $0.61 $0.12 $5.32 $6.66 $12.04 $12.04 $18.85 $2.23 $45.47 $66.55

Years 2021Ͳ2025 $47.25 $47.25 $31.12 $31.12 $3.62 $31.37 $34.99

Years 2026Ͳ2030 $20.29 $2.86 $40.07 $63.22

Years 2031Ͳ2040 $1.02 $1.02 $0.20 $12.99 $15.23 $1.02 $1.02 $0.20 $51.56 $53.80 $1.02 $1.02 $0.20 $45.47 $47.71 $1.02 $1.02 $0.20 $4.87 $7.11

22ͲYear Total $0.61 $0.61 $0.12 $5.32 $6.66 $1.02 $1.02 $0.20 $12.99 $15.23 $1.02 $1.02 $0.20 $51.56 $53.80 $47.25 $47.25 $43.16 $43.16 $1.02 $1.02 $0.20 $45.47 $47.71 $18.85 $2.23 $45.47 $66.55 $3.62 $51.66 $2.86 $40.07 $98.21 $1.02 $1.02 $0.20 $4.87 $7.11

Facility SR A1A US 1 SR 5 Philips Highway US 17 US 17 Main Street US 1B San Marco Avenue

Map Id From 151 SR 116 Wonderwood Drive 1008 at Red Cox/Coquina Rd 800 Mickler Road Duval 94 SR 9B 95 IͲ95 at the Avenues St. Johns 845 at CR 210 Clay 1037 Governor Street Duval 1017 New Berlin Road St. Johns 1030 Bridge of Lions

County Duval St. Johns

Table 3Ͳ4. Other State and Federal Highway Capacity Projects44

Haven Avenue Pecan Park Road SR 16 3Ͳ40

To Naval Station Mayport North Gate (blank) Palm Valley Road IͲ295 SR 202 J. T. Butler Boulevard

Improvement Type Widen to 4 Lanes* Intersection Improvements Widen to 4 Lanes Widen to 6 Lanes Widen to 6 Lanes Modify Interchange Context Sensitive Solutions Widen to 4 Lanes Context Sensitive Solutions

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Phase PE ROW ENV CST Total PE ROW ENV CST Total PE ROW ENV CST Total PE ROW ENV CST Total PE ROW ENV CST Total CST Total PE ENV CST Total PE ROW CST Total PE ROW ENV CST Total

Years 2019Ͳ2020 $0.61 $0.61 $0.12 $2.90 $4.24 $4.42 $1.29 $25.33 $31.04

Years 2021Ͳ2025 $43.20 $43.20 $8.91 $58.05 $44.55 $111.51

Years 2026Ͳ2030 $7.63 $3.98 $0.80 $38.16 $50.56

Years 2031Ͳ2040 $0.20 $1.02 $0.20 $4.87 $6.29 $1.02 $1.02 $0.20 $12.99 $15.23 $1.02 $1.02 $0.20 $12.99 $15.23 $1.02 $1.02 $0.20 $15.02 $17.26

$0.1 $0.61 $0.12 $2.90 $4.24 $7.63 $3.98 $0.80 $38.16 $50.56 $1.02 $1.02 $0.20 $12.99 $15.23 $1.02 $1.02 $0.20 $12.99 $15.23 $43.20 $43.20 $4.42 $1.29 $25.33 $31.04 $8.91 $58.05 $44.55 $111.51 $1.02 $1.02 $0.20 $15.02 $17.26

22ͲYear Total $0.20 $1.02 $0.20 $4.87 $6.29

St. Johns Regional Duval Nassau

County

From

7946 US 1 Alt. MLK Jr. Parkway 427 at US 17

1029 US 1 Ponce de Leon Boulevard (Boxed Funds)

Map Id

SR 109 University Boulevard

Avenida Menendez

To Context Sensitive Solutions Bicycle and Pedestrian New 6 Lane Bridge and Transit Intersection Improvements

Improvement Type

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

46 Project is included for PE phases only so that preliminary engineering can be prepared to determine the detailed scope and costs for this project. 3Ͳ41

** $40 million is programmed by Duval County and the funding is shown under locally funded projects. The project is included in this table since it is located on a state route.

* Projects identified as candidates for context sensitive solutions.

Facility US 1B King Street Bicycle and Pedestrian SR 115 Mathews Bridge** SR A1A SR 200 Total

Table 3Ͳ4. Other State and Federal Highway Capacity Projects44

PE ROW ENV CST Total CST Total PE Total PE ROW ENV CST Total

$122.33

$1.82 $1.82

$273.13

$5.06 $5.06

$284.40

$5.96 $5.96

22ͲYear Total $1.02 $1.02 $1.02 $1.02 $0.20 $0.20 $6.90 $6.90 $9.14 $9.14 $13.95 $26.79 $13.95 $26.79 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1.02 $1.02 $1.02 $1.02 $0.20 $0.20 $4.87 $4.87 $7.11 $7.11 $709.21 $1,389.08

Years Years Years Years Phase 2019Ͳ2020 2021Ͳ2025 2026Ͳ2030 2031Ͳ2040

County Duval Clay St. Johns Duval St. Johns Duval/Nassau Regional Duval 13

To North of New Berlin Road (south) Savannah Glen Boulevard CR 210 SR 23 First Coast Expressway SR 16 Connector International Golf Parkway Arnold Road Bartram Springs US 1 Kings Road / Callahan

2331 Total

From SR 105 Zoo Parkway Oakleaf Plantation Parkway SR 23 First Coast Expressway SR 16 Connector International Golf Parkway SR 16 Lannie Road Bartram Park Boulevard IͲ295 (Boxed Funds)

7447

828

1033

810 Total 811 Total 812 Total 815

Map Id 1

Improvement Type New 4 Lane Road New 4 Lane Road New 6 Lane Road New 6 Lane Road New 6 Lane Road New 4 Lane Road New 2 Lane Road Widen to 4 Lanes Widen to 4 Lanes TSM&O Projects Ferry Slip Replacement

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

47 Project is included for PE phases only so that preliminary engineering can be prepared to determine the detailed scope and costs for this project. 48 This is the local match to the Federal Passenger Ferry Program Grant which was authorized for capacity improvements but is not obligated. 3Ͳ42

52F52F

Facility Alta Drive Realignment Cheswick Oak Avenue Extension CR 2209 National Cemetery Road Race Track Road SR 115 Lem Turner Road TSM&O Projects SR A1A St. Johns Ferry 48 Grand Total

Table 3Ͳ5. Transportation Management Areas Fund Projects Phase PE ROW ENV CST Total PE ROW ENV CST Total CST Total CST Total CST Total PE CST Total CST Total CST Total PE Total CST Total CST

2019Ͳ2020 $19.36 $19.36 $7.26 $7.26 $2.18 $2.18 $28.80

2021Ͳ2025 $4.32 $0.68 $0.14 $2.24 $7.37 $10.80 $10.80 $40.50 $40.50 $6.61 $6.61 $6.62 $6.62 $71.90

2026Ͳ2030 $21.85 $21.85 $12.08 $0.80 $0.16 $15.71 $28.75 $19.08 $19.08 $2.22 $2.22 $71.89

2031Ͳ2040 $55.87 $55.87 $4.87 $24.36 $29.23 $34.51 $34.51 $1.00 $1.00 $23.20 $23.20 $143.81

22ͲYear Total $4.32 $0.68 $0.14 $24.09 $29.22 $12.08 $0.80 $0.16 $71.57 $84.61 $19.36 $19.36 $18.06 $18.06 $19.08 $19.08 $4.87 $24.36 $29.23 $34.51 $34.51 $40.50 $40.50 $1.00 $1.00 $34.21 $34.21 $6.62 $6.62 $316.40

Clay St. Johns St. Johns

1027 1025 827

Cosmos Avenue SR 207 St. Johns Parkway

Pine Tree Lane CR 214 King Street Bartram Park Boulevard

49 Local match for TRIP funding is also shown in the locally funded projects summary.

CR 218 Dixie Highway / Pellicer Lane Race Track Road Fund Totals Grand Total

Table 3Ͳ6. Transportation Regional Incentives Program (TRIP) Facility County ID From

3Ͳ43

Widen to 4 Lanes Reconstruct 2 Lanes and Widen to add Sidewalks and Bike Lanes Widen to 4 Lanes

Improvement Type

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Total

Total CST

CST 37F42F53F53F

TRIP TRIP Local Match

$0.70 $0.70 $1.40

$0.70 $0.70 $1.40 $5.40 $5.40 $10.80

$3.12 $3.12 $6.24 $2.28 $2.28 $4.56

$5.39 $8.25 $13.64

$7.15 $75.66 $82.80 $10.80 $75.26 $86.46

$3.65

Years Years Years Years 2019Ͳ2020 2021Ͳ2025 2026Ͳ2030 2031Ͳ2040

TRIP TRIP Local Match 49 TRIP TRIP Local Match

Phase Fund Source

$12.16 $11.37 $23.53 $2.98 $2.98 $5.97 $7.15 $75.66 $82.80 $22.29 $90.01 $112.30

22ͲYear Total

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

This page is intentionally blank.

3Í˛44

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

TOLL FUNDED PROJECTS L EVERAGING TOLL REVENUES TO FINANCE NEW PROJECTS WILL ALLOW OUR REGION TO CONSTRUCT THE FIRST COAST EXPRESSWAY , A REGIONAL PRIORITY FOR SEVERAL DECADES . SR 23 the First Coast Expressway will be a new multiͲlane limited access toll facility that will eventually connect IͲ95 in northern St. Johns County to IͲ10 in western Duval County. The northern section from SR 21 Blanding Boulevard in Clay County to IͲ10 in Duval County is currently under construction. The southern section from IͲ95 in St. Johns County to SR 21 Blanding Boulevard in Clay County is currently in the preliminary design phase. The project includes a new bridge over the St. Johns River. Leveraging future toll revenues to finance this project of regional significance involving three counties will advance the construction sooner than traditional funding sources. Table 3Ͳ7 summarizes the components of the corridor, but the project may be constructed as a single project.

3Ͳ45

Facility SR 23 First Coast Expressway Grand Total

County Map Id Clay 8202 1013 1012 41 Clay/St. Johns 8203 St. Johns 840 841 847

Table 3Ͳ7. Projects Funded with Turnpike/Toll Revenue From US 17 at SR 16 at CR 739 at CR 218 IͲ95 at IͲ95 at CR 16 A at CR 2209

3Ͳ46

To SR 21 Blanding Boulevard US 17

Improvement Type New 4 Lane Road New Interchange New Interchange New Interchange New 6 Lane Road New Interchange New Interchange New Interchange

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Phase CST CST CST CST CST CST CST CST

Years Years Years 2019Ͳ2020 2021Ͳ2025 2026Ͳ2030 $698.08 $47.57 $47.57 $56.70 $949.48 $47.57 $47.57 $56.70 $0.00 $1,951.22 $0.00

Years 22ͲYear 2031Ͳ2040 Total $698.08 $47.57 $47.57 $56.70 $949.48 $47.57 $47.57 $56.70 $0.00 $1,951.22

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

LOCALLY AND PRIVATELY FUNDED PROJECTS I NCLUSION OF LOCALLY AND PRIVATELY FUNDED PROJECTS OF REGIONAL SIGNIFICANCE IN THE PLAN IS ESSENTIAL TO ENSURING THE ROAD NETWORK IS CONNECTED , EFFICIENT AND SERVES ALL PEOPLE AND JOBS . The following projects are funded using local revenues or private commitments for development mitigation. The projects include widening and reconstruction projects, interchange improvements and major intersection operational improvements. The list of projects was developed cooperatively with the local government partners in the planning process.

3Í˛47

45F56F56F

From

2 962 1034 948 949 940 102 955

IͲ295 SR 115 Southside Boulevard SR 23 First Coast Expressway Pulaski Road Yellow Bluff Road US 1 SR 15 New Kings Road US 1 SR 5 Philips Highway Old Kings Road Chaffee Road Yellow Bluff Road Cedar Point Road IͲ295 IͲ95 Ramps US 23 New Kings Road

New Berlin Road (north)

3Ͳ48

US 301 Pine Tree Lane Knight Boxx Road (end of four lane) US 17

Widen to 4 Lanes Modify Interchange New 2 Lane Road Widen to 4 Lanes Widen to 4 Lanes Widen to 4 Lanes Widen to 6 Lanes* Widen to 4 Lanes

Improvement Type

Widen to 4 Lanes Widen to 4 Lanes Widen to 4 Lanes Widen to 6 Lanes

Improvement Type

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

50 Clay County 1st LOGT, Clay County 9th Cent Gas Tax, and Clay County Local Infrastructure Surtax. 51 Local match for TRIP funding. Amount is also shown in the TRIP table. 52 Duval County 9th Cent (Diesel Only), Duval County Transit Surtax and Duval County Local Infrastructure Surtax.

SR 104 Dunn Avenue SR 115 Southside Boulevard Trout River Boulevard Grand Total *Projects identified as candidates for context sensitive solutions.

Alta Drive / Yellow Bluff Road IͲ95 New World Avenue New Berlin Road

39F4F5F5F

CR 218 1026 Cosmos Avenue CR 218 51 1027 Cosmos Avenue CR 220 Doctors Inlet Road 33 SR 21 Blanding Boulevard 34 College Drive Grand Total Table 3Ͳ9. Duval County Locally Funded Road Projects (Non LOGT) 52 Facility ID From

8F43F54F54F

Table 3Ͳ8. Clay County Locally Funded Road Projects 50 Facility ID

CST CST CST CST CST CST CST CST

Phase

CST CST CST CST

Phase

$0.00

Years 2019Ͳ2020

Years 2026Ͳ2030 $43.14 $6.84 $40.89 $1.54 $10.49 $0.00 $102.9

Years 2021Ͳ2025

Years Years 2021Ͳ2025 2026Ͳ2030 $3.12 $8.25 $49.76 $64.77 $52.88 $73.02

$202.68

$86.62 $86.62

Years 2031Ͳ2040 $29.44

$122.82

Years 2031Ͳ2040 $122.82

22ͲYear Total $29.44 $43.14 $6.84 $86.62 $86.62 $40.89 $1.54 $10.49 $305.58

22ͲYear Total $122.82 $11.37 $49.76 $64.77 $248.73

ID 1019 2 1016 972 971 1020 932 930 15 37 1021 49 73 933 1015 953 935 934 1009 101 714 715 716 960 968 9 957A 957B 957C 959 16 7 7955 Wilson Boulevard McDuff Avenue SR 109 University Boulevard

To Huron Street Burkit Lane US 90 Beaver Street SR 23 First Coast Expressway Crystal Springs Road Clark Road Shindler Drive Rampart Road Pine Verde Pulaski Road SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard Old St. Augustine Road Glen Kernan Parkway McCormick Road SR 134 103rd Street IͲ295 Cahoon Road Old Middleburg Road SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard SR 134 103rd Street Hogan Road

Improvement Type Widen to 3 Lanes Widen to 5 Lanes Reconstruct 2 Lanes New 2 Lane Road Widen to 5 Lanes New 3 Lane Road Widen to 4 Lanes Widen to 4 Lanes Widen to 4 Lanes Widen to 3 Lanes Widen to 3 Lanes Widen to 3 Lanes Widen to 6 Lanes Widen to 6 Lanes Widen to 4 Lanes Widen to 4 Lanes Widen to 5 Lanes Widen to 3 Lanes Widen to 3 Lanes Widen to 3 Lanes Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Widen to 6 Lanes Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements Intersection Improvements New Interchange New Interchange Widen to 4 Lanes New 6 Lane Bridge and Transit Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

From Melson Avenue Faye Road Lenox Avenue Commerce Center SR 228 Normandy Boulevard Broward Road Old Middleburg Road S Shindler Drive SR 21 Blanding Boulevard SR 105 Heckscher Drive Penman Road SR 13 San Jose Boulevard SR 202 J. T. Butler Boulevard SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard Argyle Forest Boulevard Eastport Road Hammond Boulevard Morse Avenue US 90 Beach Boulevard Collins Road at Girvin Road at Hodges Boulevard at San Pablo Boulevard Gate Parkway at SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard IͲ295 at Collins Road at SR 134 103rd Street at Cedar Hills Boulevard at Eastport Road at Collins Road Cahoon Road US 1 Alt. Martin Luther King Jr. Jr. Parkway

42F47F58F58F

53 Adopted by local Ordinance 2013Ͳ820. 54 Transit hubs and transit accessibility and mobility improvements are summarized in the transit component. 55 Project is included for PE phases only so that preliminary engineering can be prepared to determine the detailed scope and costs for this project. 3Ͳ49

Facility 5th Street (McDuff Avenue Phase 3) Alta Drive Cahoon Road Cecil Field Connector Chaffee Road Clark Road Extension Collins Road Eastport Road Florida Boulevard Hartley Road Kernan Boulevard Old Middleburg Road Pulaski Road Ramona Boulevard (Crystal Springs Road Phase 2) Ricker Road San Pablo Road Shindler Drive SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard SR 115 Southside Boulevard SR 21 Blanding Boulevard US 17 Main Street US 17 Roosevelt Boulevard US 90 Beaver Street SR 115 Mathews Bridge Various Grand Total

41F46F57F57F

Table 3Ͳ10. Duval County Locally Funded Road Projects from LOGT 53 54 Phase CST CST CST CST CST CST CST CST CST CST CST CST CST CST CST CST CST CST CST CST CST CST CST CST CST CST CST CST CST CST CST CST PE CST

Years 2019Ͳ2020 $2.54 $10.71 $4.96 $6.41 $16.46 $14.28 $6.41 $10.16 $5.45 $20.21 $27.95 $3.73 $3.27 $11.37 $13.19 $13.79 $27.35 $7.02 $7.02 $7.02 $9.50 $228.80

Years 2021Ͳ2025 $13.77 $16.97 $40.50 $1.22 $9.27 $9.27 $9.27 $4.46 $101.50 $28.89 $48.60 $55.11 $23.50 $362.31

Years 2026Ͳ2030 $0.00 $0.00

Years 2031Ͳ2040 $40.00 $0.00 $40.00

22ͲYear Total $2.54 $10.71 $13.77 $16.97 $40.50 $1.22 $4.96 $6.41 $16.46 $14.28 $6.41 $10.16 $5.45 $20.21 $27.95 $3.73 $3.27 $11.37 $13.19 $13.79 $9.27 $9.27 $9.27 $27.35 $4.46 $101.50 $7.02 $7.02 $7.02 $28.89 $48.60 $55.11 $40.00 $33.00 $631.11

From CR 214 CR 208 CR 204

827 St. Johns Parkway

1025 SR 207

ID 813 816 818

To CR 208 SR 16 SR 206 CR 214 West of King Street Bartram Park Boulevard

3Ͳ50

Improvement Type New 4 Lane Road New 4 Lane Road New 2 Lane Road Reconstruct 2 Lanes and Widen to add Sidewalks and Bike Lanes Widen to 4 Lanes

Improvement Type Widen to 4 Lanes* New 2 Lane Road Turn Lane Improvements* Intersection Improvements Widen to 6 Lanes Intersection Improvements

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

To CR 105A Buccaneer Trail Amelia Concourse Canopy Drive Harts Road Sadler Road (blank)

56 Nassau County 1st LOGT, Nassau County 9th Cent Gas Tax and Nassau County Small County Tax. 57 St. Johns County 1st LOGT and St. Johns County 9th Cent (Diesel Only).

Facility CR 2209 CR 305 Dixie Highway / Pellicer Lane Race Track Road Grand Total

4F49F60F60F

Table 3Ͳ12. St. Johns County Locally Funded Road Projects 57

Facility ID From Amelia Island Parkway 704 South 14th Street Concourse Loop Road 501 License Road CR 105A Buccaneer Trail 705 South Fletcher Avenue US 17 707 Nassau/Duval County Line SR 200 SR A1A 703 Amelia Island Parkway US 301 SR 200 708 US 1 S Kings Road Grand Total *Projects identified as candidates for context sensitive solutions.

43F48F59F59F

Table 3Ͳ11. Nassau County Locally Funded Road Projects 56

CST CST

$2.75

Years 2031Ͳ2040 $8.47 $5.01 $2.86 $4.72 $6.03 $14.53 $10.75 $30.88

Years 2026Ͳ2030

$13.50

$32.52

$75.66 $118.61

Years Years Years 2021Ͳ2025 2026Ͳ2030 2031Ͳ2040 $42.96 $32.52 $13.50

Years 2021Ͳ2025 $0.00 $0.00

Years 2019Ͳ2020

Years Phase 2019Ͳ2020 CST CST CST

Phase CST CST CST CST CST CST

$75.66 $167.38

$2.75

22ͲYear Total $42.96 $32.52 $13.50

22ͲYear Total $8.47 $5.01 $2.86 $4.72 $6.03 $14.53 $41.63

PART

FOUR

MULTIMODAL PROJECTS

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

TRANSIT CAPACITY PROGRAMS N EW TRANSIT SYSTEMS WILL BRING CUTTING EDGE TECHNOLOGY , INNOVATION AND TRANSPORTATION OPTIONS TO N ORTH F LORIDA . Effective and efficient mass transportation in our region is an essential element for us to be competitive, provide mobility options and offer the quality of life our residents desire. New transit systems including bus rapid transit (BRT), commuter rail and transit for downtown Jacksonville are being planned that will transform our region. Regional park and ride lots, transit hubs and improvements at the St. Johns River Ferry are also included.

NEEDS PLAN A summary of the transit needs was developed. The needs were identified based on prior studies including the Jacksonville Transportation Authority and City of Jacksonville’s Mobility Plan. A summary of the transit needs are shown on Figures 4Ͳ1 through 4Ͳ14 and Table 4Ͳ1.

In addition, as part of the Active Transportation Section, projects that enhance access to transit and mobility are discussed.

4Ͳ1

2369

" )

108

2255

115

§ ¨ ¦

£ ¤

127

¬ «

A1A

® q

£ ¤

2326

7 235

2356

301

2356

" ) 122

228

£ ¤

130

301

2350

¬ « ¬ «

2321

134

2385

202

" )

¬ «

£ ¤ ¬ «

2385

2 23

228

2386

" )

2254

2358

2325

§ ¨ ¦

2 232

2301

¬ «

See Inset

1 2301 230

8 23

2353 2354

2328

£ ¤

2386

221

124

2348

¬ «

" )

2331

116

232 3

125

" )

¬ « ¬ « 105

" )

250A

A1A

295

119

" )

¬ «

§ ¨ ¦

" ) 250

A1A

£ ¤

" ) " )

" )

¬ «

2325

105

107

A1A

108

¬ «

¬ « ¬ «

" )

2366

§ ¨ ¦ 295

2 23 4

£ ¤

Legend

0 23

Bus Rapid Transit

" ) 218

Existing Skyway Express

" )

§ ¨ ¦ 95

5 23

¬ «

Skyway Extension

¬ «

A1A

¬ «

220

2 23 7

Streetcar Five Points

¬ «

Streetcar Downtown

® nq ¤

" )

Streetcar Riverside

£ ¤

13A

See Inset

214

315

¬ «

A1A

2377

" )

¤ n

208

209

Streetcar Springfield Streetcar San Marco

¬ « " ) " " ) ) " )

" )

315

£ ¤ 1

9 231

Streetcar La Villa

Intercity Passenger Rail Corridor Ferry Service

¬ «

« § ¨ ¦¬ ¬ «

207

" )

214

" )

Transportation Intermodal Center

£ ¤

Water Bodies

¬ « 100

" ) 315

Conservation Lands

¬ « 206

¬ «

6 225

Roadway System

A1A

305

" )

® q

204

¬ «

Six Counties Boundaries 2356

Downtown Jacksonville 2 6

" ) 21

" )

St. Augustine

310

2 23

5 23

2354

323

23 5

2328

2385

2355

238 6

2349

235 0

200

200A

25A

225A

326 326

6 238

2 23

200

326

Date: 10/14/2014

2377

225

" )

441

500

309

301

2353

2348

2352

316

¤ n

" ) 308

" ) £ ¤

« " ) £ ¤¬ £ ¤ «" " ) " ) ) ¬ ¬ « " ) ¬ « " ) ¬ «" ) ¬ «

335

318

2254

¬ «

§ ¨ ¦

" ) 329

2386

" )

85 200A

2 23

" ) " ) 335

2385

2351

320

23 5 5 23

" )

5 22

326

)LJXUH Transit 1HHGV BRT, Commuter Rail, Skyway, Streetcar 4.2

10,560 Feet

8 Miles

" )

108

115

¬ «

127

" ) 122

§ ¨ ¦

" )

295

119

A1A

® q

õ ô ó ö

301

250

¬ «

£ ¤

" )

ó õ ô ö õ ô ó ö ó õ ô ö õ ô ó ö

¬ «

§ ¨ ¦

A1A

295

¬ « ¬ « 105

" )

116

125

¬ «

" )

221

124

¬ « 10

£ ¤ 90

õ ô ó ö

" )

õ ô ó öó ó õ ô ö õ ô ö 10

§ ¨ ¦

¬ « õ ô ö ¬ «ó ¬ «

" )

134

228

£ ¤

130

ó õ ô ö 90 ó õ ô ó ö£ õ ô ö ¤

õ ô ö óó õ ô ö õ ô ó ö õ ô ó ö õ ô ó ö õ ô ó ö õ ô ó ö 295 õ ô ó öó õ ô ¨ ö§ ¦ õ ô ó ö õ ô ó ö õ ô ó ö õ ô ó ö

See Inset

228

250A

301

õ ô ö óó õ ô ö 220 ) õ ô ó ö"

" ) 218

202

¬ « 13

õ ô ö õ ó ô ó ö 95

¬ «

® ó õ ô ö ¤q n 1 £ ¤ õ ô ó ö õ ô ó ö 16 ¬ « ¤ n ó õ ô ö

Airport

" )

Passenger Rail Station

" ) " " ) ) " ) 208

" )

315

Amtrak Station

209

£ ¤

" )

õ ô ó ö

¬ « 207

" ) 214

Ferry Service

¬ «

A1A

õ ô ó ö

13A

214

315

Express Bus Service Local Bus Service

¬ «

A1A

§ ¨ ¦

¬ «

Park and Ride Parking Lot

õ ô ó ö

£ ¤

Legend

ó õ ô ö õ ô ó ö

¬ «

¬ « ó õ ô ö ® q ¤ n ¤ n

A1A

£ ¤

" ) " )

" )

¬ «

õ ô ó ö

108

105

107

§ ¨ ¦ õ ô ó ö

£ ¤

¬ « ¬ «

" )

See Inset

« § ¨ ¦¬ ¬ « 5

A1A

305

Community Shuttle Area

£ ¤ ¬ « 100

" )

Roadway System

315

Water Bodies

¬ « 206

26 « Transportation Intermodal Center ¬

" )

® q

204

¬ « 20

Conservation Lands Six Counties Boundaries Downtown Jacksonville

" ) 320

« £ ¤¬ £ ¤ «" " ) " ) ) ¬ ó õ ô ö ¬ « " ¬ « ) ó õ ô ö õ ô ó ö " )

" ) 308

õ ô ó ö

441

225

Date: 10/9/2014

309

301

" )

200A

25A

225A

326

¤ n

" )

200

316

500

St. Augustine

318

329

335

¬ «

" ) £ ¤

" )

335

310

" )

§ ¨ ¦

ó õ ô ö õ ô ó ö

" )

200A

" ) " )

" )

200

" )

)LJXUH Transit 1HHGV Local and Express Bus Service 4.3

10,560 Feet

8 Miles

Legend Commuter Rail Corridors Intercity Passenger Rail Corridor Railroad System Roadway System Water Bodies Conservation Lands Six Counties Boundaries

" ) 108

¬ « 2

" )

127

" ) 121

" ) 122

£ ¤ 301

" )

125

119

" ) 127

" ) 119

" ) " )

" )

23D

250

23C

¬ « 121

" ) 229

" )

" ) 124

" )

2254

" ) 23A

" )

§ ¦ ¨

¬ «

123

§ ¦ ¨

301

228

250A

2301

£ ¤

" ) £ ¤ ¤ £ 121

2301

139B

" )

£ ¤

" )

217

301

228

125

" ) 130

" ) " ¬ « ) ) " £ ¤ " ) " ) 228

" )

228

229

217

" )

301

231

217

218

)LJXUH Baker County Transit 1HHGV Commuter Rail Date: 10/9/2014

4-4

10,560 Feet

1.5

3 Miles

2328

Legend ö õ ô ó

Park and Ride Parking Lot Local Bus Service Railroad System Roadway System Water Bodies Conservation Lands Six Counties Boundaries

" ) 108

¬ « 2

" )

127

" ) 121

" ) 122

£ ¤ 301

" )

125

119

" ) 127

" ) 119

" ) " )

" )

23D

250

23C

¬ « 121

" )

" ) £ ¤ ¤ £

229

" )

