If I Were A Boy
It Went Down
Durham actresses pick which male stage roles they would play i.7
Music reviews latest Foals’ gig in Newcastle i.14
Durham’s independent student newspaper
Palatinate
No. 778
Thursday 19th November 2015| FREE
www.palatinate.org.uk
College mascots of all shapes and sizes get ready to get ready to welcome the Durham Freshers of 2015/16 A mystical glow shines over Durham Cathedral as the city enjoys Lumeire
Photograph: Durham University Photograph: Artichoke
University comes under pressure to implement living wage Jasper Cox Deputy News Editor Earlier this month Josephine Butler became the latest college to support a Living Wage for University employees, as part of an ongoing campaign to encourage Durham University to pay all staff the rate. The Living Wage is calculated by the Centre for Research in Social
Policy at Loughborough University, based on what is needed for a household to have a minimum acceptable standard of living. On 2 November it rose to £8.25 from £7.85 outside London. It is different to the National Living Wage, which was announced by George Osborne in July and will be £7.20 from next April, rising to £9 by 2020. Paul Gape, who introduced the
motion at Butler’s JCR meeting on 1 November, told Palatinate that the living wage at Durham “would ensure that all university staff could enjoy a reasonable quality of life.” He said he wanted Durham “to be more of a progressive institution on issues such as this.” The motion stated: “This JCR believes that as a leading academic institution, Durham University
must strive to be a responsible employer in the County Durham region. The current discrepancy in wage between the highest and lowest paid University staff members is unjustifiably high.” It continued: “Every employee of the University should be treated with dignity and respect, and should be paid accordingly. A Living Wage… will reduce poverty, household debt, stress and
illness and improve family life.” The fourth-year said it passed with “essentially no reaction.” He told Palatinate: “I think there are valid criticisms of the living wage so for the sake of rigour it might have been good if these were raised at the meeting and then could have been discussed, generally to raise the standard of the debate. Continued on page 6