OFF THE CUFF VOLUME 2, ISSUE 1
CONTRIBUTORS
EDITOR IN CHIEF // VINCE CALVI CREATIVE DIRECTOR // HELEN PENA-SMICKER MANAGING EDITOR // ELYSE DA SILVA DIRECTOR OF MARKETING // ISABELLE EPSKAMP DIRECTOR OF FINANCE // CAT GATTO JUNIOR EXECUTIVE BOARD MEMBER // ROCIO ALQUATI
COPY EDITORS
STYLISTS
JENNA LAVIN SANICA APTE REGINA RAPHAEL
ALICE GAO TABITHA MICHAELIDIS ANH NGUYEN SCOTT SHAPIRO ROSHNI SHUKLA WINDSOR WONG
ART DIRECTORS KATIE BARRY MIMI CHIU ALMAZ MESSGNA SERAPHIM OSIAKWAN
WRITERS TIA GALLINARO KENDALL MARCUS CORINA PINTADO MIA TRENTADUE SUSANNA YUDKIN
HAIR AND MAKEUP ROCIO ALQUATI (HAIR) ALEXANDRA DELANO (HAIR) CHRISTIANNA GILBERT (HAIR) ZARAH KAVARANA (MUA) ANDRIANA TODOROVIC (MUA)
ADVERTISING CHAIRS CAT GATTO RACHEL PICKUS
PHOTOGRAPHERS
PUBLIC RELATIONS CHAIRS
NICKI GITTER BEIXI JIA JULIA KAN CHRISTOPHER SANCHEZ
EBRU KIR CRYSTAL HERMOND
EVENTS CHAIR VERONICA CHENG ANH NGUYEN
3 OFF THE CUFF MAGAZINE
LETTER FROM THE EDITOR I am having a hard time trying to find the words as I sit down to write this Letter from the Editor. Partially because I don’t consider myself to be a writer, but mostly because it’s hard to express about how impressed I am with every member of Off The Cuff’s staff. With every article I read, every photoshoot I work on, every meeting I attend, I am constantly blown away by the dedication of my staff and the high quality work they produce. Thanks to the unmatched talent of our staff, Off The Cuff has been able to create our greatest issue yet. This past summer, our Director of Marketing, Isabelle Epskamp, and I were both living together in Manhattan working at our respective internships. Although the two of us remained busy with our jobs and savored the days we spent in one of greatest and most fashion-forward cities, we were able to utilize our resources to extend Off The Cuff’s reach and make our magazine the best it could be. Press releases were written and connections were made, and because of that we are lucky enough to feature Rollie, an up-and-coming Australian shoe brand, in this issue. (Make sure to check out my Q&A with founder Vince Lebon on [P.20]). As you’ll come to see, this issue takes a particular aim to showcase art. Fashion and art are intertwined as fashion is art and art influences fashion. The goal of this issue is to show that connection. From our Rollie shoot to the cover spread, the connections are evident. As you flip through the pages of this issue, see each spread as a different exhibit. The magazine is your museum. I hope as you read this you’re able to take in everything I’ve brought to light. After over a year of hard work from everyone on the Executive Board down to the Fashion Spies, Off The Cuff’s vision has been fully realized in this issue. And while I’m proud to say this our best issue yet, I’m even prouder to say this won’t be our best ever as we’ll continue to push the limits. Everyone at Off The Cuff is challenging him or herself to create consistently better content for our readers to enjoy. And with that, all I have left to say is... Stay Stylish, VC
table of contents
05 14 16
18
25
35
45
WHAT’S IN THE CLOSET: A LOOK INSIDE THE FASHION INDUSTRY
NORMCORE: THE 21ST CENTURY ART OF DRESSING DOWN
ONE SIZE FALLS SHORT
FROM VINCE TO VINCE: A Q&A BETWEEN ROLLIE’S FOUNDER AND OTC’S EDITOR-IN-CHIEF
POP!: BRINGING WARHOL & LICHTENSTEIN TO THE 21ST CENTURY
LONG AGO AND FAR AWAY
STILL LIFE
A LOOK INSIDE THE FASHION INDUSTRY BY KENDALL MARCUS AND SUSANNA YUDKIN It’s no surprise that working in the fashion industry is one of the most alluring career choices out there. We are constantly bombarded with images of the glitz and glamour behind the world of runway couture, bloggers, and fashion houses. But in a world centered on image, one has to ask: what is it really like to work in the industry that inspires all of our sartorial choices? When Anne Hathaway played the role of Andy in The Devil Wears Prada, women all over the world said they’d either love to be in her shoes, or they would do anything but