" ) 124

" ) 250A

121

139B

" )

¬ « 228

" ) 23A

§ ¦ ¨

" )

§ ¦ ¨ 10

ö õ ô ó

123

£ ¤

301

" )

£ ¤

" )

217

301

228

125

" ) 130

" ¬ ) " « ) ) " £ ¤ " ) " ) 228

" )

228

229

217

" )

301

231

217

218

)LJXUH Baker County Transit 1HHGV Local Bus Service Date: 10/9/2014

4-5

10,560 Feet

1.5

3 Miles

2 23

2321

5 22

2386

§ ¦ ¨ 295

" ) 1179

£ ¤ " ) 301

¬ «

217

224

" ) 209

0 23

" )

" ) " )

" )

1189

220A

13B

220

" ) 15A

" )

220

" )

5 23

218

739

" ) 739B

" ) 209

¬ « 13

" ) ¬ «

¬ «

215

" ) 315

¬ «

" )

¬ «

16A

£ ¤ 17

¬ « 230

" ) 226

" ) 315

" ) 209 9 231

" ) 315

" ) 352

¬ « 21

" ) 214

Legend

" ) 209

Bus Rapid Transit

" )

Commuter Rail Corridors

315

Intercity Passenger Rail Corridor Railroad System

¬ « ¬ « 21

" ) 309D

" )

Roadway System 209 Water Bodies Conservation Lands Six Counties Boundaries

)LJXUH Clay County Transit Project 1HHGV BRT and Commuter Rail Date: 10/14/2014

4-6

10,560 Feet

1.5

3 Miles

õ ô ó ö ó õ ô ö õ ô ó ö õ ô ó ö õ ô ó ö

õ ô ó ö

" )

£ ¤ " ) 301

õ ô ö õ ô ó ö óó õ ô ö õ ô ó ö õ ô ó ö õ ô ó ö 1179 224 õ ô ó ö ¬ « õ ô ó ö 209 õ ô ó ö

¬ «

217

§ ¦ ¨ 295

" )

õ ô ó ö

" )

" ) " )ó õ ô ö

" )

1189

õ ô ó ö

220A

13B

220

" ) 15A

" )

220

218

" ) 739

" ) 739B

" ) 209

¬ « 13

" ) ¬ «

¬ «

215

" ) 315

¬ «

" )

¬ «

16A

£ ¤ 17

¬ « 230

" ) 226

" ) 315

" ) 209

" ) 315

" ) 352

¬ « 21

" ) 214

Legend 209 õ ô ó ö Park and Ride Parking Lot

" )

214

Express Bus Service

" )

Local Bus Routes

315

Railroad System

¬ « ¬ «

Community Shuttle Area

" )

Roadway System 209 Water Bodies

309D

Conservation Lands Six Counties Boundaries

)LJXUH Clay County Transit Projects Local and Express Bus Service Date: 10/9/2014

4-7

10,560 Feet

1.5

3 Miles

2328

£ ¤§ ¦ ¨ 2254

228

¬ « 23

¬ «

2321

0 23

134

¬ «

2 232

¬ «

224

¬ «

128

¬ « 17

£ ¤

§ ¦ ¨ 295

See Inset

¬ «

§ ¦ ¨

£ ¤

152

¬ «

2385

¬ «

4-8

)LJXUH Duval County Transit Project 1HHGs BRT, Commuter Rail, Skyway, Streetcar

£ ¤ 17

2349

2353

2350

2354

295

§ ¦ ¨

Date: 10/14/2014

301

£ ¤

2301

2352

232 3

§ ¦ ¨

£ ¤

8 23

2 23

200

2301

£ ¤

104

¬ «

115

¬ « 2356

2 23

2358

2326

5 22

2358

2255

2356

® q

¬ «

A1A

202

£ ¤ ¬ «

116

¬ «

2 23

¬ «

2301

£ ¤

301

£ ¤

2325

¬ «

2385

¬ « A1A

2331

A1A

¬ «

A1A

¬ «

A1A

23 5

5 22

5 23

235 0

47 23

2355

2356

2351

® q

2353

2385

6 Miles

Six Counties Boundaries

Conservation Lands

Water Bodies

Roadway System

Railroad System

Ferry Service

Intercity Passenger Rail Corridor

Commuter Rail Corridors

Streetcar San Marco

Streetcar Springfield

Streetcar Riverside

Streetcar La Villa

Streetcar Downtown

Streetcar Five Points

Skyway Extension

Existing Skyway Express

23 8

2349

2385

Bus Rapid Transit

Airport

Legend

2354

2385

Downtown Jacksonville

2352

2254

2386

10,560 Feet

5 23

8 23 5

2328

238 6

232 3

2325

32 7 2 2348

2 23

2386

7 235 2386

Date: 10/9/2014

200

Â¬ Â«

301

Â£ Â¤

Ãµ Ã´ Ã³ Ã¶Ã³ Ã³ Ãµ Ã´ Ã¶ Ãµ Ã´ Ã¶

Â£ Â¤Â§ Â¦ Â¨

301

Ãµ Ã´ Ã³ Ã¶

Â£ Â¤

228

Â¬ Â« 23

Â¬ Â«

Ãµ Ã´ Ã³ Ã¶

134

Â¬ Â«

Ãµ Ã´ Ã³ Ã¶

Â£ Â¤

Ãµ Ã´ Ã³ Ã¶

224

Â£ Â¤

104

115

Â§ Â¦ Â¨ 295

See Inset

Â§ Â¦ Â¨

Â£ Â¤ Ã³ Ãµ Ã´ Ã¶

Â¬ Â«

295

Â§ Â¦ Â¨

Â£ Â¤

152

Â¬ Â«

4-9

116

Â¬ Â«

A1A

Ãµ Ã´ Ã³ Ã¶

202

Â¬ Â«

A1A

Ãµ Ã´ Ã³ Ã¶

Ã³ Ãµ Ã´ Ã¶ Ãµ Ã´ Ã³ Ã¶Â¤ Â£ Ã´ Ã³ Ãµ Ã¶

Â¬ Â«

)LJXUH Duval County Transit Project 1HHGV Local and Express Bus Service

Ãµ Ã´ Ã³ Ã¶

Â¬ Â« Ãµ Ã´ Ã³ Ã¶ Â¬ Â«Ã³ Ãµ Ã´ Ã¶

Ãµ Ã´ Ã³ Ã¶

Â® q

Â¬ Â«

A1A

Â¬ Â«

A1A

Â¯

Ã³ Ãµ Ã´ Ã¶ Ãµ Ã´ Ã³ Ã¶

Â¬ Â«

A1A

Ãµ Ã´ Ã³ Ã¶

10,560 Feet

Ã³ Ãµ Ã´ Ã¶ Â® q

6 Miles

Six Counties Boundaries

Conservation Lands

Water Bodies

Roadway System

Community Shuttle Area

Transportation Intermodal Center

Railroad System

Ferry Service

Local Bus Service

Express Bus Service

Airport

Park and Ride Parking Lot

Legend

Downtown Jacksonville

¬ «

" )

2301

125

" )

23C

" ) " )

23D

228

¬ «

121

2301

119

) " )"

2328

£ ¤

301

£ ¤

¬ «

2 232

£ ¤

¬ « 15

2254

228

¬ «

295

§ ¦ ¨

115

¬ «

211

¬ « £¬ ¤ « 15

104

¬ «

8 2352

5 23

232 3

® q 2326

§ ¦ ¨

£ ¤ ¬ «

2350 2 349

2354

£ ¤ 17

4-10

)LJXUH ¬ « Nassau CounW\ Transit Projects BRT, Commuter Rail, Skyway, Streetcar

§ ¦ ¨

£ ¤

108

" )

Date: 10/14/2014

127

" )

108

" )

115

" )

301

109

¬ «

200A

" )

¬ «

2325

£ ¤

2356

115

2353

7 235 23 8

2255

23 8

" )

2 23

236 6

2385

¬ «

107

" )

107

" )

2385

¬ « 116

« ¬ « ¬ A1A

105A

" )

A1A

10,560 Feet

¬ «

A1A

¬ «

A1A

« ¤¬ ¬ « £ 212

105

¬ « ¬ « ¬ « A1A

A1A

105

¬ « ¬ «

108

" )

105

® q

3.5

7 Miles

Six Counties Boundaries

Conservation Lands

Water Bodies

Roadway System

Railroad System

Intercity Passenger Rail Corridor

Commuter Rail Corridors

Streetcar San Marco

Streetcar Springfield

Streetcar Riverside

Streetcar La Villa

Streetcar Downtown

Streetcar Five Points

Skyway Extension

Existing Skyway Express

Bus Rapid Transit

Airport

Legend

Date: 10/9/2014

127

" )

¬ «

" )

125

" )

õ ô ó ö

23C

23D

" ) " )

228

¬ «

121

119

) " )"

õ ô ó öó ó õ ô ö õ ô ö

" )

115

" )

£ ¤

108

" )

301

£ ¤

115

" )

301

£ ¤

¬ «

£ ¤

¬ « õ ô ó ö

211

¬ « £ ¤ õ ô ó ö« õ ô ó ö ¬

¬ « õ ô ó ö )LJXUH

208

228

¬ «

295

§ ¦ ¨

õ ô ó ö

ó õ ô ö 104 « õ ô ó ö¬

115

¬ «

® q

£ ¤ ¬ «

õ ô ó ö

§ ¦ ¨

õ ô ó ö

¬ «

£ ¤ 17

4-11

Nassau CounW\ Transit Project 1HHGs Local and Express Bus Service

§ ¦ ¨

£ ¤

108

" )

109

¬ «

õ ô ó ö

¬ «

200A

" )

116

¬ «

ó õ ô ö õ ô ó ö

¬ «

107

" )

107

" )

« ¬ « ¬ A1A

105A

" )

A1A

10,560 Feet

¬ «

A1A

¬ «

A1A

« ¤¬ ¬ « £ õ ô ó ö 212

105

A1A

¬ « ¬ « ¬ « A1A

A1A

105

¬ « ¬ «

108

" )

105

3.5

ó õ ô ö ® q

7 Miles

Six Counties Boundaries

Conservation Lands

Water Bodies

Roadway System

Railroad System

Community Shuttle Area

Ferry Service

Local Bus Service

Express Bus Service

Airport

Park and Ride Parking Lot

Legend

" ) 5 22 6

" )

8 235

" ) 16A

15A

9 231

" ) 226

" ) 315

" )

13A

" ) 209

" ) 315

¬ « 21

" ) 352

" ) 13A

" ) 315C

" ) 214

" )

214

¬ «

309D

" )

207

¬ «

219

100

¬ « 26

¬ «

" )

207A

" ) 216

" )

® q

¬ «

309C

¬ «

¬ « 20

310

" )

100

" )

315

£ ¤ 17

" ) 20A

¬ «

" )

309B

¬ « 19

" ) 21

" ) 310

" ) 308B

" ) 309

" ) 308

Legend ® q

" ) 309

Airport Bus Rapid Transit Commuter Rail Corridors Intercity Passenger Rail Corridor Roadway System

" ) 35

Water Bodies

" ) 314

Conservation Lands Six Counties Boundaries

)LJXUH Putnam County Transit Project 1HHGs Commuter Rail Date: 10/14/2014

4-12

10,560 Feet

4 Miles

" ) " ) 16A

" ) 15A

" ) 226

" ) 315

" )

13A

" ) 209

" ) 315

¬ « 21

" ) 352

" ) 13A

" ) 315C

" ) 214

" )

214

¬ «

309D

" )

207

¬ «

219

100

¬ « 26

¬ «

" )

207A

" ) 216

" )

® q

¬ «

309C

¬ «

¬ « 20

310

" )

100

" )

315

£ ¤ 17

" ) 20A

¬ «

" )

309B

¬ « 19

" ) 21

" ) 310

" ) 308B

" ) 309

" ) 308

" ) 309

Legend ® q

Airport Local Bus Service Roadway System

" ) 35

Water Bodies

" ) 314

Conservation Lands Six Counties Boundaries

)LJXUH Putnam County Transit Project 1HHGs Local Bus Service Date: 10/9/2014

4-13

10,560 Feet

4 Miles

238 6

2 23 7

¬ «

2321

202

¤ n

¬ «

2358

115

§ ¦ ¨ 295

« " ) ¬

2325

A1A

210A

§ ¦ ¨ 295

2377

0 23

St. Augustine

" ) 13B

2 23 4

" ) 210

5 23 8

¬ « 13

2 23 7

¬ «

" ) 13A

® q

¤ n

£ ¤ 1

" ) 13

¬ « 16

¬ «

¤ n

" )

9 231

208

§ ¦ ¨

A1A

" )

See Inset

13A

¬ « 312

" ) 214

2377

" ) 13A

£ ¤

¬ «

" )

¬ «

207

A1A

209

£ ¤ ¬ «

" )

305

¬ «

6 225

Legend

206

® q ¤ n ¤ n

Airport Amtrak Station

" ) 209

Passenger Rail Station

" )

207A

Bus Rapid Transit

" )

Commuter Rail Corridors

¬ « ® q ) ¬ «" Roadway System

Intercity Passenger19Rail Corridor

" )

100 1447

Water Bodies

" ) 2016

204

¬ « 100

" )

310 Conservation Lands

Six Counties Boundaries

)LJXUH St. John's County Transit Project 1HHGs BRT and Commuter Rail Date: 10/14/2014

4-14

10,560 Feet

1.5

3 Miles

ó õ ô ö õ ô ó ö õ ô ó ö õ ô ó ö õ ô ó ö

ó õ ô ö

¤ õn ô ó ö

ó õ ô ö õ ô ó ö

¬ « 202

¬ « 115

õ ô ó ö õ ô ó ö õ ô ó ó õ ô ö ö õ ô ó ö õ ô ó ö õ ô ó ö õ ô ó ö õ ô ó ö

õ ô ó ö

§ ¦ ¨ 295

« " ) ¬ A1A

210A

õ ô ó ö

§ ¦ ¨ 295

õ ô ó ö

õ ô ó ö St. Augustine

" ) 13B

õ ô ó ö

õ ô ó

õ ô ó ö

" ) 210

¬ « 13

¬ «

" )

® õ ô ó öq n ¤

13A

£ ¤ 1

" ) 13

ó õ ô ö õ ô ó ö ¤ n

¬ « 16

" )

õ ô ó ö

208

§ ¦ ¨ 95

" )

¬ « A1A

õ ô ó ö

See Inset

13A

¬ « 312

" ) 214

õ ô ó ö

" ) 13A

£ ¤

¬ «

" )

¬ «

207

A1A

209

£ ¤ ¬ «

" )

305

¬ « 206

Legend ó õ ô ö ® q ¤ n ¤ n

" )

Park and Ride Parking 209 Lot Airport

" )

207A

Amtrak Station

" )

Passenger Rail Station

¬ « ® q ) ¬ «" Roadway System

Local Bus Service

" )

100 1447

Water Bodies

" ) 2016

204

¬ « 100

" )

310 Conservation Lands

Six Counties Boundaries

)LJXUH St. John's County Transit Project 1HHGs Local Bus Service Date: 10/9/2014

4-15

10,560 Feet

1.5

3 Miles

Table 4Ͳ1. Transit Needs County Map ID Baker 2301 Baker 2302 Baker 2303 Duval 2304 Duval 2305 Baker 2306 Duval 2307 Clay 2308 Clay 2310 Clay 2311 Clay 2312 Clay 2313 Clay 2314 Clay 2315 Clay 2316 Clay 2317 Clay 2318 Clay 2319 Clay 2320 Duval 2321 Duval 2322 Duval 2323 Duval 2324 Duval 2325 Duval 2326 Duval 2327 Duval 2328 Duval 2329 Duval 2330 Duval 2331 Duval 2332 Duval 2333 Duval 2334 Duval 2335 Duval 2336 Duval 2337 Duval 2338 Duval 2339 Duval 2340 Duval 2341 Duval 2342 Duval 2343 Duval 2344 Duval 2345 Duval 2346 Duval 2347 Duval 2348 Duval 2349 Duval 2350 Duval 2351 Duval 2352

Facility * West Extension (CSX) US 90 Area wide **** Center Street Drew Street South of Glen St. Mary Yellow Water Road SR 21 Blanding Boulevard Area wide **** SR 21 Blanding Boulevard SR 21 Blanding Boulevard SR 21 Blanding Boulevard SR 21 Blanding Boulevard SR 21 Blanding Boulevard CR 220 Doctors Inlet Road Youngerman Circle SR 21 Blanding Boulevard Southwest Extension (CSX) US 17 Roosevelt Boulevard SR 134 103rd Street SR 228 Normandy Boulevard US 1/SR 15 New Kings Road US 1 SR 115 Southside Boulevard IͲ95 Southeast (FEC) West (CSX) SR A1A St. Johns River Ferry IͲ95 SR A1A St. Johns River Ferry Area wide **** SR A1A St. Johns River Ferry SR 134 103rd Street SR 21 Blanding Boulevard Duval Road SR 115 Lem Turner Road Mayport Road US 90 Beach Boulevard SR 21 Blanding Boulevard SR 21 Blanding Boulevard US 17 Roosevelt Boulevard SR A1A SR A1A St. Johns River Ferry SR A1A St. Johns River Ferry SR A1A St. Johns River Ferry Five Points/Core/Brooklyn Southbank/San Marco Downtown Ͳ Sports Complex Five Points/Core/Brooklyn La Villa/Core Riverside/Avondale

From MacClenny (Baker County) MacClenny (Baker County) North of Drew Street (Baldwin) at Center Street (Baldwin) North of IͲ10 CR 218 at Tanglewood at Old Jennings Road at Edson Drive at Wells Road at SR 224 Kingsley Avenue at Hollow Road at Argyle Forest Boulevard North and South of Bolton Road Palatka (Putnam County) at Wells Road SR 228 Normandy Boulevard SR 134 103rd Street Downtown Jacksonville (Duval County) Lewis Speedway (St. Johns County) Avenues Mall Gateway Mall St. Augustine (St. Johns County) Baldwin (Duval County) Downtown Jacksonville (Duval County) Ft. George/Mayport at SR 228 Normandy Boulevard at Wesconnett Boulevard at IͲ95 at SR 104 Dunn Avenue at SR A1A West and East of Kernan Boulevard North and South of Wilson Boulevard North and South of SR 134 103rd Street at SR 128 San Juan Avenue North and South of SR 202 J. T. Butler Boulevard JPA Property Mayport Ft. George/Mayport Central Station Kings Avenue Station Downtown Jacksonville (Bay Street & Main Street) Five Points Transportation Center Riverside (King Street) 4Ͳ16

Brooklyn Station Southwest of Railroad Tracks (Southbank) Jacksonville Municipal Stadium Downtown Jacksonville (Bay Street & Main Street) Duval Street & Monroe Street to Ocean Five Points

Mayport Terminal Ft. George Island

Yulee (Nassau County)

SR 21 Blanding Boulevard Downtown Jacksonville (Duval County) SR 111 Edgewood Avenue Avenues Mall (Duval County) Regency Square Mall Jacksonville International Airport Downtown Jacksonville (Duval County) Downtown Jacksonville (Duval County)

Green Cove Springs (Clay County)

Wells Road

To Baldwin (Duval County) Downtown Jacksonville (Duval County)

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Improvement Type/ Mode Commuter Rail Local Bus Service Local Bus Service Park and Ride Lots Park and Ride Lots Park and Ride Lots Park and Ride Lots BRT Local Bus Service Park and Ride Lots Park and Ride Lots Park and Ride Lots Park and Ride Lots Park and Ride Lots Park and Ride Lots Park and Ride Lots Park and Ride Lots Commuter Rail Park and Ride Lots BRT BRT BRT BRT BRT BRT Commuter Rail Commuter Rail Drydock / Ferry Repairs Express Bus Service Ferry Slip Replacement Local Bus Service Long Term Site Improvements Park and Ride Lots Park and Ride Lots Park and Ride Lots Park and Ride Lots Park and Ride Lots Park and Ride Lots Park and Ride Lots Park and Ride Lots Park and Ride Lots Park and Ride Lots Relocation of Ferry offices Service & Capital Improvements Site Improvements Skyway Extension ** Skyway Extension ** Streetcar ** Streetcar ** Streetcar ** Streetcar **

Facility * Southbank/San Marco Springfield Downtown Facility North (CSX) Northwest (CSX) Southwest (CSX) US 90 Beach Boulevard SR 21 Blanding Boulevard SR 115 Lem Turner Road SR 115 Lem Turner Road US 1/SR 15 New Kings Road SR 21 Blanding Boulevard North Extension (CSX) IͲ95 Cumberland Island Ferry Area wide **** SR 200 SR A1A SR 200 SR A1A Area wide **** Southeast Extension (FEC) Area wide **** SR A1A Anastasia Island (Amphitheatre) CR 210 Racetrack Road St. Augustine Airport US 1 East First Coast Flyer SR 16*** Southwest First Coast Flyer SR 207***

*Facility is duplicated if it crosses county lines ** Transit technology or mode is to be determined during feasibility studies. *** Location to be determined. **** Services to be determined during Transit Development Plans.

Notes:

Table 4Ͳ1. Transit Needs County Map ID Duval 2353 Duval 2354 Duval 2355 Duval 2356 Duval 2357 Duval 2358 Duval 2359 Duval 2360 Duval 2361 Duval 2362 Duval 2363 Duval 2364 Nassau 2366 Nassau 2368 Nassau 2369 Nassau 2370 Nassau 2371 Nassau 2372 Putnam 2374 St. Johns 2377 St. Johns 2378 St. Johns 2379 St. Johns 2380 St. Johns 2381 St. Johns 2382 St. Johns 2383 St. Johns 2384 Duval 2385 St. Johns 2385 Duval 2386 St. Johns 2386 From Kings Avenue Station FSCJ Station Downtown Jacksonville (Duval County) Downtown Jacksonville (Duval County) Green Cove Springs (Clay County) at San Pablo Road at 105th Street at Soutel at IͲ295 Timucuan DRI North of IͲ295 Yulee Downtown Jacksonville (Duval County) Fernandina at IͲ95 east of Yulee Palm Coast (Flagler County) at Palm Valley Road east of US 1 at US 1 at Lewis Speedway Road Downtown Jacksonville (Duval County) Wells Road

4Ͳ17

Downtown Jacksonville (Duval County)

3rd Street (Jacksonville Beach)

City of St. Augustine

Fernandina Beach Yulee (Nassau County) Cumberland Island

Yulee (Nassau County) Callahan (Nassau County) Downtown Jacksonville (Duval County)

To Baptist Hospital / MOSH & Atlantic Boulevard 8th Street/ Medical Complex

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Improvement Type/ Mode Streetcar ** Streetcar ** Transportation Center Commuter Rail Commuter Rail Commuter Rail Park and Ride Lots Park and Ride Lots Park and Ride Lots Park and Ride Lots Park and Ride Lots Park and Ride Lots Commuter Rail Express Bus Service Ferry Service Local Bus Service Park and Ride Lots Park and Ride Lots Local Bus Service Commuter Rail Local Bus Service Park and Ride Lots Park and Ride Lots Park and Ride Lots Park and Ride Lots Park and Ride Lots Park and Ride Lots BRT Park and Ride Lots BRT Park and Ride Lots

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

PRIORITIZATION PROCESS PRIORITIZATION SYSTEM The transit capacity needs identified as part of the planning process were prioritized based on the following criteria:

Projects that have some level of project development completed (Alternatives Analysis, PD&E or PE phases) were given the highest priority. Other transit priorities were then considered and funded if revenues were available.

COST FEASIBLE PLAN Based on the estimated revenues available from federal and state revenue sources and local match revenues, a Cost Feasible Plan was developed and is summarized in Figures 4Ͳ15 through 4Ͳ19 and Table 4Ͳ2. The Cost Feasible Plan projects shown represent only the transit capacity projects. The funding for operations of the local and express bus needs is address in Part Five of this report. As part of the freight an intermodal needs discussed later in the report, two commuter rail projects which also accommodate rail capacity improvement improvements are included in the Cost Feasible Plan. Project #2358 – CSX from Downtown Jacksonville to Green Cove Springs Project #2240 – CSX from Downtown Jacksonville to Yulee These projects will be funded through the SIS Multimodal Program.

4Ͳ18

" )

108

115

¬ «

127

ó ô õ ö ó õ ô ö

" ) 122

§ ¨ ¦

" )

295

119

A1A

295

ó õ ô ö

¬ « ¬ « 105

116

125

¬ « 221

124

" )

£ ¤

See inset

§ ¨ ¦

óô õ ô ö ó ô õ ö ó õ ö

¬ « ¬ « ôõöó « ¬

" )

134

" )

228

£ ¤

130

301

£ ¤ ¬ «

ó ô õ ö ó90 ô õ ô ö ó õ ö

ó õ ö óô õ ô ö ó õ ô ö ó ô õ ö ó õ ô ö ó õ ô ö ó õ ô ö

228

250A

¬ « 10

ó õ ô ö

Park and Ride Parking Lot

ó õ ô ö

" )

Airport

295

¬ « 13

¬ «

Commuter Rail Corridors

ó õ ô ö

§ ¨ ¦

JTA Mobility & Transit Access Improvements

¬ «

A1A

ó õ ô ö

¬ «

Passenger Rail Station

ó õ ô ö

£ ¤

" )

218

Amtrak Station

§ ¨ ¦

220

ó õ ô ö

ó ô õ ö ó õ ô ö

202

ó õ ô ö ó ó õ ô ô õ ö ö ó ô õ ô ö ó õ ö ó õ ô ö ó õ ô ö ó õ ô ö ó õ ô ö

Legend

® q ¤ n ¤ n

¬ «

§ ¨ ¦

ó õ ô ö

" ) " )

ó õ ô ö

A1A

® q

ó õ ô ö

301

250

¬ «

£ ¤

" )

A1A

£ ¤

" ) " )

" )

¬ «

ó õ ô ö

108

105

107

§ ¨ ¦ ó õ ô ö

£ ¤

¬ « ¬ «

" )

óq ® õ ô ö n ¤

ó õ ô ö £ ¤ ó õ ô ö 1

Streetcar Five Points

" )

Streetcar Downtown

209

Streetcar Riverside

£ ¤

" )

Streetcar Springfield

" ) " " ) ) " )

" )

315

¬ «ôõöó

¤ n

208

ó õ ô ö

13A

See inset

214

315

¬ «

A1A

ó õ ô ö

Bus Rapid Transit Corridors St John's River Ferry

¬ «

« § ¨ ¦¬ ¬ «

207

" )

214

Transportation Intermodal Center

" )

A1A

305

Roadway System

£ ¤

¬ « 100

" )

Conservation Lands

315

Six Counties Boundaries

¬ « 206

¬ «

Water Bodies

" )

® q

204

¬ « 20

" ) 21

" ) 320

" )

§ ¨ ¦ 75

" ) " )

" ) 308

301

« £ ¤¬ £ ¤ «" " ) " ) ) ¬ ¬ « " ¬ ) « Downtown Jacksonville " ) ¬ «" ) ¬ «

" )

ó õ ô ö

441

225

200A

25A

225A

200

326

Projects ID's shown on County Maps

326 326

Date: 11/10/2014

309

200

316

500

¤ n

" )

318

329

335

ó õ ô ö

¬ «

" ) £ ¤

" )

335

" )

200A

St. Augustine

ó õ ô ö

310

ó õ ô ö

)LJXUH &RVW )HDVLEOH 3Oan Transit BRT, Commuter Rail, Skyway, Streetcar 4-1

10,560 Feet

8 Miles

2 23

ó õ ô ö ó ô õ ö

S CS

2321

ó õ ô ö

2 23

ó ô õ ö ó õ ô ö ó õ ô ö

2386

CSS3

ó õ ô ö

ó õ ô ö ó õ óô ö ô õ ö ó õ ô ö ó 1179 õ ô ö

" )

£ ¤ " ) 301

¬ «

217

§ ¦ ¨ 295

¬ «

ó õ ô ö

224

CS S1

10 CSS

" )

óô ô õ ö ó09 õ ö 2

0 23

ó õ ô ö

" ) 220A

" ) " ) ôõö

" )

1189

ó õ ô ö

13B

220 ó

" ) 15A

" )

220

" )

5 23

218

739

" ) 739B

" ) 209

¬ « 13

" ) ¬ «

¬ «

215

" ) 315

¬ «

" )

¬ «

16A

£ ¤ 17

¬ « 230

" ) 226

" ) 315

" ) 209

" )

Legend

315

ó õ ô ö

" )

Park and Ride Parking Lot

352

JTA Mobility & Transit Access Improvements

¬ « 21

" ) 214

" )

Commuter Rail Corridors

214

209

Bus Rapid Transit Corridors Railroad System

" ) 315

Roadway System

¬ « ¬ « 21

Water Bodies

" )

" ) 209

309D

Conservation Lands Six Counties Boundaries

)LJXUH &RVW Feasible Plan Clay County Transit Projects BRT and Commuter Rail Date: 11/10/2014

