What’s the frack? Page 6
This year’s UTSA football guide Inside
Independent Student Newspaper for the University of Texas at San Antonio
September 11, 2012
Volume 47
Issue 17
Up in smoke: UTSA moves towards tobacco-free campus Bridget Gaskill Staff Writer
File Photo
news@paisano-online.com Fall 2012 will bring significant changes to the smoking regulations at UTSA. New smoking restrictions have recently been implemented around campus buildings where research funded by the Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (CPRIT) is conducted. This month, President Ricardo Romo will appoint a task force that will propose regulations to make UTSA campuses tobacco-free. CPRIT is an organization dedicated to the research and prevention of cancer that funds a wide variety of programs in Texas, including several at UTSA. In January 2012, CPRIT adjusted their regulations to require “grant recipients to have policies prohibiting tobacco use in buildings and structures where financed research is occurring, as well as at the outdoor areas immediately adjacent to those buildings.”
The new smoking restrictions— which prohibit tobacco product use in buildings, parking lots, walkways and attached parking structures adjacent to structures in which CPRIT-funded projects are housed—went into effect Aug. 31 for several buildings on Main Campus, including the Biotechnology, Sciences and Engineering Building, Applied Engineering and Technology Building and the Monterey Building at the Downtown Campus. The Science Research Labs may also be included if a new grant is awarded later this year. For the second phase of this initiative, President Romo will assemble a task force responsible for investigating and discussing methods to make the campus tobacco-free. Beginning this month, the task force, consisting of both tobacco users and non-users from within the university, will formulate criteria for a new policy based on methods established by other Texas universities. They will discuss an appropriate time for its implementation, and will also develop a comprehensive
Valeria Rodriguez Staff Writer
news@paisano-online.com Texas politicians have set their sights on cutting funding for the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, commonly known as Planned Parenthood, the largest provider for women’s health in the United States last year. Planned Parenthood has helped 130,000 low-income women in Texas, as it is designed for women who do not qualify for Medicaid. On Aug. 21, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the state could terminate funding to these health clinics because of their linkage to abortion, and a federal court lifted a junction that had protected funding until its trial in October. Planned Parenthood has decided to challenge the law. The case started when Planned Parenthood sued Texas because the organization believed that the Texas law that cut its funding was violating its rights to free speech. Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott argued that lawmakers may decide which organizations receive state funds. This decision to reject funding for Planned Parenthood came one day after U.S. Senate candidate Todd Akin’s claim that in the case of a “legitimate rape,” a woman’s body “has ways to try to shut that whole thing down.” UTSA freshman business major Stephanie Lara believes that the law is not fair, and expressed how helpful Planned Parenthood has been in the past. “I had some situations as a young girl who couldn’t afford certain health services; they even give free exams as well,” Lara said. The Medicare and Medicaid Services clinics are discussing also pulling funding from the Texas Women’s Health Program after November, believing it would violate the federal rules. The federal government has paid
about $35 million for the program, with Texas paying about $5 million. Medicaid and Medicare provide 90 percent of women’s health funding. “I really think they shouldn’t [cut Planned Parenthood funding] because it helps women a lot,” Lara said. Cutting funding for Planned Parenthood has been a battle that Texas Governor Rick Perry has wanted to win for years. “Today’s ruling affirms that Texas’ Women’s Health Program has no obligation to fund organizations that promote abortion—including Planned Parenthood. The Fifth Circuit’s decision is a win for Texas women, our rule of law and our state’s priority to protect life,” said Perry last month, responding to the ruling by the federal court in favor of Texas. According to The Hill, a Washington, D.C. newspaper, the Republican Party believes that Planned Parenthood needs to be the first item cut from the budget in order to lower the national debt. That same report shows that from 2002 to 2007, the national organization and its affiliates took in $388 million more than they spent on programs and services. The biggest criticism surrounding Planned Parenthood has been their pro-choice stance. “Look, the idea that we’re subsidizing an institution that provides abortion, in my view, is wrong. Planned Parenthood oughta stand on its own feet and should not get government subsidy,” said Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney to LifeNews. Planned Parenthood does not promote abortion, which accounts for only three percent of the services the organization provides each year, and no funding is given by the state for abortions. These nationwide health clinics advise women on family planning; they provide cancer screenings, comprehensive sex education, rape victim counseling, HIV screening and an array of other health services.
