28,500 copies distributed monthly – to every rural mailbox in Canterbury and the West Coast.
July 2011
INSIDE Cavalier knockback gives wool Page 03 Canterbury legends Page 13 Redwoods in the high country – part 2
equities a crack at WSI
By Hugh de Lacy The threat of a monopoly over the country’s woolscouring facilities has receded with Cavalier Carpets’ bid for Wool Services International (WSI) receiving a legal knockback, and a surprise new farmercontrolled player entering the contest. Cavalier seemed on the point of creating a scouring monopoly following the Commerce Commission’s giving its approval for the listed carpet company to buy up failed Timaru entrepreneur Alan Hubbard’s 64% stake in WSI.
Page 19 Herd manager gains on farm skills through training
CONTACT US Canterbury Farming 03 347 2314
Hubbard’s Plum Duff and Woolpak Holdings shares in WSI are being cashed up by the receiver, PriceWaterhouseCoopers, and the Commerce Commission’s surprise support of a potential scouring monopoly had put Cavalier and its $40 million cash bid in the box seat to buy the publicly listed scouring and wool-trading company. But the Australian company Godfrey Hirst, the biggest carpet manufacturer and exporter in the Southern Hemisphere, spiked its rival Cavalier’s plans by winning a stay of proceedings until the validity of the commission’s decision has been decided by the High Court in a case starting on September 22. Cavalier’s bid for WSI was fiercely opposed by the target company, whose two scours
Cavalier wants to fold into its own two scouring operations, giving it a virtual monopoly, while the wool trading arm would be sold off on the open market.
newcomer in the hunt for WSI, publicly listed minnow Wool Equities Limited (WEL), which put up its hand immediately after the High Court upheld Godfrey Hirst’s stay application.
Ironically, Godfrey Hirst appears uninterested in acquiring WSI for itself: Canterbury Farming understands it has made no approach to the receiver.
WEL was the repository of the former Wool Board’s diversified corporate holdings, nearly all of which were frittered away by a group of Auckland-based entrepreneurs who acquired a dominant shareholding, then blew tens of millions of dollars on a failed bio-technology strategy.
Instead the Australian company seems primarily concerned with preventing the creation of a scouring monopoly in New Zealand, the principal source of the wool for its carpet range. This may have strengthened its position in its stay-ofproceedings action in the Wellington High Court earlier this month, which has put the direct WSI/Cavalier negotiations for WSI’s scours on hold. “What it means for the company is that it’s clear we cannot now reach any unconditional agreement with Cavalier, and it remains to be seen what further steps might be taken by Godfrey Hirst or anybody else,� WSI chairman Derek Quirke told Canterbury Farming. “It could take months or even a year to work its way through the court system,� Quirke said. The delay could strengthen the position of the surprise
By the time the Aucklanders walked away from the wreckage, leaving it in the hands of 7,800 individual farmer shareholders, WEL was reduced in value to barely $2 million. However its cash reserves are to get a $3 million boost this month from the Wool Board Disestablishment Company, ‘Disco,’ which is disbursing the final $7 million it had been retaining for the settlement of old Wool Board claims that have since been dismissed by the Supreme Court. Whether WEL can parley its $5 million in cash into a realistic bid for WSI is yet to be seen, but Quirke welcomed the bid, describing it as an ‘interesting proposition’. “They’ve got hurdles that they’re working to overcome, but unlike the Cavalier offer for the assets and liabilities of [WSI], which was a board
matter, the WEL offer will be in the first instance to the receiver who will either accept or reject it. “Then WEL will have to make a full takeover bid, and that’s where our board comes in,� Quirke said. WEL director Peter McPartlin of Marlborough told Canterbury Farming that the stay of proceedings on the Cavalier bid, combined with the forthcoming cash from Disco, gives his company a fighting chance of acquiring WSI and making it the cornerstone of its continuing efforts to improve the profitability of woolgrowing.
And while the door to farmer ownership of WSI through WEL may now be ajar, the threat of Chinese interests gobbling up WSI’s state-ofthe-art scouring technology and taking it back to China seems to be receding. WSI’s Quirke said there “have been murmurings� of a Chinese bid “but nothing serious at all.�
“Nothing’s guaranteed but there is some confidence we might be able to acquire WSI,� McPartlin told Canterbury Farming.
Quirke said several expressions of interest had been lodged with the receiver Maurice Noone, and the company was not discounting any of them.
“We’ve been looking at this for months, and we’ve not said anything until we had something to say, and that
“But in the first instance they have to satisfy the receiver that their bid is credible and attractive,� he said.
:H FDQ FXVWRP EXLOG WR VXLW \RXU QHHGV
x x x x x
includes the ability to compete against Cavalier because they’ve got very deep pockets, and also because we’ve been organising ourselves in terms of funding.�
&XVWRP GHVLJQHG IRU \RX &RPPHUFLDO UXUDO RU VWRUDJH EXLOGLQJV )URP GHVLJQ WR FRPSOHWLRQ RU VXSSOLHG .LWVHW 6WHHO WLPEHU RU FRQFUHWH PDWHULDOV 'HVLJQHG DQG PDQXIDFWXUHG E\ 6WUXFWXUH :LVH
6WDWLRQ 6WUHHW /HHVWRQ ZZZ VWUXFWXUHZLVH FR Q] 3K