Valley Voice Issue 115 (19 April, 2018)

Page 1

Valley Voice

Tulare County Board of Supes faces potential voting lawsuit NANCY VIGRAN

nancy@ourvalleyvoice.com

In a letter dated April 4, the Tulare County Board of Supervisors was threatened with legal action if it does not take measures to correct an alleged violation of the Federal Voting Rights Act. The letter, signed by Marguerite Melo of the law firm Melo and Sarsfield, stated the firm represents a “group of voters who reside within the jurisdictional boundaries of the County of Tulare.” The letter also stated the Dolores Huerta Foundation is also affiliated with the potential legal action. The pending lawsuit is “based upon the County of Tulare’s illegal dilution of the minority/Latino voting community as applied to how board seats are drawn.” Melo further stated in her letter that the firm will hold off on potential litigation until May 5, 2018, allowing the county some time for thought and response.

LAWSUIT continued on 7 »

Volume XXXVIII No. 8 19 April, 2018 ourvalleyvoice.com

Why are these men free?

CATHERINE DOE

catherine@ourvalleyvoice.com

The names in this article have been changed to protect the victims. The first week of November 2017 Frasier decided to come out to his family. He had been sexually abused as a child from the age of eight to 10 years old, and the #MeToo movement gave him the strength to name his abuser. According to Frasier, his cousin Holly arranged a sit down with his father. Frasier recounted that day. “When he arrived, he sat down and asked what was going on. I was reluctant to disclose any information at that time for fear of embarrassment. Holly then spoke up and explained why I was reluctant to speak and discussed the incident with my father. My father was visibly angry and did not speak for approximately seven minutes after being told the information. My father then asked me what action I would like to pursue. I decided to report this information to the police. My father then drove me to the Farmersville Police Department.” Frasier was interviewed by Officer Alavarez, whereupon he gave the details of his abuse, the location, and identified his abuser. The abuser would fall into the category of a caretaker and

One of these men has moved across the country — the other still lives in Tulare County.

not a stranger. During the course of Frasier’s interview five more victims were identified, three of whom would come forward within the week to give the police their testimony. One of those victims was Samantha, who had been abused for seven years by two men in the 1990’s. One was Frasier’s abuser, who still lives locally, and the other has moved to another state. Samantha and the other two victims were able to give details of what happed to the two victims who did not want to come forward. Frasier was still under the statute of limitations to press charges against his abuser. The other five victims had

aged out. All agreed that their abusers were still molesting children. So why are these two men free six months later?

Getting the run-around

Several weeks after the Farmersville Police Department did its investigation and sent the case to the Tulare County District Attorney’s office, Frasier received a letter dated November 16. The letter said that the DA’s office had “reviewed a law enforcement report” that indicated he was recently the victim of a crime.

FREE continued on 8 »

Mathis sued for retaliation by former chief of staff Hensley’s not STAFF REPORTS going down without a fight: attorneys still quibbling

Devon Mathis’ former chief of staff claims he was retaliated against attempting to put a stop to Mathis’ alleged alcoholism, sexual improprieties, gender-based discrimination, and mishandling of campaign finances, according to a new lawsuit. Sean Doherty, the former chief of staff, was fired in May 2017. He has also named the California State Assembly

in the suit, claiming that the assembly’s Rules Committee on multiple occasions did not assist in reigning in the behavior. “To help cure dysfunction in his office, Assemblyman Devon Mathis lured Plaintiff Sean Doherty away from his more lucrative consulting practice with the promise of long-term employment. Doherty realized that the dysfunctions ran all the way to the top. Fixing the problems in Mathis’

office required that Doherty prevent Mathis from misusing state resources, engaging in sexual harassment, and other improper, inappropriate, and illegal behavior,” Doherty’s suit reads. “Mathis pushed back against this effort, retaliated against Doherty, and broke his promise by terminating Doherty’s emploment.” The full story was developing as the Valley Voice headed to press. To read more, visit ourvalleyvoice.com.

Visalia Planning Commission denies controversial ARCO permit DAVE ADALIAN

dave@ourvalleyvoice.com

The fight isn’t over yet, but activists have won the first round in the battle to prevent the city’s largest gas station from being built in their southeast Visalia neighborhood.

PC Split on ARCO Decision

Stunned and thrilled members of Oppose ARCO rejoiced as the Visalia Planning Commission voted 4-1 Monday, April 9 to deny Chandi Group USA’s application to build a 17,000-square-foot ARCO AM/PM campus at the corner of Caldwell Avenue and West Street. The project, had it been approved, would have included a 20-hose gas station, car wash,

ARCO continued on 10 »

A standing-room-only crowd filled the Visalia Convention Center on April 9 as citizens lined up to share their opinion on a proposed ARCO AM/PM at Caldwell and West streets in Visalia. Dave Adalian/Valley Voice

NANCY VIGRAN

nancy@ourvalleyvoice.com

Attorneys keep quibbling regarding the former Tulare police chief, Wes Hensley’s possible public hearing regarding his firing. Specifically -- Hensley’s attorney says he is required to have one, and the City of Tulare’s attorney disagrees. Hensley’s attorney, Michael Lampe, is pulling out all of the stops to make one happen. Heather Phillips, the city’s attorney, says that only a more limited hearing is required. Chief Hensley was fired on March 20. He had been on paid administrative leave for nearly six months, and was under investigation as directed by the city’s former city manager. However, his termination was not attributed to the investigation, but as stated in his termination letter – “You are not being dismissed from employment as the result of misconduct. You are being dismissed to further the goals of this Organization, due to a loss of confidence in your ability to lead the Police Department in a manner that is consistent with the goals of this Organization; having management style that is incompatible with this Organization’s/Administration’s

TULARE continued on 9 »


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
Valley Voice Issue 115 (19 April, 2018) by Valley Voice - Issuu