Canterbury Farming, September 2011

Page 1

September 2011

28,500 copies distributed monthly – to every rural mailbox in Canterbury and the West Coast.

INSIDE Page 4

I was a knight for a day

Page 21

Possum school a NZ first

Softly-softly start to NAIT enforcement

By Hugh de Lacy

Government enforcers will initially take an easy-does-it approach to the policing of the National Animal Identification and Tracing (NAIT) system but, after that, look out. That’s the message from the chairman of the board of the NAIT establishment company, Waikato dairy-farmer Ted Coats. “The first six months of NAIT will be a softly-softly approach to allow farmers to transition to the new scheme,” Coats told Canterbury Farming. “However, there will not be a long soft landing. “First offences will likely be followed up with infringement notices by mail, and a warning.

Page 28

Deer velvet focus

CONTACT US Canterbury Farming 03 347 2314

“Further and subsequent infringement will mean fines varying, depending on the severity of the offence,” Coats said. With Federated Farmers withdrawing from its formerly entrenched opposition to the scheme, a first implementation date has been set for July 1 next year, though the empowering legislation won’t be passed before this year’s November 26 general election. On implementation day farmers must begin enrolling their cattle — dairy and beef alike — into the scheme, with deer to follow from May 1, 2013. The creation of farm-to-table

animal identification schemes has been driven globally by outbreaks of such diseases as mad cow (BSE) and footand-mouth in Europe and the Americas, though so far only the European Union and Australia have systems in place.

reputation, it will allow quick recovery from any incident.

Europe’s Trade Control and Expert System, called Traces, was launched in 2004.

New Zealand has just under 10 million cattle, with dairy and beef animals in roughly equal proportions.

The Australian system, trialled in Victoria from 1999 and recently made compulsory in all states, covers sheep, cattle, goats, pigs, dear and camels. The United States is attempting to implement a similar scheme that includes such exotics as lamas and alpacas, and even some species of fish, however they’re running into opposition from some groups on privacy and religious grounds — the Amish, for example, oppose marking of animals. New Zealand has yet to be hit by a full-scale animal epidemic, but with livestock at the heart of the economy, successive governments have been moving steadily towards a compulsory animal identification system. The intention is to provide fast and reliable information about livestock location and movements in the event of a disease outbreak or the finding of contamination in exported products. As well as boosting the country’s export food safety

Federated Farmer, which has opposed the scheme mainly on grounds of cost, has bowed to the inevitable and changed its stand from outright opposition to a monitoring role.

Farmers will need to register on the NAIT database, and all cattle and deer will have to be fitted with radio frequency identification (RFID) ear-tags either before they’re moved off the property or within 180 days of birth, whichever comes first. The scheme will include lifestyle blocks as well as commercial farms. The cost to farmers of implementing the scheme has yet to be decided. A levy will be applied at slaughter with the amount open to negotiations over the next few months. Prices of the hardware have also yet to be finalised, though in 2008 figures of $2.80 per eartag and $300 for a hand-held scanner wand were circulated. Panel readers, such as those which will be installed at freezing works, were priced at $7500 and a hand-held version of them at $2000. While farmers won’t necessarily need a scanner, the

management advantages of it being able to record weights, treatments, breeding information and milk production is expected make them a standard item of farm equipment. The NAIT’s intellectual property will be owned by the farmer providing the information. “NAIT Ltd will have a stewardship role in relation to the data, and establish a data access panel which will have an arbitration function,” Coats told Canterbury Farming. “NAIT will limit access to, and use or disclosure of NAIT data to the purposes stated in the NAIT legislation. “NAIT data will be kept private, as required by the Privacy Act,” he said. Eventually

 

    

    



the

NAIT

company will be merged into the Animal Health Board (AHB) which will have ongoing responsibility for it. The AHB’s main current task is reducing the incidence of bovine tuberculosis in cattle and deer, and taking over the functions of NAIT sets it up for the possible eventual extension of the scheme to sheep and other animals such as pigs and alpacas. “The company structure is in place because of industry involvement in the scheme: the NAIT scheme is funded by both industry and government [and] the company will exist only for the duration of the scheme establishment,” Coats said. Farmers will receive initial contact from NAIT next month.


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
Canterbury Farming, September 2011 by Integrity Community Media - Issuu