vol. 60, no. 1, 2018 Published by NTEU
ISSN 0818–8068
60 YEARS
AUR 1958–2018
Australian Universities’ Review
Australian Universities’Review
AUR Editor Dr Ian R. Dobson, Monash University
AUR Editorial Board Jeannie Rea, NTEU National President Professor Timo Aarrevaara, University of Lapland
Editorial Policy
Style
The Australian Universities’ Review (AUR, formerly Vestes) is published by the National Tertiary Education Union (NTEU) to encourage debate and discussion about issues in higher education and its contribution to Australian public life, with an emphasis on those matters of concern to NTEU members. AUR publishes articles and other contributions, including short commentary and satire.
Download full Style Guide at www.aur.org.au/submissions.
Although some contributions are solicited by the Editor or the Editorial Board, AUR is anxious to receive contributions independently from staff and students in the higher education sector and other readers.
Use single quotation marks. Use double quotation marks for quotes within a quote. Indent quotes of more than 50 words.
Use ‘per cent’ rather than ‘%’ in the text. Use ‘%’ in tables and figures where space is constrained. Use ‘s’ rather than ‘z’ in words such as ‘organise’ (analyse, recognise, etc.). Use a single space at the end of sentences.
Dates thus: 30 June 2010. Authors should ensure that the material cited in the text matches the material listed in the References.
Professor Jeff Goldsworthy, Monash University
Articles will be assessed by independent referees before publication. Priority is given to contributions that are substantial, lively, original and have a broad appeal. Responses to previously published contributions are encouraged.
Dr Mary Leahy, University of Melbourne
AUR is listed on the Government’s register of refereed journals.
Do not use numbered sections.
Dr Kristen Lyons, University of Queensland
It is presumed that authors have followed the standard scholarly ethical practices involved in seeking to have their work published. Authors should take their lead from the Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research and the Committee for Publication Ethics.
Do not use underlining.
Contributions
Tables and figures should be incorporated into the text close to where they are first referred. In general, ‘tables’ comprise data, and ‘figures’ comprise everything else (graphs, photographs, etc.). Do not refer to position of tables/figures (e.g. ‘above’, ‘left’)
Professor Jamie Doughney, Victoria University Professor Leo Goedegebuure, University of Melbourne
Professor Dr Simon Marginson, University of London Grahame McCulloch, NTEU General Secretary Dr Alex Millmow, Federation University Australia Dr Neil Mudford, UNSW@ADFA Professor Paul Rodan, Swinburne University of Technology Cathy Rytmeister, Macquarie University Natasha Abrahams, CAPA National President
Production Design & layout: Paul Clifton Editorial Assistance: Anastasia Kotaidis Cover photograph: Staircase at the New Horizons Research Centre at Monash University, Australia. Image by Keith Midson. Used with permission.
Contact Details Australian Universities’ Review, c/- NTEU National Office, PO Box 1323, South Melbourne VIC 3205 Australia Phone: +613 9254 1910 Fax: +613 9254 1915
Please adhere to the style notes outlined on this page. Contributors should send digital manuscripts in Word format to editor@aur.org.au. Contributions should be between 2,000 and 7,000 words, although longer articles will be considered. All articles should be accompanied by an abstract that would not usually be longer than 150 words.
References to be cited according to APA Publication Manual 6th edition (with minor exceptions).
Contributors should read the website before submitting a paper.
References in the text should be given in the author–date style:
Book reviews Books for review should be sent to the Editor. Our policy is to review books dealing either with tertiary education or with matters pertinent to issues in tertiary education. Book reviews should be between 200 and 1200 words; review essays may be longer.
AUR welcomes letters of response to articles published in the journal. Longer responses to articles are also encouraged. Responses should be a maximum of 1,000 words, and should be received within a month after the publication of the journal so that they can be properly considered by the Editor and the Editorial Board for the following issue.
Subscriptions AUR is free to NTEU members on an opt-in basis. Full details at www.aur.org.au/subscriptions.
In accordance with NTEU policy to reduce our impact on the natural environment, AUR has been printed using vegetable-based inks with alcohol-free printing initiatives on FSC certified paper by Printgraphics under ISO 14001 Environmental Certification.
Environment ISO 14001
Tables and figures should have separate numbered sequences, and titles should be above for tables, and below for figures. Figures should be prepared in black and white. Graphs with coloured bars are often illegible in black-and-white print.
References
Website
NTEU members may opt for ‘soft delivery’ (email notification rather than printed copy) for all NTEU magazines. To access your membership details, log in to the members’ area at www. nteu.org.au.
Avoid use of abbreviations, except for well-known organisations or processes.
Contributions are sent to a minimum of two referees, in accordance with DIISR requirements for peer blind review.
Replies and letters
AUR is also available online as an e-book and pdf. Visit www.aur.org.au for details.
Do not use footnotes, endnotes or any headers or footers except for page numbers (bottom of page, centred).
The author’s full contact details should be provided, including email address, telephones and fax.
Email: editor@aur.org.au
www.aur.org.au
Neither male nor female pronouns should be used to refer to groups containing persons of both sexes.
King (2004) argues ... or as various authors (King, 2004; Markwell, 2007) argue ... Two co-authors should be cited in the text as (Smith & Jones, 2013). More than two authors cite as (Jones et al., 2011). Page references should be thus: (King, 2004, p. 314). Page references should be used for direct quotations. The reference list should be placed in alphabetical order at the end of the paper, utilising the author–date system. For a reference to a book: Gall, M., Gall, J. & Borg, W. (2003). Education Research: An introduction (7th ed.). New York: Allyn & Bacon.
Annual subscription rates (inclusive of GST where applicable) are $71.50 AUD (Australia and NZ), $86.00 AUD (overseas airmail). Overseas payments should be made by credit card or bank draft in Australian currency.
For a journal reference:
Advertising
For a reference to a chapter in a collection:
AUR is published twice a year, in February and September. The current hard copy circulation is approximately 8,000 per issue. Rates are available on application to aur@nteu.org.au.
Archive This issue and previous issues of AUR can be viewed online at www.aur.org.au.
King, D.A. (2004). What different countries get for their research spending. Nature, 430, 311–316.
McCollow, J. & Knight, J. (2005). Higher Education in Australia: An Historical Overview, in M. Bella, J. McCollow & J. Knight (Eds). Higher Education in Transition. Brisbane: University of Queensland Press. For a web reference: Markwell, D. (2007). The challenge of student engagement. Retrieved from http://www.catl.uwa.edu.au/__data/ page/95565/Student_engagement_-_Don_Markwell_-_30_Jan_2007.pdf Do not include retrieval dates for web references unless the source material may change over time (e.g. wikis).
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018 Published by NTEU
ISSN 0818–8068
Australian Universities’ Review 2
Letter from the editor Ian R Dobson
50 Dress codes and the academic conference: McCulloch’s Iron Laws of Conferences Alistair McCulloch
ARTICLES 3
Participating in a study-abroad program: Concerns and hopes of intending international students Trevor Lovett
Students’ thinking is not preoccupied with the academic side of the impending study, and many hope to develop positive and enduring friendships. 9
Measuring research impact in Australia Andrew Gunn & Michael Mintrom
This paper reviews the policy journey of research impact in Australia from the proposed, but never implemented, Research Quality Framework (RQF) to the National Innovation and Science Agenda (NISA), considering developments from the Howard to the Turnbull Governments. 16 Optimising the efficacy of hybrid academic teams: Lessons from a systematic review process Warren Lake, Margie Wallin, Bill Boyd, Geoff Woolcott, Christos Markopoulos, Wendy Boyd & Alan Foster
This paper explores the value of utilising a hybrid academic team when undertaking the systematic review process, and shares a range of practical strategies. 25 An oral component in PhD examination in Australia: Issues and considerations Margaret Kiley, Allyson Holbrook, Terence Lovat, Hedy Fairbairn, Sue Starfield & Brian Paltridge
Based on the literature and three research projects, this paper considers a number of the key issues that would need to be addressed if an Australian institution were to introduce an oral component to the doctoral thesis examination process. 35 Alternative pathways into university: Are tertiary preparation programs a viable option? Jenny Chesters, Kerry Rutter, Karen Nelson & Louise Watson
This paper reports on a study about whether students entering university via alternative entry pathways have similar levels of achievement and attainment as students who entered via the more traditional pathway after completing Year 12. OPINION 45 Promoting learning: What universities don’t do Brian Martin
Findings from research on how people learn, mindsets, expert performance and good health are seldom incorporated into the way universities organise learning experiences.
This article draws on a long career of academic conference attendance to present two iron laws of conferences which address the relative smartness of dress of conference convenors and conference delegates. 54 Developing a sustainable academic workforce in paramedicine Peter O’Meara & Brian Maguire
There is a pressing need to develop a dedicated group of university paramedic academics. Urgent action is needed to ensure a sufficient number of paramedic academics are available to meet the educational needs of the profession. REVIEWS 57 Good Evans! What next? Incorrigible Optimist: A Political Memoir by Gareth Evans Reviewed by Paul Rodan
59 Whispering softly to me…. How to be an Academic: The Thesis Whisperer Reveals All by Inger Mewburn Reviewed by Andrys Onsman
60 English as she is spoke The Career Trajectories of English Language Teachers by Penny Haworth & Cheryl Craig (Eds.) Reviewed by Neil Mudford
62 Between paternalism and academic freedom What’s Happened to The University? A Sociological Exploration of Its Infantilisation, by Frank Furedi Reviewed by Thomas Klikauer
65 It’s a bird! It’s a plane! It’s an Academic Superhero! How to be an Academic Superhero by Iain Hay Reviewed by Andrys Onsman
67 What we all know The Knowledge Illusion – Why We Never Think Alone by Steven Sloman and Philip Fernbach Reviewed by Thomas Klikauer
70 Uni-que? UNSW: Australia’s global university by Mick Le Moignan Reviewed by Neil Mudford
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
Letter from the editor Ian R Dobson
A new year is upon us, and hasn’t AUR been around for a
In these days of massified, or even universal access to
long time: 60 years! Former editor Simon Marginson wrote
university, so-called ‘alternative pathways’ can be extremely
the definitive history of AUR ten years ago, and I would
important for many students. ‘Alternative pathways into
urge all readers to re-read ‘The Australian Universities’
university: Are tertiary preparation programs a viable
Review: A life (so far)’ (vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 4-13). Simon’s
option’, authored by four colleagues from four universities
bright exposition reveals that AUR started life in 1958 as
in four different states/territories presents an interesting
the Federal Council Bulletin, a moniker that lasted for
history of the development of these alternative pathways,
its first four issues. Later that year, it became Vestes until
and in particular, the so-called tertiary preparation
1962, when it became Vestes: The Australian Universities’
programs.‘Alternative’ students were no more likely to drop
Review, before dropping the Latin to become simply
out than the ‘un-alternative’ students!
Australian Universities’ Review in 1988. Thinking about
Brian Martin can always be relied on to provide the rest
such matters also reminds me that I have been AUR editor
of us with ‘a good read’. In this paper, he reflects on the
for ten years: my first issue was the second issue of 2008.
absence of the use of research results on ‘…how people
This has been an honour in all regards.
learn, mindsets, expert performance and good health…’
But let us return to the present.Vol. 60, no. 1 includes five scholarly papers, a few opinion pieces and book reviews. It
in what universities do to organise learning experiences. Should we be surprised?
opens with a paper about international students and their
Alistair McCulloch states that conferences are a staple of
concerns and hopes about participating in a study abroad
academic life! In this offering, he uses his long experience
program. The students have more than academic matters
‘…to present two ‘iron laws’ of conferences which address
on their mind, and they hope to build enduring friendships.
the relative smartness of dress of conference convenors
However, it has been suggested in the literature that
and conference delegates’. Fascinating! After you’ve read
attitudes and practices in Australia might restrict students
this paper, perhaps consider David Lodge’s 1984 novel,
form achieving that goal.Trevor Lovett tells all!
Small World, the second of Lodge’s Campus Trilogy.
Andrew
Gunn
and
Michael
Mintrom
put
the
Peter O’Meara and Brian Maguire examine the
measurement of research impact in Australia under
importance of the paramedic academic workforce.After all,
the microscope. Examining policy positions from the
paramedic staff are an integral part of the Australian health
Howard Government until Abbott-Turnbull, they note
system, and there are about 6,000 students enrolled in
the controversial nature of research assessment, not to
university programs. With this many students, the authors
mention the methodological and political challenges this
say that there is an urgent need for the development of
entails. More journal ranking, anyone?
a ‘dedicated group of paramedic academics, and the
Several colleagues from Southern Cross University
knock-on requirements for funding and pathways.
explore the use of ‘hybrid academic teams’ when
And then there were book reviews! This issue we have
undertaking systematic reviews. Choosing a good team,
reviews of five recently-published books, ensuring that
communicating well, and documenting everything are
there is something for everyone in AUR. If any reader has
good places to start.
a review they’d like to submit, they should do so. In fact, if
The next paper has also been written by a diverse
anyone knows of a book that they’d like to review, perhaps
team of scholars from several universities. Margaret Kiley
I could obtain a copy for you! Until the next issue, keep
and her colleagues look at the oral component in PhD
reading. Remember, in Australian higher education, we
assessment. This aspect of assessing doctoral students is
must fight on; we have no choice!
not particularly common in Australia, but it is the way it’s
Ian R Dobson is Editor of Australian Universities’ Review, and an Adjunct Professional Staff member at Monash University, Australia.
done in Europe. This paper assesses what would need to be done in the Australian context.
2
Letter from the editor Ian R Dobson
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
Participating in a studyabroad program Concerns and hopes of intending international students Trevor Lovett Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, China
This small-scale narrative investigation identifies not only the concerns but also the hopes of undergraduate psychology students from a southwest Chinese university who are about to embark on a program of study abroad. While past research has tended to focus on the anticipated negative experiences international students are likely to encounter, this study enabled students to express both their hopes as well as apprehensions in regard to the intended overseas experience. Although the data confirmed a number of findings from previous studies they also revealed that the students’ thinking is not preoccupied with the academic side of the impending study. Positive and enduring friendships are something many of the respondents expect to develop. However, a further review of the literature indicated that current attitudes and practices towards international students in Australia may restrict the participants in this research from realising those goals. Keywords: friendships, international students, narrative, social exclusion
Introduction
University (ANU) in Canberra, Australia. An important consideration in this research is cross-cultural awareness.
The implementation of the Chinese open-door policy
A Western-based approach informs the structure and
in 1978 provided opportunities for a greater number of
content of the study. As a consequence the researcher
students from the People’s Republic of China to travel
remains conscious of the need for cultural and contextual
abroad and become more familiar with different cultures
sensitivity in regard to the way in which the study is
(Chiu, 1995). Overseas study therefore is now accessible to
conducted (Dimmock, 2000).
many students for whom such an experience would have previously been impossible. Contemporary study-abroad
Review of the Literature
programs offer individuals a chance to develop global awareness and intercultural understanding. However,
Rationale: This review examines previous research
despite the increased demand for, and popularity of,
related to the concerns and hopes of students, not
study-abroad programs, students understandably remain
only intending to study overseas but those, who have
unsure about their intended overseas experience (Bell,
already participated in educational programs abroad. The
2016). The following qualitative, narrative investigation
literature review identifies the findings of prior studies
addresses both the apprehensions and hopes of second-
and evaluates their relationship to the current small-
year undergraduate students, from a southwestern
scale investigation. The review specifically reveals some
Chinese university, who are about to undertake a study-
of the contested theoretical perspectives that underpin
abroad program in psychology at the Australian National
individuals’ motivations for overseas study. The general
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
Participating in a study-abroad program Trevor Lovett
3
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
character of the review reflects the discovery orientation
deliberately drawn attention to those issues considered to
and inductive approach of qualitative work. This method
be the most relevant to the following investigation.
reduces the possibility of earlier research limiting or predicting the findings of the current study (McMillan,
Methods
2004 p. 70). Study-abroad programs are defined as those that occur
The methods used to collect and analyse data in this
outside the students’ countries of origin (Kitsantas,
study are similar to those adopted by Lovett (2014a).
2004). There is a trend by many universities both in
Although a qualitative investigation, the research does
Australia and overseas to promote international study
incorporate some statistical analysis. The meaning of the
opportunities for overseas students. The benefits for
participants’ written responses however relies on an
the hosting institutions are not only social and political
interpretive-descriptive approach (Belenky, 1992; Maykut
but also financial (Ladd & Ruby, 1999). In the United
& Morehouse, 1994).The interpretivist paradigm, in which
Kingdom for example, fees generated by international
the point of view of the actor informs an understanding
students contribute substantially to the UK’s universities’
of social phenomena, is the primary means of collecting,
budget (Brown & Holloway, 2008). Despite the
analysing and interpreting the data (Weber, 1947). Data
inevitable economic benefits of these programs, they are
are brief written responses to the research question “What
nonetheless designed to enable individuals to obtain a
concerns and hopes do you have regarding your intended
global perspective as well as intercultural competence
course of study abroad?” Each response is informed by an
and awareness (Ahn, 2014). Studying abroad has been
individual’s personal understanding and experience.
shown to increase the participating students’ self-
To infer that the concerns and hopes identified among
confidence and competitive edge in regard to future
this specific sample are typical of all Chinese students
employment (Potts, 2015).
who intend to study overseas is unjustified. Nonetheless
To identify perceived concerns and hopes of students
there are some points raised by the students in this
intending to study abroad, Bell (2014) examined some
study that could be considered generalisable (McMillan,
theoretical frameworks that explain individuals’ choices
2004). Recruiting participants for this study relied on
for taking up overseas study. One significant factor said
opportunistic sampling (Lovett, 2010) due to my obvious
to influence a student’s decision to study abroad relates
accessibility to the respondents. I teach research skills to
to future employment prospects rather than the actual
this particular cohort. The participant sample consisted
educational experience (Thirolf, 2014). Perna (2006) on
of fifty-nine, second-year undergraduate psychology
the other hand suggests that decisions are weighed up in
students involved in a 2 + 2 program between their
terms of the potential personal and educational benefits
own tertiary institution and the ANU. Two variables,
when compared to the anticipated costs associated with
identified as significant in the collection, analysis and
the study. For Chinese students in particular who choose
interpretation of the data, were age and gender. Data
to study abroad, the new environment is undoubtedly
were generated in tutorials during the second week of
going to contribute to a degree of uncertainty at both
the first semester 2017. Individuals were encouraged to
a social and educational level (Zhang, 2007). Other
be candid when responding to the research question.
preoccupations associated with participating in such
The data therefore are credible first-hand accounts of the
programs include: obtaining academic credit for the
students’ anticipated experience. To ensure participants’
overseas course, prolonging one’s graduation date, missed
confidentiality all responses were anonymous.
employment prospects, family considerations and, most
The participants’ written responses were analysed
significantly, financial constraints (Foster, 2014; Lenz &
using Ricoeur’s (1976) interpretation theory. A detailed
Wister, 2008; Shaftel et al. 2007).
examination of narratives identified specific units of
Students who study abroad not only have to deal with
meaning. This critical reading however was preceded by
the normal issues associated with being a student but
an initial cursory or naïve reading. Each student’s response
must also contend with the added pressures related to
was studied for themes, the participant’s use of particular
living in an unfamiliar cultural context as well as studying
words and any inconsistencies in what the individual had
in a different educational system and dealing with the
written.Themes are conceptual labels aligned with events
challenges of language (Campbell, 2012). The review has
and other phenomena. They are abstract constructs that
summarised and analysed some important themes related
connect the expressions in the written responses to
to international students’ intended study abroad and has
objects and images (Strauss & Corbin, 1990).
4
Participating in a study-abroad program Trevor Lovett
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
Analysis A preliminary analysis described all of the participants’ responses individually. Interpretation of the responses occurs in the next stage of the study. Interpretation, although acknowledging each participant’s experiences and views separately, treats the themes collectively (Lovett, 2014b). The analysis of the data did not set out to solve a specific problem. Both a literal and interpretive treatment of the data identified the more important concerns and hopes of this student cohort’s intended study abroad. Characteristics of the students’ writing that were not discernible as standard English were edited from responses. Removing grammatical inconsistencies reflects my concerns about language and its capacity to label individuals. Imposing myself on the data is an attempt to reduce any potential strictures of participants due to language. The representation of each student’s response nonetheless remains essentially intact (Fairclough, 1992). Emerging from the data are numerous themes that are consistent among the sample. One preoccupation in particular relates to the challenges of communication. For example: I may not be able to catch up with the native learners in my study work (Female, 21). My concerns are language gaps and culture gaps (Female, 19).
Fig. 1: Concerns (Worditout, 2017) Loneliness and culture differences concern me (Female, 20). A concern of many individuals is the academic challenges they could face: I’m concerned about a lot of things. Firstly how many classes I will have per week and how I will perform in them. This is a criterion measuring how I will digest the knowledge and skills (Female, 20). My concerns are how teachers develop lectures. Will they be the same as the Chinese pattern? Are the final exams like those in China? Will we have to write a paper? Can I choose the tutors that teach the research area in which I’m interested (Female, 20)? A concern is if the exams are too hard and I cannot succeed in my final examination (Male, 20). The following responses identify what a majority of the students want to achieve from their intended experience abroad. Something not addressed in the literature and somewhat unexpected was a genuine desire among the participant sample to establish personal friendships:
A concern is that I won’t understand the lectures because of language (Female, 20).
I hope I can make some foreign friends (Female, 19).
My oral English may not be good enough to talk with foreigners (Female, 19).
I hope I can get along with many foreign people and build a solid relationship between countries (Male, 20).
I will be concerned about the academic environment, security and language barrier (Male, 20). I’m worried about language which plays a vital part in life. Even though I have studied English for a couple of years ….it’s still a little difficult for me to communicate fluently like a native speaker. I’m not certain whether others have the same problem (Female, 21). Another significant theme identified among the cohort is the question of cultural difference: I worry about the culture shock if I go abroad. Students who come from other countries may not understand Chinese culture. It might be difficult to relate to one another (Female, 19). I think about the culture differences particularly in food and communication (Female, 19). I’m concerned that cultural differences may bring about conflict (Female, 20).
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
I hope I can make some new friends in Australia with whom I can study and talk (Male, 19). Make good friends with people from all over the world (Female, 19). I wish to have a beautiful boyfriend (Female, 20). If it’s possible I’d like to make more friends who are from different countries (Female, 19). The most important thing is to make some fantastic friends (Male, 18). I want to make a pretty good friend (Other, 20). Educational aspirations predictably constitute the greatest number of responses among the sample: I hope to learn more skills and gain greater expertise (Female, 19).
Participating in a study-abroad program Trevor Lovett
5
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
E
R
S
I
I
E
To learn frontier research from another country (Male, 20).
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
Males
Females Other Total
%
Academic demands
6
17
-
23
38%
Concerns
Accommodation
1
9
-
10
16%
I hope to attain a good score in my studies and learn plenty of knowledge to help broaden my horizon (Female, 19).
Cultural differences
3
16
-
19
32%
Language
4
25
-
29
49%
3
7
-
10
16%
The data identify the personal views of this
Money
student group. Both the narrative responses and the
Hopes
representations of them (Figures 1, 2 & Table 1) help to
Develop academically
7
28
-
35
59%
provide an understanding of the research focus, namely international students’ concerns and hopes about studying
To graduate
3
11
-
14
23%
Experience a different culture
-
13
-
13
22%
Be happy
1
8
1
10
16%
Make friends
7
22
1
30
50%
abroad. The study demonstrates that the preoccupations of this student cohort, regarding their intended overseas study, are numerous and varied. A literal and interpretive treatment of the data suggests that the issues of most concern, among a majority of the respondents, relate to the challenges of language and academic requirements.
W
Table 1. Student Concerns and Hopes
I want to get a master’s degree in psychology and acquire much more knowledge (Female, 19). I hope I can do well in my courses at university and get a good final score (Male, 19).
T
Study sample comprises 47 female, 11 male & 1 other student/s
Conversely academic development and establishing friendships reflect the more positive expectations of
Schapper (2012) however argue that a gap exists in the
the group. A number of themes identified in (Figures 1,
social support education institutions offer international
2 & Table 1) are consistent with previous research, for
students when the students are off campus. The
example: language, money, academic demands and cultural
researchers examined international students’ experiences
difference. However, as a social researcher and teacher the
in Australia and found that the students’ temporary
response of most interest to me is the students’ hopes of
visitor status created conditions for social exclusion.
establishing personal friendships when they are abroad.
The suggestion is that many international students have difficulty involving themselves in the cultural and social
Discussion
aspects of Australian life.
Evidence from the literature indicates that students who
found in the Melbourne example. International students
study abroad not only contend with issues one normally
comprise almost one third of all young people who live
associates with being a student, but also face challenges of
in the city. Most are postgraduate or undergraduates
educational, cultural and linguistic difference (Campbell,
under 25. Significantly the data indicate that the majority
2012). The data indicate that a priority among the
live alone. Melbourne City’s own statistics show that
participant sample is to develop strong positive personal
the international student population grew rapidly from
relationships with others during their overseas study
17,000 in 2002 to 29,000 in 2011. As a consequence,
program.To accommodate this expectation it is incumbent
the local government decided to become proactive in
upon hosting institutions, and the communities of which
developing strategies to ensure the experiences of this
they are part, to ensure international students feel included
diverse demographic are positive. Some of the plans
both socially as well as educationally. Paltridge, Mayson &
include: providing opportunities for students to engage
Evidence to support claims of social isolation can be
with the local community by connecting with libraries, arts and cultural programs as well as recreational centres. Local businesses and professional associations are also encouraged to offer internships and employment for international students (City of Melbourne, 2017). If
Fig. 2: Hopes (Worditout, 2017)
6
Participating in a study-abroad program Trevor Lovett
adopted Australia wide this approach has the potential to improve international students’ overall study experience vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
and contribute to their increased participation in the
who intend to study abroad. Consistent with previous
wider community: particularly in relation to establishing
research are preoccupations related to language, cultural
friendships with local Australians.
difference and the anticipated academic demands of the
The volunteer and mentoring programs developed
intended study. An unexpected theme emerging from
by Adelaide University similarly enable international
the data relates to students’ willingness to develop strong
students to meet others from all over the world: including
personal friendships with others from the host country.
locals. Students who participate are encouraged to
However, a further review of the literature shows that
become socially active and take a break from their
these aspirations could possibly go unrealised. Paltridge,
studies. According to the website many of those involved
Mayson & Schapper’s (2012) investigation indicates that
in the program have developed lifelong friendships
international students’ legal status and marginal location
(Adelaide University, 2017). Another common belief is
contributes to their social exclusion.
that homestay accommodation provides international
As a consequence, they require not only increased
students with opportunities to not only learn more
on-campus support but also a greater degree of
about the country in which they are studying but it also
acceptance among the wider community. According
gives students a chance to develop enduring friendships
to Holmes (2000) cultural stress is a consequence
with local families. This may be true to some extent
of the uneasiness that develops from interacting in
however Campbell’s (2004) study of Chinese students’
a culture different from one’s own. Kashima & Loh
homestay experiences in New Zealand revealed that in
(2006) cite previous research conducted by Furnham &
many instances it was quite the opposite.
Bochner (1986) that identifies different levels of social
In light of the findings of this study, the ANU like other
networking among international students: monocultural,
universities has a responsibility to guarantee that students
bicultural
get opportunities to fulfil the expectations they have
working with students from abroad, and in particular
and
multicultural. Personal
experience
in regard to developing positive personal relationships
Chinese students, tells me that individuals tend to
while in Canberra.
According to The International
gravitate towards the monocultural network. It is natural
Student Living Guide (2017) the primary concern of the
to assume networking with other co-nationals would
International Students’ Department (ISD) at ANU is to
be easier than either biculturally or multiculturally. It
ensure the wellbeing of overseas students who live in the
is suggested that further qualitative research into these
nation’s capital. Given the evidence of social exclusion
students’ experiences is required. Individuals need to
often experienced by overseas students within Australia it
share more of their personal stories. I would hope for the
is hoped that the expectations of this study’s participants
sake of the students who participated in this research
can be met.
that their intended study abroad becomes more than just
For a long time the issue of social inclusion has
an academic undertaking.
concerned the Australian tertiary education sector (Naylor & James, 2016). Universities obviously have a role to play
Trevor Lovett is a teacher at the Xi’an University of
when it comes to making international students feel
Architecture and Technology, China.
welcome not only on but also off campus. The current
Contact: hongkonglovett@hotmail.com
policies and practices of Australian universities, and more specifically ANU, undoubtedly promote intercultural understanding and awareness. But do these policies actually help individuals develop enduring personal friendships, something this study’s participants are looking for? I argue it should be the responsibility of teaching faculty as well as university administrators to get involved in developing activities both within and outside universities for those students who might feel socially disenfranchised.
Conclusion This study has identified some concerns and hopes of students from a south-western Chinese university vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
References Ahn, S. (2014). A good learning opportunity, but is it for me? A study of Swedish students’ attitudes towards exchange studies in higher education. Journal of Research in International Education, 13(2), 106–118. Australian National University. (2017). The International Student Living Guide 2017, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia. http://anuisd.com/ international-students-guide/ Belenky, M. (1992). Bringing balance to the classroom or workplace. Paper presented at the Wisconsin Women’s Studies Conference, Preconference Workshop, Greenbay Wisconsin. Bell, R. (2016). Concerns and expectations of students participating in study abroad programmes: Blogging to reveal the dynamic student voice. Journal of Research in International Education, 15(3), 196-207. doi: 10.1177/1475240916669028 Participating in a study-abroad program Trevor Lovett
7
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
Brown, L. & Holloway, I. (2008). The initial stage of the international sojourn: excitement or culture shock? British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 36(1), 33–49. 10.1080/03069880701715689 Campbell, N. (2004). Home(stay) is where the heart(ache) is: a study of Chinese international students living with local families in New Zealand. Australian Journal of Communication, 31(2), 107-134. http://search.informit.com. au.proxy.library.adelaide.edu.au/documentSummary;dn=200411989;res=IEL APA Campbell, N. (2012). Promoting Intercultural Contact on Campus: A Project to Connect and Engage International and Host Students. Journal of Studies in International Education, 16(3), 205-227. doi: 10.1177/1028315311403936 Chiu, M. (1995). The influence of anticipatory fear on foreign student adjustment: An exploratory study. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 19, 1-44.
V
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
Lovett, T. (2014b). “Going Going.....” Why Are Males Underrepresented In Pre-service Primary Education Courses At University?” International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 6(2), 347-356. http://www.iejee. com/6_2_2014/IEJEE_6_2_lovett.pdf McMillan, J. (2004). Educational Research Fundamentals for the Consumer (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education. Maykut, P., & Morehouse, R. (1994). Beginning Qualitative Research: A Philosophic and Practical Guide (Second ed.). London: The Falmer Press. Naylor, R., & James, R. (2016). ‘Systematic Equity Challenges: An Overview of the Role of Australian Universities in Student Equity and Social Inclusion’, in Mahsood, S., Bennett, A., and Southgate, E. (Eds) Widening Higher Education Participation: A Global Perspective, Elsevier, Science Direct, 1-13. http://dx.doi. org.proxy.library.adelaide.edu.au/10.1016/B978-0-08-100213-1.00001-9
City of Melbourne. (2017). A Great Place to Study: City of Melbourne: International Student Strategy 2013–17, Melbourne, Australia. http://www. melbourne.vic.gov.au/community/health-support-services/for-young-people/ Pages/international-student-strategy-2013-17.aspx
Paltridge, T., Mayson, S. & Schapper, J. (2012). Covering the gap: Social inclusion, international students and the role of local government. Australian Universities’ Review, 54(2), 29-39. http://proxy.library.adelaide.edu.au/ login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh&AN=8 0021829&site=ehost-live&scope=site
Dimmock, C. (2000). Designing the Learning-centred school: A Cross-cultural Perspective. London: Falmer Press.
Perna, L. (2006). Studying college access and choice: a proposed conceptual model. Higher Education, 21, 99–157.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge, Polity.
Potts, D. (2015). Understanding the early career benefits of learning abroad programs. Journal of Studies in International Education, 19(5), 441–459. 10.1177/1028315315579241
Foster, M. (2014). Student destination choices in higher education: exploring attitudes of Brazilian students to study in the United Kingdom. Journal of Research in International Education, 13(2), 149–162. 10.1177/1475240914541024 Holmes, P. (2000). Strangers, sojourners, selves: The intercultural communication experiences of ethnic Chinese students in western tertiary education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand. Kashima, E., & Loh, E. (2006). International Students’ Acculturation: Effects of conational international, and local ties and need for closure, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30(4), 471-485. http://dx.doi.org.proxy. library.adelaide.edu.au/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2005.12.003 Kitsantas, A. (2004). Studying abroad: the role of college students’ goals on the development of cross-cultural skills and global understanding. College Student Journal, 38(3), 441–452.
Ricoeur, P. (1976). Interpretation Theory: Discourse and the Surplus of Meaning. Fort Worth: Texan Christian University Press. Shaftel, J. Shaftel, T. & Ahluwalia, R. (2007). International educational experience and intercultural competence. International Journal of Business and Economics, 6(1), 25–34. Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks, Sage. The University of Adelaide. (2017). The University of Adelaide Peer Support Program, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide. http://international.adelaide.edu. au/student-support/connecting/pmp/ Thirolf, K. (2014). Male college student perceptions of intercultural and study abroad programs. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 51(3), 246–258.
Ladd, P. D. & Ruby, R. (1999). Learning style and adjustment issues of international students. Journal of Education for Business, 363-367. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1080/08832329909601712
Weber, M. (1947). The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. New York: Free Press.
Lenz, W. & Wister, J. (2008). Short-term study abroad with long-term benefits. International Education Journal, 17(3), 84–87.
Worditout, (2017). Hopes. Accessed 28 March 2017 https://worditout.com
Lovett, T. (2010). Cultural Chameleons: An investigation into the construction and influences of working-class identities on the formal learning of white babyboomer males. 2010 TASA Conference Paper, Macquarie University. http://www. tasa.org.au/uploads/2011/01/Lovett-Trevor.pdf
Worditout, (2017). Concerns. Accessed 28 March 2017 https://worditout.com Zhang, Z. & Brunton, M. (2007). Differences in Living and Learning: Chinese International Students in New Zealand. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11(2), 124-140. doi: 10.1177/1028315306289834
Lovett, T. W. (2014a). Mentor Social Capital, Individual Agency and Workingclass Student Learning Outcomes: Revisiting the Structure/Agency Dialectic. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(11), 16-28. http://ro.ecu.edu.au/ ajte/vol39/iss11/2
8
Participating in a study-abroad program Trevor Lovett
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
Measuring research impact in Australia Andrew Gunn University of Leeds, United Kingdom
Michael Mintrom Monash University
The implementation of the national Research Engagement and Impact Assessment in Australia provides a timely opportunity to review attempts to improve the non-academic impact of academic research. The impact agenda represents a new phase in academic research evaluation and funding, characterised by a heightened need to demonstrate a return on public investments in research. New imperatives seek the reorientation of some academic research towards more directly driving national innovation, meeting the needs of business, and contributing to improved social and economic outcomes. This paper reviews the policy journey of research impact in Australia from the proposed, but never implemented, Research Quality Framework (RQF) to the National Innovation and Science Agenda (NISA). Our analysis of policy developments from the Howard to the Turnbull Governments highlights the controversial nature of research impact assessment and the political and methodological challenges that have accompanied its implementation. Keywords: Higher education, research funding, research evaluation, impact and engagement, innovation policy.
