YEAR 1 LEVEL 2 COMPILATION OF SAMPLES
2018/2019 B.A. (ARCH) 1
SCALE PRECEDENT CONTEXT
IMAGE CREDIT: ZHANG CHUWEI
2018/2019 B.A. (ARCH) 1
LEVEL 2: Scale, Precedent, Context
Studio Leader:
The Year One Semester Two Studio begins with analyses of precedent studies through drawing exercises and culminates in students’ individual design explorations to demonstrate competence in a number of foundational modes of architectural thinking and making, particularly form geometry and composition, tectonic expression, and movement and space in relation to scale, materials, and contexts.
Faculty: Semester 2
Imran bin Tajudeen
Assistant Professor, PhD (Architecture) (NUS)
Stacy Cheang M.Arch (NUS)
Diong Fuhan B.Arch (NUS), M.Arch (NUS), Reg Arch Singapore
Kenneth Koh Qibao
There are three studio exercises that explore the measure of man and the modularity of materials as design generators at different scales. Project 1, the analysis of precedent houses, serves as an introduction to the translation of architectural ideas and materials into spatial, formal-compositional and tectonic expression.
B.Arch (NUS), M. Arch (NUS), Reg Arch Singapore
Gyn Kong
BA.Arch (NUS), M. Arch (NUS)
Lee May Anne
B.Arch (Hons) (NUS), BA.Arch Studies (NUS), MSIA, Reg Arch Singapore
Project 2, the design of a cabin for individual occupation, connects anthropometry with furniture,
Lim Pin Jie
of materials and their modular units, dimensions, and methods for making and constructing. Project
Ng San Son
B.Arch (1st Class Hon) (NUS), M. Arch (NUS), Reg Arch Singapore
M. Arch (NUS), BA.Arch Studies (NUS), Reg Arch Singapore
for a studio-mate, where the student also acts as an apprentice to a chosen architect, introduces the physical contexts of a site, the programmatic and social considerations of a client, and the genealogical and analytical dimensions of form language, space, and tectonic articulation. Emphasis is placed on graphic communication and the use of drawings to illustrate design.
Tsuto Sakamoto
Senior Lecturer, B. Eng.(1989) Science University of Tokyo (Tokyo, Japan), M. Eng. (1991), Waseda University (Tokyo, Japan), M. Sci. (1992) Columbia University Graduate School of Architectural Planning (New York, U.S.A.)
Tan Peck Leong, Jackson B.Arch (NUS), Dip.Arch (UCL), Arb UK
Teh Kem Jin
Adjunct Associate Professor, MSC, BSC (Hons), MIFireE, Reg Arch Singapore
Imran bin Tajudeen
Level 2 Studio Leader
Woon Chung Yen
M.Arch (NUS), MSIA, Reg Arch Singapore and New York State
Image credit: Aditya Rosli Yr1 AY1314
22
14
2018/2019 B.A. (ARCH) 1
LEVEL 2: Scale, Precedent, Context
Studio Leader:
The Year One Semester Two Studio begins with analyses of precedent studies through drawing exercises and culminates in students’ individual design explorations to demonstrate competence in a number of foundational modes of architectural thinking and making, particularly form geometry and composition, tectonic expression, and movement and space in relation to scale, materials, and contexts.
Faculty: Semester 2
Imran bin Tajudeen
Assistant Professor, PhD (Architecture) (NUS)
Stacy Cheang M.Arch (NUS)
Diong Fuhan B.Arch (NUS), M.Arch (NUS), Reg Arch Singapore
Kenneth Koh Qibao
There are three studio exercises that explore the measure of man and the modularity of materials as design generators at different scales. Project 1, the analysis of precedent houses, serves as an introduction to the translation of architectural ideas and materials into spatial, formal-compositional and tectonic expression.