10,560 Feet

1.5

3 Miles

õ ô ó ö

228

¬ « 2321

¬ «

õ ô ó ö

õ ô ó

õ ô ó ö

õ ô ó ö õ ô ö õ ô ó óó õ ô ö ö õ ô ó ö õ ô ó ö 224 õ ô ó ö ¬ « öô õ ö ¬ «ó

£ ¤ 17

õ ô ö ¬ «ó £ ¤

128

õ ô ó ö ó õ ô ö õ ô ó ö õ ô ó ö õ ô ó ö

2386

ó õ ô ö23

¬ « 134

2 232

S CS S8 CS S4 CS

104

10 CSS

295

§ ¦ ¨

See inset

2349

¬ «

CS S1

£ ¤ õ ô ó ö

§ ¦ ¨

CSS5

2326

2356

CSS1

CSS11

CSS2

295

§ ¦ ¨

£ ¤ 1

152

¬ «

4-21

¬ «

A1A

¬ «

£ ¤ 202

õ ô ó ö

ó õ ô öó õ ô ö

¬ « 10

116

¬ «

)LJXUH Cost Feasible Plan Duval County Transit Projects BRT, Commuter Rail, Skyway, Streetcar

£ ¤

õ ô ó ö

232 3

õ ô ó ö

CSS5

õ ô ö ¬ «ó

õ ô ó ö

115

¬ «

® q

Date: 11/10/2014

£ ¤

CSS6

õ ô ó ö

CSS 18

2 23

301

£ ¤

õ ô ó ö ó õ ô ö õ ô ó ö

£ ¤§ ¦ ¨

301

£ ¤

CS S3

2358

S1 CS 2354

S7 CS 23 50

2356

CSS9

¬ «

õ ô ó ö

2385

õ ô ó ö

¬ «

A1A

2331

A1A

¬ «

A1A

ó õ ô öó õ ô ö

¬ «

A1A

õ ô ó ö

7 232

2355

2349

2385

CSS 2

Six Counties Boundaries

Conservation Lands

Water Bodies

Roadway System

Railroad System

6 Miles

Transportation Intermodal Center

St John's River Ferry

Bus Rapid Transit Corridors

Commuter Rail Corridors

Streetcar Springfield

Streetcar Riverside

Streetcar Downtown

Streetcar Five Points

JTA Mobility & Transit Access Improvements

Park and Ride Parking Lot

Airport

10,560 Feet

õ ô ó ö

® q

CSS12

Downtown Jacksonville Inset

2352

15 CSS

CS S 13

CSS9

2354

6 23 5 235 0

Legend

5 23

232 3

238 6

2356

2325

CSS7

2 23

123

" )

125

" )

Ãµ Ã´ Ã³ Ã¶

" )

23C

23D

" ) " )

228

Â¬ Â«

" )

228

Â¬ Â«

119

200

Ãµ Ã´ Ã³ Ã¶Ã³ Ã³ Ãµ Ã´ Ã¶ Ãµ Ã´ Ã¶

Â¬ Â«

) " )"

121

" )

Â£ Â¤

301

Â£ Â¤

Â¬ Â«

Â§ Â¦ Â¨

Â£ Â¤

2 232

Â£ Â¤

208

228

Â¬ Â«

295

Â§ Â¦ Â¨

Â« " )Â¬

213

Ãµ Ã´ Ã³ Ã¶

CS S 12

Â¬ Â«

211

" )

211

S1 CS

5 23

CS S1

Ãµ Ã´ Ã³ Ã¶

Ã¶ CSS5 Ãµ Ã´ Ã³ Ã¶ 104

115

Â¬ Â« Ãµ Ã´ Ã³

Â® q

Â¬ Â« Â£ Â¤ Ãµ Ã´ Ã³ Ã¶Â¬ Â« Ãµ Ã´ Ã³ Ã¶

CSS6

Ãµ Ã´ Ã³ Ã¶

CSS5

2326

Â§ Â¦ Â¨

Ãµ Ã´ Ã³ Ã¶

Â£ Â¤ Â¬ Â«

2349

Â¬ Â«

109

CS S2

Â£ Â¤

109

CSS1

Â¬ Â«

Ãµ Ã´ Ã³ Ã¶

200A

" )

115

Â¬ Â«

4-22

)LJXUH Cost Feasible PlDQ Nassau County Transit Projects BRT, Commuter Rail, Skyway, Streetcar

Â¬ Â«

3 7

Date: 11/10/2014

127

" )

Â¬ Â«

108

" )

115

" )

Â£ Â¤

108

2356

" )

2325

301

2356

CSS9

115

" )

2356 CSS 18

2 23 CS S3

S7 CS 2 23

Â¬ Â«

107

" )

107

" )

Ã³ Ãµ Ã´ Ã¶Ã³ Ãµ Ã´ Ã¶2385

116

Â¬ Â«

Â« Â¬ Â« Â¬

A1A

105A

" )

Â¯

A1A

Â¬ Â«

A1A

Â¬ Â«

A1A

Ãµ Ã´ Ã³

Â« Â¤Â¬ Â¬ Â« Ãµ Ã´ Ã³ Ã¶ Â£ 212

2331

105

Â¬ Â« Â¬ Â« Â¬ Â« A1A

A1A

105

Â¬ Â« Â¬ Â«

108

" )

105

10,560 Feet

Park and Ride Parking Lot

Ãµ Ã´ Ã³ Ã¶

3.5

Six Counties Boundaries

Conservation Lands

Water Bodies

Roadway System

Railroad System

St John's River Ferry

Bus Rapid Transit Corridors

Commuter Rail Corridors

Streetcar Springfield

Streetcar Riverside

Streetcar Downtown

Streetcar Five Points

7 Miles

JTA Mobility and Transit Access Improvement

Airport

Â® q

Legend

ó õ ô ö õ ô ó ö

¬ « 202

ó õ ô ö õ ô ó ö

2 23

õ ô ó ö

¬ «

2308

2358

õ ô ó ö

115

§ ¦ ¨ 295

¤ n

« " ) ¬ A1A

2325

õ ô ö õ ô ó ö óó õ ô ö õ ô ó ö õ ô ó ö

õ ô ó ö

210A

§ ¦ ¨ 295

õ ô ó ö

õ ô ó ö 2 23

õ ô ó ö

St. Augustine Inset

" ) 13B

õ ô ó ö

" ) 210

¬ « 13

5 23 8 2 23 7

¬ «

" ) 13A

® q

õ ô ó ö

¤ n

£ ¤ 1

" ) 13

ó õ ô ö õ ô ó ö

¬ « 16

" )

2 23

§ ¦ ¨

¬ «

¤ n

See inset

õ ô ó ö

208

A1A

õ ô ó ö

" ) 13A

¬ « 312

" ) 214

õ ô ó ö

" ) 13A

£ ¤

¬ «

" )

Legend

¬ «

207

A1A

209

£ ¤ ¬ « Passenger Rail Station

® q ¤ n ¤ n

Airport

õ ô ó ö

Park and Ride Parking Lot

" )

Amtrak Station

305

¬ « 206

" )

09 Commuter Rail 2Corridors

Bus Rapid Transit Corridors

" )

207A

Railroad System

" )

Roadway System

¬ « ® q ) Conservation Lands ¬ «" Water Bodies

" )

100 1447

" )

Six Counties Boundaries 2016

204

¬ « 100

)LJXUH Cost Feasible Plan St. John's County Transit Projects BRT and Commuter Rail Date: 9/29/2014

4-23

10,560 Feet

1.5

3 Miles

47F52F63F63F

48F53F64F64F

ID Facility 2308 SR 21 Blanding Boulevard 2321 SR 134 103rd Street 2322 SR 228 Normandy Boulevard 2323 US 1 SR 5 New Kings Road 2325 SR 115 Southside Boulevard 2326 IͲ95 2385 East First Coast Flyer 60 2386 Southwest First Coast Flyer 61 2327 Southeast (FEC) 2331 SR A1A St. Johns River Ferry

46F51F62F62F

From Wells Road SR 21 Blanding Boulevard Downtown Jacksonville Downtown Jacksonville US 90 Beach Boulevard Gateway Mall Downtown Jacksonville Downtown Jacksonville Downtown Jacksonville

To CR 218 SR 228 Normandy Boulevard SR 134 103rd Street SR 111 Edgewood Avenue Avenues Mall Jacksonville International Airport SR A1A 3rd Street (Jacksonville Beach) Wells Road St. Augustine (St. Johns County)

Phase CAP CAP CAP CAP CAP CAP CAP CAP CAP CAP

Fund Source State and Federal Transit Transit Local Match Total State and Federal Transit Transit Local Match Total State and Federal Transit Transit Local Match Total State and Federal Transit Transit Local Match Total State and Federal Transit Transit Local Match State and Federal Transit Transit Local Match Total State and Federal Transit Transit Local Match Total State and Federal Transit Transit Local Match Total State and Federal Transit Transit Local Match Total FTA Passenger Ferry Grant Total

Years 2019Ͳ2020 $12.07 $4.02 $16.09 $24.50 $8.17 $32.67 $17.24 $5.75 $22.99

Years 2021Ͳ2025 $37.97 $12.66 $50.63 $17.22 $5.74 $22.96 $31.39 $10.46 $41.85 $18.23 $6.08 $24.30 $12.35 $4.12 $16.47 $6.62 $6.62

Years 2031Ͳ2040 $151.14 $50.38 $201.52

Years 2026Ͳ2030 $11.37 $3.79 $15.16 $114.69 $38.23 $152.93

22ͲYear Total $37.97 $12.66 $50.63 $17.22 $5.74 $22.96 $42.76 $14.25 $57.01 $12.07 $4.02 $16.09 $18.23 $6.08 $24.30 $12.35 $4.12 $16.47 $24.50 $8.17 $32.67 $17.24 $5.75 $22.99 $265.83 $88.61 $354.44 $6.62 $6.62

58 The revenue estimate to support these projects includes statewide New Starts Program funding which are allocated on a statewide basis. New Start Programs are not shown in the FDOT’s Adopted Work Program. 59 Transit Local Match funding will be provided from Jacksonville Transportation Authority Operating Revenue and Duval County Transit Surtax. 60 Corridor includes SR 115 Arlington Expressway, SR 115 Southside Boulevard and SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard and other routes near downtown. 61 Corridor includes SR 21 Blanding Boulevard and other routes near downtown in Riverside. 62 The funding for rail capacity improvements needed to accommodate commuter rail for the segments from Green Cove Spring to Downtown Jacksonville and Downtown Jacksonville to Yulee are shown in the Strategic Intermodal System Multimodal Program projects. 4Ͳ24

49F54F65F65F

Improvement Type BRT Commuter Rail 62 Ferry Slip Replacement

45F50F61F61F

Table 4Ͳ2. Federal and State Transit Capacity Projects Cost Feasible Plan 58 59

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

46F51F62F62F

ID Facility 2349 Downtown Ͳ Sports Complex 2350 Five Points/Core/Brooklyn 2352 Riverside/Avondale 2354 Springfield Downtown Multimodal Transit 2355 Intermodal Facility

From

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

CAP

Phase CAP CAP CAP CAP State and Federal Transit Transit Local Match Total State and Federal Transit Transit Local Match Total

Years 2019Ͳ2020

Years 2026Ͳ2030 $45.91 $15.30 $61.22 $30.38 $10.13 $238.76 $229.30

Years 2021Ͳ2025 $26.58 $8.86 $35.44

$467.79

Years 2031Ͳ2040 $129.41 $43.14 $172.55 $70.29 $23.43 $93.73

$30.38 $10.13 $41.49 $9.26 $3.09 $12.34 $1,019.95

22ͲYear Total $45.91 $15.30 $61.22 $129.41 $43.14 $172.55 $26.58 $8.86 $35.44 $70.29 $23.43 $93.73

51F56F67F67F

Years Years Years Years 22ͲYear Fund Source Improvement Type 2019Ͳ2020 2021Ͳ2025 2026Ͳ2030 2031Ͳ2040 Total 64 FTA Passenger Ferry Grant Ferry Slip Replacement $6.62 $6.62 FTA Passenger Ferry Grant Total $6.62 $6.62 State and Federal Transit BRT $53.81 $117.16 $11.37 $182.34 Commuter Rail $114.69 $151.14 $265.83 Park and Ride Lots $9.26 $9.26 Streetcar $26.58 $45.91 $199.71 $272.20 Regional Transportation Center $30.38 $30.38 State and Federal Transit Total $63.07 $174.11 $171.98 $350.84 $760.00 Transit Local Match BRT $17.94 $39.05 $3.79 $60.78 Commuter Rail $38.23 $50.38 $88.61 Park and Ride Lots $3.09 $3.09 Streetcar $8.86 $15.30 $66.57 $90.73 Regional Transportation Center $10.13 $10.13 Transit Local Match Total $21.02 $58.04 $57.33 $116.95 $253.33 Grand Total $84.10 $238.76 $229.30 $467.79 $1,019.95 63 The final transit technology will be determined during the alternative analysis phase. 64 Other capital improvements for the St. Johns River Ferry are also recommended but are unfunded at this time. They are included in the Long Range Plan as illustrative projects: 2329, Drydock and Ferry Repairs, 2333 LongͲterm Site Improvements, 3344 Relocation of Ferry Offices, and 2346 ShortͲterm Site Improvements. 4Ͳ25

Park and Ride Lots Regional Grand Total Table 4Ͳ3. Summary of Funding Source for Transit

Regional Transportation Center

50F5F6F6F

Improvement Type Streetcar 63

45F50F61F61F

Table 4Ͳ2. Federal and State Transit Capacity Projects Cost Feasible Plan 58 59

This page is intentionally blank

4Í˛26

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION AND CONTEXT SENSITIVE SOLUTIONS E FFECTIVE BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS ARE ESSENTIAL FOR A VIBRANT REGION .

INTRODUCTION

NEEDS PLAN

Our Path Forward 2040 LRTP addresses the mobility needs of our residents. For many, access to transit and the ability to walk to work or shop may be more important than driving. Our older generations need more choices for personal mobility that do not rely on automobiles and younger generations are choosing more active lifestyles that include bicycles and walking. For these reasons, our plan places an increased emphasis on addressing the needs for bicyclists and pedestrians to connect our neighborhoods with jobs, recreation and social services. The combination of these projects is summarized as “Active Transportation” projects.

DEDICATED BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PROJECTS As part of the planning process, we identified a set of regional bicycle and pedestrian projects as shown on Figures 4Ͳ20 through 4Ͳ25 and summarized in Table 4Ͳ4. These needs were identified through an extensive coordination process with the local governments that built on the previously adopted plans of the North Florida TPO and local municipalities.

4Ͳ27

19 21

" )

108

115

2120

" ) " )

127

8 21 2

" )

¬ «

A1A

2063

§ ¦ ¨ 2034

§ ¦ ¨ 20 6

2103 2 20

§ ¦ ¨

2020

2086

2001

£ ¤

6 20

2005

" ) 220

¬ « 13

2147

¬ «

A1A

2148

2007

4 21

4 215

5 21

2002

2142

4 21

§ ¦ ¨

¬ « ¬ «

Legend

2139

218

2003

202

7 20

2008

2006

2056

2022

2087

295

" )

2058

2104

2082

301

2093

£ ¤

2010

¬ « 16

£ ¤ 1

21 4

Existing Florida Greenways and Trails

" ) 315

Priority Ranking 1

208

209

£ ¤

2138

214

315

¬ «

A1A 2141

13A

" )

¬ « " ) " " ) ) " )

" )

2151

2146

2152

9 200

Pedestrian and Bike Needs Projects

21 3

0 20

8 20

228

2037

£ ¤ ¬ « 90

21 0

134

¬ «

2015

2021

7 20

" )

¬ « ¬ «

228

8 20

" )

130

¬ «

2091

4 20 7

116

2096

§ ¦ ¨

2036

2080

202 5

2055

2030

2106

221

295

2051

" )

2031

¬ « £ ¤

124

" )

105

2042

2122

125

¬ « ¬ «

295

119

" )

2049

20 4

122

250A

¬ «

A1A

2064

" ) " )

2097

£ ¤ 301

250

2108

8 211

A1A

2127

A1A

£ ¤

108

¬ «

2107

¬ «

2129

2130

¬ « ¬ « 105

107

0.1

17 21

2 21

§ ¦ ¨

£ ¤

" )

3 4

¬ «

« § ¦¬ ¨ ¬ «

207

" )

214

" )

2140

A1A

305

Roadway System 21 3

¬ «

¬ « 206

21 3

100

" )

Conservation Lands

£ ¤ 17

2145

¬ «

Water Bodies

315

" )

Six Counties Boundaries

204

¬ « 20

2142

4 21

6 20

2034

213 4

2026

" )

" ) " )

2071 2104

320

" )

§ ¦ ¨

" ) £ ¤

" )

301

« £ ¤¬ £ ¤ «" " ) " ) ) ¬ ¬ « " ) ¬ « " ) ¬ ) ¬ «" «

" ) 316

7 20

2051

500

213 5

309

" ) 308

2137

2016

441

8 201

5 200 201

3 208

225

2017

207

" )

318

329

335

¬ «

200A

2078

335

2079

" )

2040

225A

200A

25A

200

2145

2105

310

2103

2070

204 5

" )

2153

2046

2029

2055

3 21

2154

2052

207 3

2136

2059

202 1

326

326 326

326

)LJXUH Bicycle DQG 3HGHVWULDQ 1HHGV Date: 8/14/2014

4-28

10,560 Feet

8 Miles

Legend Existing Florida Greenways and Trails Nassau County Bicycle Needs ½ ¾ ¾ ½

Florida Greenways and Trails Roadway System Water Bodies Conservation Lands Six Counties Boundaries

¬ « 2

" )

127

" ) 121

" ) 122

" )

½ ¾

½ ¾ ¾ ½

119

½ ¾

" )

½ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ¾

125

½ ½ ¾ ¾

127

½ ¾ ½ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾

" ) " )

" )

2122

23D

250

23C

" )

¬ « 121

" ) £ ¤

½ ½ ¾ 2106 121 ¾ ½ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ 301 ½ ¾ ¾

229

½¾ ¾ ½

" )

139B

§ ¦ ¨

½ ¾

124

" )

£ ¤

½ ¾

301

½ ¾

§ ¦ ¨

½ ¾ ½ ¾ ) ½ " ¾

23A

½ ¾

123

£ ¤

228

½ ¾

125

½ ¾ ¾ ½

" ) 250A

¬ «

" )

228

" ) 130

½ ¾ ½ ¾

" ) 229

00 20

½ ¾

" )

½ ¾

231

228

217

301

217

218

¾½

½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ½

½ ¾

" ) " ¬ « ) ) " £ ¤ " ) " )

)LJXUH %DNHU &RXQW\ Bicycle DQG 3HGHVWULDQ Corridors Date: 10/14/2014

4-29

10,560 Feet

1.5

3 Miles

202 5

2027

2031

2090

7 20

8 20

7 20

2011

2083

2081

2104

2082

2 20

§ ¦ ¨

2087

295

5 207

" ) 1179

£ ¤ " )

¬ «

217

224

2065

2008

" )

2086

301

2001

209

5 21 0

" )

" ) " )

2004

2155

2005

2147

13B

220

2003

2148

" )

1189

220A

2007

" ) 15A

" )

220

218

" ) 739

2143

" )

739B

209

¬ « 13

" ) ¬ «

2002

215

" ) 315

" )

2010

16A

¬ « 15

¬ «

£ ¤ 17

¬ « 230

" ) 226

2149

" ) 315

" ) 209

2009

" ) 315

Legend

" ) 352

Existing Florida Greenways and Trails

Pedestrian and Bike Needs Projects

¬ « 21

" ) 214

" )

Priority Ranking

214

" ) 209

1 2 3

" ) 315

4 5

¬ « ¬ « 21

Roadway System

" )

" ) 209

309D

Water Bodies

21 3

Conservation Lands Six Counties Boundaries

)LJXUH Clay County Greenways & Trails DQG Bicycle 3ULRULWLHV Date: 8/14/2014

4-30

10,560 Feet

1.5

3 Miles

228

¬ «

2005

2122

20 0

2003

2011

¬ «

£ ¤

2007

2008

2036

¬ «

2087

2027

8 201

2090

2015

2147

2014

2049

2062

295

§ ¦ ¨

2020

2148

§ ¦ ¨

£ ¤

152

¬ «

2021

¬ «

2058

7 20 6

4-31

)LJXUH Duval County Greenways & Trails and Bicycle Priorities

2065

§ ¦ ¨ 295

2016

2 20

£ ¤

20 9

0 205

2040

§ ¦ ¨

2038

£ ¤

7 20

2004

224

¬ «

¬ « 128

£ ¤ 17

2066

2080

207 3

2055

104

¬ «

2039

21 2

2006

¬ « 23

134

¬ «

2 207

£ ¤

115

¬ «

2070

¬ «

A1A

90 2022

202

¬ «

£ ¤

¬ « 116

¬ «

A1A

2115

¬ «

A1A

¬ «

A1A

4 21

2037

¬ «

2056

A1A

2139

2079

2070

2105

2059

2078

2040

201 7

2016

202

5 201

10,560 Feet

Six Counties Boundaries

Conservation Lands

Water Bodies

Roadway System

Priority Ranking

6 Miles

Pedestrian and Bike Needs Projects

Existing Florida Greenways and Trails

Airport

Legend ® q

2046

2026

Downtown Jacksonville Inset

8 20

2055

207 3

2104

2123

2052

2029

® q

4 21

Date: 8/14/2014

£ ¤

301

£ ¤§ ¦ ¨

2031

2042

2030

2063 8 20

2001

2054 207 4

2053

2051

2033

202 5

2106

£ ¤

301

2082

2029

2064 2034

2060

9 21 2 2103

7 20

2081 21 04

2094

2009

2048

2086

£ ¤

2101

2155

2041

2083

2069

8 2093

6 20 2035

2097

2091

8 6 207

2095

2034

5 20 2083

8 211 2071

6 20 77 20

2142

2096

4 215

127

" )

228

¬ «

2106

£ ¤

108

" )

301

£ ¤

115

" )

£ ¤

¬ «

§ ¦ ¨ 10

£ ¤

108

" )

8 21 2

301

£ ¤

2072

211

8 20

¬ « £ ¤¬ «

21 0

2080

2055

207 3

104

¬ «

2032

20 9

2040

£ ¤ ¬ «

2036

2039

¬ « 109

2049

0 213

8 201

)LJXUH Nassau &Runty

228

¬ «

2033

295

§ ¦ ¨

115

¬ «

® q

7 20

2015

21 17

2062

200A

" )

2021

4-32

¬ «

107

" )

211 9

107

" )

GreHways & 7rails and %LF\FOH 3ULRULWLHV

¬ «

§ ¦ ¨

2120

£ ¤ 2129

Date: 8/14/2014

125

" )

23C

23D

" ) " )

) " )"

121

" )

119

2122

0 .2

2063

115

" )

2054 207 4

2064 2034

21 2

2052

1 0. 21 2 2053

¬ «

20 0

2042

2030

2070

2103

6 20

2069

116

¬ «

2127

105A

" )

2108

2107

2022

A1A

¬ «

A1A

20 4

¬ «

A1A

2037

A1A 2056

« ¤¬ ¬ « £ 212

105

¬ « ¬ « ¬ « A1A

2115

2123

A1A

105

¬ « ¬ «

108

" )

105

« ¬ « ¬

A1A

2118

2113

2091

2097 2096

2031

2058

Existing Florida Greenways and Trails

Airport

10,560 Feet

3.5

Six Counties Boundaries

Conservation Lands

Water Bodies

Roadway System

Priority Ranking

7 Miles

Pedestrian and Bike Needs Projects

® q

Legend

2002 ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ½ ¾

209

½ ¾

½ ¾ ¾ ½ ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ½ ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ½ ¾ ¾ ¾ ½ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾

½ ¾ ¾ ½ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ¾

¾½ ¾½

" )

½ ¾

¾ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ½

½ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ¾

3 21

½ ¾

½ ¾ ¾ ½

" )

½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ½¾ ½ 100¾ ½ ½ ¾

¬ «

½ ¾

2132 ½ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾

¾½ ½ ¾

¬ « 19

¾½

" )

½ ¾

309B

½ ¾

½ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾

½ ¾

" )

½ 213 ¾ ½ 5 ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ¾

309

½ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ½¾ ¾ ½ ¾

½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ½

¾½ ¾½

½ ¾

" ) 308

½ ¾ ½ ¾

Putnam Multi-Use Path Needs

½ ¾

" )

½ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾

Clay Multi-Use Path Needs Land Trail Opportunities Roadway System Water Bodies

309

½ ¾

Conservation Lands Six Counties Boundaries

½ ¾

)LJXUH Putnam County Greenways & Trails and %LF\FOH Priorities Date: 10/14/2014

½ ¾

¬ «

308B

½ ¾

Existing Florida Greenways and Trails

½ ¾ ½ Florida Greenways and Trails ¾

½ ¾

Legend ½ ¾

½ ¾

¾½

½ ¾

¾ ½

£ ¤

¾½

½ ¾

½ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½

½ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½

½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ½ ¾

½ ¾

310

½ ¾

2136

½ ¾

" )

½ ¾

½ ½ ¾ ¾

" )

½ ¾

½ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾

¾½

½ ¾

½ ½ ¾ ¾

½ ¾

" )

315

¬ «

310

½ ¾

½ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ½ ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ ½¾ ½ 20A ½ ¾ ¾½ ½ ½ ¾ ¾ ½

" )

½ ¾

" )

½ ½ ¾ ¾

½2134 ¾

3 21

216

½ ¾

½ ½ ¾ ¾

½ ¾

" )

207A

" )

½ ¾

½ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾

½ ¾

½ ½ ¾ ¾

½ 2133 ¾ ½ ¾

½ ¾

309C

¬ «

2140

½ ¾

207

½ ¾

¬ «

½ ¾ 20 ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ½

¬ «

½ ½ ¾ ¾ ½¾ ½ ¾ ½ ¾

¾½

¬ «

100 ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ½ ¾ ½ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ½

¾½ ¾½ ¾½ ½ ¾ ½ ¾

½ ¾

" ) 219

½ ¾

" )

309D

½ ¾

13A

½ ¾

214

" ) ½ ¾

" )

¾ ½

2 2138 ½ ½ ¾ ¾ ¾ ½ ½ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾

315C

½ ¾

" )

½ ¾

13A

209

½ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾

½ ¾ ½ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ½ ¾ ¾ ¾ ½ ½ ¾ ½ ¾

½ ¾

" )

½ ¾ ¾ ½ ½ ¾ ½ ¾

352

" ) ½ ¾

" )

½ ¾

¾½

½ ¾

¾½

½ ¾

315

13A

¾½

" )

½ ¾

" )

½ ¾

2009

½ ¾

315

16A

215 5

¾½

226

½ ¾

½ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½

" )

¾½ ½ ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾

½ ¾

15A

¾½

½ ¾

21 4

¾ ½

" )

¾½

¬ «

½ ¾

2010 ½ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ½¾ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ¾

16A

½ ¾

315

½¾ ½¾ ¾ ½

½ ½ ¾ ¾

½ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ½ ¾ ¾

½ ¾

¾ ½

½ ¾ ¾ ½ " )

" )

½¾ ¾ ½

½ ¾

½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ 21 ½ ¾ ½210¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½43 ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ¾ ½ ½ ¾ ¾ ½

¾½

215

½ ¾

739

¾½

" )

225

½ ¾

209

" )

½ ¾

½ ½ ¾ ¾

" )

15A

4-33

4 21

2001

¾½

" )

220

218

2148 ½ ½ ¾ ¾

½ ¾ " ) ½ ¾

" )

10,560 Feet

4 Miles

½ ¾

2154

2048

2082

8 20

¬ «

7 20

115

2041

3 209

2090

¬ « 202

2058

¤ n 2151

§ ¨ ¦

2104

295

2 20

2083

2081

2020

2091 5 207

§ ¨ ¦ 295

210A

2095

2087

5 21 2139

2086

2145

2142

2065

2008

« " ) ¬ A1A

2137

2142

St. Augustine Inset 0

7 20

5 21

2148

" )

2147

13B

2004

2007

4 215

" ) 210

2143

4 21 4

¬ « 13

1 20

¬ «

¬ « 16

" )

215 5

13A

® q

¤ n

£ ¤ 1

21 4

" ) 13

¬ « 16

" )

¬ «

¤ n

2151

208

A1A

2141

§ ¨ ¦ 95

¬ « 312

2146

2138

2009

" )

5 21

" ) 13A

2152

21 3

214

Legend

13A

Airport Amtrak Station

£ ¤

¬ «

" )

Passenger Rail Station209

£ ¤ ¬ «

" )

Existing Florida Greenways and Trails 17

A1A

305

Pedestrian and Bike15Needs Projects Priority Ranking

¬ «

207

2145

® q ¤ n ¤ n

" )