The Engaged University
In the global knowledge economy, governments are keen to ensure academic research remains relevant and
Universities have always been engaged with the
produces useful impact. This is vital for maintaining
economy and society around them. However, in recent
economic competitiveness.
years perspectives on this engagement have changed.
to attain and sustain high living standards must now
Considering the history of the university, the emphasis on
encourage linking of local economic activity to the global
research and publication is relatively new. Prior to this,
knowledge economy. Given this, promoting local research
engagement with society was more often via teaching and
activity that is both excellent and relevant is an important
the granting of degrees. Many governments now expect
political objective.
All governments seeking
academics and universities to demonstrate precisely how
Assessments of research impact consider how research
they are relevant to the world outside academia (Morgan,
gains the attention and changes the actions of those
2014). This is where the wider benefits of academic
outside the academy. Such impact could be technological,
research need to be shown, rather than assumed. In this
environmental, economic or social. It could affect the
environment, the money spent on academic research
policies, strategies, and actions of businesses, governments,
needs to be justified with more rigour than in the past.
non-profit organisations, and community groups. It differs
Welcome or not, this policy shift is consistent with efforts
from impact within the academic community, such as
elsewhere in government and commercial spheres to
scholarly influence and the citation counts of published
measure return on investment.
articles.
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
Measuring research impact in Australia Andrew Gunn & Michael Mintrom
9
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
The inclusion of non-academic impact into the processes
reports that set the future direction of Australian research
of research assessment signifies a new phase in the auditing
and innovation policy (Commonwealth Government,
of academic work. Academic work will increasingly come
2001).This was followed by reports including Advancing
to be judged and funded on its non-academic impact in
Australia’s Abilities: Foundations for the future of
addition to its academic value. This audit culture matters
research in Australia by the Australian Vice-Chancellors’
because it has consequences for the production of
Committee (AVCC, 2003) and Backing Australia’s Ability:
academic research. For example, Welch (2016) notes the
Building our Future through Science and Innovation
subtle ‘reshaping’ and ‘distorting’ effects on Australian social
(Commonwealth Government, 2004).
science research of ever more sophisticated academic audits over the last 20 years.
These reports created support for revising how research in Australian was funded and evaluated. One rationale for
The impact agenda has progressed over the last decade.
reform rested on the criticism of the research funding
This is evident in the funding and evaluation processes in
formulae operating at the time, which privileged quantity
some European countries, which have been adapted to
of publications produced and which ‘was not providing
incorporate the non-academic impact of research (Gunn
the right incentives’ (Sheil, 2014). The view was that
& Mintrom, 2016). Various interventions are available to
such a system can be easily ‘gamed’ by researchers who
policy makers to assess the impact of academic research.
respond by publishing more. This situation further fuels
They each interact with academic knowledge production
the ‘publish or perish’ culture which can be detrimental
in different ways (Gunn & Mintrom, 2017).
to research quality and a distraction from the pursuit of
In Australia, the research impact agenda has intermittently
wider, non-academic impact.
progressed over the last 15 years and can be viewed across
In 2004, the minister with responsibility for universities,
three periods: the Howard Government years (especially
Dr Brendan Nelson MP, announced the pioneering
from 2001-2007), the Labor Governments (2007-13) and
Research Quality Framework (RQF), which would assess
the Coalition Governments (2013-).We review each period
both the quality and impact of research in one framework.
in turn. In Australia, higher education policy is largely the
In September 2005 the Government unveiled the
responsibility of the Federal Government. Analysing policy-
‘Preferred Model’ for the RQF which detailed the structure
making at this level provides insights into the factors that
of the assessment mechanisms and criteria (Department
have shaped academic research; although it should be
of Education, Science and Training, 2005). At this point,
noted that not all research is funded by the government
Australia was at the forefront of higher education policy
and there are various other influences on the direction and
design. The government was close to implementing a
content of academic research.
cyclical research evaluation process that would inform
A review of the public policy history culminating in
research funding allocations based on both university
current endeavours to assess impact is useful for several
research quality (not just quantity) and its impact outside
reasons. First, it reveals how policy makers have wrestled
the academy.
with the challenge of measuring a phenomenon that may
The ground-breaking feature of the RQF was how it
seem intangible. Second, it identifies the decisions that led
made impact an integral part of the cyclical mainstream
to the current arrangements. This allows for reflection on
evaluation of academic research. A non-academic impact
what ideas have been proposed and abandoned and which
component existed alongside this academic quality
have progressed. We can test for evidence of cumulative
component. The RQF was ahead of its time and was in
thinking. Third, it reveals political and ministerial choices
many ways controversial. It attracted several criticisms.
that have shaped policy. It is particularly interesting to
The first was the high cost of its implementation. Some
look at the motivations of ministers to explain policy goals
were concerned the high cost of the assessment process
and why some paths were not taken. Finally, it provides
would take money away from actual research.
broader insights into the context and processes of higher
However, the main criticism of the RQF concerned the
education policy development in Australia – a complex
impact component. Criticism levelled at impact tends to
space characterised by multiple, competing interests.
fall into two categories. First is the argument that impact represents the imposition of non-academic interests onto
The Howard Government (1996-2007)
the production of academic knowledge. This diminishes the purity of curiosity driven research and encroaches
In 2001 the Liberal-National Coalition Government, led by
upon academic freedom and autonomy of ‘the liberal
Prime Minister John Howard, released the first in a series of
university’. The second common criticism challenges
10
Measuring research impact in Australia Andrew Gunn & Michael Mintrom
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
impact assessment on methodological grounds. Critics
2007). As a replacement to the RQF, the Labor Government
question the extent to which impact actually can be
developed Excellence in Research in Australia (ERA), an
measured and assessed by an audit or evaluation; often
evaluation program focused on academic excellence and
claiming evaluation processes are a distraction with
the principle of peer review.
limited real positive social outcomes. Following the Howard Government reshuffle of January 2006, Julie Bishop MP became the minister with responsibility for higher education. In November 2006 and after ‘two fraught years of anxiety and speculation’ (Armitage, 2006) the minister confirmed the RQF would commence in 2008. Bishop set out the reasons for the Government pressing ahead: ‘The RQF is an important reform for Australian research as it will boost the production of high quality and high impact research and will give Australian researchers greater capacity to compete on the international stage. There is currently no comprehensive way to measure the quality or the impact of research conducted in Australian universities or the benefits to the wider community. The RQF will assess research against international benchmarks based on its quality and impact and will provide transparency about public investment in research ... Australia is also setting a pioneering course in the assessment of research impact. The introduction of a measurement of research impact in the RQF will create a world-first research evaluation measure.’ (Bishop, 2006).
‘ERA does not feature the controversial “impact” measure that was a feature of the RQF, involving lengthy, time-consuming, written descriptions. This would have eaten up researchers’ precious time, as well as requiring detailed and painstaking attention on the part of assessors. The “impact” measure would have taken Australia on a path that led away from accepted international best practice – just when we need more than ever to ensure that our researchers have international standing.’ (Carr, 2008) The ERA was implemented and, with modifications, would go on to produce three full rounds of national evaluation by research discipline in 2010, 2012 and 2015 (Nicol et al., 2016). The criteria within the ERA meant researchers could continue to be oriented towards their academic peers, rather than be required to consider beneficiaries of their research outside the academy. Although the RQF would not be implemented in Australia, the global trend of governments redefining research policy towards the ‘instrumentalisation’ of knowledge and making universities more responsive to the needs of economic and industrial actors continued
Policy was guided by the underlying assumption that
(Albert, 2003). In this process, the RQF proposal would
the Government represents the public interest. Moreover,
prove to be valuable to policy makers in other countries.
it was the duty of government to ensure academic
For example, the RQF heavily influenced policy makers
research produced wider benefits; thus delivering a
in the United Kingdom (UK) who were developing the
return on the investment made by taxpayers. Australian
next generation of the Research Assessment Exercise.
universities, it was argued, would also benefit from being
The funding council in England commissioned the report
more competitive on the global stage. However, the extent
Capturing Research Impacts: A review of international
to which the Government can effectively represent the
practice (RAND Europe, 2009) to help policy development
public interest in higher education has been debated.
which featured the RQF as a source of ‘policy transfer’,
This is because there are a range of stakeholders in higher
where policy makers learn from comparable systems in
education, not necessarily fully represented by, or in
other countries.
agreement with, government policies.
Although
the
impact
agenda
in Australia
had
stalled, it remained present on the political and policy
The Rudd–Gillard–Rudd Governments (2007-2013)
landscape. For example, in 2011 the Focusing Australia’s Publicly Funded Research Review noted the need for increased evidence of the broader economic, social and
The federal election of 2007 brought an end to the
environmental benefits of publicly funded research and
Howard Government, and the RQF. In the Kevin Rudd-led
recommended that a feasibility study be undertaken
Labor Government, Senator Kim Carr took responsibility
on options for assessing them (Department of Industry,
for higher education. One of Carr’s first actions as minister
Innovation and Science, 2011). In 2012 the Excellence in
was to cancel the RQF implementation, on the grounds
Innovation for Australia (EIA) Trial, a substantial pilot by
there was no methodology or international recognised
the Australian Technology Network involving the Group
model to base it on. Research impact, Carr argued, would
of Eight, was undertaken. This trial sought to measure the
require universities to write long impact essays which
innovation benefits of research and act as a precursor
would be difficult to assess by verifiable standards (Carr,
to a possible future component in the national research
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
Measuring research impact in Australia Andrew Gunn & Michael Mintrom
11
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
evaluation process informing the allocation of funding. Using case studies, the EIA trials revealed considerable non-academic impact across a wide range of university research disciplines (ATN & GO8, 2012). Although it did not feature in the ERA, the impact agenda in Australia continued to develop through other activities of the Australian Research Council (ARC). In June 2013 a federal government discussion paper considering
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
While there has been some criticism from the UK higher education sector of the administrative burden of the number of case studies that have been required, it should be possible to measure impact without making it overly burdensome. …. Sometimes we need to learn from the experience of others and adapt. Innovation and impact in rankings have the potential to tell a compelling story about our ability to transfer knowledge created in our universities to industry – about the economic and social impacts’. (Birmingham, 2015).
the wider benefits arising from university based research
During the ten years since the RQF was proposed, the
was published (DIICCSRTE, 2013). However, its release in
UK developed and implemented an impact agenda into its
the finally weeks of the Labor Government meant it was
funding and evaluation model. For an Australian minister,
too late for any policy action.
it would now be easier to design a workable policy and build a consensus to implement it as the UK provided
The Abbott–Turnbull Governments (2013–)
a fully worked out model. The UK benchmark indeed addresses some, if not all, of Kim Carr’s impact concerns
The Liberal-National Coalition returned to government
of a decade earlier.
following the election of 2013, led by Prime Minister Tony
The pace of policy change now quickened. In November
Abbott. In October 2014 the Government revealed the
2015 the Watt Review published 28 recommendations
Industry Investment and CompetitivenessAgenda blueprint
(Watt, 2015) and in December the Australian Government
which argued that public research grants should prioritise
announced the National Innovation and Science Agenda
research projects which are more relevant to industry,
(NISA), which contained new measures to assist in
serve economic competitiveness and deliver business
improving the commercial returns of publicly-funded
outcomes. The blueprint argued: ‘Australia performs well
research. The NISA sought to encourage collaboration
on many measures of research excellence but cannot
between universities and business, and to better translate
rely on research expertise alone. Our future prosperity
research outcomes into economic and social benefits
depends on our capacity to turn research into commercial
(Commonwealth of Australia, 2015). In March 2016
outcomes that lift innovation, help successful Australian
the Engagement and Impact Steering Committee, with
businesses grow, and boost Australia’s productivity and
supporting working groups, was formed ‘to develop a
exports’ (Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet,
process that uses clear and transparent measures of non-
2014 p. xix). Reports such as this, which emphasise the
academic impact, and industry and end-user engagement,
need for a return on investment in research, reaffirmed the
to assess our nation’s university research performance and
Government’s position that publicly funded research is
inform future funding structures’ (Birmingham, 2016).
expected to contribute to innovation.
In May 2016, the minister responded to the Watt Review
To inform future thinking, in July 2015, the Minister for
recommendations (Department of Education and Training,
Education and Training, Christopher Pyne MP appointed
2016), several of which were closely aligned to the NISA,
Dr Ian Watt AO to conduct a review of research policy
and agreed to commission a national assessment of
and funding.
university research engagement and impact. The chair of
Following Malcolm Turnbull becoming Prime Minster
the ARC then released a Consultation Paper detailing the
in September 2015, Senator Simon Birmingham became
proposed mechanisms and criteria (Australian Research
the minister responsible for higher education. This
Council, 2016a). The Paper made reference to the impact
marked a new direction in higher education policy, as
component of the UK’s Research Excellence Framework
many of the reforms attempted by Christopher Pyne were
(REF) – revealing two-way policy transfer, with Australia
shelved. With a new minister open to new ideas, and the
now learning from the UK experience.
Coalition in office, the conditions for reviving the impact
In November 2016, with the consultation completed,
agenda were favourable. Birmingham indicated this in an
Senator Birmingham confirmed pilots would take place
address to the Business/Higher Education Round Table in
in 2017 to measure the impact of university research and
November 2015:
their engagement with business and industry. He said the
‘Unlike our Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA), the UK approach includes evidence of the impact of UK research, through its case study methodology.
12
pilots were about ‘testing how we can measure the value of research against things that mean something, rather than only allocating funding to researchers who spend
Measuring research impact in Australia Andrew Gunn & Michael Mintrom
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
their time trying to get published in journals’ (Birmingham, quoted in Australian Research Council, 2016b).
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
It must be remembered that engagement and impact are not the same thing. The experience of the UK, and
The Engagement and Impact (EI) Assessment pilots
the responses to the consultation paper, show that they
involved a selection of ten broad discipline groups being
are often viewed differently. Academics are perhaps more
tested for either the ‘engagement’ or ‘impact’ component of
amenable to engagement, seeing this as an acceptable
the assessment. Participating universities made their pilot
addition to their work; whereas impact can be met with
submissions to the ARC in May 2017, which were assessed
hostility.
throughout June by five panels comprising of academics
For example, the Australian Academy of Technological
with specific discipline expertise, industry representatives
Sciences and Engineering (ATSE) response to the
and other end-users of research. Almost 300 submissions
consultation highlighted the difficulties in assessing
were made by the 39 universities who participated,
research impact, as opposed to engagement. Their
generating extensive data. The panels provided a rating
submission argued that attempting to measure impact
and feedback on each unit that universities submitted.
involves long time lags and a diversity of indicators across
Following this, the methodology tested in the pilot, as well
disciplines. They concluded: ‘While it is only readily
as data and feedback from the experts and universities
possible to “assess” research impact, research engagement
involved, were reviewed to inform the design of the first
can be “measured”. ATSE has strongly recommended that
full assessment. The national rollout of the EI assessment
the proposed NISA process focus primarily on research
will be undertaken as a companion to the 2018 round of
engagement, not impact’ (ATSE, 2016b).
the ERA (Commonwealth of Australia, 2017).
This difference between engagement and impact relates
For the purposes of the pilot, research engagement
to another fundamental methodological debate. This is
is defined as the ‘interaction between researchers and
also evident in responses to the consultation paper, where
research end-users (including industry, Government, non-
it asked:‘If case studies or exemplars are used, should they
governmental organisations, communities and community
focus on the outcomes of research or the steps taken by
organisations), for the mutually beneficial exchange of
the institution to facilitate the outcomes?’ (Australian
knowledge, technologies and methods, and resources in a
Research Council, 2016a p. 8). In other words, should the
context of partnership and reciprocity’.This is assessed by
evaluation focus on the ‘ends’ or the ‘means’ of achieving
metric indicators and a narrative statement. Alternatively,
engagement and impact? Responses to this varied. For
research impact ‘is the contribution that research makes
example, the Australian Academy of the Humanities
to the economy, society and environment, beyond the
(AAH) expressed concern with a focus on the outcomes
contribution to academic research,’ to be assessed by
as ‘causality and attribution are notoriously difficult
qualitative information (impact studies) supplemented
to pinpoint’, while advocating a focus on ‘facilitation
with quantitative data, where available (Australian
processes would not only be more manageable, but,
Research Council, 2016c).
importantly, it would also serve to highlight the distinct
This distinction highlights the novelty of the new
stages of research pathways to impact: result of research
Australian approach. The UK system, for example, is
process; outcomes of research; and coverage of the
only concerned with impact. Considering engagement
research’ (AAH, 2016). The submission by the Early and
and impact as two distinct entities disentangles two
Mid-Career Researcher Forum of the Australian Academy
different, but obviously related phenomena. These
of Science also endorsed a focus on facilitation processes
clear demarcations between interactions with the
as it would be easier to implement because immediate
‘non-academic world’ (engagement) and non-academic
data can be collected.They also argued such an approach
benefits that can be identified and verified (impact)
would overcome time lag issues and improve incentives
help communicate what does, and what does not count,
(EMRC AAS, 2016).
in the evaluation. Moreover, considering both, means
While this focus on the ‘means’, and not the ‘ends’, of
the evaluation captures a wider range of academic
engagement and impact may be easier to assess, others
activities. It may also mitigate for Australian researchers
have argued research evaluation must be consistent and
some of the confusion UK researchers first experienced
robust. For example, a learned society of mathematicians
understanding the UK impact agenda. The absence of an
pointed out the ‘ERA measures outcomes so this
engagement element in the UK system, and the initially
assessment process should only measure outcomes too’
narrow definition of impact have been a source of
(AMSI et al., 2016). Further methodological weaknesses
frustration and an area for potential future policy revision.
were highlighted by the Australian Sociological Association
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
Measuring research impact in Australia Andrew Gunn & Michael Mintrom
13
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
(TASA) who ‘are concerned that focussing on “steps taken
the contentious nature of higher education policy making
by the institution” could be more susceptible to gaming
in Australia. It also reveals the difficulty of designing
and manipulation and could result in superficial measures
an audit mechanism that is valid and that encourages
of impact. By contrast steps taken by researchers to create
researchers to take an interest in enhancing the impact
impact would be useful to capture in the assessment’
of their work beyond the campus. The greatest policy
(TASA, 2016).
challenge has been agreeing to a methodology and
Although a nurturing environment that fosters impact and engagement is of importance to their realisation,
building a political consensus around it. The
controversy
and
methodological
challenges
an assessment of the presence of such an environment
associated with impact assessment have ramifications for
does not measure actual outcomes. Moreover, although
realisation of a fully-functioning assessment system. For
engagement may be regarded more favourably by
government ministers, building a political consensus, both
academics, it may not produce the substantiated benefits
within and outside parliament, for such a system is difficult
of impact. Returning to first principles, the objective of
as it is often met with resistance. For policy designers and
government policy is to see a return on investments made.
public managers developing a system, efforts must be
This requires verification there are outcomes, not just
made to ensure it is robust, credible and acceptable to a
processes. It is for this reason the UK research evaluation
substantial portion of the academic community.
and funding systems has focussed on impact. These
debates
illustrate
the
complex
As the assessment of impact and engagement is rolled design
out across Australian higher education in 2018, it will be
considerations and methodological choices facing higher
instructive to monitor future developments within the
education policy makers.They also highlight the differing
debates set out here. As one long and winding process
positions taken on the best way forward by different parts
reaches its end, others are only beginning.
of the sector. It reinforces the need for the pilot year.The pilot year provided an opportunity to test the robustness
Andrew Gunn is a postdoctoral researcher, specialising in
of a wide range of indicators and methods of assessment.
higher education, at the School of Education, University of
It also has increased the likelihood that the right balance
Leeds, United Kingdom.
will be found between metrics and peer review, therefore
Contact: a.s.gunn@leeds.ac.uk
addressing the concerns of organisations including the Australian Technology Network (ATN, 2016). This is
Michael Mintrom is a professor of Public Management at
important, as Universities Australia has noted: ‘As impact
Monash University, Australia, and an Academic Director at the
can only be subjectively assessed rather than objectively
Australia and New Zealand School of Government.
measured, as is the case with engagement, it is essential that the assessment criteria is (sic) robust and transparent’ (Universities Australia, 2016). The pilots have also mitigated a criticism made of the ill-fated RQF – that the Government was implementing a potentially burdensome and expensive new assessment system in the absence of any pilot data to demonstrate its advantages and justify its costs (Shewan and Coats, 2006 p. 465). The pilots can also be viewed as a way for the sector to ‘take ownership’ of and ‘co-develop’ the reforms. Here, the Government can be seen as paying respect to the ‘self governing’ status of institutions of higher education. Piloting and engaging with the sector also increases the likelihood that the fully-implemented system will work as intended.
Conclusion The
meandering
political
process
driving
the
implementation of research impact assessment highlights
14
References AAH (2016). Engagement and Impact Assessment Consultation Paper Australian Academy of the Humanities, June 2016. Canberra: Australian Academy of the Humanities. Albert, M. (2003). Universities and the market economy: The differential impact on knowledge production in sociology and economics. Higher Education, 45(2), 147-182. AMSI et al. (2016). Response to the ARC Engagement and Impact Assessment Consultation Paper. Australian Mathematical Sciences Institute, the Australian Mathematical Society, and the ARC Centre of Excellence for Mathematical and Statistical Frontiers. Armitage, C. (2006, November 15). Research framework goes ahead. The Australian. ATN (2016) Research Engagement and Impact Assessment pilot supports university-industry collaboration. Canberra: Australian Technology Network. Retrieved from https://www.atn.edu.au/news-and-events/latest-news/researchengagement-and-impact-assessment-pilot-supports-university-industrycollaboration/ ATN & GO8 (2012). Guidelines for Completion of Case Studies in ATN/Go8 EIA Impact Assessment Trial. Canberra: Australian Technology Network. ATSE (2016a). Engagement for Australia: Measuring research engagement
Measuring research impact in Australia Andrew Gunn & Michael Mintrom
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
between universities and end users. Melbourne: Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering. Retrieved from https://www.atse.org. au/Documents/reports/research-engagement-australia.pdf
Department of Education, Science and Training (2005). Research Quality Framework: Assessing the quality and impact of research in Australia, The Preferred Model, September 2005. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
ATSE (2016b). Response to the Engagement and Impact Assessment Consultation Paper, June 2016. Melbourne: Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering. Retrieved from http://www.atse.org.au/ Documents/submissions/engagement-impact-assessment-consultation.pdf
Department of Industry, Innovation and Science (2011). Focusing Australia’s Publicly Funded Research Review, Maximising the Innovation Dividend: Review Key Findings and Future Directions. October 2011. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
Australian Research Council (2016a, May 2). Engagement and Impact Assessment Consultation Paper. Canberra: Australian Research Council. Retrieved from http://www.arc.gov.au/sites/default/files/filedepot/Public/ARC/ consultation_papers/ARC_Engagement_and_Impact_Consultation_Paper.pdf
Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet (2014). Industry Innovation and Competitiveness Agenda: An action plan for a stronger Australia, October 2014. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia. Retrieved from https:// www.dpmc.gov.au/sites/default/files/publications/industry_innovation_ competitiveness_agenda.pdf
Australian Research Council (2016b, November 21). Media release: Senator the Hon Simon Birmingham, Minister for Education and Training. 2017 pilot to test impact, business engagement of researchers. Canberra: Australian Research Council. Retrieved from http://www.arc.gov.au/news-media/mediareleases/2017-pilot-test-impact-business-engagement-researchers Australian Research Council (2016c). EI: Pilot Overview. Canberra: Australian Research Council. Retrieved from http://www.arc.gov.au/ei-pilot-overview AVCC (2003). Advancing Australia’s Abilities: Foundations for the future of research in Australia. Canberra: Australian Vice-Chancellors’ Committee. Birmingham, S. (2016, March 10). Experts named to measure value of university research. Retrieved from http://www.senatorbirmingham.com.au/ Latest-News/ID/2991/Experts-named-to-measure-value-of-university-research Birmingham, S. (2015, November 17). Speech: Senator Simon Birmingham’s Keynote Address at 2015 B/HERT Awards Dinner – Melbourne. Retrieved from http://www.bhert.com/events/2015-11-17/Minister-for-Education-andTraining-Simon-Birmingham-Keynote-Address.pdf Bishop, J. (2006, November 14). Department of Education, Science and Training Media Release: Australian Government endorses Research Quality Framework. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia. Retrieved from http:// w3.unisa.edu.au/rqf/docs/mediarelease14nov06.pdf Carr, K. (2007, December 21). Ministers’ website for Innovation, Industry, Science and Research Media Release: Cancellation of Research Quality Framework Implementation. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia. Retrieved from http://archive.industry.gov.au/ministerarchive2011/carr/MediaReleases/ Pages/CANCELLATIONOFRESEARCHQUALITYFRAMEWORKIMPLEMENTATION. html Carr, K. (2008, Mar 26). Senator Carr – In search of research excellence. Science Alert. Retrieved from http://www.sciencealert.com/senator-carr-in-search-ofresearch-excellence Commonwealth of Australia (2017, August 16). Engagement and Impact Assessment pilot complete. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia. Retrieved from https://www.innovation.gov.au/event/engagement-and-impact-assessmentpilot-complete-0 Commonwealth of Australia (2015, December 7). National Innovation and Science Agenda. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia. Retrieved from http:// innovation.gov.au/page/national-innovation-and-science-agenda-report Commonwealth Government (2001). Backing Australia’s Ability: An Innovation Action Plan for the Future. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia. Commonwealth Government (2004). Backing Australia’s Ability: Building our Future through Science and Innovation. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia. Department of Education and Training (2016, May 6). Turnbull Government response - Review of Research Policy and Funding Arrangements. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia. Retrieved from https://docs.education.gov.au/ node/40706
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
DIICCSRTE (2013). Assessing the wider benefits arising from universitybased research, discussion paper June 2013. The Department of Industry, Innovation, Climate Change, Science, Research and Tertiary Education. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia. EMRC AAS (2016). Engagement and Assessment Impact consultation paper submission. Early and Mid-Career Researcher Forum of the Australian Academy of Science. Gunn, A. & Mintrom, M. (2017). Evaluating the non-academic impact of academic research: design considerations. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 39(1), 20-30. Gunn, A. & Mintrom, M. (2016). Higher Education Policy Change in Europe: Academic Research Funding and the Impact Agenda. European Education, 48(4), 241-257. Morgan, B. (2014). Research impact: Income for outcome: Australia and New Zealand are experimenting with ways of assessing the impact of publicly funded research, Nature, 511(7510), S72-S75. Nicol, M., Harvey L., & Byrne, A. (2016). The evolution of Australia’s national research assessment exercise. The Academic Executive Brief pp.5-7. Elsevier. Retrieved from https://academicexecutives.elsevier.com/sites/default/files/ AEB_2016_ARC.pdf RAND Europe (2009). Capturing Research Impacts: A review of international practice. Retrieved from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/rereports/year/2009/ capturingresearchimpactsareviewofinternationalpractice/ Sheil, M. (2014). On the verge of a new ERA. Nature, 511(7510), S67-S67. Shewan, L. G., & Coats, A. J. (2006). The Research Quality Framework and its implications for health and medical research: time to take stock? Medical Journal of Australia, 184(9), 463. Retrieved from https://www.mja.com.au/ journal/2006/184/9/research-quality-framework-and-its-implications-healthand-medical-research-time TASA (2016). Engagement and Impact Assessment Consultation Paper Response from The Australian Sociological Association (TASA). Retrieved from https://www.tasa.org.au/engagement-impact-assessment-consultation-paperresponse-australian-sociological-association-tasa/ Universities Australia (2016, June 28). Universities Australia Submission to the Engagement and Impact Assessment Consultation Paper. Canberra: Universities Australia. Watt, I. (2015). Review of Research Policy and Funding Arrangements: Report November 2015. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia. Retrieved from https://docs.education.gov.au/node/38976 Welch, A. (2016). Audit Culture and Academic Production Re-shaping Australian Social Science Research Output 1993–2013. Higher Education Policy, 29(4), 511–538.
Measuring research impact in Australia Andrew Gunn & Michael Mintrom
15
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
Optimising the efficacy of hybrid academic teams Lessons from a systematic review process Warren Lake, Margie Wallin, Bill Boyd, Geoff Woolcott, Christos Markopoulos, Wendy Boyd & Alan Foster Southern Cross University
Undertaking a systematic review can have many benefits, beyond any theoretical or conceptual discoveries pertaining to the underlying research question. This paper explores the value of utilising a hybrid academic team when undertaking the systematic review process, and shares a range of practical strategies. The paper also comments on how such a hybrid team sits in a continuum of cooperation, coordination and collaboration. Key recommendations include choosing a great team, communicating well, documenting everything, and being explicit – for the benefit of your research team, and the readers of your systematic review. Keywords: teams, collaboration, systematic reviews, protocols
While much has been written about the process-related
School of Environment, Science and Engineering and the
elements of undertaking a systematic review or meta-
School of Education liaison librarian.This hybrid team was
analysis (Booth et al., 2012; Durlak, 2008; Gough et al.,
based across two campuses. This was the first experience
2012; Littell et al., 2008; Machi & McEvoy, 2012; Ridley,
of participating in the systematic review process for many
2012), few publications discuss the practical elements,
of the team members.
especially when undertaking such a process for the first time, and with a hybrid team. During 2015, a
Systematic reviews
multidisciplinary team at a regional Australian university undertook a funded research project, using a systematic
The systematic review was planned as the first stage
review framework. While the results of that review have
of a multi-phase research project, and was intended to
been published (Lake et al., 2017), this article documents
inform the direction of future research. The project team
and shares discoveries made by the team about practical
agreed on a commitment to an evidence-based approach,
elements, in the hope of supporting others who may be
and elected to use a systematic review framework.
contemplating such an activity.
While the evidence-based practice movement originated
The core elements of a systematic review underpinned a
within the health and clinical sciences (Evidence-Based
research project that investigated alternative mathematics
Medicine Working Group, 1992; Sackett et al., 1996), the
pedagogies for students with poor mathematics skills, in
approach has since been adopted and adapted for use
a higher education setting. The multidisciplinary project
within the majority of professional disciplines (Booth,
team comprised five academics from both the School
2003; Borrego et al., 2014; Davies, 1999; Webb, 2001). An
of Education and the School of Environment, Science
increasing number of institutions, such as the Campbell
and Engineering, as well as a research assistant from the
Collaboration (2016) and the Evidence for Policy and
16
Optimising the efficacy of hybrid academic teams Warren Lake et al.
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
Practice Information and Co-ordinating Centre (EPPICentre, 2017), also support evidence-based research across a range of disciplines. In addition to publishing systematic reviews, such institutions generally produce a range of training materials and resources, designed to support those undertaking systematic reviews. Supplementary
resources, including
the
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
‘The combination of expertise with methodology, interest in the construct or process, comfort with the group approach, and diversity of perspectives and life experiences will foster the analytical approach desired to learn the essential attributes and multiple facets of the construct or process under study.’ The team was brought together to tackle a specific
Preferred
problem, drawing on the collective expertise and skills
Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-
of individuals. In this way, an essential discipline was
Analyses (PRISMA, 2015) checklist and PRISMA flow
brought to the endeavour built around: the team shaping
diagram (Moher et al., 2009), were also used throughout
a ‘meaningful common purpose’; the team identifying
this research and review process.
a performance goal (the provision of a systematic
While the processes of systematic reviews and meta-
review report) flowing from the common purpose; a
analyses are clearly defined in the literature (Cochrane
‘mix of complementary skills’; a strong commitment to
Collaboration, 2016; Glass, 1976; Higgins & Green, 2011;
completion (the funding and reporting requirements
Oxman & Guyatt, 1993), this clarity does not necessarily
were
extend to researcher and practitioner understanding,
(Katzenbach & Smith, 2013, pp. 38-39). Given the team’s
especially
and
diverse nature, communication within and amongst
frameworks have only recently been adopted. Evidence of
the team members was critical. In the early stages of
confusion about both terms and processes can be found
the project, the team members identified, discussed
in discussion posts on many academic or researcher
and documented decisions around communication,
networks (Gray, 2016). Dawe (2016, para 1), for example,
team member roles and responsibilities, and practical
recently noted that:
protocols.
in
disciplines
where
these
tools
‘I’m working with an academic at the moment who insists he is doing a Systematic Review. I’ve looked at his question and it seems to me that what he’s trying to do is a literature review that has some well-structured search documentation. I’ve sent him information on Systematic Reviews but he still insists that a SR is what he’s doing.’
time-bound);
and
mutual
accountability
The role of the project leader, a senior academic, was fundamental to the progress and success of the project. This role involved providing significant input into identification of suitable funding options, proposal writing and the overall mentorship of the group. The project leader brought this hybrid group together, actively mentored the research assistant, monitored timeframes,
During the early stages of the research project, similar
and provided critical input into the writing and editing
misconceptions were experienced by the project team.
process. In short, the team leader met the five conditions
In order to provide clarity and structure, therefore, the
that Hackman (as cited in Coutu, 2013, p. 29) identifies as
following definition was adopted from the Centre for
being essential to fulfilling and maintaining an effective
Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology (2013, para 3):
team: bringing clarity; providing compelling direction;
A systematic review answers a defined research question by collecting and summarising all empirical evidence that fits pre-specified eligibility criteria … A meta-analysis is the use of statistical methods to summarise the results of these studies.
providing design and structure; supporting the team; and providing expert coaching. The other team member roles were defined as follows. Funding allowed the appointment of a research assistant, and greatly facilitated the timely progression of both the review and its documentation as a written
The team approach
report. The research assistant worked closely with the librarian during the searching process, undertook
Effective teamwork (Gates & Hinds, 2000;Van Landingham,
the scanning and reading of the literature, developed
2015) underpinned the review process. This was vital
inclusion/exclusion criteria, analysed the literature,
given the hybrid nature of the team. Each team member
created the draft report documents and sought feedback
brought significant skills and/or expert knowledge
at every stage of the process. The project librarian
to the project, in terms of discipline content, project
worked with the team to refine the research question,
management, or professional expertise. The advantage
and develop and conduct the necessary searches. The
of this approach, according to Gates and Hinds (2000, p.
librarian also managed the discovered literature, and
102) is:
assisted in writing and editing.The librarian and research
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
Optimising the efficacy of hybrid academic teams Warren Lake et al.
