Making Space for Democracy May 06 2016

Page 1

MAKING SPACE FOR DEMOCRACY a study of the use of public space by migrant workers in Singapore Nur Atiqa Binte Asri MSc City and Regional Planning May 6, 2016


STATEMENT OF ISSUE

Little India Riot 9 December, 2013 A “mob reaction” to a fatal bus accident involving a Tamil worker


STATEMENT OF ISSUE

“Singapore’s first riot in four decades” - Ministry of Home Affairs Singapore, 2014

Involving hundreds of male South Asian migrant workers


OBJECTIVES OF STUDY

1. Understand public space democracy in the context of Singapore and how it affects migrant workers and locals, respectively;

2. Record and analyze the ways in which migrant workers use public spaces and have adapted to the current state of spatial justice in the city; and

3. Identify planning tools and policies that will enhance public spaces for use by locals and migrant workers


WHO ARE MIGRANT WORKERS?

Work Permit Holders • Male • Construction, manufacturing, marine, process, or service sectors • Age: 18-58 • Max. period of employment: 10-22 years • One rest day without pay for every 7-day period (incl. Sunday and public holidays)


WHO ARE MIGRANT WORKERS?

Work Permit Holders • Female • Only perform household and domestic duties and reside at the employer’s residential address • Age: 23-50 • One rest day without pay for every 7-day period (incl. Sunday and public holidays)


MIGRANT WORKERS’ PRIVATE SPACE

Employers provide workers with lowest cost ‘acceptable housing’ that is structurally safe, fire- and safetyproof, and that meet environmental health and sanitary standards • Purpose-built dormitories • Temporary housing quarters made from large shipping containers


MIGRANT WORKERS’ PRIVATE SPACE On average, 12 men are housed in dormitory rooms measuring no more than 25 sq meters, below the internationallyrecognized 20< square meters floor area per person minimum standards for developed countries

(UN Population Division, n.d.)


MIGRANT WORKERS’ PRIVATE SPACE In 2015, the Ministry of Manpower said it performed more than 2,600 housing inspections and took enforcement action against more than 2,100 employers who were warned ... or charged in court


LIFE + REGULATIONS IN PUBLIC SPACE

Public Order Act

• Regulation of causerelated activities via permits, regardless of the number of persons involved or the format they are conducted in

Liquor Control Bill

• Controls supply and consumption of liquor in public place • Designation of strictly-regulated ‘liquor control zones’


PUBLIC SPACE “a part of a place that the occupier of the place allows members of the public to enter...”

- Singapore Statutes Online 2012

“any place to which .. the public have access as of right or by virtue of express or implied permission ... ” - Singapore Statutes Online 2012

“public space.. is produced through constant struggles in the past and present… it is by struggling over and within space that the natures of ‘the public’ and of democracy are defined”


DEMOCRACY IN PUBLIC SPACES Places that encourage convergence - Mitchell, 1995; Low and Smith, 2006

Places that cultivate tolerance - Carr, 1993

Places that allow critical debate and increase mutual acceptance - Habermas; Carr et al, 1993


DEMOCRATIC PUBLIC SPACE Tier 1: Encourages Convergence

THE CHECKLIST

CRITERION A - Allows for unmediated interaction CRITERION B - Lacks coercion CRITERION C - Allows for discourse to check powers

Tier 2: Cultivates Tolerance CRITERION D - Engages a wide variety of cultural practices CRITERION E - Creates opportunities for social communion and shared experiences CRITERION F - Cultivates forbearance

Tier 3: Increase Disposition CRITERION G - Allows for insurgence CRITERION H - Allows for critical debate to seek consensus and mutual enjoyment


DEMOCRATIC PUBLIC SPACE Tier 1: Encourages Convergence

CHECKLIST INDICATORS

CRITERION A - Comfort and safety level, group size, mix of activities CRITERION B - Presence of police, comfort and safety level CRITERION C - Presence of police, surveillance cameras, statutory laws

Tier 2: Cultivates Tolerance CRITERION D - Country of origin, ethnicity, culture-specific activity CRITERION E - Country of origin, ethnicity, activity: talking, eating, length of stay in Singapore CRITERION F - Country of origin, education level, gender, age

Tier 3: Increase Disposition CRITERION G - Outlier activities, ownership CRITERION H - Activity: talking, group size <1, education level, ownership


RESEARCH QUESTION

How are public spaces in Singapore democratic?