B.Arch (NUS), M. Arch (NUS), Reg Arch Singapore
Gyn Kong
BA.Arch (NUS), M. Arch (NUS)
Lee May Anne
B.Arch (Hons) (NUS), BA.Arch Studies (NUS), MSIA, Reg Arch Singapore
Project 2, the design of a cabin for individual occupation, connects anthropometry with furniture,
Lim Pin Jie
of materials and their modular units, dimensions, and methods for making and constructing. Project
Ng San Son
B.Arch (1st Class Hon) (NUS), M. Arch (NUS), Reg Arch Singapore
M. Arch (NUS), BA.Arch Studies (NUS), Reg Arch Singapore
for a studio-mate, where the student also acts as an apprentice to a chosen architect, introduces the physical contexts of a site, the programmatic and social considerations of a client, and the genealogical and analytical dimensions of form language, space, and tectonic articulation. Emphasis is placed on graphic communication and the use of drawings to illustrate design.
Tsuto Sakamoto
Senior Lecturer, B. Eng.(1989) Science University of Tokyo (Tokyo, Japan), M. Eng. (1991), Waseda University (Tokyo, Japan), M. Sci. (1992) Columbia University Graduate School of Architectural Planning (New York, U.S.A.)
Tan Peck Leong, Jackson B.Arch (NUS), Dip.Arch (UCL), Arb UK
Teh Kem Jin
Adjunct Associate Professor, MSC, BSC (Hons), MIFireE, Reg Arch Singapore
Imran bin Tajudeen
Level 2 Studio Leader
Woon Chung Yen
M.Arch (NUS), MSIA, Reg Arch Singapore and New York State
Image credit: Aditya Rosli Yr1 AY1314
22
14
PROJECT 01 ARCHITECTURAL LITERACY FORM LANGUAGE AND TECTONIC ARTICULATION; MOVEMENT AND SPACE
PROJECT 02 DESIGN OF A MICRO-CAPSULE FOR INDIVIDUAL OCCUPATION
Analysis of Precedent House Project 01 focuses on the study of precedent houses, using drawings and models, as an introduction to precedent analyses through exercises on form/language, tectonics/materials, space/light, and scale.
Anthropometry: furniture and fittings; micro-space use Materials: modular units and dimensions; making and constructing
The aim of this exercise is to understand how architectural ideas and materials are translated into spatial, formal-compositional and tectonic articulation by different architects. You will select a house for study from the following list: 1. Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, Villa Tugendhat (1930) 2. Adolf Loos, Villa Muller (1930) 3. Le Corbusier, Villa Savoye (1931) 4. Mies van der Rose, Hubbe House (1934-5) 5. Frank Lloyd Wright, Falling Water (1935) 6. Louis Kahn, Adler House (1954) 7. Kiyonori Kikutake, Sky House (1958) 8. Paul Rudolph, Milam Residence (1960) 9. Richard Neutra, VDL II (1965) 10. Louis I. Kahn, Fisher House (1967) 11. Charles Correa, Parekh House (1967) 12. Geoffrey Bawa, 33rd Lane House (1960-70) 13. Mario Botta, Bianchi House (1972-73) 14. John Hejduk, Wall House ([1973] 2001) 15. Balkrishna Doshi, Doshi (Sangath) House (1981) 16. Rem Koolhaas, Villa DallAva (1991) 17. Kazuyo Sejima & Ryue Nishizasa (SANAA), Moriyama House (2005)
Project 02 focuses on developing and demonstrating the following skills in the design of a micro-capsule for your individual occupation: - micro-spatial composition (anthropometry), - formal composition (dexterity with modules and dimensions), and - tectonic articulation (materials, construction) You may assume a persona that allows you to articulate the following in connection with a site/ situation of your choosing:
Prospect and Refuge
Your retreat in nature is not a residence but a place to escape the routine of your life. Its prospect is an expression of your outlook: it provides a view of your surroundings that calms or excites you, assures or motivates you, according to your inclination. Yet it is also a place of refuge, your inner sanctuary. This duality drives your design.