17
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
assistant worked particularly closely through most stages
or input was required from each team member at each
of the review project.
stage. Identifying preferred communication approaches
The discipline experts provided input and feedback
and strategies early in the process was an effective way
throughout the entire process – assisting with the
of ensuring the process, and this included documenting
formulation of the research question, providing known
communication protocols. Thus, emails were used to
resources, analysing the literature, and writing and
circulate working documents, to request input or feedback
editing the project report and associated publication.
and to send deadline reminders. As well as face-to-face
All team members had previously been involved in
meetings, virtual meetings were conducted by Skype as
research projects, and all provided some form of
required. The team identified the importance of knowing
mentoring and coaching from their own disciplinary
how team partners operated most efficiently, including
perspectives throughout the project. However, this was
knowing their communication and working preferences.
the first experience the majority of team members had
As the project progressed through the various stages
of the formal systematic review process. In addition to
of the systematic review – the formulation of the
successfully completing the project, the team members
research question and search strategies; the retrieval and
gained insight and skill in the process, and all discovered
management, as well as the analysis and review of the
the benefits of working within an effective hybrid team.
literature; and the writing – the team members reflected
Working in collaboration with the librarian, for
upon and documented their discoveries and challenges
example, the research assistant learned more about
pertaining to the process of undertaking a systematic
systematic and structured approaches to both searching
review (Appendix A). As noted by Lakhani et al. (2012),
and managing information. In reverse, the librarian
a key attribute of effective teams is reflection. Critical
gained greater insight into the review and analysis of
reflection underpinned each stage of this project,
the literature, and experience in the use of analysis
from the formulation of the research question to the
tools such as NVivo™. As part of refining the research
successful submission of the commissioned report and
question, and the writing of the report and paper, the
associated publication.
librarian also gained content knowledge. In observing and participating in the systematic literature searching stage,
Protocols
the academics discovered practical strategies, approaches and frameworks not previously utilised.
A critical feature of a systematic review (and, indeed of
The collaborative approach to the review and analysis
a structured literature review) and any associated meta-
of the literature also demonstrated the effectiveness
analysis, is the need to record all the protocols associated
of using a hybrid team within such a setting. Once the
with the project. As noted by Evans and Chang (2000, p.
initial review framework was in place – created by
2), an underlying purpose is to ensure that such reviews
the research assistant – the discipline knowledge and
can be validated or replicated:
review experience of the academic team members was invoked. Specifically, each academic chose a number of the identified research studies, according to their area of expertise, and used the draft framework to review those studies. Results were then compared with the initial review. This approach tested the validity of the review
‘… systematic reviews should be conducted with the same rigour as any research endeavour. Like primary research, these reviews follow a predetermined plan which should be clearly documented. This documentation of the methods used, means systematic reviews can be replicated by other reviewers. It also allows the review methods used to be subject to appraisal.’
framework, addressed the issue of potential bias (Littell et al., 2008), and allowed for the development of the final
Protocols can be made publicly available: submitted to
inclusion/exclusion criteria. The diversity of the team
protocol registries such as PROSPERO (Centre for Reviews
allowed for an iterative approach to determining inclusion
& Dissemination, 2017); published in relevant journals
and exclusion criteria, in that it avoided the risk of group
such as Systematic Reviews (2017) or the JBI Database of
thinking, and encouraged active questioning (Katzenbach
Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports (2017);
& Smith, 2013).
or published in systematic review databases such as the
Communication within the team proved to be a critical
Cochrane Library (2017).
element of the project (Lakhani et al., 2012), as different
Clearly documenting the functional and operational
team members had varying roles and responsibilities
protocols of a research project also assists in its smooth
at different phases of the project. In addition, feedback
progression within a team environment. Protocols can
18
Optimising the efficacy of hybrid academic teams Warren Lake et al.
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
relate to practical aspects of the research, such as file
possible to consider the use of Google Scholar as the
management, software resources or searching, whereas
default database for performing a systematic review.
other protocols may, for example, be more conceptual,
However, as Evans and Chang (2000) indicate, and as most
and be associated with communication, ethics or
of the team members were aware, systematic reviews
confidentiality issues, or concern selected inclusion/
need to be replicable, a characteristic that is impossible
exclusion criteria (Appendix A). The underlying lesson
with Google Scholar due to the search algorithms and
is to document protocols in as much detail as possible,
database structure that they employ (Giustini & Boulos,
especially at the time decisions are made, and have
2013). Clearly, the hybrid nature of the team and the
this documentation available to team members. This is
specific skills and knowledge of members such as the
particularly important when working within a team,
librarian, helps to ensure that flawed approaches to the
or working on longer-term projects. While it is easy
systematic review were avoided in its early stages.
to assume that specific decisions or outcomes will be
Furthermore, if the research team includes higher
remembered, memories can become vague soon after
degree
the event. Furthermore, new team members or outside
researchers, collaborating with a librarian during the
research
students
or
less
experienced
researchers wanting to check project details at a later date
literature searching stage may also have ongoing benefits,
will be grateful.
including training and/or up-skilling of those involved.
Search protocols specifically need to be recorded as
More efficient or effective search strategies may be
part of the standard systematic review process. There
utilised with future literature searching, and researchers
are examples in the published literature – be they
may consider using the systematic review process (or
journal articles or those systematic reviews available
elements thereof) in future research projects. Indeed,
within specific databases – to guide a team regarding
one of the project team members now encourages
presentation. These can also be used to gather examples
his higher degree students to take a more structured
or ideas, or to identify formal guidelines or requirements.
approach to their literature searching, and to actively
Depending on the discipline or topic area being
collaborate with their liaison librarian.
investigated, a number of frameworks such as PICO
In addition to those resources found using deliberate
(Problems, Interventions, Comparisons and Outcomes),
searches related to subject or content, other literature
SPIDER (Sample, Phenomenon of Interest, Design,
will also be utilised, for example that deal with research
Evaluation, Research type) and STARLITE (Sampling
methods or theoretical perspectives. Such literature may
strategy, Type of study, Approaches, Range of years, Limits,
provide contextual information, or may add clarity to
Inclusions and exclusions,Terms used, Electronic sources)
a concept or concepts, even though it may not relate
have also been developed to assist researchers structure
directly to the specific research question. Furthermore,
their searches (Booth, 2006; Cooke et al., 2012; Schardt et
within any project, yet more literature will be discovered,
al., 2007).
either serendipitously or via recommendations from
It became apparent in this study that the development,
team members, colleagues or supervisors (Conn et al.,
evolution and recording of search protocols represented
2003; McManus et al., 1998). The expert knowledge of
a specialist domain of the librarian. While the team
academic team members is utilised in both the provision
reviewed and approved, collectively, the search strategies
and evaluation of such material. Where such literature
proposed by the librarian and articulated through the
is directly relevant to the research question, should it
protocols, it was clear that the librarian’s specialist
have been retrieved as part of the formal searches
input to the project in this regard was vital. The value of
already undertaken? If so, does the search strategy need
including expert searchers in collaboration with content
to be adapted? If it is determined that a search strategy
experts, especially when undertaking systematic reviews,
does need to be modified, this should occur early in the
is well documented (Beverley et al., 2003; Dudden &
process, ideally before any reviewing of documents is
Protzko, 2011; Federer, 2013; Harris, 2005; McCluskey,
undertaken. Where such additional resources introduce
2013; McGowan & Sampson, 2005; Papaioannou et al.,
new ideas or concepts, rather than adding clarity or
2010; Zhang et al., 2006). The involvement of a librarian
context, the search strategy and research focus would
in this team was essential in ensuring appropriate advice
need to be re-examined.
and guidance on efficient and effective search strategies,
To support the information management stage of
as well as how to record and manage them. For those
the research process, there are a number of specialised
inexperienced in structured literature searching, it is
database programs designed to both manage references
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
Optimising the efficacy of hybrid academic teams Warren Lake et al.
19
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
and to assist with the referencing process. EndNote™ is one such program, and was used by this research team (Peters, 2017). The geographically dispersed nature of the research team added additional challenges in terms of managing the project literature, and although EndNote™ offers synchronisation between desktop and online
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
‘A working group’s [which comprises almost any gathering of workers in an organisation] performance is a function of what its members do as individuals. A team’s performance includes both individual results and what we call “collective work products”. … Whatever it is, a collective work product reflects the joint, real contribution of team members.’
versions, specific protocols needed to be considered
Following this, Katzenbach and Smith also note that
in the creation of and access to the EndNote™ library
a team is characterised, first, by shared leadership roles.
(Appendix A).
While the hybrid team described here initially started with
Similar protocols were developed during the analysis
singular leadership, as the process of the review rolled out,
and review stage of the project. As with information
it became clear that, for example, the librarian needed to
management tools, there is a range of programs that can
take a leadership role, especially in her field of expertise.
assist with the analysis process, especially within the
In that context, she defined structures and processes,
qualitative research environment. For this project, the
brought clarity and focus, and provided support and
research assistant undertook the initial review of the
mentoring (cf. Coutu, 2013). The project success hinged,
studies using EndNote™ and NVivo™, and developed a
in part, on allowing this emergent leadership. In support
review framework using Microsoft Excel™. Throughout
of this, Lakhani also notes that ‘designated team leaders
this critical appraisal stage, the framework was tested
and shared leadership have both been shown to be large
for both practicality and potential bias, and inclusion/
contributors to interdisciplinary team effectiveness’
exclusion criteria were finalised and documented
(Lakhani et al., 2012, p. E262). Balanced against this is
(Appendix A).
individual and mutual accountability. An essential role of
Whether the systematic review is being submitted
the team is to bring informed discussion, consideration
to a formal evidence-based institution or to a journal or
and, eventually, consensus to the process – in short,
conference, protocols around the writing process also
the team needed to provide input to critical decisions
needed consideration (Boland et al., 2014; Booth et al.,
around the search protocols, and then provide consensual
2012; Phelps et al., 2007; Thody, 2006). Within the team
agreement to these.
setting, will one member of the team write the review,
Continuing
with
Katzenbach
and
Smith’s
with input and editing from team members, or will
characterisations, the project maintained clarity regarding
different team members be responsible for nominated
the team purpose, and worked towards its collective goal
sections? Who will undertake proof-reading and editing?
or work product, that is, the systematic literature review.
Who will monitor the manuscript for a consistent writing
All team discussions were focussed on that outcome, once
style? Such questions reflect the importance of clear
the research direction was agreed upon.The path towards
definition and communication of team roles.
this outcome, however, required the encouragement of ‘open-ended discussion and active problem-solving
Can a hybrid team successfully complete such tasks?
meetings’, again as per Katzenbach and Smith (p. 36).The end product, the literature review, once embedded in a technical report to the funding body and published as an
Much of what is described above may appear to be
academic paper (Lake et al., 2017) provided the essential
straightforward, and may, some will claim, simply be the
performance measure.
bread and butter of academic activity. However, such
While it was noted at the beginning of this paper that
activities take on an added level of complexity when
the team was brought together in a way that mirrored
undertaken within a hybrid team environment. It became
Katzenbach and Smith’s (2013) ‘essential discipline’, and it
apparent when considering both the roles of the team
appears that this discipline worked, it is admitted that the
members, and the activities undertaken during the project,
bringing together was not deliberate. What was intended,
that consideration needed to be given to the criteria and
however, was that the team was assembled to meet the
characteristics indicative of successful teams. Katzenbach
critical challenges of this project. The focus by the team
and Smith, for example, identify seven characteristics
leader was on the tasks required within the project rather
that differentiate a team from a working group. This is
than the discipline of the team per se. Nevertheless, the
important, they argue, in that it focuses on performance
team functioned well, operating as a ‘small number of
results (Katzenbach & Smith, 2013, p. 37):
people with complementary skills who are committed
20
Optimising the efficacy of hybrid academic teams Warren Lake et al.
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
COOPERATION
COORDINATION
COLLABORATION
Low trust – unstable relations
Medium trust – based on prior relations
High trust – stable relations
Infrequent communication flows
Structured communication flows
Thick communication flows
Known information sharing
‘Project’ related and directed information sharing
Tacit information sharing
Adjusting actions
Joint projects, joint funding, joint policy
Systems change
Independent/autonomous goals
Semi-independent goals
Dense interdependent relations and goals
Power remains with organisation
Power remains with organisations
Shared power
Resources – remain own
Shared resources around project
Pooled, collective resources
Commitment and accountability to own agency
Commitment and accountability to own agency and project
Commitment and accountability to the network first
Relational time frame requirement – short term
Relational time frame medium term – often Relational time frame requirement – long based on prior projects term 3-5 years
Figure 1. An integrated view of cooperation, coordination and collaboration in research projects (used with permission Keast & Mandell, 2011) to a common purpose, set of performance goals, and
with Coordination, since the project was not geared, in this
approach for which they hold themselves mutually
early phase, towards systems change (in shaded rows in
accountable’ (Katzenbach & Smith 2013, p. 39). Is this
column three). Consideration of these categories, however,
unique to a hybrid team conducting a systematic review?
may be useful to researchers considering a hybrid team
Unlikely. Indeed, other writings about team success focus
approach, particularly where a longer-term project is
on other aspects of the team. Gratton and Erickson (2013)
being considered since, ideally, some effort will need to be
for example, discuss behaviour – leading by example,
made towards collaboration in this network sense.
provision of the ‘gifts’ of mentoring and coaching,
This project team began in a medium trust relationship,
building relationships, drawing both task and relationship
where several team members already had an experience
skills amongst the team members, and building on prior
of working together and were prepared to accommodate
(‘heritage’) working relationships.
and
understand
the
nature
of
their
colleagues’
In this study, the researchers had worked together
communication and working preferences. Upon analysis,
previously, and two were the research assistant’s PhD
it appears that the team is evolving towards a high trust
supervisors. Some of the academics had also worked with
relationship evidenced by stable relations within the team
the project librarian. The project built upon this network
structure and thicker communication flows as the project
of prior relationships, and was also able to draw upon
develops.While communication started as project related,
the elements of cohesion and mutual respect, other key
the use of protocols as outlined above has supported
attributes of interdisciplinary teams (Lakhani et al., 2012).
tactical information sharing based on interdependent goals. In the longer time-frame it is hoped to establish the
Is a hybrid team a collaboration?
team’s actions as committed to systems change, since the nature of the longer-term project is to improve the system
The literature on teams and team development discussed
in which mathematics learning takes place. This team,
above suggests further comment on the relationship
like others in such projects, will need to consider how to
between the hybrid team structure and collaboration,
reconfigure this unique team structure such that resources
specifically, where the hybrid team structure sits in a
are pooled and committed to such system change and,
continuum of cooperation, coordination and collaboration
hence, accountable to the collaborative network first and
of people working together (Keast & Mandell, 2011).
foremost. Based on the current working relationship and
Figure 1 outlines the features of each of the three
what it has provided already, this is certainly achievable.
categories in terms of both relationships and resources, of people working together in active team networks
Conclusion
of three or more people. It can be argued that in the systematic review stage, the protocols and decision-
Undertaking a systematic review and associated meta-
making processes of this hybrid team were more aligned
analysis has been a highly rewarding experience for
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
Optimising the efficacy of hybrid academic teams Warren Lake et al.
21
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
this multidisciplinary and geographically dispersed team. In addition to the discoveries made regarding the underlying research question, the team members have
V
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
Centre for Reviews & Dissemination. (2017). PROSPERO: International prospective register of systematic reviews. Retrieved from https://www.crd.york. ac.uk/prospero/
also learned a great deal about the practical processes
Cochrane Collaboration. (2016). What are systematic reviews? Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=egJlW4vkb1Y
involved when utilising a systematic review framework.
Cochrane Library. (2017). Retrieved from http://www.cochranelibrary.com/
The entire process has been grounded in reflection on
Conn, V. S., Isaramalai, S. A., Rath, S., Jantarakupt, P., Wadhawan, R., & Dash, Y. (2003). Beyond MEDLINE for literature searches. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 35(2), 177-182. doi:10.1111/j.1547-5069.2003.00177.x
the nature, development and effectiveness of hybrid teams, and where such teams may sit within a continuum of cooperation, coordination and collaboration. The purpose of this paper has been to share both practical and conceptual discoveries, in order to encourage and support others who may be considering undertaking such a review – within any discipline in the higher education setting. Key recommendations include choosing a great team, communicating well, documenting everything, and being explicit – for the benefit of your research team, and for the readers of your systematic review. The authors of this paper work at Southern Cross University, Australia. Warren Lake is a PhD candidate in the School
Cooke, A., Smith, D., & Booth, A. (2012). Beyond PICO: The SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis. Qualitative Health Research, 22(10), 1435-1443. doi:10.1177/1049732312452938 Coutu, D. (2013). Why teams don’t work: An interview with J. Richard Hackman. In HBR’s 10 must reads on teams (pp. 21-34). Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press. Davies, P. (1999). What is evidence based education? British Journal of Educational Studies, 47(2), 108-121. Dawe, L. (2016). aliaHEALTH -Expertsearching - Systematic Review vs. Systematic Literature Review [Email]. Dudden, R. F., & Protzko, S. L. (2011). The systematic review team: Contributions of the health sciences librarian. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 30(3), 301-315. doi:10.1080/02763869.2011.590425
Liaison Librarian. Bill Boyd is the Professor of Geography in
Durlak, J. A. (2008). Basic principles of meta-analysis. In M. C. Roberts & S. S. Ilardi (Eds.), Handbook of Research Methods in Clinical Psychology (pp. 196209). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
the School of Environment, Science & Engineering. The other
EPPI-Centre (2017). Retrieved from http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk
authors are from the School of Education: Geoff Woolcott is
Evans, D., & Chang, A. (2000). Appraising systematic reviews. Changing Practice: Evidence Based Practice Information Sheets for Health Professionals (Supplement 1), 6p.
of Environment, Science & Engineering. Margie Wallin is a
an Associate Professor; Christos Markopoulos and Wendy Boyd are Senior Lecturers; and Alan Foster is an Associate Lecturer (Teaching Scholar). Contact: margie.wallin@scu.edu.au
References Beverley, C. A., Booth, A., & Bath, P. A. (2003). The role of the information specialist in the systematic review process: A health information case study. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 20(2), 65-74. doi:10.1046/j.14711842.2003.00411.x Boland, A., Cherry, M. G., & Dickson, R. (2014). Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide. London: Sage. Booth, A. (2003). Bridging the research-practice gap? The role of evidence based librarianship. New Review of Information and Library Research, 9(1), 3-23. doi:10.1080/13614550410001687909 Booth, A. (2006). “Brimful of STARLITE”: Toward standards for reporting literature searches. Journal of the Medical Librarians Association, 94(4), 421-429. Booth, A., Papaioannou, D., & Sutton, A. (2012). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. London: SAGE. Borrego, M., Foster, M. J., & Froyd, J. E. (2014). Systematic literature reviews in engineering education and other developing interdisciplinary fields. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(1), 45-76. doi:10.1002/jee.20038 Campbell Collaboration. (2016). Campbell Collaboration. Retrieved from http://www.campbellcollaboration.org/ Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology. (2013). Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a step-by-step guide. Retrieved from http:// www.ccace.ed.ac.uk/research/software-resources/systematic-reviews-and-metaanalyses
22
Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. (1992). Evidence-based medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association, 268(17), 2420-2425. Federer, L. (2013). The librarian as research informationist: A case study. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 101(4), 298-302. doi:10.3163/15365050.101.4.011 Gates, M. F., & Hinds, P. S. (2000). Qualitative researchers working as teams. In S. D. Moch & M. F. Gates (Eds.), The Researcher Experience in Qualitative Research (pp.94-108). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Giustini, D., & Boulos, M. N. (2013). Google Scholar is not enough to be used alone for systematic reviews. Online Journal of Public Health Informatics, 5(2), 214. doi:10.5210/ojphi.v5i2.4623 Glass, G. V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5(10), 3-8. doi:10.3102/0013189x005010003 Gough, D. A., Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2012). An introduction to systematic reviews. London: SAGE. Gratton, L., & Erickson, T. J. (2013). Eight ways to build collaborative teams. In HBR’s 10 must reads on teams (pp. 55-74). Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press. Gray, H. (2016). A meta analysis of the literature or a literature review. What is the difference? What do you prefer for your PhD candidates? Retrieved from LinkedIn Higher Education Teaching and Learning: https://www.linkedin.com/ groups/2774663/2774663-6123303560869400577 Harris, M. R. (2005). The librarian’s roles in the systematic review process: A case study. Journal of the Medica Library Association, 93(1), 81-87. Higgins, J. P. T., & Green, S. (2011). What is a systematic review? In Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (pp. Section 1.2.2): The Cochrane Collaboration. Retrieved http://handbook.cochrane.org.
Optimising the efficacy of hybrid academic teams Warren Lake et al.
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
E
JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports. (2017). Retrieved from http://journals.lww.com/jbisrir/pages/default.aspx Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (2013). The discipline of teams. In HBR’s 10 must reads on teams (pp. 35-53). Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press. Keast, R. L., & Mandell, M. (2011, 11-14 April). The collaborative push: pushing beyond rhetoric and gaining evidence. Paper presented at the 15th Annual Conference of the International Research Society for Public Management (IRSPMXV), Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland. Retrieved from http://epubs.scu. edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1789&context=bus_pubs Lake, W., Wallin, M., Woolcott, G., Boyd, W., Foster, A., Markopoulos, C., & Boyd, W. (2017). Applying an alternative mathematics pedagogy for students with weak mathematics: Meta-analysis of alternative pedagogies. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 48(2), 215228. doi:10.1080/0020739x.2016.1245876 Lakhani, J., Benzies, K., & Hayden, K. A. (2012). Attributes of interdisciplinary research teams: A comprehensive review of the literature. Clinical & Investigative Medicine, 35(5), E260-E265. Littell, J. H., Corcoran, J., & Pillai, V. K. (2008). Systematic reviews and metaanalysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Machi, L. A., & McEvoy, B. T. (2012). The literature review: Six steps to success (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin. McCluskey, C. (2013). Being an embedded research librarian: Supporting research by being a researcher. Journal of Information Literacy, 7(2), 4-14. doi:10.11645/7.2.1815 McGowan, J., & Sampson, M. (2005). Systematic reviews need systematic searchers. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 93(1), 74-80. McManus, R. J., Wilson, S., Delaney, B. C., Fitzmaurice, D. A., Hyde, C. J., Tobias, R. S., . . . Hobbs, F. D. R. (1998). Review of the usefulness of contacting other experts when conducting a literature search for systematic reviews. BMJ, 317, 1562–1563. doi:10.1136/bmj.317.7172.1562 Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & Group, P. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
Papaioannou, D., Sutton, A., Carroll, C., Booth, A., & Wong, R. (2010). Literature searching for social science systematic reviews: Consideration of a range of search techniques. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 27(2), 114-122. doi:10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00863.x Peters, M. D. J. (2017). Managing and coding references for systematic reviews and scoping reviews in EndNote. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 36(1), 19-31. doi:10.1080/02763869.2017.1259891 Phelps, R., Ellis, A., & Fisher, K. (2007). Organizing and managing your research: A practical guide for postgraduates (1st ed.). London: Sage Publications. PRISMA. (2015). Citing and using PRISMA. Retrieved from http://prismastatement.org/PRISMAStatement/CitingAndUsingPRISMA.aspx Ridley, D. (2012). The literature review: A step-by-step guide for students (2nd ed.). London: SAGE. Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M. C., Gray, J. A. M., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (1996). Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn’t. BMJ, 312(Jan 13), 71-72. doi:10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71 Schardt, C., Adams, M. B., Owens, T., Keitz, S., & Fontelo, P. (2007). Utilisation of the PICO framework to improve searching PubMed for clinical questions. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 7, 16. doi:10.1186/1472-6947-7-16 Systematic Reviews. (2017). Retrieved from https://systematicreviewsjournal. biomedcentral.com/ Thody, A. (2006). Writing and presenting research. London, England: Sage Publications. Van Landingham, M. (2015). Promoting teamwork, from within and from afar. In R. Dingwall & M. B. McDonald (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of research management. London, UK: Sage UK. Retrieved from http://search. credoreference.com/ Webb, S. A. (2001). Evidence-based social work theory and practice: Historical and reflective perspective. British Journal of Social Work, 31, 57-79. Zhang, L., Sampson, M., & McGowan, J. (2006). Reporting of the role of the expert searcher in Cochrane Reviews. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 1(4) doi:10.18438/B85K52
Oxman, A. D., & Guyatt, G. H. (1993). The science of reviewing research. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 703(1), 125-133; discussion 133-124. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb26342.x
Appendix A Practical considerations when undertaking a systematic review Communication
What documentation format will be used - Word documents, spreadsheets, OneNote or Evernote files or NVivo™ memos?
What are the team members’ preferred means of communication? How do individual team members respond to requests for input or comment or review? Is the absence of a reply to be taken to indicate implicit agreement?
Where will the project documentation be stored, and who can access this? How will documentation be shared? Via email, cloud drives?
Are team members responsive to deadlines?
How will version control of files be organised? Can older versions be restored?
If urgent responses are required, should the request be issued via email, or by other more direct means (where possible)?
Can files be viewed and edited simultaneously? Can changes be annotated with date and editor information?
Should meetings be regular or scheduled as required? Protocols
Which team members will have full write access and which will have read only access to files?
Is it required or recommended that the protocol be publicly registered or published?
How regularly will files be backed up; where will backup files be stored; who will be able to access them?
How will the project protocols be documented for the team, and what level of detail/granularity is recorded?
What software packages (and versions) will be used in the management of records and the analysis of the data?
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
Optimising the efficacy of hybrid academic teams Warren Lake et al.
23
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
If any project files are confidential, how will security be maintained?
What file/folder structure will be put in place? How will changes to a folder structure be communicated and managed?
Has a research data management plan been considered?
Will file/folder naming conventions, such as prefixes, be developed and documented?
How will time frames and time lines be managed? Will project journals or logs be used? Discovery and searching What database(s) will be used, and why? What database(s) will be deliberately excluded, and why? Will a database Thesaurus tool be used to identify relevant terms or formal subject headings? If so, will the associated Scope Notes be recorded?
How will resources be shared with team members who do not have full access to the literature library / database? If standard fields are to be used for non-standard content, how will this be documented? Will possible differences in layout / presentation / structure between desktop & web-based versions of the selected software impact on project processes?
What search terms / synonyms / phrases will be used?
Will a temporary library be used while the research question and associated search strategies are tested and refined?
What Boolean or proximity operators will be applied to the search terms?
Reviewing and analysing
What filters/limits will be applied and why? Will detailed search results and associated dates be recorded? Will Google Scholar be used, in addition to structured databases, to identify key literature? Will the difficulty of replicating searches in Google Scholar (due to changing algorithms) be considered? Will Google Scholar or Google be used to locate grey literature? What limits will be applied? Will site / domain name filters, or language / region filters be used?
How will inclusion / exclusion criteria and associated justifications be documented during the review process? Will each study be reviewed by more than one coder/rater/ reviewer, in order to reduce bias? How will the literature be allocated to reviewers? If using a software package, will it allow multiple user access? What privileges are available for different users, for example editors and viewers? Is the analysis software compatible with reference management software and/or word processing software?
Will resources found by serendipity or by direct recommendation be included?
What text analysis or visualisation tools are available within the analysis software?
Does such additional literature enhance or clarify concepts already identified in the review process, or does it bring new ideas? If new ideas are introduced, how will this impact on the review process?
Does the analysis software allow searching across all fields?
Should such additional resources have been retrieved within the formal searches already undertaken? Will the search strategy be adapted to include such resources?
Writing and referencing
At what stage during the review process is it feasible / manageable to update or adapt search strategies? Will saved searches and/or search alerts be created, so newly published resources can be identified throughout the project lifecycle? How will additional resources be recorded and managed, in relation to the formal search results? Managing the literature What database or reference management software will be used? Who will be the database administrator? Is simultaneous access to the library/database available? Which team members require access? How can the team ensure that members have the necessary skills to utilise the requisite software? Will all team members be able to add new records to the database, or will citations/documents be sent to designated team members for inclusion?
24
What export formats are available from the software? Are training resources and technical support provided? Who will have the primary responsibility for writing reports or publications? Will different team members write different sections? Who will edit? Who will check for consistent style? If referring to commercially available products (such as databases or reference management software) do they stipulate the use of trademarks or symbols (for example EndNote™)? If the preferred journal has a word count that does not allow for the inclusion of all analysis tables, do they offer alternatives such as online supplements? Are there specific referencing requirements for included resources, for example ‘Citing and using PRISMA’ (PRISMA, 2015)? Which referencing style does the journal or publisher use? Are associated style files provided or available, for use with reference management software? Will individual references be checked, especially when using reference management software and their associated style files? Will the CrossRef database be used to verify or check references?
Optimising the efficacy of hybrid academic teams Warren Lake et al.
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
An oral component in PhD examination in Australia Issues and considerations Margaret Kiley Australian National University & University of Newcastle
Allyson Holbrook, Terence Lovat & Hedy Fairbairn University of Newcastle
Sue Starfield University of New South Wales
Brian Paltridge University of Sydney
While there has been considerable research on doctoral examination there is little that examines the various roles of the oral component and what issues one might consider if introducing or revising that aspect of the thesis examination process. This matter is of particular importance in Australia where it is not usual to have an oral component as part of the final assessment. However, there are a number of Australian institutions considering the introduction of an oral component. This paper, based on the literature and three research projects initiated by the Centre for the Study of Research Training and Impact (SORTI) at The University of Newcastle, Australia, addresses a number of the key issues that would need to be addressed if an Australian institution were to introduce an oral component to the doctoral thesis examination process. Keywords: Assessment, doctoral, examination, oral examination, viva voce
Introduction
2010). The published research relates to issues such as purposes (Jackson & Tinkler, 2001), methods (Golding,
In the last 15–20 years there has been considerable
Sharmini, & Lazorovitch, 2014) and outcomes (Lovat,
international research related to the examination of
Holbrook, Bourke, Fairbairn, Kiley, Paltridge, & Starfield,
doctoral theses (see for example Holbrook & Bourke,
2015) with a substantial number of works relating to
2004; Lovitts, 2007; Mullins & Kiley, 2002; Powell & Green,
the oral component of thesis examination as identified
2003; Prins, de Kleijn, & van Tartwijk, 2015; Wellington,
by Crossouard (2011). It is this final issue, the oral
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
An oral component in PhD examination in Australia Margaret Kiley et al.
25
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
examination, that is the focus of this paper, particularly as
While the national review of Higher Degree by Research
in most cases in Australia there is not an oral component
(HDR) education in Australia, colloquially called the
as a standard part of the PhD examination process.
ACOLA Review (McGagh et al., 2016) found that: ‘Many
In light of the existing research this paper specifically
stakeholders considered that the Australian research
addresses the first of the two issues raised by Lovat et al.
training system would benefit from greater emphasis
(2015) in the conclusion to their paper, where they argue
being placed on the assessment of the candidate and
that two things seem clear from the debate. The first is:
the skills gained, rather than focus predominately
‘the Australian and UK [United Kingdom] processes seem
on the assessment of the thesis’ (p. xvi) no specific
to have something to learn from each other’ (p. 19). The
recommendation was made regarding the introduction of
second is: ‘an incorporation of the requirement for an
an oral examination. It is suggested that this is, in part, a
individual definitive report from each examiner, with a
response to the critical literature around the quality of
Viva as an additional and related component, would seem
oral examinations in some countries.
to constitute a process that offers the best form of quality
However, Gould (2016) suggests that, as the doctorate
assurance’ (p. 20). They also note that the latter: ‘offers a
develops into new forms and with pressures for some
means of closure and/or celebration’ (p. 20) – a theme
forms of standardisation globally, alternative examination
that also arises in the work of authors such as Jackson
processes might need to be implemented. For example,
and Tinkler (2004) and Crossouard (2011) and which,
with the increase in the number of candidates submitting
we argue, merits separate consideration from assessment
a Thesis with Published Papers and those undertaking
considerations per se.
Professional and Practice-based Doctorates might other
The proposal to address the issues related to the oral
forms of examination be appropriate?
component of thesis examination in Australia arose from
In light of additional or alternative forms of assessment
data collected in an extensive multi-project research
this paper considers the key issues related to the more
program detailed later in this paper. Addressing the issue
extensive use of an oral component in thesis examination in
of the oral component of examination is particularly
Australian universities. Such considerations address issues
important given that Australia is one of very few countries
arising from the literature that outline the educational
that currently does not have some form of final oral
positives and negatives of some form of oral component
assessment as a standard part of the doctoral examination
and build upon earlier and more modest suggestions by
process other than in Practice Doctorates, those involving
Kiley (2009). On consideration of the various issues it may
the visual and performing arts, or where an examiner
well be that a suitable argument could be put forward
specifically requests an oral. This can be explained
to convince those countries that currently have an oral
historically by Australia’s geographic location, as can the
that it could be discontinued or substantially revised.
historical situation for New Zealand (NZ). Partly because
Alternatively, institutions in Australia that do not currently
of this isolation, a particularly robust system of using
have an oral assessment may choose to introduce such
external examiners and written reports developed for
a practice. These decisions would need to be based on
both countries, one that allowed for the involvement of
sound educational and ethical considerations, with some
international experts without the need for assembling
of those outlined below.
in one place, in the way that the oral component has traditionally required. As time went on and different global circumstances evolved processes have changed. For example, in NZ most
Therefore, this paper asks what key issues need to be addressed when making a decision as to whether an oral component should be introduced as standard practice in Australian doctoral examination?
of the universities that had traditionally not had an oral component have recently introduced this to the overall
Setting the scene in Australia
examination process. ‘Should Australia also introduce an oral component?’ has therefore become a prominent
With approximately 8,000 Higher Degree by Research
question for researchers and administrators in the area
graduates per annum (McGagh, 2016 p. 2), in broad
of higher degrees by research. In 2007, there was a
terms, keeping in mind that each institution has its own
move by the Group of Eight (eight of Australia’s most
idiosyncrasies, it has been usual for the PhD, rather than
research-intensive universities graduating a substantial
the Practice Doctorate, in Australia to have the written
percentage of the country’s PhD candidates) to consider
thesis as the only item assessed in the final examination.
introducing some form of oral examination (Lane, 2007).
Generally, the thesis is sent out to a number of experts
26
An oral component in PhD examination in Australia Margaret Kiley et al.