¬ «

2140

206

" ) 209

2 3

" ) 207A

4 5

3 21

" ) 13

¬ « ) ¬ «"

33 Roadway21System 19

2134

® q Water Bodies

" )

100 1447

" ) 2016

Conservation Lands

¬ «

2132

2135

" )

310 Six Counties Boundaries

204

100

)LJXUH St. John's County Greenways & Trails and Bicycle Priorities Date: 8/14/2014

4-34

10,560 Feet

1.5

3 Miles

Table 4Ͳ4. Dedicated Bicycle and Pedestrian Project Needs by County County Map Id Corridor Baker 2000 SR 121 Rail Trail Corridor Clay 2001 Cecil Field Conservation Corridor Clay 2002 CR 218 Clay 2003 CR 220 Doctors Inlet Road Clay 2004 CR 220 Doctors Inlet Road Clay 2005 Long Bay Road Clay 2006 Old Jennings Road Clay 2007 US 17 Clay 2009 US 17 Roosevelt Boulevard / Park Avenue Clay 2008 US 17 Park Avenue Clay / St. Johns 2010 SR 16 Duval 2012 5th Street Duval 2013 Arlington Road Duval 2014 Arlington Road West Duval 2019 Bay Street Duval 2020 Baymeadows Road Duval 2023 Beauclerc Road Duval 2026 Boulevard Street Duval 2027 Bowden Road Duval 2028 Bowden Road Duval 2029 Broad Street Duval 2031 Cecil Field Conservation Corridor Duval 2032 Clark Road Duval 2033 Commonwealth Avenue Duval 2034 CSX Corridor North Duval 2035 Deerwood Area Duval 2036 Downtown Jacksonville Duval 2037 Downtown Neptune/Atlantic Beach Duval 2039 Duval Road Duval 2040 Duval Street Duval 2041 East Coast Greenway Ͳ Duval County Corridor Duval 2043 SR 111 Edgewood Avenue Duval 2045 Forest Street Duval 2046 Forsyth Street Duval 2047 Gate Parkway East Duval 2048 Gate Parkway South East Duval 2052 Hogan's Creek Greenway Duval 2053 Hubbard Street Duval 2054 Imeson Road Duval 2055 Jacksonville Baldwin / East Coast Corridor Duval 2056 Jacksonville Beach Area Duval 2057 Jefferson Street Duval 2058 Kernan Boulevard Duval 2059 Laura Street Duval 2060 Laura Street Duval 2061 Lee Street Duval 2062 Lone Star Road Duval 2065 Mandarin Road Duval 2089 Mary Street Duval 2066 McCoys Creek Boulevard / Fitzgerald Street Duval 2067 McCoys Creek Boulevard / Fitzgerald Street 4Ͳ35

at Sherry Drive, 2nd Street, Ocean Street, Cherry Street, SR A1A Airport Road Lee Street St. Johns / Duval County Line St. Johns Avenue Acosta Street Myrtle Avenue Gate Parkway Deerwood Parkway Market Street Orange Street Commonwealth Avenue Bulls Bay Highway (Jacksonville Baldwin Corridor) at 3rd Avenue, Ocean Street, 2nd Avenue, South 10th Street Water Street SR 152 Baymeadows Road 8th Street Bay Street Water Street Mill Creek Road SR 13 San Jose Boulevard San Marco Boulevard McDuff Avenue Nixon Street

From Baker/Union County Line CR 218 SR 16 SR 21 College Drive SR 21 Blanding Boulevard Long Bay Road at CR 220 (Fleming Island Area) Palatka at Kingsley Avenue (Orange Park) Kingsley Lake Drive Lane Avenue Lone Star Road Cesery Road Myrtle Avenue SR 115 at Southside Boulevard IͲ295 5th Street US 1 Philips Highway Spring Park Road Water Street Duval/Clay County Line Broward Road Imeson Road US 17 Main Street / S Rail Line Deerwood Park Boulevard

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

1st Street SR 116 Fort Caroline Road SͲLine 8th Street Duval Street SR 113 Southside Connector IͲ295 US 17 Main Street Bridge Leland Street Forest Street

Airport Center Drive Georgia Street Nassau/Duval County Line Post Street Lime Street Lee Street St. Johns Town Center Boulevard St. Johns Town Center Boulevard North Riverbank 14th Street Baldwin Rail Trail St. Johns River Ferry (East Coast Greenway Corridor)

SR 13 San Jose Boulevard 12th Street Spring Park Road Southpoint Parkway 5th Street US 90 Beaver Street US 17 Main Street Lane Avenue US 17 Main Street / Trout River Drive Gate Parkway

SR 13 San Jose Boulevard Melson Avenue King Arthur Road King Arthur Road Lee Street

Clay/Duval County Line

To Baker/Nassau County Line Duval/Clay County Line SR 21 College Drive US 17 Old Jennings Road SR 23 First Coast Expressway

Improvement Type Florida Greenway Land Trail Opportunities Florida Greenway Florida Greenway MultiͲUse Trail MultiͲUse Trail MultiͲUse Trail Accommodate Pedestrians and Bicyclist Florida Greenway Accommodate Pedestrians and Bicyclist Florida Greenway Ͳ MultiͲUse Trail Bike Lane Bike Lane Bike Lane Bike Lane Accommodate Pedestrians and Bicyclist BiͲdirectional 12 ft. Shared Use Path Bike Lane Bike Lane Bike Lane Bike Lane Florida Greenway Bike Lane Bike Lane MultiͲUse Path MultiͲUse Path Accommodate Pedestrians and Bicyclist Accommodate Pedestrians and Bicyclist Bike Lane Bike Lane Florida Greenway Bike Lane Bike Lane Bike Lane MultiͲUse Path Bike Lane MultiͲUse Path Bike Lane Bike Lane Florida Greenway Accommodate Pedestrians and Bicyclist Bike Lane Florida Greenway Pavement Markings and Signage Pavement Markings and Signage Bike Lane Bike Lane BiͲdirectional 12 ft. Shared Use Path Bike Lane Bike Lane MultiͲUse Path

Table 4Ͳ4. Dedicated Bicycle and Pedestrian Project Needs by County County Map Id Corridor Duval 2068 Moncrief Road Duval 2069 Monument Road and SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard Duval 2070 Myrtle Avenue Duval 2071 Newnan Street Duval 2073 Old Kings Road Duval 2074 Old Middleburg Road Duval 2075 Old St Augustine Road Duval 2078 Riverplace Boulevard Duval 2080 Riverside/Five Point Area Duval 2090 Southpoint Parkway Duval 2015 SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard Duval 2016 SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard Duval 2017 SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard Duval 2018 SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard Duval 2038 SR 104 Dunn Avenue Duval 2049 SR 105 Zoo Parkway Duval 2050 SR 105 Zoo Parkway Duval 2102 SR 109 University Boulevard North Duval 2103 SR 109 University Boulevard North Duval 2030 SR 111 Cassat Avenue Duval 2042 SR 111 Edgewood Avenue Duval 2099 SR 111 Tallulah Avenue Duval 2091 SR 115 Southside Boulevard Duval 2092 SR 115 Southside Boulevard Duval 2093 SR 115 Southside Boulevard Duval 2094 SR 115 Southside Boulevard Duval 2095 SR 115 Southside Boulevard Duval 2044 SR 126 Emerson Street Duval 2088 SR 128 San Juan Avenue Duval 2051 SR 13 Hendricks Avenue Duval 2083 SR 13 San Jose Boulevard Duval 2084 SR 13 San Jose Boulevard Duval 2085 SR 13 San Jose Boulevard Duval 2086 SR 13 San Jose Boulevard Duval 2087 SR 13 San Jose Boulevard Duval 2011 SR 134 103rd Street Duval 2024 SR 21 Blanding Boulevard Duval 2025 SR 21 Blanding Boulevard Duval 2079 SR 211 Riverside Avenue Duval 2098 SR 211 St. Johns Avenue Duval 2072 SR 228 Normandy Boulevard Duval 2096 SR A1A Duval 2097 SR A1A Duval 2100 UNF East Duval 2101 UNF West Duval 2076 US 1 Philips Highway Duval 2077 US 1 Philips Highway Duval 2063 US 17 Main Street Duval 2064 US 17 Main Street Duval 2081 US 17 Roosevelt Boulevard Duval 2082 US 17 Roosevelt Boulevard 4Ͳ36

From 13th Street SR 113 Southside Boulevard Forest Street Bay Street SͲline Herlong Road Losco Road Prudential Drive at Stockton Street, Rossell Street, IͲ95, St. Johns River Belfort Road SR 228 Hart Expressway US 90 Beach Boulevard Kings Road SR 228 Hart Expressway Biscayne Avenue Busch Drive US 17 Main Street SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard University Boulevard / Cesery Boulevard SR 21 Blanding Boulevard SR 111 Cassat Avenue US 17 Main Street Avenues Mall (US 1) US 1 Philips Highway Deerwood Park Boulevard Gate Parkway US 1 Philips Highway Hendricks Avenue SR 21 Blanding Boulevard SR 13 San Jose Boulevard Racetrack Road SR 152 Baymeadows Road Old St. Augustine Road Julington Creek Road Loretto Road Old Middleburg Road Blackburn Road Harlow Boulevard St. Johns Avenue Woodmere Street SR 103 Lane Avenue SR 202 J. T. Butler Boulevard St. Johns River Ferry Kernan Boulevard IͲ295 Racetrack Road SR 115 Southside Boulevard Eastport Road Trout River Bridge IͲ295 Duval/Clay County Line

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Bowden Road SR A1A SR 228 Hart Expressway US 90 Beach Boulevard SR 109 University Boulevard US 17 Main Street IͲ295 SR A1A Cesery Boulevard Gable Lane SR 111 Edgewood Avenue US 1/SR 15 New Kings Road 68th Street SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard / Regency Square Mall Belle Rive Boulevard US 90 Beach Boulevard Touchton Road Belle Rive Boulevard US 1 Philips Highway SR 211 Herschel Street San Marco Boulevard Downtown (Southbank) Hendricks Avenue SR 152 Baymeadows Road Plummers Cove Road SR 152 Baymeadows Road Old Middleburg Road North Appleton Avenue Wilson Boulevard Forest Street Talbot Avenue SR 111 Cassat Avenue SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard Duval/Nassau County Line UNF West UNF East Downtown (Southbank) Southbank Riverwalk Pecan Park Road New Berlin Road Edison Avenue Forest Street

To Golfair Boulevard N Regency Square Boulevard Kings Road Orange Street Martha Street Lenox Avenue SR 13 San Jose Boulevard US 1 Main Street

Improvement Type Bike Lane Bike Lane Bike Lane Pavement Markings and Signage Bike Lane Bike Lane Bike Lane Bike Lane Accommodate Pedestrians and Bicyclist Bike Lane BiͲdirectional 12 ft. Shared Use Path Bike Lane Bike Lane Bike Lane Bike Lane Bike Lane MultiͲUse Path Bike Lane Bike Lane Bike Lane Bike Lane Bike Lane BiͲdirectional 12 ft. Shared Use Path MultiͲUse Path Sidewalk Improvements Sidewalk Improvements Sidewalk Improvements Bike Lane Bike Lane Bike Lane BiͲdirectional 12 ft. Shared Use Path Bike Lane Bike Lane Bike Lane Accommodate Pedestrians and Bicyclist Bike Lane Bike Lane Bike Lane Bike Lane Bike Lane Bike Lane BiͲdirectional 12 ft. Shared Use Path BiͲdirectional 12 ft. Shared Use Path Bike Lane Bike Lane BiͲdirectional 12 ft. Shared Use Path RailsͲWͲTrails BiͲdirectional 12 ft. Shared Use Path RailsͲWͲTrails BiͲdirectional 12 ft. Shared Use Path RailsͲWͲTrails

Table 4Ͳ4. Dedicated Bicycle and Pedestrian Project Needs by County County Map Id Corridor Duval 2104 US 17 Roosevelt Boulevard Duval 2021 US 90 Beach Boulevard Duval 2022 US 90 Beach Boulevard Duval 2105 Water Street Duval / Nassau 2106 Jacksonville Baldwin Corridor Nassau 2107 8th Street Nassau 2108 Amelia Island Parkway Nassau 2109 Amelia Island Parkway Path Segment 1 Nassau 2110 Amelia Island Parkway Path Segment 2 Nassau 2111 Amelia Island Parkway Path Segment 3 Nassau 2112 Amelia Island Parkway Path Segment 4 Nassau 2113.1 Amelia Island Trial Ͳ Central (1st Ave) Nassau 2113 Amelia Island Trial Ͳ South (Buccaneer Trail) Nassau 2113.2 Amelia Island TrialͲ North ( Friendly/Clinch) Nassau 2114 American Beach Loop Nassau 2115 American Beach Loop Nassau 2116 American Beach Loop Nassau 2117 Crandall Parkway Corridor Nassau 2118 East Coast Greenway Ͳ Nassau County Corridor Nassau 2120.1 ENCPA DSAP 1Ͳ Central (Old Yulee Vicinity) Nassau 2120.2 ENCPA DSAP 1Ͳ North (Owens Road Vicinity) Nassau 2120 ENCPA DSAP 1Ͳ South (Harper Chapel Vicinity) Nassau 2121 Highland Broom Street Nassau 2123 Maxine Street Nassau 2124 Ocklawaha Trail Nassau 2125 Orange Avenue Nassau 2126 Simmons Connector Nassau 2127 SR 200 SR A1A Nassau 2129 US 17 Nassau 2119 US 17 / SR A1A East Coast Greenway Nassau 2128 US 301/ SR 200 Trans Nassau Trail Corridor Nassau 2130 William Burgess Boulevard Nassau / Duval 2122 CR 121/CR 119 Jacksonville Baldwin Rail Trail Northern Extension Corridor Putnam 2131 CR 216 Putnam 2132 Cross Florida Greenway Corridor Putnam 2133 SR 100 Putnam 2134 SR 20 Putnam 2135 US 17 Putnam 2136 US 17 Crescent City (parallel facilities) Putnam / St. Johns 2137 SR 207 St. Johns 2138 County Road 214 Corridor St. Johns 2149 CR 13 Spuds Palmo Trail Corridor St. Johns 2139 CR210 St. Johns 2140 Deep Creek to ECG Corridor St. Johns 2141 Downtown and Uptown St. Augustine St. Johns 2142 East Coast Greenway Ͳ St. Johns County Corridor St. Johns 2143 Nocatee Corridor St. Johns 2147 Race Track Road St. Johns 2148 Racetrack Corridor St. Johns 2150 SR 13 San Jose Boulevard St. Johns 2155 SR 13 William Bartram Trail Corridor 4Ͳ37

From Duval/Clay County Line San Pablo Boulevard at Hodges Boulevard Lee Street West of Baldwin at Sadler Road at Amelia Road Bailey Road 14th Street Via Del Rey SR A1A Fletcher Avenue / Amelia Island Trail Bill Melton Fletcher Avenue Bailey Road American Beach Loop Julia Street Segment American Beach Loop Burney Road Segment American Beach Loop Ocean Avenue Segment East Coast Greenway (US 17) Nassau/Duval County Line East Nassau Community Planning Area East Nassau Community Planning Area East Nassau Community Planning Area Proposed Highland Broom Street MultiͲuse Trail Maxine Street Path Via Del Rey / Bill Melton Road Orange Avenue Path Simmons/AIP Connector at SR 200 Bridge Nassau/Duval County Line Fernandina Beach CR 119 SR 200 SR A1A US 90 Beaver Street SR 100 Existing Cross Florida Greenway Trail Clay/Putnam County Line Hawthorne Putnam/Volusia County Line Prospect Street Palatka SR 13 San Jose Boulevard SR 207 at SR A1A SR 207 at US 1, Park Avenue, River, South Street, Riberia Street St. Johns /Flagler County Line SR 13 San Jose Boulevard SR 13 San Jose Boulevard SR 13 San Jose Boulevard Roberts Road CR 13

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

St. Johns /Duval County Line SR A1A US 1 Philips Highway Nocatee Corridor Julington Creek St. Johns /Duval County Line

SR A1A

SR 200 SR A1A Georgia State Line US 17 Main Street / Yulee US 17 US 301/SR 200 Trans Nassau Trail Corridor US 17 Palatka Palatka Palatka Palatka CR 308 St. Augustine SR 207 SR 13 San Jose Boulevard

8th Street/ SR A1A Bailey Road 14th Street Via Del Rey Matanzas Way Amelia Island Pkwy Atlantic Avenue American Beach American Beach American Beach SR A1A East Coast Greenway Corridor Fernandina Beach East Nassau Community Planning Area East Nassau Community Planning Area East Nassau Community Planning Area Proposed Highland Broom Street Maxine Street Path Sadler Road Orange Avenue Path Simmons/AIP Connector

Pearl Street Bulls Bay Highway

To Forest Street Downtown (Southbank)

Improvement Type Florida Greenway BiͲdirectional 12 ft. Shared Use Path Accommodate Pedestrians and Bicyclist Bike Lane Florida Greenway Accommodate Pedestrians and Bicyclist Accommodate Pedestrians and Bicyclist MultiͲUse Trail MultiͲUse Trail MultiͲUse Trail MultiͲUse Trail Trail Trail Trail Bike Lane MultiͲUse Path MultiͲUse Path Florida Greenway Florida Greenway MultiͲUse Path MultiͲUse Path MultiͲUse Path MultiͲUse Path MultiͲUse Path MultiͲUse Trail MultiͲUse Path MultiͲUse Trail Accommodate Pedestrians and Bicyclist BiͲdirectional 12 ft. Shared Use Path Florida Greenway Florida Greenway MultiͲUse Trail Florida Greenway MultiͲUse Path Florida Greenway Florida Greenway Florida Greenway Florida Greenway MultiͲUse Path Florida Greenway Florida Greenway Florida Greenway Accommodate Pedestrians and Bicyclist Florida Greenway Accommodate Pedestrians and Bicyclist Florida Greenway Florida Greenway BiͲdirectional 12 ft. Shared Use Path Florida Greenway BiͲdirectional 12 ft. Shared Use Path Florida Greenway

Table 4Ͳ4. Dedicated Bicycle and Pedestrian Project Needs by County County Map Id Corridor St. Johns 2151 SR 16 St. Johns 2152 SR A1A St. Johns 2153 St. Augustine Bike Plan St. Johns 2145 US 1 Dixie Highway St. Johns 2146 US 1 Dixie Highway St. Johns 2144 US 1 Dixie Highway / Ponce De Leon Boulevard St. Johns 2154 US 1 St. Augustine to Nocatee Corridor

4Ͳ38

From IͲ95 at SR 312 Areawide Putnam/Flagler County Line at SR 312 San Marco Avenue (US 1 B) (St. Augustine) St. Augustine

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Racetrack Road Nocatee Corridor

Areawide SR 207

To Collins Avenue

Improvement Type BiͲdirectional 12 ft. Shared Use Path Accommodate Pedestrians and Bicyclist Bicycle accommodations BiͲdirectional 12 ft. Shared Use Path Accommodate Pedestrians and Bicyclist BiͲdirectional 12 ft. Shared Use Path Florida Greenway

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

CONTEXT SENSITIVE SOLUTIONS

Context sensitive solutions provide street environments that meet the needs of adjacent land uses and traffic flow. They may involve strategies to enhance livability including those where the automobile is prioritized less than transit, pedestrian and bicycle modes. Livability and context sensitive solutions as a specific improvement type within the LRTP is a new approach from prior LRTP updates. This issue paper explains the background, policy, candidate corridor selection process and elements of context sensitive solutions, and identifies strategies that could be considered within the candidate projects for inclusion in the LRTP.

Corridors where mobility enhancement projects to support transit are identified were included. The recommended improvements for the context sensitive solutions corridors will be determined during the project development and design. The improvements are not limited to widening in the future, but the intent is to consider context sensitive solutions criteria as part of project development. The following criteria were used to identify context sensitive solutions livability corridors:

Successful applications of context sensitive solutions in our region today include the recently completed improvements along SR A1A 3rd Street in Jacksonville Beach and SR A1A Amelia Island Boulevard. These projects include bicycle and pedestrian accommodations and the development of roadway environments consistent with local communities. Other successful examples within our region include San Marco Boulevard in Jacksonville and Nocatee Parkway in St. Johns County.

Limiting the number of lanes to six general use lanes. Additional lanes are for bus rapid transit or managed lanes. Investing in each corridor consistent with an urban character defined through the project or adopted from a prior study such as the Neighborhood Vision projects performed by the City of Jacksonville or Nocatee Master Plan. For example, on some corridors an urban village concept could be used which would require wider sidewalks and onͲstreet parking, or a “Grand Boulevard” concept that would require cyclists, pedestrians and transit considered equally with automobile mobility. Requiring land use and zoning regulations that encourage redevelopment consistent with the urban design characteristics established for the corridor. Investing in corridors where transit accessibility is a high priority with the opportunity to provide additional transit service or quality of service. In addition to these livability corridors, the Jacksonville Transportation Authority has identified a set of Transit Accessibility and Mobility and Transit Hub Projects that will provide bicycle and pedestrian improvements, enhancements and transit hubs to support livability and transit accessibility. These projects are funded through the Duval County LOGT adopted in 2014.

The application of the livability policy within the LRTP encourages implementing agencies to consider alternatives and enhancements beyond adding lanes to increase automobile throughput. Identifying this improvement type does not preclude road widening or adding new roadway capacity. An alternatives analysis, including engineering, environmental assessment, planning and public involvement, will be performed in the project development process to determine the best solution for each corridor. Candidate projects for context sensitive solutions were identified using the following criteria

Elements of the Strategic Intermodal System were excluded. FDOT is responsible for the investment strategy and focused on moving goods and people. 65 Constrained corridors identified in the North Florida TPO’s Congestion Management Plan were included. Constrained corridors include facilities that have restricted rights of way limiting the ability of these roadways to be widened. Arterial roadways with six or more lanes were included. 65 In consultation with FDOT, context sensitive solutions may be appropriate at crossings of Strategic Intermodal System facilities (such as intersections with arterials or through interchanges of expressways). 52F57F68F68F

The network of corridors where context sensitive solutions are considered a priority are shown in Figure 4Ͳ26 and are summarized in Table 4Ͳ5 and Table 4Ͳ6.

4Ͳ39

" )

108

115

¬ «

£ ¤

" ) " )

" ) 127

A1A

108

105

107

§ ¦ ¨

£ ¤

¬ « ¬ «

" )

¬ «

A1A

® q

£ ¤ 301

" )

¬ «

CSS5

122

A1A

CSS5

119

CSS 12

105

§ ¦ ¨

CSS19

¬ «

" )

221

124

£ ¤ 90

CSS6

125

§ ¦ ¨

228

" )

CS S2

" )

¬ « 228

£ ¤

130

S1 CS

301

1 S1 CS

¬ « ¬ « 134

116

¬ «

CSS1

S CS

£ ¤ ¬ «

202

CSS3

" )

¬ « ¬ «

295

" )

250A

S7 CS

" ) 250

CSS9

§ ¦ ¨

" )

295

§ ¦ ¨ 295

S1 CS

£ ¤ 1

Legend ® q ¤ n ¤ n

" )

220

" ) 218

Airport

§ ¦ ¨

¬ «

Amtrak Station

¬ «

A1A

¬ « 95

Passenger Rail Station JTA Mobility and Transit Accesibility Imp

¬ «

® nq ¤

£ ¤ 1

Context Sensitive Solutions Corridors

" )

Roadway System

209

Water Bodies

£ ¤

" )

Conservation Lands

¤ n

" ) " " ) ) " )

" )

315

¬ « 16

208

¬ «

A1A

13A

214

315

Six Counties Boundaries

¬ « 207

" ) 214

" )

CSS5

£ ¤

¬ « S7 CS

CSS6

S1 CS

320

5 CS S2

S CS

" ) 21

§ ¦ ¨

" ) £ ¤

" )

CS S1318 7

" )

335

Date: 8/13/2014

" ) 225

310

" )

329

316

" ) ¬ «

200A

£ ¤

204

¬ «

CSS3

" )

® q 20

CSS7

1 S1 CS

335

100

315

CSS1

CSS4 CSS8 CSS14

" ) " )

¬ «

" )

CSS9

CSS19

A1A

206

CSS13

305

CSS5

CS S 12

« § ¦¬ ¨ ¬ «

301

« £ ¤¬ «" " ) ) ¬

" ) 309

" ) 308

CS S1

200

CS S1

441

)LJXUH Context Sensitive Solutions Corridors 4-40

10,560 Feet

8 Miles

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Table 4Ͳ5. Candidate Context Sensitive Corridors County Facility From Duval US 1 Alt. Martin Luther Myrtle Avenue King Jr. Parkway Duval Acosta Bridge IͲ95 Duval SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard IͲ95 Duval SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard SR 115 Southside Boulevard Duval SR 152 Baymeadows Southside Boulevard Road Duval US 90 Beach Boulevard SR 228 Commodore Point Expressway Duval Belfort Road SR 202 J. T. Butler Boulevard Duval SR 21 Blanding Boulevard Collins Road Duval SR 21 Blanding Boulevard Wilson Boulevard Duval SR 104 Dunn Avenue Biscayne Boulevard Duval SR 109 University Powers Avenue Boulevard Duval Duval Road SR 102 Duval Road/Airport Road Duval SR 115 Southside US 1 Philips Highway Boulevard Duval Hodges Boulevard US 90 Beach Boulevard Duval US 17 Roosevelt IͲ295 Boulevard Duval SR 202 J.T. Butler IͲ95 Boulevard Duval Kernan Boulevard SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard Duval SR 13 San Jose Boulevard Julington Creek Road Duval SR A1A Mayport Road SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard Duval Main Street IͲ95 Duval Old St Augustine Road Hood Landing Road Duval SR 211 Riverside Avenue Forest Street Duval US 1 Philips Highway Bus Park Boulevard Duval US 1 Philips Highway Baymeadows Way Duval US 1 Philips Highway Center Avenue Duval San Pablo Road SR 202 J. T. Butler Boulevard Duval SR 113 Southside SR 115 Arlington Expressway. Connector Duval SR 134 103rd Street Old Middleburg Road Duval St. Johns Bluff Road US 90 Beach Boulevard Duval US 23 Kings Road Martin Luther King Jr. Parkway Duval 8th Street IͲ95 Duval Town Center Parkway Gate Parkway Clay SR 21 Blanding Boulevard Duval/Clay County Line Clay SR 224 Kingsley Avenue SR 21 Blanding Boulevard Regional SR A1A Flagler County Line Duval and Nocatee Parkway US 1 Philips Highway St. Johns St. Johns US 1 Ponce De Leon Lewis Point Road/St. Augustine Drive Boulevard St. Johns King Street Avenida Menendez St. Johns San Marco Boulevard US 1 Ponce De Leon Boulevard 4Ͳ41

To IͲ95 Mary Street SR 109 University Boulevard SR A1A Mayport Road US 1 Penman Road Southpoint Parkway Duval/Clay County Line Cassat Avenue IͲ95 Spring Park Road US 17 Main Street SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard Chauny Road SR 129 McDuff Avenue San Pablo Road Glen Kernan Parkway SR 152 Baymeadows Road Dutton Island Road Gulf Life Drive Losco Road Water Street IͲ95 Baycenter Road SR 109 University Boulevard Crosswater Boulevard Regency Square Boulevard Ortega Farms Boulevard Saints Road SR 111 Edgewood Avenue Jefferson Street IͲ295 Old Jennings Road Professional Center Drive Georgia State Line Crosswater Parkway Old Dixie Highway US 1 Ponce De Leon Boulevard King Street

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Table 4Ͳ6. Transit Accessibility and Mobility Enhancement Projects Facility Map Id From Lenox Avenue CSS8 SR 228 Normandy Boulevard Mandarin Road CSS10 SR 13 San Jose Boulevard Merrill Road CSS11 SR 109 University Boulevard Moncrief Road / Myrtle Avenue / CSS12 US 17 Main Street 8th Street Park Avenue CSS15 US 17 Plummer Cove Road CSS17 Scott Mill Road SR 104 Dunn Avenue CSS5 IͲ295 SR 109 University Boulevard CSS18 St. Augustine Road SR 111 Cassat Avenue CSS4 SR 21 Blanding Boulevard SR 111 Edgewood Avenue CSS6 SR 111 Cassat Avenue SR 115 Arlington Expressway CSS1 SR 115 Mathews Bridge SR 115 Lem Turner Road CSS7 Downtown SR 21 Blanding Boulevard CSS3 Duval County Line/Clay County Line SR 228 Normandy Boulevard CSS14 IͲ295 US 1 SR 15 New Kings Road CSS13 IͲ95 US 1 SR 5 Philips Highway CSS16 IͲ95 South US 17 Main Street CSS9 US 17 / US 17 SR 228 State Street US 90 Beach Boulevard CSS2 IͲ95 Myrtle Avenue Underpass CSS19 Soutel Transit Hub Countywide Transit Hubs 66 Various Locations 53F58F69F69F

66 The location and scope of these projects are to be determined. 4Ͳ42

To SR 111 Cassat Avenue Westberry Road Townsend Myrtle Avenue IͲ95 SR 13 San Jose Boulevard IͲ95 Fort Caroline Road SR 111 Edgewood Avenue US 17 North Main Street Regency IͲ295 USͲ17 SR 111 Cassat Avenue US 1 Martin Luther King Jr. Parkway SR 115 Southside Boulevard Clark Road SR 115 Southside Boulevard

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

encourage bicycling and walking as travel options. For these and other reasons, proximity to transit service can be another reasonable criterion when prioritizing investments in bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure.