work in the grueling world of fashion. While Andy’s tasks were trivial, and not at all glamorous, the perks of the job seemed more than worth it. Perks for Andy included being able to raid Vogue’s fashion closet–borrowing everything from Chanel to Calvin Klein– but all at the expense of being mistreated by her boss and co-workers. The fashion industry is a difficult business to be in; it is fast-paced, sometimes eccentric, and can get ruthless, but some are truly cut out for that lifestyle. There are countless ways for young women to get their foot in the door of the world of fashion. Some want to be involved in fashion public relations. Others want to design new looks and styles for top design houses. No matter the career choice, young women are hungry for ways into the industry, whether it is starting out as an intern, assistant, or even a secretary at top fashion houses, brands, and magazines.
But is a career in fashion really how we imagine it to be? We interviewed women who worked in the industry about their experiences. Their insights are surprising, inspiring, and most of all, telling.
7 OFF THE CUFF MAGAZINE
Before starting her internship at Marie Claire, Emily Goldman said that she thought she’d be doing a lot of bitch work–getting coffee and other menial tasks. Isabelle Epskamp, a public relations intern at Rag & Bone, said, “I was definitely intimidated...everything I’ve read makes the fashion industry look like an intense
EXPECT ATIONS
place to work.” Daniella Seidl, an intern at W Magazine, said she was expecting “lots of fashion and a little bit of pain.”
Many of their expectations were met, but each of them encountered either perks or downfalls about working in the industry. Goldman “learned a lot about politics of a major magazine. I expected people to be more mature and nicer.” Helen Pena
REALITY
worked with Miami-based emerging fashion brand Style Mafia and said, “It was an extremely rewarding experience because her high standards and amazing taste taught me a lot.” Seidl noted, “The amount of research that goes into putting a shoot together is insane. The Devil Wears Prada doesn’t seem fictitious.“
Seidl was surprised about some of her tasks, “I was in charge of doing a lot of research in the Condé Nast library for photo shoots, which was a really incredible experience. I was able to pick out images as inspiration for the stylist and work closely with him in coming up with the final product.” Sarah Siegel, an intern at Good Housekeeping, was “surprised by the enormous amount of free stuff magazines get and give away.”
SURPRI
SES
LESSONS No matter the surprises or hard work, each girl found their experience rewarding. Pena said, “ I definitely know that whatever I do will involve branding and creating aesthetic experiences for people.” Epskamp found her dream job, saying “ I love everything about working in PR, especially if it goes along with fashion. There’s always something new and exciting going on, which is so much better than working a lame desk job.” On the other hand, Seidl said, “I don’t know if I see myself working in fashion for the rest of my life. I learned that it’s very important to get things done and do a good job with anything you do… and to have fun and not take things too seriously! These women had the opportunity to live out their dreams, and all of them gained new insights both about the industry and themselves. No matter what angle of the industry you want to pursue, if you are willing to work hard and devote all your passion to your work, you will go far.
9 OFF THE CUFF MAGAZINE
Pena learned that “The way to make a name for yourself is by making yourself indispensable…it’s really those people who are given a small task but go above and beyond that make it through and are remembered.” Epskamp learned the value of hard work saying, “The fashion industry is fast-paced, so you have to learn to keep up...I wouldn’t recommend going into fashion if you’re not willing to do whatever it takes to get the job done.”