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
in the field whose reports are then collated and a final
deemed to have passed. Usually, the candidate is then
recommendation made by the university concerned. It
told the names of those examiners who have agreed to
is not uncommon for oral components to be included
their names being divulged. Many institutions allow the
at various stages of the candidature, for example, at
examiners to choose to remain anonymous.
confirmation of candidature or a mid-term review, however, an oral component is rare in the final examination. Taking the
into
account
Australian
Graduate
Research Principles,
Good
Practice
developed
by
the Australian Council of Graduate Research (ACGR, 2016), and referred to by
Despite the lack of an oral component as standard practice in most PhD examinations in Australia, it is important to note that it
...the oral component ‘rarely, if ever, rendered [a] substantially different result from the one reflecting the individual judgements already made, and/or agreed on by the examiner panel beforehand’
most universities, in terms of
is common for Australian universities to allow the thesis examiners to request an oral but most Deans of Graduate Research report that such requests are very rare.
the formal examination, the
In light of the above, can
candidate might (or might not) be given some opportunity
it be argued there is a more general need for an oral
to discuss potential examiners some time prior to
component in connection with the qualification? The
submission. However, in many cases, the candidate will
Australian Qualifications Framework Council (2013, p. 64)
not be told the final choice of examiners. Furthermore,
suggests that one of the many qualities, doctoral graduates
in most instances, examiners do not know the names of
should have is:
the other examiners. Most universities have clear policies on conflict of interest between examiners, candidates and supervisors and strive to ensure that confidentiality is maintained throughout the examination process. Recognising the variations across institutions, the examiners, usually with no interaction with one another
‘Communication skills to explain and critique theoretical propositions, methodologies and conclusions, [and] communication skills to present cogently a complex investigation of originality or original research for external examination against international standards and to communicate results to peers and the community.’
or the supervisory team or the candidate, independently return their reports with their recommendations to
Hence a logical case can be made that in alignment
the university (Lovat et al., 2015). The options for
with this framework an oral component would support
recommendation vary across universities but a pattern
the assessment of the communication component. On
of ‘accept as is’, ‘accept with revisions’, ‘revise and
the other hand, analysis of data from England and New
resubmit for re-examination’, or ‘fail’ would be typical.
Zealand suggests that the oral component ‘rarely, if ever,
On receipt of the reports by the university, various
rendered [a] substantially different result from the one
processes are put in place whereby the reports and
reflecting the individual judgements already made, and/
their recommendations are discussed to determine a
or agreed on by the examiner panel beforehand’ (Lovat et
consolidated report. In many cases, the supervisor will
al. 2015, p. 16).
be given the opportunity to comment on the reports
From the above it is clear that there are a number of
but without necessarily playing a part in the final
outstanding issues related to the oral component and
determination. Except in the case of ‘fail’, it is common
they comprise the focus of this paper. In particular, we
practice in many universities that an overview of the
examine some of the underlying intentions of the oral
reports will be forwarded to the candidate who, if
exam in England and NZ, given the considerable similarity
changes are required, undertakes to make these changes
to the overall Australian system, through considering
under the guidance of the supervisor and/or academic
some of the espoused benefits of an oral component and
unit. If re-examination is required, the revised thesis is
various practices engaged in during an oral exam. The
generally re-submitted to the original examiners where
focus on the possible introduction of an oral component
possible and the process begins again. In the case of
in Australia particularly addresses the ACOLA review of
revisions, the supervisor (and perhaps Head of School or
Higher Degree by Research Training in Australia (McGagh,
delegate) sign off on the revisions. Once all the required
2016) where the concern was expressed that the
changes are complete and the final version of the thesis
Australian system examines the research but questions
submitted to the university library, the candidate will be
whether the researcher is also examined.
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
An oral component in PhD examination in Australia Margaret Kiley et al.
27
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
The oral exam aka the Viva (voce)
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
thesis, with the oral component reinforcing this decision rather than altering it. Examples of variation may exist
Within the international literature, one finds a plethora
but the comparative study results suggest they are rare.
of practices related to the oral component of doctoral
So what then is the point of spending money and time on
examination. In parts of Europe and Scandinavia,these take
something that might not necessarily impact substantially
the form of a ‘public defence’, sometimes as a very public
on the final result?
and arguably ritualistic event once the final determination has been made. In this paper, we restrict our attention to
Data sources
what we describe as the Viva voce (or simply the Viva), an integrated part of the examination process normally
The data sources for this paper, in addition to the
restricted to the candidate and the examination panel, a
published literature, came from work undertaken by The
process most germane to the tradition in England (see for
Centre for the Study of Research Training and Impact
example B Carter & Whittaker, 2009; Morley, Leonard, &
(SORTI). The Centre undertook a program of research,
David, 2003; Smith, 2014; Tinkler & Jackson, 2000, 2004;
the intention of which was to: ‘try and understand better
Trafford, 2003). Moreover, with the introduction in NZ of
the nature and form that doctoral examination takes,
an oral component, there is also some research emerging
including aspects that are easily measurable and those
from that country (S. Carter, 2008; Kelly, 2010).
that are not…., including what mindset and intentions
While a range of views has been put forward regarding
examiners appear to take into the process’ (Lovat et al.,
the purposes of the Viva in the UK, paraphrasing Tinkler
2015, p. 6). The three studies in the program followed
& Jackson (2004), in Chapter 2 (p. 16) of their book, they
the same methodology, both quantitative and qualitative,
suggest, in order of frequency, that the oral component:
allowing comparisons to be made between countries
• ‘Examiners to check the candidate’s understanding and ability…;
and between models of doctoral examination, that is, those with an oral component and those without. The
• Clarifies weak areas…;
first two studies focussed on Australia while the third
• Serves as a means of authentication…;
collected reports from two countries with a comparable
• Allows examiners to further extend the candidate
examination system to Australia but with the addition of
and their research…;
an oral – New Zealand and England. This latter study also
• Provides an opportunity for the candidate to defend the thesis…;
incorporated interviews with 82 experienced examiners from Australia, New Zealand and England.
• Causes the PhD to be located within a broader context…;
In all cases, examiner reports were de-identified, converted to a standardised text format in terms of page
• Tests the candidate’s oral skills…;
and line length (text units) and coded in QSR N6 qualitative
• Allows for a final decision to be made on borderline
software following an established coding framework. The
cases…;
standardised format allowed translation of the coding into
• Acts as a ‘rite of passage’/ritual’.
IMB SPSS for quantitative analysis based on text units. (For
These various purposes address a mix of areas, for
example,
organisational
and
ethical
a full description of the methodology see Holbrook &
matters
Bourke, 2004; Bourke, Hattie & Anderson, 2004). In the case
(authentication), educational issues (broad context
of the third study involving the Viva, the coding framework
and defending thesis), administrative considerations
was extended to capture all reference to the Viva and a
(decision-making and finalisation), and assessment (check
new framework established to code the de-identified and
understanding, clarification and skills).
transcribed interviews. Additionally, in the third study, a
Of interest, work by Green and Powell (2005) focuses
sub-set of reports was analysed, using a linguistic analysis
particularly on the Viva as a rite of passage rather than a
approach ‘to better understand the evaluative language
form of examination, particularly as they note from Tinkler
used in the reports’ (Starfield et al., 2015 p. 130).
and Jackson (2004 p. 29) that 32 per cent of UK candidates
With respect to the interviews (often undertaken by
were informed of the outcome of the assessment process
Skype or phone) those with New Zealand examiners
before going into the Viva. This is in line with a section of
revealed that most had examined theses both with and
the research reported above in Lovat et al (2015). In other
without an oral component. While some NZ universities
words, it seems that the decisions about the quality of
have had an oral component for a number of years it
the work are made during the examination of the written
is only relatively recently that an oral component has
28
An oral component in PhD examination in Australia Margaret Kiley et al.
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
become common practice across the country. However,
adequately describes this assessment event? Should it
of the Australian examiners interviewed some had taken
be termed ‘examination’, with an appropriate adjective
part in systems with an oral component but most had not
(e.g. ‘oral examination’) in order to distinguish it from
taken part directly in the oral examination process.
the examination of the written thesis? Or, is it even an
When Lovat et al. (2015) reported on the interviews, they
commented
‘examination’, given the findings reported earlier by Lovat
that, unsurprisingly, interviewees
et al. (2015) and particularly in light of the work by Clarke
were more supportive of the system which they knew
(2013 p. 250) where she suggests that, at the doctoral level:
best. So, English examiners generally reported positively
• ‘each assessment is of a single candidate, rather
on the Viva, NZ examiners, who were experiencing the
than a cohort of students, and by definition the
introduction of an oral, were generally in favour of the
candidate will have produced a unique output;
new system, and Australian examiners who had not
• the examiners are different; they have been chosen
engaged in an oral exam could not quite see its value.
explicitly for their expertise in the candidate’s
However, those examiners in Australia who had engaged
research areas....
in oral components, perhaps as candidates or academics
• each subject or field has particular expectations of
in overseas universities: ‘Saw it as beneficial in terms of
what a successful doctoral graduate should have
greater closure but did not believe it made any tangible difference to the judgement that individual examiners brought to the event’ (Lovat et al., 2015 p. 19).The findings from the studies are outlined, plus the literature provides
achieved... • each university has its own unique regulations and guidance... • each candidate has his/her own strengths and weaknesses...’
the basis for the following.
These points suggest that at the doctoral level what we
Considerations related to revising or introducing an oral component into the doctoral examination process
consider examination is somewhat different from what we understand examination to be at the coursework level. A second consideration relates to candidate preparation for the oral. For example, in most of the UK literature related
In light of the literature related to procedures in the oral
to thesis examination and research supervision, there is
component, we outline in the following sections in three
extensive discussion of opportunities for the candidate to
main categories, issues that an institution might need to
practise for the Viva situation. Examples include: ‘Practice
consider if revising their oral examination or considering
runs’ organised by supervisors; and, opportunities for
the introduction of an oral component to the thesis
candidates to give one another mock or simulated Vivas
examination process. These categories are considerations
(e.g. via video and examples on You Tube). These learning
relevant to: preparation for examination; the actual
opportunities are additional to regular seminars in the
process of the oral component; and, the completion of
department, as well as presentations at national and
the oral component.
international conferences (Sharmini, Spronken-Smith, Golding, & Harland, 2014). Wellington (2010) suggests
Considerations relevant to preparation for examination
regarding preparing candidates one needs to consider: ‘the importance of the process to students as well as the
A substantial number of considerations highlighted in the
outcome; their need and desire for formative feedback and
literature relate to preparation for the oral component,
evaluation; and the affective aspects of the event’ [italics in
with the main ones being: nomenclature; candidate
original] (p. 83). This, he suggests is particularly important
preparation; sequence; access to examiner comments; who
when one appreciates that candidate misunderstanding
attends/audience; participant roles; costs; organisation
and/or lack of knowledge of the purpose, processes and
and reporting.
policies relating to the Viva can contribute to the levels
Nomenclature is a seemingly simple issue of an oral component, and yet, as the following indicates, a number
of anxiety often reported in the literature (for example Bassnett, 2014; Crossouard, 2011).
of issues need to be addressed. Is it a defence in the sense
A third consideration relates to the sequencing of the
of the European model (Hartley, 2000) or similar to the
oral component. A number of universities in Australia
US model (Lovitts, 2007)? Is it a Viva voce, the term used
have a pre-submission seminar. In most cases these
in the UK (Wellington, 2013), the oral as often used in
seminars are not seen as part of the final examination
NZ (S. Carter, 2008) or is there another term that more
process, but, could they be? Would it be possible to use
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
An oral component in PhD examination in Australia Margaret Kiley et al.
29
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
such a process more formally to address aspects of skills
organised for candidate and examiners, rooms booked and
not accessed through examination of the written thesis
so on, and then one of the reports does not arrive, what
only? What would it take to develop that into part of the
happens? Alternatively, it might be argued that examiners
thesis examination process?
could be more likely to return reports on time if they are
On the other hand, where the oral takes place after
aware of such related issues.
the examination of the written thesis, there is a question
Another consideration related to an oral component
as to whether the oral component proceeds even when
concerns the audience. Wellington (2010 p. 77) found
it is clear from the reports on the written thesis that
from his focus groups with candidates in the UK regarding
the examiners are suggesting a revise and resubmit, or
the Viva that: ‘By far the largest areas of doubt or even
possible fail. For example, according to comments from
ignorance [of candidates] relates to rules and regulations
NZ colleagues, if the initial reports suggest a revise and
for the conduct of the viva’ along with duration and who
resubmit, then the candidate is invited to undertake the
attended the Viva and their role. As suggested above, the
changes recommended by the examiners, resubmit and
European public defence has a rich history of public
then proceed to the oral component. The decision to
engagement, whereas the UK Viva is more of a private
proceed, regardless of the result, implies three things. First
affair with the candidate, internal and external examiners
is that the candidate might perform so well in the oral that
and, when invited by the candidate, the supervisor. In
they will reverse the earlier decision of the examiners.
some cases, universities in the UK are now including a
The second suggests that the oral is considered integral to
chairperson but where this is not the case the internal
assisting the candidate in making the required revisions,
examiner takes on the role of chairing the event. The NZ
with the third being that institutions are simply following
model most frequently includes the candidate, at least one
through on a mandatory process. Moreover, postponing
examiner, a neutral chairperson, and the main supervisor.
the oral until after revisions and resubmission tends to
The role of the supervisor in the oral component
suggest that the institution considers the oral component
is one of the most debated issues, and the focus is
as an additional process to the original examination.
primarily on the nature of their contribution and impact
Linked with the decision to proceed, or not, is whether
on proceedings. While there is considerable variation in
the candidate has access to examiners’ comments on the
whether a member of the supervisory team is required to
written thesis prior to the oral component. In England, it
attend, or invited to attend with the candidate’s agreement,
appears that, in the majority of cases, the candidate does
where they do attend, the supervisor is usually there as an
not see the reports prior to the Viva, whereas, in NZ, the
observer but do they, should they, have other roles?
opposite is generally the case. Colleagues report that in
In a similar vein what is the relevance and impact of
some cases the reports were given to the candidate up
others who might be included, particularly related to
to ten days in advance of the oral in order to allow them
cultural diversity and health? In some situations, for
to prepare. Again, there are implications related to these
example in various NZ universities, the candidate can
practices. It might be argued that where the candidate
invite a friend to attend, but this is as an observer only. An
does not know the issues to be raised from examination
example, which might illuminate this issue, comes from
of the written work, the institution considers it more of
Chen (2012) where she describes the process in one
an examination whereas, with an opportunity to prepare,
Canadian university which is a semi-public event wherein
it might be seen as more of a rebuttal, a practice that is
the candidate can invite a small number of colleagues,
in keeping with academic practice when applying for
family and friends to attend as observers, with a total
research grants and similar competitive processes.
number of participants being about 10-12 persons. In some
Of course, whether the candidates are able to see the
situations, the decision regarding participation is critical
reports on the written thesis prior to the oral component
in terms of addressing student diversity, for example,
assumes that the reports have been received, and in a
those requiring particular cultural considerations and/or
timely manner. While anecdotes abound of the examiner
various health issues.
reading the thesis ‘on the train’ to attend the Viva, Carter
Decisions regarding the participants in the oral
and Whittaker (2009 p. 174) surmise that:‘Reports may or
component highlight issues related to the purpose of this
may not be required to be submitted prior to the viva and
component of the doctoral examination. For example, in
may or may not be shared between the examiners.’
the European ‘public’ oral component, there has generally
There are also many organisational issues in relation to
been agreement that the thesis has passed prior to it;
the reports. For example, if a date is set for the oral, travel
this is quite a different process from the practice to be
30
An oral component in PhD examination in Australia Margaret Kiley et al.
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
found in the UK model. This leads to the question: could
workload cost of the time involved for all participants and
the written thesis be passed but the candidate fail the
administrators along with the emotional cost, as outlined
oral component, not because it was determined that it
in much of the literature on the Viva.
was not the candidate’s own work, but due to lack of a candidate be required to re-sit the oral component
Considerations relevant to the process of conducting the oral component
only? This is where there is considerable discussion
A number of issues are deserving of consideration in
as to whether it is the thesis or candidate that is being
the conduct of the oral component, for example: Is
examined and extends to consideration of different, if
there a structure or agenda for the event and, if so, who
possibly overlapping, sets of criteria.
manages it? Does the candidate give a presentation at
communication skills or other? In other words, could
Another issue related to ‘who should be present?’
the commencement of the oral session? Is there an ideal
concerns whether there should be an internal examiner
length of the oral component? Can various participants
involved, or only external examiners. The Australian
be involved through Skype/teleconferencing? Does the
Qualifications Framework Council (2013) requires that, at
questioning cover the thesis topic only or range more
the PhD level, each thesis be examined by at least two
broadly across related disciplinary areas? Finally, what
examiners external to the institution and who have an
does it mean for all concerned when the examiners and
international reputation in the relevant field.
At the
same time, this requirement allows for a third examiner who could be internal to the university in question. Hence lingering questions include: What are the advantages and disadvantages of having an internal examiner? If there is an internal examiner, what
candidate come face-to-face?
What are the advantages and disadvantages of having an internal examiner? If there is an internal examiner, what is their role? For example, in many English universities the internal examiner chairs the oral examination process, whereas in some NZ universities the internal examiner ensures that all the required changes are suitably addressed.
is their role? For example,
The literature shows that it is not uncommon for the examiners to meet together prior to the oral session in order to determine an agenda or order of questions that lead from the simple, introductory style of question to
more
complex
levels
of analysis and synthesis (see for example Carter, S.,
in many English universities
2008; Smith, 2014; Trafford
the internal examiner chairs the oral examination
2003). This tends to lead to a more coherent and unified
process, whereas in some NZ universities the internal
session. Another form of structure in the pre-Viva meeting
examiner ensures that all the required changes are
reported by Trafford (2003, p. 115) is where ‘examiners
suitably addressed. In other cases the internal is seen as
quickly establish their respective ‘seniority’ and extent
someone who can explain the institutional circumstances,
of examining experience, while clarifying ‘content’ or
anomalies and policies.
‘methodological’ roles’. Or, as Carter & Whittaker (2009, p.
Related to the involvement of an internal examiner, the
173) suggest: ‘the pre-viva meeting can be an interesting
NZ system faced a particular issue whereby there was
contest in which examiners can seemingly examine each
considerable pressure to maintain the international nature
other.’ Trafford (2003), from his research on over 25 Vivas
of the doctoral examination process and yet introduce a
in the UK, classified the questions into different phases of
practical and financially viable oral system. Therefore,
the oral with questions that:
as a minimum the written thesis is generally sent to an
• address issues such as resolving research problems,
examiner at one of the other NZ (or if need be Australian) institutions, as well as to an international examiner. For the oral component, it is often the NZ examiner who attends the oral, not the international examiner, although with technology it is not uncommon for the international examiner to be involved by Skype or similar.
content, and structure; • concern the research question, choice of topic, location of study; • allow the candidate to discuss the implications, awareness of, the wider literature; and, • defend ‘doctorateness’.
In addressing the various issues above one is confronted
At the other end of the spectrum, examples were
by the considerations of the cost involved: cost for
found of beginning with Examiner 1 who worked their
examiners and candidates to attend, cost of organising, the
way through the thesis, asking questions and airing
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
An oral component in PhD examination in Australia Margaret Kiley et al.
31
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
concerns, and then handing over to Examiner 2 for the
second issue concerns the reliability of the technology
same process. Having a neutral chairperson who has had
and a third, and more major consideration, concerns ‘who
some training, as in some NZ universities, can ensure
is the person at a distance’? Could it be that the candidate
that a coherent agenda is developed. In NZ, in many
has returned home or moved to undertake work and so
cases, the chairperson is often from a different discipline
is using Skype or equivalent to respond to examiners
from that of the candidate and is quite explicitly not one
who are located at the other end of the connection in the
of the examiners. While in the UK it is still not common
university where they undertook their degree? Or, might
to have a neutral chair, there is research to suggest that
be it best practice to ensure that the candidate is present
this situation, along with the private nature of the Viva,
with the chairperson, at least, even if the other examiners
could lead to the unprofessional behaviour by some
and supervisors are the ones who are connecting from
examiners. For example, Pearce (2005) provides four
outside the university through technology?
scenarios based on her research and experience. These
When the process of examination involves the written
are: the nitpicker; the jealous colleague; foul play; and,
thesis only, the examiners are confined to the content of
the good Viva where: ‘a good viva is not necessarily an
that document. If there is an oral component, however, a
“easy” one’ (p. 9). In her ‘good viva’ scenario Pearce
relevant issue is whether the examiners’ questioning can
(2005, p. 9) reports that:
range across related topics beyond those of the written
Both examiners are so experienced and successful that they do not need to ‘prove’ themselves (either to the candidate or to each other) and the candidate is himself mature enough to accept that criticism of part of his thesis is not a criticism of the whole thesis (Emphasis in original).
thesis in order to assess the candidate’s appreciation of the field more generally. A further issue for consideration concerns the personality of the examiners. While in the Australian system the examiners do not meet with the candidate, or with one another, and where examiners can request that
Wallace (2003, p. 106) presents a particularly negative
their names not be divulged to the candidate, might there
picture when reporting on candidates’ experiences
be different expectations of behaviour if the examiner is
of the Viva, where she categorises experiences in the
face to face (even via Skype), rather than participating
following way:
only as the author of a written report? How examiners
An ordeal (‘torture’); a humiliation (‘they burst into howls of laughter’); a trial (‘court martial’); a process intended to break her (‘army training’) ...an inquisition or interrogation; a means of bringing the candidate’s thinking into conformity with that of the examiner.
differ in behaviours between an oral and a purely written scenario is unknown.
Considerations relevant to the actions following the oral examination
The length of the oral is often another issue for
Two issues that would benefit from consideration
discussion, with the general view being that it should be
regarding the conclusion and follow-up to the oral
‘as long as is needed’. For example, in the UK, Gibney
examination are: how, and with whom, is the final decision
(2013) reported in the Times Higher Education that: ‘the
reached and, who should write the final report?
viva…can last anything from 90 minutes to a gruelling five
From the literature, the candidate and the supervisor (if
hours.’ Given an already over-burdened academic regime,
present) are usually asked to leave the room once they have
the thought of a Viva routinely going for five hours might
addressed the agreed questions. In some cases, however,
be considered to be administratively unviable regardless
the supervisor can be invited to remain in the room while
of any specific views on the value of such an experience
the examiners deliberate. Whatever the process, the role
for the candidate and the examiners.
of the supervisor would need to be thought through
Particularly in Australia, given geographic distance from
clearly. Once an agreement has been reached, usually the
much of the locus of Western scholarship, the role that
candidate, with the supervisor, is invited to return, after
technology might play is an important issue. While many
which the examiners report the recommendation that
see the possibilities of using Skype or equivalent in order
they are going to make to the university and, where it is
to enable the overseas examiner to participate, there are a
a positive outcome, generally congratulate and share in
number of issues to be considered. One is the simple issue
initial celebrations.
of time differences, particularly for Australian candidates
It is clear from the literature that in the UK and NZ
where an examiner is in Europe, the UK or North America
the final report from the oral examination is forwarded to
with time differences of anything up to 12 hours. A
the relevant institutional office for various administrative
32
An oral component in PhD examination in Australia Margaret Kiley et al.
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
and educational purposes. Questions arise concerning the
on the doctoral examination process for many years through
actual report. For example, should it be: a combination of a
SORTI.
final summative report written by the chair and signed off by the panel, with the initial individual reports appended?
Hedy Fairbairn is a member of SORTI and has been the
Or, should the report be comprised of edited comments
Project and Data Manager on four ARC Discovery Projects
from the reports of the written thesis integrated into the
looking at doctoral examination, both nationally and
report arising from the oral? Or, might there be other
internationally.
alternatives that meet the needs of candidates, examiners and the institution and would these practices vary if the
Sue Starfield is a Professor in the School of Education and
candidate has seen the reports on the written thesis prior
Director of the Learning Centre at UNSW Sydney, Australia.
to the oral component and has had the opportunity to Brian Paltridge is Professor of TESOL at the University of
respond, as is generally the case in NZ?
Sydney, Australia and author of The Discourse of Peer Review
Conclusion
(Palgrave Macmillan, 2017)
This paper has built on earlier research by the author team
References
(Lovat et al 2015) and literature that has identified a range of issues, inconsistencies and problems with doctoral examination processes within and between systems in Australia, England and New Zealand. Among some of the foci of more recent research arose the issue of the need for, or desirability of, an oral component to examination, a practice that is common in the UK, a growing trend in New Zealand but almost entirely absent from the Australian system. The spectrum of considerations span the preparation for, conduct, and aftermath, of the oral component in thesis examination and address such issues as nomenclature, student preparation, sequence, access to examiner comments, who attends, participant roles, costs, organisation and reporting. By addressing these issues from a sound, educational research perspective, we might be able to come up with some way of answering Gibney’s (2013) query in her article Are PhD vivas still fit for purpose? where she asks: ‘So what could be done to improve the process?’ Margaret Kiley has worked in the areas of doctoral education for many years and is an adjunct at the Australian National University and holds a conjoint position at the University of Newcastle, Australia.
ACGR (2016). Australian Graduate Research Good Practice Principles, http:// www.ddogs.edu.au/resources Australian Qualifications Framework Council. (2013). Australian Qualifications Framework. Retrieved from Adelaide, South Australia: Bassnett, S. (2014). Cavalier attitudes lead to uncivil practices in the conduct of vivas. Times Higher Education. Retrieved from https://www. timeshighereducation.com/comment/opinion/cavalier-attitudes-lead-to-uncivilpractices-in-vivas/2013263.article Bourke, S., Hattie, J., & Anderson, L. (2004). Predicting examiner recommendations on Ph.D. theses. International Journal of Educational Research, 41(2), 178-194. Carter, B., & Whittaker, K. (2009). Examining the British PhD Viva: Opening new doors or scarring for life? Contemporary Nurse: A Journal for the Australian Nursing Profession, 32(1-2), 169-178. Carter, S. (2008). Examining the doctoral thesis: A discussion. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45(4), 365-374. Chen, S. (2012). Making sesne of the public PhD dissertation defense: A qualitative multi-case study of Education students’ experiences. (PhD), McGill University, Montreal, Canada. Clarke, G. (2013). Developments in doctoral assessment in the UK. In M. Kompf & P. Denicolo (Eds.), Critical issues in higher education (pp. 23-35): Sense. Crossouard, B. (2011). The doctoral viva voce as a cultural practice: the gendered production of academic subjects. Gender and Education, 23(3), 313-329. Fraser, G., & Rowarth, J. (2007). Preparing candidates for oral examination. In C. Denholm & T. Evans (Eds.), Supervising doctorates downunder (pp. 243250). Melbourne: ACER. Gibney, E. (2013). Are PhD vivas still fit for purpose? Times Higher Education. Retrieved from http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/features/are-phd-vivasstill-fit-for-purpose/2003341.article
Contact: Margaret.kiley@anu.edu.au Professor Allyson Holbrook is Director of the centre for the Study of Research Training and Impact (SORTI), a current member of the ARC College of Experts and recipient of
Golding, C., Sharmini, S., & Lazorovitch, A. (2014). What examiners do: What thesis students should know. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(5), 563-576. Gould, J. (2016). Future of the thesis. Nature, 535, 26-28.
several grants investigating doctoral education. Terence Lovat is Emeritus Professor at the University of Newcastle, Australia, and Honorary Research Fellow at the
Green, H., & Powell, S. (2005). Doctoral study in contemporary higher education (11-12). Berks: SRHE & OUP. Hartley, J. (2000). Nineteen ways to have a viva: Appendix 2. PsyPag Quarterly Newsletter, 35(June), 22-28.
University of Oxford, UK and has been involved in research vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
An oral component in PhD examination in Australia Margaret Kiley et al.
33
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
Holbrook, A., & Bourke, S. (2004). An investigation of PhD examination outcomes in Australia using a mixed method approach. Australian Journal of Educational and Development Psychology, 4, 153-169.
Prins, F., de Kleijn, R., & van Tartwijk, J. (2015). Students’ use of a rubric for research theses. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1-23. doi:10.1080/02602938.2015
Jackson, C., & Tinkler, P. (2001). Back to Basics: A consideration of the purposes of the PhD viva. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(4), 355-366.
Sharmini, S., Spronken-Smith, R., Golding, C., & Harland, T. (2014). Assessing the doctoral thesis when it includes published work. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. doi:10.1080/02602938.2014.888535
Kelly, F. (2010). Research Note Reflecting on the Purpose of the PhD Oral Examination. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 45(1), 77-83.
Smith, P. (2014). The PhD Viva: How to prepare for your oral examination. Hamps: Palgrave MacMillan.
Kiley, M. (2009). Rethinking the Australia doctoral examination process. Australian Universities’ Review, 51(2), 32-41.
Starfield, S., Paltridge, B., McMurtrie, R., Holbrook, A., Bourke, S., Fairbairn, H., . . . Lovat, T. (2015). Understanding the language of evaluation in examiners’ reports on doctoral theses. Linguistics and Education, 130-144.
Lane, B. (2007, August 29, 2007). Pressure on PhDs to meet grade. The Australian. Retrieved from http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/ story0,25197,22324208-12332,00.html Lovat, T., Holbrook, A., Bourke, S., Fairbairn, H., Kiley, M., Paltridge, B., & Starfield, S. (2015). Examining Doctoral Examination and the Question of the Viva. Higher Education Review, 47(3), 5-23. Lovitts, B. (2007). Making the implicit explicit: Creating performance expectations for the dissertation. Sterling, Va: Stylus. McGagh, J., Marsh, H., Western, M., Thomas, P., Hastings, A., Mihailova, M., & Wenham, M. (2016). Review of Australia’s Research Training System. Report for the Australian Council of Learned Academies. Retrieved from http://www. acola.org.au./ http://acola.org.au/index.php/projects/securing-australia-sfuture/saf13-rts-review Morley, L., Leonard, D., & David, M. (2003). Quality and equality in British PhD assessment. Quality Assurance in Education, 11(2), 64-72. Mullins, G., & Kiley, M. (2002). ‘It’s a PhD, not a Nobel Prize’: How experienced examiners assess research theses. Studies in Higher Education, 27(4), 369-386. Pearce, L. (2005). How to examine a thesis. London: Society of Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
Tinkler, P., & Jackson, C. (2000). Examining the Doctorate: institutional policy and the PhD examination process in Britain. Studies in Higher Education, 25(2), 167-180. Tinkler, P., & Jackson, C. (2004). The Doctoral Examination Process: A handbook for students, examiners and supervisors. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press. Trafford, V. (2003). Questions in doctoral vivas: Views from the inside. Quality Assurance in Education, 11(2), 114-122. Wallace, S. (2003). Figuratively speaking: Six accounts of the PhD viva. Quality Assurance in Education, 11(2), 100-108. Wellington, J. (2010). Supporting students’ preparation for the viva: their pre-conceptions and implications for practice. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(1), 71-84. Wellington, J. (2013). Searching for ‘doctorateness’. Studies in Higher Education, 38(10), 1490-1503. doi:10.1080.03075079.2011.634901 Wisker, G. (2012). The good supervisor: Supervising postgraduate and undergraduate research for doctoral theses and dissertations (2nd ed.). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Powell, S., & Green, H. (2003). Research degree examining: Quality issues of principle and practice. Quality Assurance in Education, 11(2), 55-63.
34
An oral component in PhD examination in Australia Margaret Kiley et al.
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
Alternative pathways into university Are tertiary preparation programs a viable option? Jenny Chesters University of Melbourne
Kerry Rutter & Karen Nelson University of the Sunshine Coast
Louise Watson University of Canberra
During the past three decades, the student populations of Australian universities have become more heterogeneous as the higher education sector expanded and new alternative entry pathways were established. Broadening access to university study and, therefore, to professional and semi-professional occupations, provides avenues for social mobility. In this paper, we examine whether students entering university via alternative entry pathways, and in particular, on-campus tertiary preparation programs, have similar levels of achievement and attainment as students who entered via the more traditional pathway after completing Year 12. Our analysis is conducted on data from one regional university and our results show that students who were not eligible to enrol on the basis of their secondary school results were no more likely than traditional students to discontinue their studies. Keywords: higher education; alternative entry; retention
In the latter part of the twentieth century, Australia, like
additional support to these non-traditional students
many other nations, transitioned into a post-industrial
(Pitman, 2017; Thomas, 2014). The expansion of higher
economy, shedding jobs in manufacturing and creating
education sectors in Australia and other Anglophone
jobs in the services sectors, fuelling demand for a more
countries such as the UK and the US is associated with
educated population with higher levels of skills and the
more heterogeneous student populations in terms of
capacity for lifelong learning (Gale & Tranter, 2011; Ryan
family background, previous level of education, life stage
& Watson, 2003). To meet rising demand for university
and motivation (Gale & Parker, 2014; Schuetze & Slowey,
degrees, the Australian Government expanded the higher
2002). However, as Walker, Matthew and Black (2014)
education sector by increasing the number of universities
note, social background is not the only barrier to the
and introducing alternative entry pathways. In 2010,
successful completion of university study with students
the government introduced equity targets to encourage
from non-traditional backgrounds requiring additional
universities to provide more opportunities for students
support throughout their studies to overcome feelings of
from a wider segment of the population and to provide
alienation (see also Thomas, 2014). To assist in preparing
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
Alternative pathways into university Jenny Chesters et al.
35
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
a more diverse student population for the rigours of
and 2015, the percentage of students from low SES families
academic life, universities have developed enabling
increased from 16 to 18 per cent (DET, 2016; Edwards
programs to upskill students who did not complete
& McMillan, 2015). Furthermore, several researchers
secondary school or who completed secondary school
provide evidence that although the expansion of the
without the required level of achievement.
higher education sector led to an increase in the number
In this paper, we analyse administrative data provided
of students from low SES families attending university,
by a regional university in Australia to examine the
there is also evidence of increased stratification within
association between pathway into university and
the sector (Gale & Tranter, 2011). Thus, expansion of
achievement and retention. After providing an overview
the higher education sector may not have achieved an
of the context and the results of previous research, we
important social justice goal of ensuring that individuals
introduce the data and then present and discuss the
from disadvantaged families have access to the same
results of our analysis.
opportunities as their peers from more advantaged families (Pitman, 2017).
Higher education in Australia
Since 1990, domestic students have been required to make a contribution to the cost of their tuition through an
The Australian higher education sector expanded after
income-contingent loan scheme. In the original scheme (the
1989 when colleges of advanced education and institutes
Higher Education Contribution Scheme), all students made
of technology were ‘re-invented’ as
new universities,
an equal contribution regardless of their degree program.
through rebranding or mergers with other colleges,
However, after several changes, contributions now differ
institutes or universities (Moodie & Wheelahan, 2009).
between discipline groups. Currently, Higher Education
Since then, the Australian Government has implemented
Loan Program (HELP) loans are interest-free (although the
several policies aimed at widening participation. In 2010,
outstanding balance is adjusted to account for inflation
the government uncapped quotas for Commonwealth
on an annual basis) and are repaid via the taxation system
supported students, which led to a dramatic increase in
once the student’s income reaches a designated threshold.
commencing-student numbers as universities scrambled
In addition, to ensure that students from low SES families
to maintain market share, and introduced a Higher
are not deterred from undertaking university study for
Education Participation Partnerships Program (HEPPP)
financial reasons, students from low-income families and
which provided specifically targeted funding to promote
independent students with low incomes have access to a
the participation of under-represented groups (Devlin,
means-tested scheme of income support.