UTSA junior sociology major Tia Robertson is offended by the cuts. “They provide necessary service to all women, mostly those who are of low income and lack health insurance. We should be looking at the positive impact of Planned Parenthood instead of getting trapped into these political agendas—agendas that actively harm the lives of individuals and fuels the war on women,” said Robertson, referring to the increasingly partisan debate on women’s issues. On Sept. 1, 200 people stood outside the capital building in Austin to protest the legislation. The protestors held up signs criticizing that many of the lawmakers who approved the law last year are men who do not face the same health concerns. “Everything is bigger in Texas, except for our appreciation of women’s reproductive rights. Although the issue is polarizing, I think we can all agree that if anyone is making any choice about anything, it should be the women that we respect enough to give them one,” UTSA sophomore political science major Alex Birnel said. Planned Parenthood President Cecile Richards recently spoke about women’s reproductive rights at the Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, N.C. In her speech, Richards exclaimed that women have come “too far” to give in to the types of legislation that voted to “end cancer screenings and well-woman visits for 5 million women, end funding for birth control at Planned Parenthood and tried to redefine rape.” Suing the state of Texas is not the only response that Planned Parenthood has on their agenda. The Planned Parenthood Action Fund is planning to spend more than $3 million on ads that will expose Romney’s desire to cut its taxpayer funding. The $3.2 million campaign will feature everything from online ads to old-fashioned door-todoor politics.
Alyssa Gonzales/The Paisano
Te x a s h a l t s P l a n n e d P a r e n t h o o d funding despite controversy and criti cism
Bridget Gaskill Staff Writer
news@paisano-online.com According to the Centers for Disease Control at least 87 people have died from West Nile virus (WNV) infection in the United States this year, 43 of them in Texas. CNN reported that this year had the “highest case count through the last week of Aug. since the virus was first detected in the United States in 1999.” It is not the highest number that the country has seen—in 2002 284 fatalities were reported nationwide— but since WNV made its first Western hemisphere appearance with the 1999 outbreak in New York City, Texas has been the site of nearly half of all WNVrelated illnesses, causing great concern for many residents. The dry, hot weather across the nation has created ideal conditions for accelerated maturation of certain species of mosquitoes. During droughts, standing water stagnates faster, providing more breeding grounds, and high temperatures quicken the mosquito’s life cycle. This results in more mosquitoes, which increases the spread of the virus. Most of those who contract the vi-
draft to update the Handbook of Operating Procedures. The possibility of the switch has raised mixed responses from students and faculty. “It’s unethical to take away someone’s choice to smoke or not,” communication major Joey Cabrera said. Cabrera, who has been a smoker for two years, continued, “I’m going to continue smoking regardless.” Sophomore accounting major Megan Murray said, “It’s a good policy because when you walk out of a building, breathing the smoke is nasty; it’ll be nice to breathe clean air.” Several University of Texas campuses—including Arlington, Brownsville, and Austin— already have tobacco policies in place. UT Arlington banned smoking on campus in August of 2011, and UT Austin became tobacco-free in April 2012. Both universities prohibit smoking in buildings, adjacent areas, walkways, sidewalks and parking areas and also offer support for individuals who wish to quit smoking.
West Nile hits Texas as drought continues rus will show no symptoms and simply recover on their own, but there have been an increasing number of severe infections, as well as deaths. Through detailed research conducted by the Center for Disease Control and the Department of State Health it had been discovered that people over 50 years of age and those with weakened immune systems are at a higher risk of becoming ill if they are infected with the virus. WNV is a mosquito-borne illness named for its origins in Africa, West Asia, and the Middle East. The illness can cause flu-like symptoms (fever, body aches, skin rashes, swollen lymph glands) as well as swelling of the brain or swelling of the membranes surrounding the brain and spinal cord. Mosquitoes become infected when they feed on infected birds or other animals, then transfer the illness when they bite humans. Methods to prevent contracting WNV include using repellents that contain DEET, picaridin or oil of lemon eucalyptus; avoiding going outdoors at dawn and dusk when mosquitoes are most active; eliminating all standing water where mosquitoes can breed; and making sure screens on windows and doors are properly maintained.