Occupation and Leisure
When you occupy your retreat, leisure is your preoccupation. You design this haven of happy pursuits to allow for variety of repose and activity. This is where you while away the hours and feel self-sufficient, and yet at a moment’s notice can abandon it to rejoin the world. Program: flexible, according to your site/situation and the persona defined Size: 9sqm, max ht 6m. Site A: Clementi Woods, west- and southwest-facing slopes Site B: MacRitchie Reservoir waterfront
PROJECT 01 ARCHITECTURAL LITERACY FORM LANGUAGE AND TECTONIC ARTICULATION; MOVEMENT AND SPACE
PROJECT 02 DESIGN OF A MICRO-CAPSULE FOR INDIVIDUAL OCCUPATION
Analysis of Precedent House Project 01 focuses on the study of precedent houses, using drawings and models, as an introduction to precedent analyses through exercises on form/language, tectonics/materials, space/light, and scale.
Anthropometry: furniture and fittings; micro-space use Materials: modular units and dimensions; making and constructing
The aim of this exercise is to understand how architectural ideas and materials are translated into spatial, formal-compositional and tectonic articulation by different architects. You will select a house for study from the following list: 1. Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, Villa Tugendhat (1930) 2. Adolf Loos, Villa Muller (1930) 3. Le Corbusier, Villa Savoye (1931) 4. Mies van der Rose, Hubbe House (1934-5) 5. Frank Lloyd Wright, Falling Water (1935) 6. Louis Kahn, Adler House (1954) 7. Kiyonori Kikutake, Sky House (1958) 8. Paul Rudolph, Milam Residence (1960) 9. Richard Neutra, VDL II (1965) 10. Louis I. Kahn, Fisher House (1967) 11. Charles Correa, Parekh House (1967) 12. Geoffrey Bawa, 33rd Lane House (1960-70) 13. Mario Botta, Bianchi House (1972-73) 14. John Hejduk, Wall House ([1973] 2001) 15. Balkrishna Doshi, Doshi (Sangath) House (1981) 16. Rem Koolhaas, Villa DallAva (1991) 17. Kazuyo Sejima & Ryue Nishizasa (SANAA), Moriyama House (2005)
Project 02 focuses on developing and demonstrating the following skills in the design of a micro-capsule for your individual occupation: - micro-spatial composition (anthropometry), - formal composition (dexterity with modules and dimensions), and - tectonic articulation (materials, construction) You may assume a persona that allows you to articulate the following in connection with a site/ situation of your choosing:
Prospect and Refuge
Your retreat in nature is not a residence but a place to escape the routine of your life. Its prospect is an expression of your outlook: it provides a view of your surroundings that calms or excites you, assures or motivates you, according to your inclination. Yet it is also a place of refuge, your inner sanctuary. This duality drives your design.
Occupation and Leisure
When you occupy your retreat, leisure is your preoccupation. You design this haven of happy pursuits to allow for variety of repose and activity. This is where you while away the hours and feel self-sufficient, and yet at a moment’s notice can abandon it to rejoin the world. Program: flexible, according to your site/situation and the persona defined Size: 9sqm, max ht 6m. Site A: Clementi Woods, west- and southwest-facing slopes Site B: MacRitchie Reservoir waterfront
PROJECT 03 DESIGN OF A DWELLING FOR A CLIENT AS AN ARCHITECT’S APPRENTICE This exercise expands upon the exploration in P02 on anthropometry and materials, now applied to the design of a dwelling with the following parameters: - Designing for a client (negotiation with “architect”) - Exploration of precedence in design (architect as “apprentice”, need not be from P1) Program: flexible, with the following minimum provision: - sleeping – eating/cooking – the necessary rooms (toilet and bathroom) - one or two activities/spaces as the dwelling’s special feature - ground floor commercial program (option) Design: based on an interpretation of a precedent architect, in conjunction with the client’s program requirements. Size: max. 120sqm, max. ht. 9m Site: specified empty plot along Victoria Street at Jalan Kledek Assessment of Project 03 is based upon the following considerations: 1. Designing for a client How have you interpreted your clients’ requirements (uses and needs, the ‘program’) and their vision of their home environment (the mood or ambience, and specified preferences)? 2. Exploration of precedence in design How have you understood and translated your precedent / master architect’s approach and design strategy? 3. Site conditions and urban context in relation to 1 & 2 How have you worked your scheme into the site you are given? Conversely, how have you worked the site into your scheme? You are asked to define which site conditions you have chosen to respond to or consider in your design decisions, and why—for example, what does your site response do for your client, or how does it enhance your translation of your precedence? 4. Architectural literacy Project 03 is also the culmination of the fundamental aspects of architectural literacy and technical competency that you have learnt through the Studio program for the whole semester: anthropometry, considerations on modules and materials/tectonics, and knowledge of drawing conventions and techniques. 5. Conceptual coherence, design sensibility, and rigour in design process.
