Mona Lisa, Mama Mia "This painting was censored at the request of some students of New York Law School," reads the sign next to the controversial work, the Mona Lisa. , This sign was written by Cristina Vergano, theartistofthework. Dean Wellington officially had "no comment" to the uproar over this painting. What on earth moved the generally apathetic New York Law School students to vociferously debate their opinions on the painting? On Sunday, October 16, the Mona Lisa was ~ hung in the cafeteria. The painting is a two-part ~ work by Ms. Vergano. Part One attracts attention by extending Leonardo da Vinci's famous g painting into a full-length portrait which ex- ~ poses male genitals. Part Two is cast as an out- ~ line of the Mona Lisa, with handwritten words ~ explaining different historical views about da l Vinci. Historians variously believe that (1) the L . . . . . - - The censored Mona Lisa
5
painter was homosexual; (2) the work is really a self-portrait because the superimposed image of the model's and da Vinci's faces are so similar; or (3) the model was a young lover of his, since he carried the painting with him for over 20 years until his death. Helena Prigal, speaking on behalf of the NYLS Art Selection Committee, said that they had been alerted to the content of Mona Lisa and were "uncomfortable about having the painting up in the cafeteria." However, they were committed to keeping the painting up throughout the entire exhibit. The Art Selection Committee comprises Ms. Prigal, Maria del Bagnoand Judith Bressler. Student members, who did not participate in the decision involving the current show, are Jeffrey Kimmel and Eileen McCrohan. Ms. Prigal, acting for the Committee, was informed
Continued on page 18
A New Era of Higher Grades growing sentiment regarding the grading curve, Dean Wellington formed an Ad Hoc Grading Committee (the "Committee") to assess NYLS's The decade-long reign of the previous grading curve has quietly ended. A new grading curve has taken the throne without fanfare or trumpets. The Administration announced its new grading policy in a memo to students dated August 24, 1994. This new policy took effect as of the summer session of 1994, and has no retroactive effect. For third-year or fourth-year students, this change will have a minimal effect on their cumulative grade point averages. The memo states that the changes in grade point averages are expected to be "modest and gradual." So, "C" students will not miraculously become "B" students overnight, nor will "B" students suddenly become "A" students. Over the last few years disgruntled students, alumni, and some faculty members have voiced their dissatisfaction with New York Law School's grading policy. Concerned about the
Over the last few years disgruntled students, alumni, and some f acuity members have voiced their dissatisfaction with New York Law School's grading policy." u
grading curve. Professor Edward Samuels was appointed the Chairperson of this Committee. Other faculty members of the Committee were Arthur Leonard and Stephen Newman; student members were Pominic Esposito and Erin O'Leary. After receiving comments and suggestions from students and faculty alike, the Committee made its recommendations at a faculty meeting, at which Dean Wellington and the Associate Deans were present. Extensive discussions followed the Committee's p resentations. A vote was taken and a new grading policy with four different grading curves was ratified. However "obvious" such a change may have appeared to students, this was not a cut and dry issue with the faculty. According to Professor Samuels, there was strong dissent against changing the curve. Although the recommendations
Continued on page 11