PRIORITIZATION PROCESS BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PRIORITIZATION PROCESS

Transit proximity prioritization criteria were developed as follows

Bicycle and pedestrian projects in the Needs Plan were prioritized using multiple criteria including safety, transit proximity, demand and cost. A five point priority scale was used.

Safety Roadways where there are concentrations of crashes involving bicyclists and pedestrians were used as a performance measure. While crash occurrences alone may not be indicative of an unusual safety concern without knowledge of exposure (and therefore the ability to calculate a crash rate for bicyclists and pedestrians), crash occurrences can also be indicative of demand— higher crashes occurrences derive from higher levels of bicycling and walking activity—which itself is not an unreasonable prioritization factor.

Latent Demand Analysis Latent demand analyses consider areas where bicycling or walking could be useful or popular modes if accommodating infrastructure was available (based on land use and demographic patterns that indicate a high probability for short trips which could be made by bicycling or walking). The North Florida TPO’s 2013 Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan included a latent demand analysis for arterial and collector roadways within the North Florida TPO region (exclusive of Baker and Putnam Counties), based on future population, employment and school enrollment data. Latent demand was used as a prioritization criterion to assign a score from one to five based on the latent demand prepared from the prior plan.

In 2012, the North Florida TPO completed a Regional Strategic Safety Plan, which included an analysis that looked for areas with unusual concentrations of crashes involving “vulnerable road users,” including bicyclists and pedestrians. The analysis identified statistically significant “hot spot” corridors using two different weighting schemes. Among the corridors identified as “hot spots’, the crash rate for vulnerableͲuserͲinvolved crashes was calculated and sorted; the hot spots with the 20 highest vulnerable user crash rates were then identified as priority corridors and used as the basis for the safety prioritization.

The latent demand analysis already includes projected future school enrollment data, but an additional school criterion could be introduced, if desired, such as a project falling within a specific buffer distance (half mile, whole mile, etc.) of a school site (pending data availability).

Projects identified as priority locations were assigned five points. Projects located in a related hot spot were assigned three points. Projects within a one mile buffer of either a priority location or hot spot were assigned one point.

Transit Proximity

The bicycle and pedestrian modes are integral to the success and utility of the transit mode as well. Good bicycle and pedestrian accommodation allows transit riders to get to their transit stops from their homes employment, shopping, and other destinations. Areas with transit service also often coincide with denser land use patterns which can also be practical areas to

4Ͳ43

Project along an existing transit route received five points. Projects intersecting an existing transit route received four points. Projects within a one mile buffer of an existing or proposed transit route.

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Prior Plan Prioritization Some of the candidate projects of the needs plan were prioritized within the plans or studies from which they are derived. Out of deference to these prior efforts, and the careful analysis and public input that may have informed them, we propose using prior prioritization as a criterion in the following ways:

Five points if a project is given a highest priority designation in the source study. Four points if a project is given a midͲlevel priority designation in the source study. Three points if a project is given a lowͲlevel or is not prioritized in the source study.

Weightings and Calculation The evaluation criteria were weighted as follows.

Latent demand, 40 percent Priority crash locations, 30 percent Transit proximity, 20 percent Need based on prior studies or plans, 10 percent

The composite score was then be divided by the project cost (in millions of dollars) for a final priority score. Table 4Ͳ6 summarizes the prioritization score for each project.

4Ͳ44

US 90 Beach Boulevard US 1 Dixie Highway 8th Street SR A1A Amelia Island Parkway Arlington Road Laura Street SR A1A Mary Street Newnan Street Baymeadows Road Laura Street McCoys Creek Boulevard / Fitzgerald Street CR210 Old Kings Road US 17 Park Avenue Old St Augustine Road Downtown Atlantic Beach

Bowden Road Lee Street Gate Parkway East SR 13 San Jose Boulevard Riverplace Boulevard Bay Street Forsyth Street Water Street SR 21 Blanding Boulevard SR 115 Southside Boulevard Hubbard Street McCoys Creek Boulevard / Fitzgerald Street Arlington Road West Gate Parkway South East Boulevard Street Forest Street SR 1909 University Boulevard Jacksonville Beach Area

Lone Star Road Imeson Road SR 21 Blanding Boulevard SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard Jefferson Street Bowden Road SR 105 Zoo Parkway SR 211 St. Johns Avenue Hogan's Creek Greenway UNF East SR 128 San Juan Avenue SR 13 San Jose Boulevard Broad Street SR 105 Zoo Parkway SR 115 Southside Boulevard SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard Duval Road

2022 2146 2107 2108 2013 2059 2152 2089 2071 2020 2060 2067 2139 2073 2008 2075 2037

2028 2061 2047 2086 2078 2019 2046 2105 2024 2094 2053 2066 2014 2048 2026 2045 2102 2056

2062 2054 2025 2017 2057 2027 2049 2098 2052 2100 2088 2085 2029 2050 2095 2016 2039

Corridor

Table 4Ͳ7. Bicycle and Pedestrian Prioritization

at Hodges Boulevard at SR 312 at Sadler Road at Amelia Road King Arthur Road 8th Street at SR 312 San Marco Boulevard Bay Street at SR 115 Southside Boulevard Bay Street Nixon Street at SR A1A SͲline at Kingsley Avenue (Orange Park) Losco Road at Sherry Drive, 2nd Street, Ocean Street, Cherry Street, SR A1A Spring Park Road Water Street Gate Parkway Julington Creek Road Main Street (US 1) Myrtle Avenue Myrtle Avenue Lee Street Blackburn Road Gate Parkway Orange Street McDuff Avenue King Arthur Road St. Johns Town Center Boulevard 5th Street Acosta Street SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard at 3rd Avenue, Ocean Street, 2nd Avenue, South 10th Street Mill Creek Road Commonwealth Avenue Harlow Boulevard Kings Road Water Street US 1 SR 5 Philips Highway Busch Drive Woodmere Street Market Street Kernan Boulevard SR 21 Blanding Boulevard Old St. Augustine Road Water Street US 17 Main Street US 1 SR 5 Philips Highway US 90 Beach Boulevard Airport Road

From

4Ͳ45

SR 113 Southside Connector Baldwin Rail Trail Wilson Boulevard US 90 Beach Boulevard 1st Street Spring Park Road IͲ295 Talbot Avenue North Riverbank UNF West SR 211 Herschel Street SR 152 Baymeadows Road 5th Street SR A1A Belle Rive Boulevard SR 228 Hart Expressway Airport Center Drive

Southpoint Parkway Duval Street St. Johns Town Center Boulevard Plummers Cove Road Prudential Drive Lee Street Lee Street Pearl Street Appleton Avenue Touchton Road 14th Street Leland Street Cesery Road Deerwood Parkway 12th Street Lime Street Cesery Boulevard

Lone Star Road SͲLine Main Street Bridge (US 17) Orange Street 8th Street Forest Street Martha Street SR 13 San Jose Boulevard

Bike Lane Bike Lane Bike Lane Bike Lane Bike Lane Bike Lane Bike Lane Bike Lane MultiͲUse Path Bike Lane Bike Lane Bike Lane Bike Lane MultiͲUse Path Sidewalk Improvements Bike Lane Bike Lane

Bike Lane Bike Lane MultiͲUse Path Bike Lane Bike Lane Bike Lane Bike Lane Bike Lane Bike Lane Sidewalk Improvements Bike Lane Bike Lane Bike Lane Bike Lane Bike Lane Bike Lane Bike Lane Accommodate Pedestrians and Bicyclist

Accommodate Pedestrians and Bicyclist Accommodate Pedestrians and Bicyclist Accommodate Pedestrians and Bicyclist Accommodate Pedestrians and Bicyclist Bike Lane Pavement Markings and Signage Accommodate Pedestrians and Bicyclist Bike Lane Pavement Markings and Signage Accommodate Pedestrians and Bicyclist Pavement Markings and Signage MultiͲUse Path Accommodate Pedestrians and Bicyclist Bike Lane Accommodate Pedestrians and Bicyclist Bike Lane Accommodate Pedestrians and Bicyclist

Improvement Type

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

5 4 4 5 5 5 3 4 5 4 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5

5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 5 5 4 5

5 5 5 3 3 4 5 5 5 5 4 4 0 5 5 4 5

Transit Proximity

3 3 3 2 5

Strategic Safety Plan

5 3 5 5 3 3 5 5 3 5 5 5 3 3 3 5 3

5 3 5 5 5 3 3 3 5 3 3 3 5 5 3 3 5

2 1 3 4 5 3 1 4 5 3 3 3 5 1 4 3 1

3 5 2 4 5 4 4 5 3 2 4 3 3 2 5 4 2

Latent Prior Demand Plan Priority 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 2 5 2 5 4 3 2 3 4 5 5 3 4 5 5 3 3 3 1 5 4 3 2 5 4 3 3

19 19 18 18 16 15 14 14 13 13 12 12 12 12 12 12 11

54 49 47 45 45 41 32 32 32 31 28 23 23 22 22 21 21 21

2773 1234 668 320 232 170 116 99 96 95 93 75 71 61 56 56

Priority Score

Deerwood Area Clark Road Myrtle Avenue SR 228 Normandy Boulevard Jacksonville Baldwin Corridor SR 126 Emerson Street Edgewood Avenue SR 111 Tallulah Avenue Moncrief Road SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard SR 134 103rd Street Monument Road and SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard SR 109 University Boulevard

SR 211 Riverside Avenue Old Middleburg Road Southpoint Parkway SR 115 Southside Boulevard Duval Street US 17 SR 104 Dunn Avenue UNF West American Beach Loop

Commonwealth Avenue SR 13 Hendricks Avenue SR 115 Southside Boulevard 5th Street Maxine Street Riverside/Five Point Area

Amelia Island Trial Ͳ Central (1st Ave) SR A1A Orange Avenue SR 111 Cassat Avenue Downtown and Uptown St. Augustine

SR A1A St. Augustine Bike Plan SR 16 CSX Corridor North SR 111 Edgewood Avenue Beauclerc Road Old Jennings Road Highland Broom Street

CR 220 Doctors Inlet Road CR 216 Amelia Island Parkway Path Segment 1 SR 13 San Jose Boulevard William Burgess Boulevard US 17 Main Street Amelia Island Trial Ͳ South (Buccaneer Trail) US 17 Crescent City (parallel facilities) SR A1A SR 200

2035 2032 2070 2072 2106 2044 2043 2099 2068 2018 2011 2069 2103

2079 2074 2090 2093 2040 2007 2038 2101 2114

2033 2051 2092 2012 2123 2080

2113.1 2096 2125 2030 2141

2097 2153 2151 2034 2042 2023 2006 2121

2004 2131 2109 2084 2130 2064 2113 2136 2127

Corridor

Table 4Ͳ7. Bicycle and Pedestrian Prioritization

Deerwood Park Boulevard Broward Road Forest Street SR 103 Lane Avenue Bulls Bay Highway Hendricks Avenue St. Johns Avenue US 17 Main Street 13th Street SR 228 Hart Expressway Old Middleburg Road SR 115 Southside Boulevard University Boulevard / Cesery Boulevard St. Johns Avenue Herlong Road Bowden Road Deerwood Park Boulevard Lee Street at CR 220 (Fleming Island Area) Biscayne Avenue IͲ295 American Beach Loop Julia Street Segment Lane Avenue SR 13 San Jose Boulevard US 1 SR 5 Philips Highway Lane Avenue Maxine Street Path at Stockton Street, Rossell Street, IͲ95, St. Johns River Bill Melton SR 202 J. T. Butler Boulevard Orange Avenue Path SR 21 Blanding Boulevard at US 1, Park Avenue, River, South Street, Riberia Street St. Johns Ferry Areawide IͲ95 US 17 Main Street / S Rail Line SR 111 Cassat Avenue IͲ295 SR 23 First Coast Expressway Proposed Highland Broom Street MultiͲuse Trail College Drive SR 100 8th Street/ SR A1A SR 152 Baymeadows Road SR A1A SR 200 Trout River Bridge Fletcher CR 308 at SR 200 Bridge

From

4Ͳ46

US 17 US 17 Bailey Road Hendricks Avenue US 17 New Berlin Road Amelia Island Pkwy Prospect Street

Duval/Nassau County Line Areawide Collins Avenue US 17 Main Street / Trout River Drive US 1 SR 15 New Kings Road SR 13 San Jose Boulevard Long Bay Road Proposed Highland Broom Street

Matanzas Way SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard Orange Avenue Path SR 111 Edgewood Avenue

Imeson Road San Marco Boulevard Belle Rive Boulevard Melson Avenue Maxine Street Path

Forest Street Lenox Avenue Belfort Road US 90 Beach Boulevard Georgia Street US 17 Main Street UNF East American Beach

Gate Parkway US 17 Main Street Kings Road SR 111 Cassat Avenue West of Baldwin US 1 SR 5 Philips Highway Post Street 68th Street Golfair Boulevard SR 109 University Boulevard Old Middleburg Road N Regency Square Boulevard Gable Lane

MultiͲUse Trail MultiͲUse Path MultiͲUse Trail Bike Lane MultiͲUse Trail RailsͲWͲTrails Trail MultiͲUse Path Accommodate Pedestrians and Bicyclist

BiͲdirectional 12 ft. Shared Use Path Bicycle accommodations BiͲdirectional 12 ft. Shared Use Path MultiͲUse Path Bike Lane BiͲdirectional 12 ft. Shared Use Path MultiͲUse Trail MultiͲUse Path

Trail BiͲdirectional 12 ft. Shared Use Path MultiͲUse Path Bike Lane Accommodate Pedestrians and Bicyclist

Bike Lane Bike Lane MultiͲUse Path Bike Lane MultiͲUse Path Accommodate Pedestrians and Bicyclist

Bike Lane Bike Lane Bike Lane Sidewalk Improvements Bike Lane Accommodate Pedestrians and Bicyclist Bike Lane Bike Lane Bike Lane

MultiͲUse Path Bike Lane Bike Lane Bike Lane Florida Greenway Bike Lane Bike Lane Bike Lane Bike Lane Bike Lane Bike Lane Bike Lane Bike Lane

Improvement Type

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

3 5 3

5 5

Strategic Safety Plan

5 4 4 5 4 5 3 5

4 5 5 4 5 4 4

5 5 5

4 5 5 4 5

5 3 5 5 4 5 5 5

4 5 4 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 3 5 5

Transit Proximity

4 4 5 3 3 3 3 4 3

5 3 3 3 3 3 4 3

3 3 3 3 3

3 3 3 3 3 3

5 5 5 3 3 3 5 5 3

3 1 1 4 1 3 1 1 1

1 5 2 4 4 3 1 2

1 5 2 5 5

2 4 3 3 1 5

4 3 4 4 5 3 3 4 1

Latent Prior Demand Plan Priority 3 2 3 2 3 5 5 4 5 2 3 3 5 4 3 2 3 4 5 3 3 2 3 4 5 4

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2

4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3

5 4 4 4 4

7 6 6 6 6 5

9 8 8 8 8 8 7 7 7

11 11 11 10 10 10 10 10 10 9 9 9

Priority Score

Amelia Island TrialͲ North ( Friendly/Clinch) Amelia Island Parkway Path Segment 2 Downtown Jacksonville Cecil Field Conservation Corridor East Coast Greenway Ͳ Nassau County Corridor US 90 Beach Boulevard ENCPA DSAP 1Ͳ South (Harper Chapel Vicinity) American Beach Loop

Mandarin Road SR 13 San Jose Boulevard CR 220 Doctors Inlet Road SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard US 17 Roosevelt Boulevard US 17 Roosevelt Boulevard Amelia Island Parkway Path Segment 3 Amelia Island Parkway Path Segment 4 SR 115 Southside Boulevard Race Track Road US 1 SR 5 Philips Highway Ocklawaha Trail Long Bay Road SR 13 San Jose Boulevard CR 218 American Beach Loop

SR 100 Racetrack Corridor Crandall Parkway Corridor Kernan Boulevard SR 13 San Jose Boulevard US 1 Dixie Highway Simmons Connector US 17 US 1 SR 5 Philips Highway US 17 Main Street ENCPA DSAP 1Ͳ North (Owens Rd Vicinity) US 1 St. Augustine to Nocatee Corridor US 1 Dixie Highway / Ponce De Leon Boulevard

Cecil Field Conservation Corridor US 17 Roosevelt Boulevard East Coast Greenway Ͳ Duval County Corridor Deep Creek to ECG Corridor Jacksonville Baldwin Rail Trail Northern Extension SR 13 William Bartram Trail Corridor Jacksonville Baldwin / East Coast Corridor

Nocatee Corridor SR 207 SR 121 Rail Trail Corridor County Road 214 Corridor CR 13 Spuds Palmo Trail Corridor US 301 SR 200 Trans Nassau Trail SR 16

2113.2 2110 2036 2031 2118 2021 2120 2116

2065 2150 2003 2015 2082 2081 2111 2112 2091 2147 2077 2124 2005 2087 2002 2115

2133 2148 2117 2058 2083 2145 2126 2129 2076 2063 2120.2 2154 2144

2001 2104 2041 2140 2122 2155 2055

2143 2137 2000 2138 2149 2128 2010

Corridor

Table 4Ͳ7. Bicycle and Pedestrian Prioritization

Bailey Road Bailey Road Duval/Clay County Line Nassau/Duval County Line San Pablo Boulevard East Nassau Community Planning Area American Beach Loop Ocean Avenue Segment SR 13 San Jose Boulevard Roberts Road SR 21 SR 228 Hart Expressway Duval/Clay County Line IͲ295 14th Street Via Del Rey Avenues Mall (US 1) SR 13 San Jose Boulevard SR 115 Southside Boulevard Via Del Rey / Bill Melton Road SR 21 Blanding Boulevard Loretto Road SR 16 American Beach Loop Burney Road Segment Palatka SR 13 San Jose Boulevard East Coast Greenway (US 17) SR 152 Baymeadows Road Racetrack Road Putnam/Flagler County Line Simmons/AIP Connector Nassau/Duval County Line Racetrack Road Eastport Road East Nassau Community Planning Area St. Augustine San Marco Avenue (US 1 B) (St. Augustine) CR 218 Duval/Clay County Line St. Johns / Duval County Line SR 207 US 90 Beaver Street CR 13 Bulls Bay Highway (Jacksonville Baldwin Corridor) SR 13 San Jose Boulevard Palatka Baker/Union County Line SR 207 SR 207 CR 119 Kingsley Lake Drive

From

4Ͳ47

Duval/Clay County Line Forest Street Nassau/Duval County Line SR A1A US 301 SR 200 Trans Nassau Trail Corridor St. Johns /Duval County Line St. Johns River Ferry (East Coast Greenway Corridor) SR A1A St. Augustine Baker/Nassau County Line SR 13 San Jose Boulevard SR 13 San Jose Boulevard US 17 Main Street Yulee SR 13 San Jose Boulevard

Lake City (Columbia County) Nocatee Corridor SR A1A East Coast Greenway SR 116 Fort Caroline Road Downtown (Southbank) SR 27 Simmons/AIP Connector SR A1A SR 2 Downtown (Southbank) Pecan Park Road East Nassau Community Planning Area Nocatee Corridor Racetrack Road

IͲ295 Julington Creek College Drive SR A1A Forest Street Edison Avenue Via Del Rey SR A1A Fletcher Avenue Amelia Island Trail Atlantic Boulevard (Regency Square Mall) US 1 SR 5 Philips Highway Southbank Riverwalk Sadler Road Old Jennings Road SR 152 Baymeadows Road SR 21 American Beach

Atlantic Avenue 14th Street US 90 Beaver Street Fernandina Beach Downtown (Southbank) East Nassau Community Planning Area American Beach

Florida Greenway Florida Greenway Florida Greenway Florida Greenway Florida Greenway Florida Greenway Florida Greenway Ͳ MultiͲUse Trail

Land Trail Opportunities Florida Greenway Florida Greenway Florida Greenway Florida Greenway Florida Greenway Florida Greenway

Florida Greenway Florida Greenway Florida Greenway Florida Greenway BiͲdirectional 12 ft. Shared Use Path BiͲdirectional 12 ft. Shared Use Path MultiͲUse Trail BiͲdirectional 12 ft. Shared Use Path BiͲdirectional 12 ft. Shared Use Path BiͲdirectional 12 ft. Shared Use Path MultiͲUse Path Florida Greenway BiͲdirectional 12 ft. Shared Use Path

BiͲdirectional 12 ft. Shared Use Path BiͲdirectional 12 ft. Shared Use Path Florida Greenway BiͲdirectional 12 ft. Shared Use Path RailsͲWͲTrails BiͲdirectional 12 ft. Shared Use Path MultiͲUse Trail MultiͲUse Trail BiͲdirectional 12 ft. Shared Use Path BiͲdirectional 12 ft. Shared Use Path RailsͲWͲTrails MultiͲUse Trail MultiͲUse Trail Accommodate Pedestrians and Bicyclist Florida Greenway MultiͲUse Path

Trail MultiͲUse Trail Accommodate Pedestrians and Bicyclist Florida Greenway Florida Greenway BiͲdirectional 12 ft. Shared Use Path MultiͲUse Path MultiͲUse Path

Improvement Type

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

3 3 2 3 3

5 2 2 3

3 3 2 3 3 3 5 5

5 3 2

2 2

Strategic Safety Plan

3 5 4 4 5 5

5 5 5 5 4 5 5

5 3 5 5 5 3 5 5 5 4 4

4 5 5 5 5 5 3 5 4 5 5

4 3 5 4 5 3

Transit Proximity

3 5 5 3 3 3 3

3 3 5 3 3 3 5

5 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

3 3 3 3 3 3 5 5 3 3 3 4 4 3 3 3

3 4 1 1 1 2 3

2 5 5 1 1 3 5

3 3 1 5 5 4 2 2 5 2 1 2 2

4 2 3 5 5 5 1 1 5 3 5 2 1 5 2 1

Latent Prior Demand Plan Priority 3 3 5 1 3 5 3 1 5 4 3 5 3 1 3 1

Priority Score

1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0

1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

2 2 2 2 2 2 2

ENCPA DSAP 1Ͳ Central (Old Yulee Vicinity) Cross Florida Greenway Corridor US 17 Roosevelt Boulevard East Coast Greenway Ͳ St. Johns County Corridor SR 20 US 17 SR A1A East Coast Greenway US 17

2120.1 2132 2009 2142 2134 2119 2135

Corridor

Table 4Ͳ7. Bicycle and Pedestrian Prioritization

East Nassau Community Planning Area Palatka Palatka St. Johns /Flagler County Line Palatka Georgia State Line Putnam/Volusia County Line

From

4Ͳ48

East Nassau Community Planning Area Existing Cross Florida Greenway Trail Clay/Duval County Line St. Johns /Duval County Line Hawthorne Fernandina Beach Palatka

MultiͲUse Path Florida Greenway Florida Greenway Florida Greenway Florida Greenway Florida Greenway Florida Greenway

Improvement Type

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

3 3 3

Strategic Safety Plan 4 4 5 5 5 5 5

Transit Proximity

Latent Prior Demand Plan Priority 3 1 5 2 3 5 5 5 5 2 5 4 5 2

Priority Score 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

COST FEASIBLE PLAN

The following table summarizes the contribution of the plan toward enhancements for bicycle and pedestrian mobility.

DEDICATED BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PROJECTS Based on a policy decision approved by the North Florida TPO Board and committees, individual bicycle and pedestrian projects were not selected for funding in the Cost Feasible Plan. The North Florida TPO is dedicating funding through the Transportation Alternatives and Other Arterials funding programs for standalone bicycle and pedestrian projects. These revenues will be dedicated to individual projects on an annual basis as part of the Transportation Improvement Program development.

Table 4Í˛8. Summary of Anticipated Expenditures for Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects Bicycle and Pedestrian Accommodations in Other Projects 67

Funding Program

Dedicated Revenue for Standalone Projects

Total

70F70F

Other State Highways Transportation Management Area Transportation Alternatives (TALU) 68 Transportation Alternatives (TALT) 69 Transportation Regional Incentive Program 70 Clay County Duval County Nassau County St. Johns County Total

$64.87 $13.44 $0.00 $0.00 $1.06 $11.84 $43.03 $1.98 $7.97 $144.20

71F71F

72F72F

73F73F

$26.79 $0.00 $31.20 $41.30 $0.00 $0.00 $59.44 $0.00 $0.00 $158.73

67 These revenues are based on 5 percent of road capacity projects on arterials and other streets. 68 These funds can only be used within the North Florida Transportation Management Area. 69 These funds are distributed by FDOT on a districtwide basis. The total shown is a districtwide total. 70 These funds are distributed by FDOT on a districtwide basis. The total shown is a districtwide total. 4Í˛49

$91.66 $13.44 $31.20 $41.30 $1.06 $11.84 $102.47 $1.98 $7.97 $302.93

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

CONTEXT SENSITIVE SOLUTIONS

Table 4Ͳ9 summarizes the context sensitive solutions projects in the adopted Cost Feasible Plan. The phasing and funding of these projects were identified in the Other Road Capacity Section. Other projects were identified as candidates for context sensitive solutions but only these projects had sufficient information and consensus to be identified as context sensitive solution priorities.

Duval County is also dedicating funding through their Local Option Gas Tax program to mobility and transit accessibility projects. These projects are summarized in Table 4Ͳ10. The projects will include enhancements such as bus shelters, lighting, landscaping and safety that will improve the quality of service for bicyclists and pedestrians.

All arterial road capacity projects are required to provide accommodations for bicyclists and pedestrians (where practical) by the North Florida TPO and FDOT policy.

Table 4Ͳ9. Candidate Context Sensitive Solution Funded Projects County ID Facility From

Clay

1037 US 17

Governor Street

Haven Avenue

Duval

100

SR 109 University Boulevard SR 202 J. T. Butler Boulevard Bridge of Lions

SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard

Improvement in Draft Needs Plan Context sensitive solutions (MulitͲuse path) Widen to 6 lanes

US 90 Beach Boulevard

Widen to 6 lanes

SR 16

US 1 Ponce de Leon Boulevard

SR A1A Avenida Menendez

Context sensitive solutions Context sensitive solutions

SR 115 Arlington Expressway Duval 103 SR 115 Southside Boulevard St. Johns 1030 US 1B San Marco Avenue St. Johns 1029 US 1B King Street

4Ͳ50

71 Adopted by local Ordinance 2013Ͳ820ͲE. 72 The location and scope of these projects are to be determined.

57F62F75F75F

Lighting, Landscape, and Painting Enhancements Transit Hub

Mobility and Transit Accessibility Enhancements

Improvement Type

4Ͳ51

SR 111 Cassat Avenue Westberry Road Townsend Myrtle Avenue IͲ95 SR 13 San Jose Boulevard IͲ95 Fort Caroline Road SR 111 Edgewood Avenue US 17 North Main Street Regency IͲ295 USͲ17 SR 111 Cassat Avenue US 1 Martin Luther King Jr. Parkway SR 115 Southside Boulevard Clark Road SR 115 Southside Boulevard

SR 228 Normandy Boulevard SR 13 San Jose Boulevard SR 109 University Boulevard US 17 Main Street USͲ17 Scott Mill Road IͲ295 St. Augustine Road SR 21 Blanding Boulevard SR 111 Cassat Avenue SR 115 Mathews Bridge Downtown Duval County Line/Clay County Line IͲ295 IͲ95 IͲ95 South US 17 / US 17 SR 228 State Street IͲ95 Various Locations

Lenox Avenue Mandarin Road Merrill Road Moncrief Road/Myrtle Avenue/8th Street Park Avenue Plummer Cove Road SR 104 Dunn Avenue SR 109 University Boulevard SR 111 Cassat Avenue SR 111 Edgewood Avenue SR 115 Arlington Expressway SR 115 Lem Turner Road SR 21 Blanding Boulevard SR 228 Normandy Boulevard US 1 SR 15 New Kings Road US 1 SR 5 Philips Highway US 17 Main Street US 90 Beach Boulevard Myrtle Avenue Underpass Soutel Transit Hub Countywide Transit Hubs 72 Grand Total

CSS8 CSS10 CSS11 CSS12 CSS15 CSS17 CSS5 CSS18 CSS4 CSS6 CSS1 CSS7 CSS3 CSS14 CSS13 CSS16 CSS9 CSS2 CSS19

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Facility Map Id From Mobility and Transit Accessibility Enhancements

56F61F74F74F

Table 4Ͳ10. Duval County LOGT Transit Accessibility and Mobility and Transit Hub Projects 71 Phase CST CST CST CST CST CST CST CST CST CST CST CST CST CST CST CST CST CST CST CST CAP CST

Years 2019Ͳ2020 $18.15 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.06 $3.39 $4.84 $26.44

Years 2021Ͳ2025 $0.00

Years 2026Ͳ2030 $0.00

Years 2031Ͳ2040 $0.00

22ͲYear Total $18.15 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.06 $3.39 $4.84 $26.44

This page is intentionally blank.