1. WALL HOUSE 2. YOGIST’S PAVILION 3. THE LIGHT HOUSE ZHANG JINGHAN STUDIO LEE MAY ANNE
PROJECT 03 DESIGN OF A DWELLING FOR A CLIENT AS AN ARCHITECT’S APPRENTICE This exercise expands upon the exploration in P02 on anthropometry and materials, now applied to the design of a dwelling with the following parameters: - Designing for a client (negotiation with “architect”) - Exploration of precedence in design (architect as “apprentice”, need not be from P1) Program: flexible, with the following minimum provision: - sleeping – eating/cooking – the necessary rooms (toilet and bathroom) - one or two activities/spaces as the dwelling’s special feature - ground floor commercial program (option) Design: based on an interpretation of a precedent architect, in conjunction with the client’s program requirements. Size: max. 120sqm, max. ht. 9m Site: specified empty plot along Victoria Street at Jalan Kledek Assessment of Project 03 is based upon the following considerations: 1. Designing for a client How have you interpreted your clients’ requirements (uses and needs, the ‘program’) and their vision of their home environment (the mood or ambience, and specified preferences)? 2. Exploration of precedence in design How have you understood and translated your precedent / master architect’s approach and design strategy? 3. Site conditions and urban context in relation to 1 & 2 How have you worked your scheme into the site you are given? Conversely, how have you worked the site into your scheme? You are asked to define which site conditions you have chosen to respond to or consider in your design decisions, and why—for example, what does your site response do for your client, or how does it enhance your translation of your precedence? 4. Architectural literacy Project 03 is also the culmination of the fundamental aspects of architectural literacy and technical competency that you have learnt through the Studio program for the whole semester: anthropometry, considerations on modules and materials/tectonics, and knowledge of drawing conventions and techniques. 5. Conceptual coherence, design sensibility, and rigour in design process.
1. WALL HOUSE 2. YOGIST’S PAVILION 3. THE LIGHT HOUSE ZHANG JINGHAN STUDIO LEE MAY ANNE
PROJECT I: WALL HOUSE
PAST, PRESENT
Exploration of time in space
AND FUTURE The past appears much longer in space, yet its stay-time is very short. On the other hand, the future appears to be
W
all house was initially a residence designed
Learning objectives: Project 1, the analysis of precedent
by American architect John Hejduk in 1973
houses, serves as an introduction to the translation of ar-
for a fellow faculty member at Copper Union.
chitectural ideas and materials into spatial, formal-com-
According to Hejduk, this house ‘had to do wiht time’,
positional and tectonic expression. Analyses of a house
where onside of the wall represents the past, the other
precedent through drawing and model-making exer-
side of the wall represents the future, and the wall rep-
cises, as an introduction to the key ideas of a selected
resents the present.
architect and their translation into the chosen house
This analysis, therefore, seeks to explore the relationship between ‘past’ and ‘future’ by unfolding the house occu-
short in space, but stay time is much longer than the past.
design (one seminal/historical example from a list to be provided).
pant’s daily routine in terms of distance and time, thus decoding the metaphor of life embedded in Wall House by Hejduk.
This perhaps reflects John Hejduk’s optimistic view of the past and future, in this allegory of life he created. Although the past may be miserable, it will pass quickly. Although the future seems to be unattainable, one would
The spend plenty of time enjoying it.
THE FLEETING PRESENT SPACE/ STAY-TIME ANALYSIS Exploration of time in space
The ‘present’ is reflected in space as a thin wall, which requires minimum time when one walked past it. Its very thinness tells the fleeting nature of the present. The wall appears two dimensional in elevation. It appears either as a thin line or a solid square. Hejduk also intentially uses axonometric diagrams which only shows two sides of the house to emphasize its two SPACE UNFOLDED
dimensional quality.
