14
Comment
Comment Editor: David Siesage
www.palatinate.org.uk
PALATINATE | Thursday 31st January 2013
Deputy: Catherine Malpass
comment@palatinate.org.uk
Corruption: who watches the watchmen? Plebgate, Hillsborough and phone hacking: the police need to work to regain trust
After numerous scandals bringing the police into disrepute, corruption and silent solidarity can no longer be ignored Photograph: West Midlands Police
Ben Hamer
Q
uis custodiet ipsos custodes? This was a question Juvenal originally posed in his Satires two thousand years ago, and it has remained relevant throughout human history: who, when the watchmen are corrupted, are there to watch them? Such a phrase seems particularly apt in the wake of a number of publically damaging incidents for the British police, such as the Hillsborough disaster, the phone-hacking scandal and “plebgate”. Once a paragon of duty and trust, has the bobby lost the respect the general public once unconditionally afforded to him? It seems to me that confidence in and respect for the police is not something that we should give up readily. However, the handling of recent events by the police has called into question the professional and ethical behaviour that underpins their service. The fallout from the investigation into Hillsborough is still causing con-
troversy, over twenty years later. The phone hacking scandal, too, revealed the cosy relationship that some officers had with executives from the News of the World.
“
There is little self-policing: no one to watch the watchmen
”
Most recently, the “plebgate” incident, where Andrew Mitchell, the former Chief Whip, allegedly went on a tirade against the British police, has caused a particular furore. Mitchell, despite the mounting pressure that eventually claimed his position in government, always maintained, that while he swore at an officer in frustration as he was redirected to another exit gate, he did not say what the officers claimed he had: that they didn’t “run this government” and that they were “****ing plebs” and “”****ing morons”. Serious doubt has been cast on
the veracity of these allegations. The police transcript, for one, doesn’t fit the CCTV, and the CCTV reveals the lack of a public audience, calling into question both the police log and a letter a “witness” sent to the government. Further investigation, months later, revealed the witness was in fact a police officer. This a story that even Juvenal could not have made up. Andrew Mitchell was pressured into resigning by the police force whose funding is being cut by his party; slandered in the newspapers for unfairly treating police, when the police, it turns out, unfairly treated him as well. He was further condemned with “evidence” from an onlooker, who turned out to be a police officer committing the strange act of impersonating a member of the public at the scene, in absentia. Further vilification followed for exhibiting such unpleasantries in front of a crowd of “visibly shocked” onlookers, who, it turned out from examination of the CCTV, weren’t actually present at all. Mitchell’s comments, which the police log has as, “I’ll have your job for this!” amongst others, seems to have not only claimed his position, but those of several policemen. The problem inherent in the police system is that there is little self-polic-
ing: no one to watch the watchmen. The government, the press and many judges are slow to criticise them — to do so would be unpopular. While the corruption exhibited in the phone hacking scandal and plebgate may not be endemic in the culture of the police, this ‘blue wall of silence’, one of solidarity in the service, certainly is.
“
The ‘blue wall of silence’ is an endemic problem
”
Their traditional enshrinement as a bastion of Britishness, of fairness and trust is something to be proud of, but failings within a system that isn’t properly self-disciplining need to be addressed, especially in light of a survey of police officers by the Open University, which proved that only half would report a colleague who punched a captive suspect.
In recognition of recent events, and the poor publicity that has ensued, a new code of ethics is being considered as a possibility to curb further crises. However, the question of whether these will be sufficient remains. After all, the body carrying this out, the Association of Chief Police Officers, is a limited company and therefore unaccountable to Parliament or the public. In contrast, police action and invaluable management of the London Olympics and the Jubilee have shown us a force that is capable of being the very best that Britain has to offer. The problems in the police force are down to a few, and exacerbated by a culture that has seen criticism of officers within and outside the force dwindle. The move towards a new code of ethics and discipline is a step in the right direction, but in order to truly solve the problem that caused “plebgate” and the phone hacking scandal, deeper and more comprehensive reform must take place to ensure a revival in public trust and confidence in British policing.
P
For more, visit palatinate.org. uk