Times of Tonbridge 26th October 2016

Page 1

Local, National and International Tonbridge Castle

OF TONBRIDGE

TONBRIDGE BLOG QUEEN LAUGHS ALL THE WAY TO MUMSNET FINALS

CONFIDENT JUDDIANS CLIMB UP THE TABLE: SEE SPORTING TIMES

Page 6

Pages 86-87

ON PATROL Officers with the red body cameras

From page 27

Campaigners warn against assuming that ‘battle is won’ adam@timesoftunbridgewells.co.uk

Full story on page 2

Page 3

IT’S A MUST READ… WEST KENT’S ULTIMATE PROPERTY GUIDE

Heathrow chosen over Gatwick for runway

By Adam Hignett

Behave – you are now being filmed on police cameras

POLICE COMMISSIONER PLEDGES ACTION ON ANTI-SOCIAL DRIVERS

r ur Yo EE pe a FRwsp

All the news that matters

Ne

Wednesday, October 26, 2016

PROTEST groups yesterday gave a cautious welcome to the news that Heathrow has been named over Gatwick as the most suitable site for the next runway. They also urged people not to be ‘complacent’. The government ended 14 years of controversy and arguments when it named the West London airport as its preferred option yesterday [October 25]. Campaigners had argued that another runway at Gatwick would ‘double’ the number of aircraft over West Kent and establish ‘ a major motorway above our heads’. But despite what can be seen as victory for the numerous grassroots campaigns that have sprung up to oppose expansion at the West Sussex airport, those leading the groups remain wary about future developments. They argue the current issues with noise from Gatwick-bound aircraft has yet to be resolved and the government’s decision to let Parliament debate the runway issue means it is not completely off the table. Tonbridge & Malling MP Tom Tugendhat told the Times: “I am pleased that the Government has recognised that Gatwick Airport is not a suitable location for airport expansion. The Airports Commission, led by Sir Howard Davies, made very clear in July 2015 that better options were elsewhere. “When I met with the Prime Minister as she launched her bid for the job, I asked her for confirmation that she would fol-

low an evidenced-led approach when taking this decision. “As expected, she has been as good as her word and has taken the right approach that will provide welcome relief to communities around Tonbridge, Edenbridge and surrounding villages.”

‘It would be wrong to support an airport that specialises in exporting UK citizens’ Irene Fairbairn, Chairman of the Tunbridge Wells Anti Airport Noise Group (TWAANG), said: “We are of course relieved that the Gatwick option has been rejected. “However, the announcement is merely the start of what promises to be a long,

acrimonious and legal minefield before a new runway is operational at Heathrow. We cannot afford to be complacent or to assume that the battle is won. “TWAANG continues to make the case to Gatwick that its current flight paths at all times of the day and night are unacceptable. We will be looking to Government to force similar environmental restrictions on Gatwick as will be applied to Heathrow. Kent and Sussex residents are not second-class citizens.” Her sentiments were echoed by Sally Pavey, head of Wealden-based Communities Against Gatwick Noise Emissions (CAGNE) group, who said the issues surrounding the airport ‘won’t go away’. “The year or so debate, and eventual MP vote, leaves the door open for Gatwick to continue lobbying. We are concerned GOOD NEWS No runway at Gatwick means no extra planes overhead

Continued on pages 2 & 16


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.