Tracing a journey in a day
This perhaps reflects John Hejduk’s optimistic view of the past and future, in this allegory of life he created. Although the past may be miserable, it will pass quickly. Although the future seems to be unattainable, one would
Portfolio
spend plenty of time enjoying it.
PROJECT I: WALL HOUSE
PAST, PRESENT
Exploration of time in space
AND FUTURE The past appears much longer in space, yet its stay-time is very short. On the other hand, the future appears to be
W
all house was initially a residence designed
Learning objectives: Project 1, the analysis of precedent
by American architect John Hejduk in 1973
houses, serves as an introduction to the translation of ar-
for a fellow faculty member at Copper Union.
chitectural ideas and materials into spatial, formal-com-
According to Hejduk, this house ‘had to do wiht time’,
positional and tectonic expression. Analyses of a house
where onside of the wall represents the past, the other
precedent through drawing and model-making exer-
side of the wall represents the future, and the wall rep-
cises, as an introduction to the key ideas of a selected
resents the present.
architect and their translation into the chosen house
This analysis, therefore, seeks to explore the relationship between ‘past’ and ‘future’ by unfolding the house occu-
short in space, but stay time is much longer than the past.
design (one seminal/historical example from a list to be provided).
pant’s daily routine in terms of distance and time, thus decoding the metaphor of life embedded in Wall House by Hejduk.
This perhaps reflects John Hejduk’s optimistic view of the past and future, in this allegory of life he created. Although the past may be miserable, it will pass quickly. Although the future seems to be unattainable, one would
The spend plenty of time enjoying it.
THE FLEETING PRESENT SPACE/ STAY-TIME ANALYSIS Exploration of time in space
The ‘present’ is reflected in space as a thin wall, which requires minimum time when one walked past it. Its very thinness tells the fleeting nature of the present. The wall appears two dimensional in elevation. It appears either as a thin line or a solid square. Hejduk also intentially uses axonometric diagrams which only shows two sides of the house to emphasize its two SPACE UNFOLDED
dimensional quality.
Tracing a journey in a day
This perhaps reflects John Hejduk’s optimistic view of the past and future, in this allegory of life he created. Although the past may be miserable, it will pass quickly. Although the future seems to be unattainable, one would
Portfolio
spend plenty of time enjoying it.
PROJECT 2: YOGIST’S PAVILION Translation of movement to spacial experience
T
his project started from a movement which is
Learning objectives: Project 2, the design of a retreat in
later translated into a space through extraction
the form of a small pavilion for individual occupation,
of six key points on human body. Knowledge of
connects anthropometry with furniture, fittings and the
anthropometry is also applied in this project, as each
use of micro-space; and with the use of materials and
movement and extraction of key points is unique to the
their modular units, dimensions, and methods for mak-
person himself. Thus the space crafted allows visitors to
ing and constructing. the design of a retreat in the form
experience exactly what the person had been through in
of a pavilion sited in natural surroundings (9sqm, max ht
performing the movement by manoeuvring variations in
6m) for individual occupation as an introduction to spa-
spatial qualities. In doing so, traditional image of a build-
tial thinking, tectonics, and dimensions/anthropometry.
ing being a box shape can be broken, allowing for more room for creativity and crafting of experience.
MAPPING AND EXTRACTION Anthropometry is used to create an experiential space born out of a movement. The sequence of movement is extracted based on the unfolding movements of six essential pionts in time.
PROJECT 2: YOGIST’S PAVILION Translation of movement to spacial experience
T
his project started from a movement which is
Learning objectives: Project 2, the design of a retreat in
later translated into a space through extraction
the form of a small pavilion for individual occupation,
of six key points on human body. Knowledge of
connects anthropometry with furniture, fittings and the
anthropometry is also applied in this project, as each
use of micro-space; and with the use of materials and
movement and extraction of key points is unique to the
their modular units, dimensions, and methods for mak-
person himself. Thus the space crafted allows visitors to
ing and constructing. the design of a retreat in the form
experience exactly what the person had been through in
of a pavilion sited in natural surroundings (9sqm, max ht
performing the movement by manoeuvring variations in
6m) for individual occupation as an introduction to spa-
spatial qualities. In doing so, traditional image of a build-
tial thinking, tectonics, and dimensions/anthropometry.
ing being a box shape can be broken, allowing for more room for creativity and crafting of experience.
