Air Studio Journal (In Progress)
Content (In Progress)
-Week 1 Introduction Previous Work My Favorite Architecture
In progress
Introduction
Previous Work Virtual Environments
In progress
Previous Work Architecture Studio: Water
In progress
Previous Work Landscape Studio: Site Tectonic
In progress
My Favorite Architecture
Falling Water Frank Lloyd Wright, 1935, Mill Run, Pennsylvania The Falling Water is one of my favour residential building. I believe the Falling Water is a dream house to nature lovers. The surrounding environments are so amazing. Not only the house was built upon the water fall is spectacular, but also the landscape is changing by seasons. This masterpiece is an innovation to the modern architecture. Mr. Wright was challenging the way of people’s thinking at that time. The site he chose to built upon the fall was beyond many expectations. Moreover, Wright was passionate about Japanese Architecture. He noticed the important of nature and cared about people--the users of an architecture. “The Falling Water is one of the great critiques of the modern movement in architecture, and simultaneously one of its masterpieces.” Frank Lloyd Wright had great distribution to the organic architecture and the modern architecture. He also practiced architecture as an individual work of art and showed architecture as a discourse that dedicate the explication and advancement of architecture’s design process rationality.
My Favorite Architecture
Seattle Library Rem Koolhaas, New York
In my mind, library is always a serious and formal study place. Few stories height in grey concrete and with steel frame windows,etc. For example, the Bailieu Library in Melbourne Uni. But this Seattle Public Library is really marvellous and break the normal design idea of a library. Rem Koolhaas is a contemporary architect and urbanist. He created an interesting interior space inside which can see from the images aside. People can enjoy reading and observing the building at the same time. Indirectly cultivate people’s reading habbit. Even the form of the building is irregular and seems no rule on it, the functional area of the library is arranged in order and logical. New York city is one of the international financial center in the world. The Seattle Library is perfectly matched with the urban facade and is part of the functional part of the city. The Seattle Library is a contemporary innovation. More importantly, it shows architecture can engage with it as visual culture as discourse and architecture’s philosophical , social or professional realm.
Architecture As Discourse An architectural project is an investment And architect is like an investment advisor, figuring the best choice out for the client. “[Architecture] exists because a client allows it to exist” (wk1 visual cul P.107) To every client, he/she has different expectation and desire to an investment. Some want a low risk and medium reward investment while some want high reward whatever how risky it will be. There is always an ideal portfolio to everyone. What an investment advisor responsible is to figure out the best choice for the patron. The choice may not be the highest reward one, but it must be the best fit. ”Architecture can scarcely exist without patronage” (wk1 visual cul P.107) As an architect, he/she are always finding the best choice for every project. Each project is unique by site condition, limited budget and need of the patron, etc. A best choice is the result of balancing different aspects to meet the patron’s requirements. Here, the best choice means more than referring to the optimal design of the building. As it is always consist of a lot comprising issues, sometimes the optimal design is not fit enough for making the best choice. Therefore, a good architecture is not only about the brilliant design, but also expresses the patron’s fulfillment to the architect. Fortunately, Under certain constraints, there are still lots of spectacular architectures on the planet. It shows architecture has its own social identity and is a valuable investment. ‘ In our society, people are always saying efficiency. To an investor, efficiency is making the most money in the shortest time; To a student, efficiency is learning the most in the shortest time. Time is always a parameter for efficiency. So, there are questions arise out: what is efficiency in architecture? How can architect finish the optimal design in relatively short time?
A form finder? Or a form maker? For the form maker to reimmerse himself in the form giving dialogue? Space, structure and form are important architectural concepts. In the architectural history, architects have been investigating these concepts with different principles. The common one is designing with complex geometrical relationships. Time consumption on creating and arranging geometrical forms is massive even with help of computation technology. However, in our nature, there are lots of spectacular forms existed. Every single element in the earth, including we people, is surviving after a long time challenges in evolution process. Therefore, my proposition is architect should get inspiration from the nature as a basis, and then further developed because it is time efficiency and helps approaching to the optimal design.� The perfection and variety of natural forms is the result of the relentless experimentation of evolution�(evolutionary p.10) As the natural forms have already been tested and designed for thousand years, million years or even longer, if it is used as the origin in the design process, designers can save at least a thousand year time. Therefore, architect can finish the optimal design in relatively short time by working with nature. How exactly architecture interact with nature will be discussed by the following precedents.