2013; Hodges et al., 2013; Pitman, 2017; Thomas, 2014).
Financial constraints are just one of the many
Consequently, many students with no or low ATARs
interrelated factors that deter young people from low SES
(Australian Tertiary Admission Rank) enrolled in university
families from attending university (Chambers & Deller,
degree programs. ATARs rank students relative to their
2011). Young people from low SES families are more
peers and range from 30 to 100. They have a similar role
likely than those from high SES families to have parents
to A levels in the UK and the SAT in the US (Goggin et
who have no experience of the higher education sector,
al., 2016). Pitman, Koshy and Phillimore (2015) found that
thus they have access to lower levels of relevant cultural
the percentage of students entering via alternative entry
and social capital (Gale & Tranter, 2011). This ‘social class
pathways, that is, not on the basis of their ATAR, increased
gradient’ in access to information, as well as financial
from 37 to 46 per cent between 2008 and 2011.
resources, structures access to higher education and the
Despite the number of domestic undergraduate
ability of students to navigate the complexities inherent in
students increasing from almost 280,000 to almost
higher education such as selecting universities, selecting
745,000 between 1988 and 2015 (DETYA, 2001; DET,
degree programs, selecting subjects within and across
2016), students from the designated equity groups, that
degree programs, and mapping out achievable goals
is, students from low socio-economic status (SES) families,
(Christie et al., 2004).
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students, students
The under-representation of students from low SES
from non-English speaking backgrounds, students with
families is also a feature of higher education systems in
disabilities, and students from rural/remote regions,
other nations (Forsyth & Furlong, 2003; Harrison & Hatt,
continue to be under-represented in the higher education
2011; Ishitani, 2006; Rowan-Kenyon, 2007; Rowan-Kenyon
sector (DET, 2016; Edwards & McMillan, 2015; Ellis, 2013;
et al., 2008; Schuetze & Slowey, 2002; Thiele et al., 2017;
Gale & Tranter, 2011; Goggin et al., 2016). Between 2009
Walker et al., 2004). For example, Schuetze and Slowey
36
Alternative pathways into university Jenny Chesters et al.
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
(2002) examined higher education in 10 countries,
to make any contribution to the cost of tuition, although
finding that although the higher education sectors
they may have to purchase course materials and/or pay
in some countries managed to attract relatively large
service fees (Hodges et al., 2013; Lomax-Smith et al.,
numbers of non-traditional students,
elite
research-
intensive universities were seemingly
less
accessible
than newer universities to non-traditional
students.
Forsyth and Furlong (2003) also found that UK students
2011). In 2015, there were
Enabling programs are particularly attractive to students from underrepresented groups, such as students from low SES families, first-in-family students, Indigenous students and students with disabilities.
from the most disadvantaged
22,495
across
programs (DET, 2016). Enabling
programs
particularly to
students as
are
attractive from
represented such
families who qualified for
students
Australia enrolled in enabling
undergroups,
students
from
low SES families, first-in-
university were the least likely to enrol at prestigious
family students, Indigenous students and students with
institutions or in prestigious courses at any institution.
disabilities (Hodges et al., 2013; Lomax-Smith et al., 2011). Enabling programs are designed to provide potential
Pathways into university
students with an opportunity to test whether they are capable of studying at university level and to discover
Although the traditional pathway into university in
whether or not they actually want to study at university
Australia is via the completion of secondary school with
(Goggin et al., 2016; Hodges et al., 2013; Thomas, 2014).
an ATAR, there are several alternative entry pathways
Students who graduate from an enabling program
including the completion of an enabling program, the
perform at similar levels as traditional students during
completion of a Vocational Educational and Training
their undergraduate degree programs (Chesters & Watson,
(VET) qualification, the completion of a lower level higher
2016;Thomas, 2014).
education qualification such as an Associate Degree, or on the basis of being over 21 years of age (Watson et al.,
Retention and attrition
2013). In 2010, around 10 per cent of all commencing students were admitted via the VET pathway, however,
As the expansion of alternative entry pathways into
the percentages differed markedly between universities,
university provides increased opportunities for the
ranging from less than five per cent in research-intensive
participation of under-represented groups in degree
universities to 26 per cent in some regional universities
programs, there is a strong policy interest in the retention
(Watson et al., 2013). According to Moodie and Wheelahan
and attrition rates of the students from these groups
(2009: 360), although VET is an ‘educational ladder of
(Coates, 2014). Retention and attrition rates are widely
opportunity’ allowing students to progress through the
accepted institutional measures of success in the higher
system one level at a time, the sector does not provide ‘a
education sector. Studies examining retention and attrition
social ladder of opportunity’ because the students most
rates of traditional students have found that students with
likely to transfer from VET into higher education were
relatively high ATARs were more likely to complete their
similar in terms of SES to students who entered the higher
degree programs (Edwards & McMillan, 2015; Lomax-
education sector via the traditional pathway.
Smith et al., 2011). Edwards and McMillan (2015) found
Enabling programs (also called transition, bridging,
that 60 per cent of students with an ATAR of less than
preparation, foundational or access programs) are an
60 completed their degree program whereas 90 per cent
alternative pathway into higher education that provides
of students with an ATAR of at least 90 completed their
commencing students with additional support, usually
degree program.
in the semester prior to the commencement of a degree
The non-completion of a degree program tends to
program. An enabling program is ‘a course of instruction
be the end result of complex and interrelated factors
provided to a person for the purpose of enabling the
at both the student and the institution levels (Christie
person to undertake a course leading to a higher education
et al., 2004). Student-level factors include: a mismatch
award’ (Australian Government, 2012: 26). All publicly-
between the student’s expectations and experiences; a
funded Australian universities offer enabling programs to
lack of preparation for higher education; financial and
students with low or no ATARs. Students are not required
personal circumstances; long hours of paid work; a lack
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
Alternative pathways into university Jenny Chesters et al.
37
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
of support and understanding from family and friends;
a sense of alienation and are, consequently, less likely to
poor mental and/or physical health; and a lack of time
complete their degree programs.
management skills. The institutional-level factors include:
In this paper, we use administrative data provided by
a lack of coordination between academic and student
a relatively new university located in a regional area, 90
support services; short contact hours that detract from
kilometres from a state capital city. In 2017, almost half of
feelings of belonging; discordance between lectures,
the 15,000 students were first in family students, almost
tutorials and assessment items; a lack of expenditure on
one-fifth were from low SES families and 23 per cent
student support services; and a lack of information about
were from regional/remote areas. Australian Bureau of
how and when to access support services (Bowles &
Statistics Census 2011 data show that in the local area,
Brindle, 2016; Bowles et al., 2014; Coates 2014; Christie
a lower percentage of the population had a university-
et al., 2004; McMillan, 2011; Mestan, 2016; O’Keefe et
level qualification (11.1 per cent compared to 14.3 per
al., 2011; Wilcoxson, 2010). O’Keefe, Laven and Burgess
cent for Australia overall); the percentage of employees
(2011) found that of the students who discontinued
engaged in professional jobs was lower than for Australia
their studies, 70 per cent subsequently enrolled at other
overall (18.9 per cent compared to 21.3 per cent); and
institutions. Wilcoxson (2010) identified differences
the percentage engaged as sales workers was larger than
between students who discontinued their studies in their
for Australia overall (11.7 per cent compared to 9.4 per
first year and those who discontinued in their second
cent). The part-time employment rate was higher than
year. The most common reasons for discontinuing in the
that of Australia (34.9 per cent compared to 28.7 per
first year were: being socially disengaged from university
cent) (ABS, 2017).
life; being poorly prepared; and lacking commitment to
Our examination of the association between alternative
a specific career. The most commonly cited reasons for
pathways into university and students’ subsequent
discontinuing study during the second year were: poor
achievement and retention is designed to answer our
health; financial difficulties; having a clearer idea of their
research question:Are graduates of the on-campus tertiary
career goals; and feelings of not belonging. Bowles and
preparation pathway program more, or less, likely than
Brindle (2017) regard having a sense of belonging, that is,
traditional students to discontinue their studies?
identifying with the academic culture of the institution and having a commitment to achieving educational goals,
Method
as integral to the completion of degree programs. Research has consistently identified an association
This study draws on de-identified unit-level administrative
between SES and both attendance at, and attrition from,
data for one cohort of domestic undergraduate students
universities. Students from low SES families are less likely
who commenced their first bachelor degree program
to attend university and those who do attend are less likely
in the first semester of 2010 (n=1771). Data for each
to graduate from university than their peers from high SES
semester, in each year from 2010 to 2014, were analysed.
families (Chesters & Watson, 2013; Edwards & McMillan,
The key variables of interest are the student’s pathway
2015). Edwards and McMillan (2015) found that of the
into university, academic achievement and progress. The
students who commenced study in 2005, 69 per cent of
majority of commencing students (60 per cent) entered
students from low SES families and 78 per cent of students
via the traditional pathway; 16 per cent were admitted on
from high SES families had completed their bachelor
the basis of a higher education sub-degree; 12 per cent
degree programs by 2013. Students from low SES families
were admitted on the basis of a VET award; 10 per cent
are more likely than their high SES peers to be the first
were admitted after the completion of the university’s
person in their family to attend university and thus may
own Tertiary Preparation Pathway (TPP) program; and
experience some difficulty adjusting to university culture
3 per cent were admitted on the basis of ‘other’ criteria
and expectations (Chambers & Deller, 2011; Christie et al.,
(that is, mature-age or professional experience).
2004; Devlin, 2013; Ellis, 2013). Devlin (2013: 941) argues
The control variables are: sex; age; Indigenous status;
that success at university depends upon an understanding
first-in-family status; study status; and field of study. There
of ‘implicit expectations’ that many students from low
are four age categories: <20 years; 20-29 years; 30-39 years;
SES families are unaware of and therefore unable to
and 40 years or older. The Indigenous status variable
respond to (see also McKay & Devlin, 2014). Walker,
distinguishes between Indigenous and non-Indigenous
Matthew and Black (2004) argue that students who lack
students.The first-in-family variable distinguishes between
the appropriate cultural capital are likely to experience
students with at least one university-educated parent and
38
Alternative pathways into university Jenny Chesters et al.
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
Table 1 Characteristics of commencing students Characteristic
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
â&#x20AC;&#x2122;
R
E
V
I
E
W
Student achievement
Total n= 1771
%
Student achievement levels, as measured by grade point average (GPA) for all units completed in 2010 and 2011,
Sex Male
E
differed slightly by pathway into university. Student
598
34
1,173
66
1,087
61
5 per cent) GPA scores by pathway into university are
20-29
428
24
shown in Table 2. Students who had completed a higher
30-39
133
8
education sub-bachelor degree qualification recorded the
40+
123
7
1,747
99
24
1
Female Age <20
Indigenous
average (mean), median (50th percentile), 5th percentile (the lowest 5 per cent) and 95th percentile (the highest
Indigenous status non-Indigenous
grades range from 0 to 7 with 4 signifying a pass. The
First in family status Not first in family
900
51
First in family
871
49
Full-time
1542
87
Part-time
229
13
Arts
296
17
Social Sciences
172
10
Education
245
14
Business
353
Science Health sciences
Study status 1st semester 2010
Field of Study 1st semester 2010
highest mean GPA of 4.7 whereas traditional students and TPP graduates recorded the lowest mean GPA of 4.2.
Table 2 Summary statistics of GPA by pathway into university and field of study Pathway
n=
Mean
Median Lowest 5%
Highest 5%
Year12
1034
4.2
4.4
1.5
6.1
TPP
166
4.2
4.5
0.9
6.3
other
44
4.4
4.6
1.5
6.7
VET
194
4.5
4.8
1.5
6.2
HE subdegree
277
4.7
5.0
1.5
6.4
Field of study Arts
288
4.1
4.5
1.2
6.2
20
Social sciences
166
4.3
4.8
1.2
6.2
132
7
Education
236
4.7
5.0
1.4
6.5
573
32
Business
336
4.0
4.2
1.3
6.1
Science
131
4.0
4.1
1.5
6.3
Health sciences
558
4.5
4.8
1.6
6.3
those who did not have a university-educated parent. The study status variable differentiates between those studying full-time and those studying part-time. The field of study variable has six categories: Arts; Social Sciences;
NOTE: calculated GPA for all units completed in 2010 and 2011.
Education; Business; Science; and Health Sciences. The descriptive statistics of the 2010 commencing cohort are provided in Table 1. Two-thirds of the students
The difference between the lowest 5 per cent and
were female; 61 per cent were aged 19 years or younger
highest 5 per cent provides an indication of the spread
and 15 per cent were aged 30 years or more. Almost half
of scores. The GPAs of TPP students range from 0.9 to
of the students were first-in-family students (our measure
6.3 and the GPAs of traditional students range from 1.5
of low SES). According to the Department of Education
to 6.1 indicating that there was a wider distribution of
(2017), in 2010, across all universities, 12 per cent of
scores within the TPP cohort. Students studying Business
domestic students undertaking bachelor degrees were
and Science had the lowest mean GPAs (4.0) and those
aged 30+ years and 14.5 per cent were students from low
studying Education had the highest mean GPA (4.7).
SES families. Health Sciences attracted almost one third of
Education students recorded the largest difference
the students (32 per cent), Business programs attracted
between the mean GPA of the lowest 5 per cent (1.4) and
one-fifth of the students and 17 per cent of students were
the mean GPA of the highest 5 per cent (6.5).
enrolled in Arts programs. vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
Alternative pathways into university Jenny Chesters et al.
39
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
Attrition
E
R
S
I
T
enrol in units of study in different patterns depending
Pathway
on their program of study, whether they are enrolled on
Year12
a full-time or part-time basis, and individual preference. In addition to the standard two semesters per year, the university offers some units over a summer semester. students complete their undergraduate degree, the
S
â&#x20AC;&#x2122;
Commencing
students who were no longer enrolled had completed a
Although there is no consistent point in time when
E
R
E
V
I
E
W
Table 3 Association between attrition and pathway into university, field of study and GPA.
Our measure of attrition is based on whether or not program by the end of 2014. Undergraduate students may
I
Discontinued sem. 1 2012
Discontinued sem. 2 2014
n=
%
%
1,060
49
54
TPP
173
44
52
HE sub-degree
288
40
48
VET
204
37
52
46
50
63
Other
completion of 24 units usually signals the completion of
Field of study
a three-year program, such as Arts, and the completion
Arts
296
52
61
of 30 units signals the completion of a four-year degree
Social sciences
172
42
49
program, such as Education.
Education
245
41
49
Business
353
45
54
Science
132
47
65
semester 2, 2010 and did not complete a degree program.
Health sciences
573
38
44
A further 17 per cent of the commencing students did
GPA 2010/2011
not enrol in semester 2, 2011 and did not complete a
<4
594
70
79
degree program. Overall between semester 1 in 2010 and
4/4.99
449
31
40
5/5.99
485
24
31
6/7
187
22
30
Of the 1771 commencing students, 56 did not complete any units in semester 1, 2010 and did not return to study. One-fifth of the commencing students did not enrol in
semester 2 in 2014, 52 per cent of students discontinued their studies without completing a degree program. Previous research suggests that a large proportion of these students may have enrolled in programs at other universities (Oâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;Keefe et al. 2011). These data allow us to
As GPA increased, the likelihood of discontinuing study
track students who changed degree programs within this
before completing a degree program decreased. By the
university, however, we are unable to track students who
beginning of semester 1 in 2012, 70 per cent of students
transferred to other universities.
with a GPA of less than 4 had discontinued their studies whereas 22 per cent of students with a GPA of at least 6
Pathways and attrition
had discontinued their studies.These figures indicate that decisions to discontinue study are not solely driven by
There is some variation in attrition rates according to
levels of achievement with some low achievers persisting
pathway into university and length of time at university,
with their studies and some high achievers discontinuing
as shown in Table 3. We examine the attrition rates at two
theirs. As Christie, Munro and Fisher (2004) point out,
time points: the beginning of semester 1 in 2012; and the
students discontinue their studies due to a range of
beginning of semester 2 in 2014. By semester 1, 2012,
personal and institutional factors such as financial and/
almost half (49 per cent) of the commencing students
or time constraints.
who entered after completing Year 12, had discontinued
education sub-degree (40 per cent) and VET pathways (37
Are graduates of the on-campus tertiary preparation program more, or less likely than traditional students to discontinue their studies?
per cent) were less likely than traditional students to have
To answer our research question, we conducted a series of
discontinued their studies by the beginning of semester
logistic regressions to examine the relationships between
1 2012. By semester 2, 2014, 65 per cent of Science
students discontinuing study by semester 1 2012 and sex,
students and 44 per cent of Health Sciences students had
age, first-in-family status, pathway, study status, field of study
discontinued their studies without completing a degree
and GPA. Logistic regressions produce odds ratios which
program.
represent the change in the likelihood of discontinuing
their studies without completing a degree program. Students who entered via the TPP (44 per cent), higher
40
Alternative pathways into university Jenny Chesters et al.
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
â&#x20AC;&#x2122;
R
E
V
I
E
W
Table 4: Association between discontinuing study and selected characteristics Model 1
Model 2
Model 3
Model 4
Odds ratio (std. err.)
Odds ratio (std. err.)
Odds ratio (std. err.)
Odds ratio (std. err.)
0.65*** (0.07)
0.64*** (0.07)
0.65*** (0.07)
0.82 (0.10)
20-29
1.16 (0.13)
1.06 (0.16)
1.07 (0.16)
1.34 (0.22)
30-39
0.83 (0.16)
0.64 (0.14)
0.67 (0.15)
1.22 (0.31)
40+
0.62* (0.13)
0.45* (0.11)
0.46* (0.11)
0.80 (0.22)
First in family =1
1.17 (0.11)
1.17 (0.12)
1.17 (0.12)
0.96 (0.11)
TPP
1.28 (0.24)
1.30 (0.25)
1.17 (0.25)
HE sub-degree
0.79 (0.13)
0.81 (0.14)
0.85 (0.16)
VET
0.76 (0.14)
0.77 (0.14)
0.65* (0.14)
other
1.30 (0.44)
1.33 (0.45)
1.07 (0.40)
2.69*** (0.43)
2.65*** (0.43)
2.78*** (0.50)
Social sciences
0.69 (0.14)
0.61* (0.14)
Education
0.66* (0.12)
0.83 (0.17)
Business
0.70* (0.11)
0.56** (0.10)
Science
0.67 (0.15)
0.58* (0.14)
0.60*** (0.09)
0.62** (0.10)
Female =1 Age (<20 = ref.)
Pathway (Yr12 = ref.)
Study status (Full-time= ref.) Part-time Program (Arts = ref.)
Health sciences GPA (<4= ref.) 4
0.16*** (0.02)
5
0.12*** (0.02)
6+
0.09*** (0.02)
Constant n= Pseudo R2
0.94 (0.09)
0.93 (0.10)
1.30 (0.20)
3.95*** (0.72)
1771
1771
1771
1771
0.0122
0.0315
0.0367
0.1777
***p<0.001; **p<0.01; *p<0.05. Note: The reference categories: male; <20 years; not first in family; TPP pathway; full-time; Arts program; GPA<4. vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
Alternative pathways into university Jenny Chesters et al.
41
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
â&#x20AC;&#x2122;
R
E
V
I
E
W
study relative to continuing study. An increase in the
include a range of personal factors identified as being
likelihood of discontinuing study is indicated by an odds
important predictors of attrition such as long hours of
ratio of greater than 1 whereas a decrease in the likelihood
paid work; financial constraints; health issues; and family
of discontinuing study is indicated by an odds ratio of less
obligations (Christie et al., 2004).
than 1. The results of the four models are presented in Table 4. We start by examining the association between
Discussion
attrition and the demographic characteristics (Model 1) and then progressively add in the other explanatory
Since 1990, the Australian higher education sector has
variables. In Model 2, we add in pathway into university
expanded by increasing the number of universities
and study status; in Model 3, we add in field of study; and
and by widening the eligibility criteria thus allowing
in Model 4 we add in GPA.
more students to access higher education. Through the
The results for Model 1 show that being female has a
development of alternative entry pathways, the student
negative effect on the likelihood of discontinuing study
populations of Australian universities have diversified and
by semester 1 in 2012, net of age and first-in-family status.
now include sizeable, but not representative, proportions
Older students, that is, those commencing study when
of low SES students, Indigenous students and students
aged at least 40 years, were also less likely to discontinue
with disabilities. Previous research examining the effects
study than younger students. When we add in pathway
of pathway into university shows that type of alternative
into university and study status (Model 2), we find that
entry pathway is an important predictor of completion.
students who entered via any of the non-traditional
There is some evidence that students entering via
pathways, including TPP students, were no more likely
the mature age entry pathway were more likely than
than traditional students to discontinue their studies, net
traditional students to discontinue their studies (Edwards
of sex, age, first-in-family status, and study status. In other
& McMillan, 2015) whereas students who completed
words, students who entered university via an alternative
an on-campus enabling program were more likely than
pathway were just as likely to continue their studies as
traditional students to complete their studies (Chesters &
students who entered via the traditional pathway. Net
Watson, 2016; Walker et al., 2004).
of pathway into university, age and study status, female
This study tracked one cohort of students attending
students were less likely than male students to discontinue
a regional university for a period of five years using
their studies. Net of pathway into university, sex and study
administrative data provided by the university. Sixty per
status, those aged 40 years or older were less likely to
cent of the students entered via the traditional pathway
discontinue their studies than those aged under 20 years
and 10 per cent of the students completed the on-campus
at the time of enrolment. Part-time students were 2.7
tertiary preparation pathway (TPP) program. On average,
times more likely than full-time students to discontinue
TPP students had similar levels of achievement as
their studies, net of the other factors.When we add field of
traditional students. GPA was a strong predictor of non-
study into Model 3, the results from Model 2 are repeated.
completion by Semester 2, 2014 with 79 per cent of
Furthermore, students studying programs in the broad
students with a GPA of less than 4 discontinuing their
fields of Education, Business or Health Sciences were less
studies compared to 30 per cent of students with a GPA
likely than Arts students to discontinue their studies, net
of 6 or higher.
of the other factors.
After controlling for sex, age, study status, field and
The final model (Model 4) includes the GPA variable
GPA, TPP students were no more likely than traditional
and as expected, as GPA increases the likelihood of
students to discontinue their studies and VET students
discontinuing study decreases. Students with a GPA of
were less likely than traditional students to discontinue
4 were only one-fifth as likely to discontinue study as
their studies. Thomas (2014) and Chesters and Watson
students with a GPA of less than 4 even after controlling
(2016) also found that graduates from enabling programs
for sex, age, first-in-family status, pathway into university,
performed just as well as students who entered university
study status and field. Interestingly, net of the other
via the traditional pathway. Tertiary preparation programs
variables, students who entered via the VET pathway are
may provide students with the confidence and skills to
less likely than traditional students to discontinue their
persist (Habal, 2012). Participation in enabling programs
studies. The final model explains around 18 per cent of
such as the TPP allows students to familiarise themselves
the variation in decisions to discontinue, however, this
with many aspects of university life before they commence
is not an unexpected result given that the data did not
undergraduate studies (Wilcoxson, 2010) and to develop a
42
Alternative pathways into university Jenny Chesters et al.
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
sense of belonging which is a key factor in the likelihood
presented in this paper indicate that graduates of the
of continuing study through to graduation (Bowles et al.,
tertiary preparation pathway program performed as
2014; Kahu and Nelson, 2017). Staff from 12 Australian
well as other commencing students and were equally as
universities interviewed by Thomas (2014) reported that
likely to complete their degree programs. As with other
graduates from enabling programs tended to do as well
enabling programs, the TPP at this university attracts
as traditional students in undergraduate degree programs.
second chance students, those who do not have the pre-
Thomas’ participants were unable to draw on data to
requisite educational qualifications for direct entry into
support their claims, however the results of our study
undergraduate degrees. By immersing students in the
do provide some supporting evidence. In other words,
university culture and providing a supportive learning
non-traditional students who complete an on-campus
environment, enabling programs have the capacity to
enabling program are just as likely as traditional students
prepare a wider segment of the population for the rigours
to graduate with a university degree.
of academic study.
A limitation of this study is that we relied on administrative data that did not include indicators of the
Acknowledgement
students’ personal and financial circumstances that other researchers have found to be important predictors of
This paper uses de-identified data supplied by the
attrition. For example, students undertaking long hours of
University of the Sunshine Coast. The findings and views
paid work were more likely to discontinue their studies
reported in this paper, however, are those of the authors
(McMillan, 2005) as were students who lacked sufficient
and should not be attributed to the University.
financial resources and those who did not integrate well into university life (Christie et al., 2004; Wilcoxson,
Dr Jenny Chesters, is a Research Fellow working in the Youth
2010). Furthermore, many students initially enrolled
Research Centre, Melbourne Graduate School of Education,
in second choice programs and then upgraded into
The University of Melbourne.
the program of their choice after completing their first year of study (O’Keefe et al., 2011). Although we were
Dr Kerry Rutter, is the head of Preparation Pathways in
able to track students who changed degree programs
the Preparation and Enabling Unit at the University of the
within this particular university, we were unable to track
Sunshine Coast.
students who transferred to other universities. Given that these data pertain to one cohort of students attending
Professor Louise Watson, is a Professor of Education in the
one regional university in Australia, the results are not
Faculty of Education at the University of Canberra.
generalisable across Australian universities. Therefore, a longitudinal study collecting data from a nationally
Professor Karen Nelson, is the Pro Vice-Chancellor (Students)
representative sample of students at regular intervals
at the University of the Sunshine Coast.
from enrolment through to graduation, or until they
Contact: jenny.chesters@unimelb.edu.au
discontinue their study, is warranted. Understanding the difficulties that some students face in accessing higher education; negotiating the complexities of studying at university-level; managing competing demands on their time and energy; and interacting with various professors, lecturers, tutors and their support staff; would provide an insight into why students discontinue their studies.
Conclusion The above findings confirm that tertiary preparation programs provide viable alternative entry pathways into higher education and are associated with similar levels of retention and completion of university study as the traditional pathway. Despite concerns that broadening the criteria for admission into the higher education sector may dilute academic standards, the results vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
References Australian Bureau of Statistics (2017) 2011 Census QuickStats. Retrieved from http://www.censusdata.abs.gov.au/census_services/getproduct/census/2011/ quickstat/316?opendocument Australian Government. (2012). Administrative Information for Higher Education Providers: Student Support. Canberra: Australian Government. Bowles, T.V. & Brindle, K.A. (2017). Identifying facilitating factors and barriers to improving student retention rates in tertiary teaching courses: A systematic review. Higher Education Research and Development 36(5), 903-919. Bowles, A., Fisher, R., McPhail, R., Rosenstreich, D. & Dobson, A. (2014). Staying the distance: Students perceptions of enablers of transition to higher education. Higher Education Research and Development 33(2), 212-225. Chambers, T. & Deller, F. (2011). Changes and choices of low-income students in Canada and England: A post-structuralist discussion of early interventions. PP. 49-73 in A. Kezar (Ed.) Recognising and serving low income students in higher education: An examination of institutional policies, practices and culture. New York and London: Rutledge. Alternative pathways into university Jenny Chesters et al.
43
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
Chesters, J. & Watson, L. (2013). Understanding the persistence of inequality in higher education: Evidence from Australia. Journal of Education, 28(2), 198 – 215.
Lomax-Smith, J., Watson, L. & Webster, B. (2011). Higher Education Base Funding Review. Final Report. Retrieved from www.deewr.gov/ BaseFundingReview
Chesters, J. & Watson, L. (2016). Staying power: the effect of pathway into university on student achievement and attrition. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 56(2), 225-249.
McKay, J. & Devlin, M. (2014). ‘Uni has a different language … to the real world’: demystifying academic culture and discourse for students from low socioeconomic backgrounds. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(5), 949-961.
Christie, H., Munro, M. & Fisher, T. (2004). Leaving university early: exploring the differences between continuing and non-continuing students. Studies in Higher Education, 29(5), 617- 636. Coates, H. (2014). Students’ early departure intentions and the mitigating role of support. Australian Universities’ Review, 56(2): 20-29. Department of Education. (2017). Selected Higher Education Statistics - 2010 Student Data. From https://www.education.gov.au/selected-higher-educationstatistics-2010-student-data DET (Department of Education and Training) (2016). 2015 Liability Status Categories Table 5.5 Retrieved from https://docs.education.gov.au/node/41711 DETYA (Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs) (2001). Higher Education Students Time Series Tables 2000. Table 5. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia. Devlin, M. (2013). Bridging socio-cultural incongruity: Conceptualising the success of students from low socio-economic status backgrounds in Australian higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(6), 939-949. Edwards, D. & McMillan, J. (2015). Completing university in a growing sector: Is equity an issue? Melbourne: ACER. Ellis, B.J. (2013). Older undergraduate students bringing years of experience to university studies: Highlights, challenges and contributions. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 53(3), 351- 374. Forsyth, A., & Furlong, A. (2003). Access to higher education and disadvantaged young people. British Educational Research Journal, 29(2), 205–225. Gale, T. & Parker, S. (2014). Navigating change: A typology of student transition in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 29(4): 734-753. Gale, T. & Tranter, D. (2011). Social justice in Australian higher education policy: an historical and conceptual account of student participation. Critical Studies in Education, 52(1), 29-46. Goggin, T., Rankin, S., Geerlings, P. & Taggart, A. (2016). Catching them before they fall: a Vygotskian approach to transitioning students from high school to university. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(4), 698-711. Habal, C. (2012). ‘I can do it, and how!’ Student experience in access and equity pathways to higher education. Higher Education Research and Development, 31(6), 811-825. Harrison, N. & Hatt, S. (2009). ‘Disadvantaged learners’: who are we targeting? Understanding the widening participation activity in the United Kingdom using geo-demographic data from South-West England. Higher Education Quarterly, 64(1), 65-88. Hodges, B., Bedford, T., Hartley, J., Klinger, C., Murray, N., O’Rourke, J. & Schofield, N. (2013). Enabling retention: processes and strategies for improving student retention in university-based enabling programs. Sydney: Office for Learning and Teaching. Ishitani, T.T. (2006). Studying attrition and degree completion behaviour among first-generation college students in the United States. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(5), 861-885. Kahu, E.R. & Nelson, K. (2017). Student engagement in the educational interface: Understanding the mechanisms of student success. Higher Education Research and Development. Accepted.
44
Alternative pathways into university Jenny Chesters et al.
W
McMillan, J. (2005). Course change and attrition from higher education (LSAY Research Report Number 39). Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research. McMillan, J. (2011). Student retention: Current evidence and insights for improvement. Joining the Dots Research Briefing, 1(6). Melbourne: ACER. Mestan, K. (2016). Why students drop out of the Bachelor of Arts, Higher Education Research & Development, 35(5) 983-996. Moodie, G. & Wheelahan, L. (2009). The significance of Australian Vocational Institutions in opening access to higher education. Higher Education Quarterly, 63(4), 356-370. O’Keefe, M., Laven, G. & Burgess, T. (2011). Student non-completion of an undergraduate degree: wrong program selection or part of a career plan? Higher Education Research and Development, 30(2), 165-177. Pitman, T. (2017) Widening participation in higher education: A play in five acts. Australian Universities’ Review, 56(1), 37-46. Pitman, T., Koshy, P. & Phillimore, J. (2015). Does accelerating access to higher education lower its quality: The Australian experience. Higher Education Research and Development, 34(3), 609-623. Rowan-Kenyon, H.T. (2007). Predictors of delayed college enrolment and the impact of socio-economic status. Journal of Higher Education, 78(2), 188-214. Rowan-Kenyon, H.T., Bell, A.D. & Perna, L.W. (2008). Contextual influences on parental involvement in college going: Variations by socio-economic class. Journal of Higher Education, 79(5), 564-586. Ryan, C. & Watson, L. (2003). Skills at Work. Lifelong Learning and changes in the Labour market. Commonwealth of Australia EIP report. Schuetze, H.G. & Slowey, M. (2002). Participation and exclusion: A comparative analysis of non-traditional students and lifelong learners in higher education. Higher Education, 44, 309-327. Thiele, T., Pope, D., Singleton, A., Snape, D. & Stanistreet, D. (2017). Experience of disadvantage: The influence of identity on engagement in working class students’ educational trajectories to an elite university. British Educational Research Journal, 43(1), 49–67. Thomas, G. (2014). Closing the policy-practice gap for low SES students in higher education: the pedagogical challenge. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(4), 807-820. Walker, L., Matthew, B. & Black, F. (2004). Widening access and student noncompletion: An inevitable link? Evaluating the effects of the Top-Up Programme on student completion. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 23(1), 43-59. Watson, L., Hagel, P. & Chesters, J. (2013). The half-open door- pathways for VET award-holders into Australian universities. National Vocational Education and Training Research Programme Research Report, Adelaide: NCVER. Wilcoxson, L. (2010). Factors affecting intention to leave in the first, second and third year of university studies: a semester-by-semester investigation. Higher Education Research & Development, 29(6), 623-639.
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
OPINION
Promoting learning: what universities don’t do Brian Martin University of Wollongong
Universities seek to promote student learning, but assessment and credentials can undermine students’ intrinsic motivation to learn. Findings from research on how people learn, mindsets, expert performance and good health are seldom incorporated into the way universities organise learning experiences.
Introduction
The day-to-day experiences of teaching, positive and negative, are one thing. But underlying the experiences
After decades of undergraduate teaching, I retired in
are deeper processes. Some of these I knew about from
2016. It seems an appropriate time to reflect on the
the beginning, whereas others I only discovered during
positives, negatives and fundamental issues concerning
my teaching career. It is these deeper processes that
undergraduate education.
I address here, in the following sections: credentials
In 30 years at the University of Wollongong, I taught a variety of subjects in the humanities and social sciences,
and assessment; how people learn; mindsets; expert performance; and health.
for example environmental politics, computers and society, scientific controversies, happiness, and media, war
Credentials and assessment
and peace. Before that, at three different universities, I did a limited amount of teaching in physics and mathematics.