MAPPING AND EXTRACTION Anthropometry is used to create an experiential space born out of a movement. The sequence of movement is extracted based on the unfolding movements of six essential pionts in time.
Y1S2
PROJECT3: THE LIGHT HOUSE From mood images to ambience in space
SECTION
T
his project has its focus on creation of ambience
introduces the physical contexts of a site, the program-
pertinent to the client’s needs. It started with
matic and social considerations of a client, and the ge-
mood images that evoke the same atmospheres
nealogical and analytical dimensions of form language,
and moods as described in client’s brief. These mood im-
space, and tectonic articulation. Emphasis is placed on
ages are then translated through various stategies into
graphic communication and the use of drawings to il-
spacial experience. Functional requirememts and site
lustrate design. The design of a dwelling at a specified
conditions are then integrated to make the house more
urban site (120sqm, max ht 9m) as an apprentice of an
relevant in the context given. Nonetheless, the emphasis
architect with a specified client and design brief as an
is still on the success of translation from mood images to
introduction to the social and cultural dimensions of ar-
atmosphere in the creation of spacial experience.
chitecture, the role of architectural precedents/ contexts
Learning objectives: Project 3, the design of a dwelling at a specified urban site for a specified client, where the student also acts as an apprentice to a chosen architect,
and site conditions, and consequently the operations on form language.
Y1S2
PROJECT3: THE LIGHT HOUSE From mood images to ambience in space
SECTION
T
his project has its focus on creation of ambience
introduces the physical contexts of a site, the program-
pertinent to the client’s needs. It started with
matic and social considerations of a client, and the ge-
mood images that evoke the same atmospheres
nealogical and analytical dimensions of form language,
and moods as described in client’s brief. These mood im-
space, and tectonic articulation. Emphasis is placed on
ages are then translated through various stategies into
graphic communication and the use of drawings to il-
spacial experience. Functional requirememts and site
lustrate design. The design of a dwelling at a specified
conditions are then integrated to make the house more
urban site (120sqm, max ht 9m) as an apprentice of an
relevant in the context given. Nonetheless, the emphasis
architect with a specified client and design brief as an
is still on the success of translation from mood images to
introduction to the social and cultural dimensions of ar-
atmosphere in the creation of spacial experience.
chitecture, the role of architectural precedents/ contexts
Learning objectives: Project 3, the design of a dwelling at a specified urban site for a specified client, where the student also acts as an apprentice to a chosen architect,
and site conditions, and consequently the operations on form language.
1. BIANCHI HOUSE 2. OPEN CAPSULE 3. CANOPY CYNTHIA WEE STUDIO TSUTO SAKAMOTO
1. BIANCHI HOUSE 2. OPEN CAPSULE 3. CANOPY CYNTHIA WEE STUDIO TSUTO SAKAMOTO
MARIO MARIO BOTTA BOTTA BIANCHI HOUSE BIANCHI HOUSE PROJECT 1 PROJECT 1 . .
OPEN CAPSULE
FISHING RETREAT PROJECT 2 .
Analyses of a house precedent. Analyses of a house precedent.
Designing a retreat in nature.
Focus : Architectural Literacy - Form Language and Tectonic Articulation; Movement and Space. Focus : Architectural Literacy - Form Language and Tectonic Articulation; Movement and Space.
Focus : Spatial thinking, tectonics, and dimensions/anthropometry.
OPEN CAPSULE
FISHING RETREAT PROJECT 2 . Designing a retreat in nature. Focus : Spatial thinking, tectonics, and dimensions/anthropometry.