4Í˛52

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

FREIGHT AND INTERMODAL SYSTEMS A NALYSIS OF THE FREIGHT SYSTEM WITHIN THE REGION IS AN IMPORTANT ASPECT OF UNDERSTANDING THE ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF TRANSPORTATION INVESTMENT AND IN PRIORITIZING PROJECTS FOR FUTURE INVESTMENTS .

NEEDS PLAN The following types of major freight and intermodal project needs were identified through various planning efforts of the North TPO, JAXPORT, FDOT, Ocean Highway and Port Authority (Port of Fernandina) and the Jacksonville Aviation Authority.

RAIL With the increase in demand that is anticipated to occur for freight rail and intermodal movements, the operational capacity on the existing rail infrastructure is anticipated to reach or exceed capacity within the region.

PORT

The Strategic Intermodal System Needs Plan and the 2040 Path Forward Adopted Needs Plan considered the track improvements provided by FDOT through coordination with the railroads. However, the focus of the railroad operations analysis usually does not exceed five to ten years. Currently 20 trains per day operate on the FEC line, 14 trains per day operate on CSX’s SͲline main. Six trains per day operate on Norfolk Southern main line.

Mile Point Navigation Improvements Jacksonville Harbor Deepening Rail capacity projects for CSX, Norfolk Southern and FEC Intermodal Yard Improvements and access for CSX, Norfolk Southern and FEC North Area/Jacksonville Rail Corridor Port access improvements at the Port of Fernandina

4Ͳ53

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Currently the FEC’s and Norfolk Southern’s regional intermodal facilities are operating near practical capacity. About 1 million intermodal container twentyͲfoot equivalency units or (TEUs) are being shipped in North Florida today. This market is anticipated to grow to 2.8 to 4.3 million TEUs by the year 2040. Additional intermodal facility capacity is needed to meet this demand. One potential solution to meet this need is developing a publicͲprivate partnership for a jointͲuse intermodal facility.

With the addition of intercity passenger service proposed by Amtrak and commuter rail by the Jacksonville Transportation Authority, the available operational capacity will be further impacted. Looking to the year 2040, additional track including triple tracking CSX SͲline, FEC and Norfolk Southern north of their intermodal facility may be needed. Based on knowledge of the current rail system, the following locations are system bottlenecks and are the region’s highest priorities.

The planned operation of commuter rail and potentially intercity passenger rail service by Amtrak or a private operator will place increased demand on the rail operational capacity within the region. Several system bottlenecks are likely to restrict the ability to meet the rail service demand. These include the Springfield Switch, FEC Rail Crossing of the St. Johns River and the Crawford Diamond crossing of CSX and Norfolk Southern. Additional rail operational modeling is needed for the region to identify other bottlenecks and recommend specific solutions to address these needs. Figure 4Ͳ28 shows these bottlenecks. Figures 4Ͳ29 thru 4Ͳ35 show the freight needs and Table 4Ͳ11 summarize the freight needs.

Springfield Switch – this location is currently a bottleneck for the interchange of traffic between the CSX and Norfolk Southern and for trains to travel north to the JAXPORT connections along Eastport. North Rail Corridor – This new rail connector will reduce some the congestion by allowing CSX trains destined for the Intermodal Container Transfer Facility to avoid the Springfield switch downtown. A phase 2 of the corridor is needed to connect to Norfolk Southern and shared operational rights to fully leverage the capacity of the new connector. A new roadway is also recommended for inclusion in this corridor between US 17 Main Street and SR 23 New Kings Road. FEC Railroad Bridge over the St. Johns River Ͳ This bridge is a system bottleneck and will limit the capacity for trains to move through the region and access the intermodal and port facilities. Crawford Diamond Ͳ With the opening of the Winter Haven Intermodal Facility and the beginning of SunRail operations in Central Florida, CSX is shifting more a significant portion of its freight traffic daily from the AͲline, which runs along US 17 to the SͲline, running along US 301. This rail traffic crosses the Crawford Diamond at Norfolk Southern. The Crawford Diamond also presents an operational challenge, considering the increased traffic and the need for CSX to clear the crossing for Norfolk Southern to traverse the crossing. In the future operational improvements (or eliminating the need for some of Norfolk Southern trains to cross the diamond) are needed. The need for additional rail intermodal facility capacity beyond the Intermodal Container Transfer Facility at Dames Point in needed to meet intermodal demand needs in the future.

PRIORITIZATION No quantitative prioritization of the freight projects was conducted as part of the plan since the anticipated revenues for these projects are allocated on a statewide basis and the prioritization will be performed by FDOT Central Office each year.

4Ͳ54

" )

108

2247 2245

" ) " ) X Ă&#x192;

127

ÂŽn q Â˘

2213 2212 2209 2211 2205

North Rail Corridor

" ) 122

A1A

2210

X Ă&#x192;

2202

2240

2258

X Â¨ Ă&#x192;Â§ ÂŚ X Ă&#x192;

2214

" )

Â§ Â¨ ÂŚ

" )

2257

0 224

2227

l ÂĽ Â˘

ÂŹ ÂŤ ÂŹ ÂŤ 105

2216 2225 2222 2234 2226 2220 2217 2229 2236 2237 2221 2232 2230 2231 2224 2219 2235 2215 2223 2228 2233 2218

116

125

ÂŹ ÂŤ

" )

221

124

ÂŁ Â¤ 90

2242

2254

2238

X Ă&#x192;

2208

ÂŹ ÂŤ 10

ÂŁ Â¤ ÂŹ ÂŤ 90

2206

ÂŹ ÂŤ 228

ÂŁ Â¤

130

X Ă&#x192;

2204

See inset

228

" )

250A

Â§ Â¨ ÂŚ

X Ă&#x192;

" )

2254

" )

Westlake Cecil Commerce Connector

301

X Ă&#x192;

ÂŹ ÂŤ ÂŹ ÂŤ 134

2207

202

2259

2200

X Ă&#x192; X Ă&#x192;

2201

Legend

X Ă&#x192;X Ă&#x192;

Â§ Â¨ ÂŚ 295

2260

ÂŁ Â¤ 1

Airport

1 5 22

Putnam Barge Port Projects

l Â¤ ÂĽ l ÂĽ Â¤ l ÂĽ Â˘

Â§ Â¨ ÂŚ

3 22

ÂŹ ÂŤ

FEC Rail Projects

4 22

Passenger Rail Station

X Ă&#x192; X Ă&#x192; X Ă&#x192;

220

218

ÂŹ ÂŤ

A1A

ÂŹ ÂŤ

" )

Amtrak Station

CSX Rail Projects

ÂŹ ÂŤ

ÂŽ nq Â¤

Norfolk Rail Projects

JaxPort Projects

ÂŁ Â¤

" )

Commuter Rail Corridors

Â¤ n

" ) ) " ) " " )

209

13A

ÂŹ ÂŤ

ÂŤ Â§ Â¨ ÂŚÂŹ ÂŹ ÂŤ

207

" )

214

FEC Rail Corridors

ÂŹ ÂŤ

A1A

214

315

Aviation Projects

ÂŹ ÂŤ

208

" )

315

ÂŁ Â¤ 1

4 225

" )

Port of Fernandina Projects

Â˘ n

ÂŹ ÂŤ

A1A

295

119

ÂŽ q Â¤ n Â¤ n

ÂŹ ÂŤ

2243

301

250

ÂŹ ÂŤ

A1A

ÂŁ Â¤

" )

ÂŹ ÂŤ

A1A

2240

" )

2244

ÂŁ Â¤

108

ÂŹ ÂŤ

107

2203

X Ă&#x192;

105

2244

Â§ Â¨ ÂŚ

ÂŁ Â¤ 2

lÂŹ ÂĽ Â¤ ÂŤ " ) 2246

2255

115

" )

A1A

305

Intercity Passenger Rail Corridor

ÂŁ Â¤

ÂŹ ÂŤ

315

Railroad System

2249

100

" )

Transportation Intermodal Center

2248

ÂŹ ÂŤ 20

ÂŹ ÂŤ 206

ÂŹ ÂŤ

6 225

CSX Rail Corridors

l Â¤ ÂĽ

ÂŽ q Â˘ X n Ă&#x192;

" )

2250

204

Roadway System Water Bodies

" )

Conservation Lands

" ) 310

Six Counties Boundaries Downtown Jacksonville

" ) " ) " )

2255

320

38 2254 22335

5 22

2355

Â§ Â¨ ÂŚ

" )

" ) 308

301

ÂŤ ÂŁ Â¤ÂŹ ÂŤ" " ) " ) ) ÂŹ " ÂŹ ) ÂŤ " ) ÂŹ ÂŤ" ) ÂŹ ÂŤ 200

441

225

4 22

200A

25A

500

309

" )

5 22

ÂŁ Â¤ ÂŹ ÂŤ

318

316

335

ÂŹ ÂŤ

" ) ÂŁ Â¤

32208 29

" )

2254

2239

" )

200A

225A

5 22

326

200

326 326

326

)LJXUH Freight 1HHGV Projects Date: 10/6/2014

4-5

ÂŻ

10,560 Feet

4.5

9 Miles

Legend X Ã

CSX Rail Projects Commuter Rail Corridors FEC Rail Corridors CSX Rail Corridors Intercity Passenger Rail Corridor Railroad System Roadway System Water Bodies Conservation Lands Six Counties Boundaries

" ) ¬ « 2

" )

127

" ) 121

" ) 122

" )

125

119

" ) 127

" ) " )

" )

23D

250

23C

¬ « 121

" )

" ) XÃ£ ¤

229

121

" )

2238

139B

124

228

123

" ) 250A

2254

" ) 23A

§ ¦ ¨

" )

¬ «

" )

301

§ ¦ ¨

AMTK 2254

£ ¤

2242

£ ¤

" )

301

228

125

" ) 130

" ) " ¬ « ) ) " £ ¤ " ) " ) 228

" )

228

229

217

" )

301

231

217

218

)LJXUH Baker County Freight 1HHGV Projects Date: 10/6/2014

4-5

10,560 Feet

1.5

3 Miles

2207

4 22

X Ã

5 22 6 5 22 2

X Ã

" )

295

1179

£ ¤ " ) 301

§ ¦ ¨

2200

¬ «

217

X Ã

224

2201

" ) 209

" )

" ) " )

" )

1189

220A

13B

220

" ) 15A

" )

220

" )

5 22

218

739

" ) 739B

" ) 209

¬ « 13

3 22 9

" ) ¬ «

¬ «

215

" ) 315

¬ «

" )

¬ «

16A

£ ¤ 17

¬ « 230

" ) 226

" ) 315

" ) 209

" )

Legend ® Airport q ¤ Amtrak Station n ¤ Passenger Rail Station n

315

" ) 352

¬ « 21

" ) 214

X Ã X Ã

" ) 214

FEC Rail Projects

" )

CSX Rail Projects 209 Commuter Rail Corridors FEC Rail Corridors

" )

CSX Rail Corridors

315

Intercity Passenger Rail Corridor Railroad System

¬ « ¬ « 21

" ) 309D

" )

Roadway System 209 Water Bodies Conservation Lands Six Counties Boundaries

)LJXUH Clay County Freight 1HHGV Projects Date: 10/6/2014

4-5

10,560 Feet

1.5

3 Miles

ÂŁ Â¤Â§ ÂŚ Â¨

Westlake Cecil Commerce Connector

2206

228

ÂŹ ÂŤ 23

ÂŹ ÂŤ

ÂŹ ÂŤ 134

2238

X Ă&#x192;

ÂŹ ÂŤ

X Ă&#x192; 1

X Ă&#x192;

2240

X Ă&#x192;

2207

X Ă&#x192; X Ă&#x192;

2260

2259

295

Â§ ÂŚ Â¨

ÂŁ Â¤

ÂŹ ÂŤ 152

2222 2234 2226 2220 2217 2229 2236 2237 2221 2232 2230 2231 2224 2219 2235 2215 2223 2228 2233 2218 2225

2216

2227

l ÂĽ Â˘

4 22

Â§ ÂŚ Â¨

ÂŹ ÂŤ

4 22

2 1 1

4-5

202

ÂŹ ÂŤ

ÂŁ Â¤

ÂŹ ÂŤ 116

)LJXUH Duval County Freight 1HHGV Projects

ÂŹ ÂŤ

2202

4 22

295

2208

Â§ ÂŚ Â¨

See Inset

X Ă&#x192;

2355

0 224

5 22

2201

Â§ ÂŚ Â¨

2255

ÂŁ Â¤ X Ă&#x192;

5 22

2200

ÂŁ Â¤

104

ÂŹ ÂŤ

1006

ÂŹ ÂŤX Ă&#x192; ÂŁ Â¤ 224

ÂŹ ÂŤ 128

Â¤ XÂŁ Ă&#x192;

2257

2214

115

ÂŹ ÂŤ

A1A

ÂŹ ÂŤ

A1A

ÂŹ ÂŤ

A1A

ÂŻ

ÂŹ ÂŤ

A1A

10,560 Feet

2254

3 22

2254 2355

X Ă&#x192;

2208

ÂŽ q

Â˘ n

l Â¤ ÂĽ l ÂĽ Â˘

X Ă&#x192; X Ă&#x192; X Ă&#x192;

ÂŽ q Â¤ n Â¤ n

6 Miles

Six Counties Boundaries

Conservation Lands

Water Bodies

Roadway System

Railroad System

Airport

Intercity Passenger Rail Corridor

CSX Rail Corridors

FEC Rail Corridors

Commuter Rail Corridors

Aviation Projects

JaxPort Projects

Port of Fernandina Projects

Norfolk Rail Projects

CSX Rail Projects

FEC Rail Projects

Passenger Rail Station

Amtrak Station

Airport

Legend

Downtown Jacksonville

2238

Date: 10/6/2014

ÂŁ Â¤

301

2242

2254

2204

2258

North Rail Corridor

2205 2212 2209 2211 2213

ÂŽ q Â˘ n

2210

1005

ÂŹ ÂŤ

A1A

2254

X Ă&#x192;

301

2243

2240

2255

ÂŁ Â¤

X Ă&#x192;

ÂŁ Â¤

5 22

2254

5 22 1

2239

4 22

125

" )

23C

" ) " )

23D

228

¬ «

119

) " )" 121

X Ã

2242

£ ¤ 2206

301

£ ¤

X Ã 2254

2204

2214

228

¬ «

295

§ ¦X ¨ Ã

X Ã

2238

2258

North Rail Corridor

¬ « 15

211

5 22

¬ « £ ¤¬ « 15

2257

115

¬ «

2212 2209 2211

X Ã

0 224

2208

104

2213

¬ «

2205

®n q ¢

2210

§ ¦ ¨ 95

2202

£ ¤ ¬ « 13

X Ã

£ ¤ 17

109

¬ «

X Ã

4-5

)LJXUH Nassau County Freight 1HHGV Projects

§ ¦ ¨

2243

¬ «

X Ã

£ ¤

2254

" )

108

" )

115

" )

301

£ ¤

2240

108

2240

" )

5 22

Date: 10/6/2014

127

" )

¬ « 2

115

" ) 2255

4 22

2203

2225 2218 2222 2234 2226 2220 2217 2229 2236 2237 2221 2232 2230 2231 2224 2219 2235 2215 2223 2228 2233

2216

2227

l ¥ ¢

¬ «

200A

" )

¬ « 10

107

" )

107

" )

¬ « 116

2247 2245

105A

" )

A1A

10,560 Feet

¬ «

A1A

¬ «

A1A

« ¤¬ ¬ « £ 212

105

¬ « ¬ « ¬ «

A1A

105

¬ « ¬ «

108

" )

A1A

105

« ¬ « ¬

2246

2244

l ¥ ¤

2244

¢ n

l ¤ ¥ l ¥ ¢

X Ã X Ã X Ã

® q ¤ n ¤ n

3.5

7 Miles

Six Counties Boundaries

Conservation Lands

Water Bodies

Roadway System

Railroad System

Intercity Passenger Rail Corridor

CSX Rail Corridors

FEC Rail Corridors

Commuter Rail Corridors

Aviation Projects

JaxPort Projects

Port of Fernandina Projects

Norfolk Rail Projects

CSX Rail Projects

FEC Rail Projects

Passenger Rail Station

Amtrak Station

Airport

Legend

" )

3 22

315

16A

" )

225

" )

" ) 15A

" ) 226

" ) 315

4 225

" )

13A

" ) 209

" ) 315

¬ « 21

" ) 352

" ) 13A

" ) 315C

" ) 214

" )

214

¬ «

309D

" )

¬ «

219

100

¬ « 26

¬ « 21

" )

2249

207A

l ¤ " ) ¥ 216

2248

" ) 309C

®n q ¢

" )

2250

¬ « 100

¬ «

¬ « 20

310

" )

X Ã

315

£ ¤ 17

" ) 20A

¬ «

" )

309B

¬ « 19

" ) 21

" ) 310

" ) 308B

" ) 309

Legend ® q ¢ n

Airport

l ¤ ¥

Putnam Barge Port Projects

X Ã

" ) 308

Aviation Projects

CSX Rail Projects

" ) 309

Commuter Rail Corridors FEC Rail Corridors CSX Rail Corridors Intercity Passenger Rail Corridor Railroad System Roadway System Water Bodies Conservation Lands

" )

Six Counties Boundaries

" ) 314

)LJXUH Putnam County Freight 1HHGV Projects Date: 10/6/2014

10,560 Feet

4 Miles

L Capacity Upgrade

¬ « 202

X Ã X Ã

¬ «

115

§ ¦ ¨

2239

295

L L

« " ) ¬ A1A

X Ã

210A

Grade Separation

2241

X Ã

§ ¦ ¨ 295

Grade Separation

2252

St. Augustine Inset

L L

" ) 13B

" ) 210

4 22 1

¬ « 13

L 5 22 2

¬ «

" ) 13A

® q

¤ n

£ ¤ 1

" ) 13

¬ «

4 225

¬ «

¤ n

" ) 208

A1A

See Inset

L L

§ ¦ ¨ 95

" ) 13A

¬ « 312

" ) 214

Legend

13A

Amtrak Station

£ ¤

¬ «

207

A1A

" )

Passenger Rail Station 209

£ ¤ CSX Rail Projects ¬ « Norfolk Rail Projects

" )

L L

FEC Rail Projects

305

¬ «

6 225

X Ã X Ã X Ã

" )

Airport

206

® q ¤ n ¤ n

Commuter Rail Corridors

" ) 209

FEC Rail Corridors L

" )

CSX Rail Corridors

207A

Intercity Passenger Rail Corridor L

" ) 13

Railroad System

¬ « Roadway ® System q ) ¬ «" Water Bodies Ã " )X 19

" )

Grade Separation

2016

204

¬ «

100 1447

100

Conservation Lands 310

" )

Six Counties Boundaries L

)LJXUH St. John's County Freight 1HHGV Projects Date: 10/6/2014

4-6

10,560 Feet

1.5

3 Miles

Construct Taxiway Terminal Development New 2 Lane Bridge Internal Rail Docks Intermodal Transfer Improvement Docks Intermodal Transfer Improvement Intermodal Transfer Improvement Docks Intermodal Transfer Improvement Internal Rail

Design & Construct ByͲPass Taxiways Intermodal Terminal Facility Development Spoil Island Connector Bridge Blount Island / Dames Point Marine Terminals Rail Blount Island Marine Terminal Berth Upgrades Blount Island Marine Terminal Facility Upgrades Dames Point Marine Terminal Berth Upgrades Dames Point Marine Terminal Facility Upgrades

2218 2219

2220

2221 2222

2223

Duval Duval

Duval

Duval Duval

Duval

Expand Apron

Air Cargo Surface Storage

JAXPORT

JAXPORT JAXPORT

JAXPORT

4Ͳ62

Talleyrand Marine Terminal Rail

New Cranes for Talleyrand and Blount Island Marine Terminals Talleyrand Marine Terminal Berth Upgrades Talleyrand Marine Terminal Facility Upgrades

Expand Apron

Air Cargo Ramp Improvements

JAXPORT JAXPORT

Improvement Type Grade Separation Grade Separation Transportation Center Grade Separation Capacity Upgrade Multi Modal Corridor Multi Modal Corridor Grade Separation Multi Modal Corridor Capacity Upgrade Bridge Grade Separation Grade Separation Construct Runway

Location at Wells Road at SR 224 Kingsley Avenue Downtown Facility at SR 104 Busch Drive Beaver Street Interlocking North Rail Corridors Phase 1 Westlake Cecil Commerce Connector at US 301 SR 200 / Baldwin North Rail Corridors Phase 2 at Bowden Intermodal at Jacksonville Bridge at Sunbeam Road at Shad Road Construction of Runway 7R/25L

Table 4Ͳ11. Freight and Intermodal Needs County Map Id Agency Clay 2200 CSX Transportation Clay 2201 CSX Transportation Duval 2355 Amtrak Duval 2202 CSX Transportation Duval 2204 CSX Transportation Duval 2205 CSX Transportation Duval 2206 CSX Transportation Duval 2242 CSX Transportation Duval 2258 CSX Transportation Duval 2207 FEC Railway Duval 2208 FEC Railway Duval 2259 FEC Railway Duval 2260 FEC Railway Duval 2209 Jacksonville International Airport Duval 2210 Jacksonville International Airport Duval 2211 Jacksonville International Airport Duval 2212 Jacksonville International Airport Duval 2213 Jacksonville International Airport Duval 1006 JAXPORT Duval 2215 JAXPORT Duval 2216 JAXPORT Duval 2217 JAXPORT

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

2226

2227

2228 2229 2230

2231 2232

2233 2234

2235 2236

2237 2214 2257 2238

2239

2240

Duval

Duval Duval Duval

Duval Duval

Duval Duval Duval Duval/Baker

Duval/Clay

Duval/Nassau

CSX Transportation CSX Transportation Port of Fernandina Port of Fernandina Port of Fernandina

Nassau Nassau Nassau Nassau Nassau

2203 2243 2244 2245 2246

FEC Railway

Duval/St. Johns 2241

CSX Transportation

JAXPORT Norfolk Southern Norfolk Southern CSX Transportation

JAXPORT JAXPORT

JAXPORT JAXPORT JAXPORT

JAXPORT

4Ͳ63

at SR A1A SR 200 / Yulee at US 301 / Crawford Diamond Berth Improvements Cruise / Cargo Berth Rail Track Improvements

St. Augustine to Jacksonville

Jacksonville to Yulee

Green Cove Springs to Jacksonville

Talleyrand Marine Terminal Rail at Norfolk Southern Railway (Near Simpson Yard) Soutel Drive to Norfolk Southern Intermodal Yard MacClenny to Jacksonville

Harbor Deepening New Cranes for Talleyrand and Blount Island Marine Terminals Talleyrand Marine Terminal Berth Upgrades Talleyrand Marine Terminal Facility Upgrades

Dames Point Marine Terminal Berth Upgrades Dames Point Marine Terminal Facility Upgrades

Blount Island / Dames Point Terminals Ͳ Rail and Bridge Blount Island Marine Terminal Berth Upgrades Blount Island Marine Terminal Facility Upgrades

New Cranes for Talleyrand and Blount Island Marine Terminals Talleyrand Marine Terminal Facility Upgrades

Dames Point Marine Terminal Facility Upgrades

2225

Duval

JAXPORT

Location Blount Island Marine Terminal Facility Upgrades

Table 4Ͳ11. Freight and Intermodal Needs County Map Id Agency Duval 2224 JAXPORT

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Improvement Type Intermodal Transfer Improvement Intermodal Transfer Improvement Intermodal Transfer Improvement Intermodal Transfer Improvement Internal Rail Docks Intermodal Transfer Improvement Docks Intermodal Transfer Improvement Dredging Harbor Intermodal Transfer Improvement Docks Intermodal Transfer Improvement Internal Rail Grade Separation New Connector Upgrade to Accommodate Freight and Passenger Service Upgrade to Accommodate Freight and Passenger Service Upgrade to Accommodate Freight and Passenger Service Upgrade to Accommodate Freight and Passenger Service Grade Separation Grade Separation Docks Docks Internal Rail

2252 2253 2254 2255 2256

Statewide Statewide Statewide Statewide Statewide

FEC Railway FEC Railway Intercity Passenger Rail Intercity Passenger Rail Intercity Passenger Rail

4Í˛64

Amtrak Service Miami to Jacksonville Miami to Jacksonville Upgrade Bolt and Clip System New Orleans to Jacksonville Jacksonville to Savannah Orlando to Jacksonville

at SR 15 Reid Street To be determined Historic Commercial Areas

2250 2251

Putnam Regional St. Johns

CSX Transportation Intermodal Logistics Center City of Saint Augustine

Location at Fernandina Port SR 100 CR 309D Barge Port

Table 4Í˛11. Freight and Intermodal Needs County Map Id Agency Nassau 2247 Port of Fernandina Putnam 2248 City of Palatka Putnam 2249 County

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Improvement Type Access Improvements Runway expansion Operational and Capital Improvements Grade Separation Intermodal Logistics Center Mobility & Distribution Improvements New Passenger Service Track Upgrade New Passenger Service New Passenger Service New Passenger Service

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

COST FEASIBLE PLAN A failure to invest in meeting these future freight needs within our region could result in the railroads making investments outside of our region to meet this demand. Moving or shifting major intermodal facilities could result in reducing our economic competitiveness as a region and JAXPORT’s competitiveness for growth since access to rail and other support infrastructure are key components to the success of any port.

Funding for the freight and intermodal projects is anticipated to occur from the statewide Strategic Intermodal System Multimodal Program. The revenues estimated to be available were based on the proportionate share based on population of the four county region. The Strategic Intermodal System Multimodal Program projects are selected on a statewide basis and there is no commitment from the FDOT at this time to fund the projects.

One potential publicͲprivate partnership that may be used to meet these needs include development of a jointͲuse regional intermodal facility. This concept could result in the following benefits to the region.

Investing in projects that result in regional economic development and leverage our position as America’s Logistic Center.

Creating greater balance of jobs and employment throughout the region through strategic investments in infrastructure. Relieving congestion and enhancing mobility through a systems approach to transportation investment and supporting future transit options such as commuter rail. Increasing safety by reducing truck traffic within the urbanized area. Providing direct access between one or two Class I railroads (CSX and Norfolk Southern), the FEC railroad. Expediting service to JAXPORT and offͲdock container storage that can improve the operational efficiencies and practical sustained capacity at our existing port facilities without requiring additional port construction. Capturing the projected increase in freight transport on the east coast of the U.S. Increasing employment in the region. Freeing up current freight rail corridors for passenger rail service. Consolidating distribution warehouses and freight transportation in one geographical area. Improving FEC access to inland U.S. Improving FEC, CSX and Norfolk Southern freight transfer capabilities. Increasing JAXPORT freight handling capacities.

Figures 4Ͳ34 thru 4Ͳ38 show and Table 4Ͳ11 summarize the priority projects anticipated to be funded.