METHODOLOGY Social Observation Matrix

• 30-minute sessions

+

Intercept Survey

• Sample size: 70

+

Informal Discussion

• Groups of no more than 5


DUNLOP STREET

• • • • •

Located within liquor control zone, one street away from riot site 2 surveillance cameras Police signs not translated to Bengali or Hindi High levels of reported comfort and safety 50% recurrent visitors - at least “every few months”


DUNLOP STREET Social Observation Matrix

• • • • •

+

Intercept Survey

+

Informal Discussion

90% Male 85.6% Indian or Bangladeshi Average group size: 2.02 Average age: 29 Mode activities: Walking, cycling, talking, meeting friends, shopping for groceries


DUNLOP STREET

82% felt like they owned the space

14%

4%

Singaporeans who felt like they did “not really”own the space


DUNLOP STREET Tier 1: Encourages Convergence CRITERION A - Allows for unmediated interaction CRITERION B - Lacks coercion CRITERION C - Allows for discourse to check powers

Tier 2: Cultivates Tolerance CRITERION D - Engages a wide variety of cultural practices CRITERION E - Creates opportunities for social communion and shared experiences CRITERION F - Cultivates forbearance

Tier 3: Increase Disposition CRITERION G - Allows for insurgence CRITERION H - Allows for critical debate to seek consensus and mutual enjoyment


TANJONG KATONG COMPLEX

• • • • •

Located outside liquor control zone 2 surveillance cameras Police signs not translated to Bahasa 84.3% of respondents reported feeling comfortable and safe Domestic workers reportedly spend alot of time sharing their work experiences


TANJONG KATONG COMPLEX Social Observation Matrix

• • • • •

+

Intercept Survey

+

Informal Discussion

100% Female 74.3% Indonesian Mode group size: 2 - group sizes as big as 12 Average age: 31 Standing and sitting in the shade, meeting friends, talking, and engaged in other optional and social activities • Outlier activities: illegal vending of traditional Indonesian food and sale of calling cards


TANJONG KATONG COMPLEX Tier 1: Encourages Convergence CRITERION A - Allows for unmediated interaction CRITERION B - Lacks coercion CRITERION C - Allows for discourse to check powers

Tier 2: Cultivates Tolerance CRITERION D - Engages a wide variety of cultural practices CRITERION E - Creates opportunities for social communion and shared experiences CRITERION F - Cultivates forbearance

Tier 3: Increase Disposition CRITERION G - Allows for insurgence CRITERION H - Allows for critical debate to seek consensus and mutual enjoyment


TANJONG KATONG COMPLEX Tier 1: Encourages Convergence CRITERION A - Allows for unmediated interaction CRITERION B - Lacks coercion CRITERION C - Allows for discourse to check powers

Tier 2: Cultivates Tolerance CRITERION D - Engages a wide variety of cultural practices CRITERION E - Creates opportunities for social communion and shared experiences CRITERION F - Cultivates forbearance

Tier 3: Increase Disposition CRITERION G - Allows for insurgence CRITERION H - Allows for critical debate to seek consensus and mutual enjoyment


So are public spaces in Singapore democratic?


So are public spaces in Singapore democratic? • Good mix of activities • High levels of safety and comfort • Big groups interacting • Absence of coercion

• Limited discourse to check powers • Limited opportunity to critically debate • Lack of diversity in users to engae a wide variety of cultural practices


THE CASE OF HONG KONG

“Little Manila” Central District, HK A privately-owned public plaza, occupied on Sundays by Filipino domestic workers


THE CASE OF HONG KONG

Hong Kong’s Neutral Position • Acknowledge the presence of Filipino domestic workers • Increase security • Increase sanitation • Allow insurgent activities and selfexpression in public space


HONG KONG PUBLIC SPACE Tier 1: Encourages Convergence CRITERION A - Allows for unmediated interaction CRITERION B - Lacks coercion CRITERION C - Allows for discourse to check powers

Tier 2: Cultivates Tolerance CRITERION D - Engages a wide variety of cultural practices CRITERION E - Creates opportunities for social communion and shared experiences CRITERION F - Cultivates forbearance

Tier 3: Increase Disposition CRITERION G - Allows for insurgence CRITERION H - Allows for critical debate to seek consensus and mutual enjoyment


RECOMMENDATIONS FOR A DEMOCRATIC PUBLIC SPACE 1. Create a citywide plan for social and intercultural coexistence in public spaces Promote intercultural knowledge between migrant worker populations and Singaporeans by allowing them to use public spaces to celebrate traditional cultural events and host intercultural public meetings


RECOMMENDATIONS FOR A DEMOCRATIC PUBLIC SPACE Key Actors:

• Ministry of Manpower • Grassroots migrant organizations • Local community development councils


RECOMMENDATIONS FOR A DEMOCRATIC PUBLIC SPACE 1a. Public art programs jointly produced by grassroots migrant organizations Raise awareness around housing and employment issues facing migrant workers, while imparting arts and cultural skills to migrant workers


RECOMMENDATIONS FOR A DEMOCRATIC PUBLIC SPACE Key Actors:

• Urban Redevelopment Authority (Place Management Department) • Grassroots migrant organizations • Community-based arts organizations • National Arts Council


RECOMMENDATIONS FOR A DEMOCRATIC PUBLIC SPACE 2. Mandate multilingual public planing meetings, design charrettes etc. in public spaces frequented by migrant workers Increases participation by and effectiveness of public meetings and workshops for locals and migrant workers • Languages should also include Hindi, Tagalog, and Bahasa.


Democratizing the planning process is essential to creating democratic public spaces. Prof. Jeff Hou Professor and Chair, Landscape Architecture University of Washington


MAKING SPACE FOR DEMOCRACY a study of the use of public space by migrant workers in Singapore Nur Atiqa Binte Asri MSc City and Regional Planning May 6, 2016


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.