MARIO MARIO BOTTA BOTTA BIANCHI HOUSE BIANCHI HOUSE PROJECT 1 PROJECT 1 . .
OPEN CAPSULE
FISHING RETREAT PROJECT 2 .
Analyses of a house precedent. Analyses of a house precedent.
Designing a retreat in nature.
Focus : Architectural Literacy - Form Language and Tectonic Articulation; Movement and Space. Focus : Architectural Literacy - Form Language and Tectonic Articulation; Movement and Space.
Focus : Spatial thinking, tectonics, and dimensions/anthropometry.
OPEN CAPSULE
FISHING RETREAT PROJECT 2 . Designing a retreat in nature. Focus : Spatial thinking, tectonics, and dimensions/anthropometry.
CANOPY
MAN/NATURE/URBANISM PROJECT 3 . The Architect’s Apprentice: A Dwelling for a Client. Focus : Social and cultural dimensions of architecture, the role of architectural precedents/ contexts and site conditions, and consequently the operations on form language.
CANOPY
MAN/NATURE/URBANISM PROJECT 3 . The Architect’s Apprentice: A Dwelling for a Client. Focus : Social and cultural dimensions of architecture, the role of architectural precedents/ contexts and site conditions, and consequently the operations on form language.
CANOPY
MAN/NATURE/URBANISM PROJECT 3 . The Architect’s Apprentice: A Dwelling for a Client. Focus : Social and cultural dimensions of architecture, the role of architectural precedents/ contexts and site conditions, and consequently the operations on form language.
CANOPY
MAN/NATURE/URBANISM PROJECT 3 . The Architect’s Apprentice: A Dwelling for a Client. Focus : Social and cultural dimensions of architecture, the role of architectural precedents/ contexts and site conditions, and consequently the operations on form language.
1. VILLA TUGENDHAT 2. MAC-RETREAT 3. TREASURE HOUSE IAN KHOO STUDIO STACEY CHEANG
1. VILLA TUGENDHAT 2. MAC-RETREAT 3. TREASURE HOUSE IAN KHOO STUDIO STACEY CHEANG
FIRST STOREY PLAN FIRST STOREY PLAN Scale 1: 200 Scale 1: 200
FIRST STOREY AXONOMETRIC
FIRST STOREY AXONOMETRIC
SECOND STOREY PLAN SECOND STOREY PLAN Scale 1: 200 Scale 1: 200
SECOND STOREY AXONOMETRIC
SECOND STOREY AXO
FIRST STOREY PLAN FIRST STOREY PLAN Scale 1: 200 Scale 1: 200
FIRST STOREY AXONOMETRIC
FIRST STOREY AXONOMETRIC
SECOND STOREY PLAN SECOND STOREY PLAN Scale 1: 200 Scale 1: 200
SECOND STOREY AXONOMETRIC
SECOND STOREY AXO
BRNO OLD TOWN
VILLA LOW BEER
ANTI-CLOCKWISE
WILLOW TREE
WITH SEMICIRCULAR SEATING
SITE PLAN SCALE 1: 1500
SECOND STOREY CIRCULATION SCALE 1: 400
HORIZONTAL LINES SCALE 1: 400
SECOND STOREY SERVANT SPACES SCALE 1: 400
VERTICAL LINES SCALE 1: 400
FIRST STOREY SERVANT SPACES SCALE 1: 400
CLOCKWISE
AXIS AND VIEWS SCALE 1: 400
FIRST STOREY CIRCULATION SCALE 1: 400
FRONT ELEVATION SCALE 1: 200
NODAL POINTS SCALE 1: 400
SECTION SCALE 1: 250
SHADOW AS A DIVIDER SCALE 1: 400
BACK ELEVATION SCALE 1: 200
BRNO OLD TOWN
VILLA LOW BEER
ANTI-CLOCKWISE
WILLOW TREE
WITH SEMICIRCULAR SEATING
SITE PLAN SCALE 1: 1500
SECOND STOREY CIRCULATION SCALE 1: 400
HORIZONTAL LINES SCALE 1: 400
SECOND STOREY SERVANT SPACES SCALE 1: 400
VERTICAL LINES SCALE 1: 400
FIRST STOREY SERVANT SPACES SCALE 1: 400
CLOCKWISE
AXIS AND VIEWS SCALE 1: 400
FIRST STOREY CIRCULATION SCALE 1: 400
FRONT ELEVATION SCALE 1: 200
NODAL POINTS SCALE 1: 400
SECTION SCALE 1: 250
SHADOW AS A DIVIDER SCALE 1: 400
BACK ELEVATION SCALE 1: 200
1000
875
750
Haruki Murakami is a Japanese novelist, short-story wrtier, and translator whose deeply imaginative and dream-like books have become international best sellers.
