Times of Tonbridge 5th April 2017

Page 1

Local, National and International Tonbridge Castle

OF TONBRIDGE

2017 Appeal launched as boaters claim they suffered a mistrial MEMBERS of Barden Boatyard are continuing to fight their eviction as they launch an appeal against the court decision in March. Three of the residents on the River Medway registered their request for a re-examination of their case by another judge after listening to the advice of the National Bargee Travellers Association, who represent the interests of boat dwellers around the country. In March, the boaters received a court order to leave by June 30. They claim there was a mistrial, based on Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights. One of the requirements within the article is ‘equality of arms’, which requires there be a fair balance between the opportunities afforded to the parties involved in litigation – which they say was denied to them.

Signs In a bizarre twist of events, Alan Mockford, son of boatyard owner, Brian Mockford, has erected signs advertising vacancies for ‘Mockford Moorings’, to be available from October, despite working for months to get the current residents evicted. The boaters believe this is not a genuine attempt to establish a new boatyard, but rather a ploy to appear to be offering mooring space to boost a later planning application for residential buildings. Alan Mockford was unavailable for comment as the Times went to press.

business awards

r ur Yo EE pe a FRwsp

All the news that matters

Ne

Wednesday April 5 | 2017

COULD YOU BE A WINNER?

Ten categories… ten chances to win… which award do you deserve?

LOCAL NEWSPAPERS

See page 57

Turf war breaks out with new INSIDE plans for school’s floodlit pitch

SIDE OF THE ANGELS Was the last minute winner over the line? Page 71

A GAME OF TWO HALVES Neighbours are divided

2 1 3

4

A GOOD ROASTING

Celebrate UK Coffee Week by buying the best beans Page 53

5 FIELD MAP: 1) Deakin Leas 2) Tonbridge Grammar School 3) Pembury Road 4) Vauxhall Gardens 5) New pitch

By Murray Jones

murray@timesoftunbridgewells.co.uk RESIDENTS who live near Tonbridge Grammar School are urging their local councillors to reject proposals for a new floodlit artificial turf sports pitch, claiming the plans are ‘unsound and ill-considered’. The move by the all-girls grammar, which was named as The Sunday Times’ State Secondary School of the Year in 2014, has reignited the controversy around expanding their facilities, which would also be available for use by the wider community. In 2014 similar plans were rejected by the borough council’s planning committee on the grounds that the increased traffic would cause an ‘unacceptable level of disturbance to the surrounding residents’. There is only one vehicular access point to the school, situated within the residential Deakin Leas.

Additionally, it was decided that the proposed level of illumination from the floodlights ‘would be intrusive and harmful to the enjoyment of those [residential] properties’. But the school is hoping that this time round the planning committee will rule in their favour, recognising the alterations they have made as sufficient. So far, more than 160 people have f­ ormally registered their support for the project with the council.

Pylons In a lengthy public statement defending its application, the school argues that the proposed use of lights has been ‘significantly reduced’ since 2014. The floodlights would now be on until 7.30pm at the latest on weeknights, instead of 8.30pm. On Saturday, the cut-off would be 6pm, with plans for Sunday use dropped entirely.

In terms of traffic management, they admit the singular access on Deakin Leas ‘presents logistical challenges’. But in recent years ‘traffic management has become a major consideration and is central to school event planning’, with a dedicated Travel Action Group meeting three times a year. Despite these changes, local residents are still adamant that the development will unfairly impact them. Stuart Drisbey, whose home backs on to the proposed site, described the plans as ‘the wrong type of development in the wrong place’, adding: “The proposed lighting is too bright and too high – pylons the height of three double decker buses stacked one on top of the other. “There will be hundreds of new vehicle movements at times when most people would rightly expect some peace and quiet.

Continued on page 2

WELCOME HOME

The LAMPS bring the Mikado to where it all began Page 66

SURPRISE SERENADE A big band performance gets a special guest visit Page 3


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.