Valley Voice Issue 109 (19 January, 2018)

Page 1

Valley Voice

Volume XXXVIII No. 2 18 January, 2018 ourvalleyvoice.com

New management, Tulare County Supervisors Investigator hired in Hensley elect Worthley as chair for 2018 rebranding, at STEVE PASTIS McDermont leave case steve@ourvalleyvoice.com

NANCY VIGRAN

nancy@ourvalleyvoice.com

It’s been three-and-a-half months since Tulare’s top cop, Chief Wes Hensley, was placed on administrative leave. He still knows little to nothing more than he did on September 27, the day he received notice. He and his attorney, Michael Lampe, are tired of the slow response and/or a lack of correspondence they have seen from the city. In a letter from Lampe to the city attorney, Heather Phillips, dated December 14, Lampe insisted the issue of an investigation for the reasoning behind the chief’s leave be placed in the Tulare City Council’s hands, however, without the aid of the mayor. “I am asking that this request be placed on the City Council Agenda for its next regularly scheduled meeting. Chief Hensley hereby waives any privacy rights with respect to this agenda item. “As we have previously advised, we will insist that any administrative hearing, whether conducted by the City Council or an independent

The Tulare County Board of Supervisors started the business of the new year with the election of a chairman and vice chairman for 2018. Steven Worthley was elected chairman, and Kuyler Crocker was elected vice chairman. Both were elected unanimously, 5-0, a voting trend that continued through the meeting. Worthley, who has previously served as chairman several times, is starting his 20th and final year on the board. After the meeting, he said there is still some unfinished county business he intends to address this year. Interest on pension bonds for retired county employees is at 7.25%, but he said the cost could be reduced to almost 4% with refinancing. Worthley wants to evaluate public safety in Tulare County, and deal with the increased expenses of staffing the new prisons being built in the county. He also wants to look at improving the appearance of county buildings. “We’ve done a lot inside our buildings, but we need to look at our buildings from the outside,” he said, suggesting improvements such as landscaping.

HENSLEY continued on 9 »

NANCY VIGRAN

nancy@ourvalleyvoice.com

I

Being their first meeting of 2018, the supervisors had a long list of appointments to make. They also voted to extend the designation of the Arts Consortium as the official arts council of Tulare County. (See related article in Scene.) The most important business, however, affected the quality of water in the communities of Seville and Yettem, and the development of affordable housing in Goshen. Water service in Seville has 75 active connections, with customers paying the current rate of $60. There are 65 active connections in Yettem, with customers paying a $58 rate. For their money, Seville residents have a water system described in the presentation by county engineer Ross Miller as “an-

f it weren’t for Clint Ashcraft, Daici Avilla and Alfredo Velasco, Lindsay’s McDermont Field House might well have closed at the beginning of the year. Renovated from an old packing house starting in 2006, the facility opened during the recession – and has yet to see a profit. Avilla and Velasco have been employed by the city to work at McDermont since its opening in 2008. Ashcraft began his employment with the city in 2006, during the planning and development stages of the facility. With a vision for what could work, and what has not, the trio formed McDermont Venture last November, and took on a five-year lease of the facility. If they had not stepped forward, “we would have had to have some serious discussions regarding closing it down,” said Lindsay Mayor Pam Kimball. “That was something we didn’t want to have to do.” The city remains dedicated to the McDermont vision, but could no longer warrant the expense of keep-

SUPERVISORS continued on 4 »

MCDERMONT continued on 10 »

In Other Business

Four enter race Tulare Mayor Jones, former friend spar in court for District D in CATHERINE DOE Hanford recall catherine@ourvalleyvoice.com

CATHERINE DOE

catherine@ourvalleyvoice.com

Hanford residents in District D will decide on January 23 whether or not they want to replace Council Member Francisco Ramirez with a fresh face. Elected as young, energetic force in 2014, Ramirez beat out incumbent Lou Martinez by a commanding 15 points. Now Martinez is vying to replace Ramirez, who is now seen by his detractors as an ineffective council member. If the recall is successful the residents have four candidates from which to choose. Two candidates, Shelly Barker and Paula Massey were profiled in the Valley Voice in the November 2 issue. Since that time, two more candidates have filed papers, former Hanford Mayor Lou Martinez and business woman Diane Sharp.

