Wednesday, November 9, 2016
All the news that matters
YOUR
FREE
Local, National and International
OF TUNBRIDGE WELLS
PAPER
TOWN NEEDS YOUR VOTE! HAVING won through to the finals of the Great British High Street of the Year Awards, The Pantiles is currently trailing in last place in its category, prompting a call for the people of Tunbridge Wells to click online and vote. Judges from the Department for Communities and Local Government visited the promenade last week as part of the process for choosing the Local Centre/Best Parade of Shops. They are responsible for half the votes, with the public making up the rest. And that’s where the town is lagging behind the other two finalists, Chester and Claygate. Pantiles hotelier Julian Leefe-Griffiths said: “Your town really does need you. It just takes a few seconds to vote and it would be great to come out on top.” (L-R) Targetfollow’s Antony Moore and Corin Thoday, Judge Jaya Relwani, Targetfollow’s Sarah Bird and Judge Eleanor Millington
INSIDE
PUPILS BEING FAILED Grammar Head bucks trend by helping ‘poor’ students. Page 10
PARKING SOLUTION
Residents rent out driveways as demand for spaces soars. Page 7
Full story pages 4-5
Businesses chase £10m rebates
NAKED & READY
Love of quality indigenous food boosts their business. Page 64
Hard pressed council believes its ‘worst fears have been realised’
Exclusive by Adam Hignett
adam@timesoftunbridgewells.co.uk NEXT month will see businesses in the town banding together in a bid to claim back £10million in rates. They believe their premises have been wrongly valued and that they are owed rebates. If their actions are successful, Tunbridge Wells Borough Council will be required to pay them £4million – enough to run the Assembly Hall for the next ten years – at a time when the authority is battling to overcome government cuts in its funding. The other £6million would be paid
largely by central government, and smaller portions by Kent County Council and Kent Fire and Rescue Service. One borough council officer told the Times: “Our worst fears have been realised.”
Refund would be enough to run Assembly Hall for ten years In total, 21 business are contesting their rates with the Valuation Office Agency [VOA] in a move believed to have been prompted by the success of a B&Q appeal in September that was reported in this newspaper, as part of an ongoing investigation into business rates.
All 21 firms, the majority of which are based in the North Farm business park, are being represented by the same agent, CVS (Commercial Valuers & Surveyors) Ltd, said to be the UK’s largest business rates specialist, and have their tribunal on December 14. CVS has declined to comment to the Times. The news that so many companies are appealing en masse has been met with dismay by council officers, who are concerned about how the local authority will pay the £4million. The council’s Director of Finance and Corporate Services, Lee Colyer, said: “It would appear that commission-chasing
property agents are now using the downward appeal process to cash in on past payments that went to central government, but that now will be partially footed by local taxpayers. “The appeals can go back to 2010, so there are around £10million-worth of potential refunds, although with so many hearings listed for the same time I hope that sufficient consideration and information will be given to each case, and that the VOA put up a robust defence of their original assessment, on behalf of local taxpayers.”
Continued on page 2
CHRISTMAS GUIDE
To help you make the most of the festive season. See inside