Combined university unions
national bargaining September stop work meetings
MUMECA Bargaining 2009 The purpose of the meeting is to • Hear from the bargaining team about negotiations so far • Discuss the options for the way ahead • Confirm instructions for the bargaining team
Agenda • • • •
Background Bargaining update Discussion Resolutions
Unions’ National Claims • • • • • • • •
One Year Term Salary increase: the greater of either 4% or $2400 No compulsory redundancies Workload: 37.5 hours for general staff and transparency in allocating teaching for academic staff Annual leave: minimum 25 days per year (includes uni holidays) Gender Equity Audit Union benefit: any improvements not passed on to nonmembers for at least 6 months Union rights: statutory provisions included in CA
Negotiations so far
• • •
4 days of national bargaining 3 of those days with the services of a mediator Employer opposition to MECA hardened
Negotiations so far • Finally agreed BPA and received employers’ claims • Employers sought to have MECA claim bargained in isolation from other claims • Only agreed to talk to their claims one by one • Have not responded to our salary claim
Negotiations so far • Have now refused to meet again nationally • Inviting us to bargain locally • They think this does not rule out a MECA
Options – Industrial Action? • Bargaining team think employer opposition to MECA so entrenched we would need sustained serious industrial action to change their position • Assessment that members more concerned about other issues this year: job security, salaries
Options – Legal Action? • Our legislation not very helpful to us in achieving a MECA • Worsened by case law, including AUS and Auckland DHB cases • Are investigating legal options but, even if successful, they will not happen in time for this year’s bargaining
Options – other choices? • To meet with them locally and explore the possibilities of achieving SECAs • Leave the MECA claim on the table
Local Bargaining • National union claims still apply • Opportunity to achieve further standardisation in the sector • Respond to employer claims • Retain ability to take national industrial action • May be able to use MECA as leverage to prevent local bargaining dragging on
National Industrial Action • Chance that some members will see very low, or even 0% pay offers from employers this year • Although most employer claims modest, Massey are seeking major changes to general staff pay scales • Local members may not be able to resist these clawbacks or achieve better pay offers by themselves • National industrial action only used in serious situations
Bargaining team recommendation •That we explore the possibilities of achieving SECAs locally •That we leave the MECA claim on the table •That we investigate legal action to overturn the AUS and Auckland DHB cases
Employer Claims: AUT •Salary progression – increments subject to performance •Progression to SLAB related to performance •Workload – update definitions •TTH – Remove 20 hour weekly maxima – Spread over 37 weeks – Rename bands – Remove semester limitations •Workload policy •Terminology – career path and teaching path •Extend lecturer scale downwards
Employer Claims: Auckland • Some relevant to FoEd CA only – tidy up • General staff: – Add duties of employer and employee – Salary & development review – reference new provisions as per ongoing working party – Suspension – allow employer to suspend during disciplinary – Eye tests – remove clause and refer to current policy – Tidy up claims
Employer Claims: Auckland • Academic staff • Remove a number of clauses and just refer to policy: – Research and study leave – Outside activities – Standards and criteria – Disciplinary guidelines – Eye tests A number of tidy up claims
Employer Claims: Waikato • 2 year term
Employer Claims: Massey • multi-year term and align date with financial year •Establish a working party to examine the sustainability of the current annual standard salary increment system for general staff and look at alternative methods for both general and academic staff •Spectacles – changes to clarify and limit entitlements •Change of wording to investigation and warning procedure clause
Employer Claims: Victoria All staff except FOE • Two year term • Clarify computation of retirement leave • Remove discipline procedures and replace with policy • General staff: Delete extra leave for new fitness etc workers • Academic: – Attendance clause – new wording – Private work – pro rata for part timers – Resignation – reduce notice from 6 to 3 months • Research assistants etc: – Changes to removal expenses • FOE – 1 year term
Employer Claims: Canterbury • • • • • •
•
‘Tidy up’ changes 3 year term Recognise Kiwisaver Redraft a number of clauses to comply with law and refer to specific current legislation Deductions – extend right of university to make deductions from pay Academic – Changes to terms of employment – Changes to termination of employment, including right of employer to suspend General – Changes to overtime, Saturday/Sunday, call backs, travelling etc – Retirement – allow for termination on grounds of medical incapacity
Employer Claims: Lincoln • Employer has tabled no claims
Employer Claims: Otago • • • • •
•
Parental leave – delete as policy is superior Research funded fixed-term staff – alerted they want to table a claim on this Policies and procedures – new wording Redundancy – correct oversight General – Annual review appeals – new wording – Annual leave – rewording to clarify for those based outside Dunedin – Long service leave – new calculation Academic – Clarify coverage of assistant research fellows – Remuneration – correct some inaccuracies
Discussion Bargaining team wish to hear your views and answer your questions
Resolution • That: – The bargaining team can explore the possibilities of achieving SECAs locally – We leave the MECA claim on the table – We investigate legal action to overturn the AUS and Auckland DHB cases
2nd resolution • The MECA claim will not be withdrawn until all the local agreements are in a position to be settled