4Ͳ65

" )

108

115

2247

l¬ ¤ ¥ « " ) 105

§ ¨ ¦

£ ¤

" ) " ) X Ã

127

2243

£ ¤ 301

2205

North Rail Corridor

" ) 122

X ¨ Ã§ ¦

2214

" ) ¬ «

" )

221

124

£ ¤ 90

§ ¨ ¦ 10

X Ã

2242

2233

l ¥ ¢

228

" )

X Ã

¬ « ¬ « 105

2208

116

¬ «

2355

£ ¤ ¬ « 90

See inset

" )

¬ « 228

£ ¤

130

2204

301

X Ã

¬ « ¬ « 134

2207

202

2259

2200 2201

X ÃX Ã

§ ¨ ¦ 295

2260

4 22 1

X Ã X Ã

Legend

£ ¤ 1

® Airport q ¤ Amtrak Station n ¤ Passenger Rail Station n

" ) 220

" ) 218

¬ «

§ ¨ ¦ 95

¬ «

A1A

¬ « 13

3 22

X Ã X Ã X Ã

¬ «

A1A

295

2240

125

250A

§ ¨ ¦

1006

" )

2202

295

119

250

A1A

X Ã

2258

" )

¬ «

1005

® q 2240

" )

A1A

2240

¬ «

A1A

£ ¤

108

107

2203

X Ã

CSX Transportation Florida East Coast Railway

¬ «

® nq ¤

Norfolk Southern

l ¤ ¥ l ¥ ¢

£ ¤ 1

" )

Port of Fernandina

208

209

Port of Jacksonville

£ ¤

" )

Spoil Island Bridge

¬ « " ) " " ) ) " )

" )

315

13A

CSX Commuter Rail North

¬ «

« § ¨ ¦¬ ¬ «

207

" )

214

FEC Commuter Rail Southeast

¬ «

A1A

214

315

CSX Commuter Rail Southwest

¤ n

" )

A1A

305

£ ¤

Railroad System

¬ « 100

" ) 315

Roadway System

¬ « 206

Transportation Intermodal Center 26 ¬ «

" )

® q

204

¬ « 20

Water Bodies Conservation Lands

" )

Six Counties Boundaries

" ) 310

Downtown Jacksonville 2240

" ) 320

2355

" ) " )

335223

X Ã

" )

§ ¨ ¦

" )

" ) 308

« £ ¤¬ «" " ) " ) ) ¬ ¬ ) « " ) " 200

441

4 22

500

309

301

" )

318

316

£ ¤ ¬ «

" ) £ ¤

329

335

¬ «

200A

220875

225

200A

25A

225A

200

)LJXUH Cost Feasible Plan Freight Projects Date: 10/8/2014

4-6

10,560 Feet

4.5

9 Miles

2207

4 22

X Ã

X X Ã

295

" ) 1179

£ ¤ " ) 301

§ ¦ ¨

2200

¬ «

217

224

X Ã

2201

" ) 209

" )

" ) " )

" )

1189

220A

13B

220

" ) 15A

" )

220

" )

3 22

218

739

" ) 739B

" ) 209

¬ « 13

" ) ¬ « 215

" ) 315

¬ « 15

¬ «

" )

¬ «

16A

£ ¤ 17

¬ « 230

" ) 226

" ) 315

" ) 209

Legend ® Airport q ¤ Amtrak Station n ¤ Passenger Rail Station n

" ) 315

X Ã X Ã X Ã

" ) 352

¬ « 21

" ) 214

" )

l ¤ ¥ l ¥ ¢

214

" )

CSX Transportation Florida East Coast Railway Norfolk Southern

" )

Port of Fernandina 209 Port of Jacksonville CSX Commuter Rail North CSX Commuter Rail Southwest

315

FEC Commuter Rail Southeast

¬ « ¬ «

Railroad System

" ) 309D

" )

Roadway System 209 Water Bodies Conservation Lands Six Counties Boundaries

)LJXUH Clay County &)3 Freight Projects Date: 8/28/2014

4-6

10,560 Feet

1.5

3 Miles

228

ÂŹ ÂŤ 23

ÂŹ ÂŤ

134

ÂŹ ÂŤ

X Ă&#x192;

2214

X Ă&#x192; 17

295

Â§ ÂŚ Â¨

ÂŹ ÂŤ 13

2202

X Ă&#x192;

2207

295

2260

2259

X Ă&#x192; X Ă&#x192;

Â§ ÂŚ Â¨

2233

Â§ ÂŚ Â¨ 95

ÂŁ Â¤ 1

ÂŹ ÂŤ 152

l ÂĽ Â˘

ÂŹ ÂŤ

4-6

ÂŹ ÂŤ

A1A

202

ÂŹ ÂŤ

ÂŁ Â¤

ÂŹ ÂŤ 116

)LJXUH 'Xval County &)3 Freight Projects

2201

X Ă&#x192;

2240

ÂŁ Â¤

X Ă&#x192;

2208

2240

Â§ ÂŚ Â¨ 95

2355

See inset

2200

ÂŁ Â¤

ÂŹ ÂŤX Ă&#x192;ÂŁ Â¤ 224

128

ÂŹ ÂŤ

ÂŁ Â¤ 1

104

ÂŹ ÂŤ

115

ÂŹ ÂŤ

4 22

Date: 10/8/2014

X Ă&#x192;

2204

2258

North Rail Corridor

2205

ÂŽ q

1006

200

ÂŁ Â¤Â§ ÂŚ Â¨

2243

ÂŹ ÂŤ

A1A

ÂŹ ÂŤ

A1A

ÂŹ ÂŤ

A1A

ÂŹ ÂŤ

A1A

ÂŻ

10,560 Feet

2355

X Ă&#x192;

2208

l Â¤ ÂĽ l ÂĽ Â˘

X Ă&#x192; X Ă&#x192; X Ă&#x192;

ÂŽ q Â¤ n Â¤ n

6 Miles

Six Counties Boundaries

Conservation Lands

Water Bodies

Roadway System

Railroad System

Spoil Island Bridge

Transportation Intermodal Center

FEC Commuter Rail Southeast

CSX Commuter Rail Southwest

CSX Commuter Rail North

Port of Jacksonville

Port of Fernandina

Norfolk Southern

Florida East Coast Railway

CSX Transportation

Passenger Rail Station

Amtrak Station

Airport

Legend

Downtown Jacksonville

3 22

2240

ÂŹ ÂŤ

301

ÂŁ Â¤

X Ă&#x192;

2242

301

ÂŁ Â¤

X Ă&#x192;

ÂŁ Â¤

2239

4 22

2240

125

" )

23C

" ) " )

23D

228

ÂŹ ÂŤ

119

) " )" 121

" )

X Ă&#x192;

2242

ÂŁ Â¤

108

" )

2206

301

ÂŁ Â¤

115

" )

301

ÂŁ Â¤

ÂŹ ÂŤ

X Ă&#x192;

ÂŁ Â¤

2204

2258

228

ÂŹ ÂŤ

295

Â§ ÂŚ Â¨

X Ă&#x192;

2214

North Rail Corridor

X Ă&#x192;

ÂŹ ÂŤ

211

ÂŹ ÂŤ ÂŁÂŹ Â¤ ÂŤ

115

ÂŹ ÂŤ 104

ÂŹ ÂŤ

2205

ÂŽ q

X Ă&#x192;

2202

ÂŁ Â¤ ÂŹ ÂŤ 1

2208

2240

X Ă&#x192;

Â§ ÂŚ Â¨

ÂŁ Â¤ 17

4-6

)LJX UH Nassau County &)3 Freight Projects

Â§ ÂŚ Â¨

2243

ÂŁ Â¤

108

2240

" )

Date: 10/8/2014

127

" )

ÂŹ ÂŤ

115

" )

2240

4 22

109

ÂŹ ÂŤ

X Ă&#x192;

2203

2233

l ÂĽ Â˘

ÂŹ ÂŤ

200A

" )

ÂŻ

ÂŹ ÂŤ 10

107

" )

107

" )

ÂŹ ÂŤ 116

2247

105A

" )

A1A

10,560 Feet

ÂŹ ÂŤ

A1A

ÂŹ ÂŤ

A1A

ÂŤ Â¤ÂŹ ÂŹ ÂŤ ÂŁ 212

105

ÂŹ ÂŤ ÂŹ ÂŤ ÂŹ ÂŤ

A1A

105

ÂŹ ÂŤ ÂŹ ÂŤ

108

" )

A1A

105

ÂŤ ÂŹ ÂŤ ÂŹ

l ÂĽ Â¤

l Â¤ ÂĽ l ÂĽ Â˘

X Ă&#x192; X Ă&#x192; X Ă&#x192;

ÂŽ q Â¤ n Â¤ n

3.5

7 Miles

Six Counties Boundaries

Conservation Lands

Water Bodies

Roadway System

Railroad System

FEC Commuter Rail Southeast

CSX Commuter Rail Southwest

CSX Commuter Rail North

Port of Jacksonville

Port of Fernandina

Norfolk Southern

Florida East Coast Railway

CSX Transportation

Passenger Rail Station

Amtrak Station

Airport

Legend

X Ã

2207

¬ « 202

2241

¬ « 115

2239

295

X Ã X Ã

2200

X Ã

2201

§ ¦ ¨

2259

« " ) ¬ A1A

210A

§ ¦ ¨ 295

St. Augustine Inset

" ) 13B

" ) 210

¬ « 13

4 22 1

¬ «

" ) 13A

® q

¤ n

£ ¤ 1

" ) 13

¬ « 16

¬ «

¤ n

" ) 208

A1A

§ ¦ ¨ 95

" ) 13A

¬ « 312

" ) 214

Legend ® q ¤ n ¤ n

X Ã X Ã X Ã

l ¤ ¥ l ¥ ¢

Airport

" ) 13A

Amtrak Station Passenger Rail Station

£ ¤

¬ «

207

A1A

" )

CSX Transportation 209

Florida East Coast Railway

£ ¤ Norfolk Southern ¬ « Port of Fernandina

" )

305

¬ « 206

Port of Jacksonville

" ) 209

CSX Commuter Rail North

" )

CSX Commuter Rail Southwest207A FEC Commuter Rail Southeast

" ) 13

Railroad System

¬ « Roadway ® System q ) ¬ «" 19

" )

100 1447

" )

Water Bodies

2016

204

¬ « 100

Conservation Lands 310

" )

Six Counties Boundaries

)LJXUH St. Johns County &)3 Freight Projects Date: 8/28/2014

10,560 Feet

1.5

3 Miles

Improvement Type Capacity Upgrade Multi Modal Corridor Roadway Grade Separation

County Duval Duval Clay Duval Nassau

Map ID From 2204 Beaver Street Interlocking 2205 North Rail Corridors Phase 1 2258 North Rail Corridors Phase 2 2200 at Wells Road 2201 at SR 224 Kingsley Avenue 2202 at SR 104 Busch Drive 2242 at US 301 (SR 200) / Baldwin 2203 at SR A1A (SR 200) / Yulee

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Phase PE ROW ENV CST Total PE ROW ENV CST Total PE ROW ENV CST Total PE ROW ENV CST Total PE ROW ENV CST Total PE ROW ENV CST Total PE ROW ENV CST Total PE ROW ENV CST Total

Fund Source SIS Multimodal SIS Multimodal SIS Multimodal SIS Multimodal SIS Multimodal SIS Multimodal SIS Multimodal SIS Multimodal SIS Multimodal SIS Multimodal SIS Multimodal SIS Multimodal SIS Multimodal SIS Multimodal SIS Multimodal SIS Multimodal SIS Multimodal SIS Multimodal SIS Multimodal SIS Multimodal SIS Multimodal SIS Multimodal SIS Multimodal SIS Multimodal SIS Multimodal SIS Multimodal SIS Multimodal SIS Multimodal SIS Multimodal SIS Multimodal SIS Multimodal SIS Multimodal

Years 2019Ͳ2020 $0.61 $0.61 $63.32 $64.53

Years 2021Ͳ2025 $15.05 $0.68 $0.68 $75.25 $91.65 $15.05 $0.68 $0.68 $75.25 $91.65 $14.13 $14.13

Years 2026Ͳ2030 $1.59 $0.80 $0.80 $7.95 $11.13 $28.55 $0.80 $0.80 $142.75 $172.89 $21.33 $0.80 $0.80 $106.66 $129.58

Years 2031Ͳ2040 $15.83 $1.02 $1.02 $79.17 $97.03 $1.62 $1.02 $1.02 $8.12 $11.77

22ͲYear Total $1.59 $0.80 $0.80 $7.95 $11.13 $15.83 $1.02 $1.02 $79.17 $97.03 $1.62 $1.02 $1.02 $8.12 $11.77 $15.05 $0.68 $0.68 $75.25 $91.65 $15.05 $0.68 $0.68 $75.25 $91.65 $28.55 $0.80 $0.80 $142.75 $172.89 $14.13 $0.61 $0.61 $63.32 $78.66 $21.33 $0.80 $0.80 $106.66 $129.58

73 These revenues represent an anticipated allocation of statewide funds. The funds are distributed on a statewide priority basis and are not “guaranteed” but represent an estimate of the proportionate share of funding for projects based on population within the region. 4Ͳ71

Facility CSX Transportation

Table 4Ͳ12. Freight and Intermodal Funded Projects

Facility Florida East Coast Railway Intermodal Logistics Center

County Duval/Clay Duval/Nassau Duval Duval Regional

Improvement Type Commuter Rail and Capacity Upgrade Capacity Upgrade Roadway Grade Separation Intermodal Logistics Center

Table 4Ͳ12. Freight and Intermodal Funded Projects

4Ͳ72

Map ID From 2243 at US 301 / Crawford Diamond 2239 Green Cove Springs to Jacksonville 2240 Jacksonville to Yulee 2207 at Bowden Intermodal 2208 at Jacksonville Bridge 2259 at Sunbeam Road 2260 at Shad Road

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Phase PE ROW ENV CST Total PE ROW ENV CST Total PE ROW ENV CST Total PE ROW ENV CST Total PE ROW ENV CST Total PE ROW ENV CST Total PE ROW ENV CST Total PE ROW ENV CST Total

Years 2019Ͳ2020 $7.60 $0.61 $0.61 $38.02 $46.83 $1.90 $0.61 $0.61 $9.48 $12.59

Years 2021Ͳ2025 $3.61 $0.68 $0.68 $18.04 $22.99

Years 2026Ͳ2030

Years 2031Ͳ2040 $118.96 $1.02 $1.02 $594.79 $715.78 $109.90 $1.02 $1.02 $549.50 $661.43 $21.04 $1.02 $1.02 $105.19 $128.26 $15.83 $1.02 $1.02 $79.17 $97.03 $24.77 $4.06 $4.06 $123.83 $156.72

22ͲYear Total $7.60 $0.61 $0.61 $38.02 $46.83 $118.96 $1.02 $1.02 $594.79 $715.78 $109.90 $1.02 $1.02 $549.50 $661.43 $3.61 $0.68 $0.68 $18.04 $22.99 $1.90 $0.61 $0.61 $9.48 $12.59 $21.04 $1.02 $1.02 $105.19 $128.26 $15.83 $1.02 $1.02 $79.17 $97.03 $24.77 $4.06 $4.06 $123.83 $156.72

Improvement Type New 2 Lane Bridge Harbor Dredging Roadway Grade Separation Access Improvements Commuter Rail

County Duval Regional Duval Nassau Duval/Clay

Map ID From 1006 Spoil Island Connector Bridge 223374 Harbor Deepening 2214 at Norfolk Southern Railway (Near Simpson Yard) 2247 at Fernandina Port 2358 Downtown Jacksonville to Green Cove Springs

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Phase PE ROW ENV CST Total CST Total PE ROW ENV CST Total PE ROW ENV CST Total CAP Total

Fund Source SIS Multimodal SIS Multimodal SIS Multimodal SIS Multimodal SIS Multimodal Federal Seaport Grant JAXPORT SIS Multimodal SIS Multimodal SIS Multimodal SIS Multimodal SIS Multimodal SIS Multimodal SIS Multimodal SIS Multimodal SIS Multimodal

Years 2019Ͳ2020 $186.50 $311.00 $186.50 $684.00 $3.33 $0.61 $0.61 $16.64 $21.18 $0.97 $0.61 $0.61 $4.84 $7.02 $836.15

Years 2021Ͳ2025 $220.42

Years 2026Ͳ2030 $313.60

Years 2031Ͳ2040 $32.16 $1.02 $1.02 $160.80 $194.99 $447.62 $447.62 $2,510.64

22ͲYear Total $32.16 $1.02 $1.02 $160.80 $194.99 $186.50 $311.00 $186.50 $684.00 $3.33 $0.61 $0.61 $16.64 $21.18 $0.97 $0.61 $0.61 $4.84 $7.02 $447.62 $447.62 $3,880.81

74 Authorization was approved in the 2014 Water Resources and Reform Development Act but is not obligated. In additional to $311.00 million shown, $186.50 million is anticipated to come from local sources and $186.50 million from the Strategic Intermodal System Multimodal programs. 4Ͳ73

Facility Jacksonville Port Authority Norfolk Southern Port of Fernandina Southwest (CSX) Grand Total

Table 4Ͳ12. Freight and Intermodal Funded Projects

This page is intentionally blank.

4Í˛74

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

PART

FIVE

Systems Management, Operations and Maintenance

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS TSM&O STRATEGIES INCREASE TRAVEL CHOICES AND EFFICIENCY OF ALL MODES WHILE REDUCING EMISSIONS AND RESOURCE USE . management, arterial traffic management, freight management, special event management, road weather management, congestion pricing, managed lanes, ridesharing and demand management programs, parking management, electronic toll collection and transit smart cards, and traveler information systems.

NEEDS This program continues a commitment of the North Florida TPO to invest in technologies for intelligent transportation systems and TSM&O strategies. The Regional ITS Plan adopted by the North Florida TPO is provided as Appendix I. Figures 5Ͳ1 thru 5Ͳ5 and Table 5Ͳ 1 summarize the TSM&O needs for the four county area. Because of the more rural nature of Baker and Putnam Counties, TSM&O needs were not identified. Figure 5Ͳ1 thru 5Ͳ5 also summarize the safety needs which are discussed later in this report.

COST FEASIBLE PLAN Our plan dedicates $34.21 million in revenue though the Transportation Management Area funding program for TSM&O projects. These revenues will be dedicated to individual projects on an annual basis when developing the Transportation Improvement Program.

TSM&O refers to multimodal transportation strategies to maximize the efficiency, safety and use of existing and planned transportation infrastructure. TSM&O strategies encompass many activities, such as traffic incident

The operations and maintenance costs for these projects are included in Appendix K.

5Ͳ1

" )

108

115

604

¬ «

" ) 127

¬ «

A1A

320

£ ¤

" ) " )

108

105

107

§ ¦ ¨

£ ¤

¬ « ¬ «

" )

¬ «

A1A

£ ¤ 301

A1A

295

§ ¦ ¨

" )

¬ «

§ ¦ ¨

326

122

305

314

" )

295

119

See inset

228

" )

8 31

313

" )

¬ «

220

¬ « ¬ « 134

207

228

£ ¤

130

603

236

301

200

229

315

602

225

652

223

662

116

650

652

659

317

208

611

655

¬ «

301

30 0

£ ¤ ¬ « 90

202

242

" ) 250A

§ ¦ ¨

301

651

310

235

205

£ ¤

609

213

240

" )

221

306

323

¬ «

124

654

663

307

325

125

660

610

" )

233

" )

¬ « ¬ « 105

224

250

712

234

230

607

§ ¦ ¨ 295

215 209

£ ¤ 1

6 60

608

20 3

217

" )

211

208

209

A1A 303

13A

210

214

31 6

315

321

¬ «

312

328

£ ¤

" )

¬ «

" ) " " ) ) " )

" )

315

Conservation Lands

£ ¤

216

330

Water Bodies

¬ «

« § ¦¬ ¨ ¬ «

207

" )

330

214

" ) 305

£ ¤

A1A

214

¬ « 206

¬ «

321

Downtown Jacksonville

309

¬ «

212

Roadway System

Six Counties Boundaries

§ ¦ ¨

329

2 20

¬ «

9 30

241

TSM&O

2 30

30 2

¬ «

A1A

30 2

¬ «

Safety Priority Corridors

" )

316

218

Safety Priority Intersections

¬ «

220

327

" )

201

5 60

204

Legend

308

¬ « 100

" ) 315

" )

325

326 323

660

204

307

¬ « 20

322 301

" )

" ) 310

661

0 31

651

320

" )

" ) " )

§ ¦ ¨

" ) £ ¤

" )

335

318 304

329

301

£ ¤ ¬ « 500

" ) 309

" ) 308

« £ ¤¬ «" " ) " ) ) ¬ " ¬ « )

" )

30 0

200

316

335

¬ «

200A

659

" )

441

225

200A

25A

225A

200

)LJXUH Safety and TSM&O Projects Date: 10/9/2014

5-2

10,560 Feet

8 Miles

220 206

239 218

226

238

313

205 237

240

236

200

317

234

5 31

602

225

230

242

311

233

603

207

229

600

23 5

318

232

607

215

301

" ) 1179

209

£ ¤ " )

¬ «

217

§ ¦ ¨ 295

221

224

" ) 209

6 60

220A

" ) " )

204

13B

220

327

201

608

" )

308

" )

1189

5 60

309

" )

" ) 15A

220

218

" ) 739

20 3

" ) 739B

231

" ) 209

¬ « 13

" ) ¬ «

30 2

¬ «

215

30 2

" )

2 20

241

315

" )

309

¬ «

16A

212

£ ¤ 17

¬ « 230

" ) 226

" ) 315

" ) 209

" ) 315

" ) 352

¬ « 21

" ) 214

" )

214

209

Legend Safety Priority Intersections

" ) 315

Safety Priority Corridors TSM&O

¬ « ¬ « 21

Roadway System

" )

2Water 09 Bodies

309D

Conservation Lands Six Counties Boundaries

)LJXUH Clay County Safety and TSM&O Projects Date: 10/9/2014

5-3

10,560 Feet

1.5

3 Miles

Date: 10/9/2014

£ ¤

301

£ ¤§ ¦ ¨

313

207

228

¬ «

31 4

311

318

5 60

¬ «

220

¬ «

611

134

236

603

608

6 60

226

208

200

238

239

23 5

213

240

204

601

¬ «

234

218

209

221

£ ¤

104

¬ «

602

307

607

295

§ ¦ ¨

323

322

§ ¦ ¨

£ ¤

¬ « 13

229

304

301

651 30 0

974

308

663

315

301

295

152

§ ¦ ¨

658

¬ «

£ ¤

712

223

652

650

306

656 654

§ ¦ ¨

319

652

¬ «

655

5-4

)LJXUH Duval County Safety and TSM&O Projects

¬ «

232

224

¬ « 128

230

225

233

222

609

£ ¤

224

115

¬ «

® q

326 325

61 0

317

660

659

314

301

£ ¤

205 237

242

£ ¤

327

600 309

5 30 0 31

202

£ ¤ 90

657

¬ «

116

¬ «

650

652

662

¬ «

A1A

¬ «

A1A

2 30

¬ «

A1A

¬ «

A1A

¬ «

A1A

10,560 Feet

® q

6 Miles

Six Counties Boundaries

Conservation Lands

Water Bodies

Roadway System

TSM&O

Safety Priority Corridors

Safety Priority Intersections

Airport

Legend

125

" )

23C

23D

" ) " )

228

¬ «

121

) " )" 119

" )

313

£ ¤ 90

301

£ ¤

115

" )

301

£ ¤

318

611

£ ¤

¬ «

208 235

228

¬ «

295

§ ¦ ¨

609

224

211

¬ « £ ¤¬ « 15

115

¬ «

® q

104

¬ «

£ ¤ ¬ « 13

322

§ ¦ ¨

304

£ ¤ 17

651

301

30 0

109

¬ «

604

5-5

)LJXUH 1DVVDX &RXQW\ Safety and TSM&O Projects

¬ «

§ ¦ ¨ 10

£ ¤

108

305

Date: 10/9/2014

127

" )

108

" )

314

" )

326 325

¬ «

115

" )

660

61 0

242

307 659

0 31

301

654

320

650

306

223

652

656

¬ «

652

200A

" )

¬ « 10

655

107

" )

107

" )

652

116

¬ «

« ¬ « ¬ A1A

¬ «

A1A

10,560 Feet

¬ «

A1A

« ¤¬ ¬ « £ 212

105

662

A1A

¬ « ¬ « ¬ « A1A

A1A

105

¬ « ¬ «

108

" )

662

105A

" ) 105

® q

3.5

7 Miles

Six Counties Boundaries

Conservation Lands

Water Bodies

Roadway System

TSM&O

Safety Priority Corridors

Safety Priority Intersections

Airport

Legend

330

651

310

609

30 0

304

223

233

6 20

229 712

315

602

225

330

603

600 31 7

328

601

652

659

312

222

¬ « 115

234

¬ « 202

§ ¦ ¨

242

230

32 9

295

303

321

330

« " ) ¬ A1A

210A

232

607

215 219

§ ¦ ¨

209

295

St. Augustine 6 60

658

" )

308

327

13B

2 30

9 30 302

" ) 210

¬ « 30 2

217

0 33

¬ «

" )

309

13A

£ ¤

216

330

" )

® q

¤ n

211

¬ « 16

" )

¤ n

312

208

¬ « A1A

32 9

328

§ ¦ ¨ 95

" ) 13A

See Inset

3 30

¬ « 312

210

" ) 31 6

316

214

321

" ) 13A

£ ¤

¬ «

A1A

321

" )

¬ «

207

209

£ ¤ ¬ «

Legend ® q ¤ n ¤ n

305

Airport Amtrak Station

" )

214

¬ « 206

" )

209 Passenger Rail Station

" )

TSM&O

207A

Safety Priority Corridor

" ) 13

Safety Priority Intersections

¬ Roadway System« ® q ¬ ) «" 19

" )

100 1447

" )

Water Bodies

2016

204

¬ « 100

" )

Conservation Lands 310

Six Counties Boundaries

)LJXUH St. John's County Safety and TSM&O Projects Date: 10/9/2014

5-6

10,560 Feet

4 Miles

306

657

658

650

651

663

653

659

660

661

305

301

654

655

Duval

300

Duval

SR 116 Wonderwood Connector

SR 116 Fort Caroline Road

SR 115 Arlington Expressway

SR 115 Lem Turner Road

SR 109 University Boulevard

SR 109 Cesery Boulevard

SR 106 Merrill Road

SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard

Old St. Augustine Road

Mt. Pleasant Road

Monument Road

Alt US 1 Hart Bridge Expressway

US 90 Beach Boulevard

Kingsley Avenue

Merrill Road

SR 109 University Boulevard SR 113 Southside Connector SR 115 Arlington Expressway US 90 Beach Boulevard

US 1/ SR 5 Philips Highway Intracoastal Waterway

Girvin Road

Arterial Management System

Freeway Management System Arterial Management System

Arterial Management System

Improvement Type

5Ͳ7

Fort Caroline Road East

Merrill Road

US 17 State Street

IͲ95

Arterial Management System

Mt. Pleasant Road

Arterial Management System

SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard Freeway Management System McCormick Road Arterial Management System

IͲ295

SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard SR 109 Cesery Boulevard Arterial Management System

Arlington Road

SR 109 University Boulevard SR 109 University Boulevard St. Augustine Road

Hart Bridge Expressway

Monument Road

IͲ95

McCormick Road

SR 10 Atlantic Boulevard Fort Caroline Road

Monroe Street

CR 315

327

Clay

US 17 SR 15

From

Table 5Ͳ1. TSM&O Needs County Map Facility ID

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

SR 9B

SR 200 SR A1A

310

311

315

317

324

325

326

322

323

313

652

314

319

320

302

Duval

Duval / Nassau Duval / St. Johns Nassau

St. Johns

US 301 SR 200

304

Duval

CR 210 Palm Valley Road

US 90 Beach Boulevard

US 301 SR 200

US 17 SR 228 Union Street

US 17 SR 228 State Street

US 17 Main Street

US 1 Martin Luther King Jr. Parkway

US 1 Main Street Bridge

SR 21 Blanding Boulevard

SR 202 J. T. Butler Boulevard

SR 134 103rd Street

SR 13 Acosta Bridge

SR 126 Emerson Street

SR 116 Wonderwood Connector

662

Duval

SR 116 Wonderwood Connector

656

Duval

Table 5Ͳ1. TSM&O Needs County Map Facility ID

5Ͳ8

SR 13

IͲ95

CR 2209

US 90 Beaver Street

SR 228 Normandy Boulevard Parental Home Road

IͲ95

SR 115 Arlington Expressway Bay Street

IͲ95

SR 228 Normandy Boulevard US 1 SR 5 Philips Highway Collins Road

IͲ95

SR 113 Southside Connector Mt. Pleasant Road

From

SR A1A

Fernandina Beach

IͲ295

Mickler Street (Callahan)

San Pablo Road

US 90 Beaver Street

Liberty Street

IͲ295

IͲ95

US 17 Roosevelt Boulevard Bay Street

SR A1A

IͲ295

Broad Street

Bedford Road

SR 101 Mayport Road

Fort Caroline Road East

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Rural ITS

Freeway Management System Arterial Management System

Rural ITS

Arterial Management System

Rural ITS

Arterial Management System

Freeway Management System Arterial Management System

Arterial Management System

Freeway Management System Arterial Management System

Traffic Operations Improvements Freeway Management System Arterial Management System

Arterial Management System

Improvement Type

321

330

328

329

St. Johns

316

St. Johns

US 1 SR 5 Dixie Highway/Ponce De Leon Boulevard US 1 SR 5 Ponce De Leon Boulevard

US 1, A1A & SR 5A

SR A1A

SR 207 SR 312

5Ͳ9

SR 5A King Street

SR 312

SR 206

IͲ95

303

St. Johns

CR 214 King Street and Anastasia Boulevard

From

Table 5Ͳ1. TSM&O Needs County Map Facility ID

SR 16

CR 214

SR A1A

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Access Management Plan

Transportation Management Plan Arterial Management System

Rural ITS

Arterial Management System

Improvement Type

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

This page is intentionally blank

5Í˛10

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

AUTONOMOUS AND CONNECTED VEHICLES A UTONOMOUS AND CONNECTED VEHICLES WILL FUNDAMENTALLY CHANGE THE WAY WE TRAVEL , OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH VEHICLES AND THE INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDED TO MEET OUR MOBILITY NEEDS .

