Ideal structure would cover costs, stay fair

resort.

He said he does not want to see promoters, or would-be promoters, getting scared off by high costs off the bat.

“This isn’t just adjusting fees,” he said. “This is major. It’s like we’re punishing promoters. At the time when we need to be embracing promoters.”

After discussions that included explanations about some of the changes, and details about negotiation possibilities, most notably with large events, Gehrig said he could not support the new structure as presented.

Councilman Peter Buas also expressed concerns about the negotiation aspect, as he said it could create a non-level playing field.

Mayor Rick Meehan said he had concerns about the large jumps in costs as well.

Meehan was the catalyst for discussions on the fees after he openly expressed concerns last year about potential lost revenue opportunities with a long-running sand soccer tour- nament that pays a flat fee to rent the beach.

Meehan said Tuesday, though, that he agreed with Gehrig that the new structure, as proposed, might not work for all events.

“One size just doesn’t fit all,” he said.

There was a consensus among staff members and the elected officials, however, that they should encourage third-party providers to take on security, public works, emergency and other services during events. The move would reduce the use of city manpower and give promoters more control over events.

Council members also said that they are not opposed to updating some of the fees, but the large jumps were not favored.

Other details, such as efforts to attract notable promoters, and discounts for nonprofits and out-of-season events were also discussed during Tuesday’s work session, but no votes or decisions were made.

Staff members said they would like to have the new rates, whatever they may be, implemented by January.