1375
750
1125
CLIENT PERSONA:
625
875
625
700
875
625
300
875
875
1125
660 1100
875 710
1000
900 300
1350 450
750
600
1250
1200
1750
1500
9 p.m.
- Wake up and start writing - Finish writing for the day - Run 10km and/or swim 1500m - Read / Listen to music - Sleep
900
Schedule: 4 a.m. 9/10 a.m. Afternoon
CONTOUR MAP SCALE 1: 8000
1750
1375
1500
Murakami adheres to an extremely strict schedule without variation in order to maintain his mental and physical strength when delving deep for his writing.
SITE PLAN SCALE 1: 2000
SECTIONAL PERSPECTIVE BB’ SCALE 1: 50
EXPLODED AXONOMETRIC SCALE 1: 50
PLAN SCALE 1: 50
1000
875
750
Haruki Murakami is a Japanese novelist, short-story wrtier, and translator whose deeply imaginative and dream-like books have become international best sellers.
1375
750
1125
CLIENT PERSONA:
625
875
625
700
875
625
300
875
875
1125
660 1100
875 710
1000
900 300
1350 450
750
600
1250
1200
1750
1500
9 p.m.
- Wake up and start writing - Finish writing for the day - Run 10km and/or swim 1500m - Read / Listen to music - Sleep
900
Schedule: 4 a.m. 9/10 a.m. Afternoon
CONTOUR MAP SCALE 1: 8000
1750
1375
1500
Murakami adheres to an extremely strict schedule without variation in order to maintain his mental and physical strength when delving deep for his writing.
SITE PLAN SCALE 1: 2000
SECTIONAL PERSPECTIVE BB’ SCALE 1: 50
EXPLODED AXONOMETRIC SCALE 1: 50
PLAN SCALE 1: 50
NEW
EXISTING
PLAN SCALE 1: 150
TENSION BETWEEN EXISTING AND NEW SCALE 1: 250
VISUAL INTERACTION BETWEEN LAYERS SCALE 1: 250
PRIVATE ENTRANCE
DIAGRAMATIC BREAKDOWN:
PRECEDENCE:
Tension: To highlight the treasure that exists between the existing and new
HOUSE N, OITA, JAPAN SOU FUJIMOTO (2008 )
Visual interaction: Visual Interaction between the layers that preserves privacy and views between the layers
Interaction across layers Preservation of views and privacy Gradual change in domain
Circulation Separated public and private entrances MAIN ENTRANCE
SECTION SCALE 1: 150
CIRCULATION SCALE 1: 250
NEW
EXISTING
PLAN SCALE 1: 150
TENSION BETWEEN EXISTING AND NEW SCALE 1: 250
VISUAL INTERACTION BETWEEN LAYERS SCALE 1: 250
PRIVATE ENTRANCE
DIAGRAMATIC BREAKDOWN:
PRECEDENCE:
Tension: To highlight the treasure that exists between the existing and new
HOUSE N, OITA, JAPAN SOU FUJIMOTO (2008 )
Visual interaction: Visual Interaction between the layers that preserves privacy and views between the layers
Interaction across layers Preservation of views and privacy Gradual change in domain
Circulation Separated public and private entrances MAIN ENTRANCE
SECTION SCALE 1: 150
CIRCULATION SCALE 1: 250
YEAR 1 LEVEL 2 COMPILATION OF SAMPLES
2018/2019 B.A. (ARCH) 1
IMAGE CREDIT: SHARLENE SOW