Sharp – I Want a More Transparent Government

Sharp has been endorsed by both the Kings County Republican Party and the Kings County Libertarian Party (KCLP.) The KCLP looks for candidates who believe in small, fiscally responsible government, will put the historic buildings to good use, liven up downtown, and bring in businesses without using local taxes for “corporate welfare or handouts.” After interviewing the four

HANFORD continued on 8 »

On September 22, 2017, a Tulare County Superior Court judge declared a mistrial in a previously undisclosed case involving Tulare Mayor Carlton Jones and a former friend of his. Jones’ former friend was tried by a jury for violating a Criminal Restraining Order (CRO) prohibiting him from coming within 100 yards of Mayor Jones and his wife. The Voice is not printing the Defendant’s name because he is not a public figure and because of the sensitivity of the case. The case was prosecuted by the Tulare County District Attorney’s office. A CRO falls in the category of a court order and those types of violations are rarely heard in front of a jury. “Violations of court orders happen thousands of times,” said Assistant District Attorney, Dave Alavezos. But in this case Alavezos said the Defendant was also on probation for vandalism and pled “not guilty” during his CRO hearing, even though the Defendant clearly violated the CRO. “If someone is not going to take responsibility, we don’t just say ‘that’s OK.’ The District Attorney’s office needs to do something,” said Alavezos. During the trial the Defendant explained the circumstances behind his violating the CRO, but was not allowed to discuss the emotionally charged reasons behind the restraining order being filed in the first place. Six witnesses took the stand during the day- long trial. The following morning the jury was unable to come to a unanimous decision and the court declared a

mistrial. The vote was 11 not guilty and 1 guilty. Criminal cases in California require the jury to reach a unanimous decision for a verdict of innocence or guilt.

Violation of the CRO

The restraining order was filed in June of 2016 and the Defendant violated it four months later. According to the Tulare Carlton Jones and his wife, Cindi. Catherine Doe/Valley Voice in order to get to the parking lot. Police report, on October 8, 2016, the Defendant’s son and the Joneses’ daughter were both participating CRO Violation Not in a soccer game at a Tulare elementary Reported for a Week school. Tulare Officer Banuelos states In an interesting twist, the Joneses in his report that sometime during did not report the violation of the CRO the game the Defendant walked past the day it happened. Mr. and Mrs. Jones. According to the Mrs. Jones called the Tulare Police Joneses he came within three to five Department more than two weeks feet, which was a violation of the CRO. later, on October 25, to report the inThe Defendant stated to Banuelos, cident. According to the transcript according to the report, that he was of the conversation, the dispatcher 10 – 20 feet away from the Joneses and asked why she didn’t call on October was headed to the parking lot to get 8, the date of the incident. She said his keys. He told Officer Banuelos that that her husband told her their lawyer he did not deliberately walk towards said “there was no longer a restrainthe Joneses and was aware of the coning order.” sequences of violating the CRO. She then told the dispatcher that Mr. Jones told Officer Banuelos she went down to the courthouse herthat the soccer game was located at a self and got another copy of the relarge field and that the defendant destraining order and discovered that it liberately walked across the field in was in fact still current and she wanttheir direction. ed it reported. According to an anonymous source close to the Defendant’s famiThe Incident Leading to ly, the Defendant did not deliberately walk towards the Joneses but needed the Trial and CRO to get his keys and didn’t want to walk The September 2017 trial and all the way around the fenced off field

JONES continued on 9 »


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
Valley Voice Issue 109 (19 January, 2018) by Valley Voice - Issuu