Volume XXXVII No. 21 • 2 November, 2017
www.ourvalleyvoice.com
Visalia Unified Looking to Add Fifth High School Dave Adalian Although plans are still in at the earliest stage, Visalia Unified School District (VUSD) Trustees are gearing up to seek voter approval for a $300 million bond to fund construction of a fifth high school. At least one long-time VUSD volunteer expert, however, isn’t sure it’s needed.
Zero Population Growth
Visalia may need another high school and soon. Or, it may not. It depends on who you ask. What isn’t in dispute is the lack of growth of Visalia’s high-school aged population. According to Jerry Jensen, a volunteer who has worked on VUSD bond oversight and facilities committees since the early 1990s, the District will experience no growth in the number of high school students beyond the year 2020, at least from within. “I’m just a numbers guy. I update (VUSD’s) enrollment projections. I’m just a volunteer,” Jensen said. “I ran the numbers again, and it indicates there are going to be 600 new students [entering
the city’s high schools by 2020], but nothing after that.” Jensen, who is now retired, spent 30 years as a sales manager for an international consumer goods company. Crunching numbers on growth was a main staple of his job. “I spent a lot of time doing consumer demographics,” he said.
VUSD Agrees, Disagrees
“We don’t have any issue with his process or his analysis,” said VUSD Deputy Superintendent Robert Gröeber. “In fact, I think we agree with it.” But, there’s more to the picture than matriculation of students already enrolled in Visalia’s elementary and junior high schools. Visalia remains a popular place to relocate, and new families coming to the area will bring more highschool aged children with them. “I think the difference is we still anticipate growth from mobility, people moving into the district,” Gröeber said. “Especially in the northwest, we see people moving in every year.” Getting those growth numbers
SCHOOL continued on 12 »
Sanctuary State Designation Doesn’t Change Much, Yet, With Local Law Enforcement Nancy Vigran In early October, Governor Jerry Brown signed into law the California Values Act (SB-54) – the “sanctuary state” bill fighting for immigrant rights, amidst confronting the presidential administration agenda. With the San Joaquin Valley, where an abundance of undocumented residents live, the bill changes little with interaction between local law enforcement and these residents. Recently, in national news, Attorney General Jeff Sessions has been fighting back against various cities that have declared themselves Sanctuary Cities. According to NBC News – “Earlier this month [October], Attorney General Jeff Sessions told the four cities — New York, Philadelphia, Chicago and New Orleans — as well as Cook County, Illinois, which includes Chicago, that they appeared to be in violation of a federal statute that requires jurisdictions to comply with federal immigration officials and help to deport suspected undocumented immigrants held in local jails. The DOJ gave those cities an October 27 deadline to prove compliance, or lose a critical federal grant that supports law enforcement and prosecution,
among other crime-fighting areas.” As of October 31, no announced updates to the potential grant-loss had been given. It is possible that California law enforcement may face similar threats to funding when the bill goes into effect in January. Other than that possibility, the sanctuary state status doesn’t affect the Visalia Police Department, said Chief Jason Salazar. “We don’t participate in immigration raids,” Salazar said. “We don’t ask immigration status, when officers pull someone over, or even if someone is under arrest.” With regard to grant funding, “that remains to be seen,” Salazar said. The department has received a couple of federal grants, which could be potentially affected in the future.
Shared Information Will See a More Narrow Scope
Kings County Sheriff Dave Robinson said there could be new challenges within the bill. He agrees with Chief Salazar in that there has not been, and will not be, any intent by local law officials to ask immigration status of anyone.
SANCTUARY continued on 10 »
Tulare Regional Medical Center has suspended its services as of October 29, 2017. Hospital officials don’t have a timeline on when the hospital will re-open. Tony Maldonado/Valley Voice
After TRMC Closure, Area Hospitals Prepare for Influx With the shutdown of Tulare Regional Medical Center (TRMC) on October 29, other area hospitals are prepared to take on an additional patient load. The remaining TRMC patients were transferred to neighboring hospitals late last week, including to Kaweah Delta Health Care District (KDHCD), Sierra View Medical Center (SVMC) and Adventist Health in Reedley. At KDHCD in Visalia, “We are near or at capacity daily in the acute medical center;” said Laura Florez-McCusker, senior public relations specialist. The hospital has 403 beds. “We are here to serve the community and provide care for those who need it,” she added. “Like many hospitals, we have experienced times of high patient demand, and we expect that to continue as we move into cold and flu season, a peak time of year for hospitals. “In recent months, Tulare physi-
Nancy Vigran cians have asked for, and been granted, staff privileges to care for patients at Kaweah Delta. “Last month, at the request of their doctors, we began receiving patients from Tulare [TRMC]. We always try to accommodate immediate needs for patient transfers from any hospital.” SVMC is a 167-bed, full-service acute care facility in Porterville. “With our proximity to Tulare Regional, we are preparing to support our neighbors and community to the best of our ability,” Kiley Arce, public relations assistance for the hospital stated on October 27. “We currently have available beds on all nursing units with the exception of our Cardiac Telemetry Unit, which is at capacity. We also have four patients being held in our Emergency Department at this time awaiting that level of care.”
AREA HOSPITALS continued on 11 »
Two Vie for Ramirez’ Hanford City Council Seat Hanford residents will head to the ballot box on January 23, 2018, where they will be faced with two questions: should City Council Member Francisco Ramirez be recalled, and if so, who should replace him? Ramirez was first elected in 2014 and represents District D. If 50 percent plus one voters say yes to the recall, then the replacement candidate with the highest number of votes wins. In that case, voters will have a tough choice between two long-time and active Hanford residents, Shelly Barker and Paula Massey. According to Jennifer Gomez, Hanford City Clerk, the nomination period ends November 9--but she is not anticipating other candidates coming for-
Catherine Doe ward. She reported that the paperwork normally takes about a week to compete and that no one else had inquired about running.
Shelly Barker – “Being on the City Council is the highest level of service”
Barker didn’t comment on whether or not Ramirez should be recalled but said she has a passion for serving her community. “I am hoping to perhaps bring fresh optics to the council.” Barker’s goals if elected would be to expand youth activities while at the same time be cost effective. She wants to
HANFORD continued on 11 »