INTRODUCTION Our future infrastructure is poised to achieve significant improvements in the coming decades, including:

Safer roads — new technologies in cars and on roadways will greatly reduce motor vehicle crashes in the coming decades. Some experts predict that we can virtually eliminate traffic fatalities by using these new technologies in concert with law enforcement, better engineering and education. Less congestion — Automated and connected vehicles, operating in platoons or independently, will travel at high speeds and occupy less highway space, as onͲboard sensors, vehicleͲtoͲvehicle and vehicleͲtoͲinfrastructure communications allow for more active traffic

These outcomes are highly desirable, and ultimately achievable. However, the path forward may require new paradigms for transportation owners from the way they plan, to how they align resources, to how they interact with the public at large. 5Ͳ11

management across cities and commuting corridors. Greater sustainability — Fewer idling, fuming cars, more efficient vehicles of all kinds (many that burn no fuels), and smoother connections between transportation modes will have a highly positive impact on the environment and air quality.

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

NEEDS PLAN

While fully autonomous vehicles might be not commonplace for ten or more years, until then there will be a steady rampͲup of automated features and communications technologies in vehicles. Within the ITS Master Plan adopted by the North Florida TPO and included in this plan, the most significant investment needed from public information is providing communication networks to address vehicleͲtoͲ infrastructure communication. With these communication networks in place cars will get FDOTͲ provided insights about accidents, ice, heavy rain, alternate routes and other factors — miles ahead of their current positions. Second, the agencies will get essential data about vehicle speed, wiper activity, tire slippage, traffic density and other factors, which will enable realͲ time responses (redirecting traffic, variable signs, inͲ vehicle alerts) to alleviate danger and congestion.

Additional information about the roadside infrastructure needs to support automated and connected vehicles is provided in Appendix J.

To provide the vehicleͲinfrastructure communication capability in the northeast Florida region, dedicated short range communications devices should be installed at every halfͲmile along priority corridors. These devices are proposed to be installed in four phases to spread the funding needed for deployment.

COST FEASIBLE PLAN No funding is dedicated to these needs at this time. During the construction of road capacity projects and ITS deployments, a fiber optic network communications backbone is being deployed incrementally to meet these needs. Once a communications backbone is in place, the costs of the dedicated short range communication devices for roadside to vehicle communications is estimated to be $6.9 million with an annual operating and maintenance cost of $0.9 million per year in present day costs.

The corridors are divided into four different phases for dedicated short range communications devices deployment:

5Ͳ12

Phase I Limited Access Highways: consists of all major limited access highways in the region such as IͲ95, IͲ295, SR 202 J. T. Butler Boulevard, and IͲ10. Phase II, Other Limited Access Highways: consists of other limited access highways or high volume corridors in the region such as SR 212 Hart Bridge Expressway, US 90 Arlington Expressway, SR 115 Martin Luther King Expressway, SR 9B, and SR 23 Branan Field Chaffee Road. Phase III, Other State Roads: consists of state roads in the region that are heavily travelled such as, SR 21, SR 13, SR 5/US 1, SR 200, SR 212, SR 90, and SR 15/US 17. Phase IV, Other Arterials: consists of arterials that are listed in the needs arterial corridor list and not included in the previous phases such as SR 102 Airport Road, and SR 105 Heckscher Drive.

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

SAFETY AND SECURITY T O ADDRESS THE SAFETY NEEDS IN OUR REGION , THE N ORTH F LORIDA TPO IDENTIFIED PRIORITY CORRIDORS AND PROJECTS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE LRTP. needs identified in this plan are local priorities for FDOT to consider in the process. FDOT funds subgrants that address traffic safety priority areas are also available. These programs include:

NEEDS PLAN The Strategic Safety Plan and Congestion Management Plan previously discussed were used to document the safety needs within the region. Regional security needs are addressed by the Regional Domestic Security Task Force and were documented earlier in this report.

COST FEASIBLE PLAN Funding for safety projects not addressed through other road improvements is allocated on an annual basis through the following statewide programs.

With the projects being determined on annual basis, funding was not allocated to specific projects in this Cost Feasible Plan.

Each year the Highway Safety Grant Program Section of the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Safety Office develops a comprehensive Highway Safety Plan that describes the projects recommended for federal funding during the upcoming federal fiscal year. The

5Ͳ13

Aging Road Users Community Traffic Safety Impaired Driving Motorcycle Safety Occupant Protection and Child Passenger Safety Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Police Traffic Services Speed and Aggressive Driving Teen Driver Safety

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Table 5Ͳ2. Priority Safety Corridors County ID Facility Clay 201 CR 209 Russell Road Clay 202 CR 215 Clay 203 CR 218 Clay 608 CR 220 Doctors Inlet Road Clay 204 CR 220A Long Bay Road Clay 241 SR 21 Blanding Boulevard Clay 209 SR 21 Blanding Boulevard Clay 212 SR 21 Blanding Boulevard Clay 215 SR 21 Blanding Boulevard Clay 219 SR 21 Blanding Boulevard Clay 221 SR 21 Blanding Boulevard Clay 231 SR 21 Blanding Boulevard Clay 605 SR 21 Blanding Boulevard Clay 606 SR 21 Blanding Boulevard Duval 200 Collins Road Duval 205 Firestone Road Duval 206 Harlow Boulevard Duval 607 IͲ295 Duval 610 IͲ295 Duval 233 Jammes Road Duval 234 Morse Avenue Duval 235 Old Middleburg Road Duval 236 Old Middleburg Road Duval 237 Rampart Road Duval 238 Ricker Road Duval 239 Ricker Road Duval 240 Shindler Drive Duval 207 SR 134 103rd Street Duval

218

SR 134 103rd Street

Duval Duval

222 225

SR 134 103rd Street SR 134 103rd Street

Duval

226

SR 134 103rd Street

Duval Duval Duval Duval Duval Duval Duval Duval Duval Duval Duval Duval Duval Duval Duval

311 603 602 315 712 601 242 230 232 208 220 318 609 611 213

SR 134 103rd Street SR 134 103rd Street SR 134 Timuquana Road SR 202 J. T. Butler Boulevard SR 202 J. T. Butler Boulevard SR 208 Wilson Boulevard SR 21 Blanding Boulevard SR 21 Blanding Boulevard SR 21 Blanding Boulevard SR 228 Normandy Boulevard SR 228 Normandy Boulevard SR 228 Normandy Boulevard SR 228 Normandy Boulevard SR 228 Normandy Boulevard SR 23 First Coast Expressway

From Old Ferry Road SR 16 N Mimosa Avenue SR 21 Blanding Boulevard CR 220 Doctors Inlet Road SR 16 at Arora Boulevard at SR 16 at Youngerman Circle at Argyle Forest Boulevard at Wells Road at CR 215 Everett Avenue Old Jennings Road Shindler Drive Morse Avenue SR 134 103rd Street Old St Augustine Road SR 228 Normandy Boulevard Morse Avenue Ricker Road Argyle Forest Boulevard SR 134 103rd Street Argyle Forest Boulevard Morse Avenue SR 134 103rd Street Collins Road at New World Avenue at Firestone Road , IͲ295 Interchanges at Harlow Boulevard at SR 21 Blanding Boulevard at Shindler Drive , Old Middleburg Road SR 228 Normandy Boulevard SR 228 Normandy Boulevard Wesconnett Boulevard US 1 SR 5 Philips Highway SR 115 Southside Boulevard Fouraker Road Argyle Forest Boulevard at Collins Road at IͲ295 NB Off Ramp at Fouraker Road at Blair Road South SR 134 103rd Street IͲ295 SR 23 First Coast Expressway at US 90 , IͲ10 Beaver Street 5Ͳ14

To CR 220 Doctors Inlet Road SR 21 Blanding Boulevard CR 739 Henley Road CR 224 College Drive Old Jennings Road CR 218 Old Jennings Road Argyle Forest Boulevard Rampart Road SR 208 Wilson Boulevard SR 21 Blanding Boulevard SR 228 Normandy Boulevard SR 115 Lem Turner Road San Juan Avenue Jammes Road SR 134 103rd Street Lenox Avenue Park City Drive SR 134 103rd Street Old Middleburg Road SR 134 103rd Street IͲ295 Wesconnett Boulevard US 17 Roosevelt Boulevard SR A1A Hodges Boulevard SR 103 Lane Avenue US 17 Roosevelt Boulevard IͲ295 SR 111 Cassat Avenue IͲ295

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Table 5Ͳ2. Priority Safety Corridors County ID Facility Duval 224 US 1/SR 15 New Kings Road Duval 229 US 1 SR 5 Philips Highway Duval 223 US 90 Beach Boulevard Duval 600 Wesconnett Boulevard Nassau 604 SR 200 SR A1A St. Johns 216 International Golf Parkway St. Johns 217 International Golf Parkway St. Johns 211 SR 16/SR 13 St. Johns 210 US 1/SR 5 Dixie Highway St. Johns 214 US 1/SR 5 Dixie Highway US 1/SR 5 Ponce De Leon St. Johns 329 Boulevard

From at Moncrief Road at Bowden Road at Forest Boulevard SR 21 Blanding Boulevard IͲ95 at SR 16 at US 1/SR 5 Dixie Highway at CR 13 at SR 312 at SR 206

To SR 21 Blanding Boulevard Chester Road

SR 5A King Street

SR 16

5Ͳ15

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

This page is intentionally blank.

5Í˛16

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE M AINTAINING AND OPERATING OUR TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM IS ESSENTIAL FOR OUR MOBILITY AND QUALITY OF LIFE .

Our plan considers the longͲterm needs to maintain and operate our transportation system. Without adequate maintenance and operations, our investments in construction and capital projects will not be sustainable and the longͲterm costs of maintaining our system will increase. The plan dedicates federal, state and local resources as summarized in the following table.

5Ͳ17

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Table 5Ͳ2. Summary of Operations and Maintenance Costs Phase 2019Ͳ2020 2021Ͳ2025 2026Ͳ2030 2031Ͳ2040 22ͲYear Total State Highway System O&M $991 $1,982 $2,023 $2,216 $7,212 Local Roadways O&M $33 $33 Clay O&M $30 $85 $108 $315 $538 Duval O&M $267 $819 $1,117 $3,612 $5,816 Nassau O&M $2 $6 $7 $20 $36 St. Johns O&M $53 $176 $257 $936 $1,422 Total Roadways $1,343 $3,067 $3,546 $7,099 $15,056 JTA Transit Bus O&M $167 $465 $548 $1,400 $2,580 Skyway/Streetcar O&M $3 $10 $11 $29 $53 BRT O&M $233 $610 $1,557 $2,400 Commuter Rail O&M $7,647 $7,647 Park and Ride Lots O&M $1 $2 $2 $5 $9 Subtotal JTA $171 $710 $1,171 $10,637 $12,689 Sunshine Sunshine Transit O&M $3 $8 $9 $23 $42 Total Transit $174 $1,427 $2,351 $21,298 $25,250 Total $1,517 $4,494 $5,897 $28,397 $40,305

5Ͳ18

PART

SIX

PLAN SUMMARY

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

MEASURES OF EFFECTIVENESS U SING PERFORMANCE MEASURES TO EVALUATE THE PLAN AND PROVIDE FEEDBACK ON THE CONSISTENCY WITH THE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES OF THE PLAN WAS INTEGRAL TO THE PLANNING PROCESS . Consistent with the requirements of MAPͲ21, system wide measures of effectiveness were used to benchmark the performance of the plan alternatives. To assess improvements in safety and mobility, the NERPMͲAB and other tools were used to quantify the benefits of the Cost Feasible Plan (as compared to a No Build scenario which is the Existing Plus Committed model network).

The Cost Feasible Plan also does not address all deficiencies that were identified through the planning process. Figure 6Ͳ1 shows the deficiencies that will exist in 2040 with implementation of the Cost Feasible Plan.

Table 6Ͳ1 on the next page summarizes the measures of effectiveness and benchmarks established during the planning process. Not all of the measures identified in the goals and objectives could be quantified (such as reliability) and these are noted. While not all the benchmarks established for the plan were met, the result of the planning process was a wellͲ balanced plan that met users’ needs to the greatest extent possible. 6Ͳ1

(2,705)

Bike trips

6Ͳ2

9 9 1,188,246 78,011 1,188,246 (14,697)

additional persons are served. additional trucks served. additional vehicle miles traveled. fewer persons choose to walk Ͳ likely a result of improved access to transit. fewer persons choose to bike Ͳ likely a result of improved access to transit.

9 9 9

9 9

9 9 9

9 9

Benchmark Met

17,166 crashes reduced per year. 858 fatal crashed reduced per year. $126,025,695 benefit per year in dollars.

58,880 additional persons with access to new transit capacity. 17,589 more persons choose transit. 198 miles of nonͲInterstate projects that will include bicycle and pedestrian improvements. $116 benefit of travel time saving per person per year. A network of constrained corridors were identified and where widening would exceed six lanes on arterial roadways, context sensitive solutions were recommended. Environmental screening was performed as part of the planning projects and projects that were identified to have fatal flaws were not included in the Cost Feasible Plan. Unable to evaluate.

Reliability could not be evaluated within the travel demand forecasting model. 254,088 additional persons with access within 1/4 mile of a Cost Feasible Plan project. 186,639,846 vehicle hours 6.1% return on investment with a benefitͲtoͲcost ratio of 3.73.

Change

Safety Benefits Change in total crashes Change in fatal crashes Safety benefit Quantity of Travel PersonͲmiles traveled TruckͲmiles traveled VehicleͲmiles traveled Walk trips

Reduce emissions from automobiles

Reduce the cost of congestion per capita Reduce the impact on natural environment

Livability Access to transit Transit riders Miles with bike and pedestrian accommodations

Delay benefit Maximize the return on investment

Access to jobs

Economic Competitiveness Reliability

Measure of Effectiveness

Table 6.1 Summary of Measures of Effectiveness

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Access to transit Utilization System congested (miles congested) Congested trips (vehicleͲmiles congested) Vehicles per lane mile Duration of congestion Lane miles added Transit load factor

Access to persons

Access to jobs

Transit riders Quality of Travel Average speed Delay Average trip time Reliability Congestion on rural facilities Accessibility Proximity to major transit hubs Miles of bicycle and pedestrian accommodations

Measure of Effectiveness

Table 6.1 Summary of Measures of Effectiveness

3.07% 14,619,980 144 0.08 818

6Ͳ3

improvement in the percent of the system that is congested. reduced congested trips per day. Vehicle reduction in vehicles per lane mile minutes reduced. lane miles added. Unable to evaluate.

9 9 9 9

9 9

Two hubs added – Downtown and Soutel 198 miles of nonͲInterstate projects that will include bicycle and pedestrian improvements. 254,088 additional persons with access within 1/4 mile of a Cost Feasible Plan project. 96,244 additional persons living in households within 1/3 of a Cost Feasible Plan project. 58,880 additional persons with access to new transit capacity.

0.05%

Unable to evaluate. reduction in delay on rural facilities

9 9 9

Benchmark Met 9

1.64 miles per hour speed improvement. 33,613 vehicle hours saved.

17,589 more persons choose transit

Change

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

" )

108

115

¬ «

£ ¤

" ) " )

" ) 127

A1A

108

¬ «

105

107

§ ¦ ¨

£ ¤

¬ « ¬ «

" )

¬ «

A1A

£ ¤ 301

" ) " )

¬ « ¬ «

295

119

250

A1A

295

§ ¦ ¨

" )

¬ «

§ ¦ ¨

122

105

" )

116

125

¬ «

" )

221

124

¬ « 10

£ ¤ 90

§ ¦ ¨

" ) 228

" )

¬ « 228

£ ¤

130

£ ¤ ¬ «

301

¬ « ¬ «

202

134

§ ¦ ¨ 295

£ ¤

Legend

V/C Ratio

" )

< 0.80

218

0.81 - 0.89

§ ¦ ¨

¬ «

> 0.90

¬ «

A1A

¬ «

220

Roadway System

¬ «

Water Bodies

¬ «

Conservation Lands

£ ¤ 1

Six Counties Boundaries

" )

¬ « " ) " " ) ) " )

209

£ ¤

" )

¬ «

208

" )

315

A1A

13A

214

315

¬ «

« § ¦¬ ¨ ¬ «

207

" )

214

A1A

" ) 305

£ ¤

¬ « 206

¬ « 26

¬ « 100

" ) 315

" ) 204

¬ « 20

" ) 21

" ) 320

§ ¦ ¨ 75

" ) 310

" )

¬ «

200A

" ) 309

" ) 308

)LJXUH 2040 Cost Feasible Plan 'HILFLHQFLHV Date: 1/28/2015

10,560 Feet

3.5

7 Miles

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

BALANCING OUR PLAN A PLAN THAT IS WELL BALANCED ENSURES WE PROVIDE OUR RESIDENTS WITH THE CHOICES THEY NEED AND THAT OUR INVESTMENTS ARE FAIR AND EQUITABLE . Our planning process ensured that we have a plan that is balanced with the anticipated revenues.

We have also developed a plan that is balanced geographically to ensure that resources are fairly allocated among our partners. Geographic equity is related to population distribution, but our plan is regional in nature and many of our investment benefit residents who cross county boundaries every day to work and play.

A plan is also well balanced when investments are made to provide mode choices to enhance mobility and livability within our community. Reliable and safe transportation through enhanced transit and safe walkable communities for our aging population is essential to maintain independent living. As more seniors continue to drive, highway features such as clear signing and lighting become especially important.

Social equity, social diversity, quality of life and meeting the needs of the underserved are aspects of social sustainability that were addressed during the planning process through extensive public outreach.

The Path Forward 2040 LRTP considers the aging population, changing demographics and population growth. The plan considers the transportation system needs of all user groups and recognizes that there is an increasing demand for solutions and strategies spanning the broadest spectrum of users, vehicles, and modal choice preferences.

The following tables summarize show the balance achieved in our planning process when the expenditures are compared to needs, geography and modes served.

6Í˛5

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Table 6Ͳ2. Total Expenditures by Fund Source for Capacity Programs 75 Fund Program Years Years 2019Ͳ2020 2021Ͳ2025 Strategic Intermodal System $39.82 $508.26 Other State Highways $122.33 $273.13 Transportation Management Area $28.80 $77.44 Turnpike/Tolls $0.00 $1,951.22 TRIP $0.70 $5.40 Clay County $52.88 Duval County $255.23 $362.31 Nassau County $0.00 $0.00 St. Johns County $2.75 $13.50 FTA Passenger Ferry Grant $6.62 State and Federal Transit $63.07 $174.11 Transit Local Match $21.02 $58.04 Transportation Alternatives (TALU) $2.80 $7.10 Transportation Alternatives (TALT) $3.78 $9.38 SIS Multimodal $338.65 $220.42 Federal Seaport Grant $311.00 JAXPORT $186.50 Grand Total $1,376.45 $3,719.80 62F67F80F80F

75 Includes all phases. 6Ͳ6

Years 2026Ͳ2030 $874.16 $284.40 $83.98 $0.00 $5.39 $73.02 $102.89 $10.75 $32.52

Years 2031Ͳ2040 $2,635.50 $709.21 $126.18 $0.00 $10.80 $122.82 $242.68 $30.88 $118.61

$171.98 $57.33 $7.10 $9.38 $313.60

$350.84 $116.95 $14.20 $18.76 $2,510.64

$2,026.49

$7,008.08

22ͲYear Total $4,057.74 $1,389.08 $316.40 $1,951.22 $22.29 $248.73 $963.11 $41.63 $167.38 $6.62 $760.00 $253.33 $31.20 $41.30 $3,383.31 $311.00 $186.50 $14,130.82

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Table 6Ͳ3. Total Revenue and Expenditures for Balancing Source Item Years 2019Ͳ2020 Strategic Intermodal System

Revenue Expenditures Cumulative Difference Other Arterials Revenue Expenditures Cumulative Difference Turnpike/Tolls Revenue Expenditures Cumulative Difference Transportation Revenue Management Area Expenditures Cumulative Difference Transportation Revenue Alternatives (TALU) Expenditures Cumulative Difference Transportation Revenue Alternatives (TALT) Expenditures Cumulative Difference Transportation Regional Revenue Incentive Program (TRIP) Expenditures Cumulative Difference State and Federal Transit Federal and State New Starts Total Revenue Expenditures Cumulative Difference Strategic Intermodal Revenue System Multimodal Expenditures Cumulative Difference Federal Seaport Grant Revenue for St. Johns River Expenditures Dredging Cumulative Difference Clay Revenue Expenditures Cumulative Difference Duval County Non Transit Revenue Expenditures Cumulative Difference

Years 2021Ͳ2025

Years 2026Ͳ2030

Years 2031Ͳ2040

$24.86 $24.86 $0.00 $116.70 $116.70 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $28.80 $28.80 $0.00 $2.80 $2.80 $0.00 $3.78 $3.78 $0.00 $0.70 $0.70 $0.00 $56.90 $6.17 $63.07 $63.07 $0.00

$473.90 $473.90 $0.00 $260.60 $260.60 $0.00 $1,951.22 $1,951.22 $0.00 $71.90 $71.90 $0.00 $7.10 $7.10 $0.00 $9.38 $9.38 $0.00 $5.40 $5.40 $0.00 $146.50 $27.61 $174.11 $174.11 $0.00

$773.34 $773.34 $0.00 $246.40 $246.40 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $71.90 $71.89 $0.00 $7.10 $7.10 $0.00 $9.38 $9.38 $0.00 $5.40 $5.39 $0.01 $153.90 $18.08 $171.98 $171.98 $0.00

$2,635.50 $2,635.50 $0.00 $538.80 $538.80 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $143.80 $143.81 $0.00 $14.20 $14.20 $0.00 $18.76 $18.76 $0.00 $10.80 $10.80 $0.01 $322.80 $28.04 $350.84 $350.84 $0.00

$4,057.74 $4,057.74 $0.00 $1,162.50 $1,162.50 $0.00 $1,951.22 $1,951.22 $0.00 $316.40 $316.40 $0.00 $31.20 $31.20 $0.00 $41.30 $41.30 $0.00 $22.30 $22.29 $0.01 $680.10 $79.90 $760.00 $760.00 $0.00

$836.15 $836.15 $0.00 $311.00 $311.00 $0.00 $67.04

$220.42 $220.42 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $47.79 $52.88 $61.95 $987.78 $362.31 $895.20

$313.60 $313.60 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $50.62 $73.02 $39.54 $725.55 $102.89 $1,517.86

$2,510.64 $2,510.64 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $110.42 $122.82 $27.14 $170.66 $202.68 $1,485.84

$3,880.81 $3,880.81 $0.00 $311.00 $311.00 $0.00 $275.87 $248.73 $27.14 $2,408.95 $923.11 $1,485.84

$67.04 $524.96 $255.23 $269.73

6Ͳ7

22ͲYear Total

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Table 6Ͳ3. Total Revenue and Expenditures for Balancing Source Item Years 2019Ͳ2020 Duval County Transit

Local Match for St. Johns River Dredging Nassau County

St. Johns County

Charter Transit Surtax Transit Local Match Differences Revenue Expenditures Cumulative Difference Revenue Expenditures Cumulative Difference Revenue Expenditures Cumulative Difference

Years 2021Ͳ2025

Years 2026Ͳ2030

Years 2031Ͳ2040

$551.73 $58.04 $707.76 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $25.00 $0.00 $36.71 $61.62 $13.50 $74.23

$647.40 $57.33 $1,297.84 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $26.54 $10.75 $52.50 $65.47 $32.52 $107.19

$1,651.08 $116.95 $2,831.97 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $58.16 $30.88 $79.78 $108.18 $118.61 $96.75

$235.10 $21.02 $214.07 $186.00 $186.00 $0.00 $11.71 $0.00 $11.71 $28.86 $2.75 $26.11

22ͲYear Total $3,085.31 $253.33 $2,831.97 $186.00 $186.00 $0.00 $121.41 $41.63 $79.78 $264.13 $167.38 $96.75

Table 6Ͳ4. Summary of Funds in Proportion to Needs76 Project Category Project Costs Road Transit TSM&O Bicycle and Pedestrian Freight Total Totals may not match due to rounding of subtotals.

Funded $33,637 $4,164 $709 $464 $6,504 $46,081

Table 6Ͳ5. Geographic Distribution County 2040 Population % Population Clay 315,700 Duval 1,071,600 Nassau 116,700 St. Johns 377,000 Total 1,881,000 Totals may not match due to rounding of subtotals.

Allocation 17% 57% 6% 20% 100%

76 See Appendix K for a summary of the needs project costs in present day dollars. 6Ͳ8

Percent of Need Met $8,892 26% $1,020 58% $34 5% $303 65% $3,880 60% $14,131 31%

% Allocation $2,925 $8,709 $656 $1,841 $14,131

21% 62% 5% 13% 100%

Strategic Intermodal System78 Turnpike/Tolls79 SIS Multimodal80 FDOT Subtotal Other State Highways81 Transportation Management Area Transportation Alternatives (TALU)82 Transportation Alternatives (TALT) 83 Transportation Regional Incentive Program (TRIP) 84 State and Federal Transit85 North Florida TPO Subtotal

Program

$1,587.40

$21.23

$6,008.96 $1,297.42 $268.75

$4,057.74 $1,951.22

Roads

$760.00 $760.00

$1,377.21 $1,377.21

Transit

$178.66

$0.00 $91.66 $13.44 $31.20 $41.30 $1.06 $34.21

$34.21

$0.00

Bicycle and TSM&O Pedestrian77

$0.00

$2,006.10 $2,006.10

Freight

$4,057.74 $1,951.22 $3,383.31 $9,392.27 $1,389.08 $316.40 $31.20 $41.30 $22.29 $760.00 $2.560.27

Total

77 These expenditures are based on 5% of road capacity projects and dedicated revenues for bicycle and pedestrian projects. 78 The revenue estimate provided by FDOT of $3,880.96 million does not include Preliminary Engineering (PE) phases. This total includes Preliminary Engineering (PE) phases as programmed in the Cost Feasible Plan. 79 The revenue estimate was provided by FDOT. 80 These funds are distributed by FDOT on a statewide basis. The funds were estimated by extrapolating the current statewide funding through the horizon of the plan and developing a reasonable estimate of the statewide funding that would be allocated to North Florida. This estimate includes $186.50 million of state funds to match the federal authorization for St. Johns River Dredging. 81 The revenue estimate provided by FDOT of $1,162.50 million does not include Preliminary Engineering (PE) phases. This total includes PE phases as programmed in the Cost Feasible Plan. 82 These funds can only be used within the North Florida Transportation Management Area. 83 These funds are distributed by FDOT on a districtwide basis. The total shown is a districtwide total. 84 These funds are distributed by FDOT on a districtwide basis. The total shown is a districtwide total. 85 The funds include $680.10 million of federal and state capacity funding for the North Florida TPO estimated by FDOT plus $79.90 of New Starts funding. The federal and state capacity funds are distributed on a statewide priority basis. The New Starts funding is allocated by the Federal Transit Administration on a competitive basis. A total of $760.30 million of New Start funds was estimated on a statewide basis by FDOT. These programs are not shown in the FDOT Adopted Work Program. 6Ͳ9

Primary DecisionͲ Making Authority FDOT FDOT FDOT North Florida TPO North Florida TPO North Florida TPO North Florida TPO North Florida TPO North Florida TPO Continued on next page.

Table 6Ͳ6. Modal Distribution

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

Primary DecisionͲ Making Authority Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Federal Grants Federal Grants

$236.88 $860.64

Clay County Duval County Road Capacity JAXPORT Transit Local Match Duval County Subtotal Nassau County St. Johns County Subtotal Local FTA Passenger Ferry Grant Federal Seaport Grant Federal Grants Grand Total

6Ͳ10

$0.00 $8,892.93

$860.64 $39.64 $159.41 $1,296.58

Roads

Program

Table 6Ͳ6. Modal Distribution

$6.62 $2,397.16

$253.33 $6.62

$253.33 $253.33

$0.00

Transit

Path Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

$302.93

$102.47 $1.98 $7.97 $124.27

$0.00 $34.21

$0.00

Bicycle and TSM&O Pedestrian77 $11.84 $43.03 $59.44

$311.00 $311.00 $2,503.60

$186.50

$0.00 $186.50

Freight $248.73 $963.11 $186.50 $253.33 $1,402.95 $41.63 $167.38 $1,860.68 $6.62 $311.00 $317.62 $14,130.82

Total

North Florida Transportation Planning Organzation 1022 Prudential Drive Jacksonville, Florida 32207 (904) 306-7500 http://www.northfloridatpo.com