Studying at university is supposed to be about learning,
The positives of being a university teacher are easy to
about acquiring understandings and skills valuable for
identify. For me, they were engaging with students eager
later in life or for their own sake. Ideally, assessment tasks
to learn, helping them gain insights about subject matter
are supposed to provide both an incentive to learn and
and life, and designing courses to help students become
feedback on learning. Credentials provide a certification
self-motivated learners. A bonus for me as a teacher
of achievement.
was learning the subject matter and being continually
The trouble is that assessment and credentials
refreshed by contact with student learners. Also positive
often undermine learning (Kohn, 1993). Let’s take a
is interaction with colleagues with similar passions for
step back: ideally, students should be or become self-
helping students learn.
motivated learners, pursuing their studies with focus and
The negatives are equally easy to identify, including
determination, even enthusiasm. This is certainly possible
dealing with students who care more about getting by
as shown by the energy with which people learn about
than learning, coping with ever larger classes, and handling
topics they care about outside of formal education, for
the administrative tasks associated with teaching, which
example sport, hobbies or diseases. However, when
seem to become ever more onerous. Marking can often
students come to university, they are subjected to a
be tedious, even though I managed to design assignments
syllabus designed by others, and the symbols of learning
that made it more pleasurable (Martin, 2014).
can displace learning itself.
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
Promoting learning: what universities don’t do Brian Martin
45
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
Assessment can be disastrous for self-motivation.
One basic finding is that learning is greater when
Instead of studying because of intrinsic interest, students
studying is spaced out over time rather than bunched
are driven by assessment tasks. When exams are over,
together. In practical terms, this means it is more efficient to
few students continue to study. Many students have no
study a little bit each day rather than cram the night before
interest in anything not assessable. Universities are not
an exam. For a long time, teachers have been saying this to
solely responsible, because assessment-driven studying
students, so this finding is not surprising, but the details are
is cemented through years of prior schooling, but
fascinating. As well as showing the benefits of spacing out
universities do little to counteract reliance on assessment
study sessions, researchers have looked at fine tuning of the
as a motivator.
spacing, for example whether it is better to do 30 minutes
Ultimately, most students want degrees, the culmination
on a topic once a day or 60 minutes every two days.
of years of assessment-driven studying. Again, the symbol
Then there is the testing effect. While studying, one
of learning displaces the substance. Imagine what would
option is to do a self-test, posing questions on the topic
happen if degrees were abolished – perhaps replaced
you’re studying. If you spend 20 minutes studying, you
by performance portfolios or examinations for entry into
can allocate some of the time for self-testing. Experiments
professions – and university classes were available solely
show this detracts from learning in the short term but
for their contribution to learning. Enrolments would drop
after a week of studying, those who spend part of the time
precipitously.
self-testing retain much more.
The problems with credentials are long-standing
Learning occurs when you’re studying but it also
(Collins, 1979; Dore, 1976). I knew about them before
occurs when you are not, as your unconscious mind
I became a teaching academic. Like many others, I did
engages with the material. Studies show you can enhance
what I could within the system. For most classes in
this ‘incubation’ process by ending your study sessions in
Australian universities, assessment is required, and there
the middle of a topic. Because the topic is incomplete,
are expectations about the sorts of assignments and
your unconscious mind spends more time processing it.
examinations that should be set. Within these limits, I
Maximising the effects of spacing, self-testing and
sought to design stimulating assessment tasks and, over
unconscious processing can enable a student to learn
the years, gradually developed approaches that would
much more or to learn a specified amount in less time.
enable and encourage at least some students to become
Furthermore, there are other learning skills canvassed
highly engaged and go beyond the usual expectations.
by Carey, all based on findings by learning researchers.
Despite these efforts, most students continued to be
So why aren’t these skills taught in primary school? Why
driven primarily by assessment tasks.
haven’t university teachers caught up with this research
If I have been such a sceptic about assessment and
and incorporated it into their teaching? Why do millions
credentials, why did I remain in a university job for so long?
of undergraduates spend untold hours using inefficient
The answer is that an academic career gives considerable
learning techniques and remain uninformed about
freedom, which can be used in various ways. I used my job
research findings? Part of the answer is academics’ focus
as an opportunity to innovate in teaching methods (within
on content in their teaching. The mechanics of learning
limits) and to orient some of my research and writing to
are treated as a separate or lesser matter, addressed
audiences outside academia. But that is another story.
by specialist learning support advisers recommended
Over three decades of university teaching, I kept on the
for weaker students. Then there is another factor: few
lookout for research that might provide insights about
academics take any interest in how to use research
learning. Not being an education researcher myself, I often
findings to enhance their own learning.
relied on popular accounts.
Mindsets Learning Carol Dweck, a psychologist, has analysed two contrasting In 2014, Benedict Carey’s book How We Learn appeared.
mindsets, namely views people have of themselves:‘fixed’
Carey worked as a science writer, including for the New
and ‘growth’ (Dweck, 2006). People with a fixed mindset
York Times. He decided to find out what researchers have
believe that talents are constrained by genetics, so some
discovered about learning. How We Learn is an eye-opener.
people are naturally smart and others less so. Some
For me, what was significant was how few of the research
children with a fixed mindset fear failure because it might
findings about learning are applied in university courses.
show they are not as smart as they believe.These children
46
Promoting learning: what universities don’t do Brian Martin
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
will sometimes not attempt a task, thereby avoiding
performing at a cocktail bar does not count as deliberate
failure. At the undergraduate level, this can manifest in
practice. Working on difficult passages does.
students saying, ‘I didn’t study much for this exam’. Why
The implication of research on expert performance is
would students undermine their own performance by not
that for learning advanced skills, the key is developing
studying? The answer is to protect their self-image. If they
a habit of undertaking regular deliberate practice, done
do well, they reaffirm their intelligence, whereas if they
privately. Concert pianists may practise several hours per
do poorly they can blame lack of study.
day throughout their performing careers. Waiting until
People with a growth mindset
treat
failure
differently: they assume it means they need to work harder. Those with a growth mindset are more likely to persist with tasks, even when they are doing poorly. In the
the day before a concert is
If university education is to become a means to enabling the development of advanced skills, then fostering a habit of regular practice at the boundaries of one’s abilities is vital. Yet this is distant from what goes on in most classes.
woefully inadequate. If
university
education
is to become a means to enabling the development of
advanced
skills, then
fostering a habit of regular practice at the boundaries of
long run, the growth mindset
one’s abilities is vital. Yet this
leads to better performance.
is distant from what goes on
Australian university marking systems constantly rate
in most classes. Far from practising skills regularly, most
and rank performance on assessment tasks. If anything,
students procrastinate and then put in long study sessions
this encourages a fixed mindset, with some students
before exams. When classes are over, they stop studying.
seeing a mark as a reflection of their innate abilities.
A typical one-semester course might involve a few
Seldom are students repeatedly assessed on the same task,
dozens of hours of classes, with an expectation to study
enabling them to see the benefits of continued effort.
a few dozen hours outside of class. This can be enough
More fundamentally, many Australians believe that
to acquire some basic knowledge but is far short of what
performance reflects innate qualities. Some academics
is required to become really good. Hundreds and then
pick out ‘bright’ students in their undergraduate years and
thousands of hours of practice are needed.The problem is
encourage them to continue to advanced studies, rather
that few university courses inspire the dedication for this
than helping all students to adopt a growth mindset.
sort of ongoing effort.
Indeed, the very idea that teachers might try to help
Another problem is that many assessment methods do
students change their attitude towards intelligence is alien.
not involve repeated attention to weaknesses until they are eliminated. A violinist will practise a difficult passage
Expert performance
for days or weeks until it can be played perfectly. However, a student submitting an essay normally receives a mark
For several decades, there has been an increasing amount
and some feedback but then never revisits the same
of research on what is called ‘expert performance’, which
essay, instead moving on to another topic. For becoming
is demonstrated high-level competence in well-defined
a better writer and thinker, it is valuable to return to
skills (Ericsson et al., 2006; Ericsson and Pool, 2016).
the same piece of work, revising and polishing it, taking
The top levels of expert performance are exhibited by,
into account feedback from readers. This is what often
for example, chess grandmasters, Olympic athletes and
occurs with academic articles submitted for publication.
classical musicians with careers as soloists. A common
Undergraduates usually miss out on this sort of training.
assumption is that innate abilities are required for
People with high intelligence scores often can improve
such stellar performance, but this is challenged by
more rapidly than others: they seem to benefit more from
studies showing that thousands of hours of practice are
training. But this holds only initially. For advanced skill
required to become a world-class performer in any well-
development, intelligence becomes less crucial. Instead,
established, competitive field. Furthermore, the practice
it is the deliberate practice that makes a difference
needs to be of a special sort. The most effective type
(Ericsson and Pool, 2016: 233–236). The implication is
of practice is called deliberate practice, which involves
that universities, by rewarding quick learners, are missing
intense concentration in trying to master skills at the edge
out on enabling students to develop habits of continual
of one’s current ability under the guidance of a master
practice that are essential for the most advanced levels of
teacher. For a pianist, routinely playing through scales or
performance.
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
Promoting learning: what universities don’t do Brian Martin
47
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
When it comes to university teachers, deliberate
There are several other aspects of health that promote
practice is uncommon. Most academics teach but do not
better learning, including restful sleep (important for
regularly practise teaching. How many teachers go over
solidifying memories), good diet and avoiding excessive
and over the same lecture or lab presentation, revising the
drugs. To some, this might seem like an abstemious
content and practising their delivery, under the periodic
approach to university, not having any fun.“Fun” seems to
scrutiny of an experienced teacher? I didn’t do this very
have become identified with damaging activities such as
often, and I’m not aware of many colleagues who do.
binge drinking and staying up all night. Dedicated athletes
Yes, many put long hours into preparing their lectures,
look after their diet and sleep, at least while in training.
but few practise delivering them, obtaining feedback
Why should dedicated scholars be any different?
from students or master teachers. Few academics study research into methods of student learning to work out
What universities don’t do
ways to adapt the curriculum and delivery to maximise it. The rationale for university teaching is that students will
Mind, brain and health
acquire knowledge and skills to become more capable workers and better citizens. Hence it is strange that the
Should students exercise? It would be good for their
way universities are set up, with modules of content to
health – and for their thinking. There is a large and
learn in set time frames, all leading to a certificate at the
growing body of research showing that physical activity
end, undermines the intrinsic motivation to learn. Despite
is vital for human health and wellbeing. It is the most
much rhetoric about lifelong learning, few students are
reliable way to improve mood and is well documented to
set on a path to maximise their learning in the long run.
improve happiness for most people.
Students learn instead that studying is an unpleasant
Beyond the benefits for the body, exercise is good for the mind. It reduces depression and anxiety and improves
necessity, to be avoided as long as possible and only undertaken when assessment tasks loom.
mental acuity (Macpherson, 2017; Ratey, 2008). It is
Meanwhile, much media attention is devoted to scandals
therefore a good way to improve the capacity for study
such as plagiarism and falling standards. Questioning the
and for better thinking.
credential system is not newsworthy.
However, relatively few students exercise regularly.
The discrepancy between the goals and reality of
When assignments are due, or exams are looming,
undergraduate education makes me reflect on radical
students may spend long hours studying without any
ideas raised in the 1960s and 1970s. Ivan Illich in
activity beyond their fingers. This is not good preparation
Deschooling Society (1971) provided a critique of
for a lifetime of learning, not to mention good health.
professionalised education, arguing that learning would
Students are compelled, by assessment tasks, to learn
be enhanced by getting rid of schooling and replacing it
specific content, so why not compel them to exercise,
with learning in the community, for example in homes
for their own good? However well intended, compulsory
and workplaces. Helping children to learn would be
exercise might only turn what should be satisfying into
collective responsibility rather than undertaken only in
a chore to be avoided when there’s no pressure. More
schools and universities (Holt, 1977, 1981; Reimer, 1973).
promising would be to turn a campus into an activity-
In practice, a great deal of learning now occurs when
intensive space, with encouragement to develop personal
individuals pursue hobbies and when they take on jobs.
or group training routines. Parking might be provided at
It is often said that universities may provide a credential
a more distant location, to encourage walking or cycling.
to get a job, but what you need to know is learned on
Some universities provide encouragement for physical
the job.This highlights the role of credentials as screening
activity, for example excellent gyms, jogging circuits and
mechanisms, reproducing the class structure.
secure bicycle facilities. Still, only a minority of students
Deschooling Society was radical when it was published
takes advantage of these opportunities, in part because
and remains so today. The education system has a
exercise is seen as an optional extra rather than a core
stranglehold over officially certified learning in most
aspect of being a learner.
fields. It remains to be seen whether information about
A few academics set a good example, riding bicycles to
learning, mindsets, expert performance and health will
work or frequenting the gym. All too many, though, seem
be incorporated into credential systems or provide a
to operate on the dualistic idea that the mind is separate
challenge to them.
from the body. It’s just not dignified to get hot and sweaty.
48
Promoting learning: what universities don’t do Brian Martin
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
Acknowledgements Thanks to Lyn Carson, Anders Ericsson, Robert Pool and two anonymous readers for valuable comments on earlier
V
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
Ericsson, K.A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P.J. & Hoffman, R.R. (Eds.) (2006). The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Ericsson, A. & Pool, R. (2016). Peak: Secrets from the New Science of Expertise. London: Bodley Head.
versions of this article.
Holt, J. (1977). Instead of Education: Ways to Help People Do Things Better. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Brian Martin is an emeritus professor at the University of Wollongong, Australia.
Holt, J. (1981). Teach Your Own: A Hopeful Path for Education. New York: Delacorte.
Contact: bmartin@uow.edu.au
Illich, I. (1971). Deschooling Society. London: Calder and Boyars.
References Carey, B. (2014). How We Learn: The Surprising Truth about When, Where, and Why It Happens. New York: Random House. Collins, R. (1979). The Credential Society: An Historical Sociology of Education and Stratification. New York: Academic Press. Dore, R. (1976). The Diploma Disease: Education, Qualification and Development. London: Allen and Unwin. Dweck, C.S. (2006). Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. New York: Ballantine.
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
Kohn, A. (1993). Punished by Rewards: The Trouble with Gold Stars, Incentive Plans, A’s, Praise, and other Bribes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Macpherson, H., Teo, W.-P., Schneider, L.A. & Smith, A.E. (2017). A life-long approach to physical activity for brain health. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 9(147), doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2017.00147. Martin, B. (2014). Marking essays: making it easier and more fun. Brian’s Comments, 8 September. Retrieved from http://comments.bmartin. cc/2014/09/08/marking-essays-making-it-easier-and-more-fun/. Ratey, J.J. with Hagerman, E. (2008). Spark: The Revolutionary New Science of Exercise and the Brain. New York: Little, Brown. Reimer, E. (1973). School is Dead. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Promoting learning: what universities don’t do Brian Martin
49
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
Dress codes and the academic conference McCulloch’s Iron Laws of Conferences Alistair McCulloch University of South Australia
Despite being a staple of academic life (or perhaps because it is so taken-for-granted), the academic conference has been generally under-utilised as a site for academic research. Using participant observation as its methodology, this article draws on a long career of conference attendance to present two iron laws of conferences which address the relative smartness of dress of conference convenors and conference delegates. The social processes underpinning the sartorial phenomenon addressed by these laws are explicated. A third law is also introduced in a desperate attempt on the part of the author to secure the immortality sought by all who make their thoughts public by publishing them in academic journals. Keywords: conferences, dress standards, publishing
There is remarkably little research literature on academic
activities (Wen et al., 2015). Chan (2013) also points to
conferences. In the same way as academics resisted the
aspects of the role of status in academic conferences and
temptation to research their own practice for many years,
to the few articles that address this, for example, Räisänen
they continue to resist the possibilities offered by that
(1999) and Blumen and Bar-Gal (2006).
most ubiquitous academic activity, the conference. This
The options available to academics wanting to examine
relative neglect is surprising given that, as Chan (2013,
under-researched aspects of conference social behaviour
p. 1060) notes: ‘in the study of academic conferences,
and the rules underpinning them remain to be fully
categorisations are often a consequence of a process of
exploited, but the volume of primary material out there
contestation and legitimation, negotiation and struggles of
must be huge if this single instance in a recent blog
hierarchical power across and within academic disciplines’.
posting by an academic is typical (and there is no reason
This is not to say there is no literature or discussion of
to suspect that it is not). In his blog, Lou Burnard (2010)
conferences.There are regular ‘How to prepare for and get
reflects on his 36 years in the profession and details ‘10
the most out of a conference’ articles in the professional
chronologically-ordered small boxes containing detritus
press. A compendium of these is provided in Houston
from assorted events and conferences I attended between
(2013). Writers of fiction, most notably David Lodge, have
1977 and 2000’. While Burnard is only able to ruminate
elevated this most mundane of events to the highest point
about ‘how jolly interesting this collection of stuff might
of drama (1984). Some have sought to look at the role of
be to anyone interested in the last three decades of digital
conference abstracts as promotional texts (Samar et al.,
humanities’, to scholars of the academic conference his
2014) while investigators of the use of social media have
10 boxes would represent pay-dirt.
begun to examine the academic conference as a site for
One of the roles of the social scientist is to observe the
research into Twitter, Tweets and associated alliterative
world and try to uncover the patterns and regularities
50
Dress codes and the academic conference Alistair McCulloch
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
A
U
which
S
T
R
underpin
A
L
I
sometimes
A
N
U
apparently
N
I
V
random
phenomena and occurrences. Many have sought to do this
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
(there, I’ve put it in print that there are, in fact, two of them) and their mode of development.
with varying degrees of success, including the founding fathers of sociology (Compte, Durkheim, Marx and Weber)
Method
and the generations of social scientists who followed them. While the search for knowledge and understanding is the
For the benefit of those who might want to attempt to
major driver behind this search for knowledge, anecdotal
replicate this process of discovery, I should state that
evidence about the propensity of social scientists to google
the laws were developed through a process of reflective
their own names on a regular basis and to establish email
introspection using a glass of the Barossa Valley’s best
and text alerts which inform them whenever their work is
Shiraz as the initial prompt object. Following my initial
cited suggests that another driver is a desire for recognition,
insight, I drew upon an academic lifetime’s experience
and a search for disciplinary as well as spiritual immortality.
of attending conferences across the globe thereby
This author readily confesses to these sins and to another,
increasing the chances that any conclusions drawn would
deeper desire which I have held secret since my days as an
be universal in nature. I also followed a well-established
undergraduate in political science when I first came across
scientific method involving:
the work of Robert Michels.
• observation
Michels is well-known to all political scientists, and
• the formulation of hypotheses
also to many scholars in related fields as a man whose
• gathering sufficient data to try to refute the hypotheses
name will always be associated with a ‘law’. In the same
• formulation of the laws, and
way as the natural and physical sciences have inter alia
• soon being in a position to publish and sit back to
Boyle’s Law, Faraday’s Laws (he, lucky man has two laws
accept both the accolades and the ensuing riches.
named after him), Hooke’s Law, and three laws named
Data were gathered using a participant observation
after the great Newton, political science has Michels’ Iron
methodology and took in many places across the UK
Law of Oligarchy (Wikipedia, 2016). I offer the suggestion
and also at conferences in Australia, continental Europe,
that few social scientists could deny having dreamed at
the Middle East and the United States. The disciplinary
some point in their careers of developing a law or similar
areas represented in the sample included Doctoral
phenomenon to be forever associated with their name. I
Education, Higher Education, Political Science, Public
for one, in a moment of auto-ethnographic honesty, am
Policy and Administration, Sustainable Development and
willing to admit that I have gone down that route and
Environmental Studies, and Voluntary Sector Studies.
but have yet to complete my journey. Put bluntly, and to
Participation and the associated observation were
come to the focus of this article, ‘McCulloch’s Iron Law
undertaken across a wide time-frame, the first conference
of (something/anything)’ sounds good. In fact, it sounds
attended being in 1980 and the most recent 2016. Both
better than good. It has a great ring to it and would fit well
research method and sample size appear to be sufficiently
on a tombstone. ‘Here lies the late Professor McCulloch’
robust to allow firm conclusions to be drawn.
(those familiar with my ability to turn up on time for meetings will recognise the pun there) ‘whose Iron Law
McCulloch’s Iron Laws of Conferences
survives him.’ The sort of thing the grandchildren can stroll along to and look at on wet Sundays when they’re
The first of McCulloch’s Laws of Conferences can now
at a loose end.
be stated.
For the sake of any non-political scientists reading this piece, Michels’ Iron Law of Oligarchy was published in 1911 and, as with all good laws, can be stated simply. It posits that, without the formal organisation of the mass of
‘The academic conference convenor is always more smartly dressed than any of the other conference participants, even if the smartness of the conference convenor decreases with each day of the conference.’
people democracy is impossible but that, once the people
This is an interesting phenomenon as there appears
are formally organised, democracy is impossible because
to be no obvious channel of communication between
organised politics creates an elite. As Michels famously
participants such that the convenor can know when he
put it, ‘Who says organisation says oligarchy’, oligarchy
or she dresses in the morning what other delegates will
being the rule of the few in their own interests. The
be wearing. One suggestion that might be made is that
desire to emulate Michels is strong and this short paper
the convenor would be able to judge from the delegates’
articulates both of McCulloch’s Iron Laws of Conferences
breakfast attire what is the necessary degree of sartorial
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
Dress codes and the academic conference Alistair McCulloch
51
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
E
elegance required in order for the convenor to remain
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
The relationship between the two laws
‘ahead of the field’, so to speak. This explanation does not stand up, however, when we observe that the law
Given that two laws have been developed which are
holds true irrespective of whether or not the convenor
held to apply to the same phenomenon, it is necessary
is staying at the conference hotel or, indeed, irrespective
to say something about precedence. Careful observation
of whether or not there actually is a conference hotel.
shows that, even though the Second Law of Conferences
A second possible suggestion, suggested by an earlier
(that the dress of all conferences participants is more
anonymous reviewer who I must thank, is that ‘the
casual the closer to the seashore the conference is held),
conference convenor has control over the delegate pool
McCulloch’s First Law of Conferences (that the convenor
which enables him/her to operate as a sort of sartorial
will always be more smartly dressed than all other
gatekeeper, perhaps punishing potential delegates who
delegates) takes precedence. This finding suggests that
are known norm violators and rewarding those who
the first law (associated with academic culture and status
typically fall into line.’ It is with regret that this suggestion
allocations) is more powerful than the second (associated
must be rejected as there is no evidence to suggest that
with the broader societal culture) and also allows us to
the laws apply to a lesser degree in conferences where
contribute to resolving the perennial debate over the
there is little competition to have a paper accepted than
relative strength of these differing agents of socialisation
they do in more competitive conference situations.
and the associated social mechanisms.
The
most
convincing
explanatory
mechanism
underpinning the first law is based in the acceptance by all
Limitations of the study
involved of the differing status of ‘convenor’ and ‘delegate’ and an acceptance of the roles ascribed by these social
Despite the author’s claims to universality, a few areas
constructs. The key social process here is the strength of
remain to be explored, perhaps by research students keen
the academic socialisation process which ensures that all
to expand their networks. First, it is not clear whether
attendees at academic conferences are aware of the need
there is a meteorological ‘tipping point’ at play here as
(a) for a convenor to ‘dress up’ and (b) for each delegate
there have been too few conferences held close to either
to ‘dress down’. Observation has demonstrated that it
the Arctic or the Antarctic Oceans to determine whether
is not uncommon, for example, for delegates to remove
the law of ‘casual dress’ applies in extreme temperatures.
ties, scarves and jackets upon arriving at a conference in
Neither is it clear whether the clothing worn in Arctic or
the morning in order to maintain the tacitly agreed upon
Antarctic settings lends itself to clear definition as either
social order. In this simple, but elegant way, sartorial order
‘formal’ or ‘informal’ attire thus raising potentially difficult
is maintained.
conceptual issues. The author is currently formulating
The second of McCulloch’s Laws of Conferences is even simpler to state than the first. ‘The closer the conference is located to the sea, the more casual the dress of all participants.’
a research grant application to explore the possibilities suggested by this line of thought and to try to clarify further both the conceptual and sartorial issues involved.
Conclusion
This phenomenon seems to be the result of the impact of the broader cultural environment on all conference
This article points to the academic conference as a
participants including the convenor, in that the sea is,
potential site for the investigation of some of the bigger
apart from those relatively few and concentrated areas
questions in social science. It provides an exemplar for this
involving working ports in which conferences are seldom
by positing McCulloch’s two Laws of Conferences which
if ever held, almost universally associated with leisure
explain differences in the dress styles of delegates and
of an informal kind. The second law holds true whether
convenors by reference to their relative social standings in
the sea in question is the northern or the southern
the event being attended, while also taking account of the
hemisphere or whether it laps the shore in developed or
conference’s geographical location and proximity to the
developing, or rich or poor countries. This association of
sea. These laws have been established through the same
the seaside or beach with informal leisure permeates the
mechanism that allowed Michels to establish his famous
ethos of conferences organised near salt water, operating
Iron Law of Oligarchy, that is, participant observation.
on both convenor and delegates alike and, hence, explains the Second Iron Law.
52
Dress codes and the academic conference Alistair McCulloch
A Third Iron Law was, together with the earlier two, briefly outlined in the author’s closing remarks to the vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
12th Quality in Postgraduate Research conference (www. qpr.edu.au) in April 2016.This Law may be stated as: ‘No matter how many catastrophes the organisers think have occurred during the course of a conference, as long as the conference venue does not explode or self-combust, the delegates will assume that everything happened as it was planned.’ The lack of any dissenting voice either during or following those remarks offers further confirmation of the strength of the Iron Laws of Conferences. Further
V
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
Blumen, O. and Bar-Gal, Y. (2006). The academic conference and the status of women: the Annual Meetings of the Israeli Geographical Society. The Professional Geographer, 58(3), 341-355. Burnard, L. (2010). Boxing Up. Retrieved from http://blogs.it.ox.ac.uk/ louburnard/2010/11/boxing-up/ Chan, P. (2013). A ‘zombie’ existence: exploring Ulrich Beck’s zombie categories and construction management research. In Smith, D., and Ahiaga-Dagbui, D., Proceedings 29th Annual ARCOM Conference, September 2-4, Reading: Association of Researchers in Construction Management. Retrieved from www. arcom.ac.uk/-docs/proceedings/ar2013-1059-1069_Chan.pdf
organising academic conferences and is dedicated to all who take on this difficult task and to all those who attend
Lodge, D. (1984). Small World. Martin Secker and Warburg Ltd.
the article will prove to be of use to those charged with
and enjoy the fruits of their labours. Alistair McCulloch is a member of the Teaching Innovation Unit at the University of South Australia Contact: alistair.mcculloch@unisa.edu.au
W
References
Houston, N. (2013). From the archives: Academic conferences. The Chronicle of Higher Education. 4 November 2013. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/blogs/profhacker/from-the-archives-academicconferences/53321?cid=wc&utm_source=wc&utm_medium=en
avenues of research have been suggested. It is hoped that
E
Räisänen, C. (1999). The conference forum as a system of genres: A sociocultural study of academic conference practices in automotive crashsafety engineering. Göteborg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis. Samar, T., Talebzadeh, H., Kiany, G., and Akbari, R. (2014). ‘Moves and steps to sell a paper: a cross-cultural genre analysis of applied linguistics conference abstracts’. Text & Talk, 34, Issue 6, Pages 759–785. Wen, X., Lin, Y.-R. (2015). Tweeting Questions in Academic Conferences: Seeking or Promoting Information?, in iConference 2015. Retrieved from https://www. ideals.illinois.edu/handle/2142/73712 Wen, X., Lin, Y.-R., Trattner, C., Parra, D. (2014). Twitter in Academic Conferences: Usage, Networking and Participation over Time, in Proceedings of the 25th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media (Hypertext 2014), pp.285–290. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1403.7772 Wikipedia (2016). List of scientific laws named after people. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scientific_laws_named_after_people
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
Dress codes and the academic conference Alistair McCulloch
53
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
Developing a sustainable academic workforce in paramedicine Peter O’Meara La Trobe University
Brian Maguire Central Queensland University
Paramedics are an integral part of the Australian healthcare system and are increasingly requested to provide a growing array of services in support of improved community health. Currently there are over 6,000 undergraduate paramedic students. A pressing challenge is the development and sustainability of a dedicated group of university paramedic academics. Urgent action is needed to: develop reliable sources of research funding; create smooth pathways for paramedic clinicians into academia; and, develop effective coalitions between ambulance agencies, paramedic professional groups and universities to ensure a sufficient number of paramedic academics are available to meet the educational needs of the profession.
Paramedics are an integral part of the Australian healthcare
2013). By 2014, the 16 Australian universities offering
system as both responders to medical emergencies and
programs of paramedicine had 6,372 undergraduate
major public health incidents, such as natural disasters and
students,
those related to human activities (Maguire, Dean, Bissell,
Commission, 2016) as well as a rapidly rising number of
Walz & Bumbak, 2007). They respond to three million
postgraduate students.
(Australian
Government
Productivity
calls for emergency assistance every year (Australian
In addition, paramedic professionalism is maturing
Government Productivity Commission, 2016). Their
through a number of other concurrent activities
roles and scopes of practice are changing in response
including: the successful establishment of their own
to ageing populations, advances in technology, changes
professional associations; the emergence of expanded
in community expectations and broader health system
and extended scopes of practice; and, in the near future,
challenges. Paramedics are increasingly being expected
professional registration through the Australian Health
to provide important services in primary health care and
Practitioner Regulation Agency (Acker, 2016). The
injury prevention in the community and health facilities
practice of paramedicine has evolved from a standard of
(Bigham, Kennedy, Drennan, & Morrison, 2013).
care focused on stabilisation and transport to the hospital
Over the past decade the profession has moved its
to a standard of care that includes delivering a growing
education requirements from a primarily post-employment
list of medications and interventions.The focus is moving
in-house training program to a pre-employment university
toward treating more people in their homes and referring
bachelor’s degree (O’Brien, Moore, Dawson, & Hartley,
them to local resources (e.g. the local general practice
54
Developing a sustainable academic workforce in paramedicine Peter O’Meara & Brian Maguire
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
physician) for follow-up care (O’Meara, Tourle, Stirling,
The major impediments to the development of the
Walker, & Pedler, 2012).While these factors are important,
paramedic academic workforce are: access to data;
a pressing challenge for the paramedic profession is the
research support from ambulance services; dedicated
creation, translation into practice, and continual renewal
research funding; and, ongoing access to clinical
of a unique body of knowledge through their own
care experience. Numerous anecdotal reports from
research efforts. Such activities are essential to ensure the
paramedic academics highlight the ongoing difficulties
quality of care provided to our communities.
of accessing ambulance service data and obtaining grant to
funding. As a result, paramedic academics have limited
demonstrate that its research contributes to the overall
Like
other
disciplines, paramedicine
needs
publication track records, restricted access to grant
vision and productivity of universities (McDermid, Peters,
opportunities and little chance of academic promotion.
Jackson, & Daly, 2012). Australia boasts a relatively high
Recruiting paramedic academics is also difficult because
number of doctoral-level qualified paramedics – estimated
of low salaries and limited promotion opportunities.
at approximately 30 in 2016, with over 60 higher degree
In addition, many paramedic academics have given up
research candidates enrolled (Network of Australasian
their clinical certifications because they are denied
Paramedic Academics, 2016). However, the demand for
practical opportunities to work clinically. It is clear that
paramedic academics continues to outstrip supply in
the development and implementation of policies and
those Australian universities currently offering entry-
practices to grow and sustain the paramedic academic
level paramedic programs.
Accordingly, the shortage
workforce in Australia needs to come from a cohesive
of adequately qualified and experienced paramedic
approach across universities, the profession, governments
academics poses a serious and foreseeable threat to the
and ambulance services.
sustainability of academic programs, undermines the
A number of crucial changes, at both strategic and
profession’s academic credibility in universities, and leads
operational levels, are needed to ensure a sustainable
to missed opportunities to improve paramedic services
development of the paramedic academic workforce.
to the community through university-based paramedicine research (O’Meara, 2006).
Firstly, strategies are needed to mentor and support aspiring paramedic academics. These strategies could
In common with other health disciplines, paramedic
include creating an environment in which practising
academics are expected to demonstrate the capacity to
paramedics are able to participate in research activities,
teach professional practice topics and clinical skills, while
spend time in universities through fellowships and joint
also being active and productive research scholars (Smith
appointments, and complete doctoral degree programs
& Boyd, 2012). Those already employed in universities
before fully transitioning to academic careers.
are required to meet annual performance benchmarks in
Secondly, the newly appointed and established
teaching quality, grant income and research productivity.
paramedic academics need the opportunity to maintain
Aspiring paramedic academics are increasingly required
their clinical currency through continuing professional
to hold doctoral-level qualifications and to have a research
practice in the same manner as is the case in other health
publication
disciplines (McDermid et al., 2012). Joint appointments
record.
