Wednesday February 13 | 2019
All the news that matters
Local, National and International
Times OF TUNBRIDGE WELLS
Strictly star adds an extra touch of
glitter to this year’s business awards Date announced for town’s biggest social and networking event By Jonathan Banks One of the most popular faces on television and star of Strictly Come Dancing, Anton du Beke, will be handing out the honours at this year’s Times Business Awards... a gala night that has become one of the leading social and networking events of the year. It will be the fourth time that the event has taken place. In the opening three years nearly 600 companies and individuals put themselves forward across ten categories ranging from start-ups to Outstanding Business of the Year. Anton du Beke, the ballroom dancing favourite from BBC’s Strictly, has been
on the show since the very first series. He has also recently released an album, From the Top, which features the light-footed star singing a range of swing and jazz hits. The 52-year-old recently became a father for the first time – to twins. Having been part of Saturday night TV since 2004, when Strictly first aired, it is fair to say Anton has become somewhat of a national treasure. In presenting the awards he follows in the footsteps of former politicians Michael Portillo and Edwina Curry as well as BBC 2 DJ Ken Bruce. The awards ceremony will be held at Salomons in Tunbridge Wells on Thursday May 30. Mark the date in your diary and watch out for full details of the big night and how to enter the awards in next week’s Times.
2019 ON HIS WAY Anton du Beke
FOR CALVERLEY
OPPOSING VIEWS William Benson (left) and Nick Pope
AGAINST CALVERLEY
Inquiry that could change face of town gets underway By Richard Williams The first witnesses were called yesterday [Tuesday] at the public hearing into the controversial Calverley Square project. It is expected to last up to three weeks and could cost taxpayers in excess of £500,000. Around 100 people crammed into the conference room of the Mercure Hotel in Pembury as the Borough Council seeks the green light for Compulsory Purchase Orders (CPOs) affecting some properties near the proposed site. The outcome will not be known for about two months and could be delayed substantially longer if there are appeals against the final decision. On one side is the Borough Council which sees the £90million development at the heart of its plans to rejuvenate the town centre. Opposing them are protestors led by Councillor Nick Pope and the Tunbridge Wells Alliance, a political party formed to fight the development on the
edge of Calverley Grounds. Department store Hoopers and residents of Grove Hill, which overlooks Calverley Grounds, are also fighting the idea. The council has admitted that if the protestors win it has ‘no plan B’ which means the development would not go ahead. Council Chief Executive William Benson yesterday told Inspector Graham Dudley that
The council has admitted that if the protestors win it has ‘no plan B’ there was a very strong economic case for the development that will see a 1200-seater theatre, office space and new council chambers being built on the edge of Calverley Grounds. The Planning Inspectorate is forced to open an inquiry if it receives ‘any’ objections to a CPO, and the costs fall on the
local authority wanting to make the compulsory purchases. The hearing, at the Mercure Hotel is scheduled to last for two weeks, but a source close to the inquiry team believe the timeframe ‘is very tight’ so it could spill over into a third week, ramping up the council’s fees. CPOs have been described as a ‘draconian’ measure but they are the only way local authorities are able to build large-scale infrastructure projects, like Calverley Square. The amount of land the council wants to purchase varies from the complete 1,906 square metres of Great Hall Car Park to a patch of land just one square metre west of Mount Pleasant Avenue. To have the CPOs confirmed, TWBC has to prove there is a ‘compelling case in the public interest’ and many of the objections are based on the claim that there is no public interest.
Full story pages 6, 8 & 9