FUTURE
normcore: THE ART OF 21ST CENTURY DRESSING BY CORINA PINTADO In 2003, Saturday Night Live told us that the greatest gift a mother could receive is a pair of “mom jeans.” Just watch the skit and you’ll see the happiness exuding from Tina Fey and company as they prance around and show off their derrieres. Fast-forward to 2014 and “mom jeans” are no longer meant for the soccer moms of suburbia. Rather, these same pairs of jeans that were once mocked have graced the runways of New York Fashion Week and adorned the tuchuses of every known blogger and Brandy Melville customer. You know which ones I’m talking about: those light wash jeans that reach so high up on the waist, you nearly risk resembling Urkel. This, my friends, is the impact of normcore at its finest.
In the 1960s, there was mod fashion and in the 90s, Calvin Klein led era of minimalism in fashion that would define the decade. Therefore, fashion has shone a spotlight on the concept of simplicity over the years. However, given its focus on basics, defining the normcore movement is not a basic task. My prior knowledge–that is, stalking everyone in New York’s Greenwich Village wearing Birkenstocks–led me to believe that normcore was simply a celebration of comfort. Think: loosefitting, high-waisted jeans, the classic Adidas “Stan Smith” sneakers, a white tee and an oversized button-down shirt that called a thrift shop its home before landing in your hands. However, the more I see this kind of uniform, the more I view normcore as an ode to bland, anti-fashion attire. The term normcore was first coined by the trending agency K-Hole, because in addition to embracing “mom jeans,” inventing new words is another favorite hobby of millenials. K-Hole clarified the definition of normcore on its Facebook page as a “means to pursue every activity like you’re a fanatic of the form. It doesn’t really make sense to identify normcore as a fashion – the point of normcore is that you could dress like a NASCAR mascot for a big race and then switch to raver ware for a long druggy night at the club. It’s about infinitely flexible, sunny appropriation.” So normcore shouldn’t have anything to do with fashion in the first place. Yet fashion is one of the main components in curating an identity. If anything, the onslaught of normcore has lessened the appreciation for the glitz and glamour of fashion; why should we dress down when fashion is all about dressing up to be the character you choose to play for a particular day? I could very well be a NASCAR mascot and a raver in my Nicholas Kirkwood heels if I so choose to.
11 OFF THE CUFF MAGAZINE
Normcore is to uniformity what pumpkin spice lattes are to fall. It’s an inevitable pairing. There’s nothing wrong with wearing a basic tee and jeans for the day, but when you get lost in a sea of clones, you lose your identity. Take for example the epidemic that became of the Birkenstock. These suckers came from a time warp of the early 90s and landed on the feet of a good 90% of my friends this past summer. The mention of Birkenstocks a year ago would’ve received scoffs and sheer disgust from many of those who ended up buying them merely because they were “in.” What distinguishes normcore from other trends is that it’s a trend that emphasizes not trying at all. Looking effortless is a battle many of us try to win in the morning when getting dressed but we must remind ourselves that sometimes fashion involves trying. In fact, it can be fun to try. I can’t begin to count the number of times I’ve spent my Saturdays creating outfits in my closet rather than studying for midterms. In an age when Beyonce’s “I woke up like dis” has become the anthem of a generation, we forget that developing a sense of style or identity is an odyssey of some sorts. I can see the appeal of normcore in encouraging a blank slate – that is, a simple tee and a pair of jeans is all you’ll need to go out and carpe diem. And if that’s what you’d prefer to wear then by all means, do what you please. However, mom jeans and basic t-shirts were still worn way before they became fads. So to what extent is normcore a fad? Or is it on its way in becoming the modern definition of classic style? No matter what normcore is or what it becomes, I will continue to don the patterns and eclectic silhouettes that differentiate my closet from others. Because nothing is more against the norm these days than some clashing patterns.
FASHION COLLAGE BY: RACHEL PICKUS
13 OFF THE CUFF MAGAZINE
MIA TRENTAUDE WITH ELYSE DA SILVA
“ONE SIZE FALLS SHORT”
UNISIZE CLOTHING’S INACCURACY 5’8” to 5’11,” 90 to 120 pounds. These parameters are the “ideal” measurements for females in the fashion world, and they have become the framework of fantasy for the common woman. There is a slew of popular clothing stores that claim to cater to the masses yet only portray ideal women, showcasing an affinity for what society deems perfect. That being said, many of these stores still manufacture clothing in a multitude of sizes to benefit from women of all sizes, despite featuring ideal women in their advertisements. In recent years, however, popular stores - particularly those geared toward young women - have implemented what they deem “one size fits all” clothing when, in reality, their definition of “one size” only applies to a slim margin of the female population-no pun intended.
