Volume XXXIV No. 24 • 18 December, 2014
www.ourvalleyvoice.com
SeaPort Airlines Approved as Visalia Air Service Provider EAS is the federal program that guarantees a certain level of scheduled The United States Department of air service to communities that would Transportation seotherwise have lost lected SeaPort Airaccess to the nalines to provide air tion’s air transporservice to Visalia tation system in a Airport. The order, deregulated airline issued on Decemindustry. ber 11, approves the It should take recommendation 45 to 60 days for submitted by the SeaPort to provide Visalia City Counits first flights to cil following its 3-2 SeaPort Airlines is expected to begin and from Visalia, vote on September service at Visalia Airport in 45-60 days. according to Visalia 12. Airport Manager Mario Cifuentez, who The December 11 order states: “By explained that the airline is now able to this Order, the Department is selecting acquire aircraft, hire pilots and schedule SeaPort Airlines, Inc. (SeaPort) to pro- flights. “Everything was contingent on vide Essential Air Service (EAS) at Visa- the awarding from the Department of lia, California, for the two-year period Transportation.” beginning January 1, 2015, through In the next two weeks, Cifuentez December 31, 2016. SeaPort will pro- expects to have a clearer vision of when vide 12 nonstop round trips per week to SeaPort will provide local service. Oakland and 12 nonstop round trips per Although the order includes a startweek to Burbank (24 total round trips ing date of January 1, the contract will per week), using 9-seat Cessna Caravan run for two years from the date that Seaaircraft, at an annual subsidy rate of Port actually begins service to Visalia, $1,990,563.” according to Cifuentez.
Steve Pastis
The Marymount California University campus in Palos Verdes.
Marymount California University Eyes Visalia Steve Pastis Visalia may soon get a four-year university. Marymount California University, a Catholic institution offering bachelor’s degrees in business, liberal arts, media studies and psychology, as well as a master’s of science degree in business administration, is considering Visalia as the site of its next campus. The university has locations in Palos Verdes and San Pedro in Los Angeles County, and Lucerne in Lake County in northern California. “We will be the fourth campus,” said Robert Aguilar, Ed.D., a former Delano school district superintendent and the main proponent of a Visalia campus. “We’re in the beginning stages of forming this university in Visalia.” Dr. Michael S. Brophy, president of Marymount California University met Aguilar at a Latino Leadership and Policy Summit hosted by the university in the spring. “He invited me to Visalia,” said Brophy, who accepted the invitation
and discussed the university with community leaders at a luncheon in Visalia on October 23. “We’re always excited and supportive to get a university here so people can get a higher education locally,” said Visalia City Manager Mike Olmos, who attended the luncheon. “The city was very supportive of Fresno Pacific, and of Fresno State as they got their satellite university at COS.” “I was certainly impressed by the passion of civic leaders,” said Brophy, who added that College of the Sequoias does “a super job.” Brophy said that the process of bringing a university here has “a long way to go, but we are happy to consider Visalia.” Aguilar is working hard to land Marymount. “We have plans to begin a study to get feedback about what kind of campus is needed here,” he said. “This research study will take six to nine months to complete. We want to make
MARYMOUNT continued on 13 »
Property owner David Stillwell speaks to the Tulare County Board of Supervisors.
Stillwell Mine Public Hearing Attracts Big Crowd The Tulare County Planning Commission held a public hearing December 10 to determine the future of CEMEX’ mining permit. The possible recommendations ranged from revocation to taking no action. Mike Spata, director of Resource Management Agency (RMA) started the proceedings by informing the commissioners that the amount of information concerning Stillwell Mine is voluminous. He recommended, before the hearing even started, that after all stakeholders have their say, the hearing be continued to the next planning commission meeting for further discussion. Greg Young, an engineer from the consulting firm Tully and Young--which wrote the county’s peer review--presented their findings first. Even though their final review was 533 pages long, Young stayed focused on three conditions specified in the Stillwell mining permit. Condition #48 states that CEMEX is to make monthly reports to the RMA about the amount of water delivered to the recharge trench. Condition #49 states that the mine cannot affect the water level, yield, or quality of any well. Condition #55 states that the recharge trench shall contain a sufficient amount
Catherine Doe of water to maintain water levels in neighboring wells. Young presented evidence that CEMEX violated all three conditions, but that the main condition under dispute was number 49. Young added that CEMEX’ consultant, EMKO Environmental, used an incomplete set of facts and that concluding that the wells went dry due to the drought was without merit. The peer review came to the conclusion that CEMEX’ mining activities caused their neighbors’ wells to go dry. Paul Mitchell, a lawyer for CEMEX, gave the rebuttal. Sprinkled throughout his presentation were potshots at the Valley Voice, an attempt to again discredit Tom Cairns of Lemon Cove, and accusations that the four residents whose wells had gone dry were unresponsive, difficult, uncooperative and ungrateful. While accomplishing that goal, Mitchell stressed three major points: that the domestic wells went dry because of the drought; that CEMEX has no obligation to keep the V-trench full while not actively mining; and lastly, even though
STILLWELL continued on 9 »
VUSD Board Censures Board Member Ulmschneider for Violating Brown Act By a 6-1 vote, the Visalia Unified Steve Pastis School District Board of Directors approved a resolution at its December 9 directly or through intermediaries, to discuss, deliberate or take meeting to publicly censure action on any item of busiBoard Member Charles ness that is within the subUlmschneider for violating ject matter jurisdiction of the Brown Act. Ulmschneithe legislative body.” With der was the lone “no” vote. seven board members servAccording to the text ing on the VUSD Board, of the censure, Ulmschneiany behind-the-scenes disder “met with three or more cussion of an issue by four board members to discuss or more members violates district business outside of a the Brown Act. properly called meeting by Ulmshneider also discalling, emailing or meet- Charles tributed packets of inforing with other board mem- Ulmschneider mation he collected about bers to lobby for the board’s adoption of German as the district’s pre- foreign languages to the other board ferred new high school foreign language members in advance of a board vote on the possible addition of a third foreign offering.” The Brown Act states: “A majority of language to the high school curriculum. the members of a legislative body shall Most of the packets were not opened, not, outside an authorized meeting, use however. a series of communications of any kind,
CENSURE continued on 13 »