Paramedic
academics
seeking
promotion to senior academic positions are typically
with
required to have substantial research records, in terms
academics maintain clinical currency (Murray, Stanley, &
of both grant income and peer-reviewed publications,
Wright, 2014).
and be nationally and internationally recognised for their research scholarship (Curtin University, 2016). knowledge
underpins
evidence-based
services
would
help
paramedic
Thirdly, in order for paramedic academics to establish and maintain research profiles relevant to their profession they
While it is well understood that the generation of new
ambulance
must have the opportunity to: influence and participate in
policy
ambulance service research governance processes; obtain
and paramedic practice (National Institute for Health
research funding in partnership with ambulance services;
Research, 2016), it is less well understood that the
and, help develop ambulance service research priorities
conduct of paramedic research is strongly linked to the
(O’Meara, Maguire, Jennings, & Simpson, 2015; Siriwardena,
recruitment and retention of a sustainable paramedic
Donohoe, Stephenson, & Phillips, 2010). An ideal action
academic workforce. Despite this link being identified for
would be to establish joint appointments between
the last decade (O’Meara, 2006),Australia lacks a coherent
universities and ambulance services.
strategy to encourage and support current and future paramedic academics. vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
At an operational level, ambulance services, professional associations and universities need to work together
Developing a sustainable academic workforce in paramedicine Peter O’Meara & Brian Maguire
55
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
on the development and writing of competitive grant applications that address national paramedicine research priorities. This will inevitably involve ambulance services and professional associations committing substantial funds to support partnership grant applications through funding programs such as the Australian Research Council Linkage Program and the National Health and Medical Research Council Partnerships Program. In the longer term, one possible outcome could be the funding and implementation of a national, hub and spoke collaborative research centre where established and future paramedic researchers and academics could work together in a wellsupported research environment. In order to ensure an effective paramedic academic workforce, universities, ambulance services and the profession need to work together to better prepare paramedics
for
academic
careers
before
full-time
academic appointments are made, then continue to support and nurture the paramedic academic workforce to ensure its survival and prosperity. This coalition needs to work together to lobby government, private industry and foundations for dedicated research funding. Paramedic research capacity and outcomes underpin claims to professionalism, and these will ultimately determine whether paramedic programs continue in the nation’s universities or return to the industry based training and apprenticeship models of old. Such a reversion would mean a less skilled and well-rounded workforce, a limit on the creation of new knowledge into the future, the loss of a generation of paramedic academics, and would be deleterious to the quality of care provided to the citizens of Australia. Professor Peter O’Meara is Professor of Rural & Regional Paramedicine in the School of Rural Health, La Trobe University, Bendigo, Australia. Professor Brian Maguire is a Professor in the School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, Australia. He is a 2009 Senior Fulbright Scholar. Contact: p.omeara@latrobe.edu.au Tel. 0354447870
56
V
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
References Acker, J. J. (2016). Informing our Future: The development of a regulatory framework for registered paramedics in Australia. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine, 13(2). https://ajp.paramedics.org/index.php/ajp/article/ view/526 Australian Government Productivity Commission. (2016). Report on Government Services, Chapter 9, Fire and ambulance services. Table 9A.37. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, Retrieved from http://www.pc.gov. au/research/recurring/report-on-government-services/2016/emergencymanagement/fire-and-ambulance-services Accessed 14/12/2017. Bigham, B. L., Kennedy, S. M., Drennan, I., & Morrison, L. J. (2013). Expanding Paramedic Scope of Practice in the Community: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Prehospital Emergency Care, 17(3), 361-372. doi: doi:10.3109/10903127.2013.792890 Curtin University. (2016). Position Description - Associate Professor / Professor, Paramedicine. Accessed 31/08/2016. Maguire BJ, Dean S, Bissell RA, Walz BJ. Bumbak D. Epidemic and Bioterrorism preparation among EMS systems. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine. 2007; 22(3): 237–242. McDermid, F., Peters, K., Jackson, D., & Daly, J. (2012). Factors contributing to the shortage of nurse faculty: A review of the literature. Nurse Education Today, 32(5), 565-569. Murray, C., Stanley, M., & Wright, S. (2014). The transition from clinician to academic in nursing and allied health: A qualitative meta-synthesis. Nurse Education Today, 34(3), 389-395. National Institute for Health Research. (2016). Care at the Scene: Research for ambulance services. London: National Health Service. Network of Australasian Paramedic Academics. (2016). Australian and New Zealand Paramedic PhDs and Graduate Research Students Dataset. O’Brien, K., Moore, A., Dawson, D. A., & Hartley, P. R. (2013). An Australian story: paramedic education and practice in transition. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine, 10(4), Article No. 1432. O’Meara, P. (2006). Searching for paramedic academics: vital for our future, but nowhere to be seen! Journal of Emergency Primary Health Care, 4(4), Article No. 9900228. O’Meara, P., Maguire, B., Jennings, P., & Simpson, P. M. (2015). Building an Australasian paramedicine research agenda: a narrative review. Health Research Policy and Systems, 13(1), 79-83. O’Meara, P., Tourle, V., Stirling, C., Walker, J., & Pedler, D. (2012). Extending the paramedic role in rural Australia: a story of flexibility and innovation. Rural & Remote Health, 12(2), 1-13. Siriwardena, A. N., Donohoe, R., Stephenson, J., & Phillips, P. (2010). Supporting research and development in ambulance services: research for better health care in prehospital settings. Emergency Medicine Journal, 27(4), 324-326. doi:10.1136/emj.2009.072363 Smith, C., & Boyd, P. (2012). Becoming an academic: The reconstruction of identity by recently appointed lecturers in nursing, midwifery and the allied health professions. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 49(1), 63-72.
Developing a sustainable academic workforce in paramedicine Peter O’Meara & Brian Maguire
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
REVIEWS
Good Evans! What next? Incorrigible Optimist: A Political Memoir by Gareth Evans ISBN 978-0-522-86644-5 (hardback), 978-0-522-86645-2 (ebook), Carlton, Australia, Melbourne University Press, 402 pp., 2017. Reviewed by Paul Rodan As he reveals in this memoir, Gareth Evans was one of
handedness of the raid on ASIO headquarters by Whitlam’s
only two cabinet members to have served for the totality
Attorney-General, Lionel Murphy. Equally uncomfortable
of the Hawke/Keating governments (the other was Ralph
was his experience in the Combe/Ivanov spy affair, with
Willis). This book follows his Inside the Hawke Keating
Evans regretting his failure to stand up for (as he saw it)
Government: A Cabinet Diary (2014), which covered
the unfair treatment David Combe received at the hands
the period from September 1984 to October 1986.
of both Hawke and ASIO.
Ultimately, various pressures left him unable to continue
When Hawke moved him from the Attorney-General’s
the diary while a minister – more’s the pity. In this more
post in December 1984, Evans could claim amongst
conventional format, he tells the story of a substantial
his achievements the creation of the Commonwealth
public career – before, in and after parliament.
Department of Public Prosecutions and the National
Despite growing up in a working-class family, with a
Crime Authority, plus the ending of certain residual
strong unionist tram-driver father, Evans does not claim to
(colonial) arrangements with the UK. But, there had been
have been propelled into politics by any proletarian zeal to
no progress on constitutional reform or a bill of rights.
wage class struggle. Rather, his main preoccupations were
In his new (unlikely) ministry of Minerals and Energy,
civil liberties and Indigenous rights, with an Australian Bill
Evans proved adaptable and capable, and in retrospect,
of Rights high on his wish list.There is some resemblance
he records his gratitude to Hawke for providing him with
to H V Evatt in the apparent faith in the capacity of
the opportunity to master an economics-related portfolio.
the law (and those with lawyer’s skills) to drive good
The experience exposed Evans to a range of controversial
public policy outcomes. Evans’ later involvement in the
issues, including environmental protection, Indigenous
architecture of the international world order would also
land rights, uranium mining and natural gas supply. It also
draw comparison with Evatt.
meant interaction with some of Australia’s leading business
As a polemicist and member of various committees
figures, occasionally described in colourful detail by Evans.
and boards, Evans (legal academic turned barrister) was
He survived with reputation intact and another election
already a reasonably public figure before his election to the
(1987) saw another change of ministry with a brief stint in
Senate. Entering the upper house in 1978, he maintained a
the mega-portfolio of Transport and Communications.
prolific output of speeches, writings and policy work, and
Deregulation of the airline industry was a key challenge
concedes that his time as Shadow Attorney-General was
in this role, but not one that worried Evans who asserts
a better preparation than going straight into government.
that this path ‘caused me no great ideological stress’, it
The Hawke Government’s first Attorney-General, Evans
‘being perfectly compatible with the kind of economic
had high hopes for the implementation of an expansive
modernisation that a contemporary Labor Party should
reform agenda. Alas, he reveals that Hawke, anxious to
in practice be implementing’ (p. 88). He then diverts into
avoid any repeat of the Whitlam Government’s tendency
a discussion of Labor’s socialist objective and associated
to embrace reform which scared the punters, had him on
issues, making the claim that he remains a democratic
a short leash from the start.
socialist rather than social democrat, although it is not
When Evans authorised the RAAF ‘spy-flights’ over
apparent (despite the assertive tone) how his version
Tasmania to assess developments with the Franklin
of the former would offend anyone claiming to be the
Dam, he not only earned himself the sobriquet ‘Biggles’,
latter. On the communications side of the portfolio, Evans
but prompted unfortunate comparisons with the cack-
provides some interesting observations about the ABC.
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
Good Evans! What next? Reviewed by Paul Rodan
57
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
Evans’ longest and most significant ministerial role was
at Oxford. As Chancellor of ANU (since 2010), he thus
that of Foreign Affairs, a post he held from September
brings a keener appreciation of the role of universities
1988 to March 1996. It could be said that he revelled in the
than do some of his Chancellor peers, increasingly drawn
position, applying his formidable intellect and capacity for
from the private for-profit sector and often with crude
sensible reasoning to advancing not only Australia’s foreign
utilitarian attitudes to higher education. Evans’ support for
policy agenda, but increasingly to broader international
elected staff and student positions on governing bodies,
problems and challenges, with the Cambodian peace
and his robust defence of free speech in the university, are
settlement a standout in this regard. Those who knew, or
refreshing, albeit increasingly novel. He addresses some of
knew of, Evans in earlier times probably still chuckle at
the key problems in the sector, and maintains an authentic
the notion of Gareth as diplomat in chief, but he seems to
Labor concern that upfront fees be resisted and low-SES
have pulled it off, mostly limiting his more acerbic barbs
students not fall by the wayside.
to the Senate and environs. In that context, his line that
The final chapter (‘Politics’) contains some well-
people take an instant dislike to Bronwyn Bishop in order
informed commentary about the state of politics, in
to save time remains a classic.
Australia and elsewhere. It also includes the mandatory
Not uniquely, Evans endorses a diplomacy which
obeisance to the political brilliance and reform genius
mixes pragmatism and principle, while cautioning
of the Hawke/Keating period; readers will take that
against human rights gestures which do more harm than
according to taste. But, in that context, a comment about
good. Australia’s middle power status was central to the
the Rudd Government rang true:
advancement of the key national interests of ‘security, prosperity and good international citizenship’ (p. 117). While relations with Indonesia were crucial, he does not resile from criticism of Suharto for the invasion of East Timor and for his earlier role in the massacre of up to half
Had serious concerns ever arisen about dysfunctional internal process, on the scale that they did in the first Rudd Government, it is inconceivable that we would have been inhibited about confronting the leadership with them (p. 332).
a million Communist Party members and supporters after
The inhibition he identifies cost Labor dearly, and
the 1965 coup (wrongly printed as 1995). He notes Paul
Evans is too diplomatic to suggest that his cabinet
Keating’s lack of apparent concern about these atrocities,
colleagues were simply more talented and competent
but who ever googled ‘NSW Labor Right, human rights’
(and less cowardly) than the Rudd/Gillard lot. But, it’s an
and expected to get any results? Given this critique, it is
unavoidable conclusion.
curious to read his affectionate description of the war
Perhaps predictably, Evans makes no mention of his
criminal Kissinger as a ‘fascinating old rogue’ (p. 181).
affair with Australian Democrats leader Cheryl Kernot, a
By way of possible balance, he later highlights an alleged
relationship that appears to have had some connection
comment by the ‘old rogue’ which displayed an apparent
with her defection to the ALP in 1997.She is only mentioned
indifference to the Cambodian genocide.
in the context of the Mabo legislation – as a ‘superb’ leader
Prior to the 1996 federal election, Evans had secured pre-
of the Democrats and having an excellent understanding
selection for a safe lower house seat, but his experience
round the issues (p. 48). While it is unrealistic to expect
as Deputy Opposition Leader and Shadow Treasurer, after
that public figures will include detailed commentary
loss of government, was not a rewarding one and he left
about such matters in their memoirs, they can usually cite
parliament after the 1998 election. With his record and
family sensitivities or a lack of public relevance by way of
connections, international opportunities were not in
explanation. In this case, however, there was an arguable
short supply with Evans’ most notable role probably that
public political consequence, rendering Evans’ muteness
of President and CEO of International Crisis Group, an
unsatisfactory.
international conflict resolution NGO. He also records his
While Evans might have expected to make his major
satisfaction with his role in the development, as co-chair of
contribution as Attorney-General, it is almost certain that
an international commission, of the notion of “responsibility
he will be best remembered as a long-serving and mostly
to protect’ (R2P) which provides a framework for UN
effective Foreign Minister, the experience then allowing
intervention against states engaging in genocide.
him to extend his role in international relations after
In his chapter on education, Evans acknowledges
leaving parliament. This memoir outlines, in an engaging
the role of inspiring school and university teachers in
style, quite a remarkable career, and dealing with the
leading him in the direction of the opportunities which
longest-serving federal Labor government, is an important
beckoned, first at the University of Melbourne and then
contribution to the history of that period. Despite seeing
58
Good Evans! What next? Reviewed by Paul Rodan
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
much of the worst of geopolitical realities, he retains
Paul Rodan is an adjunct professor in the Department
an optimism that workable systems can be created and
of Social Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology,
employed to produce a sane international order. Whether,
Melbourne, and a member of the Australian Universities’
in the age of Trump, many will share his optimism is
Review editorial board.
another matter.
W
Whispering softly to me…. How to be an Academic: The Thesis Whisperer Reveals All by Inger Mewburn ISBN 978-1-7422-3507-3, Sydney, Australia, New South Publishing, 328 pp., 2017. Reviewed by Andrys Onsman Inger Mewburn is the Thesis Whisperer (https://
shit crazy’. Although that term made me think of David
thesiswhisperer.com), the blog site indispensable for
Attenborough in a dingy cave, and I don’t really believe
anyone who is thinking about doing a PhD; anyone
you can write 10,000 words every day, I could see how
who is doing a PhD and anyone who has done a PhD.
it could possibly be done every now and then; like when
It is a wonderfully practical gift to all of the above, and
panic stations are looming. If someone had shown me
a godsend to all supervisors, especially those who don’t
how it could be done when the faeces, cheiropteran or
think they need it. If you think that, then you really do
not, was about to meet the whirling blades, I would have
need it. And as an aside, the site has also had its benefits to
suffered considerably less angst during my own studies.
Mewburn herself, as she is now (as a consequence to the
But the book is about much more than doing your
site, she claims) director of research training at the ANU.
doctorate. It’s about being an academic, which, given the
Mewburn did her PhD in Faculty of Architecture, Building
title, is quite appropriate. If you had to boil the advice
and Planning at the University of Melbourne, which is
therein into three words, it would probably be ‘don’t do
where I work. Apparently, she graduated in 2009, which
it’. And not to use word ‘therein’. But she knows full well
is well before I started, so there is no obvious conflict of
that few people will listen to that advice. And she also
interest. But I do know people who know her, and they
knows full well that universities know that full well too,
say she is very nice. So, there you go.
and will have little hesitation in exploiting that desire. For
Her new book, How to be an Academic, draws heavily
those of us who have other strings on our bow, academia
on the blogs and posts she has put on the site over the
provides a reasonably steady stream of support for our
years; which in the hands of a less skilled narrator would
other activities, which in turn often makes us better at
be enough to suggest double-dipping and cashing-in. But
teaching or researching, and worse at managementy (Oh
Mewburn is a skilled communicator and instead of cutting
bugger off, Microsoft spell checker, that is a perfectly
and pasting what is already out there, she organises and
good word!) things. Unfortunately, it is the last that seems
contextualises her contentions without resorting to the
to have a disproportionate effect on becoming a real,
usual academic sleight-of-hand of couching everything in
tenured academic, known, in universities as in prison, as a
terms of one standardised theoretical framework or other,
‘lifer’. Those gigs are hard to get but Mewburn articulates
like ‘looking through a phenomenological lens’ or ‘coming
the must-dos to give yourself the best chance of getting
at it as postmodernist functionary’. Thankfully, the book
a toe hold.
transcends all that, and is so much the better for it. First
Most of us who have climbed, albeit temporarily, up
and foremost, it is accessible: I read the whole thing, cover
into the professoriate, have had help. Finding a mentor is a
to cover in a day and enjoyed every word. It is entirely
good step. Finding a good mentor is a big step.Their advice
useful. Even the bits that aren’t.
is invaluable. Having the DVC (Research) tell me that
Few books about doing your doctorate have a chapter
my application for promotion needed drastic rewriting
about writing 10,000 words in a day and not going ‘bat
didn’t immediately plunge me headfirst into the slough
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
Whispering softly to me…. Reviewed by Andrys Onsman
59
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
of despair because I trusted her completely. Although I
white male (generically privileged, apparently), there was
did, just for a moment, dip a toe into that loveless lake, I
much I recognised from both sides of the fence.
knew that she was basically right. And so it proved. If you
The book is also a fillip for those of us who didn’t
can’t find a good, trustworthy mentor, buy this book. It
come from a privileged background – my parents were
won’t hand you a tissue, buy you coffee and have a good
immigrants working in a factory to provide a better
chat, but it will provide succour, perspective and smile
future for their children and it was thanks to Gough and
encouragingly as you take a deep breath in preparation of
scholarships that I was allowed to do a PhD and get a desk
following her advice.
in the ‘foreign students postgrad room’ at the university –
Mewburn doesn’t specifically mention mentoring: she
because it provides sound advice to get over hurdles that
bangs on about networking. And she’s on the money:
are sometimes missed by the Skips.* For example, Mewburn
networks are essential. But she points out that they are a
doesn’t mention international students in any great depth
two-way process.You give as much as you take, else the ties
but makes her advice accessible to them. That is such
will come undone. And universities covet your networks
a fantastic strategy and skill; few international students,
for their own purposes: a small step away from those
especially those who can speak English reasonably well,
companies that steal and sell your mobile numbers and
want to be treated differently. I expect the same applies for
email addresses, so they can annoy you at tea time. These
early career researchers. She doesn’t talk down to anyone.
days, in job hunting it’s about who you know and who else
For me, the single most salient point of the book is the
you know (and how much status you can bring: grants,
suggestion that getting an on-going job in a university isn’t
papers, citations, media profile, consultancies and so on).
easy, but it is doable. If you are hell-bent on chasing that
That’s networking: rhizoming your way to the top. Build
red balloon, be strategic, be proactive, don’t lose sight of
your networks solidly, purposefully and trustworthily.
your aim (and your sanity), gird your loins and don’t let
The book is divided into six sections. The first covers her morphing into the thesis whisperer, which has a lot
the bastards grind you down. And have a copy of this book on your desk.
of “this is how I did it” stuff. The next five are beings: being academic; being productive; being a writer; being
Andrys Onsman’s affiliations at the time of writing this
employed and being political. Each chapter is built around
review were the Melbourne School of Design, University of
three or four blog posts, tied together by theme and
Melbourne, and the Zelman Cowen School of Music, Monash
commentary. All the chapters are easy to read, and for
University, Australia.
those of us who have been there, each contains a neck muscle strain of head nodding. Even as a middle aged
*Anglo-Celtic Australians
English as she is spoke The Career Trajectories of English Language Teachers by Penny Haworth & Cheryl Craig (Eds.) ISBN 978-1-873927-87-8, Oxford, UK, Symposium Books, 256 pp., 2016. Reviewed by Neil Mudford This book contains a wealth of stories from and about
vital area of their lives, meeting a diverse range of people
English language teachers and their students. Many stories
of various cultures who are well travelled and being able
are very moving and their variety and complexity are
to travel yourself with skills and qualifications that are
striking. Acquiring English language proficiency can be
valued worldwide.
vital for employment and mobility for those whose first
As stated in the Foreword, the book’s particular
language is not English. Throughout the book, it is clear
importance lies partly in the fact that little has been
that English teachers find their work richly rewarding.
written about this huge variety of English language teacher
The rewards include satisfaction in helping people in a
experiences and their cultural, political and economic
60
English as she is spoke Reviewed by Neil Mudford
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
circumstances world wide. Much has been written about
Stanley makes the point that the literature supports
how to teach English but little about the lives of these
the idea that her findings for the Australian environment
teachers and their students.
are in keeping with English language teaching elsewhere.
In order to get to the rare gems in the book, you do
It therefore seems highly likely that English teachers
have to get past the title, which is about as dull sounding
elsewhere are unhappy with these aspects of their jobs.
as it could be, and the first chapter which reads like an
Consequently, it is most surprising that there are no
extended curriculum vitae for a job application. Then
mentions of industrial relations matters or complaints
there is the style of delivery in Chapters 2 and 3 sounding
outside of Stanley’s chapter even though we hear so much
to my ear to be the sort of all-encompassing, convoluted,
about many other aspects of the work.
high-level talk that sounds grand and highly perceptive but conveys little meaning.
Perhaps a factor in this silence about job conditions is the ‘rivers of life’ method and ‘storying’ oneself that a
For those who persevere, the book then opens out into
significant number of authors employ to assist in critically
a smorgasbord of complex tales from around the world of
considering and describing their career trajectories. The
the valiant and creative efforts of teachers, in sometimes
rivers of life approach involves contemplating one’s
trying circumstances, to help their students. Intertwined
professional history, identifying turning points in it and
amongst these are tales of the struggles students have in
thinking of these as ‘bends in a river’.This seems to me to
breaking into the English-speaking world.
encourage too great a focus on the individual’s internal
When I said above that English teaching skills and
life as an explanation for her/his career’s development.
qualifications are valued, I meant of course that many
It occurs to me that the meandering river metaphor
people and governments want to enjoy the benefits
should be taken a step further to include the surrounding
of English language teaching services. It will come as
countryside’s strong influence on a river’s path. This
no surprise, though, that the valuing stops well short
might lend more weight to the influence of external
of these skills attracting high wages and excellent
conditions on career trajectories. Broader influences are
conditions. In fact, quite the opposite is the case, in
considered and discussed in Section 2 of the book but
common with many other vital, helping professions.
these seem to have little connection with the individual
Nursing, firefighting and child care work spring
stories of teachers and students in Section 1.
effortlessly to mind.
Quite a number of authors recount how national or
Dr Phiona Stanley of the University of New South
state government policies have created difficulties or, less
Wales, raises these issues in detail in Chapter 15. Stanley
often, assistance for the profession. Policies are generally
canvasses the poor level of financial rewards and the
of two kinds: those that encourage or discourage English
poor working conditions suffered by English teachers in
language learning in the population and those that mandate
Australia. This is particularly so in language schools but
standards for student achievement and progress rates.
universities often have separate, lower paid levels for
Interestingly, the latter seem to generate stronger
English teachers. One of Stanley’s interviewees puts it in
feelings amongst teachers. Several authors complain
a nutshell when she says: ‘If I worked in a nice restaurant
about the tension between what they believe the student
I’d make more money than I do here [at an accredited
needs and what the government demands for rapid
international chain language school]’.
progress as measured by high-stakes generic testing. The
Casual teachers suffer the most as they are paid only for
resources are rarely available to the teachers for meeting
the teaching contact hours with the time for preparation
both these goals.The deep concern for student well-being
and marking unpaid. This leads to the ludicrous result
is frequently what drives the teachers to persevere in the
that a trained teacher holding a university degree can
profession and sometimes this can only be realised by
effectively be working for less than the minimum wage.
resisting the demands from on high.
In consequence, language school wages are so low and
The teacher’s stories attest that the greatest upheavals
the appointments so insecure and variable that few can
and upsets occur when policies are changed rapidly,
actually make a living from the work. As a result, many
irrespective of the nature of the changes. For instance, a
of the teachers who persist in the profession have other
number of instances are cited in which rapid growth in
incomes or a partner with a liveable income. Though
English teaching is decided upon but teacher numbers
highly motivated by the nature of their work, the teachers
and skill levels are insufficient for the expansion. This
working under these conditions state strongly that the
leads to overwork for the teachers and therefore no time
low pay is a burning issue for them.
to undertake the necessary professional development. In
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
English as she is spoke Reviewed by Neil Mudford
61
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
this way, a potential upturn for the profession can become another stressor for teachers.
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
This book is a valuable insight into the inner workings of a profession that is widespread and plays an important
There are many examples in the book that illustrate
role in this globalised world.The complex picture it paints
the fact that the relationship between English language
of the lives of teachers and students is highly engaging
teachers and their students is often more intense and
and I hope it helps enhance our respect and admiration
inter-dependent than for teaching in other disciplines.
for them all.
This is highlighted by many of the authors who note that it has many implications for their teaching and the
Neil Mudford is an Honorary Senior Lecturer with UNSW, an
students’ learning. For example, intense student needs can
Adjunct Senior Fellow with the University of Queensland and a
cause teachers to undertake additional pastoral care roles.
member of the Australian Universities’ Review editorial board.
Between paternalism and academic freedom What’s Happened to The University? A Sociological Exploration of Its Infantilisation, by Frank Furedi ISBN 978-1-138-21293-0, London, UK, Routledge, viii+205 pp., 2016. Reviewed by Thomas Klikauer Much has been written about the changing contours
rise of managerialism (Klikauer 2013 & 2015) has
of universities. Now, eminent sociologist, Frank Furedi
changed universities from being institutions based on
examines the last 40+ years of university changes. His nine-
academic faculties into managerial organisations in which
chapter book starts with the fact that more than 50 per
management sets the tone while academics have been
cent of young people attend university. This changes the
downgraded to course delivery workers and output-
impact of universities on society as a whole. Furedi’s core
oriented researchers strictly monitored under “impact
argument is that increasing cohorts of infantile students
fetishism” linked to key performance indicators.These are
arriving at universities have led to an infantilisation of
also ‘the sub-mental technocrats who enforce targets in
universities in which emotionally immature students
university teaching’ (Poole, 2017, p. 2).
seek protection from supposedly distressing readings
As a consequence of all that, the ‘university has become
and course materials, which in turn has led to a damaging
the target of constant rule making’ (p. 2) that, in turn,
influence on academic freedom and freedom of speech.
enhances managerialism. Furedi’s analysis does not
To elaborate his thesis, Furedi’s first chapter starts with
focus on the academic-university relationship but on the
‘the weaponisation of emotions’. This is followed by the
student (mostly undergraduate) university relationship
harm it does to academia and culture wars. Chapter 5 is
that is increasingly defined through an ‘infantilisation of
dedicated to ‘verbal purification’ while Chapter 6 debates
the campus’ (p. 4). Its ‘custom of risk-averse regime of
‘microaggression’. The final three chapters outline ‘new
childrearing’ (p. 5) is more a feature of schooling than
etiquettes, trigger warnings’ and finally what Furedi sees
university. This feeds nicely into managerialism’s ideology
as the ‘freedom-security trade-off’.
of ‘risk management’ (p. 7) postulated under the general
Furedi begins, ‘when students argue that some books
‘better safe than sorry’ (p. 8) idea.
are dangerous to their psychological well-being or
Under the common ‘it is a dangerous world out there’
that some arguments and criticism are so toxic that it
hallucination, university management has entered the
can traumatise them, it is evident that the university
‘groupthink’ of needing to provide ‘a safe space’ (p. 9)
faces a serious challenge to its academic integrity’ (p.
where the ‘adverb ‘safe’ carries connotations of ‘safe sex,
vii, preface). On the basis of a perceived ‘student care’
safe drinking, safe eating…and stay safe’ (p. 10). While
request that places students at the centre of universities,
violence in almost all advanced countries is in decline
universities have become paternalistic. The stratospheric
– despite corporate media hype – universities have set
62
Between paternalism and academic freedom Reviewed by Thomas Klikauer
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
up ‘stay safe web pages’ telling students to ‘be aware of
2002; Zimbardo, 2008) and nobody would know what
your surroundings’ (p. 11). In the USA, this is supported
“conditioned helplessness” might mean (Seligman, 1975).
through the “Safe Campus Act” (p. 9).This, so Furedi states,
Today’s risk avoidance management not only impacts
adheres to ‘libertarian paternalism [which] is founded
on research, teaching is exposed as well when such
on the premise that government and private institutions
knowledge is framed as ‘challenging material’ (p. 43) as
are entitled to manage and influence the behaviours of
‘students demand that they ought to be shielded from
individuals in order to ensure that they make the “right”
exposure to topics and texts that may make them feel
decisions. Libertarian paternalism is less coercive and
uncomfortable’ (p. 45). As a consequence,‘many teachers
authoritarian than the version practiced by explicitly
have altered their teachings style’ (p. 45), i.e. cushioning
antidemocratic rulers in the past’ (p. 14).
students while self-censoring teaching material and
Crucially, ‘once adults are diagnosed as lacking the
‘ensuring that undergraduates have a problem-free
capacity to exercise independent judgement, they become
and pleasant life’ (p. 46). Much of this reaches beyond
infantilised’ (p. 15) and as British philosopher Bauman
research and teaching and actual behaviours as a Warwick
(1989) would say, ‘objects of power’ of managerialism
University case shows (p. 50):
(Klikauer, 2016). It is managerial rule under the guise of ‘paternalistic practices [that] assume a benevolent image of profiling students with support’ (p. 15). As a result, Furedi’s ‘students need universities that educate them for a life of freedom and independence, not safe spaces that turn them into infantilised supplicants demanding protection’ (p. 16). Today’s paternalistic university no
Professor Thomas Docherty, a prominent critic of the instrumentalisation and market-driven ethos of British higher education, faced serious disciplinary charges and was suspended from his post by the University of Warwick. His alleged crime included ‘disrespect for job candidates’, showing negative ‘body language’, and the use of ‘ironic’ comments – though in the end he was found not guilty of these ludicrous charges’.
longer educates students for a life of freedom, as capitalism
Furedi writes that ‘often, the mere suggestion that
has just replaced freedom with entrepreneurship and
a particular form of behaviour might cause offence is
independence as we are made to believe that we all
sufficient to move the culture police into action’ (p. 65).
depend on capitalism sold to us as TINA: there is no
Almost self-evidently, ‘many American universities now
alternative. Twenty-first
prefers
routinely email their students at Halloween to warn them
‘infantilised supplicants’ begging for the next commercial
about the need to wear culturally sensitive costumes’
product while willing to self-adjust to managerial regimes.
(p. 67). There obviously is a need to be protected from a
century
capitalism
At a time when neoliberalism is eliminating the last
pumpkin with a candle inside.
remnants of the welfare state, a ‘powerful…therapy
Luckily, many universities offer a ‘safe space’ (p. 70) to
culture [rises under which] the twenty-first-century
protect students from pumpkins. These safe spaces, of
university would be an institution wedded to the new
course, imply that the ‘world is inherently unsafe’ (p. 71),
ethos of helplessness, support groups, counselling services,
thereby feeding the culture of fear. Beyond that, safe spaces
mentors, facilitators and emotional conformism’ (p. 17).
protect students as ‘many undergraduates regard serious
These (and others) flank capitalism’s ‘Cold Intimacies’
criticism and debate as an unacceptable challenge to their
(Illouz, 2007) in which ‘vulnerable children [can continue
person’ (p.74) failing to distinguish between academic
to be] vulnerable students’ (p.20) in a seamless furtherance
arguments and personal judgements. As a consequence,
of ‘the overparented child’ (p. 22) well into adulthood.
students are now turned into a guiding institution after
All this occurs under the unquestioned assumption that
the conversion of universities into public relations driven
there is an ‘emotional fragility of university students…
PR-universities (Cronin 2016) with the adjacent rise of
treated as if they are likely to possess some emotional
the “the customer is king” ideology. Given the student-to-
deficits’ (p. 32).This feeds into a ‘culture of fear’ (p. 36) that
educational-customer move, such educational customers,
also shapes academics, now forced to go through ‘Ethics
and increasingly the no longer academic management
Committees [to] demonstrate that their project is safe’ (p.
university, management fail to understand that ‘the exercise
37). I am still wondering what sort of emotional stress I
of judgement is not directed towards people but towards
[as a researcher] can cause when asking a BHP manager
ideas; its aim is to transcend the personal’ (p. 77). Under the
how many container ships BHP has? Under today’s ‘risk
“customer care” ideology, university management follows
managers’ (p. 37), what we have learned from Milgram
the ‘avoid rocking the boat’ (p. 79) metaphor.
and the Stanford Prison Experiment would be eliminated
Not surprisingly,‘university leaders are complicit in the
long before any research could be conducted (Bass,
project of relieving students of the uncomfortable burden
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
Between paternalism and academic freedom Reviewed by Thomas Klikauer
63
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
of holding their beliefs to account’ (p. 85). The emotional
students that [they] are about safety’ (p. 147) in an
cushioning of students extends well into the area of
increasingly safer world (Pinker, 2017). While the world
‘verbal purification’ (p. 89) where ‘as a managerial practice,
is getting safer, students are protected from dangerous
linguistic governance is indifferent to the content of
literature such as, for example, Virginia Woolf’s Mrs
speech: its concern is with the risk of tolerating it’ (p. 90).
Dalloway, Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby, Ovid’s
Typical for managerialism, managerial ‘rule-makers tend
Metamorphoses, Shakespeare’s
to assume that more rules are needed’ (p. 94), something
Dream, Mark Twain’s Huckleberry Finn, and Sophocles’
that is ideologically flanked by a deregulation hegemony.
Oedipus the King (p. 149f.).
Midsummer
Night’s
Meanwhile and perhaps more devastatingly, ‘throughout
Protecting its full-fee paying commodity (students),
most of history, campaigns for verbal purification were
protection via trigger warnings includes ‘virtually any
directed at heretical doctrines or subversive ideologies’
aspect of the human condition [such as] avoiding
(p. 100). The day might not be far off when Darwinian
discussion altogether [as well as] a smell, song, scene,
biology can no longer be taught because students claim,
phrase, person, and so on’ (p.154). As such, ‘Harvard law
‘this hurts our religious feelings’.
professor Jeannie Suk’ (p. 158) teaching rape law might
To assure students’ emotional wellbeing in an academically
cleansed
environment,
be close to becoming impossible when infantilised
university
students fail to understand that ‘academic learning is not
management has moved to micro-manage ‘microaggression
simply an extension of schooling’ (p. 163) even though
[defined as] the brief and commonplace daily verbal,
today’s universities often resemble exactly that. All of
behavioural, and environmental indignities, whether
this, according to Furedi, damages academic freedom and
intentional or unintentional that communicate hostile
freedom of speech. In his final chapter, he discusses ‘why
derogatory, or negative racial, gender, and sexual
academic freedom must not be rationed – an argument
orientation, and religious slights and insults to the target
against the freedom-security trade off’ (p. 157).
person or group’ (p. 107). This allows university managers
While ‘historic breakthroughs in intellectual and
the opportunity to extend the scope of the paternalistic
scientific thought inevitably challenge the prevailing
regulation of behaviour’ (p. 115) while ‘the charge of
order’ (p. 170), today’s market-driven and consumer-
microaggression conveys the presumption of guilt’ (p.
oriented PR-universities favour ‘attacks on academic
117), moving the ‘warning “you can’t say that” to “you can’t
freedom within the university [perhaps in the knowledge
think that”’ (p. 121). All of this reaches well beyond ‘the
that these] are far more consequential than those launched
quest for a new etiquette’ (p. 125) as, for example, ‘the
by politicians’ (p. 171). In other words, managerialism
definition of sexual harassment has expanded to include
is a much better instrument to domesticate academics
conduct that is simply unwelcome’ (p. 128).
when seeking to render universities into extended R+D
Many of these university initiatives are linked to ‘raising
facilities for capitalism as the entire system increasingly
awareness. The word ‘aware’ signifies watchful, vigilant,
depends on advances in knowledge. Furedi closes with
cautious, on one’s guard…to be on one’s guard against’
a hopeful note: ‘a serious higher education institution
(p. 137).The theme of raising awareness implies not being
does not seek to limit academic freedom but to affirm
aware and ‘the possession of awareness is a marker of a
it. It regards academic freedom as a non-negotiable value
superior status’ (p. 138) held by university management. It
that underpins the genuine pursuit of intellectual and
favours, once again, the rise of managerialism. ‘In 1975, in
scientific clarity. It teaches its members how not to take
the US, there were almost twice as many professors [sic:
uncomfortable views personally and not to be offended
academic staff] as administrators, today the administrators
by them. Instead of allowing the rationing of academic
outnumber the faculty’ (p. 139). In the space of just over
freedom, it lives and breathes this principle’ (p. 186).