15 OFF THE CUFF MAGAZINE
“IT IS SAFE TO SAY THAT THEIR ‘ALL’ IS A MINUTE MARGIN OF THE ACTUAL SPECTRUM.” The visage unisize brands attempt to present is self-acceptance by eliminating labeled sizes when their clothing actually fuels size discrimination. Stores like Brandy Melville, American Apparel, American Eagle, and Victoria’s Secret claim to cater to the common young woman, but their implementing “one size fits all” philosophy proves they think that “all” should be slim enough to fit into their products. Considering the fact that most of their fitted clothing items comfortably fit a petite woman sized four to six, it is safe to say that their “all” is a minute margin of the actual spectrum. Oversized garments that make smaller women swim in and larger women fill out seem to be the only exception.
By sticking a “one size fits all” tag on an article of clothing, the company that distributes that clothing sends a message of how they think women should be: petite and thin. This - although it may not be as drastic as the runway model mindset - puts pressure on younger females to be a certain size to fit into popular or trendy clothing. The pressure to be a certain size puts the demographic at a higher risk for eating disorders and self-loathing if they are not physically built as the designers think they should be--as models are. According to a study by Girl Scouts of the USA and The Dove Self-Esteem Fund, “63 percent of girls think the body image represented by the fashion industry is unrealistic and 47 percent think it is unhealthy, yet 60 percent say that they compare their bodies to fashion models.” The study also shows that, “48 percent wish they were as skinny as the models in fashion magazines, and 31 percent of girls admit to starving themselves or refusing to eat as a strategy to lose weight.” These statistics show that girls are influenced by the fashion world, and although unisize brands do not necessarily promote physicalities as exaggerated as those involved in modeling, girls still feel as though they should be able fit into the garments in order to be accepted by a society infatuated with “skinny.”
Although in recent years the fashion realm has become increasingly accepting of fuller-figured women, the movement toward total body acceptance in the industry is currently a farfetched fantasy. This “plus sized” movement shows how females should not be judged by their size, should look up to the progressive models in the industry, and should be comfortable with themselves, yet the “one size” theory promotes the complete opposite when not all females cannot squeeze into the slim margin of “fits all.”
17 OFF THE CUFF MAGAZINE
“THIS ‘PLUS SIZED’ MOVEMENT SHOWS HOW FEMALES SHOULD NOT BE JUDGED BY THEIR SIZE,”
FROM VINCE TO VINCE: A Q&A BETWEEN OTC EDITOR IN CHIEF VINCE CALVI & ROLLIE FOUNDER & DESIGNER VINCE LEBON
Photographed by: Christopher Sanchez Styled by: Alice Gao & Tabitha Michaelidis Models: Vince Calvi, Aniekan Inoyo & Lisa Kaucher
What made you decide to start your own shoe line? Honestly, I just felt it was time! After 10 years in the footwear industry, I wanted to create a brand that would make people happy. Something fashionable yet comfortable, something that represented quality yet affordable, fun yet adaptable and iconic. What does it take to start your own label and make it as an independent designer? It’s very easy to start your own label but creating something that is sustainable and something that creates an emotional connect with your target audience is the challenge. The business plan is just as important as the product itself. Doing what you love will help you stay true to the original vision. How did you get started working in the fashion industry? Did you go to school for fashion? I am post-graduate multimedia designer but I kind of fell into the footwear industry but quickly knew it was for me once I dove into it. I shadowed the director of an independent footwear company for 5 years before producing private labeled footwear for international brands, then after 10 years of experience I felt it was time to launch my own brand. What inspires you the most when you start thinking about the next season for your shoes? People, Movies, Music, Mags, Blogs, Travel... Without being cheesy I’d say life in general. There’s inspiration everywhere! As Edward de Bono says “One very important aspect of motivation is the willingness to stop and to look at things that no one else has bothered to look at. This simple process of focusing on things that are normally taken for granted is a powerful source of creativity...” I remember during FFaNY (Fashion Footwear association of New York) you mentioned a collaboration with Et Al, tell OTC about working with them. What was it like? Did your visions match up?
One of the head designers has become a close friend of mine now, as we seem to share a love for design and quality. He is extremely talented and really enjoyed the experience. There’ll be a lot more happening between the two brands and designers. What’s it like working in the Australian fashion industry? How does it compare to the US or Europe? I have never really tied the brand to one country to be honest, I genuinely feel like it’s a world brand, catering to world trends and people in general. One of the major benefits to living in Australia is that it’s so far away that you are less influenced by the major world industries which makes it easier to focus on innovation and a unique approach and aesthetic.
What is your go-to item in your closet? Black Jeans with a basic Tee. Who is your fashion deity? Why? Street etiquette and / or Justin Oshea. I just love how consistently cool these guys are. I’ve stalked your Instagram (@vince_lebon) and understand your quite the world traveler. What’s your favorite city in the world for fashion? Why? It would have to be Barcelona! I just love the food, music, weather, people, street fashion and art. It has everything I love about a place. This is following closely by Toyko and New York. What advice do you have for upcoming designers? Work on a business model and be genuine in what you’re doing because people will always respond better. When building a brand, think about an emotional connection as it is just as important as it being economically viable.
21 OFF THE CUFF MAGAZINE
23 OFF THE CUFF MAGAZINE
Clare wears a Sandro sweater. Taylor wears an HM button-down, Tobi velvet top.
25 OFF THE CUFF MAGAZINE
POP! BRINGING WARHOL & BRINGING WARHOL & LICHTENSTEIN TO THE LICHTENSTEIN TO THE 21ST CENTURY 21ST CENTURY PHOTOGRAPHED PHOTOGRAPHEDBY:BY:NICKI NICKIGITTER GITTER STYLED BY:BY:SCOTT STYLED SCOTTSHAPIRO, SHAPIRO &ANH ANHNGUYEN NGUYEN HAIR CHRISTIANNAGILBERT GILBERT HAIR BY:BY: CHRISTIANNA MAKEUP ANDRIANATODOROVIC TODOROVIC MAKEUP BY:BY: ANDRIANA MODELS: CAMRI & CLARE STONICH ARTICLETAYLOR BY: TIANNA GALLINARO WRITTEN BY: TIA GALLINARO
SINCE THE 1950S, Pop Art has established itself as a movement that brings together pop culture and fine art. Artists aimed to transform the public’s standards of fine art by appropriating even the most mundane and mass-produced subjects, like the Campbell’s soup can, into iconic art pieces of modern history. Pop Art was not designed to be a parody of high culture, but a way to create newfound appreciation for life’s most ordinary objects by removing them from their main context. In response to the pretentious, strict, and rather homogenous subjects of classic fine art, artists like Jeff Koons, Roy Lichtenstein, and Richard Hamilton developed a new style of art labeled Pop Art (short for popular art) that corrupted society’s experience of fine art and celebrated society’s contemporary culture. Andy Warhol was perhaps the most iconic trailblazer of the movement and decided to utilize his background in commercial art to appropriate pop culture into fine art by using mass production printing and advertising techniques. As the “Pope of Pop”, Warhol’s body of work covered a broad range of pop culture from movie icons like Marilyn Monroe, to fashion icons like Jackie Kennedy, or classic American consumer products like Coca Cola. By the late 1960s, Pop Art had expanded into a cultural movement that influenced other creative fields including music, television, and fashion. To this day Pop Art is still very much alive and maintains a large cult-like following. Andy Warhol’s prints continue to hang in the world’s most prestigious art museums on walls among top-notch artists like Rembrandt, Vermeer, and Monet. The Andy Warhol Museum was constructed in 1994 in Pittsburgh to honor the genius and currently remains the largest museum dedicated to a single artist. Last year, Lady Gaga released her Artpop album inspired by the movement and even collaborated with Jeff Koons on the album’s cover art. Over the years pop Art has continued to impact various facets of current pop culture, but none more than the fashion industry. From retail to luxury brands like Kate Spade, Nike, Moschino, and Louis Vuitton, Pop Art has remained as one of the most enduring influences in today’s fashion.