40 years, managerialism has taken hold while academics have been downgraded to the role of mere auxiliaries,
Thomas Klikauer teaches at the Sydney Graduate School of
framed as instructors and course deliverers as universities
Management, Western Sydney University.
resemble more and more a Fordist car factory that mass
References
manufactures degrees. Assuring a smooth manufacturing process demands handling of the product (training) and the customer (students) with care.
As a consequence, university
management uses trigger warnings’ (p. 146) ‘to show
64
Blass, T. (2002). The Man Who Shocked the World. Psychology Today, March/ April: 68-74. Cronin, A. M. (2016). Reputational capital in ‘the PR University’: public relations and market rationalities, Journal of Cultural Economy, 9(4):396-409.
Between paternalism and academic freedom Reviewed by Thomas Klikauer
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
Illouz, E. 2007. Cold intimacies: the making of emotional capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Poole, S. (2017). The Death of Homo Economicus review – why does capitalism still exist? The Guardian. From https://www.theguardian.com, 28 Sept 2017.
Klikauer, T. (2013). Managerialism – Critique of an Ideology, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Seligman, M. E. P. (1975). Helplessness: On Depression, Development, and Death, San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
Klikauer, T. (2015). What is Managerialism? Critical Sociology, 41(7-8): 11031119.
Zimbardo, P. G. (2008). The Lucifer effect: understanding how good people turn evil, New York: Random House.
Pinker, S. (2017). The Surprising Decline in Violence (TED-Talk, 20th March 2017: www.ted.com, accessed: 7th August 2017).
It’s a bird! It’s a plane! It’s an Academic Superhero! How to be an Academic Superhero by Iain Hay ISBN 978-1-7864-813-3, Cheltenham, UK, Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. 245 pp., 2017. Reviewed by Andrys Onsman Iain Hay is an old hand at academic development in
The book isn’t so much about how to teach or how to
higher education and his advice is worth taking heed of. I
do research as it is about how to be an academic, how
remember that when he won the Prime Minister’s Award
to operate in the academic environment. The two key
for Australian University Teacher of the Year in 2007, I
messages are networking and time management. There
was impressed with his prodigious output that seemed
are five parts:
to be entirely about offering advice to anyone wanting
1. Setting out as an academic superhero
to be a good university teacher. His latest book targets
2. Refining your academic superhero credentials
‘establishing and sustaining a successful career in the
3. Applying your academic superpowers where they
Social Science,Arts and the Humanities’ but for my money,
are needed
there is something in it for several audiences: those who
4. Performing as an academic superhero
are thinking about starting a career in higher ed; those
5. Preserving your academic superpowers.
who have started but aren’t getting anywhere; and those
I did warn you about the hyperbole – even if the term
not at all involved in the dizzy world of universities but
“academic superhero” isn’t actually Hay’s but Pitt &
interested in why so many people still want to give it a go,
Mewburn’s. But you get the drift of the structure of the
even when it is so difficult to get a reasonable job.
book: it’s all about getting in and staying in.
I should acknowledge at the onset that I’m not a fan
The four chapters that make up Part 1 are ‘Get qualified’,
of hyperbolic, funky titles. Superheroes belong in comic
‘Find a good advisor’, ‘Get mentors, get advice’ and
books. Just become good at what you do: you don’t need
‘Prepare a good CV”. Each chapter is short but chockfull
to wear your undies outside your pyjamas. I guess the title
of good advice. Examples include the advice on doing
is an acknowledgement of the zeitgeist. Whatever – I’m
some background checking on whom you are intending
not a fan of zeitgeists either.
to approach for doctoral supervision, and where they
Hay leads the aspirant through the steps of getting and
operate; the advice on setting up a master CV and the
holding a job in academe, and although he never says it
benefits of finding good mentors. However, you should
in so many words, I like the fact that he implies that once
also be careful in being mentored, especially if you are
you’re in, you need to work bloody hard, manage the job
starting off. It’s all fine and dandy in theory but in reality,
as well as your health and if you want to make it an actual
good mentors are few and far between. You have to be
career, get really good at it as quickly as possible. If you
lucky (and I was) to find a good one.
don’t, you will get caught out. It’s not about how good you
Most successful senior academics are too busy to give
think you are, it’s about how good others think you are.
more than perfunctory advice, even if they would like to
An inflated ego is just as bad as false modesty and Hay is
provide more. Some will simply exploit you. The worst is
brilliant at nudging you in the right direction, head-wise.
the unsuccessful academic dispensing advice and support,
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
It’s a bird! It’s a plane! It’s an Academic Superhero! Reviewed by Andrys Onsman
65
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
arrogantly unaware that they have nothing substantive to
Putting in an application takes a sizeable ego, and sizeable
offer anyone. You’d be surprised about how many Early
egos get bruised easily (unless you’re a psychopath with an
Career Academics get sucked in by people like that. My
external locus of control, in which case this probably isn’t
advice is to check their actual achievements rather than
the right kind of work for you. Allegedly.)
to rely on their narratives. A good mentor is a great help; a bad mentor is a great hindrance.
On the other hand, Hay’s advice on how to get an interview and how to handle it is simple but right on
Part 2 is all about focusing and putting yourself about.
the money. Read it several times, slowly. When you have
Hay gently points out that once you’ve got some runs on
made a final version of your application, read every bit
the board (and runs come in many forms), you have to get
of it out loud. The boxed texts are generally excellent
out from under that bushel. You have to be academically
and, in the case of interviews and presentations, worth
capable, reliable, knowledgeable and personally a good
internalising as a default position. The list of probable
colleague. You have to do good things and then make
questions is accurate (in my experience) and it is well
sure that people know about the good things you’ve
worth articulating clear answers to them all. And take
done. It sounds like a no-brainer (and it probably is) but
every opportunity to rehearse. Drive friends, family and
you actually have to do it. Find out what the system is
the dog mad!
and use it. But make sure you have substance to back it
Part 4 is about ensuring you stay in once you do manage
up. Particularly helpful is the section on on-line visibility.
to get into the cloisters. All of the things he mentions
Having a good web-site, preferably made by a professional
are correct – although I wish he’d put more emphasis on
designer rather than one you’ve thrown together yourself
how bloody hard you have to work and on the fact that
on a wet Sunday afternoon, really does make a difference.
regardless of how hard some people work, they’ll still
You’d be surprised who contacts you and why. The good
be less than adequate. Securing funding is important but
thing is that they already know something about you –
hard. Getting papers published in A* journals is important
which saves everybody time and effort.
but hard. Attracting good research students is important
Part 3 moves to getting a job: there are chapters called
but hard and graduating them is even harder. Doing a lot
‘Develop relationships with supportive referees’,‘Find the
of speaking in sought-after conferences is important but
right job’, Write a compelling job application’, ‘Perform
hard – both getting the gig and doing it well. Doing good
well at job interviews’ and “Manage job interview failure
research; teaching well; tapping into consultancy work;
and success’. All but the second chapter, are full of good
getting (meaningful) committee work – they are all really
advice, hints and tips and checklists.
important but also really hard. And as Hay points out they
Let me get a quibble out of the way first. No matter how
are essential to getting recognised as a good operator. But
positive or emotionally intelligent or any other hippy-
it does seem just a little bit hopeful to suggest that you
happy fad you subscribe to you are, it is unrealistically and
should also consider doing volunteer work. I’d put that
a little cruelly hopeful to have a chapter entitled “Find the
last on my list; after having a G&T or two with your life-
right job”. Much more realistic would be a chapter entitled
partner whenever it is possible, even if your life-partner
“Find a job. Any job.” Unless you have an unhealthily close
exists only in your imagination.
personal relationship with a Weisteinian dean, getting a
The other little quibble I have is his blunt advice to not
job is not a matter of choosing a nice one from a range
blog. I don’t do it and confess that I know little about it but
of options. It’s grabbing what comes up and recalibrating
some people, the Thesis Whisperer (see earlier review) is
your plan from there.
an obvious example, have made impressive careers out of
Hay advises seekers to develop a relationship with recruiters and head-hunters. It is worth a try, but I wouldn’t
it. He says, “Don’t”; I say, “Keep an open mind”. We both say,“Be careful!”
count on it. My advice is to apply for everything because as
The fifth and final part is all about maintaining your
he (Hay not Weistein) points out, statistically the chances of
health, happiness and a shred of dignity. The advice is
getting a job are slightly worse than winning Tattslotto when
sound, solid, essential and too often ignored – refer to
the amount up for grabs is big enough. It’s heartbreakingly
previous section for reasons. But don’t ignore it. It is
difficult to score a win. Perhaps that is why the sub-section
really important. Learn to say “no” politely, or at least be
on dealing with interview failure is so brief. No matter how
somewhere else when the dean is looking for someone
mindful you are, missing out on getting an interview, or
to do something. Hay knows full well that it is a job, even
missing out on the job when you do get an interview, is a
for those for whom it is a vocation. Even when it is all
major blow to your psyche and getting over it takes effort.
flowing nicely, Csikszentmihalyi-esque, and it doesn’t feel
66
It’s a bird! It’s a plane! It’s an Academic Superhero! Reviewed by Andrys Onsman
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
like a job, it is a job. And as Hay says in his conclusion, by
on sabbatical. And most importantly, you might find after
becoming good at a basically unreasonable job, you are
a couple of years that you simply don’t like it. For the sake
perpetuating the unreasonable-ness of it, calcifying the
of your happiness, get out. Do something else. Quitting
exploitative demands that make it almost impossible. As
academia isn’t failing. It is opening a door to something
usual in this book, Hay is right on the money.
else much more beautiful and fulfilling.
And therefore, I wish he’d added a section entitled
But if you’re intent on becoming an academic, read the
“Getting out if it isn’t for you” or something like that.
first chapter of this book,‘Making Academic Superheroes’.
Academia isn’t for everyone. It can be a bugger of a job.
Read it twice and think carefully about what you want in
You watch people who don’t deserve it get ahead because
life. If that doesn’t weaken your resolve, then read the rest
they’re better at schmoozing than you, while you work
of the book. Don’t just skim through it, say “Yeah, yeah, I
your butt off and stay on semester long contracts for far
know that” but actually follow the advice on its pages as
too long because you really do want to make a difference.
and when you need to. And you will need to, believe me.
You get exploited by senior academics who put their own names first on papers when you’ve done all the work; you
Hay is a trustworthy mentor and his advice is sound. The book deserves a wide readership.
get abused by students who think their fees entitle them to a degree and you get harried by the dean who needs to
Andrys Onsman is an Associate Professor in the Sir Zelman
tick a truckload of impossible boxes and the lifers are all
Cowen School of Music, Monash University, Australia.
What we all know The Knowledge Illusion: Why We Never Think Alone by Steven Sloman and Philip Fernbach ISBN 978-1-7605-530-74, New York, USA, Macmillan, 284 pp., 2017. Reviewed by Thomas Klikauer
The Knowledge Illusion is written by a professor of
Despite this being the age of machines and computers,
cognition and a professor of marketing. Its central themes
our brain, however,‘is not like a desktop computer designed
are cognition, ignorance, knowledge, and the community
to hold reams of information. The mind is a flexible
of knowledge.The book is about cognition – not marketing
problem solver that evolved to extract only the most
which, for the most part, is largely concerned with getting
useful information to guide decisions in new situations…
us to buy things we don’t need with money we don’t have
our intelligence resides not in individual brains but in the
to impress people we don’t like. As a non-marketing book
collective mind’ (p. 5). This is the first key insight of the
on cognition and knowledge, Sloman and Fernbach’s work
book. ‘The secret to our success is that we live in a world
contains 15 exquisite chapters outlining that we as human
in which knowledge is all around us. It is in the things we
beings almost never know anything individually. We know
make, in our bodies, and workspaces, and in other people.
things together as – since the internet and Wikipedia– a
We live in a community of knowledge’ (p. 13). Beyond that,
global collective and are what Nowak and Highfield call
we as humans can share knowledge and this is something
“Supercooperators”. We communicate collectively and
that we ‘don’t see in other animals’ (p. 14).This is something
thereby create knowledge on which we can all draw –
that gave us the evolutionary edge over others from lions,
most easily, for example, through Wikipedia. Sloman and
to apes and even to Neanderthals. We are super intelligent,
Fernbach start with ‘a fundamental paradox of humankind,
we communicate, and we are a collective.This is even more
something they see in the following way: the human mind
true since the advent of the internet.
is both genius and pathetic, brilliant and idiotic’ (p. 3) as we
Still, there have been and there are intelligent people
have the minds of, for example,Albert Einstein,Alan Turing,
and not all of us have the same intelligence. Individual
Stephen Hawking, Noam Chomsky, etc. but we also have
intelligence, so the authors argue, ‘is overrated’ (p. 18)
the often not so mindful Donald Trump.
even when considering that your average sea slug has a
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
What we all know Reviewed by Thomas Klikauer
67
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
nervous system consisting of roughly 18,000 neurons, a
words, with an “Intel Inside” we would have never gotten
lobster has about 100,000, a honeybee one million, rats
where we are today. Human thinking is so much more
about 200 million, and a human brain about 20 billion (p.
than just knowing things.
29). We use our sophisticated brains to create complex
We are where we are today because of our ability
societies and institutions even though Sloman and
to cooperate in collectives as Sloman and Fernbach’s
Fernbach believe ‘evolution dictates that there is no more
brilliant chapter on “thinking with other people” outlines.
important action than mating (we know people who feel
Just as the “lion-dilemma” says: hunt together or do not
the same way)’ (p. 44). Me too.
hunt at all – ‘the payoff was huge’ (p. 109) when hunting
Thinking about mating as well as engaging in thinking
large animals collectively. Firstly, we could do so only as a
as such gave us an advantage. Sloman and Fernbach write,
collective and secondly, we could only make use of 100kg
‘thinking beings were more likely to survive than their
of beef as a collective at a time where the fridge wasn’t
competitors because they were more likely to take action
even invented. Hence, Sloman and Fernbach’s conclusion,
that benefited them in the short run and the long run’ (p.
‘no individual could do this alone’ (p. 110).
49). For us humans, collective sharing and communicating
They also argue that ‘group intelligence…is more
remain imperatives. On the other hand, Sloman and
than the sum of its parts’ (p. 111). Think of a car that has
Fernbach argue, ‘imagine that someone – let’s say your
thousands of parts.What makes it running is not the sheer
spouse – refuses to talk to you. Now you have a problem’
number of parts but the working together, translating
(p. 57). Why? Some might see this as a blessing! But on
numerous parts into a driving machine. Unlike a car, unlike
a serious note, non-communication is a very serious
animals, and unlike a computer, we ‘share intentionality’
problem, in relationships, in work, and even in politics.
as we share intentions to hunt, our intentions to share a
In the non-talking spouse case, we reason backward, we
hunting bounty, and even our intentions to mate (as we
‘diagnose’ (p. 58) – why did the communication breakdown.
saw above). In all that, Sloman and Fernbach follow Lev
But we also reason forward when, for example, we examine
Vygotsky who argued ‘that it is not individual brainpower
‘causes [that] produce effects’ (p. 58). We assess future
that distinguishes human beings. It is that humans can
effects even though some people have a very limited
learn through other people and culture and that people
ability to do so. In some cases, these are the ones who fail
collaborate: they engage with others in collective
to think in hypotheticals and are incapable of ‘running little
activities’ (p. 115f.).
mental simulations’ (p. 59) assessing effects, impacts and
This even – perhaps especially – also applies to many
even alternatives. Still, ‘people ignore alternative causes
of the aforementioned intellectuals like Hawking, Chomsky,
when reasoning from cause to effect because their mental
etc. One might, for example, receive a Nobel Prize in 2013
simulations have no room for them’ (p. 61). This might
for finding the “Higgs bosom in 2012 [but as a matter of
just be one of the more devastating critiques on what
fact] nearly 3,000 people are authors on the key physics
became known as rational choice theories and the prisoner
papers that led up to the discovery, not to mention all
dilemma which force you to think A or B.
the workers who built and ran the $6.4 billion CERN
On the other hand, what many do is thinking ‘in
supercollider in which the observations of the Higgs
intuitions versus deliberations’ (p. 76) and ‘between
bosom were made’ (p. 119). Intelligence and intellectual
passion and reason’ (p. 78). Interestingly, Sloman and
achievement are not individual but collective. Similarly, the
Fernbach note that ‘more reflective people are more likely
machine-human interface is not individual but collective.
than less reflective people to prefer dark chocolate to
Despite very serious advances in machines, computers, and
milk chocolate. They are also less likely to believe in God’
even artificial intelligence (AI), these machines and even AI
(p. 83). Surprisingly, I only eat organic dark chocolate with
hardly ever communicate on a scale that resembles human-
above 90 per cent cacao and I stopped believing in God
to-human communication. Hence, Sloman and Fernbach
perhaps sometimes around grade three or four. Bingo!
note,‘we don’t collaborate with machines just as we don’t
On the downside, I also do (like many) ‘draw conclusions
collaborate with sheep; we use them’ (p. 140).
about the world based on small glimpses’ (p. 94) as one
In their chapter “thinking about politics”, the
can never know everything – even after trying for years.
key message of the “Knowledge Illusion” –we think
The sheer volume of knowledge in each field is virtually
(individually) that we know more than we actually
unknowable. Hence, it is relatively useless to ‘think of the
do– is explained in the realm of politics. Here, Sloman
mind as an information processor that spends its time
and Fernbach note that ‘Americans who most strongly
doing abstract computation in the brain’ (p. 105). In other
supported military intervention in the Ukraine in 2014
68
What we all know Reviewed by Thomas Klikauer
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
were the ones least able to identify the Ukraine’s location
report being confident they could come up with $2,000 in
on a map’ (p. 172). Similarly disturbing is that ’80 per cent
thirty days’ (p. 240) – never mind college fees. Increasingly,
[supported] mandatory food labelling [that says] BEWARE:
attending college is a question of money – lots of money –
HAS DNA [even though] most foods have DNA’ (p. 172).
that many do not have. Strangely but true, ‘money gets its
These are people who vote. Some even put Presidents
value from the communal belief that it has value; its worth
into the White House. This may lead to the question:
depends on a social contract’ (p. 245). In short, money has
did ‘Winston Churchill [really go] too far when he said,
a great exchange-value but virtually no use-value – we can
“the best argument against democracy is a five-minute
exchange it for many things (e.g. a university degree) but
conversation with the average voter” (p. 191)? On the
we can hardly use it for heating a room, for example.
other hand, Churchill’s statement might speak less against
Sloman and Fernbach conclude by saying, ‘this book
democracy – perhaps it says more about the manipulating
has three central themes: ignorance, the illusion of
influence of corporate mass media.
understanding, and the community of knowledge’ (p.
Given all this, the authors nonetheless avoid getting
256). What alarms the authors is ‘not the amount of
deeper into manipulated perceptions of people and voters.
human ignorance, but that ignorant people don’t know
Still, both argue that intelligence is merely a ‘measure of
how ignorant they are’ (p. 257). The authors close with
a person’s intellectual horsepower [that instead should
a sentence that might be useful for many – ‘we find
be seen as] how much an individual contributes to the
out that what’s going on is more complicated than we
community’ (p. 206). An individual’s contribution to a
thought’ (p. 264). This ends a most exiting book on
community may even extend to the ‘ability to understand
knowledge (the things we know), the knowledge illusion
the perspectives of others’ (p. 207). Understanding others
(we underestimate what we do not know), and the
remains vital for human society and it also remains essential
community of knowledge (we, as a collective of people
that knowledge is seen as a collective issue. Not surprisingly,
create knowledge together).
Sloman and Fernbach argue that ‘to run a company, you
On the downside, however, the book pretends that
need some people who are cautious and others who are
capitalism does not exist and all this has nothing to do
risk takers, some who are good with numbers and others
with it even though many suspect that large chunks of
who are good with people’ (p. 208).
“the things we know” are created – at least at universities –
Even for venture capitalists, it is the ‘back team [that
through external research grants that either directly serve
counts and] not ideas’ (p. 211). Mark Zuckerberg and
capitalism or indirectly produce knowledge that hardly
Steve Jobs are often framed as corporate heroes. ‘But
ever challenges the global pathologies of capitalism. As a
that’s not how it works’ (p. 211) as they depend on a huge
consequence, “we underestimate what we do not know”
collective usually called a team, a company, or corporation.
about capitalism. While the authors are right on the
Consequently, Sloman and Fernbach write, ‘we live in a
mark that individual knowledge is basically common and
community of knowledge…intelligence is not a property
collective knowledge – the community of knowledge –
of an individual: it’s a property of a team’ (p. 212). From
the relentless ideological apparatus of capitalism seeks to
all this one might see why working in teams remains
make us believe that knowledge only exists as individual
important and why it is conducted at companies, schools,
knowledge. Including what shapes the things we know,
and universities where many students reject online degrees
the things we don’t know, and our misleading perceptions
in favour of active class rooms, e.g. team teaching (Klikauer
on individual knowledge would have undoubtedly
2016). It is conceivable that online teaching might facilitate
enriched the book.
the problem that ‘many students confuse studying with light reading’ (p.218). A university degree is distinctly
Thomas Klikauer teaches stuff in the Sydney Graduate School
different from an online course for a drivers’ license.
of Management, Western Sydney University.
At university as at the workplace, we really do engage in ‘communities of learning’ (p. 228).That is something online teaching – if it is teaching at all – can hardly deliver. Online degrees might be more a marketing and cash-creation issue for the neoliberal “PR-university” (Cronin 2016:399). Unfortunately, Sloman and Fernbach often stop short of discussing the economic drivers behind all this even though they are aware that ‘only a quarter of US households vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
References Cronin, A. M. 2016. Reputational capital in ‘the PR University’: public relations and market rationalities, Journal of Cultural Economy, 9(4): 396-409. Klikauer, T. 2016. Selling Students Short: Why you won’t get the university education you deserve, Management Learning, 47(5):629-633. Nowak, M. & Highfield, R. 2011. Supercooperators: Altruism, evolution, and why we need each other to succeed, New York: Simon and Schuster. What we all know Reviewed by Thomas Klikauer
69
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
Uni-que? UNSW: Australia’s global university by Mick Le Moignan ISBN 981-7-4223-519-6, Sydney, Australia, NewSouth Publishing, 304 pp., 2017. Reviewed by Neil Mudford This book deals primarily with the University of New
the schemes but not mentioned in any detail in the book.
South Wales’ (UNSW) long-running programs providing
One is the goodwill towards Australia generated in our
higher education to students from overseas in Australia
region. The other is the benefit to the Australian people
and, more recently, at campuses in their home countries.
and their culture by getting to know people from the
It is clear that students who have gone through these
region and their cultures.
programs have had life-changing experiences that have
It occurs to me now as I write this that I first encountered
equipped and inspired them in their working and wider
Asian people in any numbers in 1967 as a Form 6 student
lives after graduation. This is especially so for those living
at Coburg High School. A dozen of my fellow students and
in the Australian community during their studies.
I moved that year from our outer suburban high school in
Also readily apparent is the fact that UNSW staff and
western Reservoir, then on the very edge of Melbourne,
students have helped the foreign students to cope with
to Coburg High in order to continue studying science.
and ultimately to be enriched by living and studying here
An abiding memory is that, as we left class to take the
and experiencing a culture markedly different to their
break in the schoolyard, the Asian students would put a
own. Over the decades since the programs’ beginnings in
friendly arm over your shoulder! That was culture shock
the original Columbo Plan, staff have put a great deal of
mid-1960s style for this northern suburbs Anglo-Australian
thought and effort into helping the students settle in and
teenager. I got used to it pretty quickly and found the
thrive. The staff took great pains to understand and look
whole experience of cultural differences exhilarating.
after the new arrivals’ many needs. This must have been
Many of the friends I made that year went on to university
quite challenging in the early years, when foreign students
in Melbourne and I realise now that they were probably
were a rarity and the challenges they faced would not
here on the Colombo Plan scheme.
have been widely appreciated. Starting university is a big
Clearly, all these good works are thoroughly deserving
enough shock to local students. See for example Dews
of praise. The story of the lives and experiences of all
and Law’s This Fine Place So Far from Home (1995) for
concerned are very interesting and well worth the telling.
discussion of the culture shock experienced by working
Unfortunately, this book tells the stories in such an
class people immersed in the middle-class university
appalling way that a great topic and theme are spoiled.
culture. Coming from other countries without family or
Someone should have put a stiff editorial broom through
friends must have been daunting for many young people,
this book early on. NewSouth Publishing won the
especially in the days when information on other cultures
Australian Book Industry Awards Small Publisher of the
was harder to come by than it is now.
Year in 2017 but I cannot imagine that UNSW: Australia’s
The UNSW staff learned as quickly as they could about
global university was a positive contributing factor.
the challenges faced by the students and did all they
The book is flawed in quite a number of ways. It is hard
could to help and support them. On top of tending to
to know where to start in summarising what is wrong
the obvious needs for advice, accommodation, food and
with it. We could start with the title which seems to have
so on, they also showed them sympathy and affection
become the university’s latest advertising slogan. Cringe-
which is probably what they most needed as they found
making in itself, the phrase is doubly embarrassing for
their feet in a new country. The many friendships that
its implications, plainly nonsense, that other Australian
developed between the visiting students and their
universities are not outward looking or not engaged
hosts referred to throughout the book are a tribute to
internationally or have few foreign students enrolled. I
the warm welcome and care provided by the people of
don’t know whether the slogan originated with this book’s
UNSW. There are two other great benefits generated by
title and was then taken up as a new UNSW marketing
70
Uni-que? Reviewed by Neil Mudford
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
catch cry or whether some bright spark dreamed up the
tone in speaking of these teams, the members are adept
slogan and which was then slapped onto the book.Which
and focused and fiercely loyal to the leader.The combined
it is hardly matters, I suppose.
team works in close-knit fashion to flawlessly implement
A key flaw is that, with few exceptions, the main UNSW
the champion’s vision. Here and there in the book, some
staff actors in the tale are members of upper management.
teams are rewarded by appearing in a photograph with
That is a rather narrow focus but worse still is the
their champion.
sycophantic treatment of their roles in the overseas student programs and their wider roles in the university.
The approach and attitude smacks of the tales in Ayn Rand’s The Fountainhead (Rand (1996)) and
Throughout the book, praise is lavished on their
Atlas Shrugged (Rand (1999)) in which Rand attributes
foresight, wisdom in decision-making, strategic thinking
creativity and productivity to captains of industry and
and magnanimous gestures. The hyperbole of this praise
decries essentially the rest of humanity as ungrateful
is, quite frankly, sickening. It is so unrelenting that it loses
‘hangers on’ who benefit from the efforts of this upper
its credibility and slides into comedy or something close
crust but simultaneously try to drag the great men down.
to it. Consequently, I feel embarrassed on behalf of the
I read both of these works in my youth at the insistence
many people who appear in the book who genuinely
of a friend who enthused about them and wouldn’t
helped the students at UNSW and put admirable effort
countenance me criticising them without having read
into doing so. Rather than damning with faint praise, the
them. I had to fight the gag reflex all the way from cover
book over-eggs the pudding with extreme praise.
to cover.
I wonder how many of the book’s characters saw any
Brief biographies and interviews of graduates from
draft copies before publication and whether they had a
the early years of the overseas student programs are
chance to intervene in setting the tenor of the work. Now
presented in Part Three of the book. All the characters
that it is out, are they wincing at how they are described?
appearing there returned to their countries of origin and
If so then how embarrassing for them and a poor reward
all achieved great success in their careers. The author
for sterling service; if not then Australia’s global university
makes sure that no one is in any doubt that the graduates’
sports an interplanetary upper echelon. The UNSW
studies and broader UNSW experiences are solidly linked
Chancellor, David Gonski, has given the book a glowing
to their successes.
endorsement in the Foreword so he, at least, must have been familiar with the contents.
For my taste, I would have been interested to hear of at least one or two graduates in this cohort who did
Another problem for me with the book’s approach is
not go on to be wealthy property developers, university
that the underlying model for leadership and the engine
chancellors or national government ministers and the
for creative and effective action expounded in the book
like, and to find out how the UNSW experience affected
is that of a few great leaders or champions, as ex-Vice-
their lives.
Chancellor Mark Wainwright calls them (p. 59).
Finally, in Part Four, the book drifts away from the
The university’s achievements are portrayed as
Columbo Plan theme and presents some of the exciting
flowing from each champion’s vision and drive. Under
research being done right now at UNSW. This section
this model, PhD students and postdoctoral fellows, the
is presented in the same mood of extreme upbeat
academics who teach and research at the coalface, and
adulation that permeates the rest of the work.The section
the professional staff who deal with student matters,
culminates in Chapter 42 which trumpets the attributes
manufacture research equipment and other items in the
and plans for the future of the current Vice-Chancellor and
workshops seem to have no creative input to the research
President Ian Jacobs. Just as with the people who worked
discoveries, the teaching or other developments that
with the Colombo Plan implementation, the people and
build UNSW’s reputation and contribute to the broader
their research are exciting and most worthwhile, but
society. Certainly no detail of their contributions is
the author’s narrative style drowns them in an adulatory
described unless the person concerned has since risen to
sugar-coating.
management’s upper levels or leads a large research team.
As well as its failings as a piece of writing, the question
Exceptions to the invisibility of ‘ordinary’ staff are the
that keeps nagging at me is why the book was written
members of the small, dedicated team that each key leader
in the first place? When I first encountered it and began
or champion has about him. And it is almost always ‘him’
reading, I thought that it was simply an over-the-top
the two female champions being Jenny Lang, to whom the
advertising effort designed to impress overseas student
book is dedicated, and Betty Chow. Judging by the book’s
‘customers’ and their parents.This seemed to not quite fit
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
Uni-que? Reviewed by Neil Mudford
71
A
U
S
T
R
A
L
I
A
N
U
N
I
V
E
R
S
I
T
I
E
S
’
R
E
V
I
E
W
enough of the facts. For example, who would pay $60 for
of Oz (Ian Channell) is mentioned (p. 28). I remember
such a weighty volume and wade through the mountains
him performing at La Trobe University. We thought he
of detail to be impressed by UNSW overseas student
was hilarious and would rush down to wherever he was
programs and sign up?
performing when word passed around that he was on
In the Preface (p xiii), the author states that people are
campus. He was a bit of light relief and we thought that
tending to refer to this work as a history, but he apologises
he made a positive contribution to the student rebellion
(not nearly sufficiently in my view, of course) and counters
and the anti-war movement by lightening it up with his
this view by stating that it is ‘nothing so comprehensive’. I
frivolity. Consequently, I am a bit shocked to find that the
agree. A properly constructed history would incorporate
UNSW Administration funded him, out of the university
a critical element and I fail to see any such thing here.The
coffers mind you, to undermine and disrupt the student
book is full of stories lavishing praise on the University’s
political movement by promoting his alternative ‘Fun
upper leadership but no mention is made of human or
Revolution’.They forced a reluctant UNSW Student Union
organisational failings or inadequacies.
to chip in for this as well it seems. UNSW historian Patrick
It is unbecoming of a university to publish a book like
O’Farrell is quoted in the book (p. 28) as saying that
this that masquerades as at least a somewhat reliable tale
Channell succeeded in ‘laughing the serious, doctrinaire
of the development of the organisation. If it were touted
socialists out of contention for student attention’. He
as an advertising blurb, it would still be embarrassing but
might have done so at UNSW, but he cheered us up at La
much less so than its actual form. A university ought to
Trobe and gave us renewed energy to protest against the
champion critical analysis. There is nothing critical about
Vietnam War. If Ian Channell wanted to see humourless
this publication.
political action he should have been present, as I was,
The portrayal of upper management as unfailingly
when the police baton-charged the peaceful and orderly
wise, benevolent and far-sighted is so ubiquitous that that
anti-Vietnam war march in Waterdale Rd., Bundoora, 200
we have to conclude that one purpose of the work is to
metres from the La Trobe campus in September 1970
convince readers that the University’s current leadership
where they bludgeoned the front ranks until they fell to
model is working brilliantly.
the ground, chased those who ran and bludgeoned them
Many of us bemoaned the loss of collegial decisionmaking and governance and its replacement by the command and control model with business-focussed administrators at the helm. The book spans the whole
and then arrested and charged some of the victims (York (1989)). Finally, I suggest that anyone planning to buy the book should ensure they have a coffee table to put it on.
period of UNSW’s existence and therefore contains tales of the earlier times when the collegial governance model
Neil Mudford is an Honorary Senior Lecturer with UNSW, an
operated at least to some extent. The book’s tales of
Adjunct Senior Fellow with the University of Queensland and
leadership and guidance in those times, however, focus
a member of the Australian Universities’ Review editorial
entirely on the Vice-Chancellor and those around him and
board.
other supposedly influential individuals, just as they do for the recent crop of Vice-Chancellors. No mention is made of Council nor Academic Board and certainly not of the Staff Association nor the unions. Consequently, these bodies seem to have played no role in the university’s growth and development and policy direction.Thus there
References Dews, C.L.B. & Law, C.L. (Eds.) (1995). This Fine Place So Far from Home: Voices of Academics from the Working Class. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Temple University Press. ISBN13: 981566392914
has been no creeping coup because the current perfect
Rand, A. (2005) [1943]. The Fountainhead. New York: Plume. ISBN 978-1-10113718-5. OCLC 300033023.
top down governance has always been.
Rand, A. (1999). Atlas Shrugged. New York: Plume. ISBN13: 9780452011878
It seems then that the book serves a number of purposes. It is a self-serving, air-brushed history of UNSW, an advertisement for the university as a destination for
York, B. (1989) Student Revolt. Campbell, ACT, Australia: Nicholas Press ISBN 0 7316 7926 1. Pdf available at https://c21stleft.com/2015/09/05/student-revolt-latrobe-university-1967-to-1973/
overseas students and, as long as it is not examined too closely, it provides a justification for running the university in the modern way - as just another corporation. In spite of all of the above, a few quite informative passages do occur here and there. For instance, the Wizard
72
Uni-que? Reviewed by Neil Mudford
vol. 60, no. 1, 2018
Members can access unlimited discounts on daily expenses, lifestyle, leisure and financial services.
Save all year with your NTEU Member Advantage benefits program.
Terms and Conditions apply.
For more information email info@memberadvantage.com.au or call 1300 853 352
www.memberadvantage.com.au/nteu
Since 1958, the Australian Universities’ Review has been encouraging debate and discussion about issues in higher education and its contribution to Australian public life.
60 1958–2018
Australian Universities’ Review
Want to receive your own copy of Australian Universities’ Review (AUR)? AUR is published by the National Tertiary Education Union (NTEU) twice a year. NTEU members are entitled to a free subscription. However, this subscription is on an opt-in basis, so you need to let us know. If you are an NTEU member and would like to receive your own copy of AUR, send us an email at aur@nteu.org.au. Subscription rates for non-members are available at www.aur.org.au. If you would like to become an NTEU member, contact the local Branch office at your institution, or join online at www.nteu.org.au/join.
www.aur.org.au