Like the fine art critics
Fast-forward to over sixty
of Andy Warhol’s era,
years later and Jeremy Scott is
some high fashion
in the exact same shoes as Andy
critics denounce the
Warhol. Following the criticism of
sight of lowbrow pop culture content walking down the runways of fashion’s most prestigious runway shows. The most recently criticized designer, Jeremy Scott, had models strut down Moschino’s Fall/ Winter 2014 Milan Fashion Week runway with outfits that appropriated the golden arches of America’s favorite fast-food restaurant: McDonald’s. Many loved the quirky chicness of Moschino’s “Fast Food Fashion” collection, but some challenged its originality and place in the refined world of couture.
his McDonald’s inspired collection, Scott is quoted as saying, “Maybe it’s because people are realizing that [high fashion] has gotten too stuffy and boring.” With the infusion of more Pop Art in fashion, there’s little doubt fashion will ever fall victim to either of those tragedies. Pop Art will always be current, relevant, or “à la mode”; Pop Art is rooted in popular culture, which is never stagnant, forever changing, and always current.
Taylor wears Sandro sweater, thrifted coat.
29 OFF THE CUFF MAGAZINE
(Left) Clare wears thrifted button-down and polka dot dress, Girls on Film skirt, Calvin Klein blazer. (Right) Clare wears Va va voom dress.
POP ART “ CORRUPTED SOCIETY’S EXPERIENCE OF FINE ART AND CELEBRATED SOCIETY’S CONTEMPORARY CULTURE.”
31 OFF THE CUFF MAGAZINE
!! ! ! ! !! Taylor wears Vanity Projects by Limb dress.
(Left) Taylor wears pants, Zara sneakers.
33 OFF THE CUFF MAGAZINE
(Right) Clare wears a Brooks Brothers trench and Sandro sweater.
!
35 OFF THE CUFF MAGAZINE
LONG AGO & FAR AWAY
CONCEPT & DESIGNS BY: KATIE BARRY & TOM LAVERRIERE PHOTOGRAPHED BY: JULIA KAN STYLED BY: WINDSOR WONG HAIR BY: ALEX DELANO MAKEUP BY: ANDRIANA TODOROVIC MODELS: SARAH CAPUNGAN, DAVID LOWE & AURELIA PAUL
37 OFF THE CUFF MAGAZINE
The word “fairytale” elicits a warm feeling within one’s heart, but these stories of our childhood have stood the test of time: remodeled and reimagined over centuries, dark undertones sacrificed. Here, the original essence of these legends come to life–the way they were long ago, and far away.
39 OFF THE CUFF MAGAZINE
41 OFF THE CUFF MAGAZINE
43 OFF THE CUFF MAGAZINE
STILL LIFE 45 OFF THE CUFF MAGAZINE
Photographed by: Beixi Jia Styled by: Scott Shapiro & Roshni Shukla Hair by: Rocio Alquati Makeup by: Zara Kavarana Models: Dhiren Garg, Tabitha Michaelidis & Mahnoor Umair
American painter and printmaker Robert Motherwell said, “Wherever art appears, life disappears.� Challenging this idea, models bring life to famous works of art, adding new dimensions and emotions.
Gustav Klimt, The Kiss 47 OFF THE CUFF MAGAZINE
Edward Munch, The Scream
49 OFF THE CUFF MAGAZINE
Sandro Botticelli, The Birth of Venus
51 OFF THE CUFF MAGAZINE
Sandro Botticelli, Venus and Mars
53 OFF THE CUFF MAGAZINE
Pablo Picasso, The Old Guitarist
JOIN THE MOVEMENT W W W.OFFTHECUFFMAG.COM / OFFTHECUFFMAG